text:
Lord Shaftesbury [Anthony Ashley Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury]
First published Wed Mar 13, 2002; substantive revision Wed Jul 20, 2011
Anthony Ashley Cooper, the third Earl of Shaftesbury, lived from 1671 to 1713. He was one of the most important philosophers of his day, and exerted an enormous influence throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries on British and European discussions of morality, aesthetics, and religion.
Shaftesbury's philosophy combined a powerfully teleological approach, according to which all things are part of a harmonious cosmic order, with sharp observations of human nature (see section 2 below). Shaftesbury is often credited with originating the moral sense theory, although his own views of virtue are a mixture of rationalism and sentimentalism (section 3). While he argued that virtue leads to happiness (section 4), Shaftesbury was a fierce opponent of psychological and ethical egoism (section 5) and of the egoistic social contract theory of Hobbes (section 6). Shaftesbury advanced a view of aesthetic judgment that was non-egoistic and objectivist, in that he thought that correct aesthetic judgment was disinterested and reflected accurately the harmonious cosmic order (section 7). Shaftesbury's belief in an harmonious cosmic order also dominated his view of religion, which was based on the idea that the universe clearly exhibits signs of perfect divine design (section 8). According to Shaftesbury, the ultimate end of religion, as well as of virtue, beauty, and philosophical understanding (all of which turn out to be one and the same), is to identify completely with the universal system of which one we are a part.
1. Shaftesbury's Life and Works
2. Shaftesbury's View of Human Nature: Teleology and Observation
3. Shaftesbury's View of Virtue: Moral Sentimentalism and Moral Rationalism
4. Virtue and Happiness
5. Attacks on Egoism
6. Attacks on Social Contract Theory and Defense of Political Liberty
7. Aesthetics
8. Religion
Shaftesbury's Works
Shaftesbury lived from 1671 to 1713. His grandfather, the first Earl of Shaftesbury, oversaw Shaftesbury's early upbringing and put John Locke in charge of his education. Shaftesbury would eventually come to disagree with many aspects of Locke's philosophy (such as the latter's anti-innatist empiricism, his social contract theory, and what Shaftesbury perceived to be his egoism), but Locke was clearly a crucially important influence on Shaftesbury's philosophical development, and the two remained friends until Locke's death.
Shaftesbury served in Parliament and the House of Lords, but ill health curtailed his political career when he was 30 years old. From then on, he concentrated his energies on his philosophical and literary writings.
The first work Shaftesbury published was an edited collection of sermons by Benjamin Whichcote, which came out in 1698. Shaftesbury wrote an unsigned preface to the sermons in which he praised Whichcote's belief in the goodness of human beings and urged his readers to use Whichcote's "good nature" as an antidote to the poisonous egoism of Hobbes and the pessimistic supralapsarianism of the Calvinists.
In 1699, John Toland published an early version of Shaftesbury's Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit (IVM). Shaftesbury renounced this version of the Inquiry, claiming that it was produced without his authorization, although the details of the episode remain unclear.
Most of the works for which Shaftesbury is famous were written between 1705–1710. It was during this period that he rewrote the Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit and completed versions of A Letter concerning Enthusiasm (LCE), Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour (SC), The Moralists (M) and Soliloquy, or Advice to an Author (SA).
In 1711, he collected his mature works into a single volume and added to them extensive notes and commentary, naming the book Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (C). He revised the Characteristics over the course of the next two years, up until his death in 1713. A new edition came out in 1714. Shaftesbury took great pains to design illustrations for the Characteristics, which he thought would advance his central claims as effectively as the written text (see Paknadel 1974).
In addition to the Characteristics, there are two posthumous collections of Shaftesbury's writings: the Second Characteristics, which is concerned chiefly with the visual arts, and Shaftesbury's philosophical notebooks, which Rand collected in The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury. The notebooks are particularly interesting, as they offer a view of Shaftesbury's private ruminations and his profound commitment to Stoic philosophy. Shaftesbury's fame and influence are chiefly due to the Characteristics, however.
The Characteristics is a remarkable volume. It covers a great many topics, ranging freely over morality, art, politics, religion, aesthetics, and culture, and it is written in a variety of different styles, including epistles, soliloquies, dialogues, and treatises. The overarching goal of the book, as Klein has put it in his very helpful introduction, is to make its readers "effective participants in the world" (C viii). Shaftesbury saw the Characteristics as an exercise in practical (and not merely speculative) philosophy—a work that would make people happier, more virtuous, and more civil. (See M part 1, section 1.)
The Characteristics was extremely popular in Britain and Europe. As Den Uyl points out, "Other than Locke's Second Treatise, Shaftesbury's Characteristics ... was the most reprinted book in English in the [eighteenth] century" (Den Uyl vii). Anybody with intellectual aspirations was sure to be acquainted with it. Shaftesbury was a towering figure in Britain in the 18th century in much the same way as J.S. Mill was in Victorian England and J.P. Sartre was in post-war France.
And yet, by the second half of the 20th century, Shaftesbury had fallen into something approaching obscurity, at least among Anglophone philosophers. Even those who worked in early modern philosophy might have read only a few excerpted pages of his works (usually in the British Moralists anthologies edited by Selby-Bigge and Raphael). Recently, considerably more attention has been paid to Shaftesbury's work, and that trend seems to be gathering steam. But it's worth diagnosing the decline in Shaftesbury's philosophical readership from the 18th century to the 20th, as it brings to light some salient features of his thought.
The most likely reason for that decline is the forms Shaftesbury's philosophy took. He did write one work—the Inquiry concerning Virtue or Merit—that has the kind of clearly-telegraphed thesis development and argumentation we've come to expect from a philosophical treatise. That helps explain why it is passages from that work that have been widely anthologized. But the Inquiry was Shaftesbury's first work, and he later distanced himself from it. The shortcomings of the Inquiry, in Shaftesbury's view, were not substantive but stylistic. It was too dry, too beholden to abstract structure, and too akin to the barren theoretical philosophizing of the Scholastics or the modern metaphysicians. In all of his later works, Shaftesbury adopted literary forms that, as it happens, academic philosophy in the 20th century moved sharply away from. In some works, he adopted epistolary personae. In others, he soliloquized enthusiastically. What he took to be his masterwork—The Moralists—reads like nothing so much as a philosophical novel, with the development of half a dozen characters, narratives of the arcs of friendships and enmities, and expansive descriptions of rooms, gardens, dinners, and landscapes. A third of the Characteristics consists of "miscellaneous reflections" in which Shaftesbury, in the voice of an anonymous commentator, boasts of the "random" presentation and lack of "regularity and order" in his writing (C 336, 339). As he put it at one point, "My reader, doubtless, by this time must being to wonder through what labyrinth of speculation and odd texture of capricious reflection I am offering to conduct him" (C 437). Shaftesbury famously said, "The most ingenious way of becoming foolish is by a system" (C 127). But there seems to have been little danger of his becoming foolish by writing in too systematic a fashion. It was systematic philosophical writing, however, that traveled better from the 18th century to the 20th.
But the different literary forms in which Shaftesbury wrote, as well as the attention he gave to his book's illustrations, points to a deep element of his philosophy. As Klein has shown, Shaftesbury sought to marry morality, on the one hand, with politeness, on the other. In attempting this goal, Shaftesbury was opposing the view that politeness—good manners, agreeability, pleasantness—is a shallow, merely cosmetic concern distinct from the virtue of a person (see Klein 1994). As this view has it, virtue has a solitary, difficult, Calvinist flavor. Shaftesbury, in contrast, sought to convince his readers that true virtue is pleasant, well-mannered, polished, and above all sociable. Moral beauty is, for Shaftesbury, not an internal struggle but an appealing character. And philosophical writing should be appealing as well—not only good but also agreeable. Philosophy should not be ponderous, difficult, and unpleasant, as it was in the hands of the Scholastics and the modern metaphysicians. It should, rather, move people to virtue in the same way inspiring art does. A well-crafted literary performance is what a philosopher should aim to produce, and it's just such a performance that the Characteristics constitutes.
Shaftesbury's view of human nature was both teleological and observation-based. Indeed, he believed that teleology and observation must go hand-in-hand—that accurate observation of human psychology requires a teleological conception of humanity, and that one needs to observe human beings to learn about the human telos. He criticized philosophers who examined human beings without placing their findings within a teleological context, comparing them to someone who examines the individual parts of a watch without taking into account the purpose for which the watch was designed. Just as the latter person will never come to a proper understanding of the watch, Shaftesbury argued, so too the former will never come to a proper understanding of human nature. Shaftesbury thought that Descartes and Locke were guilty of this narrow, non-teleological type of philosophizing. (See SA part 2, section 1; IVM book 1, part 2, section 1; M part 2, section 4.)
Shaftesbury, like most teleologically-minded philosophers, held that the end or telos of human nature is virtue, and much of his writing is devoted to an explication of his conception of virtue. The account of virtue he proposed has often been taken to be the origin of moral sentimentalism, which Hutcheson and Hume would later develop. But while there are parts of Shaftesbury's account of virtue that are undeniably sentimentalist, there are also rationalist elements that defy the sentimentalist label.
To understand Shaftesbury's account of virtue, we must first examine his account of goodness. Something is good, according to Shaftesbury, if it contributes to the "existence or well-being" of the system of which it is a part (C 168). Every animal, for instance, is a part of its species. So a particular animal, say a tiger, is a good member of its species—it's a good tiger—if it contributes to the well-being of the tiger species as a whole. There is also "a system of all animals," which consists of the "order" or "economy" of all the different animal species (C 169). So a good animal is one that contributes to the well-being of "animal affairs" in general (Ibid). The system of all animals, moreover, works with the system "of vegetables and all other things in this inferior world" to constitute "one system of a globe or earth" (Ibid). So something is a good earthly thing if it contributes to the existence of earthly things in general. And the system of this earth is itself part of a "universal system" or "a system of all things" (Ibid). So to be "wholly and really" good a thing must contribute to the good of the universe as a whole (Ibid). This progression of ever-larger systems is a bit dazzling, and we might wonder how we can ever know (or even make sense of) whether something is contributing to the well-being of the universe as a whole. But Shaftesbury avoids this problem by discussing in detail only that which makes "a sensible creature" a good member of its species—by focusing on whether an individual creature is promoting the well-being of its species (C 169). Perhaps Shaftesbury believed that a creature that contributes to the well-being of its species will also always contribute to the well-being of the universe as a whole, in which case being a good member of one's species would be equivalent to being "wholly and really" good. (See IVM book 1, part 2, section 1)
Shaftesbury went on to say that the goodness or evilness of a sensible creature is based on the creature's motives, and not simply on the results of the creature's actions (C169). This led him to a crucial claim: every motive to action involves affection or passion (C 173, 177–79, 193). Reason alone, Shaftesbury maintained, cannot motivate. This claim clearly anticipates some of the most influential anti-rationalist arguments of Hutcheson and Hume. (See IVM book 1, part 2, section 3; IVM book 1, part 2, section 4; IVM book 1, part 3, section 1; IVM book 2, part 1, section 1.)
Also crucial to his philosophy is Shaftesbury's distinction between goodness and virtue. Goodness is something that is within the reach of all sensible creatures, not only humans but also non-human animals, such as tigers. This is because a creature is good if its affections promote the well-being of the system of which it is a part, and non-human animals are just as capable of possessing this type of affection as humans. "Virtue or merit," on the other hand, is within the reach of "man only" (C 172), and that is because virtue or merit is tied to a special kind of affection that only humans possess. This special kind of affection is a second-order affection, an affection that has as its object another affection. We humans experience these second-order affections because we, unlike non-human animals, are conscious of our own passions. Not only do we possess passions, but we also reflect on or become aware of the passions we have. And when we reflect on our own passions, we develop feelings about them. Imagine, for instance, you feel the desire to help a person in distress. In addition to simply feeling that desire, you may also become aware that you are feeling that desire. And when you become aware of that, you may experience a positive feeling (or "liking") towards your desire to help. Or imagine you feel the desire to harm a person who has bested you in a fair competition. In addition to simply feeling the desire to harm, you may also become aware that you are feeling that desire. And when you become aware of that, you may experience a negative feeling (or "dislike") towards your desire to harm. These are the kinds of phenomena Shaftesbury had in mind when he wrote that "the affections of pity, kindness, gratitude and their contraries, being brought into the mind by reflection, become objects. So that, by means of this reflected sense, there arises another kind of affection towards those very affections themselves, which have been already felt, and are now become the subject of a new liking or dislike" (C 172). (See IVM book 1, part 2, section 3.)
Shaftesbury called this capacity to feel second-order affections the "sense of right and wrong" or the "moral sense" (C 179–80), although the term is not one he emphasized much or explained in detail (see Rivers 124). Indeed, there is little evidence that he thought the moral sense is a distinct psychological faculty in the way that, for instance, Hutcheson did. Nevertheless, Shaftesbury did think that the moral sense (whether one faculty or several working in tandem) is that which produces in us feelings of "like" or "dislike" for our own (first-order) affections. When the moral sense is operating properly, it produces positive feelings towards affections that promote the well-being of humanity and negative feelings towards affections that detract from the well-being of humanity. The second-order feelings that the moral sense produces can themselves motivate one to action, and people are virtuous if they act from those second-order feelings. In contrast, non-human animals, because they lack the powers of reflection necessary for consciousness of their own affections, do not possess a moral sense. So non-human animals are incapable of achieving virtue (C 175). (See IVM book 1, part 2, section 3.)
Also in line with sentimentalist moral theory is Shaftesbury's discussion of how a person can come to lose his or her sense of right and wrong. He argued (in a manner that anticipates Hume) that because our sense of morality is a sentiment, it can be opposed only by another sentiment, and not by reason or belief. "Sense of right and wrong," he wrote, "therefore being as natural to us as natural affection itself, and being a first Principle in our constitution and make, there is no speculative opinion, persuasion or belief which is capable immediately or directly to exclude or destroy it… [T]his affection being an original one of earliest rise in the soul or affectionate part, nothing beside contrary affection, by frequent check and control, can operate upon it, so as either to diminish it in part, or destroy it in the whole" (C 179). (See IVM book 1, part 3, section 1.)
But while Shaftesbury claimed that human moral judgment and human virtue essentially involve affection, he did not believe that all value depends on human affections. Goodness, which is the basis of morality and virtue, is an objective property, one that is independent of all human minds, and it is reason that can inform us of what that property consists. Goodness is real, eternal, and immutable, not something created by will, command, opinion, custom, or social contract. So even if every member of society were to approve of something harmful to humanity, it would still be vicious. For that which is destructive of the species can never be "virtue of any kind or in any sense but must remain still horrid depravity, notwithstanding any fashion, law, custom or religion which may be ill and vicious itself but can never alter the eternal measures and immutable independent nature of worth and virtue" (C 175). Fashion, law, custom, and religion can cause people to develop positive affections towards things harmful to humanity. But the development of such affections will never make such things right. The "eternal Measures" of right and wrong are not constituted by human affections. Right and wrong have an "immutable independent nature." And we are virtuous just to the extent that our affections lead us to act in accord with these eternal and immutable moral truths. (See LCE section 4; SC part 1, section 6; SC part 2, section 1; SC part 3, section 1; SC part 3, section 2; SA part 3; IVM book 1, part 2, section 1; IVM book 1, part 3, section 2; M part 2, section 2; M part 2, section 3; M part 2, section 4.)
Shaftesbury's commitment to a mind-independent moral standard fits well with his frequent claims of the naturalness of virtue and the unnaturalness of vice. There is a standard of morality, according to Shaftesbury, that is as real and mind-independent as standards of harmony and order in numbers. Moreover, Shaftesbury followed Stoic thinking in holding that human beings are designed to recognize that standard, that anticipations of it have been implanted in or imprinted on our souls. In making these claims about nature and virtue, Shaftesbury opposed those anti-innatists (such as Locke) whom he took to hold that morality originates solely custom, fashion, or education, a view that Shaftesbury thought people were drawn to in part by a foolish belief in ridiculous travel stories. In insisting on the naturalness of virtue, Shaftesbury also opposed those who held that morality originates solely in the external commands of a law-giver (divine or political). Shaftesbury believed that both of these incorrect views imply that our only reason to be moral is to acquire reward and avoid punishment (doled out by either society or lawgiver). Further, he insisted that such a position is both false, in that each of us has conclusive reason to be moral independently of rewards and punishments, as well as pernicious, in that belief in those other views can strengthen our selfishness and weaken our natural sociability. (For full discussion of many of the points in this paragraph, see Carey.)
In Shaftesbury's account of virtue, then, reason and sentiment both play essential roles. A person is virtuous if and only if her actions flow from the properly functioning moral sentiments. And reason tells us that moral sentiments are functioning properly if and only if they promote the well-being of the species as a whole. Shaftesbury's "sense of right and wrong" is truly a sentiment, but it is a sentiment that accurately represents an objective reality—i.e., a reality that is independent of human sentiments.
Shaftesbury maintained that virtue promotes the good of all humankind. As he wrote, "To love the public, to study universal good, and to promote the interest of the whole world, as far as lies within our power, is surely the height of goodness" (C 20). Or as he put it elsewhere, the virtuous person is the one who strives to develop an "equal, just and universal friendship" with all humankind (C 256). This view of the content of virtue—that to be virtuous is to promote the good of all humankind—fits well with Shaftesbury's teleological approach, for he believed that everything is designed to promote the good of the system of which it is a part. He also believed that every human being is a part of the system that is the human species as a whole. It was natural for him to think, therefore, that every human being is designed to promote the good of the human species as a whole. (It is important to remember, however, that this view of a system and its parts explains only Shaftesbury's view of the content of goodness, which is something that non-humans can also attain. Virtue or merit, which humans alone can attain, involves not merely acting for the good of the system but performing such actions in a self-aware or reflective manner.) Shaftesbury also consistently maintained that, in addition to promoting the good of humanity, virtue promotes the happiness of the virtuous person him or herself, and that vice harms not only humanity as a whole but also the vicious person. As Shaftesbury put it, "Virtue and interest may be found at last to agree" (C 167). Or as he wrote in the conclusion of the Inquiry, "And thus virtue is the good and vice the ill of everyone" (C 229–330). (See SC section 3; IVM book 2; M part 2).
This coincidence of virtue and happiness is just what Shaftesbury's teleological approach should lead us to expect. For teleological thinking generally involves the idea that the best life for a being is one that fulfills the being's natural end or purpose, and being virtuous is the end or purpose for which humans were designed. Shaftesbury corroborated this teleological connection between virtue and happiness by investigating the pleasures and pains of which human happiness and unhappiness consist. This investigation starts by drawing a broad distinction between pleasures of the body and pleasures of the mind. He next contends that a person's happiness depends more on mental pleasures than on bodily pleasures. He then seeks to show that living virtuously is by far the best way to gain the crucially important mental pleasures. Shaftesbury based much of his argument for the connection between virtue and happiness on the idea that the mental pleasures are within one's own control, insulated from the vicissitudes of "fortune, age, circumstances and humour" (C 334). As one of Shaftesbury's characters rhetorically asks, "How can we better praise the goodness of Providence than in this, 'That it has placed our happiness and good in things we can bestow upon ourselves'?" (C 335). The importance Shaftesbury placed on our control over our mental pleasures grows directly out of his appreciation for the Stoics. Indeed, it can be plausibly maintained that Stoicism is one of the strongest and most fundamental commitments of Shaftesbury's thought overall. (See SA part 3, section 2; IVM book 2; M part 3, section 3.)
What does the virtuous/natural life look like? What is the content of morality? Shaftesbury did not provide a set of moral principles of maxims that constitute morality (although he approved of those put forward in Henry More's Enchiridion Ethicum; see Rivers 130). But it is clear that he took the central feature of a virtuous life to be sociability, living in harmony with and promoting the happiness of other people.
Although Shaftesbury believed that being virtuous makes a person happy, it would be wrong to label him an egoist. In fact, he launched many attacks on both psychological egoism and ethical egoism, attacks that had as their main target Hobbes, and which clearly anticipated the influential anti-egoist arguments in Butler, Hutcheson, and Hume.
Shaftesbury argued that psychological egoism does a simply terrible job of explaining the wide spectrum of observable activities humans engage in. He ridiculed, for instance, egoistic interpretations of such things as "civility, hospitality, humanity towards strangers or people in distress," maintaining that it is much easier to explain such phenomena simply by positing real sociability and benevolence (C 55). He further pointed out that humans are often motivated by "passion, humour, caprice, zeal, faction and a thousand other springs, which are counter to self-interest" (C 54) He also claimed that the only way psychological egoism can be plausibly maintained is at the expense of becoming tautologous. (See SC section 2; SC section 3; M part 2, section 1.)
Shaftesbury also presented a pleasantly ironic ad hominem argument against egoists like Hobbes. A truly selfish knave, Shaftesbury tells us, would never publically advance the egoist thesis. While he would secretly hold that religion and morality are "a mere cheat," he would give others to think that he believed in them wholeheartedly, and would try to get them to believe in them as well, so that he could more easily use them to his "private advantage." Such knaves have "no quarrel with religion or morals, but know what use to make of both upon occasion… They are sure to preach honesty and go to church… [They] naturally speak the best of human nature that they may the easier abuse it" (C 44). But Hobbes did not behave like this. He tried to convince people of the selfishness of human beings precisely because he wanted to help humans beings, even though this conduct placed him at great peril. His very advancement of the egoist thesis refutes it. That "good sociable man, as savage and unsociable as he would make himself and all mankind appear by his philosophy, exposed himself during his life, and took the utmost pains that after his death we might be delivered from the occasion of those terrors. He did his utmost to show us that … 'there was nothing … which naturally drew us to the love of what was without or beyond ourselves' — though the love of such great truths and sovereign maxims, as he imagined these to be, made him the most laborious of all men in composing systems of this kind for our use and forced him, notwithstanding his natural fear, to run continually the highest risk of being a martyr for our deliverance" (C 42–3).
Against ethical egoism, Shaftesbury argued that virtue can exist only if people can be motivated by something other than self-interest. For persons' virtue, according to Shaftesbury, consists not in the actions they perform, but in their motives for performing them. And the motive with which we identify virtue is benevolence, not self-interest. Shaftesbury emphasized this point by drawing attention to the difference between a knave and a saint. We judge the saint virtuous, he explains, because we think he is motivated by something other than the selfishness of the knave. And if we came to believe that the saint were motivated solely by self-interest, we would no longer judge him to be virtuous. As he put it, "If the love of doing good be not of itself a good and right inclination, I know not how there can possibly be such a thing as goodness or virtue" (C 46). (See SC part 2, section 3, part 3; SC section 4, part 4, Section 1; SA part 1, section 2; IVM book 2, part 2, section 2; IVM book 2, part 2, section 4.)
Shaftesbury's belief that true virtue must flow from non-egoistic motives led him to criticize sharply the emphasis many religious moralists place on reward and punishment in the afterlife. As one of his characters explains when summarizing the goal of the Inquiry, "[The author of the Inquiry] endeavors chiefly to establish virtue on principles by which he is able to argue with those who are not as yet induced to own a god or future state. If he cannot do thus much, he reckons he does nothing" (C 266). Shaftesbury eschewed considerations of the afterlife in his case for virtue because he believed that persons who perform virtuous actions only because they desire reward and fear punishment have no real virtue in them at all. And persons who are constantly made to dwell on reward and punishment are likely to become overly concerned with their own "self-good and private interest," which must "insensibly diminish the affections towards public good or the interest of society and introduce a certain narrowness of spirit" (C 184). So an emphasis on reward and punishment cannot make people more virtuous, and it may very well make them less so (C 45–46). (See SC part 3, section 3; IVM book 1, part 3, section 3; M part 3, section 3.)
Shaftesbury thought that Locke's account of morality ultimately led to a view that was as perniciously egoistic as Hobbes's. Locke's denial of innate moral ideas, Shaftesbury believed, implied that morality was not something "real" or in the world but rather merely the result of custom or fashion. As Shaftesbury saw it, Locke's anti-innateness implies what we would call a culturally relativist position on morality. But if morality had such a status — if it made no demands that were independent of social sanction — then the only reason a person would have for being moral would be to avoid punishment and achieve reward. And if a person believed that morality originated only in societal sanction — regardless of whether that position was true — he or she would view morality as nothing more than an instrumental good to his or her own selfish ends. Shaftesbury thus took Locke's anti-innatism to be not only philosophically incorrect but also morally corrosive.
Shaftesbury did not try to defend his view by using the terminology of innate ideas, and his position may differ in some ways from thinkers such as Herbert of Cherbury or Ralph Cudworth, who did use such terminology. But what Shaftesbury claimed, and what he took to be in direct opposition to Locke, is that virtue is natural to humans. Shaftesbury emphasized that this does not mean that we are born with moral ideas already in our minds. Nor does it mean that all or even most humans will grow to be virtuous. Indeed, Shaftesbury thought that most people have upbringings that are flawed enough to prevent them from ever becoming fully natural. But just as most members of an animal species may fail to become fully healthy adult specimens (because, say, most of them live in unfavorable environments) while nonetheless it remains natural for members of that species to become fully healthy adults, so too it is natural for humans to be virtuous individuals even if most fail to do so.
Shaftesbury's anti-egoistic view also led him to an interesting consideration of what we should say to someone who asks for a reason to be virtuous, knowing that he will not be punished for vice; or, as Shaftesbury put the question, "Why should a man be honest in the dark?" (C 58). At times Shaftesbury suggested that a person who asks this question is already lost to virtue—that someone who cares about virtue for its own sake won't need another reason to act virtuously, and that someone who needs another reason doesn't have what it takes to be truly virtuous in the first place. In other contexts, Shaftesbury suggested that we should be honest even in the dark (i.e., virtuous even when we will not be punished for vice) because such conduct is a necessary condition for having an identity or unified self at all (C 127). The importance of developing a (unified) self is a striking, recurring theme in Shaftesbury's writings, and he suggested that helping one to develop such a self is the raison d'etre of philosophy (see Mijuskovic, Purviance, and Winkler). (See SC part 3, section 4; SA part 3, section 1).
A fascinating additional response Shaftesbury offered to the "Why be moral?" question is to equate a commitment to morality to the love of beauty. He wrote, "[A] real genius and thorough artist in whatever kind, can never, without the greatest unwillingness and shame, be induced to act below his character, and for mere interest, be prevailed with to prostitute his by performing contrary to its known rules … Be they ever so idle, dissolute or debauched, how regardless soever of other rules, they abhor any transgression and would choose to lose customers and starve rather than, by a base compliance with the world, to act contrary to what they call the justness and of work. 'Sir,' says a poor fellow of this kind, to his rich customer, 'you are mistaken in coming to me for such a piece of workmanship. Let who will make it for you as you fancy, I know it to be wrong. Whatever I have made hitherto has been true work. And neither for your sake or anybody's else shall I put my hand to any other.' This is virtue, real virtue and love of truth, independent of opinion and above the world. This disposition transferred to the whole of life perfects a character and makes that probity and worth which the learned are often at such a loss to explain. For is there not a workmanship and a truth in actions?" (C 117). Here Shaftesbury points out that we readily accept the possibility of an artist remaining committed to his or her art, regardless of the external rewards that may result from betraying it. We don't think such an artist needs an answer to the question, "Why produce beautiful works of art rather than schmaltz?" because we understand his or her valuing the art as an end in itself. But one's life — one's character and conduct — can be, or can fail to be, morally beautiful. And the commitment a person who appreciates moral beauty has to instantiate it can have the same force on her conduct as as an artist's commitment to produce beautiful works of art. Some might think that collapsing morality into beauty minimizes or undermines the importance of the former. But given Shaftesbury's realist view of beauty — and his equating truth with beauty — no such thing follows on his account.
It is noteworthy that despite his anti-egoism, Shaftesbury went to great lengths (as we mentioned in the previous section) to show that the virtuous person will be happier than the vicious person (IVM book II). At one point, he justified this procedure by contending that while it is best to act from entirely disinterested motives, we sometimes might have to rely on interested considerations to induce to morally correct action those people (including ourselves) who are not yet capable of achieving the heights of virtue. As he put it, "[W]e ought all of us to aspire, so as to endeavour that the excellence of the object, not the reward or punishment, should be our motive, but … where, through the corruption of our nature, the former of these motives is found insufficient to excite to virtue, there the latter should be brought in aid and on no account be undervalued or neglected" (C 269). (See IVM book 2; M part 2, section 3.)
Shaftesbury was highly critical of Hobbesian social contract theory. He argued that the selfish beings Hobbes described in his state of nature bear no resemblance to humans as they actually are. For naturally, Shaftesbury contended, humans are sociable. And society is thus humankind's natural condition. "In short, if generation be natural, if natural affection and the care and nurture of the offspring be natural, things standing as they do with man and the creature being of that form and constitution he now is, it follows that society must be also natural to him and that out of society and community he never did, nor ever can, subsist" (C 287). Shaftesbury also argued that if Hobbes's description of an amoral state of nature were correct, then it would be impossible for Hobbes ever to establish a duty to obey the laws of society. For if there had been no duty to keep one's promises in the state of nature, then the original contract could not have created a duty. And if the original contract did give rise to a duty, then there must have been a duty to keep one's promises even in the state of nature (C 51). Shaftesbury was not the first to criticize social contract theories in this way, but his version of this criticism is stated very clearly and was probably among the most influential. (See SC part 3, section 1; M part 3, section 4.)
Shaftesbury's positive political views emphasized the importance of "liberty in general" (C 443). He believed that totalitarianism made citizens less civil and increased the chances of violent conflict, while greater liberty made citizens more "polite" and peaceful. He thought, consequently, that government should grant its citizens broad freedom to publish what they wish and practice religion in the way they choose. (See SC passim; M part 2, Section 3.)
Shaftesbury endorsed freedom of speech in numerous works, maintaining that society will benefit from wide toleration of almost any opinion. His most conspicuous statement of this position comes in his discussions of enthusiasm, where he contended that religious views of all kinds out to be allowed expression and that ridicule of any kind of religion ought also be allowed. Shaftesbury argued for this position in a way that anticipates J.S. Mill's arguments for liberty of speech in chapter 2 of On Liberty. Shaftesbury claimed that widespread freedom of speech will eventually lead to correct opinions' winning out — that in the long run, right views will vanquish wrong, so long as there is an open field of intellectual competition. Later proponents of free speech would put this point in terms of "the marketplace of ideas." Shaftesbury used a similar simile — that of liberty of expression's being like "a free port" (C 31).
Shaftesbury's aesthetic theory was one of the first and most influential produced by an English-speaking philosopher. Beauty, for Shaftesbury, is a kind of harmony, proportion, or order. There is a sense in which it can be said that Shaftesbury believed that beauty is mind-dependent, in that he thought the beauty of the universe is dependent on the mind of God, the universe's artist-creator. But it is clear that Shaftesbury also thought that beauty is independent of human minds. The human responses that are the origin of human judgments of beauty are not the origin of beauty itself. Indeed, that there is a real standard of beauty (including moral beauty)—i.e., a standard with a real existence independent of human minds—is perhaps the central idea of Shaftesbury's thought as a whole. (See SC part 4, section 3; M part 3, Section 2.)
Shaftesbury held that all beauty can be placed in a three-part hierarchy. The lowest order of beauty belongs to "the dead forms"—physical things such as manmade works of art and natural objects (C 323). The second order of beauty belongs to human minds, or "the forms which form, that is, which have intelligence, action, and operation" (Ibid). The third order of beauty belongs to that "which forms not only such as we call mere forms but even the forms which form" (Ibid). This highest, most supreme and sovereign beauty, belongs to God, who has created everything in the world, including human minds. (See M part 1, section 3; M part 2, section 4; M part 3, section 2.)
Shaftesbury held that aesthetic appreciation is essentially disinterested. There has been some controversy about the sense in which Shaftesburean aesthetic judgment can be said to be disinterested, but it is clear enough that he thought true aesthetic appreciation of an object (like the motivation underlying true moral conduct) is independent of any ideas of how the object might promote one's own interests. Establishing this non-egoistic position on aesthetic judgment would also be the main goal of Hutcheson in his Inquiry concerning Beauty. (See M part 3, section 2.) But as we have already noted, Shaftesbury did not reduce beauty to subjective mental states, while Hutcheson's account of beauty may be reductionist in this way (i.e., ultimately based on the experience of the pleasures of an internal sense of beauty).
On some construals of aesthetic disinterestedness, true aesthetic considerations are independent of considerations of every other type. Aesthetics, on this view, is autonomous, the value of art is utterly distinct from value of any other sort, aesthetic responses are utterly distinct from any other responses. Shaftesbury did not affirm this kind of aesthetic independence. In fact, Shaftesbury's account of beauty is inextricably linked to his realist and theistic commitments, and he seeks to show that one and the same attitude toward the order of the universe is aesthetic, moral, and religious all at once. (That Shaftesbury believed in the unity of beauty, morality, and religion is another reason to doubt that he believed that there are distinct internal senses, such as the moral sense and the sense of beauty, a point we discussed in section 3.)
Shaftesbury maintained that virtue is a species of beauty, or that virtue and beauty are "one and the same." He suggested that the positive reaction we have when observing a moral action or character is the same as (or one example of) the positive reaction we have when observing the beauty of nature or works of art, and that the motive to act virtuously is the same as (or one example of) an artist's motive to create beauty. Shaftesbury also said that the virtuous person is one who attempts to make his or her life a thing of moral beauty in the same way that an artist tries to make beautiful works of art. In a similar vein, Shaftesbury equated bad taste with vice in that both constitute an opposition to the natural order of the universe. Developing good taste is, for Shaftesbury, a duty in the same way that developing a virtuous character is. (See SC part 4, section 3; SA part 3, Section 3; IVM book 1, part 2, section 3; M part 2, section 1; M part 3, section 2.)
Shaftesbury held that aesthetic judgment originates in an instinctive, natural human tendency. But he also maintained that one needs training in order to make correct aesthetic judgments. A great deal of practice and study are needed in order to develop true discernment or "taste." The judgment of an accomplished critic is thus likely to be more natural than the judgment of an uneducated rustic. To achieve the pinnacle of aesthetic appreciation and virtuous activity—to become fully natural—one has to have an education and acumen that most people do not possess. (See SA part 1, section 3; SA part 2, section 2; SA part 2, section 3; M part 3, section 2; Miscellaneous Reflections (MR) 3.)
Shaftesbury believed that everything in the world was created by a morally perfect God and that the world God created is the best of all possible ones. Any evil we observe is only apparent or subordinate, not real or ultimate. It's no surprise, then, that Leibniz said of Shaftesbury's work, "I found in it almost all of my Theodicy before it saw the light of day…. If I had seen this work before my Theodicy was published, I should have profited as I ought and should have borrowed its great passages." (See LCE section 5; M part 1, sections 2; M part 1, section 3; M part 2, section 3; M part 2, section 4.)
Shaftesbury based his belief in the existence of God on the argument for design (although at one point, C 306, he suggested that it is possible to give an a priori argument for the existence of God as well). He emphasized what he took to be the systematic nature of the universe. Everything in the universe fits together and works in perfect order, he argued, and so we can only conclude that the universe was created by a perfectly ordered, rational mind. Later versions of the argument from design, such as Paley's, are much indebted to Shaftesbury, and Hume's attack on the argument in his Dialogues concerning Natural Religion could have been aimed at Shaftesbury's Moralists just as easily as it could have been aimed at Butler's Analogy of Religion. (See M part 2, section 4; M part 2, section 5; M part 3, section 1.)
Shaftesbury was a proponent of natural religion. He denied that humans need supernatural revelation in order to discover and realize what constitutes true religion. Shaftesbury's natural religion had much in common with the views of the English Deists. However, he differed from them in holding that the essence of religion is not merely dispassionate belief in a few rationally-established tenets, but rather a feeling of expansive love for the universe as a whole. The truly religious frame of mind, for Shaftesbury, is that of reasonable enthusiasm. Shaftesbury took great pains to distinguish this kind of enthusiasm from false, non-rational enthusiasm, which leads to superstition, zealotry, fanaticism, and sectarian violence. Shaftesbury's reasonable enthusiasm is exemplified by Theocles, the hero of The Moralists, and it unites Shaftesbury's views of aesthetics, religion, and virtue. To truly appreciate the beauty of the world, as the character of Theocles is supposed to show, is to revere the world's Creator, which reverence also gives rise to love for all the Creator's creatures. (See LCE, passim; M part 1, section 3; M part 2, section 3; M part 3, section 2.)
The correct view is theism, which is the belief "that every thing is governed, ordered or regulated for the best by a designing principle or mind, necessarily good and permanent" (C 165). The incorrect view is daemonism, which is the belief that the governing mind is "not absolutely and necessarily good nor confined to what is best, but capable of acting according to mere will or fancy" (Ibid.). Theism, by holding up a perfect God for emulation, strengthens one's "benignity, firmness, or constancy [and the] good composure of the affections or uniformity of mind. And thus the perfection and height of virtue must be owing to the belief of a god" (C 192). Daemonism, in contrast, by holding up an arbitrary God, encourages selfish, cruel, and capricious conduct (C 191).
Still, even allowing the bare possibility of atheistic virtue was exceedingly controversial in Shaftesbury's day (not the least because it was commonplace to hold that duties to God constituted a significant part of virtue). It earned him in some quarters the dubious title of "free thinker" and marked a significant disengaging of religion and morality, even if Shaftesbury himself often emphasized the ways in which true religion promotes virtue.
His theology seems to have more in common with ancient Greek philosophy than with any specifically Christian teaching. Shaftesbury was highly critical of what he took to be the pernicious moral influence of certain Christian sects (such as Calvinism and other kinds of Puritanism) that emphasized the depravity of human nature and the jealousy of God. He seems to have believed that such religions were a form of daemonism, which, as we've seen, have a worse moral influence than even atheism. (See LCE section 4; LCE section 5; IVM book 1, part 3.) Shaftesbury's emphasis on the orderly functioning of the universe also led him to reject the traditional Christian view of miracles. He certainly did not think that miracles were needed to prove the existence of God. And he probably did not think that a perfectly ordered, rational mind, such as God's, would countenance miracles at all, as they constituted a violation of the natural order. (See M part 2, section 5.) In concert with his doubts about miracles, Shaftesbury was critical of claims of the Bible's infallibility and authority (C 436–442). The Scriptures are not self-verifying, he contended, and we ought to accept only those parts that can withstand rational scrutiny. He even raised questions about the more moderate Christian view that the Bible, while not completely infallible, is accurate about the general "substance" and "principal facts" of its subject-matter (C 438). According to Shaftesbury,we should extend the same historical methods to the Bible as we do to any other text whose accuracy we deem it important to determine (C 472–81)
Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, edited by Lawrence E. Klein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Letter Concerning Enthusiasm (in C, pp. 4–28).
Sensus Communis: An Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour (in C, pp. 29–69).
Soliloquy, or Advice to an Author (in C, pp. 70–162).
IVM
Inquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit (in C, pp. 163–230).
The Moralists, a Philosophical Rhapsody (in C, pp. 231–338).
Miscellaneous Reflections (in C, pp. 339–483).
The Life, Unpublished Letters and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury, edited by Benjamin Rand, London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1900.
Second Characters or the Language of Forms by the Right Honourable Anthony, Early of Shaftesbury, edited by Benjamin Rand, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914; reprinted, New York: Greenwood Press, 1969.
Preface to Benjamin Whichcote, The Works, Volume III, New York & London: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1977.
The Liberty Fund has published an excellent three-volume edition of the Characteristics, with Shaftesbury's original spelling and punctuation and with stellar reproductions of all of the illustrations: Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, edited and with a forward by Douglas Den Uyl, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund 2001.
Biography of Shaftesbury with extensive discussion of his thought as a whole
Voitle, Robert, 1984, The Third Earl of Shaftesbury 1671–1713, Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press.
Book length treatments of Shaftesbury's thought as a whole
Grean, Stanley, 1967, Shaftesbury's Philosophy of Religion and Ethics, Athens: Ohio University Press.
Klein, Lawrence E., 1994, Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Detailed discussions of many aspects of Shaftesbury's philosophy and its historical context
Carey, Daniel, 2006, Locke, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson: Contesting Diversity in the Enlightenment and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cassirer, Ernst, 1953, The Platonic Renaissance in England, translated by J.P. Pettegrove, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Darwall, Stephen, 1995, The British Moralists and the Internal Ought: 1640–1740, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Den Uyl, Douglas, 2001, Forward to Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, volume 1, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Gill, Michael B., 2006, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
Rivers, Isabel, 2000, Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, volume II. Shaftesbury to Hume, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneewind, J. B., 1998, The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
On Shaftesbury's account of morality
Grean, Stanley, 1964, "Self-Interest and Public Interest in Shaftesbury's Philosophy," Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2: 37–46.
Gill, Michael B., 2000, "Shaftesbury's Two Accounts of the Reason to Be Virtuous," Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38/4: 529–548.
Trianosky, Gregory W., 1978, "On the Obligation to be Virtuous: Shaftesbury and the Question, Why be Moral?" Journal of the History of Philosophy, 16: 289–300.
On Shaftesbury's view of innate ideas
Carey, Daniel, 2004, "Locke, Shaftesbury, and Innateness," Locke Studies, 4: 13–45.
On Shaftesbury's religious views
Bernstein, John A., 1978, "Shaftesbury's Reformation of the Reformation: Reflections on the Relation between Deism and Pauline Christianity," Journal of Religious Ethics, 6: 257–278.
Toole, Robert, 1976, "Shaftesbury on God and His Relationships to the World," International Studies in Philosophy, 8: 81–100.
On Shaftesbury's aesthetics
Arreguie, Jorge V and Arnau, Pable, 1994, "Shaftesbury: Father or Critic of Modern Aesthetics?," British Journal of Aesthetics , 34: 350–362.
Glauser, Richard, 2002, "Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury," Proceedings of the Aristotelians Society, Supplement, 76: 25–54.
McAllister, James W., 1991, "Scientists' Aesthetic Judgments," British Journal of Aesthetics, 31/4: 332–341.
Rind, Miles, 2002, "The Concept of Disinterestedness in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics," Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40: 67–87.
Savile, Anthony, 2002, "Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury," Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 76: 55–74.
Stolnitz, Jerome, 1961, "On the Significance of Lord Shaftesbury in Modern Aesthetic Theory," Philosophical Quarterly, 11: 97–113.
Townsend, Dabney, 1982, "Shaftesbury's Aesthetic Theory," Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 41/2: 205–213.
On Shaftesbury's views on self and personal identity
Mijuskovic, Ben, 1971, "Hume and Shaftesbury on the Self," Philosophical Quarterly, 21: 324–336.
Purviance, Susan M., 2004, "Shaftesbury on Self As a Practice," Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 2: 154–63.
Winkler, Kenneth P., 2000, " 'All Is Revolution in Us': Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume," Hume Studies, 26/1: 3–40.
On Shaftesbury's illustrations of the Characteristics
Paknadel, Felix, 1974, "Shaftesbury's Illustrations of the Characteristics," Journal of the Warburg and Courtnauld Institutes, 37: 290–312.
The Shaftesbury Project, hosted by Friedrich-Alexander-University (Erlangen) and funded with the help of the German Research Foundation.
Shaftesbury's Characteristics, Liberty Fund edition, edited by Douglas Den Uyl.
Earl of Shaftesbury entry in the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (good general account of Shaftesbury's thought).
Deism, entry by Francis Aveling in the Catholic Encyclopedia, (on contains paragraphs and subsections on Shaftesbury's relationship to Deism).
Francis Hutcheson, first of two sections on Hutcheson in the entry "Scottish Philosophy in the 18th Century", by Alexander Broadie (University of Glasgow), in this encyclopedia.
Benjamin Whichcote, section on Whichcote in the entry "Cambridge Platonists", by Sarah Hutton (Middlesex University), in this encyclopedia.
aesthetics: British, in the 18th century | contractarianism | creationism | deism | egoism | emotion: 17th and 18th century theories of | Hobbes, Thomas | Hume, David | Locke, John | Stoicism | teleology: teleological arguments for God's existence
Michael B. Gill <gillm@u.arizona.edu>
Australia SETIS, University of Sydney
Netherlands ILLC, University of Amsterdam


