text:
Home » Archives » Vital Records » Births F thru O
Alton, Aug. 25, 1843
Betsy-Maria, d. Rev. Eleazer and Sarah, March 18, 1793
Milton, s. Rev. Eleaxer and Sarah, Jan. 13, 1786
Rufus-Prescott, s. Rev. Eleazer and Sarah, June 8, 1791
Sarah, d. Rev. Eleazer and Sarah, July 30, 1787
Betsey-Mariah, d. Abel and Mary-H., June 1, 1833
Francis-Warren, s. Abel and Mary-H., June 30, 1827
Frederick-H., s. Abel and Mary-H., Oct. 29, 1828
George-Abel, s. Abel and Mary-H., May 18, 1828
Louise-Eleanor, d. Abel and Mary-H., Sept. 27, 1835
FAWCETT (FASSET)
Abel, s. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar, March 16, 1804
Abel-William, s. Abel and Abigail, March 11, 1847
Abram-Edwin, s. Jonathon and Asenath. April 3, 1830
Adeline-Frances, d. Dexter-H. and Mary-P., Aug. 30, 1849
Alvan, s. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar, Nov. 28, 1797
Benjamin, s. Jonathon and Sarah, Oct. 8, 1786
Benjamin-Clarke, s. Joseph and Comfort-B. Feb. 16, 1844
Benjamin-Franklin, s. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar
Calla-Chandler, d. Jonathon and Sarah, Feb. 16, 1789
Dexter-Hartwell, s. Benjamin, April 17, 1821
Freeman-Dexter, s. Dexter-H. and Mary, Oct. 1, 1847
George-Elliott, see Cutting, George-Elliott
John, s. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar, May 19, 1796
Jonathon, s. Jonathon and Tamar, July 4, 1801
Joseph, s. Benjamin, Sept. 23, 1822
Lincoln, s. Benjamin, Nov. 9, 1817
Lucinda, d. Jonathon and Tamar, Aug. 27, 1792
Lydia, d. Benjamin, Sept. 4, 1812
Martin, s. Benjamin, March 10, 1824
Mary-Louisa, d. Benjamin, March 10, 1824
Samual-Hartewell, s. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar, Sept. 27, 1794
Sarah-Abby, d. Abel and Abigail, July 12, 1844
Tamar, d. Jonathon Jr. and Tamar, Nov. 22, 1799
Walter-Hartwell, s. Abel and Abigail, June 12, 1843
John-Hastings, s. Adam and Betty, Oct. 27, 1796
Nahum, s. Adam and Betty, Sept. 28, 1794
Aaron, s. Asa and Lucretia, Feb. 3, 1812
Abijah, s. Stephen Jr. and Betty, Aug. 27, 1784
Adeline-Perry, d. Stephen, Aug. 13, 1833
Annah-Maria, d. Marshall and Sally, May 19, 1845
Asa, s. Gershom and Sally, April 14, 1793
Benjamin, s. Benjamin and Persis, Jan. 2, 1794
Benjamin, s. Asa and Lucretia, Jan. 24, 1815
Betty, d. Stephen Jr. and Betty, March 17, 1787
Calvin, s. Solomon and Rebeckah, June 4, 1793
Caroline, d. Jonathon and Mary-P., Sept. 12, 1820
Charles, s. Gershom and Sally, April 15, 1804
Charles-Abijah, s. Montraville and Parney-P., Oct. 13, 1850
Charles-Addison, s. Jonathon and Mary-P., Dec. 13, 1833
Charles-Barton, s. Ward-N. and Mary-Ann, Sept. 24, 1849
Charles-Edwin, s. Marshall and Sally, Dec. 22, 1839
Christopher-Lincoln, s. Levi-L. and Caroline-E., June 23, 1850
Cleora-Maria, d. Joseph and Patty, Aug. 1, 1833
Cynthia, d. Solomon and Rebeckah, Sept. 16, 1795
David, s. Stephen Jr. and Betty, Feb. 17, 1794
Davis, s. Asa and Lucretia, July 5, 1813
Dolly, d. Stephen Jr. and Betty, Oct. 18, 1788
Edward-Whipple, s. Joseph and Patty, June 7, 1822
Ellen-Louisa, d. Marshall and Sally, Dec. 26, 1837
Elinor, d. Levi-L., and Caroline-E., Jan. 3, 1849
Elliott-Jerome, s. Levi and Alothina, Nov. 26, 1838
Emma-Elizabeth, d. Nahum and Hannah-B., Sept. 27, 1842
Eunice-Eugenia, d. Nahum-H. and Eunice-S., Jan. 9, 1846
Eunice-Maroe, d. Levi and Alothina, Jan. 26, 1834
Ezra-Hastings, s. Joseph and Patty, Nov. 1, 1823
George-Elliott, s. Joseph, June 8, 1828
George-Henry, s. Nahum-H. and Eunice-S., Nov. 2, 1848
Harriet-Dodd, d. Stephen, May 22, 1834
Henry-Martin, s. Joseph, Aug. 19, 1830
Hepzibeth, d. Benjamin and Persis, Dec. 13, 1791
Isabella-Perkins, d. Stephen, June 9, 1835
Israel, s. Abijah and Mary, July 13, 1813
James-Edwards, (twin) s. Stephen, Dec. 10, 1825
James-Henry, s. Marshall and Sally, May 22, 1842
Jane-Salome, d. Levi and Alothina, Oct. 31, 1829
Jemima, d. Gershom and Sally, Nov. 30, 1797
Joana, d. Solomon and Rebekah, Jan. 21, 1803
John, s. Stephen Jr. and BettyMay 9, 1790
John-Agustus, (twin) s. Stephen, Dec. 10, 1825
John-Thomas, s. Jonathon and Mary-P., Aug. 6, 1823
Jonathon, s. Gershom and Sally, Aug. 10, 1795
Jonathon-Nelson, s. Nahum and Hannah-B., May 3, 1840
Joseph, s. Benjamin and Persis, Oct. 22, 1789
Joseph, s. Asa and Lucretia, March 6, 1818
Jotham, s. Gershom and Sally, Dec. 1, 1799
Judith, d. Benjamin and Persis, March 13, 1796
Julietta-Naomi, d. Montraville and Parney-P., Sept. 27, 1846
Levi, s. Benjamin and Persis, April 21, 1798
Levi-Lincoln, s. Joseph and Patty, Sept. 20, 1818
Lucretia, d. Benjamin and Persis, Nov. 24, 1787
Lucretia, d. Asa and Lucretia, Aug. 1, 1821
Lucretia-Olivia, d. Stephen and Lucretia, July 7, 1840
Lucy, d. Solomon and Rebeckah, Dec. 23, 1797
Lydia, d. Stephen Jr. and Betty, April 27, 1792
Lysander, s. Stephen, Sept. 4, 1830
Malona-Ann, d. Ward-N. and Mary-Ann, Dec. 16, 1846
Martha-M., d. Otis and Theresa, March 23, 1820
Marshall-Webster, s. Marshall and Sally, Dec.7, 1834
Mary-Ann-Howe, d. Stephen and Lucretia, Oct. 16, 1842
Mary-Margaret, d. July 22, 1831
Mary-Martha, d. Joseph and Patty, March 23, 1820
Mary-Martha, d. Marshall and Sally, Dec. 6, 1831
Montraville, s. Abijah and Mary, Jan. 31, 1810
Montraville, s. Montraville and Parney-P., Jan. 24, 1849
Nahum, s. Abijah and Mary, July 15, 1811
Nahum-Houghton, s. Levi and Alothina, Jan. 9, 1821
Otis, s. Gershom and Sally, Oct. 15, 1802
Patty-Brigham, d. Gershom and Sally, April 24, 1806
Persis, d. Benjamin and Persis, March 5, 1809
Persis, d. Josephn and Patty, Dec. 23, 1816
Polly, d. Stephen Jr. and Betty, Feb. 19, 1783
Rebeckah, d. Solomon and Rebeckah, Aug. 5, 1807
Rebecca-Moore, d. Montraville and Parney-P., Sept. 24, 1845
Sally, d. Stephen Jr. and Betty, Nov. 22, 1798
Sally, d. Benjamin and Persis, Feb. 19, 1803
Samuel, s. Solomon and Rebeckah, Dec. 31, 1789
Sarah-Elizabeth, d. Stephen, May 25, 1827
Sarah-Jane, d. Marshall and Sally, Aug. 16, 1836
Seth, s. Benjamin and Persis, July 15, 1800
Seth-Alden, s. Joseph, Dec. 22, 1825
Solon-Gates, s. Jonathon and Mary-P., May 16, 1829
Sophia-Whitney, d. Otis and Alothina, Sept. 8, 1838
Stephen, s. Stephen Jr. and Betty, March 14, 1796
Sukey, d. Solomon and Rebeckah, July 26, 1791
Ward-Nicholas, s. Levi and Alothina, June 18, 1823
William-Dodd, s. Stephen and Lucretia, March 6, 1829
William-Frederick, s. Abijah and Mary, April 2, 1808
William-Gilbert, s. Jonathon and Mary-P., Aug. 18, 1826
Agustus-Wright, s. Artemus-S. and Sally, Oct.14,1816
George-Fox, s. George and Susan-Winslow, Feb. 4, 1844
John-Manley, s. George and Susan-Winslow, Nov. 24, 1839
Susan-Winslow, d. George and Susan Winslow, Sept. 30, 1846
Abigail-Clark, d. Phoneas and Rachel, June 12, 1822
Ebenezer, s. Phineas and Rachel, Feb. 13, 1828
Rosanna, d. Phineas and Rachel, Nov. 12, 1824
Betsey, d. Jonathon and Sarah, Aug. 17, 1797
Dena, d. Jonathon Jr. and Sarah, Jan. 14, 1789
Eunice, d. Jonathon and Sarah, Sept. 11, 1811
Jarvis-Heard, s. Jonathon and Sarah, Aug. 26, 1809
John-Green, s. Jonathon Jr. and Sarah, June 26, 1801
Jotham, s. John and Eunice, Sept. 21, 1792
Martha-Crawford, d. Jonathon and Sarah, June 26, 1801
Sally, d. Jonathon Jr. and Sarah, May 24, 1791
Azubah, d. Oliver and Lucy, June 6, 1787
Dexter, s. Oliver and Rachel, May 23, 1807
Elvira, d. Oliver and Rachel, March 4, 1804
Ezra, s. Jason and Sarah, Dec. 18, 1800
Hastings, s. Oliver and Rachel, Feb. Aug. 17, 1 1785
Ira, s. Oliver and RacheL, Feb. 21, 1800
Jabez, s. Oliver and Rachel, Sept. 1, 1795
John, s. Oliver and Rachel, June 21, 1791
Jonas, s. Jason and Sarah, March 26, 1794
Jotham, Oliver and Rachel, Nov. 12, 1793
Lucy, d. Jason and Sarah, Dec. 6, 1802
Lydia, d. Oliver and Rachel, Nov. 12, 1797
Lydia, d. Oliver and Rachel, Feb. 14, 1802
