text:
Revolutionary reels: Soviet propaganda film and the Russian Revolution
By Shalon Van Tine
December 6, 2019 — Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal reposted from Cosmonaut — In 1896, the Lumière brothers visited Saint Petersburg to present their collection of moving pictures to a small Russian audience, marking the first viewing of film in Russia.[1] The first film to be made in Russia was during the same year: a filming of the coronation of what would be Russia's last monarch, Tsar Nicholas II.[2] It would take nearly a decade for Russia to have its own film studio, and the advent of World War I slowed the influx of foreign cinema, leaving Russia to launch its own film industry instead of relying predominantly on foreign film distributors.[3] Once established, Russia's film industry grew, and, by 1914, about half of Russia's urban population regularly attended the movies.[4]
However, the Bolsheviks would revolutionize Russian cinema as leaders recognized the potential of film propaganda as a way to influence the political and social attitudes of the people.[5] Vladimir Lenin clearly understood the power of film, as he stated, "Of all the arts, for us, cinema is most important."[6] The Bolsheviks nationalized the film industry in 1919, giving the People's Commissariat for Education control over film production, with a mandate to use cinema to promote the Communist cause at home and abroad.
Before delving into Soviet film in particular it is crucial to first understand why film stood out as a key propaganda tool in the early twentieth century. Film was a new medium. While propagandistic images had been used in various ways throughout history, moving images offered something fresh. One of the most well-known tales in film history about the impact of film on early viewers is that, upon watching Lumière's Arrival of the Train, audiences shrieked in horror at the train coming directly towards them from the background of the image.[7] Even though this story may have been embellished, early audiences were intrigued by film's ability to animate real-life imagery. Thus, film offered unprecedented realism beyond the traditional effect of pamphlets, posters, and even photography. Furthermore, since a majority of Russia's population were illiterate peasants, film could reach a widespread audience who would not have responded as well to written propaganda.[8]
The Bolsheviks focused their film industry on promoting specific communist themes among the Russian people and around the world. Different times meant different goals. During the years from the 1917 Revolution to the death of Joseph Stalin in 1953, Soviet propaganda adjusted to reflect the needs of the party in three periods: the Revolution, the Civil War, and New Economic Policy (NEP) (1917–1927); Stalinization, modernization, and the Great Purges (1927–1938); and the prewar, World War II, and postwar years (1938–1953). Over the course of these periods, Soviet film focused successively on the following key objectives: enshrining the ideals of the Revolution; solidifying the Bolsheviks' version of history and justifying Bolshevik leadership; promoting international revolution and calling on workers everywhere to unite against their oppressors; demonstrating the power of the people working together; elucidating the concept of the "New Soviet Person" and of the cultural revolution; showing the ongoing struggle against class enemies; promoting the controversial policy and methods of collectivization; demonstrating how industrialization would improve the lives of ordinary people while bringing society closer to the communist ideal; and celebrating Stalin as the strong leader of the Russian people and justifying questionable means to protect the people from enemies foreign and domestic. In short, Soviet film propaganda evolved in both content and style to reflect the changing political goals of the party during these periods.
Soviet Film Propaganda during the Revolution, the Civil War, and NEP
The tumultuous period from 1917 to 1927 began with a Tsar who ruled over the Russian Empire and ended with a Communist Party leader who exercised unrivaled control over the new Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). During this time, the Bolsheviks grew from being one of many political parties agitating for revolution into the only party—the Communist Party—which would wield power until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.[9] These years would shape Soviet leadership and would see the development of a new, impactful style of propaganda film: Soviet montage.[10] The radical filmmakers of these years would advance an innovative film style to capture the spirit of a revolutionary age.
The February Revolution of 1917 saw the collapse of the Tsarist government, which was replaced by the Provisional Government, in which power was shared between various political factions, chiefly through the bourgeois-dominated legislature, the Duma, and the councils of workers and soldiers, the Soviets.[11] Alexander Kerensky, one of the leaders in the Duma who supported the February Revolution, rose to prominence in the Provisional Government and, after the July Days, became the effective head of state. The Provisional Government sought to balance the interests of competing factions of Russian society until elections for a constituent assembly could be held. In the meantime, it continued to honor Russia's war commitment to the Allied Powers, seen by many workers and soldiers as a betrayal of the February Revolution, which had been precipitated largely by the fury of the hungry women of Petrograd who had had enough of the horror of World War I.[12] The Bolsheviks, who early in 1917 were just one of a variety of socialist workers' parties, adopted the slogan "peace, land, and bread," and by autumn 1917, they gained the majority in the Petrograd Soviet. The Bolsheviks argued for an end to dual power, embodied in the slogan "all power to the Soviets," and they organized Petrograd workers to seize power from the Provisional Government in the October Revolution of 1917.[13] The Bolsheviks declared the Soviets to be the sole organ of power, and thus began the Soviet Union, marking the first time in history that workers seized and held power for themselves. This momentous event would be celebrated in many Soviet films—first from the Bolshevik point of view, later with a Stalinist interpretation.
The Bolsheviks ended Russian involvement in World War I with a treaty in March 1918, but the fight to consolidate Soviet power had just begun. The Civil War broke out between the White Army of anti-communists and the Red Army of the Bolsheviks and their allies, such as the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries, whose members would later be either absorbed or purged.[14] In 1923, after years of fighting, social and economic upheaval, famine, brutal tactics to crush counterrevolution, conscription, nationalization of industries, crop seizures, and millions dead, the Bolsheviks achieved a ruinous, costly victory, and the future of Soviet communism and of all that they had fought for was far from certain. Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy (NEP), a "strategic retreat" from many of the communist policies of the Civil War and a partial, temporary reinstitution of a market economy.[15] NEP probably saved the Soviet Union from economic disaster and allowed the Bolsheviks—renamed the Communist Party in 1918—to solidify their control.
During the 1920s, the Communist Party launched a great propaganda campaign to win the hearts and minds of the Russian people—and to stir workers throughout the world to revolution.[16] Lenin, the preeminent leader of the Bolsheviks, died in 1924, and party leaders contended to fill the power vacuum. Stalin consolidated power within the party bureaucracy, and, by 1927, emerged as the head of the party. Stalin's rivals, chief among them Leon Trotsky, were purged from the party, and their roles in history were often diminished or distorted in Stalinist propaganda.[17] But in the years before Stalin crushed all opposition and stifled both political and creative freedom, groundbreaking master filmmakers, such as Sergei Eisenstein, Dziga Vertov, and Vsevolod Pudovkin, invented an exciting Soviet cinema unlike anything produced in the world thus far. In the first Soviet decade, these innovators brought to the silver screen—and, thereby, to the world—the spirit of the Revolution and a vision of its fruits.
Sergei Eisenstein changed the way filmmakers edited film, and, in doing so, increased the excitement and effectiveness of propaganda film. Eisenstein was influenced by some of his Soviet contemporaries who were experimenting with film montage, which he referred to as the "dialectical process that creates a third meaning out of the original two meanings of the adjacent shots."[18] While there was some disagreement among Soviet filmmakers as to the most effective way to use montage, Eisenstein developed his own theories that proved to have an authoritative impact on propaganda films. His expert use of montage in Strike (1925) and Battleship Potemkin (1925) illustrated the powerful role that film could play in communicating the theory and ideals of the Revolution.
In Battleship Potemkin, Eisenstein created a dramatized version of the mutiny that occurred on the Russian battleship Potemkin during the 1905 revolution, engaging the viewer's sympathies with exaggerated characters (one might call them "Marxist archetypes").[19] The film starts by setting the stage for revolt. In the "Men and Maggots" scene, Eisenstein introduces his viewers to his rapid style of cutting from image to image. The film shifts between shots of the distressed sailors and the spoiled meat to the maggots and the conniving expressions of the evil leaders.[20] With this tactic, Eisenstein accomplishes two important things: he wins the viewer's loyalty to the sailors and he establishes the Tsarist leaders as a force that must be eliminated. Eisenstein displays his montage techniques again during the "Drama on the Quarter Deck" scene when he cuts quickly from the commander's orders to kill the sailors, to the faces of the distraught sailors, and then to the action shots of the chaos.[21] With this style of fast-paced editing between images, Eisenstein establishes a sense of expressive panic and disorder to communicate his themes on both an intellectual and a gut level. Louis Giannetti notes on Eisenstein's editing that "Eisenstein believed that the essence of existence is constant change. He believed that nature's eternal fluctuation is dialectical—the result of the conflict and synthesis of opposites."[22]
The most effective and famous scene in Battleship Potemkin is the "Odessa Steps" sequence, in which soldiers march down the steps in an inhuman, almost robotic display of oppression, slaughtering droves of innocent people and culminating in a bloody massacre.[23] One of the most powerful series of images is the distinction between the machine-like, faceless Cossacks pitted against the helpless Russian people, such as the mother holding the child walking up the steps towards the soldiers in a desperate, doomed plea for mercy. Eisenstein mastered the editing and the sound precisely so that the viewer felt a sense of panic and fear while being fed such formidable imagery.[24] Battleship Potemkin became the film to capture the spirit of the Revolution—not just in Russia in 1905 or in 1917, but the universal Revolution of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, international and timeless. To Russians it was a call to embrace the vision of communism; to workers around the world it was a call to follow the example of their brothers and sisters in Russia.
After the Bolsheviks' costly victory in the devastating Civil War, they had to deal with the reality that the country faced severe social and economic problems.[25] Russian society was fragmented, and the Bolsheviks needed to demonstrate the power of the people working together rather than through individual action. The portrayal of collective action—a cornerstone of communist ideology—is evident in many of the propaganda films of the 1920s. Eisenstein's Strike begins with a quotation from Lenin: "The strength of the working class is organization. Without organization of the masses, the proletarian is nothing. Organized it is everything. Being organized means unity of action, unity of practical activity."[26] The film shows a workers' strike in pre-Revolutionary Russia and the violent suppression of the strike by the capitalists, famously illustrated through Eisenstein's montage of murdered workers and slaughtered cows.[27] Throughout the film, the workers are shown working together in groups, not as individuals—so much so that individuals are hard to tell apart and receive almost no unique characterization. Strike served a couple purposes at the time. First, it called on workers worldwide to unite to throw off the yokes of their oppressors. Even though the Russian Revolution had already happened, the Soviet Union still had to promote unity among the proletariat. Second, it promoted a "continuing revolution," that is, the expansion of an international proletarian brotherhood, rather than the "socialism in one country" of later years.[28]
The Bolsheviks needed to address another concern: justifying their continued leadership. The death of Lenin caused the Bolsheviks to worry about the exhaustion of the revolution, so they felt the need to continue to take advantage of the power of propaganda to keep those fires burning.[29] These fears were tackled in both Vsevolod Pudovkin's The End of St. Petersburg (1927) and Eisenstein and Grigori Aleksandrov's October: Ten Days the Shook the World (1928). Both films were released near the ten-year anniversary of the Revolution, hence their propagandistic portrayal of the historical events and the Communist Party's declaration that the films were intended to honor "the Bolshevik completion of the Russian Revolution."[30] In The End of St. Petersburg, audiences were reminded of the suffering of the Russian people before the October Revolution and the need for the Bolsheviks' bold leadership.[31] In October, Eisenstein and Aleksandrov place the Bolsheviks in the highest regard, showing them as righteous revolutionaries with the people's mandate to overthrow the Provisional Government.[32] Several scenes in October, particularly scenes involving crowds, are so realistic that they appear almost like documentary footage, blurring the line between history and propaganda.[33]
In addition to casting the Bolsheviks as the heroic leaders of the proletariat, October is also a noteworthy example of rewriting history to portray Lenin, Stalin, and Stalin's allies in a positive light while portraying Stalin's enemies in a negative light. When filming began in early 1927, Trotsky was still a leader of the Communist Party, though he was already at odds with Stalin. By December 1927, at the Fifteenth Party Congress, Trotsky and his faction had been purged from the party.[34] Stalin then stepped up his campaign to discredit Trotsky—not only by branding him a traitor in the present but also by falsely diminishing Trotsky's important role in the October Revolution and in the Civil War. When it was not possible to eliminate Trotsky's role entirely, he was instead made to look foolish, inept, or even traitorous in the retelling of historical events. At Stalin's insistence, October had to be recut to remove most of Trotsky's role in the portrayal of the October Revolution.[35] Only one scene with Trotsky remains: at a meeting of the Bolsheviks, Trotsky is shown opposing Lenin's brave plans to seize power in the name of the proletariat. Additionally, October emphasizes the role of individual leaders far more than the earlier Strike and Battleship Potemkin, marking the beginning of the shift from celebrating collective action to celebrating the great leader. Lenin becomes memorialized as almost godlike, and Stalin is cast as his chosen successor.
October displays yet again Eisenstein's successful use of montage and powerful symbolism. An early sequence depicts the people tearing down a statue of the Tsar—his head topples, then the orb and scepter, then the arms, and then the whole statue falls. Later, when Kerensky's imperial ambitions threaten the revolution, Eisenstein cuts to the statue sequence in reverse—the Tsar, piece by piece, flies back onto his pedestal.[36] These images are quickly intercut with intertitles expressing the imminent need to save the Revolution from traitorous reactionaries.
Kerensky's place in history is certainly open to debate. One could argue that Kerensky was an honest caretaker in a tight spot doing his best to balance the interests of many different groups in Russian society during a time of tremendous uncertainty. The Provisional Government was only supposed to be a temporary custodian until elections could be held for the constituent assembly in November 1917.[37] Those elections were held, and while the Bolsheviks won 25 percent of the popular vote, they placed second to the Socialist Revolutionaries who got 40 percent of the vote.[38] To the Bolsheviks in 1917, as well as to Stalin in 1927, Kerensky's role was necessarily fixed as a villain—a traitor to the February Revolution who sided with the Western imperialist powers against the suffering people of Russia—and the only legitimate election was through the workers' and soldiers' Soviets, which had, in October 1917, chosen the Bolsheviks to lead the workers' seizure of state power.
Clearly, from the point of view of the party in 1927, these events required some finessing. The Bolsheviks could contend with some justification to be the representative of the urban proletariat by October 1917, and they chiefly relied on this constituency for their claim to power.[39] Still, the Bolsheviks would look much better cast as heroic saviors of the people's Revolution from the betrayal of a new Tsar (or a new Napoleon) than as one political party among many who seized an opportunity. To that end, the story of the Great October Socialist Revolution had to be told as the triumph of the people—led by the Bolsheviks—over the monarchical aspirations of a traitor—Kerensky.
October demonstrated the Bolshevik fear that their Revolution would lead to a new Napoleon. In the film, the audience is shown flashes of Napoleon's statue with cuts to Kerensky contemplating over a chessboard. Later, a similar scene cuts between images of Napoleon to Kerensky standing in a Napoleonic pose.[40] The Bolsheviks had long been concerned that, after a successful revolution, a Napoleon-like leader might arise:
They had learned the lessons of history and had no intention of letting the Russian Revolution degenerate as the French Revolution had done when Napoleon Bonaparte declared himself Emperor. Bonapartism—the transformation of a revolutionary war leader into a dictator—was a danger that was often discussed in the Bolshevik Party… It was assumed that any potential Bonaparte would be a charismatic figure, capable of stirring oratory and grandiose visions and probably wearing a military uniform.[41]
The message of this sequence in October is clear and compelling: Kerensky was a would-be Bonaparte, and allowing him to remain in power would have been to surrender the promise of the February Revolution. Concurrent propaganda painted Trotsky in a similar light. Ironically, it was not Kerensky, Trotsky, or any other leader who became the dreaded Napoleon, but Stalin himself (an identity cemented in George Orwell's Animal Farm)—which made it all the more essential to paint Kerensky in that role.[42]
Soviet Film Propaganda during Stalin's Revolution and the Great Purges
The years from 1927 to 1938 saw Stalin wield near-absolute power over the Soviet Union. To maintain control and crush dissent—real or imagined—millions of citizens were executed or sent to the Gulag where many died, and any group within the Communist Party which looked like it might form a faction was purged.[43] Fear of attack from the West spread, and hoped-for revolutions in Germany and other Western nations failed. Stalin, therefore, shifted rhetoric and policy from the traditional Marxist aim of international proletarian revolution to "socialism in one country," which bore a striking resemblance to nationalism, a very un-Marxist concept.[44] In effect, this meant less talk about workers throughout the world and more talk of the Russian people—and of their heroic leader. The cult of personality around Stalin grew, and propagandists analogized to great leaders from Russia's past, like Alexander Nevsky and Ivan the Terrible. If Stalin's measures were iron-fisted, it was because Mother Russia was threatened by invasion, by spies, and by other class enemies.
The Soviet Union recognized that it was isolated, and that, if the communist ideal was to be achieved, the Russian people would have to do it themselves. The wave of European proletarian revolutions they had hoped for had not occurred. Modernization was a precondition for communism and necessary for defense against invasion, and, in 1928, Stalin's First Five-Year Plan made modernization the Soviet Union's top priority.[45] There were three key components to this drive: collectivization, industrialization, and the cultural revolution.[46] Collectivization meant modernization of agriculture. Peasant farmers were forced to reorganize their farms into kolkhoz (collective farms).[47] Industrialization meant building many new factories, increasing output, and bringing backward agricultural practices into the machine age.[48] The USSR wanted to beat the capitalist West at what the West did best, and the USSR knew this would require a herculean effort. Finally, if the Soviet people were to transform their nation and its production, they would also need to transform themselves. Illiterate workers and superstitious peasants would need to improve themselves: they must strive to achieve the ideal of the "New Soviet Person."[49] Propaganda was essential to show that these three aspects of modernization would improve life immediately (many films from this era include scenes simply showing machines at work, with a celebratory atmosphere) and would help to usher in the new age of communism.
Before Stalin took full control of the party, many Soviet propaganda films dealt with the themes of continuing the ideals of the Revolution, unifying the people, and preserving Bolshevik leadership. Films such as Vsevolod Pudovkin's Mother (1926), Dziga Vertov's Forward, Soviet (1926), Esfir Shub's The Fall of the Romanov Dynasty (1927), and Alexander Dovzhenko's Zvenigora (1928) all reminded the audience that the revolution was necessary and justified in order to continue towards the goal of communism.[50] Some of these themes would continue into the Stalin years, but the focus shifted towards ideas about the "New Soviet Person," the cultural revolution, and the continued fight against class enemies.[51]
This persistent battle against class enemies was evidenced in the propaganda films that emerged in the early years of Stalin's leadership, most notably in Pudovkin's Storm Over Asia (1928), which takes place in Mongolia circa 1918–20, and involves a struggle between indigenous Mongols—the oppressed people with whom the audience is meant to identify—and two class enemies: British imperialists and capitalists, and Buddhist priests and other Mongol elites. These class enemies work together to exploit the honest and noble people of the eastern steppe.[52] In Storm Over Asia, Pudovkin promotes several themes of Soviet propaganda: the continuing, international spirit of the Revolution; the ongoing struggle against various class enemies, at home and abroad; and the need for modernization to lift the people out of the darkness of superstition and religion.
Two scenes mocking religion and priests are worth noting. Early in the film, a Buddhist priest says prayers over a sick man in a humble hut. The priest employs various superstitious trinkets and noisemakers to heal the sick man—not medicine, just idle noise. In thanks for this dubious service, a family member offers the priest a fur as a "gift for the temple." When the priest decides that the gift is not valuable enough, he seizes a second fur. The son of the family (the main character in the film) tackles the priest, who ends up running away like a thief caught in the act and lucky to get away with his own hide.
Later in the film, there is a compelling sequence cutting between two scenes: preparations for a Buddhist festival and a British commandant and his wife dressing up to meet the Grand Lama at that festival. The festival shows priests dressing up in colorful, shiny, and "primitive" outfits; meanwhile, the proud British commandant dresses in his fancy and medal-clad uniform, his wife in a gown and jewels. Both sets of costumes require the assistance of servants. Intertitles are unnecessary: the message is clear that both the religious elites and the Western capitalists are class enemies, oppressors of the unpretentious, working people. As the British join the festival and make a grand entrance into the temple, Western pomp meets Eastern pomp, both meant to disgust the viewer. There is a moment of surprise when the Grand Lama—hailed as wise and revered by the priests—is revealed to be a baby sitting on a throne. A priest explains that, "Though the Great One does not speak, still he sees all, hears all, knows all."[53] The British commandant hesitates for a moment, and then bows solemnly. Again, the message is clear: the Western capitalists will play along with superstitious nonsense if their collaborators require it.
One of the most effective uses of montage in Storm Over Asia occurs in a key scene in which a British fur trader cheats the main character, a poor Mongol. A brawl ensues, and it ends with the Mongol pulling out a knife and cutting the dishonest trader's hand. The Mongol runs off. The British fur trader holds up his bloody hand, which is followed by an intertitle reading, "Avenge the white man's blood!"[54] Pudovkin rapidly cuts between close-ups of the bloody hand, images of capitalists shouting for vengeance, and troops marching in. As the Mongols flee, Pudovkin shows a row of riflemen, weapons aimed, advancing on the people who flee before them. In the end, the British commandant announces, "If within twenty-four hours the criminal is not surrendered the entire population will be fined and punished by example."[55] The sequence ends on another shot of the soldiers aiming their rifles, preparing to fire. Taken literally, the sequence presents a choppy narrative, but it is meant as a visual argument demonstrating the arrogance and racism of the Western capitalists who "buy cheap and sell dear" and the ruthlessness of "those who guard the interests of capitalism."[56]
The fruits of modernization, and especially of collectivization, is the main theme of Eisenstein and Aleksandrov's The General Line (1929). The film also tackles the need for the New Soviet Person to cast off the superstitions and backwardness of the old days. In The General Line, poor peasants with small farms are shown struggling due to drought. The peasants follow gaudy Orthodox priests, idols in hand, in a procession up to a hilltop. There the priests pray to heaven, asking for rain, while the peasants grovel in the dirt.[57] Eisenstein cuts between the people groveling and sheep—thirsty sheep, panting mindlessly. The people catch a brief glimpse of hope when they see a cloud, but, alas, there is no rain, because the priests are frauds (and, of course, they are also exploitative class enemies).[58] In the next scene, the peasant farmers have formed a dairy collective, and a new, shiny machine has arrived which efficiently churns milk into butter. The people are skeptical: they have been fooled before. They watch the machine work. An intertitle asks, "deception or progress?"[59] As the machine churns, the people see that it works, and they rejoice in their newfound prosperity. Much of the rest of the film celebrates the workings of a collective farm with similarly happy results. Production of The General Line began before Trotsky was purged from the party, and so the film was reedited to eliminate any references to him. It was released under the appropriate title The Old and the New.[60]
The reality of collectivization fell far short of what was promised to the peasants, and it was a disastrous failure, largely responsible for famine and the deaths of millions.[61] These embarrassing failures of the Communist Party's policy made its defense in propaganda that much more important. Dovzhenko's Earth (1930) celebrates life, death, the harvest, the power of the people working collectively, and the coming of the new world promised by the Revolution, all with striking visual poetry. It shows the clash of old and new—oxen versus tractor, class structure versus communism, religion versus atheism, and the individual versus the collective.[62] The past is frequently contrasted with the imagined future, a future in which the proletariat's work, joined with the power of the machine, would bring prosperity. Unlike the harsh reality of collectivization in the present, this beautiful film was intended to reassure the people of the new future that collectivization would (supposedly) soon bring them.
The key to the cultural revolution was the development of the New Soviet Person—a person who had shaken off the shackles of the old world (such as religion, superstition, and traditional bourgeois social values) and who embraced the new, modernized Soviet world. As Sheila Fitzpatrick explains:
The kind of renunciation that most interested Soviet authorities was when priests renounced the cloth. Such renunciation, if done publicly, provided dramatic support for the Soviet position that religion was a fraud that had been discredited by modern science. Signed announcements that a priest was renouncing the cloth "in response to socialist construction" appeared from time to time as letters to the editor of the local press during the Cultural Revolution.[63]
Whether such renunciations were real or coerced by Stalin's operatives, they were useful in promoting the break with old values. These anti-religious themes are on display in films like Storm Over Asia, The General Line, Earth, and also in Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow (1937). In the film, a farmer, angry at the government, attempts to destroy the crops, and his son tries to stop him to protect the Soviet state.[64] The father, an enemy of the state, is often shown alongside religious icons. Eisenstein provides a contrast between religion and modernization, between the old world and the new. The son is a prime example of the New Soviet Person: someone born into a new generation and free from the baggage of the old regime. These themes are also explored in Dziga Vertov's Man with a Movie Camera (1929), which has no narrative plot, but instead employs modernist themes of speed and movement, and documents the Soviet world of the new generation—a place where the confinements of the old world had withered away and industrialization had created a new, promising life.[65]
Soviet Film Propaganda in the Prewar, World War II, and Postwar Years
The period from 1938 to 1953 was, of course, defined by World War II—or, as it is known in Russia, the Great Patriotic War. The Nazi invasion devastated the USSR, which suffered more casualties than any other European country.[66] Relations between the Soviet Union and the West improved temporarily as they joined against their common enemies, the Axis Powers. Film propaganda from these years focused on the war—as it did in other countries as well—and on Stalin himself, the great leader. Soviet films from the 1940s bear little resemblance to the brilliant montage of the 1920s. Different messages called for different film methods: instead of quick cuts, swift movement, and groups in action, these later films have longer takes showing brave individuals holding the line. The evolution of the work of the preeminent Soviet filmmaker, Sergei Eisenstein, demonstrates this shift: Strike and Battleship Potemkin (both 1925) focus on groups—the proletariat collectively is the protagonist—while Alexander Nevsky (1938) and Ivan the Terrible, Part I (1944) focus on individuals—one strong ruler is the protagonist.[67] With these films, international socialism has been replaced by nationalism and totalitarianism. Gone is the battle cry "workers of the world, unite"; it is replaced with a call to follow the great leader Stalin and to defend Mother Russia against Western invaders. German soldiers are no longer class brothers—they are Teutonic Knights, come to pillage Russia.
Was the Revolution now complete, as Stalin claimed, or had it been betrayed, as Trotsky, Orwell, and others believed? If a filmmaker wanted his work to be seen, he had better take Stalin's side, and make sure that any hint of criticism was very cleverly veiled. For example, whether or not Eisenstein intended Ivan the Terrible, Part II (1946) as a criticism, it was perceived as such, and it was not released until 1958. Not until the thaw following the death of Stalin in 1953 and Khrushchev's policy of destalinization would filmmakers, as well as musicians, writers, and other artists, find a little more freedom of expression.
Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky (1938), a great historical epic, depicts the thirteenth-century battle on the frozen lake, in which Alexander Nevsky led the Russians against the invading Teutonic Knights.[68] Released in 1938, as Hitler was swallowing up Austria and the Sudetenland, it is no mistake that Eisenstein's subject was a great Russian victory over German invaders. The film even ends with an explicit declaration that any who would attack Russia will be defeated, the warning painted across a vast throng of Russian soldiers. One of the Germans in the film even wears a design that highly suggests the swastika. The film was very successful in the Soviet Union, but Stalin pulled it from circulation in 1939 when he signed his pact with Hitler. Two years later, when Hitler invaded Russia, Alexander Nevsky went back into widespread circulation.
Alexander Nevsky is quite different from Eisenstein's 1920s films. First, there is a shift in story-telling: whereas Strike, Battleship Potemkin, and October feature the proletariat collectively as the main character, in this film, Alexander Nevsky is the hero. The common people are still featured, but they support the great leader and follow his commands. This, of course, echoes the rise of Stalin as dictator. Second, gone is the fast-cutting of Eisenstein's signature montage. This is at least partly due to Stalin's insistence that the arts be accessible to the common public. Eisenstein had been severely criticized for being too artsy in his previously aborted film, Bezhin Meadow. For this film, Eisenstein was closely watched, and any "formalist" excursions were reined in by Communist officials.
Eisenstein's Ivan the Terrible is a two-part historical film about Ivan IV of Russia. Stalin commissioned the film because it emphasizes a single, strong leader: a Tsar from Russia's autocratic history. "Socialism in one country," effectively a nationalistic ideology, had completely replaced the international ideology of Marxism. Like Stalin, Ivan is an iron-fisted ruler only because he must be for the good of the Russian people. Russia is surrounded by foreign enemies, and is threatened from within by spies and scheming Boyars.[69] At one point Ivan leaves Moscow, only to return when the people beg him to come back. The point is clear: in times of crisis, a strong leader is needed, and ruthless tactics are justified to protect the country and its people from enemies.[70]
Part I won critical acclaim—even winning the Stalin Prize—but Part II was suppressed, and was only released after Stalin's death during the Khrushchev thaw.[71] Did Eisenstein depict Ivan as too terrible? Was there too much religious iconography? Was Eisenstein dabbling in too much experimental "formalism," rendering his work unsuitable for the masses? It is unclear why Part II was suppressed, and also what Eisenstein's true political views were. Regardless, both the content and the method of film had evolved dramatically from 1925 to 1946 to suit the changing needs of the Communist Party.
The Legacy of Revolutionary Soviet Film
During the Khrushchev thaw, censorship in the Soviet Union was relaxed somewhat, and Russian filmmakers had more freedom in their cinematic expression.[72] Stalin's successor Nikita Khrushchev eased travel restrictions and created cultural festivals that allowed an influx of diverse works from writers, artists, and filmmakers to come into the Soviet Union.[73] Thus, Soviet cinema took new forms. For instance, Mikhail Kalatozov's 1957 film The Cranes Are Flying tells a story of the Great Patriotic War, but instead of the prior patriotic Soviet take, the movie depicts the psychological damage of the war on the Soviet people, especially women.[74] Similarly, Andrei Tarkovsky's 1962 film Ivan's Childhood also deals with the effects of World War II on the mind of a child.[75] Soviet filmmaker Sergei Parajanov embraced this new artistic freedom in The Color of Pomegranates (1969), a picture that focuses on the life of a poet almost exclusively through experimental imagery.[76] This period demonstrated the diversity of Soviet filmmakers, who began to focus on the personal and the psychological rather than the collective and the political.
While the films during the thaw went a variety of new directions, during the years from the 1917 Revolution to the death of Stalin in 1953, Soviet film propaganda evolved in both substance and form to reflect the changing goals of the Communist Party. Soviet film went through three major periods during those years: The Revolution through the end of NEP, Stalin's Revolution and modernization, and the Great Patriotic War years. The Communist Party focused on fundamental themes including memorializing the Revolution, rallying the international proletariat, celebrating Bolshevik leadership, uniting the people, promoting the politics of the cultural revolution, and justifying Stalin's leadership and methods. Through the vivid power of film, great filmmakers promoted the changing policies of the Communist Party to audiences across Russia and throughout the world.[77]
David Gillespie, Early Soviet Cinema: Innovation, Ideology, and Propaganda (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), 4.
Denise Youngblood, Russian War Films: On the Cinema Front, 1914–2005 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007), 11.
Gillespie, Early Soviet Cinema, 4.
Vladimir Lenin, "Directives on the Film Business," Lenin Collected Works, vol. 42, trans. Bernard Isaacs (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1971), 388.
Martin Loiperdinger and Bernrd Elzer, "Lumière's Arrival of the Train: Cinema's Founding Myth," The Moving Image 4, no. 1 (2004): 113.
Yuri Tsivian, Early Cinema in Russia and Its Cultural Reception (New York: Routledge, 1994), 2.
Alexander Rabinowitch, The Bolsheviks Come to Power: The Revolution of 1917 in Petrograd (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2004), 273–304.
James Monaco, How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 401.
Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Russian Revolution, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 45.
Evan Mawdsley, The Russian Civil War (Edinburgh: Birlinn Limited, 2011), 65.
Fitzpatrick, Russian Revolution, 95.
Nicholas Reeves, Power of Film Propaganda: Myth or Reality? (London: Continuum, 1999), 45.
Monaco, How to Read a Film, 239–240.
Ian Christie, Eisenstein Rediscovered (New York: Routledge, 1993), 77.
Battleship Potemkin, dir. by Sergei Eisenstein (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1925).
Douglas Kellner, Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989), 143.
Louis Giannetti, Understanding Movies (London: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008), 175.
Battleship Potemkin.
Eisenstein worked with composer Edmund Meisel on the original score for Battleship Potemkin. Unique for the time, Meisel wrote his compositions to line up with what was happening within the film, getting guidance from Eisenstein on how to match the music with the rhythm of the scene. This tactic is, of course, commonplace today, but its use was innovative in early cinema.
Strike. Directed by Sergei Eisenstein. Moscow: Mosfilm, 1925.
Fitzpatrick, Russian Revolution, 114.
Reeves, Power of Film Propaganda, 45.
Robert Keser, "The End of St. Petersburg" Senses of Cinema 46, no. 1 (2008): 1.
The End of St. Petersburg, dir. by Vsevolod Pudovkin (Moscow: Gorky Film Studio, 1927).
October: Ten Days the Shook the World, dir. by Sergei Eisenstein and Grigori Aleksandrov (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1928).
Richard Taylor, The Politics of the Soviet Cinema, 1917–1929 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 97.
Gillespie, Early Soviet Cinema, 45.
October: Ten Days the Shook the World.
Ibid., 45–49.
Leonard Schapiro, The Origin of the Communist Autocracy: Political Opposition in the Soviet State First Phase, 1917–1922, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977), 42.
George Orwell, Animal Farm (Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1946), passim.
Elizabeth Waters, "The Modernization of Russian Motherhood, 1917–37," in The Stalin Years: A Reader, edited by Christopher Read (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 24.
Peter Stearns, The Industrial Revolution in World History, 4th ed. (Boulder: Westview Press, 2013), 135.
Daniel Peris, "The 1929 Congress of the Godless," in The Stalin Years: A Reader, edited by Christopher Read (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 42.
Storm Over Asia, dir. by Vsevolod Pudovkin (Moscow: Mezhrabpomfilm, 1928).
The General Line, dir. by Sergei Eisenstein and Grigori Aleksandrov (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1929).
Christie, Eisenstein Rediscovered, 8.
R. W. Davies and Stephen G. Wheatcroft, The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–1933 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 204–208.
Earth, dir. by Alexander Dovzhenko (Kiev: VUFKU-Odessa, 1930).
Sheila Fitzpatrick, Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times, Soviet Russia in the 1930s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 128.
Bezhin Meadow. Directed by Sergei Eisenstein. Moscow: Mosfilm, 1936.
Man with a Movie Camera. Directed by Dziga Vertov. Kiev: VUFKU-Odessa, 1929.
Anna Lawton, The Red Screen: Politics, Society, Art in Soviet Cinema (London: Routledge, 2003), 304.
Alexander Nevsky, dir. by Sergei Eisenstein (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1938).
Ivan the Terrible, Part I. Directed by Sergei Eisenstein. Moscow: Mosfilm, 1944.
David Brandenberger and Kevin M. F. Platt, "Terribly Pragmatic: Rewriting the History of Ivan IV's Reign," in Epic Revisionism: Russian History and Literature as Stalinist Propaganda, edited by David Brandenberger and Kevin M. F. Platt (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006), 160.
Karel Berkoff, Motherland in Danger: Soviet Propaganda during World War II (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), 162.
This essay does not attempt to delve too deeply into Russian film during the thaw, so for more information on society and cinema during this period, see Denis Kozlov and Eleonory Gilburd, eds., The Thaw: Soviet Society and Culture during the 1950s and 1960s (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2013), Josephine Woll, Real Images: Soviet Cinemas and the Thaw (New York: I. B. Tauris & Co., 2000), and Lida Oukaderova, The Cinema of the Soviet Thaw: Space, Materiality, Movement (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017).
Walter L. Hixson, Parting the Curtain: Propaganda, Culture, and the Cold War, 1945–1961 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), 102.
The Cranes Are Flying, directed by Mikhail Kalatozov (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1957).
Ivan's Childhood, directed by Andrei Tarkovsky (Moscow: Mosfilm, 1962).
The Color of Pomegranates, directed by Sergei Parajanov (Yerevan: Armenfilm, 1969).
The author wishes to thank Tristan van Tine, John Jennings, Rajko Grlic, Steven Miner, and Doug Greene for their insights on Soviet cinema, their discussions on the history of the Russian Revolution, and their feedback on this essay.


Swiss property tycoon and businessman Safa Abdulla Al-Geabury has blamed the devil for his gambling addiction, as the Ritz Club in Mayfair seeks to recover more than £2m (€2.8m, $3.1m) in dues from the billionaire.
Al-Geabury, 52, in February 2014 blew £2m at the casino in two hours. He wrote a cheque for the entire amount, but it bounced.
The Ritz Hotel Casino, which owns the club, later filed a lawsuit seeking to recover the sum plus £200,000 in interest on the dues.
Al-Geabury, who rents homes in Sloane Street and Chelsea in London and in Geneva, claimed in the High Court that he was a gambling addict, and the club should not have allowed him to play. By letting him play, the club had unlawfully breached the terms of its gaming licence, he said.
Al-Geabury is also counter-claiming £3.4m, or £5.4m in the event that the judge decides against him – the sums he lost when he gambled between October 2010 and February 2014.
The club's barrister, Clive Freedman QC, told the High Court that Al Gearbury had told a psychiatrist that "the devil made me gamble".
He added that Al Gearbury had "boasted" to a member of the casino's staff that he had enough wealth to pay off his debt, including his collection of Islamic art and diamonds.
Al Geabury, who speaks through an Arabic interpreter, said his wealth was relative as he owned no palaces or yachts. He added that he no longer dealt in gems, was not a foreign exchange dealer and had no collection of classic cars or antiques.
The hearing is due to last five days, and the court will now seek evidence from psychiatrists about the extent of Al-Geabury's disorder and if the club's staff knew about it.


Home safes can protect your valuables, cash and documents from theft, flood and fire and form an essential part of any home security plan. We are qualified and experienced safe engineers, able to install, repair, relocate and remove a range of home safes.
Any safe or strong box that can be physically moved is vulnerable to theft. For additional security, safes should be installed by a professional safe engineer. This can include fixing them to the floor, under the floor, to a wall or inside a cupboard or wardrobe.
Why trust Calder Security for home safe installation?
Even the most sophisticated and expensive safes can fail, especially when they have not been serviced for a while. Often they are repairable, potentially saving you the cost of replacing the safe. We can repair a wide range of safes thank to our experience in locksmithing and safe engineering, giving your safe years of useful life.
Why trust Calder Security for home safe repair?
Safes are most secure when they're fixed to the floor, wall or in a cupboard but at some point you may want to move it, for example when you move house, or just not need it anymore. By their nature, they can be very heavy and require a professional to remove or relocate them. We can offer this service.
Why trust Calder Security for home safe removal and relocation?
Safes are perfect for keeping your cash and valuables safe from those who would steal them but occasionally they can prove too secure if you find yourself locked out through the loss of the keys, forgetting the code or a mechanical failure. We can access most safes, often without having to damage the lock, if you find yourself in such difficult circumstances.
Why trust Calder Security for home safe opening?
Whether your safe features a traditional key lock, a digital keypad or a combination lock, these mechanisms will always benefit from regular servicing and maintenance by a professional safe engineer. Safes maintained in this way are much less likely to jam or fail, which could potentially leave you unable to access its contents.
Why trust Calder Security for home safe maintenance?


text:
Home nonetheless
Definition of nonetheless in English:
nonetheless
(also none the less)
Pronunciation /ˌnənT͟Həˈles/ /ˌnənðəˈlɛs/
In spite of that; nevertheless.
'it was the barest of welcomes, but it was a welcome nonetheless'
'It reminds me of another frighteningly different culture which nonetheless fascinates us.'
'I shed a few angry tears after that, but still went to the writing test nonetheless.'
'The outcome of the Butler Report may have been predictable but it's remarkable nonetheless.'
'Smoke from the fire streamed up to a hole in the roof: but the air was filled with woodsmoke nonetheless.'
'We should not overstate the risk to Scotland, which remains small, but it is there nonetheless.'
'He nonetheless managed to open the season with three straight league wins.'
'Much like the film it alludes to, this is an acquired taste, but worth taking a chance on, nonetheless.'
'These are not all of the colleges' own making but they will have to respond nonetheless.'
'This gossip was denied by the government but nonetheless it influenced some to vote.'
'The combat and movement can be clumsy, but the game haunts you nonetheless.'
'This is as hard to believe as the first images we saw were yesterday, but nonetheless that is what has happened.'
'Some of his advice may seem simplistic in the extreme but it is important nonetheless.'
'But a close family source said they nonetheless feared they would lose their croft.'
'Like many a Costello lyric, it's ambitious and complicated but potent nonetheless.'
'In some ways they were objects, too scary to be people, but to be adored nonetheless.'
'He stepped forward, his arms at his sides, but I was nonetheless within his personal space.'
'That was already pretty obvious over here, but nonetheless the announcement has been made.'
'They can nonetheless be taken to indicate a distinctive turn in recent art.'
'Bacall nonetheless seemed and still seems to have been made for the screen.'
'Elephant is not a total success, therefore, but it is a good album nonetheless.'
in spite of everything, in spite of that, nonetheless, even so, however, but, still, yet, though, be that as it may, for all that, despite everything, despite that, after everything, having said that, that said, just the same, all the same, at the same time, in any event, come what may, at any rate, notwithstanding, regardless, anyway, anyhow
/ˌnənT͟Həˈles/ /ˌnənðəˈlɛs/
watercat
waterdog
lungless salamander
heartless salamander
goliath frog
David frog
natterjack

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Bygdøy kirke ligger på halvön Bygdøy i västra delen av Oslo i Norge.

Kyrkobyggnaden
Ett tidigare träkapell uppfördes år 1876 och brann ned år 1958. Nuvarande kyrka i betong uppfördes efter ritningar av arkitekt Finn Bryn och invigdes år 1968.

Kyrkans västra kortsida har koppardörrar med reliefer av Ørnulf Bast. I kyrkorummet finns sittplatser för omkring 200 personer.

Inventarier
 Predikstolen och dopfunten är tillverkade efter ritningar av kyrkans arkitekt.
 Altaret är en glasmosaik utförd år 1994 av Veslemøy Nystedt Stoltenberg.
 Orgeln med 15 stämmor är byggd av J.H. Jørgensen.

Referenser
 Norske kirkebygg
 Kirken.no

Externa länkar

Kyrkobyggnader i Oslo
Kyrkobyggnader invigda 1968
Kyrkobyggnader i Oslo stift
Bygdøy
1968 i Norge

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
15 49.0138 8.38624 arrow 0 arrow 0 4000 1 0 horizontal https://www.evolveandascend.com 300 1
The Tao is a complex, yet simple, way of being. The Tao cannot be defined, and in trying to define it, the concept is actually lost. This Chinese philosophy is accredited to the 6th-century BC sage, Laozi (Lao Tzu). His text, the Tao Te Ching, is poetic teaching on the nature of the universe and... / READ MORE /
Today (January, 8th), David Bowie would have turned 73-years-old. Unfortunately, Bowie passed of liver cancer in 2016, but the loss of this icon still reverberates through many a creator, fan, and lover of the Bowie legacy. For those who may not know, beyond being a talented musician and actor, Bowie was also a skilled artist... / READ MORE /
This GIF Series by Sarah Zucker Offers a Psychedelic View of the Internet's 'Nervous System'
Sarah Zucker is a unique force in the universe of the human imagination. A modern-day renaissance person, a GIF artist with billions of views, who dabbles in all realms of the creative, and is a JEOPARDY CHAMPION! In a new GIF series commissioned for the PrintScreen Festival through a grant from Asylum Arts, Sarah offers... / READ MORE /
Culture, Film
Dimension Slipping Shows Worth Binge-Watching
The winter months are upon us, and as we prepare to bundle up and enjoy the change of season, nothing can ease the change of seasons quite like a binge-worthy series that tickles the imagination and inspires new levels of consciousness. Below, I've compiled a list of dimension-hopping, psychedelic, and surreal series that bend the... / READ MORE /
Occult, Tarot Cards
tarot, tarot cards
Salvador Dalí's Tarot Cards from 1984 Are a Delightful Dip into The Surreal Subconscious
Salvador Dalí designed a deck of surreal tarot cards in 1984 that was intended to be used as props for the James Bond film, Live and Let Die, but due to contractual agreement issues, the cards were never released. "Combining the occult with his own unmistakable sensibility, Dalí's tarot is a pastiche of old-world art, surrealism,... / READ MORE /
Consciousness, Evolve and Ascend News
Announcing Well-Being in the Modern Age's NYC 2019 Lineup!
We are really happy to support the upcoming Well-being in the Modern Age (WITMA) on Friday, October 18, 2019, from 3:30 PM to 10:00 PM (EDT) at CONTRA STUDIOS, 122 W. 26th St. (#4th Floor), New York, NY 10001. This year's event features a panel on The Imagination moderated by Jennifer Sodini, featuring Damien Echols,... / READ MORE /
WATCH: The Prophecy of Thoth, Read by Graham Hancock
In ancient days, Egypt was referred to as Khem (Black Earth). This cradle of civilization gave birth to alchemy, chemistry, and a mysterious body of work known as the Hermetic Texts. Hermetic philosophy derives its name from Hermes Trismegistus, the Greek incarnation of the Egyptian deity Thoth, who is the Neter of language, science, magic, the... / READ MORE /
Ancient Wisdom, Consciousness, Culture
Using Philosophy to Work Through Triggers and Defense Mechanisms
Manly P. Hall was an esoteric philosopher, whose scope of wisdom was seemingly endless! In the course of his lifetime, Hall published over 150 books, gave thousands of lectures, and is responsible for one of the most dynamic occult books out there, The Secret Teaching of All Ages. What triggers you? Why does it trigger... / READ MORE /
Consciousness, Culture, Modern World
consciousness, cory allen
The last few years have opened a portal into a modern-day renaissance of psychedelic exploration, spiritual searching, and an influx in the interest of taking agency over our lives through holistic practices that increase our sense of well-being, as we try to make sense of a world that's changing at lightning speed. With this resurrection... / READ MORE /
These Powerful Illustrations Highlight Some of Society's Biggest Problems
German artist Steffen Kraft, who also goes by the name Iconeo, has created a series of illustrations, which highlight some of the greatest problems we are facing individually, collectively, and on a planetary level. His potent social commentary puts the paradox of life into a powerful (and at times ironic) perspective, which is both consciousness... / READ MORE /
Stunning Photo Series Captures the Progression of a Solar Eclipse
Photographer Dan Marker-Moore has captured the stunning progression of a recent solar eclipse in Chile through a unique composition and photography process. He describes his work by saying: "My career in photography grew out of a passion and hobby. As the age of social media began so did my constant use of the camera. I had... / READ MORE /
Art, Occult
art, mudra
These Sacred Tibetan Thangkas Feature Divine Healing Mudras
Urgyen Sonam is a world-renowned master silk, thangka artist, who was born in Eastern Tibet. Having spent his childhood traveling to sacred sites by foot, he eventually found his way to India, where he became a monk, specializing in ritual music and chanting. His natural affinity to the arts directed him to undertake a five-year apprenticeship with The Dalai... / READ MORE /
Consciousness, Entheogens, Wellness
Bufo vs. Kambo: What are the Differences?
Featured art by Nic Warner Bufo and Kambo are two types of amphibious entheogenic healing medicines that are often confused or misunderstood. As someone who has previously confused, and misunderstood both, learning the differences and experiencing the differences has been nothing short of profound, evolutionary, and extremely humbling. So, what are the differences in each,... / READ MORE /
innereco, probiotics, wellness
Exploring our Inner Ecology with inner-ēco's Barb Vogel
inner-ēco is an incredible (and socially-conscious) line of probiotic products that are mindfully brought to market, with the intention of transforming your inner ecology, and allowing ultimate health to flourish. We have kept in mind a family friendly lifestyle when bringing our remarkably delicious products to market. Today's families are busy and want top quality,... / READ MORE /
Culture, Occult, Tarot Cards
books, hermetic, occult
10 Books That'll Unlock the Secrets Within Amenti Oracle: Feather Heart Deck and Guidebook
Our intention in the exploration of Amenti Oracle: Feather Heart Deck and Guidebook is to offer an alchemical journey of awareness, with the words in each passage evolving as you continue to evolve through time, the layers of wisdom can be further unlocked through direct experience and study. "Read not to contradict and confute, nor to believe... / READ MORE /
Consciousness, Entheogens
ayahuasca, plant medicine
The Promise of Shaman: A Powerful Poem About Healing With Plant Medicine
Art Credit: "La Medicina Vive en Mi" by Luis Tamani The medicine path is the most challenging, albeit beautiful, journey of self-discovery. Plunging deep into the abyss of the subconscious to uncover (and learn from) trauma, and stepping into the fire of truth, you are able to burn away what was, stepping into what is, purging... / READ MORE /
Art, Culture, Occult, Tarot Cards
ciel grove, oracle cards, tarot decks
Deck Review: 'The Knowing' by Ciel Grove
"ALL OF LIFE IS SPEAKING TO YOU. TO LISTEN IS THE GIFT OF BEING HUMAN." The Knowing is a gorgeous new oracle card deck, described as a "shamanic deck of wisdom" by Ciel Grove. "Ciel is a traditionally-trained and initiated Shamanic Practitioner + Artist living in central British Columbia, Canada. Taught and/or recognized by teachers... / READ MORE /
Astrology, Consciousness, Occult
annabel gat, astro guide, astrology, interviews
Catching Up With Annabel Gat and Learning About the New AstroGuide App!
The Astro Guide : Astrology by VICE App recently launched, and Annabel Gat is one of the key expert astrologers behind this gorgeous (and user-friendly) new platform. We recently caught up with Annabel to learn more about her work, some astrology basics and what to expect from Astro Guide Annabel Gat is an astrologer certified... / READ MORE /
Ancient Wisdom, Culture, Occult, Tarot Cards
These 42 Sacred Ancient Egyptian Ideals Pre-Date the 10 Commandments
Ma'at is an ancient Egyptian Neter ("force of nature" / goddess), as well as a living philosophy. She is the personification of truth, balance, harmony, and justice. Wife to Thoth, Ma'at is the symbolic embodiment of a discerning heart, that leads with courage, awareness, and authenticity. As a spiritual symbol, or philosophy, she is the cosmic life-force... / READ MORE /
Culture, Occult, Practical Magic(k), Tarot Cards
amenti oracle, egyptian, magick, oracle cards
How Oracle Cards Can Open Your Mind and Allow Deep Connection to the Present
Temet Nosce // Know Thyself The Matrix (1999), which is our modern day version of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", has a rather famous scene, where the protagonist, Neo, goes to visit "The Oracle". While in her apartment, above the kitchen door, the ancient Greek aphorism, Temet Nosce ("Know Thyself"), hangs. The Oracle does not... / READ MORE /
holly simple, oracle cards
Artist Holly Simple's Wonderful (and Mystical) World of Whimsy
Holly Simple is a Philadelphia based artist, cartoonist, and illustrator. Mother to the Holly Simple Tarot and Fuzzy Prism Oracle decks, her work activates a sense of child-like whimsy, while connecting us deeper to the heart of playful wisdom, and the spirit of creativity, and kindness. We recently interviewed Holly to discuss her work, and... / READ MORE /
consciousness, interviews
Exploring Synesthesia and the Bridge Between Art and Spirit with Nat Girsberger
Nat Girsberger is a Swiss, multi-media artist, who is able to "hear in color" through her gift of synesthesia. Specializing in design, installation and album art, this Brooklyn-based creative is able to make the unconscious, conscious through colorful collage, and works of art that tickle the imagination, and inspire higher realms of being. "My collages... / READ MORE /
Culture, Uncategorized
This Luxe Vegan-Leather Accessories Brand is Revolutionizing Creative Lifestyles
Launched in November of 2018, BRINN is an Asbury Park-based accessories brand thoughtfully designed for all creative lifestyles and inspired by real-life problems. With a focus on quality, innovation and detail – all of BRINN's products are made from a water-resistant and durable luxe vegan leather, making their line 100% cruelty-free. We recently had a... / READ MORE /
Nelson Diaz: Recycling Time Through Symbols and Images
Nelson Diaz is a resident of New York City, and the Hudson Valley where he works as an artist. In 2006, he was awarded a grant from The Adolph and Esther Gottlieb Foundation as well as the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation. In 2015 Nelson Diaz received the Historical Society of Rockland County Merit Award for Adaptive... / READ MORE /
art, visionary art
Exploring The Cultural Significance of Lunar Consciousness with Rithika Merchant
Rithika Merchant is an Indian artist who grew up in Bombay, studied fine art in New York, and is currently residing in Barcelona, Spain. She describes her work by saying: My works are an exploration of epics and myths across geography. I create mosaics of myths that question received histories that are available to us... / READ MORE /
cinema, consciousnes, consciousness, culture
Awakening the Collective Unconscious With 'Subconscious Cinema' by Dreamscience
The video below, by Dreamscience, is a masterfully edited collection of well-known cinematic scenes, which, woven together, evoke a powerful (and disturbing) message about culture, and the collective unconscious. Watch Subconscious Cinema, and feel free to share your thoughts! "Hey, are you a dreamer? "They say dreaming's dead. No one does it anymore.It's not dead,... / READ MORE /
Pair These Three Powerful Documentaries and Feature Films for an Eye-Opening Experience
Film is one of the most powerful mediums for affecting consciousness and perspective. It's a tool which allows us to see life through a different lens and provides the power to tell great stories, which reveal realities that are beyond the imagination. Art imitates life, but life also imitates art – and when we examine both, we... / READ MORE /
art, artists
The Transformational Power of Robert Buratti's Esoteric Art
Artist Robert Buratti grew up with a strong interest in visual art and a fascination with the Renaissance masters. His work is chiefly concerned with the role of the spiritual within contemporary art, and the talismanic and transformational power of the image. Influenced by the approach and experimentation of artists (and philosophers) such as James... / READ MORE /
brands, consciousness, fashion, sacred geometry
The Cosmically Cognitive Creations of Lifestyle Designer John Brevard
John Brevard is the force of nature behind a unique lifestyle brand, which integrates fashion, design, technology, jewelry, and accessories with the sacred patterns, which govern the heavens (and earth). With a keen eye for geometric design infused with the fractal nature of reality, each creation appears as though you are wearing a tangible part... / READ MORE /
interviews, occult, tarot cards
Exploring Realms of Light with Laura Zuspan, Creator of The Luminous Void Tarot [Interview]
Channeling divine wisdom from the heart to mind to brush-stroke, Laura Zuspan is able to open portals of light (and spirit) with her uniquely brilliant artwork. An artist, mother, seer, and sage – the magic Zuspan imbues into her creations is a palpable force of source energy expressed and embodied. We recently connected with Zuspan... / READ MORE /
12…23OLDER POSTS


InterGlobix Magazine is industry's premier luxury datacenter and connectivity reference guide. It recognizes the key shapers behind this relatively young industry and delves deep into the luxury lifestyle of the most successful industry personalities. It features behind-the-scenes stories at datacenter construction sites, looks into the emerging subsea ports, latest terrestrial and mobile industry innovations and keeps you in the know. Each luxury-packed issue offers a platform to our partners and clients to showcase their exclusive products and services to the coveted and elite high net worth individuals from the datacenter and connectivity industry. InterGlobix Magazine is owned by InterGlobix LLC, a global solutions company focused on the convergence of datacenters, terrestrial fiber and subsea fiber.


text:
Tag: Owl Manor
Owl Manor—The Final Stroke (Owl Manor: Book 3) by Zita Harrison
On 2022-09-23 2022-09-23 By JolieIn book review, Non ARC, Zealous Arts Publishing2 Comments
Publisher: Zealous Arts Publishing
Date of publication: August 10th, 2022
Genre: Gothic, Horror
Series: Owl Manor Trilogy
Owl Manor: The Dawning—Book 1 (review here)
Owl Manor: Abigail—Book 2 (review here)
Owl Manor: The Final Stroke—Book 3
Inspired by authors like Edgar Allan Poe (The Raven), Daphne du Maurier (Jamaica Inn), and Shirley Jackson (The Haunting of Hill House), Owl Manor – the Final Stroke is the third and final book in the Owl Manor trilogy of Gothic Suspense novels. It follows Owl Manor – the Dawning and Owl Manor – Abigail.
My worn books squelched through mud and grit as I trudged down the main thoroughfare of a town.
Owl Manor—The Final Stroke by Zita Harrison
I cannot stress this enough (and I have mentioned it a few times in the previous two reviews for this series), I cannot read Gothic/horror without my husband being home. After finishing this book, I couldn't close my eyes without seeing several of Dolores's paintings, Kitty's theater, or even Rachel's descent into madness. I was so unnerved by this book, and that was a good thing!!!
Owl Manor—The Final Stroke is the 3rd book in the Owl Manor trilogy. While you can read this as a standalone book, I recommend reading books 1 and 2 first. That way, you can learn about the events that lead up to this book and how they influenced the events that take place in this book.
The author did write a forward to the book explaining how it was written. This book is written in language that was common for the time. She explained that the language combines British English and frontier dialect but is moving towards an informal American dialect. She cited a website (etymobline.com) that she used in her research to make sure it was as authentic as possible.
Owl Manor—The Final Stroke takes place around 30 years after the events of Abigail and around 50ish years after The Dawning. Dolores, Kitty, and Rachel are three friends looking for a place to open a combination restaurant/theater/art gallery. Dolores finds a carved owl at a local fair, and the seller, a young boy, tells her it is from a mansion in the mountains outside of Denver. After seeing the estate, they decide to buy it and renovate it back to its former glory. But, once living there, Dolores (an empath) starts painting pictures of murdered women, the victims of Rafe Bradstone. Her dreams reach a fever pitch as women are being murdered in Denver, and she is compelled to paint them. With Kitty going down a path that includes opium use and promiscuity and Rachel spiraling down into madness, Dolores needs to get to the heart of the mystery, Owl Manor. But can she do it in time to save herself and her friends? Or will they end up being more victims of Owl Manor?
I loved Dolores's character. She was your typical turn-of-the-century artsy girl who dreamed of doing nothing but her art. She was also an empath who used her art to channel the pain of what she was feeling to canvas. So, when she started having nightmares and was compelled to paint them, it wasn't new to her. But what was new was how graphic and terrifying the paintings were. The author could take Dolores's initial feelings and expand on them. Dolores became alarmed at what she was doing. She did try to stop (the scene where she tried to burn the painting will be forever etched in my head) but couldn't. I was terrified for her when she started painting murders that had just happened. I am going to stop there because of spoilers.
I liked Kitty's character, but I was not too fond of the turn she took. She had a great vision for her theater, and I thought her first two shows were great. But then, she listened to Cecil, and everything turned. She went from this bright, vibrant girl to someone I didn't even recognize. It saddened me and made her suspect when prostitutes were being killed in Denver.
I was not too fond of Rachel. She rubbed me the wrong way the entire book. I wasn't surprised when she started hearing (and eventually seeing) Rafe. I wasn't surprised by her attitude towards Kitty or how she refused to listen to Dolores. I did, however, think it was interesting that she was the one who looked up Owl Manor's past, and she was the one who found Rafe's letters to his father. I did feel bad for her in the end, mainly because she ended up being a pawn in something much bigger than her.
I enjoyed reading the storyline with Dolores, the girls, and their business. I was fascinated to see how it would do. Despite what was going on and how everything turned out, I was still rooting for them to succeed.
The storyline with Dolores and her paintings was frightening. I didn't blame her for being as scared or fighting it as she was. I knew her paintings connected to Rafe, but I wasn't sure what the connection was. I thought she might have been Abigail's daughter, but that was dashed relatively early in the book.
Kitty's storyline was a little frightening. It showcased how someone like Cecil could easily lead someone as naive as Kitty down the wrong path. Her 180 change of morals and attitude didn't help with that conception either. I admit that I thought it was Kitty doing the killing until almost the end.
Rachel's storyline was sad to read. While I didn't like her, I did think that she had a valid point about being so angry early on in the book. But, as Rafe's spirit drew her in, I could see her falling down that rabbit hole. I was verbally yelling "No" as she started acting more erratic.
The storyline with Rafe, Eva, and the ghosts was terrifying. I felt terrible for Rafe and the fact that, even in death, he was lost without Eva. So, having that part of the storyline wrapped up the way it did make sense. But the other part of the storyline, the one with the ghosts of the women he murdered, was chilling. I understood that they wanted their stories told, but possession was a little too far in my eyes.
The storyline with the killer was interesting. There were quite a few characters to pick from, and I felt that any of them (except Dolores) could have been the killer. Heck, I even had Gabriel on the shortlist!!
I felt that the author wrote the horror angle of Owl Manor—The Final Stroke amazingly. I was creeped out by what was happening in the manor. I was also creeped out by what was happening mentally and physically to the girls.
There was a slight romance angle to the book that I wasn't too fond of. But, it didn't get in the way of the main storylines, and it did add some extra depth to Dolores's character arc.
The end of Owl Manor—The Final Stroke was interesting. I had chills reading it!! I loved how the author wrapped up the storyline of Rafe and Eva. I also liked how she wrapped up Dolores, Kitty, and Rachel's storylines. As for the killer, I was shocked at who it ended up being. That person didn't even make my "who is the killer" list or was even on my radar.
I would recommend Owl Manor—The Final Stroke to anyone over 21. There are sexual situations, mild language, and violence. There is also drug use (Kitty taking opiates) and forced sexual encounters (again, Kitty during the last of her theater dates).
If you enjoyed reading Owl Manor—The Final Stroke, you will enjoy these books:
Owl Manor: The Dawning (Owl Manor: Book 1) by Zita Harrison
On 2022-09-19 By JolieIn book review, Non ARC, Zealous Arts Publishing4 Comments
Date of publication: October 15th, 2018
Series: Owl Manor
Owl Manor: The Dawning—Book 1
Owl Manor: Abigail—Book 2
Purchase Links: Amazon | AbeBooks | Alibris | Indigo
The owl appeared from nowhere, its ivory wings billowing like a ghostly cloak against the dusky sky.
Owl Manor: The Dawning by Zita Harrison
Horror, mainly the gothic subgenre, is something that I tend to stay away from when reading for pleasure and reading for reviews. I can get easily unnerved by what I am reading, and with my husband traveling 2-3 days a week, I have learned to stay away from those genres. But with him being home (new job=more at home time), I decided to take a chance and read Owl Manor. I am glad that I did because this book was incredibly creepy and very heartbreaking at the same time.
Owl Manor: The Dawning is book 1 in the Owl Manor series. This is the first book in the series, so there will be no gentle suggestions about reading the previous books.
Owl Manor: The Dawning had exciting storylines. There was Eva's storyline. Raised by her aunt and uncle, Eva is a headstrong, intelligent young woman determined to make it in a man's world. But then she gets pregnant, is forced to marry a man beneath her station, and is turned bitter by these events. But, Eva is a dutiful wife and mother who follows her husband to Denver (in Kansas territory) during the gold rush. In Denver, she finds mind-numbing poverty. After her husband becomes ill from working in the mines, Eva is forced to find employment. She is offered a job as a maid at Owl Manor, a mansion decorated with owls in the Rocky Mountains. What Eva finds at Owl Manor is a home and a companion with its mysterious owner.
The second storyline is about Rafe. Rafe is a wealthy Englishman who is damaged. His deranged mother abused him, and he was also forced to witness his father being humiliated by his mother. After his mother leaves Rafe and his father, Rafe is dealt the blow of finding his father after committing suicide. Then, Rafe vowed to kill any woman who was a harlot (aka a prostitute). He thinks that by killing them, he is doing the world a favor. Moving from London to the States for school, Rafe settles in Morganton, NC, and continues his killing spree. He then moves to Denver and builds a mansion in the mountains. Rafe also continues killing. But, this time, something mystical happened, and owls started attacking Rafe whenever he left the house. Soon housebound and covered with scars, Rafe starts having manic moments where he destroys his study and bedroom. That stops when he meets Eva. Taken with Eva, Rafe can forget the horror of his past and suppress his urges to kill. But that only lasts a little while before Rafe has the desire to kill again. Everything comes to a head when Eva discovers Rafe's secret. What will happen to Eva? What will happen to Rafe? Will his secret be kept at Eva's expense, or will something terrible happen?
I wouldn't say I liked Eva for most of the book. I don't know if the author intended the reader to dislike her, but I did. Eva was very unpleasant until she went to Owl Manor. She was an inattentive mother who discussed why she didn't want children in front of Abigail (yes, that led to issues). Eva blamed her husband for her financial straights, yet she did nothing (except beg and consider prostitution) until she was offered a job at Owl Manor. But, when she got to Owl Manor, there was a gradual change in her attitude towards life and her family. Her attitude toward life improved, but it worsened for her family. Those scenes where she visited her sick husband were tough to read. Even when she was elevated to companion/mistress to Rafe, I was still "meh" about her. But it wasn't until the very end of the book that I started to feel bad for her. She had gotten herself and her family into a situation that would be impossible to escape. I wasn't surprised at what happened to her at the end.
I felt terrible for Rafe, but I wouldn't say I liked his actions. He was shaped by what his mother did and his father's inaction. It was a classic case of nature vs. nurture, with nature winning this round. I firmly believe that if he had been treated better by his mother, he wouldn't have gone down the path he did. I did find his reaction to Eva a little heartbreaking. In those scenes, you could see who he could have become if he hadn't been abused or witnessed everything he did.
I found the use of the owls in Owl Manor very creepy. It unsettled me a little when the author explained that souls used owls to fly to the Underworld. I got chills whenever there was a scene where owls were involved. They were hanging out on the house, waiting for Rafe to come out, and then would attack him, sending chills through me.
The horror angle was well written. The author was able to scare the heck out of me by insinuating things. A drape that moved or a reflection in the glass. I got goosebumps just reading those passages!!
The end of Owl Manor was a mess. I don't mean a mess writing-wise (nope, the author was spot on with that), but a mess with everything that happened. Also, add that what happened to Rafe at the end was anti-climactic. I was left shaken by what happened and looking forward to reading book 2!!
I would recommend Owl Manor: The Dawning to anyone over 21. There is violence, mild language, and very mild, non-graphic, sexual situations/scenes.
If you liked Owl Manor: The Dawning, you will enjoy these books.


text:
Dan Bolt provides jolt to baseball's game plan
By Ronan Khalsa on June 30, 2019
Left fielder Dan Bolt lead the team in both slugging (.595) and on-base (.453) percentages this season. He boosted his batting average from the previous season 57 points.
Photo by Kayla Johnson
Rising senior baseball player Dan Bolt is living up to his last name.
His legs have allowed him to steal seven bases this season and make plays in left field. More importantly for the Braves, his bat puts a jolt into every ball he hits.
Bolt is one of nine Bradley baseball players who grew up within an hour and a half drive of Dozer Park, home of the Single-A Peoria Chiefs and Bradley baseball team. The park was nothing new to Bolt his freshman year, having played there in high school with the Morton Potters.
Head coach Elvis Dominguez said throughout his time at the helm of the baseball program his staff targets local players in recruiting like Bolt and believes the program is in a better place because of them.
"My goal has been to try to keep the best local talent here," Dominguez said. "Whether they choose to come here or not is up to them, but we are going to go hard after them. Dan was one of the better guys in the area. We are very fortunate that he's here."
Bradley has always had Bolt's rooting interests. As a child he went to basketball games but wasn't connected to the university otherwise. He did, however, keep his mind open to the possibility of playing for Dominguez.
"Growing up, Bradley was always around and I'd cheer for them," Bolt said. "There's a bunch of local guys [on the team] who I played with before which is good for chemistry."
The outfielder took the Braves up on their scholarship offer and joined the team for the 2017 season. As a freshman, Bolt only received 14 at-bats.
Dominguez said Bolt was recruited for his hitting ability, but his outfield defense needed significant attention. Bolt just wasn't ready for the rigors of Division I baseball.
Bolt agreed he was behind the curve his freshman year and needed to learn the college game. He credits hitting coach Kyle Trewyn and a stint playing with the summer league Springfield Sliders following the 2017 season for his maturation.
"Danny came in and we obviously always liked his bat and thought he was going to hit, but from his freshman year he has worked so much on his weaknesses defensively," Dominguez said. "He has become a very, very good outfielder. He took it upon himself and took ownership of it."
This season, Bolt hit at a .327 clip, led the team in slugging and on-base percentages and only committed one error in left field. He played in all 50 games, starting in all but one.
"This year is a lot different," Bolt said. "I think I'm smarter from an IQ standpoint. I understand the game better and understand what I need to do to be better."
Bolt bats fourth in the Braves lineup and knows his role on the team is to drive in runs. He has the third most team RBIs and has 11 homers to his name this season.
Bolt said it's the most he's hit in a season. The most he's hit in a week for Bradley came April 14-20 when he homered four times on the road at Big-10 opponent Illinois and MVC-powerhouse Dallas Baptist.
He was recognized among 16 players by Collegiate Baseball Newspaper as a National Player-of-the-Week and a Missouri Valley Conference Player-of-the-Week the following Monday.
Bolt said his home run total increasing by six from the year before is partially because of his confidence at the plate and preparation.
"I'll be the first to admit I'm not the strongest guy on the team but knowing what pitches I can hit home runs with and what pitches I need to drive is really key [to my success]," Bolt said. "My main focus is just to put a barrel on the ball every time. Sometimes I get lucky and it ends up going over the fence."
Bolt said when his coaches and fellow players have confidence in his ability it pushes him further.
"[By batting fourth] it shows that the coaches have confidence in me," Bolt said. "It says a lot especially with Coach [Dominguez] being around for a long time. When a guy like that has confidence in you, it means a lot."
Bolt is the first member of his family to play collegiate sports and said his success is a credit to his parents and grandparents funding his baseball career since first grade.
They also taught him the importance of an education. As he graduates next spring, Bolt doesn't like to think much about playing professional baseball. He plans to use his finance degree to build a career in wealth management after he hangs up his cleats.
"If the opportunity [to play professional baseball] comes about, that'd be awesome and I would for sure look into it," Bolt said. "[With finance] I don't like a ton of math, but I enjoy numbers. I like seeing those things, breaking them down and analyzing businesses."
Until then, Bolt will continue to break down opposing pitchers and drive in runs for Bradley.
More from SportsMore posts in Sports »
Looking back: It's hard to believe
Halley Morrell named women's golf coach
2019 #BESPYS Awards
Softball falls to Drake, ending first winning season since 2007


Two am in the morning and we are standing on the side of the road waiting for the fire service to take the top off the car in front of us. The wind whistles across the flats making us all shiver despite our fleeces and our jackets.
Two cars have been involved in a high speed RTA, the parked car that was hit has been shunted forward leaving ten metres long skid marks. The cars aren't too damaged but the seats inside have shifted around, trapping the occupants.
There are seven ambulances here, four fire trucks, half a dozen police and three ambulance officers with clipboards. There are eight patients, all but one need cutting from the cars and collaring and boarding. The only woman involved is 'walking wounded'.
The reason that it is taking so long for our car to get it's lid removed by the fire service is because of the position of one of the patients inside. He looks rather unwell and the crew looking after him really would like to get to him.
Our ambulance was fourth on scene. When I arrived I spoke to a station-mate to see what he wanted us to do, who he wanted us to look after. Normally he is the station clown, now he's all serious and professional, no fake beards or silly glasses now.
Everyone gets checked over, all the ambulance crews are calm, it's serious but it doesn't look like anyone is about to die; more a case of being careful moving the patients 'just in case'.
The roof comes off the car and with the help of another crew and some firefighters we get our patient out safely and strapped to a board. He is freezing cold. Not wearing warm clothing, the delay in getting him out and the terrible weather has us concerned for his body temperature.
We are in a new ambulance, so the heater works and turning it up to full we are soon sweating ourselves as we assess the patient and prepare for transport.
I get on the radio to pre-alert the hospital – For some reason the radio isn't working properly and our Control can't hear me, so I use my emergency phone instead. Thankfully it works.
I travel a mile over high speedbumps to get to the hospital, there is no other route and every bump makes me aware of my patient in the back being jostled around. It's not the first time that I curse the council.
After all our patients are safe at the hospital we stand outside and laugh and joke. We reconstruct the accident, we talk about the more injured ones and we mock the driving skills of one of the officers.
It's a good job sometimes.
Did you tell the brufen OD to try better next time? 3's not going to make the blind bit of difference! ;DGood to see you had an appropriate job for once, Tom. Hope all the people in the cars were OK.
I dont want this to sound bad but I alwways come away from those kind of jobs feeling that I have actually earned my pay for the day, after hopefully having made a difference to somebody. Don't get me wrong, I don't look for these kind of jobs, but after the umpteenth crap job to hospital it makes me feel that at last that I have been able to use my skills for what they were intended rather than having to deal with the usual idiots that we get. Do others feel the same or is it just me?
I dunno, the lengths people will go to for attention hey Tom!A 'good job' to me is where you are having to think – there aren't that many 'good jobs' around here!!!!
no its not just you, it does begin to wear you down when its the same old sh*t different day. But then you get a job, that to start with gets you going a bit as your not quite sure (purely because the other buggers have worn you down up to now) and then you really need your thinking cap on for a bit. And finally you walk away from it all an hour or so later, with them tucked up in A&E and you feel that you have made a difference.It makes this job worthwhile after all.
I work on a FRU and unless I'm called to back up a crew tend to get jobs ages before a crew. I've been to two fatal RTCs in three days ,in both cases there was a seriously injured trapped casualty.The first took 40 mins. and the second 60mins. to get out,so much for Platinum 10 minutes and the"Golden Hour" I hate trauma, all you can do is give morphine and fluid and then wait untill others pull them out and spirit them away, It can be bloody frustrating! Then it is a quick restock and back out on standby and crap jobs. The days of talking over jobs with mates is fast disappearing, which is not good for our heads.
Top quality jobs up here again i see.
Detrious, I took 2 x 400mg last night, is that an OD nowadays too? My legs were aching after a very long training run for the London Marathon and there was no way I'd have gotten to sleep without them!
Except when you get dispatched for that interesting sounding job "vehicle rollover down the bank" and get there to find either (a) no occupants in the car because they all walked to the nearest house and refuse transport or (b) the car absolutely trashed but the patient with not so much as a scratch, sitting on the side of the road, also refusing transport.As a cautionary story, though – we had a young bloke (30s) complaining of numbness in one side of his body, sudden onset. To cut a long story short, he was in a side impact RTA the day before. The car had hit the passenger side, and the passenger's head had hit him in the head/neck. He refused transport. Internal injuries had caused a clot which had eventually jogged loose and made its way to the brain the following day. He ended up crashing at the hospital and last I heard he was in ICU. It always pays to get checked out (although in reality it may not have helped this particular guy).


text:
Konstantinos Dimitriou (, * 30. Juni 1999 in Thessaloniki) ist ein griechischer Fußballspieler.

Verein

PAOK Thessaloniki
In seiner Jugendzeit spielte der Verteidiger für seinen Heimatverein Giannitsa FC und schloss sich dann im Sommer 2013 dem Nachwuchs von PAOK Thessaloniki an. Zur Saison 2017/18 wurde er in die erste Mannschaft aufgenommen, kam jedoch zu keinem Einsatz. Lediglich am 15. Spieltag gegen AO Platanias wurde er als Ersatzspieler ins Kader aufgenommen, wurde jedoch nicht eingesetzt.

FC Basel
Zur Saison 2018/19 wechselte Dimitriou in die Schweizer Super League zum FC Basel, wo er einen Vierjahresvertrag bis Juni 2022 unterschrieben hat. In seiner ersten Spielzeit kam er auf 18 Einsätze für die U-21-Mannschaft des FC Basel, jedoch zu keinem Einsatz für die 1. Mannschaft. Am 3. August 2019, am 3. Spieltag der Saison 2019/20, gab er sein Debüt für den Profikader beim 3:2-Auswärtssieg gegen den FC Thun.

FC Wil 1900
Die Rückrunde der Saison 2019/20 verbrachte Dimitriou leihweise beim Zweitligisten FC Wil 1900, wo er lediglich eine Partie bestritt. Am 8. Februar 2020 wurde er bei der 0:2-Auswärtsniederlage gegen den SC Kriens in der 71. Minute ausgewechselt.

Mezőkövesd-Zsóry SE
Im Januar 2021 schloss er sich dem ungarischen Erstligisten Mezőkövesd-Zsóry SE an.

Nationalmannschaft
Seit 2014 kommt der Abwehrspieler regelmäßig in den verschiedenen griechischen Jugendnationalmannschaften zum Einsatz. Bisher absolvierte er insgesamt 36 Partien, ein Tor gelang ihm dabei jedoch noch nicht. Aktuell steht er im Kader der U-21-Auswahl.

Weblinks

Einzelnachweise

Fußballnationalspieler (Griechenland)
Fußballspieler (PAOK Thessaloniki)
Fußballspieler (FC Basel)
Fußballspieler (FC Wil)
Fußballspieler (Mezőkövesd-Zsóry SE)
Grieche
Geboren 1999
Mann


Landscape architect pur sang and together with Monique Santhagens-de Vette founder of Buro Sant en Co.
CFO and daily running of the practice. Together with Edwin Santhagens founder of Buro Sant en Co.
Experienced landscape designer making a plead for sustainable ecology.
Qualified Landscape and Garden Architecture from Mendel University, Czech Republic and master in Landscape Architecture at Wageningen University. She is passionate about the use of natural processes in the design, and about creating different atmospheres and sensory experiences for the users. She loves to paint, to travel, to explore and learn about nature - the living system we work with as landscape architects and that provides us with endless inspiration.
Landscape architect from Portugal with professional experience from several countries.
Landscape architect from Iran, with a passion for cosmopolitan cities.
Landscape designer from China. A creative designer with an incredible talent for detailing.
Landscape designer from Poland, an urban type with a passion for nature and healthy living environment.
Passionate landscape designer from Polish origin and international experience, who combines creativity and innovation with excellent skills in detailing and project implementation.
Landscape designer from the Netherlands, conceptual thinker and hands-on approach in one.
Pro-active strategic landscape designer with a creative mind and a keen eye for research. Her analysing and design approach significantly features participation. Moreover she opens our eyes to perceive spatial environment differently.
A creative international master student of landscape architecture from Wageningen University & Research. Seeks to develop more challenging climate responsive designs that feature place-specific solutions with respect for people, nature and environment.