text:
Alpedriz foi uma freguesia portuguesa do município de Alcobaça, distrito de Leiria com 16,17 km2 de área e 777 habitantes (2011). Densidade: 48,1 hab/km2.

Foi extinta (agregada) em 2013 no âmbito duma reforma administrativa nacional, tendo sido agregada às freguesias de Cós e Montes, para formar uma nova freguesia denominada União das Freguesias de Cós, Alpedriz e Montes com sede em Cós.

Foi vila e sede de concelho até ao início do século XIX. Era constituído por uma freguesia e tinha, em 1801, 804 habitantes.

População

Em 1989 deu origem à freguesia de Montes.

História
Alpedriz é uma antiga Vila no litoral centro, cujo nome, incerto; se crê do baixo-latim petrinea, 'pedrinha', talvez com a junção moçarabe do prefixo *al- resultado da posterior presença moura. Do mesmo topónimo em Portugal, existem Alpedrinha, Alpedrede e Alpedreirinha. Há diversos mitos populares quanto ao nome, um deles que a vila teria sido fundada pelos mouros em meados do século IX, derivando de duas palavras: ABI+DRIZ (supostamente 'Pai de Driz'). Improvavel porque nem 'Abi' corresponde a 'Aba' (do antigo Acádio 'Āḇu'), que significa pai na maioria das linguas semíticas, nem "Driz" é um nome árabe. Além disso, e apesar de se saber que o Rei Afonso Henriques dali expulsou os mouros em 1147, estes não deixaram qualquer sinal da sua permanência. Dos tempos Suevos e Visigodos também não foi encontrado qualquer legado, embora se saiba que ambos estes povos germânicos se fixaram nesta região e em Leiria que dista 25 km, onde deixaram numerosos vestígios. Essa herança deixa outra possibilidade quanto a toponímia ou segundo uma versão Galega, a antroponímia; do local que poderá ser Sueva ou Visigótica, derivada do nome Godo 'Alperiz' do antigo 'Elpericus' (combinação esta de Hilp + ric)  com provável hipercorreção do Latim 'Pero ou Pedro' como aponta a hipótese Galega.
O nome pedrinha indicaria a vila em si remontando no mínimo aos tempos romanos, de cuja época há um grande número de testemunhos em todo o antigo município, incluindo nos Montes onde devido às colinas ensoleiradas, o vinho era cultivado. A ponte mais antiga de Alpedriz foi construída nas ruínas da ponte Romana no rio d'Areia, que era atravessada pela estrada Romana passando por 'Colipo' '(atual São Sebastião do Freixo, Leiria), e ligava as cidades de Eburobrício '(atual Óbidos) e 'Conímbriga' (atual Coimbra).

Sem se saber o nome pré-Romano, foram encontrados restos humanos num túmulo na 'Ribeira do Pereiro' remontando ao Neolítico, supondo-se assim, e à semelhança de inúmeras outras povoações nesta zona; que estes foram os ancestrais dos habitantes celtibéricos, nomeadamente os Galaicos e/ou Túrdulos Velhos. Estes humanos muito antigos eram inicialmente semi-nómadas. Dependiam dos elementos e recursos naturais para sobreviver e defender-se; tais como a localização geográfica e topografia (Alpedriz encontra-se abrigada, a meio-caminho entre o oceano Atlântico e zonas montanhosas como a Serra dos Candeeiros), ribeiras e cursos de água, vegetação, floresta, solo fértil que lhes daria fácil acesso à caça, pesca, bagas e frutos silvestres, pastorícia e agricultura rudimentar.

Pertenceu à ordem militar de Avis como sede duma Comenda desta Ordem por doação do rei Sancho I (razão pela qual Alpedriz nunca terá dependido dos Coutos do Mosteiro de Alcobaça).

O rei Manuel I, em 20 de Março de 1515 deu-lhe Foral Novo, como consta o respectivo livro, folhas 160 e seguintes. Uma cópia do mesmo foral foi obtida da Torre do Tombo por intermédio do filho desta terra o Abílio Moniz Barreto.

Como um dos restos do passado de prestígio, existe um velhíssimo Pelourinho, que estava localizado no meio dum largo em frente da chamada Capela do Santíssimo, e é no lugar dessa Capela que hoje está instalado o referido Pelourinho.  Este data dos finais do século XV, periodo em que tal como nas outras vilas dos vizinhos Coutos de Alcobaça foi realizada sob o rei Manuel I (1469-1521) a chamada reforma urbana geral. Manuel I cumpriu a promessa de mais independência aos monges e priores, e concedeu-lhes os seus próprios tribunais inferiores. O pelourinho foi parcialmente preservado, após ter sido vandalizado duas vezes (em 1973 e 1992).
A vila possuiu também um Tribunal, um Hospital de  Pobres e uma prisão privada com direitos garantidos por bulas papais. Foi sede de concelho (extinto em Novembro de 1836) e gozava então de privilégios dos Caseiros da Ordem e ainda outros benefícios, entre os quais o de direito a asilo. Alpedriz tinha 2 Vereadores, um Procurador Escrivão da Câmara, um Notário do Judicial e um Juiz Ordinário; o último dos quais foi José Moniz Barreto.

Nas dependências da referida Capela, e ao nível do 1.° andar funcionou a escola primária, onde o António Moniz Barreto de Figueiredo iniciou as suas funções em 1890. Dizia ele que esta escola era de fundação Pombalina, e o mesmo Professor fez dela um famoso centro cultural, atraindo aqui muitos alunos de todas as freguesias circundantes que iam fazer exame a Leiria. Chegaram a estar hospedados em Alpedriz, alunos da Martingança e Maiorga. Durante as Invasões Napoleónicas a vila foi ocupada pelas tropas do General Junot tendo-se as populações locais refugiado nos pinhais e bosques circundantes. Na mesma capela e suas dependências, esteve aquartelada uma guarnição militar Francesa que foi derrotada nas Linhas de Torres Vedras pelas tropas do Exército Anglo-Luso. A sala das aulas passou a ser sede da Junta de Freguesia depois da escola, por excesso de frequência ter mudado para uma sala da casa Vieira da Rosa, sita nesta rua. Conjuntamente com a Junta de Freguesia funcionou, na mesma sala, o Tribunal do Juizado de Paz de que foi seu último Juiz, o Professor atrás citado.

O Papa João XXI cujo nome à nascença era Pedro Julião Rebolo (1205-1277), foi um filho ilustre desta vila; embora a sua origem seja muitas vezes atribuída a Lisboa.  <ref>Seite der Gemeinde Alpedriz unter: População, Freguesia de Alpedriz - Alcobaça  (Português)</ No século XIX, o rei Carlos I (1863-1908), concedeu a José Eugénio da Silva, também aqui nascido, e como recompensa pelos seus relevantes serviços no Brasil; o título de 'Visconde de Alpedriz'. lado da comunidade Alpedriz em: População, Freguesia de Alpedriz - Alcobaça  (Português)</ref>

Património
 Pelourinho de Alpedriz

Antigas freguesias de Alcobaça
Antigos municípios do distrito de Leiria


text:
What the Dickens: "Lost" Season Three Opens with A Tale of Two Cities
Is it just me or has Lost consistently presented us with a brilliant opening sequence that contradicts everything we thought we knew about the show every season so far?
Starting again with that focusing eye (previously it belonged to Jack, then Desmond, and now Juliet), Lost's season premiere ("A Tale of Two Cities") takes us on tour of a seemingly innocuous suburban town, where an unknown woman (Juliet, played by newest cast addition Elizabeth Mitchell) seems on the verge of tears before putting on, not a record, but a CD of the song "Downtown" and then realizing that she's burnt the muffins for her book club, there to discuss the merits (or trashiness) of Lost fan Stephen King's work. (That is except for someone named Ben, who is conspicuously absent.) Enter the crash of Oceanic Flight 815 following what can only be described as an electromagnetic disruption masquerading as an earthquake. Everyone runs outside into this tranquil tropical village--looking rather like an upscale Hawaiian resort--to see the plane break up in the sky overhead.
And that's when the Other-Formerly-Known-As-Henry-Gale (Michael Emerson) comes stomping out onto the village green and quickly dispatches Goodwin (Brett Cullen) and Ethan (William Mapother) to the two sections of the plane which have crashed on different parts of the island. He tells them to blend in with the groups and come up with a cover story. And wants lists from them in three days. The way he orders them about in such a calm and orderly fashion makes me think that they've done this before... perhaps many, many times before. He and Juliet exchange a look and he casually tosses off the line, "I guess I'm out of the book club then." Brilliant.
I love the fact that these seemingly normal people, complete with little old ladies, Others with plumbing skills, and argumentative book club members are the Others. We knew from last season that the rags were part of an overly elaborate theatrical ruse designed to make the castaways think that the Others were a bedraggled group of jungle dwellers and not suburban residents with CD players, working kitchens, and Stephen King books. But what's up with the whispers they can throw in the jungle? And why did they take the kids from the tail section of the plane? Why three days? And what's up with that single evergreen tree in the middle of Others village (complete with its own gazebo, no less)? I don't know about you but that weirded me out most of all, seeing an extremely tall evergreen looking so completely out of place in the tropical environment.
Jack, Sawyer, and Kate are each separated from one another and placed under immediate observation: Jack in a Hannibal Lecter-style glass cell, Sawyer in an outdoor bear cage, and Kate... in a gym-style shower. What confused me at first became remarkably clear the second they began to react to their surroundings. The Others were using their own personality traits against them. Jack's prison (both physically and metaphorically) is based on logic and order, which is why they sent Juliet in to rationalize with him. His surroundings are cold and nearly clinical. While he's underwater in fact, the room they've imprisoned him in could easily be a surgical suite for the sharks and dolphins that the Station of the Hydra had formerly bred. Sawyer on the other hand has long fought against his animalistic impulses and rage, so they imprison him in an outdoor bear cage, where he quickly begins to explore his new home, with its experiment-like buttons and levers. (Not totally convinced that Karl, his cage mate across the way, isn't part of the Others' plan and one of them. We never see them attack Karl, just the aftermath and he tries to "free" Sawyer far too easily.)
Then there's Kate. She awakens on the floor of a gym-style shower with our favorite Other, Tom (f.k.a. Zeke or the Sea Captain, played by M.C. Gainey) towering above her. He instructs her to shower and wash off the day and provides her with shampoo and soap and a clean, fluffy towel. Kate refuses to shower in front of him, but he laughs and says that she's not his type. (Huh, interesting.) Afterwards, she discovers that her clothes are gone, but there's a marked locker with a dress inside. Reluctantly, she puts it on and is led out to the beach, where Ben (the Other-Formerly-Known-As-Henry-Gale) is awaiting her, complete with a very civilized breakfast spread, including French press coffee and an appetizing spread. The Others are using Kate's feminine wiles and use of her sexuality against her. While in the past, Kate has used her looks (or her body) to get what she wants, here it's used against her as she's forced into being a woman and they use luxuries (like the shower, breakfast, the dress) against her.
Ben traps Kate into revealing which of her castaways she's more concerned about (she asks about Sawyer first) and that determines her fate: they put her in the cage across the way from Sawyer. I truly believe that if she asked about our good doctor Jack, she would have found herself underwater with him. Ben's MO is definitely about fate vs. free will (revealed by Juliet right before the crash) and he definitely errs on the side of fate. He gives Kate the opportunity to decide her own fate, but he already knows the answer. Forced to choose between logic and order and rage and chaos, she chooses our favorite con man. But I can't help but wonder how things would have turned out differently if Jack had been the first name off of her lips.
But Jack seems destined to always be second-best in the eyes of the women around him and that forms the basis of his flashback as he struggles to understand why his wife Sarah (Julie Bowen) is leaving him for another man and quickly becomes obsessed with the notion that it's his father whom she's sleeping with. (It's not, however, thus discounting hours of fan speculation on that front.) You see, Jack just wants to understand. He wants to know who this guy is and what he does so that it can make sense to his logic-fueled mind. Just like in the present, he wants to know the why's of his and Sawyer and Kate's imprisonment. But Juliet believes that people can change; it doesn't matter who you were, just who you are now. (She's definitely the free will-believing better half of the Others leadership.)
I was shocked when Juliet revealed that they had obtained Jack's father's autopsy report (or claimed to, anyway) and had concrete knowledge about Jack's education, his marriage, etc. Were they really able to get this information? Or was it a ruse, following Jack's drugging, during which he could have revealed information whilst in a suggestive state? Do the Others have a connection to the "real world"? Or is it just more smoke and mirrors?
Regardless, it seems somewhat clear that they are a religious cult of some kind and Ben appears to be their fate-driven leader. They are not Dharma Initiative members ("That was a long time ago," says Juliet.), but they seem to be using their stations and equipment, so they might be a splinter group that shot off of Dharma years ago. Whatever their affiliation, they use kidnapping, brainwashing, and murder as their modus operandi, which makes them a bonafide cult in my eyes. But what happened between Ben and Juliet that caused the friction between them... and made him willing to leave her to die should Jack open that metal door and let the ocean come rushing in?
While Ben, Juliet, and the group's motivations probably won't become clear for quite some time, I'm hooked by the latest twist in this brilliant and always serpentine drama and next Wednesday cannot arrive quickly enough so that we learn the fates of our three prisoners ... and what the rest of our castaways have been up to.
Next week on Lost ("The Glass Ballerina"): While Kate and Sawyer try to escape (and get all kissy), Sayid, Jin, and Sun attempt a daring rescue of the prisoners but the Others aren't going down without a fight. Meanwhile, Ben becomes obsessed with capturing Desmond's boat (curious, that), Jack gets a tempting offer, and Jin takes a bullet. Me, I'm more worried about what's going to happen to the pregnant Sun.
What's On Tonight
8 pm: Survivor: Cook Islands (CBS); My Name is Earl/The Office (NBC); Smallville (CW); Ugly Betty (ABC); Desire (MyNet)
9 pm: CSI: Crime Scene Investigation (CBS); Deal or No Deal (NBC); Supernatural (CW); Grey's Anatomy (ABC); Fashion House (MyNet)
10 pm: Shark (CBS); ER (NBC); Six Degrees (ABC)
What I'll Be Watching
8 pm: My Name is Earl.
Personally, I thought that last week's episode was a slight improvement over the seriously lackluster season premiere. On tonight's episode ("Sticks & Stones"), Earl decides to make amends for #91 on his list after seeing Catalina (wow, two episodes in a row!) waxing the face of another motel maid.
8:30 pm: The Office.
On tonight's episode ("The Coup"), Michael gets busted by Jan and Corporate after staging a "Movie Monday," whereby the employees of Dunder-Mifflin watch films all day rather than, you know, do work, leading a very Lady Macbeth-channeling Angela to urge Dwight to usurp Michael's position in the company. Out, damn spot!
10 pm: Six Degrees.
Six strangers discover that their lives are seemingly connected in the latest drama from producer J.J. Abrams. On the drama's third episode ("A New Light"), Laura (Hope Davis) receives a mysterious videotape that claims she'll die within seven days ... Sorry, wrong tape. Instead, said videotape makes her question her late journalist husband's integrity.
ABC Fall Premieres Lost
Labels: ABC Fall Premieres Lost
The first thing I thought of when I saw the village? Well...The Village. I'm just glad they don't speak all old-timey. That would get old, and quick.
I cannot bring myself to care about Jack, no matter how many flashbacks they throw at me. I enjoy Matthew Fox as an actor, but the character just rubs me the wrong way. I'm excited about next week to get a glimpse of what's going on on the rest of the island, as I care way more about the secondary characters on this show than the main three.
I really like the new character of Juliet. She and Ben obviously have history and I'm looking forward to learning more about what happened between them.
The first season of the show was all about our main castaways. The second season shifted focus to the "Tailies." Could this be the season of The Others?
Jon88 said…
A question for someone who takes better notes than I do: Who has been murdered by the Others? Did they specifically order Michael to kill Ana Lucia, or was this his idea?
Also, Juliet and Ben used to be a couple, yes?
Jace Lacob said…
As for who the Others have killed, they were most definitely behind Michael's murder of Ana-Lucia (if he hadn't have killed her, Ben would have). Goodwin murdered Nathan and would have killed Ana too. Ethan killed Charlie (well, he was able to be revived, but he was DEAD).
Did they murder the real Henry Gale? Unknown. And we don't know whether their kidnap victims are dead or alive yet.
But those are just the examples of murders, both attempted and successful, that we're aware of so far...
Me said…
I forgot all about the premiere!
I haven't finished reading this yet, but the opening scene was FABULOUS!!!
and I love Juliet.
FOX Shifts Into Gear with Tim Minear's "Drive"
My First Take on "5 Takes: USA"
The Six-Pack is Half-Empty on "The Amazing Race"
"Bruno" Sashays to Universal to the Tune of $42.5 ...
The Lychee Thief: Otto Cuts Himself from the Compe...
ABC Somewhat Confident in "Help," "Nine," and "Tre...
Bunny #8: The Others Test Our Castaways on "Lost"
NBC Revamps Thursday Nights with Single-Camera Com...
Logan Meets... Logan on "Veronica Mars"
ABC Announces Return of "Lost" and Gives Primetime...
Why We Love "Chris" and "Old Christine"
Casting Couch: Showtime Locks Three for Two Pilots
Such Great Heights: Teams Arrive in Kuwait and Pro...
From "Deadwood" to Driftwood: HBO Orders Milch's "...
Suyai is First to Pack Her Knives on "Top Chef"
Should ABC Really Lose "Lost" for 13 Weeks?
Locke Awaits "Further Instructions" on "Lost"
Jeffrey Rocks the "Project Runway" Finale
There's No Playbook for Love: Veronica and Logan H...
CW Arrests "Runaway"
From Across the Pond: The Four Letter Word in "Gor...
ABC Rewards "Betty" and "Brothers & Sisters"
Croc Hunters and Taxi Drivers: Teams Take on Two F...
ABC Resurrects "October Road"
Second Take: NBC's "30 Rock"
"Hold Me Close Now, Tiny Dancer": Cracking the Gla...
J'Accuse!: Allegations of Cheating Rock the Season...
Nobody's Watching... the OK, Go Spoof
Guest Stars Galore Rush to "Veronica Mars"
Travel Channel Unveils "5 Takes"... United States?
From Across the Pond: "The Street"
David Eick to Tackle "Bionic Woman" for NBC
"I'm Done Talking with Foreigners": Communication ...
CBS Weighs Launching "3 Lbs." Earlier Than Expected
CBS Yanks "Smith"
First Look: Kevin Federline in "CSI"
What the Frak: "Battlestar Galactica" Returns to F...
The "Office" Coup Fails to Amuse
What the Dickens: "Lost" Season Three Opens with A...
Catfights and Michael Knight: The "Project Runway"...
"Veronica Mars" Rolls Out the Welcome Wagon
Even PC Magazine Yearns to Get "Lost"
Who is the New "Doctor Who"?
Sci Fi Renews Drama "Eureka" for a Second Season
Birdcages and Locals Prove Duke and Lauren's Undoi...
Kitchen Confidential: "Nigella Feasts" on Food Net...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Bellamy Counter Stool with Slat Back by Magnussen Home at Gill Brothers Furniture in the Muncie, Anderson, Marion, IN area. Product availability may vary. Contact us for the most current availability on this product.


text:
Awakin Calls » Jerry Wennstrom » Blog
Jerry Wennstrom: In the Hands of Alchemy...
Couldn't load media player!
Insights from an Inspired Heart: Jerry Wennstrom
"We can ignore the deeper calling, and just dig in and live our lives in some ways miserably happy on the surface. Or we can give ourselves to that radical shift, and let it take us where it needs to."
It was pretty humbling to listen to these pearls of insight from Jerry Wennstrom's journey last Saturday. As someone who has walked his talk—who has given up everything during the prime of his art career to delve inward and outward on a more meaningful journey, last week's Forest Call was really a "symphony of conversation" as one caller described it. :)
When he was 29, he destroyed all his art.
Up until then, he painted constantly. He was at the height of his career. From his New York City loft, his creative expressions hit home for many people. A film had even been made about all his work.
But something didn't feel quite right.
"I had to ultimately find out who was behind all that, and the only way to do it was to let go of the identity."
For the first time in 15 years, Jerry Wennstrom put down the paintbrush. After a month in retreat where he fasted and read A Course in Miracles, he became clear:
I could either keep doing what I was doing as an artist, but it felt like a fear-based choice. Or, I could give myself to this exciting, abstract allurement, that I felt like would give me everything, but it promised nothing. Because it would mean becoming nothing, and allowing it to enter…
It was not an act of destruction. It was a leap towards—a kind of quantum leap—into something that I didn't yet know what it was.
From that point and 10 years afterwards, Jerry lived on nothing but the moment. Having given up his money, he never asked for anything. With no art or identity, no structure, plan, or name to fit into, he found himself completely present with whatever happened in the moment. Unconditionally.
"Which was terrifying at times," he recalled.
When he had food, he ate. When he didn't, he fasted.
Once, during a period of several days, he was fasting and not sleeping very much ("Because when you fast a lot, you tend not to sleep very much. There's a different kind of energy that takes over.") He was living in Harlem, and out on a late-night/early-morning walk. Passing by the YMCA, there was a gang sitting on the stoop.
I walked by, and one of the men came over and asked if I had a cigarette. I said, "No," and continued walking.
About half a block later, he called me back.
It was one of those moments where Jerry had to pay very close attention to his internal rhythms.
"Is it fear?" he asked himself. "Or is it being fully present with what is and trusting in the moment, which is absolutely what I had given my life to, by giving everything up."
So on the strength of that, Jerry turned and walked back over to the young man, who had a cigarette between his teeth.
"Got a match?"
"No, sorry." And he kept walking.
After another block or so, the young man called Jerry back again. Again, it was a moment that called his fears and purpose into question. No one else was around. Jerry walked back over, and all the men on the stoop stood up. There were some women sitting on the stoop.
"Well, what do you have?" the young man asked, with his group surrounding Jerry.
All he had on him were some boxes of raisins. In those days, there was a "Superman" brand of raisins. Jerry would carry boxes of them around and give raisins out to kids on the street, who came to know him and would come running when they saw him.
He handed the young man a box and put some down on the stoop in front of the women of the group. Then he turned, and continued walking. Raisins pounded the street behind him.
"Get back here!" the young man called again.
Jerry turned again.
"Who do you think you are, giving me these raisins?"
Facing his interrogator in the midst of late night/early morning hours, Jerry describes, a moment of surrender. Having grown up in a poor neighborhood, he found himself accessing a deep care for this young man who appeared quite angry in front of him. He described:
Coming from that place, it was a place of surrender, just feeling the love for even this—this difficult moment.
And I simply said, "I was just trying to be kind."
At that point, the women jumped off the stoop and pushed the men out of the way.
"You be on your way now, they don't mean you no harm," they told Jerry.
As he walked away, he looked back at the ringleader and saw an expression of pain in his face, as if he had been trying to impress the women and it had backfired.
During that period, it was in those little moments, those chance encounters, where every response was a choice. And in giving away his life—in leaping into a constant state of surrender—he opened up to discover the depth of possibility in both himself and others.
Those little moments pieced together a period of "death" in his life.
"We don't necessarily learn that much about that metaphorical death in our culture," he pointed out. "We think it's all supposed to be positive and love and light, when in fact, any journey worth its salt is going to take us into the depths where we're no longer in control. And, to the ego, that looks and feels like death."
For fifteen years, Jerry lived in solitude. He listened and struggled through fears. He grew open to each moment, and each encounter with another human being.
And there lies the inherent loneliness to go your own way, which is the way of your own mystery… there's no reference point… It's going to be about being so completely who you are that what ultimately shines in the world is a unique expression. And we love that uniqueness and we're terrified of it at the same time. We want to look like something recognizable.
Through the slow, steady tone in which he spoke, and the lucid descriptions of his process, it became pretty clear that Jerry is one who had faced a lot of edges in himself and in the world. At one point in the call, several of us were moved by his description of death—of the metaphorical "death of the ego" that has to happen in order for a deeper life expression to emerge.
"You know, not in terms of what we want, but in terms of moving people, touching lives, being of ultimate service. Because we can't serve others if we have a place that we won't go."
Today, Jerry lives with his wife Maryilyn, in house on Widbey Island. After fifteen years of solitude and in celibacy, Jerry made his way out West, where, at the age of 43, he got married, and settled on the rural property with a 40-foot meditation tower that he had built on top of a water cistern as a wedding gift for his wife. He has a studio filled with an entire new body of artwork, and objects (many of which were salvaged or offered as gifts) with endless stories.
On a property as intriguing as his life, many visitors have come through, including nine Tibetan Monks (who crowded into the 8 square foot tower to perform a blessing ceremony), Laura Chester (who featured his tower in her book on sacred spaces) and many young people caught at a point in life where everything is becoming undone.
When Richard, our moderator, suggested that Jerry might inspire some visitors on this call, Jerry warmly replied, "We have a dormitory, where we have people stay. A very big a part of my life is staying open to what comes. And many people come."
Listening to Jerry is like listening to the ocean. There's a calm in his voice, a presence that can penetrate your soul, and a trust in the ebb and flow of people and life. When one caller asked about how he stays balanced in the presence of fear, he answered, simply, "I think it's that practice of reverence."
At the end of the hour and a half Forest Call, I felt like ten minutes had passed. I found myself filled with gratitude. What a gift to learn about the trajectory of such a life. What a gift to witness the beautiful possibility that can unfold when we have the courage and honesty to live from an inspired heart.
Today, Jerry travels around the world, sharing his stories, teaching, and writing. More of his unfolding story is captured in his book, The Inspired Heart: An Artist's Journey of Transformation and in the Parabola Magazine film, In the Hands of Alchemy.
About Awakin Calls
Awakin Call is a weekly global series of deep conversations with inspiring changemakers. It is an all-volunteer offering and is completely free, without any ads or solicitation. Read more ...
To stay updated about guest announcements, fresh content, and other inspiring tidbits, subscribe below and we'll send you a weekly email.
Home Nguyen
Archived Conversations
Or search by date or through tags like:
More keywords ...
If you have any questions, feel free to drop us a note.


Target is opening a new store in South Burlington in October and is hiring 150 employees.
Target announced it's hiring 150 "team members" for its new small-format store in University Mall in South Burlington, slated to open Oct. 21.
The hiring will begin at events held at the Homewood Suites at 5 Dorset St., starting Thursday and Friday from 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and continuing on Saturday from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.. Candidates can learn about the types of positions available at the store, and about Target's "dynamic, team-oriented culture."
The Target is South Burlington is Vermont's first. Vermont was the only state without a Target.
Candidates can apply in person at the hiring fairs, or apply in advance at Target.com/careers. Store leaders will conduct pre-scheduled interviews with applicants.
"We are so excited to join the community of South Burlington and build a talented team of about 150 new team members who will help us serve residents, college students and area visitors," said Jake Moore, store team leader. "We look forward to growing our team while providing them meaningful opportunities to build and develop skills for their careers."
Target offers market competitive wages to its employees in cities across the country and recently increased its minimum hourly wage to $12. The retailer has committed to paying a minimum wage of $15 per hour by the end of 2020.
Target also offers various education benefits, such as tuition and GED reimbursement.
The South Burlington small-format store reflects a trend by Target to prioritize opening locations to serve customers in urban areas, dense suburban neighborhoods and near college campuses. The South Burlington store will offer an assortment of apparel and accessories for men, women, kids and babies, as well as health, personal care and beauty products.
There will also be an assortment of home and decor essentials, and a food and beverage selection including fresh produce, and grab-and-go snacks and meals.


Canadia Prestige Platinum Grey Oak is a high-quality laminate flooring with a crosscut textured finish, which gives the floor an authentic real wood look. When fitted, this heavy laminate (12mm thick) can be hard to tell from the real thing, but at a fraction of the cost and is suitable for heavy domestic and moderate commercial use.
For further details on the Canadia range of laminate flooring, get in touch or pop in the shop.


This was part of St. Pope John Paul II's prayer during his homily at the canonization Mass for St. Josephine Bakhita of Sudan. At the age of about 9, she was kidnapped near Darfur by slave traders.
It wasn't until near the end of her days when she finally spoke about the depths of brutal humiliation she suffered during that time. She would later be purchased by an Italian and eventually became a Catholic and a religious sister.
That prayer of John Paul needs to be the prayer of bishops, priests, and every one of us who loves Jesus Christ and his Church and each and every one of God's created people. Especially now.
Bakhita is a particularly appropriate patron saint, of course, for those who have suffered sexual abuse.
Those who were mistreated by priests — whose pain was only worsened by those in positions to help mishandling the dark realities before them — are martyrs of a sort, enduring such intimate violence in the wake of evil in what should be the holiest of encounters and relationships.
Whether outright evil, the confusion of the sexual revolution, administrative ineptitude, or mental illness were the most potent of the contributing factors that led to the prolonged agony, these vulnerable innocents are casualties of spiritual warfare. And insisting on reform and renewal in the Church, intercessors must be called upon.
There seems something prophetic, looking at it from today, about John Paul II having beatified Bakhita together with Josemaria Escrivá, the founder of Opus Dei, at the same Mass in Rome in 1992.
Dan Brown novels aside, Opus Dei and Escrivá are in many ways about the ordinary — about sanctifying everyday work and on-the-surface relatively tiny decisions as normal to so many of us as hitting the snooze button on our alarms in the morning.
Bakhita, meanwhile, suffered some of the most horrific crimes against humanity. And this brought her to Christ. He showed her his Passion in it.
We are pathetic ones, so many of us. (I can't be alone here.) We can be so stubborn about trusting him. We can be so insistent on not entering into the depths of what he wants to show us, what he wants to redeem — how he will work miracles through even terrible evil.
This time in the Church can be unsettling, maddening, and tempt despair. In his 2007 encyclical "Spes Salvi" ("Saved in Hope"), Pope Benedict XVI quoted from St. Paul's Letter to the Ephesians.
Bakhita came to know a totally different kind of "master."… Up to that time she had known only masters who despised and maltreated her, or at best considered her a useful slave. Now, however, she heard that there is a "paron" ["master" in the Venetian dialect] above all masters, the Lord of all lords, and that this Lord is good, goodness in person. She came to know that this Lord even knew her, that he had created her — that he actually loved her. She too was loved, and by none other than the supreme "Paron," before whom all other masters are themselves no more than lowly servants. She was known and loved and she was awaited.
As the Church works for justice and truth and transparency in teaching and action, we must ask Bakhita and others to make hope overwhelming to all — especially those men and women who have been hurt by the Church, and especially as children and young, vulnerable seminarians, as well.
In Blessed Josephine Bakhita we have an eminent witness of God's fatherly love and a luminous sign of the perennial modernness of the Beatitudes. In our time, in which the unbridled race for power, money, and pleasure is the cause of so mistrust, violence, and loneliness, Sister Bakhita has been given to us once more by the Lord as a universal sister, so that she can reveal to us the secret of true happiness: the Beatitudes. Hers is a message of heroic goodness modeled on the goodness of the heavenly Father. She has left us a witness of evangelical reconciliation and forgiveness.
As I write, it's unclear what went wrong at all levels involving so many leaders in the Church. John Paul may have been among them in the case of Theodore McCarrick, among others.
I can't help but think whatever the case is, the legacy of his own heroic virtue on so many fronts may be continuing to bear fruit for us in a rediscovery of this remarkable saint he canonized at this time in Church history.
Pope Francis has emphasized the beatitudes as the "identity card" of the Christian throughout his pontificate. And here is an example in the most arduous of situations.
Bakhita is proof that Christianity can transform slaves, that is, people who have lost the sense of their own personhood, into persons capable of unexpected strength. Bakhita is the certainty that through Christ, man can pass from a state of marginalization to one of eternal dignity, greatness, and freedom. And this applies not only to Africa, of course, but to the whole world. Christianity's powerful promotion of human dignity through figures such as Bakhita is enormous, even though it is often barely reported. A fundamental component of this movement is the promotion of the dignity of women, in opposition to the way in which women are reduced to objects, fashioned into slaves either by consumerism or by cultures that ignore their tremendous human, spiritual, and social gifts. Nobody has done more for women than Christianity, and Bakhita is a witness to this truth.
That she did not take that to her grave, may be a clear message to us, to embrace the current "bringing all things to light" season. Some dioceses have gone to independent auditors to take a look at their files and investigate and hand over to authorities what might be crimes.
Others have already been approached by law enforcement, as the United States Department of Justice has announced plans to take a look at every diocese in the country.
We have to face what has happened, and do so with the heart of Jesus, through the eyes of the Father, guided by the Holy Spirit. Pray for this for our bishops and priests. Pray for this for us all, for each and every one of us is a leader in the Church by what we do and say and pray and how we spend our time. Live sacramental lives of beatitude. Get to know and call upon Bakhita by name.


He said the investigation is ongoing.
Skimmers were previously found in gas pumps of the Saucier gas station last January.
Video surveillance captured four people connected to the first card-skimming incident at the Robinwood One Stop, Peterson said at the time. They were also captured on surveillance at the Walmart on U.S. 49 purchasing merchandise using the stolen card information.


The IOU Project is revolution in handmade apparel , an experiment in rethinking how goods are produced and sold in a way that benefits both people and the planet. Summer Rayne Oakes, co-founder of Source4Style, sat down with Kavita Parmar,The IOU Project is a movement to rethink how goods are produced and sold in order to benefit people and the planet, not just big business.
The Story of Iou Projects starts in india,a lady kavita parmar.This whole concept running on the thought of MahatmaGandhiji.They think that the weaver of mahatma gandhiji free the india against british rule.Today 20 million family depends on the handweaving.They weave 1 billion metre in month.The clothes of this IOU projects are most environment friendly and 100% sustainable.
The IOU Project produces unique, handmade apparel based on fabrics handwoven in India. Because each textile is unique, we provide end buyers with the ability to trace the production process from finished goods right back to the weaver that hand-wove the fabric.


Elevate your spa to the next level.
Introducing a digital skin analysis & virtual treatment app.
The environment, lifestyle, and genetics all contribute to the health of our skin. By applying intelligent filters MySkinMirror reflects the hidden effects of these factors. Revealing dark spots, early signs of aging and skin fatigue that aren't visible to the naked eye period.
Detailed measurements of the skin's health provide your clients with insight to the key areas that require treatment. Skin scores for wrinkles, age spots, under eye dark circles and more provide an easy to use comprehensive skin consultation.
Now your clients can virtually try on the services you offer. Being able to see potential results from dermal fillers or laser treatments guides your clients towards a personalized treatment plan.
"Discover underlying skin concerns one might not even realize exists, and then help treat and improve them all within the app."
Provide your clients with a personalized spa experience.
The Business Manager matches your client's unique skin condition & needs to your services & treatments.
Recommend treatments & products directly from your services and offerings. Map each service to skin scores for targeted recommendations. Your clients will enjoy a new level of consultation services that educate and empower them in their skincare journey with you.
My Skin Mirror's virtual treatment room can be configured to simulate the transformative properties of various aesthetic services. Choose from a list of the most widely offered treatments, such as injectables, dermal fillers, photo facials, laser treatments, and more.
"70% of clients would buy services recommended by the app"
Drive business results through a meaningful & engaging experience.
The future of skin consultations is intelligent applications to measure and track skin health. My Skin Mirror allows your patients to stay connected to your practice & the services you offer with a deeper link to their needs.
Track & manage the services recommended and how those impact your sales. Leverage the intelligence you gain from My Skin Mirror's analytics dashboard to move your business forward.
We will verify your contact details and send you a response.


text:
Q: What's the purpose of an exclamation mark at the start of a block comment? I have a header file in c++, where the declaration of the functions have block comments that start with "!" exclamation marks.
Example
class test{
 public:
        /*! @fn test::test()
            @brief The basic constructor, which initializes the _test handle.
        */
        test();

        /*! @fn test::upload(std::string url)
            @brief A function to execute a http POST request with the given url and image.

            @param[in] url The url we are POSTing to
            @return The response of the server
        */
        std::string upload(std::string url);
}

Also, it changes the color of the comment in VSCode like this:

What's the purpose of the exclamation marks at the start of those comments?

A: These comments are for the Doxygen system that automatically generates documentation from code.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Cogent evidence from both Canada and abroad suggests that poor governance is a principal cause of the sorry conditions in many First Nation communities. While the importance of governance is well established, how to improve governance remains a perplexing question. National and international experience shows that sustained governance improvements depend on three factors: political leadership, managerial and technical capacity and broad citizen support. Outside parties can assist with advice, funding and technical expertise but cannot lead efforts to improve governance. It also follows that governance improvements usually take considerable time; rapid governance improvements are possible but rare.
In sharp contrast with the overall dismal record of effecting important governance change is the entry into the European Union (EU) of former Soviet Bloc satellites – Slovenia, Estonia, Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Bulgaria and Hungary – after they had met stringent political, economic and membership criteria. Thus entering the EU to enjoy its many benefits provided the incentive for "a transformation of unprecedented scope and speed," the kind of change that, according to the World Bank, is a rarity.
First Nation communities in collaboration with the federal government and be sensitive to large variations in First Nation communities, e.g., size and location; be managed by an independent First Nation organization (there are several organizations with accreditation experience that could assume this role); have a dedicated funding source and other capacity-building supports for First Nation communities to access in order to achieve accreditation; have tangible and immediate benefits including access to new funding arrangements with the federal government, programs and financial benefits; build on existing systems and standards; have a regular reaccreditation process to ensure ongoing compliance with the standards, and be voluntary.
A governance accreditation system would likely have standards that encompass at least the following: membership; leadership selection and appeals; the relationship of council to members, including the handling of complaints and accountability provisions; strategic planning; the roles of council, council members and senior staff; the functioning of council, including conflict of interest; financial management; human resource management; management of real property and other assets; protection of privacy; code of conduct; the relationship of council to other community bodies such as an economic development corporation; and the monitoring of program performance.
Developing such an accreditation system would be challenging. Nonetheless, this initiative could have a profound effect in altering the strained relationship between the federal government and First Nation communities. Funding is very much an important part of this relationship, and an accreditation system holds the promise of eliminating many of the irritants that plague it. Even more importantly, sound governance in First Nation communities could be a major factor in positioning them to benefit from Canada's resource economy.


text:
Q: ssas tabular model use roles so customer can only see suppliers used I have a ssas tabular model that has dimCustomrer, dimSupplier and a fact table.
I created a role for customers so they can only see themselves and this works perfectly fine.
Is it possible for the role to filter the Dimsupplier table so they can only see the suppliers they have used?
Searching google I can't find anything that seems to help.

A: Do you want to filter dimSupplier based on the fact table? Yes, that is possible by enabling bi-directional filtering on the relationship between dimSupplier and the fact table, and also setting the security filtering behaviour to "both directions":

However, bi-directional filtering can have some performance impact if your model contains large amounts of data.
Alternatively, you could import an aggregated version of the fact table, that only contains all the distinct combinations of customers and suppliers (2 columns). Call this table BridgeCustomerSupplier, or something like that. Then, you add a row-level filter to your role on the dimSupplier table, and use LOOKUPVALUE, to see if there's a matching record in BridgeCustomerSupplier, for the current supplier (in dimSupplier - the row context), and the current customer.


You can reach me through my blog.
"We ape, we mimic, and we mock."
What is a mocked object? Mock Object.
Mock objects take stubs to an extreme and are used to set and verify expectations on interactions with model code. We found that this approach to unit testing has the side effect of making your code conform more to the Law Of Demeter.
test needs to query the object, but the queries are not available in the real object (e.g., "was this callback called?") (This needs a Mock Object that has *more* stuff than the real object; the other cases usually require a stub that is far smaller than the real object).
I want to write a test that makes sure that a damaged car cannot be returned without some action taken. For the purpose of discussion, I want a DamagedCarException() to be thrown in this case. Here is the test I want to write, but I've some problems with it.
ICar rentedCar = // How do I create this class?
// How do I make the IsDamaged property return true ?
// rentedCar.DoDamage() -- There is no such method, and I don't want to add one.
Well, the test itself is easy to read, but it wasn't easy to write. I worked too hard on this test. Experience has thought the industry that what isn't simple simply wouldn't be. So I was diligent on this case, but next time, would I be? If writing a test for this tiny bit of functionality is going to take me half an hour of doing grunt work, maybe it's not that important. I could skip this and go write important code.
This is the point where Mock Objects Frameworks enter the scene.
"Once," said the Mock Turtle at last, with a deep sigh, "I was a real turtle."
Simple, powerful, and to the point, isn't it?
The test above creates a mocked car, tells it the return its current price and when it was rented. The renter is mocked as well, and is expecting to pay for renting the car. (SetupResult() is a way to return a value without creating an expectation for it, more on that later). So, now we can see some of the problems with NMock, look at the ReturnToarkingLot method, the IsTypeOf() and IsAnything() are constraints (a very powerful part of NMock). I'm not using them to do anything, I have to put them there so NMock will recognize that the method exists (it otherwise try to find a method with no parameters and fail at runtime).
Another problem that NMock has is that it's not malleable to refactoring. This means that if I decide to rename the RentedBy property to Renter, I'm very likely to miss the tests, and I'll get no warning until runtime.
A recent experience with exactly this case caused me to write Rhino Mocks, but I'm jumping too far ahead. I just became aware of another mocking framework for .Net (there are several, most of which works in the same method, and share the same weaknesses).
This is a different approach, which read much like written language.
One weakness that remains is that it's still breaks on refactoring. It's also remains difficult to inject your own logic to the mocked object.
"They mock the air with idle state."
Encourage passing objects as method parameters rather than making references to them part of our object state.
Encourage lightweight classes and more flexible methods.
EasyMock is one of the first mock objects frameworks to appear on Java, and EasyMock.Net is the direct port to .Net. These frameworks use the explicit Record & Replay model to setup and verify tests.
They make use of strongly typed object during both record & replay phases, thus supporting refactoring tools easily and safely. However, they are quite rigid in the way they accept expectations.
It's hard to see from an example this small, but the port to .Net didn't include the .Net style guide, which result in a very alien feeling when working with this library. In addition, there is no way to express flexible constraints on the methods or to inject your own logic.
"Be mock'd and wonder'd at."
So there are all these frameworks, they have their drawbacks, but then so are most things in life, why do we need yet another framework?
The reasoning is simple, I don't subscribe to NIH; at least not usually.
I'd to resort to hacks to get callbacks from the mocked methods. This is not a good way to do mocks, but I'd no choice, I had to test some threading calls, and that meant callback from the mocked methods.
I was annoyed by the needless constraints passing that I'd to do in order to get NMock to recognize the correct method signature.
I wanted a mocking framework that would adapt to my refactoring, would give me easy way to inject my own validation and would be smart enough to blip when I'm wrong.
There was no such framework, but EasyMock.Net was close. It had the essential capability of using strongly typed object to record the expectations. What it lacked was flexible validation conditions and the ability to inject custom code into the validation. Another big problem was that it was still a Java library, but on .Net, the whole API uses concepts like SetVoidMethod(), SetReturnValue().
I took EasyMock.Net and started modifying it. The first thing was to give it a .Net interface, which went pretty smoothly, the other two objectives were completed within three days (there were some hurdles, but nothing I couldn't handle with).
Rhino Mocks objects allows Expectations, Constraints and Callbacks to be setup, specifying how the tested object should interact with the mocked object. These conditions are evaluated throughout the test run, and fails early in order to give you a warning as localizable as possible.
Supports several models of placing conditions on the mocked objects, all of which are verified on the fly during test execution. This allows testing the interactions between objects and fails as soon as the test deviates from the specified conditions. This has the advantage of giving the exact point of failure.
Mocked implementations of the objects are generated on the fly which avoids a code generation during builds.
Clear error messages for failing conditions.
Flexible way to specify conditions using Expectations, Constraints and Callbacks which is type safe and easily refactorable by the current tools.
Currently works only on interfaces and classes which inherit MarshelByRef.
In this case, it's not much of a difference, that is because we are using expectations), the same way EasyMock.Net works. Let's try something more difficult, let's assume that when the car rental sends the car to its parking lot, they require the car to inform that it arrived safely before letting the renter go. In essence, classic threading problem, but one that is very hard to solve using NMock. I created a couple of hacks in order to solve. Usually the solution for those kinds of problem is to write your own test class. This isn't very practical for large number of classes, here is how I would solve this using Rhino Mocks, I'll leave you implementing the same with the other framework.
You can see that we set up a callback for ReturnToParkingLot, and using that callback we get the ICarRental reference that we got. So we can do call the CarInParkingLot() andreturn from ReturnCar() method.
Most actions in Rhino.Mocks are done on the last method call, after each call, you can setup more information about the call: Return value, if and what to throw, constraints and callbacks. You set these conditions by calling the methods on the MockControl (Returns, Throws, Constraints and Callback). Most methods has overloads that allows you to setup returning or throwing for multiply calls of the same method. Rhino.Mocks ensure that all the requirements of a method are satisfied before the next method can be recorded, this means that for methods that return values, a return value or an exception to throw need to be set. You can setup several behaviors for a single method. The same method but with different arguments mean a different method call, as far as Rhino.Mocks is interested.
A method that returns a value must define either Returns or Throws or their equivalents ( ReturnsFor(), ThrowsFor(), AlwaysReturns, AlwaysThrow, SetupResult() or ExpectAndReturn() ).
If you want just a stub, you can use MockControl.CreateNiceControl(), which will not throw on unexpected calls, and would always return the default value. (Null or zero, usually).
If you want to check the ordering of the calls, using MockContrl.CreateStrictControl().
A callback need to match the last method signature, but is free to have a different return type (or no return type, of course). The return value of the callback is ignored, so don't expect to return some value from the callback and get it from the mocked method. This is by design and is meant to reduce the chance that the callbacks will be abused.
Rhino.Mocks can mock classes if they inherit from MarhsalByRef, it's not a recommended approach. Use of interfaces is highly recommended.
A method call is consider equal to another if they are the same method with the exact same arguments. This means that something("foo") and something("bar") are not considered to be the same method.
Validating a method call and expecting a method call are two distinct subjects. A call is validated (using expectations, constraints or callbacks) only if the call is expected. You can setup the number of expected calls using the ReturnsFor(), CalledFor() and ThrowsFor() methods.
Callback will be called for each invocation of the method, and all validation relies on whatever or not the callback throws. If the callback does not throw, the method is considered validated.
The return value of callbacks is ignored, the only way to set up a return value is to use the Returns derivatives, or the convenience methods for them.
 I've not tested this, though.
 Yes, I could've built my own test class for that, but for a single line of code it's a bit drastic, in my opinion.
Poor examples, no source code provided for download, incomplete examples. Too brief in explanation, errors in code.
Could you post the source code for this article please.
It would be nice if I was able to download the src for this article, like for ICar and others so I don't have to try and write my own implementation. Thanks.
Thanks, I fixed that. I made a mistake to only test that in Firefox.
I read his article. It looks fine to me, what do you find offensive? I will fix that.
I notice this is not under Product Showcase so I assume it is free to use. I couldn't find any licensing information, and there only seems to be a link on the home site to a binary and documentation.
Could you clarify these issues please. If you do not intend to release the source code, then this may not be the appropriate site to post this product.
Having said that, it is a very interesting article, and I would love to play around with some examples. Unfortunately I never run an executable from here if I can't view the source code as well.
Withholding my vote till more information appears on these issues, altho it would be a high vote as this looks like a great framework, and a good, if badly formatted article.
The licensing is BSD, and Rhino Mocks are free for use for both free and commercial applicatons.
I added the info in the article and in the website.


WHAT A STEAL AT $136,500K!" Perfect Time to own the Perfect Location for your Heavenly Hideaway! 7.81 ac. in the beautiful Texas Hill Country! Gorgeous Live Oaks & Persimmons! 1 BR, 1 Bath, 4-sided Rock, w/Metal Roof & 2-Car Garage. Water Well 202 ft deep/35 gpm. 50/gal Water Tank & Softener. Septic allows up to 4000 sf home. CA/CH/SS Appliances, Granite Counter Tops, Custom Hand-Made Pine Cabinets, hardwood & concrete floors. Room for an RV. Awesome Amenities!


f6.3, 4.25" Aldis-Butcher Anastigmat, iris diaphragm to f32.
Dial-set Compur, speeds 1 - 1/250, B, T.
2 ¼" x 3 ¼" exposures on C20 (120) roll-film.
Bellows to 5 ½ feet. Single extension.
The body carries the Houghton-Butcher Manufacturing Co. name. The name plaque has "Butcher's No. 6 Watch Pocket Carbine". Inside the camera is a printed label urging the use of C20 or E20 film. Probably made just prior to the full Houghton-Butcher merger.
Sold by Robinson & Co., Singapore.


text:
128. Joannes Dortmans was born on Dec. 25, 1721 in Dinther and died on Sep. 5, 1774 in Dinther. He married Catharina van Gulick on Jan. 28, 1748 in Dinther.
129. Catharina van Gulick was born on Aug. 24, 1725 in Dinther and died on Nov. 11, 1807 in Dinther.
130. Aegidius Smolders was born About 1695 in Sint-Huibrechts-Lille and died on May 22, 1754 in Schijndel. He married 1st Wilhelma Rovers on Jan. 20, 1726 in Dinther.
131. Wilhelmina Rovers was born on Apr. 21, 1703 in Dinther and died on Jun. 30, 1767 in Schijndel.
132. Ludovicus Naus was born on Nov. 4, 1706 in Kessel and died on Mar. 23, 1774 in Veghel. He married Maria van den Heuvel on Jan. 27, 1733 in Veghel.
133. Maria van den Heuvel was born on Oct. 3, 1704 in Veghel and died on May 22, 1761 in Veghel.
134. Matheus Raaijmakers was born on Nov. 17, 1728 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Dec. 22, 1806 in Son en Breugel. He married 1st Elisabeth van Roij on May 5, 1748 in Sint Oedenrode.
135. Elisabeth van Roij was born on Nov. 28, 1711 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Mar. 31, 1784 in Son en Breugel.
136. Joannes Lucius was born on Nov. 2, 1734 in Erp and died on Feb. 15, 1781 in Boekel. He married Anna Driessen on Dec. 2, 1758 in Boekel.
137. Anna Driessen was born About 1730 and died on Jan. 22, 1785 in Boekel.
138. Petrus Swiers was born About 1720 and died on Jun. 23, 1800 in Ravenstein. He married 1st Catharina van der Burgt on Feb. 28, 1745 in Boekel.
139. Catharina van der Burgt was born on Jan. 6, 1722 in Boekel and died on Sep. 2, 1787 in Ravenstein.
140. Joannes van der Loo was born on Dec. 25, 1715 in Oirschot and died on an unknown date. He married 1st Catharina van Overbeeck on Aug. 25, 1737 in Oirschot.
141. Catharina van Overbeeck was born on Jul. 27, 1708 in Oirschot and died About 1765 in Oirschot.
142. Adrianus van Heretom was born on Sep. 26, 1721 in Den Dungen and died on Oct. 8, 1781 in Schijndel. He married Catharina Wouters on Feb. 21, 1745 in Schijndel.
143. Catharina Wouters was born on Apr. 26, 1718 in Schijndel and died on Mar. 9, 1795 in Schijndel.
144. Josephus Leenders was born on Mar. 19, 1734 in Beek en Donk and died on Sep. 14, 1807 in Beek en Donk. He married Petronella Egelmeer on Dec. 1, 1765 in Beek en Donk.
145. Petronella Egelmeer was born on Sep. 18, 1740 in Beek en Donk and died on May 26, 1801 in Beek en Donk.
146. Henricus Kandelaars was born on Jan. 21, 1735 in Boekel and died on Oct. 19, 1805 in Boekel. He married Joanna van Gerwen on Oct. 24, 1755 in Boekel.
147. Joanna van Gerwen was born on Aug. 14, 1731 in Uden and died on May 4, 1810 in Boekel.
148. Michiel van der Heijden was born on Nov. 9, 1724 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Feb. 28, 1773 in Sint Oedenrode. He married 1st Helena Oppers on Oct. 9, 1763 in Sint Oedenrode.
149. Helena Oppers was born on May 14, 1731 in Sint Oedenrode and died on May 12, 1796 in Sint Oedenrode.
150. Antonius van den Broek was born on Jan. 1, 1726 in Den Dungen and died on Oct. 2, 1778 in Berlicum. He married Anna Maria van Pinxteren on Jan. 22, 1747 in Berlicum.
151. Anna Maria van Pinxteren was born on Aug. 3, 1728 in Berlicum and died on Mar. 26, 1798 in Berlicum.
152. Theodorus Oerlemans was born on Mar. 29, 1749 in Oirschot and died on an unknown date. He married Joanna Maria Turkens on Nov. 22, 1778 in Oirschot.
153. Joanna Maria Turkens was born on Jan. 20, 1748 in Oirschot and died on Jan. 6, 1790 in Oirschot.
154. Josephus van den Boom was born on Jan. 12, 1722 in Best and died on Jul. 15, 1801 in Best. He married Everarda Mekelenburg on Nov 6, 1757 in Rotterdam.
155. Everarda Mekelenburg was born on Dec. 25, 1723 in Duiven and died on Aug. 12, 1813 in Oirschot.
156. Theodorus Rijkers was born on Dec. 14, 1727 in Best and died on Aug. 6, 1764 in Sint Oedenrode. He married Joanna van der Heijden on Aug. 15, 1751 in Sint Oedenrode.
157. Joanna van der Heijden was born on Aug. 24, 1728 in Sint Oedenrode and died on an unknown date.
158. Joannes van Heretom was born on Dec. 20, 1700 in Gemonde and died on an unknown date. He married 1st Helena van den Heuvel on Feb. 2, 1766 in Gemonde.
159. Helena van den Heuvel was born on Jan. 29, 1732 in Gemonde and died on an unknown date.
160. Adrianus van Liempt was born on Apr. 24, 1700 in Gemonde and died on Jul. 24, 1772 in Schijndel. He married Mechtildis Pijnenburgh on May 23, 1723 in Schijndel.
161. Mechtildis Pijnenburgh was born on Dec. 27, 1700 in Schijndel and died on Mar. 6, 1779 in Schijndel.
162. Gerardus van Liempt was born on Oct. 24, 1703 in Schijndel and died on Jan. 31, 1765 in Schijndel. He married Digna Verhagen on Feb. 13, 1746 in Schijndel.
163. Digna Verhagen was born on Dec. 17, 1711 in Schijndel and died on May 5, 1774 in Schijndel.
164. Reijnerus Verhagen was born on Feb. 8, 1710 in Schijndel and died on Aug. 29, 1764 in Schijndel. He married Gijsberta Verwetering on Feb. 5, 1741 in Schijndel.
165. Gijsberta Verwetering was born on Mar. 1, 1710 in Schijndel and died on Jul. 26, 1779 in Schijndel.
166. Mathijs van den Boogaart was born on Apr. 22, 1726 in Schijndel and died About 1780 in Schijndel. He married Margaretha van de Bogaert on Jul. 12, 1750 in Schijndel.
167. Margaretha van de Bogaert was born on Nov. 29, 1726 in Schijndel and died on Dec. 23, 1799 in Schijndel.
168. Cornelis Dankers was born on Mar. 11, 1732 in Loon op Zand and died on Jun. 2, 1811 in Helvoirt. He married Joanna Kuijpers on Jun. 5, 1757 in Cromvoirt.
169. Joanna Kuijpers was born on Dec. 18, 1731 in Cromvoirt and died on Feb. 16, 1803 in Helvoirt.
170. Hermannus Konings was born on Mar. 11, 1731 in Schijndel and died on May 29, 1812 in Esch. He married Anna Maria van Empel on Nov. 25, 1759 in Helvoirt.
171. Anna Maria van Empel was born on Nov. 24, 1734 in Haaren and died on Jun. 21, 1793 in Haaren.
172. Franciscus van Heesch was born on Jan. 7, 1735 in Boxtel and died on Dec. 6, 1787 in Boxtel. He married Petronella van der Velden on Feb. 14, 1762 in Boxtel.
173. Petronella van der Velden was born on Aug. 15, 1738 in Boxtel and died on an unknown date.
174. Gerardus van der Meijden was born on Apr. 6, 1744 in Sint Michielsgestel and died on May 1, 1820 in Boxtel. He married 1st Adriana Teulings on Apr. 28, 1776 in Boxtel.
175. Adriana Teulings was born on May 5, 1740 in Boxtel and died on May 30, 1810 in Boxtel.
176. Jacobus Leijtens was born on Jul. 4, 1721 in Best and died on Feb. 7, 1803 in Best. He married 1st Anna Maria Merckx on Feb. 3, 1765 in Best.
177. Anna Maria Merckx was born on Jul. 17, 1738 in Best and died on Jun. 25, 1813.
178. Theodorus van Roij was born on Jan. 4, 1745 in Eindhoven and died on Apr. 18, 1798 in Best. He married Joanna van 't Paradijs on Nov. 13, 1768 in Oirschot.
179. Joanna van 't Paradijs was born on Feb. 19, 1750 in Oerle and died on Dec. 27, 1784 in Best.
180. Willem Loomans was born on Apr. 11, 1753 in Asten and died Before 1814. He married Cornelia van Vlierden on Feb. 19, 1774 in Someren.
181. Cornelia van Vlierden was born on Sep. 7, 1742 in Someren and died na 12-12-1799, voor 1814.
182. Joannes Spierings was born on Dec. 24, 1742 in Sint Michielsgestel and died on Jul. 16, 1817 in Schijndel. He married Henrica van den Mugheuvel on Jan. 12, 1777 in Sint Michielsgestel.
183. Henrica van den Mugheuvel was born on Apr. 24, 1744 in Den Dungen and died on Apr. 7, 1817 in Schijndel.
184. Henricus van den Boogaard was born on Mar. 20, 1744 in Schijndel and died on Mar. 26, 1801 in Schijndel. He married Jacoba van der Heijden on Feb. 7, 1779 in Schijndel.
185. Jacoba van der Heijden was born on Oct. 27, 1758 in Schijndel and died on Aug. 22, 1796 in Schijndel.
186. Cornelis van Boerdonk was born on Dec. 20, 1762 in Heesch and died on May 10, 1824 in Den Dungen. He married Joanna van der Donk on Nov. 7, 1784 in Den Dungen.
187. Joanna van der Donk was born on May 11, 1757 in Den Dungen and died on Aug. 15, 1831 in Den Dungen.
188. Joannes van Grinsven was born on Apr. 18, 1744 in Schijndel and died on Mar. 7, 1805 in Schijndel. He married 1st Catharina Janssen on Sep. 29, 1776 in Schijndel.
189. Catharina Janssen was born on Sep. 12, 1744 in Stiphout and died on May 15, 1820 in Schijndel.
190. Mathijs van de Vorstenbosch was born on May 23, 1745 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Jun. 28, 1793 in Schijndel. He married Maria van de Ven on Feb. 6, 1774 in Schijndel.
191. Maria van de Ven was born on Aug. 20, 1744 in Schijndel and died on Apr. 12, 1783 in Schijndel.
192. Cornelis van Wanrooij was born on Nov. 19, 1739 in Erp and died on Oct. 25, 1811 in Erp. He married Wilhelmina van den Hurk on Aug. 22, 1762 in Erp.
193. Wilhelmina van den Hurk was born on Nov. 6, 1743 in Erp and died on Dec. 11, 1776 in Erp.
194. Egidius Pepers was born on Nov. 28, 1706 in Veghel and died on Oct. 30, 1782 in Veghel. He married 1st Joanna Maria Voets on Feb. 4, 1748 in Veghel.
195. Joanna Maria Voets was born on Mar. 28, 1725 in Schijndel and died About 1795 in Veghel.
196. Joannes de Louw was born on Sep. 16, 1729 in Erp and died on Jan. 27, 1767 in Erp. He married Hendrina van Luijtelaar on Jun. 8, 1753 in Erp.
197. Hendrina van Luijtelaar was born on Mar. 9, 1729 in Erp and died on Oct. 22, 1798 in Erp.
198. Cornelis Donkers was born on Dec. 23, 1730 in Veghel and died on Jan. 28, 1778 in Erp. He married 1st Elisabeth Theodorus on Feb. 4, 1764 in Erp.
199. Elisabeth Theodorus was born on Jun. 10, 1733 in Erp and died on Jul. 11, 1772 in Erp.
200. Joannes van den Bogaert was born on May 15, 1707 in Beek en Donk and died on an unknown date. He married 1st Helena Symons on Jun. 10, 1731 in Beek en Donk.
201. Helena Petrus was born on Jun. 17, 1713 in Beek en Donk and died on Nov. 2, 1733 in Beek en Donk.
202. Petrus Raijmakers was born on Mar. 27, 1692 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Nov. 10, 1761 in Son en Breugel. He married 1st Maria van der Heijden on Dec. 1, 1748 in Son en Breugel.
203. Maria van der Heijden was born on Jan. 30, 1717 in Veghel and died on an unknown date.
204. Petrus van Drunen was born on Aug. 20, 1709 in Heesch and died on Jan. 21, 1780 in Nistelrode. He married Anna Bevers on Aug. 1, 1751 in Nistelrode.
205. Anna Bevers was born on Dec. 21, 1729 in Nistelrode and died on Nov. 24, 1785 in Nistelrode.
206. Antonius Donkers was born on Nov. 1, 1734 in Son en Breugel and died on Aug. 28, 1799 in Nuenen. He married Maria van Lieshout on Sep. 18, 1763 in Son en Breugel.
207. Maria van Lieshout was born on Oct. 6, 1741 in Son en Breugel and died on Jul. 20, 1809 in Gerwen.
208. Petrus van Gerwen was born on Aug. 22, 1724 in Boekel and died on Dec. 23, 1764 in Boekel. He married Ardina Arnoldus on Nov. 16, 1751 in Zeeland.
209. Ardina Arnoldus was born About 1725 in Uden and died on Aug. 6, 1815 in Boekel.
210. Franciscus Daniels was born on Jul. 21, 1725 in Gemert and died on May 17, 1800 in Gemert. He married Joanna Deckers on Jan. 15, 1750 in Gemert.
211. Joanna Deckers was born About 1725 and died on Mar. 13, 1797 in Gemert.
212. Arnoldus de Kleijn was born on Oct. 13, 1703 in Uden and died on Sep. 20, 1775 in Uden. He married Margaretha Petrus on Feb. 1, 1729 in Uden.
213. Margaretha Petrus was born on Jan. 6, 1710 in Uden and died on Jan. 25, 1773 in Uden.
214. Joannes van der Wijst was born on May 14, 1719 in Uden and died on Feb. 23, 1799 in Uden. He married Joanna Maria de Groot on Feb. 22, 1757 in Uden.
215. Joanna Maria de Groot was born on Nov. 18, 1730 in Uden and died on Sep. 24, 1799 in Uden.
216. Gerardus Christianus was born on Feb. 29, 1716 in Boekel and died on Sep. 4, 1759 in Boekel. He married 1st Cornelia Petrus on Jun. 14, 1756 in Boekel.
217. Cornelia Petrus was born on Jul. 10, 1722 in Boekel and died on Jun. 7, 1774 in Boekel.
218. Antonius van der Burgt was born on Jan. 4, 1733 in Boekel and died on Jun. 3, 1799 in Boekel. He married 1st Johanna Maria Daniëls on Sep. 24, 1754 in Boekel.
219. Johanna Maria Daniëls was born on Sep. 26, 1735 in Boekel and died on Dec. 2, 1771 in Boekel.
220. Joannes van Dinter was born on Jul. 28, 1710 in Gemert and died on Aug. 14, 1767 in Gemert. He married Helena van de Bergh on Jul. 27, 1734 in Gemert.
221. Helena van de Bergh was born on Dec. 15, 1710 in Gemert and died on Jan. 25, 1795 in Gemert.
222. Godefridus Joannes was born on Mar. 17, 1729 in Gemert and died on Oct. 13, 1805 in Gemert. He married Petronilla van der Lucht on Feb. 2, 1749 in Gemert.
223. Petronilla van der Lucht was born on Apr. 6, 1726 in Gemert and died on Jul. 14, 1804 in Gemert.
224. Joannes Vos was born on Oct. 20, 1724 in Son en Breugel and died on Apr. 1, 1803 in Son en Breugel. He married Henrica van Genuchte on Jun. 18, 1747 in Son en Breugel.
225. Henrica van Genuchte was born on Jun. 1, 1726 in Son en Breugel and died on Dec. 30, 1801 in Son en Breugel.
226. Cornelius Verhoeven was born on Jul. 23, 1722 in Son en Breugel and died on Oct. 4, 1758 in Son en Breugel. He married Catharina van Lieshout on Dec. 19, 1751 in Son en Breugel.
227. Catharina van Lieshout was born on Jul. 6, 1722 in Son en Breugel and died on Feb. 11, 1765 in Son en Breugel.
228. NN8
232. Wilhelmus van Diest was born on Mar. 8, 1739 in Eindhoven and died on Dec. 4, 1801 in Son en Breugel. He married Anna Maria van Lieshout on Sep. 8, 1765 in Son en Breugel.
233. Anna Maria van Lieshout was born on May 25, 1741 in Son en Breugel and died on Jan. 3, 1807 in Son en Breugel.
234. Walterus Prince was born on May 11, 1746 in Eindhoven and died on Mar. 28, 1831 in Son en Breugel. He married Wilhelma van Hoof on Feb. 10, 1771 in Son en Breugel.
235. Wilhelma van Hoof was born on Dec. 20, 1747 in Son en Breugel and died on Oct. 4, 1821 in Son en Breugel.
236. Arnoldus Heijmans was born on Sep. 13, 1716 in Son en Breugel and died on Mar. 19, 1788 in Son en Breugel. He married Aldegundis Sanders on Jan. 12, 1749 in Son en Breugel.
237. Aldegundis Sanders was born on Jun. 9, 1726 in Son en Breugel and died on Mar. 21, 1767 in Riethoven.
238. Laurentius van den Boomen was born on Oct. 3, 1731 in Eindhoven and died on May 21, 1785 in Son en Breugel. He married Catharina Timmermans on Sep. 18, 1757 in Son en Breugel.
239. Catharina Timmermans was born on Jun. 14, 1730 in Eindhoven and died on Sep. 9, 1782 in Son en Breugel.
240. Petrus Smolders was born on Sep. 12, 1722 in Wintelre and died on Nov. 12, 1789 in Eindhoven. He married Antonia Schutjes on Jan. 28, 1748 in Eindhoven.
241. Antonia Schutjes was born on Apr. 28, 1713 in Son en Breugel and died on an unknown date.
242. Petrus van Knegsel was born on Oct. 5, 1723 in Eindhoven and died on Jul. 22, 1773 in Eindhoven. He married Joanna Maria van Flierden on Feb. 16, 1749 in Eindhoven.
243. Joanna Maria van Flierden was born on Jun. 14, 1715 in Eindhoven and died on Feb. 8, 1772 in Eindhoven.
244. Andreas van Someren was born About 1690 and died on an unknown date. He married Joanna Petrus 16-10-1718 in Waalre.
245. Joanna Petrus was born About 1690 in Riethoven and died on an unknown date.
246. Cornelis Tinnebroek was born on Sep. 8, 1704 in Boxtel and died on Apr. 18, 1757 in Boxtel. He married Maria Pijnenburg on Oct. 3, 1728 in Haaren.
247. Maria Pijnenburg was born on Jun. 30, 1706 in Haaren and died on Oct. 23, 1767 in Boxtel.
248. Joannes van Lieshout was born on Oct. 13, 1701 in Lieshout and died on Jun. 23, 1750 in Best. He married Joanna Cox on Feb. 20, 1735 in Oirschot.
249. Joanna Cox was born on Jun. 10, 1711 in Best and died on Oct. 5, 1781 in Best.
250. Joannes van den Hurk was born on Dec. 14, 1715 in Best and died on Apr. 6, 1781 in Best. He married Joanna van Audenhoven on Sep. 24, 1741 in Oirschot.
251. Joanna van Audenhoven was born on Jan. 7, 1710 in Best and died on Jan. 21, 1778 in Best.
252. Theodorus van de Keer was born on Apr. 11, 1680 in Sint Oedenrode and died on Jun. 30, 1757 in Sint Oedenrode. He married 1st Petronella van de Clundert About 1723.
253. Petronella van de Clundert was born on Sep. 29, 1699 in Nuenen and died on Nov. 17, 1763 in Sint Oedenrode.
254. Godefridus van Dijck was born on Sep. 27, 1718 in Liempde and died on Nov. 24, 1764 in Liempde. He married Maria van de Meerakker on Feb. 5, 1747 in Liempde.
255. Maria van de Meerakker was born on Nov. 1, 1721 in Liempde and died on Mar. 20, 1797 in Liempde.