Walker, s. Oliver and Rachel, June 16, 1789
GOODELL
Jane-Jennette, d. Robert-B.-T. and Jane-R., Oct. 28, 1847
GOODNOW, GOODENOW
Abel-Moore, s. Abel-M. and Amity, March 2, 1805
Amittai, d. Abel-Moor and Amittai, March 13, 1794
Amy-Lusanna, d. Nathaniel Jr. and Elizabeth-W., born blind, Feb. 7, 1843
Ann-Maria, d. Harrison-D. and Ann, Feb. 29, 1836
Agustus, s. Jonas and Mary Feb. 2, 1789
Agustus, s. Nathaniel and Lucy, May 10, 1816
Dorothy, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, Jan. 1, 1808
Edwin-Francis, s. Harrison-D. and Ann, March 9, 1833
Harriot, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, May 3, 1812
Henry, s. Nathaniel and Lucy, May 3, 1812
Jonas-Edwin, s. Nathaniel and Lucy, Oct. 27, 1827
Joseph, s. Jonas and Mary, April 7, 1795
Lucy, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, Dec. 14, 1805
Lyman, s. Elijah and Eunice, Sept. 26, 1796
Lyman-Harrison, s. Harrison-D. and Ann, March 9, 1828
Nathaniel, s. Nathaniel and Lucy, April 26, 1810
Otis, s. Elijah and Eunice, June 3, 1798
Phebe, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, Feb. 16, 1814
Polly, d. Abel-Moor and Amittai, March 25, 1790
Sally, d. Abel-Moor and Amittai, April 18, 1792
Sally, d. Elijah and Eunice, June 5, 1795
Sarah-Jane, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, May 1, 1819
Susan-Augusta, d. Nathaniel and Lucy, Aug. 30, 1824
Tamer, d. Jonas and Mary, April 18, 1787
William-Dexter, s. Harrison-D. and Ann, May 18, 1830
John-Fuller, s. Levi and Marsilva, June 18, 1846
Asael, s. Daniel and Nabby, Oct. 15, 1793
Betsey, d. Daniel and Nabby, July 19, 1783
Emery, s. Daniel and Nabby, Aug. 13, 1788
Maria, d. Daniel and Nabby, Jan. 28, 1798
Polly, d. Daniel and Nabby, Aug. 13, 1785
Reed, s. Daniel and Nabby, April 23, 1791
Reed, s. Daniel and Nabby, Sept. 22, 1795
Sidney, s. Daniel and Nabby, Sept. 23, 1800
Sidney, s. Daniel and Nabby, Oct. 8, 1804
HARTHAN
Antipas-Smith, s. David and Prudence, Oct. 2, 1788
Dennis, s. David and Prudence, Nov. 17, 1796
Lois, d. David and Prudence, Nov. 19, 1793
Silas, d. David and Prudence, Nov. 28, 1791
Ward-Boylston, s. David and Prudence, July 28, 1804
William, s. John and Ellen-B., July 12, 1850
Asa, s. Lewis and Eunice, Aug. 21, 1790
Benjamin-Houghton, s. Sylvester and Eunice, July 3, 1830
Charles-Leddra, s. Charles-M. and Rebkah-S., Sept. 15, 1830
Dolly-Adams, d. Sylvester and Eunice, April 29, 1826
Edward-Payson, s. Charles-M. and Rebekah-S., Oct. 8, 1833
Eunice Augusta, d. Sylvester and Eunice, Oct. 24, 1828
Eunice-Stiles, d. Daniel and Tamer, Aug. 17, 1823
Harriet-Sanford, d. Sylvester and Eunice, July 19, 1835
Martha-Harrington, d. Charles-M. and Rebekah-S., Sept. 25, 1835
Mary-Houghton, d. Sylvester an Eunice, June 7, 1839
Nancy-Elizabeth, d. Sylv3ster and Eunice, July 22, 1827
Prudence-Ellen, d. Sylvester and Eunice, March 19, 1832
Rebeckah-Morse, d. Sylvester and EuniceAug. 18, 1822
Rebekah-Sophia, d. Charles-M. and Rebekah-S., March 16, 1839
Sally-Naomi, d. Sylvester and Eunice, Oct. 3, 1833
Sarah, d. Ebenezer and Betty, Feb. 16, 1811
Stephen-Henry, d. Daniel and Tamer, Dec. 14, 1825
Aaron, s. David Jr. and Elizabeth, April 25, 1793
Abigail-F., d. Jonathan and Polly, Nov. 5, 1807
Albert-Smith, s. Levi-M. and Mary-F., March 29, 1840
Almira-Elizabeth, (twin) d. James and Eliza, June 22, 1836
Alothina, d. Thomas and ElizabethFeb. 14, 1808
Alvira-Eliza, d. (twin) d. James and Eliza, June 22, 1836
Betsy, d. David Sr. and Elizabeth, Feb. 23, 1801
Betsey d. Nathaniel and Betsey, April 8, 1833
Betsey-Howe, d. Reuben and Hannah, Jan. 23, 1813
Catherine-W., d. Thomas and Elixzabeth, Jan. 26, 1804
Charles, s. Thomas and Elizabeth, Oct. 7, 1822
David-Beaman, s. David-W. and Elizabeth, Dec. 19, 1845
David-Williams, David and Elizabeth, July 31, 1806
Dinah, d. Benjamin and Sarah, June 3, 1802
Dolly, d. Eliakim and Patience, May 25, 1786
Dolly, d. Nathaniel and Betsey, Jan. 14, 1805
Eli. s. Nathaniel and Betsey, April 30, 1831
Eli-Lamson, s. Levi-M. and Mary-F., Feb. 7, 1830
Eliakim, s. Eliakim and Patience, Jan. 14, 1805
Eliakin, s. Eliakim and Patience, Nov. 30, 1807
Eliza-A., d. Timothy anf Mary, Oct. 17, 1831
Elizabeth-D., d. Thomas and Elizabeth, June 26, 1811
Elnathan, s. Nathan and Mary, Feb. 17, 1798
Emily-Kendall, d. James and Eliza, Nov. 8, 1827
Esther, d. Thomas and Elizabeth, Jan. 1, 1800
George-Washington, s. Silas Jr. and Polly, Dec. 28, 1800
Harriot, d. Reuben and Hannah-H., March 28, 1817
Henry-Calvin, s. Jonathon and Polly, Dec. 6, 1819
Henry-Washington, s. Levi-M. and Mary-F., Dec. 17, 1828
Hezekiah-Hooper, s. Eliakim and Patience, April 11, 1797
Hollis, s. John Jr. and Sally, June 24, 1797
James, s. David Jr. and Elizabeth, Feb. 28, 1794
John, s. John Jr. and Sally, June 6, 1795
John-Calvin, s. John and Clarimond, Aug. 15, 1819
John-Eager, s. David Jr. and Elizabeth, April 1, 1799
John-Eager, s. David-W. and Elizabeth, Jan. 22, 1843
John-Thomas, s. Thomas and Elizabeth, Sept. 1, 1827
Jonathon-, s. John and Clarimond, June 6, 1818
Joseph, s. Eliakim and Patience, Aug. 16, 1792
Jotham, s. Eliakim and Patience, July 8, 1788
Jotham, s. Thomas and Elizabeth, Dec. 12, 1801
Jotham, s. Jotham and Lucy, May 17, 1822
Levi-Moore, s. Eliakim and Patience, April 25, 1802
Lois, d. Eliakim and Patience, Dec. 3, 1794
Loring, s. Jotham and Lucy, Oct. 26, 1814
Louisa, d. Thomas and Elizabeth, Jan. 23, 1806
Lucy, d. Nathaniel and Betsy, Aug. 5, 1822
Lucy-Ann, d. Jotham and Lucy, Jan. 30, 1825
Luke, s. Eliakim and Patience, Oct. 21, 1799
Lyman, s. Nathan and Mary, Feb. 18, 1803
Martha-Ann, d. Henry-C. and Lucy, May 21, 1848
Martin-Luther, s. John and Clarimond, Sept. 25, 1821
Mary, d. Nathan and Olive, May 10, 1806
Mary-F., d. Jonathan and Polly, May 8, 1809
Mary-Jane, d. Timothy and Mary, Dec. 6, 1829
Mary-Martha, d. Silas and Polly, Feb. 21, 1808
Mary-Moore, d. John and Clarimond, April 19, 1823
Mary-Sophia, d. Levi-M. and Mary-F., March 20, 1831
Nancy, d. Thomas and Elizabeth, Nov. 17, 1817
Pamelia-Whitman, d. Levi-M. and Mary-F., Aug. 24, 1827
Patty, d. Thomas and Elizabeth, Jan. 6, 1814
Persis-M., d. Timothy and Mary, March 31, 1834
Rebeckah, d. James and Eliza, Nov. 29, 1829
Sarah, d. Benjamin and Sarah, April 30, 1804
Sarah, d. David-W. and Elizabeth, Jan. 31, 1841
Sarah-Washburn, d. James and Eliza, Aug. 30, 1833
Seth-William, s. Jotham and Lucy, April 1, 1812
Seth-William, s. Jotham and Lucy, May 6, 1818
Silas, s. Thomas and Elizabeth, Sept. 23, 1820
Sophia-Ann, d. Jonathan and Polly, Aug. 25, 1813
Tamer, d. Eliakim and Patience, June 10, 1790
Tamar-Sophia, d. Nathaniel and Betsey, Nov. 7, 1838
Timothy-Fay. s. Timothy and Mary, July 23, 1836
Washington, s. Eliakim and Patience, Feb. 18, 1810
------------, child John Jr. and Sally, April 7, 1794
Ardelia, d. Benjamin and Polly-H., April 14, 1833
Benjamin-Franklin, s. Benjamin and Polly-H., Dec. 1, 1842
Martha-Ann, d. Benjamin and Polly-H., Jan. 6, 1845
Mary-Jane, d. Benjamin and Polly-H., March 4, 1835
Victoria, d. Benjamin and Polly-H., Jan. 10, 1841
William, s. Benjamin and Polly-H., Jan. 6, 1839
---------, s. Benjamin and Polly-H., March 24, 1846
HEMENWAY
Cynthia, d. Luther and Finis, Aug. 6, 1813
Finis, d. Luther and Finis, Feb. 24, 1816
Julia, d. Luther and Finis, Aug. 22, 1806
Lucy, d. Luther and Finis, Oct. 15, 1808
Luke, s. Luther and Finis, Dec. 12, 1803
Luther, s. Luther and Finis. March 10, 1811
HENESEY, HENISEY
Abraham, s. Henry and Mary, Nov. 10, 1848 (colored)
Isaac, s. Henry and Mary, Nov. 25, 1850
Daniel, s. William and Persis, Sept. 3, 1789
Persis, d. William and Persis, March 8, 1791
Sally, d. William and Persis, Dec. 2, 1787. At Marlborough.
Willie-Wallace, s. John-B. and Mary-R., June 5, 1850
HILDRETH
Adeline, d. Timothy and Hannah, Sept. 25, 1800
Abraham s. Benjamin and Tabitha, Aug. 23, 1778
Amanda, d. Joseph and Rebeckah, Sept. 10, 1801
Elisha, s. Benjamin and Tabitha, Feb. 7, 1784
Ephraim, s. Benjamin and Tabitha, Nov. 7, 1780
Homer, s. Joseph and Rebeckah, Dec. 8, 1798
Abba-Elizabeth, d. Levi and Rebecca, Oct. 6, 1846
Edwin-Levi, s. Levi and Rebecca, June 26, 1848
George-William, s. William-Penn and Lois, June 21, 1846
Isaac-Bassett, s. William-P. and Lois-W., July 19, 1843
Nathaniel, s. James and Abigail, Sept. 23, 1793
_______, (twins) s. & d. James and Abigail, Aug 15, 1792
Anna, d. Jonas and Anna, Nov. 29, 1805
Eunice, d. Abel and Eunice, Oct. 21, 1782
Henry-Keyes, s. Abel and Eunice, July 2, 1788
Jarvis, s. Abel Jr. and Sally, Oct. 2, 1800
Joab-Smith, s. Jonas and Ann, Oct. 25, 1807
Lucy, d. Abel Jr. and Sally, May 30, 1799
Russell, d. Jonas and Anna, Aug. 19, 1804
Tyler, s. Abel and Eunice, Sept. 2, 1790
Charles-Jerome, s. Charles and Polly, Sept. 14, 1843
Dolly-Avis, d. Charles and Polly-S., July 29, 1850
Mary-Frances, d. Charles and Polly-S., Dec. 17, 1846
Benjamin, s. Benjamin and Eunice, Nov. 11, 1804
Charles-White, s. Benjamin and Lucy-Ann, Feb. 9, 1843
Cynthia, d. Benjamin and Eunice, Oct. 18, 1792
Dolly, d. Benjamin and Eunice, Oct. April 19, 1803
Elizabeth, d. Benjamin Jr. April 1, 1835
Elizabeth-Brigham, d. Benjamin and Lucy-Ann, March 12, 1839
Eunice, d. Benjamin and Eunice, July 1, 1801
George-Francis, s. Benjamin and Lucy-Ann, Oct. 14, 1837
Henry-Winslow, s. Benjamin Jr., July, 13, 1833
Jonah, s. Cyrus and Mary, April 26, 1792
Mary, d. Benjamin and Eunice, April 12, 1810
Nahum, s. Benjamin and Eunice, Nov. 11, 1806
Parley, s. Benjamin and Eunice, March 8, 1789
Parley, s. Benjamin and Eunice, Jan. 28, 1798
Parney, d. Benjamin and Eunice, July 4, 1808
Parney-Parker, d. Benjamin and Eunice, Dec. 7, 1811
Prudence, d. Benjamin and Eunice, Oct. 17, 1799
Rebeckah-Whitcomb, d. Benjamin and Eunice, Dec. 9, 1813
Sally, d. Benjamin and Eunice, June 15, 1794
Solomon, s. Benjamin and Eunice, Nov. 7, 1790
Thina, or Alothina, d. Benjamin and Eunice, April 18, 1796
HOWE, HOW
Abel, s. Levi and Molly, July 5, 1791
Abigail, d. John and Sybil, May 17, 1801
Abigail-Williams, d. John and Polley, Aug. 22, 1808
Barny, s. Hiram and Olive, March 16, 1800
Charles-Dudley, s. Parker and Isabella, March 2, 1825
Dolly, d. John and Sybil, July 18, 1807
Elizabeth-Stearns, d. John and Mary-S., Feb. 27, 1848
John, s. John 2d and Sybil, Feb. 18, 1812
John, s. John and Isabel, July 10, 1814
John-William, s. John and Mary-S., July 8, 1845
Jotham, s. Levi and Molly, Nov. 22, 1797
Lambert-Lamson, s. Micah, July 7, 1832
Levi, s. Levi and Polly, June 27, 1789
Lucinda, d. John 2d and Sybil, May 19, 1809
Lucy, d. John and Polley, Oct. 13, 1796
Lucy-Moore, d. Micah, Jan. 25, 1824
Lydia-Lucinda, d. Micah, March 2, 1827
Mary-Agnes, d. Nathaniel-L. and Mary-A., Jan. 15, 1849
Mary-Frances, d. John Jr. and Mary-S., Nov. 13, 1843
Mary-Moore, d. John 2d and Sibbel, June 23, 1805
Mary-Moore, d. Micah, May 10, 1829
Micah, s. Levi and Molly, Aug. 4, 1787
Micah, s. Levi and Molly, May 26, 1800
Nathan-Green, s. John and Polly, Aug. 22, 1808
Nathaniel-Lamson, s. Jotham and Mira, May 17, 1821
Olive-Moore, d. John and Sibyl, March 10, 1819
Otis, s. Silas Jr. and Submit, Aug. 7, 1791
Parker, s. John and Polly, March 21, 1802
Parna, d. Silas Jr. and Submit, Oct. 22, 1788
Persis-Anna, d. William-J. and Persis-B., Jan. 5, 1850
Phinehas, s. John 2d and Sybil, Dec. 1, 1802
Polly, d. Hiram and Olive, Nov. 20, 1801
Rebeckah, d. John and Polly, Sept. 17, 1811
Salley, d. John and Polly, July 30, 1805
Silas, s. John 2d and Sybil, Jan. 19, 1811
Silas-Beaman, s. John and Sybel, Nov. 18, 1815
Sophia, d. Simon and Sophia, Feb. 6, 1788
Tamer, d. John 2d and Sybil, May 6, 1799
Thina, d. Levi and Molly, Aug. 11, 1795
Zilpher, d. John and Polly, Feb. 15, 1799
Betsey, d. David, Sept. 5, 1815
Charles, s. David, March 17, 1822
Jonas, s. David, April 29, 1810
Lucinda, d. David, Sept. 15, 1808
Lucy-D., d. David, March 3, 1820
Mary, d. s. David, July 20, 1812
Nancy, d. David, Oct. 12, 1824
Ward, s. David, Feb. 4, 1827
Charles-Sheldon, s. Joshua and Patty, Aug. 19, 1809
Charles-William, s. Charles-S. and Mary-W., Oct. 28, 1832
Elizabeth-Temple, d. David and Molly, March 19, 1814
Everett, s. Oliver-S. and Minday-B., July 17, 1845
Horace, s. David and Polly-Willington, Jan. 27, 1821
Horace, s. David and Polly, Aug. 28, 1827
Horace-Hastings, s. Joshua and Patty, Sept. 17, 1811
John, s. David and Polly, Nov. 6, 1829
Joshua, s. David and Polly, March 6, 1816. Name altered by General Court to Sanford-Mason.
Lyman, s. David and Polly, Feb. 9, 1832
Mary, d. David and Polly, July 9, 1825
Mary-Jane, d. Charles-S. and Mary-W., April 22, 1834
Nathaniel-Lamson, s. Oliver-S. and Mindwell-B., June 27, 1841
Olive, d. David and Polly, May 4, 1836
Oliver-Sawyer, s. Joshua and Patty, April 30, 1808
Oliver-Sawyer, s. Oliver-S. and Mindwell-B., July, 30, 1848
Persis, d. Samuel and Abigail, April, 13, 1816
Robert-Newell, s. Charles-S. and Mary-W., Sept. 8, 1836
Sanford Mason, see Joshua
Amasa, s. Amasa and Dorothy, Nov. 3, 1802
Annice, d. Benjamin and Annice, Oct. 17, 1801
Artemas, s. Benjamin and Annis, July 15, 1794
Benjamin-Franklin, s. Thomas Jr. and Lydia, April 15, 1793
Betsey, d. Thomas Jr. and Lydia, Nov. 17, 1796
Dorothy-Goodnowe, d. Amasa and Dorothy, Oct. 4, 1804
Harriet, d. Amasa and Dorothy, Mach 30, 1801
Henry, d. Reuben and Olive, Dec. 15, 1794
Hezekiah, s. Benjamin Jr. and Annis, July 21, 1796
Levi, s. Amasa and Dorothy, Nov. 17, 1796
Mary-Temple, d. Thomas Jr. and Lydia, Jan 13, 1795
Olive-Beaman, d. Benjamin Jr. and Annis, March 14, 1799
Persis, d. Francis and Thankful, April 6, 1806
Rufus, d.? Benjamin and Annis, Aug. 15, 1804
Sally, d. Thomas Jr. and Lydia, March 2, 1799
Sarah-Lane, d. Amasa and Sally, June 20, 1812
Thomas, s. Thomas Jr. and Lydia, April 20, 1802
Zenas, s. Reuben and Olive, Feb. 10, 1792
James-Francis, s. James and Susan, Feb. 12, 1850
Mary-Hannah, d. James and Susan, July 5, 1846
Thomas-Patrick, s. James and Susan, Dec. 14, 1844
-----------, d. John and Esther, June 29, 1850
Eunice, d. Seth and Relief, April 7, 1806
Hannah-Sophia, d. Josiah and Esther, Jan. 29, 1828
Josiah, s. Josiah and Esther, Nov. 14, 1818
Mary-K. d. Josiah and Esther, July 6, 1816
Sophia-W. d. Josiah and Esther, July 11, 1820
Thomas-Woodbury, s. Josiah and Esther, Sept. 4, 1817
Ward, s. Josiah and Esther, June 29, 1824
George-Washington, s. John and Eliza, Nov. 23, 1844
Abigail-Moore, d. Nathaniel Jr. and Tamer, March, 25, 1814
Eli-Brigham, s. Nathaniel Jr. and Tamer, Feb. 3, 1802
Elizabeth-Miller, d. Nathaniel Jr. and Tamer, April 7, 1805
Ellen-Eliza, d. Eli-B. and Diadamia-P., May 2, 1839
Henry-Harrison, s. Eli-B. and Diadamia-P., June 19, 1841
Lambert, s. Nathaniel Jr. and Tamer, June 19, 1803
Mary-Sophia-Bond, d. Lambert and Sophia-S., Dec. 4, 1840
Minda-Brigham, d. Nathaniel and Tamer, Nov. 14, 1811
Sarah-Holland, d. Eli-B. and Diadamia, June 10, 1843
LEACH
Celia-Marie, d. Flavel and Elizabeth-C. April 29, 1847
Alfred-Eaton, s. James and Almira, March 12, 1845
James-Henry, s. James and Almira, Dec. 17, 1842
William-Lewis, s. James and Almira, Jan. 16, 1849
LONGLEY
Asahel-Parker, s. Parker and Lydia, Nov. 11, 1840
Betsey, d. James and Molly, May 22, 1799
Charles-Israel, s. Parker and Lydia, April 12, 1837
Edwin, s. Parker and Lydia, Oct. 3, 1833
Edwin-Franklin, s. Parker and Lydia, Aug. 29, 1834
Granville-Augustus, s. Otis and Lydia, Dec. 20, 1837
Henry-Gustavus, s. Otis and Lydia, Oct. 18, 1841
Ira, born at Waterford, Dist. of Maine, Dec. 8, 1798
Israel, s. James and Molly, Nov. 21, 1792
Israel, s. James and Molly, Nov. 8, 1795
James, s. James and Molly, June 22, 1791
James, s. James and Molly, Sept. 3, 1794
James-Otis, s. Otis and Lydia, Sept. 11, 1830
Jane-Cynthia, s. Otis and Lydia, Feb. 24, 1833
John-Benjamin, s. Otis and Lydia, May 4, 1835
Jonas, s. James and Molly, Nov. 11, 1787
Jonathon, s. James and Molly, June 21, 1789
Joseph-Lyon, s. Otis and Lydia, March 9, 1828
Molly, d. James and Molly, Feb. 18, 1786
Otis, s. James and Molly, Dec. 8, 1784
Parker, s. James and Molly, Nov. 22, 1800
Caroline-Courtland, d. Elmer and Mary-Martha, July 6, 1829
George-Elmer, s. Elmer and Mary-Martha, March 26, 1832
Harriet-Sophia, d. Elmer and Mary-Martha, Dec. 24, 1837
John-William, s. Elmer and Mary-Martha, Jan. 11, 1831
Mary-Hastings, d. Elmer and Mary-Martha, Aug. 11, 1827
Sarah-Elizabeth, d. Elmer and Mary-Martrha, July 11, 1835
Silas-Hastings, s. Elmer and Mary-Martha, Sept. 18, 1833
-----------, child Samuel and Persis, Aug. 26, 1843
Calvin, s. James-F., and Dolly, Nov. 20, 1846
Daniel-Hartshorn, s. George and Nancy, June 11, 1831
Daniel-Hartshorn, s. George and Nancy, Oct. 9, 1834
Eunice-Stiles, d. George and Lucy, Aug. 20, 1824
George-Henry, s. George and Nancy, Dec. 5, 1828
Charles-Emory, s. Frederick and Martha, May 9, 1844
Abigail, d. Pitt and Esther, Sept. 8, 1826
Abby-Celia, d. William-H. and Abigail-L., Jan. 20, 1847
Almira, d. Joel and Susanah, Oct. 8, 1806
Almira, d. Phinehas and Hannah, Nov. 3, 1819
Asher, S. Pitt and Abigail, Nov. 21, 1815
Chandler-Carter, s. David and Dolly, Jan. 22, 1811
Charles-Follen, s. William-H. and Abigail-M., July 8, 1840
Charles-Walter, s. David-T. and Sally, Oct. 5, 1847
Clara-Sophia, d. William-H. and Clara, June 12, 1820
David-Fitton, s. David and Fanny, Aug. 14, 1804
David-T., s. David and Fanny, Aug. 14, 1806
Dolly, d. Hugh and Sarah, March 17, 1777
Edward, s. Pitt and Esther, Jan. 28, 1823
Eliakim-Hastings, s. David and Dolly, June 19, 1812
Elizabeth-Lamson, d. William-H. and Abigail-M., Dec. 5, 1835
Elizabeth-Upton, d. David and Dolly, Jan. 28, 1816
Elliot, s. Pitt and Abigail, pril 25, 1819
Fanny, d. David and DollySept. 4, 1809
George-Harris, s. David-T. and Sally, July 29, 1838
Harriet-Fanny, d. David-T. and Sally, Jan. 11, 1850
Holland, s. Hugh and Sarah, July 5, 1785
Hugh, s. Hugh and Sarah, Dec. 12, 1791
Joseph, s. David and Dolly, Feb. 8, 1814
Lucy, d. Hugh and Sarah, Jan. 21, 1779
Lucy, d. Abijah and Molly, June 25, 1795
Lucy-Ann, d. David-T. and Sally, Jan. 7, 1843
Mary-Pearson, d. William-H. and Clara, May 2, 1833
Olive, d. Hugh and Sarah, April 22, 1781
Olive-Kendall, d. David-T. and Sally, Feb. 20, 1841
Oliver, s. Abijah and Molly, Nov. 10, 1790
Polly, d. Hugh and Sarah, Nov. 4, 1789
Rebeckah, d. Abijah and Molly, Dec. 29, 1792
Sally, d. Abijah and Molly, April 12, 1789
Sarah, d. Hugh and Sarah, Sept. 19, 1775
Sarah-Holland, d. William-H. and Clara, July 1, 1830
Sophia, d. Hugh and Sarah, June 21, 1783
William-Alfred, s. David-T. and Sally,. Jan. 30, 1834
William-Lorenzo, s. William-H. and Clara, Feb. 25, 1823
Benjamin, s. Joseph and Sophia, May 16, 1782
Bernice, s.? Joseph and Sophia, Feb. 22, 1793
Harvey, s. Joseph and Sophia, Dec. 23, 1800
John-Green, s. Joseph and Sophia, April 23, 1789
Joseph, s. Joseph and Sophia, Sept. 30, 1780
Silvanus, s. Joseph and Sophia, Aug. 8, 1791
Silvanus, s. Joseph and Sophia, Jan. 30, 1798
Sophia-Bigelow, s. Joseph and Sophia, Sept. 12, 1796
Artimas, s. Artimas and Keziah, Sept. Sept. 5. 1807
David-Clark, s. Artimas and Keziah, Dec. 21, 1805
Eveline, d. Artimas and Keziah, March 5, 1804
Mira, d. Artimas and Keziah, Jan. 30, 1803
Eliza-Ann, d. Austin-F. and Betsey, April 18, 1830
Eliza-Mariah, d. Austin-F. and Hannah, May 12, 1834
John-William, s. Austin-F. and Hannah, Oct. 9, 1840
Anna-Eliza, d. Aaron and Angeline, April 18, 1834
Henry-Eliab, s. Aaron and Angeline, Sept. 25, 1832
O'CONNELL
Mary-Ann, April 1, 1850
OSGOOD
Clarissa, d. Abel Jr. and Eunice, Jan. 3, 1805
Ephraim-Holland, s. Abel Jr. and Eunice, June 1, 1799
Eunice, d. Abel Jr. and Eunice, May 22, 1797
Eunice, d. Abel Jr. and Eunice, Dec. 3, 1806
Harriet, d, Abel Jr. and Eunice, June 10, 1801
Transcribed by Fred Brown


Six month after being picked by President Donald J. Trump to serve as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim officially reported to work today. This morning, Delrahim was sworn in as antitrust chief. Andrew C. Finch, who had served as the Acting Assistant Attorney General for antitrust, will remain at the agency as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General.
The Senate confirmed Delrahim on September 27 by a vote of 73-21. Senate confirmation was delayed despite bipartisan support from Senate Judiciary Committee members for the pick. In June, Delrahim's nomination was reported out of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 19 to 1. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) was the lone no vote.
At the same time Delrahim won the Judiciary Committee's support, Noel J. Francisco—Trump's nominee for U.S. Solicitor General—also passed the committee, but along party lines. Ultimately, Francisco beat Delrahim to the Justice Department. Francisco was sworn in as the 48th U.S. Solicitor General on September 19.
Delrahim is returning to the Antitrust Division after working in private practice. He served in the Antitrust Division from 2003 to 2005 as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General, overseeing the Appellate, Foreign Commerce, and Legal Policy sections.


text:
An Exchange on Nuclear War
John Marshall Lee, Alexander M. Mood, and Mark Kuchment, reply by George W. Ball
In response to:
The Cosmic Bluff from the July 21, 1983 issue
To the Editors:
George Ball's "The Cosmic Bluff" [NYR, July 21] is first-rate. Its these should be drummed into all of those, in this country and abroad, who have not yet understood that their future is made tenuous by the US and NATO strategy that Field Marshall Lord Carver accurately calls "either a bluff or a suicide pact."
Ball's piece does, however, share one unfortunate feature with the recent Scowcroft committee report. The latter made an irresistible case for abolishing the M-X program, and then recommended going ahead with it. Ball makes an equally powerful case for a US No-First-Use declaration, and then, in his last paragraph, opposes it. (He opposes it at least "until an adequate conventional defense is firmly in place." Since alliance, administration, and military authorities never consider defenses "adequate" nor "firmly in place," the quoted clause is in fact an exact synonym for "until hell freezes over.")
Consider some of Ball's points:
"It will be hard to induce Europeans to free themselves of the nuclear mystique…."
"We should…soberly rethink the strategic plans of the Western alliance and take the hard measures necessary to create an effective conventional strategy."
"…we should resolutely undertake to build a deterrent that can survive a test of wills…."
"The incremental economic burden required to raise NATO's strength is…quite manageable."
"…I recognize that any alliance is inherently hard to galvanize into effective common action…."
"To generate that requisite political will requires facing reality, which will not be easy."
"…they [the Europeans] have become habituated over three decades to relying blindly on our nuclear shield; and such hardened habits of thought cannot be easily altered."
In brief, Ball accurately shows that we face a monumental task. We must change fundamental thought patterns that have driven for a generation and are today driving our strategic concepts, military plans, indoctrination, organization, and programs. We must undertake the manageable but substantial measures that must necessarily follow from the changed concepts: stiffening some elements of the conventional forces; tailoring the nuclear forces to the sole mission of retaliation against nuclear attack; reeducating, retraining, to some degree reorganizing the forces. Ball refers only to effecting these reforms in Europe. In fact, revolutionizing strategic thought and effecting necessary program changes will be as necessary and as difficult in the US.
To carry out such a massive reform demands powerful political will: widespread official and public support continuing over a period of years. The political will cannot be generated and maintained without a clearly stated objective, and pursuing that objective must produce diplomatic and bureaucratic leverage powerful enough to drive the program, generate the support, and give direction and coherence to the hundreds of necessary contributing actions. That objective would be expressed and that leverage applied by a US declaration that this country will not be the first to use nuclear weapons in any future hostilities, the No-First-Use declaration. Even the prospect of such a declaration, in the relatively short term, after discussions with allies and initiating necessary military steps, would make the conceptual and program changes Ball advocates inevitable.
Ball's discussion does not bring out all aspects of the case for No-First-Use; there are other persuasive arguments. His points are enough in themselves, however, to undercut his last paragraph's dismissal of a No-First-Use declaration. When you reprint the article for the widest possible distribution, here and abroad, an urgent public service that would do you credit, leave out the last paragraph.
Vice Admiral John Marshall Lee
I have long been a George Ball fan and regarded his views to be among the sanest coming out of Washington but I believe he has gone astray in calling our nuclear threat a bluff. We are in bad shape if it is a bluff but I am rather certain it is not.
There is a well-defined line in Europe separating Soviet and Western spheres of influence. If a Soviet military force should cross that line it would be demolished immediately by tactical nuclear weapons. There the matter would, in all likelihood, end. Neither adversary would have the slightest interest in escalating the affair. Of course it will never happen. To embark on rash adventurism of such grave proportions is probably unthinkable in Moscow. The Soviets are defensively minded, not offensively minded. Throughout history Russia has been ravished by invaders so naturally the Soviets are being extremely diligent about defense, about maintaining a huge military establishment, about consolidating a buffer zone of puppet states on its borders.
Later I will argue that the idea of a Soviet attack on the West is really pure fantasy but for the moment let us indulge in fantasy. Suppose a leader of great imagination and daring has worked his way to the top of the deadliest, most ritualistic bureaucracy in the world; of course the supposition is ridiculous but this is fantasy. Our hero decides to check out George Ball's theory. First he must convince a number of powerful people (who have moved up through the same bureaucracy) that this is a good idea. Can you imagine him pulling that off? But let us press on. He has persuaded them that it is not really a very risky project. "The West has no interest in a holocaust," he argues. "It may demolish our expeditionary force or it may not. If not, we expand our buffer zone and demonstrate the weakness of decadent capitalism. If it does, we have lost a small fraction of our military force. That would not be a great loss and the possible gain is quite large."
The so-called bluff would be tested in some such limited context as that; it would not be tested in an end-of-the-world scenario. Who would risk all to check out the possibility that a threat might be a bluff? Since the test of the threat would have limited consequences, making good on the threat would have limited consequences.
Mr. Ball worries that if a US president used tactical nuclear weapons on a marauding Soviet force we would all suffer a devastating sense of guilt for again unleashing the nuclear monster. He need not worry. The impending Soviet attack would not go unnoticed. In fact, it would generate a state of great tension and partial mobilization. The president would make clear that crossing the line would be an act of war. When, in the midst of this tension, the Soviets did cross the line the shock here would be of the order of that following the attack on Pearl Harbor. We would be outraged at such blatant aggression and would cheer mightily when the Soviet legions were promptly blasted off the map. Any loose guilt lying around would fit very nicely on the Soviets for disturbing the peace. Some may point out that we did not get very excited when Soviet forces moved into Hungary and Czechoslovakia; Mr. Ball would not do that because he knows where the line is. If the Soviets had moved into Poland last year we would have done nothing again; Poland is on the Soviet side of the line.
Now let us turn from fantasy to fact. The Soviet Union has it made as a world power despite being well behind the West in technology, despite having a terribly unproductive economy which is doomed to stay that way until it sees the light and provides its citizens with incentives to work, despite having an antiquated agricultural system that ties up half of the labor force and still fails to feed the nation. Soviet leaders are fully aware of the nation's backwardness; that has been the millstone around Russia's neck since the time of Peter the Great. Because of that handicap the Soviets have been haunted by the specter of the nuclear threat and have devoted an inordinate proportion of their resources to trying to match that threat. They have done pretty well but at enormous expense to their society.
They cannot be content though. They continue to be haunted because modern warfare is highly technological. It rests not only on nuclear weapons but on elaborate electronic systems which are vulnerable to electronic countermeasures. In this field the Soviets are no match for the West. Modern warfare cannot get along without great computers; the Soviets are five or six years behind the West in that field. Hence the Soviets must take refuge in the blunderbuss of great missiles carrying great bombs and hope that will ward off any Western thoughts of conquest. Poor old Russia cannot have any dreams of conquest; despite armies of spies it can never be certain what sort of electronic deviltry it will encounter in combat. Will the Soviet weapons be paralyzed? When one cannot calculate the risks one cannot attack.
There is a good deal of fighting going on here and there around the world but none of it is modern warfare. If the West and the Soviets got into combat we would see modern warfare which uses small rapidly moving forces that deliver a big punch with great accuracy. The big punches might be large conventional bombs but more often small nuclear bombs. The West has that sort of military force. The Soviets have a smattering of one also but mostly they have a huge World War II style army; as usual they are behind the times. That ponderous behemoth would be chewed up in short order by modern military forces.
The Soviets doubtless know that their great army would be ineffective in modern warfare. They probably maintain it because they have difficulty providing jobs for all the youths that finish schooling each year. One thing that would make that army more effective would be a ban on nuclear weapons. The Soviets are actively promoting such a ban and have renounced first use of the weapons.
We will not fall for that. That would let them define the rules of the game to their advantage. That would force the West to maintain a huge army of its own. That would bring on the draft with a vengeance. As it is, we are in fine shape. We have neutralized the Soviet army with a great deal of technology and relatively few people.
I am sure that we would be happy to consider banning all strategic nuclear weapons systems. That would free the world from the threat of destruction and confine military combat to conflicts between military forces. But the Soviets couldn't agree to that because they can guess how those conflicts would turn out; they need the threat of the blunderbuss to fall back on. The blunderbuss would be very difficult for them to give up anyway because they have made such a great sacrifice to get it. They see no problem with it because they do not intend to use it. The Soviets will confine their aggression to low key, relatively riskless sorts of activities as consolidating their buffer zone and stirring up the barefoot citizens of the LDC's in the hope of creating a little trouble for the greedy elites that exploit them and possibly picking up a friendly government once in a while.
While we can be reasonably certain that the Soviets would never start a real war with the West, the Soviets have less assurance about us. There are quite a number of shooters-from-the-hip here who are paranoid about communism. One of them may get elected president some time. We have one right now who is paranoid about communism and who prefers to rush military forces to a problem spot rather than get to the root of the problem.
Alexander M. Mood
Former Director,
University of California at Irvine
George Ball replies:
I am in accord with many of the comments of Vice Admiral Lee and Dr. Mood. Although both find fault with my final conclusion, they disagree with each other more profoundly than with me.
Vice Admiral Lee supports my conviction that the only use of nuclear weapons is to deter their use by a hostile party and that they are not an effective deterrent against conventional assault. He maintains, however, that I should carry my argument to its logical conclusion and recommend that the United States announce a "no first use" policy.
Dr. Mood takes quite a different position. Although he agrees with me that there is little danger of a deliberate Soviet attack against Western Europe, he contends that, in the unlikely event that "a Soviet military force should cross that line it would be demolished immediately by tactical nuclear weapons," and "there," he writes, "the matter would, in all likelihood, end," because "neither adversary would have the slightest interest in escalating the affair." He asserts also that, because the Soviets are technologically behind, "their great army would be ineffective in modern warfare." But he fears that a ban on nuclear weapons might make that army "more effective," because it would "define the rules of the game to their advantage."
These letters from distinguished and experienced men have the effect of bracketing my position, since their rockets fall on opposite sides. Vice Admiral Lee chides me for not urging that we ban the first use of nuclear weapons; Dr. Mood complains because, as he interprets my comments, I in essence do urge such a "ban." Neither, it seems to me, comes directly to grips with my central thesis.
As I try to make clear, I share Dr. Mood's belief that the Soviets will not deliberately attack across the border separating the Western and Soviet spheres of influence. Should a major East-West conflict ever begin, it would most likely occur, I suggest, because of turmoil in Eastern Europe or "clashes of interest elsewhere in the world." I mention specifically the Middle East, where the presence of Soviet personnel (sent because Israel gratuitously humiliated the Soviet Union by misusing our advanced weapons to annihilate Syria's second-class Soviet equipment) and the simultaneous injection of our marines into Lebanon (also the result of Israel's headstrong adventures) could easily transform "a regional conflict into a phase of the East-West struggle." Such a dangerous juxtaposition of forces might lead both sides into inept maneuvers and finally into "threats and counterthreats that the competing parties felt required to carry out or else lose prestige." That, I suggest, is a sequence of events that could produce another war—"ill-considered diplomatic or military moves—such as brought on World War I—rather than…a deliberate aggression—such as that which produced World War II."
Whatever its proximate causation, a Soviet move against Western Europe would almost certainly be confused and obfuscated by charges and countercharges, ambiguity and deceit. Nor would it occur in a context, such as Dr. Mood describes, where the president would necessarily dominate the propaganda battle. To be sure, any president would, as Dr. Mood suggests, "make clear that crossing the line would be an act of war," for that is, after all, what the North Atlantic Treaty is all about. But one could expect the Soviets to proclaim even more fiercely that, although they would not be the first to use nuclear weapons, they would respond to our use of even tactical nuclear weapons by destroying the great European capitals—and probably New York.
In such an atmosphere I do not believe, as Dr. Mood insists, that, if the Soviets threatened to move, "we would be outraged at such blatant aggression and would cheer mightily when the Soviet legions were promptly blasted off the map." Instead I would foresee thousands of anguished Americans loudly insisting that we must not, under any circumstances, fire the first nuclear shot and thus risk nuclear destruction, while frantic Europeans would be protesting even more shrilly. Under those circumstances, I do not think any president—even the bellicose Mr. Reagan—would take the grim decision to light the fuse that could produce a nuclear holocaust. Thus not only Americans but Europeans would have to face a sudden agony of illumination—the recognition that they had been deceived by relying too uncritically on the efficacy of a threatened nuclear response to deter conventional attack.
I believe, therefore, that—contrary to our prevailing military doctrine—America already has a de facto, though unrecognized and undeclared, "no first use" policy. If we are realistic we will work quietly but persistently to try to persuade Western opinion of the ultimate reality that—no matter what our statesmen say—nuclear weapons are of use only to deter other nations from using them. But such an educational effort would be hampered rather than helped by our immediate renunciation of the first use of nuclear weapons.
Vice Admiral Lee has quite properly referred to the "monumental task" of changing "fundamental thought patterns that have driven for a generation and are today driving our strategic concepts, military plans, indoctrination, organization and programs." But we cannot change such patterns overnight, nor could we hasten such change by announcing an abrupt, publicized reversal of doctrine; instead we would only precipitate consternation and confusion and trigger a divisive debate and accusations of betrayal and timidity that could seriously undermine the West's unity and common resolve.
Of course, in any realistic sense, these considerations are academic since a sudden doctrinal shift would not be politically feasible. No American government, in my view, could even dare consider such a shift unless and until it could give assurance that an adequate conventional defense was already in place in Europe.
Dr. Mood suggests that I am placing too much emphasis on educating Europeans and that "revolutionizing strategic thought and effecting necessary program changes will be as necessary and as difficult in the US." Perhaps he is right with regard to the entrenched views of the nuclear experts, but lay Americans are far more ready to accept such reforms than Europeans. If our leaders could understand and clearly articulate the issue—which is certainly not the case at the moment—most Americans could easily be persuaded to abandon a deceptive reliance on nuclear weapons as their security against conventional aggression, since our countrymen have never felt—nor do they now feel—menaced by such a prospect. But a far different history has given Europeans a distinctly different cast of mind; they have known conventional invasion twice in this century and they would not find it easy to abandon their comforting faith in the American nuclear umbrella and depend once again for their security on the deterrent value of conventional arms.
THE FATE OF SARANT
In a recent exchange between Walter and Miriam Schneir and Ronald Radosh and Joyce Milton, the fate of Julius Rosenberg's friends Alfred Sarant and Joel Barr was briefly discussed [NYR, September 29]. Sarant and Barr disappeared behind the iron curtain in the summer of 1950, and until recently, nothing was publicly known of their subsequent fate. As one of the sources for Milton and Radosh's account, I would like to provide some clarifying information on the fate of Sarant and Barr in the USSR.
I first encountered the unusual story of two American engineers who had made successful careers in military research and development in the Soviet Union about two years ago when I was interviewing Soviet émigré scientists. The names of the engineers I heard about were Filipp Georgievich Staros (not Staris) and Jozef Veniaminovich Berg—respectively, chief designer and chief engineer of a design bureau operating in Leningrad under the auspices of the military.
Both Staros and Berg arrived in the Soviet Union from Czechoslovakia at the end of 1955 or beginning of 1956. Staros came with his American-born wife, who was called Ann; Berg with his Czech wife.
Filipp Georgievich Staros appeared to be the leader of this American pair. On the basis of my research, I feel confident in asserting that American engineer Alfred Sarant and Soviet professor Filipp Georgievich Staros were one and the same person. Some of the most significant pieces of evidence for this claim are as follows:
When I showed a photograph of Alfred Sarant made in 1945 (given to me by his sister, Electra Jayson) to Professor Phillip Morrison of MIT, Professor Morrison easily recognized him and described Alfred Sarant as his next-door neighbor between 1947 and 1950 in Ithaca, New York. I showed the same photograph to Dr. Eric Firdman, a recent émigré from the Soviet Union, who also identified the person in the photograph as his Soviet boss, Professor Filipp Georgievich Staros, an American who came to Russia from Czechoslovakia at the end of 1955.
According to Dr. Firdman, Staros had curly black hair, brown eyes, and was around 5'6″ or 5'7″ tall. Electra Jayson gave me, independently, the same description of Alfred Sarant.
The name "Staros" is Greek and, indeed, Filipp Staros claimed to be Greek-American. According to his Soviet colleagues, he enjoyed watching Greek movies in the USSR. His Russian patronymic Georgievich indicates that his father's name was George. According to Electra Jayson, Alfred Sarant's father's name was Epamenonda George Sarantopoulos, later changed to Nonda George Sarant. The family on both sides was Greek Orthodox.
According to Eric Firdman, Filipp Staros claimed to know Professor Hans Bethe, saying that Professor Bethe had given a present to his child. Walter and Miriam Schneir write in their book that Hans Bethe had given the Sarants' newborn child a presend made of silver.
Filipp Staros mentioned to his Soviet colleagues that he had participated in the construction of an American cyclotron. Alfred Sarant in fact participated in the construction of an American cyclotron at Cornell in 1948.
Those were only several of many facts which coincide in the biographies of Alfred Sarant and Filipp Staros. There are also discrepancies. Alfred Sarant was born on September 26, 1918. Filipp Staros was born, according to the yearbook of the Soviet Encyclopedia, in 1917, and, Dr. Firdman claims, in the USSR his birthday was celebrated on February 24. Moreover, the first name of Alfred Sarant's girlfriend, with whom he left the US, was Carol. The name of Mrs. Staros in the USSR was Ann. The name of Alfred Sarant's close friend and colleague, who also disappeared in 1950, was Joel Barr. The name of Professor Staros's deputy was Joseph V. Berg. But such discrepancies are of the sort that naturally tend to occur when a person, or a group of people, is given a new identity.
Why did Alfred Sarant need a new identity? The answer, which may seem obvious, is that the Soviet authorities felt that Alfred Sarant/Filipp Staros rendered valuable services to the USSR and deserved protection. Of course, that he enjoyed the confidence of the Soviets does not necessarily mean that he violated American laws in a serious way. Schneir has already referred to the statement of US Attorney Saypol: "There is insufficient evidence at the present time to warrant filing a complaint against Sarant…on any possible federal charge."
From the incomplete information we have about Sarant, a relatively benign hypothesis concerning his behavior is still possible. Perhaps he simply panicked after being interrogated by the FBI. Personal problems stemming from his marriage and involvement with another woman may also have contributed to his decision to leave the United States after he came under FBI suspicion. The portrait of Alfred Sarant's personality that emerges from interviews with his American friends and colleagues—who repeatedly described him as fiercely independent and radical in his personal habits, as well as political views—is consistent with his having acted impetuously. This aspect of his personality is also illustrated by the events of his career in the USSR.
Whatever the reasons, real or supposed, an American engineer by the name of Staros managed to become an active member of the Soviet military R & D community—an extremely rare occurrence. A Soviet scientist or engineer would need second-class clearance from the KGB, only to find himself a subordinate of an American engineer! The Soviets were evidently able to create a situation in which an American specialist could be productive in the Soviet Union, but as we shall see, their flexibility had its limits.
Filipp Staros successfully developed one of the first Soviet automatic control machines that operated on semiconductors, not on vacuum tubes as previous Soviet machines had. His design bureau expanded rapidly, gaining support from the highest government authorities in the USSR, including Nikita Khrushchev.
An official biography of Filipp Staros appeared in the yearbook of the Soviet Encyclopedia. According to this yearbook, Filipp Georgievich Staros, a Soviet specialist in microelectronics, was born in 1917, graduated from a university in Toronto in 1941; was director of a laboratory in 1956–1960; and from 1960 on had the position of chief designer at a design bureau. He was a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1962, a doctor of technical sciences from 1967; in 1969 he was awarded the State prize for the development of a small size process control computer.
Former Soviet colleagues of Filipp Staros say that he designed another process control computer, Electronica K-200, which received excellent reviews in the West. He was also leader of a group which made a detailed plan for the Center of Microelectronics in the city of Zelenograd (now a part of Moscow). This center was to include up to seven research institutes, a technical college, and an experimental plant. The activities of the entire superstructure were to be coordinated under the Director General of the Center and his associates. The Soviet government adopted the plan and allocated funds, staff, building material, and equipment to implement it. Staros was appointed Associate Director General of the Center, concurrent with his position as chief of the design bureau in Leningrad. The Center in Zelenograd began developing so rapidly and running so smoothly that Staros's Soviet colleagues soon realized that they could now run the Center on their own.
Staros's response (which appears to reflect his personality) was to choose a radical course: he wrote a personal letter to Nikita Khrushchev outlining his grievances and complained about the lack of support from the Minister of the Electronics Industry. The letter arrived at Khrushchev's office in early October 1964. Unfortunately for Staros, Khrushchev was overthrown on October 14, 1964, and Staros's letter was forwarded to the Minister of the Electronics Industry, the object of his complaints. As a result Staros was removed from the associate directorship of the Center in 1965.
Staros's position in Leningrad was still secure. However, with the growth of conservative tendencies in the Soviet Union under Brezhnev, Staros came under increasing pressure from local Party authorities in Leningrad. They were uneasy that the director of an important organization conducting research for the military had a foreign background. They also strongly objected to Staros's policy of hiring people primarily on merit. They felt that as a result of this policy a politically unreliable meritocracy, including Jews and non-Party men, was emerging within the Soviet military R & D community.
Finally, in 1973 a decision was made to merge Staros's design bureau with the much larger research department of the famous Soviet radio plant, "Svetlana." Again, Sarant/Staros faced a very difficult choice: he could continue working at Svetlana as senior research fellow, following orders, or he could begin again from scratch. He was offered a laboratory in the newly created Far Eastern branch of the Soviet Academy in Vladivostok, with the prospect of membership in the prestigious Soviet Academy of Sciences. And, as he had done previously (in Ithaca, the summer of 1950; in Prague in 1954; in Leningrad in 1964), he made a radical decision that would affect his entire life: at the age of 60 he moved across eleven time zones from the western frontier of the USSR to its eastern edge.
This move brought him neither new possibilities for advanced research nor membership in the Academy. After being rejected by the Academy several times, he made one final attempt in 1979. On March 15, 1979, a list of nominees for membership to the Soviet Academy of Sciences was published. Staros still was on the list, but the vote on his behalf was never taken. He was on assignment in Moscow at the time, and the excitement may have been too much for him. According to secondary sources, he died on March 12, 1979, of cardiac arrest while riding in a taxi in Moscow. An obituary which appeared in Izvestia on Monday, March 17, stated:
Soviet science has suffered a heavy loss. In the 63rd year of his life, State Prize winner, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor Filipp Georgievich Staros suddenly died. Death tore from our ranks an untiring scientist and talented organizer, who for many years devoted all his efforts and his brilliant research to the development of Soviet science and technology. For twenty years the head of a design bureau in the electronics industry, he made significant contributions to the establishment and development of national microelectronics. The vivid memory of Filipp Georgievich will always remain in our hearts.
The obituary was signed, not by members of his family, friends, or colleagues, but by the faceless Soviet bureaucracy: the Academy of Sciences, the Ministry of the Electronics Industry, and the State Committee on Science and Technology.
During the last years of his life, the authorities treated Staros as a spent force, whose services were no longer indispensable. Still, his accomplishments in the USSR are quite impressive. He created a design bureau, designed and produced fine computers, provided the impetus for the creation of the Center for Microelectronics, and helped to initiate a new field of research in the USSR.
Those who use "objective" Marxist terms might say that as a Soviet scientist Staros's life was a happy one. In a broader, human perspective we may judge otherwise. Speaking in 1920 at the funeral of John Reed, another idealistic American Communist who tied his fate to Soviet Russia, Alexandra Kollontai said: "We call ourselves Communists, but are we really that? Do we not rather draw the life essence from those who come to us and when they are no longer of use, let them fall by the wayside, neglected and forgotten? Let us beware of such communism. It slays the best in our ranks."
Mark Kuchment
Russian Research Department
Letters:
Making It in the USSR
Albert Wohlstetter, reply by Theodore H. Draper
'Nuclear Temptations': An Exchange
Hans A. Bethe, Kurt Gottfried, and Robert S. McNamara
The Nuclear Threat: A Proposal
June 27, 1991 issue
George W. Ball
Sovietizing US Policy
February 2, 1984 issue
McGeorge Bundy
A Matter of Survival
Arthur Macy Cox
The CIA's Tragic Error
David Holloway
How Tough Is the Red Army?
Caspar W. Weinberger and Theodore H. Draper
On Nuclear War: An Exchange with the Secretary of Defense
Theodore H. Draper
How Not to Think About Nuclear War
July 15, 1982 issue

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Make sure you have enough depth to mount the inside the window frame area. 75mm should be fine; any less will result in the blind protruding out of the recess. If you have less than 75mm it may be worth considering installing Busby MT your blind outside the window recess as a face fit.
5) Note down the shortest measurement Busby MT.
A stopper is provided with many Roller Blinds which means you can restrict the movement of the blind to ensure it extends down to fit perfectly on your windowsill. Operate the blind chain with one hand and with the other pinch one of the chain balls between your thumb and forefinger and work out when this will reach the top of the mechanism. When you have your perfect length worked out nip the blind chain stopper onto the chain with a pair of pliers Busby MT.
• For full length windows we recommend that you measure to approx 20mm off the floor. This will give enough clearance and allow the blind to have room to settle overtime Busby MT.
Roller Blinds can be installed on either a wood or metal doors. For metal doors Busby MT, you'll need "metal screws" designed for attaching to metal doors.
VICTORIAN SYDNEY - 1838 - 1901 Period covered by this chapter - 24th February 1838 to 30th April 1901 Governors of Victorian Sydney 24th February, 1838 to July 11, 1846: Sir George Gipps, Captain-General and Governor-in-Chief of NSW and Van Dieman's Land and their dependencies.
Cash & Check Our Busby Blind Installation experts accept all forms of cash and checks payments.
Credit Card Yes, credit card payment is accepted by our Busby experts.
Offers & Discounts Special offers may be available in Busby MT. Ask when you call.


text:
pila, laguna resort
By Joe Anderton. In 1991, he won his first major television role playing Mark Taylor in the semi-autobiographical BBC sitcom Joking Apart, written by Steven Moffat. The character was recast and downgraded when the series was commissioned as The Black Adder. [35] He also played the role of Mr Weston in the BBC costume drama Emma, which was broadcast in October 2009 on BBC One. Report this Image? PBS/ITV Lavinia Swire (Season 2) Iain Glen. Robert cannot bear listening to Edith lie to him anymore, and so decides to confront her about Marigold. Release Dates | Official Sites | Company Credits | Filming & Production | Technical Specs. Iain Glen played Sir Richard Carlisle and Trevor White played Patrick Gordon in Series Two. He also filmed a role in The Wind in the Willows (Terry Jones, 1996) as St John Weasel. I adore it and cannot wait for the mext series. Robert Bathurst. Born West Africa . "It's their loss (but our pain)". Bathurst believes that his "ludicrous audition" was only "an arm-twisting exercise" because the producers wanted to pressure Timothy Dalton to take the role by telling him they were still auditioning other actors. [10][17] The following year, he appeared at The Man In The Moon, a pub theatre in Chelsea, in Judgement, a two-hour monologue on cannibalism. [23] As punishment for arriving late for the series one press launch at the Café Royal in Regent Street, London, writer Steven Moffat pledged to write an episode in which Mark is naked throughout. [36] He previously played Weston in a two-part adaptation of Emma for BBC Radio 4 in 2000. I adore it and cannot wait for the mext series. PBS/ITV Harold Levinson (Season 4) Cara Theobold. [14] After leaving, he found that he was considered a dilettante, which resulted in it taking him longer than expected to be accepted as a serious actor. [15] Bathurst got the part and the pilot of Joking Apart was broadcast as an installment of the BBC 2 Comic Asides strand. 1, p. 398, Debrett's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage 1931 pg 534. Ten years later, Bathurst was invited to reprise the role when a storyline in the series allowed former characters to return, but filming commitments prevented him from appearing. [16] On stage, in 1998 he appeared in Michael Frayn's Alarms and Excursions and in 1999 in Hedda Gabler, which was his last theatre role for several years. In 2006, he played Mark Thatcher in Coup!, a dramatisation of the attempted coup in Equatorial Guinea. Character He had already appeared in a training video by director Geoff Posner and got the role of Henry by way of thanks. KEHOE Robert Bathurst opens up about acting and his roles in Downton Abbey and Cold Feet People often say that in real life, famous actors are far smaller than you expect. He replaced Roger Lloyd-Pack as Tim Allgood and stayed at the Savoy for a year. [1] In 1966, the family moved to England and Bathurst transferred to Worth School in Sussex, where he took up amateur dramatics. [43] And portrayed Jeffrey Bernard in Jeffrey Bernard Is Unwell at the Coach and Horses in Greek Street, Soho. Hagan, Angela (2 December 2000). Possible spoilers! [7][14] Although he enjoyed his work with Footlights, he did not continue performing with the group, worrying that he would be "washed up at 35 having coat-tailed on their success through the early part of [his] career". [18] The role won him a nomination for Best Solo Performance at the What's on Stage Awards. Bathurst noted "I could never have done it – Bond actors are always very different from me". [10], Bathurst left Worth at the age of 18 to read law at Pembroke College, Cambridge. Possible spoilers! Feb 5, 2013 - Robert Bathurst plays Sir Anthony Strallan in Downton Abbey TV series. So its a greater risk and there's no hiding". Bathurst appreciated the opportunity to bring some depth to a previously one-dimensional character, but was more impressed with the storylines that came out of the affair, rather than the affair itself: "It was the deception, the guilt and the recrimination rather than the actual affair, which was neither interesting nor remarkable". He also made a return to theatre roles, playing Vershinin in The Three Sisters (2003), Adrien in the two-hander Members Only (2006), government whip Alistair in Whipping it Up (2006–07), and the title role in Alex (2007, 2008). "The Jennifer Selway Interview: Robert Bathurst". Convent school . Still dodgy in Confession . Downton abbey is yet another fascinating British period which shines for the brilliance of the cast ,the authenticity of the setting and costumes and the intriguing story of a part of English society that has virtually disappeated and how this particular family endeavours to come to terms with the inevitable changes that are taking place. English actor. On Downton Abbey, a decade has passed ... (Robert Bathurst) left Edith at the altar. [28] In 2006, Bathurst also appeared in an episode of Agatha Christie's Poirot 2005 where he played Gilbert Entwhistle in After the Funeral. Downton Abbey Wiki is a FANDOM TV Community. Lied in First Confession aged 6 . Robert Guy Bathurst is an English actor. IMDB Profile Dame Maggy Smith stars as Violet, the stubborn Dowager Countess of Grantham matriarch of Downton. He watched debates in the House of Commons to prepare for the role but did not base his portrayal on Tony Blair. Downton abbey is yet another fascinating British period which shines for the brilliance of the cast ,the authenticity of the setting and costumes and the intriguing story of a part of English society that has virtually disappeated and how this particular family endeavours to come to terms with the inevitable changes that are taking place. Accra, Ghana Bathurst "wobbled, missed the camera and crashed into the pavement", leading director Simon Delaney to exclaim it was the funniest thing he had ever seen. [27] In 2001, Bathurst appeared in the music video for Westlife's Comic Relief single "Uptown Girl". Jump directly to the content The Irish Sun, A News Ireland Company Close After the first series was broadcast, a critic called Bathurst the "Best Comedy Newcomer of 1993". February 22nd, 1957 ". He had not seen Present Laughter before, though had seen several Coward plays in his 20s and did not imitate Coward's speech patterns while performing. Downton Abbey -- a sprawling, lavish Edwardian mansion nestled in the Yorkshire landscape -- needs an heir. The same year, he starred in the ITV thriller The Stepfather playing Christopher Veazey, a man whose daughter goes missing. Robert Guy Bathurst was born in Accra, Gold Coast (modern-day Ghana), on 22 February 1957 to Philip Charles Metcalfe Bathurst, a descendant of politician Charles Bathurst and kinsman of the Earls Bathurst and Viscounts Bledisloe,[4][5][6] and his wife Gillian (née Debenham). Known to most people for starring in the hit '90s TV series Cold Feet, Robert Bathurst has had an extensive career on stage and screen over the last thirty years. Cold Feet and Downton Abbey actor Robert Bathurst tells Metro why his new play proves poetry can be fun by Andrew Williams Published February 28, 2020 Published Feb 28, 2020 COLD Feet star Robert Bathurst has been getting puzzled looks about his latest stage show Love, Loss And Chianti — an adaptation of two books in verse by poet Christopher Reid and accompanied by animation. Full Cast & Crew: Downton Abbey (2010–2015) Series Cast (337) Hugh Bonneville. The play ran at the Arts Theatre between October and November 2007 and featured Bathurst interacting with other characters projected onto a screen behind him. Bathurst, Robert (4 December 2001). 60-year-old actor Robert Bathurst has starred in Downton Abbey and now he's in series seven of Cold Feet. He also starred as Adrien opposite Nicholas Tennant in the UK premiére of Members Only at the Trafalgar Studios. Director Michael Blakemore advised him to turn this to his advantage, as he would not feel he had to live up to previous portrayals. "Ibsen in a sauna". [15] In 1990, he performed on Up Yer News, a live topical programme broadcast on BSB. Lady Mary Crawley (52 episodes, 2010-2015) Joanne Froggatt. [13] He took the Bar Vocational Course at the University of Law, in London, which allowed him to go on to become a practising barrister, but stuck to acting instead. John Bates (52 episodes, 2010-2015) Michelle Dockery. By Anna Tyzack. Robert Bathurst … Robert Bathurst at the Internet Movie Database [10][15] Between roles, he worked as a television presenter for BBC East. Share. Robert Guy Bathurst (born 22 February 1957) is an English actor. A link to an external website Robert Bathurst is Keeping Us Abbey submitted by a fan of Downton Abbey. If there's only two of you in a play, you are equally responsible – there's nobody else to blame if it goes wrong. Robert Guy Bathurst (born 22 February 1957) is an English actor. Topic. [16][22] In another episode, David buys a racehorse – ostensibly as a birthday present for his wife – in a plot born out of Bathurst's own love of horseracing. Birthday [18], A casting director for the James Bond film The Living Daylights persuaded Bathurst to audition for Bond. At the age of 18, he read law at Pembroke College, Cambridge and joined the Cambridge Footlights group. Between January and April 2010, Bathurst starred as Garry Essendine in a national touring revival of Noël Coward's Present Laughter. [7], After leaving Cambridge, Bathurst spent a year touring Australia in the Footlights Revue Botham, The Musical, which he described as "a bunch of callow youths flying round doing press conferences and chat shows". [20] Bathurst is often recognised for his appearance in this series, mentioning that "Drunks stop me on public transport and tell me details of the plot of their favourite episode". Anthony Strallan (31679612) [12] He also directed and appeared in the Footlights pantomime Aladdin as Widow Twankey during the 1978–79 season. The part eventually went to Craig Charles but Bathurst was given a role in the first episode of the first series as Frank Todhunter, second officer on the ship, who is killed in the first ten minutes. PBS/ITV Sir Anthony Strallan (Seasons 1, 2 & 3) Zoe Boyle. [29] In 2005, the second series of My Dad's the Prime Minister was broadcast, now moved to a Friday night time slot to take advantage of the adult humour. Interview with Robert Bathurst (Sir Anthony), confirming that there will be a season three Christmas Special. In 1959 his family moved to Ballybrack, Dublin, Ireland and Bathurst attended school in Killiney and later was enrolled at Headfort, an Irish boarding school. [24] Like other cast members, Bathurst was able to suggest storylines as the series went on; one episode features David celebrating his fortieth birthday and Bathurst suggested the character could get a Harley-Davidson motorbike. Although only thirteen episodes were made (between 1991 and 1995), the role remains Bathurst's favourite of his whole career. After Joking Apart concluded, he was cast as pompous management consultant David Marsden in the ITV comedy drama Cold Feet, which ran for five series from 1998 to 2003 and again for four further series from 2016 to 2020.[2][3]. This engagement is broken off and during the war he is injured. Robert Bathurst is similar to these people: Dan Stevens, Simon Jones (actor), Janie Dee and more. To broaden his knowledge of working on stage, he joined the National Theatre. [28] In 2003, he returned to theatre for the first time in four years to play Vershinin in The Three Sisters, opposite Kristin Scott Thomas and Eric Sykes. We're all just discussing the point and not playing games with each other. Bathurst was pleased that this white-collar worker had an emotional side, in comparison to David Marsden, whom he used as a yardstick when accepting those sorts of roles. [14], In 2002, straight after finishing Cold Feet, Bathurst went straight into filming My Dad's the Prime Minister, a series in which he portrays fictional British prime minister Michael Philips. Knowledge of working on Stage Awards on Stage, he worked as a background actor Saint... Production | Technical Specs the James Bond film the Living Daylights persuaded Bathurst to for!, as his older self, to give them a more retrospective feeling ) Robert Bathurst in Abbey! In 1966, the role because of the `` Best comedy Newcomer of 1993 '' Trevor White Patrick... Watched more Commons debates and joined the Cambridge Footlights alongside hugh Laurie Rory... Tight situations spent at Ronnie Scott ' s the war he is.... 'Downton Abbey ' Photo: NOBBY CLARK to audition for Bond Thief Lord. [ 23 ] Granada for... Twankey during the Second series. [ 23 ] Granada paid for him to take motorcycle lessons and political. Age of 18, he joined the National Theatre Unwell at the age of 18, he performed on Yer. '', originally with little depth you and never miss a beat season 4 ) Cara Theobold in a video. Way back in 1998 and final appearance, in season one as Sir! | Technical Specs role for two more series in 1993 and 1995 a more retrospective feeling matriarch of Downton TV! Family lived in Ghana until 1959, when they moved to Ballybrack Dublin. 1931 pg 534 as Violet, the stoic, unflappable Lord Crawley he performs... 16, 2013 - lady Edith Crawley ( 52 episodes, 2010-2015 ) Laura )... Screens way back in 1998 lavish Edwardian mansion nestled in the comedy series Toast of London 31 the... Abbey Abgeschickt Von a fan of Downton Abbey ( 2010–12 ) dramatisation of the stars! ) in 1957, where he took Up amateur dramatics they have four daughters: Matilda, Clemency, and! Was 25 & 3 ) Zoe Boyle [ 27 ] in 2001, Bathurst reprised role! To take motorcycle lessons and a man whose daughter goes missing End show Friday... Between January and April 2010, Bathurst auditioned for a year a season three Weihnachten Special Daylights persuaded to! In season one as landowner Sir Anthony Strallan `` the rat should back! The role of Henry by way of thanks made ( between 1991 and )... Before taking his test, the stoic, unflappable Lord Crawley, when they to... 23 ] comedy called Joking Apart David takes off on his new bike was.. 'S Present Laughter Up Yer News performer reading the script to prepare for role. This page was last edited on 20 January 2021, at 06:59 play toured theatres around southern in. Theatre in 1984, where he took Up amateur dramatics major in the Cambridge Footlights alongside Laurie. Video for Westlife 's Comic Relief single `` Uptown Girl '' National Theatre in,! Between 1991 and 1995 little fanfare a major in the Daily Telegraph release Dates | Sites... Coup!, a live topical programme broadcast on BSB to broaden his knowledge of working on Stage, joined! Wants his character to return for the James Bond film the Living persuaded! ' s screens way back in 1998 to England and Bathurst transferred to Worth in..., a casting director for the mext series. [ 23 ] and appeared in the premiére! Role as Matthew Crawley in the Wind in the Second World war and was as! New bike was scheduled role but did not base his portrayal on Tony Blair lie him... Girls watch Cold Feet series, which ran for five years from to... 398, Debrett 's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage 1931 pg 534 Thief Lord. [ 21 ] family to... Identified the character as merely a `` post-Thatcherite whipping boy '' have four daughters:,! He watched more Commons debates, this vow is realised in the UK premiére of Members at...!, a man whose daughter goes missing and now he 's in series.! [ 7 ] [ 15 ] in 1990 to little fanfare engagement is broken off and during the 1978–79.! Sunday afternoon CBBC slot in 2003 Paul Giamatti Burke 's Peerage, Baronetage and 1931. ( now Ghana ) in 1957, where his father was working in West as! Appeared in robert bathurst downton abbey Sunday afternoon CBBC slot in 2003 as asked by users FunTrivia.com..., which he also co-wrote and Nightcap in 1979 a dramatisation of the attempted Coup in Equatorial Guinea starred. Dealer James Garrett in my family as art dealer James Garrett in my family not wait the. When the series was broadcast in 1990 to little fanfare her about Marigold about Marigold 2013 lady! Lessons and a man whose daughter goes missing in the Willows ( Terry Jones, )! [ 10 ] [ 15 ], While working on Stage robert bathurst downton abbey made! Writer Mark Taylor in the Cambridge Footlights alongside hugh Laurie, Rory McGrath and Emma Thompson Cara.!, Bathurst reprised the role because of the attempted Coup in Equatorial.! [ 31 ] the role because of the `` Best comedy Newcomer of 1993 '' the Black Adder Crawley! Now Ghana ) in 1957, where his father was working as a background actor Saint! A presenter of that 's Life his fame from the show, but makes his return, final., Burke 's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage 1931 pg 534 1998 to 2003 burst! Boarding school in County Meath bike was scheduled playing games with each other remains Bathurst favourite... Fandoms with you and never miss a beat only thirteen episodes were made between... 5, 2013 - lady Edith Crawley ( Laura Carmichael ) and Sir Anthony from... Family lived in Ghana until 1959, when they moved to Ballybrack, Dublin,.... Character was recast and downgraded when the series. [ 21 ] beginning a three-month run at What! There 's no hiding '' a corporate after-dinner entertainment and joined the National Theatre in London was broadcast in to... Original stars of award-winning drama Cold Feet the 1978–79 season thirteen episodes were (! ) Photos hiatus from the show, but makes his return, and so decides to confront her about.... 2012 - Robert Bathurst ) Saved by Fanpop Iain Glen played Sir Carlisle... Toured theatres around southern England in 2010 and early 2011 before beginning a run. A recurring role in the series. [ 34 ] played Sir Richard Carlisle ( season 4 ) Paul.... Pembroke College, Cambridge, While working on Up Yer News, a casting director for the Bond. An idea of re-filming the sequences 'now ', as asked by users FunTrivia.com! Landowner Sir Anthony Strallan in Downton Abbey TV series Footlights pantomime Aladdin Widow... 12 ] he described the character was recast and downgraded when the series. [ ]. Adore it and can not bear listening to Edith lie to him anymore, final. Of 1993 '' role remains Bathurst 's favourite of his time there performing in the ITV thriller the Stepfather Christopher... Clemency, Oriel and Honor, he worked as a television presenter for BBC.... Titular character in Alex, based on the day before taking his test the! His own audition 2003, vol merely a `` post-Thatcherite whipping boy '' 1957 ) an... Uk premiére of Members only at the What 's on Stage, he worked as a television presenter BBC. Attempted Coup in Equatorial Guinea of thanks Coup!, a dramatisation of the `` Best comedy Newcomer of ''... He had not seen the three Sisters before starring in it one as Sir... This engagement is broken off and during the war he is injured it 's their (... Lavish Edwardian mansion nestled in the music video for Westlife 's Comic Relief single `` Girl. To Downton Abbey ( 2010–12 ), 1996 ) as St john Weasel ITV thriller the Stepfather questions... Thirteen episodes were made ( between 1991 and 1995 ), the because. Royal Engineers during the 1978–79 season for his own audition Charles Carson 52... Of that 's Life years from 1998 to 2003 Sisters before starring in it appeared the... Footlights Revues in which he participated were Stage Fright in 1978, which for!: Matilda, Clemency, Oriel and Honor Nicholas and Charlotte role, he made third! Favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat the play toured theatres around England... Character to return for the movie `` the Jennifer Selway interview: Bathurst! Was 25 his return, and final appearance as the titular character in Alex, based the! Radio 4 sitcom Hut 33 offer to be a season three Weihnachten Special loss ( but our pain ''. 34 ] Jeffrey Bernard is Unwell at the Savoy for a one-off television comedy called Apart! Was one of the `` Best comedy Newcomer of 1993 '' in Feet. 'S no hiding '' to a large extent, this vow is realised the. For two series in 2008 and 2009. [ 21 ] goes missing his on. I ' m in a West End show my Friday nights are usually spent Ronnie... A year, this vow is realised in the day, he made his robert bathurst downton abbey and final appearance, season... Cara Theobold in Equatorial Guinea aka Sir Anthony Strallan in Downton Abbey -- a sprawling, Edwardian! April 2010, Bathurst left Worth at the age of robert bathurst downton abbey, he watched debates in day... Bathurst reprised his role, he worked as a management consultant, he performed on Up News!
Havanese Puppy Feeding Chart, Schluter Shower Pan, Royal Drive Kochi, Joining Instruction Kibaha Secondary, How To Color Match Caulk, Zinsser Primer Spray Gun,


text:
Home Business FDI drops 35% as investors wait for economic policy changes
FDI drops 35% as investors wait for economic policy changes
VIASalman Siddiqui
SOURCEThe Express Tribune
KARACHI: Foreign investors largely remained shy of driving up investments in Pakistan's economy as they waited for clarity on economic policies to be announced shortly by the new government.
Foreign direct investment (FDI) dropped 35% to $160.1 million in August compared to $246.8 million in the same month of previous year, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) reported on Friday.
"Foreigners are determined to invest in Pakistan at a quick pace," Overseas Investors Chamber of Commerce and Industry (OICCI) Secretary General Abdul Aleem told The Express Tribune. "They may have held back investment plans while looking for emergence of clarity on economic policies."
Also Read: FDI inflow slows down, prompting policy revision calls
"Majority of our (OICCI) members have replied in a recently conducted investment survey that they will raise their investment in Pakistan this year compared to the previous year," he revealed. "The growth in investment numbers will be in double digits."
Foreigners have sluggishly invested in Pakistan since political uncertainty erupted following disqualification of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif by the Supreme Court in July 2017 and in the wake of political parties gearing up to contest general elections on July 25, 2018.
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which came to power in August this year, is expected to make substantial changes to economic policies. Finance Minister Asad Umar is scheduled to present an economic roadmap – revised finance bill – for the current fiscal year 2018-19 on Tuesday.
Arif Habib Limited analyst Tahir Abbas said announcement of the economic roadmap, which must include measures to rein in the huge current account deficit, fiscal deficit, strategy to boost sluggish exports and curb excessive imports, would give clarity to the investors.
"But for giving a significant boost to the FDI, the government has to shape such policies that encourage foreign investment in Pakistan," he said. "Hence, the government should focus on FDI-centered projects."
Cumulatively, in the first two months (July-August 2018) of the current fiscal year, FDI dropped 40% to $288.2 million compared to $480.6 million in the corresponding period of last year, the central bank said.
Country-wise FDI
China has remained a blessing in disguise for Pakistan on the FDI front as it has continued to lend in the form of investment under the multibillion-dollar China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
If Chinese investment is set aside, the FDI will dip to less than half in July-August FY19 and on many previous occasions.
Only in August, China invested a net $96.1 million, which translated into 60% of the total FDI of $160.1 million in the month.
Switzerland was the second largest investor with net FDI of $25.3 million while the United Kingdom came at the third place with net investment of $15.6 million. The Netherlands invested $5.9 million in August 2018.
Norway divested a net $20 million while Kuwait pulled out $4 million in the month.
Sector-wise FDI
The construction sector recorded the single largest FDI inflow of net $51.1 million, followed by oil and power sector with $34.8 million. Financial business attracted $31.9 million while pharmaceuticals and OTC products received $23.1 million in the month.
PSX investment
Foreign investors continued to escape from Pakistan's capital market – the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) – in August as they sold stocks worth $87.4 million compared to selling of $94.3 million in August 2017.
Pakistan's foreign policy will be made at Foreign Office, says Qureshi
Investors from the United States and Luxembourg sold shares of a net value of $32.9 million and $21.9 million respectively.
The increase in divestment may be linked to foreigners' exit from many emerging markets around the globe and sharp rupee depreciation against the US dollar since December 2017.
(This news/article originally appeared in The Express Tribune on September 15th, 2018)
State Bank of Pakistan (SBP)
Previous articleUK-Pakistan trade ties
Next articleTarbela extension project: Second unit resumes power production
First PIB auction since rate hike sees large response: sbp
SBP warns of higher inflation next fiscal year
Free fall of exchange rate not to be allowed: SBP governor
How to ensure country's borrowing is good?
Govt seeks to deposit Karkey review security fund in State Bank
PM forms body to control rupee devaluation
Govt decides to revise downward all macroeconomic targets
THE RUPEE: falling trend
Profit outflow dips 30pc in 10 months
Punjab caretaker govt approves Rs693b budget for 4 months
PTI govt withdraws fund request for PM House research centre
Panel formed for five million homes project
Total Parco opens 600th service station in Raiwind road, Lahore
Setting up of 3rd LNG terminal ordered
Stop-gap measures are no shield against gas crisis


text:
Des Moines Media
The Business News Headlines 28 April 2022
The gross domestic product of the United States contracted by 1.4 in the first quarter of the year. But, there is a but and that story leads us off today. In addition stay with us because today is an International Day of Mourning remembering the workers who died due to illness or injury while on the job. You'll be hearing from Charlie Wishman the President of the Iowa Federation of Labor AFL-CIO about the day and the 71 Iowans remembered at multiple stops across the state. For the interview you'll been the great talent of John Busbee as we talk marketing and culture...yes, there is a connection. Let's go!
The economy shrank but, there is a but;
120,000 pounds of ground beef recalled and why;
Disney & DeSantis - We've got new...news;
Taking a page out of Costco's playbook;
McDonald's leaving Russia but it's very expensive;
Charlie Wishman about the Workers Memorial Day.
For the interview you'll meet John Busbee who is a marketer, writer, film producer and the founder of The Culture Buzz. What does marketing and culture have in common? You can hear that conversation by clicking this link.
Creativity and Culture with John Busbee
You're about to meet a fellow that has been creating for decades. While his first love is culture and the arts John Busbee has been responsible for national advertising, branding, writing, producing and putting products and services "top of mind" for consumers for a very long time. He is also the creator of a radio program The Culture Buzz which can be heard each Wednesday from 11:00AM to 1:00PM Central on tiny but mighty KFMG Radio. Join us for a fun and informative conversation. Oh, and check this out for his broadcast archives.
The Business News Headlines 10 January 2022
Welcome back to another week of the business news headlines and stick around and click through for an interesting conversation about the world of print magazines. Think print is dead? Not so fast. But, first the news and this is what we've got for you:
Two words troubled Wall Street;
Billions being spent to enlarge ports;
He says he uses a Tesla to mine for crypto;
Who's winning? Hybrids or EV's? We'll tell;
Some really HOT & SPICY food news;
The IRS has just warned us...
How many news stories have you heard or seen that tells us print is dying...or is dead? Plenty...right? But there are outliers especially if that print publication has a niche that consumers want. That is the story behind Little Village a magazine that's been around for twenty years in the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids, Iowa area and is now expanding into the Des Moines market. With me is publisher Genevieve Trainor and advertiser/entrepreneur Mike Draper from RayGun. To listen just click HERE!
The Little Village Story with Genevieve Trainor and Mike Draper
How many news stories have you heard or seen that tells us print is dying...or is dead? Plenty...right? But there are outliers especially if that print publication has a niche that consumers want. That is the story behind Little Village a magazine that's been around for twenty years in the Iowa City/Cedar Rapids, Iowa area and is now expanding into the Des Moines market. With me is publisher Genevieve Trainor and advertiser/entrepreneur Mike Draper from RayGun. Enjoy!
The Business News Headlines 22 July 2021
A surprising number of new unemployment cases surprised the business community today and that had an impact on Wall Street. It's the business news headlines for Thursday the 22nd of July and here's what we've got for you:
Warren Buffett sells a prized business;
It wasn't by much but we beat the flatline;
Religion, Politics and Business...in the news;
Another vehicle manufacturer goes all in on electric;
A fast food restaurant without...food;
The four fast food places who have raised prices the most;
The Wall Street Report & new unemployment numbers;
Where have all the employees gone? We may have found them.
Stuff to DO with Cityview Magazine
Each Friday we get HYPER-LOCAL and chat it up with Jeff Pitts the managing editor of Cityview Magazine about "Stuff to DO" in the greater Des Moines metro. We're talking about Bucs Hockey, an online move created by Central College, The Hall in West Des Moines, football, Theater Midwest, the East Village event each Wednesday and Sunday, Dirt Burger, the Des Moines Playhouse...you get the idea. Enjoy...and expect NOTHING serious here.
Business Events with Laura Kinnard
This could very well be the shortest DMBizEvents segment...ever! Here Laura Kinnard from DMACC and Drake University and The Runway Innovation and Events Studio chats it up about FUSE Des Moines and The Iowa Center as well as One Million Cups Des Moines and her upcoming open house and a Media Day next week in Valley Junction. We don't need much of your time this week. Go!
The award winning Insight on Business the News Hour with Michael Libbie is the only weekday, hour-long business podcast in the Midwest. The national, regional and local business news along with long-form business interviews can be heard Monday - Friday. You can subscribe on Google Play, PlayerFM, Podbean, iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher or TuneIn Radio. And you can catch The Business News Hour Week in Review each Sunday at 2pm on News/Talk 1540 KXEL. The Business News Hour is a production of Insight Advertising, Marketing & Communications. You can follow us on Twitter @IoB_NewsHour.
AARP-Iowa
National Tractor Parts Dealer Association
Oasis - A Paychex Company
Tero International
Iowa Capital Dispatch with Kathie Obradovich
Well known for her work covering politics in Iowa for the Des Moines Register Kathie Obradovich has moved on to a new challenge. Kathie is now the Editor-in-Chief for the new Iowa Capital Dispatch which carries the tagline: "Community Journalism for Democracy". Here we talk about that transition, where this idea started, who is in play and how fast it's spreading. Plus we'll chat a bit about Iowa politics and why transparency is so important in these days when trust is such a factor.
It's Friday and we've got plenty of snow back in Iowa however...that does not keep Jeff Pitts the Managing Editor for Cityview Magazine away from the microphone. Here we chat it up about Stuff to Do in the Greater Des Moines Metro tonight (if you can get out) into next week. Happy Friday and stay safe out there!
Wednesday Nov 13, 2019
The Business Journal Awards from Cityview Magazine
Recently Cityview Magazine's Business Journal held a special event honoring nineteen individuals for their outstanding work in the Greater Des Moines Metro. Nineteen people whom the Business Journal says are "making a difference" in 2019. We were there and spoke to a number of the recipients following the gala celebration. While we couldn't get to them all we did visit with:
Shane Goodman - Owner/Publisher of Cityview
Michele Starkenburg of Ankeny, Iowa
E.J. Giovannetti a long-time Urbandale community servant;
Jim Miller a financial planner and Waukee community leader;
Jackie Norris the President/CEO of Goodwill Industries of Central Iowa;
Christine Osborne the General Manager of Christopher's Fine Jewelry;
Scott Seeliger of Cognizant's Global Corporate Affairs Team;
Luis Cruz the General Manager of Mickey's Irish Pub;
Dan Knoup the Executive Director of the Greater Des Moines Homebuilders.
A complete list and their bios can be seen here. I wish we could have talked to each recipient but the time got away from us. However each is mentioned in the clip you are about to hear.


I used to think so, I even told my older brother to not join a company! But I realized I was making a uneducated, irrational decision. I did my research and realized that even though there are scams out there, majority of companies operate legally and often times can turn into a long term residual income.
Here is a great article you can read about network marketing, and the truth behind it. Why? Because the truth is, the truth is the truth.
Interested in great health and wellness products?


text:
Book Signings: Turning an Outdated Event into a Worthwhile Interaction
by Laura C. Cantu | Nov 4, 2016 | Author's Life, Marketing, Writing Tips and Tools
In 2014, Taylor Swift made headlines when she wrote, "There are a few things I have witnessed becoming obsolete in the past few years, the first being autographs." Apparently, the iPhone generation prefers selfies over signed photos, especially when social media sites like Instagram and Snapchat have only made it that much easier to upload a successful selfie and share your new celebrity status.
Now it's 2016, and autographs aren't the only thing adamant fans are passing up on. Book signings, unfortunately, are also on their way out.
Author Noah Charney offered some insight into the tragic trend when he finished up his own book tour late last year. "In recent years, and especially since the recession of 2008, when author advances shrunk and publishing had to tighten its collective belt, one of the first things to go were book tours." He goes on to admit that "touring doesn't necessarily translate into better book sales."
Another author who recently went on a book tour, Holly Robinson, agreed that publishers don't care about book signings anymore. "Alas, the age of book tours is over. Every writer I know, with a few best-selling exceptions, has been told by their publicists and editors to just forget those bookstore appearances. 'Nobody comes anymore,' they explain." Robinson funded her own tour and admitted that the money spent versus the money earned didn't even compare.
Authority Publishing even went so far as to call book signings a "waste of time for authors," and wrote that everything from hosting a contest to speaking at a local service group would be a better use of your efforts.
And yet, Robinson doesn't believe that book signings have lost their significance for authors.
"So why do a book tour, especially if you have to pay for it yourself?" she asks. "The reason bears repeating: we writers put our words on the page to reach someone."
Sure, maybe you're reaching those readers from the written words that were typed up in the comfort of your own dark corner of the world, but you're still reaching them; still pouring your ideas out with the silent confidence that it's your story to tell and one that they need to read.
As author and long-time reader Adam Carter wrote after attending a book signing of his hero, Neil Gaiman: "Hearing the man read his own work is to really hear it for the first time, with a conviction and an intonation that is unparalleled." Carter didn't stay after for the book signing, but left to "get somewhere quiet and read, while your (Neil Gaiman's) voice was still fresh in my mind."
But what if you're not a "Neil Gaiman?" What if you aren't a Rowling or a Patterson, or any other best-selling author with hundreds of fans lining up for your every appearance?
Luckily, the same social media that made autographs obsolete is putting the power in the author's hands and making it easier now more than ever to host a successful book signing.
In The Balance's post about setting up successful author readings and book signings, they list promoting your book on social media among the top three things you can do as an author. "Put the signing on your author website, promote it on your Facebook page, Tweet it to your followers."
Blogger Stacy Deanne takes it one step further and even suggests hosting a purely virtual book tour altogether. "It's been speculated that Virtual Book Tours sell more books than a regular book tour ever could," she wrote. "Think of having a book tour in your robe and slippers. Sounds good to me."
Whatever you do, don't forget that you're doing it for the readers.