text:
At Least 5 Killed, 44 Injured in Weekend Shootings – NBC Chicago
Friday –
Saturday –
Sunday –
At least five people have died and 44 others have sustained injuries in shootings across Chicago so far this weekend, authorities said.
In the first fatal incident of the weekend, a 31-year-old man was shot at approximately 5:19 p.m. in Greater Grand Crossing. According to police, the victim was on a sidewalk in the 6300 block of South King Drive when a light-colored vehicle pulled up and an unknown offender inside produced a firearm. The offender then fired shots, striking the man, police said.
The victim was taken to the University of Chicago Medical Center where he was pronounced dead.
At approximately 7:30 p.m., a 28-year-old woman was shot and killed in the city's Back of the Yards neighborhood. The woman, along with with a 15-year-old boy and 31-year-old man, were standing outside in the 5400 block of South Bishop when they were "shot at from a distance" by an unidentified man, police said.
The woman sustained a gunshot wound to the head and was taken to the University of Chicago Medical Center where she was pronounced dead. The 15-year-old boy was shot in the right leg and said to be in good condition.
The third victim, the 31-year-old man, sustained a gunshot wound to the shoulder and was released at the scene after refusing further treatment, police said.
Just after 9 p.m. Saturday in the 3200 block of West Division Street, two individuals were attacked by a group of gunmen, according to police.
A 24-year-old man was shot in the head, and was taken to St. Mary's Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. A 25-year-old woman was shot in the neck, and was taken to an area hospital, where she was listed in critical condition.
No further details were made available in the shooting, and no suspects are currently in custody, according to police.
Early Sunday morning, two fatal shootings occurred within less than an hour of one another. The first occurred in the 2100 block of North Oakley at approximately 1 a.m. when a 32-year-old woman, who was riding in a vehicle, was struck by gunfire from another car.
According to police, the woman was dropped off at St. Mary's Hospital, where she was pronounced dead.
No suspects are in custody, and police are continuing to investigate.
At approximately 1:38 a.m. in the 3100 block of West Augusta, a 21-year-old man was driving a Jeep when a person pulled up alongside him and fired shots. The man was struck in the head by the bullet, and was taken to Stroger Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.
No suspects are in custody at this time.
Here are the other shootings that have happened so far this weekend:
In the 2300 block of East 80th Street at approximately 6:58 p.m., a 28-year-old man and 27-year-old man were standing outside when they were approached by an unknown offender who began firing at them, police said. Both victims sustained a gunshot wound to the back. They were both transported to the University of Chicago Medical Center and said to be in good condition.
Three people were shot at approximately 8 p.m. near the intersection of 100th Street and Commercial Avenue, authorities said. The victims, all young men, were reported to be in stable condition at the hospital.
A 25-year-old woman was sitting in the rear seat of a Jeep headed northbound in the 3100 block of South Kedzie at approximately 10:56 p.m. when a person in a beige vehicle pulled up and fired shots, police said. The woman was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital in fair condition.
In the 6100 block of South Ashland at approximately 12:02 a.m. a 40-year-old entered a gas station and "consumed products without paying," authorities said. When a 58-year-old security guard approached him and asked him to pay, the man drew a gun and pointed it at the officer. The security guard pulled his gun and fired shots, striking the man in the abdomen. He was taken to University of Chicago Medical Center in critical condition.
At approximately 12:45 a.m. in the 1700 block of North Whipple, a 26-year-old man and a 33-year-old man were walking on the sidewalk when a several people in a black SUV pulled up and started firing shots, according to police. The 26-year-old was shot in the left arm and the 33-year-old was shot in the left leg. Both were taken to St. Mary's Hospital in fair condition.
A 56-year-old man was standing in the 1200 block of West 73rd Street at approximately 2:28 a.m. when he heard shots and felt pain, police said. He was shot in the chest and arm and taken to University of Chicago Medical Center in critical condition.
At approximately 5:31 a.m. in the 9300 block of South Phillips, a 28-year-old man walked into Trinity Hospital with a gunshot wound to the right arm and listed in stable condition, authorities said.
Two people were in a vehicle in the 2300 block of West Cermak at approximately 4:40 a.m. when another vehicle came up and fired shots, police said. The two self transported themselves to Mount Sinai Hospital. A 28-year-old man was shot in the arm and a 24-year-old woman was shot in the leg, with both listed in good condition.
Two people were shot during a "domestic-related altercation" in the 10500 block of South Perry at approximately 8:13 a.m., according to authorities. A 58-year-old man was shot in the left shoulder and transported to University of Chicago Medical Center in stable condition. A 60-year-old man was shot in the head and taken to University of Chicago Medical Center in critical condition.
At approximately 6:11 p.m. in the 3300 block of West North Avenue, a 37-year-old woman was walking outside when she was shot in the back, police said. The victim was transported to Stroger Hospital in stable condition.
Two people were injured in a shooting at approximately 6:13 p.m. in the 2500 block of East 95th Place, police stated. A 62-year-old and 34-year-old man were on the sidewalk when two people in a blue BMW pulled up and fired shots at both victims, authorities said. The 62-year-old was taken to the University of Chicago Medical Center with a gunshot wound to the right hand. The second victim was taken to the hospital with gunshot wounds to the right leg, according to police. He was said to be in fair condition.
At approximately 6:45 p.m. in the 700 block of West Evergreen, a 27-year-old man was in a parking lot when an unidentified offender exited a gray sedan and began shooting at the victim, police said. The victim sustained one gunshot wound to the arm, groin and leg and was initially listed in critical condition.
In the 3300 block of West North Avenue at approximately 7:58 p.m., a 43-year-old man started to leave the scene of a fight when he heard several shots and felt pain. The victim sustained a graze wound to the leg and was said to be in good condition at Norwegian Hospital.
At approximately 8:45 p.m., a 20-year-old man was driving in the 2300 block of North Stockton when a person fired shots at him. The man suffered a graze wound to his torso, and is in good condition at an area hospital, according to police.
A 49-year-old man was standing in the 2500 block of West Augusta at approximately 9:58 p.m. when he was shot in the hip. Police say the man was taken to an area hospital, where his condition had stabilized.
In the 4900 block of West Foster at approximately 10:08 p.m., a 23-year-old man was shot in the abdomen, according to police. The man did not share any further details on the shooting, and his condition had stabilized at an area hospital.
Police say that three people were shot in the 5000 block of South Ada at approximately 10:15 p.m. The three individuals were standing on a sidewalk when they were struck by gunfire. A 27-year-old woman was hit in both legs, and is in serious condition. A 62-year-old man was shot in the groin, and is also listed in serious condition. A 34-year-old woman was hit in the leg, and she is in fair condition.
A 28-year-old man walked into Trinity Hospital with a gunshot wound to his left leg. He was unable to provide details of the shooting, and he was listed in fair condition, according to police.
At approximately 12:42 a.m. in the 5400 block of West Walton, a 36-year-old man was standing on the street when he was shot in the left arm. According to police, the man was taken to an area hospital by a friend, and is in fair condition.
Two people were dropped off at Stroger Hospital with gunshot wounds at 12:45 a.m., police said. A 32-year-old man was shot in the right torso, and a 30-year-old woman was shot in the left leg and abdomen, and both are in fair condition.
In the 1200 block of North Kedzie at approximately 12:56 a.m., two people were shot, according to police. A 28-year-old woman was involved in a minor traffic crash, then was shot in the head, police said. She is listed in critical condition. A 33-year-old man, who may have been caught in the crossfire, was shot in the back, and is in fair condition at an area hospital.
Police say a 29-year-old man was driving in the 1100 block of North California at approximately 1:30 a.m. when he was shot in the back of the neck. The man was taken to an area hospital, where his condition had stabilized.
Just before 2 a.m. in the 400 block of North State Street, a 30-year-old man was walking through a parking garage when several men walked up to him and one opened fire, striking him in the right leg. Police say the man was listed in fair condition.
A 28-year-old woman was standing in a parking lot in the 1100 block of North Kedzie at approximately 2:59 a.m. when she was shot in the right hand, police say. She was taken to an area hospital in good condition.
In the 1800 block of South Ridgeway at approximately 3:01 a.m., a 38-year-old man became involved in a verbal altercation with another individual, who then pulled out a weapon and opened fire. Police say the man was shot in the back and arm, and was listed in good condition at an area hospital.
Police say a 35-year-old man was preparing to get in his car in the 7600 block of South Vernon at approximately 4:07 a.m. when a woman shot him in the abdomen. The man then drove a few blocks before striking a parked vehicle, and was then transported to an area hospital in critical condition. The woman is not in custody, and police believe the shooting was domestic in nature.
At approximately 5:40 a.m. in the 1400 block of South Morgan, a 22-year-old woman was shot in the left side of her torso. Police say the woman was able to drive herself to an area hospital, where her condition had stabilized.
A 27-year-old man was standing in the 7300 block of South Winchester at approximately 6:41 a.m. when a blue sedan drove by, with an occupant firing shots at him. The man was struck several times in the torso, and was listed in critical condition. The sedan fled southbound on Winchester, according to police.
In the 3300 block of West Chicago at approximately 11:58 a.m., a 28-year-old man was in a verbal altercation when a group of unknown men followed him, police said. One offender produced a gun and fired shots, striking the victim. The victim sustained a graze wound to the shoulder.
At approximately 1:59 p.m. in the 100 block of West Adams, a 24-year-old woman sustained a gunshot wound to the leg, police stated. The victim exited an elevator and was found in the lobby.
Tags: Chicago, Injured, Killed, NBC, shootings, Weekend
Previous Keuchel chased early, overwhelmed in 1st begin from Astros
Next Chicago Bears Post Invest in Bid for Arlington Racecourse, Fueling Stadium Rumors – NBC Chicago


text:
Q: How do I represent an homegeneous list of ADT in Scala? I'd like to express a contract that models a homogeneous list containing an ADT.
Let's say I have an ADT
sealed trait Letter
case object A extends Letter
case object B extends Letter

If I declare a contract like
case class Letters(letters: List[Letter])

I can instantiate the class as
Letters(Set(A, A))
Letters(Set(B, B))

but also as
Letters(Set(A, B))

I'd like to make this last case illegal at compile time.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Tent Pitched by God
By David Maas December 26, 2022 Covenant Priesthood Tabernacle
Jesus intercedes without ceasing for his people in the true heavenly Tabernacle, one not made with human hands.
In the gospel of John, Jesus is the true Tabernacle where God dwells. Unlike the ancient structure with its inner sanctuary that only the high priest could enter, now, in Christ, His glory is visible for all men to see. No longer is His presence limited by physical walls and geographic boundaries.
In Jesus of Nazareth, the Father and the Creator of all things is worshipped anywhere and anytime "in spirit and truth."
What was foreshadowed in the ancient Tabernacle and the later Temple building finds its substance in Jesus Christ, the Logos, the "word made flesh."
The epistle to the Hebrews also presents the true significance of the Tabernacle but from a different perspective. In its imagery, Jesus is not the tent itself but the greater high priest who now ministers in the true and greater Tabernacle "NOT MADE WITH HANDS."
THE TRUE TENT
According to the letter, after "achieving the purification of sin," the Son "sat down on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens."
This last clause alludes to Psalm 110:1. But in Hebrews, it not only applies it to his enthronement as king over the cosmos but also to his appointment as the High Priest who now mediates for his people in the "real tabernacle," and in the very presence of God Himself - (Hebrews 1:3-4, 8:1).
The image in the letter is based not on the Temple complex in the city of Jerusalem, but on the "tent" or "tabernacle" that Israel carried during its wilderness sojourn. This is clear not only from the use of the Greek noun, skéné or "tent," but also by the description - "WHICH THE LORD PITCHED." One "builds" a temple complex, but a tent is "pitched."
The distinction is important since the epistle is stressing the transitoriness of the earthly "sanctuary" in contrast to the permanence of its heavenly counterpart. And in Hebrews, all historical references to the "sanctuary" refer to the ancient Tabernacle, the "tent of meeting."
THE TRUE PRIEST
"Now in the things which we are saying the chief point is this: We have such a high priest who sat down on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, a MINISTER OF THE SANCTUARY, and of the TRUE TABERNACLE, which THE LORD PITCHED, not man"– (Hebrews 8:1-2).
And as our High Priest, Jesus is the "minister of the sanctuary." The term rendered "minister" in the passage is leitourgos, a noun used in secular Greek for "public servants" who served the people, whether in religious rituals or governmental capacities. And here, it points to one who ministers on behalf of the people.
And the priestly Son serves his people in the "sanctuary," which translates the noun naos. In the New Testament, naos normally refers to the inner sanctuary of the Tabernacle or Temple, the "most holy place" or Holy of Holies."
But in the structure of the sentence, "sanctuary" and "real tent" refer to one and the same thing, and "pitched" is in the singular number since only one structure is "pitched by the Lord."
In other words, the "sanctuary" or "holy place" and the "tent" are one and the same. The old distinction between the inner and outer courts of the Tabernacle does not exist in the "true Tabernacle." This becomes clearer in chapter 9 of the epistle.
SHADOW vs SUBSTANCE
And the ancient Tabernacle was a mere "copy and shadow" of the true and greater Tabernacle where our High Priest ministers for us. And the author of Hebrews cites Scripture to demonstrate this reality. After all, Moses was commanded to construct a COPY OF THE HEAVENLY SANCTUARY shown to him by Yahweh – (Hebrews 8:3-5).
Moreover, Moses did not see the actual heavenly sanctuary but its "PATTERN." In short, Moses made a COPY OF A COPY. This is not said to denigrate Moses or anything that God gave to Israel, but to stress the vast superiority of the Son over all that preceded him.
At this point, the epistle introduces the subject of the "new covenant" promised in the book of Jeremiah. Just as Jesus holds a superior priesthood and ministers in the "real tent," so he also offers better sacrifices and inaugurated a "better covenant."
The references to the "former covenant" refer not to the one made with Abraham, but to the Mosaic legislation that included the Aaronic priesthood, animal sacrifices, the Tabernacle, and its various rituals. The very fact that the "new covenant" has commenced means the old system, including its "ordinances of divine service," is rendered obsolete – (Hebrews 8:7-9:1).
The author then treats the ancient Tabernacle as if it consisted of two separate tents. In the old structure, there was the outer court, the "first" tent that housed the "lampstand, the table, and the showbread," namely, the "Holy place." Beyond the "veil" or "curtain" was the inner sanctuary, the "second tent," the "Holy of holies." It contained the "golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant."
The priests ministered daily in the "first" tent, making offerings and animal sacrifices. However, only the high priest could enter the "second" or inner tent, and only once each year on the Day of Atonement – (Hebrews 9:2-7).
Thus, the structure of the old Tabernacle demonstrates graphically that the "way into the Holy of holies" remained obscure while the outer court was still "standing." Only the High Priest could access it ("the Holy Spirit this signifying").
But the Tabernacle with this twofold structure is a "figure," a "type and shadow" in the present age of something more profound and quite permanent.
The goal of God's redemptive plan is not for every Israelite to enter the inner sanctuary in the earthly sanctuary, but to attain access for men from every nation to the "throne of grace" in the true and greater "Tabernacle." The sacrifices and rituals of the old system can never achieve the "purification of sins" necessary to enter the sanctuary or make the individual worshipper "complete" and his consciousness clean.
In contrast to the old system, as our High Priest, Jesus approached the divine throne through the "greater and more complete tabernacle, one not made with hands, not of this creation," and he did so "once for all" and applied his own blood to remove the stain of sin, thus opening the way into the Divine presence for all men.
And with him now ministering "evermore" as the High Priest of his people, every member of the new covenant community has free access to the "throne of grace."
Unlike the old Tabernacle with its multiple offerings and sacrifices, he entered the true and greater "Tabernacle" "pitched" by God and not by man, and there he remains mediating and interceding daily for his people.
Some members of the congregation were contemplating returning to the local synagogue to escape increasing pressure. But to now abandon all that Jesus has provided by returning to an obsolete sacrificial system and transitory sanctuary would be foolhardy in the extreme.
[Download PDF copy from Google Drive]
RELATED POSTS : Covenant,Priesthood,Tabernacle,
His Superior Word
By David Maas June 20, 2022
God's definitive word has been spoken in His Son. All previous words were preparatory and incomplete . The letter to the Hebrews exhorts believers not to abandon Jesus when difficult times come. It does so by emphasizing the superiority of what God has done in him, comparing the old Levitical system with its imperfect provisions to the new covenant inaugurated in the Son.
Incomparable New Covenant
By David Maas July 06, 2022
Jesus inaugurated the vastly superior new covenant in his death, rendering the old one obsolete . The "word" that God now speaks " in the Son " surpasses all the past revelations made in " the prophets ." Jesus went beyond them, " having achieved the purification of sins ." Consequently, he " sat down " at the right hand of God and inherited " all things ."
VK PROFILE PAGE

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Managing Contractor for the AAPF is Cardno Emerging Markets (Australia) Pty Ltd (www.cardno.com). The AAPF project management office is based in Pretoria, South Africa.
This website is created and managed by the Cardno AAPF team.


Being an expert in SEO means being able to stay on top of – and ahead of – trends in the industry. Can you anticipate the most effective strategies? Can you act on these instincts to create effective campaigns? Link building has always been a crucial component of search engine optimization, and it remains so today. But the how's and why's of linking have changed, and yesterday's effective techniques may be today's blackhat tactics. What do you need to know about link building for SEO?
In a 2011 Covario survey of more than 300 search marketers, 30 percent indicated that their main SEO strategy will be focused on link building, and 36 percent said that they would focus specifically on organic links through social media sites, like Facebook or Twitter. A variety of services have popped up in order to cater to the growing need for links, but too often, link farms, wheels, and exchanges are simply wastes of money, and they may put you in a compromising position with regard to Google – and that is the last place you want to be. Instead, focus on quality not quantity.
How do you do this? Avoid any service or SEO firm that offers to build thousands of links for you. JC Penney and Overstock.com were recently penalized by Google for doing just this, and they found their rankings on the SERPs dropped quickly and certainly. Instead, search for sites that are related to your industry or which engage the same community. Create conversation – not sales pitches. You want to put useful information out there and create an image for yourself that demonstrates your authority.
Do some link baiting. This often has negative connotations, presumably because of the word "baiting." But you are not doing anything underhanded or shady here. This means that you create high quality, useful, entertaining pieces that will naturally encourage people to share and link to you. Again, the purpose is not to sell but to engage the community and build your online presence.
Link building for SEO remains a concern and should be a top priority for any website in 2011.


