text:
Home Booklets
The True Church
Why So Many Religions?
What is a Real Christian?
How to Be an Overcomer
Greatest FEAST Ever!
What are the Times of the GENTILES?
Is There A Real Hell Fire?
David Jon Hill Church of God
Died: Nov 24, 2003
Ambassador College: 1955
Office: Evangelist
A leading Protestant theologian remarked, ...,It is doubtful whether many educated Protestants today believe in "heaven" and "hell" as literal physical places. ..." "Yet to many millions hell is frighteningly real! Is there a real hell, a real fire, a real torment — what does the Bible say?
THE RESTAURANT was crowded with men and women discussing their day's business over lunch. Fitted in between a bank building and a hat shop, this particular restaurant was long and narrow so that many of those sitting in the rear could not see what was going on toward the entrance. About 12:30, when people were still standing in line waiting to get a table, three women walked in. Two were rather skinny, one was overly plump, all were unkempt and disheveled.
About halfway to the rear of the restaurant, one of the women burst out in a loud voice screaming, "FIRE! FIRE! FIRE! Hell fire and brimstone!"
Panic struck! Diners jumped to their feet, dishes clattered to the floor as patrons tried to leave through the nearest exit in response to the one word they had heard over the hubbub of conversation — "FIRE!"
But the woman went on "witnessing for Christ," crudely informing all of the patrons of the restaurant they would go to hell and suffer in ever-burning flames unless they accepted Jesus Christ! While she was screaming this message at the top of her lungs, her disheveled partner bent near a patron's ear and whispered, "If you died today, would you be ready to meet Jesus?"
Recovering from his shock, the manager invited these three self-styled prophetesses to leave his establishment. Things quieted down, and the hum of conversation again returned to near normal — but few were talking about business anymore. The name of Jesus Christ had been used in a very unsavory situation— people's stomachs were upset, food had been spilled on some clothing, nerves were shattered and on edge, the train of thought of those discussing business over their lunch had been forgotten. For some the whole day had been ruined!
Medieval concept of hell shows doomed to writhe eternally upside down in burning potholes. This is NOT the "hell" of which the Bible speaks!
But despite her crude manner of presenting it, does the hell fire this prophetess preached really exist?
World of Confusion!
At the close of the 20th century, when mankind seems to have more knowledge on any given point than he has ever had in his entire history, there is more confusion, mixed-up ideas and superstitions prevailing about this burning issue of hell than ever before! God-defying atheists and narrow-minded scientists loudly proclaim they do not even believe God exists, much less a heaven or hell. On the other hand are religious people who, for sake of dogma, or because it suits their sense of justice, believe there is an ever-burning, never-consuming, torturing hell fire that awaits those who do not make a profession of their Christ.
Sincere, though deceived, these individuals insist that the message from God to mankind is that if a man does not accept and love Jesus in his given span of near 70 years, the Eternal God of heaven, all-wise, all-loving, all merciful, will heap unimagined and excruciating pain in the ever-burning flames of hell upon that soul for all eternity— because of 70 years of sin.
Many claim that this is the very power of the Gospel! That if you remove the punishment of hell, and the pains of everlasting suffering, from the good news, the Gospel message, no one would accept God's other teaching. Hell, in their good-news Gospel, becomes the place where God wreaks vengeance on "sinners." If this be true, and the governments of this earth were to follow the example of this "all-wise God" — then criminals, instead of being put in jail, or put to death, should be TORTURED!
Those who claim to be God's representatives on earth, from a dignified priest to the street-corner evangelist, all demand that you choose now whether you will spend eternity in heaven or in hell! Two things are taken for granted here: one, that everyone must choose Now; and two, that eternity will be spent in hell.
The Source of Truth!
Where can we go to find the real truth of this matter? If there is an ever-burning, torturing hell fire that the God of heaven has in store for those who sin against Him, then certainly it behooves each of us to find out the details regarding it!
Does science have the answer? Has anyone scientifically seen and examined hell, felt and smelled of hell, observed it in all of its excruciating agony and returned to tell of its existence and conditions?
NO! Science does not have the answer!
An encyclopedia can only give you what men have thought about hell throughout the ages of the past!
The only source that talks with real authority on this subject is the Word of God! "Thy word is truth" (John 17:17). The Bible is the only source that speaks with absolute AUTHORITY on this subject — a subject beyond the realm of modern science — and yet modern science, as far as its knowledge concerning the dead goes, completely agrees with the Bible in every detail.
Instead of trying to imagine what hell might be like, let us go directly into the pages of God's Word and find out what God has to say — letting the Bible completely interpret itself, not letting our imagination run wild on any point — really proving all things! The doctrine of hell this world propounds determines, by the use of stark fear, to force you into acceptance of the Gospel. This is not the Spirit of God, because God's Word says, "For God has NOT given us the spirit of fear; but of POWER, and of LOVE, and of a SOUND MIND"! (II Tim. 1:7.)
The truth from God's own Word will agree with God's Spirit of true love, yet will certainly not detract from God's power, and will throughout its entire explanation be completely sound-minded!
The overall, principal choice that God lays down for every individual is found in the much-preached but little understood "golden text" of the Bible, John 3:16. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." On the one hand God says that if you accept the sacrifice of His only begotten Son you will have everlasting life. On the other hand, if you do not accept the Savior who died for you, you must "PERISH"!
How does hell enter into this? What is hell? Where is hell? Who goes to hell? How long do you stay in hell? Can you leave hell?
What Is Hell?
Confusion is in the mind of today's Christian because he is told either that the Bible does not mean what it says, or that wherever "hell" is mentioned in the Bible, it is a hell of fire for the eternal torture of the damned. God's Word plainly reveals that there is more than one kind of hell.
There are three different Greek words, each having a different meaning, which have been translated "hell" in the King James Version.
The Greek word hades simply means "pit" or "grave." In 1611 when the King James Version was translated, the Englishmen spoke of putting their potatoes in "hell" for the winter-that is, simply in a hole in the ground! There has to be a place for those who die, and of that place we are all in common knowledge, the grave. If men immediately when they die go to either heaven or hell, then God's Word would not have said, "For David is NOT ascended into the heavens" (Acts 2:34) and, "Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he IS BOTH DEAD AND BURIED, and his sepulchre is with US unto this day" (Acts 2:29).
At the time Peter was preaching his first inspired sermon on that day of Pentecost in 31 A.D. — 50 days after Christ first ascended to the Father in heaven from this very "hell" — he says that the great patriarch David is still in hell!
Interior shot of Herod's tomb. It is a "hell" (Greek: hades) — or HOLE in the ground. That is what the Greek word "hades" really means!
Let us understand this!
"Because thou wilt not leave my [David's] soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One [Jesus Christ] to see corruption" (Acts 2:27). This is quoted in your New Testament from Psalm 16:10, where David prophesied of the coming of Jesus Christ, of His crucifixion and death, of His burial and stay in the grave, "hell"-but that his stay in the grave would not be long enough for Him to suffer "corruption," that is, the decaying of the flesh. Yet after Christ was resurrected, David still remained in the grave, in his sepulchre, completely corrupted and nothing but dust at that time.
By comparing this scripture with the Old Testament, we find that this hades hell of the New Testament is the same as the sheol hell of the Old Testament. God's Word describes this hell very plainly. It is merely the grave where everyone goes when he dies. It is not "the abode of the dead" in the sense that dead spirits are walking around in a dark, cold cavern somewhere in the heart of the earth, but merely the resting place where all those who have died await a resurrection. That is why the triumphant Psalm is quoted in I Corinthians 15 — the resurrection chapter where it states, "0 grave, where is thy victory?" (I Cor. 15:55.) All the individuals who have died and rotted and turned to dust will eventually be resurrected — some to eternal life, some to judgment. This hades hell will not have an eternal hold on those who spend time there.
The description of this hell is not left to the imagination of men but very clearly defined. "Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave [sheol — hades — hell] whither thou goest" (Eccl. 9:10).
Your Bible describes this as a very dead place! How else would you describe the grave?
"For the living know that they shall die: but the dead KNOW NOT ANYTHING, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now PERISHED"! (Eccl. 9:5-6.) God's Word is very plain-spoken. The grave, "hell," where you or anyone goes upon death, is a place of neither physical nor mental activity of any kind. "His [man's] breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth, in that very day HIS THOUGHTS PERISH"! (Psalm 146:4.)
Any scientific experiment which can be enacted and observed completely backs up these Bible statements. But this is as far as science can help us. This is the only hell of which science is cognizant.
Churchmen try to confuse this hades hell by admit ting that it is indeed the grave, but going on to explain that only the body goes to the grave while the soul goes elsewhere. This doctrine can nowhere be proved within the pages of God's Word. (Write for the free booklet Do You Have an Immortal Soul?) God 's Word very clearly says that David, not David's body, is both dead and buried and is not in heaven! And if David is not, then surely no one else is.
Another Hell
The second Greek word translated "hell" is tartaroo. It is used only once in the Bible. "For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell ..." (II Peter 2:4). The word here, very loosely translated hell, is not a place but a condition. It refers to the condition of restraint that God has imposed upon those angels which rebelled against Him and followed Satan the devil. This term — tartaroo hell — is never used in reference to man.
When Satan and his demons rebelled against God, He put them in a condition of restraint — much as modern governments put criminals in a condition of restraint — where they must remain until their time of judgment (Jude 6).
Science has never observed this tartaroo hell! Church men are confounded by it! God's truth is very plain concerning it!
The REAL Hell
The Greek word gehenna denotes a place of punishment. Gehenna, or the Valley of Hinnom, is a place just outside Jerusalem where trash, filth and dead bodies were thrown to be burned up. It was a city dump and there was always a fire burning to consume the refuse that was thrown there. Jesus Christ and His disciples and apostles after Him used this word consistently when they were referring to that "hell" which will BURN UP sinners! Gehenna hell is a synonym for the lake of fire into which the unrepentant are to be cast at the end of time. This is the only hell in the Bible which is associated with flames or fire. No inner caverns in the bowels of the earth are mentioned. No ice-filled rooms where people's feet are sticking out and being tickled by demented spirits are talked about in God's Word in reference to this gehenna hell. It is never described as a fire in which the damned live, but a fire in which the damned DIE!
To explain the usage of the two basic words used in the Greek language and translated "hell" in the English language in the King James Version: "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second DEATH. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire" (Rev. 20:14-15). The word translated "hell" in verse 14 is hades, the grave. The grave itself and those who are not found written in the book of life are going to be cast into the lake of fire — gehenna hell. This will empty the grave — hades hell — and it will cease to exist — no dead will ever again be buried in the grave. They will be burned up.
Do These Scriptures Contradict?
In spite of how clearly the subject of hell is discussed in the Bible, many still quote other scriptures out of context as supposed proof that God uses hell for the purpose of inflicting never-ending torture on the damned; while others also quote still other scriptures as proof that hell is the instrument God uses to destroy the wicked, body and soul!
Photo taken near bottom of Valley Hinnom, outside Jerusalem. Fires buring in the valley in New Testament times represented the final punishment which will burn the wicked to ashes. (Mal. 4:1: Rev. 20:14: Matt. 3:10-12.)
The Garden Tomb — This is the "hell" (hades, the grave) in which Jesus was buried.
Does one scripture contradict another? No! God's Word plainly says, "... Scripture cannot be broken!" (John 10:35.) How can one set of scriptures be used to "knock in the head" another set of scriptures then? The answer is, it cannot be done — honestly!
It is the habit of those who quote scriptures on the subject to use only part of the verses pertaining to the subject — they read a false meaning into them. By subtle half-truths, by vivid pictures, by peddling popular — not Biblical — teachings, they shackle Christendom to unreasoning fear or insult the intelligence of the educated into complete disbelief!
We must not read our inherited or desired meaning into any particular passage of scripture — "no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation" (II Peter 1:20)-but each passage is interpreted by, and in the light of, other texts!
Let's look into a few of the most commonly used scriptures on this subject, and understand them in the clear light of God's own Word — let's see what they really say!
Immortal Worms?
A startling statement is found in Mark 9:48. In this passage of Scripture, Christ spoke of a worm that "dieth not." Whoever heard of the immortality of worms? What did Christ mean?
Some PEOPLE think that Jesus was referring to people as worms and was trying to say that these "people" never died — but lived on in agonizing torment. Those who say this fail to notice that Jesus does not call the wicked people "worms," but instead speaks of THEIR worm. The lexicons define the Hebrew (Isa. 66:24) and Greek (Mark 9:48) words translated "worm" as a grub or maggot, and these words in no way refer to a man. Christ was not teaching the immortality of people or worms!
Actually, Jesus was here warning his listeners that those who would "offend" — who would live a life of rebellion against God — would be cast into "hell fire." Most Bibles show in the marginal rendering that this was Gehenna fire. Jesus was referring to Gehenna as a type of the second death in the "lake of fire" which will befall the ungodly.
Gehenna, or the Valley of Hinnom, was located out side of Jerusalem and was a place where trash, filth, and the dead bodies of animals and despised criminals were thrown. If anything, especially a dead body, landed on a ledge above the fires, it would be devoured by many worms or maggots which were kept alive by the animal and vegetable substances deposited there.
It was to these worms that Christ was referring when He said "their worm dieth not." But Christ didn't mean that each individual worm continued to live forever!
Actually, these worms, or maggots are the larvae which develop from eggs deposited by flies. They continue for only a few days in this larval stage, then they pupate and finally emerge as flies, later dying. These are scientific facts, known by any real student of science. And yet some people think that Christ ignorantly stated that these larvae continued to live forever in that stage of development! This just goes to show that we should always be careful to use wisdom and common sense in studying God's Word. The Holy Spirit is the spirit of a sound mind (II Tim. 1:7). Let's rightly use the minds God gave us!
This same reference to worms is found in Isaiah 66:24. Here we again find that the Hebrew word simply means a common grub or a maggot. These worms or larvae also feed on the dead bodies for a few days, and then emerge as flies. Thus, these worms "die not" but continue to develop into flies just as any normal, healthy worm! The flies continue to deposit their eggs only as long as there are dead bodies or other matter for the larvae to feed on. Also notice that this verse plainly says people are going to see, "look upon" — this does not take place in the center of the earth or hidden away in some hole in the ground.
Startlingly, a clear and thoughtful reading of this particular verse (verse 24), shows that the verse is not talking about LIVE people, but the "CARCASES of the men that have transgressed against me." They are not alive and consciously suffering in any case!
Fire Never Quenched!
"And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be QUENCHED"! (Mark 9:43 — see also Matt.l8:8-9 where same question is treated.)
Does that mean burning forever, and never burning up? Try this test: Put a piece of paper in a pan. Light it with a match.
Now, don't QUENCH that fire!
Don't put it out — for that's what "quench" means. Very soon the paper will burn up. Then put it down on the floor and step on it! Now it's merely ashes under the soles of your feet — precisely as your Bible plainly says the wicked shall be! In Jeremiah 17:27, God warned the Jews that Jerusalem would be burned, and the fire would not be quenched — unless they repented. In Jeremiah 52:13, you read the account of the burning of Jerusalem. That fire was not quenched! It is not still burning! It just burned itself out.
Example of Hell Fire
God does not leave the answer to these questions for man to reason about and come up with his own ideas. In the stern warning to those who were in need of getting back to the faith once delivered, God, through His servant Jude, left the perfect example of the effect of eternal fire! "Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for AN EXAMPLE, suffering the vengeance of ETERNAL FIRE"! (Jude 7. )
These cities of Sodom and Gomorrah suffered from the vengeance of eternal fire. Are these cities still burning and yet not being consumed?
"Eternal fire" means a fire whose results are permanent or everlasting. Sodom and Gomorrah have never been rebuilt!
The fires which burned Sodom and Gomorrah went out of themselves. Clearly there is no question as to the plain meaning of God's Word. All who will insist on rebel ling against Him unrepentantly will be burned to a crisp in a very real hell fire!
Tormented Forever?
Many are confused by Revelation 20:10, partly by a mistranslation, and partly because they do not let the Bible interpret the Bible. "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."
In your King James Version you will notice that the word "are" is in italics. This means that the word was supplied by the translators and is not in the original Greek. This is the mistranslation that misleads, indicating that the beast and the false prophet are still in the lake of fire at the time that the devil and his demons are cast into this lake. According to the chronology of Revelation itself both the beast and the false prophet were cast alive into the lake of fire at the beginning of God's thousand-year reign on the earth (Rev. 19:20). By merely using God's J definition of what happens to human bodies when they are cast into fire, we can realize that they will be burned up just like so much fat on a hot stove (Psalm 37:20), and therefore the phrase in Revelation 20:10 should be translated "where the beast and the false prophet WERE."
In Matthew 25:41 Jesus said, "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels." Jesus here plainly showed that the everlasting fire was prepared for Satan and his angels. Yet He goes on to show that human beings who are ultimately judged unfit for eternal life, and are not granted the gift of LIFE — something they do not have of themselves — are also to be cast into this very lake of fire, as verse 46 says, "And these shall go away into everlasting punishMENT" (verse 46). This final punishment which sinners suffer is eternal DEATH by fire. It is not eternal punishiNG! Once they are burned up and now dead they are going to stay dead forever — this makes the punishment everlasting!
When these people are cast into this lake of fire it is by God 's definition — the Bible definition — an eternal, everlasting DEATH from which there is no resurrection forever, called "the second DEATH"! "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars [that is, all those who insist on breaking God's laws, who persist in sin — I John 3:4], shall have their part in the "' lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is [by God's own definition] the second death"! (Rev. 21:8.)
"The Smoke of Their Torment"
Does the scripture, ". . . And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever ..." (Rev. 14:11), contradict the passage which reads, "And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet ..."? (Mal. 4:3.)
Notice that verse 8 gives the time setting of Revelation 14:11. It is speaking about the impending fall of "Babylon."
Verses 9 and 10 say:". .. If any man worship the beast and his image and receive his mark ... he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone . . . in the presence of the Lamb" (that is, at Christ's second coming)!
Those who have a part in this system of "Babylon," and who receive this frightful punishment from Almighty God, have "no rest day nor night" as long as they remain in that land falling under God's wrath! They will either have to flee that area and seek God's mercy or be tormented by sulphurous fumes till they perish.
Notice that this passage does NOT say these individuals are being tormented forever in an ever-burning hell. Verse 11 says: "... The SMOKE of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever... ."
The Bible plainly teaches that flesh and blood is subject to combustion and death. Malachi 4:3 says the ashes of the wicked will finally be under the feet of the righteous. The wicked will be DESTROYED and will die that death — the second death-from which there is never to be a resurrection (Rev. 20:6, 14).
Why Does God Use Gehenna Hell?
God's plan of salvation is a 7000-year plan. For 6000 years of this time God has allowed mankind to go his way, under the influence of his own mind and directed also by the mind of Satan the devil. Man has tried every way he can think of to govern himself to bring peace, happiness, health, prosperity, but has failed miserably! Down through the ages God has selected some few whom He called out of this world to realize His plan of salvation, to repent of their ways, which are contrary to His laws, and to change their way of life to agree with God.
When Jesus Christ returns to this earth, He will for the first time in mankind's history set His hand to save the whole world — that is, all people who are alive on the earth at that time. He will offer them the same salvation that He has in the past only offered to a few whom He has called out of the world. Then, at the close of a thousand years of this reign, all of those who have ever died, but never had a chance to know the true Jesus and His true Gospel message, will be resurrected and given their ONE opportunity to obey and by the strength of God's Holy Spirit to enter into His Kingdom!
At one time or another every man who has ever existed will stand with his mind open and his understanding clear to live a life of overcoming with God's Spirit and endeavor to enter into His Kingdom. For further under standing about this point, write for our free booklet After Death — Then What?
There have been, and there will be, however, some few who will utterly rebel against doing God's will — who will set their wills against obedience to His laws so completely that nothing can be done with them. These will be the individuals God refers to in His Word as those who have committed the unpardonable sin!
God in His mercy has planned that these individuals should be completely done away with — made to CEASE TO EXIST! It is set down very plainly: "For the wages of sin [the transgression of God's law, living contrary to the very nature of life itself] is DEATH [the cessation of life]" (Rom. 6:23).
Lest anyone should question what God meant by this, He firmly stated: "Behold, all souls are mine, as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: THE SOUL THAT SINNETH, IT SHALL DIE" (Ezek. 18:4).
God's promise to all people is life or death! Not life or life! God realizes that men are weak, that they are subject to vanity. He has not devised this lake of fire in order to torture human beings, but only to rid them once and for all from the face of the earth — to do away with their lives. Knowing that they cannot continue to live the way they want to live, but that they would only bring misery and pain and suffering on themselves throughout eternity if He allowed them to live, God mercifully puts an end to their life. And even in this act God is NOT pleased . "For I have NO PLEASURE in the death of him that dieth" (Ezek. ..18:32). God does not want anyone to be thrown into this lake of fire! But those who insist on living contrary to the laws of life are going to be mercifully snuffed from existence by this method. .
"For if we sin willfully AFTER that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain FEARFUL looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall DEVOUR the adversaries" (Heb. 10:26-27).
Therefore we see from God's Word that hell fire is NOT held over the head of every individual to force him into accepting Jesus Christ as his personal Saviour — it is NOT a threat of pain and eternal punishing that the merciful and all-powerful Eternal God is levying against those who refuse to hear His Gospel-but a final judgment, a doing away-with the individuals who reject Him AFTER they have received a knowledge of His truth.
The time when the real fear of a real hell fire comes on an individual is after he has sinned willfully against the knowledge of God's truth that has been opened to his mind!
God Is Love — Justice!
The primary reason so many men and organizations of men have a false conception of "hell" is that they view the doctrine of hell just as an isolated doctrine. They fail to look at the overall purpose of God in putting man on this earth, of offering him the gift of eternal life for obedience, or of everlasting punishment (not punishing) for disobedience.
God created man in His own image and likeness (Gen. 1:26). In the Garden of Eden, He told man the way that would lead to eternal life. Then He told man that doing the wrong thing — eating of the fruit of the tree which God had forbidden — would lead to death (Gen. 2:17). But Satan, the father of lies (John 8:44), told the woman, "Ye shall not surely die" (Gen. 3:4).
Man has been believing that lie — of being born with immortality within himself — ever since!
God's purpose is to develop holy, righteous character in man which would make man fit for eternal life. God gave ancient Israel His commandments, "that it might be well with them, and with their children forever" (Deut. 5:29).
God's decrees are always for man's good. They are not designed as arbitrary decrees which God has set in order to have some excuse for plunging men into flames of fire! Where do men get such ideas about God? Certainly not from the Bible!
God created man in His own image in order that man might be brought to the place where God could entrust him with the precious gift of eternal life. Notice that God offered Adam and Eve life on one hand, and death on the other.
If man would rebel against God and make it impossible for God to entrust him with eternal life — knowing that he would abuse that life — then the kindest thing that God could do would be to let man die. Then, stub born, sinning :rr an would be unable to bring any further misery on himself or others by his wrong ways. He would just cease to exist, and thus would not interfere with the happiness of others who were found worthy of eternal life.
This is exactly what God said would happen to Adam and Eve if they disobeyed! The reward of eternal life for obedience — and of death — eternal death — for disobedience is stressed all through your Bible.
Only this is consistent with the Scriptures, and with God's plan and purpose — and His character of supreme love! Yet God will not, because of His infinite love, take away anyone's life because of ignorance or weakness, but because they willfully and knowingly refuse to obey their Creator.
The warning of a hell fire should be a fearful warning to those who know God's truth and still refuse to obey it! It should bring a somber realization that unless we surrender to God's will and His way of love, and refuse to let anything turn us aside, God will take away forever the life He has given us!
LAZARUS and the RICH MAN by Herbert W Armstrong - 1973 - (Audio File)
Thousands have asked for the true explanation of the "rich man and Lazarus. , Here is what the Bible really says!
Do SAVED mothers up in heaven see the writhing and hear the shrieks of their own lost children down in hell?
Stop and think! Would you really want to spend eternity in a heaven where you would be forced to gaze constantly upon your own loved ones who were lost, hearing them frantically screaming to you for help you would be unable to give, gazing constantly upon their indescribable agony, as they, on fire, are burning — burning to death — yet never really burning up? Would you be happy?
Yet that is exactly the kind of "heaven" that is being pictured by most of the churches and the clergy! Many of them rely more on Jesus' account of Lazarus and the rich man than any other argument to support their teaching that the "saved" go instantly, at death, to heaven while the lost leave their bodies and are plunged into an ever burning inferno of eternal torture.
What the Bible SAYS
Those who deny going to heaven or to hell at the instant of death have said the account of Lazarus and the rich man was merely a parable. But the "immortal soul" advocates insist this is not a parable! Jesus was stating facts that had happened, they argue.
So let's pretend this was not a parable. Let's take it literally. Jesus surely meant exactly what He said. But He did not say what is popularly believed!
Jesus said, "There was a certain rich man." Then there really was a certain rich man. Jesus said definitely that this particular rich man "was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day." He really lived in luxury and splendor! (Luke 16:19.)
Also, Jesus said, "There was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, and desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores" (verses 20-21).
Yes, there were many such beggars in Judaea when Jesus lived there.
Next Jesus described what happened to them.
"And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died and was buried" (verse 22). They both died!
That is exactly what Jesus said. Now read that again. Did Jesus say the beggar went to heaven?
He certainly did not! He said the beggar "was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom [at the time of the resurrection]."
Did the Beggar Go to Heaven?
Now what is a "bosom"? If you can find what a "bosom" is — and in this case Abraham's bosom — you will know where the beggar was taken.
Look in your dictionary. A "bosom" is the breast of a human being, with the arms as an enclosure; a loving embrace by the arms of one person about another; an intimate relationship.
So Lazarus was carried into an intimate relationship with Abraham.
Lazarus here is pictured as a person, perhaps even a Gentile, who received salvation. Do Gentiles, upon being converted and becoming Christ's, enter into any intimate relationship to Abraham? They certainly do! To the Gentile-born Galatians, the Scriptures written by Paul say definitely: "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed [children], and heirs according to the promise" (Gal. 3:29).
Through Christ they become the children of Abraham. Through faith we all become "the children of Abraham" (Gal. 3:7). That is an intimate relationship with Abraham. That is being taken into Abraham's bosom!
Now Abraham is an heir of God. God gave Abraham a promise. Notice (Gal. 3:29), those who through Christ become Abraham's children are heirs — but heirs according to the promise God made to Abraham.
The PROMISE Was Not Heaven!
Now what did God promise Abraham? To what promise was this beggar now an heir? Did God promise Abraham and his children heaven?
Let's not put any interpretation upon the sacred Word of God. No scripture is of any private interpretation — it is interpreted by other scriptures. It ought not to be interpreted by man.
To learn what God promised Abraham, we must turn back to Genesis 12.
"And Abram took Sarai his wife ... and they went forth to go into the land of Canaan; and into the land of Canaan they came.... And the Lord appeared unto Abram, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land" (Gen. 12:5-7).
The land of Canaan is on this earth, not up in heaven. This beggar through Christ became "Abraham's seed" — in the intimate relationship of one of Abraham's children. Then God included this beggar when He said:: "Unto thy seed will I give THIS LAND.
Again, later, God promised Abraham: "For all the LAND which thou seest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed FOREVER" (Gen. 13:15).
Again, still later: "In the same day the Eternal made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates" (Gen. 15:18). Here God wrote into the agreement, or the title to the property, the very boundary line of the property. Of course the expression "thy seed" refers in particular to Christ, but since this beggar was Christ's, he, also, was "Abraham's seed, and heir according to the promise."
The promise was not heaven. The promise was the land of Canaan, on this earth. It was forever, so the promise included eternal life, and eternal inheritance (Heb. 9:15). The promise, then, was eternal life on this earth!
Only an Heir!
Now notice an important point. The beggar was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom — that is, by Bible explanation, he became one of Abraham 's children, and therefore he became an heir to inherit the land on this earth, and eternal life.
The next question is, when was this beggar to inherit — to come into possession of eternal life in the promised land? Jesus, in telling about Lazarus and the rich man, did not cover that point. He only told what happened, not when. We must find the answer, not in human imagination or the false teaching of man, but in the Bible!
The son who is heir to his father's property cannot come into possession of it before his father inherits it. This beggar, carried into the intimate relationship of a son of Abraham, could not inherit either eternal life, or this land, prior to the time his father Abraham receives these promises.
When, then, did Abraham actually receive these promises? The startling answer of Scripture is-he didn't! He has not, even yet in our day, inherited these promises!
WHEN We Inherit the Promises
Scripture reveals the answer through the inspired speech of the very first Christian martyr, Stephen, who was stoned to death for these very words.
It is in Acts 7: "And he said, Men, brethren, and fathers, hearken; The God of glory appeared unto our father Abraham ... and said unto him, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and come into the land which I shall show thee. Then came he out of the land of the Chaldeans .. .into this land, wherein ye now dwell. And He gave him none inheritance in it ... yet He promised that he would give it to him for a possession, and to his seed after him" (Acts 7:1-5).
Again this amazing fact is stated in the faith chapter — Hebrews 11: "By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed.... By faith he sojourned in the LAND of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise.... These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth" (Heb. 11:8-13).
Abraham died, but has not to this day inherited the promises!
Abraham died, and was still dead, at the time of Christ's earthly ministry. We read in John 8:52, "Abraham is dead." At that time — centuries after he died — Abraham was not living on earth or in heaven or anywhere! He is still dead today. When, then, is he to inherit the promises?
At the time of the resurrection of the just, of course! The Kingdom of God is the government to be set up at Jerusalem to rule all nations after the second coming of Christ.
"For the Lord Himself shall descend from heaven .. . and the dead in Christ shall rise first" (I Thes. 4:16). Human mortals, in Christ, living and dead, receive eternal life — immortality — the promises God made to Abraham — at Christ's second coming. That is when they shall put on immortality. "Flesh and blood [human mortals] cannot inherit the Kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I show you a mystery; we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead [including Abraham and the beggar] shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality" (I Cor. 15:50-53).
Again, notice when Abraham and all his children co heirs are finally to inherit the promises — the Kingdom of God, on this earth:
"When the Son of man shall come in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him," — notice, this is the second coming of Christ — "then shall He sit upon the throne of His glory .. .then" — and not until then-"shall the King say unto them on His right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world" (Matt. 25:31-34).
Jesus said Abraham would receive the promises, including eternal life, through the resurrection: "But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living" (Matt. 22:31-32). Jesus did not say Abraham was then living. Yet the things God has promised are so certain they may be counted as if already accomplished. Abraham, as shown above by Scripture, was and still is dead. But Jesus spoke this about Abraham "as touching the resurrection of the dead." Abraham will be resurrected.
Jesus told one particular group they would see Abraham in the Kingdom (Luke 13:28), because Abraham, now dead, will then be resurrected from the dead.
Carried by Angels
Now again let's get back to what Jesus said about Lazarus in Luke. Jesus said this beggar died. So, like Abraham, he is still dead.
But after Lazarus died, Jesus said he "was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom." We now know that where he was carried was not up to heaven, but into the status of a son and heir of Abraham, to inherit the land on this earth, and eternal life upon it, at the time his father Abraham comes into his inheritance — at the time of the resurrection.
But notice, Lazarus is to be carried there by the angels!
When do the angels come down from heaven? In Matthew 25:31, quoted above, we saw that it was at the second coming of Christ — at the time of the resurrection.
Again, Scripture reveals: Christ shall "send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together His elect from the four winds" — out of their graves in a resurrection (Matt. 24:31). The time when the angels carry Lazarus and the saints into sharing the inheritance with Abraham — into Abraham's bosom — is the time of the resurrection. Lazarus is to be resurrected, and carried by the angels through the air to meet Christ, at His return, and to be with Abraham, in the intimate relation ship of father and son! Yes, how plain! Lazarus will then enjoy the fond embrace of his father through Christ, Abraham — both then resurrected and living forevermore, in the promised land, then inherited!
There is no doubt as to how the Bible uses the word "bosom." Turn to Isaiah 40:11. Here we find God will care for His people as a shepherd does his sheep, carrying them "in His bosom." Jesus was "in the bosom" of the Father (John 1:18), enjoying the Father's blessings and close relationship. Moses carried the children of Israel in his bosom (Num. 11:12). To be in one's bosom is to have that one's love and protection, and share his blessings and inheritance. So it will be at the resurrection.
The Fate of the Rich Man
Now let's see what happened to the rich man - and when.
Jesus said of him: ". . . The rich man also died, and was buried" (Luke 16:22). Jesus did not say the rich man was taken immediately at that time to an eternally burn ing hell. He did not say the body was buried but that the rich man himself was plunged immediately into a burning hell. He said the rich man died — and the rich man, himself, was buried.
Now one would hardly say that the act of throwing one into that imaginary burning caldron luridly described as hell was a burying of the person, would he? One is not buried unless he is covered up.
People are buried in a grave, and covered with earth. But the imaginary hell invented by Dante Alighieri and accepted by the Roman Catholic Church and later by most Protestants is never pictured as a place of burial. But this rich man died and was buried. He, himself, was buried — not a "house" he had lived in. Jesus said so — read it in your Bible.
What Kind of Hell?
In the next verse, Jesus said: "And in hell he lifted up his eyes" (verse 23).
So the rich man was in a place called "hell," after all, wasn't he? And in this hell he "lifted up his eyes." His eyes had been closed, in death, and now there came a time when they opened — he "lifted up his eyes."
What kind of "hell" is this?
Startling though it may be, the rich man was buried in the same kind of "hell" Jesus was buried in! Yes, Jesus died and was buried — and in "hell"!
In the first inspired sermon preached by Peter on the day the New Testament Church started, Peter said: "He [David] seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left IN HELL, neither his flesh did see corruption" (Acts 2:31).
Jesus, too, died and was buried. And in "hell" He, too, lifted up His eyes — when He was resurrected!
Now let me explain that, and make it plain!
The New Testament was written in the Greek language. Your Bible is a translation into the English language. In the English language your Bible probably reads, "And in hell he lifted up his eyes." However, in the original Greek in which the New Testament was written there are three different Greek words, each having a totally different meaning, but all three of which were translated into the King James version by the English word "hell."
One of the Greek words is tartaros, which refers only to the present condition of darkness, or perversion, and of restraint, of the fallen angels, or demons. Another is gehenna, a place at the bottom of a high ledge at the south end of Jerusalem, where garbage, refuse, and bodies of the ledge to be burned up. Down below, the fires were kept continually burning. They burned up, or consumed - totally destroyed the bodies and refuse dumped there. This is the word Jesus used when He spoke of being finally destroyed in "hell fire."
But this rich man was not buried in that "hell." He was not in gehenna. The third, and most commonly used Greek word was written here by Luke — hades. And hades means "the grave" — a place of burial in the ground!
When the King James translation of the Bible was made, Englishmen spoke commonly of "putting their potatoes in hell for the winter." They buried them in the ground!
This is the "hell" Jesus was buried in — the "hell" His soul was not left in — the grave, or tomb, from which He was resurrected! And this, hades, was also the "hell" in which the rich man was buried.
WHEN Did He Open His Eyes?
Now once again, Jesus did not say when this rich man, "in hell," lifted up his eyes. Jesus pictured him as one of the wicked, or lost. We must look to other scriptures to tell us when the unjust will lift up their eyes in their graves.
Daniel speaks of the resurrection of the just, and of the unjust: "And many of them that sleep [their eyes closed] in the dust of the earth [their graves-buried-in hades], shall awake [lift up their eyes], some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt" (Dan. 12:2).
Jesus said: "... The hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil [including the rich man], unto the resurrection of damnation [judgment]" (John 5:28-29).
Here Jesus speaks of two different, separate resurrections. Quoted above are scriptures showing that the "dead in Christ" are to be resurrected at His second coming. In I Corinthians 15:22-24, we read that all are to be resurrected — but in an order of different resurrections — Christ Himself, 1900 years ago; afterward, in a different resurrection, "they that are Christ's at his coming," and then "cometh the end" — indicating the resurrection of the unjust later.
In Revelation 20:4 we read of the resurrection of those in Christ at His coming. But Revelation 20:5 says: "But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished." So the resurrection of the rich man and all the unjust or unsaved will take place after the millennium! It is pictured and described in Revelation 20:11-13.
So, while Jesus in speaking about the rich man and Lazarus did not say when the rich man will open his eyes and be resurrected out of his grave, other scriptures do reveal that it will be after the millennium.
Are the Dead Conscious?
Notice, now, Lazarus, with Abraham and all the saints who are Abraham's children, is to be resurrected at the time of Christ's coming. They shall live through the millennium. But the rest of the dead shall not live until the thousand years are past. The rich man, then, will not come back to life until a thousand years after Abraham, Lazarus, and all who are Christ's have been made alive.
Will this rich man be conscious of the great lapse of time?
Your Bible says, if you will believe what it says: "For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything . . . for the memory of them is forgotten" (Eccl. 9:5) — that is, they have no consciousness while dead. They are totally unconscious! Job speaks of a dead man and says: "His sons come to honour, and he knoweth it not; and they are brought low, but he perceiveth it not of them" (Job 14:21). Isaiah says our father Abraham knows nothing of us, today (Isa. 63:16). David was inspired to write: "His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; m that very day his thoughts perish" (Psalm 146:4).
Many times people have died, and by the drug adrenalin or other methods the heart has been started beating again. Always they say they were totally unconscious — no dreams — no knowledge — just a total blank.
The rich man, then, at the time of his resurrection, after the millennium, will come to consciousness, open and lift up his eyes, knowing absolutely nothing of the hours, days, and years since he died. To him it will be the next fraction of a second from the time — he died. It will seem to him as if he had gone immediately to this state or condition in which he finds himself rising up out of the grave.
What Is This FLAME?
But when he is resurrected, he sees a flame which torments him. What is this?
Now Jesus did, on other occasions, speak of perishing and being destroyed in gehenna fire. What is this? It is described in Revelation 20:14-15, as a lake of fire.
Scripture everywhere describes the final fate of the wicked as being burned up. Their punishment is death by fire! It is this "lake of fire," which is "the second death," from which there shall be no resurrection! They remain forever dead! This death is for all eternity — eternal punishment — but it is not eternal punishing!
Now, opening his eyes in his grave, this rich man SEES Abraham, and Lazarus in his "bosom" — his embrace! He also sees this awful flame of fire — this lake of fire which is about to destroy him forever! He is terrified!
What happens when one is suddenly so horrified with fear? His mouth goes dry. His tongue sticks to his mouth and throat!
The rich man cries out in this mental agony: "Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my TONGUE; for I am tormented in this flame."
Now if the rich man were in the kind of "hell" most people seem to believe, his whole body would be on fire — you would think he would have called for at least a bucket of water to put out the fire, wouldn't you?
Look at this!
How much water did he call for? He said to Abraham: ".. . Send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water." Just a couple of drops — that's all the water he requested! Doesn't that strike you as strange?
Why did he call for water? To put out the fires of all "hell"? — the kind of hell people would have you believe he was in? Ah, no! He only wanted a mere couple of drops of water on Lazarus' finger — why? — "to 'cooL MY TONGUE'!" That's what the rich man said! Open your own Bible again, and read it!
The flame, he said, was "tormenting" him. This word "tormented," used in verses 24 and 25 is translated from the Greek word odunomai. This is defined in any Greek English lexicon as "to cause pain, to pain, distress; pain of body, but also, pain of mind; grief, distress."
Why, of course! This rich man opens his eyes in his grave in a resurrection. He is resurrected mortal, just as he was before he died — not immortal like Lazarus. He sees this lake of fire. Now he knows the frightful, the awful doom he is to be thrust into — to be burned up — destroyed! He is suffering mental anguish such as he never experienced in his lifetime. His tongue is dry. He breaks out in cold sweat. He cries for a little water on the tip of Lazarus' finger to cool his tongue! He is in a condition of weeping and gnashing of teeth!
The Final Hell Fire
Now once again read this in your Bible. Read exactly what Jesus said, not what the "hell-fire" preachers have told you He said! Did Jesus say this rich man was going to suffer endlessly and forever — always burning — being on fire — yet never burning up? Did He? Of course not!
There is not one word here about how long his anguish is to last.
Jesus was saying these things to those who would not repent. What did He want to make them understand, when He gave this account about Lazarus and the rich man? Jesus answers this question for us in Luke 13:27, 28 where He said: "Depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the Kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out." Yes, they are going to be in exactly the same position as this rich man! Jesus is using him as an illustration to show these individuals what is to befall them. They are to be thrust out — into the lake of fire which shall consume them, leaving them neither root nor branch, as the Scriptures say.
The wicked are going to be cast into the lake of fire. When they lift up their eyes in their resurrection, they shall know that they are doomed, now to be cast into the lake of fire to be burned up.
This rich man cried out for help because of his mental and physical anguish — knowing what was now to befall him! He knew he was guilty! When a man realizes he is guilty, and faces his just and terrible retribution, the very first part of the body to be affected is the tongue, which dries out — seems to be on fire.
What Is the Great Gulf?
But Abraham and Lazarus were afar off, and no water was brought. The rich man had to suffer mentally for his sins. He had had his reward, in the material things he sought and craved, during his mortal lifetime.
There is a great gulf fixed between this doomed sinner and all the glorified saints in God's Kingdom.
What is that great gulf?
The gulf mentioned by Abraham which prevents the wicked from escaping death by hell-fire, and which also keeps the righteous from being burned, is immortality. Those who are immortal shall never die because they are born of God (Rev. 20:6). But human beings who have not been begotten and born by the Spirit of God are still flesh, subject to corruption and death. They can be burned by fire.
Don't forget, this is a literal fire and the rich man is a human being composed of flesh and blood. Only the saved possess immortality as the gift of God (Rom. 2:7), but the wicked reap anguish and wrath that shall devour the adversary — fiery indignation (Heb. 10:27). What happens when a human body is being burned by a flame?
There is a period of torture during which the fire consumes the body before the person dies. Then what about this rich man? Jesus didn't say he was immortal, for if he were he would be spirit and flames do not burn spirit. Fire is a physical process. It is combustion of matter.
The rich man is a physical person just as you are.
And Jesus leaves us in this account, with the rich man hearing the words of Abraham in his mind or conscience and tormented by the flames that are billowing about his body.
A human body doesn't burn forever. It finally turns to ashes in a fire. Therefore we must go to other verses of the Bible to find out exactly what did happen after the short conversation recorded.
Matthew 13:30 speaks of the wicked being gathered into bundles to be burned. What happens to tares (weeds) when in fire? They burn up!
Again in Matthew 3:12, John warned the Pharisees that they would be burned up as chaff if they didn't repent. They are to be burned with unquenchable fire, too. A fire so hot that no amount of water put on it could put it out, because the flames would turn the water to steam.
When God punishes the wicked the fire will be unquenchable! But that doesn't say it won't burn itself out when it has nothing more to burn. An unquenchable fire can't be put out, but it can burn itself out when it has consumed everything.
Malachi 4:1, 3 speaks of this fire that will burn the rich man: "For, behold, the day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.... And ye shall tread down the wicked; for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet in the day that I shall do this."
That is the end of the wicked! They shall perish and not be any more. "Into smoke shall they consume away" (Psalm 37:20).
The rich man then, being mortal flesh, is going to burn up after being tormented in the flame. He is going to die the second death (Rev. 20:14). The wages of sin is death, not endless torment (Rom. 6:23).
The Rich Man's Brothers
The rich man at last realized he was doomed! He now comprehended the gulf that existed between him and those who had been made immortal. Abraham had made clear the utter impossibility of the rich man crossing that gulf into immortality. He had had his chance during his lifetime. He had passed it up for this world's material riches and pleasures. There was no hope for him. He was now doomed to perish in this lake of fire.
His last thought flashed finally to his five brothers. He gave one last cry to Abraham, begging him to send Lazarus to his father's house to plead with his brothers, lest they come to his terrible fate. Abraham replied they had the writings of Moses and the prophets. But the rich man realized they would not hear these scriptures.
"Nay, father Abraham:" he screamed, "but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent"! (Verse 30.)
The rich man knew Lazarus was raised from the dead! This one statement proves that the whole experience of Lazarus and the rich man was given by Jesus to show the truth of the resurrection — not to teach any immediate going to "heaven" or "hell" at the instant of death.
Abraham replied: "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one ROSE from the dead" (verse 31).
There it is! In plain language! The experience of Lazarus and the rich man shows the resurrection from the dead — not an instantaneous going to "heaven" or "hell." It is a resurrection from the dead — not from life. It shows mortality which dies, and is dead — not immortality which never loses consciousness and lives forever in an eternal punishing of the imaginary "hell." Jesus was showing a resurrection — or bringing back to life of one who was dead — of one who had no consciousness whatever of the lapse of centuries and millennia since his death.
Far from illustrating immortality of the soul and the lurid eternally burning torture of Dante's fabled "hell," Jesus illustrates death — total unconsciousness through the centuries — resurrection from death and restoration of consciousness — and, finally, the second death in the lake of fire that shall totally destroy the wicked — in which they perish — and become ashes under the soles of the feet of the saved — the eternal punishment of death — eternal death — the SECOND death!
The Warning for YOU!
Finally, what is the real lesson?
Jesus was preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom of God — the New Testament Gospel. He was showing salvation, the resurrection to eternal LIFE as the gift of God — inheritance of the Kingdom of God on this earth.
The Apostle Paul plainly tells us that the New Testament Church of God is built upon the foundation of the apostles and the prophets, Jesus Christ being the chief corner stone (Eph. 2:20). Jesus said: "I . will build my Church." Paul reveals it was built on the foundation of the PROPHETS as well as the apostles!
Jesus here teaches YOU that if you refuse to hear Moses and the prophets — and Moses was one of the prophets — you have no hope of salvation! The scriptures (Old Testament as well as New), according to II Timothy 3:15, are able to make us wise unto salvation. We are to take the whole Bible, not the New Testament only.
Those who teach that the Commandments of God are done away teach a message of doom! Those who teach the pagan doctrine of the immortality of the soul — going off to "heaven" at death, or eternal punishing — teach contrary to what Jesus said!
May you take heed, and hear all the Word of God!


text:
Qbit and the Keepers of the Blue Planet
by Paul Adam
Maria Parcak-Ruiz
Science Books about Women
Part 2: The Keepers: Emily- Chapters 7-8
Chapter 7- I'm a Keeper?
Emily asked, "So, did it turn out to be a test?"
"Um, some of it was and some of it wasn't"
"A test for, what?"
"They needed to know if I really was a Keeper."
"A Keeper, what do you mean a Keeper."
"That's what you and I are Emily, Keepers, the descendants of the original people that came to this planet to watch over the animals and beasts they brought with them."
Emily's eyes lit up, "I'm a Keeper? How do you know? I haven't had any tests!"
She thought about it for a second. "Is that why I have to go to Arcadia? To be tested?"
"Tested and taught. We're already pretty sure you're a Keeper."
"Oh yeah, how can you be so sure?"
"Just from watching you and seeing the way you go about doing things. Plus, Heron told me."
"Heron told you. So, I was right about being able to connect with him."
"Yep, he knew the moment he first met you."
Emily seemed to be lost in thought, she finally asked, "Did you ever meet him again?
"Mayuk."
"Yes, I did actually, we work together every now and then."
"Work, don't you mean worked?"
"Nope, once a Keeper always a Keeper.
Emily got up and walked to the railing and looked out at the trees. She turned to her and said, "It's so cool, my grandmothers a Keeper!" After a second, she asked, "What will Arcadia be like for me?"
Nee Nee went to the railing. "The most wonderful experience you could ever have and also, the scariest. You'll do things you never thought you could, meet people you never dreamed of meeting and go places you've never heard of. But you'll be put in situations that could get you seriously hurt and others that will leave a lasting impression on your heart."
"So, pretty boring, huh?"
Nee Nee laughed out loud. "Yes, terribly boring!"
They both turned to look out over the back yard and sat in silence for a while listening to the sounds of nature. A rumble of distant thunder echoed in the trees.
"Nee Nee, I'm scared."
"I know Lee Lee, but you need to go. Others are counting on you."
"But I worry about you! Are you going to be okay?"
She laughed gently and stroked Emily's hair. "You are such a sweet girl. I'll be fine, you don't have to worry about me. And who knows, maybe we'll run into each other – out there." She nodded towards the yard.
"Really, really."
The thunder rumbled, closer this time.
Nee Nee looked at her and said, "You better get going if you're going to beat the rain."
"I suppose." She looked up at her grandmother then suddenly threw her arms around her.
Surprised for a second, Nee Nee hugged Emily back. "What's this for, Sweetheart?"
Emily released her grandmother and took a step back. She wiped tears away from eyes with the back of her hand. "I don't know." She smiled up at her. "I guess it's a thank you for all you've done for me. Plus, I'm going to really miss you."
Nee Nee rubbed the side of her head and replied, "Oh Honey, don't think of this as an ending, this is the start of something fantastic for you. I'll be right here waiting to hear about all your adventures."
Just then the wind blew, exposing the underside of the leaves on the trees. "You better get a move on."
"Yeah, I suppose," answered Emily. She walked a little way down the porch towards the steps then turned to wave goodbye. "Bye Nee Nee."
"See you soon Love."
Emily spun around and ran to the steps then jumped down without touching any of them.
Chapter 8- Three Sisters
Emily stopped her bike at the stop sign and looked both ways before turning left. There was never anybody coming but it was something she did out of habit anyway. She rode about a hundred yards up the road and turned into the stone driveway. She rode up to the small tool shed and put her bike away. The thunder was rumbling closer now and she could smell the rain in the air, it wouldn't be long before it started. She walked up the slate path to the front door but stopped before going in. She took a couple steps back to admire the building.
Her parents and their engineering students from the local community college designed had built it. Its design is based on a Native American tradition of planting, called The Three Sisters. The method makes use of corn stalks planted in the center with pole beans and squash planted around it. The pole beans climb the stalk, using it as a support. The squash leaves cover the soil around the corn and bean plants, keeping the soil moist and preventing weeds from growing.
The house uses blocks, molded from mushroom juice and corn husks, placed around a curved support structure made from 3D printed organic material that hardens when exposed to sunlight. That structure becomes the support for a genetically altered native vine which takes the place of the pole beans. The vine tendrils are very strong, so as it grows up and around it helps to bind the mushroom blocks and support structure together. Squash, just like what's used in the Three Sisters except leaves are treated with Nano particles, are planted around the base. The squash uses the pole beans as support as it makes its way up the building. The Nano particles allow the current generated by the natural photosynthesis process to flow through the stems and into storage centers placed throughout the structure. The leaves become the electrical system for the structure producing enough power for the entire building. The current can also travel through the plant's root systems to the roots of other similar structures nearby, allowing the excess current from one building to be sent to any of the others when needed. Excess electricity can also be stored in batteries for use on cloudy days. Heating and cooling occur much the same way a termite mound works. Openings in strategic places allow for the flow of air, bringing in cool air in the summer and distributing warm air in the winter. Each building blends so well into its surroundings that, from a short distance, you might not even know they were there.
Emily walked through the door, took her shoes off and headed for the kitchen. Her parents were waiting for her at the table.
"Hey," she said as she passed them on the way to the refrigerator for a drink of water. She could hear through the open window by the sink that she had just barely beaten the rain home. Large drops splattered off the squash leaves.
Her parents first looked at each other, then turned to look at her. Her mom asked, "You were at Nee Nee's, right?"
She put the container of water on the counter and got a glass from the cabinet. "Yep."
They both said, "Well?"
She slowly filled the glass, put the container back, then went back to the glass and drank the water without pausing. She let out a loud burb then said, "Excuse me!"
Her mom said, "Manners, please."
"Well, what?"
Her father replied, slightly annoyed, "Did you speak to your grandmother?"
"Oh, yes, yes I did."
"What did you talk about then?"
Emily went over to the table, pulled out a chair, sat down and folded her hands. "I don't know, the usual."
"The usual?"
"Yeah, you know, gardening stuff, the weather, Native American traditions and how the younger generation doesn't appreciate elders the way they should. Normal stuff."
Her mom and dad looked at each other again. Her dad turned to her and asked, "Nothing else?"
"Nope. Why, was there something she was supposed to tell me?"
"Well, yes. We were hoping she would talk to you about something important. She said she would."
She tilted her head toward the ceiling and put her finger to her chin and tapped it. "Hmm, let me think…something important…ohhh, yeah, there was something else."
Her mom perked up, "What was it?"
"She mentioned something about me being a Keeper, the same as her, and that I needed to go to Florida to be with Uncle Dave so I could learn all sorts of things about saving animals and stuff." She looked at them and broke into a big grin.
Her dad slapped his hand on the table. You stinker! She told you we were going to be here waiting to find out what she said, didn't she?"
She laughed and said, "Yep, she did."
Her mom asked, "So, what do you think? Do you want to go? Or do you want to stay? Either way is fine with us. We want what you want. I don't think you'll be gone for a long time. You could come back any time you want."
"Easy mom, you're going to blow a gasket. I want to go, I think. I'm both scared and excited at the same time."
Emily could see tears in her mom's eyes. She took hold of Emily's hand and said, "We're so proud of you."
"I haven't done anything yet, Mom."
"I mean we're so proud of who've grown up to be, the things you believe in and how you go about doing them. That's what we're proud of."
Emily slumped in her seat a little and said, "What if I screw up down there? Will you still feel the same way about me?"
Her dad said, "Of course we will, Jellybean. We'll always feel that way, no matter what. You need to not worry about that sort of stuff and just go there to learn what you can and have a good time. Hopefully, it will be a great experience."
She looked at them, "What do you think about me being a Keeper? Is that alright?"
Her mom grabbed her hand and said, "Alright? It's better than alright, it's fantastic!"
"It doesn't make me a freak, or anything, does it?"
"Do you think Nee Nee is a freak?"
"Of course not!"
"Well then, neither are you. You have a gift, something hardly anyone else on this planet has. You should feel lucky, not embarrassed."
"What about at the school? Do you think the other kids will be like me? I mean, not the talking to animals' thing, but, scared and nervous."
Her dad took her other hand, "Honey, every year your mom and me see new students come into our classes. They feel the same way, nervous, unsure of themselves, worried about saying the wrong thing' It's only natural. But after four years, they leave more confident and surer of who they are and what they want to do with their lives. I'm sure it's going to be the same way with you. You need to give it a chance but, remember, it won't happen overnight either."
"Yeah, I guess. I can't believe I have to leave at the end of the week, though."
Her parents both popped out of their seats and exclaimed in unison, "What? The end of the week? No way!"
Dragons, fantasy, mythical beasts, science fiction, Stories for tweens
Part 2: The Keepers: Emily- Chapters 9-12

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


April 20, 2015: The Rainforest Alliance is releasing detailed scores from its bi-annual Cupping for Quality event. The cupping featured 49 coffee samples from Colombia, Ethiopia, India, Kenya and Rwanda, which were reviewed by a panel of expert cuppers. Balzac Brothers hosted the event at their SCAA certified lab in Charleston, South Carolina.
This year, the average score was 83.87 Points; 80 is the threshold for specialty categorization, according to SCAA cupping protocol. These results demonstrate that the sustainable farming practices required for Rainforest Alliance certification can lead to a better tasting cup of coffee. The highest score – 88.68 points – went to Gathacha, a farm located in Kenya. KZ Noir, the first Rainforest Alliance CertifiedTM farm in Rwanda, also competed in the spring cupping. This is the first Rwandan coffee to be cupped at the Rainforest Alliance Cupping for Quality.
In 2013, more than 454,962 metric tons of coffee was produced on Rainforest Alliance Certified farms, a 20 percent increase over 2012. In 2014, that number jumped to 662,000 metric tons. Coffee from Rainforest Alliance CertifiedTM farms now represents over 5.2 percent of global production.
For more information on sustainable sourcing or to set up an interview with a Rainforest Alliance representative, please contact: Brittany Weinke, BWeinke(at)ra(dot)org, (212) 677-1900.
The Rainforest Alliance is a global non-profit that works to conserve biodiversity and ensure sustainable livelihoods by transforming land-use practices, business practices, and consumer behavior. The Rainforest Alliance CertifiedTM seal is an internationally recognized symbol of environmental, social, and economic sustainability that helps both businesses and consumers identify products that come from sustainable sources and vote with their dollars to help support a brighter future. For more information, visit http://www.rainforest-alliance.org.


text:
Crookhill Primary School's Special St Oswald's Connection
Pupils at Crookhill Primary School in Ryton, Gateshead, have been working on a very unusual canvas in their classroom this term.
With Elmer's Great North Parade around the corner, the school have been busy painting their very own little elephant sculpture, alongside fundraising over £7000 for the Hospice. The primary school has two special connections to the Hospice, giving them even more motivation to get involved.
Mrs O'Shaughnessy and Mrs Bunting are both teachers at the school and have two very different stories as to why they support St Oswald's.
Mrs O'Shaughnessy said:
I found out I was having twins but that there would be some complications. All of the teachers were aware but I didn't want to tell the world, I wanted to make sure I had valuable time with my boys. Mrs Bunting then came in to be my maternity cover.
Danyl and Dylan were born in October. I had been told Danyl only life 4-6 weeks which was heart-breaking. St Oswald's were there from the 20 week scan when I found this out. We used their family support service for months and really got to know all the staff. My eldest son Oliver really benefitted from his time there.
We had decided to use St Oswald's for end of life care for Danyl, but he seemed to defy all odds. We were able to celebrate Danyl's 1st birthday together, although he sadly passed away a few days after. We sent a letter out to all of the parents of the school to tell them what had happened. It was incredible though, the school have done everything for us, we're a family here and it really shows.
I don't know what I would've done without the Hospice, it's been my support, it's got me through the days, helped with pre and post bereavement and Oliver still goes for play therapy.
Mrs Bunting said:
We found out my husband Andy had a brain tumour and needed surgery quickly, he was only 38 years old. The Hospice helped us after his surgery, he stayed in for a few weeks to recover. We got to talk to all the nurses so I could understand how to look after him, his medication and all the other daily stuff in between.
We had both signed up to do the Great North Run together. Andy had already done it 5 times previously and although I knew he wouldn't make it, we still supported each other. He died in the May, just 4 months before the run. I knew I had to do it and I was cursing him the whole time, but I managed to finish it with my friends. We raised over £38,000! It was incredible. I also did the Firewalk for St Oswald's with a few staff members earlier in the year.
Andy would come into the Hospice every week for physiotherapy. I'd look forward to every Tuesday as it was the only time I could leave him knowing he was in safe hands. The Hospice offered me complementary therapy at the same time, it was such a relief. I had an hour to myself where I'd be pampered and could get looked after. I wasn't worrying, I was just relaxing.
I still see the physiotherapists around, they always come up to me and we hug, just like seeing friends, its lovely. St Oswald's just prepared me. I worked with the nurses and it was all the preparation that made things a little easier.
As well as decorating a sculpture for Elmer's Great North Parade, the staff and pupils at Crookhill have worked hard all year fundraising for St Oswald's Hospice. Their choir sang in Asda for donations, they've held bake sales, sold St Oswald's merchandise and supported the Hospice through their summer fair and fun runs. Some staff have also signed up to do a skydive for the Hospice later in the year.
You can see Crookhills Elmer on the trail across Tyne and Wear for 11 weeks from 21st August. You can find out more here.


A lot more most college applications usually are submitted, it is actually time to move your care about the school funding applications. In tight economic instances, many families are unable and schools are at the same time. Along with the stock game collision, many colleges' endowments were severely damaged. I know associated with countless top schools that eliminated merit scholarships altogether. This is extremely complicated on people whose income falls within the "middle income melt" range, if a family's profit is possibly not low enough to qualify for plenty of need-based assistance instead of superior enough to obtain your university education and learning outright. It's a tough identify to take.
Zero Essay College Scholarships: Is That Available?
For any of us which applied to class some time past when – whenever you would have entered your essay on the typewriter rather than a pc – things were different. When I use higher education, there does exist zero SAT prep on the inside my location, application deadlines were February or later, few universities required essays, and additionally quite a few educational institutions admitted everyone which applied. Today the case is completely different.
For the reason that same vein, keep in mind that everyone will examine your essay whilst still being have that be the better choice. Don't assume that this reader already knows concerning you, that slightest bit. Assume that various readers knows nothing around yourself or for the story you need to reveal to. If you really grasp that idea, you will see the importance of which include detail as part of your authoring. In a personal narrative dissertation, facts are particularly significant. That they make the actual difference with the very simple report on incidents, in addition to a unique story. So, whatever affair or experience if you find yourself relating inside essay, usually do not let it rest in bland, choppy sentences, just like "I awoke. I acquired dressed. I went to class. I went along to class. " Details tell the many readers which you're, and result in the article much easier to read. Don't just claim that most people awakened; alternatively, tell families the method that you have been feeling the moment the security alarm went off, so that you attack the snooze button a couple of times. Every bit of detail which you add to your essay creates depth and interest. Your inner entire world of opinions and feelings can be just as important to the essay for the true events that happened, so make sure you don't allow it to needlessly sit out there.
College Prowler only permits people to get in monthly. Right at the end of launched, successful is actually randomly selected, along with being knowledgeable in the 15th for the in the future when she or he provides won the scholarship. Twelfth grade, college and graduate students meet the requirements to apply for this no-essay college scholarship like international students who may have accepted visas. Students has to be at the least 13 years of age. old to be able to use.


A federal jury awards damages to the University of California and a browser technology company after finding that the software giant infringed a patent.
A federal court in Chicago has ruled that Microsoft must pay $521 million to a Web technology company and the University of California after finding that the software giant's Internet Explorer infringed one of their patents.
The company, called Eolas Technologies, originally filed suit against Microsoft in 1999, alleging that the Redmond, Wash., giant infringed on one of its patents when enabling Internet Explorer to use plug-ins and applets in the software. The company's technology was first outlined in a patent application in the early 1990s.
Martin Lueck, an attorney with Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi who represented Eolas, said the jury likely was swayed by internal documents from Microsoft. The specific patent from Eolas was not mentioned in the documents, but Microsoft executives had described the necessity for technology that conformed to the outlines of the patent.
"Microsoft executives talked about the need to have a browser that would serve as an application delivery platform," Lueck said.
"It's been 10 years since we first created the technology, and it has been a long road," Doyle said. He added that the company will use the proceeds of the case to fund research projects already under way at Eolas. Eolas has 100 stockholders.
Although Eolas obtained a jury verdict on Monday, the case is far from over. Microsoft will appeal.
"While today's outcome is disappointing, we do plan to appeal this decision, and we are confident the facts and the law will support our position," Microsoft said in a statement. "We believe the evidence will ultimately show that there was no infringement of any kind and that the accused feature in our browser technology was developed by our own engineers based on pre-existing Microsoft technology."
Additionally, the judge in the district court case will hear evidence in the coming weeks on a counterclaim from Microsoft. The software giant said the Eolas' patent is invalid and that an inventor name Pei Wei, who worked at O'Reilly and Associates, came up with similar technology, but at an earlier time. A Microsoft representative said that Eolas knew of his work, which makes their lawsuit inequitable.
Lueck dismissed Microsoft's allegations that the technology was covered by earlier inventions crafted by Pei Wei.
"If you look at the time when these patents were filed, 1993, the Internet was just beginning. There isn't any prior art," Lueck said. "It is a weak argument."
The technology in question is one of the fundamental elements of Web browsing. Applets and plug-ins allow Web surfers to view multimedia or real-time content within a Web browser rather than a separate software application. Features such as movie clips, streaming audio, and live stock quotes can be embedded into a Web page and served to consumers.
Eolas claimed that Microsoft's patent infringement allowed the software giant to win the browser war against Netscape Communications. Microsoft in May said it would pay AOL Time Warner $750 million to settle a lawsuit brought on by America Online subsidiary Netscape.
The patent was originally filed by the University of California and inventors Michael Doyle, David Martin and Cheong Ang.
Eolas also came up with the "e" logo, which IBM purchased the rights to use in 1997.


We work one-on-one with you. We only take on a limited number of clients to ensure a high standard of personalized service.
We go beyond the match. We're committed to bringing out your best qualities before the date. Date coaching and ongoing support and encouragement are included in your membership.
We take care of the details. We arrange that all-important first date for you.
You are in control. We get your feedback after the date. We use that feedback to fine tune the search, if needed.
Contact us today to start your membership.


text:
Barbra Streisand speaks out against U.S. voter ID laws
Superstar BARBRA STREISAND is encouraging fans to stand up and fight against new U.S. voter identification laws which threaten to bar minorities and the elderly from heading to the polls this November (12).
Published 14th August 2012
The Funny Girl singer/actress is not a fan of state legislation which demands residents produce valid photo ID cards before allowing them to vote, and like many critics of the scheme, she fears it will only present problems for the poor and the elderly as many of them do not possess the required documentation, which costs money to apply for, and will therefore not be able to vote in the upcoming Presidential elections.
The idea of the voter ID law is to prevent fraudulent votes being cast, but Streisand insists the legislation favoured by members of the Republican Party is not the way to go.
In a post on her website, she writes, "The new laws requiring US citizens to produce photo IDs at the poll are designed to deprive elderly and minority citizens of the precious right to cast their vote. These regressive laws are themselves the most dangerous voter fraud threatening American democracy."
Streisand, a registered Democrat, has also given fans the links to two websites which may be of help for anyone affected by the new laws.
She adds, "I would like to direct you to two key non-partisan organizations which may be able to help you protect your own right to vote or who can direct you in how you can help protect the endangered rights of others. There is a great need for concerned activist assistance."


The Alaska Marine Conservation Council is excited to host the first ever Homer Halibut Festival on September 19th & 20th, 2015!
Homer is often called the Halibut Capital of the World, and this is a title we want to celebrate! We are kicking off the Homer Halibut Festival as an opportunity for the community to celebrate the iconic halibut resource of Homer and of Alaska. The weekend's activities will provide ample opportunity to learn about halibut science and fisheries management, enjoy a community meal with friends, run the 5K Halibut Hustle and through music, storytelling and art, honor the fish and fishing traditions that have enriched the End of the Road. Through knowledge and celebration, we hope to increase awareness and stewardship of both halibut and marine ecosystems.
Learn more and view the full festival schedule at www.homerhalibutfest.org.
Thank you to all of our generous sponsors who made this event possible!


text:
Le taser X-26 est un pistolet à impulsion électrique développé par la société Axon Enterprise

Cadre d'utilisation
Comme dans toute situation de légitime défense la proportionnalité doit être prise en compte lors de l'utilisation de l'arme. L'arme reste létale.

France
L'arrêté "Instructions relatives à l'emploi du PIE (LBD et GMD) de la Police Nationale et de la Gendarmerie" de 2014 en France encadre les conditions d'utilisation de l'arme.

Le recours au dit "PIE" (Pistolet à Impulsion Électrique) est soumis au régime d'où bien de la légitime défense, dans un cas de nécessité ou lorsqu'il y a un besoin de contrainte légitime

 Légitime défense : art 122-5 code pénal. Utilisation de la force devant une atteinte injustifiée envers soi-même ou autrui sauf s'il y a disproportion entre les moyens de défense et la gravité de l'atteinte. Il en est de même pour la légitime défense des biens hors l'homicide volontaire.
 État de nécessité : art 122-7 code pénal. Utilisation de la force devant un danger actuel ou imminent envers soi-même, autrui ou un bien sauf s'il y a disproportion entre les moyens de défense et la gravité de l'atteinte.
 Contrainte légitime : art 122-4 code pénal et 73 code de procédure pénale. Lorsque l'auteur d'un crime ou d'un délit flagrant s'oppose à son interpellation, un membre des forces de l'ordre peut faire appel à un Taser.

États-Unis
L'arme peut-être légalement détenue des particuliers dans 46 des États Américains.

Munitions
L'arme peut utiliser trois types de cartouches, chacune avec un niveau de puissance différent (Gris, Jaune, Vert par ordre de puissance).

Les cartouches doivent être rechargées électriquement après une intervention.

Variantes

 X-26P "Plus sûr" selon l'entreprise

 X-26P CEW

Utilisateurs
France : 25 000 tasers possédés par la police ;
États-Unis : police et armée.

Notes et références

Pistolet

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Conversations With Spirits
By E O Higgins
The story of a dissipated genius in a borrowed hat and coat
Review in the Baker Street Journal
Conversations with Spirits has been reviewed in the latest edition of The Baker Street Journal.
Founded by Edgar W. Smith in 1946, the quarterly is the world's leading publication about Sherlock Holmes and Arthur Conan Doyle.
"Conversations with Spirits by E O Higgins. London: Unbound, 2013. 244 pp. £9.99.
This very funny - yet often quite touching - first novel takes place in December 1917.
The narrator and protagonist, Trelawney Hart, has escaped from the fame he acquired as a child genius, and from the misery of his wife's death, by plunging deeply into the bottle.
Raised to be a perfect, logical thinker like John Stuart Mill, Hart is commissioned by Conan Doyle to offer an independent validation of medium J. P. Beasant, who claims he will walk through a ten foot-thick solid brick structure.
The alcoholic logician, described as 'all brain and no heart,' and the spiritualist novelist play off each other nicely until the big reveal in the final scene."
1st edition hardback and the ebook edition.


Innovative inclusive employment job board, VERCIDA, has announced a partnership with Irish data science firm, Opening.io, to provide a world-first job-matching service using artificial intelligence (AI).
The new arrangement means VERCIDA will be integrating Opening.io's artificial intelligence technology into their job boards and using intuitive searching to help people find work that suits their skills and profile. The groundbreaking system allows candidates to directly upload their CV to the VERCIDA site, then see suitable vacancies seamlessly matched to them.
Next post Interested in joining Wild Inventions?


text:
Andrea	in | April 10, 2018
507: Unsupervised
http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/athousandthingstotalkabout.com/podcast-player/3634/507-unsupervised.mp3
Do you or would you let a kid run around your neighborhood unsupervised? At what age do you think that would be "OK"?
On May 8, the state of Utah will become the first in the nation to have a quote-unquote free range parenting law on the books. It's a law that specifically protects parents who choose to allow their children to engage in independent activities unsupervised, as long as the children are not being neglected. Specifically, a concerned passer-by reporting unsupervised children to child welfare would not, in and of itself, warrant an investigation.
Quoting from Desert News:
While [this] bill had unanimous support in the Utah Legislature, it might have run into opposition in states where parents have run afoul of local child welfare agencies because they let their kids engage in such activities as walking or playing unsupervised. In Maryland, for example, Danielle and Alexander Meitiv were mired in a child welfare investigations after letting their children, 10 and 6, walk a mile home from a park and another adult called police. Texas author Kari Anne Roy endured a monthlong probe for letting her son, 6, play on a bench 150 feet away but visible from her porch, sparking complaints from a neighbor.
Not all states have laws specifically laying out the age at which a child can be left alone at home or in a car, but many do. Those ages rage between 6 and 12 years.
Quoting further from the Deseret News article:
And the point that people worry that just being alone makes children vulnerable was driven home further when a similar bill hit a wall in Arkansas a year ago. The bill sailed through the Arkansas Senate, but died after someone in a House committee hearing said it takes just 37 seconds to steal a child. While no documentation was offered to back that assertion, the bill died.
The social fear of the worst-case scenario is strong — and when you have experienced something bad or had family experience bad things, you're more likely to expect that bad things will happen again. This catastrophic thinking can fly in the face of the statistics that crime – especially stranger-crime against children — has gone down consistently for decades. But it's still very different when the children are yours or your family.


text:
Lost In... Movies
Where I talk about movies, TV shows and other things close to my heart.
Sabrina (1995) Review – Decently Charming Remake
Date: 7. June, 2020Author: Luke 1 Comment
It's not that long ago I have re-watched the original Sabrina (1954), so I've decided to give this remake a go, after all, look at that pedigree! Harrison Ford, Julia Ormond, Greg Kinnear and many more, being directed by the one and only Sydney Pollack? Movie like that deserves a watch.
And I need to say, I was pleasantly surprised, even though at times, slightly confused. Sabrina is definitely not the worst remake I've ever seen, even though it is at least 80% the same exact movie. There was some minor changes (like Sabrina going to France, but not to learn to be a cook/chef, but to work for Vogue, being involved with fashion world) and for me two major changes, and paradoxically, one made the movie better and one slightly worse, even though it was necessary.
Beware, SPOILERS are coming!
Let's start with the good change – in the original movie, I didn't get the "transformation" of the playboy brother to the "alright, I'm going to take the reigns now" guy at the end. Whereas in this movie, Greg Kinnear sold it better, where you can see his character more throughout other characters in this movie, so when he steps up, and shows everyone, that it's not just his older brother, who knows thing or two about the business, it doesn't feel as sudden. I did like it and I thought Kinnear's performance might sneakily be the best in this movie, but as his role isn't as big, it's easy to forget about him.
The "bad" thing was Harrison Ford's character, as they made him more cynical and jaded (at least it seemed like that to me) than in the original movie. The reason for the word bad being in quotes is, I do understand why they have done it, as his character (until he falls for Sabrina almost at the end) is really a bad person, who's putting his company first, no matter what. And again, I totally understand why, as his character motivations were stated quite clearly in the movie, about filling out his dad's shoes and making sure he's a good fit for this company, but when you think about it, he's the antagonist (villain) of the story, that only becomes the protagonist (the good guy) maybe 20/30 minutes before the end. But Harrison definitely was good in this movie, no question about it.
Julia Ormond was charming, but to me, she's had the toughest job of all the actors, as playing the same role as the icon whom Audrey Hepburn unquestionably was, must've been terrifying. Look, nobody can't really compare to Audrey, as she was the total package – charisma, charm, beauty, elegance, wit… but Julia managed, and I thought she did well.
The movie overall won't really surprise you, even if you haven't seen the original from 1954, as it follows what became one of the most copied story structures – poor person (usually a woman) watches/works for rich people most of her life, than she's sent someplace for a year or two, comes back, but now she's sophisticated, and changed, to a point where some of the rich people don't even recognise her for a bit, and once they do, they fall for her and realise, what they've had right in front of them the entire time. It became a cliche, but it became a cliche for a good reason, as most of us can relate to watching the rich people having good time and secretly wanting to be them.
The only other thing I need to say is, this might be one of the rare instances, where a bit of fairy tale storytelling works a bit better for a movie (the original) rather than the shot of cynicism that (even though is needed) slightly puts the movie down a bit. That's why I'll prefer the original over re-watching this remake of Sabrina any time soon, even though it's not a bad movie at all. It's just more realistic, mainly when comes to the characters and sometimes, you want that, and sometimes, you just want the fairy tale, with the lovely Audrey.
Rating: 3.5 out of 5.
That's all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!
19953.5*
Movie and TV lover with opinions about everything.	View all posts by Luke
Previous Previous post: Cook Off (2017) Review – Nice Effort, Questionable Execution
Next Next post: Maleficent: Mistress of Evil (2019) Review – Dark, Dramatic… Decent
One thought on "Sabrina (1995) Review – Decently Charming Remake"
Pingback: Sabrina (1995) Review – Decently Charming Remake — Lost In… Movies | First Scene Screenplay Festival
1* 1.5* 2* 2.5* 3* 3.5* 4* 4.5* 5* 1937 1938 1940 1947 1950 1954 1955 1958 1962 1967 1968 1975 1976 1977 1980 1981 1983 1984 1987 1991 1992 1995 1997 1998 1999 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Non-English Not a Review NSFW PodcastReview Star Wars Think Piece
Previous Articles:
© 2021 Lost In... Movies


text:
Q: Best load testing tools for Symfony2 I have a question about the load testing tools that can help my website developed with Symfony2 to ensure good performance.
I'm really new about testing so I need to know the best open source tools to use for Symfony2?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange