text:
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Education Applications for New Awards; International Research and Studies Program-Research, Studies, and Surveys; and Specialized Instructional Materials, 47770-47774 [2020-17170]
Applications for New Awards; International Research and Studies Program-Research, Studies, and Surveys; and Specialized Instructional Materials, 47770-47774 [2020-17170]
Download as PDF 47770 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices competence in world languages and area or international studies; advance national security by developing a pipeline of highly proficient linguists and experts in critical world regions; and contribute to developing a globally competent workforce able to engage with a multilingual/multicultural clientele at home and abroad. Approval of this collection is necessary in order to conduct fiscal year (FY) 2022 program competitions. This collection is being submitted under the Streamlined Clearance Process for Discretionary Grant Information Collections (1894–0001). Therefore, the 30-day public comment period notice will be the only public comment notice published for this information collection request.'' Dated: August 3, 2020. Kate Mullan, PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division, Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. [FR Doc. 2020–17160 Filed 8–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Applications for New Awards; International Research and Studies Program—Research, Studies, and Surveys; and Specialized Instructional Materials Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for the International Research and Studies (IRS) program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 84.017A. This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1840–0795. DATES: Applications Available: August 6, 2020. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: September 8, 2020. Pre-Application Webinar Information: The Department will hold a preapplication meeting via webinar for prospective applicants. Detailed information regarding the webinar will be provided on the website for the IRS program at www.ed.gov/programs/ iegpsirs/index.html. ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg.FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl E. Gibbs, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 257–09, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453–5690. Email: cheryl.gibbs@ed.gov. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program: The IRS program provides grants to institutions, public and private agencies, organizations, and individuals to conduct research and studies to improve and strengthen instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, and other international fields. The research and studies may include, but are not limited to— (a) Studies and surveys to determine needs for increased or improved instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, or other international fields, including the demand for foreign language, area, or other international specialists in government, education, and the private sector; (b) Research on more effective methods of providing instruction and achieving competency in foreign languages, area studies, or other international fields; (c) Research on applying performance tests and standards across all areas of foreign language instruction and classroom use; (d) Developing and publishing specialized materials for use in foreign language, area studies, and other international fields or for training foreign language, area, and other international specialists; (e) Studies and surveys to assess the use of graduates of programs supported under title VI of the HEA by governmental, educational, and privatesector organizations and other studies assessing the outcomes and effectiveness of supported programs; (f) Comparative studies of the effectiveness of strategies to provide international capabilities at institutions of higher education; (g) Evaluation of the extent to which programs assisted under title VI of the HEA that address national needs would not otherwise be offered; PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (h) Studies and surveys of the use of technologies in foreign language, area studies, and international studies programs; (i) Studies and evaluations of effective practices in the dissemination of international information, materials, research, teaching strategies, and testing techniques throughout the educational community, including elementary and secondary schools; (j) Evaluations of the extent to which programs assisted under title VI of the HEA reflect diverse perspectives and a wide range of views and generate debate on world regions and international affairs, as described in the grantee's application; (k) Systematic collection, analysis, and dissemination of data that contribute to achieving the purposes of title VI, part A of the HEA; and (l) Support for programs or activities to make data collected, analyzed, or disseminated under 20 U.S.C. 1125 publicly available and easy to understand. Priorities: Under this competition there are three competitive preference priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(ii), these priorities are from regulations (34 CFR 660.1). In this competition, the Department invites applicants to submit an application to request support for either a Research, Studies, and Surveys project or a Specialized Instructional Materials project. Applicants must provide in section 15 of the SF 424 Application for Federal Assistance, a description that clearly identifies the type of IRS project for which funding is requested. Additional submission details are included in the application package. Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award an additional five points to an application that meets one of Competitive Preference Priority 1, Competitive Preference 2, or Competitive Preference Priority 3. An applicant may receive points under only one competitive preference priority. In the application project abstract, you must indicate the selected competitive preference priority being addressed by the FY 2020 proposed project and provide a substantive description of how the project activities meet the priority. These priorities are: Competitive Preference Priority 1. (5 points). Research on more effective methods of providing instruction and achieving E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices competency in modern foreign languages, area studies, or other international fields. Competitive Preference Priority 2. (5 points). Studies and surveys to assess the use of graduates of programs supported under title VI of the HEA by governmental, educational, and privatesector organizations and other studies assessing the outcomes and effectiveness of supported programs. Competitive Preference Priority 3. (5 points). Developing and publishing specialized materials for use in foreign language, area studies, and other international fields or for training foreign language, area, and other international specialists. Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1125. Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR parts 655 and 660. Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education only. II. Award Information Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Estimated Available Funds: $900,000. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2021 from the list of unfunded applications from this competition. Estimated Range of Awards: $36,000– $60,000 for each 12-month budget period. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $48,000. Estimated Number of Awards: 18. Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Project Period: Up to 36 months. III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants: Public and private agencies, organizations, institutions, and individuals. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost sharing or matching. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which contain requirements and information on how to submit an application. 2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of projects that may be proposed in applications for the IRS grant competition, your application may include business information that you consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ''business information'' and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended). Because we plan to post on our website a selection of FY 2020 IRS funded abstracts and applications' narrative sections, you may wish to request confidentiality of business information. Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your application, under ''Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c). 3. Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 4. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. 5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate the application. We recommend that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 30 pages and (2) use the following standards: • A page is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. • Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, except titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47771 references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs. • Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters per inch). • Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, Application for Federal Assistance cover sheet (SF 424); the Supplemental Information For SF 424B; Part II, ED 524 (Summary Budget A) and the detailed budget justification (Summary Budget C); or Part IV, assurances and certifications. The recommended page limit also does not apply to the project abstract, curriculum vitae, or letters of support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to the entire application narrative. V. Application Review Information 1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition are from 34 CFR 655.31, 660.31, 660.32, and 660.33. The total maximum score for the selection criteria and the selected competitive preference priority is 100 points for applications for research, studies, and surveys; and the total maximum score for the selection criteria and the selected competitive preference priority is 100 points for specialized instructional materials projects. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses. Note: Applications for a research project, study, or a survey will be evaluated using the criteria in 34 CFR 655.31 and 660.32. Applications for the development of specialized instructional materials will be evaluated using the selection criteria in 34 CFR 655.31 and 660.33. The Secretary uses the following criteria to evaluate applications for a research project, study, or a survey: (a) Plan of operation (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the plan of operation for the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows– (i) High quality in the design of the project; (ii) An effective plan of management that ensures proper and efficient administration of the project; (iii) A clear description of how the objectives of the project relate to the purpose of the program; (iv) The way the applicant plans to use its resources and personnel to achieve each objective; and (v) A clear description of how the applicant will provide equal access and treatment for eligible project E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 47772 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices participants who are members of groups that have been traditionally underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic minority groups, women, and handicapped persons. (b) Quality of key personnel (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the key personnel the applicant plans to use on the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) The qualifications of the project director (if one is to be used); (ii) The qualifications of each of the other key personnel to be used in the project. In the case of faculty, the qualifications of the faculty and the degree to which that faculty is directly involved in the actual teaching and supervision of students; (iii) The time that each person referred to in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section plans to commit to the project; and (iv) The extent to which the applicant, as part of its nondiscriminatory employment practices, encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have been traditionally underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic minority groups, women, handicapped persons, and the elderly. (3) To determine the qualifications of a person, the Secretary considers evidence of past experience and training, in fields related to the objectives of the project, as well as other information that the applicant provides. (c) Budget and cost effectiveness (up to 5 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the project has an adequate budget and is cost effective. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) The budget for the project is adequate to support the project activities; and (ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the project. (d) Evaluation plan (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the evaluation plan for the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows methods of evaluation that are appropriate for the project and, to the extent possible, are objective and produce data that are quantifiable. (e) Adequacy of resources (up to 5 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 that the applicant plans to devote adequate resources to the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) Other than library, facilities that the applicant plans to use are adequate (language laboratory, museums, etc.); and (ii) The equipment and supplies that the applicant plans to use are adequate. (f) Need for the project (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows— (1) A need for the proposed project in the field of study on which the project focuses; and (2) That the proposed project will provide information about the present and future needs of the United States for study in foreign language and other international fields. (g) Usefulness of expected results (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the extent to which the results of the proposed project are likely to be used by other research projects or programs with similar objectives. (h) Development of new knowledge (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the extent to which the proposed project is likely to develop new knowledge that will contribute to the purposes of the International Education Program authorized by part A of title VI of the HEA. (i) Formulation of problems and knowledge of related research (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that problems, questions, or hypotheses to be dealt with by the applicant— (1) Are well formulated; and (2) Reflect adequate knowledge of related research. (j) Specificity of statement of procedures (up to 5 points). The Secretary reviews each application for the specificity and completeness of the statement of procedures to be followed, including a discussion of such components as sampling techniques, controls, data to be gathered, and statistical and other analyses to be undertaken. (k) Adequacy of methodology and scope of project (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows— (1) The adequacy of the proposed teaching, testing, and research methodology; and PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (2) The size, scope, and duration of the proposed project. The Secretary uses the following criteria to evaluate applications for development of specialized instructional materials: (a) Plan of operation (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the plan of operation for the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows– (i) High quality in the design of the project; (ii) An effective plan of management that ensures proper and efficient administration of the project; (iii) A clear description of how the objectives of the project relate to the purpose of the program; (iv) The way the applicant plans to use its resources and personnel to achieve each objective; and (v) A clear description of how the applicant will provide equal access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have been traditionally underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic minority groups, women, and handicapped persons. (b) Quality of key personnel (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the key personnel the applicant plans to use on the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) The qualifications of the project director (if one is to be used); (ii) The qualifications of each of the other key personnel to be used in the project. In the case of faculty, the qualifications of the faculty and the degree to which that faculty is directly involved in the actual teaching and supervision of students; (iii) The time that each person referred to in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section plans to commit to the project; and (iv) The extent to which the applicant, as part of its nondiscriminatory employment practices, encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have been traditionally underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic minority groups, women, handicapped persons, and the elderly. (3) To determine the qualifications of a person, the Secretary considers evidence of past experience and training, in fields related to the objectives of the project, as well as other information that the applicant provides. E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices (c) Budget and cost effectiveness (up to 5 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the project has an adequate budget and is cost effective. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) The budget for the project is adequate to support the project activities; and (ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the project. (d) Evaluation plan (up to 10 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the quality of the evaluation plan for the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows methods of evaluation that are appropriate for the project and, to the extent possible, are objective and produce data that are quantifiable. (e) Adequacy of resources (up to 5 points). (1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the applicant plans to devote adequate resources to the project. (2) The Secretary looks for information that shows— (i) Other than library, facilities that the applicant plans to use are adequate (language laboratory, museums, etc.); and (ii) The equipment and supplies that the applicant plans to use are adequate. (f) Need for the project (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that— (1) The proposed materials are needed in the educational field of study on which the project focuses; and (2) The language or languages, the area, region, or country, or the issues or studies for which the materials are to be developed, are of sufficient priority and significance to the national interest to warrant financial support by the Federal Government. (g) Potential for the use of materials in other programs (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the extent to which the proposed materials may be used elsewhere in the United States. (h) Account of related materials (up to 5 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that— (1) All existing related or similar materials have been accounted for and the critical commentary on their adequacy is appropriate and accurate; and VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 (2) The proposed materials will not duplicate any existing adequate materials. (i) Likelihood of achieving results (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the outlined methods and procedures for preparing the materials are practicable and can be expected to produce the anticipated results. (j) Expected contribution to other programs (up to 10 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the extent to which the proposed work may contribute significantly to strengthening, expanding, or improving programs of foreign language studies, area studies, or international studies in the United States. (k) Description of final form of materials (up to 5 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows a high degree of specificity in the description of the contents and final form of the proposed materials. (l) Provisions for pretesting and revision (up to 5 points). The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that adequate provision has been made for— (1) Pretesting the proposed materials; and (2) If necessary, revising the proposed materials before publication. 2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality. In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). 3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 200.205, before awarding grants under this program the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 47773 conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible. 4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this competition to receive an award that over the course of the project period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards—that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant—before we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS. Please note that, if the total value of your currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal funds you receive exceed $10,000,000. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 47774 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices application as part of your binding commitments under the grant. 