text:
The fall of man, the fall of Adam, or simply the Fall, is a term used in Christianity to describe the transition of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience. The doctrine of the Fall comes from a biblical interpretation of Genesis, chapters 1–3. At first, Adam and Eve lived with God in the Garden of Eden, but the serpent tempted them into eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which God had forbidden. After doing so, they became ashamed of their nakedness and God expelled them from the Garden to prevent them from eating from the tree of life and becoming immortal.

In mainstream (Nicene) Christianity, the doctrine of the Fall is closely related to that of original sin or ancestral sin. They believe that the Fall brought sin into the world, corrupting the entire natural world, including human nature, causing all humans to be born into original sin, a state from which they cannot attain eternal life without the grace of God. The Eastern Orthodox Church accepts the concept of the Fall but rejects the idea that the guilt of original sin is passed down through generations, based in part on the passage Ezekiel 18:20 that says a son is not guilty of the sins of his father. Calvinist Protestants believe that Jesus gave his life as a sacrifice for the elect, so they may be redeemed from their sin. Lapsarianism, understanding the logical order of God's decrees in relation to the Fall, is divided by some Calvinists into supralapsarian (prelapsarian, pre-lapsarian or antelapsarian, before the Fall) and infralapsarian (sublapsarian or postlapsarian, after the Fall).

The narrative of the Garden of Eden and the fall of humankind constitute a mythological tradition shared by all the Abrahamic religions, with a presentation more or less symbolic of Judeo-Christian morals and religious beliefs, which had an overwhelming impact on human sexuality, gender roles, and sex differences both in the Western and Islamic civilizations. Unlike Christianity, the other major Abrahamic religions, Judaism and Islam, do not have a concept of "original sin", and instead have developed varying other interpretations of the Eden narrative.

Genesis 3

The doctrine of the fall of man is extrapolated from the traditional Christian exegesis of Genesis 3. According to the biblical narrative, God created Adam and Eve, the first man and woman in the chronology of the Bible. God places them in the Garden of Eden and forbids them to eat fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The serpent tempts Eve to eat fruit from the forbidden tree, which she shares with Adam, and they immediately become ashamed of their nakedness. Subsequently, God banishes Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, condemns Adam to work in order to get what he needs to live and condemns Eve to give birth in pain, and places cherubim to guard the entrance, so that Adam and Eve will never eat from the "tree of life".

The Book of Jubilees, an apocryphal Jewish work written during the Second Temple period, gives time frames for the events that led to the fall of man by stating that the serpent convinced Eve to eat the fruit on the 17th day, of the 2nd month, in the 8th year after Adam's creation (3:17). It also states that they were removed from the Garden on the new moon of the 4th month of that year (3:33).

Traditional interpretations

Immortality

Christian exegetes of Genesis 2:17 ("for in the day that you eat of it you shall die") have applied the day-year principle to explain how Adam died within a day. Psalms 90:4, 2 Peter 3:8, and Jubilees 4:29–31 explain that, to God, one day is equivalent to a thousand years and thus Adam died within that same "day". The Greek Septuagint, on the other hand, has "day" translated into the Greek word for a twenty-four-hour period ().

According to the Genesis narrative, during the antediluvian age, human longevity approached a millennium, such as the case of Adam who lived 930 years. Thus, to "die" has been interpreted as to become mortal. However, the grammar does not support this reading, nor does the narrative: Adam and Eve are expelled from the Garden lest they eat of the second tree, the tree of life, and gain immortality.

Original sin

The Catechism of the Catholic Church says: "The account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms [...] that the whole of human history is marked by the original fault freely committed by our first parents." St Bede and others, especially Thomas Aquinas, said that the fall of Adam and Eve brought "four wounds" to human nature. They are original sin (lack of sanctifying grace and original justice), concupiscence (the soul's passions are no longer ordered perfectly to the soul's intellect), physical frailty and death, and darkened intellect and ignorance. These negated or diminished the gifts of God to Adam and Eve of original justice or sanctifying grace, integrity, immortality and infused knowledge. This first sin was "transmitted" by Adam and Eve to all of their descendants as original sin, causing humans to be "subject to ignorance, suffering and the dominion of death, and inclined to sin."

In the light of modern scripture scholarship, the future Pope Benedict XVI stated in 1986 that: "In the Genesis story [...] sin is not spoken of in general as an abstract possibility but as a deed, as the sin of a particular person, Adam, who stands at the origin of humankind and with whom the history of sin begins. The account tells us that sin begets sin, and that therefore all the sins of history are interlinked. Theology refers to this state of affairs by the certainly misleading and imprecise term 'original sin.'" Although the state of corruption, inherited by humans after the primaeval event of original sin, is clearly called guilt or sin, it is understood as a sin acquired by the unity of all humans in Adam rather than a personal responsibility of humanity. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, even children partake in the effects of the sin of Adam, but not in the responsibility of original sin, as sin is always a personal act. Baptism is considered to erase original sin, though the effects on human nature remain, and for this reason, the Catholic Church baptizes even infants who have not committed any personal sin.

Eastern Orthodox Christianity rejects the idea that the guilt of original sin is passed down through generations. It bases its teaching in part on Ezekiel 18:20 that says a son is not guilty of the sins of his father. The Church teaches that, in addition to their conscience and tendency to do good, men and women are born with a tendency to sin due to the fallen condition of the world. It follows Maximus the Confessor and others in characterising the change in human nature as the introduction of a "deliberative will" () in opposition to the "natural will" () created by God which tends toward the good. Thus, according to Paul the Apostle in his epistle to the Romans, non-Christians can still act according to their conscience.

Eastern Orthodoxy believes that, while everyone bears the consequences of the first sin (that is, death), only Adam and Eve are guilty of that sin. Adam's sin is not comprehended only as disobedience to God's commandment, but as a change in man's hierarchy of values from theocentricism to anthropocentrism, driven by the object of his lust, outside of God, in this case the tree which was seen to be "good for food", and something "to be desired" (see also theosis, seeking union with God).

Meta-historical fall

The biblical fall of man is also understood by some Christians (especially those in the Eastern Orthodox tradition) as a reality outside of empirical history that effects the entire history of the universe. This concept of a meta-historical fall (also called metaphysical, supramundane, or atemporal) has been most recently expounded by the Orthodox theologians David Bentley Hart, John Behr, and Sergei Bulgakov, but it has roots in the writings of several early church fathers, especially Origen and Maximus the Confessor. Bulgakov writes in his 1939 book The Bride of the Lamb translated by Boris Jakim (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2001):

Empirical history begins precisely with the fall, which is its starting premise. But this beginning of history lies beyond empirical being and cannot be included in its chronology. ...[With the] narrative in Genesis 3, ...an event is described that lies beyond our history, although at its boundary. Being connected with our history, this event inwardly permeates it.

David Bentley Hart has written about this concept of an atemporal fall in his 2005 book The Doors of the Sea as well as in his essay "The Devil's March: Creatio ex Nihilo, the Problem of Evil, and a Few Dostoyevskian Meditations" (from his 2020 book Theological Territories).

Subordination
Traditionally, women have received the major blame for the Fall of humanity. The subordination exegesis is that the natural consequences of sin entering the human race, was prophesied by God when the phrase was made: the husband "will rule over you". This interpretation is reinforced by comments in the First Epistle to Timothy, where the author gives a rationale for directing that a woman (NIV: possibly "wife"):

Therefore, some interpretations of these passages from Genesis 3 and 1 Timothy 2 have developed a view that women are considered as bearers of Eve's guilt and that the woman's conduct in the fall is the primary reason for her universal, timeless, subordinate relationship to the man.

Alternatively, Richard and Catherine Clark Kroeger argue that "there is a serious theological contradiction in telling a woman that when she comes to faith in Christ, her personal sins are forgiven but she must continue to be punished for the sin of Eve." They maintain that judgmental comments against women in reference to Eve are a "dangerous interpretation, in terms both of biblical theology and of the call to Christian commitment". They reason that "if the Apostle Paul was forgiven for what he did ignorantly in unbelief", including persecuting and murdering Christians, "and thereafter was given a ministry, why would the same forgiveness and ministry be denied women" (for the sins of their foremother, Eve). Addressing that, the Kroegers conclude that Paul was referring to the promise of Genesis 3:15 that through the defeat of Satan on the cross of Jesus Christ, the woman's child (Jesus) would crush the serpent's head, but the serpent would only bruise the heel of her child. Moreover, many scholars suggest that the concept of inherited guilt in Christianity is a controversial subject at best, and must be treated with care.

Agricultural revolution

Authors such as Isaac Asimov, Daniel Hillel, and Daniel Quinn suggest that some of the Genesis 3 narrative's symbolism may correlate to the experience of the agricultural revolution. "The expulsion from the Garden of Eden is a folk memory of the beginning of agriculture. With that transition, humans no longer dwelled idyllically in a parkland, feeding on wild fruits or animals, but had begun the toilsome cultivation of cereals." The serpent of the Genesis narrative may represent seasonal changes and renewal, as with the symbolism of Sumerian, Egyptian, and other creation myths. In Mesoamerican creation myths, Quetzalcoatl, a feathered serpent agricultural deity, is associated with learning as well as renewal. The leading role of Eve in the Genesis narrative may be attributed to the interest of Neolithic women in shifting away from gatherer life in favor of raising crops. Women also may have taken the role of organizers in early farming settlements, thus effectively leading the shift to agrarian society. Though these settlements may have been relatively egalitarian compared to more modern societies, the Genesis narrative may be interpreted as mourning the hunter-gatherer life as a paradise lost.

Other interpretations

Gnosticism

Gnosticism originated in the late 1st century CE in non-rabbinical Jewish and early Christian sects. In the formation of Christianity, various sectarian groups, labeled "gnostics" by their opponents, emphasised spiritual knowledge (gnosis) of the divine spark within, over faith (pistis) in the teachings and traditions of the various communities of Christians. Gnosticism presents a distinction between the highest, unknowable God, and the Demiurge, "creator" of the material universe. The Gnostics considered the most essential part of the process of salvation to be this personal knowledge, in contrast to faith as an outlook in their worldview along with faith in the ecclesiastical authority.

In Gnosticism, the biblical serpent in the Garden of Eden was praised and thanked for bringing knowledge (gnosis) to Adam and Eve and thereby freeing them from the malevolent Demiurge's control. Gnostic Christian doctrines rely on a dualistic cosmology that implies the eternal conflict between good and evil, and a conception of the serpent as the liberating savior and bestower of knowledge to humankind opposed to the Demiurge or creator god, identified with the Hebrew God of the Old Testament. Gnostic Christians considered the Hebrew God of the Old Testament as the evil, false god and creator of the material universe, and the Unknown God of the Gospel, the father of Jesus Christ and creator of the spiritual world, as the true, good God. In the Archontic, Sethian, and Ophite systems, Yaldabaoth (Yahweh) is regarded as the malevolent Demiurge and false god of the Old Testament who generated the material universe and keeps the souls trapped in physical bodies, imprisoned in the world full of pain and suffering that he created.

However, not all Gnostic movements regarded the creator of the material universe as inherently evil or malevolent. For instance, Valentinians believed that the Demiurge is merely an ignorant and incompetent creator, trying to fashion the world as good as he can, but lacking the proper power to maintain its goodness. All Gnostics were regarded as heretics by the proto-orthodox Early Church Fathers.

Islam

In Islam, it is believed that Adam () and Eve () were misled by Iblīs (otherwise referred to as , ), who tempted them with the promise of immortality and a kingdom that never decays, saying: "Your Lord only forbade you this tree, lest ye should become angels or such beings as live forever". Adam and Eve had been previously warned of Shayṭān's scheming against them, and had been commanded by God to avoid the tree of knowledge that Shayṭān referred to. Although God had reminded them that there was enough provision for them "not to go hungry nor to go naked, nor to suffer from thirst, nor from the sun's heat", they ultimately gave in to Shayṭān's temptation and partook of the tree anyway. Following this sin, their "nakedness appeared to them: they began to sew together, for their covering, leaves from the Garden", and were subsequently sent down from Paradise () onto the Earth with "enmity one to another". However, God also gave them the assurance that "when there come unto you from Me a guidance, then whoso followeth My guidance, he will not go astray nor come to grief."

Muslim scholars can be divided into two groups regarding the reason behind Adam's fall: the first point of view argues that Adam sinned out of his own free will, and only became a prophet later, after he was cast out of paradise and asked for forgiveness. They adhere to the doctrine according to which infallibility ('iṣmah) only applies to prophets after they were sent to a mission. According to the second point of view, Adam was predestined by God's will to eat from the forbidden tree, because God planned to set Adam and his progeny on Earth from the beginning and thus installed Adam's fall. For this reason, many Muslim exegetes do not regard Adam and Eve's expulsion from paradise as a punishment for disobedience or a result from abused free will on their part, but rather as part of God's wisdom (ḥikmah) and plan for humanity to experience the full range of his attributes, his love, forgiveness, and power to his creation. By their former abode in paradise, they can hope for return during their lifetime. Unlike Iblīs (al-Shayṭān), Adam asked for forgiveness for his transgression, despite God being the ultimate cause of his Fall. For that reason, God bestowed mercy upon Adam and his children. Some Muslim scholars view Adam as an image for his descendants: humans sin, become aware of it, repent for their transgressions (tawba), and return back to God. According to this interpretation, Adam embodies humanity and his Fall shows humans how to act whenever they sin.

Within the Shīʿīte branch of Islam, Muslim followers of the Alawite sect believe that their souls were once luminous stars worshipping ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib in a world of light, but that upon committing sins of pride they were banished from their former state and forced to transmigrate in the world of matter.

Zoroastrianism
In classic Zoroastrianism, humanity is created to withstand the forces of decay and destruction through good thoughts, words and deeds. Failure to do so actively leads to misery for the individual and for his family. This is also the moral of many of the stories of the Shahnameh, the key text of Persian mythology.

Literature and art

In William Shakespeare's Henry V (1599), the King describes the betrayal of Lord Scroop – a friend since childhood – as being "like another fall of man", referring to the loss of his own faith and innocence the treason has caused.

In the novel Perelandra (1943) by C. S. Lewis, the theme of the fall is explored in the context of a new Garden of Eden with a new, green-skinned Adam and Eve on the planet Venus, and with the protagonist  the Cambridge scholar Dr. Ransom  transported there and given the mission of thwarting Satan and preventing a new fall.

In the novel The Fall (1956) by Albert Camus, the theme of the fall is enunciated through the first-person account given in post-war Amsterdam, in a bar called "Mexico City." Confessing to an acquaintance, the protagonist, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, describes the haunting consequence of his refusal to rescue a woman who had jumped from a bridge to her death. The dilemmas of modern Western conscience and the sacramental themes of baptism and grace are explored.

J. R. R. Tolkien included as a note to his comments about the Dialogue of Finrod and Andreth (published posthumously in 1993) the Tale of Adanel that is a reimagining of the fall of man inside his Middle-earth's mythos. The story presented Melkor seducing the first Men by making them worship him instead of Eru Ilúvatar, leading to the loss of the "Edenic" condition of the human race. The story is part of Morgoth's Ring.

In both Daniel Quinn's Ishmael (1992) and The Story of B (1996) novels, it is proposed that the story of the fall of man was first thought up by another culture watching the development of the now-dominant totalitarian agriculturalist culture.

In Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials series (1995, 1997, 2000), the fall is presented in a positive light, as it is the moment at which human beings achieve self-awareness, knowledge, and freedom. Pullman believes that it is not worth being innocent if the price is ignorance.

The novel Lord of the Flies explores the fall of man. The storyline depicts young, innocent children who turn into savages when they are stranded on a desert island. Lord of the Flies was originally named Strangers from Within, also showing his views of human nature.

The theme is also frequently depicted in historical European art. Lucas van Leyden, a Dutch engraver and painter during the Renaissance period, created several different woodcuts featuring Adam and Eve (two were part of his Power of Women series).

See also

 Book of the Heavenly Cow
 Deal with the Devil
 Ningishzida
 Paradise Lost by John Milton

References

Bibliography

Further reading
 Beynen, G. Koolemans, Animal Language in the Garden of Eden: Folktale Elements in Genesis in Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural World, Roy G. Willis, ed., (London: Routledge, 1994), 39–50.
 Thompson, William Irwin, The Time Falling Bodies Take to Light: Mythology, Sexuality and the Origins of Culture, 1981, 2001

External links

 The Fall, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Martin Palmer, Griselda Pollock & John Carey (In Our Time, Apr. 8, 2004)

Bereshit (parashah)
Biblical phrases
Book of Genesis
Christian mythology
Christian terminology
Christian theology of the Bible
Garden of Eden
Gnosticism
Islamic mythology
Jewish mythology
Judeo-Christian topics
Mormon cosmology
Religious concepts related with Adam and Eve
Systematic theology

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


CHICAGO – TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR, the official tee time site of the PGA TOUR, today announced the elimination of booking fees. Now golfers can book tee times without a booking fee on TeeOff.com, the TeeOff.com mobile app or 24/7 via the TeeOff.com reservation center.
The fastest growing tee time reservation site in golf, TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR launched in 2013 with a commitment to making it easier for golfers to book their next round.
With booking fees topping $3 on some online sites ($12 per foursome), the incremental expense made online booking cost prohibitive for many golfers. TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR first debuted the No Booking Fees promotion in its app in November 2016. Today, TeeOff.com is extending the No Booking Fee convenience to all TeeOff.com platforms – online, on app, on the phone.
"Whether you book one round or every round on TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR, your booking fee will be free," Cohen said.
Offering half a million tee times and deals golfers won't find anywhere else, TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR wants to make it easier for anyone to play. Operated by golf technology leader EZLinks Golf, a PGA TOUR affiliated company, TeeOff.com by PGA TOUR is the only tee time reservation site to bear the PGA TOUR mark.
For more information or to book your next tee time, visit www.teeoff.com.


text:
Q: QML: Change cursor color in TextField How to change cursor color and probably width in QML TextField element? Let say we have following one:
import QtQuick 2.12
import QtQuick.Controls 2.12

TextField {
    id: control
    placeholderText: qsTr("Enter description")

    background: Rectangle {
        implicitWidth: 200
        implicitHeight: 40
        color: control.enabled ? "transparent" : "#353637"
        border.color: control.enabled ? "#21be2b" : "transparent"
    }
}

How to make cursor color green or blue or whatever? Thanks!

A: @eyllanesc provides a very good answer, but I want to point that the blinking behavior will not be preserved when you define a custom cursorDelegate.
If you want to have the blinking of the cursor. It can be done using an animation:
import QtQuick 2.12
import QtQuick.Controls 2.12

TextField {
    id: control
    placeholderText: qsTr("Enter description")

    background: Rectangle {
        implicitWidth: 200
        implicitHeight: 40
        color: control.enabled ? "transparent" : "#353637"
        border.color: control.enabled ? "#21be2b" : "transparent"
    }

    cursorDelegate: Rectangle {
        id: cursor
        visible: false
        color: "salmon"
        width: control.cursorRectangle.width

        SequentialAnimation {
            loops: Animation.Infinite
            running: control.cursorVisible

            PropertyAction {
                target: cursor
                property: 'visible'
                value: true
            }

            PauseAnimation {
                duration: 600
            }

            PropertyAction {
                target: cursor
                property: 'visible'
                value: false
            }

            PauseAnimation {
                duration: 600
            }

            onStopped: {
                cursor.visible = false
            }
        }
    }
}

A: You have to set Rectangle with the color you want as the cursor through the cursorDelegate since TextField inherits from TextInput and therefore shares that property.
import QtQuick 2.12
import QtQuick.Controls 2.12

TextField {
    id: control
    placeholderText: qsTr("Enter description")
    cursorDelegate: Rectangle {
        visible: control.cursorVisible
        color: "salmon"
        width: control.cursorRectangle.width
    }
    background: Rectangle {
        implicitWidth: 200
        implicitHeight: 40
        color: control.enabled ? "transparent" : "#353637"
        border.color: control.enabled ? "#21be2b" : "transparent"
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Healing body, mind and spirit.
We believe every health care journey begins with a dedication to healing body, mind and spirit. Our faith-based mission and approach to holistic health is essential to a person's overall wellness. We respect and abide by the unique spiritual needs of everyone who chooses St. Rose Health Center, regardless of faith or belief.
The chaplains at St. Rose bring all the resources of spiritual and pastoral care to help our patients, their families and friends better cope with the challenges of illness or injury. Our chaplains are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide spiritual guidance through prayer, ritual, sacrament, or help our patients connect to their religious communities of choice. Patients, their family members or friends can request a visit from a chaplain. To contact a member of our spiritual care or pastoral care team, please call Golden Belt Home Health & Hospice at 620-792-8171.


text:
Knute Hill (July 31, 1876 – December 3, 1963) was a U.S. Representative from the state of Washington. He was known by the nickname "the Little Giant".

Background
Born on a farm near Creston, Illinois to Norwegian immigrant parents, Hill moved to De Forest, Wisconsin in 1877 and later to Red Wing, Minnesota in 1889. He attended both Red Wing Seminary and the University of Minnesota at Minneapolis. He graduated from the law department of the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 1906. He was admitted to the bar the same year and practiced law in Milwaukee and Eau Claire, Wisconsin from 1908 to 1910. He moved to Prosser, Washington in 1911. He taught in the public and high schools of Benton County, Washington from 1911 to 1922. He also engaged in agricultural pursuits and was a founding member of the Washington State Grange.

Political career
Running as a Farmer-Labor Party candidate in 1924 Hill unsuccessfully contested the 4th congressional district seat in Washington. He received over 13 percent of the votes cast.

Hill served as a member of the Washington State House of Representatives from 1927 until 1933. Hill was elected as a Democrat to the Seventy-third and to the four succeeding Congresses. He represented the State of Washington's 4th congressional district from March 4, 1933 – January 3, 1943. He was an unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1942 to the Seventy-eighth Congress.

Hill was Superintendent of the Uintah-Ouray Indian agency at Fort Duchesne, Utah from 1943 until his resignation on March 31, 1944. Hill was a radio commentator in Spokane, Washington from 1944 to 1946. He was an unsuccessful Independent Progressive candidate for election in 1946 to the Eightieth Congress. Hill served as a consulting appraiser and information clerk in the Bureau of Reclamation, Columbia Basin Project, Ephrata, Washington, from March 1949 until his retirement in 1951.

Later years
Knute Hill died of a heart attack in his cabin in Desert Hot Springs, California. He was interred in the Terrace Heights Memorial Park, in Yakima, Washington. Records and papers associated with his political career are maintained at the Washington State University in Pullman, Washington.

References

External links

 Washington State University Libraries
 Knute Hill register of papers in the Washington State University Library

1876 births
1963 deaths
American people of Norwegian descent
People from Ogle County, Illinois
People from Desert Hot Springs, California
University of Minnesota alumni
University of Wisconsin Law School alumni
Democratic Party members of the United States House of Representatives from Washington (state)
People from DeForest, Wisconsin
People from Red Wing, Minnesota
People from Prosser, Washington
Democratic Party members of the Washington House of Representatives


Wonder if Bo knew that his lasting impact on sports would give way to some of the best colorways and models of 09? Well if he didn't he is sure to find out once he strolls into a store to see these Medicine Ball flavored Air Trainer III's. Mr Jackson himself popularized the colorway and now its making its way to retailers around the country. Its on select shelves as we speak and the good people over at best place for auto loan have 12 pairs in stock. You know what to do.


BGC Masters Day 7: Neil Robertson will meet Shaun Murphy, who defeated John Higgins in the Final after beating Judd Trump in the semi-finals.
Robertson and Trump played twice last year both on BBC events but unfortunately Robertson lost both matches, World Championship first round and UK Championship semi-finals. The Bristol 22-year-old indeed wanted to win for the third time but Robertson stroke him this time with a 6-3 victory.
The former World Champion built his advantage early in the match, winning the first two frames before Trump pulled one back. The first game was a safety battle which The Aussie found his way to tighten Trump's attacking way of playing. Robertson made 100 to lead 2-0 but Trump replied a 76. Robertson did not hesitate in the last frame before mid interval, a break of 89 put him 3-1 ahead in the interval.
Frame 5 ended in a dramatic way. The players did not hold their nerve to score well with good chances, Trump looked like he could pull another back to trail 2-3. The crucial moment came - Trump missed the straight forward frame ball blue which left Robertson over the pocket. Robertson cleared up and winning the next to lead 5-1.
Thunder from Down Under got a decent chance to wrap up the match but missed on 24 which allowed Trump to take the frame and the next one with 95, reducing the gap to two frames only. Once again first chance is in Trump's hand but he did not hold it, run of 69 from Robertson to win 6-3, putting himself in the final. The Australian punched the air and shouted 'Come on' after potting the match ball.
"I'm over the moon to be in the final. I was at my club last night until 11pm sorting out my tip. I'm really pleased with how the tip bedded in today.'' Robertson had a shout out on Trump's mates, "He had a couple of mates in the crowd, they are probably nice lads. But I didn't really like that they said hello to me before the match and then they were screaming for the white to go in on my shot, or when he fluked a ball they were saying 'Good shot Judd.' They can clap, they can scream his name, but when it's unfortunate incidents I don't really think it's sporting."
Seems that they are not happy with each other!
Shaun Murphy will play in his first Masters final too. He defeated John Higgins by 6-4 despite being 3-0 up. The Magician stormed to take the first three frames in 30 minutes with runs of 101 and 86 in the first two, clearance of 69 recovering from 0-62 down in the third frame. Higgins won the fourth frame to drag 1-3 at the interval.
The Wizard of Wishaw pulled another one back right after the interval but Murphy produced 122 to regain two-cushion advantage. The Scotsman made 59 to take the next frame but Murphy fired his third ton in the match, 100 to go 5-3 up. 72 allowed Higgins to hold his stance in the match. Murphy's 55 in the following frame was not enough to win the match, Higgins missed the final pink to drag into a decider. Murphy took this simple pot to win 6-4.


text:
layout: project
lab: [koeln] #needed for Aggregation on Lab-Page
imgname: koeln/opennoisemap.png
title: OpenNoise Map
status: Abgeschlossen, tägliche Datenaktualisierung

links:
- url: https://openmaps.online/noise
  name: Webseite
- url: https://github.com/codeforcologne/OpenNoiseMap
  name: Code

collaborators:
- name: Martin Over

tags:
- Umwelt

---
Mit dieser Web-Karte lassen sich tägliche Überschreitungswerte des maximal gemessenen Schalldruckes aus den Daten der Sensor Community interaktiv darstellen.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
Duncan research files of
Mary Ann (Duncan) Dobson
the Genealogy Bug
Last revised June 23, 2010
PULASKI CO. AR
Formed 1818 from Arkansas
Crawford formed 1820 from Pulaski
Conway formed 1825 from Pulaski
Jefferson formed 1829 from Arkansas, Pulaski
Scott formed 1833 from Pulaski, Crawford, Pope
Saline formed 1835 from Pulaski, Hempstead
White formed 1835 from Pulaski, Jackson
Prairie formed 1846 from Pulaski
Faulkner formed 1873 from Pulaski, Conway
Lonoke formed 1873 from Pulaski, Prairie
1830 Pulaski Co. AR Census (& from Lorna LaFave 4/17/1983)
Pg.244  William Duncan    0000,1000,01 - 0000,1000,01
(MAD: James Duncan on 1829 tax list in Pulaski Co. AR)
(MAD: one Peter C. Williams mar. Miss Nancy Duncan 10/9/1828)
1840 Pulaski Co. AR Census
Pg.105  James Duncan      1101,1001    - 0010,1
1850 Pulaski Co. AR Census (also from Lorna LaFave 8/1983)
Fourche Twp.
Pg.322, #111-111, Wm. DUNCAN 58 VA farmer $500
Rachel 50 NC
Thos. J. 30, James F. 28 AL
Winney J. 17 TN
Ann E. 11 AR
Saml. P. 17 MS
Chas. WEILBLUR 35 GERM carpenter
(MAD: 1840 Saline Co. AR census; Wm. & Rachel & James F. in 1860 Jefferson Co. AR census; one Ann L. Duncan mar. James W. Walls 11/2/1856 Jefferson Co. AR; one Thomas J. Duncan mar. Maria Bullen 8/15/1853 Saline Co. AR, 1860 Saline Co. AR census as age 30 b.TN; children also said to include Littleton L. Duncan on 1850 Saline Co. AR census)
Eagle Twp.
Pg.325, #151-151, Elizabeth LEFEVRE 41 SC & children
Pg.325, #155-155, John B. LEFEVRE 40 AR farmer $1000
Louisa Q. 14, Nicholas W. 7 AR
Matilda H. 6, William 4 AR
(MAD: looking for Battise Lafavre age 42 said to have mar. Elizabeth Duncan age 38 on 8/21/1851)
Pg.325, #156-156, Acare LEFEVRE (m) 44 AR farmer $4500
Mary F. 35 VA
Ambrose L. 17 AR & younger
Pg.325, #159-159, F.G. LEFEVRE (m) 51 AR farmer $3000
Mary 48 AR
John C. 20 AR & younger
Pg.326, #161-161, Peter LEFEVRE 25 AR & family
Pg.328, #193-193, Leon LEFEVRE 40 AR farmer $3000 (alone)
Little Rock City
Pg.361, #670, Chas. D. DUNCAN 23 OH engineer on steamboat
(MAD: Charles Duncan age 24 mar. Elmira Long age 17 on 4/9/1851; Elmyra Duncan mar. William A. Counts 11/22/1857)
Bayou Metor Twp.
Pg.367, #750-757, Jackson DUNCAN 25 TN farmer
Eliza 17 GA
Sarah E. 1 AR
(MAD: Jackson Duncan mar. Luiza McCraw 2/23/1847)
Pg.368, #756-765, James DUNCAN 60 NC farmer
Sophia 35 TN
George 13 MS
Missouri F. (f) 5, James H. 1 AL
City of Little Rock
Pg.25, #357, (blank) DUNKIN (m) 25 SCT common laborer
w/other laborers
Gray Twp.
Pg.84, #84-43, John B. LAFEVRE 50 AR farmer $500-$500
Sarah A. 33 AL housewife
Matilda F. 18 AR
William K. 15 AR farmhand
Ruth A. GUNIGAN? 31 AL
Francis (m) 10 AL
John KITCHEN 22 GA farmhand
Platte Twp.
Pg.124, #353-22, James DUNCAN 36 ENG laborer
w/others
Plant Twp.
Pg.145, #475-31, Jackson DUNCAN 40 SC farmer $1000-$800
Louisa 37 SC
Sarah 13, Cansida (f) 10, Malinda 7 AR
James 4, William 11/12 AR
Big Rock Twp. N4R (Lefere families from page by page)
Pg.159, #562-50 Leon LEFERE (m) 52 AR farmer $12,000-$20,000 (alone)
Pg.159, #563-51 Amber L. LEFERE (m) 18 AR farmer $8,000-$6,500 (alone)
Pg.159, #571-59 Ambros L. LEFERE (m) 26 & family
Pg.159, #574-62 William B. LEFERE 24 AR & wife
Pg.159, #580-68 Francis G. LEFERE 65 AR, Mary 55 SC & others
Union Twp.
Pg.186, #164-144, Margaret HALLIBURTON? 50 TN housewife $1600-2000
David 10, Annie 13 AR
L.F. DUNCAN (f) 23 TN seamstress
Lizzie COLE 7? AR
Z?.T DUNCAN (m) 4 AR (first letter of name written over)
Willie (m) 4/12 AR
(MAD: one Lucinda F. Dunkin age 22 mar. George F. Thompson age 22 on 2/27/1861; see Thos. & Wm. Duncan in 1870 Franklin Par. LA census with Maggie Halliberton)
Campbell Twp.
Pg.206, #301-270, L.L. DUNCAN (m) 39 TN farmer $2000-$350
Thomas Jefferson (Duncan) 18 AR
James N. 15, Zacharia H.F. (m) 12 AR
Saml. Lane (m) 10, Harvy C. 8 AR
Rosenia Arkansas Josephine (f) 6 AR
(MAD: Littleton L. Duncan; 1850 Saline Co. AR census; Martha E. Duncan 35 TN d. 1/1860 per Mortality Schedule; L.L. Duncan age 41 mar. Adaline Downs age 17 on 2/27/1861)
Ashley Twp.
Pg.24, #390-403, WILLIAMS, Charles 43 IL farm lab. $175-$0, mar. in Dec.
Julia 20 IL keeping house, mar. in Dec.
Mary A. 9 AR
DUNCAN, Hariet? (Haust?) (f) 4 IL
ALLERD, Missouri W. (f) 3/12 AR b.March
Bayou Meto Twp.
Pg.30, #30-31, SALIS, Thomas 30 MS farmer $400-$200
Elizabeth 27 AL at home
Monroe (m) 7, Logan (m) 5 AR
John 3, Henry 1 AR
DUNCAN, Tenniss ("m") 14 AR asst. K.H.
(MAD: indexed "Timmes" Duncan)
Big Rock Twp.
Pg.43, #118-132, DUNCAN, Daniel 36 AL farmer $3000-$400
Sarah 31 TN keeps house $1000-$0
Alexander 10, Tennie (f) 8 AR
Mary 7, Lewis (m) 4 AR
Pg.55, #281-304, GAMBELL, Joseph 45 MO BLACK farm laborer $0-$0
Mary 55 KY BLACK
Jane 28 TN BLACK
Amas (m) 30 TN BLACK
William 18 TN BLACK
Mary 25 TN BLACK
DUNCAN, Sophia 6 AR BLACK
Lucy 1 AR BLACK
Pg.75, #580-610, DUNCAN, Alfred 45 VA BLACK farm laborer $0-$0
Caroline 40 MD MULATTO keeps house
Edward 16, Gay (m) 13 AR MULATTOS work on farm
Henry 10 AR MULATTO
Pg.92, #108-109, DUNCAN, Lytle (m) 59 TN farmer $800-$250
Malilda P. (f) 24 MS keeping house
Harvey (m) 16 AR at home
Josaphine (f) 15 AR keeping house
Martha A?. 7 AR at home
Pg.93, #125-126, DUNCAN, Thomas 24 AR farmer $0-$400
Rona M. (f) 25 AL keeping house
Mary K. 5, Richard M. 3 AR
(MAD: not Rosa M.)
Pg.94, #135-136, DUNCAN, Henry 21 AR (whites) farm lab. $0-$0
Lila 22 TX keeping house
John C. 10/12 AR b.Oct.
(MAD: Henry T. Duncan age 20 mar. Delila Mills age 23 12/15/1868; his full name was Zachariah Moderee Lytle Taylor Henry Clay Duncan from info of Jim Porter 10/2002; H.C. Duncan age 35 mar. Annie A. Carpenter age 23 12/4/1884; R. Anna (Martin) Carpenter, per Jim Porter 10/2002)
Pg.95, #159-159, DUNCAN, Henry 36 NC BLACK farm lab. $0-$0
Nancy 27 SC BLACK keeping house
Mary M. 8/12 AR BLACK b.Dec.
(MAD: one Henry Duncan age 40 mar. Nancy Duncan age 35 on 12/11/1868)
Caroline Twp.
Pg.109, #83-83, DUNCAN, H.W. (m) 36 TN farmer $250-$167
Nancy 18 MS k.house
Henry W. 4 TN
Pg.110, #100-100, DUNCAN, W.B. (m) 45 KY farmer $1400-$829
Jane R. 38 TN k.h.
Amanda 18 TN k.h.
William 16 TN farm L.
Mary F. 14 TN
Sarah G. 12 AR
Cordelia (f) 6, Chas. H. 3 AR
Josephine (f) 8/12 AR b.Nov.
(MAD: William Duncan, 1860 Prairie Co. AR census)
Pg.136, #466-501, ALDERSON, Wm. 59 KY farmer $400-$368
Rhoda 55 TN k.h.
Columbus (m) 16 MS farm L.
Alice 10 AR at home
DUNCAN, James D. 19 AR farm L.
John 10 AR farm L.
(MAD: ages as given; ???? children of Little L. Duncan)
Pg.136, #467-502, DOUGLASS, John 56 SC farmer $250-$100
G.H.D. (m) 33 SC farmer
America (f) 18 AR k.h.
DUNCAN, A.H. (m) 17 AR farm L.
(MAD: A.H. Duncan age 22 mar. Jane Braden age 16 on 12/23/1877)
Little Rock, Ward 3
Pg.273, #21-26, COUNTS, William A. 34 AR clerk in hardware store $0-$300
Elmyra R. 34 TN keeps house
Andrew A. 8, Maude (f) 3 AR
Pg.273, #21-27, DUNCAN, Elmyra (f) 17 AR seamstress
Chas. D. 1 AR
Pg.336, #374-389, DUNSCOMB, Leander S. (m) 43 NY surveyor
& school teacher $500-$300
Bettie 25 VA keeps house
Finley S. (m) 8, Grant S. (m) 3 AR
Eddie B. (m) 1 AR
Pg.353, #557-707, HOWELL, Isaac 40 KY BLACK teamster $0-$100
Elizabeth 35 KY BLACK keeps house
DUNKINS, George 34 KY BLACK "no occupation," blind
CARY, Major (m) 17 MS BLACK porter in store
GORDON, David 15 AR MULATTO porter in office
JONES, Sallie 26 KY BLACK keeps house
JORDON, Chas. T. 45 NC (white) lawyer $2000-$5000
McMANNUS, Michael 25 IRE tailor, parents of foreign birth
MARTIN, John R. 32 IRE no occupation, parents of foreign birth
Pg.384, #39-39, DUNCAN, Jackson 52 TN farmer $0-$750
Louisa 39 GA keeping house
Sarah E. 22, Mary 19 AR keeping house
Malinda 15, Jimmie (m) 13 AR
William 11 AR at home
Luella (f) 8 AR
Josephine (f) 2, Albert 2 AR
(MAD: ages as given, does not say twins; ?? one Sarah E. Dunkin age 18 had license to marry Thomas C. Mabry age 18 on 9/22/1867)
1910 Census, Big Rock Twp., Pulaski County, Arkansas (from Kathy D. Cawley 12/2007)
S.D.# 5, E.D.# 104, Page# 80B
Magnolia Row
DUNCAN,
William A., Head, age 27, M1X, 7 yrs., MO./IL./MO., laborer/lumber mill
Sarah, Wife, age 28, M1X, 5 chi. born, 2 living, MO./IL./N.C.
Frankie, Daughter, age 2, AR./MO./MO.
(not named yet), Son, age 3/12, AR./MO./MO.
HARRIS, Susan, Sister-in-law, age 17, MO./IL./N.C.
4009 West 27th
William A., Head, rents, age 37, MO./IL./MO., carpenter/house
Sarah, Wife, age 38, MO./IL./S.C.
Frankie, Daughter, age 12, attends school, AR./MO./MO.
Archie, Son, age 9, attends school, AR./MO./MO.
BUELL, Willie, Brother-in-law, age 40, W'd., IL./IL./IL., plasterer/working out
BUELL, Wayne, Nephew, age 8, attends school, AR./IL./MO.
ESTATE RECORDS
Pulaski Co. AR Probate Records (from Lorna LaFave 9/1983)
7 June 1859?, Petition for appointment of guardianship by Lytle L. Duncan for his children under 14 -- James N., Zachary T.M.H.C. Duncan, Samuel Lane Duncan, Harvey C. Duncan, Madena A.G. Duncan for interest in the estate of the late Wm. Crockett, Sen. dec., as grandchildren being entitled to 1/4 of the estate.
12 Apr. 1866 (filing date), L.L. Duncan petition to the court as guardian of his minor children, Thomas J., James J., Henry, Samuel L., Harvey Cornell, and Josephine to sell 1/3 interest in land in Jefferson Co. The land inherited by the children from an uncle -- 1/3 share -- the other shares to a brother (of the uncle) Wm. Crockett, and sister Elizabeth Canada. All wish to sell the land.
1903 & 1905, Probate records of James Thomas Duncan, d. intestate and unmarried at Little Rock 27 July 1903. Est. of $17,695.46 distributed among relatives in Scotland who were named. He apparently was born between 1845 and 1850, and in Scotland.
Pulaski Co. AR Probate Books (FHL film 1,302,564; and from Lorna LaFave 9/1983)
D-41: April term 1857, 14th April; in the Estate of Charles D. Duncan, decd; this day comes Elmyra R. (plain) Duncan, administratrix of the estate of Charles D. Duncan, decd, by attorney and files her report as adm. of said estate.
? June? 1855, Application for adm. of the estate of Charles D. Duncan, who d. in Desha Co. ? on or about 8 Oct. 1854, leaving no will, the heirs being Elmyra R. Duncan and Charles D. Duncan. Appl. by Elmira R. Duncan.
24 July 1855, Petition for sale of land by Elmyra R. Duncan in the matter of the est. of Charles D. Duncan, late of Pulaski Co., dec'd, being SE 1/4 of Sec. 17, 2S-11W, in Pulaski Co.
Pulaski Co. Chancery Court Record (from Lorna LaFave 11/1983)
1884, Sept. term. Eliza Williford, plaintiff against ? Williford, as administrator, of J.H. Olmstead, deceased, Jennie Duncan, wife of William Duncan, Viola Thrasher, wife of Frank Thrasher, Elmira Hayworth, wife of Thomas Hayworth, Emma Davis, Frank Olmstead, Paulina Olmstead, William Duncan, Frank Thrasher, Thomas Hayworth, James Hayworth, and James Davis, defendants -- that H.J. Olmstead purchased the land SW 1/4 of 30-4N-112 (sic), 160 acres --- with the personal and separate funds of plaintiff and took deed in his name and held said lands as trustee for plaintiff and died without executing said trust ----.
Pulaski Co. AR Tax Records (from Lorna LaFave 9/1983)
1833 James Duncan, 1 horse, 1 cattle
1835 William Dunkin
1838 William Duskin (This may not be Duncan)
1841 James Dungan, NE 26 2N 12W 160 acres (1830-1841) 160 acres
1845 James Duncan
1846 Thomas J. Duncan
James Duncan, 2 horses, 7 cattle
1847 William Duncan, SW NE 28 2S 12W 40 acres, 3 horses, 10 cattle
Thomas J. Duncan, 1 horse
James Duncan, 1 horse
Jackson Duncan, 2 cattle
1848 Jackson Duncan, 1 horse, 1 cattle
James Duncan, 3 horse, 5 cattle
William Duncan, 3 horse, 10 cattle
Thomas Duncan
James Duncan
I. Duncan, 2 horse, 7 cattle (could be "J" Duncan)
Thomas Duncan, SW NW 2S 12W 40 acres, 3 horses, 15 cattle
William Duncan
Bureau of Land Management, General Land Office Automated Records Project. Little Rock [Pulaski Co.], AR Land Office, Act/Treaty of April 24, 1820, Entry Classification: Sale - Cash Entries
Name, Acres, Date land document signed
Duncan, Charles D, 40 acres, Mar 01 1855
Duncan, James F, 160 acres, Mar 01 1860
Duncan, James F, 120 acres, Jun 01 1859
Duncan, Littleton L, 120 acres, Jun 01 1859
Duncan, Lytle L, 181.89 acres, Mar 01 1860
Duncan, Thomas C, 280.56 acres, Mar 01 1860
Duncan, Thomas C, 40 acres, Mar 01 1860
Duncan, Thomas C, 40 acres, Apr 01 1861
Duncan, Thomas J, 120 acres, Oct 01 1860
Duncan, Thomas J, 80 acres, Jun 01 1859
Duncan, Thomas J, 80 acres, Mar 01 1860
Duncan, William, 40 acres, Aug 02 1838
Duncan, William B, 80 acres, Nov 01 1833
Little Rock [Pulaski Co.], AR Land Office, Act/Treaty of May 20, 1862, Entry Classification: Homestead Entry Orig.
Duncan, Chittenden L, 80 acres, Oct 30 1877 (MAD: see Van Buren Co. AR)
Bureau of Land Management, General Land Office Automated Records Project. Batesville [Independence Co.], AR, Land Office, Act/Treaty of April 24, 1820, Entry Classification: Sale - Cash Entries
Name, Acres, Date land document signed (MAD: see Independence Co. for complete list)
Duncan, Stephen, 640 acres, Oct 01 1839 (MAD: Pulaski Co. AR & Adams Co. MS)
Pulaski Co. AR Deed index, grantors, DO-F, 1819-1906 (FHL film 1,302,636; Placerville FHC 4/22/2008 on loan; pg.571+; MAD: have reformatted to put deed book & page first; did not copy Dunscomb or Dungan)
Z-385: Duncan, Charles D. to Applegate, Joseph, Mch. 24, 1856, filed Aug. 16, 1856, Admr. Deed, Z-385, SE part Sec.17 T2N R11W
E3-403: Duncan, Delilah et al to Bridges, Giles, Dec. 6, 1875, filed Dec. 8, 1875, W.D., book E-3, pg.403, part SW Sec.25, SE Sec.26, T2S R11W
Z-384: Duncan, Elmyra R. to Applegate, Joseph, Mch 27, 1856, filed Aug. 16, 1856, Rel of D, Z-384, SE part Sec.17 T2N R11W
R2-614: Duncan, Emily R. to Wassell, John, Mch. 6, 1857, filed Mch 9, 1857, QC L, R2-614, SE part Sec.26 T5N R9W
E3-403: Duncan, Henry et al to Bridges, Giles, Dec. 6, 1875, filed Dec. 8, 1875, W.D., E3-403, part SW 25 and SE 26 T2S R11W
34-95: Duncan, H.K. & wf. to Barnes, Mary Ann, Jany 22, 1891, filed March 21, 1891, W.D., #7382(?), 34-95, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.31 T1N R11W
C2-1: Duncan, J.F. to Crockett, William, Jan. 5, 1857, filed Dec. 1, 1858, W.D., C2-1, SW SE Sec.25, T2S R12W
8-125: Duncan, John C. & wf. to Crawford, John, Mch. 27, 1879, filed Jan. 4, 1883, S.W.D., 8-125, und. 1/3 E fr 2, NW (1/4) Sec.14, T1N R12W
11-454: Duncan, Jennie et al to Williford, Eliza, Oct. 14, 1884, filed Oct. 29, 1884, Decree, 11-454, SW & W 1/2 NW (1/4) Sec.30 and W 1/2 Sec.29 T4N R11W
C2-2: Duncan, Littleton L. & wf. to Crockett, William, Feb. 13, 1858, filed Dec. 1, 1858, W.D., C2-2, S 1/2 NW (1/4) and NE SW (1/4) Sec.22 T2S R12W
C2-4: Duncan, Lytle to Crockett, William, Feb. 13, 1858, filed Dec. 1, 1858, W.D., C2-4, NW pt. Sec.30 T2S R11W
34-95: Duncan, Elizabeth & husb. to Barnes, Mary Ann, Jany. 22, 1891, filed March 21, 1891, W.D., #7382, 34-95, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.31 T1N R11W
W-260: Dunkin, R.L. to Brownlee, James, (MAD: date blank), filed Apr. 27, 1849, Assgn, W-260, Int. in lease
AN-47: Duncan, Thomas J. & wf to Jay, John W., Jan. 19, 1863, filed Feb. 3, 1865, W.D., Book AN, pg.47, NW NW & SW SW & E 1/2 NW & NE? SW & SW NW & NW NW (1/4) Sec.26 T2S R13W "& others."
R2-158: Duncan, William & wf. to Hann, Isaac, Feb. 9, 1857, filed Mch 6, 1857, W.D., book R2 pg.158, SW NW (1/4) Sec.28 T2S R12W
11-454: Duncan, William et al to Williford, Eliza, Oct. 14, 1884, filed Oct. 29, 1884, decree, 11-454, SW (1/4) & W 1/2 NW (1/4) Sec.30 and W 1/2 Sec.29 T4N R11W
1903 not copied
Pulaski Co. AR Deed index, grantees, DO-F, 1819-1906 (FHL film 1,302,646 part 4; Placerville FHC 4/22/2008 on loan; pg.571+; MAD: have reformatted to put deed book & page first; did not copy Dunscomb or Dungan)
Z-281: Duncan, Elmyra from Dotter, Marcus & wf, Oct. 27, 1856, filed April 30, 1856, W.D., Z-281, lots 7 & 8, Block 82, Little Rock
R2-616: Duncan, Ellmira R. from Arkansas State of, June 2, 1851, filed March 9, 1851, "Don" (MAD: donation land?), R2-616, SE pt. Sec.26 T5N R9W
X-54: Duncan, James F. from Ross, John M. & wf, Dec. 23, 1852, May 5, 1853, W.D., X-54, part NW (1/4) NW (1/4) Sec.26 and SE (1/4) SW (1/4) Sec.22 T2S R12W
76-277: Duncan, James H. from St.L. M.&S. Ry. Co., Oct. 13, 1882, filed Nov. 10, 1903, D, #1312, rec. book 76 pg.277, part S 1/2 NW 1/4 Sec.18 T4N R10W
MAD: similar deeds in 1890, 76-282, and in 1899, 76-284, not copied
C2-8: Duncan, Martha from Crocket, William, Aug. 4, 1858, rec. Dec. 1, 1858, W.D., C2-8, NW part Sec.30 T2S R11W
MAD: did not copy Leander Dunscomb or other Dunscombs
34-97: Duncan, Lizzie et al from Arkansas State of, Jan. 22, 1891, filed Mch 21, 1891, B? Tax D, #1383, 34-97, part of SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.31 T1N R11W
AN-44: Duncan, Thos. J. from United States, Oct. 11, 1854, filed Feb. 3, 1865, Recpt., AN-44, SE (1/4) NE (1/4) Sec.27 T2S R13W
AN-44: Duncan, Thos. J. from United States, June 1, 1859, filed Feb. 3, 1865, Patent, AN-44, NW (1/4) NW (1/4) & SW (1/4) SW (1/4) Sec.26 T2S R13W
AN-45: Duncan, Thos. J. from United States, March 1, 1860, filed Feb. 3, 1865, Patent, AN-45, SW (1/4) NW (1/4) & NW (1/4) SW (1/4) Sec.26 T2S R13W
AN-46: Duncan, Thos. J. from United States, Oct 1, 1860, filed Feb. 3, 1865, Patent, AN-46, E 1/2 NW (1/4) & NE (1/4) SW (1/4) Sec.26 T2S R13W
G2-263: Duncan, William B. from McCollum, W.J. & wf, Dec. 9, 1858, filed Feb. 1, 1861, W.D., G2-263, NW part Sec.2 T4N R8W
30-66: Duncan, W.R.R. from Roots, P.K. trustee, April 2, 1890, filed Apl. 2, 1890, W.D., 30-66, lot ?10, Block 12, Little Rock, Wrights addn.
MAD: 1901 and 1903 not copied
Pulaski Co. AR Deeds (SLC 6/9/2008; not all deeds copied; extracts also from Lorna LaFave 11/1983)
AN-44 No.39: Cert. #6241 from Receiver to Thos. J. Duncan, 11 Oct. 1854, Thomas J. Duncan of Saline Co. AR for $5 for SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec.27 Twp.2S Range 13W, 40 acres. Filed Feb. 3, 1865. (FHL film 1,302,776)
AN-44 No.40: Cert. #9549, Patent to Thomas J. Duncan of Saline Co. AR, 1 June 1859, for NW 1/4 NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.26 Twp.2S Range 13W. Filed Feb. 3, 1865. (FHL film 1,302,776)
AN-45: Patent to Thomas J. Duncan of Saline Co. AR, March 1, 1860, SW 1/4 NW 1/4 and NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.26 Twp.2S Range 13W. Filed Feb. 3, 1865. (FHL film 1,302,776)
AN-46: Patent to Thomas J. Duncan of Saline Co. AR, Oct 1, 1860, filed Feb. 3, 1865, Patent, AN-46, E 1/2 NW 1/4 and NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.26 Twp.2S Range 13W. Filed Feb. 3, 1865. (FHL film 1,302,776)
AN-47: 19 Jan. 1863, Thomas J. Duncan and wife Maria of Saline Co. AR for $600 to John H?.(W?) Jay of Pulaski Co. AR, NW 1/4 NW 1/4 and SW 1/4 SW 1/4 and E 1/2 NW 1/4 and NE 1/4 SW 1/4 and SW 1/4 NW 1/4 and NW 1/4 SW 1/4, all in Sec.24 Twp.2S Range 13W, and SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Sec.27 Twp.2S Range 13W, in all containing 320 acres. (FHL film 1,302,776)
X-54: 23 Dec. 1852, John M. Ross and Sarah, his wife, of Pulaski Co. AR for $88 to James F. Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR, NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec.26 Twp.2S Range 12W, and SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.22 Twp.2S Range 12W, in all 80 acres. (FHL film 1,302,664)
A2-158: 2 March 1857, William (X) Duncan and wife Rachel (X) of Jefferson Co. to Isaac Hann, $500, SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec.28 Twp.2S Range 12W, 40 acres. Executed at Pine Bluff, Jefferson Co. Wit. J.F. Eaton, W. Rider. Rec. 2 April 1857. (FHL film 1,302,764)
C2-1: 5 Jan. 1857, James F. Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR to William Crocket for $250, SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Sec.25 Twp.2S Range 12W, 40 acres. (no wife) /s/ J.F. Duncan. Wit. Wm. G. Campbell, J.R. Dougherty. Rec. Feb. 1, 1858. (FHL film 1,302,764)
C2-2: 13 Feb. 1858, Littleton L. (X) Duncan and wife Martha of Pulaski Co. AR to William Crockett, $40, S 1/2 NW 1/4 and NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Sec.22 Twp.2S Range 12W, 120 acres. Wit. Wm. G. Campbell, James A. Harris. Appeared in Campbell Twp. Filed Dec. 1, 1858. (FHL film 1,302,764)
C2-4: 13 Feb. 1858, Lytle L. (X) Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR to "Willim" Crocket, $50, NW 1/4 Sec.30 Twp.2S Range 11W, 180.89 acres. Wit. Wm. G. Campbell, James A. Harris. (FHL film 1,302,764)
T2-263: 9 Dec. 1858, deed made in Prairie Co. W.J. McCollum of said county to William B. Duncan, for $550, NW 1/4 Sec.2 Twp.4N Range 8W, 180? (160?) acres. Signed W.J. McCollum, Martha McCollum. Wit. F.A. Ticke?, Joshua Ragsdale. Filed in Prairie Co. AR. Recorded Pulaski Co. AR 6 Feb. 1861. (FHL film 1,302,773) (Lorna LaFave note: This land appears to be in present Lonoke Co, formed 1873 from Pulaski and Prairie)
"Reports of cases at law and equity argued and determined in the Supreme Court of Arkansas; January, May and October terms 1859" ("Arkansas Reports") Vol.20, by L.E. Barber, pgs.85 to 92 (California State Law Library, Sacramento, 12/2003)
PEAY, Receiver, etc., v. DUNCAN et al; Supreme Court of Arkansas; 20 Ark. 85; January, 1859, Decided.
Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court in Chancery. Hon. George W. Beazley, Circuit Judge.
(Opinion) ENGLISH, C. J. This was a bill to foreclose a mortgage, filed in the Monroe circuit court, 23d June, 1848. The original complainants were Henry L. Biscoe, Sandford C. Faulkner, and others, residuary trustees of the Real Estate Bank, under the deed of assignment. In the progress of the cause it was shown that, by an order of the chancery court for Pulaski county, the trustees had been removed, and the assets of the bank placed under the management of Gordon N. Peay, as receiver, and he was substituted as complainant in the bill.
The defendants were William B. Duncan, Francis Surget, John Ker, Alfred Mullins, William McBride and John Smith.
The bill alleges that on the 2d July, 1837, Duncan having subscribed 300 shares of the capital stock of the Real Estate Bank, in order to secure the stock, and the repayment of the moneys to be borrowed by him, under the charter, on account of his stock, executed to the bank a mortgage upon a number of tracts of land, which are described, amounting to 3,218 acres, etc., situated in Monroe county, of which he was then the owner in fee. The mortgage was conditioned for the payment of all moneys which Duncan might receive from the bank on account of his subscription for stock, etc., and for the payment of such sum of the bonds of the State, issued in favor of the bank, as would be equal to the amount of stock allowed him, etc., and, also for the payment of the bond given by him for stock, etc., etc. Duncan to remain in possession of the lands until legally sold to discharge his obligations and liabilities aforesaid. Mortgage duly acknowledged and recorded 3d October, 1837, in Monroe county
That on the 4th December, 1839, after the award of stock to Duncan, in order further to secure the payment of said stock, moneys, etc., and to correct mistakes made in the first mortgage, in the description of the lands, he made a second mortgage to the bank, upon the same lands (with corrections, exceptions, etc., stated), conditional in all respects as to the first mortgage; which was duly acknowledged and recorded on the day of its execution.
On the 16th of September, 1837, the board of managers awarded to Duncan 234 shares of stock, etc.; and, under the 17th section of the charter, he became entitled, as stockholder, to borrow from the bank $11,700; and accordingly borrowed the same at the following time, and in the following amounts: October 18th, 1839, $10,534; November 29th, 1839, $1,166.
For which several sums he executed his notes, reciting his rights as stockholder, and binding himself to repay the money so borrowed, by annual payments, so that the whole should be paid by 25th October, 1856, and to pay annually, in advance, interest at the rate of eight per cent. on the part of the sums remaining unpaid at the end of each year. The notes are exhibited.
The bill further alleges the assignment of the bank of the 2d April, 1842, to trustees, including Duncan's mortgages and notes: that complainants were residuary trustees, etc., and that the charter of the bank had been forfeited, etc.
That there were no known liens upon the lands of older date than the mortgages.
That on the 29th November, 1843, Duncan conveyed the lands to Surget and Ker, who were originally joint equitable owners thereof with him. He borrowed said moneys from the bank, and executed the mortgages upon the lands with their knowledge and consent. When he conveyed the lands to them it was with the express understanding that they were bound for the moneys so borrowed by him. Immediately after Duncan sold the lands to them, he left the State, and has never returned, and they are also non-residents. They agreed to pay Duncan's debts to the bank, and were allowed the amount thereof out of the price of the lands in purchasing them of him.
Since the date of the mortgages, the defendants, Mullins, McBride and Smith, had entered upon the lands as tenants of Surget and Ker, leasing from them with notice of the mortgages, etc.
Duncan's notes to the bank remain unpaid, except some small credits, which are stated.
Prayer for foreclosure of the mortgages, sale of the lands, etc., and for general relief.
A demurrer was interposed to the bill in behalf of all the defendants. Afterwards Duncan and Surget withdrew the demurrer as to them, and filed a joint and several plea in bar, accompanied by the answer of Surget as to the matters of discovery prayed by the bill.
The substance of the plea is, that the trustees of the bank had previously filed a bill, in the same court, against Duncan, Surget and Ker, to foreclose the same mortgages, for the same debt; that a demurrer was interposed thereto, overruled by the court, and decree thereupon against the defendants: and they appealed to this court, the decree was reversed, and the cause remanded, and the demurrer sustained, and the bill dismissed for want of equity, in obedience to the mandate of this court.
The death of Ker was suggested, and his executor, widow and heirs made parties. His executor, Duncan, answered the bill, setting up the former decree relied upon by the plea, etc.
The complainants entered replication to the plea and answers.
The cause was heard April, 1856, upon bill, plea, answers, replications and exhibits, and the bill dismissed for want of equity; and Peay, receiver, etc., appealed.
The objection made by the counsel for the appellant, in the argument here, to the sufficiency of the plea in bar of the bill, comes too late.
If a complainant conceives a bill to be defective in form or substance he may take the judgment of the court upon its sufficiency by setting it down for argument; which, in practice, operates as a demurrer. But if the complainant relies to a plea, he puts in issue the truth of its allegations: and if, upon the hearing, the defendant proves the truth of the matter pleaded, the suit, so far as the plea extends, is barred even though the plea is not good in point of form or of substance.
In this case the complainant replied to the plea.
In support of the truth of the allegations of the plea, the defendants exhibited and read upon the hearing, transcripts of the proceedings, etc., of the Monroe circuit court, and of this court, on appeal, in the first bill to foreclose the mortgages in question referred to in the plea. The parties to that bill, it is manifest, were the same, in legal effect, as the parties to the bill now before us, except that three of the defendants to the present bill, Mullins, McBride and Smith were not parties to the first. But it is shown that they were in possession of the mortgaged premises as tenants of Surget and Ker, and held in no other right.
It clearly appears, also, that the first bill was to foreclose the same mortgages, upon the same property, and for the same debt, as the second: and that the final decree against the complainants (the trustees of the bank), though upon demurrer, was upon the merits, and not upon mere formal defects in the bill. (See Duncan et al. v. Biscoe et al., 7 Ark. 175.)
The general principles of law in respect to the conclusiveness of judgments and decrees of the domestic tribunals are well settled, and perfectly intelligible. A judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is conclusive between the same parties, or their privies, upon the same matter, when brought into question in the same court, or in another court of concurrent jurisdiction. The rule is founded upon considerations as well of abstract justice as of public policy, which forbids the litigation of any matter which has been once fairly determined by proper and competent authority between the same parties: or those standing in the relation of privies to them.
In Duncan et al. v. Biscoe et al., which is relied upon as a bar to the present bill, this court decided that the trustees of the bank had no interest, general or special; in the stock mortgages; that they were held for the benefit of the bondholders, and the idemnity of the State; that the trustees could not foreclose the mortgages to obtain payment of the stock loans; and that these loans were made on the faith of the stock owned by the borrowers, and not upon the mortgagee.
This decision is the law of the case, notwithstanding it was overruled in Wilson v. Biscoe, 11 Ark. 44.
Every consideration of public policy requires that a matter once fairly and solemnly adjudicated between parties, should forever be at rest. If a party suffers loss from an erroneous decision, it is but an unavoidable incident to the administration of justice by imperfect beings.
The decree is affirmed.
MAD: See also, in Monroe Co. Arkansas, the case of DUNCAN et al. v. BISCOE et al, Trustees R. E. BANK; Supreme Court of Arkansas; 7 Ark. 175; January, 1846, Decided; from "Reports of cases at law and equity argued and determined in the Supreme Court of Arkansas; January and July term 1846 and January term 1847" ("Arkansas Reports") Vol.7, by E.H. English, pgs.175 to 194 (California State Law Library, Sacramento, 12/2003)
MAD: See also, in New Orleans, Louisiana, and Adams Co. Mississippi, the case of DUNCAN LINTON, CHARLOTTE LINTON and her husband, FRANCIS SURGETTE, STEPHEN DUNCAN guardian of MARY LINTON and JOHN LINTON MINORS, Plaintiffs in error, v. FREDERICK STANTON; Supreme Court of the United States; 53 U.S. 423; 13 L. Ed. 1050; 12 HOW 423; March 1, 1852, Decided December 1851 Term; from "Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in The Supreme Court of the United States" Book XIII (13 L Ed. pgs.1050 to 1051), by Stephen K. Williams, Containing Howard Vol.9, 10, 11, and 12; (12 How pgs.423 to 426) (El Dorado Co. CA Law Library 12/2003)
MAD: See also, in Jackson Co. Arkansas, the case of WILLIAM BYERS, Appellant, v. FRANCIS SURGET; Supreme Court of the United States; 60 U.S. 303; 15 L. Ed. 670; 19 HOW 303; March 5, 1857, Decided; December 1856 Term; from "U.S. Supreme Court Reports - Cases argued and decided in the Supreme Court of the United States" Vol.15 Lawyers Edition, by Stephen K. Williams, 1882; includes Vol.60 U.S. Reports, Dec. 1856; also reported in Vol.19 Howard and Vol.1 Miller's Decisions; pages 670-674 in Vol.15 Lawyer's Edition; pages 303-312 in Vol.60 U.S. Reports (El Dorado Co. CA Law Library 12/2003)
REFERENCES FROM OTHER LOCALITIES
Chicot Co. AR Deeds (SLC 7/22/2014)
Deeds, v. C-D 1837-1844 (FHL Film 977,961)
C-691/692: William Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR bond to Samson Gray of Pulaski Co. AR, for $500, the payment to be made to said Samson Gray, bond, made as Bayou Master A.T. 19 Dec. 1832. The consideration is that I, William Duncan, for consideration of $450 paid me, sold to said Samson Gray a donation of two 1/4 sections to which I am entitled under Act of Congress to aid OH in extending the Miami Canal from Dayton to Lake Erie, and to grant a quantity of land to said state to aid in the construction of the canal authorized by law, and for making donations of land to certain persons in ARK territory, approved 24 May 1828 as an actual settler in that part of the territory of AR ... and the Cherokee ?? west of the Mississippi ratified 23 May 1828 has leased to .. and I the said William Duncan have removed from the county which has ceased to be a part of said territory ... delivered to Wm. M. D. Pettit Cook Dec. 20, 1840 ... the sale of which is authorized by law &c, and William Duncan hereby irrevocably nominates and appoints the said Samson Gray my attorney in fact with a power of substitution for me to choose any two quarter sections of land which are subject to entry under the provisions of the act ...and make application for the entry and location, and sign my name and receive any patents that may be issued in my name ... Now, if William Duncan shall make, on the reasonable demand of said Samson Gray after the patent or patents which shall be issued, a deed to the two 1/4 sections of land together with a relinquishment of dower therein to said Samson Gray, then this obligation be void. /s/ William (D his mark) Duncan. Wit. Saml. M. Rutherford, W.H. Securty. Ack. Big Rock Twp, Pulaski Co. AR, by William Duncan before Dudley D. Mason, J.P., 19 Dec. 1832. Filed for record 23 May 1840. Recorded March? 15, 1840. (FHL Film 977,961)
C-698/699: James Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR bond to Samson Gray of Pulaski Co. AR for $500, signed at Bayou Metre A.T., 21 Dec. 1832. That James Duncan for $400 paid by Samson Gray of Pulaski Co. AR, have sold him the claim or donation of 600 quarter sections of public lands to which I am entitled under Act to aid State of Ohio in extending the Miami Canal from Dayton to Lake Erie, ... and James Duncan has moved from the County which has ceased to be a part of said Territory ... and am entitled to two quarter sections of land in that territory, James Duncan appoints Samson Gray his attorney to select any two quarter sections of land ... and make application for entry or location of the same and receive any patents issued in my name, I shall make a deed to Samson Gray after the patents are issued, this document is void. /s/ James (X) Duncan. Wit. Saml. M. Rutherford, William Saunders. William Saunders, J.P. of Big Rock Twp, Pulaski Co. AR, appeared 21 Dec. 1832 before Wm. Launous? J.P. Filed for record 25 May 1840, recorded June 17, 1840. (FHL Film 977,961)
Saline Co. AR Deed (from Lorna LaFave 9/1983)
9 Feb. 1853, William Duncan and Rachel Duncan of Pulaski Co. to Richard P. Hammond, land in Saline Co., W 1/2 of NE 1/4, and NW 1/4 of SE 1/4, Sec. 36, 2S-15W. Wit. Little Page Rowland.
Rappahannock Co. VA Deed (FHL film 33,660)
B-380: 6 June 1835, William B. Duncan of Pulaski Co. AR, one of the heirs of James Duncan Sr. late of Culpeper Co. VA decd who died intestate, to James Duncan Jr. of Culpeper Co. VA, for $1 and other considerations, appoint said James Duncan my attorney to sell my portion of the estate of said James Duncan Sr., and also my right to the portion of my father James Duncan's estate which has been set apart as the dower of my mother Dorcas Duncan the lawful widow of James Duncan decd. Reg. Pulaski Co. AR. (MAD: 1840 Monroe Co. AR census; 1850 Smith Co. TX census)
HISTORIES before 1923
1908 "Pioneers and Makers of Arkansas" by Josiah H. Shinn (FHL book 976.7 H2s and films 1,004,960 item 2 and 934,822 item 1)
Pg. 161: People over 70 in 1830: Pulaski Co. Septuagenarians .... William Duncan.
1889 "Biographical and historical memoirs : of Pulaski, Jefferson, Lonoke, Faulkner, Grant, Saline, Perry, Garland and Hot Spring counties, Arkansas, comprising a condensed history of the state, a number of biographies of distinguished citizens of the same, a brief descriptive history of each of the counties above named, and numerous biographical sketches of their prominent citizens" (Central AR) pub. by Goodspeed (FHL film 934,823 item 2 and FHL book 976.7 D3bhm; Los Angeles Public Library book; from Evelyn Sigler 8/1983 and Lorna LaFave 3/1984)
Pg.455-6: Pulaski County: Dr. George W. Granberry, a prominent physician and surgeon, of Jacksonville, Ark., was born in Russell Co. AL, September 13, 1848, being a son of Richmond and Zilpha (Duncan) Granberry. The father was a native of Jefferson Co. GA, born in 1817. His parents were Thomas and Claricy (Yarbrough) Granberry, both from the State of Georgia, who moved to Mississippi, when Richmond was in his sixth year. After a residence of a few years in Mississippi, they returned to Georgia, moving to Alabama in 1837, but during their declining years decided to again return to Georgia and pass their last days in that State. Thomas Granberry was a well-known Baptist preacher, and of Irish descent. Mrs. Zilpha Granberry was born in North Carolina, in 1820, and was the daughter of Edmond and Nancy (White) Duncan; the father a native of North Carolina, and of Scotch descent. Mr. Duncan was a soldier in the Revolutionary War, and fought in a regiment from his native State. He escaped the siege and capture of Charleston with his regiment, by being mounted in place of a sick trooper, and taking part in the disastrous expedition with Gen. Moultrie to Monk's Corner, where the command was surprised by Tarleton, and cut to pieces. Mr. Duncan was among the fortunate few who escaped the butchery that followed, and afterward served under Gen. Green until peace was declared in 1783. He settled in Georgia in 1812. Upon the visit of Gen. Lafayette to the United States in 1834, he was among the few old veterans left to greet that venerable patriot. Richmond and Zilpha Granberry were the parents of nine children, four of whom are yet living, the oldest son Benjamin F. Granberry, being killed in the Confederate army. The others died from natural causes. Dr. Granberry was reared in Alabama until twelve years of age, when his parents moved with him to Panola Co. MS, where he was educated in the public schools. On September 27, 1862, the Doctor enlisted in Company H, 2nd Regiment Mississippi Partisan Cavalry, ....
1911 "Historical review of Arkansas, its commerce, industry and modern affairs" 3 vols., by Fay Hempstead, pub. by Lewis Pub. (FHL book 976.7 D32sa; CA State Library, Sutro Branch, book F411 H485; and from Evelyn Sigler 1991)
Vol.II, pg.803-5: ROBERT D. DUNCAN, cashier of State National Bank of Little Rock [Pulaski Co.]; born Claysville, Harrison Co. KY, on 2 July 1858, son of John S. and Mary A. (Curran) Duncan, both natives KY where respective families were founded many years ago, the father a merchant. Duncan family of stanch Scottish lineage, Colonial times. Parents of Mr. Duncan members of Baptist church; of their children, a son and two daughters are living.
The subject of this review was reared to maturity in native state & in state of MO, graduate of William Jewell College of Liberty, MO; business pursuits. In 1870 Mr. Duncan established his home in state of MO, engaged for some time in banking business at St. Joseph, that state; later he located in Kansas City, live-stock commission business, for a number of years; removed to city of St. Louis, banking; in 1904 to Little Rock. In 1884 Mr. Duncan was married to Miss Adelaide J. Corbin, of Liberty, MO, and he has two sons: Corbin M. Duncan connected to Union Electric Co. of St. Louis, and Robert D. Duncan Jr., student of Washington University, St.Louis.
Return to Index to Duncan Research Files in Arkansas
Return to The Genealogy Bug's Home Page

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Electron Scattering from Complex Nuclei, Part B is a three-chapter text that explores the excitation of the nucleus to bound levels and the nucleus breakup through particle emission from continuum states. The first chapter discusses the inelastic scattering to nuclear levels, the giant resonances, the concepts of radiative corrections, and the phase shift analysis for inelastic scattering. The subsequent chapter concerns the quasi-elastic continuum and the observations of the nuclear decay products. The last chapter presents special topics on electron scattering, such as dispersion and exchange corrections, sum rules, and isospin effects. Physicists, researchers, and graduate students will find this book invaluable.


Research has proven everyone is unique, there is need for every person to identify the different hobbies and talents in order to learn if the hobbies can be transformed to careers. Some studies have noted it is critical to turn the hobby into a career as it gives the individual an opportunity to work in a stress free environment. Furthermore, by working for a hobby an individual enjoys doing allows him or her to be the best version of himself or herself. There are necessary steps that an individual needs to undertake to ensure the best results are guaranteed especially when dealing with hobbies which are noted to be unforeseen in many people.
The fear of the unknown identified to hold may people back and make them to be afraid to pursue their desired dreams. In order to successfully get the needed resources to transform the hobby to a business not only is the fear important to eliminate but it allows the person to gather the needed resources for the business venture. The next step a person needed to ensure there an intact business plan that needs to be executed, business plans allows an individual to get the needed plans in motion and it becomes easy to follow up the business and calculate the expected results. It is important to highlight a realist business plan allows the individual to be honest to oneself and gather all the requirements to ensure the right results are accomplished. Different businesses are noted to get different results, but what separated an ordinary business with a great business is the ability to be patient in the business and get the needed resources to make the business flourish.
Studies have indicated it is critical for an individual to conduct research market and know how many similar businesses are there, this enables the person to device ways to ensure her or his business is unique and preferred by customers. Currently many business laws and regulations been passed and there is need for an individual to investigate the different laws and regulations pertaining the specific business. With considerations of the laws and regulations an individual is able to establish him or herself in the business very fast and be considered by investors. Finally after encompassing everything the last thing would be to ensure the individual sells the products or services offered by developing strategic marketing plans that will ensure the business flourish.


text:
Agitating farmers misguided, ryots across country are happy about agri laws: Prakash Javadekar
(Eds: Updates with more quotes) Chennai, Dec 25 (PTI) Union Minister Prakash Javadekar on Friday said 'some' farmers protesting against the recently enacted Central laws were misguided by their 'political masters' and were painting a picture as if ryots across the country were with them.
He also lashed out at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his criticism of the farm laws and said 'he appears (in public) once in a fortnight' and challenged him for an open debate on the issue.
The Minister for Environment and Information slammed the opposition parties, saying they were 'bankrupt' on the issue of farm laws, against which thousands of farmers, especially from Punjab and Haryana, are protesting at the borders of Delhi for nearly a month.
Noting that NCP leader Sharad Pawar as the Agriculture Minister during the UPA regime wrote to states on the subject, he wondered how could the laws enacted by the NDA government for the whole nation become 'bad' now.
The refrain against the new farm laws by the opposition parties is 'hoax' and the 'opposition is bankrupt on this issue,' he told reporters.
Addressing farmers at a meeting at nearby Maraimalai Nagar organised by the Tamil Nadu unit of the BJP, Javadekar asserted ryots in the country were happy with the farm laws and other pro-farmer initiatives such as the PM Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme.
He claimed the minimum support price (MSP) received by Punjab farmers during the NDA rule was more than double of the amount they got in the previous UPA regime.
'The Punjab farmers have received every year more than double the amount that they got as MSP during the Congress-led UPA rule. Their income has already doubled and they are experiencing it. Still, they are agitating as they are being misguided,' the minister said.
The farmers' protest against the farm laws has become an intense topic for debate across India because 'some farmers and their political masters have launched their agitation around Delhi, showing as if it is an all-India phenomenon and in the interest of entire farmers of the country.
'But farmers everywhere are happy with the new laws and the farmers' welfare schemes will continue,' the minister said.
He assured that the contentious MSP and Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) will continue and underlined that the Modi government 'will solidly' stand behind the farmers and the common man.
During their ten-year rule, the Congress and the DMK had only extended Rs 53,000 crore as one-time loan waiver to farmers and had not even implemented the MS Swaminathan Committee report on MSP, he alleged.
'This amount (of Rs 53,000 crore) was given to the banks and not to the farmers. But now Prime Minister Modiji is depositing Rs 2,000 directly in the bank accounts of the farmers. Modiji has already paid Rs 1.20 lakh crore directly to the bank accounts of the ryots,' Javadekar said.
This sum also included the digital deposits of Rs 18,000 crore to nine crore farmers by the Prime Minister on Friday, under the PM-KISAN scheme, the minister who earlier released a book 'Modi Government that protects farmers wellbeing,' said.
The first book was presented by BJP state president L Murugan.
The Minister said for about 40 years, remunerative prices were the 'real demand' of the farmers.
When a committee led by renowned farm scientist M S Swaminathan recommended cost plus 50 per cent to address it, the UPA regime did not accept it but Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed to the proposal when the BJP came to power.
As a result, 'the Minimum Support Price has risen phenomenally,' he said adding for commodities that get MSP, the farmers income 'doubled.' MSP and APMCs would continue to be on and at the same time farmers should have a right to sell where they get more prices and this aspect necessitated the new farm laws which was a basic reform and in tune with demands of farmers after discussion over a span of 20 years.
Referring to welfare schemes like the PM Kisan, and initiatives and growth in the agriculture and allied sectors, he said, 'farmer is getting more income now and for sure by 2022 he will have his income doubled.' Training his guns against Rahul Gandhi, Javadekar said, the Congress leader 'has also jumped into this and he comes rarely, he appears once in a fortnight...he suddenly said you have to withdraw the laws.
'I am giving him open challenge for a debate, whether the laws are good, (are) in the interest of the farmers or not. I will challenge Rahul Gandhi and the DMK for a debate,' Javadekar said.
Punjab farmers were 'deliberately misguided' that their MSP will go away after these laws, following which they have been protesting near Delhi for a month now, he said.
But their counterparts from Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh among others were not agitating since they were not being misguided.
'There is no place for any misunderstanding or misgiving...we solidly stand behind farmers, behind the common man of the country,' the Minister said. PTI JSP VGN SA VS VS


This dream would not have come to fruition without the support of our family, friends, and especially our backers. We are thankful for our early supporters on Kickstarter and Indiegogo who believed in, not only loopit, but in re.design. We would like to recognize those people in a special way on our site and send a great big, warm THANK YOU to all of you!


Virtual scsi driver not detected windows 7. Vista XP SP1 SP2 SP3 MESE OSR2 OSR1 95 NT4 NT 3.
HCL and VMware ESXi Support. Where to find Apple II documentation.
An initiator typically serves the same purpose to a computer as a SCSI bus adapter would tape changers), instead of physically cabling SCSI devices ( like hard drives , except that an iSCSI initiator sends SCSI commands over an IP st Updated: 13 December. In a worst- case scenario, the drive itself may be dead. 04/ 20/ ; 8 minutes to read Contributors.
Virtual scsi driver not detected windows 7. Backup Tools BIOS Tools, File Managers, Password Tools, Cleaners Remote Control. 45e ( rar/ tgz) - 175. Fixed bug in DMA timing for ICH4 chips.
MDGx AXCEL216 MAX Speed Performance Windows. ESXi vCenter Server 5 Documentation VMware vSphere ESXi , vCenter Server 5 Documentation VMware vSphere Basics VMware vSphere Virtualizing the IT Infrastructure.
A license gives you the right to run Virtual ] [ on one computer at a time ( you can install it on multiple computers though). Starting in versions after Windows 10 1803. An initiator functions as an iSCSI client.
Implemented support for exporting a virtual machine to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure User interface: greatly improved HiDPI including better detection , scaling support per- machine lease Version 0. Hiren' s Boot CD contains a lot of testing and troubleshooting tools. Driver Verifier is available in all versions of Windows starting with Windows. Due to wrong programming we got assymetric transfer r/ w rate in UDMA 5 - 80/ 16 Mb/ s Added handling of Exclude option for separate channels for Compatible controllers and AHCI channels. H: An IEEE 1394 driver uses the IRP_ MJ_ DEVICE_ CONTROL IRP withIoControlCodeIOCTL_ 1394_ CLASS to communicate with the bus driver. For example it tells you how to configure a virtual machine how to use the. 10 DOS 6 Tricks Secrets Tips Tweaks Hacks Fixes Updates Upgrades games st Updated: 8 September. The system notices it when it is plugged in powered on but does not show it under My Computer any other drive display option. Jan 21 · Moving Windows to a Different Hard Disk/ RAID Controller Without ReinstallingOverviewOne of the trends in personal computing these days is the prevelance of more options for hard disks RAID. Virtual scsi driver not detected windows 7. I upgraded from Vista Home Premium SP2 ( 32Bit) to Windows 7 Home Premium ( 32Bit) and after the upgrade my external usb hard drive can not be seen.
Form HP compatibility matrix installing Windows Server on HP DL 380 G5 is not supported, but it does not mean that it doesn' t work. Oct 16 Asus , Acer, support community, advice for Microsoft Windows 7 Computers such as Dell, · Windows 7 Forums is the largest help , HP, providing friendly help a custom build. This problem has several possible causes: partition issues on the external drive using the wrong file system, dead USB ports driver issues in Windows. Driver Verifier: What' s New.
NUCs are not officially supported by VMware but they are very widespread in many homelabs or test environments. Some components were accidentally listed a few weeks ago but their listing has been removed.
Buying a license is easy; just go to the online Virtual ] [ store. X enhanced mode DOS extenders Windows 95 are now fully working.
Ioctl Hex Value Header Brief; IOCTL_ 1394_ CLASS: 0x2d: inc\ ddk\ 1394. After installing the OS ILO SAS P400 controller drivers were missing:. This is the bug check code for all Driver Verifier SCSI Verification violations. An initiator typically serves the same purpose to a computer as a SCSI bus adapter would except that, tape changers), instead of physically cabling SCSI devices ( like hard drives an iSCSI initiator sends SCSI commands over an IP network. Hiren' s Boot CD is very useful bootable CD to solve computer problems. It has a lot of testing troubleshooting repair tools.
· Resolved : The resolution was to: Plug in and turn on. It should tell you what Disk 2 is go into disk management figure out what disk 2 is. In order to improve your user experience with Oracle VM VirtualBox it is recommended to read this section to learn more about common pitfalls get recommendations on how to use the product. Virtual scsi driver not detected windows 7.
This Help file is about the Virtual ] [ application. 45e ( rar/ tgz) - 430.
45e ( rar/ tgz) - 325. The NUC is not supported by VMware and not listed in the HCL. The SCSI_ VERIFIER_ DETECTED_ VIOLATION bug check has a value of 0x000000F1.
This section summarizes the changes and provides links to related documentation. Moving Windows to a Different Hard Disk/ RAID Controller Without ReinstallingOverviewOne of the trends in personal computing these days is the prevelance of more options for hard disks and RAID. Jan 16 · In command link do diskpart then list disk.
These release notes include the following topics: What' s New in This Release ; Before You Begin; Internationalization; Compatibility Notes. After installing the OS,. Each version introduces new features and checks for finding bugs in Windows drivers. PC Bridgeboard ( A1060 Sidecar AT, A2286 , A2386SX) emulation rewrite: Emulation core replaced with patibility has improved greatly for example Windows 3.
This chapter provides answers to commonly asked questions. ESXi after a resolved issue with the NIC driver, vCenter Server 5 Documentation VMware vSphere Basics VMware vSphere , vCenter Server 5 Documentation VMware vSphere ESXi , Virtualizing the IT tel' s 7th Gen NUC is currently rolled out it' s time to take a look at their capabilities as homeserver running VMware ESXi.
My virtual SCSI driver not detected because a few days ago I deleted it to get daemon tools to work but now Its causing more problems, where can I fix this problem! virtual SCSI driver. Missing MS Virtual WiFI Mini Port Adaptor.
Failed to install windows 10 BietenMan69 replied Dec 27, at 6: 13 PM. A to Z of Items # 5. " Virtual SCSI driver not detected" After I first installed Daemontools 4.