text:
\section{Supplemental Material}
\section{Experimental details}
\par
\textit{Single photon source and classical light source}.---Light pulses of $\sim$150 fs duration, centered at 830 nm, originating from a Ti:Sapphire laser (76MHz repetition rate, Coherent Mira-HP) are split by a beam splitter into two beams. The transmitted one is sent to a pulse picker (Coherent, distinction ratio $> 500:1$) since the repetition rate of the laser oscillator is too high to the bandwidth of photon-counting detectors. The repetition rate of the light pulses is reduced to 1.9MHz and the intensity of the pulses is attenuated by a set of neutral density filters. A synchronizing signal from the pulse picker (1.9MHz) gives the trigger signal of the weak coherent state input. The reflected beam is frequency doubled in a $\beta-$barium borate (BBO) crystal to generate second harmonic beam (415 nm central wavelength). Then the beam is used to pump a 10 mm bulk potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) crystal phase-matched for type-II collinear degenerate downconversion, which produce photon pairs, denoted as signal and idler. The signal and idler photons are separated by a polarizing beam splitter (PBS) and coupled into single mode fiber. The idler mode is detected by an avalanche photodiode (Excelitas Technologies, SPCM-AQRH-FC with a detection efficiency about 49\%) to give the trigger of the heralded single photon source, while the signal mode is sent to the measurement device shown in the main text. In addition, the second order coherence value $g^{(2)}(0)$ of the heralded single photons is measured by splitting the signal mode at a 50:50 beam-splitter and detecting the two output modes with two APDs (labeled by $a,b$), then the second order coherence value can be calculated by
\begin{equation}
g^{(2)}(0)=\frac{C_{a,b,T}}{C_{a,T}C_{b,T}}N_T.
\end{equation}
Here $C_{a,b,T}$ denotes the three-fold coincidence rate between detectors $a,b$ and heralding, while $C_{a,T}$ ($C_{b,T}$) denotes the coincidence rate between detectors $a$ ($b$) and heralding. The experimental result exhibits $g^{(2)}(0)=0.0397(38)$, ensuring the measured state is very close to a single photon state. Moreover, to estimate the imperfections in the state preparation and detection, and thereby the vacuum component caused by loss in the experiment, we calibrate the losses in the state preparation and detection respectively, and reconstruct the photon number statistics of the state at three different positions of the setup \cite{Daryl2004,PhysRevLett.97.043602}: (i) before all the loss, i.e., derived from the final photon number distribution and the beam splitter model; (ii) before the measurement device, accounting for the imperfection in the source; (iii) accounting for all the loss. The results are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sta}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\addtocounter{figure}{1}
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{sta1.pdf}\label{fig:sta:a}}
\quad
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{sta2.pdf}\label{fig:sta:b}}
\quad
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{sta3.pdf}\label{fig:sta:c}}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\caption{\label{fig:sta} The reconstructed photon statistics of the single photon source at different positions: (a) before all the loss,(b) before the measurement device and (c) accounting for all the loss.}
\end{figure}
\par
\textit{Fair sampling for the two sources}.---The idea of fair sampling is that the reported statistics is a fair statistical sample of the results of kind of states without any loss, based on the assumption that the loss is independent on the measurement settings. For heralded single photons, the loss in the setup would add additional vacuum component to the state, and all the events with no clicks on the three detectors are caused by loss. As a result, we can extrapolate the measurement results to what would be obtained with $100\%$ detection efficiency according to the fair sampling assumption. The events conditioned on ``at least one of the three detectors ($D_1,D_2,D_3$) clicks, and simultaneously the trigger $D_T$ clicks'' are fair samples of the ensemble of all heralded single photons without loss. Alternatively, one can also consider the results without applying fair sampling. In the following, we consider an experiment with non-unit heralding efficiency, and the results correspond to a state including the vacuum component caused by losses in the apparatus. The heralding efficiency $\eta_H$ is defined by
\begin{equation}
\eta_H=\frac{\sum_i C_{i,T}}{N_T},
\end{equation}
where $N_T$ denotes the count rate of heralding clicks (the trigger detector $D_T$), and $C_{i,T}$ denotes the coincidence count rate between the detector $i$ and the trigger detector $D_T$. The measured heralding efficiency of single photons in the experiment is 16.2\%. Figure \ref{fig:HSPS:a} shows the KCBS value for the single photon source without applying fair sampling, which gives the measured value $\beta=3.5550(30)$ under $E_3$ and $\beta=-3.9176(60)$ under $E_2$ in our case. The result of $E_1$ is very close to that of $E_2$ because the multi-photon component for the source is nearly zero. The detailed experimental values are shown in Table. \ref{tab:hsps_e}. It can be seen from the figure that the increasing of the value is mainly due to the finite heralding efficiency compared with the one for ideal single photons. If we do not apply the fair sampling assumption, the violation of the non-contextual bound cannot be observed with a heralding efficiency less than $89.65\%$. The single photon source can achieve quantum bound without applying fair sampling if the heralding efficiency is sufficiently high, while the coherent states with varied amplitudes never violate the inequality under full statistics $E_3$, irrespective of detection efficiency and intensity.
\begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:hsps_e}Summary of the results for the single photon source with or without fair sampling.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}

   &$E_1$&$E_2$&$E_3$  \\
    \hline
    With fair sampling & $-3.9284(59)$ & $-3.9176(60)$ & $-3.9176(60)$ \\
    Without fair sampling & $-3.9284(59)$ & $-3.9176(60)$ & $3.5550(30)$
   \end{tabular}

\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\addtocounter{figure}{1}
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{HSPS_UFS.pdf}\label{fig:HSPS:a}}
\quad
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.4\linewidth]{post_UFS.pdf}\label{fig:HSPS:b}}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\caption{\label{fig:HSPS} The KCBS values and post-selection probabilities for heralded single photons without applying fair sampling: (a) the KCBS values, (b) The post-selection probabilities. }
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[h]
  \centering
  \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{splitter.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:splitter}The schematic diagram of fair sampling for coherent state inputs.}
\end{figure}
\par
For coherent state input, fair sampling can be taken in the same idea that the loss is independent of measurement setting, thus the registered statistics is a representative sample of a attenuated coherent state accounting for the losses. Note a coherent state remains coherent with loss and the photon number distribution is always Poissonian with a smaller average photon number. Given that the measurement device is based on a linear optical network, it is reasonable to incorporate the overall losses from the photonic network and detection into the preparation part. The overall detection efficiency $\eta$ can be abstracted as a beam splitter with splitting ration $\eta:(1-\eta)$ in the preparation stage, thus the measurement result is equivalent to that for a coherent state $|\sqrt{\eta} \alpha\rangle$, and the linear optical network can be regarded as a lossless channel, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:splitter}. The registered detector clicks is a fair sample of the coherent state with a smaller average photon number.
\par
To estimate the reduced average photon number of the coherent state $\eta|\alpha|^2$ from the click statistics, we consider the detection of coherent states $|\alpha_i\rangle$ distributed in $m$ modes. The average collected clicks when we put $m$ APDs to detect the light fields can be derived from the Poissonian distribution of coherent states
\begin{equation}
n_{\text{collected}}=\sum_{i=1}^m n'_i=\sum_{i=1}^m\left[1-\exp{\left(-|\alpha_i|^2\right)}\right].
\label{eq:number}
\end{equation}
Here $|\alpha_i|^2$ denotes the average photon number of the coherent state in the $i$-th mode, and $n'_i$ denotes the corresponding collected average clicks by the $i$-th APD. Applying Eq. (\ref{eq:number}) to the scenario in our experiment, we arrive at the average photon number $\bar{n}$ of the coherent state $|\sqrt{\eta} \alpha\rangle$
\begin{equation}
\bar{n}=\eta |\alpha|^2=\sum_{i=1}^m|\alpha_i|^2=\sum_{i=1}^m\ln{\frac{1}{1-n'_i}}.
\end{equation}

\begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:setting}The correspondence between the registered events and the clicks of detectors $D_1,D_2$ and $D_3$ (as in Fig. 2 of the main text). Note all of the events are conditioned on the measurement event $E_j$.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $N(A_i=-1)$ & $N(A_{i+1}=-1)$ & $N(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1)$  \\
    \hline
    1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & $D_2$ & $D_3$& $D_2\cap D_3$ \\
    2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ & $D_3$ & $D_1$& $D_1\cap D_3$ \\
    3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ & $D_1$ & $D_2$& $D_1\cap D_2$ \\
    4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ & $D_2$ & $D_3$& $D_2\cap D_3$ \\
    5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ & $D_3$ & $D_2$& $D_2\cap D_3$ \\
   \end{tabular}

\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}
\par
\textit{Measurement setting and data collection}.---In the language of quantum theory, the maximum violation of the KCBS inequality can be achieved by performing 5 projective measurements on a qutrit system. For the single-photon input $|\psi\rangle=(0,0,1)^T$, the 5 projectors can be represented as $P_i=|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i|$ ($i=1,2,...,5$), where
\begin{equation}
|\psi_i\rangle=c_i\left(\cos(4\pi i/5),\sin(4\pi i/5),\sqrt{\cos(\pi/5)}\right)^T.
\end{equation}
Here $c_i$ is the normalization coefficient. Then the 5 observables can be defined by $A_i=2P_i-\openone$, producing outcomes $\{+1,-1\}$ \cite{Klyachko_2008}. The three modes in our setup are defined as one spatial mode of the light field, and the vertical polarization and horizontal polarization in another spatial mode, denoted as mode 0,1,2 respectively. The beam displacers (BDs) and half wave-plates (HWPs) are then used to perform operations on the polarization modes and transformations on the spatial modes. The following detectors thus perform the corresponding measurements by the detection of the light field distributed in the three modes. The experiment goes by changing one of the measurement to another and measuring a different context. The data of the experiment is recorded by an event register, including the clicks of the detectors (the three APDs) and the signal from the input trigger. The trigger signal of the single photon source is the clicks of the trigger APD in the idler mode of the spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC), while the trigger signal of the classical light pulses is a synchronizing signal of the pulse picker monitored by a fast photodiode (PD). In each measurement context, two of the three APDs give the outcomes of the observables $A_i, A_{i+1}$, while the third APD plays the role of ancillary outcomes $A_\text{anc}=0,1$. The detailed settings that the clicks of which two detectors are registered are summarized in Table. \ref{tab:setting}. For example, in the context $\{A_1,A_2\}$, we register the clicks of Detector 2 for the counts $n(A_1=-1)$, the clicks of Detector 3 for the counts $n(A_2=-1)$, and the coincidences of Detector 2 and Detector 3 for counts $n(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1)$. All of the counts are collected with respect to the measurement event $E_j$ with counts $N_j$. Then the conditional probabilities $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_j)$ can be calculated by $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_j)=n(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_j)/N_j$. In other words, the probabilities are assigned and renormalized over the event $E_j$. In the experiment with full statistics ($E_3$), the statistics of outcomes are registered with respect to the input trigger without the help of the ancillary outcome. The dark noise is negligible compared with the count rate because all the registered counts are based on the coincidences between the detectors and the input trigger.

\par
\begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:result_sp}Collected experimental result for the single photon source input.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}

   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle$\\
    \hline
   1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & $0.4446(19)$ &0.4495(19) & $0.0013(2)$ && $-0.7831(28)$\\
   2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ & $0.4593(20)$ &0.4442(21) & $0.0013(2)$  && $-0.8017(27)$\\
   3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ & $0.4570(20)$ &0.4323(19)& $0.0013(1)$  && $-0.7735(24)$\\
   4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ & $0.4290(22)$ &0.4583(22) & $0.0013(2)$  && $-0.7692(28)$\\
   5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ & $0.4573(20)$ & 0.4403(20) & $0.0013(1)$  && $-0.7900(28)$\\
   \hline
   &&&&&$\beta$&$-3.9176(60)$
  \end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}
\textit{Summary of results and imperfections}.---As a detailed summary of the experimental results, the experimental values with error bars for the coherent state inputs are summarized in Table. \ref{tab:results}. Moreover, we give the collected experimental probabilities for several representative cases with coherent states under different measurement events $E_j$, as shown in Tables. \ref{tab:result_01} and \ref{tab:result_124}. For each measurement context, the assigned probabilities $P(A_i=-1|E_j)$, $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_j)$ and $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_j)$ with respect to the measurement event $E_j$ are used to calculate the correlation $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_j}$ by Eq. (2) in the main text.
 \begin{table}[h]
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:bound}Collected experimental result to correct the bound.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
   \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
    $P(A_1=-1)$ & $P(A'_1=1|A_1=-1)$ & $P(A_1=1)$ & $P(A'_1=-1|A_1=1)$ &\textbf{Calculated} $-3-\epsilon$\\
    \hline
     $0.4446(19)$ & $0.0058(7)$ &0.5554(19)& $0.0020(4)$  &  $-3.0074(9)$\\
   \end{tabular}
   \end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}
\par
In our experiment, the main imperfection is the inaccuracies of the configurations of waveplates and beam displacers. This imperfection may lead to five observables which are not ideally symmetric as the maximum violation case. As a result, the measured probabilities do have some discrepancies from the ideal case, resulting in a lower observed violation of the KCBS inequality. However, this imperfection does not change the non-contextual bound [Eq. (1) in the main text], because the derivation of the non-contextual bound does not depend on any specific arrangement of the experiment, only the axioms of probability theory are assumed. An observed violation of the non-contextual inequality always shows the contextuality of the system, therefore our arguments are not affected.
\par
Another issue is that due to the experimental imperfections, the measurement $A_1$ in the context $\{A_1,A_2\}$ (denoted as $A_1$ in the following) and context $\{A_5,A_1\}$ (denoted as $A_1'$ in the following) are not physically the same. To take this imperfection into consideration, we adopted the method proposed in \cite{Lapkiewicz_2011} to characterize the difference between $A_1$ and $A_1'$ and correct the non-contextual bound. The non-contextual inequality in the practical case is a test including six observables, $A_1, A_2, ..., A_5$ and $A_1'$. The effect of this difference on the non-contextual bound is quantified by
\begin{equation}
\epsilon=1-\langle A_1 A_1' \rangle=2\left[P(A_1'=-1|A_1=1)P(A_1=1)+P(A_1'=1|A_1=-1)P(A_1=-1)\right].
\end{equation}
The conditional probabilities $P(A_1'=a_1'|A_1=a_1)$ can be experimentally measured by setting the measurement context in $\{A_5,A_1'\}$ and blocking the mode corresponding to $A_1$ or the other modes except for $A_1$. As a result, the experiment is conducted under the condition $A_1=1$ or $A_1=-1$. The experimental result to correct the bound is shown in Table. \ref{tab:bound}. This difference render the actual non-contextual slightly different from the ideal case (-3). All the results in the experiment are compared with the characterized bound rather than the theoretical one.

\begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:results}Experimental results for classical light field (coherent state) inputs under different definitions of measurement events. $\beta_\text{th}$, $\beta_\text{exp}$ represent the theoretical and experimental values of the left hand of the KCBS inequality respectively, and $P_\text{th}(E_j)$, $P_\text{exp}(E_j)$ represent the theoretical and experimental values of post-selection probabilities respectively.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{$E_1$: Only 1 detector clicks}}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{$E_2$: At least 1 detector clicks}}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{$E_3$: Full statistics}}\\
   $\bar{n}$  & $\beta_\text{th}$ & $\beta_\text{exp}$ & $\beta_\text{th}$ & $\beta_\text{exp}$ & $\beta_\text{th}$ & $\beta_\text{exp}$ \\
    \hline
0.10 & -3.9611 & -3.9471(32) & -3.7830 & -3.7680(32) & 4.1296 & 4.1315(24) \\
0.40 & -4.0078 & -3.9788(39) & -3.3129 & -3.2858(31) & 2.2720 & 2.2840(41) \\
0.72 & -4.0579 & -4.0146(22) & -2.7798 & -2.7448(21) & 1.0192 & 1.0462(37) \\
0.99 & -4.1003 & -4.0574(28) & -2.3081 & -2.2716(40) & 0.4009 & 0.4404(60) \\
1.24 & -4.1378 & -4.1018(34) & -1.8802 & -1.8478(38) & 0.1103 & 0.1488(21) \\
1.57 & -4.1859 & -4.1482(15) & -1.3215 & -1.2843(71) & 0.0002 & 0.0506(14) \\
1.84 & -4.2260 & -4.1843(21) & -0.8503 & -0.8069(73) & 0.0756 & 0.1352(28)\\
    \hline
    &&&&&&\\

   $\bar{n}$  & $P_\text{th}(E_1)$ & $P_\text{exp}(E_1)$ & $P_\text{th}(E_2)$ & $P_\text{exp}(E_2)$ & $P_\text{th}(E_3)$ & $P_\text{exp}(E_3)$\\
    \hline
0.10 & 0.0961 & 0.0960(3) & 0.0991 & 0.0991(3)  & 1 & 1 \\
0.40 & 0.2904 & 0.2896(4) & 0.3282 & 0.3278(5)  & 1 & 1 \\
0.72 & 0.4075 & 0.4049(3) & 0.5117 & 0.5105(5)  & 1 & 1 \\
0.99 & 0.4551 & 0.4505(4) & 0.6293 & 0.6271(11) & 1 & 1 \\
1.24 & 0.4694 & 0.4647(2) & 0.7107 & 0.7084(6)  & 1 & 1 \\
1.57 & 0.4614 & 0.4552(3) & 0.7909 & 0.7877(8)  & 1 & 1 \\
1.84 & 0.4394 & 0.4316(4) & 0.8417 & 0.8378(6)  & 1 & 1
   \end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}

    \begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:result_01}Collected experimental result for classical light input with $\bar{n}=0.10$ under different measurement events $E_j$.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}

   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_1)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_1)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_1)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_1}$\\
    \hline
1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & 0.4455(10) & 0.4468(10) & 0(0) && -0.7845(11) \\
2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ & 0.4502(10) & 0.4525(10) & 0(0) && -0.8054(12) \\
3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ & 0.4576(11) & 0.4334(10) & 0(0) && -0.7820(13) \\
4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ & 0.4291(12) & 0.4583(14) & 0(0) && -0.7748(17) \\
5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ & 0.4591(10) & 0.4411(10) & 0(0) && -0.8004(13) \\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$-3.9471(32)$\\
   &&&&&&\\
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_2)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_2)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_2)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_2}$\\
    \hline
1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ &0.4578(9)  & 0.4591(10) & 0.0213(3) && -0.7487(12) \\
2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ &0.4626(10) & 0.4649(11) & 0.0218(3) && -0.7678(13) \\
3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ &0.4696(11) & 0.4459(9)  & 0.0211(3) && -0.7466(13) \\
4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ &0.4414(12) & 0.4701(13) & 0.0206(3) && -0.7405(18) \\
5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ &0.4710(10) & 0.4533(10) & 0.0211(3) && -0.7643(13)\\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$-3.7680(32)$\\
    &&&&&&\\
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_3)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_3)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_3)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_3}$\\
    \hline
    1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & $0.0459(3)$ &0.0460(3) & $0.0021(0)$ && $0.8248(9)$\\
    2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ & $0.0464(4)$ &0.0466(4) & $0.0022(0)$  && $0.8227(14)$\\
    3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ & $0.0465(5)$ &0.0442(4)& $0.0021(0)$  && $0.8269(17)$\\
    4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ & $0.0434(5)$ &0.0462(4) & $0.0020(0)$  && $0.8290(16)$\\
    5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ & $0.0459(4)$ & 0.0442(4) & $0.0021(0)$  && $0.8280(13)$\\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$4.1315(24)$\\
   \end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}

 \begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:result_124}Collected experimental result for classical light input with $\bar{n}=1.24$ under different measurement events $E_j$.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_1)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_1)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_1)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_1}$\\
    \hline
1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & 0.4435(5) & 0.4677(5)  & 0(0) && -0.8223(5)  \\
2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ &0.4674(6) & 0.4489(6)  & 0(0) && -0.8327(6)  \\
3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ &0.4634(5) & 0.4434(5)  & 0(0) && -0.8137(7)  \\
4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ &0.4395(7) & 0.4679(6)  & 0(0) && -0.8148(8)  \\
5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ &0.4637(10) & 0.4454(15) & 0(0) && -0.8183(30)\\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$-4.0574(28)$\\
   &&&&&&\\
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_2)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_2)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_2)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_2}$\\
    \hline
1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ &0.5899(9)  & 0.6080(10) & 0.2563(16) && -0.3708(29) \\
2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ &0.6104(8) & 0.5967(13) & 0.2618(17) && -0.3668(28) \\
3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ &0.6040(4) & 0.5888(5)  & 0.2539(5) && -0.3699(9) \\
4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ &0.5851(16) & 0.6064(9) & 0.2524(21) && -0.3734(35) \\
5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ &0.6057(8) & 0.5920(16) & 0.2571(12) && -0.3669(13)\\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$-2.2716(40)$\\
    &&&&&&\\
   $i$  & \textbf{Measurement context} & $P(A_i=-1|E_3)$ & $P(A_{i+1}=-1|E_3)$ & $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1|E_3)$  &&  \textbf{Calculated value} $\langle A_i A_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_3}$\\
    \hline
    1 & $\{A_1,A_2\}$ & $0.4175(20)$ &0.4304(21) & $0.1814(17)$ && $0.0297(13)$\\
    2 & $\{A_2,A_3\}$ & $0.4348(21)$ &0.4251(24) & $0.1865(18)$  && $0.0263(17)$\\
    3 & $\{A_3,A_4\}$ & $0.4270(6)$ &0.4163(6)& $0.1795(5)$  && $0.0315(7)$\\
    4 & $\{A_4,A_5\}$ & $0.4121(29)$ &0.4271(24) & $0.1778(22)$  && $0.0326(18)$\\
    5 & $\{A_5,A_1\}$ & $0.4303(10)$ & 0.4207(16) & $0.1827(10)$  && $0.0288(9)$\\
    \hline
    &&&&&$\beta$&$0.4404(60)$\\
   \end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}