What if they transported race cars with bikes, instead of the other way around? Would that be silly, or just cool? (A TdF team car outside Avoriaz, France this morning.) Photo Credit: Spencer Platt/Getty Images.


text:
Coachella Owner Philip Anschutz Donated to Anti-LGBT Organizations as Recently as 2015
Madeleine Davies
Despite previous statements claiming he never knowingly donated to LQBT hate groups and denouncing reports as "fake news," Philip Anschutz of Anschutz Entertainment Group—the corporation that, through its subsidiary company Goldenvoice, puts on the Coachella and Panorama music festivals—donated to Alliance Defending Freedom through his philanthropic organization the Anschutz Foundation as recently as 2015, according to tax records.
In September of 2016, the Washington Post reported that the Anschutz Foundation donated to Alliance Defending Freedom, the Family Research Council, and the National Christian Foundation (the first two of which are openly anti-LGBT—the National Christian Foundation, however, doesn't publicly state its views on LGBT rights) between 2010 and 2013. The story recirculated earlier this month, following the announcement of the 2017 Coachella lineup, leading Anschutz—a friend of the Koch brothers and a climate change denier—to release the following statement:
Recent claims published in the media that I am anti-LGBTQ are nothing more than fake news – it is all garbage. I unequivocally support the rights of all people without regard to sexual orientation. We are fortunate to employ a wealth of diverse individuals throughout our family of companies, all of whom are important to us – the only criteria on which they are judged is the quality of their job performance; we do not tolerate discrimination in any form.
Both The Anschutz Foundation and I contribute to numerous organizations that pursue a wide range of causes. Neither I nor the Foundation fund any organization with the purpose or expectation that it would finance anti-LGBTQ initiatives, and when it has come to my attention or the attention of The Anschutz Foundation that certain organizations either the Foundation or I have funded have been supporting such causes, we have immediately ceased all contributions to such groups.
However, by viewing the the Anschultz Foundation's tax filings, Marc Hogan and Amy Phillips of Pitchfork discovered that the foundation has donated to Alliance Defending Freedom as recently as 2015.
Pitchfork reports:
According to a tax filing made by the Anschutz Foundation to the IRS, uncovered by Pitchfork via the nonprofit tax document source CitizenAudit.org, the foundation donated $75,000 to Alliance Defending Freedom and $15,000 to National Christian Foundation in the year ending in November 2015. The "program area" for these two gifts is classified as "core principles." Other examples of a "program area" in the filing include "health," "youth development," and "quality of life." Representatives for AEG have not responded to Pitchfork's request for clarification of what the foundation's "core principles" are.
Before that, from December 2011 to November 2014, the Anschutz Foundation contributed $110,000 to Alliance Defending Freedom, $50,000 to National Christian Foundation, and $20,000 to Family Research Council, according to online tax filings viewed by Pitchfork via the Foundation Center, another data tracker. The "program areas" listed for these gifts include "religious and related activities," "Christian principles & values," and "conserv concepts, public policy." (The abbreviation "conserv" is not explained.)
According to the homepage of its website, Alliance Defending Freedom believes "God immutably creates each person as male or female. These two distinct, complementary genders together reflect the image and nature of God, and rejecting one's biological sex rejects the created image of God" and "all forms of sexual immorality are sinful and offensive to God." The organization is also anti-abortion and has defended several businesses that refuse to serve same-sex couples. The National Christian Foundation, another one of the Anschultz Foundation's favorite organizations, has donated at least $10 million to Alliance Defending Freedom.
Neither Anschultz nor his foundation have responded to Pitchfork's request "about how the groups' views on LGBTQ issues failed to reach the attention of Anschutz or the foundation sooner." However, a lawyer for at at Hogan Lovells, one of AEG's law firms, says that contributions stopped in 2015.


HP Throws Weight Behind MySQL, JBoss - InternetNews.
Wade told internetnews.com the added layer of MySQL and JBoss support addresses one of the largest concerns customers have today in opting to pick open source technology over mainstay proprietary products such as Microsoft Windows, Sun Microsystems' Solaris or UNIX.
"We can provide support for that entire solution stack and we're also now giving our customers flexibility in choice and the types of solutions they want to deploy whether that's a commercial or open source application," Wade said.
Bob Bickel, vice president of strategy and corporate development at JBoss, said commercial use remains somewhat constrained because a CIO doesn't know whom they can turn to for support.
The deal is truly symbiotic. While MySQL and JBoss get backing from a technology driver such as HP, HP gets the added credibility of being cozy with open source, a label many enterprises and HP rivals, such as IBM and Dell , are working toward.
Linux sales are trending tall regardless; according to recent hardware server and database software studies from high-tech research outfit Gartner.
Despite legal threats from SCO Group and competition from Microsoft, Gartner said Linux continued to be the growth powerhouse in the operating systems server market, with a revenue increase of 57.3 percent in the first quarter of 2004.
Gartner also found that Linux siphoned market share from UNIX in the relational database management system (RDBMS) market, a niche that grew 158 percent from $116 million in new license revenue in 2002 to nearly $300 million in 2003.


text:
Home/About Us/Newsroom/Dr. Siva Maran Joins Tennova Medical Group
Section Menu Submenu ☰ About Us Home 2019 News Releases2018 News Releases2017 News Releases2016 News Releases2015 News Releases2014 News Releases
Dr. Siva Maran Joins Tennova Medical Group
Gastroenterologist specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disorders
KNOXVILLE, TN (July 23, 2020) – Tennova Healthcare recently welcomed Siva Maran, M.D., gastroenterologist, to Tennova Gastroenterology – Morristown. He is accepting new patients at his office at 705 North High Street, Suite A, Morristown, TN. Same-week appointments are available. To schedule an appointment, call (423) 415-3310 or visit TennovaMedicalGroup.com. Dr. Maran also offers telehealth visits.
Dr. Maran has been serving patients in the Morristown area for more than 25 years. Prior to joining Tennova, he was in private practice at Morristown Gastroenterology.
He is experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive health conditions, including stomach ulcers, gastrointestinal bleeding and irritable bowel syndrome. He specializes in capsule endoscopy, colon cancer screening, ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus, and gastrointestinal wellness and nutrition. Dr. Maran performs procedures such as colonoscopies, upper endoscopies and therapeutic endoscopic interventions exclusively at Jefferson Memorial Hospital and Newport Medical Center.
Dr. Maran earned his medical degree from Madurai Medical College in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. After coming to the United States, he completed a residency in internal medicine at East Tennessee State University in Johnson City, TN; and fellowship training in gastroenterology, also at East Tennessee State University. Dr. Maran is board certified in gastroenterology and internal medicine.
"I am committed to helping people with digestive disorders lead more comfortable and healthy lives," Dr. Maran said. "I also specialize in capsule endoscopy, which uses a tiny wireless camera that takes pictures as it passes through the digestive tract. The camera sits inside a small capsule—about the size of a large vitamin pill—that is swallowed. Images are transmitted to a recording device worn on a belt around your waist. This safe and painless in-office procedure allows doctors to see areas of inflammation as well as tumors in the small intestine."
Tennova Healthcare offers the latest techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disorders including endoscopy at Jefferson Memorial Hospital, Newport Medical Center, North Knoxville Medical Center, Turkey Creek Medical Center and LaFollette Medical Center. With more than 20 gastroenterology specialists at multiple locations across the region, the health system is dedicated to offering patients comprehensive care for a full range of digestive health conditions—close to home.


The painting depicts the interior of a Renaissance-style church at night with an elegant couple making an entrance. The imaginary view of this interior includes elements taken from actual churches, notably the pulpit from Rotterdam's Laurenskerk.The figures are by Anthonie Palamedesz. who assisted de Lorme, as well as Dirck van Delen, on larger interior scenes.


This Sausage Gravy and Biscuit Breakfast Casserole is a mouthful, both to eat and to say, but that shouldn't stop you from making it because it is going to become your new favorite dish. Of that, I am certain. I wasn't originally going to post this recipe on my blog. I made it early last month for Jones Dairy Farm, and posted a sneak peek image of it on Instagram the day I made it. A lot of people kept asking for the recipe, which should not of surprised me as much as it did because it's a breakfast/brunch casserole made of eggs, sausage gravy, and homemade buttermilk biscuits. What's not to like?!?! I've never known a moment where biscuits weren't a great idea. So I decided this was a good enough excuse to share it on the blog so that you can enjoy the step-by-step photos as per usual, and make it for your next brunch or breakfast.
I got the idea for this dish when I was in Idaho a couple of months ago. As part of the Idaho Potato Harvest, we had a bus driver named Bruce who was so awesome. He's a retired veteran and native Idahoan who has had so many jobs all over the country, and I was fortunate enough to talk to him throughout the tour. He told me so much about his life and what he used to do, and why he started driving tour buses. During one of our chats he told me about this dish that he makes all the time for his wife and kids and grandkids, a sausage gravy casserole with biscuits. He shared with me exactly how to make it and what I should and should not do. So when I came home I started testing out the recipe for myself. Since Bruce didn't tell me the exact amounts, I had to play around with it a few times to get it right. I finally got it down and was super excited that it turned out just as he described it. So this Sausage Gravy and Biscuit Breakfast Casserole is dedicated to Bruce, the nicest bus driver I've ever met, and the coolest cat I know.
Let's get started with the sausage gravy! We begin by browning our breakfast sausage. I'm using turkey sausage, but feel free to use whatever sausage you have on hand, or what your favorite is. Jones Dairy Farm has a great selection of different breakfast sausages that are all perfect for this dish.
Once the sausage has browned and is crispy, sprinkle with flour and stir, cooking for about 30 seconds just to get rid of that raw flour flavor.
Slowly stream in the milk, while stirring, cooking over low to medium heat until the gravy has thickened. Season with salt and lots of fresh cracked black pepper. That's the best part about sausage gravy, all that black pepper.
Remove from the heat and set it off to the side so that you can get the eggs together. In a medium bowl, whisk together the eggs, milk, hot sauce, salt and pepper until evenly combined.
Pour the eggs into a well greased 9-inch square baking pan, or any other oven-safe baking dish that is similar in size. You don't want anything too big as it'll make this casserole too thin. The whole point is to have it thick and fluffy with the eggs and biscuits on top.
This is where the weird part comes in, but I'm going to need you to trust me. I just barely trusted myself when I made this, but it works and it's delicious, I promise. Pour the sausage gravy right into the eggs. Yes, right into the eggs. Then give it a gentle stir to somewhat distribute the gravy around the eggs.
Bake in a preheated 375 degree F oven for about 10 to 15 minutes. That's not enough time to cook the eggs, but just enough to allow them to firm up and set just a bit. If you were to add the biscuits on top right away, they'll sink down to the bottom of the casserole and the eggs would bake over them. Not a bad thing, just not what we're going for here.
While the eggs and gravy bake, take this time to make the biscuits. In a large bowl, combine the flour, salt, baking powder, and sugar. Add the cold diced butter and work it into with your fingers or a pastry blender until coarse crumbs the size of peas form. Stir in the buttermilk until just combined. Turn out the dough on a floured work surface, knead it a few times, and then roll it out to about 1/2 an inch thick. Cut out 9 biscuits with a 3 or 4-inch round biscuit cutter.
Remove the par-baked casserole from the oven and place the biscuits on top. Brush with buttermilk and sprinkle with black pepper. Return to the oven and bake until the eggs have puffed and set, and the biscuits are golden brown and cooked through, about 20 to 25 minutes.
Remove from the oven and allow to cool slightly before slicing and serving. As the casserole cools, it gives the eggs a chance to settle down a bit, making it easier to cut. Sprinkle with sliced scallions on top for garnish. I like that pop of green to an otherwise brown and yellow dish.
We made homemade biscuits here, which I can't express enough just how much more delicious they are when you make them yourself, but I know that it's not always possible. Sometimes we just don't have the time or the patience, and that's okay. This casserole shouldn't stress you out, so feel free to use canned biscuits from the store. Just place them on top and bake off as directed. No one will be the wiser.
The gravy sausage doesn't fully cook into the eggs, so when you slice and serve and cut into the casserole with your fork, the sausage gravy oozes out a bit, making it SO beyond amazing. You're going to want to make this dish over and over again. I'm giving you a fair warning right now up front, so that later on you're not too surprised.
I developed this Sausage Gravy and Biscuit Breakfast Casserole for Jones Dairy Farm, so if you'd like to be able to grab the recipe and print it off for your next brunch, breakfast, or even dinner, be sure to click here so you can get the recipe for yourself! Be sure to let me know what you think once you make it! It's going to be your new favorite breakfast/brunch recipe, I just know it.
I am so down with this crazy awesome casserole! It's like the ultimate comfort food breakfast!
This looks fantastic! I'm wondering how you feel about freezing this, and at what point you might try to do it? I'm thinking after the par bake, maybe freezing the biscuits separately? I may attempt this, will report back if I do!
This looks amazing! I hope to try making it this weekend. 🙂 If you have any recs on what brand of canned biscuits to use, do let me know!


text:
You Are Here : Home / Council business, news and information/ News / Latest news / Road safety reminder as schools return
Road safety reminder as schools return
Please take extra care on the roads next week, with children returning to school.
Parents of seven-year-old Matilda, Adam and Amy, are grateful that Tea Tree Gully Council community safety officers visit local schools to share road safety messages with parents and children.
"I think it means that the community are being looked after - instead of dealing with the problems after something unfortunate occurs," said Amy who takes every opportunity to teach their three children about road safety.
And it seems the message is getting through to Matilda (pictured).
"Sometimes I look twice and sometimes I look three times just in case" when crossing the road, she said.
If your child attends a local school, you'll most likely see some of our community safety team handing out road safety education brochures and monitoring traffic and parking at school drop-off and pickup times, said Laura Watson, community safety manager at the City of Tea Tree Gully.
"Our team are easy to spot as they wear bright orange vests. They work closely with schools and SAPOL to help improve road and pedestrian safety around schools by making sure people follow the Australian road rules.
"However, we can't be everywhere at once. It's important that drivers, cyclists and pedestrians take the right steps to protect kids around schools, where roads can get congested, making it more dangerous and even harder to see children," said Laura.
Report school road safety concerns
Our community safety officers are friendly and professional and are happy to be approached, while on duty, by parents and carers to chat about any school road safety concerns.
Parking issues can also be reported via the report it/request it section on our website.
To report dangerous driving, contact SAPOL.
School road safety tips
Allow enough time to safely take your child to the school gates. Park a few streets away if possible and walk your child to school – it's great exercise and an opportunity to teach them road safety rules on the way.
Talk to your child about signs, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings and safe places to get in and out of your vehicle. Make sure you practise what you preach!
Teach your child to cross the road safely: Stop at the kerb, look and listen for traffic, and then decide whether it's safe to cross.
Follow speed limits and parking signs in and around school zones to help improve traffic flow and prevent obstructions. This includes not parking or stopping at the side of a road marked with a yellow line.
A Community Safety Officer on duty at a local school school crossing.


text:
Home Arts & Entertainment	Gary Malkin & Liz Dawn, Transformational Music
Arts & EntertainmentHealth & Well-beingVividLife Talks
Gary Malkin & Liz Dawn, Transformational Music
written by VividLife.me October 27, 2014
Join Liz Dawn as she talks with composer Gary Malkin about his message of transformational music to bring about social change and inner harmony.
Gary is a seven time Emmy® award-winning composer, producer, performer and public speaker dedicated to making a difference in the world by creating music-driven media and experiences that inspire the heart and catalyze individual and societal healing. He is passionate about the vital role music, media, and the arts can play during these extraordinary times of change as an innovative tool to enhance our humanity, deepen our sense of meaning in our lives, and cultivate greater emotional/social intelligence in an increasingly complex and distracted world.
Gary has presented his vision of new ways to use music for life-balance and social intelligence at places such as Google, Harvard's Conference on Spirituality and Health, Scripps Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, and The Institute for Functional Medicine; and was recently featured on the national PBS Series, Healing Quest, the Huffington Post, and will now be joining Liz Dawn on Celebrate Your Life radio!
Liz, is the co-founder/co-creator of Mishka Productions and Celebrate Your Life events whose mission is to bring powerful life changing events that inspire, heal and transform one's life! www.CelebrateYourLife.Org
Celebrate Your Life with Liz Dawn, brings you intimate and deep conversations with some of the world's finest spiritual teachers of our time. The show's host, is none other than Liz Dawn, president and co-founder of Mishka Productions, the creators of the infamousCelebrate Your Life conference and events. Tune in each week as Liz takes you on a journey through all ways to celebrate, honor and nourish your life!
Written by VividLife.me
What does your YOUR VividLife Look Like? What does it feel like to be living a Vivid Life every single day?
Gary Malkin & Liz Dawn, Transformational Music was last modified: October 27th, 2014 by VividLife.me
Yvonne Sklar & Tina Klonaris-Robinson, Is Heaven for Real?
David Christopher & Edie Weinstein, The Holy Universe continued…
LISTEN: What's Your Possibility? with Shasta Townsend
Overcoming Insomnia Naturally
Sharon Salzberg: Real Happiness
Rejuvenate Latte
READ: Hungry in Hendersonville
The Spirit of Giving
Ask the Ghost Whisperer James Van Praagh LIVE Tues. May 4th 1 pm EST
Fit For A Queen Mother's Day Brunch
How To Recover From Betrayal (Not just love betrayal, but betrayal of all kinds.)
What is True Beauty?


