text:
Fiorina-Boxer Senatorial Debate - Sept. 1, 2010
September 01, 2010— Saint Mary's College of California, Morago, California
Senatorial debate
categories: Debate, Speeches
This was the only debate between Carly Fiorina and Barbara Boxer in their 2010 Senate race in California.
MODERATOR: Good evening. I'm Randy Shandobil, the political editor for KTUV Television. Before welcoming the candidates, let me introduce you to the journalists who will be asking tonight's questions. Carla Marinucci is the San Francisco Chronicle's senior political reporter. Scott Schafer is the host of KQED Public Radio's The California Report, and Pilar Marrero is the senior political reporter for La Opinion. We will also be taking some questions from KTUV viewers. Now it's time to introduce the candidates. Please welcome Sen. Barbara Boxer and Carly Fiorina. Thank you, both for joining us. Democrat Barbara Boxer is a three-term United States senator. She has served in the Senate since 1993. Before that she served in the House of Representatives for ten years. Republican Carly Fiorina is running for elected office for the first time. Her background is in business. Fiorina served for six years as the Chief Executive Officer of Hewlett-Packard. Thank you, both for joining us tonight. So let's get started. Now before tonight's debate, your campaigns participated in a coin toss to see who would get to answer first on the opening remarks. Senator you won but chose to let Carly Fiorina go first so, Ms. Fiorina, you have 90 seconds.
FIORINA: Thank you so much, and please call me Carly. It's great to be with all of you here. Thank you for letting us into your homes this evening. You know, I have lived the American Dream. I started out like most Americans do in a small business. I typed, I filed, I answered the phones for a little nine-person company about an hour from where we are tonight. My husband started out driving a tow truck for the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I am running for public office now because I, like so many of you, think our country is headed in the wrong direction. I think the American Dream is too hard for too many people. Frank and I are worried that our two granddaughters won't have the same opportunities that we have had. I've never run for public office before, but I think our Founding Fathers intended ours to be a citizen government. I think it's what of, by, and for the people means. I have created jobs. I have cut spending. I have solved problems. I think we need some common sense and some practical problem-solving ability in Washington D.C. Barbara Boxer has been in Washington D.C. for 28 long years, and though she may say many things tonight, her track record, her long track record in Washington D.C. is consistent and clear, and the results of her policies are devastating for this state. In the last 20 months alone, our unemployment rate has grown from 10.2% to 12.3%. Our debt has grown from $10.8 trillion to $13 trillion on its way to $20 trillion. Barbara Boxer may say she is fighting for Californians, but the truth is, she is fighting hardest for another six years in Washington D.C.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Sen. Barbara Boxer. You get 90 seconds now.
BOXER: Thank you very much, everybody. It's wonderful to be here. Thanks to the sponsors. Thanks to the good people of California who have put their faith in me. Because of that, I have been able to enact 1000 provisions. For our children, the first ever after-school program. For our veterans, the first ever comprehensive casualty care center in California for our wounded warriors. We've doubled the transportation funding. That means thousands of jobs, and jobs are my focus. That's why I'm working to make California the hub of the new clean energy economy. That's why I'm working to make sure small business gets access to credit, and that's why I'm working to stop tax breaks to companies who ship jobs overseas. When I talk about shipping jobs overseas, I'm reminded of my opponent. When she was CEO of Hewlett-Packard, before she was terminated actually, she shipped 30,000 jobs overseas. Think of it. That's the size of Foster City. Through all that pain, what did she do to show any sacrifice? She took $100 million. So that reminds me of Wall Street. That's what happened on Wall Street. Bonuses at the top. Pain for everybody else. I want to see the words "made in America" again. I ask for your vote. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Now to the questions, but first, a few guidelines. You'll both get up to 90 seconds to answer a question. The other candidate will have up to 60 seconds for a rebuttal. One note, we've got lots of questions tonight so I'm sure our audience at home would appreciate brief, concise answers. So if it's possible to answer a question under 90 seconds, I'm sure no one would complain. Carla, you have the first question.
MARINUCCI: Ms. Fiorina, let's get to the economy. You supported tax cuts for business and for the wealthiest Americans because they "pay for themselves by creating jobs," but you've opposed two recent jobs bills, one a teachers' jobs bill which would bring 16,000 jobs to California, the other a small business jobs bill which is actually supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. How do you justify immediate help for the wealthiest Americans but not for average Californians who might be out of a job and listening to this debate tonight?
FIORINA: You know, I think first we need to start by describing what the 2001-2003 tax cuts really were—tax cuts that are going to expire in January. The vast majority of that tax relief went to middle class Americans. In fact, if those tax cuts are not extended, the average Californian family will pay up to $1600 more in taxes. It's also true that small business owners in particular are struggling under the weight of businesses. Sen. Boxer has voted against small business tax relief each and every time. The death tax will skyrocket to 55% on January 1. We have 88,000 farms in this great state, most of them family-owned. To create jobs, we need to make sure that, in particular, our small businesses, our family-owned businesses, our innovators and our entrepreneurs are freed from strangling regulation and freed from taxation. I think in the middle of a terrible recession…. This is the worst economic crisis since 1979 and since 1929 in this state. Just think about it. We have 12 metropolitan areas with unemployment above 15%. We have 23 counties with unemployment above 15%. Meanwhile in the last 20 months, the federal government spending has increased 10% each year and federal government employees have increased 14.5% over the last 2 years.
MODERATOR: Sen. Boxer, you have 60 seconds to reply.
BOXER: I would like to go back to the question because it's very important. We had 16,500+ teachers get pink slips in the mail. They were going to not be in the classroom when our children are there. What is more important than our children? I'm a product of public schools, 95% of our people go to public schools, the kids go to public schools. This was a bill that was paid for. Do you know that my opponent actually called that bill, where we saved these teachers' jobs, she called the bill a disgrace. She called it disgraceful. Now, I'll tell you why I don't think she likes it, because we paid for that bill. It was deficit neutral because we paid for it by stopping some tax breaks for companies who ship jobs overseas. Every time you really get past the surface, you see my opponent fighting for the billionaires, for the millionaires, for the companies who ship jobs overseas. She even opposes the small business legislation that most everybody supports, that we give tax breaks to small businesses.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Senator. Scott, you have the next question, and it's for Sen. Boxer.
SHAFER: Thank you. Sen. Boxer, last night President Obama officially ended the U.S. combat mission in Iraq. During the course of that war, more than 4400 Americans died and tens of thousands came home with physical and mental disabilities. My question is, do you think the war was worth the cost? And going forward in Afghanistan, what criteria will you use to say enough is enough, it's time to bring our troops home?
BOXER: Well, I'm very happy that our combat troops are coming back from Iraq. I was one of about 23 that did not vote for that war. I did, in fact, support the troops. I voted for 85% of all the spending bills that we had even though I had disagreements on that war. When I opposed any of those bills, it was because it wasn't good enough for our wounded warriors. So I am so glad that they are coming back. I think the reason that we are at this point is because America finally said, through our President, this is a date we're coming home. Say to the Iraqis, you have to step up to the plate and defend your own nation. I believe in nation helping, not nation building. I feel the same way in Afghanistan. I did vote to go after Osama Bin Laden, and George W. Bush turned away from it and went into Iraq. I do support the President trying to see that we can train the Afghan people to, again, defend themselves. But I do want to see more timelines drawn there. I think it's important to send that signal. This is a timeframe. I'm on a Feingold bill which you can read which essentially says give us a time table, give us the conditions in which we can bring our troops home. I think we're on that track. I support beginning the withdrawal by 2011, but I'm happy that our troops are coming home. They are the bravest. They are the greatest, and now we have to take care of them. They have some terrible injuries and wounds. I just went to that comprehensive casualty care center, and they are doing miraculous things there.
MODERATOR: Senator, I'm sorry, your time is up.
BOXER: Thank you.
MODERATOR: Apparently the lights are not working, but a real quick follow-up before we go to your answer. If the President doesn't come up with a written timeline, as you've suggested he do, will you call him out on that as you did President Bush? You were very critical of President Bush for not having a firm timeline, and you haven't been as critical of President Obama.
BOXER: Well, actually, I've already stated it publicly that I'm on the Feingold bill which will require the President to do that. Because I don't think this is a matter of partisanship. It's a matter of our troops. It's a matter of—we need to rebuild America. We're in a tough time and so I think we can help Afghanistan and help Iraq, but we need to rebuild our country.
MODERATOR: Okay. Ms. Fiorina, your reply.
FIORINA: You know, Sen. Boxer's last two answers are a perfect illustration of her rhetoric versus the reality, so let's look at the reality of her record supporting our men and women in uniform. She voted against body armor. She voted against support for brain trauma and post-traumatic stress syndrome. She voted against extended family leave for their families. And in fact, the vote that she cast so upset then-Sen. Joe Biden that he said, "This is a political vote, nothing is worth…" in that case, his son's life. As regards to the two bills that she talked about earlier—the truth is, the small business bill that she supported could have been a great bill, but they threw in there TARP Junior—the opportunity for the federal government to take equity positions in community banks. We all know how well that worked out with TARP Senior. It didn't work so well. It didn't get credit flowing again. As for the teachers bill, we are playing political football with taxpayer money. In fact, Sacramento and Washington, D.C. have been fighting over who gets to spend that money and the vast majority of teachers won't be employed until 2012 and some of it may just go to reducing the deficit.
MODERATOR: Time is up. Pilar, you have the next question, and it's for Carly Fiorina.
MARRERO: Yes, thank you very much. Ms. Fiorina, every year 65,000 young men and women graduate from high school in the U.S. and have a hard time furthering their education or even finding a job because they were brought here illegally when they were children. They are undocumented through no fault of their own. Would you have them continue to live in this limbo? Would you send them all back to countries they don't remember, they don't really know, or would you consider supporting legislation that helps them in the long path to citizenship if they study and meet certain goals?
FIORINA: You know, I believe that the 21st century is the century of brain power and innovation. We need to cultivate all the brain power we can by making sure that people are well-educated here. Yes, I would support the Dream Act because I do not believe that we can punish children, who through no fault of their own are here trying to live the American Dream. Now let me very quickly say, I do not support amnesty for those who have come here illegally. I believe the federal government must secure the border and it has not done its job. I believe, as well, that the federal government has to come up with a guest worker program that works. Sen. Boxer has vilified the people of Arizona even though the federal government isn't doing its job, and at a critical moment in 2007 when a guest worker program was on the table, she was the deciding vote that killed the guest worker program and, in essence, destroyed a compromise on comprehensive immigration reform. When she voted for the Dorgan amendment, which killed that guest worker program, her comment was that immigrants represent a cheap source of labor that threatens the American worker. You see, if you look at Sen. Boxer's long track record of 28 years in Washington, D.C., you will see this: She is for more taxes, she is for more spending, she is for more regulation, and she is also for big government and elite extreme environment groups.
MODERATOR: Senator, your reply.
BOXER: Well first, I have to say that I'm very proud of my record for veterans. That's why I am the bipartisan—I'm the co-chair of the bipartisan Military Families Caucus and I have a record which won me an award from doctors who were trying to find better treatments for burn victims. I got the first funding for traumatic brain injury, and my husband served in the military so I love the military in a very personal way. Now, what I want to say about immigration is this: My opponent called comprehensive immigration reform a distraction. Imagine, a distraction. We have 11 million people here who are living in the shadows. And here's where we stand. Under the law—since my opponent feels we shouldn't deal with this issue—they would have to be deported. We just had a recent study from U.S.C and several other very important institutions that said the way to get this economy going again is to go with comprehensive immigration reform. Now the Dream Act is—
BOXER: The Dream Act is part of that.
MODERATOR: Over the past few weeks, viewers and readers have been sending in questions they would like to hear the candidates answer. So right now, we are going to shift gears just a little bit and hear a couple of those questions. The first question comes from Tim Tam. Mr. Tam is a Democrat and he lives in Oakland.
TAM: Sen. Boxer, you've been staying in the office three terms. Why don't you let other people try?
MODERATOR: That question was you've been in office three terms, why not give other folks a chance.
BOXER: I did hear it.
MODERATOR: It's the first time we've tried it, so….
BOXER: Well, my answer is, every election is a chance. That's what America is about. You know, I have to say this, our founders decided to put the power in the hands of the people, and the people have to vote. Now, I have been so fortunate. I'm a first-generation American on my mother's side. My mother never graduated from high school. She had to work to support the family. I'm in the United States Senate. Why? Because I fight for people. Because I fight for the dream. But, of course, every time I run I have a tough fight on my hands, and people are going to decide if they want to have me back or if they want to elect someone who made her name as a CEO in Hewlett-Packard laying thousands and thousands of workers off, shipping their jobs overseas, making no sacrifice while she was doing it, taking $100 million. I don't think we need those Wall Street values right now. So every race I run in, there is a clear choice. There's a clear choice here on jobs. There's a clear choice on the issue of offshore oil drilling. There is a clear choice on the issue of a woman's right to choose and many other areas that I think we'll get to tonight.
MODERATOR: Ms. Fiorina, your reply.
FIORINA: Well, you know, I think it's a good question and Sen. Boxer is right. Ultimately the choice is up to voters, but I think one of the things that voters believe is that results count. In her 18 years in the Senate, Sen. Boxer has four bills with her name on them, four pieces of legislation. That is far below the record or even the average. Those four bills include naming a river in Virginia, naming a courthouse, renaming a post office, and bringing some federal dollars back to the Bay area after the earthquake. It is all well and good for Sen. Boxer to continue to miss-characterize my record. I would remind her that it was she who voted for the Wall Street bailout. It is she who has taken many contributions from Wall Street executives, and I would remind her as well that when you lead a business, whether it is a 9-person business or a 150,000 people, you sometimes have to make the agonizing choice to lose some jobs to save more. What enrages people in California as they see people making those tough choices absolutely every day and stores shuttering -
MODERATOR: Time is up.
FIORINA: - is federal government employees growing at 14.5%.
MODERATOR: I'm sorry, time is up. Our next viewer question is for Ms. Fiorina. It comes from a peninsula Republican, Tom Watson. Mr. Watson is a retired employee from Hewlett-Packard and he has a question regarding the outsourcing of jobs at HP. Let's listen.
WATSON: Carly, while you were at HP, you sent thousands of jobs offshore. In defense of your actions, you coined the phrase, "right shoring." Also, in a keynote speech in 2004 you said, "There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore." Do you still feel that way? What are your plans to create jobs in California?
FIORINA: This is the 21st century. Any job can go anywhere. What worries me deeply is the jobs we lose now may not come back and so we have to fight for every job. The truth is that California has higher than average unemployment rate because we are destroying jobs and others are fighting harder for our jobs. Texas is fighting harder for our jobs, North Carolina is, so is Mexico, Brazil, Guatemala, China, India, Russia, Poland. I know precisely why those jobs go, and I'll tell you why. Because China, for example, like Texas, like Brazil, gives companies huge tax credits, they help them cut through regulation, they reward R&D, they provide access to credit. That's what we need to do. I've proposed a two-year payroll tax holiday for every small business that will hire an unemployed worker. I've proposed five-year tax holidays for new businesses that will locate here to use the power of the federal government to create special economic zones—just as the Chinese have— to help companies cut through regulation. Instead of bailing out General Motors, let us give them the incentives to bring their plants back home and to hire American workers and let us decide that in this country we are going to be, once again, number one in innovation. We have fallen to 17th in the world. We have to fight for innovation, and that means we have to be number one in the world in terms of the incentives we provide for R&D. We can grow our economy again, but it means we have to fight for private sector jobs, and frankly, I don't think there are enough people in Washington who even understand why private sector jobs are created.
MODERATOR: Let me ask you a real quick follow-up before we go to the senator, connected to HP. You've in the past said school teachers should have their pay connected to their performance. School scores down, they should face the consequences. When you were at HP and the board of directors forced you to resign in part because of the stock market dropping with regard to HP, you got a severance of $21 million so some people might say, "Gee, shouldn't CEOs have the same standards as school teachers?" on that regard?
FIORINA: Absolutely they should. In fact, during my time at Hewlett-Packard, I ripped up my employment contract and put my pay up for shareholder vote. Every dollar that I earned at Hewlett-Packard was voted on by shareholders and every dollar was tied very specifically to performance. Just to review, in the six years that I managed Hewlett-Packard during the worst technology recession in 25 years, we doubled the size of the company to $88 billion, we tripled the rate of innovation to 11 patents a day, we quintupled the cash flow, we improved the profitability in every product line -
MODERATOR: Thank you.
FIORINA: - in fact, our stock outperformed the Peer index by 23%.
MODERATOR: Thank you, we have to move on. Senator, your reply.
BOXER: Yes, I think we're entitled to our opinion but not entitled to our facts. The facts are that there was a $21 million severance check. My understanding is it was taken after my opponent was fired. The stock went down more than 50%, so if she's calling for accountability of the teachers, there ought to be accountability with CEOs. I think it's really simple, but I think the viewer who asked the question hit on something very important. I think it is this: if ever we needed a United States senator from California to fight for American jobs, it's now. My opponent, we know that she shipped jobs overseas, thousands of them. We know she fired workers, tens of thousands of them. We also know she has opposed every jobs bill that we voted on. The Hire Act, which gave a tax holiday to business people if they hired an unemployed person—she opposed that. She opposed the teachers, bringing back 16,500 teachers into the classroom—she opposed that. She opposed Wall Street reform.
MODERATOR: Sorry, Senator, time is up, but you get the next question, and it's from Carla Marinucci.
BOXER: All right.
MARINUCCI: Senator, many of our readers at SFGate.com asked us to ask you this, it regards one of the very often repeated clips on the Internet in which you chided Brigadier General Michael Walsh. He appeared before you in committee. He addressed you as ma'am, and you told him you should be called senator because you worked hard to get that title. A lot of the readers said they thought it showed you had gotten out of touch after three terms in Washington, high-handed. Why did you make that comment to the Brigadier General and is their criticism fair?
BOXER: Well, people absolutely have a right to criticize me for anything I do. I don't take issue with it. But in that particular moment, we were having a lot of back and forth. This was a formal hearing. So I made the call that I should call the general, general and it would be better if he called me by my formal title instead of sir and ma'am—general and senator. That's what it was. Afterwards, I called the general and I said, "Do I owe you an apology? Did I upset you?" He said, "No, not at all." We work very well together. We're working very well together. He's working on Army Corps of Engineer projects right now as we speak. After the BP spill, he is helping us with our flood control in Sacramento. So that is what that was about.
MODERATOR: Ms. Fiorina.
FIORINA: Well, I'm certainly pleased to hear that Sen. Boxer called the general and asked if she needed to apologize, and I take him at his word if he indicates that he wasn't offended. I absolutely agree with Sen. Boxer that we're not entitled to our own facts. I think it's actually a shame that Barbara Boxer would use Hewlett-Packard, a treasure of California, one of the great companies in the world, whose employees work very hard and whose shareholders have benefited greatly from both my time at CEO and all the hard work of the employees that I had the privilege to lead. I think it's a shame that she would use that company as a political football. I understand she's going to mischaracterize my record and my severance package, but I think it's a shame that she would use the company in that way. As for her reference to Wall Street reform, let's just talk about Wall Street reform for a second. You know, the Wall Street crisis hits and it turns out there are 20 agencies that were asleep at the switch, but what this Wall Street reform bill did in essence was say, never mind those 20 agencies, never mind Fanny and Freddy that were part of the problem. What we are going to do is -
MODERATOR: Ms. Fiorina…
FIORINA: - is create a brand new agency with a bunch of new federal government bureaucrats.
MODERATOR: I'm sorry, time is up. I noticed that both of you are kind of drifting off the question to answer something you'd like to answer. I understand this is frustrating for you at times, but if you could answer the question directly that would be great. Scott, you have a question for Ms. Fiorina.
SHAFER: Thank you. Ms. Fiorina, you supported Proposition 8 and say that marriage should only be between one man and one woman. Domestic partnerships and civil unions are not recognized by the federal government and the Defense of Marriage Act means that committed gay and lesbian couples are denied more than a thousand federal rights that heterosexual couples get, like benefits from Social Security when a spouse dies. My question is this, should federal law be changed to allow for equal legal status for same sex couples and if not, why not?
FIORINA: I do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, but I also have been consistent and clear that I support civil unions for gay and lesbian couples. The Defense of Marriage Act had broad bipartisan support and actually the position that I have consistently espoused is consistent with that of our President and the vast majority of senators in the U.S. Senate. I think what we now are seeing on Proposition 8 is that the voters were quite clear about their views on this. This is now going through a legal process. Whatever your views about gay marriage, I think many of us would conclude that when voters have such a clear decision, for that decision to be overturned by a single judge seems perhaps not appropriate, and so this is now the beginning of what will be a long legal process. I support very much the repeal of don't ask, don't tell. I know that the military is getting ready to release its report on the best way to execute that decision.
MODERATOR: Sen. Boxer, your reply.
BOXER: Yes, you know we do have courts that check the legislature and the legislature checks the president. That is what our Constitution says. So yes, a lot of the laws that we pass may well go through that test. Now, if you read Ron George's decision on this—by the way, a Republican who was appointed to the state of California bench—he is clear. He says the only way to get equal rights to gays and lesbians is to say that there should be marriage equality. It is a very straightforward decision because, as you said, the only way to get the rights that married couples have is to go for marriage equality. I think, and I'm glad to say, I believe that people are coming around to see it. I also would just say that, in terms of what we heard about the fact that I shouldn't talk about my opponent's days at HP, she's running on her record as the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, so what she did there counts, and I'm going to keep on telling the truth about it.
MODERATOR: And I'm going to keep on watching the clock. I'm sorry, time is up. Pilar, you have the next question.
MARRERO: Yes, and it's for the senator. Senator, in news stories and the polls it appears that voters and analysts tend to look at Sen. Feinstein and the California senator who can work with the other side of the aisle and you as the more partisan senator. Can you think of a time that you disagreed strongly with President Obama on something and you did something about it?
BOXER: Well, yes, I actually can. First, let me just say that I am a cosponsor on 500 Republican bills, and I could give you a list of things I worked with my colleagues. The after-school bill was done with a Republican colleague and many of the work, a lot of the work I've done for veterans has been done with Republican colleagues. With President Obama, at this particular point I do think we need an exit strategy from Afghanistan. I do believe it is very important. So that is one clear example. I also, if I were him, I would appoint Elizabeth Warren right now to head that new consumer agency that is going to be looking over credit cards because, as you know, people don't read all that fine print and we need to have somebody looking over the shoulder of the banks. My opponent opposed that Wall Street reform. It sets up that consumer protection agency. For the first time, you'll be able to have someone looking out for you, make sure you don't get—I don't want to use that word—make sure that you get treated fairly on your mortgage and you get treated fairly on your credit cards.
MODERATOR: Senator, thank you. Ms. Fiorina, your reply.
FIORINA: I think the senator is right. We both need to run on our records, and I am proud to run on my record at Hewlett-Packard and I think the senator must run on her record. The truth is, her record is long on talk and very short on achievement. The reason it is short on achievement is because she is one of the most bitterly partisan members of the U.S. Senate. That is why after 18 long years in the Senate and 28 years in Washington D.C. she only has four relatively insignificant bills with her name on them. The truth is, her signature piece of legislation as the chairman of Environment and Public Works, she could not shepherd that to a conclusion. That bill was taken away from her and given to John Kerry because it was believed that he had a better chance of getting bipartisan support. I don't happen to support her cap-and-trade bill. It has been called the most expensive piece of regulation and legislation in U.S. history. But nevertheless, I think it's telling that her bitter partisanship prevented her from getting her top priority accomplished in the U.S. Senate.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Carla, you have the next question.
MARINUCCI: Ms. Fiorina, you're pro-life and you have said you would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade if given the opportunity, and you believe that life begins at conception. Does that mean you would also seek to deny funding to institutions which are engaged in embryonic stem cell research?
FIORINA: Well, I am pro-life. I am pro-life because of my personal experiences. My husband's mother was told to abort him. She did not. Her health was threatened as a result. She lived a ripe old age to 98 and my husband, obviously, is the rock of my life. I recognize that not everyone agrees with me on this, and I recognize as well that the most important issue right now in this election is the creation of jobs and getting our government under control. But with regards to your very specific question, I am comfortable with federal funding for adult stem cell research which shows more promise according to many scientists, and I've also been very clear in saying if embryos were going to be destroyed in any event, that I have no trouble with research. It is when embryos are produced for the purposes of destruction, for the purposes of stem cell research, that I have a great deal of difficulty, and I think the judge's ruling that recently came out basically suggested that we don't have clear enough guidelines about whether embryos are being produced for destruction. Sen. Boxer voted against a ban on human cloning so we know where she stands on this issue. Her positions on these issues are extreme. She has said that she doesn't think a baby has rights until it leaves the hospital. So, I think the judge has said that we need to have some clarity about these rules to ensure that embryos are not being destroyed.
MODERATOR: But, before the senator gets a chance to reply, real quick, I just want to make sure that Carla's, the premise of her question correct. You do suggest that we overturn Roe v. Wade?
FIORINA: If there were an opportunity. It's not an issue that I'm running on. By the way, the reason for that is because I'm a strong believer in states' rights. I think voters have to make some of these very difficult decisions. I am prepared to trust the voters' judgment on offshore drilling. I am prepared to trust the voters' judgment on -
MODERATOR: I asked about abortion.
FIORINA: - the right to choose, and the Californians have made their decisions on those issues.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Senator, your rebuttal.
BOXER: Yes, I mean, I respect everybody's personal view and everybody has a story as to why they come to a certain position. I respect it. That's why I'm pro-choice. I let people decide. But what the people of California have to understand is that if my opponent's views prevailed, women and doctors would be criminals. They would go to jail. And women would die like they did before Roe . Wade. So this isn't about my opponent's personal view or my personal view. It is about the women and the families of our state and of our country. Now my opponent says that I passed four bills. She keeps saying that, well first she said three and now she's made it four. The fact is, 1000 Boxer provisions have been enacted. We have a list of these and we have a hundred of them up on barbaraboxer.com for you to see. As a matter of fact, I am very proud of those provisions. Now under the way she is counting bills, McCain-Feingold neither of them would have gotten credit for the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform because I don't know whether my opponent is trying to confuse people, but the fact of the matter is the way a bill becomes a law has many, many tracks. It could be straightforward of a bill with your name on it or—
MODERATOR: I hate to be a broken record, but time is up.
BOXER: - it could be an amendment, it could be other things.
MODERATOR: Sorry, Senator.
BOXER: It's okay.
MODERATOR: Scott, you have the next question.
SHAFER: Sen. Boxer, there is no question that President Obama inherited a terrible economy and Democrats often blame the current troubles on his predecessor, and yet, Democrats have controlled Congress for almost four years. President Obama is nearing the halfway point in his first term, and the unemployment rate is stuck above 9% and there are signs of the economy slowing down again. At what point should Democrats stop blaming President Bush and start taking full responsibility for the economy?
BOXER: We're taking responsibility and we're taking action. I talked about a number of those things that we have already done—making sure teachers stay in the classroom, making sure that small businesses get access to credit. All we need is one Republican to get that bill done when we get back, and I think we are going to get one Republican and then we can create 500 to 1000 to a million new jobs. But you know, I feel that you have to look at history; otherwise, you will repeat it. So, let me tell you, I served for eight years with Bill Clinton and I supported every budget and every economic policy. We created 23 million new jobs net, and not only did we balance the budget, but we created a surplus. Then I served eight years with George W. Bush. I did not support his priorities and his budgets. We wound up with a $1.3 trillion deficit after those eight years, and the worst job creation record since Herbert Hoover. One million new jobs compared to 23 million. So, yes, we didn't get here overnight and we're not going to solve it overnight but job by job by job we are going to solve it. There is a man out here in the audience, I don't want to embarrass him, Jay Smith if he's out there, who is working because of the Economic Recovery Act. On Doyle Drive, 2000 workers working because of the Economic Recovery Act. So, yes, we are taking responsibility, but people in this country and my state have to get the whole picture.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Ms. Fiorina, your reply.
FIORINA: Recovery summer has become the summer of despair in California. In the last 20 months, our unemployment rate has gone up from 10.2% to 12.3%. I have talked with small business owners up and down the state, and they are being strangled by too much cost, too much uncertainty, too much regulation. Barbara Boxer is promising numbers and jobs now. When she voted for that stimulus bill that has manifestly failed, she said that it would bring help and hope and 400,000 jobs to this state, and we now have 2.3 million people out of work. As for fiscal discipline, why is it that she has voted six times against a balanced budget amendment, including during President Clinton's time? Why is it that she has voted six times to increase the debt ceiling in the last 20 months alone? Why is it that she has voted four times against a relatively modest bipartisan proposal to slow the rate of increase in federal government spending to 1.5%? Her record is crystal clear.
MODERATOR: Time is up again. Pilar, you have the next question.
MARRERO: Yes, and it's for Ms. Fiorina. Your campaign put out an ad some time ago that seemed to equate global warming with the weather. You have also said that you think AB32, the anti-global warming measure in California, is a job killer and should be suspended. There is a proposition now on the ballot in California, Prop 23, that would do just that. I'm not sure you have taken a position on that so I have a double question. What is your position on Prop 23 and do you think global warming is real or is it just a problem with the weather?
FIORINA: You know, the ad that you are referring to was really talking about national security and what are our priorities for national security. I think that is a very legitimate question to be asked of Sen. Boxer who has been campaigning since 1992 on cutting our military budget in half, who believes that terrorists should be given the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens. That is what that ad was about. We should always have the courage to examine the science, but all scientists agree on this: the only way to impact global warming is to act globally. A state acting alone will make no difference. What we need in this country, a priority of mine if I am fortunate enough to gain the confidence of the voters of California, will be a national and comprehensive energy bill. That means that AB32 would be superseded. It should be. It would have been superseded by Barbara Boxer's cap-and-trade bill, but her bill was completely the wrong track. It would have cost us trillions of dollars in lost economic output, millions of jobs, it doesn't do enough to fund energy R&D. What we need to do in a comprehensive energy policy, is fund energy R&D, we need to give more federal funding to Lawrence Livermore, for example, we need to give more to Berkeley. We also need to take advantage in an environmentally responsible way of every resource of energy we have including nuclear, wind, solar. And we have to acknowledge that we cannot put bills in place that punish excessively energy-intensive industries like farming, like manufacturing, and like small business owners.
MODERATOR: Time is up, but you didn't answer part of Pilar's question, which is do you support Prop 23 which would suspend AB32?
FIORINA: My focus is on a national energy policy.
MODERATOR: Yes or No?
FIORINA: Because that why—
MODERATOR: Just answer—do you support it?
FIORINA: I have not taken a position on it yet because I think what we are doing —there is no question in my mind and there is no question in people who have studied AB32 that AB32 is at the very least in the short term a job killer so why would we go forward? But, what we need is national energy policy.
MODERATOR: Sen. Boxer?
BOXER: Well, if you can't take a stand on Prop 23, I don't what you will take a stand on. This is a crucial bill and I'll tell you the reason why. If we overturn California's clean energy policies, that's going to mean that China takes the lead away from us with solar, that Germany takes the lead away from us with wind, but I guess my opponent is kind of used to creating jobs in China and other places. I want those jobs created here in America. I want to see the words "made in America" again. This is the way we're going to do it. The whole world is going green. I know that my opponent has gotten huge support from the coal companies, from big oil. They are hoping that I don't make it. I am asking the people of this state who care about these issues to really take note because if my opponent gets there, California is done for in terms of its lead on clean energy. No bill I ever wrote ever superseded California's clean energy laws because I honor those laws, and they are creating jobs now.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Time is up. Okay, I think now would be a good time to go back to a couple questions from viewers, and this next question is for Sen. Boxer. It comes from Alana Armstrong. She is an undergraduate student here at Saint Mary's College. She is not a Democrat and not a Republican. She refers to herself as an independent.
BOXER: Okay.
AMRSTRONG: Growing up on a small farm in the central valley, one thing that has always shocked me is that the largest and wealthiest agribusiness interests collect 74% of the farm subsidies while small family farms are unable to compete. What have you done in the U.S. Senate to rectify this inequity?
MODERATOR: Senator?
BOXER: Yes, well for the first time, finally, in the last farm bill we— working together with my colleague, Sen. Feinstein—we were able to get the first recognition that our specialty crops need to take a place in the farm bill. We grow 300 different products in our state, and for the first time, we were able to do that. Now I think there are very big subsidies going to ethanol, going to corn that don't make any sense and I fought hard to change those, but I really think there is a change. We have, in fact, limited some of the subsidies. We have said that if you are a great big giant farm and you're not a family farm, you are not going to get these subsidies. And I will tell you something else Sen. Feinstein and I are doing. We want to make sure that the estate tax does not kick in for a family farm where the family continues the farming. If you are a huge farm, that is a different story and you're an agribusiness that's different, but if you really are a family farm then you shouldn't have to pay that estate tax because we want to encourage those farms to continue.
FIORINA: You know, it's a lot of great words, but in the real world actions speak louder than words. Sen. Boxer has voted against death tax relief 18 times. Her track record is very clear. While our 88,000 farms here in California, most of them family owned, struggled with water, with a lack of water, Sen. Boxer refused to lift a finger. As chairwoman of Environment and Public Works, she could have put out an amendment forward to waive a biological assessment to turn the water back on in our Central Valley—she refused. When a colleague put that amendment forward, she voted against it. When Sen. Feinstein stepped forward to put an amendment on the table that would have waived that assessment to provide needed water, she pressured her colleague to drop that amendment. Here is the truth. Central Valley struggles with record unemployment. They need water. Sen. Barbara Boxer, the chairwoman of Environment and Public Works, has stood in their way and she has over and over again refused to give them death tax relief.
MODERATOR: Time is up. Our next viewer question, and this is for you, Carly Fiorina. It comes from Tracy Holifield, a Democrat from Oakland. I think it has to do with guns and airplanes, something you talked about in a primary debate.
FIORINA: Yes.
HOLIFIELD: I read earlier that you are in favor of the people on the no-fly list to have guns. I'm a resident of Oakland, and that doesn't sit well with me at all. Please explain your stance.
FIORINA: Well, I know it sounds so strange, but let's talk about the no-fly list for a moment. My sister-in-law was on the no-fly list. My friend of 20 years' husband was on the no-fly list. Edward Kennedy was on the no-fly list. The no-fly list isn't particularly well-managed. People who shouldn't be on it are on it and people who should be on it, like the Christmas Day bomber who almost made it out of the country, wasn't on it. Here's the truth: we should not be taking constitutional rights away from citizens and at the same time giving constitutional rights to terrorists. That's exactly what Barbara Boxer is in favor of doing. Barbara Boxer agrees that the vast majority of crimes committed with a gun are committed by criminals who have broken laws to acquire their gun. So let us prosecute those laws. Let us prosecute those criminals, but let us not deny law-abiding citizens their constitutional rights and instead give constitutional rights to terrorists as Sen. Boxer would like to do.
BOXER: It's hard to know how exactly to start, but let me say this. It's shocking to me that my opponent would say if you are on that no-fly list, there's only a few thousand, I'm sure that if your sister wanted a gun they would look and they would see she could have that if, in fact, she lived in California she'd have to go to the local sheriff. But it seems to be as someone who authored a bill with a Republican colleague which became the law that it says pilots who are trained have a right to carry a gun in the cockpit because there is so much concern by the pilots that they be able to take action. That is where you want to have a gun on the airplane, not giving it to people who are on the terrorist watch list. When I saw my opponent say that, I was watching it, it was in a debate, and Tom Campbell, who she was running against in the primary, he doesn't get very excited and for the first time in my life I saw him get excited when she said this, and he said, "Oh, my goodness." And that was, for him, really getting excited. So, I think that is so out of step, it is so out of touch and having that kind of view in the United States Senate just is going to harm us. It is going to make us less safe, that's what it's going to do.
MODERATOR: Unbelievably, we're out of time for full questions with full answers, but just let me ask something real quick, if you could answer quickly and, Senator, you get a quick rebuttal. If I understand correctly, that you're also for allowing the assault weapons ban to disappear. Is that correct?
FIORINA: I think it's crystal clear that we have loads of laws and most of the time criminals are breaking those laws and we are curtailing citizens' lawful rights to carry guns. The assault weapons ban is extremely arbitrary in what qualifies as an assault weapon, and let me just say that Sen. Boxer, I don't know, perhaps she's truly confused or perhaps she's just trying to create rhetoric—
MODERATOR: I'm sorry, but we're—
FIORINA: - but the no-fly list and the terrorist watch list are quite different things.
MODERATOR: We're really tight. I want to make sure the senator has time for a quick response.
BOXER: Yes, the assault weapons ban has been in place in California since the 1980s so to go back to that dangerous yesterday makes no sense at all. It has bipartisan support, and also, my colleague, Sen. Feinstein, has worked so hard to get that assault weapon ban to be in place nationally. I have been her strong supporter in that, and I hope I can go back because we want to have our streets safe.
MODERATOR: Okay, we're now going to shift to closing statements, and Ms. Fiorina, you go first. You get two minutes.
FIORINA: Thank you so much for the privilege, truly, to be here and to have a great debate with you, Sen. Boxer. I have traveled up and down this wonderful state, and I have been struck by her beauty and by the spirit of Californians. But I must say, I am also struck by the anger, the frustration, and yes, even the fear. I remember meeting the immigrant who had built his small business from the ground up only to see it ruined with too much taxation and too much regulation, and I remember him looking at me and saying, "This is not the country I came to. My own government is destroying my livelihood." I remember speaking to the city councilman who talked about his struggles to keep his community together while they struggled with almost 40% unemployment. I remember, as well, the woman who looked me in the eye and grasped by my hand and said, "I have never voted before, but I am voting for you because I am afraid for my children's future. Promise me this: when you get to Washington you will not forget us." We can turn our nation around. We can get it back on the right track. We can get our state on the right track. We can grow our economy. We can control government spending, but to do all these things, we must start by changing the people we send to Washington. I ask for your support. I ask for your vote, and I pledge to you this: I will go to the U.S. Senate and I will fight for the millions of Californians who love their country, who go about their business, who pay their dues, who serve their communities. You don't ask for frills or favors, you give a lot, you expect little. You are asking for one simple thing now: that we take our government back, make it listen, and make it work.
MODERATOR: Senator, you now get two minutes for a closing statement.
BOXER: Thank you so much, everyone, for this opportunity. I think you've seen here, this is a very clear choice, and I am going to run through some of those choices. This election is between someone who is fighting for jobs day in and day out—jobs right here in America—versus someone who, when she had the chance, laid off 30,000 workers and shipped jobs to China. This election is about someone who is working hard so that we can see the words "made in America" again versus someone who was proud of her time at HP when she stamped made in China, made in India on her products. This is a choice, a clear choice. It's between someone who is fighting for taxes for the middle class and small business versus someone who is fighting for the wealthy, wealthy few, the billionaires, the CEOs. This is a big difference in clean energy. One of us is fighting hard to make California the hub of the new clean energy economy and the millions of jobs that go with it. The other is being supported by big oil and big coal. This is a choice between two people who differ on a woman's right to choose. I've worked my whole life to protect a woman's privacy and her health. My opponent would turn that woman into a criminal. This is a very clear choice between someone who has fought all her life to protect our coasts and the 400,000 jobs that rely on a beautiful coast—the fisherman, the tourist industry, the recreation industry—and my opponent does not support the Boxer-Feinstein legislation to permanently protect that coast. Finally, this is a choice, a choice between a candidate who fought really hard for Wall Street reform to end that mess over there and someone who opposes that reform, and I think, frankly, acted just like a Wall Street CEO. What do I mean by that? Destroying jobs for Americans and taking it for yourself. I hope we don't go back to that.
MODERATOR: Senator, I'm sorry, time is up. So thank you both. Thank you, Sen. Boxer and thank you, Carly Fiorina. We all apologize for not getting to more questions. We certainly would have liked to, but hopefully what we've talked about tonight will help people here and help viewers and listeners at home make informed decisions on what they should do on Election Day, November 2. So thanks to our panel of journalists, and I would like to thank everyone her at Saint Mary's College for hosting this debate. So, on behalf of KTUV Television and The San Francisco Chronicle and KQED News, thanks for joining us and good night.
Video found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DmG-UJNlFI&list=PLYNqC0R5WJbvsMjYN0sk8hHKDe6T33yps.


text:
Борша (, ) — село в Словаччині в Требішовському окрузі Кошицького краю. Село розташоване на висоті 102 м над рівнем моря. Населення — 1240 чол. (2005). Переважна більшість населення — угорці. Історично — частина Земпліна. Вперше згадується в 1214 році. В селі є бібліотека та футбольне поле.

Відомі люди
У селі народився керівник антигабсбурзької національно-визвольної війни угорського народу Ференц ІІ Ракоці.

Примітки

Посилання
 Інформація на obce.info
 Інформація на e-obce.sk

Села округу Требишів

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Q: Saving file to subdomain Background
We have an intranet where users can request business cards. This generates the business card and sends it as an SVG to our Marketing Manager who then sends it off to the printers. This whole process works perfectly.
Problem
I need to create a VCard with this script and save it to our website. This is to enable contacts to download this VCard using a link that will be embedded in a QR Code on the business card (the QR Code cant contain the VCard as it's to much info). I have already created the VCard and it works like it's supposed to.
Our website is hosted under www.example.com and our intranet is under intra.example.com. It's on the same VPS.
Question
Is there any way that I can save the VCard file to the www. server with the script running in the intra. subdomain?

A: Yes.
They are running on the same computer, so they have access to the same file systems and databases.
You just need to store the data somewhere accessible from the other site.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
30 Years: Vitra Design Museum
Anniversary celebration and panel discussion
The Vitra Design Museum was founded in autumn 1989. Along with the Design Museum in London, which opened the same year, it was the first museum to be devoted exclusively to design, establishing a completely new type of institution. What began as a small, private initiative grew
over the years into one of the world's leading museums for design and architecture. Today, the exemplary buildings by Frank Gehry and Herzog & de Meuron are as much a part of the museum's identity as its collection, exhibitions, on-site publishing house, and global network of travelling exhibitions. On the occasion of its 30th birthday, the Vitra Design Museum is hosting an anniversary event featuring a panel discussion. Our guests will include prominent figures from the museum's past and present, designers, colleagues, and many other interesting participants. Together we will look back on the last and offer a preview of the next 30 years. Come and celebrate with us!
6 pm, Zaha Hadid Fire Station
Free admission, registration: events@design-museum.de
More information: www.design-museum.de/30years
Balkrishna Doshi: Architecture for the People
The architect Balkrishna V. Doshi (born 1927 in Pune, India) ranks among the most influential pioneers of modern Indian architecture. In 2018, he won the prestigious Pritzker Prize. Since the 1950s he has created more than 100 buildings for public and cultural institutions as well as housing estates...
Living in a Box: Design and Comics
Since their inception in the early 20th century, comics have become an inherent part of global visual culture. The exhibition »Living in a Box« demonstrates the close relationship of comics to design. Design items or interiors depicted in these genres can reflect the personalities of certain...
Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg: Better Nature
British designer and artist Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg explores our relationship with nature and technology through what we design. For the past decade, she has researched possibilities for the design of living matter, also referred to as »synthetic biology«. For projects like »Designing for the Sixth...
Objects of Desire: Surrealism and Design 1924 – Today
Surrealism was one of the most influential art movements of the twentieth century. Many works of Surrealists like Salvador Dalí, René Magritte, Meret Oppenheim, and Man Ray were inspired by everyday objects and explored the world of dreams, emotions. Since the 1930s, Surrealism has had a strong...
Free entry with the Museums-PASS-Musées
Vitra Design Museum
Charles-Eames-Straße 2
http://www.design-museum.de
info@design-museum.de

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
SCHNEIDER, HARALD* AND KATHLEEN M. PRYER. University Herbarium, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;, Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605. - Spore morphology of heterosporous ferns and its possible implications for understanding the evolution of the seed habit.
Heterospory has originated independently several times in vascular plant evolution, but seeds are known only from one living lineage. Although fossilized remains of seed plants from the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous (ca. 340 mya) have provided exceptional insights into understanding the seed habit, events leading to its origin are still unclear. Monomegasporangy (single megaspore/megasporangium) is assumed to be one of the key innovations in the evolution of seed plants. This character state is found in only one other living group of vascular plants, the heterosporous ferns, which include two families with a fossil record dating back to the Early Cretaceous, Marsileaceae and Salviniaceae. Recent phylogenetic studies have demonstrated convincingly that heterosporous ferns are a monophyletic group nested within leptosporangiate ferns. Heterospory and monomegasporangy, therefore, evolved independently and at different times in the geological record in ferns and seed plants. Heterosporous ferns have an aquatic lifestyle, similar to that of Paleozoic seed plants. Comparative spore studies reveal remarkable similarities among the spores of heterosporous ferns, in particular, the presence of a gula, a modified perine structure above the aperture. The gula comprises inner and outer portions, which together enclose a chamber (= sperm lake). Each of the five extant genera (Azolla, Marsilea, Pilularia, Regnellidium, Salvinia) have their own characteristic gula, reflecting differences in ecology (e.g., amphibious versus floating growth forms). Additional differences are also found in the perine ultrastructure. Structures similar to a gula - lagenostomes - are also found in the megaspores of Paleozoic seed plants. This leads to the hypothesis that heterosporous ferns have evolved analogous megaspore structures to seed plants and these can be used as a model to better understand the biological constraints in which the seed habit evolved.
Key words: gula, heterospory, Marsileaceae, monomegasporangy, Salviniaceae, seed habit


text:
Q: Is it possible to use WMI in a Windows service? I'm writing a simple service to set the default printer based on where I'm connected, but I'm having trouble using WMI in my service.  The more I think about it the less I think it's possible to do what I'm trying to do; as a service is not associated with a particular user, but I thought I would ask about it anyway in case my suspicions are wrong.
Here is what I'm doing.

*

*Service subscribes to NetworkChange.NetworkAvailabilityChanged event.

*When event is received query WMI SELECT * FROM Win32_Printer WHERE Network=true.

*Loop through the ManagementObjectCollection and check the status of each printer.

*If the printer is connected call ManagementObject.InvokeMethod("SetDefaultPrinter",null)
When I check the Security event log I noticed Failure Audit events "Unknown username or bad password", which I'm assuming is because I did not explicitly supply that information.
Is there a way to do this without specifying a username and password, or are credentials required for security purposes?

A: The service must run as some user, for example NETWORK SERVICE, LOCAL SERVICE or SYSTEM. You need to make sure the given account has permission to do what you want.
To change the permission of a deployed service on Windows go to Start > Administrative Tools > Services then you can change the service account for a given service.

A: I know this is an old question but i feel the existing answer doesn't quite provide a manageable solution.
As pointed out to effect a users default printer selection you need to be authenticated as that user and whilst it is possible to set a windows service to logon as a specific user a better solution would be to ...
Create a winforms program using a hidden form and launch it when the user logs on using Task Scheduler.
This way the PC can be used by many users and benefit from the application without having to change the service logon settings.
I suggested a winforms application as it has a low entry bar, you can use any other kind of invisible from a UI perspective project type.

A: you should use linqtowmi for this it works great!


text:
Home / Events / Close to You
08:00 PM, February 19, 2022 | Orpheum Theatre
Considered one of the best vocalists of all time, Karen Carpenter captured the attention of a generation with the surprisingly deep material of her unabashedly catchy pop music. Singer and playwright Lisa Rock has compiled a moving tribute to the music and life of Carpenter, and brings it to the stage with her 6-piece band. Dedicated to re-creating the true sound of The Carpenters, Rock and her band showcase some of the most memorable songs of the 70s including "We've Only Just Begun," "Rainy Days and Mondays," and of course "Close to You."
2022-02-19 2022-02-19 20:00:00 Close to You
Considered one of the best vocalists of all time, Karen Carpenter captured the attention of a generation with the surprisingly deep material of her unabashedly catchy pop music. Singer and playwright Lisa Rock has compiled a moving tribute to the music and life of Carpenter, and brings it to the stage with her 6-piece band. Dedicated to re-creating the true sound of The Carpenters, Rock and her band showcase some of the most memorable songs of the 70s including "We've Only Just Begun," "Rainy Days and Mondays," and of course "Close to You."
 200 N. Broadway St. Wichita, KS America/Chicago
200 N. Broadway St.


text:
samseinfos.com > family life > genealogy > What do genealogy mean
What do genealogy mean
genealogy, the study of family origins, and history. … The word genealogy comes from two Greek words: one meaning "race" or "family" and the other "theory" or "science." To trace ancestry, the science of studying family history.
What is Jesus genealogy?
What means genealogy?
How many years is 20 generations?
What does genealogy include?
How do you make a career out of genealogy?
Why is genealogy important in history?
What does genealogy mean in philosophy?
© typepad.com
Matthew began Jesus' lineage with Abraham and named each father in 41 generations that ended in Matthew 1:16: "And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ." . Joseph descended from David through his son Solomon. … Joseph and Mary were distant cousins.
How many generations are there in Jesus' genealogy? The Seventy-Seven Generations of Luke: A Messianic Prediction in the Gospel of Luke, based on a parallel to the first book of Enoch. In the Gospel of Luke 3: 23-38, we can read the genealogy of Jesus of Nazareth.
What does Jesus' genealogy indicate? What does the genealogy of Jesus indicate? Indicates that Jesus is the new Adam. What are the four main types of Old Testament books?
1: an account of the descent of a person, family, or group of an ancestor or of older forms. 2: regular descent of a person, family, or group of organisms from a parent (see sense of parent 1) or an older form: pedigree. 3: the study of family ancestral lines.
What is the meaning of genealogy, why is it important? Genealogy is the study of the history of families, especially through the study of historical documents to discover the relationships between specific people and their families.
What does a genealogy do? Genealogists use oral interviews, historical records, genetic analysis, and other records to obtain information about a family and to prove the kinship and genealogy of its members. The results are often shown in graphs or written as narratives.
What is the difference between ancestry and genealogy? Thus, the difference between genealogical and genetic ancestry can be summarized in the observation that whole siblings have identical genealogical ancestry but differ in their genetic ancestry, due to differences in the transmission of chromosomal segments from their parents.
Since each generation lasts about 25 years, we simply divide 500 by 25 to determine that there are 20 generations in 500 years.
How old are 15 generations? The idea that there are about 20 years in a generation would indicate that 15 generations is about 300 years. 300 years and more than 32,000 individuals.
How many generations are 4000 years old? For example, a population of 4,000 individuals would have, on average, a more recent common ancestor about 13 generations before and an IAP about 24 or 25 generations before.
Genealogy, researching your family history, or maybe you like solving puzzles or mysteries! … And this is what genealogy is: the search for your family tree; learn about who came before you and by adding these names to a family chart (also called a family tree).
What should be included in a genealogy book? Think about all the research, family stories, photos, periods, events, people, documents, and memories you can include in your book. There really are no rules about what a family history book should look like.
What is the difference between family history and genealogy? Definition: Genealogy: A study of family ancestors with relevant data such as dates of birth, marriage, and death. Family history: an in-depth study of a family lineage with more emphasis and clarification on the life story of each ancestor. … Full names of their parents, place of birth, date of marriage and place.
What does a family chart show? Each leaf represents individual family members with information such as dates of birth, marriage, and death. A family tree diagram or family chart makes it easy to record the people, places, and events that make up your family history and then share them with others.
How to Become a Professional Genealogist
Join the Association of Professional Genealogists. …
Prepare and request certification and / or accreditation. …
Attend educational seminars and workshops. …
Subscribe to journals / genealogical journals and read all pages. …
Explore local courts, libraries, and archives.
How Much Money Does a Genealogy Researcher Make? Salary Summary The average salary for a genealogist is $ 72,320 a year and $ 35 an hour in the United States. The average salary range for a genealogist is between $ 52,016 and $ 89,097. On average, a bachelor's degree is the highest level of education for a genealogist.
Can genealogy be a career? Genealogists often find work as a librarian, tour guide, archivist, or private business owner. To become a professional genealogist, you typically need post-secondary education in a related field, such as genealogy courses and seminars at a national university or genealogy society.
Is there a demand for genealogists? There is a huge demand for this, especially from experienced genealogists or family historians who know exactly what they want you to get for them. Very often, the client does not give you the full details of the family in which he is working.
Genealogy research can be a great family activity, involving siblings, children, and grandchildren. It can bring family members together around a shared interest and also inspire intergenerational storytelling and exchange. Learning about common ancestors has a way of opening doors of communication.
What is genealogy for? genealogy, the study of family origins, and history. Genealogists compile lists of ancestors, who organize them into genealogical charts or other written forms.
It is important to know your family history Why or why not? While you may not be able to change your genetic makeup, knowing your family history can help you reduce your risk of developing health problems. Family members share their genes, as well as their environment, lifestyles, and habits. … The risks of diseases such as asthma, diabetes, cancer and heart disease also run in families.
Why do we care about genealogy? This has made genealogy accessible to the masses. As the world becomes more full and anonymous, ancestry tracking allows people to feel more connected to others, he said. Sites like Ancestry.com allow people to find distant cousins they never knew existed, he said.
In philosophy, genealogy is a historical technique in which the commonly understood appearance of various philosophical and social beliefs is questioned in an attempt to explain the scope, breadth, or totality of discourse, thus expanding the possibility of analysis, as opposed to to the Marxist use of the term ideology …
What does Foucault mean by genealogical method? Foucault's genealogical method, in short, is a methodology of suspicion and criticism, a series of procedures of defamiliarization and re-conceptualization that belong not only to any object of knowledge of the human sciences, but to any procedure (or position) of the knowledge of the human sciences. -production.
What is the meaning of genealogy? Genealogy research gives you the opportunity to trace the legal ownership of land over time to find out who has today's legitimate title. Location of biological parents: This is a common reason for researching genealogy.
What is genealogy
How to do genealogy research


text:
package main

import (
	"flag"
	"fmt"
	"go/ast"
	"go/token"
	"strings"
	"unicode/utf8"
)

var printfuncs = flag.String("printfuncs", "", "comma-separated list of print function names to check")

// printfList records the formatted-print functions. The value is the location
// of the format parameter. Names are lower-cased so the lookup is
// case insensitive.
var printfList = map[string]int{
	"errorf":  0,
	"fatalf":  0,
	"fprintf": 1,
	"panicf":  0,
	"printf":  0,
	"sprintf": 0,
}

// printList records the unformatted-print functions. The value is the location
// of the first parameter to be printed.  Names are lower-cased so the lookup is
// case insensitive.
var printList = map[string]int{
	"error":  0,
	"fatal":  0,
	"fprint": 1, "fprintln": 1,
	"panic": 0, "panicln": 0,
	"print": 0, "println": 0,
	"sprint": 0, "sprintln": 0,
}

// checkCall triggers the print-specific checks if the call invokes a print function.
func (f *File) checkFmtPrintfCall(call *ast.CallExpr, Name string) {
	name := strings.ToLower(Name)
	if skip, ok := printfList[name]; ok {
		f.checkPrintf(call, Name, skip)
		return
	}
	if skip, ok := printList[name]; ok {
		f.checkPrint(call, Name, skip)
		return
	}
}

// literal returns the literal value represented by the expression, or nil if it is not a literal.
func (f *File) literal(value ast.Expr) *ast.BasicLit {
	switch v := value.(type) {
	case *ast.BasicLit:
		return v
	case *ast.Ident:
		// See if it's a constant or initial value (we can't tell the difference).
		if v.Obj == nil || v.Obj.Decl == nil {
			return nil
		}
		valueSpec, ok := v.Obj.Decl.(*ast.ValueSpec)
		if ok && len(valueSpec.Names) == len(valueSpec.Values) {
			// Find the index in the list of names
			var i int
			for i = 0; i < len(valueSpec.Names); i++ {
				if valueSpec.Names[i].Name == v.Name {
					if lit, ok := valueSpec.Values[i].(*ast.BasicLit); ok {
						return lit
					}
					return nil
				}
			}
		}
	}
	return nil
}

// checkPrintf checks a call to a formatted print routine such as Printf.
// The skip argument records how many arguments to ignore; that is,
// call.Args[skip] is (well, should be) the format argument.
func (f *File) checkPrintf(call *ast.CallExpr, name string, skip int) {
	if len(call.Args) <= skip {
		return
	}
	lit := f.literal(call.Args[skip])
	if lit == nil {
		if *verbose {
			f.Warn(call.Pos(), "can't check non-literal format in call to", name)
		}
		return
	}
	if lit.Kind != token.STRING {
		f.Badf(call.Pos(), "literal %v not a string in call to", lit.Value, name)
	}
	format := lit.Value
	if !strings.Contains(format, "%") {
		if len(call.Args) > skip+1 {
			f.Badf(call.Pos(), "no formatting directive in %s call", name)
		}
		return
	}
	// Hard part: check formats against args.
	// Trivial but useful test: count.
	numArgs := 0
	for i, w := 0, 0; i < len(format); i += w {
		w = 1
		if format[i] == '%' {
			nbytes, nargs := f.parsePrintfVerb(call, format[i:])
			w = nbytes
			numArgs += nargs
		}
	}
	expect := len(call.Args) - (skip + 1)
	if numArgs != expect {
		f.Badf(call.Pos(), "wrong number of args in %s call: %d needed but %d args", name, numArgs, expect)
	}
}

// parsePrintfVerb returns the number of bytes and number of arguments
// consumed by the Printf directive that begins s, including its percent sign
// and verb.
func (f *File) parsePrintfVerb(call *ast.CallExpr, s string) (nbytes, nargs int) {
	// There's guaranteed a percent sign.
	flags := make([]byte, 0, 5)
	nbytes = 1
	end := len(s)
	// There may be flags.
FlagLoop:
	for nbytes < end {
		switch s[nbytes] {
		case '#', '0', '+', '-', ' ':
			flags = append(flags, s[nbytes])
			nbytes++
		default:
			break FlagLoop
		}
	}
	getNum := func() {
		if nbytes < end && s[nbytes] == '*' {
			nbytes++
			nargs++
		} else {
			for nbytes < end && '0' <= s[nbytes] && s[nbytes] <= '9' {
				nbytes++
			}
		}
	}
	// There may be a width.
	getNum()
	// If there's a period, there may be a precision.
	if nbytes < end && s[nbytes] == '.' {
		flags = append(flags, '.') // Treat precision as a flag.
		nbytes++
		getNum()
	}
	// Now a verb.
	c, w := utf8.DecodeRuneInString(s[nbytes:])
	nbytes += w
	if c != '%' {
		nargs++
		f.checkPrintfVerb(call, c, flags)
	}
	return
}

type printVerb struct {
	verb  rune
	flags string // known flags are all ASCII
}

// Common flag sets for printf verbs.
const (
	numFlag      = " -+.0"
	sharpNumFlag = " -+.0#"
	allFlags     = " -+.0#"
)

// printVerbs identifies which flags are known to printf for each verb.
// TODO: A type that implements Formatter may do what it wants, and vet
// will complain incorrectly.
var printVerbs = []printVerb{
	// '-' is a width modifier, always valid.
	// '.' is a precision for float, max width for strings.
	// '+' is required sign for numbers, Go format for %v.
	// '#' is alternate format for several verbs.
	// ' ' is spacer for numbers
	{'b', numFlag},
	{'c', "-"},
	{'d', numFlag},
	{'e', numFlag},
	{'E', numFlag},
	{'f', numFlag},
	{'F', numFlag},
	{'g', numFlag},
	{'G', numFlag},
	{'o', sharpNumFlag},
	{'p', "-#"},
	{'q', "-+#."},
	{'s', "-."},
	{'t', "-"},
	{'T', "-"},
	{'U', "-#"},
	{'v', allFlags},
	{'x', sharpNumFlag},
	{'X', sharpNumFlag},
}

const printfVerbs = "bcdeEfFgGopqstTvxUX"

func (f *File) checkPrintfVerb(call *ast.CallExpr, verb rune, flags []byte) {
	// Linear scan is fast enough for a small list.
	for _, v := range printVerbs {
		if v.verb == verb {
			for _, flag := range flags {
				if !strings.ContainsRune(v.flags, rune(flag)) {
					f.Badf(call.Pos(), "unrecognized printf flag for verb %q: %q", verb, flag)
				}
			}
			return
		}
	}
	f.Badf(call.Pos(), "unrecognized printf verb %q", verb)
}

// checkPrint checks a call to an unformatted print routine such as Println.
// The skip argument records how many arguments to ignore; that is,
// call.Args[skip] is the first argument to be printed.
func (f *File) checkPrint(call *ast.CallExpr, name string, skip int) {
	isLn := strings.HasSuffix(name, "ln")
	isF := strings.HasPrefix(name, "F")
	args := call.Args
	// check for Println(os.Stderr, ...)
	if skip == 0 && !isF && len(args) > 0 {
		if sel, ok := args[0].(*ast.SelectorExpr); ok {
			if x, ok := sel.X.(*ast.Ident); ok {
				if x.Name == "os" && strings.HasPrefix(sel.Sel.Name, "Std") {
					f.Warnf(call.Pos(), "first argument to %s is %s.%s", name, x.Name, sel.Sel.Name)
				}
			}
		}
	}
	if len(args) <= skip {
		if *verbose && !isLn {
			f.Badf(call.Pos(), "no args in %s call", name)
		}
		return
	}
	arg := args[skip]
	if lit, ok := arg.(*ast.BasicLit); ok && lit.Kind == token.STRING {
		if strings.Contains(lit.Value, "%") {
			f.Badf(call.Pos(), "possible formatting directive in %s call", name)
		}
	}
	if isLn {
		// The last item, if a string, should not have a newline.
		arg = args[len(call.Args)-1]
		if lit, ok := arg.(*ast.BasicLit); ok && lit.Kind == token.STRING {
			if strings.HasSuffix(lit.Value, `\n"`) {
				f.Badf(call.Pos(), "%s call ends with newline", name)
			}
		}
	}
}

// This function never executes, but it serves as a simple test for the program.
// Test with make test.
func BadFunctionUsedInTests() {
	fmt.Println()                      // not an error
	fmt.Println("%s", "hi")            // ERROR "possible formatting directive in Println call"
	fmt.Printf("%s", "hi", 3)          // ERROR "wrong number of args in Printf call"
	fmt.Printf("%s%%%d", "hi", 3)      // correct
	fmt.Printf("%.*d", 3, 3)           // correct
	fmt.Printf("%.*d", 3, 3, 3)        // ERROR "wrong number of args in Printf call"
	printf("now is the time", "buddy") // ERROR "no formatting directive"
	Printf("now is the time", "buddy") // ERROR "no formatting directive"
	Printf("hi")                       // ok
	const format = "%s %s\n"
	Printf(format, "hi", "there")
	Printf(format, "hi") // ERROR "wrong number of args in Printf call"
	f := new(File)
	f.Warn(0, "%s", "hello", 3)  // ERROR "possible formatting directive in Warn call"
	f.Warnf(0, "%s", "hello", 3) // ERROR "wrong number of args in Warnf call"
	f.Warnf(0, "%r", "hello")    // ERROR "unrecognized printf verb"
	f.Warnf(0, "%#s", "hello")   // ERROR "unrecognized printf flag"
}

type BadTypeUsedInTests struct {
	X int "hello" // ERROR "struct field tag"
}

func (t *BadTypeUsedInTests) Scan(x fmt.ScanState, c byte) { // ERROR "method Scan[(]x fmt.ScanState, c byte[)] should have signature Scan[(]fmt.ScanState, rune[)] error"
}

type BadInterfaceUsedInTests interface {
	ReadByte() byte // ERROR "method ReadByte[(][)] byte should have signature ReadByte[(][)] [(]byte, error[)]"
}

// printf is used by the test.
func printf(format string, args ...interface{}) {
	panic("don't call - testing only")
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


The KRT17 gene provides instructions for making a protein called keratin 17 or K17. Keratins are a group of tough, fibrous proteins that form the structural framework of certain cells, particularly cells that make up the skin, hair, nails, and similar tissues. Keratin 17 is produced in the nails, the hair follicles, and the skin on the palms of the hands and soles of the feet. It is also found in the skin's sebaceous glands, which produce an oily substance called sebum that normally lubricates the skin and hair.
Keratin 17 partners with a similar protein, keratin 6b, to form molecules called keratin intermediate filaments. These filaments assemble into dense networks that provide strength and resilience to the skin, nails, and other tissues. Networks of keratin intermediate filaments protect these tissues from being damaged by friction and other everyday physical stresses. Keratin 17 is also among several keratins involved in wound healing.
More than 20 mutations in the KRT17 gene have been identified in people with pachyonychia congenita, a rare condition that primarily affects the nails and skin. In most cases, this condition becomes apparent within the first few months of life. Most of the KRT17 gene mutations associated with pachyonychia congenita change single protein building blocks (amino acids) in keratin 17.
The KRT17 gene mutations responsible for pachyonychia congenita change the structure of keratin 17, preventing it from interacting effectively with keratin 6b and interfering with the assembly of the keratin intermediate filament network. Without this network, skin cells become fragile and are easily damaged, making the skin less resistant to friction and minor trauma. Even normal activities such as walking can cause skin cells to break down, resulting in the formation of painful blisters and calluses. In the sebaceous glands, abnormal keratin filaments lead to the development of sebum-filled cysts called steatocystomas. Defective keratin 17 also disrupts the growth and function of other tissues, such as the hair follicles and nails, which explains why the signs and symptoms of pachyonychia congenita can also affect these other parts of the body.
At least four mutations in the KRT17 gene have been found to cause a skin disorder called hereditary steatocystoma multiplex. Researchers suggest that this condition may be a mild form (variant) of pachyonychia congenita (described above). Like pachyonychia congenita, hereditary steatocystoma multiplex involves the development of multiple sebaceous gland cysts called steatocystomas. Most people with hereditary steatocystoma multiplex do not have the other features of pachyonychia congenita, although mild nail and dental abnormalities are possible.
The KRT17 gene mutations that cause hereditary steatocystoma multiplex change single amino acids in the keratin 17 protein, which interferes with the assembly of the keratin intermediate filament network. In the sebaceous glands, these keratin abnormalities lead to the development of steatocystomas. It is unclear why these sebum-containing cysts are typically the only feature of this disorder.
Liao H, Sayers JM, Wilson NJ, Irvine AD, Mellerio JE, Baselga E, Bayliss SJ, Uliana V, Fimiani M, Lane EB, McLean WH, Leachman SA, Smith FJ. A spectrum of mutations in keratins K6a, K16 and K17 causing pachyonychia congenita. J Dermatol Sci. 2007 Dec;48(3):199-205. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
McGowan KM, Coulombe PA. Keratin 17 expression in the hard epithelial context of the hair and nail, and its relevance for the pachyonychia congenita phenotype. J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Jun;114(6):1101-7.
McLean WH, Rugg EL, Lunny DP, Morley SM, Lane EB, Swensson O, Dopping-Hepenstal PJ, Griffiths WA, Eady RA, Higgins C, et al. Keratin 16 and keratin 17 mutations cause pachyonychia congenita. Nat Genet. 1995 Mar;9(3):273-8.
Smith FJ, Coleman CM, Bayoumy NM, Tenconi R, Nelson J, David A, McLean WH. Novel keratin 17 mutations in pachyonychia congenita type 2. J Invest Dermatol. 2001 May;116(5):806-8.
Terrinoni A, Smith FJ, Didona B, Canzona F, Paradisi M, Huber M, Hohl D, David A, Verloes A, Leigh IM, Munro CS, Melino G, McLean WH. Novel and recurrent mutations in the genes encoding keratins K6a, K16 and K17 in 13 cases of pachyonychia congenita. J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Dec;117(6):1391-6.


The parents of a black teen say he was harassed, called the n-word and had rocks chucked at him while on a Boy Scouts camping trip at Camp Woodruff in north Georgia, reports AL.com.
The boy's parents are Ethiopian immigrants and say the blatant harassment and racist remarks came at the hands of white Boy Scouts during the week-long camping trip with Troop 10 from Johns Creek, Ga.
According to reports, boys from Troop 76 from Vestavia Hills threw rocks and was responsible for bullying the 14-year-old old.
"It upsets me that this is that boy's summer camp memory," said Leanne Potts, a parent whose son is in Troop 10 with the 14-year-old who was bullied.
"The members of Troop 76 had thrown rocks," Potts confirmed.
Some scouts also allegedly were wearing Donald Trump "Make America Great Again" hats at the camp.
"The rocks are not accurate," Spiegel said.
However, Rev. Wade Griffith, senior pastor of Liberty Crossings United Methodist Church, which sponsors Troop 76, was more sympathetic when he addressed the issue to his members.
"What happened was very regrettable and is absolutely inconsistent with the values and high ideals of scouting and, more importantly, the United Methodist Church," he wrote.
Matt Rendahl, director of camping for Camp Woodruff said the incident was handled.
"We shouldn't have that in camp, or anywhere," Rendahl said about the use of the racial slur.


First is Water to Water by Karen Wyle. You can find my reviews of Karen Wyle's earlier novels on Goodreads, and you'll tell from their number and ratings that I love her writing. Water to Water is no exception--a well-imagined alien world with truly alien life-forms, alien culture, and even alien faith. Readers are quickly drawn into lives and questions as a young adult comes to terms with his father's passing. But why do the dead go to the sea? Where do the dead of other species go? And what is soul? A truly intriguing tale to enjoy with some elegantly complex four-star coffee.
Continuing a theme of water and youthful protagonists, Portal Through The Pond by David K. Anderson stands alone as an intriguing alien worlds tale for middle grade and up, but is also a fascinating start to a new series. It's team of young protagonists are set on their curious path after the death of Christy's grandmother, and the revelation of grandma's secrets. An interesting team are gathered at different times--Christy's old friends, old enemies, new friend... and the self-blaming girl, partially deaf boy, and angry rebel all end on their own journey across a nicely imagined, very strange landscape, from pond to pond perhaps. Enjoy this adventure-style novel with some easy-drinking two-star coffee.
Dream of the Navigator by Stephen Zimmer is first in a dystopian series for teens, blending the dystopian tropes of an over-controlled society with fantasy elements of worlds beyond our own and powers at play, preying on humanity or striving to save us. It's a cool blend and a fascinating novel, very dialog-driven and drawing strongly on present-day politics and science. Enjoy with some dark five-star coffee.
But now it's time for real coffee and real life again. I think I need another book! Strange new worlds are FUN.


Mike wouldn't just put down adults. He put down our son Benjamin as a kid. This was a constant thing, like one time I took the kids shopping with Mike. Benjamin didn't want the clothes Mike picked for him. Mike told Benjamin he was a "wuss" for picking those clothes and that I must have been influencing him and told him he is "just like your Mom" (as if this is bad). Benjamin just went silent and would then buy nothing.


Floor ~ Egger Classic 12mm Olchon Oak Dark Laminate Flooring Epl147 Egger Classic 12mm Olchon Oak Dark Laminate Flooring Epl147 Floor Amazing Photo 61 Amazing Dark Laminate Flooring Photo Ideas. Dark Laminate Flooring Reviews. Dark Laminate Flooring Per Case. Dark Laminate Flooring Pros And Cons.


Ask us a new one!
Have a question? Let our outstanding customer support team for Fake Book Covers provide you the answers you seek. Complete the form at the bottom of the page for additional assistance.
We start working on your order as soon as it is placed, so we are unable to make any changes or modifications to an order after it has been placed and confirmed.
Once your order has been shipped, you'll be provided with a tracking number by the shipping company.
Can I request an item to be gift wrapped?
For US shipments, after your order has been placed, contact us within 2-3 hours. Unfortunately, we are unable to offer gift wrap options for orders shipped outside the US.
What payments methods does Fake Book Covers accept?
*Please note, PayPal is unavailable to customers in Turkey.
We are required to collect sales tax for Texas deliveries.
When you place an order, your credit or debit card is initially charged to ensure funds for the order are available. You will only be charged for the items that are shipped, along with applicable shipping and tax rates. If an item is not available, that portion of your order will be refunded.
These rates are not applicable for orders shipped outside of the US. Please note: Some oversized items may require an additional shipping charge. Free Shipping applies only to merchandise. Taxes do not count towards the Free Shipping total.
How much does it cost to ship outside the US?
Most International orders will ship out within 2 business days of ordering. Orders are subject to verification and approval before shipping and may take up to 72 hours to process.
Customs departments in each country often have regulations that should be investigated prior to placing orders; these may pertain to duty taxes and/or allowable items. We cannot be responsible for any additional expenses incurred or for the retention of your order by customs if it does not pass inspection, and you will not be refunded. The customer is responsible for all expenses in these circumstances.
* Express and Economy rates only cover shipping charges. Duties and taxes may be due to the parcel carrier upon delivery. Express delivery is not available for all countries.
Standard shipping for US orders takes an estimated 5-9 business dates. Express shipping takes an estimated 2-3 business days.
Please note that our delivery options refer only to the delivery time frame and not the time required to prepare your order. While more orders are ready for shipping within 1 day of ordering, some orders may take additional time. Orders shipped outside of the contiguous US and to PO boxes are shipped via USPS.
Most orders will ship out within 1 business day of ordering. Orders are subject to verification and approval before shipping and may take up to 48 hours to process. Please note that we do not ship on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. While we will do all we can to ensure your order is delivered on time, Fake Book Covers cannot be held responsible for conditions beyond our control such as severe weather, service interruptions, etc.
Once your order has shipped, you will receive an email with shipping tracking information.
For international orders, should I expect to pay duties and taxes for my order?
International orders can be shipped with duties and taxes due upon delivery via our Express or Economy ship methods. These orders may be delivered by your local postal service. Although charges are not always incurred, assessment of duties and taxes will be based on the value of the order and the tax-free threshold, if it exists, for goods imported into the destination country. Payment of any duties and taxes is the responsibility of the recipient and these fees are collected at the time of delivery. More information can be obtained by contacting your local customs office.
What qualifies as restricted merchandise?
We are unable to ship certain items outside of the contiguous US. If this applies to your order, we'll let you know after a member of our team has confirmed your order and shipping details with international regulations.
ALL SALES ARE FINAL. When you receive your package, promptly check the items. We will credit or exchange for DEFECTIVE items only (or for any shipping errors made by us). You must contact us here for a Return Merchandise Authorization. Please note: As part of the return process, upon receipt of an authorized return, if the returned item is found to be in perfect condition, a 25% restocking fee will be applied.
ALL SALES ARE FINAL. When you receive your package, promptly check the items. We will credit or exchange for DEFECTIVE items only (or for any shipping errors made by us). You must contact us here for a Return Merchandise Authorization. Place it in a securely sealed shipping container. Don't forget to save a copy of your order number for your records – you can find it in your packing list. Make sure any old labels on your package are removed or obscured and affix your shipping label. Address your package to the address mentioned in the packing list included with your order. Returns must be sent with tracking confirmation. After you have shipped the item back, immediately send us the tracking number here. Please note: As part of the return process, upon receipt of an authorized return, if the returned item is found to be in perfect condition, a 25% restocking fee will be applied.
If you receive a damaged or defective item, please contact us immediately and we will help you exchange or return the item. Please note: As part of the return process, upon receipt of an authorized return, if the returned item is found to be in perfect condition, a 25% restocking fee will be applied.
Can I exchange my order if I'm an international customer?
Unfortunately, exchanges are not available. Items can only be returned for a refund if damaged or defective. If you would like a replacement item, please place another order online.
Please allow 2-3 weeks from the time you mail your return/exchange for it to be processed. We will email you once it is processed. If you've requested an exchange, we will contact you with an invoice for the shipping charges on the exchanged item. Once payment has been received, the exchanged item will be shipped to you. If you would like to expedite the exchange process, please return your original item and place a new order for the item you want.
Buyfakebookcovers.com takes great pride in offering a safe and secure online shopping experience. We understand that the safety of your personal information is extremely important to you. We use a wide array of electronic and physical security measures and devices to protect your personal data and credit card information from unauthorized access.
Our payment processing company uses SSL encryption to secure the communication of all sensitive information passing between your browser and our servers. To confirm that it is a secure connection, you should see the https://www.paypal.com/.... in the URL. The "https" indicates that it's using SSL. Furthermore, you should see a yellow lock at the bottom right corner of your browser.
Shouldn't the address bar show https:// rather than http://www.Buyfakebookcovers.com/? Doesn't the 's' at the end mean it is a secure connection?
Pages that are only used for products or blogs will still use the regular http:// since no sensitive information is being passed through them.
Yes! Our awesome payment processing company go to great lengths to ensure the safety of our customers' payment information. All payment information is encrypted and connections too. Look for the https://www.paypal.com symbol in your browser URL after you have selected a product you would like to purchase from our website.


Amazon: Striped Raglan Tunic Top for Just $4.99 Shipped! | Happy Deal - Happy Day!
Adreamly Women's Striped Raglan Short Sleeve Color Block T Shirt Tunic Tops for $9.99 (size M is that price) Use promo code 50FQ6W62 and your price drops to just $4.99!!
Striped top made of high quality material, Lightweight, breathable and stretchy. Soft to touch and wear.
Design with striped pactch work ,raglan short sleeve, cute hem with high low cutting and boat neck. This stylish striped top is must-have for your summer wardrobe.
Women striped tunic top suitable for summer and spring, daily wear, home, working, holiday party, vacation,and many occasions.


text:
Q: UIView not animated properly using UIView Animation I am working on UIView Animation. I want to move a view upside while i scroll up and should move down when i scroll down.
- (void)scrollViewDidScroll:(UIScrollView *)scrollView {
CGPoint scrollVelocity = [_collectionViewLeaderboard.panGestureRecognizer velocityInView:_collectionViewLeaderboard.superview];
if (scrollVelocity.y > 0.0f){
    NSLog(@"going down");
    [UIView animateWithDuration:0.3f
                              animations:^ {

                                  _headerview.frame = CGRectMake(0, 0, _headerview.frame.size.width, _headerview.frame.size.height);

                                  _headerviewSecond.frame = CGRectMake(0, _headerview.frame.size.height, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.width, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.height);

                                  self.collectionViewLeaderboard.frame = CGRectMake(self.view.frame.origin.x, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.height+_headerview.frame.size.height, self.view.frame.size.width, self.view.frame.size.height);

                                  frameconditon = _headerview.frame;
                                  _viewOptions.frame = CGRectMake(_viewOptions.frame.origin.x,_headerview.frame.size.height+_headerviewSecond.frame.size.height+30, _viewOptions.frame.size.width, _viewOptions.frame.size.height);

                                      } completion:^ (BOOL completed) {

                              }];

}
else if (scrollVelocity.y < 0.0f){
    NSLog(@"going up");

               [UIView animateWithDuration:5.3 animations:^{

                   _headerview.frame = CGRectMake(_headerview.frame.origin.x, -(_headerview.frame.size.height), _headerview.frame.size.width, _headerview.frame.size.height);

                   _headerviewSecond.frame = CGRectMake(0, (_headerview.frame.size.height)-40, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.width, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.height);

                   self.collectionViewLeaderboard.frame = CGRectMake(self.view.frame.origin.x, _headerviewSecond.frame.size.height, self.view.frame.size.width, self.view.frame.size.height);
                    frameconditon = _headerviewSecond.frame;

                   _viewOptions.frame = CGRectMake(_viewOptions.frame.origin.x,_headerviewSecond.frame.size.height+20, _viewOptions.frame.size.width, _viewOptions.frame.size.height);

        } completion:^(BOOL finished) {

        }];

    }
}

A: I believe its very simple thing if you want to move the view up and down.
Because If you add view in scroll view you can automatically get the view up and down along with the scroll. You just need to set "contentSize" property of scrollView.
If its not the case, you are trying to get panGesture of UICollectionView then you can not get in "scrollViewDidScroll" method.
Here is the useful tutorial on UIPanGestureRecognizer with UICollectionView. Hope so it will help.
https://uncorkedstudios.com/blog/using-uigesturerecognizers-with-uicollectionviews


Today i decided to move my DHCP from the old Small Business Server 2003 as their is no longer support for this version of Windows and moving it to a newer OS will be better. The move was pretty straight forward, you can look at the link below, i successfully exported the DB, installed the DHCP role on Windows 2008 R2 and reimported the DB without any errors. All my reservations and leases were still in place.
I then unauthorized DHCP on SBS 2003 and removed the role. I then rebooted one of my notebooks and let it renew its IP, that was successful as well. Hope it helps anybody else who is trying to move roles.