Another blog that helps with organization, orderliness in life is Home Sanctuary. I so need balance in my life. Time to think about New Year's Resolutions.
I want to find the time to spend in my devotions daily. I want to find the time creating my crafts and scrapbooking. But I can't enjoy these if my home is a total unorganized mess. I am not happy and my hubby certainly is not happy. Thanks to Home Sanctuary, I have am adopting the following Missions Statement.
I would like my home to be clutter free and inviting and warm. My goal is to decide which tasks I need to do each day so that we can maintain a better, more harmonic, more organized lifestyle. I want to honor my husband's greater need (than mine) for orderliness and routine. I want to be able to invite friends over without having to clean up for a week beforehand! I will find something to take joy in each and every day and find a way to bring joy to someone else each day.
The above picture is the before.... the below is the after.... I am not really happy with the after but I have to just accept what I have at the moment. I don't like that all my cords are so visible but I don't have the length in them or the room to tuck them in anywhere. From this I realized that I need to find a place to hang some of my cords for my camera and my Kindle. Right now they are in one of the drawers but I want them out. But at least the desk top is now usable and I have room to right and make lists!
My inspiration for getting started is from this blog: A Bowl Full of Lemons I will probably readjust a few things. I have my organizer to the left of the computer. It kind of travels with me. I make notes in it at the computer desk but when I leave the house, I try to take with so that I can add appointments and such to it.


text:
"Let's wind up the Supreme Court", says a furious SC on non-compliance of it's AGR order by telecos [Full Report]
Case BriefsSupreme Court
Published on February 14, 2020 February 18, 2020 By Prachi Bhardwaj
Supreme Court: Taking a strong note of non-compliance of its order asking telecom companies to pay adjusted gross revenue of Rs 1.47 lakh crore to DoT, a bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra, JJ has issued contempt notice to the telecom companies. The managing directors of Bharti Airtel , Vodafone, MTNL, BSNL, Reliance Communications, Tata Telecommunication and others have been summoned to the court on March 17.
The Court said that the telecom companies have violated the order passed by this Court in pith and substance as in spite of the dismissal of the Review application, they have not deposited any amount so far.
"Shocked" over the non-compliance of it's 2019 order, the bench said,
"It appears the way in which things are happening that they have scant respect to the directions issued by this court."
The Court also issued notice to a DoT Desk Officer who asked the Attorney General to not insist on payment of dues as directed by the Supreme Court. On this, a furious Justice Mishra said,
"A Desk Officer of the Department of Telecommunications has the temerity to pass the order to the effect of issuing a direction to the Accountant General, another Constitutional Authority"
The Desk Officer had asked the Attorney General
"not to insist for any payment pursuant to the order passed by this Court and not to take any coercive steps till further orders."
The Court said that this kind of order was nothing but a device to scuttle order of the Supreme Court.
Last year, in Union of India v. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1393, the bench of Arun Mishra, SA Nazeer and MR Shah, JJ had refused to change the definition of gross revenue as defined in clause 19.1 of the licence agreement granted by the Government of India to the Telecom Service Providers. It had held,
"The definition in agreement is unambiguous, clear, and beyond the pale of doubt, and there is no confusion in the definition of gross revenue, which is the basis for realisation of the licence fee. Licensees have made a futile attempt to wriggle out of the definition in an indirect method, which was rejected directly in the decision of 2011 between the parties and it was held that these very heads form part of gross revenue."
According to DoT, Bharti Airtel owes around Rs 23,000 crore, Vodafone Idea Rs 19,823 crore and Reliance Communications Rs 16,456 crore.
[Union of India v. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India, 2020 SCC OnLine SC 182, order dated 14.02.2020]
Tagged with: Adjusted Gross revenue, Contempt, Gross Revenue, Interpretation, Telecom Sector
Written by Prachi Bhardwaj
Associate Editor, EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Previous storyCabinet approves — MoU between India and Iceland in the field of Sustainable Fisheries Development
Next storyArms (Amendment) Rules, 2020 — Notified by Centre
Nitish Katara Case: Vikas and Vishal Yadav to undergo imprisonment of 25 years; Sukhdev faces 20 years in prison
By Prachi Bhardwaj	Published on October 3, 2016 October 29, 2016
Ker HC | Court orders Maintenance Tribunal to reconsider the case and elicit truth by inquisitorial approach under MWPSC Act
By Devika	Published on December 21, 2019 December 24, 2019
Case BriefsCOVID 19Supreme Court
COVID-19| Final Year Exams: "Heavens will not fall if exams are not conducted", AM Singhvi tells SC
By Prachi Bhardwaj	Published on July 31, 2020 August 7, 2020

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl