text:
Retired Local Physician has an Effective Treatment for COVID 19
Peter Christian Published: January 19, 2022
One of Missoula's most respected physicians, Dr. Walter Peschel, now retired, told KGVO on Wednesday that he has developed a highly successful treatment for COVID 19.
Mayor John Engen and the Missoula County Commissioners have all reached out to state and national government officials to take note of Dr. Peschel's treatment and sponsor a study by the Food and Drug Administration, but have so far been unsuccessful.
Here's what Dr. Peschel shared with KGVO.
"I've put together a four drug protocol that seems to be very safe," said Dr. Peschel. "It's inexpensive for COVID. It would be $25 maybe for one month treatment and durable, and when compared to other traditional inflammatories in other illnesses it seems to be most efficacious."
Dr. Peschel said the human immune response itself is the culprit in many COVID deaths.
"We thought COVID would be a very unique illness to try this medicine with because the people who get sick that are hospitalized and die, the reason they have this adverse outcome is because their immune response over activates," he said. "It is the immune response, not the virus that damages the body with a focus on the lungs."
Dr. Peschel provided results from some of the patients he has treated.
"What we found is the C-reactive proteins stayed normal for the full month (of treatment) with a slight increase for two days from three to eight in the third week," he said. "We found the oxygen level stayed normal, with a slight decrease from 96 to 93 in the third week. Nobody went to the hospital and nobody died."
While he waits for the FDA to respond to his successful treatments, Dr. Peschel described the patients he is seeking in western Montana to help in their battle with COVID 19.
"Peter, what I'm looking for in Missoula is patients who are acutely ill with COVID," he said. "The sooner I can get them, the better. And I would like to have people who are a little more high risk, although I'd probably take care of anybody right now. People who are 60 and older who have obesity, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, because they do so poorly. It doesn't take that many people to see if your medicine works. In other words, if I had (could successfully treat) 100 of those people, and nobody went to the hospital, then that were really mean something."
Peschel did not reveal the four ingredients in his COVID treatment, but said it would be inexpensive, keep people with dangerous comorbidities out of the hospital, and help provide a locally based solution to the COVID epidemic.
Dr. Peschel will be our guest on the KGVO Talk Back Program on Monday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and will take calls from listeners.
LOOK: What 25 Historic Battlefields Look Like Today
The following is an examination of what became of the sites where America waged its most important and often most brutal campaigns of war. Using a variety of sources, Stacker selected 25 historically significant battlefields in American history. For each one, Stacker investigated what happened there when the battles raged as well as what became of those hallowed grounds when the fighting stopped.
These are the battlefields that defined the United States military's journey from upstart Colonial rebels to an invincible global war machine.
LET'S GO: The most popular historic sites in America
Source: Retired Local Physician has an Effective Treatment for COVID 19
Filed Under: County Commissioners, COVID-19, Dr. Walter Peschel, FDA, Mayor Engen, Successful Treatment
Missoula Mayor John Engen Diagnosed with Pancreatic Cancer
Incident Commander Sees Fewer Cases but Watches for New Variant
Incident Commander Cindy Farr Sees Steady Decline in COVID Cases
Community Medical Center Now 100 Percent Vaccination Compliant
Incident Commander Hoping COVID Turns from Pandemic to Endemic
Is Anyone in Missoula Still Howling for Frontline Workers?
Help Is on the Way: Finding At Home COVID Tests in Missoula
Health Department – Omicron Cases Blowing Delta out of the Water
MCPS Superintendent Tests Positive for COVID – Working from Home


text:
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>

#include "common.h"

#include "voltage.h"
#include "vp.h"
#include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
#include "prm-regbits-44xx.h"
#include "prm44xx.h"

static u32 _vp_set_init_voltage(struct voltagedomain *voltdm, u32 volt)
{
	struct omap_vp_instance *vp = voltdm->vp;
	u32 vpconfig;
	char vsel;

	vsel = voltdm->pmic->uv_to_vsel(volt);

	vpconfig = voltdm->read(vp->vpconfig);
	vpconfig &= ~(vp->common->vpconfig_initvoltage_mask |
		      vp->common->vpconfig_forceupdate |
		      vp->common->vpconfig_initvdd);
	vpconfig |= vsel << __ffs(vp->common->vpconfig_initvoltage_mask);
	voltdm->write(vpconfig, vp->vpconfig);

	/* Trigger initVDD value copy to voltage processor */
	voltdm->write((vpconfig | vp->common->vpconfig_initvdd),
		       vp->vpconfig);

	/* Clear initVDD copy trigger bit */
	voltdm->write(vpconfig, vp->vpconfig);

	return vpconfig;
}

/* Generic voltage init functions */
void __init omap_vp_init(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
{
	struct omap_vp_instance *vp = voltdm->vp;
	u32 val, sys_clk_rate, timeout, waittime;
	u32 vddmin, vddmax, vstepmin, vstepmax;

	if (!voltdm->pmic || !voltdm->pmic->uv_to_vsel) {
		pr_err("%s: No PMIC info for vdd_%s\n", __func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	if (!voltdm->read || !voltdm->write) {
		pr_err("%s: No read/write API for accessing vdd_%s regs\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	vp->enabled = false;

	/* Divide to avoid overflow */
	sys_clk_rate = voltdm->sys_clk.rate / 1000;

	timeout = (sys_clk_rate * voltdm->pmic->vp_timeout_us) / 1000;
	vddmin = voltdm->pmic->vp_vddmin;
	vddmax = voltdm->pmic->vp_vddmax;

	waittime = DIV_ROUND_UP(voltdm->pmic->step_size * sys_clk_rate,
				1000 * voltdm->pmic->slew_rate);
	vstepmin = voltdm->pmic->vp_vstepmin;
	vstepmax = voltdm->pmic->vp_vstepmax;

	/*
	 * VP_CONFIG: error gain is not set here, it will be updated
	 * on each scale, based on OPP.
	 */
	val = (voltdm->pmic->vp_erroroffset <<
	       __ffs(voltdm->vp->common->vpconfig_erroroffset_mask)) |
		vp->common->vpconfig_timeouten;
	voltdm->write(val, vp->vpconfig);

	/* VSTEPMIN */
	val = (waittime << vp->common->vstepmin_smpswaittimemin_shift) |
		(vstepmin <<  vp->common->vstepmin_stepmin_shift);
	voltdm->write(val, vp->vstepmin);

	/* VSTEPMAX */
	val = (vstepmax << vp->common->vstepmax_stepmax_shift) |
		(waittime << vp->common->vstepmax_smpswaittimemax_shift);
	voltdm->write(val, vp->vstepmax);

	/* VLIMITTO */
	val = (vddmax << vp->common->vlimitto_vddmax_shift) |
		(vddmin << vp->common->vlimitto_vddmin_shift) |
		(timeout <<  vp->common->vlimitto_timeout_shift);
	voltdm->write(val, vp->vlimitto);
}

int omap_vp_update_errorgain(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
			     unsigned long target_volt)
{
	struct omap_volt_data *volt_data;

	if (!voltdm->vp)
		return -EINVAL;

	/* Get volt_data corresponding to target_volt */
	volt_data = omap_voltage_get_voltdata(voltdm, target_volt);
	if (IS_ERR(volt_data))
		return -EINVAL;

	/* Setting vp errorgain based on the voltage */
	voltdm->rmw(voltdm->vp->common->vpconfig_errorgain_mask,
		    volt_data->vp_errgain <<
		    __ffs(voltdm->vp->common->vpconfig_errorgain_mask),
		    voltdm->vp->vpconfig);

	return 0;
}

/* VP force update method of voltage scaling */
int omap_vp_forceupdate_scale(struct voltagedomain *voltdm,
			      unsigned long target_volt)
{
	struct omap_vp_instance *vp = voltdm->vp;
	u32 vpconfig;
	u8 target_vsel, current_vsel;
	int ret, timeout = 0;

	ret = omap_vc_pre_scale(voltdm, target_volt, &target_vsel, &current_vsel);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	/*
	 * Clear all pending TransactionDone interrupt/status. Typical latency
	 * is <3us
	 */
	while (timeout++ < VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT) {
		vp->common->ops->clear_txdone(vp->id);
		if (!vp->common->ops->check_txdone(vp->id))
			break;
		udelay(1);
	}
	if (timeout >= VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT) {
		pr_warning("%s: vdd_%s TRANXDONE timeout exceeded."
			"Voltage change aborted", __func__, voltdm->name);
		return -ETIMEDOUT;
	}

	vpconfig = _vp_set_init_voltage(voltdm, target_volt);

	/* Force update of voltage */
	voltdm->write(vpconfig | vp->common->vpconfig_forceupdate,
		      voltdm->vp->vpconfig);

	/*
	 * Wait for TransactionDone. Typical latency is <200us.
	 * Depends on SMPSWAITTIMEMIN/MAX and voltage change
	 */
	timeout = 0;
	omap_test_timeout(vp->common->ops->check_txdone(vp->id),
			  VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT, timeout);
	if (timeout >= VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT)
		pr_err("%s: vdd_%s TRANXDONE timeout exceeded."
			"TRANXDONE never got set after the voltage update\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);

	omap_vc_post_scale(voltdm, target_volt, target_vsel, current_vsel);

	/*
	 * Disable TransactionDone interrupt , clear all status, clear
	 * control registers
	 */
	timeout = 0;
	while (timeout++ < VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT) {
		vp->common->ops->clear_txdone(vp->id);
		if (!vp->common->ops->check_txdone(vp->id))
			break;
		udelay(1);
	}

	if (timeout >= VP_TRANXDONE_TIMEOUT)
		pr_warning("%s: vdd_%s TRANXDONE timeout exceeded while trying"
			"to clear the TRANXDONE status\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);

	/* Clear force bit */
	voltdm->write(vpconfig, vp->vpconfig);

	return 0;
}

/**
 * omap_vp_enable() - API to enable a particular VP
 * @voltdm:	pointer to the VDD whose VP is to be enabled.
 *
 * This API enables a particular voltage processor. Needed by the smartreflex
 * class drivers.
 */
void omap_vp_enable(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
{
	struct omap_vp_instance *vp;
	u32 vpconfig, volt;

	if (!voltdm || IS_ERR(voltdm)) {
		pr_warning("%s: VDD specified does not exist!\n", __func__);
		return;
	}

	vp = voltdm->vp;
	if (!voltdm->read || !voltdm->write) {
		pr_err("%s: No read/write API for accessing vdd_%s regs\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	/* If VP is already enabled, do nothing. Return */
	if (vp->enabled)
		return;

	volt = voltdm_get_voltage(voltdm);
	if (!volt) {
		pr_warning("%s: unable to find current voltage for %s\n",
			   __func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	vpconfig = _vp_set_init_voltage(voltdm, volt);

	/* Enable VP */
	vpconfig |= vp->common->vpconfig_vpenable;
	voltdm->write(vpconfig, vp->vpconfig);

	vp->enabled = true;
}

/**
 * omap_vp_disable() - API to disable a particular VP
 * @voltdm:	pointer to the VDD whose VP is to be disabled.
 *
 * This API disables a particular voltage processor. Needed by the smartreflex
 * class drivers.
 */
void omap_vp_disable(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
{
	struct omap_vp_instance *vp;
	u32 vpconfig;
	int timeout;

	if (!voltdm || IS_ERR(voltdm)) {
		pr_warning("%s: VDD specified does not exist!\n", __func__);
		return;
	}

	vp = voltdm->vp;
	if (!voltdm->read || !voltdm->write) {
		pr_err("%s: No read/write API for accessing vdd_%s regs\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	/* If VP is already disabled, do nothing. Return */
	if (!vp->enabled) {
		pr_warning("%s: Trying to disable VP for vdd_%s when"
			"it is already disabled\n", __func__, voltdm->name);
		return;
	}

	/* Disable VP */
	vpconfig = voltdm->read(vp->vpconfig);
	vpconfig &= ~vp->common->vpconfig_vpenable;
	voltdm->write(vpconfig, vp->vpconfig);

	/*
	 * Wait for VP idle Typical latency is <2us. Maximum latency is ~100us
	 */
	omap_test_timeout((voltdm->read(vp->vstatus)),
			  VP_IDLE_TIMEOUT, timeout);

	if (timeout >= VP_IDLE_TIMEOUT)
		pr_warning("%s: vdd_%s idle timedout\n",
			__func__, voltdm->name);

	vp->enabled = false;

	return;
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


- The history object is part of the window object, and contains the URLs visited by the user (within a browser window).
It contains useful methods and properties that let you move back and forth through the user's history, and manipulate the contents of the history stack.
• The history object has two properties: length and state.
window.history.length - returns the number of URLs in the history list.
window.history.state - returns the object added in history with pushState() or replaceState().
back() - loads the previous URL in the history list.
forward() - loads the next URL in the history list.
go(x) - Loads a specific URL from the history list (x can be a negative or positive index number).
pushState(state_obj, title, url) - pushes the given data onto the session history stack with the specified title and, if provided, URL.
Additionally, it modifies the address in the address bar with the specified 'url' without loading that address (it does not matter if it's /or not a valid address).
- Click the following button, see the change in the browser address.
replaceState(state_obj, title, url) - updates the most recent entry on the history stack to have the specified data, title, and, if provided, URL.
Similar with pushState(), it modifies the address in the address bar with the specified 'url' without loading that address (it does not matter if it's /or not a valid address).


All material included on this site ("the content") is owned or licenced for use by Moly-Cop. The site may include third party content which is subject to that third party's terms and conditions of use.
This license shall automatically terminate if you violate any of these restrictions and may be terminated by Moly-Cop at any time. Upon terminating your viewing of these materials or upon the termination of this license, you must destroy any downloaded materials in your possession whether in electronic or printed format.
The materials on Moly-Cop's web site are provided "as is". Moly-Cop makes no warranties, expressed or implied, and hereby disclaims and negates all other warranties, including without limitation, implied warranties or conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property or other violation of rights. Further, Moly-Cop does not warrant or make any representations concerning the accuracy, likely results, or reliability of the use of the materials on its Internet web site or otherwise relating to such materials or on any sites linked to this site.
In no event shall Moly-Cop or its suppliers be liable for any damages (including, without limitation, damages for loss of data or profit, or due to business interruption) arising out of the use or inability to use the materials on Moly-Cop's Internet site, even if Moly-Cop or a Moly-Cop authorized representative has been notified orally or in writing of the possibility of such damage. Because some jurisdictions do not allow limitations on implied warranties, or limitations of liability for consequential or incidental damages, these limitations may not apply to you.
The materials appearing on Moly-Cop's web site could include technical, typographical, or photographic errors. Moly-Cop does not warrant that any of the materials on its web site are accurate, complete, or current. Moly-Cop may make changes to the materials contained on its web site at any time without notice. Moly-Cop does not, however, make any commitment to update the materials.
Moly-Cop has not reviewed all of the sites linked to its Internet web site and is not responsible for the contents of any such linked site. The inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by Moly-Cop of the site. Use of any such linked web site is at the user's own risk.
Any claim relating to Moly-Cop's web site shall be governed by the laws of the State of New South Wales without regard to its conflict of law provisions.
When you use the site Moly-Cop may place a "cookie" on your computer's hard drive so we can recognise you as a return user and personalise your experience. a cookie is a piece of data that enables us to track and target your preferences. The cookie will be stored on your hard drive until you remove it. We may use other technologies to record your usage and personalise your experience.


text:
The White House - 1600 Daily: Enforcing the law—at the border and within
McGrath Academy of Irish Dance | March 15, 2018
(Official White House Photo by Emily Higgins)
Enforcing the law - at the border and within
"California sanctuary policies put the entire Nation at risk," President Donald J. Trump said while visiting the U.S.-Mexico border this week. "They're the best friend of the criminal."
Sanctuary city policies aren't about protecting law-abiding immigrants. Rather, the term "sanctuary city" generally refers to localities that refuse to cooperate with lawful Federal immigration enforcement. When a suspected illegal alien is arrested on criminal charges, these jurisdictions will often release the suspect quickly before Federal officials can arrive.
After visiting Southern California to examine border wall prototypes this week, President Trump plans to host a roundtable with law enforcement officials to discuss the threat from these sanctuary cities. His goal is to ensure that Federal law is enforced both at the border and inside our Nation.
"I want to thank ICE and the Border Patrol agents for their incredible work and their incredible bravery," the President said on Tuesday. "It's a dangerous job. It's a tough job."
Watch: President Trump reviews border wall prototypes in California.
See examples of criminal aliens that California has released—with life-and-death consequences.
4 ways to rebuild American strength
As the Trump Administration rebuilds America's strength and confidence at home, it is also restoring the Nation's standing abroad. Four principles drive President Trump's approach:
Fighting to rebuild our military: Last month, President Trump signed a two-year budget deal that raises the military's budget caps for national defense to $700 billion for Fiscal Year 2018.
Putting America first in our strategy: The President's national security strategy emphasizes protecting the homeland, promoting prosperity, preserving peace through strength, and advancing American influence.
Ending the threat of terror: Under the Trump Administration's watch, ISIS has lost nearly 100 percent of its former caliphate.
Deterring threats to the American people: The President has rallied world powers in support of increasing economic and diplomatic pressure on North Korea while taking aggressive action to confront threatening behavior from Iran.
Learn more about how America is confronting threats abroad like never before.
Talking tax cuts in Missouri
One of the most rewarding outcomes of tax reform is listening to the stories of real Americans whose lives have been made better. This week in Missouri, President Trump heard many of these personal accounts as he met with workers and business leaders in St. Louis.
One person spoke about how tax changes have made it easier to grow his company through capital investments. Others talked about the $1,000 bonuses they were able to extend to hard-working employees after President Trump signed tax reform into law last December.
The President also toured a St. Louis Boeing facility that assembles U.S. fighter planes. "A few years ago, this plant was in very serious danger of shutting down, and we got it going again," the President said. "We are keeping thousands of Americans employed right here in St. Louis."
Watch the highlights of President Trump's Boeing tour and roundtable with Missourians.
POTUS TODAY
Today, President Trump will receive his daily intelligence briefing before having lunch with Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen.
This afternoon, the Vice President will participate in a meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono.
By Middletown Insider - March 16, 2018

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Welcome to and thanks for visiting BikeVis, a company with one aim, to get bikers seen out on the street. This page is really just to introduce myself and BikeVis, while telling you a little about how we came about.
I had been shocked at how increasingly hard it is to be seen out on the street with the growth in traffic, and had often thought, Is there some other way to get noticed?.
The initial idea came to me while working on my bike back in 2009, I thought about buying some high powered lights to raise the front profile of my bike to others. This area I thought would be best to target to get me seen by cars as I approached. I wanted a small single high powered white LED with wide viewing angles in a small enclosure. Though there were plenty of lighting units out there, nothing fitted what I wanted with most consuming too much power and being way too big, spoiling the looks of my bike.
I must admit at this point I almost gave up, but instead decided to source some small LEDs and simply glue them to my bike. Straight away I could see the difference in the way cars treated me when riding, and after many comments from other bikers and requests for me to fit them I decided to get the job done properly.
Several months down the line and after tracking down the best way to manufacture these lights, BikeVis was born, and I hope those who use our products will stand less chance of being invisible out there.
Since release our BikeVis Bullet Lights have proved extremely popular and we have started to expand our shop with many new products, and we have many more to come.
If you're interested in discounts for your forum, friends or group please contact us.
Thanks, and keep the 'shiny side up'.


Vice President and Chief Security Architect at SecureAuth. Twenty-year technology veteran, helping to eliminate identity-related breaches.
It's the hangover security teams dread: the annual influx of holiday-gifted devices and their smiling owners. Welcome to the world of BYOD (Bring Your Own Devices). Employees are settling back into the office and bringing new devices they want to connect or use for work purposes with them. Smartphones, smartwatches, and tablets are always popular holiday gifts, but let's call them what they are to corporations: foreign machines invading private networks. They've long been a concern of the vast majority of organizations, which has compelled many of them to adopt and enforce BYOD policies.
It doesn't stop there. Internet of things (IoT) devices, unsanctioned software, and new applications can be difficult to keep off the corporate network, which can cause IT frustration and introduce a slew of new threat vectors. Attackers love insecure devices; they often accompany vulnerable users with access to sensitive corporate data and introduce new paths into the corporate network.
This creates anything but an easy start to the new year for enterprise security teams. Here are some top tips for staying safe and secure during this gadget-driven hangover.
In an era of digital transformation when people are constantly connected, it may be impossible to avoid employee devices finding their way onto the corporate network. Security teams need to ensure that a comprehensive BYOD policy includes the concept of network segmentation. This may require your company to create a separate network segment that restricts access to corporate-issued devices and an "unsafe" network for personal devices (or even visitors) that doesn't permit access to corporate information. This can help to ensure that only approved devices and users have access to the most sensitive data on the restricted network.
If an employee is authorized to access corporate email or store data on a new device, effective security policies are essential. Those can include setting up a mobile virtual private network (VPN). Mobile VPNs allow users to create an encrypted link between them and the VPN's endpoint on their mobile devices.
Using a mobile VPN protects the user even if they are working remotely. If an attacker is "listening in" on the network where the device is connected, all they will see is a stream of unusable data.
A growing number of services that companies use regularly offer multifactor authentication to help differentiate legitimate users from attackers. Internal user training can help educate employees on how to enable these features to protect themselves and their data on websites. However, an organization shouldn't neglect its own responsibility to deploy the most secure authentication strategies. They should work to determine if a login attempt is from a legitimate user or from an attacker using stolen credentials or piggybacking on a stolen device.
Organizations should look at multiple attributes of an authentication attempt, such as the location the user is logging in from, the user's past behavior in terms of what they've accessed, the user's whereabouts on the internet (through the IP address) and the phone number associated with the user's device. These individual risk indicators can add up to a very powerful risk profile that can increase trust without forcing overly complex passwords or arduous login sequences. This way, even if an attacker has a stolen identity or an employee's device and attempts to gain access to the network, your company's risk engine could detect the suspicious attempt and stop it in its tracks. Ensure your company's risk engine is programmed to detect these attributes or that your IT team is trained to recognize them.
Security training is crucial to a successful cybersecurity strategy and should be reinforced after the holidays when new devices work their way into the office. Security-awareness training can equip employees with the knowledge and best practices to operate safely. Training employees during initial onboarding is a good start, but I've found that regular training — at least annually — is also necessary.
"Spear phishing," in which specifically targeted employees receive tailored scam emails and notifications that appear as though they are from a trusted source, is a common tactic. In my experience, it's an especially popular method after the holiday season because savvy attackers can disguise themselves as employees' favorite brands and exploit their likeliness to get users to click a link on unfamiliar devices — or even familiar devices, for that matter. Organizations need to be vigilant about informing their staff about this type of threat.
Cybersecurity and risk teams should also conduct periodic assessments and audits of company assets to uncover risks that would otherwise be ignored. Teams can provide additional training on "password hygiene" to discourage using the same passwords across work and personal accounts.
Help get employees into the practice of spotting and reporting suspicious activity and phishing attempts. While no one can fully secure the employee, knowledge is power — and training can help reduce risk.
These four strategies are not foolproof but are designed to provide a level of security as new devices make their debut. You can't stop employees from bringing foreign devices into the workplace — whether it's their smartphone, smartwatch or smart car outside — and malicious attackers will likely never stop trying to gain access to the ever-proliferating swarm of internet-connected systems. However, you can most certainly make proactive changes now to help prevent cyber attacks this new year.
Chief Security Architect at SecureAuth. Former engineering lead for Mandiant and FireEye. George Mason University Alumni.


Electrolytic chlorine generation (or salt chlorine generation) with IntelliChlor Salt Chlorinator is the easiest, most effective, and convenient way to keep your pool water sparkling clean and sanitized. The IntelliChlor Salt Chlorinator uses table salt to produce all the chlorine your pool needs, right in your pool safely, effectively, and automatically. An Eco Select Choice: Using only natural table salt, the IntelliChlor Salt Chlorinator automatic chlorine generator creates pure chlorine in the pool and eliminates the need to buy, store, and add harsh chlorine products manually. In effect, fewer resources are used in the production, packaging, and transportation of these chemical compounds.
Power Center (P/N 520556): Provides power and controls communication to and from the IntelliChlor cell.
IC 20 Cell (P/N 520554): Designed for pools up to 20,000 U.S. gallons (75,000 liters). The cell will produce the equivalent of 0.70 pounds of pure chlorine per 24 hours of continuous pool pump run time. The IC20 cell uses two terminal blades and five bi-polar blades.
IC 40 Cell (P/N 520555): Designed for pools up to 40,000 U.S. gallons (150,000 liters). The cell will produce the equivalent of 1.40 pounds of pure chlorine per 24 hours of continuous pool pump run time. The cell uses three terminal blades and ten bi-polar blades.
IC 60 Cell (P/N 521105): Designed for pools up to 60,000 U.S. gallons (227,124 liters). The cell will produce the equivalent of 2 lbs. of pure chlorine per 24 hours of continuous pool pump run time. The IC60 cell uses a total of 15 blades (three terminal and twelve bi-polar blades).
IntelliChlor dummy bypass cell (P/N 520588): Recommended for new pool start-up.
This Pentair 520555 IC40 Salt Chlorine Generator Cell and the The "Dichro Chillum" go great together. Consider snagging both!


text:
Age UK Kensington and Chelsea
Archived: Age UK Kensington and Chelsea
This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile
We have not inspected this service yet
Inspection summaries and ratings at previous address
Updated 29 March 2019
This announced inspection was carried out on 13 and 21 December 2018. We completed inspection activity on 25 January 2019. We gave the provider two days' notice of the inspection to make sure that key staff we needed to speak with were available. The service was rated as Good at the previous inspection in May 2016. At this inspection we have rated the service as Requires Improvement.
Age UK Kensington and Chelsea is a domiciliary care agency which provides the regulated activity of 'personal care' to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. Not everyone using Age UK Kensington and Chelsea receives regulated activity. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with personal care; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the provider was providing services for 47 people, which included 27 people who received personal care.
A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of the inspection the manager had appropriately applied to CQC for registered manager status.
We found the provider did not always have detailed risk assessments in place to identify risks to people's safety and well-being. For example, staff had recorded their concerns about a person's skin integrity in their daily visit sheets but this was not reflected in the person's risk assessment.
Recruitment practices did not always demonstrate that references for staff were checked to ensure they were genuine, to ensure that people who used the service consistently received care and support from staff with appropriate skills and background to work for the provider.
People who used the service felt safe with staff, who had received training to protect people from the risk of abuse and harm. Staff were also trained to protect people from the risk of cross infection and were provided with personal protective equipment to use at people's homes.
Staff told us they felt well supported by the management team. Records demonstrated that staff had received induction, mandatory training, individual and group supervision, and annual appraisals. Team meetings were also held by the manager to bring staff together for discussions about their work and development.
Where required staff supported people to meet their nutritional needs and attend health care appointments. People were supported to meet their medicine needs where this formed part of their agreed care plan. Staff informed us they reported any concerns about a person's health to their line manager so that applicable health care professionals could be informed.
The provider understood how to protect people's rights and supported people to make choices about their care and support in line with their capacity to do so. People were supported in a respectful manner that promoted their dignity. Staff understood how to meet people's religious and/or cultural needs. People and relatives liked receiving their care from a limited number of conscientious and reliable care staff that they got to know well.
The care plans were being reviewed and updated by the manager to ensure that people's needs and wishes were described in a more individual and detailed manner. We noted that some plans needed more written guidance for staff to provide care and support that was tailored to people's unique needs and aspirations. People and relatives were given information about how to make a complaint. We saw that where complaints and safeguarding investigations had occurred, the provider carried out its own analysis to identify and address shortfalls in how the service operated.
People and relatives expressed they thought the service was well managed and they liked the openness of the manager. We saw that quality assurance systems were in place but the provider had not picked up on specific issues that needed to be improved on, that we found during the inspection. For example, we found that the on-call records needed to be written in a more precise and professional manner. The provider had created its own action plan and fully acknowledged that improvements were needed.
There were well developed working relationships with other local services, which enabled the provider to continually develop its own knowledge and offer people who used the service new opportunities to meet their health care needs and social interests.
We found three breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, recruitment and good governance. You can see what action we asked the provider to take at the end of the full version of this report.
Inspection Report Published 29 March 2019 PDF (opens in a new tab)
The service was not always safe.
Risks to people's safety were not always identified and mitigated.
Staff recruitment practices were not sufficiently rigorous for the provider to be assured that newly appointed staff had suitable experience, knowledge and background to work with people who used the service.
Staff provided a reliable and punctual service.
Staff had training and guidance to understand and detect abuse, and the measures to take to protect people.
Staff received appropriate training, supervision and support to meet their needs.
People were satisfactorily supported by the provider to meet their health care and nutritional needs.
Staff respected people's rights to make their own decisions where possible.
The service was caring.
People and relatives thought they received thoughtful and compassionate care.
People's needs and wishes were met by care staff they were familiar with.
The provider assisted people to access independent advocacy and other support, if people wished to.
The service was not always responsive.
Care planning was not always undertaken in an individual way that responded to people's identified personal care and health care needs.
People and their relatives reported they were pleased with how staff provided care and support.
Suitable systems were in place to respond to any complaints. The provider learnt from complaints where people and/or their relatives had not received satisfactory care and support.
The service was not always well-led.
Positive views were expressed by people, relatives and care workers about the manager's approach. However we found shortfalls in the management of the service.
Quality monitoring tools were used but did not always identify the areas for improvement we found during the inspection.
The provider had already developed an action plan to improve the service, based on its own audits and findings prior to this inspection.
The provider worked positively with other local services that supported older people and their informal carers.
Virtus Care LTD
In London, W11 1QR
Octavia Housing - Burgess Field
In London, W10 5PT
Equal People Mencap
In London, W10 6EJ


text:
Tennessee church shooting suspect charged with murder
Kristin M. Hall and John Raby, The Associated Press
Published Monday, September 25, 2017 3:35AM EDT
Last Updated Monday, September 25, 2017 9:11AM EDT
Police tape lines the scene at the Burnette Chapel Church of Christ after a deadly shooting at the church in Antioch, Tenn. on Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017. (Andrew Nelles / The Tennessean)
NASHVILLE -- The pastor shouted "Run, run, gunshots!" and congregants hid under pews or in bathrooms as a masked man armed with two guns opened fire at a Tennessee church, killing one person and wounding six before being subdued.
Burnette Chapel Church of Christ member Minerva Rosa said members were talking about the success of their yard sale the previous day when they heard gunshots Sunday outside the building in a Nashville neighbourhood. The church pastor, David Spann, 60, then shouted for everyone to run, according to a witness.
The gunman entered the church from the back after fatally shooting a woman outside, police said. He then walked through the church silently, shooting six more people before an usher subdued him, police said. Police later recovered another pistol and a shotgun from the suspect's vehicle.
Rosa said the reading that day had been from Luke, Chapter 8, and she recalled the part about a woman who touched Jesus and was cured of bleeding.
By the end of the shooting, she was on her knees, her dress stained with blood, putting pressure on the gunshot wound in Pastor Spann's chest. She and others got on their phones to call 911.
Another church member, a 22-year-old usher named Robert Engle, tackled the gunman and suffered injuries when he was pistol whipped. In the struggle, the shooter shot himself, although it wasn't clear if it was on purpose or an accident. Engle retrieved his own gun from his car and held the man until police arrived, police said.
"He's amazing," Rosa told reporters about Engle. "Without him I think it could be worse. He was the hero today." Authorities identified the attacker as Emanuel Kidega Samson, 25, of Murfreesboro, who came to the United States from Sudan in 1996 and is a legal U.S. resident.
Samson will have his first court appearance Wednesday, WMSV-TV reported, citing court records. According to an arrest affidavit, Samson waived his rights and told police he arrived at the church armed and fired upon the building Sunday.
No motive was immediately determined. Church members told investigators the suspect had attended services a year or two ago, said Don Aaron, a spokesman for the Metro Nashville Police Department. Nashville police did not immediately comment on several bizarre posts on the suspect's Facebook page in the hours before the shooting.
The gunman pulled into the church's parking lot as services were ending. Melanie Smith, 39, of Smyrna, Tennessee, was killed when the shooter opened fire in the parking lot. Spann's wife, Peggy, 65, was also shot as well as William and Marlene Jenkins, 83 and 84 respectively, Linda Bush, 68, and Katherine Dickerson, 64. Police said none of the surviving victims suffered life-threatening injuries.
Aaron called Engle "an extraordinarily brave individual."
But in a statement Engle said he did not want to be labeled a hero.
"The real heroes are the police, first responders and medical staff and doctors who have helped me and everyone affected." Engle asked for prayers for all those injured as well as the shooter.
Blake Langford, 21, got a text from his father telling him not to come to the church where his family attended after the shooting. "My grandmother hid under a church pew. My stepmom and my aunt, they barricaded themselves in the bathroom," Langford said he learned from his father, who arrived at the church seconds after the shooting ended.
Langford said he knew Engle and believed his actions saved lives.
"He's 6 foot 5, a really big guy, but a gentle giant," Langford said. "He's always been that kind of person to put others before himself."
Forty-two people were at the church at the time of the shooting, Aaron said.
The church describes itself on its website as a "friendly, Bible-based group of folks who love the Lord and are interested in spreading his word to those who are lost."
Photos on the church's Facebook page show a diverse congregation with people of various ages and ethnicities.
On Samson's Facebook page, a post in the hours before the shooting read, "Everything you've ever doubted or made to be believe as false, is real. & vice versa, B."
Another post read, "Become the creator instead of what's created. Whatever you say, goes."
And a third post read, "You are more than what they told us."
Police charged Samson Sunday night with one count of murder and said multiple charges were pending. He was ordered held without bond by a judicial commissioner. In addition, federal agents have opened a civil rights investigation into the shooting.
After the attack, the nearby New Beautiful Gate Church opened its doors to Burnette Chapel churchgoers as they reunited with loved ones. New Beautiful Gate Pastor Michael Mosby said he is neighbours with Spann.
"As a pastor myself, you come with the expectation of sitting down and having a service and not thinking about what can happen around you," Mosby said. "You never know who is going to come to the door or what reasons they would come to the door, come to your church and do something like that. We're always on guard. We just thank God many more weren't hurt."
Raby reported from Charleston, West Virginia.
1 dead, at least 7 hurt in U.S. church shooting
Parents warn about wild parsnip after son gets blisters


text:
Justia Forms Business Contracts FERRELLGAS FINANCE CORP Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 19,
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2019, by and between Ferrellgas Partners, LP and each director and executive officer of Ferrellgas, Inc., its general partner
Contract Categories: Business Operations - Indemnification Agreements
EX-10.34 3 fgp-20191031ex10345302d.htm EX-10.34 fgp_Ex10_34
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
THIS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of November ___, 2019 between FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Company"), and ________________ ("Indemnitee").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, highly competent persons have become more reluctant to serve business enterprises as directors or officers or in other executive or management capacities, including serving as a director, officer or agent for the general partner of a limited partnership, unless they are provided with adequate protection through insurance or indemnification against inordinate risks of claims and actions against them arising out of their service to and activities on behalf of the business enterprise;
WHEREAS, Ferrellgas, Inc., a Delaware corporation that is the sole general partner of the Partnership (the "GP") has determined that, in order to attract and retain qualified individuals to provide services on behalf of the Partnership, the Partnership will attempt to maintain on an ongoing basis, at its sole expense, liability insurance to protect persons serving the Partnership and its affiliates from certain liabilities. Although the maintenance of such insurance has been a customary and widespread practice among United States-based business enterprises, the Partnership believes that, given current market conditions and trends, such insurance may be available to it in the future only at higher premiums and with more exclusions. At the same time, directors, officers, and other persons in service to business enterprises are being increasingly subjected to expensive and time-consuming litigation relating to, among other things, matters that traditionally would have been brought only against the business enterprise itself. Section 6.7 of the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership ("LPA") requires indemnification of the officers and directors of the Partnership and of the GP. Section 6.7 of the LPA expressly provides that the indemnification provisions set forth therein are not exclusive, and thereby contemplate that contracts may be entered into between the Partnership and persons such as the Indemnitee with respect to indemnification;
WHEREAS, the uncertainties relating to such insurance and to indemnification have increased the difficulty of attracting and retaining such persons;
WHEREAS, the GP has determined that the increased difficulty in attracting and retaining such persons is detrimental to the best interests of the Partnership and its partners and that the Partnership should act to assure such persons that there will be increased certainty of such protection in the future;
WHEREAS, it is reasonable, prudent and necessary for the Partnership contractually to obligate itself to indemnify, and to advance expenses on behalf of, such persons to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law so that they will serve or continue to serve the Partnership and the GP on behalf of the Partnership free from undue concern that they will not be so indemnified or have expenses advanced;
WHEREAS, this Agreement is a supplement to and in furtherance of the Section 6.7 of the LPA and shall not be deemed a substitute therefor, nor to diminish or abrogate any rights of
Indemnitee thereunder; and
WHEREAS, Indemnitee does not regard the protection available under the Section 6.7 of the LPA and insurance as adequate in the present circumstances, and may not be willing to serve, or to continue to serve, as an officer or director without adequate protection, and the Partnership desires Indemnitee to serve in such capacity. Indemnitee is willing to serve, continue to serve and to take on additional service for or on behalf of the Partnership on the condition that he be so indemnified; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Indemnitee's agreement to serve, or to continue to serve, as an officer, director, agent or representative of the GP in connection with the provision of services to and to undertake activities relating to the Partnership's business and affairs from and after the date hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Indemnity of Indemnitee. The Partnership hereby agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law, as such may be amended from time to time. In furtherance of the foregoing indemnification, and without limiting the generality thereof.
(a) Proceedings Other Than Proceedings by or in the Right of the Partnership. Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section l(a) if, by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status (as hereinafter defined), the Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding (as hereinafter defined) other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Partnership. Pursuant to this Section 1(a), Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses (as hereinafter defined), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee, or on Indemnitee's behalf, in connection with such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Partnership, and with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the Indemnitee's conduct was unlawful.
(b) Proceedings by or in the Right of the Partnership. Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section 1(b) if, by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status, the Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding brought by or in the right of the Partnership. Pursuant to this Section 1(b), Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the Indemnitee, or on the Indemnitee's behalf, in connection with such Proceeding if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Partnership; provided, however, if applicable law so provides, no indemnification against such Expenses shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter in such Proceeding as to which Indemnitee shall have been adjudged to be liable to the Partnership unless and to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall determine that such indemnification may be made.
(c) Indemnification for Expenses of a Party Who is Wholly or Partly Successful. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status, a party to and is successful, on the merits or otherwise, in any Proceeding, he shall be indemnified to the maximum extent permitted
by law, as such may be amended from time to time, against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on Indemnitee's behalf in connection therewith. If Indemnitee is not wholly successful in such Proceeding but is successful, on the merits or otherwise, as to one or more but less than all claims, issues or matters in such Proceeding, the Partnership shall indemnify Indemnitee against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on Indemnitee's behalf in connection with each successfully resolved claim, issue or matter. For purposes of this Section 1(c) and without limitation, the termination of any claim, issue or matter in such a Proceeding by dismissal, with or without prejudice, shall be deemed to be a successful result as to such claim, issue or matter.
2. Additional Indemnity. In addition to, and without regard to any limitations on, the indemnification provided for in Section 1 of this Agreement, the Partnership shall and hereby does indemnify and hold harmless Indemnitee against all Expenses, judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on Indemnitee's behalf if, by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status, Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding (including a Proceeding by or in the right of the Partnership), including, without limitation, all liability arising out of the negligence or active or passive wrongdoing of or attributed to Indemnitee. The only limitation that shall exist upon the Partnership's obligations pursuant to this Agreement shall be that the Partnership shall not be obligated to make any payment to Indemnitee that is finally determined (under the procedures, and subject to the presumptions, set forth in Sections 6 and 7 hereof) to be unlawful.
3. Contribution.
(a) Whether or not the indemnification provided in Sections 1 and 2 hereof is available, in respect of any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in which the Partnership is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), the Partnership shall pay, in the first instance, the entire amount of any judgment or settlement of such action, suit or proceeding without requiring Indemnitee to contribute to such payment and the Partnership hereby waives and relinquishes any right of contribution it may have against Indemnitee. The Partnership shall not enter into any settlement of any action, suit or proceeding in which the Partnership is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding) unless such settlement provides for a full and final release of all claims asserted against Indemnitee and is otherwise reasonably acceptable to Indemnitee and Indemnitee's counsel. For all purposes of this Agreement, "settlement" shall include any pretrial diversion agreement, deferred prosecution agreement, non-prosecution agreement, corporate plea agreement or similar arrangement with regulatory personnel or governmental prosecutors or agencies.
(b) Without diminishing or impairing the obligations of the Partnership set forth in the preceding subparagraph, if, for any reason, Indemnitee shall elect or be required to pay all or any portion of any judgment or settlement in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding in which the Partnership is jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), the Partnership shall contribute to the amount of Expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred and paid or payable by Indemnitee in proportion to the relative benefits received by the Partnership and all officers, directors or employees of the Partnership, other than Indemnitee, who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand,
and Indemnitee, on the other hand, from the transaction or events from which such action, suit or proceeding arose; provided, however, that the proportion determined on the basis of relative benefit may, to the extent necessary to conform to law, be further adjusted by reference to the relative fault of the Partnership and all officers, directors or employees of the Partnership and the GP other than Indemnitee who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, in connection with the transaction or events that resulted in such expenses, judgments, fines or settlement amounts, as well as any other equitable considerations which applicable law may require to be considered. The relative fault of the Partnership and all officers, directors or employees of the Partnership and the GP, other than Indemnitee, who are jointly liable with Indemnitee (or would be if joined in such action, suit or proceeding), on the one hand, and Indemnitee, on the other hand, shall be determined by reference to, among other things, the degree to which their actions were motivated by intent to gain personal profit or advantage, the degree to which their liability is primary or secondary and the degree to which their conduct is active or passive.
(c) The Partnership hereby agrees to fully indemnify and hold Indemnitee harmless from, and advance all Expenses to Indemnitee in connection with, any claims of or for contribution which may be brought by officers, directors, or employees of the Partnership and the GP, other than Indemnitee, who may be jointly liable with Indemnitee.
(d) To the fullest extent permissible under applicable law, if the indemnification provided for in this Agreement is unavailable to Indemnitee for any reason whatsoever, the Partnership, in lieu of indemnifying Indemnitee, shall contribute to the amount incurred by Indemnitee, whether for judgments, fines, penalties, excise taxes, amounts paid or to be paid in settlement and/or for Expenses, in connection with any claim relating to an indemnifiable event under this Agreement, in such proportion as is deemed fair and reasonable in light of all of the circumstances of such Proceeding in order to reflect (i) the relative benefits received by the Partnership and Indemnitee as a result of the event(s) and/or transaction(s) giving cause to such Proceeding and/or (ii) the relative fault of the Partnership and the GP (and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents) and Indemnitee in connection with such event(s) and/or transaction(s).
4. Indemnification for Expenses of a Witness. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that Indemnitee is, by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status, a witness, or is made (or asked) to respond to discovery requests, in any Proceeding to which Indemnitee is not a party, Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee or on Indemnitee's behalf in connection therewith.
5. Advancement of Expenses. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Partnership shall advance all Expenses incurred by or on behalf of Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status within thirty (30) days after the receipt by the Partnership of a statement or statements from Indemnitee requesting such advance or advances from time to time, whether prior to or after final disposition of such Proceeding. Such statement or statements shall reasonably evidence the Expenses incurred by Indemnitee and shall include or be preceded or accompanied by a written undertaking by or on behalf of Indemnitee to repay any Expenses advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified against such Expenses. Any advances and undertakings to repay pursuant to this Section 5 shall be unsecured and interest free.
6. Procedures and Presumptions for Determination of Entitlement to Indemnification. It is the intent of this Agreement to secure for Indemnitee rights of indemnity that are as favorable as may be permitted under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act ("DRULPA") and public policy of the State of Delaware. Accordingly, the parties agree that the following procedures and presumptions shall apply in the event of any question as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement:
(a) To obtain indemnification under this Agreement, Indemnitee shall submit to the Partnership a written request, including therein or therewith such documentation and information as is reasonably available to Indemnitee and is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification. The GP of the Partnership shall, promptly upon receipt of such a request for indemnification, advise the Audit Committee of the Partnership (as described and defined in the LPA) in writing that Indemnitee has requested indemnification. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any failure of Indemnitee to provide such a request to the Partnership, or to provide such a request in a timely fashion, shall not relieve the Partnership of any liability that it may have to Indemnitee unless, and to the extent that, such failure actually and materially prejudices the interests of the Partnership.
(b) Upon written request by Indemnitee for indemnification pursuant to the first sentence of Section 6(a) hereof, a determination with respect to Indemnitee's entitlement thereto shall be made in the specific case by one of the following four methods, which shall be at the election of the Audit Committee or, with respect to (3) only, after the occurrence of a "change in control" of the Company, at the election of the Indemnitee (1) by a majority vote of the Audit Committee, even though less than a quorum, (2) by a sub-committee of Audit Committee designated by a majority vote of the Audit Committee, even though less than a quorum, (3) if there are no disinterested members of the Audit Committee or if the Audit Committee so directs or at the specific request of Indemnitee after the occurrence of a "change in control" of the Company, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion to the Audit Committee, a copy of which shall be delivered to the Indemnitee, or (4) if so directed by the Audit Committee, by the holders of the Outstanding Units (as defined in the LPA) of the Partnership. For purposes hereof, disinterested directors are those members of the Board who are not parties to the action, suit or proceeding in respect of which indemnification is sought by Indemnitee. For purposes of this Section 6(b), "change in control" of the Company shall mean (i) a change (whether occasioned by resignation or removal of directors in place as of the date of this Agreement, by the addition of new directors or otherwise) occurring after the date of this Agreement in the persons constituting a majority of the Board of the GP or of the board of the GP's sole shareholder, Ferrellgas Companies, Inc. ("FCI"); or (ii) the occurrence after the date of this Agreement of an issuance, sale or other transfer or other disposition, whether by merger, conversion transaction, foreclosure, reorganization or otherwise, of shares or other securities that constitute 50% or more of the outstanding shares of the GP or of FCI; or (iii) the occurrence after the date of this Agreement of a sale, or other transfer, however effected, in one transaction or in a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all the assets of the GP, of FCI or of the Company.
(c) If the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by Independent Counsel pursuant to Section 6(b) hereof, the Independent Counsel shall be selected as provided in this Section 6(c). The Independent Counsel shall be selected by the Audit
Committee. Indemnitee may, within ten (10) days after such written notice of selection shall have been given, deliver to the Partnership a written objection to such selection; provided, however, that such objection may be asserted only on the ground that the Independent Counsel so selected does not meet the requirements of "Independent Counsel" as defined in Section 13 of this Agreement, and the objection shall set forth with particularity the factual basis of such assertion. Absent a proper and timely objection, the person so selected shall act as Independent Counsel. If a written objection is made and substantiated, the Independent Counsel selected may not serve as Independent Counsel unless and until such objection is withdrawn or a court has determined that such objection is without merit. If, within twenty (20) days after submission by Indemnitee of a written request for indemnification pursuant to Section 6(a) hereof, no Independent Counsel shall have been selected and not objected to, either the Partnership or Indemnitee may petition the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or other court of competent jurisdiction for resolution of any objection which shall have been made by the Indemnitee to the Partnership's selection of Independent Counsel and/or for the appointment as Independent Counsel of a person selected by the court or by such other person as the court shall designate, and the person with respect to whom all objections are so resolved or the person so appointed shall act as Independent Counsel under Section 6(b) hereof. The Partnership shall pay any and all reasonable fees and expenses of Independent Counsel incurred by such Independent Counsel in connection with acting pursuant to Section 6(b) hereof, and the Partnership shall pay all reasonable fees and expenses incident to the procedures of this Section 6(c), regardless of the manner in which such Independent Counsel was selected or appointed.
(d) In making a determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification hereunder, the person or persons or entity making such determination shall presume that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion by clear and convincing evidence. Neither the failure of the Partnership (including by the Audit Committee or independent legal counsel) to have made a determination prior to the commencement of any action pursuant to this Agreement that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor the identification by the Partnership in any settlement of Indemnitee as a wrongdoer or other admission by the Partnership with respect to Indemnitee in any settlement, nor an actual determination by the Partnership (including by the Audit Committee or independent legal counsel) that Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct.
(e) Without limiting the effects of the LPA, Indemnitee shall be deemed to have acted in good faith if Indemnitee's action is based on the records or books of account of the Enterprise (as hereinafter defined), including financial statements, or on information supplied to Indemnitee by the officers of the Enterprise in the course of their duties, or on the advice of legal counsel for the Enterprise or on information or records given or reports made to the Enterprise by an independent certified public accountant or by an appraiser or other expert selected with reasonable care by the Enterprise. In addition, the knowledge and/or actions, or failure to act, of any director, officer, agent or employee of the Enterprise shall not be imputed to Indemnitee for purposes of determining the right to indemnification under this Agreement. Whether or not the foregoing provisions of this Section 6(e) are satisfied, it shall in any event be presumed that Indemnitee has at all times acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the best interests of the Partnership. Anyone seeking to overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion by clear and convincing evidence.
(f) If the person, persons or entity empowered or selected under Section 6 to determine whether Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification shall not have made a determination within sixty (60) days after receipt by the Partnership of the request therefor, the requisite determination of entitlement to indemnification shall be deemed to have been made and Indemnitee shall be entitled to such indemnification absent (i) a misstatement by Indemnitee of a material fact, or an omission of a material fact necessary to make Indemnitee's statement not materially misleading, in connection with the request for indemnification, or (ii) a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law; provided, however, that such sixty (60) day period may be extended for a reasonable time, not to exceed an additional thirty (30) days, if the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification in good faith requires such additional time to obtain or evaluate documentation and/or information relating thereto; and provided further, that the foregoing provisions of this Section 6(f) shall not apply if the determination of entitlement to indemnification is to be made by the holders of the Outstanding Units pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement and if (A) within fifteen (15) days after receipt by the Partnership of the request for such determination, the Audit Committee resolves to submit such determination to the holders of the Outstanding Units for their consideration at an annual meeting thereof to be held within seventy five (75) days after such receipt and such determination is made thereat, or (B) a special meeting of holders of the Outstanding Units is called within fifteen (15) days after such receipt for the purpose of making such determination, such meeting is held for such purpose within sixty (60) days after having been so called and such determination is made thereat.
(g) Indemnitee shall cooperate with the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information which is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any Independent Counsel, member of the Audit Committee or holders of the Outstanding Units of the Partnership shall act reasonably and in good faith in making a determination regarding the Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification under this Agreement. Any costs or expenses (including attorneys' fees and disbursements) incurred by Indemnitee in so cooperating with the person, persons or entity making such determination shall be borne by the Partnership (irrespective of the determination as to Indemnitee's entitlement to indemnification) and the Partnership hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold Indemnitee harmless therefrom.
(h) The Partnership acknowledges that a settlement or other disposition short of final judgment may be successful if it permits a party to avoid expense, delay, distraction, disruption and uncertainty. In the event that any action, claim or proceeding to which Indemnitee is a party is resolved in any manner other than by adverse judgment against Indemnitee (including, without limitation, settlement of such action, claim or proceeding with or without payment of money or other consideration) it shall be presumed that Indemnitee has been successful on the merits or otherwise in such action, suit or proceeding. Anyone seeking to
overcome this presumption shall have the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion by clear and convincing evidence.
(i) The termination of any Proceeding or of any claim, issue or matter therein, by judgment, order, settlement, corporate plea agreement, pretrial diversion agreement, deferred prosecution agreement, non-prosecution agreement or conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement) of itself adversely affect the right of Indemnitee to indemnification or create a presumption that Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Partnership or, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, that Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.
7. Remedies of Indemnitee.
(a) In the event that (i) a determination is made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, (ii) advancement of Expenses is not timely made pursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, (iii) no determination of entitlement to indemnification is made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement within ninety (90) days after receipt by the Partnership of the request for indemnification, (iv) payment of indemnification is not made pursuant to this Agreement within ten (10) days after receipt by the Partnership of a written request therefor, or (v) payment of indemnification is not made within ten (10) days after a determination has been made that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or such determination is deemed to have been made pursuant to Section 6 of this Agreement, Indemnitee shall be entitled to an adjudication in an appropriate court of the State of Delaware, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, of Indemnitee's entitlement to such indemnification. Indemnitee shall commence such proceeding seeking an adjudication within one hundred eighty (180) days following the date on which Indemnitee first has the right to commence such proceeding pursuant to this Section 7(a). The Partnership shall not oppose Indemnitee's right to seek any such adjudication.
(b) In the event that a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification, any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 7 shall be conducted in all respects as a de novo trial on the merits, and Indemnitee shall not be prejudiced by reason of the adverse determination under Section 6(b).
(c) If a determination shall have been made pursuant to Section 6(b) of this Agreement that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification, the Partnership shall be bound by such determination in any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 7, absent (i) a misstatement by Indemnitee of a material fact, or an omission of a material fact necessary to make Indemnitee's misstatement not materially misleading in connection with the application for indemnification, or (ii) a prohibition of such indemnification under applicable law.
(d) In the event that Indemnitee, pursuant to this Section 7, seeks a judicial adjudication of the Indemnitee's rights under, or to recover damages for breach of, this Agreement, or to recover under any directors' and officers' liability insurance policies maintained by the Partnership, the Partnership shall pay on Indemnitee's behalf, in advance, any and all expenses (of the types described in the definition of Expenses in Section 13 of this
Agreement) actually and reasonably incurred by Indemnitee in such judicial adjudication, regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, advancement of expenses or insurance recovery.
(e) The Partnership shall be precluded from asserting in any judicial proceeding commenced pursuant to this Section 7 that the procedures and presumptions of this Agreement are not valid, binding and enforceable and shall stipulate in any such court that the Partnership is bound by all the provisions of this Agreement. The Partnership shall indemnify Indemnitee against any and all Expenses and, if requested by Indemnitee, shall (within ten (10) days after receipt by the Partnership of a written request therefore) advance, to the extent not prohibited by law, such expenses to Indemnitee, which are incurred by Indemnitee in connection with any action brought by Indemnitee for indemnification or advance of Expenses from the Partnership under this Agreement or under any directors' and officers' liability insurance policies maintained by the Partnership, regardless of whether Indemnitee ultimately is determined to be entitled to such indemnification, advancement of Expenses or insurance recovery, as the case may be.
(f) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no determination as to entitlement to indemnification under this Agreement shall be required to be made prior to the final disposition of the Proceeding.
8. Non-Exclusivity; Survival of Rights; Insurance; Primacy of Indemnification; Subrogation.
(a) The rights of indemnification as provided by this Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Indemnitee may at any time be entitled under applicable law, the LPA, any agreement, a vote of the holders of the Outstanding Units, a resolution of directors of the GP, or otherwise. No amendment, alteration or repeal of this Agreement or of any provision hereof shall limit or restrict any right of Indemnitee under this Agreement in respect of any action taken or omitted by such Indemnitee in his Official Status prior to such amendment, alteration or repeal. To the extent that a change in the DRULPA, whether by statute or judicial decision, permits greater indemnification than would be afforded currently under the LPA and this Agreement, it is the intent of the parties hereto that Indemnitee shall enjoy by this Agreement the greater benefits so afforded by such change. No right or remedy herein conferred is intended to be exclusive of any other right or remedy, and every other right and remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right and remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or otherwise. The assertion or employment of any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise, shall not prevent the concurrent assertion or employment of any other right or remedy.
(b) To the extent that the Partnership maintains an insurance policy or policies providing liability insurance for directors, officers, employees, or agents or fiduciaries of the Partnership or of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise that such person serves at the request of the Partnership, Indemnitee shall be covered by such policy or policies in accordance with its or their terms to the maximum extent of the coverage available for any director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary under such policy or policies. If, at the time of the receipt of a notice of a claim pursuant to the terms hereof, the Partnership has directors' and officers' liability insurance in effect, the Partnership shall give
prompt notice of the commencement of such proceeding to the insurers in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective policies. The Partnership shall thereafter take all necessary or desirable action to cause such insurers to pay, on behalf of the Indemnitee, all amounts payable as a result of such proceeding in accordance with the terms of such policies.
(c) The Partnership hereby acknowledges that Indemnitee has certain rights to indemnification, advancement of expenses and/or insurance provided by or on behalf of the GP. The Partnership hereby agrees (i) that it is the indemnitor of first resort (i.e., its obligations to Indemnitee are primary and any obligation of the GP to advance expenses or to provide indemnification for the same expenses or liabilities incurred by Indemnitee are secondary), (ii) that it shall be required to advance the full amount of expenses incurred by Indemnitee and shall be liable for the full amount of all Expenses, judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement to the extent legally permitted and as required by the terms of this Agreement and Section 6.7 of the LPA, without regard to any rights Indemnitee may have against the GP, and (iii) that it irrevocably waives, relinquishes and releases the GP from any and all claims against the GP for contribution, subrogation or any other recovery of any kind in respect thereof. The Partnership further agrees that no advancement or payment by the GP on behalf of Indemnitee with respect to any claim for which Indemnitee has sought indemnification from the Partnership shall affect the foregoing and the GP shall have a right of contribution and/or be subrogated to the extent of such advancement or payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee against the Partnership. The Partnership and Indemnitee agree that the GP is an express third party beneficiary of the terms of this Section 8(c).
(d) Except as provided in paragraph (c) above, in the event of any payment under this Agreement, the Company shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of Indemnitee (other than against the GP), who shall execute all papers required and take all action necessary to secure such rights, including execution of such documents as are necessary to enable the Company to bring suit to enforce such rights.
(e) The Partnership shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment of amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder if and to the extent that Indemnitee has otherwise actually received such payment under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise.
(f) The Partnership's obligation to indemnify or advance Expenses hereunder to Indemnitee who is or was serving at the request of the Partnership as a director, officer, employee or agent of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise shall be reduced by any amount Indemnitee has actually received as indemnification or advancement of expenses from such other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise.
9. Exception to Right of Indemnification. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement, the Partnership shall not be obligated under this Agreement to make any indemnity in connection with any claim made against Indemnitee:
(a) for which payment has actually been made to or on behalf of Indemnitee under any insurance policy or other indemnity provision, except with respect to any excess beyond the amount paid under any insurance policy or other indemnity provision, provided, that
the foregoing shall not affect the rights of Indemnitee or the Fund Indemnitors set forth in Section 8(c) above; or
(b) for an accounting of profits made from the purchase and sale (or sale and purchase) by Indemnitee of securities of the Partnership within the meaning of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or similar provisions of state statutory law or common law; or
(c) in connection with any Proceeding (or any part of any Proceeding) initiated by Indemnitee, including any Proceeding (or any part of any Proceeding) initiated by Indemnitee against the Partnership or its directors, officers, employees or other indemnitees, unless (i) the GP authorized the Proceeding (or any part of any Proceeding) prior to its initiation, or (ii) the Partnership provides the indemnification, in its sole discretion, pursuant to the powers vested in the Partnership under applicable law.
10. Duration of Agreement. All agreements and obligations of the Partnership contained herein shall continue during the period Indemnitee is an officer or director of the GP or the Partnership (or is or was serving at the request of the Partnership as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise) and for a further period of four (4) years and shall continue thereafter so long as Indemnitee shall be subject to any Proceeding (or any proceeding commenced under Section 7 hereof) by reason of his Official Status, whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors (including any direct or indirect successor by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Partnership), assigns, spouses, heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives.
11. Security. To the extent requested by Indemnitee and approved by the GP, the Partnership may at any time and from time to time provide security to Indemnitee for the Partnership's obligations hereunder through an irrevocable bank line of credit, funded trust or other collateral. Any such security, once provided to Indemnitee, may not be revoked or released without the prior written consent of the Indemnitee.
12. Enforcement.
(a) The Partnership expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement and assumes the obligations imposed on it hereby in order to induce Indemnitee to serve as an officer or director of the Partnership and agent of the Partnership with respect to the MLP, and the Partnership acknowledges that Indemnitee is relying upon this Agreement in serving as an officer or director of the Partnership and agent of the Partnership with respect to the MLP.
(b) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral, written and implied, between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.
(c) The Partnership shall not seek from a court, or agree to, a "bar order" which would have the effect of prohibiting or limiting the Indemnitee's rights to receive advancement of expenses under this Agreement.
13. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement:
(a) "Official Status" describes the status of a person who is or was a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary of the Partnership, the GP or of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise that such person is or was serving at the express written request of the Partnership. Proceedings relating to acts or omissions of Indemnitee as a GP representative or agent in the affairs of the Partnership are, for all purposes of this Agreement, deemed to be Proceedings made against Indemnitee by reason of Indemnitee's Official Status.
(b) "Enterprise" shall mean the Partnership and any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise that Indemnitee is or was serving at the express written request of the Partnership as a director, officer, employee, agent or fiduciary.
(c) "Expenses" shall include all reasonable attorneys' fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees of experts, witness fees, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and all other disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with prosecuting, defending, preparing to prosecute or defend, investigating, participating, or being or preparing to be a witness in a Proceeding, or responding to, or objecting to, a request to provide discovery in any Proceeding. Expenses also shall include Expenses incurred in connection with any appeal resulting from any Proceeding and any federal, state, local or foreign taxes imposed on the Indemnitee as a result of the actual or deemed receipt of any payments under this Agreement, including without limitation the premium, security for, and other costs relating to any cost bond, supersede as bond, or other appeal bond or its equivalent. Expenses, however, shall not include amounts paid in settlement by Indemnitee or the amount of judgments or fines against Indemnitee.
(d) "Independent Counsel" means a law firm, or a member of a law firm, that is experienced in matters of corporation law and neither presently is, nor in the past five years has been, retained to represent (i) the Partnership or Indemnitee in any matter material to either such party (other than with respect to matters concerning Indemnitee under this Agreement, or of other indemnitees under similar indemnification agreements), or (ii) any other party to the Proceeding giving rise to a claim for indemnification hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Independent Counsel" shall not include any person who, under the applicable standards of professional conduct then prevailing, would have a conflict of interest in representing either the Partnership or Indemnitee in an action to determine Indemnitee's rights under this Agreement. The Partnership agrees to pay the reasonable fees of the Independent Counsel referred to above and to fully indemnify such counsel against any and all Expenses, claims, liabilities and damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its engagement pursuant hereto.
(e) "Proceeding" includes any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternate dispute resolution mechanism, investigation, inquiry, administrative hearing or any other actual, threatened or completed proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Partnership or otherwise and whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which Indemnitee was, is or will be involved as a party or otherwise, by reason of his or her Official Status, by reason of any action taken by Indemnitee or of any inaction on his part while acting in his or her Official Status; in each case whether or not he is acting or serving in any such capacity at the time any liability or expense is incurred for which indemnification can be provided under this Agreement; including one pending on or before the date of this Agreement, but excluding one initiated by an Indemnitee pursuant to Section 7 of this Agreement to enforce his rights under this Agreement.
14. Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision hereof shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Agreement is intended to confer upon Indemnitee indemnification rights to the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws. In the event any provision hereof conflicts with any applicable law, such provision shall be deemed modified, consistent with the aforementioned intent, to the extent necessary to resolve such conflict.
15. Modification and Waiver. No supplement, modification, termination or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions hereof (whether or not similar) nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
16. Notice By Indemnitee. Indemnitee agrees promptly to notify the Partnership in writing upon being served with or otherwise receiving any summons, citation, subpoena, complaint, indictment, information or other document relating to any Proceeding or matter which may be subject to indemnification covered hereunder. The failure to so notify the Partnership shall not relieve the Partnership of any obligation which it may have to Indemnitee under this Agreement or otherwise unless and only to the extent that such failure or delay materially prejudices the Partnership.
17. Notices. All notices and other communications given or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed effectively given (a) upon personal delivery to the party to be notified, (b) when sent by confirmed electronic mail or facsimile if sent during normal business hours of the recipient, and if not so confirmed, then on the next business day, (c) five (5) days after having been sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or (d) one (1) day after deposit with a nationally recognized overnight courier, specifying next day delivery, with written verification of receipt. All communications shall be sent:
(a) To Indemnitee at the address set forth below Indemnitee signature hereto.
(b) To the Partnership at:
One Liberty Plaza
or to such other address as may have been furnished to Indemnitee by the Partnership or to the Partnership by Indemnitee, as the case may be.
18. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same the same instrument. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or any electronic signature complying with the U.S. federal ESIGN Act of 2000, e.g., www.docusign.com) or other transmission method and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.
19. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction thereof.
20. Governing Law and Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement and the legal relations among the parties shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to its conflict of laws rules. The Partnership and Indemnitee hereby irrevocably and unconditionally (i) agree that any action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be brought only in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware (the "Delaware Court"), and not in any other state or federal court in the United States of America or any court in any other country, (ii) consent to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Delaware Court for purposes of any action or proceeding arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, (iii) waive any objection to the laying of venue of any such action or proceeding in the Delaware Court, and (iv) waive, and agree not to plead or to make, any claim that any such action or proceeding brought in the Delaware Court has been brought in an improper or inconvenient forum.
SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Indemnification Agreement on and as of the day and year first above written.
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
By: FERRELLGAS, INC., its Sole General Partner


text:
Q: объект ошибка типа builtin не subsettable Только начал осваивать язык программирования R. Надо было найти все NA в таблице.  Сначала это получилось, но на следующие попытки выдавал ошибку. Видел несколько похожих случаев, но не понял как применить на мой. Буду рад любой попытке, заранее спасибо.
Мой код:
NAF <- read.csv(file = "C:/Users/User/Documents/NAF.csv", header = TRUE)
NAF$carbon[NAF$carbon == 000000e+00] <- NA
is.na[NAF]

A: По большому счёту вам достаточно функций is.na() и which().
is.na() - проверка является ли значение NA;
which() - возвращает индексы элементов вектора (столбца таблицы в вашем случае) которые соответствуют заданному выражению.
# тестовая таблица
NAF <- data.frame( a = c(1,2,NA,4,NA),
                   b = c("k","o","c",NA,"r"),
                   c = c("P",NA,NA,"Q",NA))

# найти NA в столбце
NAF$a[ is.na(NAF$a) ]
#> [1] NA NA

# найти номера строк в столбце со значением NA
which( is.na(NAF$c) )
#> [1] 2 3 5

# найти все NA в таблице
sapply(NAF, function(x) x[ is.na(x) ] )
#> $a
#> [1] NA NA
#>
#> $b
#> [1] <NA>
#> Levels: c k o r
#>
#> $c
#> [1] <NA> <NA> <NA>
#> Levels: P Q

# получить индексы всех NA в таблице
sapply(NAF, function(x) which( is.na(x) ) )
#> $a
#> [1] 3 5
#>
#> $b
#> [1] 4
#>
#> $c
#> [1] 2 3 5

Created on 2019-07-03 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Yes, it's true. We've been taking dancing lessons.
And furthermore, it's true we have a secret soft spot for High School Musical movies.
In fact, we're talking about camping out just to get tickets for the new High School Movie Part XIII.
We're certain it's going to sell out for weeks.
And now, for the first time, we display for you our hard-earned dancing skills.
I. can't. be. your. friend. any. more.
Ouch! So much for thoughts of sincerity! I can't believe I fell for that.
That's painful to watch. I think you owe me that one minute of my life back.
Gotta love JibJab! Now, if there was a Star Wars clip, I'd expect to see Fr. Roderick doing his thing!
Catholics with a sense of humor…ya gotta love that!


Available 5/11/2018 via Lowatt & Arctic Rodeo.
Standard cover, designed by John Yates, with standard weight red vinyl.
Two color print of John Yates' 'Second Letter' logo on a gray t-shirt.
John Yates's 'Second Letter' logo printed in two colors on natural tote bag over original photo from the 1920 "Wall Street Bombing".