text:
The 2013 Ladbrokes World Darts Championship was the 20th World Championship organised by the Professional Darts Corporation since it separated from the British Darts Organisation. The event  took place at the Alexandra Palace, London between 14 December 2012 and 1 January 2013.

Adrian Lewis was the defending champion having won the last two editions of the tournament, but was beaten by Michael van Gerwen in the quarter-finals, thus ending Lewis' 15 match unbeaten run at the World Championship.

Phil Taylor aged 52 claimed his 16th and last World Championship title with a 7–4 victory over Michael van Gerwen in the final, despite trailing 0–2 and then 2–4 after six sets. Taylor won five sets in a row for the win. Van Gerwen averaged between 105 and 108 in the early sets but as his average never dropped, Taylor's average levelled off at 103 as did his ascendancy over a rival he admitted in the post-match interview was 'hard to crack'.

With his 2013 PDC World Championship win, Taylor became the first winner of the newly created Sid Waddell Trophy, named after the legendary darts commentator who died of bowel cancer on 11 August 2012.

Format and qualifiers
The televised stages featured 72 players. The top 32 players in the PDC Order of Merit on 26 November 2012 were seeded for the tournament. They were joined by the 16 highest non-qualified players from the Pro Tour Order of Merit, based on the 33 events played on the PDC Pro Tour.

These 48 players were joined by two PDPA qualifiers (as determined at a PDPA Qualifying event held in Barnsley on 26 November 2012), the highest ranked non-qualified player on the PDC Youth Tour Order of Merit, and 21 international players: the four highest names in the European Order of Merit not already qualified, and 17 further international qualifiers to be determined by the PDC and PDPA.

Some of the international players, such as the four from the European Order of Merit, and the top American and Australian players were entered straight into the first round, while others, having won qualifying events in their countries, were entered into the preliminary round.

Players were:

Order of Merit

Pro Tour
  Ian White
  Michael Smith
  Dean Winstanley
  James Hubbard
  Arron Monk
  Joe Cullen
  Scott Rand
  Darren Webster
  Dennis Priestley
  Johnny Haines
  Steve Brown
  James Richardson
  Peter Hudson
  Mickey Mansell
  Mark Jones
  Andy Jenkins

European Order of MeritFirst round qualifiers
  Co Stompé
  Gino Vos
  Magnus Caris
  Jerry Hendriks

PDPA QualifiersFirst round qualifier
  Stuart Kellett
Preliminary Round Qualifier
  John Bowles

PDC Youth Tour QualifierPreliminary Round Qualifier
  Jamie Lewis

International QualifiersFirst round qualifiers
  Darin Young
  Shane Tichowitsch
  Kyle Anderson

Preliminary Round Qualifiers
  Daryl Gurney
  Jani Haavisto
  Dave Harrington
  Max Hopp
  Lourence Ilagan
  Jarkko Komula
  Mohd Latif Sapup
  Leung Chen Nam
  Paul Lim
  Robert Marijanović
  Haruki Muramatsu
  Charl Pietersen
  Carlos Rodríguez
  Andree Welge

Prize money
The 2013 World Championship featured a prize fund of £1,000,000 – the same as in the previous three years.

The prize money was allocated as follows:

Draw
The draw for the Round of 64 took place on 4 December 2012, the preliminary round pairings were published on 26 November 2012.

Preliminary round
The winner played his first round match the same day.

Last 64

Final

Statistics
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size: 95%; text-align: right"
|-
! Player
! Eliminated
! Played
! Sets Won
! Sets Lost
! Legs Won
! Legs Lost
! 100+
! 140+
! 180s
! High checkout
! Average
|-
|align="left"|  Phil Taylor
| Winner
| 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 170
| 97.46
|-
|align="left"|  Michael van Gerwen
| Runner-up
| 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 144
| 98.83
|-
|align="left"|  Raymond van Barneveld
|  Semi-final
| 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136
| 99.29
|-
|align="left"|  James Wade
|  Semi-final
| 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130
| 90.62
|-
|align="left"|  Andy Hamilton
|  Quarter-final
| 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 138
| 95.84
|-
|align="left"|  Simon Whitlock
|  Quarter-final
| 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 164
| 95.07
|-
|align="left"|  Wes Newton
|  Quarter-final
| 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 144
| 92.70
|-
|align="left"|  Adrian Lewis
|  Quarter-final
| 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 138
| 91.74
|-
|align="left"|  Terry Jenkins
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 120
| 97.63
|-
|align="left"|  Robert Thornton
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 150
| 96.22
|-
|align="left"|  Gary Anderson
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 142
| 95.15
|-
|align="left"|  Kevin Painter
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 160
| 94.40
|-
|align="left"|  Dave Chisnall
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 157
| 93.41
|-
|align="left"|  Colin Lloyd
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132
| 92.79
|-
|align="left"|  Vincent van der Voort
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 108
| 91.83
|-
|align="left"|  Mark Walsh
|  Third round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 101
| 86.91
|-
|align="left"|  Peter Wright
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 141
| 95.10
|-
|align="left"|  Scott Rand
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 104
| 94.01
|-
|align="left"|  Mark Webster
| |  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 145
| 93.49
|-
|align="left"|  Colin Osborne
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 164
| 92.15
|-
|align="left"|  Dean Winstanley
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 141
| 91.62
|-
|align="left"|  Ronnie Baxter
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 89
| 90.74
|-
|align="left"|  Paul Nicholson
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107
| 90.26
|-
|align="left"|  Daryl Gurney
|  Second round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 122
| 90.09
|-
|align="left"|  Brendan Dolan
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 124
| 89.75
|-
|align="left"|  John Part
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 127
| 89.45
|-
|align="left"|  Justin Pipe
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116
| 88.37
|-
|align="left"|  Steve Beaton
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84
| 88.15
|-
|align="left"|  John Bowles
|  Second round
| 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 121
| 87.63
|-
|align="left"|  Richie Burnett
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 121
| 86.17
|-
|align="left"|  Jerry Hendriks
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 156
| 85.13
|-
|align="left"|  Denis Ovens
|  Second round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 113
| 83.22
|-
|align="left"|  Kim Huybrechts
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 127
| 98.79
|-
|align="left"|  Jamie Caven
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 110
| 94.15
|-
|align="left"|  Wayne Jones
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116
| 92.21
|-
|align="left"|  Ian White
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 98
| 92.11
|-
|align="left"|  Shane Tichowitsch
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 161
| 92.07
|-
|align="left"|  Mervyn King
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 140
| 90.70
|-
|align="left"|  Arron Monk
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52
| 89.88
|-
|align="left"|  Jani Haavisto
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 130
| 89.29
|-
|align="left"|  Dennis Priestley
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92
| 88.20
|-
|align="left"|  Mark Jones
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16
| 87.95
|-
|align="left"|  Michael Smith
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40
| 87.90
|-
|align="left"|  Joe Cullen
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52
| 87.89
|-
|align="left"|  Darren Webster
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76
| 87.60
|-
|align="left"|  Stuart Kellett
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84
| 87.53
|-
|align="left"|  Darin Young
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 144
| 86.57
|-
|align="left"|  Steve Brown
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 76
| 86.12
|-
|align="left"|  Haruki Muramatsu
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 116
| 85.94
|-
|align="left"|  Co Stompé
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 72
| 85.63
|-
|align="left"|  Johnny Haines
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 95
| 84.29
|-
|align="left"|  Paul Lim
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 170
| 83.65
|-
|align="left"|  Kyle Anderson
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40
| 83.63
|-
|align="left"|  Magnus Caris
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64
| 83.27
|-
|align="left"|  James Richardson
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100
| 83.26
|-
|align="left"|  Lourence Ilagan
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 121
| 82.95
|-
|align="left"|  Max Hopp
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96
| 82.70
|-
|align="left"|  Peter Hudson
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56
| 82.57
|-
|align="left"|  Andy Smith
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 64
| 81.81
|-
|align="left"|  Leung Chen Nam
| First round
| 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40
| 81.46
|-
|align="left"|  Gino Vos
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61
| 79.90
|-
|align="left"|  James Hubbard
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 101
| 78.80
|-
|align="left"|  Mickey Mansell
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82
| 78.46
|-
|align="left"|  Andy Jenkins
| First round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70
| 73.20
|-
|align="left"|  Jarkko Komula
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81
| 82.32
|-
|align="left"|  Robert Marijanović
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73
| 82.16
|-
|align="left"|  Carlos Rodríguez
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40
| 81.92
|-
|align="left"|  Jamie Lewis
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 118
| 81.84
|-
|align="left"|  Charl Pietersen
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40
| 81.79
|-
|align="left"|  Andree Welge
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16
| 76.70
|-
|align="left"|  Mohd Latif Sapup
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10
| 65.58
|-
|align="left"|  Dave Harrington
| Preliminary round
| 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| –
| 59.36
|-

Representation from different countries
This table shows the number of players by country in the World Championship, the total number including the preliminary round.

Broadcasting

The tournament was available in the following countries on these channels.

Additionally, the semi-finals and final were broadcast in 3D in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

References

External links
Official site
Netzone; Results and Schedule

2013
World Championship
World Championship
2012 sports events in London
2013 sports events in London
2012 in British sport
2013 in British sport
December 2012 sports events in the United Kingdom
January 2013 sports events in the United Kingdom
International sports competitions in London
Alexandra Palace


text:
Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area
Timothy W. Olsen, Scott Sanderson, Xiao Feng, William C. Hubbard
PURPOSE. To assess the thickness and surface area of porcine sclera. METHODS. One hundred twenty-eight porcine globes were sectioned from the center of the cornea to the region of the optic nerve. Photographs of the sectioned sclera including a millimeter scale were taken. Photographic slides were projected onto blank paper, and the scleral silhouette was traced. Perpendicular thickness measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals from the limbus to the optic nerve. The sclera of 18 porcine eyes were cut into small pieces, and the surface area was calculated with computerized digital tracing software. RESULTS. The scleral thickness near the corneal scleral limbus was 0.83 ± 0.2, 0.91 ± 0.17, and 1.12 ± 0.23 mm in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, respectively. Thickness decreased to minimum of 0.31 ± 0.07, 0.35 ± 0.1, and 0.43 ± 0.16 mm at a distance of 5 mm from the limbus in the small and medium-sized pigs and 6 mm in the large-sized pigs, respectively. The mean scleral surface area was 7.78 ± 0.66, 9.66 ± 0.75, and 11.92 ± 1.57 cm2 in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, whereas the corneal surface area was 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.15 - ± 0.09, and 1.40 ± 0.19 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Porcine scleral thickness is very similar to human scleral thickness. The porcine model is an excellent model for studying transscleral drug delivery.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Dive into the research topics of 'Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sclera Medicine & Life Sciences 100%
Swine Medicine & Life Sciences 64%
Limbus Corneae Medicine & Life Sciences 14%
Cornea Medicine & Life Sciences 8%
Software Medicine & Life Sciences 6%
Eye Medicine & Life Sciences 5%
Pharmaceutical Preparations Medicine & Life Sciences 3%
Olsen, T. W., Sanderson, S., Feng, X., & Hubbard, W. C. (2002). Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 43(8), 2529-2532.
Porcine sclera : Thickness and surface area. / Olsen, Timothy W.; Sanderson, Scott; Feng, Xiao et al.
In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 43, No. 8, 05.08.2002, p. 2529-2532.
Olsen, TW, Sanderson, S, Feng, X & Hubbard, WC 2002, 'Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area', Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2529-2532.
Olsen TW, Sanderson S, Feng X, Hubbard WC. Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002 Aug 5;43(8):2529-2532.
Olsen, Timothy W. ; Sanderson, Scott ; Feng, Xiao et al. / Porcine sclera : Thickness and surface area. In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002 ; Vol. 43, No. 8. pp. 2529-2532.
@article{e95f5e306752434295a6a635d77a79e6,
title = "Porcine sclera: Thickness and surface area",
abstract = "PURPOSE. To assess the thickness and surface area of porcine sclera. METHODS. One hundred twenty-eight porcine globes were sectioned from the center of the cornea to the region of the optic nerve. Photographs of the sectioned sclera including a millimeter scale were taken. Photographic slides were projected onto blank paper, and the scleral silhouette was traced. Perpendicular thickness measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals from the limbus to the optic nerve. The sclera of 18 porcine eyes were cut into small pieces, and the surface area was calculated with computerized digital tracing software. RESULTS. The scleral thickness near the corneal scleral limbus was 0.83 ± 0.2, 0.91 ± 0.17, and 1.12 ± 0.23 mm in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, respectively. Thickness decreased to minimum of 0.31 ± 0.07, 0.35 ± 0.1, and 0.43 ± 0.16 mm at a distance of 5 mm from the limbus in the small and medium-sized pigs and 6 mm in the large-sized pigs, respectively. The mean scleral surface area was 7.78 ± 0.66, 9.66 ± 0.75, and 11.92 ± 1.57 cm2 in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, whereas the corneal surface area was 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.15 - ± 0.09, and 1.40 ± 0.19 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Porcine scleral thickness is very similar to human scleral thickness. The porcine model is an excellent model for studying transscleral drug delivery.",
author = "Olsen, {Timothy W.} and Scott Sanderson and Xiao Feng and Hubbard, {William C.}",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
T1 - Porcine sclera
T2 - Thickness and surface area
AU - Olsen, Timothy W.
AU - Sanderson, Scott
AU - Feng, Xiao
AU - Hubbard, William C.
N2 - PURPOSE. To assess the thickness and surface area of porcine sclera. METHODS. One hundred twenty-eight porcine globes were sectioned from the center of the cornea to the region of the optic nerve. Photographs of the sectioned sclera including a millimeter scale were taken. Photographic slides were projected onto blank paper, and the scleral silhouette was traced. Perpendicular thickness measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals from the limbus to the optic nerve. The sclera of 18 porcine eyes were cut into small pieces, and the surface area was calculated with computerized digital tracing software. RESULTS. The scleral thickness near the corneal scleral limbus was 0.83 ± 0.2, 0.91 ± 0.17, and 1.12 ± 0.23 mm in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, respectively. Thickness decreased to minimum of 0.31 ± 0.07, 0.35 ± 0.1, and 0.43 ± 0.16 mm at a distance of 5 mm from the limbus in the small and medium-sized pigs and 6 mm in the large-sized pigs, respectively. The mean scleral surface area was 7.78 ± 0.66, 9.66 ± 0.75, and 11.92 ± 1.57 cm2 in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, whereas the corneal surface area was 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.15 - ± 0.09, and 1.40 ± 0.19 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Porcine scleral thickness is very similar to human scleral thickness. The porcine model is an excellent model for studying transscleral drug delivery.
AB - PURPOSE. To assess the thickness and surface area of porcine sclera. METHODS. One hundred twenty-eight porcine globes were sectioned from the center of the cornea to the region of the optic nerve. Photographs of the sectioned sclera including a millimeter scale were taken. Photographic slides were projected onto blank paper, and the scleral silhouette was traced. Perpendicular thickness measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals from the limbus to the optic nerve. The sclera of 18 porcine eyes were cut into small pieces, and the surface area was calculated with computerized digital tracing software. RESULTS. The scleral thickness near the corneal scleral limbus was 0.83 ± 0.2, 0.91 ± 0.17, and 1.12 ± 0.23 mm in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, respectively. Thickness decreased to minimum of 0.31 ± 0.07, 0.35 ± 0.1, and 0.43 ± 0.16 mm at a distance of 5 mm from the limbus in the small and medium-sized pigs and 6 mm in the large-sized pigs, respectively. The mean scleral surface area was 7.78 ± 0.66, 9.66 ± 0.75, and 11.92 ± 1.57 cm2 in the small-, medium-, and large-sized pigs, whereas the corneal surface area was 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.15 - ± 0.09, and 1.40 ± 0.19 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. Porcine scleral thickness is very similar to human scleral thickness. The porcine model is an excellent model for studying transscleral drug delivery.
JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
<?php

namespace Bumble\Validation;

/**
 * Validates a currency field using the ISO 4217 standard. The validator will
 * parse the prefix and code from the money. It will automatically ensure the correct
 * decimal and comma format given the currency. If only one currency is to be validated
 * the prefix and code are not required; however, if multiple codes are provided
 * the validator requires the code or prefix to distinguish the currency being used.
 *
 * Options
 *    allowPrefix    A boolean, true it allows the currency code ($, £, etc), else false. DEFAULT: true
 *    allowCode   A boolean, true it allows the suffix (USD, CAD, etc), else false. DEFAULT: true
 *    currencies    An array of allowable currencies using the code (USD, CAD, etc). DEFAULT: 'USD'
 *    codeField    Use this option if the code is in another field, such as a separate dropdown box.
 *    prefixField    Use this option if the prefix is in another field, such as a separate dropdown box.
 *
 */
class Currency extends BaseValidator {
    const ANY = null; //for options where any value is acceptable

    //template constants
    const NO_FILE_UPLOADED     = 'noFileUploaded';
    const FILE_TOO_BIG        = 'fileTooBig';
    const INVALID_FILETYPE     = 'invalidFiletype';

    protected $templates = array(
        self::NO_FILE_UPLOADED  => 'A file must be uploaded.',
        self::FILE_TOO_BIG        => 'The file uploaded is too large.',
        self::INVALID_FILETYPE    => 'An invalid filetype as provided.'
    );

    protected $defaults = array(
        'name'         => null,
        'require'     => false,
        'filesize'    => self::ANY,
        'filetype'  => self::ANY
    );

    public function isValid( $value = null ) {
        $name = $this->getOption('name');
        $filesize = $this->getOption('filesize');
        $filetype = $this->getOption('filetype');
        $required = $this->getOption('required');

        //required and file not uploaded
        if( $required && empty( $_FILES[$name]['name'] ) )  {
            $this->error( self::NO_FILE_UPLOADED );
            return false;
        }

        //validate file size
        if( $filesize != self::ANY && $_FILES[$name]['size'] > $filesize ) {
            $this->error( self::FILE_TOO_BIG );
        }

        //validate extension
        if( $filetype !== self::ANY ) {
            $name = $_FILES[$name]['name'];
            $pos = stripos( $name, '.' );

            //no extension, we assume the filename
            if( $pos === false ) {
                $ext = $name;
            } else {
                $ext = substr( $name, $pos + 1 );
            }

            //case insenstive
            $ext = strtolower( $ext );

            //check if in array, make sure we lowercase it all so it's case-insensitive
            if( !in_array( $ext, array_map( 'strtolower', $filetype ) ) ) {
                $this->error( self::INVALID_FILETYPE );
            }
        }

        //has errors, return false
        if( $this->hasMessages() ) {
            return false;
        }

        return true;
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


去る2003年秋、私はアムステルダムの「文化的な生産の実験室」(SMARTプロジェクトスペース)を悲しくも遷移を強いられたことについて報告した。SMART Project Space is situated in a location which plays a vital role in shaping the new cultural city map in Amsterdam.
Translation: Rin OkadaLocated close to the city centre, the Old West neighborhood of Amsterdam is a deprived urban area which is about to undergo a program of regeneration. The new functionality of the building offers a sense of possibility, of civic improvement, a flagship that is sympathetic and responsive aiming to redraw the established cultural map and expand the infrastructure of visual arts within the city. By creating a new cultural platform, SMART Project Space plays a vital role within its urban setting. It endows the city with a high quality municipal service and a new public space for both the local and international community.
Occupying a laboratory building for the third and last time – the first temporary space was the Bus House on the Kloveniersburgwal, previously used to house the laboratories of the Amsterdam harbour customs and most recently, the Swammerdam Institute, a former clinical laboratory of the Medical Faculty of the University of Amsterdam – SMART Project Space aquired the building of the former Pathological Laboratories in the Wilhelmina Gasthuis area in Amsterdam Old West in August 2005.
After more then a year of developing plans, fundraising and permit procedures, SMART has now started the renovation of the 3600m2 building, which will be developed into an exhibition space of 500m2, two large project rooms, a film theater with three cinema spaces, a lecture and performance hall with a flat floor theater surface of 10×11 meters and a capacity of 120 seats, ten studios for the SMART Residency Program, a media cafe/restaurant, a library with a reading room, and an art bookshop.
Although the renovation works will take a good half year to conclude, the main entrance to the building is available for the resident artists and visitors to access the exhibition spaces.


A privately owned company, Costa has been servicing the foodservice industry throughout New England for more than fifty years.
We offer a complete line of fresh products that include, fresh fruits and produce, dairy, and value added fruits, vegetables and prepared salads. In addition, over 3500 frozen food and grocery items are part of our product mix.
We services a wide range of foodservice customers, consisting of hotels, restaurants, contract feeders, healthcare, K-12 schools, retail, and college and university dining.


I have rebuilt the kernel on my Apalis iMX6 / Ixora adding the ath10k driver. When I boot, with a Silex SX-PCAEC wifi card I see the firmware is not loading.
The latest firmware appears to be firmware-5.bin.
Are there some explicit instructions for installing and updating the firmware for a non expert?
Attached is my boot message if it's of any help.
Yes, you can quite simply copy the firmware binary file to the proper firmware location (`/lib/firmware/ath10k/...`) on the rootfs. As for the firmware version, it'd be best to use the version of firmware requested by the driver ('-2'). Although the newer firmware should work with the device, it may not be backward compatible with the older driver/kernel.
Thanks Brandon, this removed the "ath10k: Could not fetch firmware file 'firmware-2.bin': -2".
You may also require the board.bin file as provided in the kernel.org firmware repo.
You might alternatively try using the Candela firmware.
And finally the ideal approach is probably to backport a newer driver (and use along with a newer firmware). Unfortunately, this is a bit more work. And we'll eventually release a 4.1 kernel for iMX6 which will anyway have a newer driver/firmware.
If I go the backports path do i need to put the kernel back to stock?
@Klonk, to use a backported kernel module, you'd probably want to go back to the original kernel. I don't think it's necessary, but you'd otherwise need to ensure the old module isn't loaded.
I recommend backporting primarily because we don't know what state this driver is in - generally a driver matures in later kernels, so backporting it would help ensure it's maturity. However, it is a bit more work to go this route. Notice that the backport instructions I linked to are for native compilation. For cross-compiling, be sure to setup the cross environment to invoke the cross toolchain. You may also refer to our developer article about backporting.
OK thanks, I'll try this path on another board. I'll let you know how it goes.


Edoardo Campanella works as Eurozone economist at UniCredit Bank. He is also a Junior Fellow at the Aspen Institute Italia and a Young Leader at the Council on Italian and US Relations. He previously worked for the economic research departments of the World Trade Organization, the World Economic Forum and the Italian Senate. He holds an MPA from the Harvard Kennedy School, which he attended as Fulbright Scholar. While at Harvard, he was awarded the Certificate for Teaching Excellence - a Harvard-wide award for the best teachers of the year - for teaching a globalization course. In 2015, he was a shortlisted for the Bracken Bower Prize, awarded by McKinsey and the Financial Times to emerging authors in the economics field below the age of 35. His proposal was about Europe's elite brain drain.


Roger Ebert once wrote in his journal about whether video games are art. Ebert never believed even during the end of his life. His thoughts would never change. Today, the debate still invited so many questions. Even there is a debate between movies as a literary or not. To be honest, that's not a debatable question of whether people will say art, literature, or not. Personally, I'm freaking love indie games and I appreciate it as an aesthetic work not comparable to AAA games. Indie games don't often get many stages. Morely, they work alone rather than inviting many people or creating a company. Through this documentary, James Swirsky and Lisanne Pajot changed a superficial thought about indie games.
This documentary tells about various difficulties faced by game developers as connoisseurs of a work. This documentary explores the real effort and passion of a game developer. Here, we become acquainted with Edmund McMillen and Tommy Refenes. At the time, they were making a video game called "Super Meat Boy". On the other hand, there was Phil Fish who temporarily developed "Fez". He also has to deal with legal uncertainty and continues pressured by other things. There was Jonathan Blow with his game, "Braid". This documentary explores all kinds of lives from all of them. What are their goals, their future, and what they have to face?
"Indie Game: The Movie" isn't a smart nerdy-like movie. This film doesn't draw us to understand everything about computers. Here, we don't find knowledge about coding or programming. This documentary invites us to enter such world of game developers. We share in how they feel. How a developer works until their work successfully marketed, everything is shown. They all have freedom in unlimited expression and creativity. However, this brought them to another appearance and what affected their project. Their difficulties include facing internal problems, not having investors, not having a publisher, divorce, conflict, lack of funds, family and others.
This documentary is not about art or not who is the best. Those who work as programmers, designers, and developers did whatever they can to survive in their scope. They are also not EA, Activision, or Epic Games. Independent games are made by people who work in such an environment. They work alone from compiling a code, writing a program, designing, learning pixel art, and etc. Companies such as Microsoft participate in it. They tried their best. They must be able to adapt in the online gaming community and social media.
This documentary about video games is not a thing as smart people. Pajot and Swirsky wrote this documentary in its pure emotional feeling. It's full of suspense, there is a consequence they have to do if their game fails. As Phil Fish said if "Fez" failed, he would commit suicide. I know, I know, the community really hates Fish in various kinds of problems and controversies he made a few years ago. In addition to Phil Fish, McMullen brought his childhood experience into a flash game. Himself, as a child, was very fond of drawing monsters. To the extent that his parents and teachers consider him to be in a mental disorder.
McMillen and Refenes said that "Super Meat Boy" tells about a love story. Focusing on a skinless boy, he must save his girlfriend. McMillen always said why meat boy doesn't have skin. Well, the answer is simple. He was stuck on a band-aid and vice versa. He also doesn't want the game to look like "Super Mario Brothers". As much as possible, he assembles various levels and elements so that players can stick with their controller and complete the game with anger.
Phil Fish's "Fez" is a game about the world of 2D but 3D. He got a lot of praise in 2008 when he introduced the demo version. However, he must face various problems. He has to face the bizarre gamers community, design issues, problems with his partners, and various other dramas. Phil Fish says that you can't make anything big before showing the demo. It took years to make a game and even a like "Grand Theft Auto V". Whereas Fish, he was just himself alone who has to deal with impatient community gamers. Frustration goes on to him.
One of the main keys of this documentary is the use of the interview technique. The game developer is free to express their emotions and feelings. As if, they had found a new container and it was just right to vent all their feelings they had gotten. "Indie Game: The Movie" managed to deliver a pleasant viewing experience for both gamers and non-gamers. Through this series of stories, there are joys and sorrows. This film also provides very meaningful information besides it's about video games. In essence, making work is not easy. It also requires a lot of time especially for those who are independent. This film changes the minds of some people who are still stuck in one perspective.


Norman Ratcliffe co-leads the LOMVIA project, with Patrick Roberts. Part of the research in the LOMVIA project involves fieldwork to collect data on Arctic seabirds to identify how they are responding to environmental change. In this blog, Norman recounts his experience of fieldwork on Iceland. Some of the fieldwork photos are shown in the picture banner above.


text:
Sunday Preview: Women's Tennis Brings the Fire With 3 Must-Watch Matches
Friday, October 8, 2021 - Petra Kvitova and Arantxa Rus play in Round 2 in Stadium 4 on day 5 of the 2021 BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells Tennis Garden in Indian Wells, CA. (Kathryn Riley/BNP Paribas Open)
by Jeff Donaldson
See WTA Stars In Action
1 | Putinsteva vs. [24] Ostapenko
Stadium 4 – Third match at 11:00 a.m. PST
2-1 head-to-head
If you know, you know.
This match should absolutely be on everyone's radar on the middle Sunday of the BNP Paribas Open. Both players are known for their volcanic temperaments on court, showing every emotion in the book from the highest of jubilant highs after a screaming down-the-line winner to the lowest of levels of disgust at a forehands that might barely miss the lines.
Beyond the histrionics, however, they're both exceptional tennis players. Yulia Putinsteva has an all-court approach with varying changes in pace and spin laced throughout, while Jelena Ostapenko might possibly hit the biggest ball in tennis – off both wings.
Expect lots of return winners off weaker service deliveries in this match, a few tossed racquets here and there and, yes, there will definitely be some mind-boggling rallies.
2 | [7] Kvitova vs. [27] Azarenka
Stadium 2 – 6:00 p.m. PST
It might be the rivalry that never truly was, but we're glad these two two-time Grand Slam champions will be treating fans at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden to some of the best that women's tennis has to offer.
Both Petra Kvitova and Victoria Azarenka broke through around the same time. In 2011, these players mastered the power-baseline tennis ushered in by their predecessors, taking the ball unimaginably early to blast their way to Wimbledon (Kvitova), Australian Open and US Open (Azarenka) titles across two seasons.
Exactly 10 years ago, they capped off the WTA season with one of the matches of the year at the WTA Finals in Istanbul, but, due to various dips in form and injury layoffs, couldn't seem to meet in a draw for years after that, playing just twice since 2011. The friendly Czech has the lead in their head-to-head at 5 wins to 3 for the fiery Belarusian, but with both having up-and-down campaigns this year, it feels like today's Stadium 2 clash is a blank slate.
3 | [23] Fernandez vs. [9] Pavlyuchenkova
Stadium 1 – Not before 8:00 p.m. PST
First career meeting
Knocking off three Top 5 players in four matches (with a former World No. 1 sandwiched in between), Leylah Fernandez became one of the darlings of the US Open last September when she reached the finals as a diminutive but fearless teenager. A first Grand Slam final at just 19 years of age marked the arrival of a new star in women's tennis and she, alongside her 18-year-old conqueror in the final Emma Raducanu, became household names overnight.
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova couldn't have had a more different career story if you scripted it yourself.
A precocious junior champion who broke records with her multiple Grand Slam titles (you rarely see a junior player, eager to transition to the pros, win more than one these days), Pavlyuchenkova has been a perennial Top 30-20 player but who ostensibly has never delivered on her promise as a dominant junior. Before 2021, her best results at a major event were a handful of quarter-final finish, but this season she finally made a breakthrough at age 29, reaching the Roland Garros final before falling to Barbora Krejcikova in three sets.
It's the tale of two careers, and in their primetime Stadium 1 match on Sunday in the Palm Desert, there will be plenty to play for. Pavlyuchenkova is looking to reach the Top 10 for the first time in her 12-year career, needing to make the most of her hard-hitting baseline game to out perform a handful of players results-wise this week in order to clinch the milestone. On the other hand, Fernandez, with her lefty craftsmanship and unassailable desire to win (and put on a show while doing so), will be looking to consolidate her momentum from the US Open and confirm herself as a contender for every event she plays at.
And may the best player win.
Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaJelena OstapenkoLeylah FernandezPetra KvitovaVictoria AzarenkaWTAYulia Putintseva
PreviousVideo: Bianca Andreescu – Saturday, October 9, 2021
NextSunday Preview: 3 Men's Blockbusters to Watch


Email Address Generator i8s specifically designed to search for email addresses directly from the mail servers. Download the Email Generator to build huge mailing lists for email marketing or advertising campaigns. Free trial download.
1. The software searches and generates the email addresses and verifies the validation of the same from the mail servers.
2. Auto detects the max e-mail verifying session for a single connection, limited by current SMTP Server.
3. Auto detects DNS server of your local computer.
4. The multithreading feature allows 500 simultaneous search threads. Normally 1500 emails can be generated in a minute.
5. Email Generator exports the search results to a plain text file.
6. The professional and easy to use software can be set up in a jiffy.
You can be the first to write a review of E-mail Generator Software!


You won't automatically be forced to serve jail time if you were charged with a DWI related offense for the first time in Texas. In some cases, defendants serve jail time for 1st occurrences, but its generally due to a lack of proficient legal counsel, additional charges, or the decision of the defendant.
If you're under legal representation by the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates you can expect our legal team to take all the necessary steps to keep you out of jail.
If you're found guilty of a 1st DWI, chances are you won't have to serve any jail time, but will have your jail sentence suspended while you serve a period of Probation/Community Supervision. Generally, probationary periods range from 6 months to 1 year but can be extended to 2 years if the court deems it necessary.
Persons found guilty of Driving While Intoxicated a 2nd time in Texas are eligible for probation/community supervision. However, it's not a given as is the case with 1st-time cases. If probation is granted, the guidelines are generally more stringent than that of 1st time DWI cases. Also worth noting, the probationary period is lengthier, but it's a much better outcome than serving jail time.
Persons convicted of 2nd DWI offenses may face a jail time requirement. However, the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates may be able to negotiate weekend time or another alternative.
In general, the more severe the DWI offense, the more severe the probationary guidelines.
Listed below is a general overview of potential probationary guidelines one may be subject to in the event they are found guilty of a DWI offense and elect to a probationary agreement with the court.
Timely reports to the assigned probation officer.
Maintain employment and support for all dependents.
Pay all required fines, court costs, and any probationary fees.
Attend DWI & alcohol education classes, and avoid becoming intoxicated or influenced by non-prescription drugs.
You may also be required to meet with victims of drunk driving accidents or people who have lost loved ones as a result of intoxicated manslaughter.
You must complete all community service requirements demand by the court and get and alcohol & drug evaluation.
You will likely be barred from all nightclubs, pubs, bars, taverns, and other establishments where alcohol is served.
In some cases serving a jail sentence is a requirement.
A requirement for an anti-alcoholic, or deep lung device, may be ordered to ensure that you do not operate your vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. If you attempt to bypass the device, or fail the in-car breathalyzer, the court will be notified and the consequences will be severe and promptly executed.
Attorney Tad Nelson, attorney Amber Spurlock, and the staff of the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates are here to provide you with answers to any questions you have about your DWI charges, relative laws, probationary possibilities for your situation, and potential probationary requirements based on your individual situation.
If you or someone you care about was arrested on suspicion of Driving While Intoxicated in Pearland, Angleton or elsewhere in Brazoria or Galveston County, we're here to help. Feel free to call the Law Offices of Tad Nelson & Associates at 979-267-6069 with any concerns or questions that you may have about probation for DWI.


Thank you for entrusting your patients to our care. Dermatology Consultants strives to offer the best patient care to everyone. We want to partner with you to ensure that patient information is communicated safely and effectively.
Our practice utilizes the latest technology in Health Information Exchange (HIE) to provide communication regarding your patients' care. You may communicate and send all patient referrals and clinical summaries using Secure Direct Address to our providers below.
DO I HAVE TO USE DIRECT FOR SENDING TRANSITIONS OF CARE DOCUMENTS FOR MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2?
Not Necessarily. You may send using any of the transport mechanisms certified for your EHR technology or via an eHealth Exchange participant. While all certified EHR technology must include Direct functionality, there are other options your vendor may have also certified that you can use to exchange with other providers, either point-to-point or through an HIE. It's best to talk with your vendor about the Transitions of Care options available to you.
A Direct address is needed to exchange health information using Direct. Because Direct is based off of existing e-mail standards, a Direct address looks very similar to an e-mail address. Like e-mail addresses, Direct addresses can be issued to individuals or to organizations, departments, or specific devices. An example of a Direct address is b.wells@direct.aclinic.org. While this may look and function similar to an e-mail address, it is important to know that a traditional e-mail account (e.g. gmail, yahoo mail, or your company e-mail) are NOT Direct addresses. Messages sent to or from traditional e-mail accounts are not secure and will fail to send via Direct. Just like distinct fax numbers you may have today for each of your office affiliations, you or your colleagues may have a distinct Direct address for each practice affiliation. Be sure to verify that you are sending to the correct address for the location where you intend to send patient information.
Direct is a technical standard for exchanging health information between health care entities (e.g. primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, clinical labs) in a trusted network. It is secure, easy-to-use, inexpensive, and approved for use by nationally-recognized experts and organizations. Direct functions like regular e-mail with additional security measures to ensure that messages are only accessible to the intended recipient, per the protection regulations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). For Stage 2 Meaningful Use, electronic health record (EHR) vendors are required to either (a) certify their transitions-of-care modules or complete EHR product offerings to include Direct to meet certification requirements, or (b) work with a third party to provide Direct services. The tools your vendor gives you may or may not include the word "Direct," so it's important to have a conversation with your vendor to understand the tools available to you in your EHR product.