Play 3 S -50 3.5 50 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 S -100 2 29 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 3 S -50 3.5 50 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 2 S 110 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 E -420 0 0 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 E -170 1 14 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4 W 50 5 71 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 S 170 7 100 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 S 50 3.5 50 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 2 S -110 1 14 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 4 E 420 7 100 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 E 170 6 86 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 W -50 2 29 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 S 100 5 71 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 S -170 0 0 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3 S 50 3.5 50 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 4 S 620 4 57 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 4NT S -100 1 14 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 4 S 620 4 57 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 S 650 6.5 93 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 S 650 6.5 93 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 4 S -100 1 14 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4 S 620 4 57 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 4 S -100 1 14 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 4 S -620 3 43 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 S -650 0.5 7 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 4 S -650 0.5 7 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 4 S 100 6 86 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 S -620 3 43 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4NT S 100 6 86 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 4 S 100 6 86 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 S -620 3 43 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 S 140 6 86 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3NT N -50 3 43 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2NT N -50 3 43 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3NT N -100 0.5 7 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 S 150 7 100 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3 S 130 5 71 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3NT N -50 3 43 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3NT N -100 0.5 7 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2 S -140 1 14 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3NT N 100 6.5 93 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 S -150 0 0 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3 S -130 2 29 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3NT N 50 4 57 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3NT N 50 4 57 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3NT N 100 6.5 93 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2NT N 50 4 57 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 W -110 0 0 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 W 100 2.5 36 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 2 W 200 5 71 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 W 300 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 W 100 2.5 36 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 1 W 100 2.5 36 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 2 W 100 2.5 36 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2x S 380 7 100 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 W -300 1 14 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 2 W -100 4.5 64 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2 W -100 4.5 64 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1 W -100 4.5 64 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 W -100 4.5 64 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 2x S -380 0 0 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 W -200 2 29 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2 W 110 7 100 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 4 E -420 0 0 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3NT W -400 1.5 21 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 E -200 3 43 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3NT E -400 1.5 21 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 E -140 5 71 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 W -140 5 71 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3 W 50 7 100 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 W -140 5 71 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3NT E 400 5.5 79 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3NT W 400 5.5 79 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 E 140 2 29 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 2 W 140 2 29 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3 W -50 0 0 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 W 140 2 29 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 E 200 4 57 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 E 420 7 100 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 1NT N -50 6 86 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 1 E -80 4 57 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 1NT N -50 6 86 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 1NT N -50 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 W -90 3 43 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 1x W -360 1 14 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3x S -800 0 0 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 1NT N -100 2 29 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 1NT N 50 1 14 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 1 E 80 3 43 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2 W 90 4 57 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1x W 360 6 86 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3x S 800 7 100 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 1NT N 100 5 71 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 1NT N 50 1 14 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 1NT N 50 1 14 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2NT W 100 7 100 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2NT W -210 2 29 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 2 W -130 5 71 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2NT W -120 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3NT W -630 0 0 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 1NT W -210 2 29 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 2NT W -150 4 57 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2NT W -210 2 29 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2NT W 210 5 71 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3NT W 630 7 100 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2 W 130 2 29 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1NT W 210 5 71 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2NT W 150 3 43 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2NT W 210 5 71 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2NT W -100 0 0 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2NT W 120 1 14 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 E -130 4.5 64 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 E -130 4.5 64 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 E -130 4.5 64 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 N -200 2 29 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 E -130 4.5 64 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3NT W -460 0 0 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3NT E -430 1 14 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play PASS 7 100 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2 E 130 2.5 36 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 E 130 2.5 36 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 E 130 2.5 36 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3NT W 460 7 100 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3NT E 430 6 86 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play PASS 0 0 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2 E 130 2.5 36 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3 N 200 5 71 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 S 110 6 86 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 S -100 0.5 7 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 S -50 2.5 36 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 S 110 6 86 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 1NT N 90 4 57 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 2 S -50 2.5 36 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 S -100 0.5 7 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 S 100 6.5 93 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 S 50 4.5 64 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1NT N -90 3 43 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 S 50 4.5 64 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 S 100 6.5 93 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2 S -110 1 14 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2 S -110 1 14 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3 S 150 3 43 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 4 S 130 2 29 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3NT N 600 6 86 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 1NT N 120 1 14 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 1 E 200 5 71 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2NT N 180 4 57 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 1 N 110 0 0 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3NT N 630 7 100 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 1 E -200 2 29 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3NT N -600 1 14 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2NT N -180 3 43 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1NT N -120 6 86 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 1 N -110 7 100 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3NT N -630 0 0 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 S -150 4 57 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 4 S -130 5 71 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 4x E -510 0 0 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 S 110 5 71 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 S -100 3 43 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 4 E -130 2 29 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3NT W 200 6.5 93 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 5 E -400 1 14 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3 S 200 6.5 93 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 S -50 4 57 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3NT W -200 0.5 7 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 S 100 4 57 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 5 E 400 6 86 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 4 E 130 5 71 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3 S -200 0.5 7 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3 S 50 3 43 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4x E 510 7 100 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 S -110 2 29 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3 E 50 2 29 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 4 E 100 5.5 79 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4 E 100 5.5 79 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 E -140 0 0 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 4 E 100 5.5 79 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 4 E 50 2 29 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4 E 100 5.5 79 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 4 E 50 2 29 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 4 E -100 1.5 21 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 E -100 1.5 21 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 4 E -50 5 71 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 E 140 7 100 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 4 E -100 1.5 21 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 E -50 5 71 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 E -50 5 71 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 4 E -100 1.5 21 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3NT S 630 7 100 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 4 S 620 6 86 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 N 150 4 57 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3NT S -100 0.5 7 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 4 N 150 4 57 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 4 N 150 4 57 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3NT S -100 0.5 7 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 N 130 2 29 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 N -150 3 43 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 N -150 3 43 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3NT S 100 6.5 93 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3NT S 100 6.5 93 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 4 N -150 3 43 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3 N -130 5 71 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3NT S -630 0 0 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 S -620 1 14 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 W 150 4.5 64 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 4 S -100 0 0 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4NT N -50 1 14 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 5 S 450 7 100 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 4 W 100 2.5 36 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 4 W 150 4.5 64 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4x W 300 6 86 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 4 W 100 2.5 36 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 4NT N 50 6 86 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 W -150 2.5 36 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 5 S -450 0 0 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 4x W -300 1 14 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 4 W -100 4.5 64 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 W -100 4.5 64 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 W -150 2.5 36 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 S 100 7 100 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3 N 140 5.5 79 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 S 130 4 57 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 N 140 5.5 79 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 S 90 2 29 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2 N 170 7 100 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 N 110 3 43 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4 W 50 0.5 7 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 W 50 0.5 7 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 N -140 1.5 21 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 2 N -110 4 57 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2 S -90 5 71 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 4 W -50 6.5 93 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 N -170 0 0 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3 W -50 6.5 93 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 N -140 1.5 21 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2 S -130 3 43 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2 S 110 6.5 93 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 S -100 1 14 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 S -100 1 14 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 S 110 6.5 93 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2 S -50 4 57 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 S -50 4 57 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 S -100 1 14 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2 S -110 0.5 7 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 S 100 6 86 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 2 S 50 3 43 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3 S 50 3 43 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 S 50 3 43 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 S -110 0.5 7 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 S 100 6 86 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 S 100 6 86 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3 N 110 2.5 36 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 W 50 0 0 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 2 N 110 2.5 36 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 N 110 2.5 36 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 N 130 6.5 93 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2NT S 120 5 71 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 N 110 2.5 36 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2 N 130 6.5 93 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2 N -110 4.5 64 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 N -110 4.5 64 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 N -130 0.5 7 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 N -130 0.5 7 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2NT S -120 2 29 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 N -110 4.5 64 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 W -50 7 100 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 N -110 4.5 64 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 W -90 6 86 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 W -110 3 43 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 W -110 3 43 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 W -90 6 86 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 W -130 0.5 7 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 W -110 3 43 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 W -130 0.5 7 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2 W -90 6 86 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2 W 90 1 14 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 4 W 130 6.5 93 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 W 130 6.5 93 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 W 90 1 14 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 W 110 4 57 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 W 90 1 14 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 2 W 110 4 57 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 W 110 4 57 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 4 E 100 6 86 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 E -110 4 57 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4 E 100 6 86 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 E -140 3 43 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 4 E -620 0.5 7 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 E 100 6 86 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 E -620 0.5 7 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 E -170 2 29 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 E 140 4 57 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 E 620 6.5 93 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 E 170 5 71 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 E -100 1 14 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 E -100 1 14 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 E 620 6.5 93 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 2 E 110 3 43 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 E -100 1 14 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 E 300 6.5 93 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 E 100 4 57 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 2 S -100 1.5 21 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 S -100 1.5 21 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 S -100 1.5 21 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 N 110 5 71 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 W 300 6.5 93 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 S -100 1.5 21 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 S 100 5.5 79 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 S 100 5.5 79 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 S 100 5.5 79 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 N -110 2 29 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 E -300 0.5 7 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 W -300 0.5 7 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 E -100 3 43 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2 S 100 5.5 79 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2 W -170 3 43 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3 N -200 1 14 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 W -130 5.5 79 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 W -110 7 100 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 W -200 1 14 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 E -140 4 57 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 N -200 1 14 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 W -130 5.5 79 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 W 110 0 0 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 W 200 6 86 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 3 W 130 1.5 21 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 E 140 3 43 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 W 170 4 57 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 N 200 6 86 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 N 200 6 86 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 W 130 1.5 21 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3 N -50 0.5 7 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 2 W 200 6.5 93 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 1 W 100 2.5 36 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 W 100 2.5 36 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2 S 110 4.5 64 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 W 200 6.5 93 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 S -50 0.5 7 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 S 110 4.5 64 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 S -110 2.5 36 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 2 W -200 0.5 7 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3 N 50 6.5 93 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3 S 50 6.5 93 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 W -200 0.5 7 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 S -110 2.5 36 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 1 W -100 4.5 64 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 W -100 4.5 64 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 1NT W 200 6.5 93 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 1NT W -120 2 29 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3 W 200 6.5 93 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 2 S 170 5 71 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2 N -200 0 0 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 1NT W -120 2 29 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 2 S 140 4 57 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 1NT W -120 2 29 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 N 200 7 100 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 1NT W 120 5 71 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 1NT W -200 0.5 7 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 S -140 3 43 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 1NT W 120 5 71 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 1NT W 120 5 71 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 W -200 0.5 7 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 S -170 2 29 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3NT N 490 3.5 50 1-Nancy Ditman-Jacqueline Irwin vs.
Play 3NT S 520 5.5 79 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 3NT S 520 5.5 79 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3NT S 460 1 14 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3NT N 490 3.5 50 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 6NT N 990 7 100 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3NT N 430 0 0 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 N 480 2 29 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3NT N -490 3.5 50 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 6NT N -990 0 0 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 3NT N -490 3.5 50 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 3NT N -430 7 100 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3NT S -520 1.5 21 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4 N -480 5 71 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3NT S -520 1.5 21 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3NT S -460 6 86 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 4 S -50 1.5 21 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4 S -50 1.5 21 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 4 S 450 7 100 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3NT S 430 6 86 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 4 S -50 1.5 21 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 S 420 4.5 64 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 S -50 1.5 21 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 4 S 420 4.5 64 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3NT S -430 1 14 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 4 S 50 5.5 79 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 4 S -420 2.5 36 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 S 50 5.5 79 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 S 50 5.5 79 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4 S 50 5.5 79 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 S -420 2.5 36 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 4 S -450 0 0 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 N 620 7 100 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4 N -100 4 57 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 4 N -100 4 57 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2 S -100 4 57 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 3NT N -100 4 57 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 N -100 4 57 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 N -200 1 14 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3 N -400 0 0 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 2 S 100 3 43 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3NT N 100 3 43 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 4 N 100 3 43 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 N -620 0 0 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 4 N 200 6 86 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4 N 100 3 43 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 N 400 7 100 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 4 N 100 3 43 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 N -50 1.5 21 2-Bonnie Gartner-Susan Blatt vs.
Play 4 E 200 7 100 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 E 50 3 43 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3NT N -150 0 0 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 1NT S 120 5 71 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 1NT S 150 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 3 S -50 1.5 21 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 N 110 4 57 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3NT N 150 7 100 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 1NT S -120 2 29 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 1NT S -150 1 14 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 4 N 50 5.5 79 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 3 S 50 5.5 79 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4 E -200 0 0 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 2 N -110 3 43 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 E -50 4 57 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2 S -100 3 43 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 1NT E -120 0 0 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 2NT E 50 6.5 93 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2 W -90 4.5 64 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3NT E 50 6.5 93 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 W -110 1.5 21 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3 W -110 1.5 21 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 2 W -90 4.5 64 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 2 W 90 2.5 36 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3NT E -50 0.5 7 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 W 110 5.5 79 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 S 100 4 57 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 W 110 5.5 79 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 1NT E 120 7 100 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 2 W 90 2.5 36 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 2NT E -50 0.5 7 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 E -260 4 57 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 4 E -620 2.5 36 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 4 E -620 2.5 36 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 3 E -170 5.5 79 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 4 E -650 1 14 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 E -710 0 0 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 3 E -170 5.5 79 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3 E -140 7 100 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 E 170 1.5 21 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 4 E 650 6 86 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 4 E 710 7 100 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 E 260 3 43 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 3 E 170 1.5 21 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 E 620 4.5 64 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 E 140 0 0 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 4 E 620 4.5 64 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 N 90 2 29 3-Lynne Goldstein-Meryl Dinowitz vs.
Play 3 E -140 0.5 7 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 E -140 0.5 7 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 3 E 100 3.5 50 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 N 150 6 86 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 N 110 5 71 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 E 100 3.5 50 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3 N 170 7 100 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3 E -100 3.5 50 2-Marie Wildman-Susan Lynch vs.
Play 3 N -150 1 14 4-Shelly Amin-Yolanda Rudich vs.
Play 2 N -110 2 29 6-Ron Kahan-Betsy Kahan vs.
Play 2 N -90 5 71 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 2 E -100 3.5 50 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 E 140 6.5 93 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 N -170 0 0 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3 E 140 6.5 93 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 2 N 110 6 86 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 3 E 50 4 57 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 3 E -140 2 29 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 S -200 1 14 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 E -110 3 43 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 N 110 6 86 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 4 E -420 0 0 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 1 S 110 6 86 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 3 E 140 5 71 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 S 200 6 86 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 2 E 110 4 57 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 N -110 1 14 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 2 N -110 1 14 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 4 E 420 7 100 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3 E -50 3 43 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 1 S -110 1 14 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 3NT N -150 0.5 7 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 2NT N -100 2 29 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 N 200 5 71 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 2 N 170 3 43 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 2 N 200 5 71 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 3 S 200 5 71 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 3NT N -150 0.5 7 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.
Play 2NT N 100 5 71 1-Richard Wettan-Michael Pollack vs.
Play 3 N -200 2 29 3-Deborah Richter-Barbara Scharf vs.
Play 2 N -170 4 57 5-Hisako Foster-Therese Pak vs.
Play 2 N -200 2 29 7-John Adonai-Peggy Theiss vs.
Play 4 S -450 0 0 8-Edmond Fursa-Barbara Alper vs.
Play 3 S -200 2 29 9-Howard Cohen-Stacey Weiss vs.
Play 3NT N 150 6.5 93 10-Sandra Miller-Melanie Weinstein vs.
Play 3NT N 150 6.5 93 11-Sonia Kingshott-Linda Munger vs.
Play 5 E -450 3.5 50 4-Ann Sacher-Anna Decker vs.
Play 5 E -450 3.5 50 5-Pat Torraco-Daniel Leib vs.
Play 5 W -480 0 0 6-Glenn Salka-Audrey Royer vs.
Play 3 W -230 7 100 7-Beverly Persky-Victor Lish vs.
Play 4 W -450 3.5 50 8-Janet Clark-Patricia Taylor vs.
Play 4 W -450 3.5 50 9-Harold Salm-Gil Ghitelman vs.
Play 5 E -450 3.5 50 10-Lee Davis-Karin Schwenk vs.
Play 4 W -450 3.5 50 11-Rosemary Kindler-James Kindler vs.


BC Hydro works with some of B.C.'s largest organizations to strategically manage plans around energy efficiency. The important work being done by some of this province's leaders in energy management is being featured in this space. This month, the discussion highlights how K-12 schools can benefit from energy efficiency.
After putting a little thought into it, Alexandra Tudose believes she has identified the moment when her personal connection to the natural world bloomed into life.
After studying sustainability at Simon Fraser University and sustainable energy management at the British Columbia Institute of Technology, she decided energy management would be a good way to combine her interest in the environment with her natural inclination for the world of business – first as energy manager for the City of Maple Ridge, and then School District 42.
She credits much of the progress the district has made to date to groundwork done by SD 42 secretary treasurer Flavia Coughlan and director of maintenance Rick Delorme. Even before Tudose was hired, detailed studies identified specific costs and the energy-saving potential of a wide variety of projects, which were then approved by the board. That allowed Tudose to hit the ground running.
Tudose's first project involved a complete lighting redesign for Thomas Haney Secondary, which involved updating bulbs and fixtures, and in some cases, removing fixtures altogether from areas that were overlit. The project resulted in more than one million kilowatt hours of energy saved, and more than $100,000 in annual energy cost savings. It also provided an opportunity to conduct a student workshop about the purpose of the project.
Student engagement with conservation continues to evolve over at School District 36 (Surrey). The Energy Conservation Cup – a competition between schools – started off as a one-week-long energy-savings initiative, says manager, Energy Management & Sustainability, Tracy Blagdon. In its seventh year, it now extends through an entire month, and incorporates a wide variety of conservation ideas.
It's a microcosm of how Blagdon and many energy managers operate. The Surrey school district has specific goals in its five-year plan: To reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by the year 2020 (compared to its 2010 baseline), and to have every site participate in at least one conservation project. Persuasion, outreach and co-operation are key – ordering people to take part would never be successful in the long run.
Having a strategic energy management plan already in place smoothes the way. Blagdon can point to specific areas where incorporating energy efficiency will be mutually beneficial by improving learning conditions for students, saving money or decreasing how much maintenance is required for a facility. It also allows for integrated planning as the rapidly growing district moves ahead with building new schools and retrofitting existing ones.
The energy management assessment process available through BC Hydro helps identify priorities for all of the different project possibilities, and helps keep all of the different parts of the organization involved in energy management, Blagdon says.
BC Hydro's support tools have been a helpful foundation for the district's planning efforts, says Ron Macdonald, manager, Energy and Sustainability for School District 39 (Vancouver). He's built on their planning spreadsheets and uses the MyHydro tool regularly. It tracks energy usage in increments as small as five minutes, which can help explain what may be happening when power consumption is higher than expected.
Macdonald agrees with Blagdon and Tudose about how important a strategic energy management plan (SEMP) is for success. In addition to creating a long-term focus – which can be a challenge when budgeting occurs on a year-to-year basis – it places a high priority on communication throughout a large organization.
The current plan in Vancouver is still focused on infrastructure, with plans to work on behavioural change in the next five-year plan. Using passive design principles – where natural features of a site are harnessed for heating and cooling, rather than equipment – is something Macdonald is enjoying. Window shades help with cooling, as does adjusting air intake locations for ventilation systems. During the summer, pulling in air from the shady side of a building would ease the demand on an air conditioning unit, while activating vents on the sunny side during the winter would mean less work for a boiler. The district has included a concept known as "earth tubes," which sends air through underground tubes for some natural precooling, which decreases the amount of energy needed to artificially cool it.
For her part, Tudose says consulting people early on in the process of creating a SEMP allows them to pitch innovative ideas, voice their concerns and "buy in" to the general idea of energy management. She is also looking forward to potentially boosting energy efficiency education opportunities with students, which would align with curriculum requirements.
It comes as Tudose contemplates a highly personal learning and teaching opportunity of her own – preparing to welcome a baby girl to the world.
As someone who regularly delivers presentations about energy management and conservation to students, Alexandra Tudose says she's conscious about authenticity.
and budgets, but it's one Tudose enjoys. In the last fiscal year alone, the school district saved 1,241,000 kWh of power, enough to power 110 homes for a year. She says the secret of their success relates to strategic energy management, because of the clarity around targets, processes, and how individuals can truly make a difference.


text:
Sports-no-CBCCBC-Sports
NBA rejects Memphis Express moniker
CBC Sports · Posted: May 22, 2001 11:52 AM ET | Last Updated: May 22, 2001
The NBA will not allow teams to be named for corporations, meaning the Vancouver Grizzlies will not become the Memphis Express if the league approves the move.
FedEx Corp. is ready to buy naming rights to a new arena if the NBA grants permission for the Grizzlies to relocate to Memphis. The company hoped to include a corporate nickname in the approximately $100-million deal.
But Joel Litvin, the NBA's executive vice-president of legal and business affairs, said Monday the league forbids a corporate nickname.
"That's not territory that we're prepared to enter," Litvin told the Commercial Appeal.
Litvin did not immediately return a call to The Associated Press on Tuesday.
That won't change FedEx's decision to buy the naming rights since the company thought getting the team named after the corporation was "a longshot," said Mike Glenn, FedEx's executive vice-president of market development and corporate communications.
NBA commissioner David Stern and the league's relocation committee are to visit Memphis next week.
They will tour downtown Memphis, The Pyramid arena that would be the Grizzlies' interim home and potential sites for a new arena. They also will meet with Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley and members of the Memphis group that would buy up to 50 percent of the team.
Litvin called The Pyramid an adequate temporary facility, but he indicated a new arena would need to be "a certainty or near-certainty" for the NBA governors to approve the move.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC Sports

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Military Bases Open Their Doors to Home-Schoolers
Associated Press | By Kimberly Hefling
ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE, Md. -- A growing number of military parents want to end the age-old tradition of switching schools for their kids.
They've embraced homeschooling, and are finding support on bases, which are providing resources for families and opening their doors for home schooling cooperatives and other events.
"If there's a military installation, there's very likely home-schoolers there if you look," said Nicole McGhee, 31, of Cameron, N.C., a mother of three with a husband stationed at North Carolina's Fort Bragg who runs a Facebook site on military home schooling.
At Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia, the library sported special presentations for home-schoolers on Benjamin Franklin and static electricity. Fort Bragg offers daytime taekwondo classes. At Fort Belvoir, Va., there are athletic events and a parent-led chemistry lab.
At Andrews Air Force Base about 15 miles outside of Washington, more than 40 families participate on Wednesdays in a home schooling cooperative at the base's youth center. Earlier this month, teenagers in one room warmed up for a mock audition reciting sayings such as "red leather, yellow leather." Younger kids downstairs learned to sign words such as "play" and searched for "Special Agent Stan" during a math game. Military moms taught each class.
There are also events outside the co-op, such as a planned camping trip for kids reading Jean Craighead's "My Side of the Mountain."
"Some weeks I wonder how my kids are going to do the school side of school because they are so busy socializing," said Joanna Hemp, the co-op's welcome coordinator.
Military families move on average nearly every three years. The transition can be tough for children, and home schooling can make it easier, advocates say. The children don't have to adjust to a new teacher or worry that they're behind because the new school's curriculum is different.
Some military families also cite the same reasons for choosing home schooling as those in the civilian population: a desire to educate their kids in a religious environment, concern about the school environment, or to provide for a child with special needs.
Two 16-year-olds, Andrew Roberts and Christina Cagle, interviewed at the Andrews co-op say they are happy their parents made the decision to home-school them. Roberts said he thinks he gets a lot more done in a school day than peers in a traditional school, and he sees his friends plenty at Bible study groups and during other social events with other teenagers on base.
"There's not like a lot of peer pressure considering you're mostly with your siblings and it's kind of a relaxed environment," Cagle said.
Participating military families say there's an added bonus to home schooling. It allows them to schedule school time around the rigorous deployment, training and school schedules of the military member.
"We can take time off when dad is home and work harder when he is gone so we have that flexibility," McGhee said.
Sharon Moore, the education liaison at Andrews who helps parents with school-related matters, said at the height of the summer military moving season, she typically gets about 20 calls from families moving to the base with home schooling questions. She links them with families from the co-op and includes the home-schooled children during back-to-school events and other functions such as a trip to a planetarium.
"It comes down to they are military children and we love our military children," said Moore, a former schoolteacher. "We recognize that they have unique needs that sometimes other children don't have, and we want to make sure that we do our best to serve them and meet those needs because they have given so much to this country."
This kind of support for home schooling by the military was uncommon in the 1990s, said Mike Donnelly, a former Army officer who is an attorney with the Home School Legal Defense Association, based in Purcellville, Va. He said that changed in 2002 with military-wide memo that said home schooling can be a "legitimate alternative form of education" for military member's children. Most military bases today are friendly toward home-schoolers, he said.
Lindsay Burchette said she first considered home schooling in 2011 when her husband joined the Navy and they were living in suburban Knoxville, Tenn. Her then-8-year-old son stressed about having to start a new school in Pensacola, Fla., when they moved there for her husband's training and then again within a year when they reached his permanent duty station at Andrews.
"Starting a new school is bad enough and doing it twice over seemed like a lot," said Burchette, a mother of three. "He kind of perked up after we mentioned that. The move kind of changed perspective for him."
Her family is now preparing to move again -- this time to Norfolk, Va., and she's now home-schooling her two oldest kids, ages 10 and 5.
"I have no issues with public schools or the system," Burchette said. "It's just working for us right now."
Home schooling in recent decades has grown in popularity in the general population, with the most recent government statistics estimating that about 3 percent of school kids are home-schooled in America.
Within the military population, Donnelly said his group estimates that from 5 percent to 10 percent of military kids are home-schooled. An estimate by the Military Child Education Coalition, using very limited research data, estimated that up to 9 percent of military kids could be home-schooled.
The vast majority of military kids attend local public schools, with a much smaller percentage attending Department of Defense schools and an even smaller percentage attending private schools or home schooling, the National Military Family Association estimates.
Like home schooling parents in the general population, military families at home often use online curriculum and materials to enhance instruction. Some hire tutors for areas such as advanced math or foreign languages.
Home schooling, of course, isn't for every military family. It requires a parent who can stay at home, and it can create an extra level of stress for the parents at home if the spouse is deployed, some spouses have told researchers.
For military families and others who do opt to home-school, there's very little scientifically rigorous research about the long-term social and academic effects, said Joseph Murphy, an education professor at Vanderbilt University who wrote a book about home schooling.
"At this point, I think we would say there's certainly not the evidence of problems with academics that a lot of people predicted, these kids do OK and they may do better than OK, I just don't want to overstate given the science of the question," Murphy said.
Family and Spouse Family and Spouse Education
Military Families Need a Safety Net During Military Health System Reform
Recent short-notice Middle East deployments are stark reminders of the challenges military members and their families face.
Career Planning for the Military Spouse
How can you grow your own career while still supporting your spouse?
What to Do If Your Service Member Deploys Without a Phone or Laptop
While not having a phone or computer downrange sounds like a first-world problem everyone should just get over, it's a big de...
Families of 82nd Airborne Soldiers Warned About Social Media Use After Threats
Family of soldiers deployed with the 82nd Airborne are being warned of "menacing" messages they might get on social media.
Military Education Topics
Spouse Education
Spouse Topics
Military and Family Life
Military Relocation
Spouse & Family Education
6 Ways to Help a Military Spouse Dealing with a Surprise Deployment
Dear Military Family: If You're Feeling Tired and Sad, It's Not Just You
Our Best of the Decade: SpouseBuzz in Review
Scholarship Application for Military Children Program Now Open
Tis the Season to Ask for Help
Read about the numerous GI Bill programs and learn how the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Montgomery GI Bill, REAP and MGIB-SR can help you reach your education goals.
Money For School
Learn how military tuition assistance, GI Bill, scholarships, and other education benefits can help you pay for school. Find the best college funding.
Once you have chosen a degree, it's time to select the military-friendly school that offers you the best opportunity to reach your goals. Learn more.
The key to success in college is hard work and planning. Learn how to manage your time and develop the study habits needed to ensure reaching your education and career goals.
Getting Your Degree
Matching your career goals and interests to getting a degree will keep you from wasting your GI Bill and Tuition Assistance benefits. See tips and more.
Timesaving Programs
There are many time saving programs available to veterans planning for college which give college credit without taking classes. See if it will work for you.


To learn more about TI's reinforced isolation family of products, visit www.ti.com/isolation and read this white paper: Enabling High-Voltage Signal Isolation Quality and Reliability.
Filmed in TI's high-voltage lab, this series of videos will focus on capacitive isolation structure, working voltage reliability, withstand voltage capability, methods for testing reliability, and more.
06:17 Want to understand how high-voltage isolation technology works? Watch and learn about TI's capacitive isolation structure.
09:49 Want to understand how high-voltage isolation technology works? Watch and learn about reliability testing for isolation.
07:57 Want to understand how high-voltage isolation technology works? Watch and learn about surge testing for isolation.


text:
Log Book
Düsseldorf Boat Show 2021 postponed to April due to COVID-19 infection rates
by Avasta
The latest boat show to face postponement due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is Europe's largest, with Boot Düsseldorf rescheduled to April 17-25
The 2021 Düsseldorf Boat Show will be delayed by almost 3 months due to the COVID-19 pandemic
The organisers of the Düsseldorf Boat Show have today announced that Europe's biggest indoor boat show will be delayed by 12 weeks due to "ongoing high infection numbers across all of Europe".
The new dates (April 17-25) have been agreed following "close consultation with its partners and exhibitors who endorse this decision", a statement from Messe Düsseldorf GmbH added.
It is hoped that giving exhibitors and visitors more than a month's notice of the decision will ease the inconvenience of having to wait three more months for the return of such a pivotal event in the boating calendar.
By postponing rather than cancelling the event the organisers have avoided going the same way as the Cannes and Southampton boat shows, both of which were shelved at the 11th hour when local authority approval was withdrawn, moves that have proven costly to the wider yachting industry.
The 2021 Miami Boat Show, originally scheduled for February 11-15, was cancelled at the end of October, leaving the 2021 Dubai Boat Show (March 9-13) as the next major event in the international boat show calendar.
However, those looking for a boating fix before then can look forward to the Ancasta Virtual Boat Show, which is due to take place online during the original dates of the 2021 Düsseldorf Boat Show (23-31 January).
Potential buyers will be able to compare and contrast different models from Beneteau, Lagoon and McConaghy Yachts.
"The Düsseldorf boat show is such a fantastic show and the postponement, although understandable, is disappointing," said Will Blair, Ancasta's Group Marketing Director.
"Many people use Boot Düsseldorf to compare and contract different models, and we didn't want people to miss out on that opportunity, so we're holding our own virtual version.
"We're looking forward to welcoming people onboard in January, to assist them in finding their perfect boat ready for the 2021 season."
For more information and to book an appointment, visit: ancasta.com/dusseldorf
Cellar and Galley (94)
Extraordinary boats (358)
Featured Yachts (58)
Interior Decor (43)
Rental (12)
Yacht Life (50)
Yacht News (478)
Yacht Racing (44)
Yachting Destinations (84)
Flax 27: update to already impressive offering
Sign up for speacial offers
We are a company that specializes in renting and selling luxury sailing & motor yachts on the southern Spanish coast of Costa Del Sol. VipBoat is the pioneer luxury yacht charter company offering yachts for rent at a fair price.
Сaptain's cabin
Puerto Banús, 29660 Marbella
En, Fr, De, Es, Ru
go@vipboat.es
© VipBoat. All Rights Reserved - 2021
This website uses cookies and asks your personal data to enhance your browsing experience. Learn more about Cookies.
Ok, All aboard! Privacy Policy


text:
Q: Change Bootstrap's collapse button's value on click I have searched the forum, I have searched Google and read all the articles but I still can't seem to get this right. What I would like to do is to change my button's value on click. That is if the content is shown then I would like to change the value of the button to let's say "hide." And if the content is hidden, then the button should show its default value of "check."
My code:

One two
<input type="text" id="input">
four five
<button class="my-btn" type="button"
data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#collapseAnswer" aria-expanded="false"
aria-controls="collapseAnswer" onclick="checkInput()">
CHECK
</button>

function checkInput()
{
var a=document.getElementById("input");
if ((a.value=="three")||(a.value=="three"))
{
document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Correct!";
}
else
{
document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Wrong";
}
}

Here is a link to my fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/xd6vwLop/
But now it seems it doesn't work here... Although in my file it shows the innerHTML and hides it as well on a second click. I'd like to change the value of the button if the innerHTML is shown.
Is there also a possibility to speed up the animation when the innerHTML is supposed to disappear? It takes too much time and some users might want to click again on the button since it takes some time to hide the content.
Thank you very much.

A: Check the updated JSFiddle here https://jsfiddle.net/xrtmpy4f/
Basically, you need use the innerText property to change the text of the button
function checkInput() {
  var a=document.getElementById("input");
  var checkbtn = document.getElementById("check-btn");

  if (checkbtn.innerText.trim() === 'CHECK') {
    checkbtn.innerText = 'HIDE';
      if ((a.value=="three")||(a.value=="three")) {
    document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Correct!";
    } else {
    document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Wrong";
   }
   return;
  }

  if (checkbtn.innerText.trim() === 'HIDE') {
    checkbtn.innerText = 'CHECK';
    document.getElementById("message").innerHTML = '';
    return;
  }

}

A: function checkInput() {
  var text = document.getElementById("check-btn");
  text.innerText === 'CHECK' ? (text.innerText = 'HIDE') : (text.innerText = 'CHECK');
var a=document.getElementById("input");
if ((a.value=="three")||(a.value=="three"))
{
document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Correct!";
}
else
{
document.getElementById("message").innerHTML="Wrong";
}
}

A: var elem = document.getElementById("input");
elem.onkeydown =  function (e) {
    if (e.keyCode === 13) {  //checks whether the pressed key is "Enter"
       checkInput();
    }
};

A: You could add it in the closure so that it doesn't override with other variables.
(function() {
    var elem = document.getElementById("input");
    elem.onkeydown =  function (e) {
        if (e.keyCode === 13) {  //checks whether the pressed key is "Enter"
           checkInput();
        }
    }
})();

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Please see below the timetable for additional revision and intervention sessions that the school is running over the Easter break. I appreciate that the timetable looks very intensive but not all students need to attend all sessions.
As a school, we appreciate the pressure that students are under but we also understand the fact that a structured revision programme, with regular short breaks, is recognised as the most productive way to study.
If you have any questions or concerns about the forthcoming exams or the Easter timetable then please do not hesitate to contact myself at the Year 11 office.


I just love her colour pallet so much!
And here I was worried I wasn't improving, I'm so happy how this came out!
Just Just bleach it again!
wow, long ago i not seen ruby. she's beautiful and more feminine (?
I always liked the way as you draw.