text:
package org.zstack.compute.vm;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowire;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Configurable;
import org.zstack.core.cloudbus.CloudBus;
import org.zstack.core.cloudbus.CloudBusListCallBack;
import org.zstack.header.core.workflow.Flow;
import org.zstack.header.core.workflow.FlowRollback;
import org.zstack.header.core.workflow.FlowTrigger;
import org.zstack.header.message.MessageReply;
import org.zstack.header.network.l2.CheckL2NetworkOnHostMsg;
import org.zstack.header.network.l2.L2NetworkConstant;
import org.zstack.header.network.l3.L3NetworkInventory;
import org.zstack.header.vm.*;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;

/**
 */
@Configurable(preConstruction = true, autowire = Autowire.BY_TYPE)
public class VmMigrationCheckL2NetworkOnHostFlow implements Flow {
    @Autowired
    private CloudBus bus;

    @Override
    public void run(final FlowTrigger trigger, Map data) {
        final VmInstanceSpec spec = (VmInstanceSpec) data.get(VmInstanceConstant.Params.VmInstanceSpec.toString());
        boolean allowUnknown = spec.getMessage() instanceof MigrateVmMessage && ((MigrateVmMessage) spec.getMessage()).isAllowUnknown();

        List<CheckL2NetworkOnHostMsg> cmsgs = new ArrayList<CheckL2NetworkOnHostMsg>();
        for (L3NetworkInventory l3 : VmNicSpec.getL3NetworkInventoryOfSpec(spec.getL3Networks())) {
            CheckL2NetworkOnHostMsg msg = new CheckL2NetworkOnHostMsg();
            msg.setL2NetworkUuid(l3.getL2NetworkUuid());
            msg.setHostUuid(spec.getDestHost().getUuid());
            bus.makeTargetServiceIdByResourceUuid(msg, L2NetworkConstant.SERVICE_ID, l3.getL2NetworkUuid());
            cmsgs.add(msg);
        }

        if (cmsgs.isEmpty()) {
            trigger.next();
            return;
        }

        bus.send(cmsgs, new CloudBusListCallBack(trigger) {
            @Override
            public void run(List<MessageReply> replies) {
                for (MessageReply r : replies) {
                    if (!r.isSuccess() && !allowUnknown) {
                        trigger.fail(r.getError());
                        return;
                    }
                }

                trigger.next();
            }
        });
    }

    @Override
    public void rollback(FlowRollback trigger, Map data) {
        trigger.rollback();
    }
}


text:
Debt Troubles Start To Pile Up For Miners
By: Gwen Preston January 19, 2009
VANCOUVER–For a growing number of mining companies unable to make payments on significant debts, the prospects for a happy new year are growing dim.
During the last days of 2008 and the first of 2009, at least four companies that are developing or running mines admitted to serious debt payment problems. And those four stories could be just the tip of the debt-default iceberg.
On the last day of December, Minera Andes (MAI-T, MNEAF-O) confessed its inability to respond to a US$11.3-million cash call from its subsidiary, Minera Santa Cruz (MSC), which owns the San Jose gold project in Argentina. The project is a joint venture: Hochschild Mining (HCHDF-O, HOC-L) owns 51% of MSC and operates San Jose, while Minera Andes owns the other 49%.
The cash call went out to finance further expansion and development at the gold project, which began production in late 2007 and had its first three months of positive earnings from gold and silver sales in the second quarter of 2008. But the partners have ambitious plans for the project.
Within its first 15 months of operation, the joint-venture partners have already expanded the San Jose operation, boosting mining and processing capacity to 1,500 tonnes per day from just 750 tonnes. The second phase of expansion involves connecting to the regional electrical grid, a task planned for early 2009; in the third phase, further expansion of the refining circuit will enable the operation to convert all concentrate to dor.
Despite the magnitude of plans at San Jose, Minera Andes did not expect to face a cash call from MSC because the company planned to finance second and third-phase expansion costs from cash flow. Indeed, Hochschild had previously assured Minera Andes that cash calls would not be necessary. It is unclear exactly why that changed, but now Minera Andes is in a tight spot.
Under the terms of its credit agreement with Macquarie Bank, Minera Andes is required to hold cash and equivalents at least equal to the sum of all MSC's outstanding cash calls, plus certain other amounts. Minera Andes currently has US$3.3 million on hand, which means it is not in compliance with the terms of the credit agreement. In addition, the company is required to maintain its shareholding in MSC at 49%. If Minera Andes does not finance its portion of the cash call, its shareholding in MSC could be diluted, which would also violate the credit agreement.
Finally, Minera Andes has to repay a portion — US$7.5 million — of the principal amount outstanding under the credit agreement in March, and then pay the remaining US$10 million in September. Its obligations to Macquarie are secured by the company's assets.
Minera Andes and Macquarie are discussing the possibility of refinancing the credit agreement or rescheduling the amounts due. Minera Andes is also looking at other financing options. On news of the cash call and credit troubles, the company's share price lost another penny to close at 42¢, near its 52-week low of 39¢ and distant from its February high of $1.92. Minera Andes has 190 million shares outstanding, 223 million fully diluted.
Unstable ground from an over-active irrigation system has given Gold Hawk Resources (CGK-V, CGHRF-O) no end of trouble. The company started production at its Coricancha gold-silver-lead-zinc mine, which sits 90 km east of Lima, Peru, in October 2007. But in early May, after just seven months of production, a regular inspection detected ground movement uphill and near the tailings handling area and processing plant. Gold Hawk immediately suspended plant operations and tailings placement.
Geotechnical consultants determined the ground movement was due to excessive irrigation of the hillside above the tailings and processing plant by third parties. The Peruvian government ordered the third parties to terminate irrigation and Gold Hawk installed ground movement detectors and dewatered affected areas. By the end of July, the ground movement had ceased.
Nevertheless, as a result the company has to move its entire operation — meaning the processing plant and the tailings facility — to a new area some 30 km away. Gold Hawk has submitted an environmental impact assessment for the new facility; if the EIA is approved and Gold Hawk can raise the needed capital, the company says it can restart production at Coricancha by the middle of the year.
Gold Hawk will receive US$14.5 million in insurance monies and has already received a US$2-million advance. However, the lack of cash flow combined with the costs associated with moving the entire operation mean the company is unable to repay its principal debt, which sits at US$9.7 million. The debt was due for repayment on Dec. 31, following a three-month extension. The company and its primary lenders are in discussion to extend the repayment date but were unable to come to an agreement by the end of the year.
Prior to the operations halt, the facility at Coricancha was milling 410 tonnes per day at an average grade of 3.06 grams gold per tonne and 91 grams silver. The property hosts 651,200 measured and indicated tonnes grading 6.5 grams gold, 200.4 grams silver, 3.17% lead, 3.84% zinc and 0.44% copper, plus 3.9 million inferred tonnes averaging 6.5 grams gold, 261 grams silver, 2.56% lead, 3.12% zinc and 0.35% copper.
At presstime, Gold Hawk shares, which have a 52-week trading range of 1-52¢, sat at 1.5¢. The company has 226 million shares outstanding.
The third troubled story to ring in the new year is that of Belvedere Resources (BEL-V, BLVDF-O). In mid-December, Belvedere suspended operations at its Hitura and Sarkiemi nickel mines, both in Finland. As a result, Belvedere's wholly owned subsidiary, Finn Nickel, will now be unable to fulfill its production and delivery obligations under the terms of its offtake agreement with Jinchuan Group. Finn has, therefore, declared a force majeure, which excuses the company from its obligations for a period.
Finn has advised Jinchuan Group that, if a depressed nickel price forces a prolonged suspension of its operations, non-delivery will turn into a default under the prepayment agreement. If Finn defaults, Jinchuan can demand full repayment of a US$7.5-million prepayment that Finn accepted from Jinchuan in August. The two companies are in discussions.
Belvedere is working towards developing two production centres in Finland, meaning two processing facilities will be fed by several surrounding deposits. The company achieved production in the Hitura region in mid-2007, where the Hitura and Sarkiniemi mines together produce some 2,500 tonnes of nickel annually in concentrate.
In October, Belvedere was granted an environmental permit for its Luikonlahti mill. The company purchased the mill in October 2007; it will form the nucleus of the Kotalahti production centre in central Finland. The first mine planned for production at Kotalahti is Hautalampi, where in November Belvedere boosted resources by 30%. Measured and indicated resources now stand at 1.71 million tonnes grading 0.46% nickel, 0.4% copper and 0.11% cobalt; inferred resources add 55,843 tonnes grading 0.44% nickel, 0.19% copper and 0.07% cobalt.
There are roughly 2 km of underground workings already in place at Hautalampi, left behind by a previous operator, that mean Belvedere can start production within six months of a production decision. Ore from the site will be trucked 40 km to Luikonlahti, at a rate of 250,000 tonnes annually. Until recently, the company maintained it would start production in the second half of 2009.
Belvedere shares are now trading at 18¢. The company has a 52-week trading range of 4¢-$1.75 and has 79 million shares issued.
Zaruma
And finally, Zaruma Resources (ZMR-T, ZMRAF-O) admitted an inability to make debt payments. Zaruma's wholly owned subsidiary, Minerales Libertad (ML), borrowed US$23.5 million from Empresa Minerales Los Qu
enuales (EMLQ), a member of the Glencore International AG group of companies. ML used the money to fund development of Luz del Cobre, a copper project in Sonora, Mexico.
When the money ran out in October, ML advised EMLQ that it was no longer able to pay its debts generally, as they came due. Within weeks, ML halted development work at Luz del Cobre, even though the project was just four months away from the beginning of production. Luz del Cobre is expected to be able to produce copper at roughly US$1.15 per lb., but the project needs another US$15 million to reach production.
Now, with several months having passed with no payments, ML has received notice from EMLQ that it is in default, which means that the entire loan is payable immediately. EMLQ holds the shares of ML as security for the loan; one effect of the default notice is that Zaruma has lost its voting rights in directing its subsidiary's movements. Since the shares of ML are worth far more than the outstanding debt, Zaruma says it will take all necessary action to protect shareholders' interests.
One option that the parties are investigating is to use the existing milling equipment at Luz del Cobre to crush ore from the San Antonia gold resource nearby and pile it onto heap-leach pads.
An internal scoping study indicates that a gold heap-leach operation could get into production in five months for minimal capital costs. At a gold price of US$800 per oz., the operation is expected to yield US$450,000 per month in net cash flow.
Zaruma shares, which traded between 3¢ and 45¢ over the last 52 weeks, sat at 5¢ at presstime. The company has 118 million shares outstanding.
COMPANY: Belvedere Resources LtdMinera Andes IncOracle Mining CorpRed Tiger Mining Inc
Be the first to comment on "Debt Troubles Start To Pile Up For Miners"

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
By columbiacitysource	Neighborhood, Politics
Follow Up: Future Mountain Bike Park at Cheasty Greenspace
Following the last post on the future mountain bike park at Cheasty, Columbia City Source was contacted by Mary DeJong (Co-founder & Co-chair, Friends of Cheasty Greenspace at Mt.View) looking to get some more information out about the project and what they are doing to reclaim the site for public use:
Neighbors and Community members,
I want to respectfully address some of the misunderstandings and misperceptions around this current conversation about mountain biking in Seattle's greenspaces. The Cheasty Greenspace Trails and Mountain Bike Park (aka Beacon Bike Park) has been a very public project that was first submitted via the 2013 Levy Opportunities Fund. The Friends of Cheasty Mt. View reached out for support, opposition, and public input through flyers, web based information, and numerous public meetings in 2012 when it was applying for the Levy Opportunity Fund grant.
Based on an out-dated bike use policy, the project wasn't funded. However, due to the tremendous interest and support this project has garnered, Seattle Parks entered into a very public process to consider amending the bike-use-policy. In response to concerns of potentially seeing bikes in all natural areas, the Seattle Parks Board of Commissioners and Seattle Parks (via the public meeting/comment process) requested a pilot/demonstration project in Cheasty Greenspace. For the following reasons, Cheasty Greenspace has been identified by Seattle Parks as the best location for this pilot project, which was unanimously voted in favor at the January 9 Seattle Parks Board of Commissioners public hearing.
Please, do come out for the public information meeting on Tuesday, March 25, from 6:30-8:00pm at Jefferson Community Center. We would love to hear your thoughts and ideas in response to the proposed design for a multi-use trail system that will see this land informing the health and wellness of our community.
RECLAIM: Cheasty Greenspace was an original feature in the Olmstead Legacy design for Seattle. This design intended that residents would have access to nature within a quarter mile walk from all doorways in our city. Cheasty Greenspace is the Rainier Valley's largest contiguous forest, an inaccessible and unsafe open space much of which is surrounded by chain-link fence and filled with nefarious behaviors. In addition to a high number of homeless encampments in Cheasty, there is evidence of drug and sex trafficking, and SPD has come out with K-9 cadaver units looking for deceased bodies, and search and rescue teams looking for weapons involved in fatal shootings, in the last few years. This land has become one that is feared, avoided and forgotten and yet this forestscape is immediately adjacent to New Rainier Vista, one of Seattle's densest urban neighborhoods, and falls within Sound Transit's Light Rail corridor.
Rainier Valley residents have a life expectancy 10% shorter than their neighbors in affluent Northeast Seattle. Valley residents experience higher rates of poverty and teenage pregnancy, and three times more likely to die from heart disease or diabetes. This project isn't just about social trails; this is about social justice. This is an opportunity to transform the health and wellness of lives in our community! By reclaiming this land for its original intended purpose of recreational access, we are removing barriers of outdated preservation models and privilege that keep the community from the inherent physical and psychological benefits that are available from immediate and daily access to Nature.
RESTORE*: We need to restore Cheasty Greenspace to ensure that it can provide great habitat, retain storm water, and provide healthy benefits to the citizens of the Rainier Valley. Because of its high percentage of invasive cover, this park is considered at high risk of losing its tree canopy and native plant understory in the very near future. By restoring this greenspace we will recreate a healthy and sustainable native habitat, increase biodiversity, and maintain the much-needed physical benefits that forests provide to communities. To date, the restoration efforts that have transpired in Cheasty Greenspace "North" not to be confused with the community led restoration efforts of Cheasty Greenspace/Mt.View-the southern most 10 acres of the greenspace) have been led by EarthCorps with little neighborhood involvement. The community WILL restore this land if there is something in it for them; we have proven that safe and welcoming access to the woods with various ways to enjoy and recreate within is what compels the community to action with our work in Cheasty's southern 10 acres.
By broadening the recreational scope that this landscape can offer increases our chances of attracting more interest and commitment to this land. We need to pay attention and leverage the community and neighborhood interest that is focused on transforming Cheasty into a place that contributes to the health of the forest and also to the wellness of individuals and families. Exposure and experience to Nature (through various modes of recreation, which includes single track mountain biking in this park) for urban children and youth is critical to the raising up of future stewards and conservationists. The notion that urban youth will spontaneously passively recreate in this forest (if it was even safe and accessible in the first place), is wishful thinking. There are too many barriers that stand in the way of this kind of usage, privileged exposure and experience to that kind of passive use being primary. We want to remove the barriers of privilege from both daily, safe access to Nature, as well as to a sport that requires a fair degree of privilege in which to participate. Across the world, social justice groups are seeing the far-reaching positive social effects on communities when bikes/biking opportunities are offered and provided. With the partners who have come around this project, there is the potential to involve our neighborhood youth in trail/leadership building in exchange for a bike. While a simple plan, there is the potential long term positive effects in our community, reducing chronic crime, violence, and health issues top among them.