To order Queen Nation - Tribute to Queen concert tickets online please click a link above. We sell tickets to all types of concerts and other events.
Queen Nation is performing at Gaslamp Restaurant & Bar in Long Beach, CA.


NPR's Michele Norris and Steve Inskeep will interview the President today with a focus on foreign policy, previewing Obama's trip to the Middle East later this week.
According to the release, the interview will take place in the White House library and will air in two parts- tonight on All Things Considered and tomorrow on Morning Edition. You can also listen to the entire interview on NPR's website beginning this evening at 7pm.


Some of Carlton's current players waited a long time to play in their first finals match in 2009, and even then, the sniff of premiership success still seemed a long way off. So it should not surprise current-day Blues fans that some of our stars of the modern era are right at the top of an unfortunate list – that of most games played for the Blues without winning a flag. However, as we shall see, there is always hope, particularly when you play for a club as successful as the Old Dark Navy Blues.
During Season 2010, three Bluebaggers found themselves approaching the magic 200 game mark. This was not just a sign of longevity, but also evidence of real ability - very few players make it to 100, let alone 200 senior appearances in this game. Ryan Houlihan, Heath Scotland and Chris Judd were all in reach the double century milestone. Most readers will know that Chris Judd was already a Premiership Player. Whilst neither Scotland and Houlihan had yet become a Premiership Player, they each had historical referees that may have given them motivation.
Whilst the legendary status of John Nicholls is well recognised, very few people realise that Big Nick only eventually won a Premiership in his 200th game of VFL football! Others in this heady list include Rod Ashman, Frank Gill and Serge Silvagni, although for younger fans the story of Mil Hanna should surely show that flag success could be just around the corner. Hanna's career at Carlton began shortly before our 1987 triumph, and was hampered by serious injury in his first five seasons. But he recovered, and went on to a fine career, during which he was a key component of our 1995 Premiership.
Unfortunately, Houlihan would retire in 2011 with 201 games to his name, but no flag.
Player Year Opponent Game No. in Premiership Carlton Game No.
Scotland could potentially find himself joining the Wells-Spalding-Williams club. Greg Wells, Earl Spalding and Greg Williams all joined the Blues after each had spent considerable time at other clubs without flag success, and all three became vital players in their own right in Premiership teams for the Old Dark Navy Blues.
Of course, longevity alone does not guarantee a flag. Carlton's first decade in the 21st century was among the worst in our history, with stalwarts Lance Whitnall (216 games) and Matthew Lappin (196 Carlton games) heading the list of Blues who have played most games without a flag.
In fact, in bringing up 200 games Houlihan was only the fourth Blue to start game 200 without a flag (after Vallence, Nicholls, Whitnall) and only the first Blue to not have played in a GF by that stage. Poor Houla!
But after all of the sobering up above, we shouldn't forget the other side of the coin; some of the shortest routes to glory. In fact, a select few Blues have actually won flags within their first 10 games, with Jimmy Morris holding the quite extraordinary record of having claimed one in only his fifth match!
Articles: Waiting to play Finals Footy | The Shortest Route to Glory!
1996 - Carlton Social Notes (15/05/96).


Avid social media user and content creator on YouTube. He's known for publishing challenge and prank videos as well as vlogs to his self-titled channel, where he's gained over 60,000 subscribers.
He first became active on social media in January of 2014 with Twitter.
He has done live broadcasts on YouNow and began to create lip-sync videos on musical.ly as well.
He has a sister named Natalia. He is from Tulsa, Oklahoma.
He posted a YouTube video called "Adele Hello Prank Calls" in December of 2015.


text:
Hutchmoot: Sonata at Payne Hollow
By Pete Peterson • September 22, 2020
A man named Harlan Hubbard—a writer, a painter, a musician, a husband, and a lover of the good earth—once wrote: "It happened this morning that I left for wild, far off places."
Some 15 years ago, though I didn't realize it at the time, I was myself setting out for a wild and far off place when I first read Wendell Berry's novel, Jayber Crow. The place came in the form of a fictional town called Port William, and the wild in a cast of beloved characters. But as I'd learn as I explored the breadth and depth of Berry's writing, his towns and people, his sentences and poems, were not the destination itself—but instead the path, a path that would lead me not from the world but deeper into it. Berry's love of Port William (and by extension, his love of his actual home in Port Royal, Kentucky) would teach me to love my own places and my own people in deeper, truer ways.
It happens in life that we often find ourselves in need of a guide, of someone to show us the wild and far-off facts that often lie right in our own backyards or back-woods or creeks or brothers or sisters or wives or husbands. Wendell Berry, I suspect, is no different from you or I in that regard. And though many of those who guided him may be unknown to us, I think perhaps Harlan Hubbard was one of them.
It happens in life that we often find ourselves in need of a guide, of someone to show us the wild and far-off facts that often lie right in our own backyards or back-woods or creeks or brothers or sisters or wives or husbands.
He was a man of the generation before Berry, as Berry is of the generation before mine. Harlan loved the earth and was spellkept by it all his life. The industrial noise of engines and the callous grind of commerce frustrated him. He dreamed of an escape from them, and so in time he married Anna and together they left for wild, far off places upon a shanty boat on the Ohio river. They would make it as far as New Orleans before returning to the Kentucky hills to settle in Payne Hollow, a little piece of earth along the river they loved. There they lived out the remainder of their lives.
They had no running water, no electricity, no modern conveniences, but their lives were full of wonder and music. She played piano and cello, he the violin. And their songs filled the Kentucky woods for 30 years. He also was a serious writer and a talented painter, and the subject of both his words and his art was the earth about him, the river, and the preservation of its beauty.
It's impossible to know the story of Anna and Harlan without seeing them as literary and ideological ancestors of Wendell Berry, as if in them we better understand the soil out of which Port William and its characters have grown. In fact, the cover of every one of Wendell Berry's novels is adorned with one of Harlan's paintings, like a watermark suggesting some underlying ownership or heritage.
To say that without Harlan and Anna Hubbard we might have no Wendell Berry is to state the case too strongly. But certainly, I think, their lives have given greater depth and direction to Berry and his work, for as T. S. Eliot said, "No poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone." And therefore to know Harlan and Anna Hubbard is to know Wendell Berry with more completeness than we have without them.
Anna Hubbard died in 1986. Harlan followed her two years later in 1988. And in the wake of their lives and music and writing and painting and care for the goodness of the earth, it seems right that Wendell Berry would offer us his remembrance of them. That remembrance takes the form of a fifteen- minute, one-act play called Sonata at Payne Hollow.
On October 11th, The Rabbit Room is proud to present a special staged reading of this unique piece of theater. Drawing talent from Nashville's rich theater community, we aim to create, in the space of just a few short minutes on stage, something that captures the timelessness of Berry's words and also of Harlan & Anna's lives. During our online event, Hutchmoot: Homebound, join us down at the riverbank for Wendell Berry's Sonata at Payne Hollow.
Click here to register for Hutchmoot: Homebound.
Pete Peterson is the author of the Revolutionary War adventure The Fiddler's Gun and its sequel Fiddler's Green. Among the many strange things he's been in life are the following: U.S Marine air traffic controller, television editor, art teacher and boatwright at the Florida Sheriffs Boys Ranch, and progenitor of the mysterious Budge-Nuzzard. He lives in Nashville with his wife, Jennifer, where he's the Executive Director of the Rabbit Room and Managing Editor of Rabbit Room Press.
Welcome to Hutchmoot
Hutchmoot.com | MindyCook.com

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Phoma lirelliformis är en lavart. Phoma lirelliformis ingår i släktet Phoma, ordningen Pleosporales, klassen Dothideomycetes, divisionen sporsäcksvampar och riket svampar.

Underarter

Arten delas in i följande underarter:

 lirelliformis
 weigelae-roseae

Källor

Sporsäcksvampar
lirelliformis

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
ITBusiness.ca | Business Advantage Through Technology
Follow Us RSS Follow @itbusinessca Like us on Facebook IT Business on Linkedin Subscribe to us on YouTube Subscribe
ITBusiness.ca Menu
Creative Capital
CMO Digital
Unboxing for Business
All Hands on Tech
2 Truths and a Lie with Canadian Technology Leaders
LGBTQ2S+ VOICES in IT
LightningPR
Digital Transformation Week 2021
SMBs move cautiously into the cloud
Grant Buckler
@grantbuckler
Published: October 31st, 2011
Not quite half of Canada's small and medium businesses are – at least knowingly – using cloud computing today. Of those that are, about two-thirds use software as a service products like Salesforce.com and Google Apps. The less familiar concepts of infrastructure, platform and hardware as a service have penetrated only five to 15 per cent of SMBs so far.
Those figures come from ITBusiness.ca's e-mail survey of Canadian SMBs, completed by about 300 businesses across the country in September. About 56 per cent of respondents said they had used no cloud technology this year, 36 per cent reported using software as a service, just under 15 per cent infrastructure as a service (AppEngine, VMWare, etc.), about nine per cent platform as a service (like Amazon Web Services or Microsoft's Windows Azure platform) and about eight per cent hardware as a service, meaning they had hardware managed remotely by a managed service provider.
Free Download: | Read the full report from ITBusiness.ca
These figures may understate the impact of cloud computing on SMBs, because not everyone understands the terms or realizes when they are using cloud services, suggests Stuart Crawford, president and chief operating officer of Ulistic Inc., and a member of ITBusiness.ca's editorial advisory board.
Related Story | Cloud providers rapped for hyping cloud security
Carmi Levy, an independent IT consultant in London, Ont., says he knows of a local public relations firm that uses Evernote – a note-taking application whose online component allows access from multiple devices – extensively, yet "if you ask them if they've committed to the cloud they'll say no."
Whether or not a business is consciously pursuing cloud technology, Levy observes, "chances are it's already affecting your business life."
And that's probably good for smaller businesses, he says, because the cloud can offer them capabilities they would find hard to provide in-house. "What SaaS and cloud-based services are doing is they're levelling the playing field, because now they're taking away the need to bring in big-iron infrastructure."
There could also be small businesses using platform as a service offerings without recognizing them as such, Crawford says – for instance, running SQL Server on Azure. But, says Andrew Muroff, chief information officer at Premier Salons Inc., a Toronto-based salon and spa operator that uses Google Apps throughout its North America-wide operations, software as a service is the most comfortable form of cloud computing for SMBs today. "Those are the things people can dive into with relatively little risk."
Muroff, who says he has been a champion of cloud computing since his time at Toronto-based 80/20 Solutions Inc. – which offers a hosted marketing automation system – says Google Apps saves Premier $300,000 to $400,000 a year on software licensing and speeds up some operations.
Related Story | SMBs don't have time, money for social media
When the survey asked SMBs what concerns they have about adopting cloud services, one issue came out well ahead. About 35 per cent of respondents named security risks as their biggest concern.
Crawford says he can understand business owners being concerned about the security of data in the cloud, but believes that today, the cloud might well be securest place SMBs can choose to put their data.
"Data in the cloud at a reputable organization is more secure than sitting in your office," he says.
"Who has more money to spend on security?" Muroff asks. "Google, or me?"
Tom Moss, director of products and services for security software vendor Trend Micro Canada in Toronto, says SMBs considering cloud services do need to ask some questions. Software as a service providers should have service-level agreements that include provisions for security. "Small businesses can make an assessment," he says – "do I feel secure given what is there?"
With infrastructure as a service, he says, the service provider still controls the platform and "you're pretty much going to have to live with whatever security controls they provide," so it's also important to understand what the provider will do for you. With platform as a service, "there is no SLA for security" and the responsibility falls mainly on the SMB.
Businesses using any sort of hosting should consider encrypting data in case it gets left behind when they move off a provider's systems, Moss adds, as providers' procedures for getting rid of such data may not always be foolproof.
After security, costs and pricing structure was the next biggest concern about moving to the cloud, named by around 26 per cent of survey respondents. Ownership and access of data came in at around 18 per cent and data sovereignty concerns about information being stored outside of Canada was the top worry for about 17 per cent. The "other" category accounted for the balance.
Crawford says cloud computing is sometimes seen as more expensive than the traditional licence model, analogous to renting property being more costly than buying in the long term. But it's not necessarily so when you consider immediate access to upgrades at no added cost, not to mention the possible tax advantages of operating expense versus capital cost. And cloud solutions help businesses stay current with the latest technology, he says.
Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn Share with Google+
Adobe Flash CS 5.5 is 'PowerPoint on steroids,' student says
CRTC leads international effort to stop cross-border telemarketing calls
Azure, cloud, Evernote, Google, small business, software as a service, state of the SMB
About Grant Buckler
Freelance journalist specializing in information technology, telecommunications, energy & clean tech. Theatre-lover & trainee hobby farmer.
Follow Follow @grantbuckler on Twitter
Microsoft making Cloud for Retail generally available
Hashtag Trending Dec. 23- Social media distrust; engineers love blockchain; No vaccine, no pay at Intel
Accenture extends its partnership with AWS to help businesses digitally transform
Tweets by itbusinessca
GET NEWS AND INSIGHTS CRITICAL TO YOUR BUSINESS Receive the IT Business Newsletter and stay informed.
Websites ITWC.ca IT World Canada.com Channel Daily News.com Direction Informatique.com
Community Subscribe About Us Contact Us Social Media Tech Videos Tech News Tech Blogs Tech Slideshows Tech Events CMO Digital
Follow @itbusinessca Like us on Facebook IT Business on Linkedin Subscribe to us on YouTube RSS
© 2022 ITBusiness.ca


text:
AllEducationFinanceFoodHealthTechTravel
Signal downloads skyrocket 4200% after WhatsApp announced mandatory sharing of users data with Facebook
Naveenika Chauhan - January 14, 2021 0
Someone's loss is someone's gain, especially when it comes to consumers, for as the saying goes – the customer is the king; it is...
InstaDiet- Delicious Diet Food Delivered To Your Doorstep!
inventiva - January 5, 2021 0
The wait is over, people. Your one-stop solution to convenient and delicious weight loss is here! Want to know more about it? Read on. Scientists,...
Indian Start-ups that registered a success story in the year of the pandemic; Eleven Indian companies that stood out and attained Unicorn Status
Naveenika Chauhan - January 2, 2021 0
The year 2020 has passed us by, many of us were determined to say goodbye to the year, which has been one of the...
Bri Innovations Launches Two "Sensibly Innovative" Products
Tamanna - December 3, 2020 0
Recently, we have seen a surge in new products that would never have been thought, if the covid had not affected India. It's an...
Jakarta-based Wahyoo gets $5 million Series A to help small eateries digitize their operations
Anukriti Priya - August 5, 2020 0
While growing up, Peter Shearer watched his mother get up every day at 2AM or 3AM to prepare for her catering business. For many...
Government and big private firms did not pay Rs 6 lakh crore to MSME sector, Nitin Gadkari said – will find a solution in...
inventiva - March 20, 2020 0
Gadkari rejects allegations of budget cuts in MSME sector The Prime Minister has targeted to reach the Indian economy by 5 Trillion dollars by 2024 Micro,...
Venture Arm of SBI Capital Launches ₹400 Cr Fund Focused on SMEs
inventiva - November 21, 2018 0
SBICAP Ventures Ltd (SVL), an alternative asset manager and a wholly owned subsidiary of State Bank of India's SBI Capital Markets Ltd, is seeking...
China's Largest Bank Sets Up $200 Mn Fund for Investing in Indian MSME Startups
Indian SMEs and small startup ventures, which are facing a funding crunch since a year or so, can rejoice now as the Indian unit...
Atal Innovation Mission to Launch Innovation Challenge , Set Up 100+ Incubators Across India
Atal Innovation Mission (AIM), a flagship initiative set up by the NITI Aayog, have two major announcements about its plan for fostering innovation and...
Exclusive Interview with Karan Gupta, Founder Of "Qraamen" (Celebrities' Favourite Brand) -Which Offers Men's Grooming Products for Sexier You
Tamanna - November 2, 2020 0
Skin blemishes bother us all. Compared with men, women have a wide variety of skincare products in the market. But skincare is not limited...
Exclusive Interview with Isha Kampani,CEO of "Intellistall"-A Fully Digital Marketing Company to Help Your Business Grow Rapidly
Tamanna - August 25, 2020 0
In the wake of COVID-19, digital epidemiology rose rapidly. Thus, the pandemic coronavirus crisis seemingly provides a swift glimpse into a future world, in...
BRI Innovations : Bridging The Innovators To Their Industry
Priyadharshini Varadharajan - August 18, 2020 0
How many of us have used Korean products and wondered, "Goodness, how are they making it?" Are we not among those people who have...
Exclusive Interview with Sanjoy Sachdev, Chairman of the World Famous Organization "Love Commandos"
Tamanna - August 1, 2020 0
Love Commandos is a world-famous non-profit organization and charity dedicated to rescuing star-crossed Indian lovers. For the past ten years, using a network of...
Astrology – An Indian Vedic Science!
bhavyta - July 27, 2020 0
Samarpit Kanwatia is a Mumbai based acclaimed celebrity astrologer with an experience of more than 18 years having numerous clients, pan world. His dealing with multiple clients,...
Covaxin issues a warning – only those who are healthy should get the vaccine; if such is the disclaimer, then what about those who...
Here we go again. In yet another disclaimer Bharat Biotech the manufactures of Covaxin, have come out with a fact sheet about who should...
Bird Flu takes a devastating stature as we sit on the brim of battling coronavirus
Ananya Narang - January 20, 2021 0
We fought a pretty tough battle with 2020 and our journey with 2021 has begun. We may not be sure of good things happening...
PM Fasal Bima Yojna completed 5 years and PM Modi congratulated the beneficiaries, But do we really have something to congratulate about?
On December 13, 2021, PM Fasal Bima Yojna that had its launch in 2016, completed 5 years and Prime minister Mr. Narendra Modi addressed...
Tesla steps in India as promised by Elon Musk last year
One of US' topmost valuable company Tesla is all ready to set foot into the Indian automobile market and Indians have been nothing but...
Donald Trump creates history by becoming the first US president to be impeached twice
Well, one person that can't stay off headlines for a long time definitely has to be Donald Trump. And oh, not in headlines for...
India's top IT companies aim at hiring freshers for FY22; A look at some of the top recruiting trends in the year 2021 as...
There is some encouraging news coming in from India's top IT firms, as they open up the recruitment drive and collectively plan to hire...
Blockchain startups, especially in Israel, seeing a lot of investment and success
inventiva - January 19, 2021 0
Cryptocurrencies, especially bitcoin, have become 'the talk of the town' over the last couple of years, largely due to the large rises and equally...
Rafale to feature in Republic Day parade for first time
The newly inducted Rafale fighter aircraft will feature in India's Republic Day parade on January 26 and culminate the flypast by carrying out the...
The E-commerce space sees the highest YoY growth – Tata Digital in final stage of takeover talks with BigBasket; BigBasket aims to go public...
Speaking at the Prarambh Startup India International Summit on Saturday, Hari Menon shared that BigBasket's future plans include aiming towards an IPO. Although he did...
Indian economy may contract 25 pc in current fiscal
The Indian economy is not recovering as fast as the government claims and the country's economy may contract 25 per cent in the current...
Get Ready: The Big Bash League is around the corner
Anukriti Priya - December 1, 2020 0
With almost nine successful running years, the Big Bash League is back and is all ready to take off on the tenth of December...
Dare to Dream Innovation Contest: DRDO
inventiva - October 28, 2020 0
Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) has launched the second edition of the Dare to Dream Innovation Contest. In light of India's vision of an 'Atmanirbhar...
The First WPT Online India Series by Adda52
The excitement of live poker action might be missing in this time of pandemic from the domestic sector. However, the poker brands seem to...
Fabletics' Don Ressler and Kevin Hart to talk D2C at Disrupt 2020
Anukriti Priya - September 1, 2020 0
The world of retail has been absolutely rocked by the coronavirus pandemic. Stores closed across the country, and at the same time, online sales...
IFA's executive director discusses why the tech show must go on
Anukriti Priya - August 29, 2020 0
In June, the CTA announced that CES 2021 would go forward in-person. The event was set to have slipped under the wire — having...
Home Trends AI Weekly: Despite fears of job-stealing robots, AI did a lot of...
AI Weekly: Despite fears of job-stealing robots, AI did a lot of good this year
By inventiva
In case you somehow missed the dire predictions regarding artificial intelligence: AI is coming for our jobs. Over 10 percent of positions currently occupied by humans will be eliminated by cheaper, more efficient automated replacements, and experts agree AI could make redundant as many as 75 million jobs by 2025.
With new reports sounding the alarm bells on what seems a daily basis, it's all too easy to get caught up in the negativity. But as we reflect back on a few of AI's achievements in 2018, I'd argue it's tough not to be encouraged by the good it can do — specifically, the ways AI can augment skilled humans.
Recall Unanimous AI, a startup headquartered in San Francisco and founded by Stanford-educated computer scientist and CEO Louis Rosenberg. Its swarm intelligence platform — which uses, as you might have guessed, machine learning — makes predictions with the help of living, breathing people. In a study conducted earlier this year by Stanford University's School of Medicine, a group of radiologists achieved 82 percent diagnostic accuracy with Unanimous AI's solution, compared to human experts' 73 percent accuracy.
"Humans have experience, knowledge, wisdom, and intuition that's not being represented in these big datasets," Rosenberg told VentureBeat in an earlier phone interview. "It takes 12 years to become a radiologist — 12 years of talking to other doctors, observing and processing the world, and filling the databases inside their heads. There's value in this."
Then there's the encouraging work emerging from programs like Microsoft and National Geographic's AI for Earth Innovation Grant, which seeks to invest tens of millions of dollars over the next four years to bolster AI development across five key areas — agriculture, biodiversity, conservation, climate change, and water. This year's winners include faculty director of Stanford's Natural Capital Project Gretchen Daily, who's working on a way of measuring the impact of dams and reservoirs around the world, and Solomon Hsiang, associate professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, who will use 1.6 million historical aerial photographs to identify the effect of droughts and climate change on human migration in Africa.
READ Helm.ai raises $13M on its unsupervised learning approach to driverless car AI
READ Mews grabs $33M Series B to modernize hotel administration
"We're well aware of the power of taking machine learning-based approaches to solving problems," Lucas Joppa, chief environmental officer at Microsoft, told VentureBeat earlier this month. "There's so little we know about the natural world, [and] the technology sector has the potential to accelerate the next phase of Earth exploration … I wake up incredibly enthusiastic about how much there is left to be discovered."
Need more examples of AI's potential for positive impact? What about Huawei's Facing Emotions app for visually impaired users, which uses a smartphone camera and algorithms to "translate" seven universal emotions — anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, surprise, and contempt — into corresponding sounds, or an interactive game from Montreal startup Stradigi AI that uses computer vision to help people learn American Sign Language (ASL)? Facebook is using AI to generate photo captions for blind users. Chipmaker Intel recently supported Wheelie, a startup working on a wheelchair that enables riders to navigate with facial expressions, through its AI for Social Good initiative.
And earlier this month Xprize, a nonprofit organization that aims to spark projects that "solve societal grand challenges," provided an update on its four-year effort to develop scalable AI technologies that address some of the world's most difficult problems. In a bonus milestone round timed to coincide with the NeurIPS conference in Montreal, Aifred Health, a Montreal startup developing a system that uses data about mental health to help clinicians choose personalized patient treatment programs, took home first place and $35,000.
On the ecological front, Google and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) earlier this year announced a project that uses machine learning models to identify endangered whale species and inform shipping companies of their locations. Separately, the search giant detailed its work to predict impending severe floods by setting AI models loose on historical weather data, as well as its dogged pursuit of models that can predict the location of aftershocks up to one year after a major earthquake.
READ Sumeru Equity Partners buys majority stake in SocialChorus with $100M investment
READ Astro Gaming reveals customizable pro controller for PS4 and PC
"Artificial intelligence is not just helping people create more useful products — we use it in a lot of ways throughout many Google products — but is also emerging as a really powerful tool for improving the society that we live in," Google AI head Jeff Dean said onstage at a Google event in October. "In fact, I'd argue that there's never been a better time to be working in the field of artificial intelligence."
Source: VentureBeat
To Read Our Daily News Updates, Please Visit Inventiva Or Subscribe Our Newsletter & Push.
AI Weekly
category-/Science
Previous articleSpot is a cryptocurrency app to control all your wallets and exchange accounts
Next articleProBeat: DxOMark's Pixel 3 camera score shows AI isn't enough
inventiva
Naveenika Chauhan - January 19, 2021
inventiva - January 19, 2021
READ 6 CEOs and execs share the productivity apps they can't live without
What is the new Faceless Tax Reform which will make taxpayers feel Fearless? Explained!
Apple iPhone 12 – The 2020 iPhone is a tiny smartphone!
How Gold Digging Global Pharma Lobby Is Making Fool Of Desperate & Frustrated Common People With Their Lies About Coronavirus Covid-19 Vaccine For Making...
Supreme Court Extends The Moratorium Period On Repayment Of Loan To Another 2 Years
Narendra Modi Likely To Declare A Emergency In India Under Article 360
List of 150 Venture Capital Firms in India
Trends11321
Stories5215
STARTUPS2058
Press Release467
Inventiva is a Business Magazine & website covering startups, business, economy & finance, trade insights, updates on launches, events, funding & investment rounds, mergers and acquisitions, awards, technology trends, data insights, marketing & business trends, strategy & planning. Inventiva cover entrepreneurship articles & stories and interviews of entrepreneurs, ceo, cxo, top management, reviews of products and services & tech, ai, ml, vr, analytics news.
© 2020 Inventiva is a part of Nine Network Private Limited. Nine Network is a company registered under Indian Companies Act 2013 and Registered As Nine Network Private Limited CIN: U74140DL2016PTC289760. Inventiva is a fully Licensed & Registered Print Media With RNI (Registrar Of Newspaper For India) Under MIB (Ministry of Information & Broadcasting) With Registration Number DELBIL/2018/76160. NINE NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED incorporated/ registered as a Private Limited Company on 19-01-2016, is recognized as a startup by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion. DIPP Registration & Certificate No.: DIPP20903
Covaxin issues a warning – only those who are healthy should...
Bird Flu takes a devastating stature as we sit on the...


text:
I want to live in a baugruppe
By David Roberts on Aug 8, 2013
stevecadmanA baugruppe.
If you could create your perfect living situation, what would it look like?
Right now most people's choices are limited to single-family homes, apartments, or condos. But what if the choices weren't limited? What if you could stitch together your ideal scenario?
As a devotee of the medium chill, I think about this a lot. And here's my own personal answer.
I want to live in a dense urban area where groceries, parks, schools, and restaurants are all within walking distance — where I can live comfortably without a car. I'd like for the district/neighborhood to be structured in such a way as to encourage casual encounters with neighbors. I'd like it to have a robust sense of community.
The building (or buildings) I lived in would be a type of cohousing, which is to say, it would be shared by a group of families who co-owned it. There would be a large common area with a big kitchen, eating space, and lounge, where families could take turns making meals for the whole group. There would be a shared outdoor area with a large garden and stuff for the kids to play on. And each family would have its own (modestly sized) unit, say, two bedrooms, two bathrooms, an office, a kitchen, and a small living room. To reach the individual units, you'd have to pass through the common area, which would encourage spontaneous socializing.
The families who lived in my building would be my friends, basically — a group of us at similar stages in our lives, with common interests and values. (This would include some childless friends, perhaps some grandparents too, just for a nice age mix.) We would share child care, tools, and time with one another. It would be an intentional community.
The building(s) would be modern in aesthetic and built to passivhaus standards, with tons of insulation, natural light, and fresh air circulation. It would have solar panels, batteries, a natural gas microgenerator, a geothermal heat-exchanger, and smart appliances, all networked together by a smart whole-home energy management system. It would create more energy than it consumes. It would have the ability to island itself from the grid in the case of emergency. And it would be located near a transit hub.
Ha ha, yes, of course it is.
But what if it wasn't? What if I had the money? What if I had a group of families together, ready and willing to participate? Is there anything like this even possible?
I've looked at several cohousing places (primarily online, a few in person) and most of them are just a bit too far down the hippie, commune-ish side of the spectrum for me. My friends and I have idly talked about trying to buy houses on the same block, but that's not really the same thing. Theoretically we could all buy condos in the same building, but a) it's really difficult to find condos big enough for families, b) most condo buildings are awful, especially the common areas, c) it wouldn't really be an intentional community, and d) it's difficult to find truly sustainable building practices among condo developers.
What if we could build our own condo building? Well, good luck finding a developer that will customize such a project to the needs, values, and specifications of a particular group of families.
Anyway, all this was on my mind recently when I ran across a fascinating series of posts by Michael Eliason of the Brute Force Collaborative, a Seattle design firm. They are all about baugruppen, or building groups, which appear to address exactly the kinds of concerns I mention above.
zanderroth architektenBaugruppe in Prenzlauerberg.
Eliason introduces baugruppen here. The basic idea is that a group of people comes together to work directly with architects and designers, bypassing developers, to build a shared dwelling that they own collectively (a co-op, basically). Taking developers out of the picture saves money — 25 to 30 percent in Berlin, where baugruppen are common — and opens up space for much more ambitious, innovative, and sustainable architecture. It also fosters cooperation and community among members of the collective.
In this post, Eliason notes that many jurisdictions (Freiburg, Tuebingen, Hamburg, and Berlin) recognize the benefits of baugruppen and structure public policy to encourage them. "There are a number of solid reasons why cities should be interested in stimulating and facilitating such undertakings," he says. "Jobs, affordable housing within city limits, maintaining or expanding the tax base, and stimulating development of vacant/awkwardly shaped/smaller lots developers may see as too risky are just a few."
This post covers why baugruppen tend to save money over conventional developer-driven projects. I like this in particular:
For me, the big point on cost-effectiveness is that a member gets a unit tailored to their specific needs — as well as desired communal spaces if space and budget allows. Developers don't normally fine-tune projects like this, as it would add even more cost and time. Additionally, development projects tend to be directed towards the average user, whom they try to appeal to, however there are some notable exceptions to this, especially here in Seattle. But before a BG even brings on an architect (assuming there isn't one already in the group) — they'll have discussed the type of lifestyle they would like to live, the type of building they would like to dwell in. A bunch of musically-oriented families founding a BG? They might plan a rehearsal space as part of the common area. Older couples might want a co-owned guest unit they could let their friends or children stay in, thus keeping their unit smaller and more affordable. Want a say in what color your facade is? How about typical finishes in common areas? BGs can offer that level of communal authorship.
iJuliAn
This post is about the innovative efficiency and sustainability measures popping up in baugruppen. This one is about the wide variety of sizes and styles among them. And this one is about the communities that form around them:
There are a number of ways baugruppen are formed — some are initiated by friends or acquaintances that already share a common bond or set of core values. Others need additional members, and declare a strong central concept (bikes only! DINKS ok! Intergenerational granola-loving families!), a rallying cry for those that may be interested in joining up. …
Once formed, a large amount of community buy-in must take place. To actually build a baugruppe is no small feat. Like co-housing, the design process of many baugruppen is driven by future tenants. Concepts, themes and ideas are developed, processes are formulated to move project planning forward. The land situation must be worked out. Architects work with the owners on the design — both groups bringing needs and constraints to the table. This is not usually the case with developer-initiated projects, but on the best projects, it is this close collaboration with clients that really drives success. There has to be consensus amongst the members to move forward, schedules have to be maintained. This is a process of give and take — actual democracy in action! Though the process may take more time (e.g. weekly meetings for up to and over a year) and definitely involves challenges (There should be bike storage! The stairs should be yellow!) — it seems like a great way to engage your future neighbors while formulating a building that meets your needs in a way other models can't or won't. Imagine having a say in whether or not your building would have a roof terrace, or how your building engages the public! Want to implement ecological and social requirements for a project? Then do it! How about prioritizing car-free living like in Vauban? Go for it! This process seems to induce a greater sense of pride, respect and sense of community than other models — perhaps owing to the greater degree of trust and respect garnered through the planning process.
zanderroth architekten
All the posts are filled with specific examples (and photos) of baugruppen. Check them out.
As Eliason says, this mostly seems to be happening in Germany (which is way ahead on community energy projects too). But it sounds like exactly the kind of thing I have in mind. And I know I can't be the only one who dreams of sustainable urban living, with a community and a home that reflect my values.
What would it take to get these things going in the U.S.? Or at least, ahem, in Seattle? Do any of you readers have experience with them? Thoughts about the regulatory or financing barriers in the U.S.? Educate me.
More in Cities	All Cities
grid-locked
Can a city truly be 100% renewable? It's complicated.
sticker shock
A Massachusetts city will post climate change warning stickers at gas stations
What Mayor Pete's primary promises mean for the Department of Transportation
See no evil
Why did EPA air monitors fail to detect an oil refinery explosion?


The UAB opens its selection process for tenure-eligible lecturer and researcher positions under a new call for the Serra Húnter Programme which will be open until 7 December.
The Serra Húnter Programme aims to recruit some 500 new faculty members to the Catalan public universities before the year 2020 and is funded by the Government of Catalonia and Catalonia's public universities.
The programme's objective is to incorporate into the universities highly qualified academic and research staff with academic records meeting high-level international standards. Positions are offered in the ranks of tenure-track associate professor, tenured associate professor, tenure-track full professor and tenured full professor.
In the first phase of the programme - which went from 2003 to 2010 - a total of 428 tenured associate professor were hired. In this second phase - which is being conducted during the 2012-2020 period, 500 new professors will be hired.
The selection process to choose the candidates will consist of two parts. The first will be an international campaign to inform academics of the positions offered by the universities. This part will focus on informing aspirants on the documents they will need to present when applying for one of the positions.
The second part consists in the selection process per se, with access to the positions offered and which will begin with the official call for applications.
To view number of contracts, categories, profiles and departments participating please visit the Serra Húnter Programme website.


On 15th March Marie, Mattéo, Anthony, Arnaud and Jeanne had their final training before attempting the Haute Route challenge. The students and two teachers participated in the ski race in Ovronnaz. With a height difference of 1720m and a series of uphill and downhill, the team is now ready to face the Haute Route.
The students were in good physical condition, showed team spirit and determination.
We wish the team all the best for this amazing and courageous project!