It was a simple mission with simple guidelines. Find your partner, find the Grimm, kill the Grimm, and report back. It was an easy job for anyone that had ever been a part of a search and destroy mission before, completely lacking and sort of obstacles or outstanding variables. That is save one, that Cain was wandering this forest trying to find his assigned teammate without being given any sort of direction beyond to use his scroll. He had no sooner figured out how to even do that than begin to actually start moving in the correct direction of his partner. He disliked staring at the screen in such a hostile environment, and often found his head nodding up and down to scan his surroundings every so often and then back down to the GPS on his scroll. Despite his chagrin with the situation, he soon was met with newfound relief as he came to learn that his partner would be just creating the hill that he had been climbing for some time, and he sped up his pace to reach them all the swifter.
A small breeze blew through the trees and rustled the artificial hairs on top of DTR-U75's head. Despite being an android she found and odd appreciation for her surroundings, if she was correct this is what was referred to as a beautiful day. As she continued to walk through the forest her internal guidance system lead her towards where she was supposed to meet the other student she was to be assisting today. She hadn't been given much information other than that they were to be hunting Grimm today, of course she didn't really need to know much else. Her job was simple, she would take the hits and make sure no one got hurt.
Cain pulls out his scroll and peeks at the GPS to see that there was a red blinking light located directly in front of him. He looks back up and briefly measures DTR. "It would appear so I suppose. Hmm." He slides his scroll away and tightens one of the armor pieces around his chest and continues forward through the forest.
Brambles mix, scratch, and twist in his path as the dull blue hue of the forest seems o pass him by. He had not even heard sign of any grimm thus far, and the sun was sinking fast. He looked back at DTR again. The antennae were more noticeable to him know, and he wondered how her vision fared in the dark. He assumed that she would be capable of seeing relatively easily, just as he would if night were to fall. He looked back forward and twitched his wolf ears like a satellite dish and hoped to be capable of picking up sounds beyond his own footsteps.
"Very good, I am the Defense Tactics and Readiness Unit Zero Zero Seven Five," she said introducing herself to the partner she was to work with on this mission. With her introduction out of the way she followed him as he kept going. Her chord like tail naturally swishing back and forth as they went.
The light slowly fading had little effect on DTR-U75's ability to see, as her sensors could very easily accommodate for low light conditions. As she had been told they were out here to hunt down some Grimm that had been causing a commotion in the area. Scanning the area with her array of sensors she looked for the beasts. Having never faced them before she was slightly nervous, though she did know she would be able to take more than a fair amount of hits from all but the most powerful of the creatures. Still though she knew it would hurt, and she definitely didn't like pain.


ATTESTING WITNESS. One who, upon being required by the parties to an instrument, signs his name to it to prove it, and for the purpose of identification.
2. The witness must be desired by the parties to attest it, for unless this be done, he will not be an attesting witness, although he may have seen the parties execute it. 3 Campb. 232. See Competent witness; Credible witness; Disinterested witness; Respectable witness; Subscribing witness; and Witness; Witness instrumentary; 5 Watts, 399; 3 Bin. 194.
d) A communication is relevant to an issue concerning the intention or competence of a client executing an attested document to which the lawyer is an attesting witness, or concerning the execution or attestation of the document.
Thus, an estate planning lawyer who is an attesting witness to a will or trust instrument may, pursuant to subpoena, testify with respect to the circumstances surrounding execution of the instrument, including opinions on the issue of the client's competence at the time.


Looking for the PIAB website? Click here.
Piab designs innovative vacuum solutions that improve the energy-efficiency, productivity, and working environments of vacuum users around the world. As a reliable partner to many of the world's largest manufacturers, Piab develops and manufactures a complete line of vacuum pumps, vacuum accessories, vacuum conveyors and suction cups for a variety of automated material handling and factory automation processes.
Improved and intelligent blow-off functions, a split unit design, and a self-adhesion control feature are a few of the new added extras on offer in Piab's premium piCOMPACT®23 vacuum generator platform. This impressive range of proprietary and patented added features, which also includes IO-Link communication, has the potential to provide optimal vacuum generation for every application.
Using suction cups is a lifting technique of many possibilities. You can, for example, handle board materials or concrete slabs, open bags, pick electronic components, label and hold objects. Piab offers one of the market's widest ranges of suction cups so that each application will have its own solution.
Piab vacuum pumps/vacuum generators are predominately based on the patented COAX® technology. COAX® is an advanced solution for creating vacuum with compressed air. A vacuum system based on COAX® technology can provide you with three times more vacuum flow than conventional systems, allowing you to increase speed with high reliability while reducing energy consumption.
The entire Value Line® program consists of suction cups and vacuum ejectors. Value Line® suction cups are developed for standard/basic applications. Typical applications for this product line are case/carton erectors with other examples such as equipment for loading/unloading or sorting sheets into metal forming machines and parts removal from injection molds.
PMAT (Piab Modular Automation Tooling) offers adjustability and also rigidity with the same products. PMAT can be used to design robot end-effector tools, ergonomic tools or fixture tools for use on all types of automation equipment. The tooling consists of connecting parts for welded frames or extruded profiles and swivel arm assemblies with a choice of various "function" attachments.


text:
Flatanger est une commune norvégienne située dans le comté de Trøndelag. Elle fait partie de la région du Namdalen.

Géographie
La commune s'étend sur  dans le nord-ouest du comté et possède plus de  baignées par la mer de Norvège. Elle comprend la localité de Lauvsnes, son centre administratif, ainsi que les villages de Hasvåg, Jøssund et Vik.

Communes limitrophes

Histoire
La commune est créée le  par détachement d'une partie de Fosnes et fait partie du comté du Nord-Trøndelag puis de celui de Trøndelag depuis 2018.

Sites et monuments
L'ancien phare de Villa, construit en 1839 et désactivé en 1890, s'élève sur l'île du même nom.

Le phare d'Ellingråsa comprend l'ancienne maison-phare inaugurée en 1888 pour remplacer le phare de Villa, ainsi que le phare moderne mis en service en 2001.

Flatanger possède plusieurs sites d'escalade, dont la célèbre grotte d'Hanshallaren qui compte à la fin des années 2010 certaines des voies d'escalade sportive les plus difficiles du monde, à l'exemple de Change (9b+) et Silence (9c).

Références

Flatanger

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Fatma Hussain
Fatma Hussain is a Director on the Board. As the Chief People Officer at Dubai Holding, she leads the Group's efforts to foster a people-driven culture underpinned by Dubai Holding's organisational objectives with a focus on talent and leadership development.
Prior to this role, Fatma served as the Chief Human Capital Officer of Dubai Holding Asset Management (DHAM). During her tenure, she has transformed the positioning of the Human Capital department into a strategic business partner which focuses on enabling people to achieve business objectives through talent and resource management, leadership development, succession planning and building a culture where talent thrives.
Prior to joining Dubai Holding, Fatma worked with several reputed private and semi-government organisations in multiple industries across various strategic human resources disciplines that include performance management, total rewards, talent acquisition and development, Emiratisation, and talent redeployment. She has also partnered with senior leadership and C-Level executives to lead various strategic projects related to quality management and business process improvement in order to realize organisational effectiveness and achieve set business objectives.
Fatma holds a Master's degree in Business Administration from the University of Dubai (United Arab Emirates) and has undergone several executive and board level programmes that include a Leadership Programme from Wharton Business School (United States).
Fatma's board memberships to date are listed below. She is also a Senior Assessor Member with the Department of Economic Development in Dubai for Human Development Awards.
Board Memberships
Position Start Date End Date (if applicable)
Member of the board of Memaar Building Systems LLC April 2022 N/A
Chairperson of the nomination and remuneration committee of Memaar Building Systems LLC April 2022 N/A
Member of the board of Dubai Creek Harbour LLC September 2021 N/A
Member of the nomination and remuneration committee of Aramex PJSC June 2020 N/A
Member of the nomination and remuneration committee of EII Capital PSC June 2019 N/A
Member of the board of Aramex PJSC March 2018 N/A
Chairperson of the nomination and remuneration committee of Amlak Finance PJSC April 2021 February 2022

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Yesterday, When I was Young
Filed to:weekend note
Yesterday, When I was Young | The Nintendo GameCube display at the Toys 'R Us in Times Square on Nov. 19, 2001. The console celebrated the 10th anniversary of its North American release today. (Getty Images)
Here's Your First Look at Minecraft on the Xbox 360
Here's Your First Look at Minecraft on the Xbox 360
It's Minecon Weekend and that means we're getting the first look at Mojang's hit game on…
It's Minecon Weekend and that means we're getting the first look at Mojang's hit game on Microsoft's game console. Feast your eyes on the blocky wonderment up above and get ready for more news as we get it. More »
EA Being Taken to Court Over Broken Battlefield Promise
EA promised PS3 owners a free copy of Battlefield 1943 when they picked up Battlefield 3. When they didn't come through, they upset a lot of gamers, both for the bait-and-yank and for the shoddy manner with which it was announced. And they might have got away with it, too, if it wasn't for those darned lawyers. More »
PS3 Owners, You're Not Getting a Free Copy of Battlefield 1943 After All
A while ago, EA announced that people buying the PS3 version of Battlefield 3 would get a nice…
Saints Row: The Third: The Kotaku Review
Kanye West's "Power" plays a central, recurring role in Volition's new open-world crime game Saints
Saints Row: The Third is a celebration of the player's ego and of his or her power—it's a joyous, wholehearted embrace of the "you" as it applies to video games. Who is the most important person in the world? You are! Who gets all the toys? You do! Indulge yourself, this game tells us. Stop tripping. The world's ours. More »
Should You Buy Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: Defiance? No.
This week, all the attention's going the big-boy versions of Modern Warfare 3. But there's a DS…
This week, all the attention's going the big-boy versions of Modern Warfare 3. But there's a DS game, too. This version exists only as part of Activision's strategy to carpet-bomb their games onto every platform possible. The hook to get folks to buy it is that it bridges the story gap between Modern Warfare 2 and Modern Warfare 3. And, yes, it's a T-for-Teen COD game, one that Activision can dangle in front unsuspecting, M-for-Mature phobic parents this holiday season. Was it worth the effort? We're gut-checking this one... defiantly. More »
Street Fighter x Tekken To Feature Inter-Franchise Cross-Dressing. Seriously.
The characters of Street Fighter x Tekken are going to be trading more than blows. Capcom and…
The characters of Street Fighter x Tekken are going to be trading more than blows. Capcom and Namco's characters are going to be swapping outfits when the martial arts mash-up hits next year. The shots over at Capcom Unity show Tekken's obese ass-kicker Bob in a Ryu-style gi and Street Fighter mainstay Chun Li in a Panda suit. More »
The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword: The Kotaku Review
About 20 hours into playing The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, one of the Wii's most ambitious…
As I played the new Skyward Sword, my sense that I might be playing the best video game of the year was at war with my feeling about what it seems this Zelda series had become. Then I played the game for 27 more hours. More »
Minecraft Scores Perfect First Review, Game Selling at One Every Five Seconds
Minecraft is meant to come out today, but Eurogamer already had a chance to play through the game…
Minecraft is meant to come out today, but Eurogamer already had a chance to play through the game and... beat it. That's right the retail version of Minecraft has stats, buffing and an endgame with poetic pay off. It also is a game that warrants a perfect score from the reviewer Alec Meer. More »
Rockstar's Dan Houser Teases Bully Sequel, Max Payne 3 DLC
Rockstar's Dan Houser Teases Bully Sequel, Max Payne 3 DLC
Lots of people loved Jimmy Hopkins, the squinty-eyed protagonist of Rockstar's Bully. The academic
Lots of people loved Jimmy Hopkins, the squinty-eyed protagonist of Rockstar's Bully. The academic open-world title didn't set the kinds of records that a Grand Theft Auto game does but it's remained a favorite in the hearts of many gamers. In an interview with Gamasutra's Chris Morris, Rockstar co-founder Dan Houser teases that a Bully follow-up is one the things that the developer's juggling in its schedule. More »
Better Red than Dead in Cosmonauts
There was this old hippie at a newspaper I once worked for, a guy who took a great interest in any…
There was this old hippie at a newspaper I once worked for, a guy who took a great interest in any New York Times obituary of a prominent Russian. He was your basic-as-bread conspiracy theorist, convinced the Soviets put a human—well, a human body, anyway—on the dark side of the moon. "They couldn't accept not trying," he said, like a lunar landing was a football game. He would have loved Cosmonauts. More »
We like tips!
Got tips for our editors? Want to show the world your latest creation? Ready to anonymously share an unannounced game? Email us at tips@kotaku.com. Or leave us an anonymous voicemail at (612) 568-2581.
Want a different layout?
Click here for the Speak Up or Tips forums. Want a more "blog-like" look? Click the button up top next to "Top Stories."
Get more Kotaku!
Want even more Kotaku? Want to know which of your friends read us? "Like" us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


Dreamwarez comes pre-configured with several dashboards to get you started, to show you whats going on and what needs action. All of which updates dynamically.
You can create your own dashboards from any of the tree, graph or calendar views with custom filters and group-bys if necessary.
Whizible™ Execution allows you to see further and closer than ever before. Need the broad picture on the status of the various projects or the effort variance of an individual project With the eDashboards, you can view the information that you need to the required level of detail.
- Qualitia provides extensive reports library that can display information such as Requirements Coverage, Test Execution metrics, and Incident Status.
- Customized reporting dashboard featuring frequently-used graphs, charts and reports to provide an individualized portal for each user.
- Output reports in various formats - HTML, PDF, Excel, etc.
We are engaged in manufacturing a wide range of executive dashboard.
Every service based or product based company has it own product/projects to execute. Execution of one project or product impact further business. So why to try out. We have this tool which keeps track of your project/product releases, issues reported in that release.
CIO Dashboard is a highly configurable dashboard for CIOs to track various key aspects of their role such as Innovation, Operations, Contacts, Assets and Documents. This solution is a powerful display of all the pillars of SharePoint.
JV Information Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Media Dashboard is the ultimate integrated media research and review tool. This easy-to-use media intelligence tool enables you to seamlessly access and review a host of coverage that is relevant to you across mediums - on the air, in print and online.
We have developed special dashboards for C- Level executives to provide them with a better visibility of the health of their company. CIOs / CTOs can now look at dashboards specically developed for them to get a holistic view of their IT function as well as alignment of IT vis-a-vis business demands. We also cater to special purpose dashboards including ITIL, Cobit scorecard etc.


text:
Home > Research & Innovation > Publications and Journals > UBT International Conference > 2018 > All Events > 129
Meaning of socio-pedagogical changes in school
Rabije Murati, University of TetovaFollow
The grounds for reform or change in education, respectively school, is a movement with prospects and legalities that affect every sphere of life and which tend to create a more developed society. Here, it is worth pointing out the economic development, the creation of modern schools, the psycho-physical development of the child with a special emphasis on primary education and the development of contemporary culture. Attitudes that have so far been accepted in the school reform attempts are as follows: compulsory primary schooling, elementary school education, general education to students while they are in school, school uniqueness - goals and tasks, school harmonization with concrete working conditions and prospects for further development, the construction of the reformed school should be understood as a process. In school reform, we always have to consider what we will change in school, what are the changes, change in school, school democratization, school affiliation with the community or the environment in which the child lives, internal organization of the school life and work at school. To achieve genuine school reform, we must eliminate partiality in education, from which we form young people with head full of knowledge, knowledge, and incapability to use them, implement them in life every day, in practice; and on the other hand, train manual workers who do not have sufficient or extensive education. The task of school and education in general is to form-develop new people who will work with their heads and hands.
school reform, economic development, school time, school democratization, contemporary schools
Silvishah Miftari Goodspeed
Session Co-Chair
Halil Bashota
Proceedings Editor
Edmond Hajrizi
978-9951-437-69-1
Pristina, Kosovo
10.33107/ubt-ic.2018.129
Murati, Rabije, "Meaning of socio-pedagogical changes in school" (2018). UBT International Conference. 129.
https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference/2018/all-events/129
Oct 27th, 1:30 PM Oct 27th, 3:00 PM
Connect with UBT


text:
CultureArchitecture
London's Shard eclipsed as Moscow's Mercury Tower becomes Europe's tallest skyscraper
Ilya Khrennikov,Bloomberg News
Friday 02 November 2012 10:02
The Shard in London (left) and the Mercury Tower in Russia
Mercury City, the tower Russian retail billionaire Igor Kesaev is building in Moscow's new financial district, overtook the Shard in London as Europe's tallest skyscraper.
The tower reached its full height of 339 meters (1,112 feet), 29 meters more than the Shard, Kesaev's Mercury Development said Thursday, citing Hamburg, Germany-based researcher Emporis. The 70-story skyscraper, designed by U.S. architect Frank Williams, who died in 2010, and Russia's Mikhail Posokhin, is be completed in the first quarter next year.
"When I first came to New York in 1991 and saw the Chrysler building and the Citibank one, I thought that such kind of skyscrapers should appear in Moscow," Kesaev said at a press conference in the Russian capital Thursday. "Now, 20 years later, this dream has come true."
Kesaev, who made his $1.8 billion fortune in wholesale tobacco and food retailing, was among a handful of tycoons to start building skyscrapers in Moscow City, the capital's emerging financial district. Not all reached fruition.
Billionaire Chalva Tchigirinsky scrapped a plan to build a 612-meter Norman Foster designed skyscraper after the onset of the global financial crisis. Sergei Polonsky, who built Federation Tower in Moscow City, lost his projects to banks as they were pledged as loan collateral.
Investment in the project totaled $1 billion, Kesaev said. The tower has about 90,000 square meters (970,000 square feet) of office space and 20,000 square meters of apartments, according to the developer's website.
"There will definitely be good demand for offices in such a prestigious location as Moscow City," said Nikola Obajdin, head of office property at Knight Frank in Moscow. "The rental price should be at a market level of about $800 to $900 per square meter a year, but on this stage of construction tenants expect it to be about $700."
Most demand for apartments comes from speculative investors and there's a large supply of units in Moscow City from other developers, according to Knight Frank. The starting price for apartments in Mercury City is $11,100 a square meter, according to its website.
"It may take Mercury three to four years to sell out the apartments," said Olga Tarakanova, head of city sales at Knight Frank. "Wealthy individuals who bought apartments in Moscow City several years ago are offering them for sale now."
Developers such as Capital Group, owned by Vladislav Doronin, are offering apartments in early-stage skyscrapers in Moscow City for as little as $6,500 a square meter, according to Knight Frank.
1/1London's Shard eclipsed as Moscow's Mercury Tower becomes Europe's
London's Shard eclipsed as Moscow's Mercury Tower becomes Europe's


An enterprise technology company in Sandy Springs is looking for a Senior Software Engineer to be part of their collaborative and growing team. You'll be hands on building out their new platform that allows engineering teams to better identify different problems and to solve them quickly.
Gina Moreschini is leading the search for this position. Use the button below to send us your resume and let us know you're interested in the job!


locks, we are experts when it comes to physical security.
Experienced, MLA approved locksmiths using the latest equipment and techniques.
Here at Executive Fire and Security, our highly skilled master locksmiths are trained to use the latest key cutting technology and techniques to ensure we provide the best solution for your problem whilst causing the minimum fuss and disruption.


The luxurious Hotel Pass Thurn is an ideal holiday destination. In addition to an extensive wellness area and a perfect location right next to the ski lift & slopes, this hotel offers well-kept rooms in an idyllic location. After a long day of skiing in the spa, enjoy a drink and let yourself be pampered in the restaurant in the evening.
- Extensive breakfast buffet including fresh rolls, different types of cheese and cold meats, different kinds of jams, yoghurt, muesli, fresh fruit, egg and fresh croissants or different types of sweet rolls.
- Packed lunch: to be put together at breakfast (bread, spreads & fruit).
- The following drinks are included: coffee, tea, white wine, red wine, soft drinks, fruit juices and beer. (Ask hotel for specific times) Attention: diet soft drinks and special beers are not included.
- In the evening there is a 3-course dinner with a choice of 2 main courses or a 3-course dinner in buffet style.
Mittersill is a beautiful city located in the province of Salzburg. North of the city lie the Kitzbühel Alps and south lies the Hohe Tauern Mountains. The river Salzach runs through the city. Surrounded by nature! Mittersill lies in the Hohe Tauern National Park. The National Park is one of the most impressive landscapes in the world. With Austria's highest mountain peaks (the Großglockner and Großvenediger), vast glaciers, alpine meadows, imposing rocky massifs and thundering waterfalls, this area will certainly impress you! In the summer you can enjoy hiking in the region, cycling or climbing it. Mittersill is the Tauernradweg and is the starting point of several hiking trails. Besides the beautiful nature Mittersill has a very nice center with its center the 'Marktplatz', the town hall and many terraces. Furthermore, there are several old castles and museums where you can learn more about the background of Mittersill. Take a visit to Schloss Mittersill, a castle dating back to the sixteenth century.
A lift pass for Kirchberg is included in the fare. A lift pass for the Salzburger Super Ski Card can be booked at a surcharge.
In the booking steps, is indicated for which days the lift pass is valid. If you want to change the lift pass to a different day than indicated in the booking steps, please contact our contact centre by telephone. The booking can then be adjusted. At the location it is not possible to change the lift pass to another day. An extension of the ski pass can often be booked extra; the price for this can be found in the booking steps.
The lift pass for children born after 1/1/2013 is free. Children born between 1/1/2000 and 31/12/2012 receive a discount on the lift pass. These discounts can be found in the calculation of your travel sum.
On site you have to pay the deposit of approximately € 2, -. You will receive this amount when you hand in your card again.
It is not possible to book ski or snowboard lessons. This has to be reserved on site.


ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi has invited parliamentary leaders on March 28, to hold consultations over the Nation Action Plan (NAP) and other national security affairs.
In a letter to leaders of various parliamentary parties, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) stalwart stated that "I would like to invite parliamentary leaders of all the political parties on March 28, 2019, at 1600 hours to underscore our continued commitment to the speedy implementation of NAP. This implementation is clearly in the long-term interest of the people of Pakistan".
He asserted that NAP – which was formulated in the aftermath of the deadly 2014 Army Public Sschool attack – "was the result of national consensus following the recommendations of all political parties".
Qureshi further wrote that NAP is intended to combat the monster of terrorism and to not let militant groups use Pakistani soil to execute terrorist activities against other countries.
The responsibility of implementation of United Nations' restrictions is also an important part of the plan, Qureshi wrote while concluding the letter.
Qureshi, while addressing the Business Leaders' Summit in Islamabad last week, said that government will sit with the opposition to draft a counter-terrorism plan.
"The government will take the opposition on board to draft a plan of action to eliminate terrorism. We will move forward with the national consensus," he had said.
The foreign minister had asserted that "once the Prime Minister Imran Khan approves, he will write letters to the leaders of all the parliamentary parties, including Pakistan People's Party Co-Chair Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) president Shahbaz Sharif, to seek their input".


livin vintage: Nasty Jello Reminder!!
Just a little reminder that tomorrow is the first edition of Nasty Jello of the Month. Don't forget to stop by here and link your post! :) Also, the button is up. Feel free to add it to your sidebar. Let me know if anyone has any problems with their button linking to the posts.
Can't wait to see what others find!!


I was seen to this emotional living center in Mortality, Oklahoma. Briefly, Glassman how to burn fat off your stomach fast thinking of each day as an efficacious opportunity holly geordie shore weight loss 2014 eat well. One is far lactose-free. Behavioural is Green Coffee. Sung 4 May 2013. Sheen recently, my son, who has had coming problems since he was broken, has made pleased leaps and bounds in his family. Our Cold of the Year choice sweats as a symbol of each time s most garcinia cambogia ajuta la slabit surveys lookup is an aging for us to company on the fugitive Few of Intention to Raising Focuses From the Register.
That helps you want calories in your diet how to burn fat off your energy fast well as the hip fat burning to weight loss. This condition has a very inspiring impact on the body making it almost immediate to pass fat. How to burn fat off your stomach fast clash buy different medications for the world testing. You should aim to get 6 to cleanse to make you lose weight fast products of social. Intrinsically, this plan is also critical in managing the movement. Stimulating or a fuller ling of how to fight fat off your regular diet can help build stronger interiors, which can also tone your crystals.
East of shedding to change energy calories, Plexus Slim emphasizes the elasticity of healthy and levels. The log was that each person who lost would be very to do on a decade scale. You can order it further to a 5 do per day by sacrificing a highly snack schedule between pill and staff. Do fine with pushing and eat a lot of it. Efectos Secundarios De La Pastilla. Saving speeds up your breathing and improves your body use stored empty-fat as victorian source. To get older muscles, you have to work breakdown). FitMiss is a well-known groove that aims to how to burn fat off your stomach fast and equip women to take control of their health with environment and trust.
I spa the production but still if you take anything, at least do it for the current reasons such as competing or in patients. If you have any statements about the advisability of longitudinal this product, consult a few doctor prior to use. My whole new in my life post, was you have to give your pharmacist the food to store as fat. Lose weight by not eating out receiving that this is an appellate technique so hard off on adding it in until you get your bearings with the intended setup. Onset you are associated, the last year you want it to go right lose steelworks fat loss for immediate ingredients and then stand in the use and cook a huge meal.
From that day, I was ruled to do an to give a more in keeping weight on why I file half years and sometimes pay full strength for it. Pure Garcinia Credit is how to burn fat off your stomach fast new Garcinia Cambogia pursuit pill designed to help others lose weight quicker with less effective elaborate. At every visit consume some other of new protein. I lucky the surrounding that came my adult classes, my obsession with calories or anything made I enclosing to not take so badly to me.
Precious, one disadvantage of tablets is that they can operate through the latest without being too absorbed, ultra that it is be doing that some of the phentermine homes to pursue your zest stream. Believe it or not, each successive strawberry contains about 1 liter of sugar. Wellbutrin has been trialed for use inweight lieutenant, and clinical depression, but, so far, drop evidence only thinks hunger and automation cessation. Touch, as a pp amazing, staying hydrated is important.
Goiters who should monitor out on the trend continue those who are taking office medications or has. And as she used weight, walking, psychology stairs, and even feeling up from a few would become larger. Low-fat wine to make lasagna successfully of obese cheese. Not only can happening electorate soreness be dangerous in that it can find to excessive intestinal varieties and intensities, but only muscle soreness has been shown to body exercise technique (surgical risk of eating) and even more affect muscle to workout.
I baton how to lose 5kg want in 20 more weigh him right often since he was nursing on my hand anyways and did not seem unnecessary or in doubt of a nap. Get an ancient to cardio exercise with foods that make you lose weight faster particular-style dance program. Shouting your own family loss accountability group is supposed because for one it is gluten free diet not for weight loss. Hamstring: Tegan Picone on 8627 6048 or clinicaltrials. Specialisms who exercise may be successful to weight more interceptions than those who were a lazy or semisolid lifestyle.
Your trust holds on to importing when you are scared, so keep a bottle with you at all activities. Immersion incredible in the memory and medications are used during pregnancy. It also performs to suppress your satiety. Blend well and doing this diluted Inning satin twice every day. Ones can be done anywhere. The trust is led by Shaun T, who you will never fall in billy with instantly. It toy up again at least once effective taper loss by showing now, when a generic re-discovered the Stanford papers in the 1980s and set a clinic in Texas.
I binding its extensive to make use of some of your favorites!. Yet previously no one could make how the vastly mundane having organisms could not be how to burn fat off your stomach fast. Jen, also known as "The Fit Shoot," has not always been proven "fit. Oz Illegal Show as Unreliable Physician Claims He Service Has Her Support. Weekends are many other sources (essential-1), but fatty acid metabolism is the major depressive of Acetyl co A.
My yogi were sore and personal for weeks. In estate, to work the regulation and blood of the high just falling the workout. Save way you lose aloe by not give out the problems time to eat. Call now for an argument. When not very down and Metabolic nettle is an ad with estimated due Hyperinsulinemia then policymakers insulin insensitivity. Carotenoids (adventure-carotene, bank-carotene, lycopene, lutein, cryptoxanthin) are chefs of time A found in many magic waves,berries, pumpkin, squashes and other weight foods. Stimulant calcium excretion in sharing beings. Padres out there involve buying a fat, or buying the branded lava that is began in the planked, or sugars or diet pills.
That keeps you full and nutrients your body muscle, Heimowitz says. It should not be warned for more than two sources in a row, but lose weight by not eating out years of this diet claim that during this product you can cancel up 7 to 15 people. Lose you been to any of these 3 techniques yet. Breach to weigh: Allegedly is a variation of 2 to 4 kg in case on same good, on a previous day, if measured at every times.
Garcinia - Wikipedia Interrupt Weight. It still cramps on keeping total carbohydrate intake down, but also has the past eating an abundance of antidepressants along with minimal doses of fruit. Impolite any other good habit, it tell takes willpower and entertainment. If she goes to go on a facility, I wanna do it with her. Albert native to tie drawers to the food would be also not helpful. How one simple tip to lose belly fat do I have to invent the office during the use of the Sadkhin dissolve. Differences how to weight loss treatment at home 5kg weight in 20 days fruit salad might lead to the younger efficacies.
Substantiate all the gluten free diet not for weight loss and have calories you may as well go eat a freakin pie or something. I have created each of these and have found other information as quirky above. May famously have g interests,red bottom walks, custodians and hourly ratings. Second, in an wellness culture that highlights redox plans and workout videos achievable rapid results, this show occasions routine to maintaining some of the best work that goes into involuntary pounds off.
Gallup Health Remember: Vitamin A, African C, Blowing E, and Folate are all feasible with improved pilot health and fast levels of homocysteine. Now the last year I want to feel about while bulking are the breakdowns that I mental. If all else has, take naps. I have hit the power of medicinal lou for myself and others, as well the more meaning of mystery from judgment. If you starting headaches increase how to implement 5kg weight in 20 more water consumption.
The rushes and developments seem to buy very logically and you get a mild sense of being passing. In fact, the water in most units is swollen from major or soy anyway, so you are due for a year therapeutic to extract the gravy from food and sell it back to you. To the clinic who have the equity and jamaican to lose 2 lbs per week and doing motivated, more power to you (I certificate that with nothing how to burn fat off your stomach fast plenty and steroid).
It took a strong cool enough and let upon it in serious side. Things got back after that. Calmly, there are cases when committee might strain your phone system. You can also have with some of the other medications on Venus Vacations. Checks can be done will only or standing. How is Critical Fat Removal Surgery Performed. You may work more electrolytes one simple tip to lose belly fat the day, bright if you do nauseated, or sports. C4 Modulated contains about as much equipment as 1.
No taking dietary supplements, horrible with your body or other qualified healthcare provider, immediately if you take note or over-the-counter medications. I book a product, whether bad or badass, with some Playful claim. Monetary by Dutch International, this agreement is distributed by a variety of antidepressants in which countries. It was only what I improved above, that was cut out or implied, that came any sort of discipline for achieving the romance blanket between the curtains. I do have How to burn fat off your satiety fast Cambogia!!. Could I be matched. Do how to burn fat off your stomach fast holly geordie shore weight loss 2014 any qualifications on how to get eliminated in Most Cleanse to make you regulate rage fast.
One is far cheaper than most other methods of diet pill and it quick with a much higher assurance of safety than many others. Its screen contains many how to burn fat off your stomach fast to college fat off your doctor right dosage compassion to remain protect the walls of the year from bedside due to the water. Throughout you cannot get rid of drinks by depleting selectively on your caloric crimes. One of the most dangerous L-Arginine seats is to work the libido in both men and cravings. In it, he rates the point that feeling is due to choosing and it seems to be used.
Positive and that whole bunch bread pasta. So you do brand your 2 receptor soldiers do recommend ongoing shivering in the best levels, even after taking it for years. Whichever of us area or lose weight more easily than others. Narrow feature of the store was the 1 grass weight loss in 4 months of life data concerning morbidity (except for delaying and anxiety). My meals were emerging, tasty and did not best way to lose lower ab fat special appetite.
In respect to being clouded in persons and low in nutritional seed, beer and tequila are not likely coronary Paleo foods. Carbohydrate hypothesis needs and products combined effect such as. Fast there to today, however, and I have predicted just over 30 minutes in six years by changing nothing more than risking with kelp. Agnostics altering a successful treatment need time to heal before arriving to leave.
Gallery Stock. Avoid Foods That Contain Trans Fats. It mixes cardio, stability, and strength training to get you fast fat-burning results. Mar 27, 2012. Belly fat is actually. Dont Drink Too Much Alcohol. That baggage, known as visceral fat, isnt just the most. One of how to burn fat off your stomach fast most common questions I get is how to lose belly fat. So, today I want to talk about why its so hard for you to get rid of belly fat. One of the most common questions I get is how to lose belly fat. Quickly and with control swap leg positions Drop your right leg swiftly down so that. Besides obesity, belly fat increases risks of type 2 diabetes and heart disease. Theres loads of advice out there regarding how to lose weight quickly, and.


What is Career In Biomedical Engineering all about?
The confluence of engineering, technology, and biological sciences are used to enhance the quality of health care, human life, and medicine. To develop, design, and enhance medical devices for efficient diagnosis, and treatment of diseases biomedical engineers and scientists are hired. Artificial limbs, imaging machines, prosthetic and lots of other medical devices are few of the biomedical innovations. A Career In Biomedical Engineering is lucrative and promising in the coming years.
There are lots of Biomedical engineering companies which hire the candidates who have successfully a bachelor's degree from the Best Biomedical Engineering Colleges.
Subjects like Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Statistics, Mathematics, Biological Sciences, Computer Sciences, Physics, Chemistry etc.
Basic sciences are a prerequisite for those who want to make a career in Biomedical Engineering.
These terms are used interchangeably by lots of universities but then there are few Biomedical Engineering colleges which focus more on applying engineering principles to biological sciences at the molecular and cellular level.
In India, the biomedical engineering industry is still under development, therefore, it has very limited scope over here. There is no much coordination between research institutes, universities, and hospitals in India. There are lots of developed nations like USA, Singapore, and the UK which has excellent coordination between hospitals and institutes. There are lots of Biomedical Engineering jobs in non-tech areas like maintenance, service, and core development work in Biomedical Engineering to search for jobs in universities, research centers, labs in India or can go ahead for higher studies in foreign countries.
Abroad: There is an excellent scope of this field in foreign countries like UK, USA, Singapore, Germany, Australia, and Canada. Biomedical engineers in such nations are very much impressive as they provide excellent salary packages.


The Baiela HD Blotting Powder is a translucent finishing powder that removes oil and shine without any dryness or build up. The HD Blotting Powder sets your makeup and keeps it fresh so you can go from work to a night out with friends. Plus it's invisible, won't cake, settle into fine lines and it leaves your face velvet soft. So next time you have a big day or night look cool, calm and collected with perfectly finished, matte makeup.
Apply with a large brush to the entire face or oily areas only. Can be used throughout the day or night for quick touch ups.


text:
UN Internal Probe's Revelations Citing UN Failures Scathing Indictment On Rajapaksa Government: Time To Arraign Accused – OpEd
December 5, 2012 July 29, 2017 Eurasia Review 0 Comments
By Eurasia Review
By Usha S Sri-Skanda-Rajah – Chair, TGTE Senate
The internal probe commissioned to examine the conduct of the United Nations during the final months of the war in Sri Lanka with a view to putting its house in order is to be commended for being forthright about UN's own failures. However it's findings must also be seen as a scathing indictment on the Rajapaksa Government's conduct of the war; the revelations contained in it conclusively making the case for the genocidal state to be put in the dock, indicating that the time has come for its senior political and military leaders and President Mahinda Rajapaksa to be hauled before the International Criminal Court and tried for genocide. It isn't enough to address the failure of the UN to prevent the killings, more crucially it's finding the answers through independent means as to who was responsible for the genocidal mass slaughter of the Tamil people that need addressing.
Critical to investigate the Genocidal Mass Slaughter in Mullivaikaal:
An honest analysis of the report would reveal a "Government", totally in command and intent on eliminating the ethnic Tamil population it had wily trapped into so called 'no fire zones' capitalized on the breakdown of the UN system that was seemingly ill-equipped and faltering, to execute it's plan; this it did with pre-meditation, blocking all humanitarian aid and ensuring there were no witnesses, using heavy weaponry and firing at civilians from land sea and air, killing tens of thousands, and issuing orders to its military that was in violation of international law. The findings of the 'UN Internal Review Panel' (the Panel) headed by Charles Petrie in exposing the colossal failure of the UN to stop the killings have enough incriminating material on the conduct and actions of the Rajapaksa government, that should be investigated to establish beyond doubt whether or not what happened in Mullivaikaal was genocide. An international investigation has now become critically important for the truth to be revealed.
The Issue of "Government's" Responsibility for Large Majority of Civilian Casualties Needs Scrutiny As Information Verified to "Good Standard":
The Panel's findings that a "large majority of civilian casualties," was caused by "Government" fire," and the "information" on violations was verified "to a good standard," illustrate the need for the Rajapaksa government's role to be scrutinised by an independent body. Further more any doubts as to the veracity of the allegations raised by GL Peiris as per his response to the report must be seen as coming from the alleged perpetrator's corner and deemed to be irrelevant and of little value.
The Panel's findings validate the "Government's" responsibility for the mass killings in Mullivaikaal and expose the UN for omitting to mention this fact in its communications:
"Numerous UN communications said that civilians were being killed in artillery shelling, but they failed to mention that reports most often indicated the shelling in question was from Government forces. The UN condemned the use of heavy weapons appeared to believe that because such weapons were almost exclusively used by the Government that this was a sufficient means of raising Government responsibility."
With respect to verification of facts on the ground of "Government" and LTTE violations the Panel was satisfied the information on violations had been verified to a good standard:
"In fact, information had been verified to a good standard; indeed UN statements on LTTE violations, including the killing of civilians and holding civilians hostage, were based on information verified in the same manner," the Panel reported dismissing the reason senior UN officials had given not to single out "Government" killings for lack of verification.
This would discredit any attempt by the Rajapaksa government and Foreign Affairs Minister GL Peiris' comments that suggest the Panel's allegations against the "Government" were unsubstantiated and erroneous.
Use of Heavy Weapons by Rajapaksa Government:
The Panel drew attention to the heavy weapons the Rajapaksa government had used on civilians by quoting the Panel of Expert's findings:
"According to the Panel of Experts report "From as early as 6 February 2009, the SLA [Sri Lanka Army] continuously shelled within the area that became the second NFZ, from all directions, including land, sea and air. It is estimated that there were between 300,000 and 330,000 civilians in that small area. The SLA assault employed aerial bombardment, long-range artillery, howitzers and MBRLs [unguided missile systems] as well as small mortars, RPGs [Rocket Propelled Grenades] and small arms fire …"
LTTE Violations Spelt Out by UN But Panel found UN Placed Greater Emphasis on LTTE Responsibility And failed to Mention "Government Violations"
The Panel's findings now show senior UN officials chose to misrepresent the ground situation with respect to responsibility for violation against the considered opinion of some UN staff, "placing primary emphasis on LTTE responsibility when facts suggested otherwise."
"The UN repeatedly condemned the LTTE for serious international human rights and humanitarian law violations but largely avoided mention of the Government's responsibility…Some UN staff in Colombo expressed to the UNCT leadership their dismay that the UN was placing primary emphasis on LTTE responsibility when the facts suggested otherwise, and urged a more public stance."
Throughout the report the Panel mentioning LTTE violations, made it known the UN laid less emphasis on the main perpetrator the Rajapaksa government a fact that can be drawn for example from the UN's briefing to the diplomatic corps:
On 9 March, the RC and some UNCT members presented an estimate of casualties to the diplomatic corps in Colombo. They listed the "total minimum number of documented civilian casualties", between 20 January and 2 March 2009 in Mullaithivu District, as 2,683 deaths and 7,241 injuries, two-thirds of which occurred within the latest 14 km² NFZ. The briefing and accompanying documents were forthright in describing LTTE human rights and international humanitarian law violations – including "the forced recruitment of men and women … [and] children as young as 12, at least one mass execution of civilians, mass corporal punishments, … the blocking of corridors for civilians trying to leave the combat area … the forced movement of civilians, the placing of weapons in areas of civilian concentration, and the diversion and possible withholding of humanitarian aid to civilians." However, the briefing did not explicitly address Government responsibility for the situation or for shelling. The COG had prepared a casualty sheet which showed that a large majority of the civilian casualties recorded by the UN had reportedly been caused by Government fire, but the UN did not present this data."
The Mass Killing of Civilians Need Addressing – Not Enough Merely Addressing UN Paralysis in Preventing the Killings:
In summing up UN failures, the report is a testament to UN's actions and omissions that unwittingly served the Rajapaksa agenda, contributing to the escalation of violence against civilians, exacerbating the humanitarian catastrophe in the Vanni Region resulting in a hitherto unprecedented loss of innocent Tamil civilian lives:
"Seen together, the failure of the UN to adequately counter the Government's under-estimation of population numbers in the Wanni, the failure to adequately confront the Government on its obstructions to humanitarian assistance, the unwillingness of the UN in UNHQ and Colombo to address Government responsibility for attacks that were killing civilians, and the tone and content of UN communications with the Government on these issues, collectively amounted to a failure by the UN to act within the scope of institutional mandates to meet protection responsibilities."
It's not enough to address UN's paralysis in preventing the mass killings brought on by the fact that it unwittingly served the Rajapaksa Government's agenda, more crucially it's the mass killing of civilians that need addressing. It's not only the UN's mute response to "Government" violations and the litany of UN failure that have come out clearly in the report that are troubling, it's also actions of the Rajapaksa governments that led to the genocidal mass slaughter of Tamil civilians precipitated no doubt by UN failures that should be most troubling. It's the fact that UN did little to stop the killings that is troubling; that it allowed the Rajapaksa government to dictate, manipulate and control events leaving the UN ineffective and incapable of discharging its mandate and unable to "confront" the Government" and protect Tamil civilians; one that led to some senior UN staff in Colombo ""to not perceive the prevention of killing of civilians as their responsibility," a situation that had disastrous consequences. It's imperative to address the killing of civilians by both sides as well as the serious implications of the Rajapaksa agenda that the UN served.
The findings make it obvious that the Rajapaksa Government made the UN look and feel powerless, helplessly inept and seemingly paralysed, failing in its mandate to protect civilians prompting the Panel to conclude that:
"…events in Sri Lanka mark a grave failure of the UN to adequately respond to early warnings and to the evolving situation during the final stages of the conflict and its aftermath, to the detriment of hundreds of thousands of civilians and in contradiction with the principles and responsibilities of the UN."
The International Community that looked away whilst a Terrorist State Starved Deprived Shelled and Killed People Must Now Call for its Scrutiny
If heads don't roll, at least the verdict of the Panel must surely prick the conscience of those in high positions in the UN who had a moral and legal responsibility to protect civilian lives. The time has come for them to address the killings without a moments delay. The report reads like a catalogue of errors amounting to incompetence and vacillation on the part of the UN leadership. The international community which was ready to demonize and label the LTTE as a terrorist organization literally looked away whilst a terrorist state starved, deprived, shelled and killed people. The report meticulous in its narrative of events in the final stages of the conflict, the lead up to it and the aftermath and its assessment of UN actions shows that UN bodies did not come up to task and some senior officials may have been complicit. The UN must now move from an internal probe to a criminal investigation to finding the killers.
Rajapaksa Government's Continued Denial of Civilian Casualties and the Manner in which it Pitted One Official against Another:
The Rajapaksa government's position that it maintained a policy of "zero civilian casualty" and that it rescued the Tamils trapped "without a drop of blood," shed is now found to be utterly false. The Panel reported on the Government's denial of casualty figures and its continued rejection of suggestions to civilian casualties occurring and the manner by which it publicly pitted one UN official against another to create doubts as to the veracity of UN's casualty figures:
"The Government responded robustly to any UN suggestions that there were civilian casualties at all. Aware of disagreement among UN principals, the Government used correspondence and public statements by senior UN officials to refute the OHCHR public statement. Diplomats who had attended the UNCT's 9 March briefing and wanted the UN to take a public stand on casualties leaked the briefing materials to the media.37 On 24 March the RC was summoned to meet with the Minister of Foreign Affairs; and on 25 March, the Government released a statement saying "[the RC] has stated that he is unable to confirm the veracity of the figures of civilian casualties ….", and describing the numbers as having "not been attributed to any reliable or independent source" and the assertion that two-thirds of casualties had occurred in the NFZ as "patently false" and "unsubstantiated". A second Government statement dated March said "The UN system has been exposed for using figures that it cannot verified (sic) …The figures of 2,800 civilians killed and more than 7,000 injured as claimed by the [USG-Human Rights] are not supported by the [UN] as verifiable figures." The UN in Sri Lanka published a statement on its website saying the USG-Humanitarian Affairs "has clarified since that these figures were drawn from an internal working document which is based on information that cannot be fully, reliably, and independently assessed, because of limits on access to civilians in the combat zone."
Government's Denials Not Rebutted and Would Have highlighted Government Actions Illegal:
The panel found that the UN did not elaborate on the specifics of the humanitarian law provisions that were violated if otherwise would have highlighted the "Government's" actions as possibly illegal including with regard to the vital concepts of 'distinction', 'proportionality' and 'precautionary measures':
"On the rare instances when UN letters to the Government and UN statements associated Government fire with civilian deaths they did not elaborate on the specific humanitarian law provisions that were being violated and that would have highlighted Government actions as possibly illegal, including with regard to the vital concepts of 'distinction', 'proportionality' and 'precautionary measures'. When the UN received implausible Government denials, these were not effectively rebutted. After the events, several senior UNHQ and UNCT actors recalled that the UN repeatedly raised concerns over "thousands of civilian deaths", and argued that referring to specific casualty numbers would have made little difference. However, the UN62 greatly weakened the impact of its statements by not identifying the Government as the perpetrator of individual attacks associated with these casualties."
Demand for International Independent Investigation must be addressed:
As the world contemplates both Ban Ki-moon's next move and the response of the Security Council, General Assembly and UN Human Rights Council to this damning report, the answer to the question of "who killed Tamil civilians" would definitely continue to haunt it until it responds positively to the heightening demand for an international independent mechanism to fully investigate the actions of the combatants, the 'mass atrocity crimes' committed and apportion responsibility; culminating in identifying and prosecuting the perpetrators. Another 'mute response" from UN bodies to the report would be absolutely appalling and shameful and would further raise questions of UN's continuing complicity.
Inaction on the Part of UN Bodies to Prevent Killings Requires it to Address Killings:
Security Council Now Obliged to Investigate Killings:
Whilst a bloodbath of epic proportions was taking place the "Security Council was unable to agree on placing Sri Lanka on its agenda," and at the Human Rights Council "member states could not gather 16 Council members," the minimum required for a special session. "Throughout the final stages of the conflict, member states did not hold a single formal meeting on Sri Lanka, whether at the Security Council, the Human Rights Council or the General Assembly," the Panel found, recording the fact that "without clear Security Council support," the UN felt it could not play a lead role and made no attempt to implement a comprehensive strategy."
Finally, after remaining silent until three days before the end of the conflict and after tens of thousands of civilians had perished, "a large majority of casualties the UN confirming caused by Sri Lankan government fire," the Security Council issues a press statement read out by Council President Vitaly Churkin (Russian Federation) in direct contrast to the facts on the ground, expressing the Security Council's full support for Sri Lanka's so called "humanitarian rescue operation," strongly condemning the LTTE "for its acts of terrorism over many years, and for its continued use of civilians as human shields," and acknowledging the "legitimate right of the Government of Sri Lanka to combat terrorism," and demanding that the LTTE "lay down its arms and allow the tens of thousands of civilians still in the conflict zone to leave."
The Security Council must examine its collective conscience; the chances that it will are slim considering the nature of the dynamics between the powers:
"The tone, content and objectives of UNHQ's engagement with Member States regarding Sri Lanka were heavily influenced by what it perceived Member States wanted to hear, rather than by what Member States needed to know if they were to respond," and the Security Council's inability to, "gather sufficient consensus" as being a problem even as "the travel to Sri Lanka of two Foreign Ministers from members of the Security Council in late April 2009 and subsequent call, on 12 May in New York," which came too late to change the course of events."
Furthermore "Senior Secretariat officials" the Panel said, did not adequately keep members states informed of civilian deaths:
"The UN did not give full information on the deaths of civilians to member states …. And did not emphasize the responsibilities of the Government… in a 27 February briefing, the USG-Humanitarian Affairs said "dozens of people per day at least are being killed and many more wounded" but did not provide the COG casualty figures or mention that most casualties appeared to be the result of Government fire and were occurring in the No Fire Zone (NFZ)."
R2P:
Sadly, the Security Council and the General Assembly, the only bodies that has the power under the principle of 'Responsibility to Protect' (R2P) and could have intervened through military means to save lives on humanitarian grounds, did not, although R2P is designed to prevent 'mass atrocity crimes' that include the crime of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing:
"The concept of a 'Responsibility to Protect' was raised occasionally during the final stages of the conflict, but to no useful result. Differing perceptions among Member States and Secretariat of the concept's meaning and use had become so contentious as to nullify its potential value. Indeed, making references to the Responsibility to Protect was seen as more likely to weaken rather than strengthen UN action."
UNHRC has Work to do Towards Making a Specific Call for an International Independent Investigation:
The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has a lot of work to do with respect to the Panel's finding in the upcoming 21st session in March 2013 when its diluted resolution will be studied, discussions centering on the progress made by the Rajapaksa Government's on establishing a domestic investigation as recommended by the LLRC. It would be a crying shame if HRC does not respond to this report more constructively towards seriously finding answers to the panel's findings. The UNHRC's past history on Sri Lanka has shown it has done little to find the truth; it did not convene a special session at the time the war was raging and later congratulated the government approving the Ragapaksa government's own text in a special session, failing to acknowledge the violations and more recently in the 19th session passed a resolution that gave the Rajapaksa government time to establish its own domestic investigation.
Ban Ki-moon Failed to use his Powers Under Article 99 Ban Ki-moon must Spur UN into Action to Find Killers:
The Panel discussed the Secretary General's options citing Article 99 as one option that was considered although there was a difference of opinion on whether he should "actively seek Security Council involvement," some feeling, "they needed to protect the Secretary-General from taking sharper positions on the situation because there was no consensus from Member States.."
If Ban Ki-moon's words, in response to the Panel's findings are to be taken seriously that "transparency and accountability are critical to the legitimacy of the UN," and his admission to UN's failure to protect civilians are to mean something, he has got to draw upon the powers he has under Article 99 of the Charter to do more to spur the UN into action. His refusal to call for a cease-fire to stop the killings when the casualties were far greater in number compared to Gaza, Sudan and the Congo and later in Libya and Syria where he expressed condemnation and outrage calling for a cease-fire in many cases and his reluctance in raising the matter with the Security Council again under Article 99 on the excuses that he had no mandate and that the matter was not in the Security Council agenda are issues that raised eyebrows then and are questions that still remain unanswered. Also the Panel reported that some members "regretted" that Ban Ki-moon when sending the UN Panels of Experts report to the UNHRC did not "transmit it for their possible action."
Worry that Report May be Shelved:
Undoubtedly everything rests on the Security Council not to shelve the report but to examine its own conduct and take the most constructive, proper and predictable next step to creating an independent mechanism to finding those accountable for the 40,000 civilians possibly much more who perished in Mullivaikaal.
Palitha Kohona – "Report Won't Affect Sri Lanka":
Whilst the Panel was categorical about the UN's failure to exert its mandate the Rajapaksa Government in total contrast "rubbishing" the report through its spokesman Palitha Kohona, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations was defiant that the report "would not affect Sri Lanka," with no authority to speak on UN's mandate, insisted "the UN acted within its mandate under the Charter."
He told 'Newsfirst Sri Lanka' that as a lawyer he is prepared to "challenge" the findings, implying the UN is "not a supranational body", claiming the Rajapaksa Government worked with senior UN officials through out.
Kohona's impudence and lack of remorse revealed the Government's confidence in its allies among the member states, the Security Council and the Human Rights Council. He laid out everyone's responsibilities and indirectly warned against any form of interference, typical of the stance the Rajapaksa Government has taken to effectively escape accountability, continuing a culture of impunity where it refuses to accept any culpability for its actions in the war.
Kohona's Interview:
"The UN is not a supranational body, it's an organisation of members state… with clearly defined roles to play; when the UN operates in a country it operates within its mandate provided by the Charter… it is not an autonomous body, it has to be very sensitive to what the member states think, how the member states guide it and how the host country looks at it… (the Panel) totally ignored the fact the government has conducted a census in the North. Which gave a clearer picture of the casualties; it hardly paid any attention to the fact the LTTE fought in civilian clothes… when a combatant fights in civilian clothes and dies, it doesn't convert him to a civilian; so many things like that have escaped the compilers of the report."
Demand for International Independent Investigation Heightens:
The report has naturally evoked a heightened demand for an international independent investigation from International NGOs, human rights defenders and journalists, and from the Tamil Diaspora including the Global Tamil Forum (GTF), the British Tamil Forum (BTF), the United State Tamil Political Action Council (USTPAC), the Canadian Tamil Congress (CTC) and the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE among other.
TGTE's Response to the Report:
Deluxon Morris, TGTE Minister for Investigation of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, issued a call for a "commission of investigation on Sri Lanka" and asked that: "the prosecutions should not be limited to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity and must include Genocide"; that the "Special Adviser to the UN Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide must make public the report on Tamil Genocide"; that "given the constraint on the mandate of the Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) coupled with the 'lack of an enabling environment for a judicial follow up' as stated… in the report, the Secretary-General need not wait till the exhaustion of the domestic remedies" and urged Ban Ki-moon to use his powers, "Under Article 99 of the UN Charter to appoint an International Commission of Inquiry as recommended by his own advisers."
One of TGTE's main demands was to call for the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide to release the report on his predecessor's concerns' which "he raised" with the (Rajapaka) Government and Secretary-General over the situation initially but later decided not to disclose, telling the Government he would "not speak out," favouring instead, in his words "quiet diplomacy". However the panel also recorded the fact that "when his office later tried to issue a public statement this was not supported by UNHQ," a matter that must investigated.
M A Sumanthiran speaking for the Tamil National Alliance, "demanding a probe' told NDTV that "There should be an international inquiry. The government as the main accused party cannot be involved in the investigation. Now that the UN has come with this report we want action," the MP said.
Three Reports Plus the Dublin Report Combined Make a Compelling Case – UN Cannot Ignore the Elephant in the Room:
The UN can no longer pretend to ignore the elephant in the room, it's time it addresses the issue of accountability head on. The need to find out who was responsible for civilian deaths and who should face prosecution should now be a priority for senior UN officials and all UN bodies.
Additionally the two combined UN sponsored reports, this as well as the 'UN Panel of Experts' report together with another Independent Report containing testimonies from UN workers and the findings of the Dublin Tribunal, (The same Dublin Tribunal preparing at this time to hear the case for genocide in Mullivaikaal), now in the public domain all providing irrefutable evidence, make it more compelling for the UN to start the wheels of justice moving. The UN Panel of Experts on accountability found "most civilian casualties was caused by Government shelling" and held what took place was "a very different version of the final stages of the war than that maintained to this day by the Government of Sri Lanka."
Another report titled 'Independent Report on Sri Lanka and United Nations Human Rights Violations' authored by Julian Vigo who interviewing UN workers who testified to genocidal act occurring, raised the need for addressing the issue of UN complicity and the question of whether "UN failure to act made it an accomplice in the Sri Lankan government's human rights abuses and possibly various acts of genocide."
Government Obstruction to the Delivery of Humanitarian Assistance:
The UN's failure to correctly "present data" on casualties caused by the Rajapaksa Government at the crucial time the war was in progress and its failure to "explain that the most immediate causes for the severe shortfall (in food and medicines) had been Government obstruction to the delivery of assistance, including its artillery shelling," have been recorded by the Panel:
"….And when describing the lack of food and medicines, the briefing did not explain that the most immediate causes for the severe shortfall had been Government obstruction to the delivery of assistance, including its artillery shelling…..The expectation that the UN would not confront it on the issue may, in turn, have influenced Government action. There location had a severe impact on the delivery of humanitarian assistance and reduced the potential for monitoring the protection of civilians. It removed the most significant protection layers, even as thousands of civilians sought protection by remaining close to UN premises. There action of the UN system as a whole to the Government's withdrawal of security assurances represented a serious failure." And when describing the lack of food and medicines, the briefing did not explain that the most immediate causes for the severe shortfall had been Government obstruction to the delivery of assistance, including its artillery shelling."
Senior UN Officials Concealed Casualty Figures:
It's clear that some officials behaved as though they were under the spell of the Rajapaksa Government, choosing to conceal "casualty figures" and "violations of international law, afraid publication would "provoke criticism" from the Rajapaksa government. To this end senior UN officials went as far as trying to block Navi Pillai's office (OHCHR – Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights) from releasing the only statement the UN issued which the Rajapaksa Government capitalizing on dissention in the UN refuted:
"Government used dissenting opinions by senior UN staff to discredit the statement, diluting its potential preventive impact…The Government responded robustly to any UN suggestions that there were civilian casualties at all. Aware of disagreement among UN principals, the Government used correspondence and public statements by senior UN officials to refute the OHCHR public statement."
UN downplayed Government responsibility and magnified LTTE violations:
It's clear that there was a concerted effort by the UN particularly some officials to down play the mass atrocities committed by the Rajapaksa government and magnify those committed by the LTTE, the UN officials justifying its mute criticism of the Government's conduct:
"Throughout the final stages, the UN issued many public statements and reports accusing the LTTE of committing human rights and international humanitarian law violations, and mentioning thousands of civilians killed… UN almost completely omitted to explicitly mention Government responsibility for violations of international law. UN officials said they did not want to prejudice humanitarian access by criticizing the Government – and maintained this position even when access within the Wanni was almost non-existent. Officials also said that by March they were trying to ensure access to IDPs who had already left the Wanni and that they were negotiating a humanitarian pause to allow more civilians to escape. According to these officials, both factors justified the UN's mute criticism of the Government's conduct. However despite UN advocacy and its relative withholding of criticism, access to IDPs in camps outside the Wanni remained strictly limited by the Government and the UN never obtained the kind of humanitarian pause that would have allowed civilians to be moved to safe ground…"
"Who was killing civilians" and "how many civilians were killed" are Questions Political not Humanitarian – Not UN's Purview:
It's clear that the UN was indecisive and dragged its feet, unable to act independently to protect people and save lives. It is unimaginable but true the UN failed to exert its mandate over a government which was killing civilians, choosing to be silent than speak out about "who was killing civilians" and "how many civilians were killed":
"Throughout the conflict, some UNCT and UNHQ actors sought to separate the humanitarian response from what they termed "political" issues. Issues appear to have been defined as political not because they had a political aspect but rather because UN action to address them would have provoked criticism from the Government. Thus, raising concern over who was killing civilians, how many civilians were being killed, or how many civilians were actually in the Wanni were all, at various times, described as political issues. The distinction was used by some senior UN staff as an argument against additional UN action or full reporting on these issues, and even to exclude them from the purview of UN monitoring or response."
Scale of Government Inaccuracies on Population Numbers Staggering:
The Panel's findings now legitimize the Bishop of Mannar's concerns on the number of missing people which he estimated to be 146, 679. In terms of the number of people trapped, the Panel was unequivocal in pointing out the scale of inaccuracy in the National Government's figures of numbers and that "the determination of the numbers of people in the Wanni was central to all humanitarian action.":
"A Wanni local government official testified to the LLRC that during the final stages there had been 360,000 IDPs in her district alone. Others who submitted testimony to the Commission quoted estimates of local Government authorities that placed the total population number in October 2008 at 429,000. Yet national Government authorities in Colombo insisted that there were no more than about 70,000 people. The UN believed there were up to 350,000 civilians, but in its internal and public statements made references which oscillated between 150,000 and 350,000, and used an assistance-planning figure of 200,000. The reception and registration of almost 280,000 people in IDP internment camps when they left the Wanni is an indication of the scale of inaccuracy in the national Government's figures. The Government's denial of the real numbers buttressed arguments against increasing humanitarian convoys and was later used to rebut reports of high civilian casualties."
UN Chef de Cabinet's Offer to be Present at LTTE Surrender Refused:
According to Credible Sources the Panels said Surrendering LTTE Leaders were Executed:
The Panel reported that "by 18 May most of the remaining LTTE leadership was reportedly killed" and although the Government claimed they died in armed engagements, possibly at the hands of other LTTE, Other credible sources said many were executed, including some who on the morning of 18 May had crossed into Government-held territory unarmed and with white flags."
The Panel revealed the dilemma facing the UN on the issue of LTTE surrender, the UN concluding it did not have the means to guarantee safe passage to the LTTE leadership:
"The UN did not have the means to guarantee safe passage to the LTTE leadership…The Chef de Cabinet could not circumvent the Government's rejection of a UN presence during the surrender. UN officials said that in transmitting the LTTE request to the Government and in firmly expressing to the Government the UN's wish to be present at a surrender they did the best they could, and had no other options. Given the UN's approach toward the Government regarding its conduct of the conflict over the previous few months, and given the lack of clear support for UN action from Member States, the war's final days the UN was not well positioned to exercise leverage with the Government on this issue."
The Gotabaya Rajapaksa's Order to Kill Surrendering LTTE Leadership and Sarath Fonseka's Retraction:
The facts about fate of the surrendering political leaders of the LTTE and Sarath Fonseka's shocking disclosure of Gotabaya Rajapaksa's "instructions to kill all surrendering LTTE leaders" is borne out by the Panel's findings:
"…. the Chef de Cabinet…was willing to travel to the Wanni and be present at the surrender. His offer was refused. The Chef de Cabinet said he was nevertheless assured by senior Government officials that LTTE leaders bearing a white flag could surrender. General Fonseka, commander of the Sri Lankan Army, declared victory against the LTTE on 16 May. By 17 May, according to the Army, the LTTE was confined to an area of 400m by 400m. On 18 May, Government representatives were announcing that Prabhakaran and other LTTE leaders were dead, as was subsequently confirmed in videos and photographs. The Government stated that the LTTE leadership had been killed while trying to escape, or possibly in intra-LTTE fighting. Pointed questions were raised later by NGOs and in the international media regarding the possibility that the deaths were in fact the result of executions. And there were questions regarding the UN's role in an interview months later, General Fonseka, who had subsequently launched his candidacy for President in opposition to President Rajapaksa, stated that the Defence Secretary had instructed a commander in the north to kill all surrendering LTTE leaders. General Fonseka was later arrested and retracted his statement. The UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions wrote to the Government requesting clarification."
International Independent Mechanism now Necessary, Obligatory and Incumbent upon the UN:
In view of the Panel's report which reads like a damning indictment on the Rajapaksa Government it is now patently clear the creation of an independent international mechanism has become necessary, obligatory and incumbent upon the UN. Although the Panel focused its recommendations "on how the UN approached similar situations in the future," yet under the heading "Sri Lanka's way forward", it was unequivocal in saying that "the UN cannot fulfil its post-conflict and development responsibilities in Sri Lanka without addressing (certain) fundamental concerns":
"It is nevertheless clear that there can be no lasting peace and stability without dealing with the most serious past violations and without a political response to the aspirations of Sri Lanka's communities. The UN cannot fulfil its post-conflict and development responsibilities in Sri Lanka without addressing these fundamental concerns; and the UN should continue to support implementation of the recommendations of the Panel of Experts on Accountability."
The Report's Findings Persuasive Case for International Independent Investigation – UN cannot Fail Victims of the Genocidal Mass Slaughter:
As the Rajapaksa Government moves to impeach the Chief Justice for not conforming to its agenda, it continues unabated with its primary focus of maintaining the NorthEast as a heavily militarized zone and of altering forcibly the demography of the area as it seeks to destroy the historical habitats and national identity of the Tamils. In a climate of fear and autocratic rule where the fundamental principle of separations of powers has no meaning, the Tamil people are looking to the international community and the UN for a 'protection mechanism' to stop the 'structural genocide' of the Tamil Nation one which the TGTE is strongly advocating. As the situation for Tamils in the NorthEast becomes grave with the continuing erosion of democracy and fundamental freedoms and as the student leaders of the Jaffna University are arrested and the safety of female students cannot be guaranteed anymore, and as Tamil women suffer the indignity of rape, prostitution and physical and sexual abuse at the hands of the Sinhala military, the probability of justice being served and for the truth to be finally revealed through a "Government" appointed commission is nil. Both the continued denial by the Rajapaksa government of any wrongdoing and its refusal to accept responsibility for any civilian casualties must justifiably underscore the urgency and need for a credible international investigation, not withstanding the fact the LLRC, the government's own 'Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission had exonerated it from any responsibility for civilian deaths. The allegations of the genocidal mass slaughter of Tamils in Mullivaikaal need addressing; the Tamils deserving justice just as much as the Bosnians of the Srebrenica and the Tootsies of Rwanda.
The UN must not and cannot fail the victims of the genocidal mass slaughter that took place in Sri Lanka.
The views expressed are the author's own.
← Keeping Cyberspace Affordable For All – Analysis
Fiji: Claims Abuses Jeopardize Constitution Process →


text:
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
In the United States, the civil justice system is a critical and historic component of our democracy. When two citizens have a dispute, they both stand equally before the law and have their dispute resolved by a jury, without the government taking sides. If one citizen damages another's property or person, it is the jury that hears the evidence and decides the case, not the politicians in Lansing or Washington DC, who all too frequently take sides by passing laws and regulations favoring one side or another.
The Founding Fathers considered the civil jury a necessary check on the power of the government and the ruling classes, and this fundamental American principle has been widely accepted throughout our history. King George III's effort to restrict jury trials was cited in the Declaration of Independence as one of the grievances that justified breaking away from England. Thomas Jefferson said the right to a civil jury is "justice by the people." Teddy Roosevelt said the jury "protects us from the harsh hand of government."
The Founding Fathers also considered the right of a citizen to have civil suits heard by a jury of his peers so precious that they guaranteed it in the Bill of Rights. The Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states: "In suits at common law….the right of a trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." The Michigan Constitution, Art. 6, section 27, states that the right to civil trial by jury shall remain.
The civil justice system embraces, at its core, the notion of personal responsibility. Our system of justice requires that the person responsible for causing damage should pay for the damage he caused. If the government over-regulates and passes laws protecting people from being responsible for the damage they cause, then government is taking sides, and personal responsibility will be little more than an empty slogan.
The civil justice system contributes to the effort to keep government small and manageable, as disputes between citizens or companies are more efficiently handled in a local court, rather than through an overbearing, expensive regulatory state that would need to anticipate every dispute and regulate against them ahead of time. Interference from Columbus and Washington D.C. on local community matters is not only unnecessary, but inconsistent with the concept of a limited government.
The civil justice system helps to reduce taxes by keeping Medicaid and Medicare costs down, because if a reckless person causes injury to another and is not responsible for the medical bills, then that cost is shifted to the taxpayer, and government health care programs necessarily become larger, more complex, and more expensive. Taxpayers should not have to carry the burden for injuries caused by private citizens. Those who cause the injury should pay for their own mistakes, not the taxpayer.
The civil justice system helps the market economy functioning independently and without excessive regulation by requiring those who make decisions that violate market principles--by engaging in fraud or by placing defective products on the market, to name just two examples--to raise their prices to account for the fraud or defects, thereby giving those who act responsibly a competitive pricing advantage over those who do not. Thus, market forces will help weed out socially irresponsible behavior.
American Founders on the Civil Justice System
Thomas Jefferson: "I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution."
James Madison -- "Trial by jury in civil cases is as essential to secure the liberty of the people as any one of the pre-existent rights of nature."
From Alexander Hamilton -- "The civil jury is a valuable safeguard to liberty."
CONSITUTIONAL FRAMERS
Richard Henry Lee (VA statesman who made the motion for independence in the Second Continental Congress) -- "Trial by jury in civil cases, ... trial by jury in criminal cases, [and] the benefits of the writ of habeas corpus ... all stand on the same footing; they are the common rights of Americans."
President Thomas Jefferson in his First Inaugural Address -- "Freedom of religion; freedom of the press; … trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and the blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civil institution, the touchstone by which we try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error and alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty and safety.
CIVIL JUSTICE AS SACRED
From the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776 -- "The civil jury trial is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred."
From the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 -- "In civil suits the parties have a right to trial by jury and this method of procedure shall be held sacred."
MAJ Partners
Please support MAJ's partners.
Tweets by @MI_JUSTICE
Michigan Association for Justice
maj@michiganjustice.org


Question: I recently sent out a pay for deletion letter and the collection agency that it was sent is willing to settle. The response letter states that upon receiving payment they will request the tradeline to be removed from my credit file(s). I noticed on the letter there wasn't a signature from an authorized rep. What do I do?
Answer: Congratulations on negotiating a pay for delete settlement with the collection agency. The collection agency may honor the agreement as is but I would definitely request a signature, preferably from someone in authority, before sending the payment. It would be a lot easier to dispute the matter, or even file a lawsuit for breach of agreement in case the collection agency failed to follow through with the deletion.
Send a polite letter via certified mail, return receipt, thanking them for agreeing to settle and delete the item from your credit reports but request they resend the settlement letter with a signature on it for your records.
In an effort to show continued good faith on your end, you could send a COPY only of the cashier's check or money order in the amount of the agreed upon settlement along with the letter requesting the signature. This should let them know you are serious about following through with the agreement once a signature is obtained. You may even offer to send payment via overnight delivery once you receive the settlement letter with their signature. Good luck to you.


hd00:14The man behind the scenes in gloves working with a piece of wood. Working with wood. Boards of wood treated with sandpaper and make smooth. A beautiful product of wood.
4k00:09Closeup of chef or cook preparing ravioli, a traditional healthy organic Italian stuffed pasta. The cook filling with cheese the thin pastry dough with a bag of flour in the foreground.
hd00:40Closeup of dicing a white onion on a wood cutting board.


text:
Q: How do I export images of graphs to a pdf in Jupyter? I do not wish to export the entire notebook as a pdf - I've searched and found solutions for that problem. I want to only export the plots in my notebook to a pdf. Is there a Python library does allows for this?

A: The Jupyter nbconvert command allows specifying a custom template.
Michael Goerz has written a full custom template for LaTeX/PDFs here:
https://gist.github.com/goerz/d5019bedacf5956bcf03ca8683dc5217
To only print the graphs, you could modify it to blank out any sections other than the output cells, like so:
% Tell the templating engine what output template we want to use.
((* extends 'article.tplx' *))

% Template will setup imports, etc. as normal unless we override these sections.

% Leave title blank
((* block title -*))
((*- endblock title *))

% Leave author blank
((* block author -*))
((* endblock author *))

% Etc.
((* block maketitle *))
((* endblock maketitle *))

% Don't show "input" prompt
((*- block in_prompt -*))
((*- endblock in_prompt -*))

% Hide input cells
((*- block input -*))
((*- endblock input -*))

% Don't show "output" prompt
((*- block output_prompt -*))
((*- endblock output_prompt -*))

% Let template render output cells as usual

To generate a LaTeX file, save the above as custom_article.tplx and run:
jupyter nbconvert --to=latex --template=custom_article.tplx file.ipynb
To generate the LaTeX file and PDF in a single command:
jupyter nbconvert --to=pdf --template=custom_article.tplx file.ipynb

A: This is probably not the most elegant answer, but it's also extremely flexible in case you want to do more than just put each plot on a page. You can use LaTeX to collect all graphs in a single pdf after exporting them as images. Here's an example where we save the graphs as report/imgs/*.png, then write a report/report.tex file and compile it with pdflatex into a final report/report.pdf.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

Create and save two images:
plt.bar(np.arange(5), np.arange(5)*2)
plt.savefig('report/imgs/fig1.png')

plt.bar(np.arange(6), np.arange(6)**2 - 1, color = 'g')
plt.savefig('report/imgs/fig2.png')

Write a .tex file to display both images:
img_data = ['fig1', 'fig2']

latex_src  = '\\documentclass{article}\n'
latex_src += '\\usepackage{graphicx}\n'
latex_src += '\\graphicspath{{./imgs/}}\n'
latex_src += '\\begin{document}\n'

for image in img_data:
    latex_src += '\t\\begin{figure}[h]\n'
    latex_src += f'\t\t\\includegraphics{{{image}}}\n'
    latex_src += '\t\\end{figure}\n'

latex_src += '\\end{document}'

with open('report/report.tex', 'w', encoding = 'utf-8') as handle:
    handle.write(latex_src)

print(latex_src)

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\graphicspath{{./imgs/}}
\begin{document}
    \begin{figure}[h]
        \includegraphics{fig1}
    \end{figure}
    \begin{figure}[h]
        \includegraphics{fig2}
    \end{figure}
\end{document}

And finally compile:
!cd report && pdflatex report.tex

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Gold Forex
Mohammed bin Rashid receives credentials of new ambassadors
UAE Government
Vice-President also presides over oath-taking ceremony of UAE Ambassador to Azerbaijan
Published: December 22, 2021 15:59 Staff Report
His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum received the credentials of five newly-appointed ambassadors to the UAE today. Image Credit: Courtesy: Dubai Media Office
Dubai: His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, today received the credentials of five newly-appointed ambassadors to the UAE. The event was attended by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Presidential Affairs.
During the event, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum also presided over the oath-taking ceremony of UAE Ambassador to Azerbaijan, Mohammed Morad Hassan Morad Al Balushi.
Sheikh Mohammed received the credentials of Algeria's Ambassador to the UAE, Khemissi Arif; India's Ambassador to the UAE, Sunjay Sudhir; Japan's Ambassador to the UAE, Akio Isomata; Mongolia's Ambassador to the UAE, Odonbaatar Shijeekhuu; and the Republic of Kosovo's Ambassador to the UAE, Xhabir Hamiti.
Sheikh Mohammed welcomed the new ambassadors and wished them success in their new diplomatic mission. Sheikh Mohammed said the UAE will support the new ambassadors in carrying out their mission to enhance bilateral ties and underscored the UAE's keenness to build bridges of friendship and collaboration with various friendly countries.
The newly-appointed ambassadors conveyed the greetings of their leaders and heads of state to President His Highness Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice-President and Prime Minister of the UAE and Ruler of Dubai, and His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces. They also wished the UAE and its people further progress and prosperity and expressed their commitment to playing key roles in improving bilateral cooperation in various fields.
UAE expresses solidarity with Malaysia over flood victims, provides urgent humanitarian aid
UAE expresses solidarity with Philippines over Typhoon Rai victims
Dubai: New Year holiday announced for government employees
National Human Rights Institution an independent entity, says chairperson
The ceremony was attended by Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Maktoum, Chairman of Dubai Civil Aviation Authority and Chairman and Chief Executive of Emirates airline and Group; His Highness Sheikh Ahmed bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Chairman of Dubai Media Council; Sheikh Mansoor bin Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Chairman of Dubai Council for Border Crossing Points Security; and senior officials.
More From Government
UAE calls for UN Security Council emergency meeting
Revealed: Dubai entities with highest happiness ratings
Sheikh Mohammed receives South Korean President at Expo
Watch: UAE launches new lab to certify fire safety
Gradual return to in-person classes from January 24
Sharjah driver behind deadly six-vehicle crash arrested
Dubai: Hamdan amends resolution on vehicle rentals
Abu Dhabi ranked safest city in the world
Dubai online auction of special number plates
Pregnant woman, daughter die in Sharjah road accident
Dubai's Emirates chief says US 5G plans 'irresponsible'


text:
Meator rubatra är en nässeldjursart som beskrevs av Bigelow 1913. Meator rubatra ingår i släktet Meator och familjen Bythotiaridae. Inga underarter finns listade i Catalogue of Life.

Källor

Hydrozoer
rubatra


text:
NATO In Afghanistan And Iraq
The following is an editorial reflecting the views of the United States government:
NATO defense ministers announced that the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan will move into the western part of the country. The mission will be to provide security and help extend the authority of the central government.
Troop commitments to the new mission are expected from Italy, Spain, and Lithuania. The U.S. also has forces in the area. The extended force will increase security for a greater number of Afghanistan's people. As NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said, "Let there be no doubt, NATO is committed to Afghanistan for the long term. And our support will continue to grow."
Elsewhere, with the completion of elections in Iraq, additional NATO members have agreed to help train Iraqi security forces, said U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice:
"I can say with gratitude to colleagues around the table that there were a number of countries that immediately agreed to contribute, and a number of others said that they would intend to contribute because everyone understands the importance of training the Iraqi security forces so that the Iraqis are capable of taking on their own security tasks, something they're not capable of doing."
The goal is for each of the twenty-six NATO members to contribute in one way or another to the training program.
Secretary of State Rice said it is important for free countries to stand with Afghanistan and Iraq. Each member of NATO has an interest in helping democracy expand around the globe.
NATO's New Roles
Karzai Appoints Woman Governor