3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20. 4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b). (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/ fund/grant/apply/appforms/ appforms.html. Performance reports for the IRS program must be submitted electronically using the International Resource Information System (IRIS), the International and Foreign Language Education office's web-based reporting system. For information about the system and to view the reporting instructions, please go to http:// iris.ed.gov/iris/pdfs/IRS.pdf. (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Aug 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 5. Performance Measures: The following performance measures have been established to assess the effectiveness of the IRS program: 1. Percentage of IRS projects that are focused on improving or strengthening K–16 instruction in less commonly taught languages, area studies, or other international fields. 2. Percentage of IRS projects that are focused on the evaluation of the outcomes and effectiveness of Title VIFulbright-Hays International Education programs in addressing national needs. 3. Percentage of IRS projects that result in information from IRS studies, surveys, or research on language, area, and international studies being made available and accessible to the public. 4. The cost per IRS project that is focused on improving or strengthening K–16 instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, and other international fields. 6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the performance targets in the grantee's approved application. In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). VII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Robert L. King, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education. [FR Doc. 2020–17170 Filed 8–4–20; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Waivers Granted Under Section 3511 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, Department of Education. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In this notice, we announce waivers that the Department of Education (Department) granted, within the last 30 days, under the CARES Act. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugh Reid, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 11114, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 245–7491. Email: Hugh.Reid@ ed.gov. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 8339. SUMMARY: Section 3511(d)(3) of the CARES Act requires the Secretary to publish, in the Federal Register and on the Department's website, a notice of the Secretary's decision to grant a waiver. The Secretary must publish this notice no later than 30 days after granting the waiver and the notice must include which waiver was granted and the reason for granting the waiver. This notice is intended to fulfill the Department's obligation to publicize its waiver decisions by identifying the waivers granted under section 3511. The Department has approved waivers of the following requirement: Section 421(b) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) to extend the period of availability of fiscal year (FY) 2018 funds for programs in which the State educational agency (SEA) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM 06AUN1
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 152 (Thursday, August 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
Applications for New Awards; International Research and Studies
Program--Research, Studies, and Surveys; and Specialized Instructional
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for the International
Research and Studies (IRS) program, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.017A. This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB control number 1840-0795.
DATES: Applications Available: August 6, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: September 8, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information: The Department will hold a
pre-application meeting via webinar for prospective applicants.
Detailed information regarding the webinar will be provided on the
website for the IRS program at www.ed.gov/programs/iegpsirs/index.html.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg.FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl E. Gibbs, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 257-09, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 453-5690. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The IRS program provides grants to
institutions, public and private agencies, organizations, and
individuals to conduct research and studies to improve and strengthen
instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, and other
international fields.
The research and studies may include, but are not limited to--
(a) Studies and surveys to determine needs for increased or
improved instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, or
other international fields, including the demand for foreign language,
area, or other international specialists in government, education, and
the private sector;
(b) Research on more effective methods of providing instruction and
achieving competency in foreign languages, area studies, or other
international fields;
(c) Research on applying performance tests and standards across all
areas of foreign language instruction and classroom use;
(d) Developing and publishing specialized materials for use in
foreign language, area studies, and other international fields or for
training foreign language, area, and other international specialists;
(e) Studies and surveys to assess the use of graduates of programs
supported under title VI of the HEA by governmental, educational, and
private-sector organizations and other studies assessing the outcomes
and effectiveness of supported programs;
(f) Comparative studies of the effectiveness of strategies to
provide international capabilities at institutions of higher education;
(g) Evaluation of the extent to which programs assisted under title
VI of the HEA that address national needs would not otherwise be
offered;
(h) Studies and surveys of the use of technologies in foreign
language, area studies, and international studies programs;
(i) Studies and evaluations of effective practices in the
dissemination of international information, materials, research,
teaching strategies, and testing techniques throughout the educational
community, including elementary and secondary schools;
(j) Evaluations of the extent to which programs assisted under
title VI of the HEA reflect diverse perspectives and a wide range of
views and generate debate on world regions and international affairs,
as described in the grantee's application;
(k) Systematic collection, analysis, and dissemination of data that
contribute to achieving the purposes of title VI, part A of the HEA;
(l) Support for programs or activities to make data collected,
analyzed, or disseminated under 20 U.S.C. 1125 publicly available and
easy to understand.
Priorities: Under this competition there are three competitive
preference priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(ii),
these priorities are from regulations (34 CFR 660.1).
In this competition, the Department invites applicants to submit an
application to request support for either a Research, Studies, and
Surveys project or a Specialized Instructional Materials project.
Applicants must provide in section 15 of the SF 424 Application for
Federal Assistance, a description that clearly identifies the type of
IRS project for which funding is requested. Additional submission
details are included in the application package.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award an additional five
points to an application that meets one of Competitive Preference
Priority 1, Competitive Preference 2, or Competitive Preference
Priority 3. An applicant may receive points under only one competitive
preference priority. In the application project abstract, you must
indicate the selected competitive preference priority being addressed
by the FY 2020 proposed project and provide a substantive description
of how the project activities meet the priority.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1. (5 points).
Research on more effective methods of providing instruction and
achieving
competency in modern foreign languages, area studies, or other
Studies and surveys to assess the use of graduates of programs
and effectiveness of supported programs.
Developing and publishing specialized materials for use in foreign
language, area studies, and other international fields or for training
foreign language, area, and other international specialists.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1125.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR parts 655 and
Note:  The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions
of higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $900,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2021 from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $36,000-$60,000 for each 12-month budget
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $48,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 18.
Note:  The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: Public and private agencies, organizations,
institutions, and individuals.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for the IRS grant
competition, your application may include business information that you
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information''
and describe the process we use in determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended). Because we plan to post on our website a selection of FY 2020
IRS funded abstracts and applications' narrative sections, you may wish
to request confidentiality of business information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
4. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of
the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate the application. We recommend
that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 30 pages
and (2) use the following standards:
A page is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' margins
at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, except titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, Application
for Federal Assistance cover sheet (SF 424); the Supplemental
Information For SF 424B; Part II, ED 524 (Summary Budget A) and the
detailed budget justification (Summary Budget C); or Part IV,
assurances and certifications. The recommended page limit also does not
apply to the project abstract, curriculum vitae, or letters of support.
However, the recommended page limit does apply to the entire
application narrative.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 655.31, 660.31, 660.32, and 660.33. The total maximum
score for the selection criteria and the selected competitive
preference priority is 100 points for applications for research,
studies, and surveys; and the total maximum score for the selection
criteria and the selected competitive preference priority is 100 points
for specialized instructional materials projects. The maximum score for
each criterion is indicated in parentheses.
Note:  Applications for a research project, study, or a survey
will be evaluated using the criteria in 34 CFR 655.31 and 660.32.
Applications for the development of specialized instructional
materials will be evaluated using the selection criteria in 34 CFR
655.31 and 660.33.
The Secretary uses the following criteria to evaluate applications
for a research project, study, or a survey:
(a) Plan of operation (up to 10 points).
(1) The Secretary reviews each application for information that
shows the quality of the plan of operation for the project.
(2) The Secretary looks for information that shows-
(i) High quality in the design of the project;
(ii) An effective plan of management that ensures proper and
efficient administration of the project;
(iii) A clear description of how the objectives of the project
relate to the purpose of the program;
(iv) The way the applicant plans to use its resources and personnel
to achieve each objective; and
(v) A clear description of how the applicant will provide equal
access and treatment for eligible project
participants who are members of groups that have been traditionally
underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic minority groups,
women, and handicapped persons.
(b) Quality of key personnel (up to 10 points).
shows the quality of the key personnel the applicant plans to use on
the project.
(2) The Secretary looks for information that shows--
(i) The qualifications of the project director (if one is to be
used);
(ii) The qualifications of each of the other key personnel to be
used in the project. In the case of faculty, the qualifications of the
faculty and the degree to which that faculty is directly involved in
the actual teaching and supervision of students;
(iii) The time that each person referred to in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)
and (ii) of this section plans to commit to the project; and
(iv) The extent to which the applicant, as part of its
nondiscriminatory employment practices, encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have been
traditionally underrepresented, such as members of racial or ethnic
minority groups, women, handicapped persons, and the elderly.
(3) To determine the qualifications of a person, the Secretary
considers evidence of past experience and training, in fields related
to the objectives of the project, as well as other information that the
applicant provides.
(c) Budget and cost effectiveness (up to 5 points).
shows that the project has an adequate budget and is cost effective.
(i) The budget for the project is adequate to support the project
activities; and
(ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the
(d) Evaluation plan (up to 10 points).
shows the quality of the evaluation plan for the project.
(2) The Secretary looks for information that shows methods of
evaluation that are appropriate for the project and, to the extent
possible, are objective and produce data that are quantifiable.
(e) Adequacy of resources (up to 5 points).
shows that the applicant plans to devote adequate resources to the
(i) Other than library, facilities that the applicant plans to use
are adequate (language laboratory, museums, etc.); and
(ii) The equipment and supplies that the applicant plans to use are
adequate.
(f) Need for the project (up to 10 points).
The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows--
(1) A need for the proposed project in the field of study on which
the project focuses; and
(2) That the proposed project will provide information about the
present and future needs of the United States for study in foreign
language and other international fields.
(g) Usefulness of expected results (up to 10 points).
The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows
the extent to which the results of the proposed project are likely to
be used by other research projects or programs with similar objectives.
(h) Development of new knowledge (up to 10 points).
that the extent to which the proposed project is likely to develop new
knowledge that will contribute to the purposes of the International
Education Program authorized by part A of title VI of the HEA.
(i) Formulation of problems and knowledge of related research (up
to 10 points).
that problems, questions, or hypotheses to be dealt with by the
applicant--
(1) Are well formulated; and
(2) Reflect adequate knowledge of related research.
(j) Specificity of statement of procedures (up to 5 points).
The Secretary reviews each application for the specificity and
completeness of the statement of procedures to be followed, including a
discussion of such components as sampling techniques, controls, data to
be gathered, and statistical and other analyses to be undertaken.
(k) Adequacy of methodology and scope of project (up to 10 points).
(1) The adequacy of the proposed teaching, testing, and research
methodology; and
(2) The size, scope, and duration of the proposed project.
for development of specialized instructional materials:
access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members
of groups that have been traditionally underrepresented, such as
members of racial or ethnic minority groups, women, and handicapped
persons.
that--
(1) The proposed materials are needed in the educational field of
study on which the project focuses; and
(2) The language or languages, the area, region, or country, or the
issues or studies for which the materials are to be developed, are of
sufficient priority and significance to the national interest to
warrant financial support by the Federal Government.
(g) Potential for the use of materials in other programs (up to 10
points).
the extent to which the proposed materials may be used elsewhere in the
(h) Account of related materials (up to 5 points).
(1) All existing related or similar materials have been accounted
for and the critical commentary on their adequacy is appropriate and
accurate; and
(2) The proposed materials will not duplicate any existing adequate
materials.
(i) Likelihood of achieving results (up to 10 points).
that the outlined methods and procedures for preparing the materials
are practicable and can be expected to produce the anticipated results.
(j) Expected contribution to other programs (up to 10 points).
the extent to which the proposed work may contribute significantly to
strengthening, expanding, or improving programs of foreign language
studies, area studies, or international studies in the United States.
(k) Description of final form of materials (up to 5 points).
The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows a
high degree of specificity in the description of the contents and final
form of the proposed materials.
(l) Provisions for pretesting and revision (up to 5 points).
that adequate provision has been made for--
(1) Pretesting the proposed materials; and
(2) If necessary, revising the proposed materials before
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this program the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
Performance reports for the IRS program must be submitted
electronically using the International Resource Information System
(IRIS), the International and Foreign Language Education office's web-
based reporting system. For information about the system and to view
the reporting instructions, please go to http://iris.ed.gov/iris/pdfs/IRS.pdf.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
5. Performance Measures: The following performance measures have
been established to assess the effectiveness of the IRS program:
1. Percentage of IRS projects that are focused on improving or
strengthening K-16 instruction in less commonly taught languages, area
studies, or other international fields.
2. Percentage of IRS projects that are focused on the evaluation of
the outcomes and effectiveness of Title VI-Fulbright-Hays International
Education programs in addressing national needs.
3. Percentage of IRS projects that result in information from IRS
studies, surveys, or research on language, area, and international
studies being made available and accessible to the public.
4. The cost per IRS project that is focused on improving or
strengthening K-16 instruction in modern foreign languages, area
studies, and other international fields.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Robert L. King,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020-17170 Filed 8-4-20; 11:15 am]


As the level of progression in freestyle snowboarding continues to evolve at a crazy rate, the race to stomp the first quadruple cork has unofficially been on all year… and UK rider Billy Morgan just crossed the line, landing a Backside 1800° Quadruple Cork yesterday in Livigno, Italy.
For those struggling to get their brain around the trick, a Quad Cork 1800 is shred shorthand for a jump containing four off axis flips and five full rotations. That's one full flip and half a rotation more than the previous biggest trick, a Triple Cork 1620, landed last month by Yuki Kadano at the US Open Slopestyle.


June 2013 | Blog | Di Bruno Bros.
Grilled Raclette with a Barbeclette!
This past May, I had the good fortune to travel to France and work with one of our favorite affinage companies, Marcel Petite. Nestled in the Jura Mountains in northeast France, Marcel Petite ripens massive wheels of Comte to absolute perfection. We arrived at the aging facility, a decommissioned military bunker named Fort Lucotte.
At Di Bruno Bros., our slogan is "Celebrating Great Food and Great People since 1939." We strive to align ourselves with meaningful companies comprised of passionate employees who proudly represent the cheese maker. Few companies, if any, live up to this mantra like Essex Street Cheese.
They're stinkers. There's no other way to describe washed-rind cheeses as a category. Since so many artisan cheesemakers in the United States are exploring this style – from Doe Run Dairy's new Bathed in Victory (PA) to Canal Junction's Charloe (OH) – I thought I'd offer a few pointers about identifying and tasting this full-bodied favorite.
It is always disappointing when a customer tells us that they purchased "too much" cheese their last time in and had to throw some away. This stings, both because the customer feels that they threw some money down the drain, and also because a small piece of an artisan's efforts have gone for naught.
Madame Fromage, News & Events, Random Fun!
Hey there, cheese lovers. Our new book, Di Bruno Bros. House of Cheese: A Guide to Wedges, Recipes, and Pairings, is out and we've got a load of upcoming events where we'll be showing it off. Come join us for a gander and nibble!


Sometimes random moments are just meant to be. The first time I ever walked into Natasha's store, Rough & Tumble, was completely by chance. It just happens to be two storefronts down from my favorite LYS, and while we were all sitting in a circle, knitting away, one of the ladies mentioned it. I honed in on two words in particular, and heard nothing else–local, handbag. You all at this point obviously know my deep, driving passion for local items and those of you closer to me know about my small collection of coach bags. With that in mind, I convinced one of the ladies to accompany me down the street.
Walking in was an experience in itself–the shop is a breezy mixture of clean lines, stunning bags, and negative space. It much reflects Natasha herself–she has a sunny, cheerful face and a zen-like peace about her, even when she's busy. She took the time to tell me a lot about the store.
All the bags are handmade right there–the entire workspace is open, separated only by a countertop like structure.
Natasha works with all different kinds of materials–deceptively delicate looking linen, rugged waxed canvas, and buttery soft leather. She designs for both function and beauty–one of her bags can be used 3 different ways–and goes through many prototypes to get it right.
I love the rich cinnamon-pumpkin shade of this one.
It seems to harmonize with everything we style it with! The White cowl is worked up in Quince & Co's Osprey yarn. A favorite local Maine yarn of mine!
For the giveaway- 2 skeins of Quince & Co. Lark AND one R & T wristlet of my choice.
To enter: share this post on facebook, and then visit Natasha's Rough & Tumble on Etsy and tell me which bag you think would work with everything in your closet!
I just wanted to add that I am not sponsored by any of the companies I promote–I love this stuff and I that's why I write about it!
Winner will be announced one week from today!
Posted by Alicia & filed under Handbags, Knitting, Local, Maine. This post has 55 comments.
Wow!! I love all those bags, how can I choose!? I guess if I couldn't have them all (!) I would choose the FIELD TOTE – waxed canvas bag- classic and could go with anything. I will be saving my pennies for one of those!
I would use it as a purse/diaper bag….plus it is something my husband wouldnt mind holding if I needed him too!
Definitely sling in brushed gold. Funny thing? I'm 8.3 miles away from a store that sells these (Cambridge, MA)…but I can't get there because I have a meeting, and then have to drive 4 hours home tomorrow…so It'll have to wait…sad.
http://www.etsy.com/listing/152768187/the-train-bag-small-ipad-pocket-with-two?ref=cat_gallery_10 —- I just adore this bag! Can you say 'perfect' for me? 😉 and by the way Alicia, you are absolutely amazing!!
I totally am excited about the FIELD TOTE – waxed canvas bag! Would make on the go so much simpler! Love Love!
Oh, Alicia. You find the most wonderful things. Now, if only I could afford one. Definitely going on my Christmas list! I love the tiny sling. And all the colors are so beautiful!
P.S. I shared on FB! Please enter me in your contest….
I think the mid hobo pack is fabulous especially in the brown and black combo. It would go with everything and I love how you can wear it 3 different ways.
This is a great giveaway!! Shared on FB for handbag and yarn lovers alike!
but they're all so perfect!
I love the Train tote!!
Wow, those bags are beautiful! I'm off to check out the website.
Thanks for introducing me to this amazing shop, Alicia!
I can't decide between the Large Duffel, Petite Hobo, and Lined Sling. I've been looking for purses in this style for about 2 yrs!
Just found your website/blog and Ravelry page, plus this great plug for Rough&Tumble – which one of the stores is just north of me. Sounds like I need an excuse for a break from work for a small road trip.
I'm a hobo bag type of gal – something soft brown leathery, slouchy but with plenty of pockets and other amenties inside. The Duffle just fit the bill. Absolutely perfect. Will definitely check them out – and if a LYS is nearby – the duffle just may come home with me filled with yarn! Now that's a great birthday present to myself!
I love all of her bags, but if I have to pick one it would be the Petite Boho with the outer zipper. I would love to visit her shop. Shared with my facebook family.
I love the "ready to ship – 1903 ORIGINAL PACK – LAPTOP size" great for everyday use!
Hope to win this gorgeous bag!
All are beautiful. Love the tiny sling bag tho!
I love the field tote.
I love the LARGE SLING bag. Rust or brown. Or all the colors. They're all stunning!
I could fit everything in it, and it would be my go-to everything kind of bag.
Beautiful bags- hard to pick a favorite! Perhaps the petite hobo or petite boho in vintage cognac would be at the top of my list! Stunning!
I love the field tote. It looks like a great all purpose tote.
Tough choice to make from all of the fabulous bags, but I kept coming back to the 1903 NY CROSS BODY. A dream bag. Love the wristlet, too! So wonderful to learn of this incredible artisan's creations.
I love so many but the MID HOBO PACK 'three in one' – leather backpack – I think would be hard to live without at the moment. The size is perfect -not to large, not too small. The 2 toned color really got me.
I'm loving the 1903 NY cross-body. What a fabulous find! If I win, that's great, but I think I'll have a R&T bag one way or another!
I love the 1903 NY cross body — R&T offers such wonderful bags! Thanks for sharing with us!
What beautiful bags – love the 3 in 1 styles so versatile.
A great hand knit and a great handbag really make for a great look!
I think the Field Tote would complete my wardrobe. I really like the look of the distressed waxed leather. I only carry around a bag that can fit all the items I need, so the oversized bag with its extra pockets is great as not only a diaper bag but a knitting bag as well.
I did not know the store front was so close to the yarn shop. May have to make a trip myself. I have fav these and will pin the post also!!!
There is so many beauties!!!!
I just had to say I love your blog for one. And I also have to say I love this giveaway. I sadly am not able to share this on Facebook, but I did go to the rough and tumble etsy store and immediately loved/regretted it lol. Those bags are gorgeous and works of art and completely unhealthy for my pocketbook, I promptly favorited their shop and a few of their bags, my favorites are the boho styles and the duffle styles. Thank you for an introduction to such an amazing little shop!
For me it has to be the 1903 NY cross body, I love, love, love it.
Since I just moved to Seattle and need something that is water resistant to take when I bike to work in the rain, the FIELD MESSENGER 1913 waxed canvas laptop bag is PERFECT!
I love the PETITE HOBO PACK 'three in one' – leather backpack in Cognac!! That bag is gorgeous!! I'm sorry I don't have a facebook page/account, or I would definitely share!
But really, any of them would be amazing!!
The Field Tote is my favorite, I'd have to sell a calf to buy one though! I don't do Facebook so unable to share there, sorry.
They are all so beautiful! The large duffle seems like it would be great to go with everything. But I'm sure if I spend some more time, I will change my mind a few times!