All photos included are of the current state of affairs within Cheasty Greenspace/"North"RE-IMAGINE: Place-making Cheasty Greenspace: This greenspace holds much potential in providing the residents of New Rainier Vista, Columbia City and Beacon Hill with access to nature, pedestrian/commuter options, and recreational pursuits. That this land is nestled in between the dynamic going-ons of Jefferson Community Center, Rainier Community Center, and Lake Washington makes this an exciting addition to the recreational offerings in our community. Seattleites beyond the Rainier Valley will also benefit from the park and easily access it via light rail, bus, or bike. So much good could be done here to ensure the ecological integrity of the land, while making it SAFE for our neighborhood and a GREAT asset to our community and all of Seattle.
The identity surrounding Cheasty has changed significantly in the last ten years since the explicit efforts to implement policies and practices to keep people out of these woods. The Rainier Valley is now a transit thoroughfare committed to sustainable high-density living. Sound Transit is investing in the ideas of the Place-Making movement to evolve the neighborhoods surrounding their Light Rail stations into GREAT PLACES to where people are drawn, move and stay. This community will be healthy and whole to the degree that variable offerings are provided, safe and welcoming access to nature being a priority. Cheasty Greenspace falls within a trifecta of Light Rail stations (Columbia City, Mt.Baker and Beacon Hill) making this landscape singularly the most unique greenbelt in the city in the way it could be conceived as a PLACE that informs the sustainable living ideals of urban design and planning. By creating a space where there hasn't been one before (in that Cheasty North currently isn't a safe space for the community), we will see a huge return in public investment and subsequent economic growth. Furthermore, the optimization of this place is central to the retention of our youth, young talents and young families. This project has the potential to decrease the propensity towards "suburban flight"-the trend of young families leaving the Valley when they have children for the desire to have more access to nature and to get away from the violence.
What makes a place great? Sociability (welcoming, cooperative, neighborly), uses and activities (fun, active, vital, special and real), access and linkages (connected, walkable, convenient, accessible), comfort and image (safe, charm, clean, attractive, historic). What is the quality of this space? We know that intuitively, a good place nurtures, fosters and develops healthy individuals and communities. Cheasty Greenspace has the power and the potential to contribute to the social fabric of our neighborhoods and transform our negative social and health related trends. Cheasty Greenspace can be transformed into a GREAT place that informs and elevates the great features and characteristics of SE Seattle and the city as a whole.The vision for a multi-use trail system in Cheasty Greenspace is our collective response to our community demanding something new and different for this land. No longer will this forest prevent interconnection between neighborhoods and access to a transit thoroughfare. People will be able to walk THROUGH these woods in safety to school and to public transportation. We can activate this space with recreational trails, which will naturally tie in to the dynamic park developments at Jefferson Community Center. By creating trail systems that invite the public into the forest, they become engaged and invested in the land, committing to steward it. Invested usage will also enhance the life and landscape of Cheasty Greenspace and the sustainability of living within urban density.
We now need to become the stakeholders of this dynamic demonstration project and identify the experts (Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance, IMBA, Bike Works and REI) to elevate this asset and implement the idea of urban mountain biking that has garnered unprecedented support. To date we have the equivalent of $500,000.00 in pledged volunteer match hours (24,500 volunteer hours) over the next five years for this pilot project! This doesn't include the institutional support (Seattle University and Seattle Pacific University) and organizational/business support, which spans the spectrum from Union Gospel Mission to Patagonia. Let us move forward with designing a PLACE that is a gathering place for our community within a natural context in our city's primary transit corridor.
Let us believe that by re-imagining this place, this land, we will be transforming the lives-the very health and wellness-of this community!
With love and passion for the woods,
Co-founder & Co-chair, Friends of Cheasty Greenspace at Mt.View
2013 Denny Award Recipient for Conservation and Environmental Stewardship
http://cheastymtview.com/
https://www.facebook.com/CheastyMtView
**For a collection of statements of volunteer support and pledged hours, click here:
**For original visionary language around the Cheasty Greenspace Trails and Mountain Bike Proposal, please visit: http://www.beaconbikepark.com/
**For a GREAT compelling document for WHY Cheasty is THE spot for this project (as well as broad-stroke policy change perspectives), please read:
One thought on "Follow Up: Future Mountain Bike Park at Cheasty Greenspace"
columbiacitysource says:
Just in case people missed this follow-up link that was posted by a reader on the initial post on this topic, it's definitely worth reading:
http://ahlness.wordpress.com/2014/03/13/a-tale-of-two-cheasties/


text:
Blackchain
Bitcoin, Lightning, EOS June 1st, DeFi, Globalcoin, Tesla, and Inflation
Bitcoin Price, Portfolio Strategy, and Bitcoin Block Reward Halvening
Bitcoin Bull Market, Crypto Predictions, Binance Re-Org, and Commentary
Market Update, Decentralized Finance, EOS REX, and Tezos Staking
Earn BAT with Brave, DAI Stability Issues, and Tether Controversy
The Brave Browser and Basic Attention Token
Risks and Profitability for ASIC Cryptomining
How to Buy Altcoins using Crypto Exchanges
How to Buy Bitcoin using Coinbase
Home Articles The Brave Browser and Basic Attention Token
There are a handful of utility tokens that are actively being used in conjunction with a functioning product. The Basic Attention Token or BAT is a prime example of just that. In this article we'll take a closer look at BAT and the associated Brave Browser discussing how they work and primary motivations behind the project.
What is the Brave Browser?
Brave is a browser that adds a blockchain twist to ad blocking, privacy, and revenue generation for creators. It's no secret that ads and tracking have take over the internet. By doing so, we have an environment filled with click-bait, fake news, slow performance, low quality content, and compromised privacy. This has created a user revolt with many adopting ad blocking technologies. Publishers have responded by creating paywalls and restricting content access. An example is shown for Forbes' magazine, which prevents you from accessing its articles if it detects an ad blocker. When you turn off ad blocking, you are met with a full page ad and even more ads once you finally get to the article. This isn't only annoying, but it significantly slows performance.
Forbes restricting content access when an ad blocker is enabled on web.
The Brave browser seeks to fix this by eliminating embedded ads, pop-ups, and even whitelist requests. That said, the team behind Brave understands that publishers and creators need to make money, and that's where the Basic Attention Token comes in.
What are Basic Attention Tokens (BATs)?
BAT is an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain that fuels the Brave ecosystem. In a nutshell, it's the currency that users can contribute to creators in return for consuming their content. Once you have some BAT in your wallet (within the browser) you can choose which sites you'd like to contribute to and how much. The browser keeps track of your website or YouTube viewing and allocates BAT proportionally. Creators who have verified site ownership are eligible to receive BAT and you can select who to include in your payout as shown in the screenshot.
Brave Browser dashboard for Basic Attention Tokens
You may be surprised by how many websites are verified and participating in this blockchain 'experiment', but honestly, who would turn down free money? If you have your own website or YouTube channel you can participate by verifying ownership and setting up an Uphold account.
How Does Brave Compare?
Overall, the browser lives up to its mission of maintaining privacy and blocking ads. That said it is still a work in progress, especially with its BAT payment system. It is still a manual process and prone to bugs here and there. Even so, the browser is under active development and improving all the time.
As far browsers go, it seems to adhere to industry standards and has a small but growing number of extensions. This is where other browsers like Chrome or Firefox have a distinct advantage, but over time I expect many extensions to be ported.
A key feature that Brave touts is faster load times, which I can attest to. When compared to Chrome or Firefox load times are much faster, especially for sites with a lot of ads. Brave explains it in their own words in the following video.
Overall, it's a good browser and I encourage you to give it a test drive. Right now I mainly use it as my "news" browser and it works quite well. If you'd like to support this site, you can give it a test run by downloading the browser here (referral).
The BAT payment system is a bit buggy, possibly because it's a manual process. In the future it'd be ideal to automate the process and make sure it can scale on the Ethereum blockchain. From a technical perspective, I'd be a bit worried about relying on a non-native chain to process transactions, especially if the user base becomes very large and creators demand more frequent payments.
Porting Firefox/Chrome extensions and encouraging developers to contribute to the Brave ecosystem would pay long-term dividends. Right now basic extensions are in place and porting shouldn't be too much effort. It's something worth taking seriously.
A feature that could be interesting is allowing websites to set their access fees. This could automatically be paid in BAT, providing immediate access and settlement. Right now payments to creators are strictly voluntary and publishers cannot set an access fee. In the future it'd be nice to be able to simply pay for a month's access or a single article with BAT tokens. However, this would create a lot of micro-transactions, clogging the Ethereum network, and sending fees through the roof. Scaling anyone?
Should I invest in BAT?
BAT is a true utility token. It has a specific purpose confined to a particular ecosystem and industry. That said, it also functions as a currency within that ecosystem and can be traded for other digital currencies or assets. All that to say, that it does have value. The primary question is, how much? This is a perpetual and difficult question in the greater cryptospace and utility tokens in general. Since BAT is constrained to a particular vertical (digital advertising/publishing) it will likely be valued based on that sector. Granted, this is a very large sector with the likes of Google and Facebook generating $100B+ in ad revenue. Though we can't, and don't provide investment advice, it is worth monitoring Brave browser adoption and the velocity of the currency. In a follow-up article we will provide a more in-depth analysis that seeks to elicit the parameters that impact token value.
Professional Disclaimer
The Site cannot and does not contain financial or investment advice. The financial or investment information is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Accordingly, before taking any actions based upon such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not provide any kind of financial or investment advice. THE USE OR RELIANCE OF ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
Previous articleRisks and Profitability for ASIC Cryptomining
Next articleWhat to Expect with ASIC Cryptomining
Can Bitcoin Reach $100,000?
Blackchain - November 28, 2017
My Greatest Fear when Investing in Cryptoassets Today
Blackchain - February 25, 2018
Is Crypto Finally Back on Track?
Blackchain - April 27, 2018
Why Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum are Rising
Blackchain - December 13, 2017
Crypto Asset Fund Offers Blockchain Investment Vehicle
Blackchain - August 10, 2017
Financial and technical research for blockchain technologies, stocks, bonds, startups, and real estate.
Contact us: info@blackchain.co
© Copyright 2019 Blackchain. All rights reserved.


text:
Q: How to reproject a latlong J2000 coordinate image into latlong Galactic Coordinate image I have a 2x1 ratio lat/long projection of the night sky in J2000 equatorial coordinates (the fixed equatorial coordinate system on Jan 1.5, 2000).
I need to convert this into a 2x1 ratio lat/long image based on the galactic coordinate system (with the center of the image centered on the center of the milky way).
I know that the North Pole of the J2000 coordinate system is at 122.93200023 long, 27.12843056 lat, and 12.860114 East of North.
It's just a rotation and translation of the coordinates, so I would assume GDAL could handle that, but I can't find a function that seems to work.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange