text:
Weer'd World
When the Going Gets Weer'd, remember YOU ARE NOT A DUCK!
About Weer'd Beard
← "Gun Death" Zombies
"Gun Death" Horrible →
The Antis Flailing at a Good Law
Posted on February 13, 2015 by Weerd Beard
I have a driver's license, and I can drive across country, and into foreign nations legally. Yet I have THREE carry permits, and can only carry in 40 states. Yep, I'm "safe" and vetted to carry in most of the country, but not ALL of the country. Doesn't make a lot of sense. Makes even less sense that I can carry in Massachusetts, which is no small feat in itself, and of course I can carry in neighboring Vermont…but given that they have no laws spesific to concealed carry, so can you! But I carry in New Hampshire under a separate permit, and I cannot legally carry in Connecticut and Rhode Island! This is 5 states that cover a VERY small area. My family frequently travels to neighboring states just to do simple things like shopping or grabbing a bite to eat, and last weekend my Mother-In-Law was talking about taking a vacation in Newport Rhode Island, and rather than getting a hotel room, simply staying with us, and commuting, which is totally reasonable, yet I need two permits in this small area, and two of those states, I'm not covered.
Enter a law fixing that!
Gun owners would be allowed to carry concealed weapons around the country under new legislation introduced in the Senate.
The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act would allow gun owners who have a concealed carry permit in their home state to bring their firearms in any other state with concealed-carry laws.
Note that now we have 50-states of Concealed Carry, as well as legal carry in the District of Columbia, so yeah, if you can legally carry in your home state, you can travel EVERYWHERE in this fine nation, and all you need to worry about is what are the laws in each of the states you travel through. Great law! What's not to like?
Of course the antis hate it!
"This bill is evil and dangerous. It is basically a proposal promoted by the gun lobby and its lap dog politicians to force every state to allow just about anyone to carry a loaded, hidden gun in public. Under this proposal, law enforcement in states with stronger gun laws would be handcuffed and helpless to take their own reasonable precautions to prevent dangerous people from carrying guns. States that use reasonable discretion in awarding concealed carry permits would be forced to accept the standards of states with reprehensibly low standards, like Florida. A recent study showed Florida has handed out gun permits to 1,400 felons. Under this bill, every one of those felons would have a permit to carry their guns in public across the country, from Times Square to Venice Beach. Florida happily handed George Zimmerman, a man who had an arrest record and history of violence, a permit to carry the gun he used to kill Trayvon Martin. Florida's shamefully dangerous gun laws are one thing that need to be addressed, and we can start by not forcing the rest of the country to live with the same danger."
OK let's tear apart this pile of stupidity. First off by "Just about anyone" is just people who can pass a background check and all the application process to get a concealed weapons permit. I really don't think Mr. Gross' implication matches reality.
As for law enforcement taking their own "reasonable precautions", what he's talking about is "May Issue" laws, where police deny people's permits with NO due process. If they had convictions or other disqualifications the denial would be reasonable by today's standards (tho frankly I disagree with many of the crap that denies people their rights), to "because I say so" type denials. The end result is a major issue of equal protection under the law, where at worst is average citizens being denied their rights while people with political connections get special privileges, or people in one town or county get their rights, while the next town or county are denied.
This is not only not reasonable, but straight up not how we do legal business in America!
As for states with "reasonable discretion" vs. States with "reprehensibly low standards", where is the problem? Are people in Florida getting in old-west style gun fights at high noon, or killing each other over petty arguments or parking spaces, like groups like the Brady Campaign have predicted when concealed carry first started its rebirth in the 1990s? Are the people of Massachusetts who have lots of difficult steps to carrying a gun any better at that task than say the people of neighboring New Hampshire that simply need to pass a background check, fill out a one-page application and pay $10?
Seems the picture being painted by reality is that heavy restrictions on carry is the unreasonable action. Also I'll note the growing number of states that no longer (or never did) require a permit to carry aren't seeing any problems either. Seems the reasonable solution is LESS laws, not more!
Last Mr. Gross totally goes off the rails. First up Florida's "1,400 Felons" issue isn't as simple as they make it out to be:
The Sun-Sentinel found that 1,400 individuals held valid licenses to carry guns in the first half of 2006 even though they had pleaded guilty or no contest to felonies, including assault, burglary, drug possession, child molestation and homicide.
They were eligible because they entered into plea deals that let them avoid formal convictions if they successfully completed their sentences, usually probation. The practice is referred to as the "withholding of adjudication."
Under Florida gun law, people who are given such breaks are eligible to carry guns three years after completing their sentences.
I don't know a lot about this law, but it sounds like the pleas were done so that they could quickly show society that they weren't a danger or an issue, so long as the records would be withheld after a period of good behavior. Again, I don't fully understand it, but how it's presented here, it doesn't sound like a bad idea.
Still at it's worse, if somebody WAS a convicted Felon AND for some oversight had a valid concealed carry permit…they couldn't legally own the gun they're carrying…which makes it about the same as carrying a gun without the permit in the first place. As much as the authoritarians like to tote laws as "stopping behavior", anybody without a carry permit can carry if they also own a gun. Legal or not, it's physically possible, and the laws don't change physics, as much as "Progressives" like to think so.
As for the anti-gun whipping boy, George Zimmerman, they make him sound like some rabid monster…except he's never been convicted of a serious crime. He's hardly the greatest man who ever lived, but as I say, they are anti-freedom, not anti-gun. See Zimmerman was never convicted of any of the crimes the antis like to paste on him…but since they don't like him because he shot a nasty little black thug, he should have his rights removed. If there's a reason to pass this law, that's a REALLY good one.
Not only is our current carry system onerous to people who travel outside their home state, it's also EXPENSIVE! I have 3 carry permits, and each costs me about $100 every few years…that's not trivial money. If I'm not some horrific murderer in my home state, why do I become a monster because I drove up the road a bit?
This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Self Defense. Bookmark the permalink.
8 Responses to The Antis Flailing at a Good Law
The_Jack says:
And here we see the key word with how they think: "reasonable discretion in **awarding** concealed carry permits"
The antis see CCW as a prize that the state bestows on grandees it deems worthy.
Heck the "Just about anyone" part also gives away that they *loath* the idea of common proles being armed.
Also note they see having an "arrest record" as being an automatic disqualification there. Because only bad people ever get arrested. I mean why bother with trials?
Course by " forcing the rest of the country to live with" Florida's laws means… Forcing the 9 or so may issue states (which are what 1/3 of the US population) to act like the rest of the country (more of less).
Heck, evil twisted Florida still requires training and a background check to legally carry a gun. I thought background checks was what the antis were all about!
Jack/OH says:
Duh, yeah! Seems to me if the Second Amendment in its most robust construction is to make any sense at all, it ought to apply to Joe Sixpack who carries a cover-my-ass defensive revolver when he crosses the Ohio-Pennsylvania border to buy cement.
I've commented on Weer'd's good blog off and on for a while. I've not heard a single gun shot in that time. For Chrissake, where is the "gun apocalypse"? Hats off to the commenters here.
Thirdpower says:
I had a BC spokesmouth on record saying they would support CCW if it had 'Strict Standards' w/ a list. But when IL was pushing CCW, that same spokesmouth testified against it even though it fit all the requirements he had previously said were needed.
divemedic says:
The "withhold adjudication" law (948.01) here in Florida is used for all sorts of things. If you get a speeding ticket, they will withhold adjudication if you pay court costs. After a year, the incident is forgotten. It's a good deal compared to a full-on ticket, because the ticket doesn't appear on your record, even though the court costs are the same as the ticket would have cost. At least your car insurance doesn't go up.
Apply this to other crimes: you plead guilty and ask for a "withhold." You are put on probation for a year or so, and if you keep out of trouble for a year, the charges are dropped.
What this means is that you have NOT been convicted of a felony and are NOT barred from having a CWP. The reason is that 790.06(k) states that a person is not eligible for a CWP if they have had adjudication withheld on any felony or misdemeanor crime of domestic violence unless 3 years have elapsed since probation or any other conditions set by the court have been fulfilled.
As far as Zimmerman, he has never been convicted of any crime that I am aware of. Under our laws, he is innocent.
"Florida happily handed George Zimmerman, a man who had an arrest record and history of violence, a permit to carry the gun he used to kill Trayvon Martin."
So, they support taking peoples' rights away for merely being arrested for a crime without ever being convicted? They want police to have the ability to arbitrarily deny someone a concealed carry license even though they couldn't prove that they did anything wrong? So much for due process.
Erik, divemedic–FWIW–I used to be a hang-'em-high type. Politically motivated police misconduct directed at innocent people has pretty much persuaded me we don't want police to have more powers than absolutely needed.
Heck, In places like Mass the police can take away your carry permit without you being arrested, let alone being charged.
So *yes* the Antis support that.
Heck the entire *point* of May issue is to empower the police to deny rights to otherwise qualified citizens.
I'm in my sixties now. The last few years I've met a cop who I know is a serial "testi-liar". There's also the cop who gave me a minor rough-up for publishing opinion that upset a local Mr. Big.
There are plenty of good cops. We need cops. But I can't get the stink of police corruption out of my nostrils.
You bet. More stringent gun laws mean more opportunity for police corruption.
Bad Justice
Gun Death?
Weerd Beard on Car WTF??
Scott Garabedian on Car WTF??
Beans on If The Taser Doesn't Work, Shoot Him in the Leg!
Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 071: GRPC and the NFA | Weer'd World on A Tinfoil Hat Made Out of Copper
Magus Zeal on Wind and Solar: A Real-World Observation


rustic home bars. Do you know rustic home bars is one of the hottest topics on this category? Thats why were showing this content right now. We had taken this picture on the internet that we believe would be one of the most representative photos for rustic home bars.
We all know every ones opinion; will be different from each other. Likewise to this graphic, inside our viewpoint, this really is one of the best picture, now what do you think?
This More knowledge about rustic home bars has been published by admin in this category section. Please leave a comment here. Many thanks.
Rustic Home Bar Idea Image Photos Pictures Ideas High .
Rustic Bar Designs For Home Home Bars Designs Rustic Home Bar Ideas .
Rustic Home Bar Design Built For Entertaining Raddest Men S .
The Rustic Home Bar Thechicybeast.
Inspiring Ideas Rustic Home Bar Designs On Design Oceansafaris.
Rustic Bar Designs For Home The Rustic Home Bar Designs .
Baby Nursery Astounding Rustic Home Bar Ideas Pictures Modern .
Mesmerizing Rustic Home Bar Contemporary Best Picture Interior .
Wood Home Bar Kanistrofff Info.
Custom Adirondack Rustic Home Bar By L Post Rustics CustomMade Com.
16 Awe Inspiring Rustic Home Bars For An Unforgettable Party Barn .
Pictures Of Rustic Home Bars Rustic Home Bar With Wood Stools .
Rustic Home Bar Northern Cabin Pictures Furniture Set .
Rustic Home Bar Bars With Reclaimed Wood Kitchen Furniture Set .
Pictures Of Rustic Home Bars Curved Rustic Home Bar Meadors Co.
Rustic Bar Bars Don Have Formal Home Art Decor 35464.
Rustic Home Bar Design Ideas Remodeling Pictures Houzz.
Small Rustic Home Bars Rustic Home Bar Ideas Ideas For A Home Bar .
Rustic Home Bar Ideas Osascosp Online.
Small Rustic Home Bars Lake House Exudes Rustic Simplicity Meadors Co.
Rustic Bar Designs For Home Rustic Bar Ideas Rustic Home Bar Ideas .
16 Awe Inspiring Rustic Home Bars For An Unforgettable Party Lodge .
16 Awe Inspiring Rustic Home Bars For An Unforgettable Party Bar .
Amazon Com Honey Rustic Home Bar Kitchen Dining.
Barre La Maison La Main Personnalis Construit Whisky Rustic .
Beautiful Rustic Home Bar Ideas Home Ideas.
Rustic Home Bar Decor Bars For Sale Furniture Galettedesrois .
Rustic Bar Cabinet Home Bars For Sale Rustic Home Bar Rustic Bar .
Home Bar Decor Coachleon Co.
Buy Rustic Home Bars Online At Overstock Com Our Best Dining Room .
Rustic Home Bar Home Bar Back Wall Rustic Home Bar Designs Home Bar .
Small Home Bar Small Home Bar Ideas Best Small Home Bars Ideas On .
Rustic Home Bar Ideas Home Decor Ideas Khodro Us.
Rustic Home Bar Designs Home Decor Renovation Ideas.
Rustic Home Bars Home Bar Rustic With Saddle Bar Stools Pendant .
Rustic Home Bars Unique Mesmerizing Rustic Home Bar Contemporary .
Bar Ideas For Home Rustic Home Bar Ideas Home Bar Custom Hand Built .
Rustic Home Bar Ideas Home Bar Ideas Bar Ideas Home Bar Ideas Easy .
Pictures Of Home Bars Readingsolution Co.
Bar Furniture For The Home Corner Bar Furniture For The Home Bars .
Custom Home Bars Design Line Kitchens Sea Girt House Plans Bar .
Home Bars Style Rustic Home Gallery Stores Furniture.
Rustic Bars For Sale Rustic Bars For Sale Baby Nursery Winsome .
Home Depot Outdoor Bar Chairs Bars Rustic Ideas Images Full Size For .
Home Bar Ideas Home Bar Ideas 6 Rustic Home Bar Design Ideas .
Images Of Home Bars Awe Inspiring Rustic Home Bars For An .
Sophisticated Storage This Rustic Home Bar Cabinet Unit Home Bar .
Cool Home Ideas Bar Plans Wet Bars And Bar.
Fresh Rustic Home Bars Home Design Ideas.
Small Home Bars Really Encourage Bar Ideas Design For 14 .


An Arctic Early Warning System?
The Arctic Ocean could become a critical laboratory for understanding the process of climate change, an early warning system for alterations that will affect the entire Earth.
Understanding the impacts of climate change on the Arctic Ocean is one of the great challenges of the 21 century. The Arctic has remained a truly hidden ocean, veiled by its ice sheet nearly year-round. Its harsh conditions and remote location have left it largely unexplored—the last ocean region to give up its secrets to science. Indeed, it's been 20 years since the last major effort to measure biological activity along a transect of the Arctic Ocean.
This ignorance could be costly, however, as the Arctic is changing rapidly. For one thing, atmospheric warming from climate change at polar latitudes is double that of lower latitudes. As a result, more and more of the Arctic sea ice now melts off during the summer, and when it refreezes in winter, the ice is thinner. By some estimates, the summer Arctic could be effectively ice-free in two or three decades. That in turn will bring a host of changes, some of which are already starting—more human activity from shipping, commercial fishing, tourism, and oil and mineral exploration, increased coastal erosion, stormier weather, and potentially large changes to the marine ecosystem. The end of the summer sea ice will also likely mean the end for polar bears and other species that depend on it for access to fishing.
At a less visible level, the end of the sea ice will eliminate the algae that grow on its lower surface and may also diminish native plankton, altering the ocean's biological productivity and disrupting the marine food chain. The Arctic is also more sensitive than other oceans to increasing acidification from higher levels of dissolved carbon dioxide.
These changes make the Arctic a critical laboratory in which to study climate change—in effect, a place where we can understand and document the linkages between global warming and the physical and chemical changes that in turn drive ecosystem change. However, understanding of the Arctic is sparse because it has been difficult and expensive to mount expeditions in the summer; during the winter, the region has been effectively inaccessible. We don't even have a baseline for the Arctic against which to measure change, let alone the kind of continuous monitoring and observing tools that are needed to understand processes and measure rates of change.
The basic research challenge is thus to identify the present state of the Arctic marine system, explore system responses to climate change, and identify and predict ongoing and future changes.
That's important, because as climate change accelerates, many of those changes and impacts will happen in latitudes where people live too. Moreover, changes in the Arctic have impact elsewhere. Melting polar ice sheets, such as the Greenland Ice Sheet, accelerate rising sea levels. Warming temperatures in the Arctic modify atmospheric patterns, particularly the high altitude jet stream that flows from west to east around the earth, with direct impacts on weather across the Northern Hemisphere. One theory is that the jet stream will exhibit greater meanders, driving greater extremes in temperature and drought for the United States and Europe. The unseasonably warm weather in Alaska and Boston's record snow falls this past winter might be examples of such meandering. A warmer Arctic will also mean thawing permafrost, which not only increases local coastal erosion and run-off of organic materials into the ocean, but also releases methane—a very potent greenhouse gas—to the atmosphere. In effect, thawing permafrost creates a positive feedback loop: the warmer it gets in the Arctic, the more atmospheric warming accelerates.
That makes the Arctic an invaluable laboratory, as well as an early warning system for climate change —if we make the effort to pay attention and understand.
Arctic research has been limited by the high logistics costs of operating in a demanding and remote environment. A 6-week summer expedition on an icebreaker costs about $2 million for the ship time alone. Winter expeditions are so challenging they are seldom carried out, leaving the Arctic largely unobserved for most of the year.
Fortunately new ways to monitor the Arctic Ocean and measure its properties are emerging. Autonomous platforms such as gliders, ice-tethered profilers, and long-range unmanned, self-guided vehicles—underwater drones—can complement ship-based methods, making possible more efficient and year-round observations. More capable sensors are under development that are smaller, more energy-efficient, and capable of measuring additional chemical and biological properties. The data these new platforms and sensors could collect, together with ship-based expeditionary research, would help scientists sort out how physical and chemical changes affect the Arctic ecosystem—in effect, what climate change means for living things.
As the Arctic region fast approaches a potential tipping point, philanthropy can make a pivotal difference, providing a unifying force for otherwise fragmented efforts. An investment of $100 million over 5 years would accelerate technology development, expand collaborative international observing and expeditionary efforts, and enable scientists to create the first comprehensive assessment of the state of the physical, chemical, and biological Arctic Ocean.
An investment of $1 billion over 10 years would enable the creation of a comprehensive Arctic observation system. Investments would extend existing technology and accelerate new technology to create an efficient basin-scale observation system capable of year-round data collection. Expeditions would be used to develop a phenomenological foundation for improved models coupled to the observation system and to look more closely at interactions and processes that cannot be completely described using sensors. Such an effort would transform our understanding of the Arctic and create a monitoring system capable of both tracking the evolving state of the Arctic and improving our capabilities to predict changes, mitigate impacts, and minimize the risks to human activities, both in the region and globally.
Given that we only have one Earth, that we continue to use carbon-based fuels that cause warming, and we're uncertain about how climate change will unfold, the Arctic provides a window to the future that philanthropy can open.


If you are a visually-oriented web surfer, you can search through the information below for school information and other fun stuff. Otherwise, use the list on the left. It contains an alphabetical list of links to the same information.
Are you a student at Berkshire Middle School? If so, you are one of the people I would expect to visit this site. If you are someone else, that's okay, too. Do you want some tips on writing and grammar? That's a main focus of this site. Check out the links at the bottom of this page for help from schools around the country, too.
NOW THAT YOU'RE HERE, WHAT'S THE POINT AGAIN?
Perhaps you're looking for a source of writing or grammar tips, or you're hoping to find an up-to-date homework assignment that you neglected to write down. Maybe you'd like information about Berkshire students' published books, or are interested in the records of the trips to Kentucky cave country. This is the kind of data that will be available during the 2016-2017 school year. The "Quick Links On This Site" box (below) will take you to these and other topics.
There is an old but good online textbook that covers grammar and writing. It's not the easiest to move through, but it's a good resource if you want extra information or practice. Click on the book icon to begin, or go to tiny.cc/blue6 .
is filled with published authors.
short fiction and non-fiction pieces.
Play the "LANGUAGE ARTS MAN" game!
A talented former student of mine, Dan Sills, has allowed me to share some of his work. But first, you must agree not to change any of it or claim it as your own. Also, you must receive permission from the owner of the computer you are using before downloading any files.
Click here to download the L.A. Man game as a .zip file.
Click here to download a .zip file of one of Dan's stop-action films.
Click on the thumbnail picture above to see some of Dan's L.A. Man artwork.
More Helpful Information on the Six Traits of Writing - with examples!
HOMEWORK HELP: B.J. Pinchbeck's site has links to almost 800 places to get help.
MORE HOMEWORK HELP: Here are many reference tools from The Kids on the Web.
STILL MORE HOMEWORK HELP: Homework Help from Discovery has over 700 educational sites.
For Fun: Here's a site with a variety of anagrams.
Enjoy your stay on planet Earth.


text:
Fandango Announces Rewards Program
Alden Ehrenreich is Han Solo, Donal Glover is Lando Calrissian and Phoebe Waller-Bridge is L3-37 in SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY.
Kicking off what could be a record-breaking summer at the box office, Fandango will launch today its new Fandango VIP+ rewards program to incentivize advance ticketing and more moviegoing this summer. For the first time, ticket buyers on Fandango can earn VIP+ Points redeemable for discounts and free stuff across Fandango's family of businesses — from ticketing to streaming digital movies and TV shows to fan merchandise.
"In a summer packed with blockbusters, we wanted to reward Fandango customers for what's sure to be many trips to their local cinemas over the next several months," said Fandango CMO Adam Rockmore. "We've built an expansive movie ecosystem at scale that we will mobilize for our Fandango VIP+ rewards program, helping drive advance ticket purchases and incremental sales for our exhibition and studio partners."
Fandango VIP+ launches in advance of the highly-anticipated Marvel's Avengers: Infinity War, debuting in theaters on April 27, and will continue throughout an unprecedented summer of blockbuster movies including Deadpool 2, Solo: A Star Wars Story, Ocean's 8, Incredibles 2, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, Ant-Man and the Wasp, Mission: Impossible – Fallout, The Equalizer II, Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation, Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again, and more.
To participate in the Fandango VIP+ rewards program this summer, a ticket buyer needs to be a Fandango VIP member, Fandango's free-to-join loyalty program. For every movie ticket purchased on Fandango, Fandango VIP members will receive 150 VIP+ Points. Once members reach 600 VIP+ Points, they will receive a six-dollar discount code to be used towards future movie ticket purchases, digital movie purchases and rentals on FandangoNOW, or movie merchandise on Fandango FanShop.
In a recent survey Fandango conducted with more than 4,500 moviegoers, 85% of respondents said they were more likely to buy movie tickets from an outlet that offered a rewards or loyalty program. In addition to receiving benefits from the Fandango VIP+ rewards program, ticket buyers will continue to receive partner perks from AMC Stubs®, Cinemark Connections, Regal Crown Club®, Marcus' Magical Movie Rewards®, and others. Information about Fandango VIP membership can be found here (www.fandango.com/fandangovip), and full details on the Fandango VIP+ rewards program can be found here (www.fandango.com/VIP-Plus).
Over the past several years, the company has built a comprehensive digital network to serve moviegoers with all their needs: Rotten Tomatoes and Movieclips help fans discover movies with reviews and trailers; Fandango, MovieTickets.com and Flixster sell tickets to more than 30,000 U.S. screens; FandangoNOW offers new and catalogue movies and next-day TV shows to buy or rent; and the hottest movie fan merchandise can be found on Fandango FanShop.
Fandango continues to pioneer new movie discovery and ticketing experiences for leading mobile, social, AI bot and voice recognition platforms with tech giants Apple, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, and others. Now moviegoers can use Fandango to discover movies, access showtimes and buy tickets with their friends, while using their favorite messaging apps, social networks and voice assistants.
The company has also incorporated leading digital payment platforms into its ticketing service, including Apple Pay, Android Pay, PayPal, Visa Checkout and Masterpass, enabling ticket purchases via debit and credit cards with just one touch. Fandango also offers PayPal split pay, making it easier to split the bill for tickets with multiple friends.
Weekend Box Office Results August 11th 2019
Celebrating its first anniversary this month, Fandango FanShop offers a wide variety of exclusive and limited edition movie gear, collectibles, jewelry, fashion accessories, home goods, fine art and posters, based on popular films and franchises. FanShop's print on-demand capabilities enable the site to offer exclusive t-shirts, posters and other items that cannot be found at traditional retailers. Over the past year, Fandango has leveraged FanShop to reward moviegoers for their ticket purchases with complimentary movie collectibles and exclusive poster art inspired by highly-anticipated movies and franchises such as Marvel's Avengers: Infinity War, Black Panther, Thor: Ragnarok, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Ready Player One, and many others.
According to Fandango's survey, 84% of moviegoers said they were likely to catch up with franchise films at home before the latest film installment hits theaters. To help fuel fans' excitement for a new theatrical release, Fandango's video on demand service, FandangoNOW, often offers discounts and specials on franchise films to rent or buy, prior to the new movie's opening weekend. In anticipation of Marvel's Avengers: Infinity War, starting today FandangoNOW is offering up to 20% off the purchase of select Marvel Studios digital movies. With a purchase or rental of select Marvel movies, fans will also receive a code for a free* Avengers: Infinity War poster and 10% off of Marvel merchandise on Fandango FanShop.
Fandango is the ultimate digital network for all things movies, serving more than 60 million unique visitors per month, according to comScore, with best-in-class movie information, ticketing to more than 30,000 U.S. screens, trailers and original video, home entertainment and fan merchandise. Its portfolio features leading online ticketers Fandango, MovieTickets.com and Flixster; world-renown movie review site Rotten Tomatoes; and Movieclips, the #1 movie trailers and content channel on YouTube. Fandango's movie discovery and ticketing innovations can also be found on mobile, social, AI and voice platforms from Apple, Facebook, Google, Amazon, and others. Fandango's video on-demand service, FandangoNOW offers new release and catalog movies and next-day TV shows to more than 200 million connected, over-the-top (OTT) and mobile devices, while Fandango FanShop curates unique and exclusive fan gear and collectibles. In Latin America, the company operates leading online ticketers Ingresso.com and Fandango Latin America.
*Shipping and handling not included.
INTO THE BADLANDS Season 3 Posters
Discovery & Science Set BattleBots Premiere Dates
Fandango Launches New Ticketing Experience On Instagram
Fandango Launches On The Google Assistant
Fandango Joins Movies Anywhere
Fandango Sells More Than 30% Of BLACK PANTHER Four-Day Opening Weekend
Fandango Unveils New Moviegoing Innovations For iOS 10

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Squeeze 16 of the lemons, reserving the rinds and juice. In a large saucepan, combine 3 cups of the sugar and 3 cups water, stirring until dissolved. Add the lemon rinds, and cook over medium heat until the liquid becomes syrupy, about 15 minutes. Remove from heat, and let stand until room temperature. Remove, and discard lemon rinds. Stir in the lemon juice, about 4 cups.
Spread remaining 1/2 cup sugar on a small plate. Cut the remaining lemon into quarters. Rub the wedges along the rims of 16 mint-julep cups or tall glasses, and invert the glasses in the sugar to create a sugared rim.
Crush a few mint leaves into the bottom of each glass with a muddler or the back of a wooden spoon. Fill each glass with ice cubes, and pour 1/2 cup of lemon syrup in each glass. Top off with about 1 1/2 ounces of bourbon per glass. Garnish each glass with a fresh sprig of mint.


Gear6 provides scalable Memcached solutions, enabling high-growth web sites to deliver and scale dynamic applications and content. By focusing on the emerging need for a dedicated web caching tier, Gear6 solutions dramatically improve the scalability of web applications and databases, improving quality of service and reducing infrastructure cost.
Gear6's flagship offering is Gear6 Web Cache, a Memcached protocol-compliant solution that enables web site developers and operators to scale web services and applications, to save money, rack space, power and time, to protect users and sites from failures and traffic spikes, and to manage all aspects of caching operations.
Violin Memory provides a scalable flash memory array that delivers unprecedented sustainability and spike-free latency at price points challenging HDD performance storage. Violin Memory's solutions are designed for the company who is looking to accelerate their business critical applications and virtualize their Data Center storage.
SASI had existing relationships with Gear6 through previous transactions. Gear6 was at an inflection point and engaged SASI to advise them on strategic options including M&A. SASI identified, selected and approached a strategic set of acquirers who could leverage Gear6's core solution set. Communicating the core value proposition and larger vision were critical to moving the process forward.


At the time Sainsbury's relaunched football collector coins so the company producing them also sold them in to other clubs and countries. In Portugal Sporting. Benfica and Porto all commissioned collector folders and coins. Identical design to the Sainsbury sets.
The folder is identical in design and layout to the Sainsbury folders of 1998 onwards.
Identical to the Sainsbury coins in design. Silver coloured and highly polished.
I guess Record are the distributor or promoter of the coin sets.


text:
Q: How to remove all soft hyphens (U+00AD) from a file There is a thing called Soft hyphen. Its unicode value is U+00AD and it cannot be seen in my text editor.
Apparently, a few of my files are riddled with it:
$ perl -C7 -ne 'for(split(//)){print sprintf("U+%04X", ord)." ".$_."\n"}'
nc
U+006E n
U+00AD
U+0063 c
U+000A

In between n and c, there is a soft hyphen. If you copy this command echo nc, you will find that it has three characters (not two).
How can I remove all soft hyphens (U+00AD) from my file?

A: Just use sed (I tested with GNU sed, I do not know if non-GNU seds can do it) and copy/paste the character into the sed expression. Here, I copied your echo nc command and ran it, redirecting the output to a file which gave me a test file with the character of interest:
$ perl -C7 -ne 'for(split(//)){print sprintf("U+%04X", ord)." ".$_."\n"}' file
U+006E n
U+00C2 Â
U+00AD
U+0063 c
U+000A

It also added a U+00C2 Â which I don't understand but I don't know unicode, so I assume it's some sort of unicode weirdness. The file looks as expected, there is actually what appears like a space but is in fact the soft hyphen between the a and n:
$ cat file
nc

$ od -c file
0000000   n 302 255   c  \n
0000005

Regardless, copy/pasting that apparently white space and feeding it to uniprops, gives:
$ uniprops ''
U+00AD ‹U+00AD› \N{SOFT HYPHEN}
    \pC \p{Cf}
    All Any Assigned C Other Case_Ignorable CI Cf Format Changes_When_NFKC_Casefolded CWKCF Common Zyyy Default_Ignorable_Code_Point DI Graph X_POSIX_Graph
       Latin_1 Latin_1_Supplement Latin_1_Sup InLatin1 Print X_POSIX_Print Unicode

And copying into a sed substitution operator gives:
$ sed 's///g' file | perl -C7 -ne 'for(split(//)){print sprintf("U+%04X", ord)." ".$_."\n"}'
U+006E n
U+0063 c
U+000A

In other words, it correctly removes it. So you can apply that command to all of the affected files:
sed -i 's///g' file1 file2 ... fileN

Try it on a couple of files first (and use -i.bak or i .bak depending on your OS and sed implementation to keep a backup to test safely) and then run it on all of them.

A: Using Raku (formerly known as Perl_6)
raku -pe 's:g/\c[SOFT HYPHEN]//;' file

Raku provides high-level Unicode support, built-in. No need to load libraries or remember command line flags. Above utilizes one way identifying Unicode characters in Raku, \c[SOFT HYPHEN], i.e. just spell out the name! Or you could use the Unicode identifier:
raku -pe 's:g/\x00AD//;' file

Two things about Raku's version of the familiar s/// substitution operator: you place modifiers like :global (known as 'adverbs' in Raku) immediately after the s, as in s:global or its abbreviation, s:g.
Secondly, a less 'backslashy` version of the above code is as follows:
raku -pe 's:g[\c[SOFT HYPHEN]]="";' file

OR
raku -pe 's:g[\x00AD]="";' file

See the links for discussion of Raku's Unicode support.
https://www.codesections.com/blog/raku-unicode/
https://docs.raku.org/language/unicode

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Come see us at TWU to learn about the latest pediatric equipment for physical and occupational therapy.
This equipment fair is for PT students that are about to graduate and enter the workforce in May. Other attendees include local practicing pediatric PTs from institutions such as Texas Children's Hospital and Shriners Hospitals for Children. Also attending are the second-year PT students, OT and Nursing students, and their professors.


Speaking at Ruby Conf in October!
Say the words "content management" in the ears of nearly any Web developer and they will likely frown and complain that most content management systems are too complicated, difficult to setup, or not very flexible. They have good reason to complain. Content management systems are notorious for containing every feature, except for the kitchen sink!
Enter Radiant—a light-weight content management system designed from the ground up to be simple to use, while remaining flexible and powerful. It's a content management system that has borrowed much from Textpattern and MovableType while seeking to be more than a simple a blogging engine.
In his talk John will talk about the design and discovery process he went through while building Radiant and cover the guiding philosophies behind it. He will also demonstrate installation and setup from a Gem and talk about how Radiant can be extended. You will discover the joys of Radiant's robust domain languages and revel in the ease with which you can create new content. He will also discuss how Radiant is being used on the new version of the main Ruby web site (http://ruby-lang.org) and explain how others are using it.


Excellent service, quick & professional team. Very happy customer.
Ben's Tree Service is a Darwin based company specialising in tree and palm removal, stump grinding and pruning. We have the right equipment and expertise to get the job safely while taking great care of your property.
Our qualified and experienced team can provide you with the information you need to make the right decision about your trees and palms.
Ben's Tree Service has been looking after the needs of both residential and commercial customers in the Darwin and surrounding region for over 10 years.
Whether you need to have a dead tree removed, clean up your yard after a storm or simply want to enjoy more sunlight in your front yard, Ben's Tree Service can assist you.
No job is to big or small. With years of experience in all tree problems, we'll sort it out.
Getting someone to even turn up in Darwin is hard work, finding a company as efficient, friendly and professional as Ben's Tree Service is even harder. Really happy with the end result and will definitely be using this company again!
We were very happy with the service we received from Ben and Arweena. Competitively priced, great to deal with and committed to doing an excellent job.
Always use Bens tree Service. Prompt, efficient, good pricing. Ben and his team are always aware of the other plants that may be affected and always take their time to ensure little to no damage. Have used Ben for years, Big or small. Highly recommended.
Ben and his team did a great job for me. Coconut tree was across fencing and in the pool after storm. They removed the tree in difficult circumstances and at a very reasonable cost. Highly recommended.
We use Ben and his team on a daily basis as we know we are getting an exceptional job, clean and most of safe for our clients. Very well presented team with excellent results.
Excellent job in removing trees on my property.
I received fantastic and professional service from beginning to end. Ben and his team worked hard, went above and beyond to ensure nothing was damaged in the process and cleaned up perfectly when they had left. Top job!!!
Great job at reasonable prices. Staff were professional and hard working.


Wholesale Sales & Marketing Specialist. 9yrs Experience, predominately in the Baby/Kids/Parenting industry. Helping wholesalers get into more stores, get more reorders, become a favorite supplier to stores and increase their brand exposure.
Is There An Australian Version Of Alibaba Website For Products?
Where can I buy closeout, wholesale maternity dress? My dad is looking open up a small store.
Can anyone suggest the best products to sell online?


Oh…and I totally forgot…So, today is a bad body image day for me. It actually started last night…Or really, Tuesday.
Tuesday, I went on the Meal Challenge where a dietitian takes a handful of us on a restaurant outing for lunch. It went as well as could be expected….I mean, I ate at a restaurant, I enjoyed some of the food, I felt anxious and guilty. And I worried about the impact (i.e. gaining weight) from the trip.
Tuesday afternoon, we had Snack Challenge, for which I had to eat a doughnut.
Tuesday evening, I had a dinner date with one of my peers.
Last night, I ate left-overs from the evening dinner.
And then I had yoga. And when I was sitting there in yoga, I looked down at my stomach and I could tell that it was bigger. And I looked at my thighs and they were totally bigger. And I felt very self-conscious and embarrassed. Now, I know that technically, my body wasn't bigger…I can intellectualize that. But my distorted sense of self saw that I am fatter.
This morning, I was obsessing about what to wear and hating my body. I had a full outfit on and was sure that everything didn't fit right. And I was in my closet going to pick out a different outfit, but couldn't figure out what to wear because none of it would be better. I would still be ugly and fat. I am still ugly and fat.
I just am convinced that everything I eat will make me fat…Like, every single bite of food. My dietitian and I talk about this a lot. That it is not actually true, that it is a manifestation of my ED. And still, I can't shake it…I know that eating will make me fat.
I really wish I could count calories. And weigh myself. I just need to know what is going on with my body.
This entry was posted in Posts and tagged anorexia nervosa, atypical anorexia, body checking, body image, dietitian, eating disorder by Heidi. Bookmark the permalink.
Wish I could be there and say a LOT of things to you in person – all good things – but I am here, and I don't want to say a lot on here. YAY for Callie and everyone else who is helping you. Boo for the peer who says things that make you feel badly; I wish everyone there could be supportive of each other, but I guess they just aren't. YAY for you for keeping on when it is tough!! And, as always, you are worth it!! And I love you!!


best home design ideas, like Turn Pictures Into Coloring Pages Free Online. Winged Cat Coloring Pages. Angelfish For Kids. Saving Money Coloring Pages. Graduation Coloring Pictures. Colouring In Pictures Of Dolphins.


Is presentation a part of the over-burden task assigned to you on your weekends? Stressed out of hours of search over internet for appropriate PowerPoint template, Then, not for fret now, our four cross text box templates are exactly what you are looking for. No matter which industry to belong to or whatever is your presentation theme. Our professionally designed PowerPoint template fits in any presentation topics. Our four cross text box slide represents a business model or steps into four stages. Uniqueness is what strikes in minds; Our PowerPoint template is one such design that can easily catch the eye-balls of your audience. Surely your over-burdened task of creating a presentation will turn into exciting and entertaining. You can see the use of simple PowerPoint shapes turned into an elegant and astonishing presentation design. The presenter can apply these four-cross-text-box PowerPoint templates to exhibit modern ideas, concepts, and other business topics. The user may also create an effective analysis of SWOT, PEST and many others. The color layout of the PPT slide also holds the audience focus more on the diagram and further can easily relate with the spoken words.
Our Four-cross-text-box is entirely distinct of other conventional PowerPoint templates. The four outer text boxes are identically same but are differentiated by the inner square boxes. Each inner box is glossed using vibrant color and is represented using infographic icons. Each outer edge of the inner square box is adjoined with outer boxes. Adjacent to the object, the presenter can find the text areas, where the presentation's topic can be added. Moreover, each step can be elaborated separately with the same icons. The conveying design can precisely deliver your presentation information. The shapes can easily be altered using the PowerPoint menu. Each and every element of the template can be customized to match the presentation's specific look. The slide is available in the black and white background. However, the presenter can modify the color scheme to the desired one. For enabling the audience to retain the information easily, these slides are designed as meaningful and as simple as possible. Our four-cross-text-box template can be downloaded in both PowerPoint and Keynote version.


Photograph 51 - Did He Like It?
Does Rosalind Franklin know how precious her photograph is? In the race to unlock the secret of life it could be the one to hold the key. With rival scientists looking everywhere for the answer, who will be first to see it and more importantly, understand it? Anna Ziegler's extraordinary play looks at the woman who cracked DNA and asks what is sacrificed in the pursuit of science, love and a place in history.
September 14, 2015: When Nicole Kidman steps out of the shadows, breaking off from a wall of men, and onto the edge of the stage at the Noël Coward Theater, where Anna Ziegler's "Photograph 51" opened here on Monday night, her eyes beam undiluted willpower. It is a gaze that both chills and warms, radiating and demanding trust in this singularly self-possessed presence. Ms. Kidman makes it clear that she is in charge here, and woe unto those of us who doubt it. That act of coercion by confidence occurs in the opening seconds of Michael Grandage's compelling production of this biographical drama about a scientific discovery and the pride and prejudice behind it. And it turns out to be a perfect introduction both to a newly reincarnated Ms. Kidman, returning to the British stage for the first time in 17 years, and to the perfectionist character she portrays. That's Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958), a British chemist and X-ray crystallographer whose work at King's College in London during the early 1950s was essential to identifying the mysteries of DNA, or as another character in the play says enthusiastically, "discovering the secret of life!" In "Photograph 51," the word on Franklin among her fellow scientists — all male, needless to say — is that she is exacting, humorless, brilliant and disciplined to the point of rigidity.


text:
All Cases page 42
You are here: BAILII >> Browse A-Z title lists >> All Cases page 42
AG v M [1991] JRC 044 (20 March 1991)
AG v M [1994] JRC 204 (07 October 1994)
AG v M [2000] JRC 148 (26 July 2000)
AG v M and S [1987] JRC 167 (09 October 1987)
AG v M W and S [1988] JRC 129 (01 July 1988)
AG v MacDonald [2005] JRC 004 (12 January 2005)
AG v Mackay [1992] JRC 083 (15 May 1992)
AG v Mackenzie [1990] JRC 153 (19 October 1990)
AG v MacKenzie [1996] JRC 163 (18 September 1996)
AG v MacKenzie [2001] JRC 168 (31 July 2001)
AG v Madden [1988] JRC 162 (09 August 1988)
AG v Madrigal Investment Ltd [1988] JRC 105 (03 June 1988)
AG v Magnet Publications Ltd [1988] JRC 184 (16 September 1988)
AG v Maguire [1986] JRC 086 (12 June 1986)
AG v Maguire [1989] JRC 075a (12 May 1989)
AG v Maguire [1991] JRC 150 (21 October 1991)
AG v Majid [2003] JRC 101 (20 June 2003)
AG v Malco Developments Ltd [2004] JRC 023 (06 February 2004)
AG v Mallet [2000] JRC 87 (24 May 2000)
AG v Malone [1989] JRC 184 (10 November 1989)
AG v Maloney [1996] JRC 085 (03 May 1996)
AG v Maltez [2000] JRC 158 (04 August 2000)
AG v Maltez [2000] JRC 217A (06 November 2000)
AG v Maltez [2000] JRC 234 (24 November 2000)
AG v Mamado [1990] JRC 140 (28 September 1990)
AG v Mandel [1987] JRC 065 (01 April 1987)
AG v Mandel [1995] JRC 090 (15 May 1995)
AG v Manning 06-Sep-2019 [2019] JRC 171 (06 September 2019)
AG v Manning [1985] UR 052 (28 May 1985)
AG v Manning [1986] JRC 121 (18 August 1986)
AG v Manning [1988] JRC 036 (15 February 1988)
AG v Manning [1988] JRC 136 (04 July 1988)
AG v Manning [2018] JRC 230 (12 December 2018)
AG v Manson [2008] JRC 108 (04 July 2008)
AG v Manson and Mckenzie [2000] JRC 34 (25 February 2000)
AG v Marett [2017] JRC 110 (14 July 2017)
AG v Marett and Riddell [2004] JRC 166 (17 September 2004)
AG v Marie [1986] JRC 006 (10 January 1986)
AG v Marie [1988] JRC 100 (01 June 1988)
AG v Marie [1991] JRC 149a (18 October 1991)
AG v Marie [1992] JRC 073 (24 April 1992)
AG v Marie and de Freitas [1987] JRC 051 (09 March 1987)
AG v Marie (bail application) [1987] JRC 067 (02 April 1987)
AG v Mark Amy Ltd and SGB (CI) Ltd [1992] JRC 098 (05 June 1992)
AG v Marques and Marques [1988] JRC 104 (03 June 1988)
AG v Marrett [2000] JRC 167 (18 August 2000)
AG v Marriott [1987] JRC 009 (15 January 1987)
AG v Marriott [1987] JRC 023 (05 February 1987)
AG v Marsden [1989] JRC 180 (27 October 1989)
AG v Marsh [2002] JRC 16 (18 January 2002)
AG v Marshman [1994] JRC 121 (16 June 1994)
AG v Marshman [1995] JRC 134 (10 July 1995)
AG v Martin [1994] JRC 248 (15 December 1994)
AG v Martin [1997] JRC 171 (01 September 1997)
AG v Martin [2005] JRC 011 (21 January 2005)
AG v Martin and Hughes [1987] JRC 016 (30 January 1987)
AG v Martin and S [1996] JRC 245 (19 December 1996)
AG v Martins and Others [2007] JRC 207 (09 November 2007)
AG v Martland [1986] JRC 182 (15 December 1986)
AG v Mason [2001] JRC 230 (14 November 2001)
AG v Matson [2001] JRC 143 (06 July 2001)
AG v Maxwell [1996] JRC 234 (09 December 1996)
AG v MB [1986] JRC 116 (05 August 1986)
AG v McAteer [1996] JRC 093 (17 May 1996)
AG v McAvoy [1986] JRC 113 (25 July 1986)
AG v McCabe [2005] JRC 013 (04 February 2005)
AG v McCabe [2017] JRC 036 (03 March 2017)
AG v McCallum [1987] UR 138 (01 September 1987)
AG v McCann and Others [2007] JRC 242 (17 December 2007)
AG v McCarthy [2003] JRC 107 (30 June 2003)
AG v McClean [2001] JRC 100 (04 May 2001)
AG v McConnachie [1986] JRC 100 (11 July 1986)
AG v McConnachie [1986] JRC 159 (21 October 1986)
AG v McConnachie [1987] JCA 002 (07 January 1987)
AG v McConnachie [1990] JRC 042 (28 March 1990)
AG v McConnachie [2002] JRC 46A (27 February 2002)
AG v McConnachie [2002] JRC 54 (01 March 2002)
AG v McConnacie [1989] JRC 135 (11 August 1989)
AG v McCool [1991] JRC 052a (12 April 1991)
AG v McCool [1996] JRC 004 (12 January 1996)
AG v McCool and Heys [2000] JRC 45 (09 March 2000)
AG v McCormack [2003] JRC 030 (13 February 2003)
AG v McCormack and Others [2008] JRC 112 (14 July 2008)
AG v McCormick [2001] JRC 64 (16 March 2001)
AG v McCrum [1997] JRC 049 (14 March 1997)
AG v McDermott 23-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 157A (23 August 2019)
AG v McDonagh Munks and Mohammed [2002] JRC 207 (30 October 2002)
AG v McDonald [1990] JRC 188 (07 December 1990)
A.G. v. McDonnell [2000] IEHC 38 (29th March, 2000)
AG v McDonough [1994] JRC 156 (25 July 1994)
AG v McDonough [1996] JRC 001 (05 January 1996)
AG v McDonough [1996] JRC 099 (24 May 1996)
AG v McDonough [1997] JRC 046 (07 March 1997)
AG v McDonough and Dring [1991] JRC 156 (25 October 1991)
AG v McDonough and Others [1994] JRC 117 (15 June 1994)
AG v McFarlane [1986] JRC 019 (07 February 1986)
AG v McFarlane [1989] JRC 205 (11 December 1989)
AG v McFarlane [2002] JRC 88 (29 April 2002)
AG v McGarry [1994] JRC 071b (12 April 1994)
AG v McGinn [1986] JRC 030 (24 February 1986)
AG v McGough [1992] JRC 110 (26 June 1992)
AG v McGovern [1988] JRC 243 (16 December 1988)
AG v McGrath [1985] UR 071 (11 July 1985)
AG v McGregor [1986] JRC 157 (13 October 1986)
AG v McGregor [1987] JRC 219 (21 December 1987)
AG v McGregor [1991] JRC 125 (13 September 1991)
AG v McGurk [1989] JRC 136 (11 August 1989)
AG v McGurk and McDonald [1987] JRC 166 (07 October 1987)
AG v McInnes [2000] JRC 43 (07 March 2000)
AG v McIntosh [1990] JRC 057 (24 April 1990)
AG v McIntyre 14-Aug-2006 [2006] JRC 112B (14 August 2006)
AG v McIntyre 14-Aug-2006 [2006] JRC 112C (14 August 2006)
AG v McKay [2004] JRC 172 (24 September 2004)
AG v McKenzie [1994] JRC 074 (18 April 1994)
AG v McKeown [2018] JRC 187 (05 October 2018)
AG v McKernan [1986] JRC 038 (21 March 1986)
AG v McKernan [1986] JRC 081 (05 June 1986)
AG v McKinney [1991] JRC 188 (12 December 1991)
AG v McKinney [1992] JRC 002 (03 January 1992)
AG v McLaughlin [1985] UR 048 (21 May 1985)
AG v McLaughlin [1985] UR 084 (09 August 1985)
AG v McLaughlin [1987] JCA 159a (25 September 1987)
AG v McLaughlin [1991] JRC 057a (01 May 1991)
AG v McLean [1986] JRC 109 (21 July 1986)
AG v McLean [1996] JRC 014 (19 January 1996)
AG v McLean [2018] JRC 200 (31 October 2018)
AG v McLean and Lochhead [1994] JRC 059 (18 March 1994)
AG v McLees [1992] JRC 023 (17 February 1992)
AG v McLees [1992] JRC 189 (23 October 1992)
AG v McLees [2000] JRC 2 (10 January 2000)
AG v McLees [2000] JRC 155 (28 July 2000)
AG v McLees Swanston [2002] JRC 215 (07 November 2002)
AG v McMahon [1992] JRC 155 (28 August 1992)
AG v McMahon [2000] JRC 74 (27 April 2000)
AG v McMinn [2000] JRC 38 (02 March 2000)
AG v McNally [1995] JRC 024 (03 February 1995)
AG v McNamee and Ors [1986] JRC 138 (19 September 1986)
AG v McPhee [1985] UR 081 (01 August 1985)
AG v McSherry and McSherry [1988] JRC 020 (22 January 1988)
AG v Mee [1994] JRC 253 (23 December 1994)
AG v Melville [1995] JRC 049 (10 March 1995)
AG v Melville [1995] JRC 098 (01 June 1995)
AG v Melville [1995] JRC 151 (26 July 1995)
AG v Melville [1995] JRC 184 (20 September 1995)
AG v Melville [2004] JRC 148 (31 August 2004)
AG v Menard [1991] JRC 119 (28 August 1991)
AG v Mendes [2002] JRC 25 (25 January 2002)
AG v Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland [2006] ScotSC 113 (11 January 2006)
AG v MHS Environmental [2001] JRC 239 (30 November 2001)
AG v Miah [2001] JRC 11 (12 January 2001)
AG v Miah [2002] JRC 210 (04 November 2002)
AG v Miah [2004] JRC 048 (16 March 2004)
AG v Miah and ors [2003] JCA 135 (21 July 2003)
AG v Miah and ors [2003] JRC 040 (21 February 2003)
AG v Michel 16-Sep-2019 [2019] JRC 179A (16 September 2019)
AG v Michel 18-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 205 (18 October 2019)
AG v Michel 19-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 160 (19 August 2019)
AG v Michel and Gallichan [2007] JRC 120 (18 June 2007)
AG v Michel and Gallichan [2007] JRC 175 (20 September 2007)
AG v Michieli [1987] UR 020 (02 February 1987)
AG v Miller [1991] JRC 151 (21 October 1991)
AG v Mills and Mills [1991] JRC 056d (26 April 1991)
AG v Milne [1992] JRC 143 (07 August 1992)
AG v Milne [1992] JRC 183 (14 October 1992)
AG v Mière [1990] JRC 025 (05 February 1990)
AG v Mitchell [1986] JRC 091 (27 June 1986)
AG v Mitchell [1997] JRC 085 (01 May 1997)
AG v Mitchell and Monins [1997] JRC 094 (23 May 1997)
AG v Moffat [1989] JRC 159 (22 September 1989)
AG v Mohammed [2004] JRC 027 (12 February 2004)
AG v Molloy [1994] JRC 218 (03 November 1994)
AG v Monet [2001] JRC 3A (05 January 2001)
AG v Monge [2003] JRC 172A (06 October 2003)
AG v Moniz [2003] JRC 037 (14 February 2003)
AG v Monnier [1987] JRC 015 (30 January 1987)
AG v Monteiro [2001] JRC 90 (27 April 2001)
AG v Moore [1995] JRC 040 (01 March 1995)
AG v Moore and McCaffrey [1997] JRC 016 (24 January 1997)
AG v Moreira [2003] JRC 083A (16 May 2003)
AG v Moreira and Monet [2000] JRC 11 (21 January 2000)
AG v Morgan [1986] JRC 137 (19 September 1986)
AG v Morgan and Schlandt [2000] JRC 254 (20 December 2000)
AG v Morley and Others [1995] JRC 069 (13 April 1995)
AG v Morris [1988] JRC 140 (08 July 1988)
AG v Morris [1992] JRC 094 (03 June 1992)
AG v Morrow [1997] JRC 079 (25 April 1997)
AG v Mortimore [2003] JRC 143 (04 August 2003)
AG v Moss and Bade [2001] JRC 97 (03 May 2001)
AG v Mouilpied [2009] JRC 001 (02 January 2009)
AG v Mowat [2005] JRC 009 (20 January 2005)
AG v Moy [2002] JRC 7 (10 January 2002)
AG v Mr and Mrs Mileti [1986] JRC 064 (01 May 1986)
AG v Mr H [1991] JRC 177 (26 November 1991)
AG v Mugridge 2004JRC134 (30 July 2004)
AG v Muir [1989] UR 072 (04 May 1989)
AG v Muir and others [1989] JRC 030 (17 February 1989)
AG v Muldoon [1986] JRC 027 (24 February 1986)
AG v Mullane [1987] UR 135 (01 September 1987)
AG v Mullin [1988] JRC 214 (31 October 1988)
AG v Munks [2003] JRC 231 (12 December 2003)
AG v Munks [1999] UR 66 (9 April 1999)
AG v Munks [1999] UR 168A (8 October 1999)
AG v Munks [2001] JRC 111 (18 May 2001)
AG v Munro Rourke [2002] JRC 107 (28 May 2002)
AG v Munson [1997] JRC 186a (02 October 1997)
AG v Muren and Peters [2000] JRC 166 (16 August 2000)
AG v Murphy 20-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 162 (20 August 2019)
AG v Murphy [1986] JCA 145 (24 September 1986)
AG v Murphy [1987] JRC 195 (20 November 1987)
AG v Murphy [1988] JRC 035 (15 February 1988)
AG v Murphy [1990] JRC 095 (06 July 1990)
AG v Murphy [2000] JRC 68 (14 April 2000)
AG v Murphy [2005] JRC 080 (10 June 2005)
AG v Murphy [2017] JRC 009 (12 January 2017)
AG v Murphy and Hine [1987] JRC 090 (22 May 1987)
AG v Murray [2019] JRC 116 (21 June 2019)
AG v Murray [1988] JRC 077 (27 April 1988)
A.G. v. Musinskas [2004] IEHC 292 (17 August 2004)
AG v Mutter [1987] JRC 102 (22 June 1987)
AG v Myles [1990] JRC 203 (21 December 1990)
AG v Myles and Vale [2005] JRC 026 (03 March 2005)
AG v N [1986] JRC 169 (21 November 1986)
AG v N J Valentine Ltd [1987] JRC 159 (25 September 1987)
AG v Nafkha [2000] JRC 86 (23 May 2000)
AG v Napoli Restaurants [1991] JRC 113 (16 August 1991)
AG v Nash [2002] JRC 52 (01 March 2002)
AG v Naughton [1994] JRC 086 (29 April 1994)
AG v Neil [2004] JRC 088 (14 May 2004)
AG v Neild [1994] JRC 107 (26 May 1994)
AG v Nelson [2002] JRC 199 (18 October 2002)
AG v New Lyn Apartments Ltd [1997] JRC 224 (12 December 1997)
AG v Newall and Newall [1994] JRC 164 (08 August 1994)
AG v Newcombe and Wall [1996] JRC 223 (25 November 1996)
AG v Newell [2000] JRC 157 (04 August 2000)
AG v Newland [1992] JRC 024 (21 February 1992)
AG v Nicholls [2017] JRC 093A (15 June 2017)
AG v Nicolle 05-Jul-2018 [2018] JRC 120 (05 July 2018)
AG v Nicolle [2004] JRC 057 (26 March 2004)
AG v Nicolle [2004] JRC 186 (29 October 2004)
AG v Nicolle [2018] JRC 139 (27 July 2018)
AG v Nixon [1996] JRC 247 (20 December 1996)
AG v NM and Drewett [1991] JRC 048 (05 April 1991)
AG v Noble [2004] JRC 153 (03 September 2004)
AG v Nobrega and Others [2007] JRC 194 (11 October 2007)
AG v Noel [2003] JRC 027 (07 February 2003)
AG v Noel [1996] JRC 141 (29 July 1996)
AG v Nolan and Nolan [2005] JRC 111 (12 August 2005)
AG v Noon [2001] JRC 172 (02 August 2001)
AG v Norris [1992] JRC 095 (03 June 1992)
AG v North Dorset District Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 76 (AAC) (14 February 2013)
AG v Nozedar [1986] UR 009 (14 January 1986)
AG v Nunes Gardening and Maintenance Limited [2019] JRC 019 (08 February 2019)
AG v O'Brien [1985] UR 120 (22 November 1985)
AG v O'Brien [1986] JRC 183 (15 December 1986)
AG v O'Brien [2000] JRC 21A (04 February 2000)
AG v O'Brien [2000] JRC 194 (06 October 2000)
AG v O'Brien [2004] JRC 055 (19 March 2004)
AG v O'Brien and Gourlay [1996] JRC 185 (11 October 1996)
AG v O'Brien Smith Lynn [2002] JRC 39 (12 February 2002)
AG v O'Connell [1995] JRC 067 (07 April 1995)
AG v O'Connell [1995] JRC 085 (05 May 1995)
AG v O'Connell [1995] JRC 132 (07 July 1995)
AG v O'Connor and Ors [2007] JRC 054 (28 February 2007)
AG v O'Cuneff [2004] JRC 035 (23 February 2004)
AG v O'Driscoll [1988] JRC 097 (27 May 1988)
AG v O'Driscoll [2003] JRC 212A (20 November 2003)
AG v Oeillet [1994] JRC 158 (29 July 1994)
AG v Oeillet [1995] JRC 020 (27 January 1995)
AG v OFSTED [2003] EWCST 232(EYSUS) (11 November 2003)
AG v Ofsted [2010] UKFTT 465 (HESC) (15 October 2010)
AG v O'Hara [1997] JRC 097 (23 May 1997)
AG v O'Keefe [1986] JRC 075 (22 May 1986)
A.G. v. Oldridge [1999] IEHC 40; [2000] 2 ILRM 233 (10th November, 1999)
A.G. v. Oldridge [2000] IESC 29; [2000] 4 IR 593; [2001] 2 ILRM 125 (19th December, 2000)
AG v Oliveira [2008] JRC 101 (20 June 2008)
AG v Oliveira [2005] JRC 047 (15 April 2005)
AG v Oliver [1997] JRC 147 (25 July 1997)
AG v Ollivier [2003] JRC 225 (03 December 2003)
AG v O'Neill [1992] JRC 218 (04 December 1992)
AG v O'Neill [2004] JRC 028 (12 February 2004)
AG v O'Reilly [2000] JRC 115 (23 June 2000)
AG v O'Rourke [1991] JRC 054a (19 April 1991)
A.G. v. O�Rourke [2003] IEHC 60 (29 July 2003)
AG v O'Shea [2007] JRC 076 (30 March 2007)
AG v O'Shea [1991] UR 036 (28 February 1991)
AG v OShea [2001] JRC 206A (19 October 2001)
AG v O'Shea [2004] JRC 034 (20 February 2004)
AG v Owens [2000] JRC 1 (06 January 2000)
AG v Ozard [2001] JRC 197 (21 September 2001)
AG v Ozard [2002] JRC 220 (15 November 2002)
AG v Ozard [2003] JRC 055 (21 March 2003)
AG v Ozouf [2001] JRC 76 (29 March 2001)
AG v Ozouf [2001] JRC 225A (09 November 2001)
AG v P [2018] JRC 151 (22 August 2018)
AG v P A Associates Ltd [1992] JRC 217 (04 December 1992)
AG v P, B, O & R [1996] JRC 157 (06 September 1996)
AG v Page [2019] JRC 139 (19 June 2019)
AG v Page [2000] JRC 49 (17 March 2000)
AG v Page [2000] JRC 156 (01 August 2000)
AG v Page [2000] JRC 183 (15 September 2000)
AG v Page [2003] JRC 112 (04 July 2003)
AG v Palmer [1985] UR 050 (28 May 1985)
A.G. v. Paperlink Ltd. [1983] IEHC 1; [1984} ILRM 373 (15th July, 1983)
AG v PAR Developments Limited [2007] JRC 061 (09 March 2007)
A.G. v. Parke [2004] IEHC 20 (24 February 2004)
AG v Parker [1986] JRC 054 (14 April 1986)
AG v Parkinson [1992] JRC 092 (29 May 1992)
AG v Parrington [2003] JRC 220 (01 December 2003)
AG v Passman [2001] JRC 86A (20 April 2001)
AG v Paton [2019] JRC 117 (21 June 2019)
AG v Patrick [1997] JRC 039 (28 February 1997)
AG v Patrick [2002] JRC 213 (04 November 2002)
AG v Patterson and Nolan [1987] JRC 204 (27 November 1987)
AG v Patterson and Nolan [1988] JRC 110 (10 June 1988)
AG v Patterson and Nolan [1988] JRC 131 (01 July 1988)
AG v Patton [1988] JRC 034 (12 February 1988)
AG v Paul and Haley [1993] JRC 065 (18 May 1993)
AG v PDB Carpenters and Builders Ltd. [1994] JRC 177 (02 September 1994)
AG v Peacock [1989] JRC 023 (10 February 1989)
AG v Pearce [2000] JRC 205 (20 October 2000)
AG v Pemberton [1991] JRC 080 (14 June 1991)
AG v Pennymore Investments Ltd [1985] UR 102 (18 October 1985)
AG v Pereira [2011] JRC 180 (14 September 2011)
AG v Perkins [1986] JRC 076 (23 May 1986)
AG v Perkins [1997] JRC 189 (03 October 1997)
AG v Perkins [1997] JRC 215 (28 November 1997)
AG v Perkins [2000] JRC 169 (20 August 2000)
AG v Perpignan Investments [1988] JRC 112 (14 June 1988)
AG v Perree [1991] JRC 054b (19 April 1991)
AG v Perron [1989] JRC 185 (10 November 1989)
AG v Perry and Bevan [2002] JRC 190 (10 October 2002)
AG (Persecution, Discrimination, Risk, Family member) Israel [2004] UKIAT 00215 (27 July 2004)
AG v Petrulaitis [2001] JRC 220 (02 November 2001)
AG v Phillips [1990] JRC 064 (04 May 1990)
AG v Phillips [1990] JRC 135 (21 September 1990)
AG v Pick [2000] JRC 223 (10 November 2000)
AG v Picot [1985] JRC 003 (11 January 1985)
AG v Picot [1985] UR 027 (01 April 1985)
AG v Picot [1988] JRC 090 (23 May 1988)
AG v Picot [2000] JRC 33 (23 February 2000)
AG v Picot [2001] JRC 141 (29 June 2001)
AG v Piggott [1986] JCA 143 (23 September 1986)
AG v Piggott and Piggott [1985] UR 135 (17 December 1985)
AG v Pinewood Home Furnishings Ltd [1997] JRC 206 (14 November 1997)
AG v Pinto 8 Mar 2019 [2019] JRC 038 (08 March 2019)
AG v Pires [2008] JRC 011 (25 January 2008)
AG v Pirzada [2002] JRC 123 (28 June 2002)
AG v Pita [1988] JRC 061 (08 April 1988)
AG v Pita [1988] JRC 091 (23 May 1988)
AG v Pita (trading as Ace of Spades Gardens) [1985] UR 085 (12 August 1985)
AG v Pitchley [1996] JRC 222 (25 November 1996)
AG v Plowright [1995] JRC 030 (13 February 1995)
AG v PNGdeC [2004] JRC 071 (28 April 2004)
AG v Pockett [1990] JRC 201 (21 December 1990)
AG v Pockett [1991] JRC 053b (16 April 1991)
AG v Pope [1985] UR 131 (11 December 1985)
AG v Portelet Heights Ltd [1988] JRC 050 (18 March 1988)
AG v Porteous [2001] JRC 138 (15 June 2001)
AG v Postill [1995] JRC 153 (28 July 1995)
AG v Postill [1995] JRC 192 (02 October 1995)
AG v Pouton [1985] UR 073 (17 July 1985)
AG v Powell [2000] JRC 97 (06 June 2000)
AG v Powell [2000] JRC 104 (14 June 2000)
AG v Powell [2003] JRC 217 (27 November 2003)
AG v Power [2000] JRC 32 (21 February 2000)
AG v Prentice [2003] JRC 183 (16 October 2003)
AG v Preston [1986] JRC 008 (13 January 1986)
AG v Presume [2000] JRC 213 (01 November 2000)
AG v Price 24-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 211 (24 October 2019)
AG v Price [1985] UR 059 (24 June 1985)
AG v Price [2001] JRC 170 (02 August 2001)
AG v Price and Bass [2000] JRC 88 (25 May 2000)
AG v Priestley [2019] JRC 025 (14 February 2019)
AG v Pringle [1993] JRC 087 (12 July 1993)
AG v Prior [2000] JRC 227 (17 November 2000)
AG v Prior [2000] JRC 243 (06 December 2000)
AG v Prior [2001] JRC 35 (09 February 2001)
AG v Prior [2001] JRC 79 (30 March 2001)
AG v Prior, Reed, & McLean [1994] JRC 236 (25 November 1994)
AG v Prisk [1988] JRC 160 (05 August 1988)
AG v Prouse [1985] JRC 005 (15 January 1985)
AG V Przyanek 29-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 216 (29 October 2019)
AG v Pumfrett [1986] JRC 017 (31 January 1986)
AG v Purden [2004] JRC 119 (06 July 2004)
AG v Q [2011] JRC 114 (03 June 2011)
AG v Queally [1996] JRC 132 (19 July 1996)
AG v Queally [1996] JRC 233 (09 December 1996)
AG v Quenault [1989] JRC 204 (08 December 1989)
AG Quidnet Hounslow LLP v London Borough of Hounslow [2012] EWHC 2639 (TCC) (28 September 2012)
AG v Quinault and Haywood [2004] JRC 019 (28 January 2004)
AG v Quinn [1992] JRC 142 (07 August 1992)
AG v Quirke [1994] JRC 078 (22 April 1994)
AG v Quirke [1994] JRC 093 (13 May 1994)
AG v R [2011] JRC 076 (13 April 2011)
AG v R [1994] JRC 243 (06 December 1994)
AG v R [1996] UR 164 (19 September 1996)
AG, R v [2010] NICA 20 (13 May 2010)
AG v R de Jesus [2002] JRC 41 (15 February 2002)
AG v R J Le Sueur Limited [2019] JRC 070 (26 April 2019)
AG v R J Wilkinson Ltd [1988] JRC 239 (09 December 1988)
AG, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 1309 (Admin) (20 May 2015)
AG, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2202 (Admin) (24 July 2015)
AG v Raffray [1995] JRC 014 (20 January 1995)
AG v Raffray [1995] JRC 140 (20 July 1995)
AG v Raffray Ltd [1989] JRC 094c (16 June 1989)
AG v Raikes [1985] UR 116 (19 November 1985)
AG v Raimundo [1992] JRC 103 (12 June 1992)
AG v Ramsbottom [1988] JRC 083 (05 May 1988)
AG v Rankin and Country Bridge Ltd [1992] JRC 097 (05 June 1992)
AG v Rawlinson [2011] JRC 115 (17 June 2011)
AG v Rawlinson [1992] JRC 202 (23 November 1992)
AG v Rawlinson [2001] JRC 30 (02 February 2001)
AG v Ray Wilkinson Builders Ltd [2002] JRC 143 (02 August 2002)
AG v Rayson [1995] JRC 027 (13 February 1995)
AG, Re [2015] EWCOP 78 (25 November 2015)
AG, Re [2016] EWCOP 37 (6 July 2016)
AG, Re A Decision of the Mental Health Tribunal [2006] ScotSC 5 (11 January 2006)
AG. Re A Decision Of The Mental Health Tribunal [2006] ScotSC 8 (11 January 2006
AG v Ready Plant Ltd [1991] JRC 148 (11 October 1991)
AG v Rebelo [2019] JRC 007A (28 January 2019)
AG v Rebelo 29-Oct-2019 [2019] JRC 215 (29 October 2019)
AG v Reeves [2013] JRC 119 (19 June 2013)
AG Ref 004/2003 Under S 36 Of Criminal Justice Act 1988 v Suchedina [2004] EWCA Crim 1944 (21 July 2004)
AG Reference No 46, 47 & 48 of 2009 [2009] EWCA Crim 2591 (19 November 2009)
AG Reference (Number 1 of 2008) Gibbons & Ors [2008] NICA 41 (21 July 2008)
AG v Regal Construction [2001] JRC 182 (10 August 2001)
AG v Reid [1992] JRC 109 (25 June 1992)
AG v Reid [2018] JRC 193 (18 October 2018)
AG v Reid and Reid [1986] JRC 012 (16 January 1986)
AG v Reissing [1992] JRC 051 (26 March 1992)
AG v Rennie and Williams [1996] JRC 159 (10 September 1996)
AG v Renouf [2000] JRC 197 (11 October 2000)
AG v Renouf [2001] JRC 125 (30 May 2001)
AG Representation of Haynes [1987] JRC 055 (16 March 1987)
AG v Resources Recovery Board, Fritot and Luce (also see 26) [1987] JRC 028 (10 February 1987)
AG (Returnees, deserters, prison conditions) Rwanda CG [2004] UKIAT 00289 (28 October 2004)
AG v Reucroft and others [1990] JRC 059 (30 April 1990)
AG v Revenue and Customs, & Anor (Tax credits and family credit - responsible for child and child care credits) [2018] UKUT 318 (AAC) (25 September 2018)
AG v Reynolds [2000] JRC 160 (08 August 2000)
AG v Reynolds and Carey [1986] JRC 013 (17 January 1986)
AG v Ribeiro [1997] JRC 041 (04 March 1997)
AG v Ribeiro [2001] JRC 26 (26 January 2001)
AG v Richards [2000] JRC 162 (11 August 2000)
AG v Richomme [2009] JRC 185 (18 September 2009)
AG v Rimmer and Holding [2001] JRC 85 (12 April 2001)
AG v Riviera Guest House and White [1991] JRC 160 (01 November 1991)
AG v Robb [1990] JRC 049 (06 April 1990)
AG v Robb [1997] JRC 055 (21 March 1997)
AG v Roberts [2004] JRC 150 (31 August 2004)
AG v Roberts and LG [2008] JRC 148 (05 September 2008)
AG v Robins [2003] JRC 234 (19 December 2003)
AG v Robinson 13-Sep-2019 [2019] JRC 179 (13 September 2019)
AG v Robinson [1989] JRC 182 (01 November 1989)
AG v Roche [1997] JRC 125 (04 July 1997)
AG v Rodrigues [2007] JRC 185 (28 September 2007)
AG v Rodrigues [2000] JRC 100 (09 June 2000)
AG v Rodrigues and Viveiros [2008] JRC 109 (04 July 2008)
AG v Rogers [1986] JRC 120 (18 August 1986)
AG v Romeril [2000] JRC 192 (29 September 2000)
AG v Romeril [2001] JRC 127 (01 June 2001)
AG v Romeril, Quemard and Quemard [1985] UR 054 (31 May 1985)
AG v Rooney [1980]008 (19 March 1980)
AG v Rooney and Twomey [1987] JCA 214 (16 December 1987)
AG v Roscouet [1991] JRC 012 (18 January 1991)
AG v Rosemel Holdings Ltd [1992] JRC 132 (24 July 1992)
AG v Ross [2001] JRC 165 (27 July 2001)
AG v Rosser [2002] JRC 67 (22 March 2002)
AG v Rowe [1986] JRC 067 (06 May 1986)
AG v Rowe [2004] JRC 217 (10 December 2004)
AG v Rowency Holdings Ltd [1997] JRC 033 (21 February 1997)
AG v Rowlands [1985] JRC 001 (03 January 1985)
AG v Rowley [1987] JRC 117 (17 July 1987)
AG v RR [1992] JRC 118 (07 July 1992)
AG v Ruban [1987] JRC 131 (10 August 1987)
AG v Ruellan [1990] JRC 162 (26 October 1990)
AG v Ruellan [1990] JRC 174a (16 November 1990)
AG v Russell [1991] JRC 010 (14 January 1991)
AG v Russell [1995] JRC 088 (12 May 1995)
AG v Russell-Biggie and Gooch [1993] JRC 041 (15 March 1993)
AG v Russell-Biggie and Phelan [1995] JRC 169 (31 August 1995)
AG v Ryall [1994] JRC 212 (14 October 1994)
AG v Ryan [1985] UR 101 (14 October 1985)
AG v Ryan [1987] JRC 030 (13 February 1987)
AG v Ryan [2004] JRC 151 (31 August 2004)
AG v S and L [1990] JCA 136 (24 September 1990)
AG v S G Benest & Son Ltd [1991] JRC 009 (11 January 1991)
AG v Sa [2000] JRC 229 (17 November 2000)
AG v Sale [2001] JRC 187 (24 August 2001)
AG v Salinger [1987] JRC 009a (16 January 1987)
AG v Salinger [1988] JRC 038b (19 February 1988)
AG v Salisbury [1988] JRC 149 (15 July 1988)
AG v Sambor [1992] JRC 021 (14 February 1992)
AG v Sambor, Rooney and Twomey [1987] JRC 144 (07 September 1987)
AG v San Michele Guest House and Davies [2000] JRC 154 (28 July 2000)
AG v Sanders and Sanders [2004] JRC 127 (16 July 2004)
AG v Sandham and Gould [1985] UR 074 (17 July 1985)
AG v Sandland [2011] JRC 079 (13 April 2011)
AG v Sandland [2003] JRC 111 (04 July 2003)
AG v Sangster and Sangster [2001] JRC 247A (14 December 2001)
AG v Santer [1994] JRC 134 (01 July 1994)
AG v Saunders [1993] JRC 106 (05 August 1993)
AG v Saunter [1997] JRC 002 (10 January 1997)
AG v Sauvage [1986] JRC 026 (24 February 1986)
AG v Savage and McGorian [1989] JRC 093 (09 June 1989)
AG v Saven [1992] JRC 058 (03 April 1992)
AG v Schlandt [2001] JRC 105 (15 May 2001)
AG v Schlandt [2001] JRC 132 (08 June 2001)
AG v Scholhammer and others [1989] JRC 103 (30 June 1989)
AG v Schollhammer [1992] JCA 128 (14 July 1992)
AG v Schollhammer [1992] JRC 034 (05 March 1992)
AG v Schollhammer, Udon and Jones [1989] JRC 129 (31 July 1989)
AG v Scobie [2002] JRC 189 (10 October 2002)
AG v Scobie [2004] JRC 201 (19 November 2004)
AG v Scott [1990] JRC 198a (14 December 1990)
AG v Scott [2001] JRC 41 (16 February 2001)
AG v Seal [2002] JRC 32 (04 February 2002)
AG v Secretary of State for Defence (AFCS) (War pensions and armed forces compensation : Armed Forces Compensation Scheme) [2015] UKUT 469 (AAC) (25 August 2015)
AG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] UKUT 127 (AAC) (08 July 2009)
AG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) (Employment and support allowance - other) [2017] UKUT 413 (AAC) (13 October 2017)
AG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA) (Employment and support allowance - Post 28.3.11 WCA activity 4: picking up and moving/transferring) [2018] UKUT 137 (AAC) (10 April 2018)
AG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) [2010] UKUT 291 (AAC) (26 July 2010)
AG Securities v Vaughan [1988] UKHL 8 (10 November 1988)
AG v Self [1990] JRC 102 (13 July 1990)
AG v Selway [2002] JRC 187 (10 October 2002)
AG v Severns [1987] JRC 194 (19 November 1987)
AG v SG [1992] JRC 174 (02 October 1992)
AG v SG, DC, NM, DL, DD, SB and JP [1992] JRC 150 (14 August 1992)
AG v SGB (CI) Ltd [1990] JRC 182 (23 November 1990)
AG v Shaban [1988] JRC 095 (25 May 1988)
AG v Shadbolt [1985] UR 110 (01 November 1985)
AG v Shahnowaz Correia [2003] JRC 121 (14 July 2003)
AG v Shales [1987] UR 136 (01 September 1987)
AG v Shannon [1985] UR 035 (15 April 1985)
A.G v. Shannon Foynes Port Company [2003] IEHC 615 (7 March 2003)
AG v Sharman [2017] JRC 103 (30 June 2017)
AG v Sharp [1985] UR 111 (04 November 1985)
AG v Sharples [2004] JRC 089 (21 May 2004)
AG v Shaw [1992] JRC 087 (22 May 1992)
AG v Shaw [1992] JRC 221 (11 December 1992)
AG v Sheldon [1996] JRC 209 (08 November 1996)
AG v Sheldrake [1985] JRC 017 (07 February 1985)
AG v Sheldrake [2003] JRC 166 (18 September 2003)
AG v Shelton [1981] JRC 005 (29 January 1981)
AG v Shori [1986] JRC 114 (25 July 1986)
AG v Short [1985] UR 112 (04 November 1985)
AG v Sidney [1987] JRC 139 (04 September 1987)
AG v Siham [1992] JRC 146 (10 August 1992)
AG v Simao [2004] JRC 017 (23 January 2004)
AG v Simao [2004] JRC 021 (03 February 2004)
AG v Simmons [2000] JRC 233 (24 November 2000)
AG v Simon [2019] JRC 050 (27 March 2019)
AG v Simpson [2002] JRC 211 (04 November 2002)
AG v Sinclair [1995] JRC 022 (30 January 1995)
AG v Skeete [2002] JRC 130 (12 July 2002)
AG v Skelhorn [1989] JRC 094b (16 June 1989)
AG v Skinner [1994] JRC 127 (24 June 1994)
AG v Skinner [1994] JRC 220 (04 November 1994)
AG v Skinner [1995] JRC 041 (01 March 1995)
AG v Skinner [2003]093A (13 June 2003)
AG v Skinner and Skinner [1994] JRC 245 (12 December 1994)
AG v Smale [2002] JRC 194A (11 October 2002)
AG v Smith [2003] JRC 233 (19 December 2003)
AG v Smith 19-Sep-2019 [2019JRC185 (19 September 2019)
AG v Smith [1982] JRC 018 (30 June 1982)
AG v Smith [1986] JCA 140 (23 September 1986)
AG v Smith [1994] JRC 187 (16 September 1994)
AG v Smith [2003] JRC 210 (14 November 2003)
AG v Smith [2004] JRC 074 (29 April 2004)
AG v Smith [2004] JRC 168A (23 September 2004)
AG v Smith and McAllister [1988] JRC 232 (02 December 1988)
AG v Smitton [1993] JRC 101 (29 July 1993)
AG v Smitton [2001] JRC 31 (05 February 2001)
AG v Smitton Banach and Reeves [2019] JRC 099 (03 June 2019)
AG v Smitton Banach and Reeves [2019] JRC 093 (23 May 2019)
AG v Smythe [1986] JRC 131 (05 September 1986)
AG v Snaith [1997] JRC 100 (30 May 1997)
AG v Sneddon [2001] JRC 201 (28 September 2001)
AG v Sneddon [2002] JRC 17 (18 January 2002)
AG v Snell [2005] JRC 079 (10 June 2005)
AG v Somerville and Hardman [2004] JRC 183 (22 October 2004)
AG v Somerville Limited [2017] JRC 086 (09 June 2017)
AG v Sonnic Limited and Mendonca [2019] JRC 120 (28 June 2019)
AG v Sousa [2001] JRC 219 (26 October 2001)
AG v South [1994] JRC 066a (25 March 1994)
AG v South Ayrshire Council (Housing and council tax benefits - other) [2017] UKUT 110 (AAC) (16 February 2017)
AG v Sowney [2002] JRC 103 (24 May 2002)
AG v Speck [2004] JRC 100 (07 June 2004)
AG v Spencer [1990] JRC 192 (11 December 1990)
AG v Spencer [1994] JRC 181 (09 September 1994)
AG v Spencer [1997] JRC 110 (13 June 1997)
AG v Spinola [2005] JRC 060 (29 April 2005)
AG v Sprokkelenburg [1984] JRC 026 (28 September 1984)
AG v Sproule [1992] JRC 004 (10 January 1992)
AG v St Aubin's Wine Bar Ltd and Brooks [1986] JRC 119 (18 August 1986)
AG v St Roche Ltd and Davey [1989] JRC 041 (09 March 1989)
AG v Stammers [2002] JRC 212 (04 November 2002)
AG v Standard Bank Jersey Limited 09-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 156 (09 August 2019)
AG v Standen [1985] UR 103 (18 October 1985)
AG v Stansell Q.V.C. Ltd [1995] JRC 172 (01 September 1995)
AG v States Employment Board [2010] JRC 181 (05 October 2010)
AG v St.Aubins Wine Bar Limited [1996] JRC 136 (25 July 1996)
AG v St.Aubins Wine Bar Limited [1996] JRC 193 (18 October 1996)
AG v St.Aubin's Wine Bar Ltd [1995] JRC 092 (17 May 1995)
AG v Stead [1993] JRC 078 (21 June 1993)
AG v Steadman and Coles [2003] JRC 182 (16 October 2003)
AG v Steel and Anor [2003] JRC 172B (06 October 2003)
AG v Steer [1992] JRC 009 (20 January 1992)
AG v Stephens [2000] JRC 244 (08 December 2000)
AG v Stephens [2002] JRC 111 (31 May 2002)
AG v Stevenson [1997] JRC 021 (07 February 1997)
AG v Stevenson [2004] JRC 121 (09 July 2004)


text:
Project Page for 'La Comédie humaine volume XV - Études philosophiques - suite [1845]'
Proofreading Round 2: Available (The page-texts have already been proofread, and now need to have the text WordChecked and carefully compared to the image.)
La Comédie humaine volume XV - Études philosophiques - suite [1845]
de Balzac, Honoré
projectID6380faf2552d9
The Internet Archive: Canadian Libraries
Friday, November 25, 2022 at 12:47 (Current Time: 13:14)
Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 11:40
Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 13:57
Monday, December 12, 2022 at 04:46


The award-winning play is heading for the West Coast this fall.
Harry Potter fans on the West Coast are in for a treat this fall. According to Playbill, 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' is set to make a fall debut in San Francisco.
Last year, Playbill announced that 'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' was heading to San Francisco in fall 2019. Now, the dates are officially set. Performances of the play begin on October 23 and its press opening is December 1. It will debut at the Curran Theater.
'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' made its debut in July 2016. It premiered at the Palace Theater in London, where it is currently playing. It is also at the Lyric Theater in New York, as well as the Princess Theater in Melbourne. The play made its debut at Lyric Theater in 2018 and is in previews at Princess Theater. It will also premiere in Germany in 2020.
The play is based on an original J.K Rowling, Jack Thorne and John Tiffany. Thorne also wrote the two-part play. It is the story of Harry Potter's son Albus and his adventures at Hogwarts. Albus tries to follow his father's footsteps, but struggles. The play begins where Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows ended. Deathly Hallows is the final book of the Harry Potter series. The play received acclaim, including six Tony awards.
Tickets for the play go on sale to the public on March 14. Priority access beings March 11, and registration for priority access begins on March 3. Tickets are available on harrypottertheplay.com.
'Harry Potter and the Cursed Child' is an acclaimed play that fans enjoy. Now, Harry Potter fans from all over the world can enjoy the play.


text:
/ Investing
The Week Ahead, Markets Haven't Been Wrong, Closer to a Vaccine? Watching J&J
The equity market recovery is just as sloppy in performance as the economy itself.
By STEPHEN GUILFOYLE
Aug 24, 2020 | 07:19 AM EDT
Stocks quotes in this article: AAPL, TSLA, AMZN, XLK, AZN, PFE, BNTX, JNJ, PANW
Monday morning. Where do we stand going into this new week? Foreign markets and U.S. equity index futures markets have traded higher overnight. We'll get to that shortly. Markets measured at the headline level have continued to make new highs, after a series of stutter steps, all while leadership has continued to narrow. The talk over the weekend, or at least the early part of the weekend, had been all about record highs for the Nasdaq Composite and S&P 500 driven "generally" by mega-cap tech names, but even that word "generally" is a little broad. The markets have been driven really by a sudden (sudden as in weeks, not minutes) realization that especially Apple (AAPL) and Tesla (TSLA) had been somehow under-owned at the professional level. Makes some sense, with both of those names in particular splitting shares, as that does at least begin to address the market-wide issue that scarcity of equity had become. Who's next became the question many asked? Amazon (AMZN) would be my guess. Still just a guess, and I am long that name. You don't have to have a ton of education to speculate.
It is true though that mega cap, mostly tech names have only been able to drag a minority of individual issues with them to the upside. This does not signal coming weakness. This does not signal anything in my opinion. It just means that as certain names grow in market capitalization they then become more significant in leading the performance of that given headline market index, as that's how our most followed indices are weighted. Underperforming your benchmark this year? I know that does not feel very good, but from an ego feeding perspective, you may be more diversified than that benchmark is itself. You might be beating the market without beating your benchmark. Got me?
On Friday, 220 of the S&P 500's constituent member issues closed higher. That was better than Thursday. Both days were officially "up" days. In fact, at the New York Stock Exchange, losers beat winners on Friday almost two to one, while declining volume decisively beat advancing volume. In fact, just about the only positive takeaway I have after scanning the NYSE's data for the day, would be that trading volume itself decreased ever so slightly on what without knowing better, looks like a "down" day. Same story up in midtown. At the Nasdaq Market site, losers also beat winners almost 2 to 1. Declining volume also handily beat advancing volume. Trading volume at the Nasdaq (more optimistically?) dropped off more dramatically from Thursday to Friday at the Nasdaq than it did at 11 Wall Street.
Economic Perspective
It has been spoken of and written on often across the realm not since this awful coronavirus first started having a negative impact on all of our lives, but since the aggressive recovery in equity markets became quite evidently more robust, particularly in June and beyond. We have harped on the fact that historical valuation metrics were quite useless in a never seen before financial environment. Still, you will read here and there, quite educated, and quite intelligent (and well known) financial pundits who do not understand how this works. Such is life. Either they do not understand, or they have something to sell.
The fact is that at the headline, equity market performance is not reflective of the uneven, both in depth and velocity of the economic rebound in the U.S. Beyond those headline indices, however, the equity market recovery is just as sloppy in performance as the economy itself. The Dow Transports have gained back quite a bit, though still underperform the two large cap indices that most follow closely. Sure, that index is narrow, and highly specialized. However, the economy goes nowhere without the transports, nor the banks. Yeah, how are the banks doing? Better not look. Okay, go ahead, the group is a mess. Now broaden the scope, but downsize in market cap. The S&P 400 (mid-caps), as well as the small cap indices (Russell 2000, and S&P 600)? Survey says: BZZZ !! Still better than the banks. The banks can not recover until investors know that their debtors are in okay shape. Understand? Then, once that condition is satisfied, the group is valued based on net interest margin... even if they invent a hundred other ways to profit. Now, you know why nobody paying attention is overweight the banks. Just a fact of life. For now. Everything changes. Sometimes you don't see it coming.
The markets have not been wrong. The narrowing market success is precisely representative of narrowing economic success. Just last week, every one of you saw some red hot housing data for July hit the tape. You also saw key regional manufacturing surveys represent businesses that continued to grow in August, but appear to have taken a sideways bent. Then there was the employment picture. An unwelcome rebound in claims for jobless benefits. Can a less than confident household drive consumption?
Last week (using select sector SPDR ETFs as proxies), the Tech sector (XLK) ran more than 4%, easily outperforming measures that single out either semiconductors or software. AAPL screamed 8.2% higher over five days. Apple is considered hardware, though investors value the brand as a software subscription type business with a hardware driven, captive customer base. Consumer Discretionaries finished in second place for the week at +1.8%. Autos, yes autos easily led once that performance is broken out by industry. Tesla gained more than 24% for the week.
This is not rocket science. What this is... is what uncertainty looks like. Understand this now, so you don't get shaken out at the time. At a market cap of $2T+, when "they" do take profits in AAPL, the Dow, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq Composite will all sell off, perhaps sharply, even if broader equity markets have a good day. Bear in mind that while yes, fiscal policy has provided short-term support to the economy, and the monetary policy has funded that effort at little cost while ensuring that the plumbing works. While this effort had been grand in scale, it has not been able to, and can not lift all boats equally, or even lift all boats. There will be more financial casualties.
Emergency Use Authorization
We did mention above that markets were stronger overnight. President Trump made an announcement on Sunday evening. The Food and Drug Administration had authorized use of convalescent plasma taken from recovered Covid-19 patients as treatment for those seriously ill with the infection. What this does is waive some regulatory requirements involved in making use of certain medical products that are not yet fully FDA approved. Limited studies show that hospitalized patients not requiring ventilation may show as much as a 35% improvement in survivability 30 days after receiving the plasma, if received within three days of diagnosis. No magic wand. Just positive development.
At almost the same time, the Financial Times ran a story suggesting that the Trump administration might be considering fast-tracking the Covid-19 vaccine being collaborated on in the UK by AstraZeneca (AZN) and Oxford University based upon a somewhat small trial if successful. That study included 10,000 volunteers, whereas the standard set in this country calls for 30,000. There has been no official comment made regarding this possibility as far as I can tell. You did see the news on Friday that Pfiizer (PFE) and BioNTech (BNTX) could have a vaccine ready for regulatory review as soon as October. Financial markets are starting to feel like something is close.
Short interest continues to drop. According to data published at Goldman Sachs, which I read in the Financial Times, such interest as a proportion of market cap for the median stock in the S&P 500 has fallen to 1.8%. This would be the smallest this percentage has been since Goldman started tracking this data in 2004. The 15 year average runs at about 2.4%.
Breakout?
Maybe. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) , another vaccine name, the one looking forward to a global trial including 60,000 volunteers, may be on the verge of a technical break-out.
Readers will see the blue cup created last spring. There is really no handle there, and there was no breakout created at that time. Since, we have a rather shallow "saucer" formed in orange that lasted from May into July. This saucer has created a handle, with a pivot point just below $152. That spot was taken on Friday. Can it hold? Will it hold? I have increased my target price for JNJ to $184 from $174 based on the new pivot. At the same time, I am increasing my panic point from $133 to $143.
Economics (All Times Eastern)
No significant domestic macroeconomic data scheduled.
The Fed (All Times Eastern)
No Public Appearances Scheduled.
Today's Earnings Highlights (Consensus EPS Expectations)
After the Close: (PANW) (1.39)
(Apple, Amazon, and Johnson & Johnson are holdings in Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS member club. Want to be alerted before Jim Cramer buys or sells these stocks? Learn more now.)
At the time of publication, Stephen Guilfoyle was Long AMZN, PFE, JNJ equity.
TAGS: Economy | Investing | Markets | Small Cap | Stocks | Technical Analysis | Trading | Banking | Coronavirus
More from Investing
5 Key Tips for Navigating an Ugly Stock Market
Jan 15, 2022 10:00 AM EST
A bear market can be easily tamed if you operate from a position of power.
Market Cranks Up -- but Is This a Turning Point?
Dip buyers went to work on Friday, but what should we make of the move?
Going in Circles With the QQQs
Let's update on the Invesco QQQ fund and see what a push through $390 would do.
Waiting for Nvidia to Restart Its Uptrend
Hold off until the technical clues point to a bottom reversal.


text:
The Arkham Sessions, Ep. 82: "Second Chance"
The Arkham Sessions, hosted by Dr. Andrea Letamendi and Brian Ward, is a weekly podcast dedicated to the psychological analysis of Batman: The Animated Series. Nostalgic, humorous, and even a little educational, each episode promises to lend some insight into the heroes, villains, and classic stories of the Dark Knight!
When his doctors have deemed him psychologically healthy, Harvey Dent is scheduled for reconstructive surgery to correct his "bad side," the last remnant of his alter-ego, Two-Face. According to his psychotherapist, Dent has made significant therapeutic gains and is able to "make decisions without relying on chance" (his coin). But before the surgeon is able to make the first cut, a group of thugs break into the hospital and drag the sedated patient away. Batman and Robin later learn that it was Two-Face who planned the kidnapping in an attempt to save himself from being completely eradicated. It's clear that Harvey Dent had no idea about the scheme, despite it coming from his own mind. Was this part of a dissociative state or something much more destructive and pervasive? How can someone double-cross themselves?!
Dissociation is any disruption or discontinuity in the normal integration of consciousness, memory, identity, emotion, perception, or behavior. Many of us experience an occasional state dissociation (such as during traumatic experiences or while under the influence) but trait dissociation is when a part of one's integral personality is disrupted or fragmented. As we reflect on Two-Face sabotaging his own recovery, we revisit the diagnosis of Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), formerly known as Multiple Identity Disorder, a psychiatric condition characterized by the experience of two or more distinct identities that recurrently take control over one's behavior. For a primer on DID, we recommend checking out our analysis of The Ventriloquist here. In this Two-Face-centric episode, we discuss the controversy of the diagnosis of DID and provide examples from neuroimaging research and case studies to examine the phenomenon of multiple identities. We also express our confusion over Batman's treatment of Robin in this episode, which gives some clear indicators that their relationship is a bit unbalanced or one-sided. Many more Two-Face puns to go, just listen below!
Come and join our Imzy community!
Have psychology-related questions about Batman? Write to us via Twitter, @ArkhamSessions, or on Facebook. Or visit our official website.
And, don't forget to subscribe to The Arkham Sessions on iTunes to get all of the latest episodes!
Last modified on Saturday, 14 May 2016 12:45
Published in: The Arkham Sessions
The Arkham Sessions, Ep. 81: "Riddler's Reform"
The Arkham Sessions, Ep. 83: "Harley's Holiday"