text:
Vic's Statehouse Notes #281 – February 28, 2017
The House has voted to tell our K-12 students that money isn't there for them and school funding must be put back to the levels of the Great Recession.
On Monday (Feb. 27) the Indiana House passed a budget that gives a meager 1.1% increase for our K-12 students for next year, 2017-18. A 1.1% increase matches the 2009-10 budget written in January 2009 in the deepest part of the Great Recession. Also in 2012-13, later in the Great Recession, the K-12 increase was only 1.0%.
Now the supermajority is telling our K-12 students that 2017-18 gets 1.1% again, no better than the Great Recession.
Yet at the same time our public school students are being told that times are bleak, other parts of the budget contradict this pessimism:
The surplus will again exceed $2 billion.
The House budget added $7 million for more private school scholarships. Tax credits for private school tuition scholarships were lifted to $25 million for the two year budget, up from $18 million during the current biennium.
Virtual charter schools were treated generously, getting 100% of the state per pupil amount, instead of the 90% that they have been getting.
The House has let down our K-12 students, increasing total funding only 1.1% in the first year and 1.7% in the second year, figures adding $273 million in new money for K-12 in the two year budget. This is less than what Governor Holcomb recommended ($280 million) and far less than what the 2015 budget added ($474 million).
After a three day break, the General Assembly will return Monday for the second half of the session when the Senate will consider the budget. Public school advocates should contact Senators to make two points:
Tell them that they must do better than the House for our K-12 students. A 1.1% increase is simply inadequate and will mean program cuts.
Tell them they should stop the expansion of private school support with tax dollars. Tell them they can put $6 million back into the K-12 budget by freezing the School Scholarship Tax Credits for private school tuition. Better yet, they can put $25 million back into the K-12 budget by canceling the School Scholarship tax credit program altogether, a program that duplicates what private school vouchers do already.
On the floor of the House in the budget debate, both Representatives Greg Porter and Vernon Smith pointed out that under the budget proposal, 201 of the 292 public school corporations will either lose money in 2017-18 or will receive less than 1%.
Chair of Ways and Means Representative Tim Brown responded by saying that his job is not to "protect school corporations but to protect school children." He said he is "agnostic" about corporations but he said the per-child funding goes up in this budget.
I took that as an invitation to look at the per-child funding in the House budget and discovered that it only goes up 0.6% in the first year and 1.4% in the second year, less than the increases for total funding cited above (1.1% and 1.7%).
These are meager increases for our students at a time when we are not in a recession. Despite all that has been said, neither our K-12 students nor our school corporations have been given a priority in the budget.
Our Senators need to hear pointed messages about K-12 funding from parents, educators and community members.
School Scholarships
Indiana really doesn't need the School Scholarship program established in 2009 since the much bigger and better known Choice Scholarship (voucher) program was passed in 2011.
School Scholarships are given out to private school students for private school tuition by Scholarship Granting Organizations who get their money by taking donations and then authorizing the donors to take 50% of the donation as a credit off of their Indiana income tax. In 2009-10, the first budget for the program was $2.5 million. Private school advocates have grown the annual budget to $9.5 million in 2016-17. Now the new House budget would boost the budget to $12.5 million in both years.
That is a significant amount! That's $25 million for two years, more than we spend on Alternative Education and the Senator Ford Technology Fund when both are added together!
If the Senate would freeze the budget for School Scholarships at $9.5 million, the Senators would have another $6 million with which to boost the K-12 tuition support for all students. If the Senate would start to roll back this privatization program, it would have even more to help the bottom line for K-12 support.
In 2015, the Senate froze the School Scholarship budget at $7.5 million, but the House pushed to raise it to the current levels.
Ask your Senator or any Senator to freeze or lower School Scholarships and use the money to restore better funding for all K-12 students.
Only the righteous indignation of parents, educators and community members can get the General Assembly to do better for our K-12 students and to stop the expansion of private school scholarships using public tax dollars.
Tell Senators that in the midst of a growing economy, they must do better than 1.1%.
Thanks for your advocacy for public education!
"Vic's Statehouse Notes" and ICPE received one of three Excellence in Media Awards presented by Delta Kappa Gamma Society International, an organization of over 85,000 women educators in seventeen countries. The award was presented on July 30, 2014 during the Delta Kappa Gamma International Convention held in Indianapolis. Thank you Delta Kappa Gamma!
ICPE has worked since 2011 to promote public education in the Statehouse and oppose the privatization of schools. We need your membership to help support ICPE lobbying efforts. As of July 1st, the start of our new membership year, it is time for all ICPE members to renew their membership.
Our lobbyist Joel Hand is again representing ICPE in the new budget session which began on January 3, 2017. We need your memberships and your support to continue his work. We welcome additional members and additional donations. We need your help and the help of your colleagues who support public education! Please pass the word!
Go to www.icpe2011.com for membership and renewal information and for full information on ICPE efforts on behalf of public education. Thanks!
I am a lifelong Hoosier and began teaching in 1969. I served as a social studies teacher, curriculum developer, state research and evaluation consultant, state social studies consultant, district social studies supervisor, assistant principal, principal, educational association staff member, and adjunct university professor. I worked for Garrett-Keyser-Butler Schools, the Indiana University Social Studies Development Center, the Indiana Department of Education, the Indianapolis Public Schools, IUPUI, and the Indiana Urban Schools Association, from which I retired as Associate Director in 2009. I hold three degrees: B.A. in Ed., Ball State University, 1969; M.S. in Ed., Indiana University, 1972; and Ed.D., Indiana University, 1977, along with a Teacher's Life License and a Superintendent's License, 1998. In 2013 I was honored to receive a Distinguished Alumni Award from the IU School of Education, and in 2014 I was honored to be named to the Teacher Education Hall of Fame by the Association for Teacher Education – Indiana.
Labels: Charters, Funding, ICPE, VicSmith, Vouchers
Tomorrow (Monday, Feb. 27) the Indiana House will take a final third reading vote on a budget that puts funding for our school children back in the Great Recession.
The House budget (HB 1001) increases K-12 funding for next year only 1.1%. This is the same low increase for schools passed in the 2009-10 budget and again in 2012-13 during the stress of the Great Recession.
For the second year of the biennium, the House budget proposal increases K-12 funding by 1.7%, well below the latest inflation rate which the Bureau of Labor Statistics says now stands at 2.5%.
Why is the House putting our student support back to the Great Recession? Are we that bad off?
In the last two-year budget in 2015, K-12 funding increased 2.3% both years. Increases for the past 20 years can be seen in Budget Summary Document to give you the full picture. Look at the column labeled "Total Funding."
Only the righteous indignation of parents, educators and community members can get House members to do better for our K-12 students.
Please contact your member of the House or any member of the House before the vote Monday afternoon to tell them that this budget is totally inadequate for our K-12 students. Tell them in the midst of a growing economy, they must do better than 1.1%.
Don't Be Fooled by the Numbers Game
What our K-12 students need is an increase in "Total Funding". As stated above, the current House budget would raise this only 2.8% (1.1% and 1.7%) over the two-year budget, compared to 4.6% (2.3% and 2.3%) in the current two-year budget passed in 2015.
Some members of the House have tried to focus on other measures to distract attention from the meager increases of 1.1% and 1.7%:
One House member used the "target revenue" line to tell constituents that the proposed budget was up 4.7% over the two years. "Target revenue" is not what schools actually get.
Others have focused on the "Foundation" amount that all schools get, which is scheduled to go up by 5.4% over two years. This figure ignores the "Complexity" amount that helps students of poverty and is being reduced by 15%. "Foundation" plus "Complexity" equals "Regular Funding." "Regular Funding" plus funding for special education, honors and career education equals "Total Funding", which should be everyone's focus.
Eyes glaze over quickly when citing budget numbers, but there is a simple message here for House members: They should do better than a 1.1% increase next year for our K-12 students!
Now is the time to speak up for better funding for our K-12 students. Thanks for your advocacy for public education!
Labels: Funding, ICPE, Indiana General Assembly, VicSmith
It was great to see so many public school advocates at the "Celebration of Public Education" last Monday!
Monday's celebration was a fantastic day in the Statehouse. It lifted the spirits of all who came and it buoyed the resolve of supportive legislators, including Representatives Sue Errington and Sheila Klinker, both members of the House Education Committee who addressed the crowd. The day motivated all present to keep up the fight for strong public schools. As our speakers said many times, this is about democracy! We must keep it going!
The displays were great, the lunches were great, the speakers representing parents, educators and clergy were great, and the audience was great!
The day was a great success! Thanks to all who came and to all who couldn't be present but were there in spirit!
Now let's go to work. All the message cards to legislators were picked up and used on Monday. Keep those messages going! That is what this work is all about.
In the middle of the speakers, MC Joel Hand brought surprising information that had just come from the Senate Chamber. The Senate had rejected Senate Bill 179, the bill removing the power of voters to select the State Superintendent and giving that power to the Governor. The vote was 23-26!
The Senate respected the power of voters of Indiana and turned down a bill which would overturn the 166 year history of electing the State Superintendent. In addition, the bill removes the two year residency requirement now in law, opening the door to an out-of-state appointee with no personal knowledge of Indiana's schools. Unbelievably, the bill also sets no requirements to be a teacher or administrator, opening the door to an appointee with no experience in education. This is just wrong!
Apparently, the Senate agreed, and the bill went down.
Listening to the Voters
Since the vote on SB 179, House Speaker Bosma and Governor Holcomb are having trouble listening to the voters and the Senate on this issue. Governor Holcomb still says he wants to appoint his own "secretary of education", and Speaker Bosma has let it be known he would like to put the language of the House bill which passed on Monday on the same subject (HB 1005) into the budget.
The technique of putting controversial bill language into the budget has long been used as a hammer to get pesky legislators back into line. If it is in the budget, no one in the supermajority would vote against it.
That technique is how the first step was taken in 2009 to give public money to private schools. Tax credits for donors to private school scholarships, a program that cost taxpayers $18 million during this biennium, was passed on the last day in the 2009 special session budget, thus becoming the first domino to fall on Indiana's path to creeping school privatization.
Tell your legislators, however, that changing the election of the State Superintendent is too big an issue to sneak by using the old budget ploy. We are talking about our Constitutional heritage with a 166 year history. If the people are ready to give up voting for their State Superintendent, there should be a clear and convincing vote of their representatives in the General Assembly. That has not happened this year, and Speaker Bosma and Governor Holcomb should restate their case next year.
Contact your legislators on this issue to say that no back room deals or budget tricks should be used on this one. Since it was voted down in the Senate, they should respect the voters and let it go for this session.
The Indianapolis Star (Feb. 21, p. 3A) quoted a Senate rule regarding a defeated bill that says "that exact language or substantially similar language shall be considered decisively defeated and shall not be considered again during the session."
It will be up to the voters and the people to hold the Senators to this rule. Remind your Senator or any Senator that this concept has been decisively defeated for this session.
Listening to the Needs of One Million Plus Students
While these issues percolate, the needs of our K-12 students are being ignored in the budget.
The proposed House budget increases the tuition support budget only 1.1% for next year (2017-2018).
The House has put our school children back in the Great Recession.
In the worst part of the Great Recession when the economy was coming unglued in the long session of 2009, the General Assembly wrote a budget that gave public schools a 1.1% increase for 2009-2010. They repeated a 1.0% increase in the budget for 2012-13.
Ask your member of the House: Are we really back to the Great Recession for our school children?
Funding for K-12 tuition support is being given no priority and no urgency by the leaders of the House. They are willing to even raise taxes for roads but expectations for K-12 funding are being backpedaled and nearly ignored.
Only direct and pointed messages from parents, educators and public school advocates can change their budget priorities. Talk to House members and to Senate members about the needs of K-12 students. In the 2015 budget, K-12 funding increased by 2.3% and 2.3% in the two year budget. Here in 2017, as quietly as possible, the House leaders want increases for K-12 students to be 1.1% and 1.7% in the two year budget.
Compare these numbers to the latest inflation rate released Feb. 15th by the Bureau of Labor Statistics: 2.5% annual increase (from Jan. 2016 to Jan. 2017). Shouldn't resources for our K-12 students at least keep up with inflation?
If no one speaks out about this, low funding for our K-12 students will prevail and programs will be cut. You know how it works: Superintendents and local school boards have to cut staff and programs, usually arts programs first, and then they get blamed. They should not be blamed for low funding. Now is the time to act to get legislators to raise these unreasonably low K-12 tuition support increases.
Today (Feb. 23rd) the House reviewed amendments to the budget on second reading, rejecting one amendment to restore $5 million per year for teacher professional development, a fund once set at $15 million annually when the 1999 school accountability law passed but zeroed out during the Tony Bennett years.
The budget bill is now ready for the final vote in the House on Monday, Feb. 27th. This weekend is the time to speak up! Tell them they can do better than 1.1% for our students!
Labels: Bosma, Funding, Holcomb, ICPE, Indiana General Assembly, Public Education, VicSmith
Defending Democracy
Cathy Fuentes-Rohwer is the chair of the Indiana Coalition for Public Education–Monroe County. If you live in South Central Indiana you can join ICPE–Monroe County HERE. Elsewhere in Indiana join the Indiana Coalition for Public Education.
Below is the text to the speech she gave at the Celebration and Rally for Public Education at the Indiana Statehouse on Monday, February 20, 2017
"We are here once again to celebrate and rally to protect public education.
We've been here before.
Four years ago, we rallied to stop the spread of vouchers. Back then, in 2013, in the name of "school choice," 37 million of our public tax dollars were siphoned away from public education to private, mostly religious schools. Today that number is near $134 MILLION.
Two years ago, we were here protesting the move by Gov. Pence and the state legislature to strip our then-superintendent, Glenda Ritz, of the role and responsibilities we elected her to perform. Today, there is a bill here in the statehouse that would now make that moot. The superintendent of public instruction will now be an appointed position instead of allowing the voters to decide. This is democracy in Indiana.
Now, in 2017, we are living in a Brave New World. Governor Pence is now vice-president Pence. And we have at the head of our nation's education department a billionaire lobbyist, Betsy DeVos, who has no public school experience, no education background, and who has made it her life's mission to destroy our system of public education. She has been quoted as saying that we must open up the "education industry because it is currently a "dead end, a monopoly." She said, "government truly sucks." Now she IS the government that she despises. A Brave New World, indeed.
We're familiar with this rhetoric here in Indiana where DeVos' friends in our legislature, as well as those donating to their campaign coffers, have said similar things. This is the narrative of corporate education reformers who disdainfully call our public schools "government" schools and who have been passing ALEC legislation for the past several years in order to dismantle it.
When we object, they accuse us of "defending the status quo" and argue that our schools are "failing." They pass laws to void our votes while saying they want POLITICS out of education. SO: How do we fight back?
First, we must turn these words around and take back the narrative! We need to celebrate our successes in public schools, but we also must point out that the purpose of education is not to produce workers in the interest of the corporate world. My children are not widgets in a factory. I send my children to public schools to learn to become citizens for a democracy. They learn to respect people who think differently from them, who come from different backgrounds, and they find common ground. They find friendship. It's not about a parents "right" to "choose." We don't ask for choices—we ask for healthy, vibrant public schools. No child is more deserving than another. The focus on personal choice distracts us from our collective, social responsibility for educating ALL of our country's children. It also covers up the fact that "school choice" is actually about schools choosing the students—and creating separate (but equal?) systems of education that are not accountable, increasing the disparity in education outcomes and dividing our communities. This goes against our democratic ideals.
Second, we must organize and act. The outcry and controversy around the confirmation of DeVos should give us hope. Our country supports public education!
SO: Write letters to the editor, call your elected officials, form your own chapter of ICPE! We have some amazing parents from the Washington Township Parent Council in our midst and I'd like to give them a shout out for REPRESENTING all parents at education committee hearings and testifying. Thank you for standing up for public education. They are a great example of what engagement looks like. We should all do the same in our own communities.
Third, we must engage politically. There is NO WAY to take politics out of education. Many people are reluctant to get "political." Politics is not about Republican or Democrat. Politics is about your relationship to power. We are in the middle of one of the greatest power struggles for control of our public community schools that we have ever seen. I think they WANT you to feel disenfranchised and hopeless about politics. Why else do they talk about government with such disgust when they are sitting in government seats? When we stand up for our schools, our teachers, and our kids—they accuse us of being political. Okay… LET'S OWN IT. YES. We ARE political. Because in a democracy, power is found in the collective and in our votes. We may not have enough money to buy ourselves a cabinet seat, but we have local positions for which we can run. I am here speaking to you as a mother, and as the chairperson of the Monroe County ICPE, and, although I am not speaking in my official capacity as one, I am also a new school board member. Do you want to help ensure that we fulfill the promise of public education and equity? Run for school board or help get someone elected. If we improve public schools for our kids, we are improving them for ALL kids. None of us can pretend to be neutral politically. As Desmond Tutu has said: "If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor."
Finally: we must remember: We are not defending the status quo. We are defending democracy.
Labels: CathyFuentesRohwer, ICPE-MCSCI, Public Education
Nevertheless, We Persist!
Presented by Phyllis Bush, Monday, February 20, 2017 at the Indiana State House.
2017 Celebration Of Public Education
Good afternoon, friends of public education!
Like so many of you, I am the product of and a passionate supporter of public schools. I am a retired teacher and an advocate for kids, for teachers, and for my community. I am a member of the Network for Public Education and of the Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education, (the lime green renegades). According to my grandsons, I am a Legendary Slam Gram. While where we are now might not be called legendary, this is most definitely a critical point in time. We are at a moment of historic consequence, not only for my grandsons, but also for the future of all of our children.
For the past six years, every legislative session seems to have brought daily threats to public education. Along with so many of you here today, I have been doing all that I can to slow the education reform juggernaut. We have run into brick walls, condescending pats on the head, lectures on Ayn Rand and school choice, and much like a certain senator who was warned, Nevertheless, we have persisted!
Here are some of the facts that we need to keep in mind as we celebrate and defend public education.
1. Nearly 90% of all Indiana children (1,010,811) attend public schools.
2. The 3 largest school districts in Indiana are Fort Wayne Community Schools, Indianapolis Public Schools, and (ding, ding, ding) Indianapolis Charter Schools.
3. The number of Indiana students using vouchers has jumped from 4,000 students in 2011-12 to 32,686 students last school year. Since the voucher program began, over $330 million dollars have been sucked out of our general education funds.
How's that for fiscal responsibility?
We have been sold a bill of goods both by politicians and reformers which says that standardized testing is a way to measure student achievement. Rather than spending nearly $130 million on instructionally inappropriate testing, we could more than likely get the same results simply by looking at zip codes.
What seems to have been forgotten in all of this desire to "fix education" is that education is the most important investment we can make in our society. We have to educate all of our children, not just the privileged.
We must educate our legislators to understand that children are more than test scores and that learning is more than obedience.
Even though many of you may be shocked to hear this, Betsy DeVos is the gift that keeps on giving. Because she is so supremely unqualified and manifestly entitled and because her obvious intent is to complete the job of privatization that a certain Indiana florist and his friends from ALEC have begun, she has managed to energize us into realizing that public schools in our communities are at risk.
Rather than arming our teachers to ward off grizzlies, she has awakened a bunch of Mama Grizzlies and Grandma Grizzlies and has put us in a state of major pissment because the threat she is posing is messing with our little ones.
So, my fellow Grizzlies, what do we need to do? Much, of course, depends on your comfort level, but here are some suggestions :
1. Inform and engage our families, our friends, our neighbors, and anyone who will listen.
2. Write letters to the editor. Contact our legislators and make appointments to talk with them and to engage them in conversations. We need to show them and our community leaders that supporting public education is in their best interest.
3. Go to town hall meetings in your district, not with pitchforks and a list of demands, but rather with one or two concrete requests. We need to show how these bills are hurting our families.
4. Talk with business people and community leaders to let them know that being college and career ready is not the only thing that we want for our children. We want critical thinking, caring, discerning human beings who will contribute to our communities and to our future. This kind of learning and knowledge, rather than dubious test scores, is the key to a good and just society where we are aware of the value of all citizens, not just the privileged few.
5. Join groups like Indiana Coalition for Public Education and the Network for Public Education to keep in the loop about what is happening and about action steps that are needed.
This election has provided a wake up call for all of us.
We are witnessing the dismantling and privatization of public education.
We are witnessing the dismantling of democracy.
Will you stand by and watch this runaway train, or will you speak out and do something?
As the saying goes,
"If not us, then who? If not now, then when?"
Labels: Phyllis Bush, Public Education
This morning in a late amendment to House Bill 1384, the House Education Committee voted on an 8-4 party line vote to ease penalties on voucher schools that have a "D" or an "F" for two consecutive years.
Currently voucher schools with a "D" or "F" for two years in a row can't receive new voucher students although they can continue to take vouchers for current students.
House Bill 1384, a graduation bill, now has been amended to allow voucher schools to request that the State Board of Education "waive or delay" the penalties "if the eligible school demonstrates that a majority of students in the eligible school demonstrates academic improvement during the preceding year."
The bill does not define the meaning of "academic improvement" in this sentence.
Thus on this Presidents' Day when many are in the Statehouse to celebrate public education, the House Education Committee wants to give voucher schools another boost by easing the accountability rules.
If you are going to the Statehouse today and can talk with legislators, please ask them why consequences for public schools and charter schools can't be "waived or delayed" if the "school demonstrates academic improvement during the preceding year"?
If the General Assembly is ready to ease the standards of school accountability, why don't they allow waivers or delays for all schools, not just voucher schools? They should not show a bias toward voucher schools.
Thanks for your advocacy for public education! Perhaps you are already in the Statehouse for today's "Celebration of Public Education"!
Labels: ICPE, Legislature, VicSmith, Vouchers
Five updates on public education in the Statehouse:
UPDATE #1: Join us in the Statehouse this Monday on Presidents' Day (Feb. 20th) for "A Celebration of Public Education"! We need your voice and the voices of your family and friends on issues updated below!
Lunch (if pre-registered) at 12:30. Choirs at 1:30. Speakers at 2:00 in the North Atrium.
The League of Women Voters has joined the list of sponsoring organizations:
AFT Indiana
Concerned Clergy
Indiana Parent Teacher Association
Indiana Small & Rural Schools Association
Indiana State Teachers Association (lunch & display sponsor)
Indiana Urban Schools Association
Speakers at 2:00 pm in the North Atrium are being coordinated by the Indiana Coalition for Public Education, and Joel Hand will serve as MC.
Displays on the 3rd and 4th floor will highlight a sampling of great things happening in public schools.
Bring new and gently used classroom supplies for ISTA ReSupply and book donations to celebrate Read Across America.
I hope to see you as we celebrate public education!
UPDATE #2: Senator Kruse announced Wednesday before the hearing that SB 534 (Education Savings Accounts for Special Education) would not advance. It is dead for this session. Senator Kruse deserves your thanks for stopping this bill!
He went ahead with the hearing on the bill after announcing its fate. An expert from the Foundation for Excellence in Education in Florida, funded by Jeb Bush and the Gates Foundation, extolled the virtues of Education Savings Accounts, which as I have written would undermine the entire concept of public education. No doubt we will fight this fight again in the future.
UPDATE #3: The Senate bill to expand pre-kindergarten programs (SB 276) passed the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday with no link to a lifetime K-12 voucher such as that passed in House Bill 1004. SB 276 now goes to the Appropriations Committee. In its present form, it deserves the full support of public school advocates!
UPDATE #4: Both bills to make the State Superintendent of Public Instruction into a secretary of education appointed by the Governor are ready for a final vote on as early as Monday. If you oppose taking power from the voters to select our State Superintendent, this is your last weekend to appeal to your Senator or House member to oppose Senate Bill 179 and House Bill 1005. Both bills require no experience in Indiana and, unbelievably, no experience in education! Since they are identical, they could be signed into law very soon.
UPDATE #5: It appears that the Indiana House is sending a message to our K-12 students that they can't give them adequate support this year because our roads are bad!
The House budget released Wednesday gives even less for tuition support than did the Governor's meager budget released in January.
The Governor asked for $70 million the first year (1.0% increase) and $210 in the second year (2.0% increase above the first year) or a total of $280 million new dollars.
The new House budget invests $77 million in the first year (1.1% increase) and $196 million in the second year (1.7% increase above the first year) or a total of $273 million new dollars.
In 2015, the final budget invested $157 million in the first year (2.3% increase) and $317 million in the second year (2.3% increase above the first year) or a total of $474 million new dollars.
Is Indiana so poor this year that the support for public education must slip this much compared to 2015? The latest Consumer Price Index from the federal government showed the annual inflation rate in January 2017 to be 2.5%. Our school programs can't even keep up with inflation next year when the increase is only 1.1%.
Legislators have not made increased funding for public schools a priority this year. The supermajority is trying to set an expectation that this is all that schools will get, but this is totally inadequate. They need to hear more from public school advocates!
In addition, the House budget would raise the amount for tax credits for private school scholarships from $9.5 million to $12.5 million each year. For the two-year budget, that means an increase of $6 million for private school tuition scholarships. This is the first point that public school advocates should press legislators on, so that at least $6 million could be shifted to shore up the clearly inadequate K-12 funding. If you talk with your legislator in the Statehouse when you come on Monday, this is an important point to make to stop the expansion of taxpayer money going to private schools!
Thanks for your advocacy for public education! I hope you can get to the "Celebration of Public Education" in the Statehouse on Monday!
Labels: AFT, ESA, Funding, ICPE, Indiana General Assembly, ISTA, Kruse, NEIFPE, PreSchool, SPI, VicSmith, Vouchers
Yet another attack on public education is coming at you.
This is in addition to (1) ending the power of voters to select the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and (2) using the pre-K program as a cover to vastly expand K-12 vouchers.
This new bill would start the process to end public education itself.
The Senate Education Committee will hold a hearing Wednesday afternoon (Feb. 15th) on SB 534 which puts in place Milton Friedman's blueprint to end public education by giving public money directly to parents on a debit card.
This bill was first filed last year using the deceiving name "Educational Savings Accounts." This year SB 534 is using the name "Special Education Scholarship Accounts". It would fund a huge expansion of private school vouchers Indiana for special education and Section 504 students. It would advance the privatization of our educational system in line with the plans of voucher-inventor Milton Friedman, who supported the abolishment of public education.
It is a direct attack on public education. It pushes forward a radical new private school voucher plan. It would be the biggest voucher expansion since Governor Pence's voucher expansion was enacted in 2013. In the fiscal note on SB 534, the non-partisan Legislative Services Agency has concluded that "the estimated increase in expenditures based on the current formula will be between $144 million and $206 million annually."
This bill and this concept should be denounced by all public school advocates to any and all legislators, most immediately to the members of the Senate Education Committee before their meeting on Wednesday at 1:30pm in the Senate Chamber.
If you are offended enough by this bill to come speak against the bill yourself, please do so!
The members of the Senate Education Committee to contact are:
Republican Senators Kruse, Raatz, Bassler, Crane, Freeman, Kenley, Leising and Zay
Democratic Senators Melton, Mrvan and Stoops
SB 534 is a Voucher Experiment for Special Education Students
SB 534 is a radical experiment to give public money directly to parents as Milton Friedman wanted.
Using the same concept, HB 1591 has been filed in the House as an experiment for all students and all parents, carrying a fiscal price tag of $344 million to $366 million according to LSA.
These new experiments with our school children would undermine funding and support for the public schools of Indiana, which after five years of school choice have still been chosen by 92.5% of all students and need the support of legislators, not another attack.
Similar damaging bills have been passed in some form in Arizona, Florida, Nevada, Mississippi and Tennessee, all states that perform below Indiana on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the respected national measure known as "the nation's report card."
Senate Bill 534 and House Bill 1591 are right out of Milton Friedman's plan to take public schools out of our society and leave education to a marketplace of private schools, all funded by the taxpayers but without government oversight.
Both bills give money directly to parents in the amount that the average child gets in their school district. Parents can then pay for private schools or "approved educational services providers" including tutors or other private vendors.
The program is to be run by the Indiana Treasurer, not the Indiana Department of Education. SB 534 even provides for the Treasurer to outsource the program to be run by a bank. Unbelievably, this means they want to privatize management of the privatized voucher program!
It's simply unacceptable and demoralizing to our hard-working public school teachers and administrators.
Not all Republicans in Indiana agree with the Republican leaders bringing these radical bills forward to further privatize our schools. These bills should not advance. Only grassroots citizens talking to their legislators can stop these bills and the death spiral for public education. It is time to speak up! The loss of funding and instability this would bring to public schools would obviously disrupt their ability to provide long-term quality programs for over one million Hoosier students.
Senate Bill 534 – Special Education Scholarship Account Program
SB 534 is sponsored by Senator Raatz, a first term Senator who formerly served as the principal of a Christian school. Students can already get vouchers to go to Christian schools. This bill would hurt enrollment at public schools and voucher schools alike by allowing the entire amount of public money for a special education student or a Section 504 student to be spent for "an approved educational services provider" which includes "a nonpublic school and a private tutor" with no standards stated for receiving IDOE approval and weak standards for provider fraud.
The bill specifies that approved providers will not be regulated. Thus, the bill wants to give out government money to private providers with absolutely no government control.
The bill would also:
reduce accountability. Approximately $6000 in public money will be given to parents of special education and Section 504 students with no requirement for annual testing or evaluation or accountability for student progress.
expand taxpayer-funded vouchers to high income families. SB 534 removes all income limits. Remember how Indiana's voucher law was pitched and passed in 2011 as a program to help low income families? That rationale has disappeared. Currently, families of disabled students with incomes up to $89,900 are eligible for vouchers. This expansion contributes to the projected fiscal cost of $144 million to $206 million.
narrow and weaken the curriculum. Education is reduced to "reading, grammar, mathematics, social studies and science" for special education students. It is unacceptable to allow students to be educated under this program with no art, no music, no health, and no physical education. This reduction of the educational curriculum is hard to fathom.
pay textbook and computer fees for private schools while public school parents get no help with textbooks. SB 534 makes textbooks for private schools or private programs a taxpayer expense.
allow parents to divert money intended for K-12 education to their 529 college fund. This is an incentive for parents who can afford to pay for their current private school to enroll in the program, take the money intended for K-12 education and put it in a 529 college account instead.
allow the money to go to parents without strong fraud protection. No penalties are listed when parents commit fraud with their child's money. After audits of a random sample of accounts, authorities are only given power to suspend or close an account. The bill says nothing about repaying taxpayer money that has been misspent or about fraud. This bill is a recipe for fraud and would require an expensive Educational Bureau of Investigations to root out problems.
allow parents to sign up for the money without criminal background checks. Teachers are under increased scrutiny for criminal background checks. If parents have a criminal record or a record of abuse or neglect, they should not be given $6000 on a debit card to educate their child. SB 534 does not address this crucial issue.
Troubling Questions
The fact that SB 534 is being given consideration by Republican leaders in the General Assembly raises troubling questions which you should ask your legislators:
1) Does this mean that those advancing SB 534 no longer support public education?
2) Does this new way of giving out vouchers mean they have given up on the current voucher program?
3) With Indiana schools in a crisis over ISTEP testing and assessment, do we really need to stop everything and take time for a battle over more vouchers with less accountability?
Let them know that plunging Indiana into another all-out battle over privatizing our public schools would be damaging to all schools, including the private voucher schools that could well lose students to "providers" in the radical remake of our system envisioned by SB 534 and HB 1591.
SB 534 and HB 1591 should disappear from consideration while all efforts are focused on solving the complexities of Indiana's assessment problems and the teacher shortage.
Milton Friedman, the inventor of private school vouchers, in a speech to state lawmakers at the American Legislative Exchange Council in 2006 answered his own question of "How do we get from where we are to where we want to be?" by saying "the ideal way would be to abolish the public school system and eliminate all the taxes that pay for it." SB 534 would help his plan to abolish public schools.
I urge you to contact Senators listed above on the Senate Education Committee by Wednesday afternoon (Feb. 15th) to tell them you strongly oppose Senate Bill 534.
Thanks for speaking up about this radical bill, and thanks for your advocacy for public education!
Labels: ICPE, Kruse, Legislature, PreSchool, Public Education, VicSmith, Vouchers
If you are a voter, read this one right away.
The power of voters in Indiana is about to be reduced. Our democracy faces another hit.
As a voter, you can speak out to retain your power (1) as the Senate votes Monday on Senate Bill 179 and (2) at a Tuesday hearing on House Bill 1005. Both bills would remove from voters the power to elect the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Governor Holcomb wants the General Assembly to take away the power voters now have to elect the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and let him appoint a "secretary of education".
I disagree. Voters have had that power for 166 years since 1851, and voters should retain their current power to shape education policy in Indiana through electing this independent office.
Governor Holcomb wants the General Assembly to remove the residency requirement that the Indiana State Superintendent of Public Instruction be an Indiana resident for at least two years, opening the door to out-of-staters with no background in the history or development of Indiana's schools.
I disagree. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction should be a leader who knows Indiana schools from personal experience.
Governor Holcomb wants the General Assembly to open up the position of State Superintendent of Public Instruction to anyone who will serve "at the pleasure of and at a salary determined by the governor". No qualifications are stated in HB 1005. Teaching experience or teaching licenses are not mentioned.
I disagree. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction should be a skilled and respected educator with experience in Indiana's public schools. Voters have seen to that for 166 years, but making the office an executive appointment could give us a Betsy DeVos-like candidate with no teaching experience. That should not happen. I say we should leave it to the voters!
If you disagree with Governor Holcomb and want to retain your power as a voter, prompt action is needed:
1) The Senate has scheduled SB 179 for Monday Feb. 13th (tomorrow) for a vote on Senator Kenley's amendment to first allow an advisory statewide referendum of all voters on this question before an historic change of this magnitude is approved. Contact any and all Senators before Monday at 1:30pm to say you support the referendum amendment and you oppose the bill taking power away from the voters.
2) Testimony for and against House Bill 1005 which would fulfill Governor Holcomb's wish to appoint the State Superintendent will be heard in the House Education Committee this Tuesday, February 14, 2017 in the House Chamber. The meeting begins at 8:30am.
If you oppose removing this part of our heritage from the control of voters, you have a chance to show up Tuesday to speak against the bill.
If you can't get to the Statehouse Tuesday, I urge you to contact members of the House Education Committee about your opposition to HB 1005 before the Tuesday meeting.
The members of the House Education Committee are:
Republican Representatives Behning, Cook, Burton, Clere, DeVon, Jordan, Lucas, Thompson and Wesco
Democratic Representatives V. Smith, DeLaney, Errington and Klinker.
The 1851 Constitution Made the State Superintendent an Independent Office Elected by the Voters
Since 1851, voters have controlled who serves as the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The 1851 Constitution set the term of office as two years, and included the State Superintendent as a state official to be elected. A constitutional amendment in 1970 took the office out of the Constitution and gave the power to the General Assembly to decide how the State Superintendent would be chosen. The General Assembly at that time passed a law setting a four year term which first took effect with Harold Negley's election in 1972.
Now in 2017, Governor Holcomb and Speaker Bosma, the sponsor of HB 1005, want to cut the voters out of the selection process.
If You Speak Against the Bill, You Will Not Be Alone
When this same concept was brought to the Senate Elections Committee on February 6, Senate Bill 179 passed 6-3, but it had the opposition of both Democratic Senator Tim Lanane, Senate Minority Leader and Republican Senator Dennis Kruse, chair of the Senate Education Committee. In fact, the bill was routed through the Senate Elections Committee rather than the Senate Education Committee because of the opposition of Senator Kruse.
Senator Kruse was quoted in the Indianapolis Star (Feb. 7, page 1A): "I am a strong believer in the election of the superintendent. I have been my whole life and will continue to be. I think it's better to have the position elected than appointed. I think it gives another voice to the people."
For the people, however, to keep this voice, they are going to have to speak up promptly!
Voters Will Have to Speak Up for the Power of Voters
The power of voters is under attack here, and individual voters will need to speak out directly if they are going to turn this agenda around. We have seen it time and time again in this election cycle. People have turned out to express their positions. Will they turn out to retain the power of voters in choosing Indiana's State Superintendent?
First, contact your Senator or all Senators to support the referendum amendment to SB 179 when it comes up on second reading on Monday.
Second, if you have strong feelings about taking this power away from voters, come and testify on Tuesday in the House Chamber. You can state your opposition in four sentences, but your presence would make a difference. Nothing about the process is convenient, but that is way it is. The meeting begins at 8:30 am. To testify on House Bill 1005, you need to sign in before 8:30 after going through security at the east or west doors and then wait to be called in the meeting, which can often be a long time.
It depends on how offended you feel as a voter that after 166 years you will no longer have a say in the selection of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Is anyone concerned about this diminishing power of voters in our democracy?
Of course, the Governor would like more power. Is anyone concerned that there will be no checks and balances on the Governor's policies on education from an independently elected State Superintendent?
The ongoing historic debate of the past forty years has been over privatization and whether public money should be given to private schools. These bills to give the governor more power in this fundamental debate won't take politics out of education as some have said but will only focus the historic privatization question on the governor's race, which is also influenced by a myriad of other issues. Education will get lost in the shuffle of election issues.
Is anyone concerned that the name will change under HB 1005 from "State Superintendent of Public Instruction" to "Secretary of Education"? This is clearly a major step in the ongoing effort to unravel the long and proud heritage of public education in Indiana.
Here is your chance to stand up for your own power as a voter in our diminishing democracy! Contact Senators about SB 179 on Monday. Contact House members or come to the Statehouse on Tuesday regarding HB 1005 to speak up to retain the power that voters have had since 1851 to choose the State Superintendent.
Thanks for your dedicated support of public education!
Labels: Behning, Election, Holcomb, ICPE, Legislature, VicSmith
Here is your chance to stand up for public education! Come to the Statehouse on Presidents' Day to support public education!
On February 20th, you along with your friends, family and colleagues are invited to a "Celebration of Public Education".
Lunch is available at 12:30 (register by Feb. 15). Student choirs begin at 1:30. Speakers begin at 2:00 in the North Atrium.
These are difficult times for public education, an institution that has undergirded our democracy for 180 years:
On Tuesday US Senators voted to confirm a private school voucher advocate with no professional experience in public schools as US Secretary of Education.
Governor Holcomb has recommended a meager 1% budget increase in general fund tuition support during a time when inflation is now running at 1.7%. Public school programs would have to be cut just to keep up with inflation. His recommended increase in the second year of the biennium is only 2% but his budget would keep a surplus of $2 billion.
Bills filed in both the House and the Senate seek to end the concept of public education and common schools written into Indiana's 1851 Constitution and give public money directly to parents without accountability or oversight, using the deceiving name "Education Savings Accounts."
House Bill 1004 would use the high-profile and popular pre-kindergarten expansion bill as a tool to expand private school vouchers, giving a lifetime K-12 voucher to students who have received a pre-K grant "at any time."
Public education has been under attack for a long time. For an even longer time, public education has been a tremendous cornerstone to the progress in Indiana that we celebrated in last year's bicentennial.
It's time to celebrate and support public education!
Public officials in the Statehouse need to put a higher priority on PUBLIC education. Only constituents and voters can get them to do that. That's where we need your presence in the Statehouse. I hope to see you there!
Partners and Details
Many groups are in the coalition partnering to support the "Celebration of Public Education" on Presidents' Day. Others may be added. In alphabetical order, they are:
Indiana State Teachers Association
Displays highlighting a sampling of great things happening in public schools are invited. If you want to reserve a display table for your group or school, go to: ista-in.org/celebration
Lunch will be available on the 4th floor courtesy of the ISTA. A lunch count is requested by February 15th by emailing: dcrum@ista-in.org
Labels: ICPE, ISTA, NEIFPE, Public Education, VicSmith
Today, Tomorrow, and Every Day
by NEIFPE co-founder Donna Roof
Today, I am heartsick and outraged...I saw 50 Senators and our Vice-President vote for a person who is highly unqualified to be our country's Secretary of Public Education.
Today, I am heartsick and outraged...I witnessed how politicians have loyalty to their corporate donors rather than the common good.
Today, I am heartsick and outraged...I hear yet again the myth of failing public schools.
Today, I am heartsick and outraged...I fear what will happen to the neighborhood public schools who welcome all children.
Today, I am heartsick and outraged...I find offensive the assault on the teaching profession.
But yet...
Today, I am hopeful...I saw 50 Senators who pushed back in committee and testified for 24 hours for public education.
Today, I am hopeful...I stand in solidarity with public education supporters--teachers, parents, students, concerned citizens--who voiced their outrage via emails, tweets, phone calls, and rallies.
Today, I am hopeful...I now observe even more people uniting to save their public schools.
Today, I am hopeful...I believe in the teaching profession which has all children as its main focus.
Today, I am hopeful...I trust in Margaret Mead's wisdom: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Today, tomorrow, and every day...I will join with advocates across the country to save public education.
Today, tomorrow, and every day...I promise to Speak Up! and Speak Out! and be but one, yet mighty, voice for public education.
Today, tomorrow, and every day...I will encourage those who support public education to keep fighting the good fight and never lose sight of its goodness.
Today, tomorrow, and every day...I will continue to value public education as the great foundation of our country, for without it, all else is for naught.
Today, tomorrow, and every day...I will fight against the injustice being brought against public education as I heed the words of Martin Luther King, Jr.: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
❈❈❈
Labels: Donna Roof, Politics, Public Education
Vic's Statehouse Notes #273 – February 6, 2017
In its meeting last Tuesday (Jan. 31), the House Education Committee passed the biggest K-12 voucher expansion since the 2013 session.
This voucher expansion is in a high profile bill to expand pre-kindergarten, House Bill 1004.
Senate Bill 276 also expands pre-kindergarten but without expanding vouchers. SB 276 deserves your active support while HB 1004 deserves your active opposition.
I urge all public school advocates to contact members of the Senate Education Committee before they vote on Wednesday February 8th (1:30pm) to support Senate Bill 276 as it stands with no link to K-12 vouchers.
The members of the Senate Education Committee are:
Lifetime Vouchers for Pre-K ($6 M to $10.5 M): Approaching Half the Annual Funding for Pre-K Itself
House Bill 1004 gives a lifetime K-12 voucher to any student that gets a pre-kindergarten grant. The bill sets the income cap for this voucher expansion at a high level: $89,900 for a family of four. This is 200% of the reduced lunch income level and higher than most pathways to vouchers which are capped at 150% of the reduce lunch level.
The bill also doubles the number of families that can apply for a pre-K grant and thereby qualify for a lifetime voucher by raising the pre-K income cap from $31,000 to $67,000 (for a family of four).
This expensive voucher guarantee would eventually lead to voucher eligibility for all students.
Universal vouchers have long been the Holy Grail for voucher advocates like Representative Behning. Obviously if they can hitch vouchers to pre-K, they can ride the pre-K escalator up as it eventually expands to reach the goal of universal vouchers.
The expense of the voucher provision hurts the funding available for pre-K students. The non-partisan Legislative Services Agency estimated that giving vouchers to all pre-K students could cost the state between $6 and $10.5 million annually. The pre-K plan itself will cost the state $20 million annually. Clearly the money to be spent on vouchers would be better spent on raising the funding to help more pre-K students.
Senate Bill 276 expands the pre-K program without the expensive baggage of expanding the K-12 voucher program. Let Senators know that you support their approach and oppose using the pre-K bill as a cover to further expand K-12 vouchers.
It Could Have Been Worse
The original language of HB 1004 as presented by Representative Behning would have changed the income caps for all 50% vouchers to include all families of four up to $89,900, significantly lifting the current cap of $67,000 which has been in place since the fundamental compromise struck in 2011 to pass the historic voucher bill.
Before voting 9-4 to pass HB 1004, the committee approved Amendment 5 offered by Representative Ed DeLaney, who had detected this huge voucher expansion in the original language. Fortunately, Representative DeLaney's amendment was approved, keeping the rest of the voucher program under current rules while the debate about voucher eligibility for pre-K students proceeds. Representative DeLaney should be thanked for his excellent work on this point.
Continuity Is Not Mentioned in the Bill Language
Representative Behning, the bill sponsor, claimed that the reason for giving lifetime voucher eligibility to all students receiving pre-K grants is to allow continuity from private and religious pre-school programs to the private and religious kindergarten programs in the same school. His language in the bill, however, does not say that. It says nothing about continuity. It says a voucher will go to any student who has received a pre-K grant "at any time" if they meet the income guideline ($89,900).
That is far more than a continuity rule. That is a pipeline to universal K-12 vouchers.
The program has been running effectively and with the strong support of parents for the past two years without any link to a lifetime voucher. The current language says: "The receipt of a grant under the pilot program does not qualify, nor have an effect on the qualification or eligibility, of a child for a Choice Scholarship."
Senator Kenley put this language in his 2014 bill that got Pre-K started in Indiana. There is no reason this language should be repealed to plunge the debate into an argument about the privatization of our public schools. We are already well behind other states in providing pre-K to young children. Representative Behning supports the Governor in asking for only a $10 million increase while asking for an attached K-12 voucher program that would cost $6 million to $10 million.
Adding K-12 vouchers to pre-K doesn't make sense in the budget.
Contact Senators on the Education Committee by Wednesday February 8th, 1:30pm
It is time to tell members Senate Education Committee listed above that you support SB 276 in its current language with no link to K-12 voucher expansion!
Let them know that it would be wrong to entwine a highly controversial and expensive expansion of the K-12 private school voucher program with the much needed pre-K program.
Let them know that you oppose the House pre-K bill (HB 1004) which makes expansion of pre-school part of the march to privatize public education in Indiana.
Let them know that you support Senate Bill 276 and that you would strongly oppose any attempt to add amendments to link it to K-12 Choice Scholarships.
Public schools, in spite of their dire financial conditions, would have no choice but to make cuts in other areas to establish preschools to compete in the marketplace that now exists in Indiana. Under policies established by Sections 20 and 21 in HB 1004, public schools would need to be prominent in the pre-K arena in order to get their share of incoming kindergarteners, or their future enrollment would be seriously eroded with all the funding consequences that would bring.
Thank you for your dedicated support of public education!
Labels: Behning, ICPE, Indiana General Assembly, PreSchool, VicSmith, Vouchers
A gift to private schools with no accountability
NEIFPE co-founder Phyllis Bush wrote this op-ed for the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel about privatization.
By Phyllis Bush for The News-Sentinel
Thursday, February 02, 2017 8:01 AM
Every January the education reform takeover artists orchestrate countless "school choice" events, presenting us with quasi-infomercials about their miraculous successes. That said, nothing says well-financed and effective marketing like 21,392 events across all 50 states and photo ops with mayors and elected officials as they issue proclamation after proclamation about the importance of school choice.
Nothing says instructional and fiscal irresponsibility as the school choice promoters who push optics over substance. Nothing says access to legislators like the bright yellow scarves (readily available in "choice" kits), which open doors of access for the scarf-wearers ahead of us non-scarf-wearing citizens who are sent to the end of the legislators' access lines. These "reformers" are dynamic salespeople who never mention that there are negative consequences to school choice.
Accordingly, the school choice rhetoric is so hypnotic that unless a person digs into the details, it is nigh on impossible to cut through all of the jargon to understand what is really meant by "school choice." In fact, some ideas which look good on the surface often morph into some not such great realities.
What, you might ask, are those not-so-pleasant realities? Perhaps an acquaintance with some review of the true cost of charters and vouchers (aka opportunity scholarships/Education Savings Accounts) might be helpful. Here are some of the unadvertised side effects of vouchers and charters:
Vouchers drain state tax dollars from the entire education funding pot. This often causes district budgeting deficits and/or the need for tax increases, referendums and the like. That loss of revenue to public schools increases class sizes and diminishes student resources such as counselors, support personnel, supplemental materials and buses.
From the vantage point of a traditional public school supporter, vouchers are a gift of taxpayer funds given to private schools without any accountability. Additionally, the expansion of choice is creating two separate school systems. In this parallel system, one pathway will be for those who can afford quality choices. The other pathway will be to an underfunded, separate-but-unequal road, marked by poverty and by zip codes. As most people know, public schools are required to accept all students while "choice schools" have the option of choosing the students who fit their agenda. Choice schools are allowed to reject students with behavior issues, students with low scores, students with disabilities, and students who don't speak English.
The probable result of this further expansion of choice schools will be that the children with the most difficulties will be housed in the least well-financed schools. Sadly, many legislators have chosen to be willfully unaware of the consequences of "school choice."
While the reformers and the takeover artists and the hedge fund managers talk and talk and talk about the miraculous results of school choice, research shows that these results are uneven at best. As thoughtful citizens and taxpayers, wouldn't it be prudent if we asked ourselves what is best for our traditional public schools, our communities and our kids?
Perhaps the fundamental question is what does society stand to lose in the name of "school choice?" Whose choice is it, anyway?
Phyllis A. Bush is a resident of Fort Wayne.
✏✏✏
Labels: Charters, Choice, Letters, Phyllis Bush, Vouchers


text:
CBD Vape Blog
Psychedelic-Focused Media, E-Commerce and Event Company Delic Holdings to Begin Trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange Under the Ticker Symbol "DELC"
Ryan Allway
Delic Holdings Inc. (" DELIC " or the " Company "), a psychedelic-focused media, e-commerce and event company, is pleased to announce that effective at market open today, the Company will begin trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the ticker symbol "DELC."
Jackee Stang, CEO of DELIC comments "Canada has consistently shown leadership in helping cannabis and now psychedelics emerge from false stigmas. Canada was the first G7 country to legalize cannabis, and as psychedelics further gain ground on what may appear as false stigmas, the health and wellness sector will only grow. As such, the DELIC community is deeply proud to be a part of the Canadian Securities Exchange. We started DELIC to mainstream the psychedelic conversation, advocate for cognitive freedom and ultimately see an end to the War on Drugs."
Ms. Stang continued, "As the first ever psychedelic wellness corporation, it is our mission to open the doors of psychedelic healing to the masses. We decided to take DELIC public because we believe that psychedelic wellness should be open to everyone… All people from diverse backgrounds and varied life experiences. DELIC is the first ever psychedelic wellness company designed to disrupt the status quo by diversifying our operations, maintaining sensible messaging and intentionally avoiding dogmatic practices or binary rhetoric. We believe in being pragmatic and maintaining a clear-headed approach as the psychedelic sector continues to build."
In conjunction with the previously-announced business combination with Molystar Resources Inc., DELIC raised $3,475,500 through a non-brokered private placement offering.
On November 17, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,450,000 options to directors, officers and certain advisors pursuant to the Company's share compensation plan — each with an exercise price of $0.25, vesting as to 1/3 of such options on each of the 6, 12 and 18-month anniversaries, and expiring in three years.
About DELIC
DELIC was formed in 2019 to address the growing interest in psychedelic science. DELIC was the first psychedelic umbrella media platform and is currently a trusted source for those interested in psychedelic science. DELIC's offerings include "The Delic", an e-commerce lifestyle brand, "Reality Sandwich", a free public education platform providing psychedelic guides, news and culture and "Meet Delic", a proposed biannual psychedelic wellness summit. For more information, check out www.deliccorp.com.
This article was published by CFN Enterprises Inc. (OTCQB: CNFN), owner and operator of CFN Media, the industry's leading agency and digital financial media network dedicated to the burgeoning CBD and legal cannabis industries. Call +1 (833) 420-CNFN for more information.
About Ryan Allway
Mr. Allway has over a decade of experience in the financial markets as both a private investor and financial journalist. He has been actively involved in the cannabis industry since its inception, covering public and private companies.
Taste Test: Nathaniel Paul waxes existential with 'songbird'
Megan Rapinoe named Sports Illustrated's 2019 Sportsperson of the Year for being 'a force of …
Top Cannabis Trends in 2019 [and some 2020 projections]
FDA CBD Regulations: What to Know [2019]
By: Cannabis Oil Pure CBD – five Established Overall health Advantages of Cannabidiol CBD Oil
Copyright © 2021 by cbdvapeblog.com. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


For words to go with the pictures, please visit my Caring Bridge site.
You are and always have been stunning!! Am keeping you in my prayers.
Sweet thoughts to you lovely lady. Know that your heartfelt posts have prompted me to get my own checkup. Mammogram Thursday! My best hopes coming your way.
Hey girl – hard to see you in that seat…we are praying for you! When I saw that pic, this is the first song that popped in my head…Beauty for Ashes by Crystal Lewis. Praying he gives you gladness and peace in the midst of it all today.
You are so very brave! I love that you still have a smile on your face 🙂 Still praying for you!
You look beautiful. You're amazing, girl!
Just commented on your Anti-Procrastination post, but I wanted to let you know that even though you have no idea who I am, I'm here for you if you need any help with the link party or your blog.
Amy just sending hugs & prayers your way! I know you don't know me but know that I'll be sending positive thoughts your way!
I have been very behind in my blog reading so I am just now reading about your diagnosis. Wow, thanks so much for sharing your story with us. I will be praying for you, your doctors, your girls and the rest of your family.
Thank you for your offer, Kristi.
Jenni-you made me laugh out loud and hurt my port. Hee. Hee.
Amy-thank you, love the cheer and have loved your sweet comments.
Laurie-I know you better than you may think, you have a wonderful blog. Prayers from people like you are what is keeping me going, they mean more than I can express..
Amy, I am praying for you. I know that you don't know me, and it might not mean much, but please know that prayers are being said for your healing!
Girl, you are beautiful even while doing your chemo. GO GIRL GO!! WORK CHEMO WORK!!
Um…I'm not sure you're allowed to be that cute while getting chemo.


Number Of Protons Of Lithium has become the image we ascertained on the internet from reliable creativeness. We constitute one mind to discourse this Number Of Protons Of Lithium picture on this webpage because predicated on conception via Yahoo Image, Its one of the top reted inquiries keyword on Google INTERNET SEARCH ENGINE. And that people also consider you came up here were looking for this information, aren t You? From many options online were sure this pictures is actually a good image for you, and we sincerely hopefully you are pleased with using what we present.


text:
Shirley (Sam) Ann Armour
November 3, 1931 - December 19, 2014
ARMOUR, Shirley (Sam) Ann
It is with heavy hearts we announce the passing of Shirley (Sam) Armour on December 19, 2014 at the age of 83 years.
She leaves to cherish her memory two nieces: Susan MacDonald and Kelly Moscrip; one nephew Walter (Jen) Moscrip; two step daughters: Leigh Ritchie and Rae Armour and one sister-in-law Edna.
Shirley was predeceased by her parents Walter and Ebba Moscrip, her much loved husband Art Armour and one brother Melvin Moscrip.
Cremation has taken place.
A celebration of Shirley's (Sam's) life will be held on January 3, 2015 at 2:30 pm at Millwoods Presbyterian Church, 6607-31 Avenue, Edmonton, AB. Interment will follow at Edmonton Cemetery at a later date.
The family wishes to express their sincere gratitude to all her friends, Doctors, nurses and homecare for their support shown over the last 3 years.
© 2021 Serenity Family Service Society Shirley (Sam) Ann Armour


text:
#ifndef	_H_JFS_LOGMGR
#define _H_JFS_LOGMGR

#include "jfs_filsys.h"
#include "jfs_lock.h"

/*
 *	log manager configuration parameters
 */

/* log page size */
#define	LOGPSIZE	4096
#define	L2LOGPSIZE	12

#define LOGPAGES	16	/* Log pages per mounted file system */

/*
 *	log logical volume
 *
 * a log is used to make the commit operation on journalled
 * files within the same logical volume group atomic.
 * a log is implemented with a logical volume.
 * there is one log per logical volume group.
 *
 * block 0 of the log logical volume is not used (ipl etc).
 * block 1 contains a log "superblock" and is used by logFormat(),
 * lmLogInit(), lmLogShutdown(), and logRedo() to record status
 * of the log but is not otherwise used during normal processing.
 * blocks 2 - (N-1) are used to contain log records.
 *
 * when a volume group is varied-on-line, logRedo() must have
 * been executed before the file systems (logical volumes) in
 * the volume group can be mounted.
 */
/*
 *	log superblock (block 1 of logical volume)
 */
#define	LOGSUPER_B	1
#define	LOGSTART_B	2

#define	LOGMAGIC	0x87654321
#define	LOGVERSION	1

#define MAX_ACTIVE	128	/* Max active file systems sharing log */

struct logsuper {
	__le32 magic;		/* 4: log lv identifier */
	__le32 version;		/* 4: version number */
	__le32 serial;		/* 4: log open/mount counter */
	__le32 size;		/* 4: size in number of LOGPSIZE blocks */
	__le32 bsize;		/* 4: logical block size in byte */
	__le32 l2bsize;		/* 4: log2 of bsize */

	__le32 flag;		/* 4: option */
	__le32 state;		/* 4: state - see below */

	__le32 end;		/* 4: addr of last log record set by logredo */
	char uuid[16];		/* 16: 128-bit journal uuid */
	char label[16];		/* 16: journal label */
	struct {
		char uuid[16];
	} active[MAX_ACTIVE];	/* 2048: active file systems list */
};

#define NULL_UUID "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"

/* log flag: commit option (see jfs_filsys.h) */

/* log state */
#define	LOGMOUNT	0	/* log mounted by lmLogInit() */
#define LOGREDONE	1	/* log shutdown by lmLogShutdown().
				 * log redo completed by logredo().
				 */
#define LOGWRAP		2	/* log wrapped */
#define LOGREADERR	3	/* log read error detected in logredo() */

/*
 *	log logical page
 *
 * (this comment should be rewritten !)
 * the header and trailer structures (h,t) will normally have
 * the same page and eor value.
 * An exception to this occurs when a complete page write is not
 * accomplished on a power failure. Since the hardware may "split write"
 * sectors in the page, any out of order sequence may occur during powerfail
 * and needs to be recognized during log replay.  The xor value is
 * an "exclusive or" of all log words in the page up to eor.  This
 * 32 bit eor is stored with the top 16 bits in the header and the
 * bottom 16 bits in the trailer.  logredo can easily recognize pages
 * that were not completed by reconstructing this eor and checking
 * the log page.
 *
 * Previous versions of the operating system did not allow split
 * writes and detected partially written records in logredo by
 * ordering the updates to the header, trailer, and the move of data
 * into the logdata area.  The order: (1) data is moved (2) header
 * is updated (3) trailer is updated.  In logredo, when the header
 * differed from the trailer, the header and trailer were reconciled
 * as follows: if h.page != t.page they were set to the smaller of
 * the two and h.eor and t.eor set to 8 (i.e. empty page). if (only)
 * h.eor != t.eor they were set to the smaller of their two values.
 */
struct logpage {
	struct {		/* header */
		__le32 page;	/* 4: log sequence page number */
		__le16 rsrvd;	/* 2: */
		__le16 eor;	/* 2: end-of-log offset of lasrt record write */
	} h;

	__le32 data[LOGPSIZE / 4 - 4];	/* log record area */

	struct {		/* trailer */
		__le32 page;	/* 4: normally the same as h.page */
		__le16 rsrvd;	/* 2: */
		__le16 eor;	/* 2: normally the same as h.eor */
	} t;
};

#define LOGPHDRSIZE	8	/* log page header size */
#define LOGPTLRSIZE	8	/* log page trailer size */

/*
 *	log record
 *
 * (this comment should be rewritten !)
 * jfs uses only "after" log records (only a single writer is allowed
 * in a page, pages are written to temporary paging space if
 * if they must be written to disk before commit, and i/o is
 * scheduled for modified pages to their home location after
 * the log records containing the after values and the commit
 * record is written to the log on disk, undo discards the copy
 * in main-memory.)
 *
 * a log record consists of a data area of variable length followed by
 * a descriptor of fixed size LOGRDSIZE bytes.
 * the data area is rounded up to an integral number of 4-bytes and
 * must be no longer than LOGPSIZE.
 * the descriptor is of size of multiple of 4-bytes and aligned on a
 * 4-byte boundary.
 * records are packed one after the other in the data area of log pages.
 * (sometimes a DUMMY record is inserted so that at least one record ends
 * on every page or the longest record is placed on at most two pages).
 * the field eor in page header/trailer points to the byte following
 * the last record on a page.
 */

/* log record types */
#define LOG_COMMIT		0x8000
#define LOG_SYNCPT		0x4000
#define LOG_MOUNT		0x2000
#define LOG_REDOPAGE		0x0800
#define LOG_NOREDOPAGE		0x0080
#define LOG_NOREDOINOEXT	0x0040
#define LOG_UPDATEMAP		0x0008
#define LOG_NOREDOFILE		0x0001

/* REDOPAGE/NOREDOPAGE log record data type */
#define	LOG_INODE		0x0001
#define	LOG_XTREE		0x0002
#define	LOG_DTREE		0x0004
#define	LOG_BTROOT		0x0010
#define	LOG_EA			0x0020
#define	LOG_ACL			0x0040
#define	LOG_DATA		0x0080
#define	LOG_NEW			0x0100
#define	LOG_EXTEND		0x0200
#define LOG_RELOCATE		0x0400
#define LOG_DIR_XTREE		0x0800	/* Xtree is in directory inode */

/* UPDATEMAP log record descriptor type */
#define	LOG_ALLOCXADLIST	0x0080
#define	LOG_ALLOCPXDLIST	0x0040
#define	LOG_ALLOCXAD		0x0020
#define	LOG_ALLOCPXD		0x0010
#define	LOG_FREEXADLIST		0x0008
#define	LOG_FREEPXDLIST		0x0004
#define	LOG_FREEXAD		0x0002
#define	LOG_FREEPXD		0x0001

struct lrd {
	/*
	 * type independent area
	 */
	__le32 logtid;		/* 4: log transaction identifier */
	__le32 backchain;	/* 4: ptr to prev record of same transaction */
	__le16 type;		/* 2: record type */
	__le16 length;		/* 2: length of data in record (in byte) */
	__le32 aggregate;	/* 4: file system lv/aggregate */
	/* (16) */

	/*
	 * type dependent area (20)
	 */
	union {

		/*
		 *	COMMIT: commit
		 *
		 * transaction commit: no type-dependent information;
		 */

		/*
		 *	REDOPAGE: after-image
		 *
		 * apply after-image;
		 *
		 * N.B. REDOPAGE, NOREDOPAGE, and UPDATEMAP must be same format;
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 inode;	/* 4: inode number */
			__le16 type;	/* 2: REDOPAGE record type */
			__le16 l2linesize;	/* 2: log2 of line size */
			pxd_t pxd;	/* 8: on-disk page pxd */
		} redopage;	/* (20) */

		/*
		 *	NOREDOPAGE: the page is freed
		 *
		 * do not apply after-image records which precede this record
		 * in the log with the same page block number to this page.
		 *
		 * N.B. REDOPAGE, NOREDOPAGE, and UPDATEMAP must be same format;
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 inode;	/* 4: inode number */
			__le16 type;	/* 2: NOREDOPAGE record type */
			__le16 rsrvd;	/* 2: reserved */
			pxd_t pxd;	/* 8: on-disk page pxd */
		} noredopage;	/* (20) */

		/*
		 *	UPDATEMAP: update block allocation map
		 *
		 * either in-line PXD,
		 * or     out-of-line  XADLIST;
		 *
		 * N.B. REDOPAGE, NOREDOPAGE, and UPDATEMAP must be same format;
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 inode;	/* 4: inode number */
			__le16 type;	/* 2: UPDATEMAP record type */
			__le16 nxd;	/* 2: number of extents */
			pxd_t pxd;	/* 8: pxd */
		} updatemap;	/* (20) */

		/*
		 *	NOREDOINOEXT: the inode extent is freed
		 *
		 * do not apply after-image records which precede this
		 * record in the log with the any of the 4 page block
		 * numbers in this inode extent.
		 *
		 * NOTE: The fileset and pxd fields MUST remain in
		 *       the same fields in the REDOPAGE record format.
		 *
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 iagnum;	/* 4: IAG number     */
			__le32 inoext_idx;	/* 4: inode extent index */
			pxd_t pxd;	/* 8: on-disk page pxd */
		} noredoinoext;	/* (20) */

		/*
		 *	SYNCPT: log sync point
		 *
		 * replay log upto syncpt address specified;
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 sync;	/* 4: syncpt address (0 = here) */
		} syncpt;

		/*
		 *	MOUNT: file system mount
		 *
		 * file system mount: no type-dependent information;
		 */

		/*
		 *	? FREEXTENT: free specified extent(s)
		 *
		 * free specified extent(s) from block allocation map
		 * N.B.: nextents should be length of data/sizeof(xad_t)
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 type;	/* 4: FREEXTENT record type */
			__le32 nextent;	/* 4: number of extents */

			/* data: PXD or XAD list */
		} freextent;

		/*
		 *	? NOREDOFILE: this file is freed
		 *
		 * do not apply records which precede this record in the log
		 * with the same inode number.
		 *
		 * NOREDOFILE must be the first to be written at commit
		 * (last to be read in logredo()) - it prevents
		 * replay of preceding updates of all preceding generations
		 * of the inumber esp. the on-disk inode itself.
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 inode;	/* 4: inode number */
		} noredofile;

		/*
		 *	? NEWPAGE:
		 *
		 * metadata type dependent
		 */
		struct {
			__le32 fileset;	/* 4: fileset number */
			__le32 inode;	/* 4: inode number */
			__le32 type;	/* 4: NEWPAGE record type */
			pxd_t pxd;	/* 8: on-disk page pxd */
		} newpage;

		/*
		 *	? DUMMY: filler
		 *
		 * no type-dependent information
		 */
	} log;
};					/* (36) */

#define	LOGRDSIZE	(sizeof(struct lrd))

/*
 *	line vector descriptor
 */
struct lvd {
	__le16 offset;
	__le16 length;
};

/*
 *	log logical volume
 */
struct jfs_log {

	struct list_head sb_list;/*  This is used to sync metadata
				 *    before writing syncpt.
				 */
	struct list_head journal_list; /* Global list */
	struct block_device *bdev; /* 4: log lv pointer */
	int serial;		/* 4: log mount serial number */

	s64 base;		/* @8: log extent address (inline log ) */
	int size;		/* 4: log size in log page (in page) */
	int l2bsize;		/* 4: log2 of bsize */

	unsigned long flag;	/* 4: flag */

	struct lbuf *lbuf_free;	/* 4: free lbufs */
	wait_queue_head_t free_wait;	/* 4: */

	/* log write */
	int logtid;		/* 4: log tid */
	int page;		/* 4: page number of eol page */
	int eor;		/* 4: eor of last record in eol page */
	struct lbuf *bp;	/* 4: current log page buffer */

	struct mutex loglock;	/* 4: log write serialization lock */

	/* syncpt */
	int nextsync;		/* 4: bytes to write before next syncpt */
	int active;		/* 4: */
	wait_queue_head_t syncwait;	/* 4: */

	/* commit */
	uint cflag;		/* 4: */
	struct list_head cqueue; /* FIFO commit queue */
	struct tblock *flush_tblk; /* tblk we're waiting on for flush */
	int gcrtc;		/* 4: GC_READY transaction count */
	struct tblock *gclrt;	/* 4: latest GC_READY transaction */
	spinlock_t gclock;	/* 4: group commit lock */
	int logsize;		/* 4: log data area size in byte */
	int lsn;		/* 4: end-of-log */
	int clsn;		/* 4: clsn */
	int syncpt;		/* 4: addr of last syncpt record */
	int sync;		/* 4: addr from last logsync() */
	struct list_head synclist;	/* 8: logsynclist anchor */
	spinlock_t synclock;	/* 4: synclist lock */
	struct lbuf *wqueue;	/* 4: log pageout queue */
	int count;		/* 4: count */
	char uuid[16];		/* 16: 128-bit uuid of log device */

	int no_integrity;	/* 3: flag to disable journaling to disk */
};

/*
 * Log flag
 */
#define log_INLINELOG	1
#define log_SYNCBARRIER	2
#define log_QUIESCE	3
#define log_FLUSH	4

/*
 * group commit flag
 */
/* jfs_log */
#define logGC_PAGEOUT	0x00000001

/* tblock/lbuf */
#define tblkGC_QUEUE		0x0001
#define tblkGC_READY		0x0002
#define tblkGC_COMMIT		0x0004
#define tblkGC_COMMITTED	0x0008
#define tblkGC_EOP		0x0010
#define tblkGC_FREE		0x0020
#define tblkGC_LEADER		0x0040
#define tblkGC_ERROR		0x0080
#define tblkGC_LAZY		0x0100	// D230860
#define tblkGC_UNLOCKED		0x0200	// D230860

/*
 *		log cache buffer header
 */
struct lbuf {
	struct jfs_log *l_log;	/* 4: log associated with buffer */

	/*
	 * data buffer base area
	 */
	uint l_flag;		/* 4: pageout control flags */

	struct lbuf *l_wqnext;	/* 4: write queue link */
	struct lbuf *l_freelist;	/* 4: freelistlink */

	int l_pn;		/* 4: log page number */
	int l_eor;		/* 4: log record eor */
	int l_ceor;		/* 4: committed log record eor */

	s64 l_blkno;		/* 8: log page block number */
	caddr_t l_ldata;	/* 4: data page */
	struct page *l_page;	/* The page itself */
	uint l_offset;		/* Offset of l_ldata within the page */

	wait_queue_head_t l_ioevent;	/* 4: i/o done event */
};

/* Reuse l_freelist for redrive list */
#define l_redrive_next l_freelist

/*
 *	logsynclist block
 *
 * common logsyncblk prefix for jbuf_t and tblock
 */
struct logsyncblk {
	u16 xflag;		/* flags */
	u16 flag;		/* only meaninful in tblock */
	lid_t lid;		/* lock id */
	s32 lsn;		/* log sequence number */
	struct list_head synclist;	/* log sync list link */
};

/*
 *	logsynclist serialization (per log)
 */

#define LOGSYNC_LOCK_INIT(log) spin_lock_init(&(log)->synclock)
#define LOGSYNC_LOCK(log, flags) spin_lock_irqsave(&(log)->synclock, flags)
#define LOGSYNC_UNLOCK(log, flags) \
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(log)->synclock, flags)

/* compute the difference in bytes of lsn from sync point */
#define logdiff(diff, lsn, log)\
{\
	diff = (lsn) - (log)->syncpt;\
	if (diff < 0)\
		diff += (log)->logsize;\
}

extern int lmLogOpen(struct super_block *sb);
extern int lmLogClose(struct super_block *sb);
extern int lmLogShutdown(struct jfs_log * log);
extern int lmLogInit(struct jfs_log * log);
extern int lmLogFormat(struct jfs_log *log, s64 logAddress, int logSize);
extern int lmGroupCommit(struct jfs_log *, struct tblock *);
extern int jfsIOWait(void *);
extern void jfs_flush_journal(struct jfs_log * log, int wait);
extern void jfs_syncpt(struct jfs_log *log, int hard_sync);

#endif				/* _H_JFS_LOGMGR */

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub