text:
Allegran dating
The company touted that the drug had met both registrational co-primary endpoints in the two trials, and said it plans to file for approval with the Food and Drug Administration in 2019, but it will also have a formidable rival in this drug category, biopharmaceutical company Allergan . Allergan announced positive late-stage results for its migraine drug, ubrogepant, in February, and also expects to file with the FDA in 2019. shares dropped nearly 23% in premarket trade Monday after the company released data from two phase 3 clinical trials for its migraine drug rimegepant.The latest clinical trial data for Biohaven's rimegepant appeared to have no signal of liver toxicity issues, which has been a concern with these oral drugs intended to treat acute symptoms of migraine, said Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat, though he noted that one of the studies had a p-value of 0.03 on a measure of freedom from pain at two hours, though the p-value threshold was 0.05.In addition, Biohaven and Allergan's trials were not designed exactly the same, Raffat said.Still, how Allergan's 25-mg dose looks in the second phase 3 trial will be "especially important if they can hit on efficacy and not have liver [toxicity]," he said, and results for a new phase 3 trial run by Biohaven with a different formulation will also matter.Many companies are rushing to develop new migraine therapies, many of them intended to prevent painful migraines before they occur. are among those developing drugs for acute migraine, intended to relieve the attacks once they occur.Biohaven expects to release additional results from the trials at scientific meetings this year.
No subscribe free sex chat 121
not dating but jealous
sex dating in woodruff wisconsin
Totally free adult chat and browes and date
Free veb cam sex chat keralas
Sex chat premium
Biohaven shares have dropped 26.9% over the last month, compared with a 4.6% drop in the S&P 500 . Allergan previously made a deal with the New York state American Indian tribe the St.Regis Mohawk Tribe to protect Restasis from competition using the tribe's sovereign immunity as a shield against patent challenges, a deal that was widely criticized, including by lawmakers.Generic drugmaker Mylan made the patent challenge against Allergan's Restasis, which targets six patents.Mylan Chief Executive Health Bresch called Allergan's deal with the tribe "a sham." The tribe had not established that its sovereign immunity applied to the specific patent challenge proceedings, the PTAB said, and that even if it did apply, the challenge could continue because Allergan was still involved as an owner of the patents.
An oral hearing on the case is tentatively scheduled for April 3, and a final written decision is expected by June 6.
A Texas district court judge also previously ruled against Allergan on similar issues last fall. shares rose 1.7% and 1.1% respectively in premarket trade Wednesday after the companies announced that their drug met its primary endpoint in a phase 3 trial testing it in women with uterine fibroids.
Allegran dating comments
Dating Information - Allegran test environment
Find that special someone with Date the UK's online dating service. Date the UK is the best way for UK singles to meet people online in the UK for fun, friendship and flirting.…
Allergan, Inc. - Wikipedia
Allergan, Inc. was an American global pharmaceutical company focused on eye care, neurosciences, medical dermatology, medical aesthetics, breast enhancement, obesity intervention and urologics. Allergan, Inc. was formed in 1948, incorporated in 1950 and became a public company in 1970. it ceased operation in.…
Talk to sluts no cams -
K9 personals chat -
100 friends partners dating site directory -
keira knightley and orlando bloom dating -


If you are a practitioner of yoga, it is likely that you would want to have something of that appear in your garden. This yoga frog - cobra pose figure should do the trick. She is in the classic cobra pose, and gazes up happily from the position. Her long legs and froggy toes point nicely, her delicate hands support her, and the adorable expression says it all. Alone in her practice or with other yoga posing frogs, this figure brings a sense of calm and whimsy to any part of the garden.


Adding the work to the deal is a requirement to receive the payment. Therefore, we absolutely require for it to be added to the service.
If you don't have access to the final files, ask your Employer to share with you screens of work or links to it.


taking a sample of tissue (biopsy) from the liver for examination under a microscope.
National Cancer Institute. Liver cancer treatment (PDQ): patient version.
Ryder SD. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in adults. Gut 2003;52(Suppl 3):1–8.


text:
Конрад Вжещиньский (; 10 сентября 1993, Пултуск, Польша) — польский футболист, полузащитник клуба «Ягеллония».

Карьера
Футбольную карьеру начал в 2012 году в составе клуба «Полония» Варшава. В 2013 году стал игроком польского клуба «Мотор» Люблин.

В 2014 году подписал контракт с клубом «Видзев». В начале 2019 года перешёл в казахстанский клуб «Кайрат».

Достижения
 «Кайрат»
 Чемпион Казахстана: 2020
 Серебряный призёр чемпионата Казахстана: 2019

Клубная статистика

Примечания

Ссылки

Футболисты Польши
Игроки ФК «Полония» Варшава
Игроки ФК «Мотор» Люблин
Игроки ФК «Видзев»
Игроки ФК «Погонь» Седльце
Игроки ФК «Заглембе» Сосновец
Игроки ФК «Кайрат»
Игроки ФК «Ягеллония»

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
2 Desert Research Institute, University and Community College System of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512, USA.
3 Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
4 Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Desert Research Institute, University and Community College System of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512, USA.
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
High amounts of snowfall have increased the thickness of the interior of the East Antarctic ice sheet from 1992 to 2003.


text:
mini|hochkant=1.2|
Der 200-Meter-Lauf der Frauen bei den Leichtathletik-Weltmeisterschaften 2011 wurde am 1. und 2. September 2011 im Daegu-Stadion der südkoreanischen Stadt Daegu ausgetragen.

In diesem Wettbewerb errangen die US-amerikanischen Sprinterinnen mit Silber und Bronze zwei Medaillen.
Weltmeisterin wurde die zweifache Olympiasiegerin (2004/2008) und zweifache Vizeweltmeisterin (2007/2009) Veronica Campbell-Brown aus Jamaika. Über 100 Meter hatte sie außerdem 2007 WM-Gold, 2005 WM-Silber und 2004 Olympiabronze errungen. Mit der 4-mal-100-Meter-Staffel hatte sie vier weitere Medaillen gewonnen: 2005 und 2007 jeweils WM-Silber, 2000 Olympiasilber, und 2004 Olympiagold. Auch hier in Daegu gab es für sie vier Tage zuvor über 100 Meter mit Silber und am Schlusstag als Mitglied der Sprintstaffel mit Gold zwei weitere Medaillen.
Den zweiten Platz belegte die frisch gebackene 100-Meter-Weltmeisterin Carmelita Jeter, die 2007 und 2009 jeweils WM-Bronze über 100 Meter errungen hatte. Außerdem war sie 2007 Weltmeisterin mit der Sprintstaffel und siegte am Schlusstag auch hier wieder mit ihrer Staffel.
Bronze ging an die dreifache 200-Meter-Weltmeisterin (2005/2007/2009) und zweifache Olympiazweite über 200 Meter (2004/2008) Allyson Felix. Auch sie hatte weitere Staffelerfolge in ihrer Sammlung. Über 4 × 400 Meter war sie zweifache Weltmeisterin (2007/2009) und Olympiasiegerin von 2008, über 4 × 100 Meter hatte sie 2007 Gold gewonnen. Hier in Daegu war sie vier Tage zuvor Zweite im 400-Meter-Einzelfinale geworden und gewann zwei weitere Goldmedaillen mit der 4-mal-100- sowie der 4-mal-400-Meter-Staffel.

Bestehende Rekorde

Auch nach diesen Weltmeisterschaften hatte der bereits seit 1987 bestehende WM-Rekord weiter Bestand.

Doping
Die Resultate der im Halbfinale ausgeschiedenen Russin Julija Guschtschina wurden nach positiven Dopingbefunden in Nachtests aus dem Jahr 2017 von den Olympischen Spielen 2012 und den Weltmeisterschaften 2011 beginnend mit dem 1. September 2011 bis 31. Dezember 2014 annulliert. Die Athletin wurde außerdem mit einer vierjährigen Sperre bis zum 27. März 2021 belegt.

Benachteiligt war eine Athletin, der die Halbfinalteilnahme verwehrt wurde. Unter Zugrundelegung der hier erzielten Resultate war dies die Schwedin Moa Hjelmer, die sich über die Zeitregel eigentlich für das Halbfinale qualifiziert hatte.

Vorrunde
Die Vorrunde wurde in fünf Läufen durchgeführt. Die ersten vier Athletinnen pro Lauf – hellblau unterlegt – sowie die darüber hinaus vier zeitschnellsten Läuferinnen – hellgrün unterlegt – qualifizierten sich für das Halbfinale.

Vorlauf 1
1. September 2011, 10:50 Uhr

Wind: −0,1 m/s

Vorlauf 2

1. September 2011, 10:58 Uhr

Wind: −0,3 m/s

Vorlauf 3

1. September 2011, 11:06 Uhr

Wind: −0,3 m/s

Vorlauf 4

1. September 2011, 11:14 Uhr

Wind: +0,3 m/s

Vorlauf 5

1. September 2011, 11:22 Uhr

Wind: −0,2 m/s

Halbfinale
Aus den drei Halbfinalläufen qualifizierten sich die jeweils ersten beiden Athletinnen – hellblau unterlegt – sowie die darüber hinaus zwei zeitschnellsten Läuferinnen – hellgrün unterlegt – für das Finale.

Halbfinallauf 1
1. September 2011, 19:25 Uhr

Wind: −0,7 m/s

Im ersten Halbfinale ausgeschiedene Sprinterinnen:

Halbfinallauf 2
1. September 2011, 19:33 Uhr

Wind: −0,1 m/s

Im zweiten Halbfinale ausgeschiedene Sprinterinnen:

Halbfinallauf 3
1. September 2011, 19:41 Uhr

Wind: −1,8 m/s

Im dritten Halbfinale ausgeschiedene Sprinterinnen:

Finale

2. September 2011, 20:55 Uhr

Wind: −1,0 m/s

Video
 Women's 200m Final - WC Daegu 2011, youtube.com, abgerufen am 2. Januar 2021

Weblinks
 World Championships Daegu (englisch), abgerufen am 2. Januar 2021
 Women 200m Athletics XIII World Championship 2011 Daegu (KOR) auf todor66.com (englisch), abgerufen am 2. Januar 2021
 Ergebnisse im Statistics Handbook der IAAF zur WM 2019 in Doha, Women 200 m, Daegu 2011, S. 259 (PDF; 10,3 MB), englisch, abgerufen am 2. Januar 2021

Einzelnachweise und Anmerkungen

200 m der Frauen
Leichtathletikwettbewerb in Daegu
Laufveranstaltung in Südkorea


text:
Kathy Jean
Erika Christie
Divij Kak
Marli Monroe
Richard "RB" Botto
Friedrich Naderlinger
Samantha Renaud
Lauren Elizabeth Jayne Stiener
Allen Clark
Landis Stokes
Shari D. Frost
Dr. Glen Hepker
Kelly Lynn
Wendy Kay
CJ Walley
Jorge J Prieto
The First Steps Towards Professionalism
Posted 4 years ago by Tobias Schachinger
We all know that filmmakers come in all ages, races, genders and creeds. We at Stage 32 want to support them all. Today, we will be hearing from one of our younger members about his journey to learn filmmaking and how that has led him to turn a hobby into a passionate career.
Tobias Schachinger will share his advice on productivity and how his team has taken their first steps toward becoming professional filmmakers. Enjoy!
My team's latest short film, Trust, had a lot of firsts for us: First time, we shot in a location not owned by a team member and the first time we received sponsoring from a local company. But before that, we spent over two years just about filmmaking, hardly ever releasing anything. I'd like to share some of the most important things we learned about productivity over those two and a half years and tell you how we managed to get a location and a sponsor. First, let me tell you a little bit about who we are.
Everything started in the summer of 2013 when two 15-year-old Austrian high school students named David and Tobias (that's me) wanted to make a parody of The Walking Dead. All we had was a Sony DSLR with a kit lens and a tripod. So we got one of our friends to do the cinematography (that is, to hold the camera) and walked through the woods a bit. This is what the first "trailer" of our web series "Zombie Academy" looked like:
Well. Quite embarrassing. I wasn't sure if I should put this in here, but I want you to see that we really started from nothing.
Anyway, we quickly realized that three people weren't gonna be enough. We needed actors (zombies can't all look the same) and more crew members (without CGI, you need someone to make people look like zombies). So we got a few more people on board, and after a while, we had a pretty solid team:
So our team was complete. A bunch of high school students who didn't know what the hell they were doing, but we had fun doing it!
What We Learned:
1. Set a realistic deadline for your project.
I'm a procrastinator. I'd even say I'm a master of procrastination. The parody of a german saying roughly translates to: "What you can do today, do not put off to tomorrow. Put it off to the day after tomorrow, and tomorrow will bring no sorrow." I think it lies in human nature to procrastinate: However passionate you may be about something, watching Netflix always requires less effort.
But there is one way to overcome procrastination. Deadlines. Set yourself personal deadlines and stick to them, and you won't have a problem. Sounds simple enough, right? Well, with just a little bit of self-discipline, it is.
This doesn't just apply to single tasks that you have to do every day, you also need to set deadlines for entire projects. Our first project – Zombie Academy – never got finished. Wanna guess why? Well, actually, there were some personal differences between crew members that made it impossible to keep on shooting. But had we had a deadline, we could have finished the project long before those differences came up.
So set a realistic and specific deadline for your project and stick to it. Realistic means you should give yourself enough time to be sure you can actually make it happen, specific means the deadline should be "March 28, 2016", not "some time towards the end of this month or maybe the beginning of the next one." The latter doesn't work. You won't meet it. Period.
2. Planning is everything.
The first time we shot for "Zombie Academy", we had a script, a camera and - well, nothing else. That's it. And as you can imagine, it was a disaster. David and I didn't know our lines. When the cinematographer (we'll use that very loosely. Really he was just a guy holding the camera) asked me how I wanted him to shoot it, I was like "well, you know, just, like, hit record, and, I dunno, film us?" If something like that could turn out into a good film, everyone would be a filmmaker.
So we learned pretty soon that the actors should know their lines and there should be some kind of plan so the director and "camera guy" know what shots they should get. A while later we realized that it would be pretty helpful to have a schedule and make sure in advance that we can make our day. An important thing to keep in mind when doing that is, schedule more than enough time for every shot and don't forget about setup time (setting up lighting, audio etc.). Planning to shoot until 11pm and finishing at 8pm is always better than the other way around, especially when you're not working with professionals.
Little tip: For shot listing and scheduling, "Shot Lister" is a great app. You can not only make your shot list and schedule shoot days, you can also bring your tablet to the shoot, check off the shots you've got and reschedule live if it looks like you're not gonna make the day - and it's free!
Shotlister in action!
Those two things - shot listing and scheduling - were enough for a while, but for "Trust", we did more. It was our biggest production yet! So we got ourselves a plan of the location, bought an app called "Shot Designer" and made detailed sketches (so-called overhead sketches), blocking out every shot without having to be on location and have the actors and DP there. With the app, we were able to animate actors, cameras and insert props and lighting. In addition, we made a lined script (which means to draw a line across your script for every shot to see exactly where it starts and where it ends) to visualize how much coverage we would have for every part of the script.
Also, we actually incorporated rehearsals this time around. This way we could make sure the actors really knew their lines and did everything to convey the right emotions. Taking care of all that beforehand saved a lot of time and hassle in production.
So to sum up: Planning makes perfect. Or at least, gets you to the finish line without driving yourself and your team mad.
3. Perfectionism in post is good, but stick to your deadline.
You may have heard/read this a billion times, but maybe you haven't and in that case you should: "You can't fix it in post." If you're on set and you realize there's something you can't pull off the way you wanted to in camera, you shouldn't say "we'll fix it in post", because odds are, you can't. And that's true. Post production shouldn't be your "way out" if something goes wrong or doesn't look the way you imagined.
But that doesn't mean everything has to look perfect in camera. If you have multiple shots of everything (which you can make sure of with a lined script), you can easily fix messed up shots by editing in others. If you like the first part of one take, but the second part is better in another one, just put a different shot in between to hide the transition. The same goes for audio - just evaluate all your options and get creative.
And even if you don't have any other coverage, by doing some reading and watching some YouTube tutorials, you can usually learn pretty quickly how to do some more advanced stuff like masking, tracking or rotoscoping to fix your image or how to apply advanced transitions and effects to your audio. However, if you're just working on little imperfections, it can drive you crazy. Don't let it. It's way more important to meet your deadline. Odds are, viewers won't notice every little mistake.
How did we get our location and sponsor?
So how did a few 17-year-olds get a location and a sponsor? Well, here's Shia LaBeouf to answer your question:
That's right. Just get out there and do it! It's that simple (of course, not always easy.) Find what you need. Write e-mails to local companies or places and ask if you can get a little money/shoot there. For the sponsorship, all I did was write a few e-mails to local banks and restaurants, bluntly asking for a specific small amount of money to support a film project. It doesn't matter if you get a no (or, which is more likely, no answer at all), there are lots of companies that want to support local projects. And you don't need to live in some big city for that, it's actually an advantage to live close to a smaller town, because smaller local companies are more likely to support you, and they make it easier to talk to someone in charge.
For the location, I have to admit, we had a connection. But that alone is also a pretty useful tip: Ask people if they know someone who can help you. Connections are everything in filmmaking, not just when it comes to locations or sponsorships. If you know someone who knows someone who knows someone, you win!
By the way, here's a tip if you're thinking about launching a crowdfunding campaign: If you don't have some popularity and a bigger fanbase already, going to companies and just asking for small contributions will get you a lot more money a lot quicker and with a lot less effort.
Anyway, so that's it. I hope this was a little helpful to someone out there wanting to know where to start. It doesn't have to be flashy or come with tons of awards. Taking the first step and then another will lead you to places you could have never imagined. It's those experiences that will craft a long-term career. I wish you all the best with your own projects!
About Tobias:
Tobias Schachinger is a 17-year-old high school student from a small city in Upper Austria. Together with a few friends and schoolmates, he has spent the last few years learning how to make short films by simply doing it. Their first short film "The Deal" was released in Summer 2015, and their second one called "Trust" just came out this week. (View here!) Both films were made in collaboration with other Stage 32 members.
Tobias will graduate high school this summer, after which he plans to go to university to study Media Technology and Design so he can become a professional filmmaker one day.
A Writer´s Journey Through Time And Space
RB's Stage 32 News, Notes, Discussions and Other Fun Stuff (April 1, 2016)
Blog Post by Tobias Schachinger, posted on Monday, April 4th, 2016
FilmmakingInspirationalProducingTips
Script Developed & Pitched Through Stage 32 Going into Production in March with Major Producer!
Movement, Contemplation, and Soul Renewal for the New Year
How to Make Friends in the Film Business: Resetting the Intention of Networking
Coffee & Content - How to Edit Comedy & Composing Epic Music for Film and TV
3 Strategies to Help Build Creative Intimacy
Read the 2020 Writers Guild Awards Nominated Screenplays

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Yasin Ozturk/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
The Benefits of Trump's 'Transactional' Foreign Policy
Far from settling scores, America should be looking for the exits as fast as possible. But, at least here, the president's transactional calculus prevented us from further running up the bill.
Christopher Roach
The recent drone attack that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani and a Shiite militia leader in Iraq led predictably to a retaliatory strike by Iran. Twenty or so ballistic missiles were launched at bases in Iraq where U.S. troops were housed. Fortunately, no one was killed.
Instead of launching a counterattack, President Trump stopped. Since no Americans were killed, Trump said, there would be no good reason to strike back. Instead, he promised more sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
The president's America First supporters, including me, have been disappointed with Trump's occasional escalations in the Middle East. The president who promised to get us out of the Middle East, and frequently expressed skepticism of our neverending wars there, has at least three times engaged in provocative actions that had the potential to set in motion a broader conflict, perhaps even a world war.
In 2017 and 2018, Trump ordered airstrikes against the Assad regime in Syria for its alleged use of chemical weapons. Two weeks ago, Trump approved the mission to kill the powerful and popular Iranian general while he was in Iraq. Each of these countries is connected to regional allies and the broader Shia and Sunni sectarian struggle for power. What's more, Russia and China are waiting in the wings to upend America's global dominance.
But in all three cases, Trump chose not to take things further.
Trump Focuses on the Tangible
In Syria, with great controversy, he ordered our troops to withdraw after the destruction of the ISIS caliphate. With Iran, he stopped the potentially infinite cycle of attack and counterattack by absorbing a blow, a controversial decision made more palatable because America sustained no casualties.
While all three of these actions had a dubious strategic rationale, big-picture strategy is not the only important factor in foreign policy. Decisions on how to manage immediate events and their surprises are equally important. Grand strategy can be undermined by poor operational art, bad planning, the decisions of others, or just bad luck.
Trump's approach to these events (and his approach to foreign policy more generally) is focused on the tangible: more jobs at home, fewer dollars spent on the defense of ungrateful allies, and less concern for international institutions and process than his predecessors demanded.
One decidedly different aspect of Trump is his rejection of the usual high-minded approach that has informed much of American policy, including the notion that, in every war, we must seek a comprehensive solution and uproot hostile regimes.
Trump is content with the old-fashioned punitive raid.
The False Counsel of the "Idealists"
There is a very American habit of dressing up even the most prosaic conflicts in grandiloquent and crusading language. President Wilson justified America's involvement in World War I as a way to "make the world safe for democracy." Franklin Roosevelt described World War II as a great contest between "democracies" and "dictatorships," even though the murderous Joseph Stalin and his Red Army did the majority of the fighting and dying on our side.
At the time of the first Persian Gulf War, President George H.W. Bush promised a "new world order," which, in spite of his intentions, had a rather ominous sound.
Finally, the "global war on terror" was, in the words of George W. Bush, a crusade to make the world safe for "freedom." This broader concern with American values, the internal politics of allies, and reforming other nations to be more like us is sometimes described as foreign policy "idealism."
While this rhetorical habit seems to appeal to Americans and connects our foreign policy to our nation's philosophical origins, it appeals even more to the highly educated, tinkering, and ambitious managerial class—the traditional stewards of the nations' foreign policy. Americans and their "can-do" optimism, often tragically, have been employed in long-running campaigns of ambitious scope. The failures of the Vietnam War disposed of this propensity for a time, but was revived by Clinton in the Kosovo War, the first so-called "humanitarian war." George W. Bush reinforced this impulse by pursuing an ambitious reformation of the Middle East in response to 9/11.
Americans, for all their alleged demand for high moral causes in order to pursue a war, are just as inclined to tribal demands for revenge. The rallying cry of World War II, after all, had nothing to do with democracy; it was "Remember Pearl Harbor." Similarly, while Bush and his team sought to remake the Middle East in America's image, the dominant emotion of Americans was a desire for revenge for the September 11 attacks, which first sustained the Afghanistan and Iraq campaigns and then grew into weariness over the endless insurgencies.
Americans quickly tire of the high-minded part of their foreign campaigns, particularly when these efforts are not connected to something fundamental, such as safety for the homeland or revenge for fallen countrymen.
Trump's Disruptive and Transactional Approach
Trump has been criticized for his "transactional" view of things. This could mean many things, but here it mostly amounts to criticism about tone and decorum.
The president is very blunt. He expressly asks for things in exchange for American help. He is willing to call out allies and play nice with enemies. He sees himself as a dealmaker, ignoring the pieties and habits of the foreign policy experts. He is criticized both for rash threats and for being overly solicitous, often with regard to the same regimes.
Paradoxically, his transactional approach often expresses more empathy and common sense than the on-again, off-again concern for human rights and democracy among the "idealists." These idealists who mourn the treatment of the Iranian people in order to goad us into liberating them, often are rather cavalier about turning the place into a "glass parking lot." The idealism of the idealists is something special.
Because he is unmoored from the rhetorical and ideological straightjacket that dominated his predecessors, Trump has shown considerable flexibility and willingness to change course, to include our relations with China, North Korea, and also the Middle East.
While the initial decision to attack Soleimani appeared rash and likely to further solidify America's presence in the Middle East, it would have been worse if Trump viewed this strike as something other than a single, one-off measure to push back against the Iranians and remove a troublesome and talented adversary. After Iran inevitably retaliated, Trump's remarked that Iran was "standing down." At the same time, Iran described its attack as a "proportionate response."
It would have been very easy and more typical for an American leader to escalate further, treating Iran's response as an unprovoked attack and an affront to the high ideals of democracy and freedom.
In truth, both the United States and Iran view the actions of the other as aggression, while seeing its own responses as defensive and justified. These competing views of events can never be fully reconciled. Instead of embracing this inevitable cycle of revenge, Trump has shown a reluctance to wage full-scale war, a product of his repeatedly expressed skepticism of American's involvement in the Middle East.
Arguably because of his "transactional" view, Trump has treated diplomacy and military operations not as opposites, but as part of the same spectrum of policy, each a mode of communication, with one being rather unmistakable in its seriousness.
I am doubtful of any possibility of an enduring peace with Iran or with any other nation in the Middle East. Their values are alien to our own, their resentment of America's presence inseparable from national and religious identity, and our history in the region has had few successes and many disappointments. Benjamin Netanyahu has sometimes described Israel as living in a "dangerous neighborhood." This is no doubt true. But we live in the safe suburbs of the Western Hemisphere. We can avoid this bad neighborhood and its problems.
The logic that informed Trump's decision to stand down should have prevented the initial decision to take out Soleimani. This strike undoubtedly has added to Iran's long list of imagined and real grievances with the United States, while alienating Iraq's majority Shia community among whom our troops are still deployed.
Far from settling scores, America should be looking for the exits as fast as possible. But at least here Trump's transactional calculus prevented us from further running up the bill.
Christopher Roach is an attorney in private practice based in Florida. He is a double graduate of the University of Chicago and has previously been...


The world learned recently that Prince joined the long list of celebrities who passed away intestate or without a will. Some of the names on the list are surprising, others not so. The Honorable Salvatore Phillip "Sonny" Bono, Michael Jackson, Howard Hughes, Abraham Lincoln, Pablo Picasso, Martin Luther King are all grouped together with such musical greats as Jimmy Hendrix, Curt Kobain and Amy Winehouse. Pablo Picasso's estate was valued at approximately $30 million upon his passing in 1973 and is now valued at several billion dollars and took several years to sort out.
If a will does not surface, which seems likely, the local probate Court will follow Minnesota's intestacy laws to divvy up at his estate which is initially estimated at at least $100 million and very well likely be worth several hundreds of millions of dollars. While Prince was no doubt a creative genius on par with others who were considered truly great, his creativity did not go into the realm of financial planning, as a will is the most basic of all legal documents. No doubt he could have afforded the most well paid team of lawyers to easily and without much interference value his estate and develop a legal strategy to help prevent public drama which could cost millions in legal fees as well as untold emotional costs to his family members and very well may cause an irreparable rift in family relations. Prince and the other above celebrities, however, are in the majority, as the American Bar Association estimates that approximately 55% of Americans pass away without a will. Forbes estimates that the number may be as high as approximately two out of three Americans.
The only way to insure that your intentions are respected by a Court is via a proper will or trust. In addition and perhaps more importantly, in the absence of a will, trust or some other instrument to convey your property and indicate your intentions, the process will take much more time, more expense and may be a public proceedings. Most important of all, if you have children under 18 or a care for a child who has special needs, in the absence of a will a Court will have to find a guardian without any guidance from you. Furthermore, a will or trust ensures that only your appointed representative will serve in that capacity. Finally, a will ensures that only those who you want to receive the bounty of your earnings will receive it. Given the small amount of time and cost that needs to be invested into creating a will, it is shocking that so many people with substantial assets do not have a will.
In New York, if a person passes intestate, has no children but is married, the spouse gets all assets. If there is no spouse but children, the children inherit everything. If there is a spouse and children, the spouse inherits the first $50,000 as well as half of the balance and the kids receive the other half. If there are no kids, no spouse and only siblings, the siblings receive it all. New York follows the rule of per stirpes which means that if a child of the deceased passes prior to the deceased, that deceased's children inherit his/her share equally.


text:
home Biography Elaine Starchuk
Elaine Starchuk
krijana Published On Sun Jan 10 2021 Modified On Sun Jan 10 2021
Facts of Elaine Starchuk
Body and Relation Status of Elaine Starchuk
Elaine Starchuk is a rising American model who started her modelling career at the age of eighteen. She, however, came into the spotlight after tying the knot with Tommy Lee. Her husband is a famous American musician and the founding member of Motley Crue.
How Old Is Elaine?
Elaine was born on 7th April 1964, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Her nationality is Canadian; however, ethnicity is not known as she did not disclose her parents' name and details. She follows Christianity.
Elaine started her modelling career at the age of eighteen. She wanted to be one of the top models in the fashion industry since her childhood. So, she travelled to the United States to start her modelling career.
Elaine's first model shoot was for Playboy Magazine, and her debut brought a huge fame. Soon later, she featured on magazines like Penthouse Magazine, Miss N*de BC, among others.
Besides modelling career, Elaine is also an entrepreneur, the CEO and founder of Enlightened Lashes. She established the company in 2007. Her beauty institute was one of the first one to train eyelashes extension in Canada.
How Much Is Elaine Starchuk's Net Worth?
Elaine is a successful model and entrepreneur who has been earning a high figure of money. As of 2021, her net worth is reported to be around $500 thousand. Her primary source of income is her business venture, endorsement, company, and modelling career.
On the other side, her former husband, Tommy Lee, has a net worth of $80 million. He earns in millions figure salary from his musical career.
Her Married Life
Elaine came into the spotlight for her relationship with musician Tommy Lee. As per sources, they got married on 24th November 1982, after dating for a long time. The former pair made headlines after they started living separately after seven days of marriage.
Elaine Starchuk with her former husband, Tommy
SOURCE: marriedbiography
However, Elaine and Tommy got divorced in 1985. The exact reason behind their separation is still not known.
Before dating Tommy, Elaine was in a relationship with David Coverdale. She also dated Vince Neil and Gregg Giuffria. She also was in a relationship with Nikki Sixx, a band member of Motley Crue. She also dated Ander Erikson for five years.
Elaine was also married to Todd Marshall. However, they divorced after four years of conjugal life.
While celebrities prefer to keep their surgery story away from the media, Elaine has gone under the knives for a couple of times. Back in the 1980s, she had breast surgery. The surgery led her to chest injuries in December 2013.
Elaine's recent pictures also show that she has done lip surgery.
American model
American entrepreneur