text:
The Escapist Portal > The Escapist Forums > Off-topic Discussion
[Politics] Nazis Attack LGBT Pride Parade
Pages PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NEXT
Thread IndexSearch ForumsPosting GuidelinesContact Moderators
TheIronRuler
36 POSTED: 10 Jun 2019 13:52
Call up the boys, resurrect the Black Panthers and use your god-given right to carry firearms and scare the crap out of white people.
Legally owned and licensed firearms, held by organized law-keeping black citizens for the safety of their communities.
Police wouldn't risk starting a riot, they'd rather protect the nazis from getting lynched.
Y'know when Nazis marched in New York in the 30s Lansky was asked low-key by the US government to crash their rallies and beat them to pieces...
https://allthatsinteresting.com/meyer-lansky-punch-a-nazi
He delivered.
This shouldn't be made illegal by any means. Let this surface, identify the ring-leaders and plan retribution. If you allow this to bubble under your feet you will lose track of the movement.
I regularly play devil's advocate here when "white nationalists" (as if that's a thing, bitter poor whites turning to populism for salvation) gets conflated with nazis. It's more productive to have a dialogue with these people and understand why they are lashing out (hint: It's opium, mechanization and globalization), and maybe even address these issues... These nazis? Break them.
ObsidianJones
I don't know what kind of world we've living in, but this shocks and horrifies me more than active shootings. Probably because I grew up in the dangerous part of the Bronx and Brooklyn (family's there) during the 80's and 90's. I've dodged literal bullets before, so I guess I don't weigh gun violence that highly even though it often comes at the too high cost of innocent lives. But this... This is an attack on love and human rights. That's chilling to me.
erttheking:
I'm buying a gun. Congrats Nazis, you made me do a total 180 on gun ownership. The second my student debts and car payments are taking care of I'm taking vacation time to go through MA gun ownership training and buying a safe for it. Clearly, it's needed to ensure my own safety.
Ok, you might be joking, but as a gun owner, I want to talk with you.
This is not a choice that should be done out of fear. After my incident with my mother, I thought for three months before I got my shotgun. The incident was nothing bad, mind you. She had an dementia episode, and all of the availible cops came to my condo late at night... which made me worried that if they did this while they were bored, what could happen if they all did that with another bored episode and we were getting robbed at that time.
I came down on the side of last chance prepardedness. My first instinct will always to be call the police if something happens. But if they can't get there in time, I had to be able to protect my family.
I wholeheartedly agree that it's the best idea to take some firearm training lessons. Don't consider it your one stop shop, though. Martial Art lessons will not only serve you well where ever, but can help get you in shape to have faster reaction times or to just peace out of a situation if need be.
But they want a war.
They want us to take up arms so they can strike as many times as they want claiming self defense, blithely ignoring everything that lead up to us taking up guns in response. We're not dealing with rational people here.
Talk to many people about gun ownership. If you have anyone in your life that owns one, really share your feelings. Talk to those in your life that don't have a gun. Share your feelings just as much. And if at the end, you still feel like a gun will best serve your safety, then do it. Treat it with all the fear and respect it deserves. But know that you chose it with a level head and due to reason, not fear.
erttheking
ObsidianJones:
Don't worry, this isn't an impulse purchase (that would be impossible anyway, MA has a lot of barriers to purchase for exactly that kind of reason. Also, firearm training isn't optional in MA, you need to go through it if you want a gun license. I've done my research on this front) I've been sitting on this one for a long time.
And when I say "when I have my loans and car payments taking care of" I mean "I'm going to do this in three years." Trust me, this isn't impulsive.
And as much as I get that they want a war, well Ghandi suggested that if Nazis come up to you, you should just let them kill you. Ghandi was full of shit. I have never been the type of person who goes looking for a fight. But if someone kicks my door in with intent to do harm, well, I'm not going to die for the sake of holding the moral high ground. And I mentioned that I was going to be buying a safe, that's because whenever I am not using it, it's going to be locked up in a place that only I know.
Trust me, I'll be doing a lot of talking to people when my loans are paid off and I'm actually going to start taking steps towards the purchase. Which, again, is going to be a couple of years. And don't worry, I've been very critical of those who treat guns like toys instead of tools of death. I'm not a hypocrite.
PsychedelicDiamond
evilthecat:
Dreiko:
And any ideology can be twisted into killing people. You had the gas chambers and you had the gulags and all those people sent to Siberia and so on. The thing in common those ideologies all have is their authoritarian nature. The more you approach it the likelier you are to become corrupted by the power you're messing with and commit atrocities.
This comparison doesn't work.
The gulags (as we call them in English) were concentration camps. They were, essentially, prisons. They were unusually harsh prisons with a very high rate of inmate mortality, but they were still prisons. Their motivation was not "ideological" except in the sense that some prisoners held in the gulags had been detained for political reasons. There was never any organised political intent to kill the imprisoned population. They were (with some possible exceptions, and we'll get to that) not victims of deliberate genocide, they were not victims of "ideology", they were victims of a prison system which sought to extract maximum benefit from them at the lowest possible cost, even if it meant people died.
The vast majority of "liberal" societies have used concentration camps. Some still do. Many US prisons, for example, are essentially concentration camps. They are designed to house a large, controlled population in a small space at low cost. Many also use forced labour. The actual concept of a concentration camp was invented by European colonial administrators as a means of controlling potentially rebellious populations in the colonies. All concentration camps have casualties. People die in prison. People die in detention centres. This is not ideology, it's pragmatism.
The Nazis had concentration camps. All kinds of prisoners, political and otherwise, went to concentration camps for all kinds of reasons. The concentration camps did not have gas chambers. People died in them (a lot of people, in fact) but those people dying was not the objective. The gas chambers were housed in extermination camps. These camps were not designed to house or contain people, but to kill them within hours of arriving and in as fast and efficient a way as possible. That was the only purpose of those camps.
There was genocide in the Soviet Union. Specific minorities were targeted for persecution and pogroms (although unlike the Nazi genocides, the goal was never to wholly eliminate those groups). For example, it's quite likely that Soviet agricultural policy specifically targeted Ukrainians for deliberate starvation as a means of consolidating power within the Russian Soviet, but note that even here I had to add that, because even there the goal was not the ideological elimination of "subhuman" Ukrainians but the maintenance of political control.
This idea that "authoritarianism" is the problem is only true in the sense that state killing is always authoritarian, whether it's in a democratic society or not. A prison is always an authoritarian institution, it's a place where people are detained against their will by the state. Border controls are authoritarian. Militarized police are authoritarian. Corporate hierarchies are authoritarian. Authoritarianism can exist quite comfortably within "liberal" societies. The problem with Nazism wasn't that it was authoritarianism and that the Nazi leaders got corrupted by power and thus were compelled to kill all Jews, it's that their entire ideology was based on a chauvinistic sense of superiority and a desire to exterminate others. It still is. That is something quite profoundly different to a simple abuse of power, or instrumental pursuit of "order" or "efficiency".
If you want to indulge in some kind of horseshoe theory, an appropriate horseshoe would be to compare the deliberate starvation of Indians under the Raj as a result of cruel and negligent agricultural policy with the deliberate starvation of Ukranians under Stalin as a result of cruel and negligent agricultural policy. Or to compare the use deliberate use and promotion of torture in both US and USSR-backed puppet regimes as a means of maintaining ideological control. These are horrific, horrific crimes against humanity, but they were ultimately the product of instrumental political goals. For the Nazis, killing millions of people was the goal. It was not the means, it was the end, and that is fundamentally different.
That the famine colloquially referred to as the Holodomor was an intentional attempt to starve the Ukrainian people is a notion that even most western historians disagree with. Yes, it was a horrible famine that was, among other things, the result of decisions made by the government of the Soviet Union. Collectivization of farms led many farmers to burn their harvest and kill their livestock, the encroaching fascist death cult from the west meant that ressources were mostly allocated to urban areas and the arms industry... but there is very little that would indicate that their was a deliberate effort to kill Ukrainians. Stalin did a lot wrong. I'm not gonna deny that. But he wasn't a comic book villain who was going out of his way to starve his own people.
And again, Stalin did some truly horrible things. Many good people, hell, many good communists, were killed in purges based around little more than paranoia and political grandstanding, leadership of the secret police was given from one corrupt brute to the next, decisions were made in regards to East Germany that were actively harmful to its development as a socialist nation, the human rights abuses in Soviet labour camps, even if partly caused by ressource shortages as result of the war, were atrocious and there is no justification for the rampant antisemitism following the Soviet Unions worsening relationship with Israel.
But if there is one thing to be said in defense of Stalin it's that he wasn't Hitler and he does not deserve to be mentioned along with Hitler the way he often is. Even his most brutal, most inhumane policies were, on some level, based on realpolitik. Realpolitik tainted with paranoia and distrust of his own people, yes, but you could see how there were political reasons for what he did especially seeing how he had to lead the Soviet Union through the aftermath of the Civil War, the great famine, a war against an enemy who planned to kill and enslave the entire slavic race and colonize all of Eastern Europe and the beginning of the Cold War. Unlike Hitler, whos specific brand of cruelty, much like that of the modern far right, was based on a cultish belief in esoteric racial hierarchies, pathological narcissism and literal occultism.
There is a certain pattern to that, you know. The farther you go the left the more scientific and the more theoretical will the ideologies get. Marxism is a science, rather than a doctrine and so are most other, more obscure leftist theories. However, the farther you go to the right, the more will you drift into spritiualism, occultism, religion and other form of superstition and the less connection will these ideologies have to factual, material reality. Even past Hitler and Mussolini, the two grandfathers of the modern far right, rightist philosophers like Evola, or, for a modern and rather influential example, Aleksandr Dugin (Look him up, he's had great influence on neofascist propaganda mouthpiece Lauren Southern) promote a worldview that is religious much more than political, an apocalyptic totalitarian dogma hiding behind notions of national and ethnic identity.
Schadrach
Lil devils x:
In Detroit, an armed white supremacist group called the National Socialist Movement (NSM) descended on the annual Motor City Pride Festival, where they held placards, gave Nazi salutes and displayed armbands with swastikas.
Dressed in black with a number carrying firearms and shields, the NSM marchers tore apart pride flags and pushed over at least one counter-demonstrator.
"Literally f****** Nazis are at Motor City Pride right now, please be safe out there y'all," one user tweeted on Saturday afternoon. "Even if they deserve it, do not engage. Our safety at our Pride is the most important thing."
Hey, actual right wing organized violence! Line them up, charge them with whatever you can prove, and sentence appropriately. Use the investigation to search their computers and phones to see how and where they organized, and get anyone planning violence with criminal conspiracy charges. Assuming of course that the article is accurate. I wonder if there's any live footage of the event out there with enough on either side of events to show context?
In Washington DC, seven people were taken to hospital after fears of a potential gunman at the pride event sparked panic.
Hundreds of people were gathered at the Dupont Circle for the parade when people started running after hearing what they thought was a gunshot.
"As the officers were going to the scene, there was a crowd of people going away from it and some of the individuals in the crowd said there was a man with a gun and that someone had fired a shot," said Guillermo Rivera, a commander with the Metropolitan Police Department.
A man was taken into custody and is facing a gun possession charge, he said.
Elizabeth Hernandez, 19, was among those celebrating in the city when she said she heard "pop, pop" and suddenly barricades were being thrown over and a crowd of people starting running frantically from the area.
"Everything fell and everyone said 'Run!"' said Ms Hernandez, of Falls Church, Virginia.
Mayor Muriel Bowser tweeted that she had been briefed by police and there were "no shots fired".
I might be reading between the lines here, but basically someone heard a loud noise, people freaked out and caused a stampede and somewhere in this they found someone they could charge with a gun possession charge for a gun that presumably was not discharged (and therefore he didn't shoot it to start the stampede) as no shots were actually fired?
I suppose that brings up the question of where the initial noise came from? There are some obvious missing details here.
To me it looks like he is trying to take a piss on it tbh.
I'm not sure. I know you're not used to peeing standing up (for obvious reasons) but it's...awkward...to pee straight down (and otherwise he'd be peeing on the column and trickling down to the flag). And it'd splatter all over his shoes. If he were a step or two back, I'd agree with you. I'm sure that's what he's trying to imply in the image (which he seems to be posing for), but it's unlikely he was or was immediately about to start pissing on that flag without moving first.
How is it that men taking other's property and destroying it is not arrest worthy? If they push people down and steal their flags and destroy them, should they have not been arrested at that point? I see this happening frequently, but police rarely arrest them, why is that somehow okay to do? That should be considered theft assault and property damage should it not?
I said as much when it was BAMN and similar groups doing it in CA, and I agree with you here.
I suspect there will be certain folks who are more...partisan about who should be allowed to do that to whom though.
Armadox:
in hopes that the Left finally has enough of it and raises their fist.
Finally has enough of it? Er, there are folks in CA who'd like to have a chat with you. Before, you know, assaulting you, likely with an improvised bludgeon.
Hawki:
This is actually kind of terrifying.
I've said in the past that "Nazi" is a term used too liberally, but these are actual fucking Nazis who aren't even trying to hide that they're Nazis.
Agreed. If you wanted to literally punch Nazis rather than "Nazis" this was a fine opportunity.
trunkage:
Instead of blaming the Left when they try to combat it.
Honestly, I'm fine with "combating it", so long as they can actually target the extremists they claim to want and not just, you know, anyone wearing a MAGA hat, or not knowing how to answer when asked if they're "proud", or just verbally expressing disagreement with their views (you know, "Nazis" as opposed to Nazis). That's always been the big problem with violence on the left, it tends to be poorly aimed.
Neurotic Void Melody:
We can at least all breathe a sigh of relief nobody came armed with milkshakes. In the hands of an unhinged leftie, they might as well be communist nukes filled with mind-control gas that boasts an additional bonus of infertility for anybody unlucky enough to be born cis.
On the upside the milkshake thing is a deescalation from the usual improvised bludgeons and assorted aerosols (because pepper spray is expensive when you probably have some insecticide already!)
The best defense against a bad Nazi with a gun is a good QUILTBAG with a gun? =p
To be fair, they'd probably think twice about armed protest if they knew the folks they were protesting would be armed as well.
CaitSeith
TheIronRuler:
It's opium
This is first time I ever heard about opium being brought up to be an issue here. What is this? The 19th century?
Schadrach:
If I wanted jokes I'd go to someone who was actually funny.
PsychedelicDiamond:
There is a certain pattern to that, you know. The farther you go the left the more scientific and the more theoretical will the ideologies get. Marxism is a science, rather than a doctrine and so are most other, more obscure leftist theories. However, the farther you go to the right, the more will you drift into spritiualism, occultism, religion and other form of superstition and the less connection will these ideologies have to factual, material reality. Even past Hitler and Mussolini, the two grandfathers of the modern far right, rightist philosopher like Evola, or, for a modern and rather influential example, Aleksandr Dugin (Look him up, he's had great influence on neofascist propaganda mouthpiece Lauren Southern) promote a worldview that religious much more than political, an apocalyptic totalitarian dogma hiding behing notions of national and ethnic identity.
I like this paragraph.
Stalin was a cutthroat propelled into stardom by a string of brutal acts of violence against the whites, calculated political maneuvering around fellow generals and the nagging paranoid belief that the same can be done to him... A frightening man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TK9c-caEcw
Do you remember the Kulaks? Pepperidge farms remember.
I do place him on the same pedestal as hitler though. I do believe he had earned that dishonor and notoriety. In the same cesspool as Nguema, Trujillo and Pol Pot... The body-count doesn't need to be the key factor in determining your target of scorn. It is often the acts they participated in, encouraged or allowed that determine it...
CaitSeith:
The opioid epidemic is a name for the rampant consumption of drugs - prescribed or obtained via the black market - which are produced from the poppy plant. Opium is one of the first iterations of the drug. Modern drugs are distilled differently (you can produce heroin and codein from poppy, for example) and their compounds can differ from Opium (there are similar synthetics, for example Pethidine and Fentanyl), but it's essentially the same damn thing... it's highly addictive.
This drug brought down a hundreds year old massive Empire which dominated east Asia. It can punch way above its weight.
Ok, you seem to have it sorted out.
I'm sorry to welcome you into this life. But I'm glad we have more with their head screwed on.
I appreciate you wanting me to have my head clear when doing this. Thank you.
Batou667
"A man is due to appear in court after allegedly causing a stampede at a gay pride parade in the US which left seven people needing hospital treatment.
The man, named in US media as 38-year-old Aftabjit Singh, allegedly waved a BB gun, which fires small metal ball projectiles, in the capital Washington on Saturday.
A number of people reported hearing gunshots before the crowd fled.
However, officials maintain there is no evidence that shots were fired.
A police report - cited by the Associated Press news agency - said the man took the weapon out after noticing someone "hitting his significant other"."
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48577355
This Sikh-sounding gentleman is obviously part of a very deep Nazi false-flag operation.
I'm aware of the opioid crisis; but this is the first time I hear blaming opium directly. Mainly because the main offenders are the synthetic ones.
Saelune
Gethsemani:
Saelune:
We just celebrated D-Day. A celebration about violently attacking Nazis. That's what celebrating D-Day is about, it is about attacking Nazis. Do you think D-Day was bad?
Generally, any celebration related to WW2 is a celebration of the war ending or coming closer to ending. Operation Overlord was integral in allowing the Western Allies to conduct operations to directly bring an end to the war in Europe and thus liberating the occupied and oppressed people. That's what we are celebrating.
There's absolutely nothing glorious or righteous about thousands upon thousands of young men being maimed or dying in agony, no matter which side of the conflict those men were on. Hitler and the rest of the Nazis will always be the people responsible for 50 million people dying in Europe because of WW2, and while I am thankful that the Allies and USSR stepped up to stop them, I think we should be really careful about canonizing the people who fought them. We should honor them for their sacrifice, but that's not the same as saying that attacking a Nazi is always a good thing. Because violence begets violence and by extolling the virtue of exercising violence on our opponents, we are also falling into the same kind of rhetoric that the Nazis used. From there, we are really close to being just as bad as anyone else that thinks violence against their enemies, real or imaginary, is alright.
It really isn't. Most celebrations of WW2 are nationalistic circle-jerks, but then, most celebrations of the military are never for the soldiers involved.
But also you're saying the ends justify the means. I mean, I agree in this case, but I think there is a lot of virtue signaling that never wants to consider the between parts. WW2 ended with violence. There is no way the Nazis were going to be defeated by anything except violence. I do not think that truth has changed.
I also think for all the people claiming violence is the wrong way to deal with Nazis, I think a lot of those people secretly don't mind when Nazis get punched in the face, but they want to virtue signal that they personally are 'above violence' even to people who perhaps deserve it, so they can feel good that a Nazi got punched, but also feel good cause it wasn't then doing the punching. Either way, the Nazi is punched, and the person criticizing it is 'virtuous' for being anti-violence. Similar to how Republicans can pretend to condemn bigotry while letting the bigots do what they want. They pretend to care when a LGBT nightclub gets shot up, but do nothing about it, so they can pretend they are above the violence, while also having less 'sinful queers' infesting the world.
Nazis are bullies, and they want to see where the line is, so they can edge up to the line. Then they see people not stopping them, and see the line is further in their favor, and so they keep inching forward, and they will keep doing it until either A) Everyone they want eradicated is eradicated, or B) They themselves are eradicated.
Tolerating intolerance will only let intolerance fester and grow.
There's only so much poppy you can export from Afghanistan and Pakistan via India, you've got to start making your own at the lab...
I use the term because it evokes the effects of Opium on China. It does for me, at least.
Batou667:
That's some tinfoil stuff right here... What else do you have to say?
This is why I have the problems with you that I do. There is no dialogue to be had with Nazis. They had their chance in 1938 and have proven they want only evil.
If they want a dialogue, it is on THEM to come to US with one. But they wont, cause they want to KILL US ALL. They are the bad guys, they choose to be the bad guys, and it is up to the good guys to stand up to them.
If the NRA was about arming up against Nazis, I might not hate them, but they are about arming the people who side with Nazis. Nazis and the KKK are why I don't want guns to be as open and free as they are. No, it will not stop them from getting guns, but it would be nice if when they had guns, we knew it was because they are the bad guys. Instead of cops protecting KKK and Nazis, they should be stopping them.
Black Panthers. Look it up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3uemBXG74
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeWPp81ankc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHWGAEF5GGA
Don't be useful idiots. Don't allow the government to take away more of your freedoms for your perceived safety. Take action, as is customary in your own nation.
If there is no dialogue there is only conflict, and if you do not reach a hand out to those people you have forfeit them all.
By comparison in my state if I wanted to legally concealed carry a pistol (or open carry for that matter) I'd just need to do what federal law mandates to buy the gun (as in the background check). We have legal open and concealed carry with no permits, just a minimum age requirement.
By which he means "opiates", as in opium derived drugs like heroin (that seems to be the popular one here lately - that and oxy).
Remember when the Black Panthers murdered over 16 million people in concentration camps? Me neither.
Know what happaned when we opened a dialogue with Nazis before? They invaded Poland.
You are wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong, and your wrongness only allowes Nazis to keep being a problem.
I think I prefer my state.
You misunderstand. Firstly, I am very much aware of the history of Europe during that time. I've been hit by the head with it since I was at primary school. Secondly, as I've said before, you conflate 'nazis' with other nationalist and populist groups which only serves to drive them towards the nazi cause. Open dialogue, understand their difficulties, and reconcile them. They turn to that extreme ideology out of desperation and anger. Trump won because he harassed that helplessness (and because he was a great campaigner). You risk alienating these communities, and you actively do, when you run around foaming at the mouth about Trump, the right wing and 'nazis'. Don't make the ideology illegal - confront it with force, as I've suggest above already twice and you seem to have misunderstood me twice. Black Panthers were a movement to defend the black community in the US, since in many places the police refused to do so. Gun laws are in place for a reason - and you too could have a trained militia, dedicated to patrolling the streets of your neighborhood and keeping you safe. Do not allow the government to exert force on these groups, because the permissions they will receive from the public will not be revoked, and they could be used at the discretion of any US government against groups it wants to put down. It was how the NSA and surveillance on citizens were approved following the 9/11 terror attacks. Siding with the government can have you give away your rights for perceived protection from these 'nazis'.
I know what happened when 'we' opened dialogue with the Nazis. They were allowed to annex the Saarland, and re-militarize the Rhineland without much protest. By the time of Ribbentrop-Molotov and the invasion of Poland Germany was not someone you could have a dialogue with. The strange last attempt of any dialogue was Rudolf Hess flying over to the UK and getting his ass landed in prison.
You are wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and your wrongness only divides your country further, pushing people ever closer to extremes.
Ugh, got an error, lost my original reply.
You're victim blaming. You're NOT blaming the bad guys. You're telling the victims to bend over for their abusers, and that is beyond unfair of you. THEY made the division, not us. THEY said 'Kill all Jews/Blacks/LGBT people' not us. You are blaming the wrong people, and that is not ok.
If they want to beg for forgiveness, they can come to us and beg for it. Crazy thing is, I will give it to them, I am very willing to forgive people who ask for it. Most of them arent willing to do it, and that is not my fault.
It is your line of thinking that is the problem, it is the reason Nazis are still a problem after 70 years still.
Sure, but the most problematic ones are the synthetic opioids, which their overdose death ratio has spiked very recently at a pretty fast pace. That's why it confused me.
At least try to address any of my points.
You conflate 'nazis' with other nationalist and populist groups which only serves to drive them towards the nazi cause.
You are laying a nasty Catch-22. If those groups have all the same goals and ideologies than the nazi, then they are just nazis with a different color. If all that was it needed for them to join is Saelune's accusations, then they were just waiting for an excuse (and nazis will just make up one for them when there is none). And a pretty big issue is that those groups do no effort to keep nazis away from them, which ends up in radicalizing their members, no matter what the left does.
Yes. If only Saelune would stop accusing them, there will be no more nazis.
I sense hostility because I ask to treat these people as reasonable humans, that can be convinced to stop what they're doing... and understand their mistakes. If you read my earlier posts, you could understand better my suggestions.
You seem to have trouble with reading comprehension when it comes to my posts. Maybe it's just because English isn't my first language, I don't know. Could be because you refuse to actually try to understand my points at all.
A much more recent example of this happening would be National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977) which resulted in the court upholding free speech rights, and no Sudatenlands ended up getting annexed. It's almost like contemporary American politics are vastly different than WWII and that one cannot apply the same rules of engagement without sounding like a hyperbolic lunatic who sees a fascist behind every tree.
As for these people, they committed a litany of crimes against people and property (seriously, if you want to destroy flags to make a political point, buy your own) and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Considering they were considerate enough to commit their crimes in front of cameras, it should be an easy prosecution. You can always write in to the DA's office about this if you think they're moving too slow on it.
That's also an option. Those of us on the right will absolutely never give up our firearms, period, end of conversation, and the same rights to bear arms apply equally to those on the left.
CM156:
As for these people, they committed a litany of crimes against people and property and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Considering they were considerate enough to commit their crimes in front of cameras, it should be an easy prosecution. You can always write in to the DA's office about this if you think they're moving too slow on it.
You did an oopsie on the quote earlier.
I was flexing my history nerd knowledge. It's irrelevant here, but I felt a need to do it.
I'm not sure I understand what my oopsie was.
The Lunatic
Oh no, a couple of assholes attacked a pride parade.
Let's round up every white guy and accuse them of being war criminals.
Strange, when people within the BLM movement was destroying shops, shooting people and generally being a complete load of assholes, we heard constantly that a few bad examples don't override the entire movement.
I guess the same doesn't apply when it's white people asking to uphold their freedom of speech. Seems a little racist to me.
You quoted my paragraph, when the post was attributed to Saelune. So either you meant to quote me, or you thought Saelune wrote that.
Ahhh, sorry, my mistake there. Very sorry about that.
Hey, you're apart of my community. I look out for my community.
You're also pretty awesome, so that helps.
The Lunatic:
This post is The Lunatic defending literal Nazis.
Back To TopThread IndexPosting Guidelines Select Forum ...DiscussionGaming DiscussionOff-topic DiscussionSite Information and AnnouncementsUser ReviewsAdvice ForumCurrent EventsRole PlayingTech DiscussionForum GamesThe Escapist CommentaryFeatured ContentThe News Room Jump To Forum:
Posting on this forum is disabled.
Served from: 172.31.21.7 | Version: com


• Changes in defendants' protections, including elimination of double jeopardy and exceptions to the exclusionary rule.
• New governmental investigative techniques like "Carnivore"
• -Discussion among faculty members on the breadth of changes since September 11, the effect on our work and implications for our clients, including issues relating to economic embargoes and freezing of assets.
NYLS (47 Worth Street) is between Church St. and West Broadway.
-Take subways 1&9 to Franklin Street; 1, 2, 3 to Chambers Street; A,C,E to Chambers Street; R, N to City Hall.
Space guaranteed only if pre-registered. Payment must accompany registration. Cancellations are not accepted, however, if you cannot attend you may either send a substitute (requires written authorization from you) or receive the materials and video instead.
Discounts available for legal aid, legal services and other public interest attorneys.
For additional information about the program or about joining the National Lawyers Guild, NYC Chapter, please call (212) 255-4181 or email nyc@nlg.org.
We are committed to not excluding people for inability to pay. Financial hardship applications are available (Scholarships and fee waivers awarded by advance application only).
The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to protecting and advancing the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR's work began in 1966 with legal representation of civil rights activists in the Jim Crow South. Over the last four decades, CCR has played an important role in defending and advancing movements for peace and social justice. CCR uses litigation proactively to take the law in a positive direction to combat government efforts to suppress political dissent, to empower poor communities and communities of color, to guarantee the rights of those with the fewest protections and least access to legal resources, to train the next generation of constitutional and human rights attorneys, and to strengthen the broader movement for constitutional and human rights. As our nation formulates a response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, CCR remains true to its vision, values and principles, vigorously promoting civil rights and human rights, social justice and social change and the expansion of political and economic democracy as the best prescription for creating a just, humane, peaceful and secure nation and world.
The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) is an association of progressive lawyers, legal workers, law students and jailhouse lawyers dedicated to the principle that human rights are more sacred than property interests. Founded in 1937 as the first racially integrated national bar association, the Guild's membership now consists of approximately 6,000 legal professionals working to use the law as a vehicle for societal betterment. The Guild has active chapters in cities across the country. For over 65 years, the Guild has been in the forefront in providing legal assistance for those struggling for racial justice and economic and gender equality. We currently have national programs focused on such issues as police misconduct and brutality, immigration, and international human rights. The NLG Post 9-11 Project is a national project founded to coordinate the Guild's response to the aftermath of September 11, 2001.
Jane Sung-ee Bai is Executive Director of CAAAV Organizing Asian Communities and the lead organizer for its anti-state violence organizing. CAAAV is a poor and low-income Asian immigrant community-based organization which fights against poverty, gentrification and displacement, worker exploitation, and other forms of institutional racism and the criminalization of immigrants of color. For the past 15 years, CAAAV has also advocated for over 200 no/low-wage Asian immigrants against police violence, INS detention and deportation, and other forms of racist violence. CAAAV is a member of Third World Within, a city-wide network of grassroots organizations run by, for, and about people of color.
Dana Biberman is the President of the New York City Chapter of the National Lawyers Guild. She joined the Guild in 1971 as a legal worker and member of the national office staff. As an attorney, she has worked in the public sector for 12 years and taught at New York Law School for six years. She has been a political activist in New York City for over 30 years, and was a plaintiff in several lawsuits aimed at exposing COINTELPRO. She holds a B.A. from Barnard College and a J.D. from New York Law School.
Robert J. Boyle has been a criminal and constitutional law litigator in New York City for over 20 years. Author of the Third Edition of Representation of Witnesses Before Federal Grand Juries, published by Clark Boardman Callaghan (now West). Former Staff Attorney of the Grand Jury Project, Inc. Mr. Boyle has represented numerous witnesses before federal grand juries, lectured on grand jury issues and prepared testimony for Congress on proposed grand jury reforms.
Nancy Chang is Senior Litigation Attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. She litigated the leading cases in which immigrants were detained based upon "secret evidence" and secured their release. She serves on the Board of the National Coalition to Protect Political Freedom and as a member of the Coalition's Legal Committee. She also serves on the Executive Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. She co-authored a shadow report to the United Nations on racial discrimination. She is the author of a recent article "The USA PATRIOT Act: What's So Patriotic About Trampling on the Bill of Rights?," and a pamphlet on how the USA PATRIOT ACT silences political dissent. She is currently preparing a revision of the CCR publication, "If an Agent Knocks."
Ron Daniels is Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. He holds a B.A. in History from Youngstown State University, an M.A. in Political Science from the Rockefeller School of Public Affairs in Albany, New York and a Ph.D. from the Union Institute. He is recognized as an expert on public policy issues affecting national and international rights. He appears frequently on television and radio and his weekly column, Vantage Point, is reprinted in more than one hundred African American and progressive newspapers nationwide.
William H. Goodman is the Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights. During his 33 years in private practice, he actively represented the Detroit Chapter of the NAACP and the civil rights movement, the anti-war movement, the Attica Brothers Legal Defense, the UFW grape and lettuce boycott, Greenpeace and the environmental movement, the anti-nuclear movement and the Detroit Newspaper strike support movement. He has been National President of the National Lawyers Guild and President of the NLG Detroit Chapter. He has published several articles addressing important issues in civil and constitutional rights.
Margaret Ratner Kunstler serves as the president of the William Moses Kunstler Fund for Racial Justice in addition to her private law practice. In 1968, as a law student at Columbia, she assisted Mary Kaufman to found the NLG Mass Defense Office. Ms. Kunstler took on major responsibility for the Attica Defense discovery motions, and later was co-counsel on Indictment #1. In the 70s and early 80s, at first with the Grand Jury Project and then with the Center for Constitutional Rights, she represented countless organizations and individuals who were targets of FBI surveillance and governmental assault. She edited The Representation of Witnesses before Federal Grand Juries and, as education director for the CCR, authored many self-help pamphlets, including, "If an Agent Knocks," and "Radical Re-entry."
Russell Neufeld is the Attorney-In-Charge of the Capital Division of the Legal Aid Society in New York City and an adjunct professor at New York Law School. He speaks and writes frequently about the death penalty and other human rights issues. A graduate of Goddard College and Brooklyn Law School, Mr. Neufeld has taught at Goddard, Harvard and Brooklyn Law School.
Michael Ratner is an attorney who works with and is the vice-president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. He is a lecturer in law at Columbia Law School where he teaches international human rights litigation and was previously the Skelly Wright Fellow at Yale Law School. He has also been Special Counsel to President Bertrande Aristide; Instructor, Yale Law School, International Human Rights Law Clinic; Legal Director, Center for Constitutional Rights; and President, National Lawyers Guild . He has co-authored three books on international human rights issues and has been honored for his efforts fighting human rights abusers.
Claudia Slovinsky has been an immigration and nationality attorney for over 20 years, representing asylum applicants, immigrants in political cases, and non-profit institutions and corporations. She is a co-operating attorney to several labor unions, the Center for Constitutional Rights, is on the board of the American Friends Service Committee Immigrant Rights Program, and is a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association and the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild.
Manuel Vargas is the Director of the Immigrant Defense Project of the New York State Defenders Association (1997-present). He is the author of Representing Noncitizen Criminal Defendants in New York State (1st ed. 1998; 2nd ed. 2000), and provides criminal/immigration law training and support to criminal defense lawyers who represent immigrants, to immigrant advocates, and to immigrants themselves. He spent the eight years prior to joining the Immigrant Defense Project representing immigrants in deportation proceedings as a staff and supervising attorney of the Immigration Unit of the Legal Aid Society of the City of New York.


Pep up your casual attire wearing the Merrell Duskair Moc. This shoe features a slightly raised footbed that ensures a relaxed walking experience. It is equipped with an M Select™ GRIP outsole for wear resistance and grip. This shoe has an M Select™ MOVE footbed for support and cushioning. The Merrell air cushion has effective shock-absorbents for protection from sudden impacts.


text:
«Без доказів» — кінофільм режисера Грегуара Віньєрона, який вийшов на екрани в 2010 році.

Зміст
Етьєн скоро повинен успадкувати від тестя його компанію, що виробляє засоби для чищення, але одна зустріч з другом дитинства, Патріком, все змінює. Етьєн зізнається, що 12 років тому вкрав у одного хіміка формулу, завдяки якій його кар'єрне зростання прискорилося в рази. Патрік радить Етьєну знайти цього хіміка і винагородити його за заслугами. Все ускладнюється після того, як Патрік вбиває хіміка.

Ролі

Знімальна група
 Режисер — Грегуар Віньєрон
 Сценарист — Лоран Тірар, Грегуар Віньєрон
 Продюсер — Женев'єва Лемаль
 Композитор — Крістоф Лапінта

Посилання
 «Без доказів» на сайті MEGOGO.net

Фільми французькою мовою
Кримінальні фільми Франції
Фільми-трилери Франції
Психологічні трилери
Дебютні фільми режисерів

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Home Brief City of Chengdu repossesses two Evergrande plots
City of Chengdu repossesses two Evergrande plots
on: December 21, 2021 In: Brief, Law & Regulation, PropertyTags: No Comments
Two plots of land in the central Chinese city of Chengdu owned by heavily-indebted China Evergrande Group have been repossessed by the local government having been sat empty for around ten years, reports the South China Morning Post. The sites were acquired by a real estate development company under Evergrande in 2010 and 2011, according to two notices on the website of the Longquanyi Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources Chengdu.
"If the developer keeps the land and does not develop it, the land will become idle, which is objectively detrimental to local development. The government wants to sell the land in the hope of making the best use of it," said Fu Yongsheng, a lawyer at Shanghai Brilliance Law Firm. Developers set up subsidiaries for projects after obtaining land from the government, he added.
The plots have areas of about 259,000 square meters and 84,000 square meters, respectively. The government notices said that construction on the land should have started in 2010 and 2011.
SenseTime HK IPO is back on
ByteDance becomes most valuable unicorn

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: extract everything from SQL by 1 SELECT I would like to extract everything from my SQL by 1 select.
I have table like this :
   client_id   | name  | company | number | stockfile | sum_pallets | time |
      111      | Peter |   O2    | 77533  |    002S   |     121     | 11:00|
      111      | Peter |   O2    | 77534  |    002S   |     42      | 11:00|
      111      | Peter |   O2    | 77535  |    002S   |     85      | 11:00|
      111      | Peter |   O2    | 77533  |    002S   |     215     | 10:00|
      181      | Steven|   Call2 | 89555  |    S2S    |     150     | 11:00|
      181      | Steven|   Call2 | 89559  |    S2S    |     80      | 10:00|

I use this code for select from sql -
$supplier = mysql_query("SELECT * from table")
And Now i need something like this for extract -
while($record = MySQL_Fetch_Array($supplier) WHERE Time = "10:00" AND Name = "PETER"):
So i will get :
only 1 record with all colums for time 10:00 and name PETER.
Can someone help me?
I do not want use more than 1 select.

A: Here's one way to do this :
$supplier = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM table");

while($record = mysql_fetch_array($supplier)) {
  if ($record['Name'] == "Peter" && $record['Time'] == "10:00") {
    // Here's Peter with time 10:00
  }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Camden Caley is a quiet, pet-friendly community offering one, two, and three bedroom apartment homes. This tucked-away apartment community in Centennial is still only minutes away from I-25 and I-225, Sky Ridge Medical Center, and zoned in the premier Cherry Creek School District.
Cherry Creek State Park is right next door, complete with the Cherry Creek Reservoir, hiking trails, camping, and gorgeous mountain views. Also, watch the 2016 Super Bowl Champions, the Denver Broncos, practice just a few miles away at their world-class Training Center!
Camden Caley apartments match the great surrounding area with equally impressive amenities you have been looking for. Stylish interiors include features like granite countertops, washer and dryer, walk-in closets and patios. During the colder months, we have garages available to keep you and your car warm, as well as cozy fireplaces inside your home.
Our community is also the perfect place to unwind or entertain. Soak in the hot tub, take a dip in the resort-style swimming pool with outdoor grilling stations, work out in the 24-hour state of the art Fitness Center, or play with your furry friend at our Dog Park! We also have a business center with a computer and wifi printer/fax/scanner.
Residents receive a technology package with a savings of up to 48% off retail. This money-saving package includes high-speed internet up to 150 Mbps and over 140 digital video channels through Xfinity. Use the Xfinity Go app on your smartphone or tablet to access your digital video anywhere!
Live the relaxed life at Camden Caley – stop in today and check us out.
All pets must be pre-approved by management.
Some of our apartment homes offer a direct access garage and we offer detached garages for $95.00 per month.
Visitor parking is located around the perimeter of the community.


My Nutrition My Life is the best nutritional center!!! You will transform your life , from the inside out.
With my personalized program I have loose weight , and more important I have learned about nutrition, healthy life style and eating habits. I'm very happy to see the results every week, my overall health has improved and so far I have lost 20 pounds! I'm sure I will reach my goal with her help!
I had the pleasure of meeting Kamalini at Orange Theory Fitness over a year ago. I was immediately drawn to her positive energy and her genuine persona. She pushed herself during the workouts and always encouraged the people around her.
After a year of working out, I was looking ok, but knew I needed to do something else to see even better results.
My friend Kristin and I decided to meet with Kamalini to see how she could help us with our nutrition and dietary needs. Kamalini sent me all the paperwork to fill out prior to our first meeting. When we met, she went through every page and asked many questions to clarify my responses. Kamalini came up with a plan tailored to my individual needs. She carefully explained every step I would take, what I should expect and provided an abundance of recipes for me to try as I began my new journey of eating clean. Kamalini checked in on me weekly and we had scheduled appointments to answer any questions and to provide next steps.
I couldn't be more ecstatic with the progress I have made! I have never felt better in my life! I have more energy than ever before and sleep amazing every night. I never feel hungry and have not had any tummy issues with anything I have tried.
I didn't begin this adventure to lose weight, but am extremely happy with the 15 pounds that I have lost to date.
This entire experience has been much more than I could have ever imagined. I look better, feel better and am now armed with the knowledge I need to keep my body in check from now on. Most importantly, I have a friend in Kamalini that I will cherish forever.
I am so grateful to Kamalini for her guidance in improving my life. I got thru the phase 1 & 2 diets and lost 14 lbs!! I feel like it's so good to have someone to check in with. I had never heard of bone broth before and how good it is for you. It's been great learning about which foods are so healing and adding them to my life. The whole reason for me seeing her in the first place wasn't just to lose weight but to learn to eat better and create a lifestyle with a healthy platform. I am extremely happy with the changes I've made so far and I will continue to keep learning and applying this beautiful knowledge to my life. Our bodies are magnificent things that have this magical ability to heal themselves when we provide them with the right tools, healthy foods! Kamalini took me on a grocery store tour, which was really helpful, and showed me how to properly read labels. They sure like to sneak sugar in a lot of stuff. I very much look forward to continuing to learn from her on this exciting journey of optimal health!
My Nutrition My Life™, LLC. Copyright .


How do you assess the success of your marketing strategy? Does it include customer satisfaction surveys? It should — they give you a direct line into the thoughts of your customers, and provide targeted information you can use to streamline your approach to marketing — and its success. Customer satisfaction surveys can provide your business with a measurable means to assess your approach.
Rating of the salesperson they worked with.
Future plans for repeat business.
Factors influencing them to choose your company.
Overall satisfaction with your company.
Recommendations to family and friends, based on the products or services you sell, and based on overall satisfaction with your company.
Easy to use: "Yes" or "no" questions are effective.
Short: A survey that takes more than a few minutes to fill out might get tossed.
Targeted: Including key components that you want the survey to measure.
Informative: Ask for details that tell you what your customers want, how they shop, when they need services, etc.
The customer satisfaction survey that you implement should yield a summery or analysis of the overall results, so you can outline variances in geographical regions, gender and age. This type of information will help you assess the departments, sales programs and employees within your company, along with how your business measures up nationally.
How often should you conduct a survey? There's no hard-and-fast rule; evaluate your marketing strategy to consider how often to place a survey in front of existing customers in order to engage them. Frequency often depends upon industry. If your business is driven by seasonal changes, for instance, a quarterly survey might be effective.
Continuity Programs provides turn-key solutions, including customer satisfaction surveys, to maximize your business' investment in marketing — and our proven track record across many industries will help turn your marketing strategy from lackluster to robust.