\section{Details of theoretical predictions}
\par
According to the probability theory, the result of a correlation experiment can be abstracted as a mathematical description of the measurement scenario \cite{1367-2630-13-11-113036,PhysRevLett.119.050504}: the probability space. The probability space is described by a triple $(\Omega,E,P)$ which consists of 3 parts: the sample space $\Omega$, which is the set of all possible outcomes $\{a_i, a_{i+1}, a_\text{anc}\}$; the event space $E$, which is a set of events $\{e_k\}$ (subset of $\Omega$) relevant to the purpose of the experiment; the probabilities of events $P$, $P(\Omega)=1$. To test an non-contextual (NC) inequality, one can define a proper event space $E$, and then calculate the parameter $\beta$ with the collected probabilities $P$ of these events.
\par
In the following, we give the quantum description of the classical light experiment and derive the theoretical predictions. From the viewpoint of quantum theory, coherent states are the quantum-mechanical equivalents of classical monochromatic electromagnetic waves, due to the fact that the properties of coherent states most closely resemble the classical behavior of light field. Coherent states can be expanded in terms of the Fock states $|n\rangle$, and the probability of detecting $n$ photons subjects to the Poissonian distribution
\begin{eqnarray}
|\alpha\rangle=&&\sum_{n}\exp(-|\alpha|^2/2)\frac{\alpha^n}{(n!)^{1/2}}|n\rangle \\
\mathcal{P}(n)=&&|\langle n|\alpha\rangle|^2=\exp(-|\alpha|^2)\frac{|\alpha|^{2n}}{n!}.
\end{eqnarray}

\par
In the experiment with classical light fields, the input state can be denoted as
\begin{equation}
|\psi\rangle=|0\rangle_{0}|0\rangle_{1}|\alpha\rangle_{2},
\end{equation}
where $0,1,2$ denote the 3 input optical modes. After the transformations of the linear optical network, the state becomes coherent states distributed in 3 modes. For example, in the measurement context $\{A_i,A_{i+1}\}$, the output state can be ideally described as
\begin{equation}
|\psi'\rangle=\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_i}\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\left|\left(1-\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\right)^{1/2}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_\text{anc}}.
\end{equation}
Here $A_\text{anc}$ denotes the optical mode of the ancillary observable corresponding to the third APD in the measurement device. We define $A_\text{anc}=0$ when the third APD gives a click and  $A_\text{anc}=1$ when it does not, then the measurement outcomes of the experiment can be represented of the form $\{a_i\ a_{i+1}\ a_\text{anc}\}$. Accordingly, the 3 conditions of measurement events $E_j$ can be defined by
\begin{eqnarray}
E_1=&&\{-1+1\ 1,+1-1\ 1,+1+1\ 0\}, \\
E_2=&&\{-1-1\ 1,-1-1\ 0,-1+1\ 1,-1+1\ 0,+1-1\ 1,+1-1\ 0,+1+1\ 0\}, \\
E_3=&&\Omega=\{-1-1\ 1,-1-1\ 0,-1+1\ 1,-1+1\ 0,+1-1\ 1,+1-1\ 0,+1+1\ 0,+1+1\ 1\}.
\end{eqnarray}
From the perspective of quantum measurements, the APDs perform projective measurements on the quantum state $|\psi'\rangle$. The projection operator $\hat{P}_{+1}=|0\rangle\langle 0|$ and $\hat{P}_{-1}=\openone-|0\rangle\langle 0|$, where $\openone$ is the identity operator. As a result, we can derive the joint probability distribution $P(A_i=a_i,A_{i+1}=a_{i+1}|E_j)$ over the outcomes under measurement context $\{A_i,A_{i+1}\}$ and measurement event $E_j$. Consequently, we can calculate the KCBS value $\beta (\alpha |E_j)=\sum_i M_i\left(\alpha |E_j\right)$ and the post-selection probability $P(E_j)$ for coherent state inputs. Here $i$ denotes different contexts $\{A_i,A_{i+1}\}$ and $M_i\left(\alpha |E_j\right)$ represents the measurement result $\langle A_iA_{i+1}\rangle_{|E_j}$ for the coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$ under $E_j$.
\par
For Condition (i):
\begin{eqnarray}
\beta (\alpha|E_1)=&&\sum_i M_i\left(\alpha |E_1\right)=5\times\frac{\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)-2\exp\left[-\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right]+\exp(-|\alpha|^2)} {\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)+2\exp\left[-\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right]-3\exp(-|\alpha|^2)}\\
P(E_1)=&&\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)+2\exp\left[-\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right]-3\exp(-|\alpha|^2);
\end{eqnarray}
\par
For Condition (ii):
\begin{eqnarray}
\beta(\alpha|E_2)=&&\sum_i M_i\left(\alpha |E_2\right)=5\times\frac{1-\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2\right)+4\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)-4\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)} {1-\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2\right)} \\
P(E_2)=&&1-\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2\right);
\end{eqnarray}
\par
For Condition (iii):
\begin{eqnarray}
\beta(\alpha|E_3)=&&\sum_i M_i\left(\alpha |E_3\right)=5\times\left[1-2\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)\right]^2 \\
P(E_3)=&&1.
\end{eqnarray}

\section{The correlation of the outcomes and the non-classicality of the state}
\begin{table}
 \centering \caption{\label{tab:g}The measured correlation function $g_{i,i+1}$ for the outcomes of $A_i,A_{i+1}$ for single photons and classical light fields.}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}

     & $A_1 A_2$ & $A_2 A_3$ & $A_3 A_4$ & $A_4 A_5$ & $A_5 A_1$ \\
    \hline
    HSPS & $0.0391(48)$ & $0.0400(46)$ & $0.0413(44)$ & $0.0408(47)$ & $0.0401(45)$\\ \hline

    Classical light&&&&&\\

   $\bar{n}$  & $A_1 A_2$ & $A_2 A_3$ & $A_3 A_4$ & $A_4 A_5$ & $A_5 A_1$ \\
    \hline
0.10 & 1.0102(131) & 1.0115(126) & 1.0161(144) & 1.0115(136) & 1.0132(129) \\
0.40 & 1.0096(35) & 1.0086(32) & 1.0104(52) & 1.0090(31) & 1.0092(31) \\
0.72 & 1.0093(17) & 1.0147(23) & 1.0095(18) & 1.0094(17) & 1.0088(17) \\
0.99 & 1.0139(15) & 1.0105(11) & 1.0117(13) & 1.0097(12) & 1.0105(10) \\
1.24 & 1.0093(8) & 1.0091(10) & 1.0099(9) & 1.0099(9) & 1.0092(7) \\
1.57 & 1.0095(7) & 1.0094(6) & 1.0103(6) & 1.0095(7) & 1.0093(6) \\
1.84 & 1.0093(5) & 1.0110(6) & 1.0106(5) & 1.0105(5) & 1.0103(7)
   \end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
    \end{table}

\par
\textit{The correlation of the outcomes}.---As clarified in the main text, the correlations between the measurement outcomes play a central role in the violation of the KCBS inequality. The measured values of correlation function $g_{i,i+1}$ [defined in Eq. (2) in the main text] between the outcomes $A_i$ and $A_{i+1}$ in our experiment are summarized in Table \ref{tab:g} for single photons and classical light fields. As we expected, the measured correlations in the single photon experiment are nearly zero. The joint probability term $P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1)$ thus can be ignored compared with the marginal probabilities $P(A_i=-1)$. In contrast, the measured correlations $g_{i,i+1}$ in the classical light experiments are about 1, which testify the outcomes are uncorrelated. The measured values are slightly larger than 1 due to the intensity fluctuations in the light waves \cite{book:14435}.
\par
When the light intensity is low, the correlation function $g_{i,i+1}$ defined in the main text can be approximately recast into
\begin{equation}
g_{i,i+1}=\frac{P(A_i=-1,A_{i+1}=-1)}{P(A_i=-1)P(A_{i+1}=-1)}\approx\frac{\langle I_i I_{i+1}\rangle}{\langle I_i\rangle\langle I_{i+1}\rangle},
\end{equation}
where $I_i$ represents the intensity of the light in the port $i$ (which corresponds to the observable $A_i$ in the experiment). This formulas is very similar to the second order coherence $g^{(2)}(0)$ of the light field, which is a witness of non-classicality of light fields and used to quantify the photon antibunching. In practice, the violation of non-contextual inequalities does not solely depend on $g^{(2)}$ of the state, but also depends on the specific photon number distribution (determined by the average photon number for a specific kind of number distribution, e.g., coherent states, thermal states). As we shown in the main text, the violation of the NC inequality with a linear optical setup is related to the photon statistics of the input light field. In the following, we establish the connection between the input state and the violations of non-contextual inequality in the Glauber--Sudarshan $P$ representation.
\par
\textit{Non-classicality and contextuality in Glauber--Sudarshan $P$ representation}.---We start with the mapping of the linear optical network for a coherent state $|\alpha \rangle$ as input in one mode and vacuum state $|0\rangle$ in the other two modes,
\begin{equation}
|0\rangle_{0}|0\rangle_{1}|\alpha\rangle_{2}\mapsto \left|\frac{1}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_i}\left|\frac{1}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\left|\left(1-\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\right)^{1/2}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_\text{anc}}.
\end{equation}
Then let us consider a general input state in mode 2 instead of a coherent state. The input field can be represented as $\hat{\rho}_{\text{in}}=|0\rangle_0\langle 0|\otimes|0\rangle_1\langle 0|\otimes\hat{\rho}$, where the the Glauber--Sudarshan $P$ function of $\hat{\rho}$ is denoted by $P(\alpha)$. The Glauber--Sudarshan $P$ representation of the input field can be written as:
\begin{equation}
\hat{\rho}_{\text{in}}=\int d^2\gamma \int d^2\beta \int d^2\alpha \ \delta (\gamma) \delta(\beta) P(\alpha) \ |\gamma\rangle_0\langle\gamma|\otimes|\beta\rangle_1\langle\beta|\otimes|\alpha\rangle_2\langle\alpha|.
\end{equation}
And the output field of the optical network can be represented as
\begin{equation}
\hat{\rho}_{\text{out}}=\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ |\alpha/\sqrt[4]{5}\rangle_{A_i} \langle\alpha/\sqrt[4]{5}|\otimes|\alpha/\sqrt[4]{5}\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\langle\alpha/\sqrt[4]{5}|\otimes|\sqrt{1-2/\sqrt{5}}\alpha\rangle_{A_{\text{anc}}}\langle\sqrt{1-2/\sqrt{5}}\alpha|.
\end{equation}
If the value of $\beta$ for a coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$ as input is denoted as $\beta(\alpha |E_j)=\sum_i M_i\left(\alpha |E_j\right)$ under $E_j$, generally the value of $\beta$ for the state $\hat{\rho}_{\text{in}}$ is
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_j}=\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \beta(\alpha |E_j).
\label{eq:pe3}
\end{equation}
In our case, applying the operator $\hat{O}=|0\rangle_{A_i}\langle 0|\otimes|0\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\langle 0|+(\openone-|0\rangle_{A_{i}}\langle 0|)\otimes(\openone-|0\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\langle 0|)-(\openone-|0\rangle_{A_{i}}\langle 0|)\otimes|0\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\langle 0|-|0\rangle_{A_{i}}\langle 0|\otimes(\openone-|0\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\langle 0|)$ on the state, and recalling that the experiment has 5 symmetric contexts, we arrive at the value of $\beta$ under $E_3$
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_3}=5\times\int d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \left[1-2\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)\right]^2,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_3}=5\times\int d|\alpha| \ \tilde{P}(|\alpha|) \ \left[1-2\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)\right]^2,
\end{equation}
where $\tilde{P}(|\alpha|)$ represents the qusi-probability distribution $\tilde{P}(|\alpha|)=\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\ |\alpha|P(\alpha)$, $\phi=\textrm{arg}(\alpha)$~\cite{book:14435}. The photon number distribution of the input state can also be derived by this qusi-probability distribution:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{P}(n)=&&\text{Tr}(\hat{\rho}_{\text{in}} |n\rangle\langle n|) \nonumber \\
=&&\int d^2 \alpha \ P(\alpha)|\langle n|\alpha\rangle|^2 \nonumber \\
=&&\int d|\alpha|\ \tilde{P}(|\alpha|)\exp(-|\alpha|^2)\frac{|\alpha|^{2n}}{n!}.
\end{eqnarray}
The photon number distribution $\mathcal{P}(n)$ can be represented as an average over Poissonian distributions. To violate the KCBS inequality the $\beta$ value should be less than $-3$, i.e.
\begin{equation}
5\times\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \left[1-2\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)\right]^2<-3.
\end{equation}
\par
In our case, since the $\beta$ value for a coherent state input always can not violate the inequality in spite of the average photon number [$\text{min}(\beta)=0$ for coherent states], there should be some non-classicality in the P-representation of the input state $P(\alpha)$ if a violation is observed with this input state.
\par
Moreover, if the measurement device has a detection efficiency $\eta$ due to some losses in the setup, the output state should be
\begin{equation}
|0\rangle_{0}|0\rangle_{1}|\alpha\rangle_{2}\mapsto \left|\frac{\sqrt{\eta}}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_i}\left|\frac{\sqrt{\eta}}{\sqrt[4]{5}}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_{i+1}}\left|\sqrt{\eta}\left(1-\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}}\right)^{1/2}\alpha\right\rangle_{A_\text{anc}},
\label{eq:state}
\end{equation}
which yields the result
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_3}=5\times\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \left[1-2\exp\left(-\eta |\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)\right]^2.
\end{equation}
\par
In summary, the violation of the NC inequality without post-selection will depend on the non-classicality of the input light field. As an example, we perform numerical simulations for the mixture of single photon state $|1\rangle$, coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$ and thermal state $\rho_{\text{th}}=\sum_n \bar{n}_{\text{th}}^n /(1+\bar{n}_{\text{th}})^{n+1}|n\rangle\langle n|$ to demonstrate different violations of the KCBS inequality. Specifically, we show the simulation results for 2 kinds of optical states:
\par
(i) The mixture of the single photon state $|1\rangle$ and the coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$,
\begin{equation}
\rho_1=(1-\lambda)|1\rangle\langle 1|+\lambda|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|.
\end{equation}
\par
(ii) The mixture of the single photon state $|1\rangle$ and the thermal state $\rho_{\text{thermal}}$ with average photon number $n_{th}$,
\begin{equation}
\rho_2=(1-\lambda)|1\rangle\langle 1|+\lambda\rho_{\text{th}}.
\end{equation}
\par
The simulation results are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:mix}. As we expected, violating the KCBS inequality is a sufficient but not necessary condition for the negativity of $P(\alpha)$. The $P$ functions of the two states generally possess negativity since they have a single photon state in the mixture, but violating the inequality demands a higher ratio of single photon state in the mixture.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\addtocounter{figure}{1}
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{mix1.pdf}\label{fig:mix:a}}
\quad
\subfigure{\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{mix2.pdf}\label{fig:mix:b}}
\addtocounter{figure}{-1}
\caption{\label{fig:mix} The simulation results of different optical states: (a) the mixture of single photon state $|1\rangle$ and coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$; (b) the mixture of single photon state $|1\rangle$ and thermal state $\rho_{\text{th}}$.}
\end{figure}
\par
On the other hand, if we apply post-selection on the detection part, the value of $\beta$ for the measurement event $E_1$ with perfect detection can be written as:
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_1}=5\times\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \frac{\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)-2\exp\left[-\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right]+\exp(-|\alpha|^2)} {\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)+2\exp\left[-\left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right]-3\exp(-|\alpha|^2)}.
\label{eq:pe1}
\end{equation}
Since $\beta (\alpha |E_1)\leq 5-4\sqrt{5}$, the inequality can be violated under this condition even with a classical $P(\alpha)$ as input. For $E_2$ we have

\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_2}=5\times\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \frac{1-\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2\right)+4\exp\left(-2|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)-4\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2/\sqrt{5}\right)} {1-\exp\left(-|\alpha|^2\right)}.
\label{eq:pe2}
\end{equation}
The equation can also be represented in terms of post-selection probability $P(E_2)$,
\begin{equation}
\beta_{E_2}=5\times\int  d^2\alpha \ P(\alpha) \ \left[1+\frac{\beta \left(\alpha |E_3\right)}{P(E_2)}-\frac{1}{P(E_2)}\right].
\end{equation}
Substituting the $P$ function of the single photon state $P(\alpha)=\left(1+\frac{1}{4}\Delta \right)\delta(\alpha)$ into Eq. (\ref{eq:pe3}), one can find that the KCBS value of $\beta(\alpha|E_1)$ under the limit $\alpha \to 0$ is equal to the value of single photon state under $E_3$. Similarly, consider the state
\begin{equation}
|\mu \rangle=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-|\alpha_0|^2/2)}{[1-\exp(-|\alpha_0|^2)]^{1/2}}\frac{\alpha_0^n}{(n!)^{1/2}}|n\rangle
\end{equation}
which is equivalent to a coherent state with vacuum component removed. The state possesses a $P$ function
$\displaystyle{
P(\alpha)=\frac{1}{1-\exp(-|\alpha_0|^2)}\delta(\alpha-\alpha_0)-\frac{\exp(-|\alpha_0|^2)}{1-\exp(-|\alpha_0|^2)}\delta(\alpha)}$,
and the KCBS value of $\beta(\alpha_0|E_2)$ is equal to the value for the state $|\mu \rangle$ as input under $E_3$.
\par
For the single photon state $|1\rangle$ with $P(\alpha)=\left(1+\frac{1}{4}\Delta \right)\delta(\alpha)$ as the input, it can be found that the violation is the same under the three definitions $E_1, E_2$ and $E_3$, i.e. $\beta_{E_1}=\beta_{E_2}=\beta_{E_3}=5-4\sqrt{5}$ according to Eq. (\ref{eq:pe3}).

\section{Experimental data}
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{The registered measurement results for single photon experiment. Here $C_{a,(b,c),T}$ denote the coincidence count rate in 1.4s between the detectors $a,(b,c)$ and the trigger detector (the idler mode in SPDC), and $N_T$ denotes the corresponding count rate in the trigger detector. The values in the brackets represent standard uncertainties given by 150 repetitions of the experiment and data collection.}
\label{raw-single}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrrr}
              & $C_{1,T}$  & $C_{2,T}$  & $C_{3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,T}$ & $C_{1,3,T}$ & $C_{2,3,T}$ & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$      \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$ & 25347(193) & 25075(178) & 6082(84)   & 72(9)       & 19(4)       & 19(5)       & 0(0)          & 346798(1640) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$ & 26569(202) & 5696(86)   & 25698(194) & 20(4)       & 77(9)       & 19(4)       & 0(0)          & 356275(1352) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$ & 6494(80)   & 24918(178) & 26345(211) & 20(5)       & 21(5)       & 75(8)       & 0(0)          & 360549(1469) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$ & 27041(225) & 25313(198) & 6779(86)   & 77(9)       & 24(5)       & 23(5)       & 0(0)          & 363776(2026) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$ & 27349(207) & 26333(178) & 6244(91)   & 79(9)       & 22(5)       & 21(5)       & 0(0)          & 366636(1353) \\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}

\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{The registered measurement results for classical light filed inputs. Here $C_{a,(b,c),T}$ denote the coincidence count rate in 1.4s between the detectors $a,(b,c)$ and the trigger signal (the synchronizing signal of the pulse picker), and $N_T$ denotes the corresponding count rate in the trigger signal. The values in the brackets represent standard uncertainties given by 150 repetitions of the experiment and data collection.}
\label{raw-classical}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrrr}
$\bar{n}=0.10$  & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 119146(656)    & 118814(674)    & 29801(212)    & 5519(91)      & 1390(41)      & 1390(40)     & 65(8)         & 2591148(1) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 120200(941)    & 26983(281)     & 120803(1048)  & 1268(42)      & 5669(112)     & 1277(45)     & 60(8)         & 2591149(0) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 29812(262)     & 114535(863)    & 120642(971)   & 1341(41)      & 1405(38)      & 5416(91)     & 62(8)         & 2591154(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 119672(1042)   & 112374(1281)   & 30486(456)    & 5250(119)     & 1429(45)      & 1344(48)     & 63(8)         & 2591153(1) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 118994(943)    & 114533(951)    & 26860(288)    & 5329(110)     & 1259(44)      & 1217(43)     & 57(7)         & 2591152(0) \\ \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=0.40$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 421355(3326)   & 418210(3245)   & 109382(1042)  & 68666(1068)   & 17994(351)    & 17886(323)   & 2948(93)      & 2591147(0) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 433901(1231)   & 103593(386)    & 432928(1220)  & 17508(150)    & 73118(439)    & 17511(154)   & 2964(58)      & 2591147(0) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 115941(1474)   & 405581(2188)   & 427735(2393)  & 18309(298)    & 19348(344)    & 67625(763)   & 3071(82)      & 2591145(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 431660(4489)   & 402893(3439)   & 114514(1112)  & 67727(1263)   & 19314(362)    & 18032(325)   & 3050(90)      & 2591145(0) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 424048(4667)   & 410394(3930)   & 104782(1548)  & 67783(1055)   & 17333(353)    & 16789(386)   & 2779(93)      & 2591146(1) \\ \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=0.72$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 717113(7035)   & 690496(6908)   & 194970(2247)  & 192895(3832)  & 54581(1185)   & 52589(1121)  & 14782(465)    & 2591145(0) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 707364(11448)  & 185247(3448)   & 680115(11717) & 51256(1715)   & 188436(5988)  & 49489(1696)  & 13765(675)    & 2591144(1) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 210232(1300)   & 697006(2022)   & 732012(1846)  & 57056(459)    & 59952(515)    & 198775(1090) & 16362(194)    & 2591144(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 719289(5133)   & 685378(4151)   & 199189(1474)  & 192063(2528)  & 55986(766)    & 53349(709)   & 15053(311)    & 2591142(0) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 731302(6914)   & 712236(4699)   & 196599(1824)  & 202803(3202)  & 56016(988)    & 54567(824)   & 15611(375)    & 2591142(0) \\ \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=0.99$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 897217(8187)   & 861074(7947)   & 251446(2828)  & 302309(5271)  & 88699(1711)   & 85192(1685)  & 30156(848)    & 2591147(1) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 959875(2193)   & 265437(829)    & 924061(2337)  & 99344(565)    & 345923(1643)  & 95879(561)   & 36051(329)    & 2591149(0) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 278189(1557)   & 926253(3816)   & 925607(4612)  & 100397(981)   & 100443(1007)  & 334755(2851) & 36496(522)    & 2591149(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 946736(5764)   & 923119(5554)   & 273625(2350)  & 340558(3975)  & 101080(1364)  & 98725(1274)  & 36627(681)    & 2591148(1) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 951452(5331)   & 926865(6464)   & 279351(1825)  & 343924(4237)  & 103876(814)   & 101411(823)  & 37861(491)    & 2591147(0) \\ \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=1.24$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 1115288(5367)  & 1081923(5058)  & 326521(2343)  & 470045(4425)  & 141901(1621)  & 137749(1525) & 60177(958)    & 2591146(0) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 1126739(5336)  & 314891(2065)   & 1101507(6182) & 138200(1550)  & 483343(4754)  & 135289(1568) & 59669(963)    & 2591145(0) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 338075(1071)   & 1078697(1676)  & 1106430(1658) & 141996(594)   & 145671(629)   & 465190(1360) & 61561(365)    & 2591145(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 1106730(6316)  & 1067832(7400)  & 335458(2607)  & 460636(5708)  & 144953(1823)  & 140054(2003) & 60772(1177)   & 2591144(0) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 1115093(2525)  & 1090014(4168)  & 335552(4281)  & 473394(2716)  & 145785(1779)  & 142681(1584) & 62308(705)    & 2591144(0) \\ \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=1.57$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 1318906(5593)  & 1291769(5611)  & 428766(2478)  & 663785(5796)  & 220573(2247)  & 216089(2230) & 111736(1647)  & 2591216(0) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 1346500(3073)  & 397968(1320)   & 1345865(3122) & 208695(1161)  & 705972(3099)  & 208919(1165) & 110158(890)   & 2591215(1) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 415002(2674)   & 1240955(5240)  & 1303059(6136) & 200562(2146)  & 210617(2231)  & 630461(5533) & 102429(1536)  & 2591208(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 1280196(4707)  & 1230235(4300)  & 426232(2684)  & 613613(4297)  & 212748(1979)  & 204461(1876) & 102607(1258)  & 2591209(0) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 1324944(5144)  & 1311555(4218)  & 379163(2571)  & 676899(4759)  & 195756(2029)  & 193872(1848) & 100637(1352)  & 2591210(0) \\  \hline
               &                &                &               &               &               &              &               &            \\
$\bar{n}=1.84$
               & $C_{1,T}$      & $C_{2,T}$      & $C_{3,T}$     & $C_{1,2,T}$   & $C_{1,3,T}$   & $C_{2,3,T}$  & $C_{1,2,3,T}$ & $N_{T}$    \\ \hline
$\{A_1,A_2\}$  & 1455626(2947)  & 1424706(2985)  & 492345(1515)  & 807816(3273)  & 279096(1416)  & 273356(1438) & 155817(1146)  & 2591222(1) \\
$\{A_2,A_3\}$  & 1449516(9606)  & 452415(4344)   & 1439459(9698) & 255813(4169)  & 814156(10871) & 254502(4142) & 144729(3354)  & 2591223(0) \\
$\{A_3,A_4\}$  & 480699(1714)   & 1425190(4068)  & 1465853(3883) & 266827(1591)  & 274549(1591)  & 814810(4481) & 153422(1311)  & 2591224(0) \\
$\{A_4,A_5\}$  & 1463814(11009) & 1424103(10769) & 511443(2737)  & 813015(12255) & 292407(3499)  & 284713(3440) & 163604(3188)  & 2591225(0) \\
$\{A_5,A_1\}$  & 1476570(7297)  & 1468857(8392)  & 454731(3931)  & 845609(8594)  & 262060(3331)  & 260935(3443) & 151153(2628)  & 2591226(0)
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}
\end{widetext}
\end{document}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaArXiv


County Market is a coast to coast supermarket chain primarily operating in the Midwestern and Southern regions of the United States. Presently, more than 100 independently owned County Market stores operate in Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin and is part of the SuperValu Inc. company.
There are no approved fake reports for County Market. Want to report a fake news story from County Market? Download our free Chrome extension to get started.
There are no approved ratings yet. Be the first to rate County Market.
How would you rate County Market in terms of truthfulness, accuracy and fact-checking?
How would you rate County Market in terms of editorial quality?
How would you rate County Market in terms of general credibility and authority in the industry?


text:
Guildford Baseball and Softball Club Home of the Guildford Mavericks, Millers & Gold Cats
Umpires Call
Guildford Baseball on Tour
Downloads – Juniors
Glove Buying Guide
Mavericks Hall of Fame
BBF Calendar 2019
Roster for 2019
In the early days….
Club Policies and Procedures
Baseball Skills & Instruction
Babe Ruth's visit to Surrey
For the first time in 10 years, the club fielded two teams in the BBF leagues in 2011. The 1st team (Mavericks I), continued in Double-A and compiled a 16-4 record, finishing in 1st place in Pool B, which was the clubs 3rd first place finish in it's history. Although Pool A winners the Latin Boys got the better of the Mavericks in the southern regional final, it was still the second best record achieved by the club, behind that 1999 team.
Mavericks II, competed in Single-A, under manager Ben Stobart (in only his second year with the club). They posted a very respectable 5-8 record, which only Southampton bettered, of all the clubs with second teams.
Both clubs also took to the field in the clubs new Cardinal and Gold colours, which replaced the old Navy blue, white and red, colours that had been worn for the last 8 years.
The club was also able to blood many new players to the game across both teams, with the debutants this year being: David Austin, Chris Matthews, Chris Ward, Graham Sedge, Tunde, Gillian Conway, Will Frawley, Jorgen Lovbakke and new first team coach, Tony Oliva, who also donned the playing uniform on a couple of occasions on the field of play, and proved that age is no handicap, as he drove one over the RF fence in his second AB.
Off the field of play, the club had the boost of the Shere re-enactment and related demonstration in the Surrey Youth Games, which all game off the back of the publicity generated around the news that the first ever recorded written work of baseball, was just down the road in Shere, by William Bray. Not only was this a high profile event at the Youth Games, but we also appeared on TV and radio, as well as local media.
Mavericks II schedule 2011
Single-A Standings 2011
2011 Double-A Play-offs
2011 Double-A Standings
Mavericks 2011 Schedule
2011 Mavericks: (top L-R) Michael B, Kevin Z, Will F, Jimmy S, Rob S, James C, Owen H, Chris M, ?, Tom D, Greg Y, Rob W, (front L-R) Jack B, John K, Matt B, Chris L, Heather A, Dave A, James G, Graham S (Lying down) Tony O
Mavs On Facebook
@GuildfordMavs
RT @FreeReinUK: Lockdown is back for a new season in 2021 and so is #WorkoutWednesday For those working at home who are sick of being at their desk all day, 1pm on Wednesday is a chance to do a 20 minute workout with #britishbaseball people. DM me for Zoom details @bsuk @BritishBaseball, Jan 12
RT @bsuk: 53 clubs & teams have signed up to the #DevelopmentCharter so far - and this one is historic. We're thrilled that the Southern Belles are the 1st all women's baseball team to Charter! Manager @Jesicamaevernon tells us why they've signed: https://t.co/uV0O7hPheN #WomenInBaseball https://t.co/xyby3RxM1Y, Jan 12
RT @FreeReinUK: If you're a baseball player looking to stay strong and sharp for the new baseball season, apart from signing up to @smarttobefit offseason programme, you could ask Santa for some of these https://t.co/MfMjckEszW, Dec 14
Amazing work by @Kings_Guildford students! You're all awesome! https://t.co/HZTjbM5K1a, Dec 4
Recommended https://t.co/swM2rp9EEu, Nov 30
Want to play baseball?
The Guildford Baseball and Softball Club is always looking to expand, and welcomes new members, whatever their experience. We currently run adult teams in the BBF Leagues on a Sunday, with Thursday training sessions for those wanting to improve their play. Junior baseball sessions are run on Saturday mornings, so that children can learn the game, and eventually progress into the senior teams. These are a mix of intra-squad games and games against other clubs. We also run junior midweek training (most likely on a Wed for 2020) starting in May
If you are interested in playing, coaching, managing, umpiring, scoring, or any other activity than helps run an amateur sports club, then please get in touch, as we would love to hear from you.
info@guildfordbaseball.co.uk, or call Michael on 07798927072.
Photo selection
© 2021 Guildford Baseball and Softball Club. All Rights Reserved.
Designed by Martin Reed

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


We've gathered reviews from around the internet and within our office. These reviews are given by our patients from Google, Facebook, and Yelp. Take a moment to view our testimonials, write a review, or schedule an appointment.
A busy place, friendly staff and helpful knowledgeable doctors. 3 of them. Very pleasant waiting area with lovely view. An inform yourself preventive signboard gives quick advise to anyone that wants to learn.
Dr. Soszka is great at treating Hashimoto's. His whole body approach is needed where traditional Endocrine treatments have fallen short.
Very service oriented clinic. Dr. Beeson is one of the most experienced chiropractors in Oregon and knows his business. Plus they have an MD and a naturopath in the clinic so whatever you need, they have. Highly recommended for anyone who actually wants to get better!
Our customers often tell us about their experience in our clinic. We would like to share a few with you. We've provided their initials to protect their identity.
The care I received from Dr. Beeson and his staff is the best care I have received from any medical practice.
Some of the best treatment I've ever received.
I had surgery a month ago, and I was extremely stressed about it, and my back was hurting too. The adjustment & massageI received just before the surgery eased my back pain & helped my relax a lot, helping me get through the abdominal surgery & recovery much more easily. Thank You Very Much.


Opentag Business Directory is a free business directory to submit your business URL. Put forward your site in Opentag Business Directory to strengthen your business. Opentag Business Directory is launched with the vision of being the pioneer in contemporary online business directories.
Everyday more than 500 business websites get their listing here in this directory. It is more convenient to get genuine traffic towards your website with the help ofFire Safety Consultants directory . Now you can connect to the global online market just within your fingers tips ahead. Your response helps Opentag Business Directory to build the largest global business directory in your deserved way. High Page Rank for your web(s) is just at your door step when you select a properly designed business directory.
Now enjoy your moments with greater possibilities for business listing, in the way you want in some prominent ways. Do not hesitate to enjoy a mountaining Online Directory for your business with excellence and eminence. Do not miss this great chance to get attached with the Global Business Directory. This website can help expanding your business immensely. So, please, stop wasting time and do submit your business ASAP.


text:
SteelSeries Sensei is Available Now
September 21, 2011 | Filed under: Gaming,Gaming PR,Industry News | Posted by: Kristofer Brozio
A new mouse from SteelSeries with some decent specs…
The most customizable mouse to ever hit the competitive gaming industry, the SteelSeries Sensei, is now available online for consumers directly from the SteelSeries' Web Shop. With an MSRP of $89.99 / €89.99, and a list of original features that have been perfected alongside some of the world's most recognized competitive gamers, the Sensei is setting a new standard in mouse customization and capabilities; some of these features include:
A 32 bit ARM processor, that powers sophisticated calculations to be done directly on the mouse – without the need for software drivers and without having to rely on the user's computer.
Complete customization, from the buttons, macros and multiple profiles to the colors, and technology settings.
Illumination with 16.8 million colors choices to be programmed in 3 different zones on the mouse.
Sensitivity settings that can be changed in increments of one from 1 to 5,700 CPI, and an "overclocked" Double CPI feature that allows the user to go all the way up to 11,400 DCPI.
A 10.8 megapixel image correlation laser sensor at up to 12,000 frames per second and the ability to handle tracking movements of up to 150 inches per second.
An ambidextrous design with a metal, non-slip grip coating and is connected with a double braided nylon cord with a USB connector.
Simple plug and play; for the PC Gamers* who want advanced customization options, the Sensei is supported by SteelSeries Engine technology – save multiple profiles, create long and advanced macros with layers, keystrokes and precise timing. The Sensei Mouse is compatible with both Mac and PC; *SteelSeries Engine for Mac will be coming in 2012; for PC it is available now.
Introduced just last month during GamesCom, the Sensei has already received awards and recognition from industry media for its superior design, customization and functionality. The first of these reviews and awards to be published include, Hardware Heaven with a 10/10 score and the coveted Diamond Award, XS Reviews with a 9/10 score and a Gold Editor's Choice Award, LanOC with a 10/10 score and both the Editor's Choice and Top Honors Awards, and KitGuru with a 9/10 score and the Must Have Award. You can find the full roster of reviews on the Sensei page; be sure to keep an eye out for more that are coming soon.
The SteelSeries Sensei can be pre-ordered from the SteelSeries Web Shop directly at http://steelseries.com or by clicking the 'Buy Now' button, at http://steelseries.com/sensei.


We appreciate payments being paid promptly and by the due date. Due dates are written on the invoices which will be sent via email and available on the client portal.
Payment methods are listed on the invoice payment gateway itself.
You can pay your invoices by going to (https://www.petromedia.co.uk/cloud/login) using the credentials provided to you. There, you will also have access to your email account and a list of all your previous invoices from PetroMedia in PDF format.
For any billing related queries, please contact our finance department at finance@petromedia.co.uk.
A Flexible Plan is a 'contract-like' agreement but with no commitment so you can submit notice to leave whenever you like.
Flexible Plans renew automatically as they continue until cancelled. For cancellation information, refer to the refunds section iii.
Renewal of fixed contract-like agreements will be discussed 1 month prior to the renewal date.
A Flexible Plan is one a 'contract-like' agreement but with no commitment so you can submit notice to leave whenever you like.
With a Flexible Plan, you can cancel whenever you like. We do however require that you give 30 days notice. Start-up or initial costs are non-refundable.
For a 12 or 24 month contract, refunds can not exceed 20% of the total annual or monthly price. Refunds will be calculated based on the percentage of time left on a contracted plan. Start-up or initial costs are non-refundable.
A Pre-Paid Flexible plan is when you pay for an entire year or two years in advance. Pre-Paid Flexible Plans are non-refundable, however, if you decide part way into your Pre-Paid Flexible Plan term that you no longer require our service then we can discuss a good-will gesture based on the amount of time left of your plan and our administration costs.
Prices are assessed regularly and could be subject to change based on (but not limited to) factors such as inflation or in rough accordance with changes of the RPI . We will attempt to notify you of any pricing change 30 days in advance via email.
We accept cash, card or bank transfer. Payments are to be made either prior to or after an event, whatever suits you best.
We generate an invoice for all the services that we provide. This will be delivered to you on the day of the event and due on the day.
If when we are operating, any item belonging to PetroMedia is damaged by someone outside of PetroMedia, then the client (you) will be liable to pay or offer a replacement.
Please refer to the PetroMedia Cloud Hosting Acceptable Use Policy & Terms of Service.


Contact Us -- See below to send message.
G-Force Jars, LLC. was founded by members with a combined knowledge of over 50 years of experience in down hole tool design. G-Force introduced the G-Force Jars and Drivers to the market and has been receiving glowing reviews.
"Current customers include Old School Services, Extreme Energy, STS, Turn Right Tools, MMS, Spartan, and many more."
All contents ©Copyright 2010. G-FORCE JARS- G-FORCE JARS AND DRIVERS ARE PATENT PENDING 2014. All Rights Reserved.


text:
Enghien-Les-Bains, France
Select a City All Cities Atlanta Berlin Boston Cologne Dresden Dublin Enghien-Les-Bains, France Frankfurt Haarlem, The Netherlands Hamburg London Los Angeles Madrid Mexico City Milan New York Oak Park, IL San Francisco Stockholm Turin Vienna Washington, DC Zurich
PRINT March 2005
Haarlem, The Netherlands
Tendance Floue
Soccer matches, traffic jams, diplomatic handshakes, oil slicks, antiglobalization marches, the Eiffel Tower, Kafka's birthplace, lederhosen, tulips, reindeer: These are just some of the media events, tourist attractions, and cultural clichés you will not see along Nationale Zéro. Rather, this more than 14,000-mile highway winding through the twenty-five countries of the recently enlarged European Union will allow you to discover, among other things, Lithuania's final resting place for Soviet-era statuary ("Stalin World"), Holland's Côte d'Azur, the Festival of the Midnight Sun in Lapland, or the skyline of Benidorm, the Spanish Manhattan—not to mention an emerald forest in Poland, an enchanted blue highway in Sweden, and the specter of clandestine immigration from Greece to Gibraltar. In fact, and as its name might suggest, Nationale Zéro does not exist, except as it's been visualized by ten members of France's pioneering photography collective Tendance Floue, or "Blurry Tendency." "Europe doesn't have mythical routes like US Route 1, so we had to imagine one," explain these pragmatic utopians, whose blurry line between art and photojournalism emerged in the aftermath of the first Gulf War as a response to the surplus of images and deficit of doubts in the media.
The imagining of Nationale Zéro got under way five years ago, but it was only in March 2003, with the impending entry into the EU of ten new countries, that a magazine commission allowed Tendance Floue to hit the road. Taking turns in two-week stretches over the next seven months, the group's participating members covered a trans-European route improvised on the basis of affinities for place names, secondary roads, and chance. The only restriction (apart from the classic problems with a used car, purchased for the occasion à la Kerouac or Robert Frank): to punctuate the journey every fifty kilometers (around thirty miles) with a panoramic shot to serve as a photographic "milestone."
For Enghien-les-Bains, a small spa town just north of Paris, Nationale Zéro was appropriately transformed into an "exhibition route" starting at the town's Centre des Arts (stretches one through three, by Meyer, Pascal Aimar, and Mat Jacob), continuing at the Centre Culturel François Villon (four through seven, by Olivier Culmann, Gilles Coulon, Philippe Lopparelli, and Patrick Tourneboeuf ), and winding up at the local Médiathèque (eight through ten, by Denis Bourges, Caty Jan, and Thierry Ardouin). This itinerary of seventy-two large-format photos was literally underlined by a continuous strip of 170 miniaturized images placed end to end (several of them also greeting commuters on billboards at the train station). In the absence of any commentary other than the highwaylike signage used to delineate each stretch of the route within the three venues, this series of land-, sea-, and cityscapes put visitors "on the road" as well.
But unlike its prototype, this reduced model—also presented at www.tendance-floue.net—permitted multiple go-rounds, backtracking, and stopovers at will. Which meant that the urge to distinguish countries and regions—or to discern the distinctive penchant of each photographer for fantasy, poetry, geometry, anecdote, irony, or drama—could give way to an appreciation of the underlying and often overriding continuities and contradictions of the whole. Capturing the abundant splendor of natural settings and the encroaching mediocrity of the urban peripheries, the more or less comfortable cohabitation of tradition and technology, recurrent forms of sociability and isolation, the international dress codes of the nouveaux riches, the homeless, and the homeboys (here, two young Algerians waiting for a smuggler to take them from Greece to Italy), this subjective atlas of human geography opened up questions as wide as the panoramic milestones and as long as an imaginary highway of 14,000 miles.
—Miriam Rosen


text:
BRITANNIA returns with WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE
by Sebastian Piccione on Jan 12th, 2017 · No Comments on BRITANNIA returns with WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE
Peter Milligan and Juan Jose Ryp's sold out Roman Mystery BRITANNIA is due for a sequel. BRITANNIA: WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE will be a four issue series starting in April. Detector Antonius Axia is back, for more mystery, intrigue, and Gladiatorial combat.
Posted on January 5, 2017 by The Valiant Voice
Master Storytellers Peter Milligan & Juan Jose Ryp Investigate a Harrowing New Prestige-Format Case for the World's First Detective
As revealed today at io9, Valiant is proud to announce BRITANNIA: WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE #1 (of 4) – a brand-new journey into myth and mystery from comics master Peter Milligan (Shade, The Changing Man) and incendiary artist Juan José Ryp (Britannia)! On April 26th, Valiant's critically acclaimed, ten-time sold-out magnum opus returns with an all-new beginning and a startling new case for Antonius Axia, the world's first detective… One with a haunting connection to the horrors of Rome's arena and the very gods themselves…
Fifty thousand Romans stand on their feet, watching from the rafters of the coliseum with captured breath as Achillia, a gladiator unlike any that Rome has seen before, faces incredible odds – one lone warrior against five of Rome's greatest. Such is the tradition, when a female gladiator enters the fray. When the carnage is complete, the coliseum roars its approval as Achillia stands victorious. Now, only one match away from winning her freedom, she has begun to gain renown. The women of Rome, suppressed by their husbands and fathers, have noticed. The men of Rome, husbands and fathers to a growing horde of women entertaining ideas of independence, have noticed as well.
On the other side of Rome, a strange mystery swirls through the Palatine Hill. In the dead of night, down winding alleys, Rome's elite swear that they see visions of a blood-soaked Apollo walking the city…visions that are driving them mad. Even more are becoming sick with weird fever god-dreams. Panic ensues in the city. The Chief Vestal, Rubria, is arrested by Emperor Nero and threatened with crucifixion unless the deadly curse that's fallen on Rome is lifted. She asks Antonius Axia, hero of Britannia and Rome's only detective, for help. She offers only one clue…the gladiator Achillia.
"We couldn't be prouder of the work that Peter and Juan have done in building the captivating and mysterious world of Britannia," Valiant Editor-in-Chief Warren Simons told io9. "Having the marketplace respond to a new character and a new concept with such enthusiasm has been invigorating and emboldened the entire team to take the next series into even more challenging territory. Antonius Axia is a vital and important new addition to the Valiant line, and his next adventure will be an investigation into an unthinkable mystery plaguing the dark heart of Rome, its gods, and its citizens."
On April 26th, the gods stalk the world of men when the smash-hit, repeatedly sold-out series that pushed the boundaries of the Valiant Universe farther than ever before returns with a must-read new volume presented in the deluxe VALIANT PRESTIGE format in BRITANNIA: WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE #1 (of 4) – featuring covers by Eisner Award winner Cary Nord (X-O Manowar, Conan), Eisner Award nominee David Mack (Daredevil), rising star Adam Gorham (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Universe), and Eisner Award winner Dave Johnson (100 Bullets)!
For more information, visit Valiant on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram, and ValiantUniverse.com.
For Valiant merchandise and more, visit ValiantStore.com
BRITANNIA: WE WHO ARE ABOUT TO DIE #1 (of 4)
Written by PETER MILLIGAN
Art by JUAN JOSÉ RYP
Cover A by CARY NORD
Cover B by DAVID MACK
Character Design Variant by DAVID MACK
Variant Cover by ADAM GORHAM
Variant Cover by DAVE JOHNSON
Blank Cover Also Available
$3.99 | 32 pgs. | VALIANT PRESTIGE | T+ | On Sale APRIL 26 (FOC – 4/3/17)
All-New Doop #1 Review
by Scott Miller on Apr 10th, 2014 · No Comments on All-New Doop #1 Review
Release Date: April 9th, 2014
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Written By: Peter Milligan
Art By: David Lafuente
All-New Doop #1 is weird. I like the idea of him floating around the background of the X-Men's biggest and most hated story where he, I guess, records them all. I thought he would be trolling Battle of the Atom and Milligan was going to be making fun of it. If he did, it went over my head. I don't really see where this book is headed though.
We follow Doop thru one the mutants' biggest storylines recently focusing mostly on Battle for the Atom as he skulks around in the background as a "marginal character". It feels like that issue of X-Men Legacy where we were introduced to that mutant who everyone completely and totally forgot existed as soon as he was out of sight. Just not as good. That issue was full of detailed emotional exposition and plenty of introspective contemplation while this issue about Doop is just there. Much of Doop's purpose is implied and I don't feel like it's given enough history or details for the reader to determine what exactly he's supposed to be doing. In one instance he's recording a battle. In another he's motivating a healer to fix an injured Cyclops which I'm sure any other X-Man could've done. In another part of the story he's travelling between stories witnessing another argument between the mutants. Then he reaches into himself and…well…that's it. He doesn't pull anything out. It just moves to a new part of the story. Maybe he was pulling his "sleeve" up to look at his watch. I don't know if that was something that went over my head or something that will impact the story later or what. That's my complaint about this 1st Doop issue. I don't know what in the hell is going on. I'm confused but not in a cool, mysterious, mad genius with a master plot, kind of way. I'm just really confused. At the end we find out that he's in love with Kitty Pryde and wants to marry her. At her complaints that they can't even have a conversation much less get married, the little green booger turns himself inside out, literally. And then he speaks English?! At first I thought he was gonna rock the Yoda speech for a second there but no. Anyway, at least he can talk now so maybe his story will make more sense to me. I actually am looking forward to figuring out just what the hell Doop is.
The art fits in this his whacky world. The facial expressions on the X-Men are pricless as they interact with each other and Doop especially. Kitty Prydes surprised looks and astonished facial expressions are hilarious when he makes himself known on the battlefield and when he proposes. If Doop continues to bounce around battles and X-Men skirmishes with little to no purpose, at least the art will look awesome.
Overall this was a strange read and I hope it will be one that fleshes out into more of a storyline instead of Doop randomly doing stuff. And things. I'm interested in the character just because he's weird but I need to see some kind of reason or motivation for his weirdness to stay interested.
Marvel First Look at ALL-NEW DOOP #1
by Sebastian Piccione on Mar 13th, 2014 · 4 Comments on Marvel First Look at ALL-NEW DOOP #1
The Strangest Mutant of All is Back in ALL-NEW DOOP #1!
This April, the weirdest mutant of them all takes center stage in his very own limited series! Today, Marvel is proud to present your first look at ALL-NEW DOOP #1 – from Doop co-creator and legendary X-writer Peter Milligan and blockbuster artist David Lafuente!
Who is Doop? Actually…what is Doop? Living in the margins of the X-Men, Doop's origins have always remained shrouded in mystery as he hovered around with his video camera – freaking out readers and fellow X-Men alike. But his time has finally come! Where did Doop come from? What is he? All your questions will be answered! And this adventure will prove once and for all that Doop is, in fact, the most powerful X-Man! From the pages of the blockbuster X-Men crossover Battle of the Atom comes the story you didn't see! Did you know Doop was an integral part of stopping the evil X-Men from the future? Don't believe us? You will!
Don't miss a new story starring one of the X-Men's strangest that will have you on the edge of your seat. This April, the Doop shall inherit the Earth in ALL-NEW DOOP #1!
ALL-NEW DOOP #1 (FEB140700)
Art by DAVID LAFUENTE
Cover by MIKE ALLRED
Variant Cover by ADI GRANOV (FEB140701)
FOC – 03/17/14, On-Sale – 04/09/14
To find a comic shop near you, visit www.comicshoplocator.com or call 1-888-comicbook.
For comics anytime, anywhere check out comicstore.marvel.com and www.marvel.com/mobile
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company, is one of the world's most prominent character-based entertainment companies, built on a proven library of over 8,000 characters featured in a variety of media over seventy years. Marvel utilizes its character franchises in entertainment, licensing and publishing. For more information visit www.marvel.com


Me-When was Team Hind formed and by whom?
They-Team Hind was formed by Govind singh(indcyberjocker) and Vikash pandey(vikyp) 2 years ago.
Me-What type of skills do all the members have?
They-All members are either hackers,coders,programmers,developers etc.
Me-Which teams or countries are against Indian cyber space and to which team, Team hind is against the most?
They- Countries like Pakistan,Nepal and sometimes China are against indian cyber space and our biggest enemy is PCA.They are against India due to some political reasons.
Me-What did you except from Indian govt. ?
Me-Which hacker teams are working as same as Team hind?
Me-May I have the cyber name of all the members of Team hind?
ANONFIGHTER ! An@n ! cupid ! Cyber_Don ! Cyber_Buddy ! CYBA TIGER ! Cyber_Defacer ! Cyber_Don ! D3AD_SEC ! R4HUL ! SURVIVOUR$ ! TERM!NAT0R ! Hacker_Herok (JAI AAI AXOM ) ! Spakwv root ! Mr. HaX ! Neo Hacker !INDI4N L33T ! Sleeping_lion ! injector devil ! error_404_indi ! ind code ! indcyberjoker ! vikyp ! red_dragon ! cyber w0lf ! z3r0 ! Hacker Ritz ! BROWNSPID@R ! SPIRIT !
I salute Team Hind and all Indian hackers for protecting Indian cyber space..


You can expect a lot from the 2005 Pontiac Grand Prix. This 4 door, 5 passenger sedan provides exceptional value! A 3.8 liter V-6 engine pairs with a sophisticated 4 speed automatic transmission, providing a smooth and predictable driving experience. Top features include front bucket seats, front and rear reading lights, a tachometer, variably intermittent wipers, fully automatic headlights, tilt steering wheel, remote keyless entry, and power windows. Passenger security is always assured thanks to various safety features, such as: dual front impact airbags, traction control, a security system, an emergency communication system, and 4 wheel disc brakes with ABS. This car was designed with safety in mind, allowing you to drive with even greater assurance. We pride ourselves in the quality that we offer on all of our vehicles. Stop by our dealership or give us a call for more information.


Bad weather, breakdowns, running out of fuel, getting stuck are some of the more common reasons why a driver might have to bed down for the night (or perhaps for several nights) until the situation is resolved. A night out does not have to be a life threatening experience.
Here is my go-to fire making method for survival situations and how to use it. My number one choice is a combination of cotton balls infused with petroleum jelly and ignited with a ferro rod.


Crafted in sturdy coated canvas featuring our dreamy Sleeping Rose motif, the Mini Skinny keeps keys, cards and other small essentials stylishly secure.
Detail oriented? This one's for you. This zipper features a luxurious leather pull, giving you satisfaction with every open-close.


IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales Company enjoys a high reputation in bearing industry , the quality of the IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales is self-evident.IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales company as one of the world's leading manufacturers with hundred years history .For the high-quality of IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales, whether a hub assembly of the family car , roller coaster , or aircraft engine , can appear IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales' figure. IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales have two hundred and thirty types, twenty-six thousand different specifications of the tapered roller bearings, which are widely used in many areas. IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales can meet the high demands of machine tools for high speed, precision and hardness requirements with its super precision . IKO RNA4920 bearing hot sales can produce for the difference of ABEC-7 to ABEC-9, and its highest standards of precision recognized by ball bearing industry .
145 000. 329 000. NA4920. RNA4920. NA4920. RNA4920. NA4920. RNA4920. NA4920. RNA4920. NA 4922. 2 120. RNA 4922 1 280. IR11012540. 110. 125. 150 (Approx.) NUMBER. Assembled. INNER RING. Dimensions(mm). Basic dynamic load rating. Basic static load rating. IKO. INA. NTN. TORRINGTON(KOYO).
Japan Iko Rna 4906 Uu Needle Roller Bearings , Find Complete Details about Japan Iko Rna 4906 Uu Needle Roller Bearings,Rna4906,Needle Bearing Rna4909,Iko Rna4909 from Needle Bearing Supplier or Manufacturer-Shanghai Yi'ao Bearing Co., Ltd.


Distance to art'appart im Kempinski Plaza is 9 kilometres, approximately 20 minutes' drive.
Driving directions. From the airport, follow directions to the city centre and Kurfuerstendamm.
Turn into Uhlandstrasse to find the art'appart Kempinski Plaza.
Description Location. The art'appart im Kempinski Plaza is located in Berlin, Germany, 500 metres from the shopping area of Kurfuerstendamm and within five kilometres of the Brandenburg Gate. Zoo station is 500 metres from the hotel, and Berlin Tegel Airport (TXL) is nine kilometres away.
Hotel Features. Comprised of 29 serviced studio apartments and suites, art'appart im Kempinski Plaza is a modern, seven storey property in the centre of Berlin. Coffee and safe deposit boxes are available at the front desk (limited hours) where staff can assist with travel and tourist arrangements. Laundry services can be arranged and garage parking is provided (surcharge). Bicycles can be hired nearby and a network of cycle paths stretches across the city.
A takeaway breakfast of coffee or tea and a selection of pastries is offered each morning (surcharge). Restaurants in the vicinity provide a variety of international and German dining options.
Guestrooms. The art'appart im Kempinski Plaza apartments average 68 square metres in size and have white walls, laminate flooring, and contemporary furniture. All are equipped with cable television, direct dial phones, wireless Internet access (surcharge), and safes. Fitted kitchenettes have modern appliances. Private bathrooms have hair dryers and complimentary toiletries. DVD players and bathrobes are available on request. Housekeeping services are provided every three days.
Expert Tip. The Hi Flyer is the largest helium balloon in the world and rises 150 metres above Brandenburg Gate to give unrivalled views of the city.


Societies are always welcome at Chester Golf Club but it is advisable to book early to guarantee that your desired day is available as free days at the club are soon snapped up.
We have a variety of packages available to suit individual requirements. Please contact the Professional Scott Booth, by email or telephone: 01244 671185 to discuss your Society's requirements.
Buggies and electric trolleys are available on a first come first served basis for hire and our professional will be happy to help you in any way he can. The use of a ride on buggy is restricted to members, visitors and guests having a genuine incapacity to play golf unless aided by the their buggy. Anyone wishing to use their own ride on buggy on the course should apply in writing to the Secretary via secretary@chestergolfclub.co.uk.
Our Michelin trained chef Lance Kennet and his staff are on hand to look after your catering needs before and after your round, so that your day will be as enjoyable as possible.
No matter the group size, we can guarantee that you will have an enjoyable day out.


text:
Non-stick coating thwarts mould and bacteria
Hospitals and the construction and marine industries could reap the benefits of a new type of coating for steel products according to researchers from University of Wollongong (UOW).
The build-up of organisms such as mould, algae and bacteria wreaks havoc on steel products – leading to the need for regular and expensive cleaning and maintenance.
In the marine industry, for example, algal growth can stick to boat and ship hulls, resulting in decreased speed and manoeuvrability as well as increasing fuel consumption.
In hospitals, bacterial contamination of surfaces such as countertops, surgical tools, and medical devices contributes to the spread of potentially deadly hospital-acquired infections.
Currently, the only way to deal with the problem involves coatings that incorporate biocides, which release antimicrobial agents to kill target microorganisms. The problem with this is that many biocides are made with toxic chemicals.
But this could change. Instead of directly targeting microorganisms, the researchers looked at developing a coating that prevented them attaching to a surface in the first place.
They combined silica nanoparticles with chemical compounds which are naturally hydrophilic, or able to bond to water. The nanoparticles are then readily attached to a surface to form a water layer or coating.
"This water layer actually forms a barrier, preventing interactions with proteins, which are often a precursor to organism attachment and subsequent biofouling," PhD student Brianna Knowles said.
"Microorganisms can't displace the bound water and so they're not able to form an attachment to the surface," she said.
"Hydrophilic coatings also don't pose the risk of environmental contamination and don't promote the emergence of biocide or antibiotic-resistant organisms."
In lab tests, the particle coatings showed an 87 per cent reduction in adhesion of microbial spores and a 96 per cent reduction in bacteria (Escherichia coli).
These results indicate the potential for the silica nanoparticles to be further developed as versatile fouling-resistant coatings for widespread coating applications.
"At this stage, it could be coated directly onto an existing surface to provide fouling protection but further work could be devoted to trying to incorporate nanoparticles with hydrophilic chemistries into paints," research supervisor Dr Paul Molino said.
Read more about this innovative research here. Story credit: University of Wollongong newsroom.
Research to develop new and useful technologies is only possible if we support our universities. To keep Australia clever, please sign the petition below.
UQ a step closer to printable prosthetic limbs


Is e dùthaich ann an ear-dheas na h-Eòrpa a tha ann Am Monadh Neagrach neo Montenegro (Sèirbis: Crna Gora, IPA: /'t͡sr̩na: 'ɡɔra). Tha crìochan aige san iar-thuath le Bosna agus Hearsagobhana, san iar le Croàisia, sa deas le Albàinia, san ear le cosobho agus san ear-dheas leis An t-Sèirb. Tha am Monadh Neagrach suidhichte aig a' Mhuir Mheadhanach. Bha am Monadh Neagrach neo-eisimeileach gu 1918. An dèidh sin bha i na pàirt Iùgoslaibhia. Nuair a bhris an Iùgoslabh às a chèile anns na 1990an, bha aonadh ann eadar an t-Sèirb agus am Monadh Neagrach. Ach ann an 2006 chaidh am Monadh Neagrach a stèidheachadh mar stàit leatha fhèin. Tha Podgorica na phrìomh-bhaile na Poblachd.
Air a tharraing à "https://gd.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Am_Monadh_Neagrach&oldid=498009"


Female bulldog born 9/1/16. Not fixed going to be needing her shots soon. She loves cuddles and is great with kids. BUT she's a special case and will be very picky who she goes with. Have had her since 11/16 never had an issue. Recently she's became aggressive with our other dog and has became food aggressive. I have small kids and can not take the risk of them getting hurt from a dog fight. I looked for a foster homes they can't take her due to having other dogs. Contacted shelter and they're a no kill BUT will put down if she's aggressive. I don't want to put her down because she's a great dog, but she can't stay here with this behavior and would love to find her a home that someone can take the time to work with her and a home with NO other animals. If you feel like you would be able to give her this or point me to someone that can please contact me. There IS A re homing fee to ensure she goes to a good home. Thank you.


We are a company which is connected to it's root and moving ahead swiftly, with the experience of elders and the agility of the new generation. We have learned from the experience of three generations, how to provide feasible personalized solutions, to our each and every customer. Because, we understand each and every customers is unique in itself. We are committed to deliver the prime solutions to our customers, and we can say this with confidence, because of our staff dedication, understanding and never give up attitude.
We understand one thing very surely, if we are providing quality service to our clients, then only we are able to hold the top position in the industry. Every solutions which we provide, every action which we take, is to enhance the quality and provide effective results.
Innovation is the key of success and a distinction from the competitors. We have employed our best men, to deliver the most innovative solutions, for handling the rapidly changing demands of the clients.
J. Marriott Jr.Employees are the real force in any organization, which decide the fate of any company, and IRC, is having a workforce which understands it's responsibility towards their work and consistently try to improvise their performance.
To achieve success in any field persistent hard work and having wisdom to put the hard work in right direction are the two basic prerequisite, that's why we invest heavily, in our workforce to upgrade there knowledge, by conducting various workshops on diverse topics related to our industry, which helps them to analyze the market scenarios, and motivates them to produce meaningful results.
IRC aims for ultimate customer satisfaction. It is one of the best specialized Logistics Solutions Provider Company in India. We see ourselves as an experienced logistics Service provider who is able to solve any logistics problem or carry out any task efficiently related to the same. This also shows the dedication of our team. Total customer satisfaction is the result of the inclination towards quality shown consistently in all IRC's services. This performance is distinguished by the common goal of acquiring quality and by the will to constantly grow and improve both qualitatively and quantitatively.
IRC aspires to be number one Transportation and Logistics Service Provider in the market by aligning itself towards the continuously changing scenario of market.
It is IRC's policy to be open and responsible while presenting itself to the public. In this way, not only the technical, but also to a large extent the social competencies of the company are developed.
We believe in improving every moment. Every new challenge, every new achievement motivates us to improve. This attitude of ours, to improve ourselves, helps us in dealing with the competition around us. This hunger of improvement makes us class apart from our competition.
Started in 1963, IRC (India) Limited is India's oldest and the most reputed innovative logistics solutions provider. Approved by the Indian Banks Association (IBA) with Code No. DLI-1662, our portfolio includes Air Freight, Marine Freight, Transportation, Warehousing, 3PL, Global Logistics and more!