*If your curtains do not already have gathering tape attached as ours did, you will also need to purchase the gathering tape and sew it on to your curtains.
I finally gave in and bought some penguin classics illustrated by Coralie Bickford-Smith for our new faux mantel! I love them! I'm also really needing to share an update of our living space! I'll be ready soon!


text:
Соммарива — итальянская фамилия и топоним

Топоним
 Соммарива-дель-Боско — коммуна в Италии в провинции Кунео региона Пьемонт.
 Соммарива-Перно — аналогично.

Фамилия
 Соммарива, Ганнибал ди (Аннибале; 1755—1829) — австрийский генерал кавалерии итальянского происхождения.
 Соммарива, Лоренцо (род. 1993) — итальянский сноубордист (англ.).
 Соммарива, Эмилио (1883—1956) — итальянский художник и фотограф (англ.).
 Д'Анна де Соммарива, Анджело (1340—1428) — итальянский куриальный кардинал.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Give your team the freedom to get things done anywhere, and they'll be even more motivated and productive. That's why we created Toshiba Mobile Zero Client (TMZC) – a clientless solution that empowers your staff to work on the move, while following all of your security regulations.
Empower your staff to work anywhere on-site using award-winning Toshiba-branded hardware from Dynabook.
No update of end user devices is required. All updates are centrally managed and prepared by our TMZC experts based on your requirements.
Choose from any Toshiba-branded chassis and create the right impression for your business.
For more information on our TMZC solution, email us at TACS-Security-Solutions@toshiba.com.


Getting married one month today and better late than never I need to start my skin care regime.
Elemis is fantastic. And drink LOADS of water!
It might be worth going and speaking to a beauty therapist and seeing what they recommend, as there's only so much you can do in a month.
I started Dermalogica about a month ago. I had a pretty good routine before but have gone a bit more up market with the products (it's bloody expensive now!). I like it so far although at first I bought the wrong products for my skin type, but things are much better now and I love the exfoliators! Don't go mad with it as you've not got long and don't want to aggrevate your skin with a sudden change. A good cleanser, exfoliator and moisturiser is worth buying to give yourself a good base for make-up. What type of skin have you got?
I've been looking up all kinds of tips online. I found "free"/"cheap" things and tried lemon juice- working so far.


text:
Podcast Archive Sign Up About Donate Search
Follow The Bulwark on Twitter The Bulwark RSS Feed
Never miss out on the best of The Bulwark.
Let's Not Forget About Biden's Gaffes
Before he faced #MeToo scrutiny, Crazy Uncle Joe was best remembered for his many verbal miscues.
by Benjamin Parker
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Print
The Democratic party has put the rest of its 2020 primary race on hold to fight over whether Joe Biden's "tactile politics" disqualify him as a candidate in the #MeToo era.
This is an awkward time for the former vice president, but there is one silver lining: It helps everyone forget his long list of other gaffes. Once we're done litigating his overly friendly hugs and hair sniffing, those could become the real liability for his campaign, assuming he jumps in.
Because when Biden opens his mouth in front of real, voting Americans, bad things happen.
Campaigning ahead of the 2008 elections, Biden identified "the number-one job facing the middle class… a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs." This was a radical departure from Biden's long-standing top priority, also three-letter word, "E-R-U-D-I-T-I-O-N."
In 2012, he had his own version of JEB! Bush's "Please clap" moment, telling a crowd of donors, "You all look dull as hell, I might add. The dullest audience I have ever spoken to, just sitting there, staring at me. Pretend you like me!"
The same droll charm was on display when Biden shared his condolences with the Irish prime minister on the death of his mother – who he realized part-way through was still alive. "She's – wait – you mom's still – your mom's still alive. You dad passed. God bless her soul."
Nailed it.
At least Biden doesn't have to worry about appearing low-energy. During the 1988 presidential race, a New Hampshire voter asked Biden about his law school record. Biden interrupted the man, gesturing vigorously,
I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect. I went to law school on a full academic scholarship, the only one in my class to have a full academic scholarship. The first year in law school I decided I didn't want to be in law school, and ended up in the bottom two thirds of my class, and then decided I wanted to stay, going back to law school, and in fact ended up in the top half of my class. I won the international moot court competition. I was the outstanding student in the political science department at the end of my year. I graduated with three degrees from undergraduate school and 165 credits — only needed 123 credits – and I'd be delighted to sit down and compare my IQ to yours if you'd like, Frank.
Poor Frank was eventually able to finish his question after Uncle Joe's tirade, much of which turned out to be false. But hey, at least he fights?
Further examples of Biden's tact and wit abound. There was the time he asked a man in a wheelchair to "Stand up, Chuck, let 'em see ya!" Or the time he graced America with his remarks on cultural diversity in his home state of Delaware, where "You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight a slight Indian accent. I'm not joking!" Luckily for Biden, none of these gaffs turned out to be a "big f***ing deal."
Does Biden really even want to run? It's not like he's missing out on a life of status and influence. As of now, he's widely respected among Democrats, he has a cushy position as a non-teaching professor in charge of a program named after him within a large university, and he can play kingmaker with his endorsement in the primaries, assuming he can get the candidate's name right.
And he doesn't have to answer questions from Frank anymore.
Benjamin Parker
Benjamin Parker is a senior editor at The Bulwark.
More from The Bulwark
What Would It Cost for Republicans to Condemn Trump?
Jonathan V. Last
But What About All the Americans Trump Didn't Tell to Go Back to Africa?
Christian Schneider
The F-35 Has Been a Mess. Is Our Military Aviation Dominance in Trouble?
Reuben Johnson
Bulwark Newsletters
An Open Letter to Megan Rapinoe, from America
Joel Engel
Scenes from America's Nervous Breakdown
The Fourth of July Is an Idea and Donald Trump Doesn't Understand It
The Breakup
Sarah Longwell
Copyright 2019, All Rights Reserved. The Bulwark is a project of Defending Democracy Together Institute.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


04/13/2019 - A bucket list item ⛳ Lessons from Golf: for Life & About Boundaries ⛳ And a favorite recipe for fish!
01/19/2019 - Re-Entry from Disney to the Snowy Midwest. A reminder that you NEED White Space. And, how to make "Bone Broth"
12/08/2018 - On Changes and Irony 🎄Think Before You Shop 🎄 And A favorite SAUCE recipe!
11/24/2018 - Short & Sweet Love Note. How to deal with Mental Clutter. And a yummy cranberry orange loaf recipe.
11/10/2018 - Reminders of Faith While Traveling 🌈 Which Room to Declutter First to Prep for the Holidays 🌈 And a Recipe for Apple Cider Muffins !
10/27/2018 - Are you always rushing around? 🍁 Is the Comparison Game keeping your from happiness? 🍁 And how about chicken and sweet potatoes for dinner?


Looking to Sell Your House in Maricopa?
You Need a Maricopa Agent!
I know what you are thinking, of course I'm going to say you need a Maricopa Agent to sell your Maricopa home, after all I'm an agent that lives in Maricopa. But I promise you, that isn't my motivation. Those that know me, know that I only want what is best for folks and I truly believe in my heart that you will see the best results by using a local agent. Let me explain 3 reasons why I believe you are better off with an agent that lives and works in Maricopa.
A lot of folks from the valley are great at knowing their own communities. Each community is made up of the different parts. For example, with Maricopa, not only do we have the 17 subdivisions we also have a whole section of acreage that has different values depending on where your land is located. This is no different from the subdivisions.
When looking at our subdivisions, we have some with community pools, one with a fitness center, most have parks and tot lots and some have lakes within them. Then we have some that are at the front of the city for quick access out-of-town and some nestled further east. We have some north of the tracks and some south of the tracks. Everyone puts a different value on what each of these locations and amenities mean to them and how much they are willing to pay for them. You need an agent that understands these little nuances.
While subdivisions can vary on where they are located in Maricopa, believe or not, your home's value can also change dramatically but where it is located within that subdivision. Let's take one of the most diverse subdivisions we have… Rancho el Dorado. You can have a 1600 sq ft home in Rancho el Dorado and the price can vary anywhere from say $135,000 to $235,000. That is a huge difference! As many of you know, Rancho is a pretty large subdivision.
The Duke Golf Course adds a whole new dynamic to pricing. Folks who have a home that back onto the golf course usually get a higher premium than those say around the southern side or northeastern side of the subdivision. Even some of the streets just outside of the golf course can have a big swing. You also experience this when two subdivisions overlap. For example, you notice this in area of Alterra and Maricopa Meadows. The same house will vary even though they are only a few streets apart. Does your agent understand this?
One of the biggest challenges that listing your home will have with an out of area agent is something you might not even know you are being neglected on. Let's say a potential buyer drives by your home, sees the sign and calls to set up a showing. They are in the area and would like to see if they could see it anytime before they leave to head back out of Maricopa (many buyers do not live here currently and visit the area to discover if they like it). Those of us that live locally, often will get calls from folks standing outside a home who wonder if we could show the home since the agent stated they lived over an hour away and couldn't make it out. When your agent lives here, they can usually break away or get a fellow agent to run out real quick.
The other benefit with local agents is, we tend to drive by your home on a regular basis. This is extremely beneficial for those that have had to move away and hope to have an extra set of eyes on the home. Local agents can provide this service. Many out of area agents only visit your home when they are in the area and this can stretch for weeks if not months at a time.
We know there are some great agents out there. Both in Maricopa and out. I've met some fantastic agents from the Valley. However, just like a Maricopa agent might not be the best or most informed agent for property in say Tempe or Scottsdale, neither are they for Maricopa. We each usually specialize in our local areas. Each town and local area has unique challenges and quirks.
Don't you want an agent that understands your Maricopa home?
You want an agent that understands not only how to list your home, but you want one that understands the potential buyers of your home. So those that live here understand better than anyone. We can help navigate both sides of the transaction due to our history and experience in Maricopa.
So before you settle on an agent, talk to a few. See how well they understand the unique challenges your home will have. And as always, make sure they will be honest with you. A good agent tells you both the pros and cons. Not just what they think you want to hear but more what you need to hear.
I've lived here since 2004 and love it. I understand that some folks sell their home to either move up in Maricopa or to head to a new area. Whatever your reason, I'd love to help!
Matter of fact, all of us here at the Maricopa Home Team live, work and love Maricopa. Any of us would love to help you either purchase or sell your home.


Al Gore Speaking Tonight at Walmart!
After requesting a book from my city library on Adorno, I discover to my satisfaction that one website has generous excerpts of Adorno's theories–enough for me not to need the library book after all. Swell. Have you ever thought about how much human labor and fuel can be saved simply by having web access to certain kinds of text and information? This by itself should be a reason for publicly-funded libraries to stay on the cutting edge of technology and to point patrons towards freely available options.
In an almost surreal juxtaposition, last night I was shopping at Walmart (long story) and while walking through the audio/video section I was treated to a 1 minute monologue by Al Gore promoting "An Inconvenient Truth." I also heard this same promo a few weeks ago while renting videos at my local Blockbuster store. The store's motives may simply have been commercial in nature, but isn't it interesting how an issue like Global Warming can suddenly pass into the mainstream to the point where it is used to sell things?
Occasionally bona fide intellectuals are tossed into the river of pop culture with often hilarious but salubrious results. (Susan Sontag on the Simpsons, George Soros on Republican campaign commercials, Stephen Hawking on Star Trek New Generation). Highbrow people love it because it provides the comforting illusion that intellectuals have influence; middlebrow people love it because it provides a lovable face for a package of complex and often subversive ideas.
Next post: Hey, what ever happened to copyright?


text:
info@norfarchtrust.org.uk
Film release: 'The Return of Happy Times': an insight into the Burgh Castle Almanac
Recorded over the past year, this moving and uplifting film – the title is taken from a saying on a Roman coin the Burgh Castle Almanac (BCA) group found at the Fort – illustrates the kind of activities the BCA have been involved in, with members also explaining how the group has benefited them. The film is directed by Lowestoft-based photographer and filmmaker Julian Claxton, together with members of the group.
It's hoped that other parts of the country will take up the BCA model, and the film is seen as a major contributing factor towards achieving that aim.
The film can be viewed on YouTube: please note this link with take you to an external website: 'The Return of Happy Times'
Burgh Castle Almanac is an archaeology, creativity and wellbeing programme based at Burgh Castle Fort and Time and Tide Museum. It is run by the Restoration Trust, in partnership with Norfolk Archaeological Trust and Stonham, supported by Access CT and Norfolk Museums Service. It is part of Water, Mills and Marshes, a Heritage Lottery Funded project that aims to help people make the most of unique heritage sites and landscapes in the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads. More information about the Burgh Castle Almanac can be found here
NAT's Director to step down in January
Norfolk Archaeological Trust's Director for the past six years, Caroline …Read More »
Hidden stories and mysterious soundscapes in September
Heritage Open Days is England's largest festival of history and …Read More »
Caistor Roman Town : New Guide!
We are very pleased to announce publication of a new …Read More »
Beginnings and endings
As it's January, named after Janus the Roman god of …Read More »
On the particular
In the run up to Christmas it's natural to reflect …Read More »
On streamlining lumps and bumps
The consultation period for the government's Planning for the Future …Read More »
Registered Charity No: 274604.
Company limited by guarantee.
Registered in England No: 191668
For all enquiries please email
© Norfolk Archaeological Trust | Designed by Starfish | Supported by Studio Blip


RW0121 LILAC DITSY FLORAL RUCHED CHEMO HAT WRAP [RW0121 LILAC DITSY] - £3.30 : UK Headwear for cancer, Chemo Hats for cancer patients, Turbans, Beanies & Head Scarves for hair loss.
Product description:These stretchy hat wraps/headbands are the perfect accessory to wear with any of the chemo hats in the range, this one is shown pictured on a LILAC hat which would need to be purchased separately.
Information: This ladies chemo hat headwrap is just one of the many items of chemo headwear and hats for cancer patients in the huge range that we have at Annabandana, all of our products are designed to cover hairloss caused by chemotherapy and radiation treatment for cancer and other conditions such as alopecia. We try to use soft and breathable fabrics such as cotton and bamboo as much as possible for comfort and most of our products are made in the UK. If you cannot find what you are looking for or need advice on any of our products please contact us and we will help you.


The event S.l., s.n., 1967? represents a publication, printing, distribution, issue, release or production of resources found in University of Oklahoma Libraries.
The Resource S.l., s.n., 1967?
6 Items that share the ProviderEvent S.l., s.n., 1967?
Context of S.l., s.n., 1967?
Data Citation of the ProviderEvent S.l., s.n., 1967?


The Chicago Dental Experience you Can Count On!
Welcome to Bucktown Dental Associates. We welcome patients from Bucktown, Wicker Park, and Logan Square. We are thrilled to announce we will be relocating to our beautiful new practice at 2156 N Damen Ave, on July 1st!
Chicago Bucktown Dental Associates, Dr. Elseweifi combines more than 30 years of clinical experience with the latest in dental technology. He is a fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry.
You can have the beautiful bright smile of your dream in one or two appointments. Bucktown Dental Associates offers single visit crowns by CEREC®. Call our office for a free cosmetic dentistry consultation. Dr. Elseweifi will present different treatment options. Treatment options may include orthodontics, teeth whitening, porcelain veneers, or cosmetic bonding. If you need teeth replacement, we talk about bridges, implants, or All-on-4® dental implants.
Looking for Bucktown dentist or a Wicker Park dentist? Dr. Yasser Elseweifi is a general dentist with more than 30 years of experience as a general & cosmetic dentist. He received his DDS degree in 1985. He earned Fellowship of the Academy of General Dentistry (FAGD) in 1999. He is one of only 7 percent of general dentists who achieved this honor. He is a member of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry.


This fabulous 2nd floor, 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom apartment with air conditioning and underfloor heating for the winter months,Enjoy complimentary wireless internet access throughout the apartment the apartment is conveniently located for access to the beach, shops, bars and restaurants and other amenities..
Its a 'Sun Worshippers' dream come true - Take advantage of the miles of sandy beaches which are literally on the doorstep. For the Golfer's who within 35 minutes of the apartment could be playing the fabulous La Manga Club or several newly opened courses, including Roda.
Chose to dine al fresco, on the terrace overlooking the Tomas Mastreo Marina. Or wander down to the marina and its cosmopolitan choice of restaurants & bars. Large comfortable lounge with TV, Stereo, Air Conditioning for the summer months & Warm air in the Winter plus underfloor heating. Separate fully fitted kitchen, with utility room, featuring a washing machine.
Overlooking Sun Terrace with full length sliding patio windows onto a terrace in main bedroom - plus built-in wardrobes and drawers in each bedroom. An added bonus for winter lets is the underfloor heating available in each room, including the bedrooms.
The apartment is complimented by full air conditioning throughout including the two bedrooms, lounge and dining room - A real plus when wanting to escape the sun just for 5 minutes or feeling comfortable whilst changing to get ready to sample the varied dining experiences around the Tomas Maestro Marina. Plus adding to the comfort of a good night's rest, whilst you recharge the batteries ready for the next day's sun bathing. Lounge has TV with satellite, DVD player and a CD player. Take your favourite CD's or DVD's with you! Please note that the apartment is cleaned prior to your arrival and after you leave.
The cleaner does not come during your stay. If you wish for an additional clean during your stay, there will be an extra charge.
Air conditioning units: Extended and fitted throughout the apartment - including, Bedrooms, Lounge and Dining room. They can provide warm or cool air.
For the winter months: Under floor heating is available and individually controlled for every room in the apartment including the entrance lobby. Smoking - although not allowed in the apartment is allowed and catered for on the terrace. Handy separate utility room featuring washing machine facilities to ensure winter or summer, all your needs are catered for.
The apartments at Los Miradores Del Puerto La Manga del Mar Mneor are 45 minutes drive from the local airport of Murcia (San Javier) which is becoming more and more popular with the low cost airlines (Ryanair, Jet2, Flybe, Monarch, BA etc) from several locations in the UK. Alicante is 1hr 20 mins drive and the new Murcia airport at Corvera will open late 2011 which will bring more tourists to the region.
The La Manga Strip has many blue flag beaches. From the apartment you are no further than a few minutes away from either the crystal clear waters of the Mar Menor or the Mediterranean Sea. The Costa Calida (Warm Coast) can be as active or as relaxing as you choose. The climate is ideal for all kinds of outdoor activities, from horse-riding, to sailing and from golf to scuba diving. With over 320 days of sunshine and summer temperatures of 26 degrees it really is a paradise between two seas. Well served by shops, bars, banks, restaurants, close to the marina and all water sports the La Manga Strip has something for everyone. This is a place where the Spanish come to holiday, which guarantees you a real flavor of Spain. The fishing village at the beginning of the strip (Cabo De Palos) is a must visit with its atmosphere, Sunday market, restaurants and night life is a great night out.
My friend John and I spent a lovely week on the La Manga Strip during half term 2009. We thought the apartment was beautiful and the views from the balcony were excellent. The apartment was very comfortable, clean and well equipted. There were bars and supermarkets within easy reach and the beach was a short walk away.
The marina opposite the apartment had a good selection of bars and restaurants and, again was within easy walking distance.
There was an excellent pool available to apartment residents. However, the sea was warm and safe and we spent much of our time down on the beach.


text:
« CLEAN POWER PLAN: Backers of Obama carbon rule see window in Supreme Court rebalancing
STOLL, KEENON AND OGDEN HAVE NEW MANAGER »
GSU Symposium Panelists Call for Cameras at US Supreme Court
Katheryn Hayes Tucker, Daily Report
February 17, 2016 | 0 Comments
L-R Robert Barnes, Dahlia Lithwick and Adam Liptak take part in the Keynote discussion at the GSU College of Law symposium Invisible Justices. Thursday February 11th 2016.
John Disney/Daily Report
The absence of cameras at the U.S. Supreme Court dominated discussion and debate among judges, professors, students and lawyers at Georgia State University last week.
The conversations took place at a GSU College of Law symposium titled "Invisible Justices: Supreme Court Transparency in the Age of Social Media."
Organizers— Professor Eric Segall and Law Review editors Luke Donohue and Christine Lee—took care to bring in a mix of voices. For example, Professor Nancy Marder of Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law said that putting the high court on visual display would not further the cause of justice. And attention was paid to the justices themselves arguing against cameras, fearing that news clips from their proceedings would be misleading.
But the consensus was clearly on the side of bringing the high court technologically into the 21st century.
"It's a government proceeding that we have a right to see," said Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett. He noted that his court's arguments have been recorded by cameras for years. The results have been "uniformly positive," with none of the drawbacks predicted by opponents of cameras at the highest court.
Willett was introduced with an unusual distinction: having the most Twitter followers of any Supreme Court justice in the country. He has 29,900 followers, and has tweeted 20,100 times—including once during his own panel discussion. He said Twitter is a useful tool for busy judges who face election deadlines.
"I wouldn't tweet so much if I didn't have to run for office," Willett said.
A highlight of the camera and tweeting discussion came when Judge Richard Posner of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals—appearing via Skype and looming overhead on a screen—pulled out his own smartphone and began to take pictures, then texting and tweeting them. Laughter filled the auditorium. The moderator, Brigham Young University law school Associate Dean RonNell Jones, asked if someone would please take Posner's picture and tweet it. Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Stephen Dillard obliged and tweeted it within a few seconds.
With regard to cameras in court, Georgia Supreme Court Justice David Nahmias stood on the side of change.
"We have cameras in our courtroom. Shock," Nahmias said, adding that most state supreme courts do. "It works fine."
Cameras at the U.S. Supreme Court would have a dramatic effect on news reporting, suggested Segall, who is a faculty advisor to the law review and author of a book on the court, "Supreme Myths."
Network news under-reports on the Supreme Court because they don't have cameras inside, he said, adding. "The national news would spend more time on the Supreme Court if they could roll the tape." Segall said that justices only go on television when they want to sell their books.
In addition to judges and professors, the symposium also included journalists covering the U.S. Supreme Court. Segall and Donohue moderated a lunch presentation with three Supreme Court reporters: Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Dahlia Lithwick of Slate and Newsweek and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post.
Another question on the table was whether justices should have term limits. Liptak said the founders may not have counted on longevity in framing lifetime appointments, although he noted no difference in performance of justices by age. And he added that the average justice is still younger than the average member of the Rolling Stones. (The discussion took place on Friday, two days before Justice Antonin Scalia died suddenly at age 79).
Read more: http://www.dailyreportonline.com/id=1202749781561/GSU-Symposium-Panelists-Call-for-Cameras-at-US-Supreme-Court#ixzz40MZXgdjq


Policy makers once again turned to The Ziegenfelder Company to find out more about how our Zieggy Tribe is impacting the lives of those trying to overcome past issues with addiction. CEO Lisa Allen testified for a hearing in front of the U.S. House Committee on Small Business on Thursday, September 13 in Washington, D.C.
Allen was one of three guests featured at the hearing titled, "Now Hiring: How the Opioid Epidemic Affects Small Businesses." Each guest spoke for five minutes and then answered questions from committee members.
Allen's testimony centered on the company's compassionate hiring practices and how those policies positively impact the entire Zieggy Tribe.
To watch the entire hearing, CLICK HERE.


text:
Comitato di Valutazione Scientifica
Occhio di riguardo
Segnalazioni editoriali
#ViviInternetAlSicuro
Diverso Avviso
Blog di Marco Scialdone
L'Accademia Informa
Radio Sapienza
Numeri Speciali
Home » Striking a Balance among Security, Privacy and Competition. The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIP)
Striking a Balance among Security, Privacy and Competition. The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIP)
DIMT
Il presente articolo si prefigge l'obiettivo di analizzare l'effettiva portata del Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, che è stato accusato di fornire nuovi poteri ai servizi segreti per controllare specialmente le società straniere (ponendo, quindi, problemi di bilanciamento fra sicurezza, diritto alla riservatezza e libertà d'impresa), mentre nelle intenzioni dichiarate dal Governo si tratterebbe semplicemente di chiarire poteri preesistenti. Summary: 1. Introduction – 2. The DRIP and the nature and extent of obligations that can be imposed on telecommunications service providers based outside the UK – 2.1. Methodological flaws – 2.2. Some substantial remarks – 3. The secondary legislation: The Data Retention Regulations 2014 – 4. The aftermath: R (David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and the proposed Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill – 5. Conclusion. 1. Introduction. In an unprecedented hurry [1], in July 2014 the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIP or DRIPA) [2] has been enacted. The occasio [3]of the act is the European Court of Justice Judgment of 8 April 2014 in joined cases C-293/12 Digital Rights Ireland and C-594/12 Seitlinger, which declared the Data Retention Directive (2006/24/EC) [4] invalid [5]. Consequently, the DRIP provides the powers to introduce secondary legislation to replace the Data Retention Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/859) [6] that implemented the directive in domestic law [7]. 2. The DRIP and the nature and extent of obligations that can be imposed on telecommunications service providers based outside the UK. Anyway, what is more important from a comparative private law perspective is that the examined legislation clarifies the nature and extent of obligations that can be imposed on telecommunications service providers [8] based outside the UK under Part 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) [9]. This Act ensures that any company providing communication services to customers in the UK is obliged to comply with requests for communications data [10] and interception warrants issued by the Secretary of State, irrespective of the location of the company providing the service. 2.1. The DRIP has many methodological flaws and more nuanced substantial characteristics. For what it concerns the first ones, the process that led to the production of this legislation has been described as "a blot on our claim to be a democratic society" [11]. As is common knowledge, the UK Government could have waited the European Institutions to harmonise the law after the Digital Rights Ireland – Seitlinger ruling, but the situation has been considered an emergency. First, if it were a proper emergency, waiting from April to July would have been very irresponsible. The truth is that the investigations have gone on as always and there has not been any immediate effect of the European ruling at hand [12]. Second, there has been no consultation. Better, allegedly the Government took into consideration the communications industry, law enforcement and intelligence agencies as those affected by DRIP provisions". Nevertheless, the point is that it is not negligible that the citizens are, if not the first, for sure among the primary subjects of the mentioned legislation [13]. More in general, the behaviour of the Government appears to run with the hare and hunt with the hounds. It is an emergency so it is not important to wait for an act of the European Institutions (even though it could happen that the DRIP conflicts with the forthcoming EU legislation), but at the same time the Government adds a sunset clause, which has the effect of keeping this law in place for twenty-nine months. It is reasonable to ask oneself how can "a review in 30 months be adequate (30 weeks would be a long time), especially when it is clear that Parliament has little business to deal with between now and the election?" [14]. 2.2. Some substantial remarks. Let's move to the content. In the Digital Rights Ireland – Seitlinger judgement, the ECJ declares the Directive 2006/24 invalid because it required the telecommunications service providers to retain for up to two years all meta-data about emails, text messages and telephone calls of every EU citizen and to make these available to national security agencies. This was found in contrast with the rights to privacy and data protection consecrated in the Charter of Fundamental Right of the European Union. Despite the hurry, the solution taken by the Government appears to be quite well balanced. On the one hand, in fact, the DRIP allows the security services to require a public telecommunications operator to retain communications data in line with the purposes of the RIPA. On the other hand, it limits the length of time such data can be retained to a maximum of twelve months [15], reduces the number of public bodies that can access the data collected, creates a privacy and civil liberties board to oversee the enforcement of the DRIP, provides the annual publication of a report on the amount of data intercepted and other less relevant provisions [16]. It is clear, nevertheless, that the statement that the Bill does not contain new powers is false. On this point, I espouse the Open letter on data retention and investigatory powers Bill ("DRIP") from UK privacy law academics of 10th July 2014 [17]. The Government is indeed authorised to compel any person or company outside the UK: i. To execute an interception warrant (also relating to conduct outside the UK) (4(2)); ii. To do anything, including complying with technical requirements, to ensure the ability, on a continuing basis, to assist the UK with interception at any time (4(6)); iii. To obtain, retain and disclose communications data also relating to conduct outside the UK (4(8)). Something is new under the sun: no extraterritorial effect was provided by the RIPA [18], now extraterritoriality is not negligible anymore. Furthermore, it is true that the Secretary of State can only require retention of the same types of communications data that he could under the 2009 Regulations, but he may however "also make regulations which relate to the wider category of communications data retained by service providers under the voluntary code of practice under ACTSA, s 102" [19]. It is, eventually, been noted that the DRIP "does not meet the terms of the CJEU decision and breaches the Human Rights Act 2000 and the Charter Rights" [20]. 3. The secondary legislation: The Data Retention Regulations 2014. On 1st August 2014, the Data Retention Regulations 2014 came into force [21], completing the framework introduced by the DRIP. They provide that a communications service provider can be required to retain data only when target of a notice of the Secretary of State. 4. The aftermath: R (David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and the proposed Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill. There has already been an important occasion when the High Court judged on the DRIP. In a nutshell, the case had been brought by two Members of Parliament, with the intervention of the human rights activists of Open Rights Group (ORG) and Privacy International (PI) [22] seeked an order disapplying section 1 of the DRIP for breach of the Directive on privacy and electronic communications 2002/58/EC ("PECD"). In December 2014, in R (on the application of David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [23], Mr Justice Lewis granted the Claimants permission to proceed to a substantive hearing, thus agreeing that the DRIP can be challenged by judicial review. As a reaction [24], the Government is proposing to use the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill (CTSB) [25] to extend their remit to cover data generated as a result of internet communications. In fact, part 3 of the CTSB deals with the data retention: what is more important is not that clause 17 amends the DRIP, but the point is that security and the battle to terrorism are once again used to restrict people's privacy. This is meaningful not only from an axiological point of view, but also from a programmatic one, as art. 1 PECD provides for an individual right to confidentiality, erasure and anonymity of one's 'communications' or 'traffic data,' specifying the obligations of the Member States in the following articles, which can be derogated from Article 15 PECD, by which Member States can exceptionally restrict the mentioned rights when "necessary, appropriate and proportionate […] to safeguard national security (i.e State security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detention and prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communications system". 5. Conclusion. It appears clear the difference between the UK approach and the EU one. It is sufficient to read the Article 29 Working Party Data Protection Group Opinion 5/2002 [26] where it is provided that retention of traffic data for purposes of law enforcement should meet strict conditions under Article 15 (1) of the Directive: i.e. in each case only for a limited period and where necessary, appropriate and proportionate in a democratic society. Where traffic data are to be retained in specific cases, there must therefore be a demonstrable need, the period of retention must be as short as possible and the practice must be clearly regulated by law, in a way that provides sufficient safeguards against unlawful access and any other abuse. In conclusion, "systematic retention of all kinds of traffic data for a period of one year or more would be clearly disproportionate and therefore unacceptable in any case" [27]. As a matter of fact, in conclusion, the DRIP introduces "powers that are not only completely novel in the United Kingdom, they are some of the first of their kind globally" and applies it to a very wide target, so the above-mentioned counterweights risk to be a red herring. Eventually, with the purpose (or with the excuse, some might dare to say) of protecting privacy (which is in fact violated by the Secretary of State allegedly for security reasons), the freedom of enterprise is left to bite the dust [28]. Note: [1] Introduced on 14th July, it has received the royal assent three days later with little parliamentary debate. [2] Here the official full name: "An Act to make provision, in consequence of a declaration of invalidity made by the Court of Justice of the European Union in relation to Directive 2006/24/EC, about the retention of certain communications data; to amend the grounds for issuing interception warrants, or granting or giving certain authorisations or notices, under Part 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000; to make provision about the extra-territorial application of that Part and about the meaning of "telecommunications service" for the purposes of that Act; to make provision about additional reports by the Interception of Communications Commissioner; to make provision about a review of the operation and regulation of investigatory powers; and for connected purposes". The DRIP is available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/en/ukpga/2014/27/enacted?view=plain (accessed 9th January 2015). [3] See the Impact Assessment of the Home Office of 27th June 2014 at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukia/2014/266/pdfs/ukia_20140266_en.pdf (accessed 9th January 2015). From a comparative perspective, it has been noted that in Switzerland, even though there is a 6-months-retention regime, the Swiss Federal Council stated that the European Court ruling had no effect on Swiss laws (see Emergency data retention law to be challenged, in P. & D.P. 2014, 14(8), 1,17 and, on the wider implications of the European Court's ruling see the article published in Volume 14, Issue 7 of Privacy & Data Protection). [4] The Data Retention Directive (DRD), whose occasion are the terrorist attacks in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005 (http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/police-cooperation/data-retention/index_en.htm), can be read at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:105:0054:0063:EN:PDF (both accessed 9th January 2014). On the DRD see, for example, I. Brown, Communications Data Retention in an Evolving Internet, in International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2011, II, 95; T. Konstadinides, Destroying Democracy on the Ground of Defending It? The Data Retention directive, the Surveillance State and Our Constitutional Ecosystem, in European Law Review, 2011, V, 722 and A.R. Servent, Holding the European Parliament responsible: policy shift in the Data Retention directive from consultation to codecision, in Journal of European Public Policy, 2013, VII, 972. [5] Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Ireland (Ireland) and the Verfassungsgerichtshof (Austria)) ― Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C-293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, The Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland and the Attorney General, and Kärntner Landesregierung, Michael Seitlinger, Christof Tschohl and Others (C-594/12), not yet published, but readable at http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=150642&doclang=EN (accessed 9th January 2015). The ECJ ruled that "Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC is invalid". On the judgement see F. Fabbrini, Human Rights in the Digital Age: The European Court of Justice Ruling in the Data Retention Case and its Lessons for Privacy and Surveillance in the U.S., Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 15/2014, forthcoming in 28 Harvard Human Rights Journal (2015), available at ssrn.com/abstract=2482212 (accessed 9th January 2015). [6] The Data Retention Regulations 2009 are available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/859/pdfs/uksi_20090859_en.pdf (accessed 9th January 2015). [7] See the Data Retention Regulations 2014 of 30 July 2014 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2042/pdfs/uksi_20142042_en.pdf, accessed 17th January 2015), that sets out what information must be included in retention notices served to telecoms and Internet companies. [8] On this point, the DRIP amends the RIPA definition of telecommunications service to provider allegedly to include the webmail, but potentially referring today also to cloud providers and social media ones. [9] The RIPA, enacted in July 2000 and last modified in February 2010, moving from the necessity to address the technological evolution, deals with the public surveillance and the interception of communications. The official full name is "An Act to make provision for and about the interception of communications, the acquisition and disclosure of data relating to communications, the carrying out of surveillance, the use of covert human intelligence sources and the acquisition of the means by which electronic data protected by encryption or passwords may be decrypted or accessed; to provide for Commissioners and a tribunal with functions and jurisdiction in relation to those matters, to entries on and interferences with property or with wireless telegraphy and to the carrying out of their functions by the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service and the Government Communications Headquarters; and for connected purposes". It can be read at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/23/contents (accessed 9th January 2015). On the RIPA see, for example, J. Hörnle, How to control interception-does the UK strike the right balance?, in Computer Law and Security Report, 2010VI, 649; H. Fenwick, Covert surveillance under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers act 2000, in Journal of Criminal Law, 2001, VI, 521; Anonymous, First RIPA convictions over disclosure of encryption keys, in Computer Fraud and Security, 2009, IX, 3; A.S. Reid-N. Ryder, For Whose Eyes Only? A Critique of the United Kingdom's Regulation of Investigatory Powers act 2000, in Information and Communications Technology Law, 2001, II, 179. To understand the relation between the DRIP and the RIPA one can read also in R. Jay, The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 – Recent Developments, in Computers & Law, 15-1-2015, where it is said that "RIPA is the legislation that governs access to retained communications data as well as powers to intercept the content of communications. DRIPA amends definitions in RIPA and covers the extent of the powers of the UK to serve notices on telecommunications service providers that are based outside the UK, but provide services within the UK". [10] Data", in the sense of the Data Retention Directive, are "traffic data and location data and the related data necessary to identify the subscriber or user" (art. 2.2, a)). Now, the RIPA definition appears to be way wider, as it encompasses any information held or obtained about those whom services are provided to. According to sec. 1 suppl., (1) of the DRIP, "communications data" has the "meaning given by section 21(4) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 so far as that meaning applies in relation to telecommunications services and telecommunication systems". The clause 17 of the proposed Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill would extend the concept to data which relate to an internet access service or an internet communications service. [11] L. Eastham, Editorial, in Computers & Law, 2014, III, 2. [12] It sounds quite unreal what stated in the above cited Impact Assessment: "without this Bill, vital evidence from telephones and the internet (sic!) that is needed by the police on a day to day basis might be lost. More crimes, including the most serious such as child sexual exploitation, may go unpunished" (italics mine). [13] This behaviour appears even stranger if one reads the Impact Assessment, that names the "groups affected", the last of them being "the general public, whose safety and security are affected by the capabilities of the police and other agencies to prevent and detect crime, and whose privacy needs to be protected". One may read a certain degree of paternalism in these lines, where the citizens are treated as objects rather than as subjects of rights. [14] Ibidem [15] Previously, the fifth of the Data Retention Regulations 2009 provided that "The data specified in the Schedule to these Regulations must be retained by the public communications provider for a period of 12 months from the date of the communication in question". From a comparative perspective, it can be useful to note that art. 132 of the Italian code of privacy (d.lgs. n. 196/2003), as modified by the d.lgs. n. 109/2008 (which enacted the Data Retention Directive in Italy), provides that "i dati relativi al traffico telefonico sono conservati dal fornitore per ventiquattro mesi dalla data della comunicazione, per finalità di accertamento e repressione di reati, mentre, per le medesime finalità, i dati relativi al traffico telematico, esclusi comunque i contenuti delle comunicazioni, sono conservati dal fornitore per dodici mesi dalla data della comunicazione" (24 months for the telephone communications, 12 months for the Internet ones, but see art. 123, paragraph 2 of the italian code of privacy, in so far as it concerns the data on billing, that can be retained for 6 months or more if necessary in case of a trial). [16] For example, see the biennial review of the relevance of the RIPA, the accessibility to only data that is relevant and the maintenance that such data can no longer be gathered solely for the interest of the economic well-being of the UK. [17] The signatories of the letter are Dr Subhajit Basu (University of Leeds), Dr Paul Bernal (University of East Anglia), Professor Ian Brown (Oxford University), Ray Corrigan (The Open University), Professor Lilian Edwards (University of Strathclyde), Dr Theodore Konstadinides (University of Surrey), Professor Chris Marsden (University of Sussex), Dr Karen Mc Cullagh (University of East Anglia), Dr. Daithí Mac Síthigh (Newcastle University), Professor David Mead (University of East Anglia), Professor Andrew Murray (London School of Economics), Professor Steve Peers (University of Essex), Julia Powles (University of Cambridge), Professor Burkhard Schafer (University of Edinburgh), Professor Lorna Woods (University of Essex). Please find the letter here http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/158070/Open_letter_UK_internet_law_academics.pdf (accessed 9th January 2015). [18] In the Explanatory Notes it is asserted that the RIPA had implicit extraterritorial effect. [19] Jay, The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, cit. [20] Ibidem [21] See., more specifically, reg. 1., sec. 2 and 3. [22] The human rights organizations have been given permission to make a further written intervention. [23] See https://www.openrightsgroup.org/ourwork/reports/open-rights-group-and-privacy-internationals-submission-in-dripa-case (accessed 17 January 2015). [24] This is the interpretation provided by Jay, The Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 cit. [25] The "Bill to make provision in relation to terrorism; to make provision about retention of communications data, about information, authority to carry and security in relation to air, sea and rail transport and about reviews by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission against refusals to issue certificates of naturalisation; and for connected purposes" can be found at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2014-2015/0075/15075.pdf (accessed 20th January 2015). On 13 January 2015 there has been the second reading at the House of Lords (the general debate on all aspects of the Bill), the Committee stage (line by line examination of the Bill) has begun on 20 January. [26] Opinion 5/2002 on the Statement of the European Data Protection Commissioners at the International Conference in Cardiff (9-11 September 2002) on mandatory systematic retention of telecommunication traffic data, 11 October 2002, WP 64. It can be read at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2002/wp64_en.pdf (accessed 20 January 2015). [27] See, more recently, the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Evaluation report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC) (2011/C 279/01) (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1421770645538&uri=CELEX:52011XX0923(01)) and the Article 29 Working Group Report 01/2010 on the second joint enforcement action: Compliance at national level of Telecom Providers and ISPs with the obligations required from national traffic data retention legislation on the legal basis of articles 6 and 9 of the e-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC and the Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC amending the e-Privacy Directive, 13 July 2010, WP 172. It is available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2010/wp172_en.pdf (both accessed 20 January 2015). [28] On privacy and competition, s. C. Kuner-F.H. Cate-C. Millard-D.J.B. Svantesson-O. Lynksey, When Two Worlds Collide: The Interface between Competition Law and Data Protection, in International Data Privacy Law, 2014, IV, 247. LEGGI On porn censorship and liberal ethics in the UK. Brief notes on the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 21 gennaio 2015
actcameronconservazionidatadatidiegaguidoinghilterrainternetinvestigatoryispleggenotopowersproviderregnoretentiontelcotelecomukunitoweb
Self-help in civil matters and state justice
SELF-HELP IN CIVIL MATTERS AND STATE JUSTICE* di Luciana D'Acunto Università di Napoli "Federico II"…
Il nuovo fascicolo sanitario elettronico: sottoscrizione, tutela dei dati, responsabilità civile
Di Alberto Gambino, Vittorio Occorsio, Elena Maggio.
Disciplina romana della schiavitù ed intelligenza artificiale odierna. Spunti di comparazione
L'idea che una disciplina delle odierne macchine intelligenti possa trarre spunto da quella anticamente elaborata…
Smart contracts: opportunità e disciplina. Intervista al Prof. Andrea Stazi.
Tribunale condanna Deliveroo e l'algoritmo di ranking reputazionale "Frank": intervista agli avvocati Ernesto Belisario e Giuseppe Cassano
Garante privacy: informativa whatsapp non idonea per la protezione dei dati personali
Convegno per la Giornata Europea della protezione dei dati: "Privacy e neurodiritti: la persona al tempo delle neuroscienze"
"Privacy e neurodiritti: la persona al tempo delle neuroscienze"
L'intelligenza artificiale cambia la società: sviluppi, impatti, vantaggi e rischi.
Libertà in rete e solidarietà digitale
previous post: Note in tema di giurisdizione della Corte dei Conti in materia di responsabilità per danno erariale degli amministratori delle società in house (nota a margine della sentenza n. 7177 del 26 marzo 2014 delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di Cassazione)
next post: Call for Papers International Conference on Media Change "Serialization landscapes: series and serialization from literature to the web" – Urbino, 7-9 July 2015
La rivista "Diritto Mercato Tecnologia" intende fornire un costante supporto di aggiornamento agli studiosi e agli operatori professionali nel nuovo scenario socio-economico originato dall'interrelazione tra diritto, mercato e tecnologia, in prospettiva interdisciplinare e comparatistica.
ISSN (Online Edition): 2239 -7442
Puoi contattare la redazione di Diritto Mercato Tecnologia scrivendo a dimtstampa@gmail.com
Copyright Diritto Mercato Tecnologia 2021 - All Rights Reserved
Iscriviti alla nostra Newsletter Rimani sempre aggiornato
Autorizzo il trattamento dei miei dati personali ai sensi del GDPR e del Decreto Legislativo 30 giugno 2003, n. 196


text:
ORELL FüSSLI AG EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli Ltd: Zeiser Division acquires key technologies from Inspectron and expands offering
EQS Group-Ad-hoc: Orell Füssli AG / Key word(s): Mergers & Acquisitions
Orell Füssli Ltd: Zeiser Division acquires key technologies from Inspectron and expands offering
02-Jul-2021 / 07:00 CET/CEST
Zurich, July 2, 2021 - The Zeiser Division of Orell Füssli Ltd is acquiring leading technologies in the field of document inspection and track & trace for security printers from Inspectron.
Orell Füssli is a leading systems supplier of security technologies and identification systems for governments and citizens. In the fields of security printing and serialisation Orell Füssli offers innovative printing processes, equipment and services for the production and successful protection of banknotes, documents of value and identity documents.
The ZEISER Division takes over innovative track & trace software from Inspectron (UK) and thus strengthens its position in the field of traceability of security documents. In the USA, ZEISER is also taking over Inspectron's branch specialising in the service business. With this acquisition, ZEISER further expands its leading position as a provider of serialisation solutions and services for the security printing industry. Inspectron's technology combined with ZEISER's offering in the area of customisation and verification technologies, market access, sales resources and integration expertise offers attractive synergies and significant growth potential. ZEISER is thus well positioned to capture a substantial share of the growing market demand for track & trace solutions for security documents. In addition, ZEISER can successfully position itself in security printing by further developing its technology in the direction of automation and Industry 4.0. The acquisition will lead to a noticeable growth in sales at ZEISER. The parties have agreed not to disclose the purchase price.
Inspectron is a global technology provider of document inspection and track & trace software for security printers. Inspectron's systems verify, track and report on millions of documents, labels, identity cards and packaging. The core product acquired from ZEISER is a real-time tracking, reporting and auditing system that is used both on individual machines and on entire production lines. Due to its high modularity, the software, which will be marketed under the product name HARMONY, can be easily and quickly adapted to customer-specific processes. Customers are global financial institutions, government agencies and printers for the production of passports and ID documents, banknotes, tax stamps, security bags, lottery tickets and other security printed products.
Thorsten Tritschler, Managing Director of ZEISER: "We see a growing demand for real-time tracking technologies in our end markets. The acquisition represents an expansion of our portfolio and is an ideal fit with ZEISER's existing business. In addition to micromechanical products, it will allow us to increasingly offer software and services. In addition, we will be able to increase customer value through the development of further innovations and are pleased to be able to offer a new product and welcome new employees to Zeiser".
Publication Half-Year Results 2021 06 August 2021
Orell Füssli Ltd
Tel. +41 44 466 72 73, media@orellfuessli.com
Orell Füssli is a pioneer in the fields of security and education. With its expertise in security solutions for governments and citizens and as a leading Swiss book retailer, Orell Füssli supports its customers with a unique and customer-specific offering.
As a leading systems supplier for security technologies and identification systems and a long-standing partner of government, Orell Füssli sets technological standards. In the fields of security printing and serialisation Orell Füssli provides innovative printing processes, systems and services for the production and successful protection of banknotes, securities and identity documents.
With its attractive large-format and specialist bookstores Orell Füssli offers a wide-ranging book-related shopping experience. In book retailing Orell Füssli has a 50% interest in Orell Füssli Thalia AG, which provides an extensive offering through 36 branches in German-speaking Switzerland and diverse e-commerce services. Orell Füssli provides logistical and service facilities for libraries and companies.
Orell Füssli was founded more than 500 years ago and generates revenues of some CHF 250 million with around 600 employees at locations in five countries. Orell Füssli shares are listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange.
File: Media Release Inspectron
End of ad hoc announcement
Company: Orell Füssli AG
Dietzingerstrasse 3
E-mail: info@orellfuessli.com
Internet: https://www.orellfuessli.com/
ISIN: CH0003420806
Listed: SIX Swiss Exchange
End of Announcement EQS Group News Service
1214614 02-Jul-2021 CET/CEST
Orell Füssli AG: Orell Füssli presents growth strategy until 2028 at...
Orell Füssli AG Half-Year 2022: Positive business development in the 1st...
Orell Füssli AG: Orell Füssli acquires hep Verlag and becomes the...
Orell Füssli AG: Annual General Meeting of 11 May 2022 approves all...
Orell Füssli AG: Orell Füssli AG boosts profitability and increases...
EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli AG: Orell Füssli and Swisscom enter into...
EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli LtdMedien: Orell Füssli Ltd acquires majority...
EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli Ltd Half-Year 2021: Solid start to the business...
EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli Ltd: Zeiser Division acquires key technologies...
EQS-Adhoc: Orell Füssli AG: Annual General Meeting of 11th May 2021...
Voir tous les communiqués de ORELL FüSSLI AG


Percona DBA Service for Google Cloud means focusing on your business.
Percona DBA Service for Google Cloud® Brings Expert Managed Database Services to Your Applications.
As a proud Google Cloud partner, Percona is committed to providing innovative solutions that help you make the most of your Google Cloud investment. In addition to our solutions that enable developers to build, test and deploy applications on Google Cloud, the Percona DBA Service for Google Cloud provides world-class expertise to help manage this high-performance database environment.
With Percona, you can proactively monitor performance to reduce critical incidents and ensure your database is running at top speed to meet business goals.
Percona DBA Service gives you in-depth technical expertise, on demand and at an affordable price.
Our data is crucial to running our operation. We have a complicated interconnected customer, reservation, inventory, dry-cleaning, and shipping data that must be available at a minute's notice. Percona's solutions guarantee that it is – which keeps our applications and customers happy.


Income and asset documents and credit report are analyzed to determine the amount of financing you qualify for.
Browse our preferred vendors including attorneys, inspectors, credit experts and more.
Relocating to a new home can be an exhilarating yet stressful experience. However, there are a few key things that buyers and sellers can keep in mind to make the move smooth and easy.
Tax Hammer is dedicated to making sure everyone's home is fairly assessed. We are Specialists! This means that the only thing we do are grievances of residential assessments! This is our specialty because Tax Hammer = Tax Reduction!


The Dominican Rehabilitation Association (Asociación Dominicana de Rehabilitación), an organization that provides comprehensive rehabilitation to persons with physical and intellectual disabilities. Dr. Julio Alberto Brea Guzman, resident partner in our Sosúa office, is the president of the Sosúa subsidiary of the non-profit.
Fundación Guzmán Ariza Pro Academia de la Lengua, an organization founded in 2009 by our name partner, Fabio J. Guzmán Ariza, to sponsor the activities of the Dominican Academy of Letters and to promote proper language usage in legal documents and the Dominican media. In 2013, the Foundation financed the publication of the first comprehensive dictionary of Dominican Spanish (Diccionario del español dominicano), and, in 2016, that of the first dictionary of Dominican phrases (Diccionario fraseológico del español dominicano). The Foundation has also collaborated with the Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic and the Constitutional Court in promoting better practices in legal drafting. In July 2016, the Foundation opened the first chapter in the Americas of the Fundación del Español Urgente (Fundéu Guzmán Ariza) to encourage correct Spanish usage in the media.
The DREAM Project (Dominican Republic Education and Mentoring Project) is a nonprofit organization that, since 1999, has been committed to providing equitable access to quality education for children born into poverty in rural areas and small communities of the Dominican Republic. Since 2004, Guzmán Ariza has sponsored the Guzmán Ariza Summer Camp and School, where every year poor Dominican children attend a program designed to keep them at school, offering them individualized academic tutoring, extracurricular activities, and alternative sources of education that instill life and job skills.
The Mariposa DR Foundation, whose mission is inspired by the United Nations Millennium Development Goals. These goals include promoting gender equality and empowering women. Milagros de la Cruz, an attorney with the firm, is a member of the board of directors of the foundation.
Fundación MIR (Mission International Rescue), founded by Lian Fanjul de Azqueta, is a non-profit organization that has since 1990 served the women, youth and in-need children of La Romana and the Eastern region of the Dominican Republic. Their programs, spearheaded by their four schools with a current enrollment of 1,800 students, provide a home, education, medical assistance, and technical preparation for in-need children and youth in La Romana and nearby rural communities. Our La Romana office provides pro bono legal assistance to the organization.
The Mahatma Gandhi Foundation, an organization that promotes community development in Las Terrenas. Our office in Las Terrenas provides financial support to the organization and collaborates in the activities organized by the Foundation.
The Samaná Smiles Foundation (Fundación Sonrisas Samaná), a non-profit that provides financial support to poor children needing medical care.
The Dominican Boxing Federation (Federación Dominicana de Boxeo), an organization that contributes to the strengthening of amateur boxing in the country. Partner Ruben Garcia is vice president of the Federation and chairs its subsidiary in San Francisco de Macoris, where, for decades, he has provided financial support to promising young boxers.