Ok… I am still alive… God blessed me with a lovely Boy: Hamza!
I still cannot believe I am a mother of two. To me, this is a great blessing. Hamza is lovely masha'Allah and Omar loves him thank God. Jealousy is beginning to show in ways, but not in an extreme fashion. He is becoming somewhat more stubborn and says no a lot too. I am trying to handle him well, although sometimes I do lose my temper after repeating myself over and over again about something. But I do try to balance things. The bright side is so far he does not hate his brother or hurt him, he loves him a great deal which is great!
Although, sometimes I have to manage both Omar and his father with the temper problem (they quarrel and get stubborn with one another!!). Ulysse sometimes deals with Omar as if he is older than what he is. I in turn have to tell Ulysse (aside, not in front of our son) that what he is doing is in excess or is not the way to deal with Omar at this age… But all in all I guess we are alright. I do wish I can give more attention to Omar though. I think I will be able to manage insha'Allah. Or so I keep telling myself. I am trying and I am enjoying being a mother for two boys.
This is all for now. I miss the blogosphere and I miss all of you!
Great to hear from you again! Don't forget us! Glad the little ones are good mashAllah!
So happy for you! As always, best wishes to you. Hope that the transition is going well. Much love.
Congratulations Dalulla!!! Best wishes to you and family.
i hope you and you new baby are doing well!
god bless you all, dear!
I hope you and your family are adjusting well to the new addition and that everyone is healthy. I know how busy it can be with two young children but I am still waiting to see a picture of your new son! I'm curious to see if he has his brother's big, beautiful eyes. Please post one or email one when you have the chance. My love to you.
Asalaamu alaikum, I have moved from opinionated Voice to Radical Muslim so please update your link if neccessary, and keep in touch too.
Hello, Paschalis family alot of hugs from Bojan!!!!
Bojan! no is that really you??? How have you been what a small small smmmmmmaaaal world! since when have you been around blogs... I am so happy to see a comment from you i could not believe my eyes! Why don't you ever contact Uly? He would be very very happy to hear from you... I hope you come back again and see this comment!
that is a great blessing , may allah make all their life happiness and success and give you the wisdom and strength to raise them well Great to hear from you again! Don't forget us! Glad the little ones are good mashAllah! So happy for you! As always, best wishes to you. Hope that the transition is going well. Much love. Mabrook Congratulations Dalulla!!! Best wishes to you and family.
I hope you and your family are adjusting well to the new addition and that everyone is healthy. I know how busy it can be with two young children but I am still waiting to see a picture of your new son! I'm curious to see if he has his brother's big, beautiful eyes. Please post one or email one when you have the chance. My love to you. Asalaamu alaikum, I have moved from opinionated Voice to Radical Muslim so please update your link if neccessary, and keep in touch too. Hello, Paschalis family alot of hugs from Bojan!!!! Bojan! no is that really you??? How have you been what a small small smmmmmmaaaal world! since when have you been around blogs... I am so happy to see a comment from you i could not believe my eyes! Why don't you ever contact Uly? He would be very very happy to hear from you... I hope you come back again and see this comment!


text:
In re Marriage of Erickson
In re Marriage of McFarlane
• 8-10 The court may order an ex-spouse to pay such fees where the party seeking payment demonstrates her own…
Rackow v. Human Rights Com
• 10 The amount of the award of attorney fees depends upon whether the work was reasonably required and…
Full title:In re MARRIAGE OF TONI D. ERICKSON, a/k/a Toni D. Flesvig…
Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part and remanded
Date published: Sep 23, 1985
136 Ill. App. 3d 907 (Ill. App. Ct. 1985)
483 N.E.2d 692
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part and remanded
approving retroactive modification of maintenance and support obligation to date of wife's remarriage
Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Hawking
Opinion filed September 23, 1985.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Du Page County; the Hon. S. Keith Lewis, Judge, presiding.
Gordon T. Trapp and Zachary M. Bravos, both of Bravos Trapp, of Wheaton, for appellant.
John J. Burek, of Burek Field, of Wheaton, for appellee.
JUSTICE LINDBERG delivered the opinion of the court:
Petitioner, Toni Erickson, currently known as Toni Flesvig, appeals from certain orders the circuit court of Du Page County entered in this post-dissolution proceeding. She raises four assignments of error in this court: (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered respondent, Alan Erickson, to pay her $430 per month for child support; (2) a recent amendment to section 505(a) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Marriage Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1984 Supp., ch. 40, par. 505(a)), which took effect during the pendency of this appeal, requires that the cause be remanded for a redetermination of the child support; (3) the court below erred when it dismissed petitioner's petition for a rule to show cause; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered respondent to pay only $445 of the fees of counsel the petitioner incurred in the post-dissolution matter.
On December 30, 1980, petitioner filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. Respondent filed a counterpetition for dissolution of marriage, which the trial court dismissed at his request. On September 10, 1982, the court below entered a judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. In its order, the court awarded custody of the parties' minor child to petitioner; ordered respondent to pay her $1,000 per month in unallocated maintenance and child support for the first 24 months and, thereafter, $800 per month as unallocated maintenance and support until the child became 18 years old; and divided the parties' marital property. In particular, among other things, the court awarded petitioner the former marital home, situated in Glen Ellyn, Illinois, and respondent a condominium that was located in New Hampshire. Also, the trial court ordered each party to pay one-half of the fees of counsel the petitioner incurred.
On February 8, 1984, respondent filed a petition for a redetermination or modification of unallocated maintenance and child support. The petition alleged that petitioner had remarried on November 20, 1983, and requested that the court eliminate maintenance as of November 20, 1983, and enter an award of support for the minor child.
Six days later, petitioner filed a petition for an order requiring respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for his failure to pay the full $1,000 monthly sum in unallocated maintenance and child support. In her petition, petitioner admitted that she had remarried on November 20, 1983, and stated further that respondent had unilaterally reduced the monthly payment in question from $1,000 to $400 as of December 1, 1983. That same day, the trial court entered an order requiring respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court as a result of his failure to pay the $1,000 monthly sum for unallocated maintenance and support.
On May 23, 1984, the trial court held a hearing to adjudicate these matters. The evidence adduced at that time established that petitioner called respondent on November 17, 1983, to inform him that she was going to be remarried three days later. Petitioner was remarried on November 20. Respondent related that he tried to resolve the question of the amount of unallocated maintenance and support with his ex-wife. However, petitioner denied that respondent ever contacted her regarding this matter.
Prior to December 1, 1983, respondent had paid the full $1,000 monthly sum of unallocated maintenance and support. On that date, without a court order, he unilaterally reduced his monthly payment from $1,000 to $400; he paid petitioner the reduced amount from that date until the time of the instant hearing. According to petitioner, respondent was in arrears in the sum of $3,900 regarding the payment of unallocated maintenance and support. In addition, she admitted that she did not inform the court that she had remarried.
During the course of their marriage, the parties had one child, who was almost 16 years old at the time of the hearing. Respondent was self-employed as a sales representative for Techni-Cal of Camrio, California. In this position, he was guaranteed a monthly draw or gross salary of $4,500. However, he was required to repay his monthly draw from his sales commissions. In 1983, he drew $45,000 as salary, but earned only $15,332 in commission, leaving a deficit of $29,667. During the first five months of 1984, he drew $22,500 in salary, but made only $5,529 in commissions, for a debit of $16,170. The total amount he owes Techni-Cal as a result of those deficits is $46,638. Although he had not yet filed an income tax return for 1983, because he had received an extension of time within which to file, he stated that his gross salary for 1983 was $54,389. He related, in addition, that he incurred $17,000 in work-related expenses.
Respondent sold the condominium he owned in New Hampshire and experienced a $7,000 loss as a result of the sale. Currently, he does not own any real estate, a car, stocks, or bonds. However respondent has a checking account with a balance of $218. Also, he owns a sailboat that is encumbered with a loan in the sum of $29,900. Including this debt, respondent has existing debts amounting to $49,860. Respondent, who has remarried, has monthly expenses of $4,607. His current wife earns an annual gross salary of $25,500.
In March 1983, petitioner terminated her employment due to stress; at that time, she was making $12,000 per year. Recently, she has been looking for new employment, without success. Neither she nor her son has any assets, except the $1,500 she has in her checking account.
Petitioner and her son currently reside with her new husband, Robert Flesvig, and his son. Before moving in with her current spouse, she sold the marital home which the trial court had awarded her in the decree of dissolution. She related that her projected annual monthly expenses were $943, while those of her child amounted to $858. Based on those calculations, she requested $800 per month in the form of child support.
She listed as specific expenses for both herself and her child one-quarter ($88.35) of the monthly real estate taxes owing on her husband's home and one-quarter ($290.25) of the monthly mortgage payment due on Mr. Flesvig's residence. The testimony established that Mr. Flesvig owned the home prior to marriage to the petitioner and that he deducted from his income tax the interest payments associated with the mortgage. His marriage to petitioner did not increase either his monthly mortgage payment or his real estate tax liability. Petitioner did not know whether the title to her husband's home was in her name.
In 1983, Robert Flesvig received total wages in the sum of $36,922. His adjusted gross income for that year amounted to $34,690.
In its order of June 18, 1984, the trial court determined that, due to petitioner's remarriage, respondent was absolved from making maintenance payments from the date of her remarriage, November 20, 1983. Accordingly, the trial court ordered that maintenance was terminated on the date of her remarriage. In addition, the court modified the original judgment of dissolution of marriage by requiring respondent to pay monthly child support in the sum of $430 and made the support order effective nunc pro tunc to November 20, 1983. Also, the court decreed that the substance of the rest of his order rendered moot petitioner's petition for a rule to show cause and, therefore, declined to issue the rule.
Approximately two weeks later, petitioner filed a petition for the payment of the fees of counsel she incurred in the post-dissolution proceeding. After respondent filed a response to the petition for fees, the trial court held a hearing on July 3, 1984, to adjudicate the matter. Petitioner sought fees in the amount of $1,753.10. However, the court determined that reasonable fees of counsel were $445. After declaring that respondent had a far greater ability to pay the fees than did petitioner, the court ordered him to pay this amount. Petitioner filed a timely notice of appeal.
• 1 Petitioner's first contention in this court is that the trial court abused its discretion when it decreed that respondent was obligated to pay petitioner $430 per month for child support. Her argument is that the amount of support the court below ordered her ex-husband to pay is inadequate.
Originally, on September 10, 1982, the trial court entered an order that dissolved the parties' marriage and awarded petitioner $1,000 per month for unallocated maintenance and child support. Subsequently, after respondent had filed a petition for a redetermination or modification of the award of unallocated maintenance and support, the court below entered an order on June 18, 1984, that terminated maintenance as of the date of the petitioner's remarriage, November 20, 1983. In addition, the court modified its original order by requiring the respondent to pay $430 per month for child support and made the support order effective nunc pro tunc to November 20, 1983. We conclude from these facts that the court's second order, when viewed in its entirety, is properly deemed to be a modification of child support under section 510(a) of the Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 510(a)). See, e.g., Finley v. Finley (1980), 81 Ill.2d 317, 329; Potocki v. Potocki (1981), 98 Ill. App.3d 501, 505, 424 N.E.2d 714, 717; Lewis v. Staub (1981), 95 Ill. App.3d 243, 247, 419 N.E.2d 1223, 1226.
In adjudicating a petition for a modification of child support, the trial court considers the same factors it weighs, under section 505(a) of the Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 505(a)), when it formulates an original support order. ( In re Marriage of Butler (1982), 106 Ill. App.3d 831, 836-37, 436 N.E.2d 561, 565; In re Marriage of Roth (1981), 99 Ill. App.3d 679, 682-83, 426 N.E.2d 246, 249; Ill. Ann. Stat., ch. 40, par. 510(a), Historical Practice Notes, at 699 (Smith-Hurd 1980).) Both the initial award of child support and the adjudication of a modification of child support rest within the sound discretion of the trial court, whose decisions in these matters will not be reversed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. In re Marriage of Butler (1982), 106 Ill. App.3d 831, 836-37, 436 N.E.2d 561, 565.
In an exhibit petitioner introduced at the hearing, held in this matter, she calculated that the parties' minor child incurred monthly expenses of $858.06. Further, the exhibit stated that a reasonable amount of support for the one child was $800 per month. By contrast, the trial court awarded petitioner $430 per month for child support. We believe that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it entered the order awarding respondent only $430 per month.
Respondent listed as expenses the child's one-quarter ($88.35) share of the realty taxes that Mr. Flesvig owed on his home and the minor's one-quarter portion ($290.25) of Mr. Flesvig's monthly mortgage payment. However, Mr. Flesvig admitted that he owned the home and that his marriage to petitioner did not increase either his monthly mortgage payment or his real estate tax liability. Furthermore, there is no evidence that either petitioner or her son was also an owner of the residence or otherwise legally obligated for the payment of the real estate taxes or the mortgage. Accordingly, the trial court could have concluded, with ample justification, that these two items were improperly listed as the child's expenses. Subtracting this combined total (378.60) from the amount petitioner listed as reasonable child support ($800) leaves the child's resultant monthly expenses at approximately $422, very close to the court's award of $430. We also note that $430 is approximately one-half the $856 that petitioner testified was required for the minor's monthly support. The financial responsibility for the support of a child is the obligation of both parents. ( In re Marriage of Wentink (1984), 132 Ill. App.3d 71, 80, 476 N.E.2d 1109, 1115.) Therefore, based upon these factors and an examination of the elements set forth in section 505(a) of the Marriage Act as they relate to the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering the instant support order.
• 2 Petitioner argues, in addition, that the trial court lacked sufficient evidence of respondent's income upon which to base the current order of child support. Petitioner did not raise this contention in the trial court and made no objection on this basis when the court below entered its order. Petitioner acquiesced in the manner in which the hearing was conducted and cannot raise this matter for the first time on appeal. Cf. Auton v. Logan Landfill, Inc. (1984), 105 Ill.2d 537, 543, and McKinnie v. Lane (1907), 230 Ill. 544, 548 (a party may not complain of an error to which she consented).
In any event, the trial court had sufficient evidence before it of respondent's financial condition, including a good approximation of his 1983 income. Although respondent's tax returns for 1983 were not available due to the fact that he obtained an extension of time in which to file them, the court was presented with evidence that respondent earned roughly $54,000 that year and had $17,000 in business expenses. In addition, the record reflects the presentation of testimony concerning respondent's assets and the property he owned.
• 3 Petitioner next argues that the trial court erred when it dismissed her petition for a rule to show cause. Relying principally upon section 510(a) of the Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 510(a)), she maintains that the trial court erroneously modified the support order nunc pro tunc to November 20, 1983, a date prior to the filing of respondent's petition to terminate maintenance and modify support.
Section 510(a) of the Marriage Act prescribes that, with one exception that is not applicable here, the court may modify the maintenance or support provisions of any judgment "only as to installments accruing subsequent to the filing of the motion for modification * * *." (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 510(a).) Section 510(b) of the Marriage Act provides that "the obligation to pay future maintenance is terminated upon * * * the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance," unless the parties agree otherwise in a written separation agreement (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 510(b)). In re Marriage of Kozloff (1984), 101 Ill.2d 526, 533; In re Marriage of Clarke (1984), 125 Ill. App.3d 432, 435, 465 N.E.2d 975, 977.
The well-settled rule in this State is that past-due installments of child support are the vested right of the designated recipient; thus, the court lacks the authority to modify those amounts that have already accrued. ( Hoos v. Hoos (1980), 86 Ill. App.3d 817, 821, 408 N.E.2d 752, 755; Jozwick v. Jozwick (1979), 72 Ill. App.3d 17, 20, 390 N.E.2d 488, 490.) Furthermore, a party may not unilaterally terminate child support payments. ( In re Marriage of Homan (1984), 126 Ill. App.3d 133, 135, 466 N.E.2d 1289, 1290-92; Hoos v. Hoos (1980), 86 Ill. App.3d 817, 821, 408 N.E.2d 752, 755; Jozwick v. Jozwick (1979), 72 Ill. App.3d 17, 20, 390 N.E.2d 488, 490.) The modification of such payments is a judicial function; the court's decision to modify the payment of child support is discretionary in nature and only takes effect prospectively. Hoos v. Hoos (1980), 86 Ill. App.3d 817, 821, 408 N.E.2d 752, 755; Jozwick v. Jozwick (1979), 72 Ill. App.3d 17, 20, 390 N.E.2d 488, 490.
It is equally manifest that the remarriage of the recipient spouse does not automatically reduce an unallocated award of maintenance and child support; rather, as is required in other cases where a modification is sought, the party desiring the reduction must petition the court to modify its prior decree. ( Potocki v. Potocki (1981), 98 Ill. App.3d 501, 505, 424 N.E.2d 714, 717.) In that instance, even though a parent's obligation to support a child terminates upon emancipation, the parent responsible for tendering the payments may not make a unilateral pro rata reduction in the amount of unallocated child support payments upon one child's emancipation absent an agreement to the contrary. ( Finley v. Finley (1980), 81 Ill.2d 317, 328-29.) Similarly, it is clear that the death of one child does not give the obligor-parent the right to reduce unilaterally such unallocated child support payments. Lewis v. Staub (1981), 95 Ill. App.3d 243, 245, 419 N.E.2d 1223, 1225.
In the case at bar, petitioner remarried on November 20, 1983; respondent became aware of her pending remarriage on November 17, 1983, and as of December 1, 1983, unilaterally reduced the unallocated monthly award of maintenance and child support from $1,000 to $400. On February 8, 1984, respondent filed a petition to modify the trial court's earlier order of dissolution; he sought a termination of maintenance and requested that the trial court determine the amount of child support he was required to pay his ex-wife. On June 18, 1984, the trial court absolved respondent from making maintenance payments from the date of petitioner's remarriage and ordered that maintenance was terminated as of November 20, 1983. Also, the court modified the original decree that dissolved the marriage by requiring respondent to make monthly child support payments in the amount of $430 and made the support order effective nunc pro tunc to November 20, 1983. Lastly, the court below denied petitioner's petition for a rule to show cause.
• 4 A nunc pro tunc order is a decree the court enters in the present to make the record speak for something that was done previously. For example, the court may employ such an order to correct a record that omitted an order that the court made earlier. However, if there was no earlier order to which a nunc pro tunc order could relate back, then the use of this type of order is improper. ( Harner v. Harner (1982), 105 Ill. App.3d 430, 436, 434 N.E.2d 465, 470.) In the current case, the utilization of a nunc pro tunc order was inappropriate because there was no earlier order modifying the initial maintenance and support decree that was omitted from the record. However, the court could have modified its earlier order of unallocated maintenance and support and made the modified order retroactive. This would appear to be an appropriate circumstance for this court to construe the trial court's order as a retroactive modification of the original order. See Harner v. Harner (1982), 105 Ill. App.3d 430, 436, 434 N.E.2d 465, 470.
The remaining and more difficult inquiry is whether the trial court's order should be retroactive to November 20, 1983, the date of the petitioner's remarriage, or February 8, 1984, the date the respondent filed his petition to terminate maintenance. Based on the jurisprudence cited above, it is clear, under section 510(a) of the Marriage Act, that if this case implicated solely an order of modification of unallocated maintenance or child support, or both, then the trial court's order of modification would be effective on February 8, 1984. However, the present case involved a hybrid order in which maintenance was terminated, under section 510(b) of the Marriage Act, and child support was modified pursuant to section 510(a). Apparently, the trial court implicitly divided the previously unallocated award into separate awards for child support and maintenance, a proper procedure ( Potocki v. Potocki (1981), 98 Ill. App.3d 501, 504, 424 N.E.2d 714, 716-17), and then terminated the maintenance portion of the previous order and entered the modified support provision, making both determinations effective on November 20, 1983.
• 5 Based on the particular facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court correctly determined that maintenance be terminated on November 20, 1983, and, further, that the modified monthly child support payment of $430 be retroactive to November 20. (See, e.g., Claflin v. Claflin (1980), 82 Ill. App.3d 246, 402 N.E.2d 673, cert. denied (1980), 449 U.S. 1015, 66 L.Ed.2d 474, 101 S.Ct. 575.) A holding that the trial court's order should be effective on February 8, 1984, would be unjust and, therefore, an unwarranted result for two reasons. First, it would violate the express language of section 510(b), which states that respondent's obligation to pay maintenance was extinguished upon the remarriage of petitioner. Secondly, although respondent did terminate 60% of his monthly unallocated payment, he did nonetheless file a petition in which he sought both a termination of maintenance and a determination of his current support obligation. Pursuant to this conclusion, the court below also correctly denied petitioner's petition for a rule to show cause.
• 6 Petitioner asserts that the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered the respondent to pay only $445 of the $1,753.10 in fees the petitioner incurred in this cause. She argues that the court's award is inadequate. Accordingly, she requests that the court reverse the trial court's order and remand the cause or, alternatively, enter an appropriate award of fees in this court.
Ordinarily, the party for whom legal services were rendered bears the responsibility of paying the fees of counsel. ( In re Marriage of Ransom (1981), 102 Ill. App.3d 38, 40, 429 N.E.2d 594, 597.) However, section 508(a) of the Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 508(a)) provides that after the court considers the relative financial resources of the parties, it may order a party to pay the fees of counsel and costs that the other spouse necessarily incurred. ( In re Marriage of Melnick (1984), 127 Ill. App.3d 102, 109-10, 468 N.E.2d 490, 495.) The court may order an ex-spouse to pay such fees where the party seeking payment of fees demonstrates her own financial inability to pay them and the ability of her ex-spouse to pay the fees. ( In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 128 Ill. App.3d 1017, 1027, 471 N.E.2d 1008, 1017; In re Marriage of Carini (1983), 112 Ill. App.3d 375, 383, 445 N.E.2d 412, 418.) It is clear that the inability of a party to pay fees need not be tantamount to destitution. In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 128 Ill. App.3d 1017, 1027, 471 N.E.2d 1008, 1017; In re Marriage of Melnick (1984), 127 Ill. App.3d 102, 110, 468 N.E.2d 490, 495-96.
The amount of the award of fees depends upon whether the work was reasonably required or necessary for the proper performance of legal services in the particular case. ( In re Marriage of Melnick (1984), 127 Ill. App.3d 102, 110-11, 468 N.E.2d 490, 496.) The fees that are awarded should provide for fair compensation. ( In re Marriage of Burrows (1984), 126 Ill. App.3d 752, 758, 467 N.E.2d 987, 992.) In making an award of fees, the trial court should consider the attorney's skill and standing; the nature of the controversy and the novelty and difficulty of the issues the case presents; the importance of the subject matter from the perspective of family law; the degree of responsibility involved in the management of the case; the time required and labor expended; the customary charge in the community; and the benefits the client derived from the representation. ( In re Marriage of Melnick (1984), 127 Ill. App.3d 102, 111, 468 N.E.2d 490, 496; In re Marriage of Ransom (1981), 102 Ill. App.3d 38, 41, 429 N.E.2d 594.) The court is not bound to accept the attorney's opinion of what constitutes a reasonable fee, but must inquire into all the necessary factors. ( In re Marriage of Ransom (1981), 102 Ill. App.3d 38, 41, 429 N.E.2d 594, 597-98.) The decision regarding the allowance of fees rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, whose award will not be overturned unless the court abused its discretion. In re Marriage of Smith (1984), 128 Ill. App.3d 1017, 1027, 471 N.E.2d 1008, 1017; In re Marriage of Melnick (1984), 127 Ill. App.3d 102, 110, 468 N.E.2d 490, 495; In re Marriage of Burrows (1984), 126 Ill. App.3d 752, 758, 467 N.E.2d 987, 992.
In the case at bar, the trial court concluded, after holding a hearing concerning petitioner's petition for fees, that the parties had disparate abilities to pay the fees of petitioner's counsel. The court determined that respondent's ability to pay the fees was far greater than that of petitioner. Also, the court decided that a fair and reasonable amount of fees in the present case was $445. The court reached this conclusion based upon its estimation of the experience of counsel, the novelty of the question involved, "what was presented in this case," and the conduct of the lawyers.
After careful consideration of the facts and circumstances involved here, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that reasonable fees in this case were $445 and ordered respondent to pay only that amount. In the petition for fees, counsel for the petitioner admitted that the nature of the controversy was relatively simple, that the case presented no novel or difficult question, and that there was no important family law issue involved. In light of these factors, as well as the trial court's familiarity with counsel and the presentation of the case, we find no abuse of discretion. See, e.g., In re Marriage of Burrows (1984), 126 Ill. App.3d 752, 758-59, 467 N.E.2d 987, 992.
RECENT AMENDMENT TO SECTION 505(a)
Petitioner argues next that a recent amendment to section 505(a) of the Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1984 Supp., ch. 40, par. 505(a)), which took effect on September 12, 1984, during the pendency of this appeal, requires that the cause be remanded for a redetermination of the appropriate amount of child support respondent must pay. Section 505(a), as amended, provides that in cases involving child support alone, the court shall make the initial determination of the minimum amount of support based upon the number of children and a stated percentage of the net income of the responsible parent. A similar provision governs the initial award of child support and maintenance in cases involving both items.
• 7 In support of her position, the petitioner relies upon the general rule that when the legislature changes the law while an appeal is pending, the court of review will apply the law as it exists at the time of the decision, rather than the law that existed at the time the trial court entered judgment. ( E.g., Rios v. Jones (1976), 63 Ill.2d 488, 494-95, appeal dismissed (1976), 429 U.S. 934, 50 L.Ed.2d 304, 97 S.Ct. 346; Krug-Etheridge v. Krug (1982), 111 Ill. App.3d 780, 783, 444 N.E.2d 690, 692.) Respondent, without citation to any authority, disagrees, contending that this proceeding is governed by section 510 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 510) and that the amended section 505(a) is not implicated. However, respondent is in error. The trial court is to consider the same factors in considering modifying the amount of child support as it considers in formulating an original support order. ( In re Marriage of Lasota (1984), 125 Ill. App.3d 37, 465 N.E.2d 649; In re Marriage of Roth (1981), 99 Ill. App.3d 679, 426 N.E.2d 246; see Ill. Ann. Stat., ch. 40, par. 510, Historical Practice Notes, at 192-93 (Smith-Hurd Supp. 1985).) Those factors are found in section 505(a) (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1984 Supp., ch. 40, par. 505(a)).
Thus, it would appear that this cause must be remanded for a computation of the minimum amount of child support required by the 1984 amendment to section 505(a) to determine whether the amount of child support awarded by the trial court met the minimum established therein.
However, the remand relates only to the amounts of child support from September 12, 1984, the effective date of the amendment. The reviewing courts apply the law as it exists at the time of its decision, rather than at the time of the judgment of the lower court. ( Cronin v. Lindberg (1976), 66 Ill.2d 47.) Thus the rule that legislative enactments are construed as prospective and not retrospective absent express language to the contrary ( Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc. (1981), 86 Ill.2d 1), causes us to conclude that Public Act 83-1404 (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1984 Supp., ch. 40, par. 505(a)), effective September 12, 1984, is prospective only in its effect. We affirm the award of child support in every other regard.
In sum we affirm the judgment of the circuit court of Du Page County in every regard except that we reverse that part of the judgment applicable to the period subsequent to September 12, 1984. We remand the cause for calculation of the minimum award of child support now provided for by section 505(a). To the extent the present award is less than the minimum award for the period commencing September 12, 1984, it shall be increased to such minimum award.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
SCHNAKE, J., concurs.
JUSTICE UNVERZAGT, dissenting:
I concur in the judgment of the majority on all issues except the decision to remand the cause for calculation of the minimum award of child support.
The majority decides that the recent amendment to section 505(a) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1984 Supp., ch. 40, par. 505(a)), which took effect on September 12, 1984, during the pendency of this appeal, requires that the cause be remanded for a redetermination of the appropriate amount of child support the respondent must pay subsequent to that date. Section 505(a), as amended, provides that in cases involving child support alone, the court shall make the initial determination of the minimum amount of support based upon the number of children and a stated percentage of the net income of the responsible parent. A similar provision governs the initial award of child support and maintenance in cases involving both items.
New section 505(a) governs cases in which the trial court is making an initial determination of child support or an initial award of child support and maintenance, not, as occurred here, the termination of maintenance and the modification of child support. Secondly, even if section 505(a) were to apply to the facts of this case, remanding for a new hearing is particularly inappropriate, because the trial court correctly applied the existing law. I submit that this is not a case in which the amendment in question evinces an intent on the legislature's part to clarify the original legislative purpose of the prior version of section 505(a). ( Cf. Krug-Etheridge v. Krug (1982), 111 Ill. App.3d 780, 783.) The majority is remanding the cause for a new determination of child support in accordance with a statutory test that did not come into effect until months after the trial court rendered its judgment. Such an application of the statute defies common sense and is not warranted here. See In re Marriage of Olson (1983), 96 Ill.2d 432, 442.
Furthermore, a cursory review of the evidence will reveal that the trial court's determination of dollar amounts is very close to what can be achieved by another hearing. I do not think litigants should be burdened with the costs and expenses of a hearing the majority now requires where no good can be accomplished.


text:
Piano and Politics: Walter Gieseking's Career During the Third Reich and Postwar Period
LatinoJr_umd_0117E_14816.pdf (6.702Mb)
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)
Latino Jr., Frank Raymond
Davis, Shelley G.
During the Third Reich, Walter Gieseking (1895-1956) enjoyed an illustrious, international career as its preeminent "indispensable" and, later, "God-gifted" concert pianist. He was increasingly used by Goebbels's Propaganda Ministry as a propaganda tool, and throughout World War II, the Ministry ordered him to tour annexed, occupied, and neutral countries such as Finland, France, Romania, and Poland, where he appeared before public audiences as well as German and foreign officials and troops. Hitler named him "Professor" in 1937, decorating him with the War Merit Cross, 2nd Class without Swords, in 1944. By that September, Gieseking was among the highest paid of seventeen pianists allowed by the Propaganda Ministry to continue their profession. Conversely, Gieseking met with Nazi officials in 1936 to protest the ban on the music of his friend, composer Paul Hindemith, and he fought to keep his Jewish manager, Arthur Bernstein, in the 1930s, before helping him escape with his wife to the U.S. in 1939. Gieseking's story is that of an elite German artist who controversially remained a Reich citizen, despite his conflicted feelings toward the regime and the career struggles he faced as the conditions for him became progressively more dangerous and difficult. After WWII, he met with fierce public opposition as he resumed his career abroad, particularly in the U.S., where the government involved itself, but also in South American nations, Australia, the Territory of Hawaii, and Canada. He became the single most protested German musician of his time. Based largely on copious unpublished and previously unstudied archival documents, including those from his privately maintained Nachlass, my dissertation illuminates almost entirely unexamined phases of Gieseking's life. I show how the Nazi regime influenced, and ultimately controlled, his career. I explore the political challenges that he encountered within Germany and abroad, before, during, and after the war, providing new perspectives on the uneasy relationship between this prominent German musician and a ruthless dictatorship, as well as on the postwar Allied-led denazification procedures and intense anti-Nazi opposition he endured. Integrated are relevant aspects of his activity as a composer, essayist, recording artist, and teacher.
Music Theses and Dissertations


text:
The Future of European Security
After Brexit
What prospects exist for European security?
Ralf Roloff
January 2017, Number 08.01
"June 23, 2016, will be remembered as a defining moment for European integration. For the first time, a member country decided to leave the European Union. A shock wave swept through Europe and perhaps the United Kingdom, too. Is this the beginning of the end for the European project? Will Brexit encourage other countries to follow the U.K.'s example? Or will Brexit encourage the remaining member countries to show more unity and solidarity and push the EU toward an ever closer union? What are the EU's prospects?
After the British referendum, paradoxically, discussions about further integration gained new momentum in the EU. Will those discussions provide a new vision for the EU with a catalytic dynamic, as the single market and monetary union projects did in the 1980s and 1990s? Is "more Europe" the right answer to growing Euro skepticism and Euro-populism in all member countries?
The answer is "yes" and "no" and "it depends." It depends on what "more Europe" really means. The EU is a complex and differentiated political system that follows at least three tenets: integration, interdependence and balance of power..."
Excerpt from Ralf Roloff, "After Brexit," per Concordiam: Journal of European Security Defense Issues 8, No. 1, 2017: 7-9.
This article reflects the views of the author and are not necessarily the official policy of the United States, Germany, or any other governments.
Marshall Center Hosts 'Next Steps to NATO' Seminar in North Macedonia
Marshall Center Hosts Strategic Workshop in Brussels
Marshall Center Professors Advise Georgia on New National Defense Strategy
Marshall Center


text:
Thompson players capture medals in three categories at provincewide badminton tournament
Trio came home with medals in boys' singles, boys' doubles and mixed doubles.
Ian Graham Jun 13, 2022 4:30 PM
From left to right, Cameron Murray, Dilshan Saggu and Tina Thorne of Thompson, who each came home with medals from a recent badminton tournament in Winnipeg. Ian Graham
Three Thompson teens who came back from a badminton tournament in Winnipeg with medals in three different categories aren't showing any rust in their game despite two years off the court due to the COViD-19 pandemic.
Dilshan Saggu, 14, took gold in the under-15 boys' singles as well as silver in the under-15 boys' doubles with Cameron Murray, also 14, and bronze in mixed doubles with Tina Thorne, 16.
Having just taken up badminton in the last couple of years before the pandemic, Saggu said that he was extremely nervous at the outset of his first tournament ever, the Manitoba Junior Regional Challenge.
"When I had my first game, I was pretty nervous beforehand," he said. "I was all shaking, like anxiety and everything."
That feeling changed once the match was on. "It was pretty easy. Then I got some confidence."
His strategy for success was to rely on his smash and target people's backhands.
"Most of the time people's backhands are mostly weak," Saggu said.
The tournament was also the first big one ever for Murray.
"I was a bit nervous at first," he said. "I started playing and I felt fine, like I just kind of got in the zone."
Although he and Saggu didn't win their last match, they pushed the final to a third set.
"It was hard," Murray says. "They were really close games."
Thorne is the only one of the trio who had recent tournament experience under her belt prior to the regional challenge, having competed as a member of R.D. Parker Collegiate's badminton team earlier this spring, which showed in her other results.
"I made it to semifinals for singles and doubles as well," Thorne says.
Her and Saggu's success came from their ability to communicate, developed over many games together as members of the Thompson Badminton Club.
"We were playing together like every night," she says.
The accomplishments of the three are testament to their talent, says Todd Harwood, one of their coaches.
"We haven't really been coaching," he said. "I didn't know Cameron existed until eight weeks ago and he goes down there and played in the third-fourth game in singles. It was really impressive."
The regional challenge was a new event put on because of the cancellation of the Manitoba Games as a result of the pandemic, and Harwood said it attracted all the best players in the province.
"A typical junior tournament for Badminton Manitoba would have 80, 90 kids and this one was 160," said Harwood.
Because of Sport Manitoba funding for provincial sports organizations that put on tournaments like this, the cost to the players was low.
"Sport Manitoba … helped cover the cost of our travel to Winnipeg, hotel and that sort of thing, which made it easier for kids to get to," said Harwood, with an out-of-pocket cost of only $150 each.
The north had the third-largest team of any region at the tournament, with 10 players from Thompson and 12 from Grand Rapids.
"Kids in the north are able to compete in badminton against the best of the best," said Harwood. "There's no reason kids from Thompson can't be competitive with the best in the province."
Trojan boys win every set on way to volleyball tournament title
Girls first, boys second at RDPC varsity volleyball tournament
Thompson bodybuilder wins title at first competition


text:
Q: JSF print screen like capture I am generating some linecharts via JSF (Primefaces).
So charts are accessible and generated nicely via accessing in any browser.
However i need to send those charts via email to certain persons cause they do not want to click on a link so this should be automated.
Is there a way to generate an image out of what the JSF is rendering ?
Thanks

A: Charts are canvas based and can be exported as static images with client side api.
Take a look here:
http://www.primefaces.org/showcase/ui/chartExport.jsf

A: Primefaces use Javascript Libraries to render the charts. You would have to process the browser output before sending the email.
(Also, lazy managers)
You would have to dig into the Java Image API (not JSF) in order to plot the graph (from the raw data) into an image if you want the JVM to send the email.
If you want to just automate the process in your machine to send the emails (so you can send the emails in one click instead of doing it all manually, be mindful of this caveat:

You would have to generate a custom page with print CSS and your email layout, then use a browser plugin that sends the email on a click.


Home > Entertainment > celebscoop > To Prep For His Alleged Stint On Bigg Boss 12, Sreesanth Is Following A Strict Fitness Regime!
To Prep For His Alleged Stint On Bigg Boss 12, Sreesanth Is Following A Strict Fitness Regime!
From being one of the finest bowlers in the Indian cricket team to being banned for life from playing cricket for his alleged connection in spot-fixing case, S Sreesanth's career was almost over after his arrest in 2013. And since then he has been trying his hands at different ventures, including films, Khatron Ke Khiladi 9 and Nach Baliye.
However, now the rumour mills are churning out stories that he will next be seen in the most popular Indian TV reality show Bigg Boss 12. The list also includes celebrities like Karanvir Bohra, Bharti Singh, Dipika Kakar, Ssumier Pasricha (Pammy Aunty), Nehha Pendsse, Srishty Rode and Anup Jalota among others.
Bigg Boss 12 will premiere on Sep 16.


text:
Shayn is an eroded impact crater that lies on the Moon's far side. It lies to the north of the crater Freundlich and northeast of Trumpler. To the west of Shayn is the crater Nušl, and to the north-northeast lies Champollion.

This is an eroded crater that has undergone wear from subsequent impacts. Most of the rim has become rounded and the original sharp edges lost from a history of minor impacts. The southern inner wall, however, still displays some slumped, shelf-like structure. A pair of small impacts lie along the inner wall in the northeast part of the crater. The interior floor is pitted with small and tiny craterlets. The most notable of these is a small crater to the northwest of the midpoint.

Satellite craters

By convention these features are identified on lunar maps by placing the letter on the side of the crater midpoint that is closest to Shayn.

See also
 1648 Shajna, minor planet

References

Impact craters on the Moon

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia