text:
Enright Archives Added to Leo Frank Case Research Library
Posted on February 2, 2017 by Chief Curator
LEOFRANK.INFO is pleased to announce that the full book, text, and newspaper archives formerly housed at Jack Enright's Leo Frank Library site have been added to this, the online Leo Frank Case Research Library. We are deeply grateful for Mr. Enright's assembling and saving this valuable material. Some of the documents from his site were not previously available here, and have at times been invaluable in our transcription and research work. All of this material very much deserves to be preserved for the scholars and readers of the future.
These new additions may be accessed by going to
https://www.leofrank.info/enright/default.html
which is also linked in our sidebar and top menu.
New links to the specific material housed in the new (to us) archive can also be found at:
Atlanta Directory
Bill of Exceptions
Bill of Indictment
Brief of Evidence
Defense Case
Georgia Supreme Court
Hugh M. Dorsey
The Jeffersonian
States' Exhibit
Transcript of Record
Watson's Magazine (1915)
Below are newspaper articles about the Leo Frank case. They are in chronological order and come from the Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Georgian, Atlanta Journal, New York Times and Washington Post. The Jeffersonian, a weekly newspaper from Thomas E. Watson based out of Thomson, Georgia, is also listed.
You can narrow the list down to one specific newspaper by clicking the newspaper name in the list below. You can also scroll directly to a particular month by clicking the respective month to the right of the desired year in the links below.
Newspapers by Name
Illinois State Journal
The Jeffersonian (under Documents)
Newspapers by Month
1910: December
1913: April May June July August September October November December
1914: January February March April May June October November December
1915: January February April May June July August September October November
1916: February April September
1917: August
1919: January February June
1922: March December
1929: February
1930: July August
1942: January
December 1, 1910: Selig-Frank Wedding Announcement (Atlanta Journal)
April 28, 1913 to May 8, 1913: Full Newspapers (Atlanta Georgian)
April 28, 1913: Girl is Assaulted and then Murdered in Heart of Town (Atlanta Constitution)
April 28, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
April 28, 1913: Pretty Young Victim of Sunday's Atrocious Crime and the Building in Which She Met Her Death (Atlanta Constitution)
April 29, 1913: $1,000 Reward (Atlanta Constitution)
April 29, 1913: Held on Murder Charge in Mary Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
April 29, 1913: I Am Not Guilty, Says John M. Gant (Atlanta Constitution)
April 29, 1913: Pinkertons Hired to Assist Police Probe the Murder of Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
April 29, 1913: Was Victim of Murder Lured Off on Joy Ride Before She Met Death? (Atlanta Constitution)
April 30, 1913: Did Murderers Plan Cremation? (Atlanta Constitution)
April 30, 1913: Murder Analyzed by Dr. M'Kelway (Atlanta Constitution)
April 30, 1913: While Hundreds Sob, Body of Mary Phagan Lowered Into Grave (Atlanta Constitution)
April 30, 1913: While Hunt Continues for Slayer of Mary Phagan, Marietta Mourns as Body is Lowered into Grave (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1913: Frank Tried to Flirt With Murdered Girl, Says Her Boy Chum (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1913: Newt Lee Tells His Story During Morning Session (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
May 1, 1913: Pretty Young Sweetheart Comes to the Aid of Arthur Mullinax (Atlanta Constitution)
May 2, 1913: Frank and Lee Held in Tower, Others Released (Atlanta Constitution)
May 2, 1913: Frank Girls Going to Inquest (Atlanta Constitution)
May 2, 1913: Keep an Open Mind (Atlanta Constitution)
May 4, 1913: Impostors Busy in Sleuth Roles in Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
May 4, 1913: The Case of Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
May 5, 1913: Sleuths Believe They Can Convict Phagan Murderer (Atlanta Constitution)
May 6, 1913: Pistol Toting is Condemned by Judge Ellis in His Charge (Atlanta Constitution)
May 6, 1913: Third Man Brought into Phagan Mystery by Frank's Evidence (Atlanta Constitution)
May 7, 1913: Officials Plan to Exhume Body of Victim Today (Atlanta Constitution)
May 8, 1913: Frank Will Take a Stand at Inquest (Atlanta Constitution)
May 8, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
May 8, 1913: Stains of Blood on Shirt Fresh, Says Dr. Smith (Atlanta Constitution)
May 9, 1913: Frank and Lee Ordered Held by Coroner's Jury for Mary Phagan Murder (Atlanta Constitution)
May 10, 1913: Factory Foreman Who Testified (Atlanta Constitution)
May 10, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
May 10, 1913: Girl Will Swear Office of Frank Deserted Between 12:05 and 12:10 (Atlanta Constitution)
May 10, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
May 11, 1913: Mystery of 14-Year-Old Mary Phagan's Tragic End Adds One to Long List of Atlanta's Unsolved Crimes (Atlanta Constitution)
May 11, 1913: Officer Swears He Found Frank With Young Girl (Atlanta Constitution)
May 12, 1913: Find Guilty Man, Frank's Lawyer Told Pinkertons (Atlanta Constitution)
May 12, 1913: The Phagan Case Day by Day (Atlanta Constitution)
May 13, 1913: Story From New York (Atlanta Constitution)
May 14, 1913: Clue is Sought in Handwriting of Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
May 14, 1913: Poem in Handwriting of Mary Phagan May Give Solicitor Clue to Murder (Atlanta Constitution)
May 15, 1913: Victim of Murder Prepared to Die, Believes Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
May 16, 1913: Constitution Starts Fund to Bring Burns Here to Solve the Mary Phagan Murder Mystery (Atlanta Constitution)
May 17, 1913: Bring Burns Here (Atlanta Constitution)
May 17, 1913: In Loop of Death, Dorsey May Have Clue to Murderer (Atlanta Constitution)
May 18, 1913: Three Arrests Expected Soon in Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
May 19, 1913: Detectives Seek Clue in Writing of Negro Suspect (Atlanta Constitution)
May 20, 1913: Women Declare Phagan Murder Must be Solved (Atlanta Constitution)
May 21, 1913: Tobie is Studying Mary Phagan's Life (Atlanta Constitution)
May 22, 1913: Experts are Here on Finger Prints (Atlanta Constitution)
May 23, 1913: Rooming House Sought by Frank, Declares Woman (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1913: Coleman Affidavit Which Police Say Felder Wanted (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1913: Frank Not at Home Hours on Sunday, Declares Lanford (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1913: Girl Strangled, Says Indictment (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1913: Leading Figures in Charges of Bribery in Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: 'Becker of South' Lanford is Branded by Col. Tom Felder (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: Frank Indicted in Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: Frank is Praised by John O. Parmele (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: Others Will be Involved in New Bribery Charges Intimates Chief Lanford (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: Savings of School Girls are Offered to Hunt for Murderer of Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
May 25, 1913: Thomas Felder Brands the Charges of Bribery Diabolical Conspiracy (Atlanta Constitution)
May 26, 1913: New Witnesses in Phagan Case Found by Police (Atlanta Constitution)
May 26, 1913: Thousands in Atlanta Living the Life of Mary Phagan's Murderer (Atlanta Constitution)
May 27, 1913: Burns Agency Quits the Phagan Case; Tobie Leaves Today (Atlanta Constitution)
May 28, 1913: Conley Reported to Admit Writing Notes Saturday (Atlanta Constitution)
May 29, 1913: Negro Sweeper Tells the Story of Murder Notes (Atlanta Constitution)
May 30, 1913: But One Thing is Proved in Mary Phagan Mystery (Atlanta Constitution)
May 30, 1913: Conley Says He Helped Frank Carry Body of Mary Phagan to Pencil Factory Cellar (Atlanta Constitution)
May 31, 1913: Mary Phagan's Murder Was Work of a Negro, Declares Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
June 1, 1913: Conley is Removed from Fulton Tower at His Own Request (Atlanta Constitution)
June 1, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
June 1, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
June 2, 1913: Frank Asked Room to Conceal Body, Believes Lanford (Atlanta Constitution)
June 3, 1913: Grand Jury Calls for Thos. Felder and Police Heads (Atlanta Constitution)
June 3, 1913: Leo Frank's Cook Put Under Arrest (Atlanta Constitution)
June 4, 1913: Servant of Frank is Liberated After Long Examination (Atlanta Constitution)
June 5, 1913: Frank Wanted Gun to Take His Life, Says Negro Cook (Atlanta Constitution)
June 6, 1913: Dorsey Replies to the Charges of Mrs. Lucille Selig Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
June 7, 1913: Current in Effect on Day of Tragedy (Atlanta Constitution)
June 8, 1913: Mrs. Frank Writes About Phagan Case (Atlanta Constitution)
June 10, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
June 10, 1913: Leo Frank Reported Ready for His Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
June 10, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
June 11, 1913: Lanford Silent on Rosser's Card (Atlanta Constitution)
June 13, 1913: Negro Conley May Face Frank Today (Atlanta Constitution)
June 15, 1913: Detective Chief Tells Grand Jury of Third Degree (Atlanta Constitution)
June 16, 1913: Constitution Picture Will Figure in Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
June 18, 1913: Partial Newspaper
June 18, 1913: Two New Witnesses Sought by Officers (Atlanta Constitution)
June 19, 1913: Mrs. Formby Here for Phagan Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
June 19, 1913: Reuben Arnold May Aid Frank's Defense in Big Murder Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
June 21, 1913: Frank and Lee Held in Tower, Others Released (Atlanta Constitution)
June 22, 1913: Frank Not Guilty of Phagan Murder, Declares Arnold (Atlanta Constitution)
June 23, 1913: Leo M. Frank's Trial June 30, Says Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
June 24, 1913: Frank's Trial Set for Next Monday (Atlanta Constitution)
June 25, 1913: Reported Hoke Smith May Aid Leo Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
June 25, 1913: Trial of Leo Frank Postponed by Judge (Atlanta Constitution)
June 28, 1913: Lanford and Felder Indicted for Libel (Atlanta Constitution)
July 1, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
July 4, 1913: Effort Will Be Made to Free Newt Lee (Atlanta Constitution)
July 8, 1913: Frank and Conley May Meet Today (Atlanta Constitution)
July 10, 1913: Mary Phagan's Pay Envelope is Found (Atlanta Constitution)
July 10, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
July 11, 1913: Jim Conley Not Right Man, Says Mincey (Atlanta Constitution)
July 13, 1913: Detective Harry Scott's Hunch- Thrilling Story of How it Secured James Conley's Confession (Atlanta Constitution)
July 18, 1913: Many Rumors Afloat Regarding Grand Jury (Atlanta Constitution)
July 19, 1913: Grand Jury Meets to Indict Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
July 19, 1913: Scott Believes Conley Innocent, Asserts Lanford (Atlanta Constitution)
July 20, 1913: Frank's Lawyers Score Dorsey for His Stand (Atlanta Constitution)
July 20, 1913: Grim Justice Pursues Mary Phagan's Slayer (Atlanta Constitution)
July 23, 1913: Bloody Club Lends New Clue to Mystery (Atlanta Constitution)
July 23, 1913: Give Right of Way to Case of Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
July 24, 1913: Conley and Lee Meet in Tower (Atlanta Constitution)
July 25, 1913: Venireman Drawn for Frank Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
July 26, 1913: Frank's Lawyers Ready for Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
July 27, 1913: How Detectives Trailed Clues in Phagan Murder Case (Atlanta Constitution)
July 27, 1913: Phagan Trial Will Be Great Legal Battle (Atlanta Constitution)
July 27, 1913: Scott is Summoned by Frank's Lawyer (Atlanta Constitution)
July 28, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
July 28, 1913: Jurors in Leo M. Frank Case Must Answer Four Questions (Atlanta Constitution)
July 28, 1913: Leo Frank's Trial on Murder Charge Booked for Today (Atlanta Constitution)
July 29, 1913: Numerous Witnesses Called in Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
July 29, 1913: Trial of Leo M. Frank on Charge of Murder Begins, Mrs. Coleman, George Epps and Newt Lee on Stand (Atlanta Constitution)
July 29, 1913: Unusual Interest Centers in Mrs. Frank's Appearance (Atlanta Constitution)
July 29, 1913: Will Leo Frank's Lawyers Put Any Evidence Before the Jury? (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: Lee, Dull and Ignorant, Calm Under Cross Fire (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: Members of Mary Phagan's Family who are Attending Frank Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: Mother and Daughter in Tears as Clothing of Mary Phagan is Exhibited in Courtroom (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: Sergeant Dobbs Resumes Stand at Tuesday Afternoon Session (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: The Defense Center of the Trial of Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
July 30, 1913: Three Witnesses Describe Finding Mary Phagan's Body (Atlanta Constitution)
July 31, 1913: Bearing of Black and Lee Forms a Study in Contrast (Atlanta Constitution)
July 31, 1913: Daintily Dressed Girl Tells of Daily Routine of Factory (Atlanta Constitution)
July 31, 1913: Defense Riddles John Black's Testimony (Atlanta Constitution)
July 31, 1913: Detective Black Muddled by Keen Cross Examination of Attorneys for Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
July 31, 1913: Gantt, Once Phagan Suspect, On Stand Wednesday Afternoon (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Acquitted in the Same Court, She Believes Frank is Innocent (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Attorneys for Both Sides Riled by Scott's Testimony; Replies Cause Lively Tilts (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Finding of Hair and Envelope Described by Machinist (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Frank's Presence in Office at Time He Says He was There is Denied by Girl on Stand (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
August 1, 1913: Haslett Describes Visit to Home of Leo Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Holloway Denies Affidavit He Signed for Solicitor (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Leo Frank Innocent, Says Mrs. Appelbaum (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
August 1, 1913: Spots Were Large as Fan, Declares Woman Who Saw Them (Atlanta Constitution)
August 1, 1913: William Gheesling, Embalmer, Tells of Wounds on Girl's Body (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Frequent and Angry Clashes Between Attorneys Mark the Hearing of Darley's Testimony (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Humor Pathos Tragedy (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Mary Phagan Murdered Within Hour After Dinner (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Negro Lurking in Factory Seen by Wife of Employee (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Startling Statements Made During Testimony of Dr. Harris (Atlanta Constitution)
August 2, 1913: Stenographer Parry Identifies Notes Taken at Phagan Inquest; Women and Girls Thronging Court for Trial of Leo Frank; Gay Febuary Tells Frank Jury About Statement Prisoner Made (Atlanta Constitution)
August 3, 1913: Condition of Girl's Body Described by Dr. J. W. Hurt (Atlanta Constitution)
August 3, 1913: Defense Will Use Many Witnesses (Atlanta Constitution)
August 3, 1913: Fixing Hour of Girl's Death Through Aid of Modern Science the Prosecution's Greatest Aid (Atlanta Constitution)
August 3, 1913: Girl Asked for Mary Phagan's Pay but was Refused by Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 3, 1913: Resume of Week's Evidence Shows Little Progress Made (Atlanta Constitution)
August 4, 1913: Frank on Stand Wednesday Week (Atlanta Constitution)
August 4, 1913: Leo Frank's Trial is Attracting Universal Interest in Georgia (Atlanta Constitution)
August 5, 1913: Amazing Testimony of Conley Marks Crucial Point of Trial, Says Frank Admitted Crime (Atlanta Constitution)
August 5, 1913: Conley Grilled Five Hours by Luther Rosser (Atlanta Constitution)
August 5, 1913: Gheesling Furnishes His Formula to Jury (Atlanta Constitution)
August 5, 1913: Says Employer Slew Girl (New York Times)
August 6, 1913: Mincey Affidavit is Denied (Atlanta Constitution)
August 6, 1913: Women are Playing Big Part in Trial of Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 7, 1913: Judge's Decision Admits Conley Testimony in Full (Atlanta Constitution)
August 7, 1913: Mary Phagan was Strangled, Declares Dr. H. F. Harris (Atlanta Constitution)
August 7, 1913: Spontaneous Applause Greets Dorsey's Victory (Atlanta Constitution)
August 7, 1913: Unable to Shake Conley's Story, Rosser Ends Cross-Examination (Atlanta Constitution)
August 8, 1913: Dorsey Forces Childs to Admit Certain Portions of His Testimony Could Not be Considered Expert (Atlanta Constitution)
August 8, 1913: Rosser Swears Bludgeon was Not in Factory Day After Murder (Atlanta Constitution)
August 8, 1913: Will Defense Put Character of Leo Frank Before Jury? (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: Conductor Also Swears Epps Boy was not on Car with Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: Defense Will Seek to Show That Mary Phagan's Body Was Tossed Down a Chute in Rear of Pencil Factory and Not Taken Down by Elevator as the State Insists (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: Epps Boy not with Mary Phagan, Declares Street Car Motorman (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: Hopkins Woman Denies Charges Made by Dalton and Jim Conley; is Forced to Admit Untruths (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: Model of Factory Attacked by Solicitor (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: N. V. Darley Denies Testimony Given by Conley and Dalton (Atlanta Constitution)
August 9, 1913: She Denies Charges Made by Dalton and by Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Defense Will Renew Attack Upon Dr. Harris' Testimony (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Epps Boy Denies Trying to Avoid Being Called to the Stand Again (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Full Newspaper (Atlanta Georgian)
August 10, 1913: Partial Newspaper (Atlanta Journal)
August 10, 1913: Reporter Makes Denial of Charge that Reports have been Flavored (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Schiff Put on Stand to Refute Conley and Dalton Testimony (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Schiff Testimony Contradicts That Given by Dalton and Negro Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
August 10, 1913: Startling Testimony of Conley Feature of Trial's Second Week (Atlanta Constitution)
August 11, 1913: Murder Evidence May be Concluded by Next Saturday (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1913: As the Very Wildest of Guessing, Dr. Westmoreland Characterizes Testimony Given by Dr. Harris (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1913: Defense Has the Best Day Since Trial of Frank Began (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1913: Expert Flatly Contradicts the Testimony of Dr. Harris (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1913: Frank's Financial Sheet Would Take 3 Hours' Work to Finish (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1913: Schiff Admits he Kept Conley Knowing he was Worthless (Atlanta Constitution)
August 13, 1913: Campbell Told by Mrs. White of Negro Lurking in Factory (Atlanta Constitution)
August 13, 1913: Dalton Recalled by Defense, Admits Having Served on Gang (Atlanta Constitution)
August 13, 1913: Facing the Jury, Frank Asserts His Innocence of Mary Phagan's Death (Atlanta Journal)
August 13, 1913: Many Witnesses Take the Stand to Refute Points of Prosecution (Atlanta Constitution)
August 13, 1913: Testimony of Helen Ferguson Refuted by Magnolia Kennedy (Atlanta Constitution)
August 13, 1913: Women on Stand Deny Statements Made About Them by Dalton (Atlanta Constitution)
August 14, 1913: Lively Tilts Mark the Hearing of Testimony of Dr. Kendrick (Atlanta Constitution)
August 14, 1913: Quinn Intimates that Spots May Have Been on Floor for Months (Atlanta Constitution)
August 14, 1913: Surprise Sprung by Introduction of Character Witnesses by Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
August 15, 1913: Character of Frank Good, So Many Witnesses Declare (Atlanta Constitution)
August 15, 1913: Frank Not Nervous on Night of Murder, Says Mrs. Ursenbach (Atlanta Constitution)
August 15, 1913: Lawyers Appear Very Interested in Raincoat Lent to Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 15, 1913: Many Men Swear to Good Character of Superintendent of Pencil Factory (Atlanta Constitution)
August 15, 1913: Mother-in-Law of Frank Denies Charges in Cook's Affidavit (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Dorsey Questions Witness About Alleged Fund for Frank's Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Leo Frank Innocent, Said Conley, According to a Girl Operator (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Miss Mary Perk Tells Jurymen She Believes Conley is Guilty (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Mother of Frank Takes Stand to Identify Letter Son Wrote (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Mrs. Rae Frank Goes on Stand in Defense of Her Son (Atlanta Constitution)
August 16, 1913: Still Another Office Boy Swears He Never Saw Women With Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 17, 1913: Frank to Tell His Own Story Monday Afternoon to Jury Which Will Decide His Fate (Atlanta Constitution)
August 17, 1913: Prisoners' Mother Questioned as to Wealth of Frank Family (Atlanta Constitution)
August 17, 1913: That Pinkertons Double-Crossed Police, Dorsey Tries to Prove (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1913: Frank May Tell Story to Jury on Stand Today (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1913: Mary Phagan's Grandmother Dies After Dreaming Girl was Living (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1913: Men on Frank Jury Must Be Some Mighty Good Husbands, Asserts the Deputy in Charge (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Books and Papers Put in Evidence by the Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Climax of Trial Reached When Frank Faced Jury (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Frank Ends Statement After Testifying Four Hours (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Frank's Character is Testified to by Long List of Girls (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Harlee Branch Tells of Conley Pantomine (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1913: Mrs. Wardlaw Denies Ever Seeing Frank on Car with Little Girl (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Clashes Between Lawyers Mark Effort to Impeach Negro Cook (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Denies He Said He Was Willing to Lead Party to Lynch Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Dr. Clarence Johnson is Called to Corroborate Dr. Roy Harris (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Saw Mary Phagan on Her Way to Pencil Factory, Says McCoy (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Sideboard in Leo Frank's Home Moved, Asserts Husband of Cook (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: State is Hard Hit by Judge's Ruling Barring Evidence Attacking Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: State Suffers a Severe Blow When Testimony is Ruled Out (Atlanta Constitution)
August 20, 1913: Witness Swears he saw Frank Forcing Unwelcome Attentions upon the Little Phagan Girl (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Frank Hooper Opens Argument in Leo Frank Case This Morning (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Frank's Character Bad, Declare Many Women and Girls on Stand (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Girls Testify to Seeing Frank Enter Dressing Room With Woman (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Girls Testify to Seeing Frank Talking to Little Mary Phagan With His Hands on Her Person (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Leo Frank Takes Stand Again Despite Objection of Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Railway Employee Swears Car Reached Center of City at 12:03 (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Starnes Tells How Affidavit from Negro Cook was Secured (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Swears that Frank Prepared Sheets in Less Than 2 Hours (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Testimony of Dr. Harris Upheld by Noted Stomach Specialists (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1913: Testimony of Hollis Assailed by Witness (Atlanta Constitution)
August 22, 1913: Arnold Ridicules Plot Alleged by Prosecution and Attacks the Methods Used by Detective (Atlanta Constitution)
August 22, 1913: Chronological Table of Frank's Actions on Day of Murder (Atlanta Constitution)
August 22, 1913: Frank Case May Go to Jury Late This Afternoon (Atlanta Constitution)
August 22, 1913: In Dramatic Phrases, Hooper Outlines Events Leading Up to and Following Death of Girl (Atlanta Constitution)
August 23, 1913: Dorsey's Brilliant Address Attacking Leo Frank is Stopped by Adjournment of Court Friday (Atlanta Constitution)
August 23, 1913: Rosser Makes Great Speech for the Defense; Scores Detectives and Criticizes the Solicitor (Atlanta Constitution)
August 24, 1913: Many Records are Badly Broken by State's Most Expensive Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
August 24, 1913: Solicitor Reasserts His Conviction of Bad Character and Guilt of Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 25, 1913: Leo Frank's Fate May be Decided by Monday Night (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: As Bells Tolled, Dorsey Closed Magnificent Argument Which Fastened Crime on Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Frank Convicted, Asserts Innocence (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Frank Sentenced to Hang October 10 (Atlanta Journal)
August 26, 1913: Glad and Relieved Trial is Over; No Doubt of Leo Frank's Guilt (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Guilty, Declares Jury (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Here is the Chronological Order of Final Day of Frank's Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Leo Frank Received Fair Trial, Declares Chief Newport Lanford (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Mary Phagan, the Victim (Atlanta Constitution)
August 26, 1913: Partial Newspaper
August 27, 1913: Frank Sentenced on Murder Charge; to Hang Oct. 10 (Atlanta Constitution)
August 27, 1913: Hugh Dorsey's Great Speech Feature of the Frank Trial (Atlanta Constitution)
August 28, 1913: Cell of Leo M. Frank Now Like Living Room (Atlanta Constitution)
August 29, 1913: Leo M. Frank to Make No Public Statement (Atlanta Constitution)
August 31, 1913: Graduates of Cornell Will Aid Leo M. Frank in Fight for Life (Atlanta Constitution)
September 4, 1913: Frank Trial Bills are Ordered Paid (Atlanta Constitution)
September 9, 1913: Will Rear Monument to Little Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
September 10, 1913: Jim Conley Indicted by Jury on Tuesday (Atlanta Constitution)
September 24, 1913: Leo Frank Again Made President of B'nai B'rith (Atlanta Constitution)
September 26, 1913: Did Not Discuss Guilt of Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
September 28, 1913: Grief of Mrs. Coleman is a Pitiful Sight (Atlanta Constitution)
September 30, 1913: Speculation is Rife as to Who'll Hear Leo Frank's Motion (Atlanta Constitution)
October 3, 1913: May Use Jurors to Deny Charges (Atlanta Constitution)
October 5, 1913: A. H. Henslee May Establish Alibi (Atlanta Constitution)
October 6, 1913: Sparta Citizens Insist Henslee was Prejudiced (Atlanta Constitution)
October 7, 1913: Henslee Answers Sparta Citizens (Atlanta Constitution)
October 14, 1913: Dorsey Expected Back in Atlanta Wednesday (Atlanta Constitution)
October 16, 1913: Dorsey Will Request Postponement Again (Atlanta Constitution)
October 18, 1913: Criminal Court Will Convene Monday Week (Atlanta Constitution)
October 20, 1913: Bodeker Keeps Counsel (Atlanta Constitution)
October 20, 1913: Locked Doors Guard Witness Who Declares Frank Innocent, Detectives Keep All-Night Vigil in Order to Arrest Him (Atlanta Constitution)
October 21, 1913: J. C. Shirley Ready to Account for Movements on Murder Day (Atlanta Constitution)
October 21, 1913: Murder Witness Arrested on Libel Charge (Atlanta Constitution)
October 24, 1913: Proof of Charges Will Mean a New Trial, Says Court (Atlanta Constitution)
October 25, 1913: Jury Loaned Ears to Ravings of Mob, Says Rube Arnold (Atlanta Constitution)
October 27, 1913: Arnold to Resume His Speech Today (Atlanta Constitution)
October 30, 1913: Retrial Hearing for Leo M. Frank Comes to Close (Atlanta Constitution)
November 2, 1913: Leo Frank Appeals to Supreme Court (Atlanta Constitution)
November 6, 1913: Dorsey Spent $1145.39 in the Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
November 10, 1913: The Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
November 14, 1913: Trial of Jim Conley Postponed to Monday (Atlanta Constitution)
November 26, 1913: Conley Will be Tried During January Term (Atlanta Constitution)
December 7, 1913: Frank Case Will be Argued Dec. 15 (Atlanta Constitution)
December 17, 1913: Leo Frank's Fate Now Rests With High Tribunal (Atlanta Constitution)
December 25, 1913: Laboring Folk of Griffin Send Dorsey X-mas Present (Atlanta Constitution)
January 1, 1914: Good Luck Marked 1913 Giving Knockout Blow to Prophets of Disaster (Atlanta Constitution)
January 1, 1914: Gunman and Thug Busy During Year 1913 (Atlanta Constitution)
January 5, 1914: Case Against Fisher is Set for Wednesday (Atlanta Constitution)
January 8, 1914: Frank Attorneys File Supplemental Brief (Atlanta Constitution)
January 9, 1914: Fisher Freed on Murder Charge (Atlanta Constitution)
January 15, 1914: Dorsey Will Not Reply to Latest Frank Brief (Atlanta Constitution)
February 1, 1914: Court Takes Recess, Case of Jim Conley is Set for February 23, 1914 (Atlanta Constitution)
February 18, 1914: Leo M. Frank Has Not Lost All Hope; Counsel Will Make Vigorous Fight to Save the Life of Their Client (Atlanta Constitution)
February 18, 1914: Split Court Denies New Trial to Frank (New York Times)
February 19, 1914: Counsel for Frank to Ask a Rehearing by Supreme Court (Atlanta Constitution)
February 21, 1914: Evidence for Frank Hidden, Say Counsel (New York Times)
February 21, 1914: Jim Conley Case to Come to Trial Week From Today (Atlanta Constitution)
February 22, 1914: Solicitor Dorsey Scorched in Card by Frank Counsel (Atlanta Constitution)
February 23, 1914: Mrs. Nina Formby Makes Affidavit to Assist Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
February 24, 1914: All-Night Search to Find M'Knight Meets No Success (Atlanta Constitution)
February 25, 1914: Appeal for Frank in Murder Case (New York Times)
February 25, 1914: Conley Convicted, Gets Year on Gang (Atlanta Constitution)
February 26, 1914: Plied With Whisky She Lied in Story Told About Frank Says Mrs. Formby (Atlanta Constitution)
February 27, 1914: Becker Trial Was Parallel to Mine; Leo Frank Writes the Constitution (Atlanta Constitution)
February 27, 1914: Detectives Scored in Alleged Formby Confession (Atlanta Constitution)
February 28, 1914: Appeal for Frank Delayed by Hope of New Evidence (Atlanta Constitution)
March 1, 1914: Helen Ferguson Tells Defense in Affidavit of Advance by Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
March 2, 1914: Frank Convicted by Public Clamor (New York Times)
March 3, 1914: Frank Takes a Hand in Frank's Behalf (New York Times)
March 4, 1914: Luther Z. Rosser Holds Conference in New York Over Leo Frank's Case (Atlanta Constitution)
March 5, 1914: Geo. Epps Brands as a Falsehood Story of His Son in Affidavit (Atlanta Constitution)
March 6, 1914: Affidavit Verified by Mrs. Ethel Miller (Atlanta Constitution)
March 6, 1914: Frank's Time Alibi Gets New Support in Two Affidavits Given the Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
March 7, 1914: No Clemency Plea Planned for Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
March 8, 1914: Frank Resentenced, Says He's Innocent (New York Times)
March 8, 1914: New Developments in Case of Frank Come With a Rush of Resentence (Atlanta Constitution)
March 8, 1914: Rosser Defends Interview Answering Georgia Chamber (Atlanta Constitution)
March 9, 1914: Leo Frank Answers List of Questions Bearing on Points Made Against Him (Atlanta Constitution)
March 10, 1914: Frank Will Use Address by Taft (Atlanta Constitution)
March 11, 1914: Burns to Return by Next Friday and Make Report (Atlanta Constitution)
March 11, 1914: Justice Asked Now for Frank in Atlanta (New York Times)
March 12, 1914: Smith to Protect Conley from Grill by William Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
March 13, 1914: Frank Case Yields New Bribe Charge (New York Times)
March 14, 1914: Evidence for Frank Ignored, She Says (New York Times)
March 15, 1914: Frank Asks Six Questions (New York Times)
March 15, 1914: Leo M. Frank, An Innocent Man, May Suffer a Disgraceful Death for Another's Crime (New York Times)
March 15, 1914: M'Knight Badly Injured Trying to Slip Into City Unnoticed by Detectives (Atlanta Constitution)
March 15, 1914: Prisoner in Tower Asks Public for Answers to These Questions (Atlanta Constitution)
March 16, 1914: Frank No Pervert, States W. J. Burns on Reaching City (Atlanta Constitution)
March 16, 1914: From Pulpits Comes Call for New Trial For Frank; Burns Here to Open Probe (Atlanta Constitution)
March 16, 1914: Pastors Demand Retrial for Frank (New York Times)
March 18, 1914: Becker Will Come to Leo Frank's Aid if Defense Calls (Atlanta Constitution)
March 18, 1914: Burns Confers With Leo M. Frank (New York Times)
March 19, 1914: Burns Says He Can Solve Frank Case (New York Times)
March 19, 1914: Smith to Thwart Secret Attempt to Grill Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
March 20, 1914: Crime in Factory Foulest He Ever Knew Says Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
March 21, 1914: Detective Burns Given Hot Roast by Will M. Smith (Atlanta Constitution)
March 22, 1914: Burns to Extend Frank Case Inquiry (New York Times)
March 23, 1914: Detective Burns Goes to New York to Hunt Evidence (Atlanta Constitution)
March 23, 1914: New Frank Trial Urged by Pastor (Atlanta Constitution)
March 25, 1914: Promises Surprise in the Frank Case (New York Times)
March 25, 1914: Smith is Giving His Service Free to James Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
March 26, 1914: Probe Telegrams Sent From Newark (Atlanta Constitution)
March 27, 1914: Points to Conley as Girl's Slayer (New York Times)
March 30, 1914: B'nai B'rith Delegate Lauds Atlanta Spirit, Discusses Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
March 30, 1914: Welcome Given to B'nai B'rith (Atlanta Constitution)
March 30, 1914: Witness for Frank Sought in Chicago (Atlanta Constitution)
March 31, 1914: Conley is Anxious to Face Accusers (Atlanta Constitution)
March 31, 1914: Funeral Notices (Atlanta Constitution)
April 2, 1914: The Courts and the Frank Case (New York Times)
April 2, 1914: Will Show Employers Necessity of Militia (Atlanta Constitution)
April 5, 1914: Burns Will Seek Talk With Conley Early This Week (Atlanta Constitution)
April 7, 1914: More Affidavits for Frank Motion (Atlanta Constitution)
April 8, 1914: Did Stover Girl go to Factory? (Atlanta Constitution)
April 9, 1914: Burns and Dorsey Hold Conference (Atlanta Constitution)
April 10, 1914: Interest Centered in Report of Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
April 11, 1914: New Evidence Against Jim Conley Reported (Atlanta Constitution)
April 12, 1914: Reward of $1,000 Offered by Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
April 13, 1914: Burns Expected to Return Soon (Atlanta Constitution)
April 15, 1914: State May Oppose Plans of the Defense (Atlanta Constitution)
April 16, 1914: Frank's New Plea to be Filed Today (New York Times)
April 16, 1914: Leo Frank's Fight to Get New Trial Will Begin Today (Atlanta Constitution)
April 17, 1914: Way is Paved to Take Case of Leo M. Frank Before Federal Court (Atlanta Constitution)
April 19, 1914: Atlantans Favor New Frank Trial (New York Times)
April 19, 1914: Testimony He Gave at Trial Was True, Declares M'Knight (Atlanta Constitution)
April 20, 1914: Burns Expected to Return Today (Atlanta Constitution)
April 21, 1914: Grand Jury to Act on Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
April 22, 1914: Dorsey and Burns Have Warm Words (Atlanta Constitution)
April 22, 1914: Lanford Declines to Show Affidavits (Atlanta Constitution)
April 23, 1914: Conley is Guilty, Asserts W. J. Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
April 24, 1914: Battle for Life of Leo M. Frank Begins in Court (Atlanta Constitution)
April 25, 1914: Did Not Confess to Girl's Murder, Says Jim Conley (Atlanta Constitution)
April 26, 1914: Monday is the Anniversary of Death of Mary Phagan (Atlanta Constitution)
April 26, 1914: Says Love Letters Written by Conley Prove Him Guilty (Atlanta Constitution)
April 27, 1914: Conley Notes Show Guilt, Says Burns (New York Times)
April 27, 1914: Friends Pay Tribute Today in the Cemetery at Marietta to Mary Phagan's Memory (Atlanta Constitution)
April 28, 1914: Friends Pay Tribute to Memory of Girl Killed One Year Ago (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1914: Horrible Mistake in Case of Frank, States W. J. Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1914: Ragsdale Alleges an Offer of 200 (New York Times)
May 2, 1914: Burns Attacked by Mob (New York Times)
May 2, 1914: W. J. Burns and Dan Lehon Summoned by Solicitor Dorsey to the Frank Retrial Hearing (Atlanta Constitution)
May 2, 1914: William J. Burns Driven Out of Marietta (Atlanta Constitution)
May 3, 1914: Dorsey Calls C. W. Burke and Other Investigators for Leo Frank to Court (Atlanta Constitution)
May 5, 1914: Frank Affidavits False, Says Dorsey (New York Times)
May 5, 1914: Return of Negress Ordered by Judge Monday Morning (Atlanta Constitution)
May 6, 1914: May Call Burns Before Grand Jury (New York Times)
May 7, 1914: Frank Plea Fails, Will Take Appeal (New York Times)
May 7, 1914: New Trial Denied Leo Frank; No Argument by Hugh Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
May 10, 1914: Burns to Answer Contempt Charge (Atlanta Constitution)
May 10, 1914: Judge Will Not Give an Opinion (Atlanta Constitution)
May 14, 1914: Leo Frank Hearing Set For Wednesday (Atlanta Constitution)
May 16, 1914: Lehon Contempt Trial is Postponed by Hill (Atlanta Constitution)
May 17, 1914: Dorsey Ready to Argue Move to Upset Verdict (Atlanta Constitution)
May 18, 1914: Frank Inquiry Today (New York Times)
May 19, 1914: Lehon Contempt Trial Up Today (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1914: Our Record Clean, Asserts Dan Lehon (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1914: Persecuted, Says Lehon (New York Times)
May 30, 1914: Negro Cuts Detective in Effort to Escape (Atlanta Constitution)
June 5, 1914: Frank Hearing Today (New York Times)
June 6, 1914: Verdict is Void, Declare Lawyers for Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
June 7, 1914: Another Step in Frank Case Won by State (Atlanta Constitution)
June 16, 1914: Burns to be Ousted by the Police Chiefs (Atlanta Constitution)
June 19, 1914: Burke Indicted for Perjury Subornation (Atlanta Constitution)
June 20, 1914: Burns is Dropped by Police Chiefs (Atlanta Constitution)
June 20, 1914: Resented His Criticisms (New York Times)
June 25, 1914: A. S. Colyar Arrested at Cartersville Home (Atlanta Constitution)
June 30, 1914: Knocks and Boosts From the State Press (Atlanta Constitution)
October 3, 1914: Frank Not Guilty, Believes Conley's Lawyer, Plans to Obtain Freedom of Man in Tower (Atlanta Constitution)
October 4, 1914: William Smith Tells Why His Opinion Has Changed as to Guilt of Leo Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
October 10, 1914: No Attack on Dorsey, Says William M. Smith (Atlanta Constitution)
October 15, 1914: Appeal Made by Leo Frank For New Trial Turned Down by Georgia Supreme Court (Atlanta Constitution)
October 27, 1914: Last Appeal Made for Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
November 1, 1914: Jackson's Trail Through Georgia Will be Marked (Atlanta Constitution)
November 3, 1914: No Delay Expected in Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
November 11, 1914: Frank Case Decision May Be Given Today (Atlanta Constitution)
November 15, 1914: Leo Frank Loses in Supreme Court (Atlanta Constitution)
November 20, 1914: Grand Jury is Probing Bond Fraud Cases (Atlanta Constitution)
November 21, 1914: Leo Frank Again Loses Big Point (Atlanta Constitution)
November 22, 1914: Vindication Asked by Leo M. Frank in Card to Public (Atlanta Constitution)
November 24, 1914: Frank Case Witness Placed Under Arrest (Atlanta Constitution)
November 24, 1914: Refuses Frank a Writ of Error (New York Times)
November 25, 1914: Is It a Denial of Justice? (New York Times)
November 26, 1914: Editorial Article 1 (No Title) (New York Times)
November 27, 1914: Justice Holmes's Opinion (New York Times)
November 28, 1914: Jury Was on Trial, Says Leo M. Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
November 28, 1914: Last Plea to Supreme Court (New York Times)
November 29, 1914: Retry Leo Frank, Says Rabbi (New York Times)
November 30, 1914: Frank Case Today in Highest Court (New York Times)
November 30, 1914: No Delay Expected in Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
December 1, 1914: The Press on Frank Case (New York Times)
December 2, 1914: Says Frank Verdict was Legal Nullity (New York Times)
December 3, 1914: Action is Postponed on Frank Remittitur (Atlanta Constitution)
December 4, 1914: Press on Frank Case (New York Times)
December 5, 1914: Frank Case Remittitur in Hands of the Court (Atlanta Constitution)
December 6, 1914: Atlanta's Mob Spirit Resident Holds it Responsible for Leo Frank's Conviction (New York Times)
December 8, 1914: Frank Loses Last Chance in Court (Atlanta Constitution)
December 9, 1914: Frank May Again Ask for a Writ (New York Times)
December 9, 1914: Habeas Corpus Writ for Leo Frank Today (Atlanta Constitution)
December 10, 1914: Frank Resentenced, Reassures Innocence (New York Times)
December 10, 1914: Leo Frank Hears Sentence of Death (Atlanta Constitution)
December 11, 1914: Georgians Here Appeal for Frank (New York Times)
December 11, 1914: Judge Hill Suffers Relapse of Illness (Atlanta Constitution)
December 11, 1914: New Plea to Courts Prepared for Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
December 12, 1914: Pastors Demand Retrial for Frank (New York Times)
December 13, 1914: All Urged to Write Appeals for Frank (New York Times)
December 14, 1914: Finds Mob Frenzy Convicted Frank (New York Times)
December 14, 1914: Frank Counsel Hopeful (New York Times)
December 14, 1914: Plan Hard Fight for Frank's Life (Atlanta Constitution)
December 15, 1914: Frank Can Appeal Again, Says Lawyer (New York Times)
December 17, 1914: Brooklyn Petition for Frank Pardon (New York Times)
December 18, 1914: Leo Frank Opens New Court Fight (Atlanta Constitution)
December 19, 1914: Frank's Moral Energy: Can He Write His Own Speeches, a Personal Acquaintance Asks (New York Times)
December 19, 1914: Newman to Hear Frank Case Today (Atlanta Constitution)
December 20, 1914: Alexander Scores Charge of Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
December 22, 1914: Frank Mass Meeting Called (New York Times)
December 23, 1914: Marshall Will Make Supreme Court Plea (Atlanta Constitution)
December 24, 1914: Called Lynch Law Veiled (New York Times)
December 27, 1914: Says His Analysis Vindicates Frank (New York Times)
December 28, 1914: Frank Railroaded, E. V. Debs Asserts (New York Times)
December 28, 1914: Full Newspaper (Illinois State Journal)
December 28, 1914: Leo Frank Decision is Expected Today (Atlanta Constitution)
December 28, 1914: Lesson From Frank Case (New York Times)
December 29, 1914: Frank's Trial Legal, Declares Grossman (Atlanta Constitution)
December 29, 1914: Lamar Grants Appeal to Frank (New York Times)
December 29, 1914: Leo M. Frank's New Fight for Life May Last in Courts for Six Months Before a Final Decision is Reached (Atlanta Constitution)
December 30, 1914: Long Legal Battle in Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
December 31, 1914: Article 5 (No Title) (New York Times)
January 1, 1915: Texans Make Plea for Leo M. Frank (New York Times)
January 3, 1915: Leo M. Frank Says Politics Prompted Joseph M. Brown to Write Card to Chronicle (Atlanta Constitution)
January 4, 1915: The Frank Case: A Socialist Plea for Justice Where It Can Still Be Done (New York Times)
January 6, 1915: Leo Frank Replies to Attack by Brown (New York Times)
January 10, 1915: Frank is Innocent, Says George S. Dougherty (New York Times)
January 17, 1915: Warren Grice Will Ask Early Hearing on Frank Petition (Atlanta Constitution)
January 17, 1915: William J. Burns Scores Man Who Worked in Frank Case (New York Times)
January 20, 1915: Article 8 (No Title) (New York Times)
January 24, 1915: Leo Frank Appeal is Set for Feb. 23 by Supreme Court (Atlanta Constitution)
January 29, 1915: Jim Conley Will Take Stand Today as State Witness (Atlanta Constitution)
January 30, 1915: Large Sums Paid to Burns Agency, Haas Tells Court (Atlanta Constitution)
January 31, 1915: Will Leo Frank be Tried Again? (Atlanta Constitution)
February 10, 1915: State is Preparing for Frank Hearing (Atlanta Constitution)
February 23, 1915: Conley, Not Frank, Guilty, Train Holds (New York Times)
February 23, 1915: Lawyers for State Reach Washington (Atlanta Constitution)
February 23, 1915: Sheriff Mangum Leaves to Attend Leo Frank Hearing (Atlanta Constitution)
February 24, 1915: Postpone Hearing of Frank Appeal (Atlanta Constitution)
February 27, 1915: Leo Frank's Fate in Hands of Court (Atlanta Constitution)
April 4, 1915: Jewish War Victims Aided by Leo Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
April 18, 1915: About the Frank Case (New York Times)
April 20, 1915: His Plea Denied, Frank May Move for a Rehearing (Atlanta Constitution)
April 21, 1915: Frank's Attorneys Confer on Appeal (Atlanta Constitution)
April 22, 1915: Frank Pardon Plea Will Be Completed Within a Few Days (Atlanta Constitution)
April 23, 1915: Frank Makes Plea for Commutation (Atlanta Constitution)
April 28, 1915: Article 12 (No Title) (New York Times)
April 30, 1915: Mother and Father of Leo Frank Here to Attend Hearing (Atlanta Constitution)
May 1, 1915: Leo Frank an Innocent Man, Declares Geraldine Ferrar After Visit to Tower Cell (Atlanta Constitution)
May 4, 1915: State Will Wait for U.S. Mandate in Case of Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
May 6, 1915: Frank's Lawyers Get Affidavits (Atlanta Constitution)
May 6, 1915: Georgia Counsel Surprised (New York Times)
May 10, 1915: Frank Will Face Judge Hill Today (Atlanta Constitution)
May 11, 1915: Leo Frank's Fate up to Gov. Slaton as Final Arbiter (Atlanta Constitution)
May 17, 1915: Frank a Mob Victim, Rabbi Wise Asserts (New York Times)
May 18, 1915: Date for Hearing of Frank is Fixed (Atlanta Constitution)
May 19, 1915: Texans Make Plea for Leo M. Frank (New York Times)
May 19, 1915: Paterson to Frank's Aid (New York Times)
May 19, 1915: State of Tennessee Makes Plea for Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
May 20, 1915: Two State Legislatures Ask Georgia's Governor for Clemency for Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
May 22, 1915: Dr. White to Discuss Leo Frank's Sentence (Atlanta Constitution)
May 23, 1915: Leo Frank Jurors to Hold Meeting to Discuss Case (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1915: Calls Frank Victim of Cry Against Jews (New York Times)
May 24, 1915: Free Sons Send Petition (New York Times)
May 24, 1915: Pastors to Plead for Commutation of Frank Sentence (Atlanta Constitution)
May 24, 1915: Plan Appeals for Frank (New York Times)
May 27, 1915: Clemency is Urged for Leo M. Frank by Georgia Society (Atlanta Constitution)
May 27, 1915: Clemency Protest is Filed by Dorsey (Atlanta Constitution)
May 28, 1915: Dorsey's Course Still Undecided (Atlanta Constitution)
May 29, 1915: Conley and Frank Meet Wednesday (Atlanta Constitution)
May 29, 1915: W. J. Burns Exonerated (New York Times)
May 30, 1915: Hope for Frank in Final Fight (New York Times)
May 31, 1915: Leo Frank's Plea for Commutation to be Heard Today (Atlanta Constitution)
June 1, 1915: Frank's Hearing Ends Commission, to Make Recommendation Soon (Atlanta Constitution)
June 2, 1915: Frank and Conley Will Meet Today (Atlanta Constitution)
June 2, 1915: Phagan Townsfolk at Frank Hearing (New York Times)
June 3, 1915: Frank and Conley Will Not Testify (Atlanta Constitution)
June 5, 1915: Magicians at Trick Dinner (New York Times)
June 5, 1915: Prison Commissioners Go to Their Homes (Atlanta Constitution)
June 5, 1915: Rochester Aid for Frank (New York Times)
June 9, 1915: Decision on Frank is Expected Today (New York Times)
June 10, 1915: Case of Leo Frank is up to Governor for Final Decision (Atlanta Constitution)
June 11, 1915: Final Plea for Frank to be Made Saturday (Atlanta Constitution)
June 12, 1915: Marietta Delegation to Fight Frank Plea (Atlanta Constitution)
June 12, 1915: To Make Last Plea for Frank Today (New York Times)
June 13, 1915: Begin Last Frank Plea to Governor (New York Times)
June 13, 1915: Slaton to Spend Today in Study of Frank Appeal (Atlanta Constitution)
June 14, 1915: Slaton Expected to Inspect Scene of Murder Today (Atlanta Constitution)
June 15, 1915: Howard to Finish Appeal for Frank Early Wednesday (Atlanta Constitution)
June 17, 1915: Ask State to Cease Killing by Law (New York Times)
June 17, 1915: Frank's Fate Now in Slaton's Hands (New York Times)
June 17, 1915: Leo Frank's Fate up to Governor; Hearing is Ended (Atlanta Constitution)
June 17, 1915: Leo Frank's Head Put in Metal Braces (Atlanta Constitution)
June 17, 1915: Reward of $1,000 Offered by Burns (Atlanta Constitution)
June 18, 1915: Leo Frank May Know His Fate by Sunday (Atlanta Constitution)
June 19, 1915: Decision on Frank Expected Monday (Atlanta Constitution)
June 19, 1915: Gov. Slaton Delays Leo Frank Decision (New York Times)
June 20, 1915: Frank May Not Know His Fate Till Tuesday (New York Times)
June 20, 1915: Howard Confident of Commutation for Leo Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
June 21, 1915: Frank Sentence Commuted (Atlanta Constitution)
June 21, 1915: Frank's Sentence is Commuted by Slaton (Atlanta Constitution)
June 22, 1915: Creditable to the State (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: Frank Starts Prison Work, Noisy Crowd at Governor's Home Dispersed by Militia (Atlanta Constitution)
June 22, 1915: Gov. Slaton's Statement; Slaton Commutes Frank Sentence (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: How Constitution Got Story of Frank's Departure When Governor, Sheriff and Other Officials Combined to Keep Commutation Secret Until Monday Afternoon (Atlanta Constitution)
June 22, 1915: Marshall Praises Slaton's Courage (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: Press of Georgia Upholds Governor (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: Rejoicing in Frank's Home (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: Soldiers Now Guard Him (New York Times)
June 22, 1915: Whole Frank Case Reviewed in Slaton's Statement (Atlanta Constitution)
June 23, 1915: Gov. Slaton Sees Mob's Anger Die (New York Times)
June 24, 1915: Guards Increased at Milledgeville (Atlanta Constitution)
June 25, 1915: A Study for Psychologists (New York Times)
June 25, 1915: Troops to Guard Slaton (New York Times)
June 26, 1915: Violence Feared in Atlanta Today (New York Times)
June 29, 1915: Praise for Slaton in Flood of Mail (New York Times)
June 30, 1915: Slaton Here; Glad He Saved Frank (New York Times)
July 1, 1915: Capitol Gossip (Atlanta Constitution)
July 14, 1915: Militia Under Arms Following Mob Rumor (Atlanta Constitution)
July 18, 1915: Leo Frank's Throat Cut by Convict; Famous Prisoner Near Death (New York Times)
July 18, 1915: Leo Frank's Throat Cut by State Farm Prisoner (Atlanta Constitution)
July 19, 1915: Creen's Mind Affected by Fall from Bridge (Atlanta Constitution)
July 19, 1915: Frank Survives Assassin's Knife (New York Times)
July 19, 1915: Frank's Condition Steadily Improving, Good Chance to Recover, Say Doctors (Atlanta Constitution)
July 20, 1915: Another Doctor Added to Staff Treating Frank (Atlanta Constitution)
July 20, 1915: Frank in a Fever, Infection Feared (New York Times)
July 22, 1915: Frank Grows Stronger; Danger is Nearly Over (Atlanta Constitution)
July 25, 1915: Convicts at State Farm Ask Pardon for McNaughton (Atlanta Constitution)
July 25, 1915: Frank's Assailant Before Governor (New York Times)
July 25, 1915: The Hideous Mob Spirit (New York Times)
July 26, 1915: Only Genuine Motion Pictures of Leo Frank (New York Times)
July 26, 1915: Preacher Defends Thaw (New York Times)
August 2, 1915: Frank's Head in Braces (New York Times)
August 2, 1915: Leo Frank's Head Put in Metal Braces (Atlanta Constitution)
August 11, 1915: On Day of Release, He Weds Daughter of GA Prison Head (Atlanta Constitution)
August 17, 1915: Posses Chase Frank Mob (Atlanta Constitution)
August 17, 1915: Warden is Overpowered (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Article 1 (No Title) (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Called Blot on State by Josephus Daniels (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Georgia Press Condemns Act (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Georgia's Shame (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: Governor Prepares for Formal Inquiry (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Had Not Given Up Hope (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: Harris to Probe Frank Lynching (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: How the Jeffersonian Fanned Race Hatred (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Loyless Bids, Georgians Choose (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Lynching of Leo Frank Denounced by Daniels (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: Mob Had Plotted Crime for Weeks (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Mob Hanging Better than Judicial Murder, Says John M. Slaton (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: Mob's Own Story in Detail (Atlanta Constitution)
August 18, 1915: Neighbors Protect Frank Slayers (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Save Body from Mob; Heels Mutilate Face (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Says Tom Watson is Frank's Slayer (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Took Frank's Life in Resentment (New York Times)
August 18, 1915: Trial Called a Prolonged Lynching (New York Times)
August 19, 1915: A Regrettable Incident (New York Times)
August 19, 1915: Grim Tragedy in Woods (New York Times)
August 19, 1915: Handcuffs May Prove Clue to Identity of at Least One of Leo Frank's Lynchers (New York Times)
August 19, 1915: May Find Mobbers by the Handcuffs on Burke's Wrists (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1915: Proof of Frank's Innocence (New York Times)
August 19, 1915: Woodward is Rapped by Governor Slaton (Atlanta Constitution)
August 19, 1915: Would Isolate Georgia (New York Times)
August 20, 1915: Frank Lynching Due to Suspicion and Prejudice (New York Times)
August 20, 1915: Frank's Body Here; Burial Hour Secret (New York Times)
August 20, 1915: Mob Law is Condemned in Statement by Harris on Leo Frank Lynching (Atlanta Constitution)
August 21, 1915: Alleged Frank Relics (New York Times)
August 22, 1915: Leo Frank Wrote His Own Alibi (New York Times)
August 22, 1915: One Frank Lyncher Said to be Known (New York Times)
August 24, 1915: Boycott Started Against Atlanta by Boston Firm (Atlanta Constitution)
August 24, 1915: Coroner to Resume Investigation Today into Frank Lynching (Atlanta Constitution)
August 25, 1915: Lynchers Unknown, Frank Jury Finds (New York Times)
August 25, 1915: Officials of Cobb Seek Clew to Mob (Atlanta Constitution)
August 30, 1915: Rope on His Auto, New York Police Shadow Atlantan (Atlanta Constitution)
September 12, 1915: Famous French Parallel to the Frank Case (New York Times)
September 13, 1915: Attacks Watson in Frank Case (New York Times)
September 20, 1915: Frank Committee Loses Chairman (New York Times)
October 17, 1915: Queries from Times Readers and Answers to Them (New York Times)
November 3, 1915: Society Lukewarm on Suffrage Vote (New York Times)
November 5, 1915: Gangster Madden Stays in Sing Sing (New York Times)
November 15, 1915: New England Educational Journal Criticizes Narrowness of Eastern Magazine (Atlanta Constitution)
November 20, 1915: Echo of the Frank Case (New York Times)
February 15, 1916: Jim Conley is Fined for Beating His Wife (Atlanta Constitution)
February 29, 1916: Morris Lasker Dead (New York Times)
April 2, 1916: Georgians Square, Asserts Slaton (Atlanta Constitution)
September 12, 1916: Dorsey Assails Slaton and Jews (New York Times)
September 13, 1916: Marshall Denies Dorsey's Charges (New York Times)
August 4, 1917: Ex-Gov. Slaton in a Fight (New York Times)
January 14, 1919: Jim Conley Shot as Store Breaker by Druggist Conn (Atlanta Constitution)
January 17, 1919: Jim Conley Admits Attempt at Burglary (Atlanta Constitution)
January 18, 1919: Leo Frank's Accuser Shot (New York Times)
February 25, 1919: 20-Year Jail Sentence for Conley (New York Times)
June 11, 1919: Recalls the Frank Case (New York Times)
August 19, 1921: W. J. Burns to Head the Secret Service (New York Times)
March 5, 1922: State Will Cite Leo Frank's Case in Dupre Hearing (Atlanta Constitution)
December 2, 1922: The Anti Lynching Bill (New York Times)
February 24, 1929: Aged Inmate Soon Will Complete 15 Years in Prison (Atlanta Constitution)
July 16, 1930: Heckler Questions Slaton Concerning Leo Frank Case (Atlanta Constitution)
August 12, 1930: Slaton Discusses Frank Commutation (Atlanta Constitution)
January 4, 1942: L.P. Whitfield, Noted Sleuth, 61, Succumbs (Atlanta Constitution)
December 1, 1943: Leo Frank's Widow Not Bitter, Sews on Wedding Anniversary (Atlanta Constitution)
December 2, 1943: Mrs. Frank Fine, Brave Woman, Slaton Opines; Silent on Case (Atlanta Constitution)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Book archives, Historical preservation, Jack Enright, Newspaper archives by Chief Curator. Bookmark the permalink.


The Canadian Music Centre is Open!
We are thrilled to announce that the CMC (20 St. Joseph Street, Toronto) has re-opened to the public. Please note that our main entrance remains temporarily unavailable and the building is accessible through the lower entrance. Thank you for your patience during this time!


text:
Here's what Biden plans to do on his first day as president
By: Jane Norman - January 20, 2021 10:42 am
WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 18: The U.S Capitol Building is prepared for the inaugural ceremonies for President-elect Joe Biden as American flags are placed in the ground on the National Mall on January 18, 2021 in Washington, DC. The approximately 191,500 U.S. flags will cover part of the National Mall and will represent the American people who are unable to travel to Washington, DC for the inauguration. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON—Joe Biden early Wednesday unveiled the list of executive orders, memos and directives he will make when he assumes the presidency later in the day, reversing a slew of Trump administration actions and laying out new policies of his own.
"These actions are bold, begin the work of following through on President-elect Biden's promises to the American people, and, importantly, fall within the constitutional role for the president," the transition team said in a statement.
According to the transition team, Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will:
Ask the American people to mask up for 100 days in a "100 days masking challenge" to prevent the spread of COVID-19. They will require masks and social distancing in all federal buildings and on all federal lands.
Create the position of a COVID-19 response coordinator, reporting directly to the president.
Cease the process of withdrawing from the World Health Organization, which has been coordinating the global response to COVID-19, and begin taking part in WHO meetings and other actions.
Ask the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to extend the federal eviction moratorium until at least March 31 and call on Congress to provide more rental assistance. They will ask the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, to "consider extending foreclosure moratoriums for federally guaranteed mortgages and continuing applications for forbearance for federally guaranteed mortgages until at least March 31."
Ask the Department of Education to extend the pause on interest and principal payments for federal direct student loans until at least Sept. 30.
Sign the document to rejoin the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and deposit it with the United Nations on Wednesday.
Direct federal agencies to review actions taken during the Trump administration that were harmful to public health, damaging to the environment and not in the public interest.
Direct agencies to consider revising vehicle fuel economy and emissions standards.
Direct the Department of Interior to review the boundaries and conditions of the Grand Staircase-Escalante, Bears Ears, Northeast Canyons, and Seamounts Marine National Monuments and placing a temporary moratorium on all oil and natural gas leasing activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
Revoke the presidential permit for the Keystone XL pipeline.
Embed the concept of equity across the government by defining it as the "consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities, such as Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and other persons of color; LGBTQ+ persons; people with disabilities; religious minorities, persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise affected by persistent poverty or inequality."
Direct federal agencies to review the state of equity in their departments and deliver action plans; launch a new data working group to make sure that federal data reflects American diversity; task the budget office with working for more equitable allocation of federal resources; and more.
Reverse Trump administration orders that excluded undocumented immigrants from census counts.
Sign a presidential memo supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and call on Congress to take action to pass laws for permanent status for Dreamers.
End the restriction on entry into the United States of people from primarily Muslim and African nations.
Stop construction of the border wall by terminating a national emergency declaration that was used by President Donald Trump to continue its funding.
Sign an order aimed at prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Order every appointee in the executive branch to sign an ethics pledge.
Issue an order that pauses any new Trump regulations from moving forward so they can be reviewed.
by Jane Norman, Wisconsin Examiner
Ask the American people to mask up for 100 days in a "100 days masking challenge" to prevent the spread of COVID-19. They will require masks and social distancing in all federal buildings and on all federal lands. Create the position of a COVID-19 response coordinator, reporting directly to the president. Cease the process of withdrawing from the World Health Organization, which has been coordinating the global response to COVID-19, and begin taking part in WHO meetings and other actions. Ask the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to extend the federal eviction moratorium until at least March 31 and call on Congress to provide more rental assistance. They will ask the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, to "consider extending foreclosure moratoriums for federally guaranteed mortgages and continuing applications for forbearance for federally guaranteed mortgages until at least March 31." Ask the Department of Education to extend the pause on interest and principal payments for federal direct student loans until at least Sept. 30. Sign the document to rejoin the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and deposit it with the United Nations on Wednesday. Direct federal agencies to review actions taken during the Trump administration that were harmful to public health, damaging to the environment and not in the public interest. Direct agencies to consider revising vehicle fuel economy and emissions standards. Direct the Department of Interior to review the boundaries and conditions of the Grand Staircase-Escalante, Bears Ears, Northeast Canyons, and Seamounts Marine National Monuments and placing a temporary moratorium on all oil and natural gas leasing activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Revoke the presidential permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. Embed the concept of equity across the government by defining it as the "consistent and systematic fair, just, and impartial treatment of all individuals, including individuals who belong to underserved communities, such as Black, Latino, Indigenous and Native American persons, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and other persons of color; LGBTQ+ persons; people with disabilities; religious minorities, persons who live in rural areas; and persons otherwise affected by persistent poverty or inequality." Direct federal agencies to review the state of equity in their departments and deliver action plans; launch a new data working group to make sure that federal data reflects American diversity; task the budget office with working for more equitable allocation of federal resources; and more. Reverse Trump administration orders that excluded undocumented immigrants from census counts. Sign a presidential memo supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and call on Congress to take action to pass laws for permanent status for Dreamers. End the restriction on entry into the United States of people from primarily Muslim and African nations. Stop construction of the border wall by terminating a national emergency declaration that was used by President Donald Trump to continue its funding. Sign an order aimed at prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Order every appointee in the executive branch to sign an ethics pledge. Issue an order that pauses any new Trump regulations from moving forward so they can be reviewed.
Jane Norman
As the Washington Bureau Chief of States Newsroom, Jane directs national coverage, managing staff and freelance reporters in the nation's capital and assigning and editing state-specific daily and enterprise stories. Jane is a veteran of more than three decades in journalism.
Misogyny is fueling the country's gun violence epidemic,… by Anna Gustafson August 1, 2022
Trump's fake electors: Here's the full list by Kira Lerner July 5, 2022

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
EditorialCORONAVIRUS
COVID-19: All the wrong moves in all the wrong places
Christopher D. Barrett and
View ORCID ProfileMichael B. Yaffe
Christopher D. Barrett, Center for Precision Cancer Medicine, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and the Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Divisions of Acute Care Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care and Surgical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Dr. Barrett has patents pending related to the field of fibrinolysis and COVID-19 therapy. Email: cdbarret{at}mit.edu
Michael B. Yaffe, Chief Scientific Advisor and Academic Editor, Science Signaling, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC 20005, USA. Center for Precision Cancer Medicine, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and the Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Divisions of Acute Care Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care and Surgical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Dr. Yaffe has patents pending related to the field of fibrinolysis and COVID-19 therapy. Email: myaffe{at}mit.edu
Science Signaling 15 Sep 2020:
Vol. 13, Issue 649, eabe4242
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.abe4242
Christopher D. Barrett
Christopher D. Barrett, Center for Precision Cancer Medicine, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and the Departments of Biology and Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Divisions of Acute Care Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care and Surgical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Dr. Barrett has patents pending related to the field of fibrinolysis and COVID-19 therapy. Email:
For correspondence: cdbarret@mit.edu
Michael B. Yaffe
ORCID record for Michael B. Yaffe
In this Editorial, Barrett and Yaffe highlight shortcomings in our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and underscore the need for more basic research into this new disease.
https://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse
You are going to email the following COVID-19: All the wrong moves in all the wrong places
By Christopher D. Barrett, Michael B. Yaffe
Science Signaling 15 Sep 2020
Missteps and opportunities in the tackling of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed.


The prime suspect for the 11 September attacks on America, Osama Bin Laden, has apparently urged Pakistani Muslims to defend Islam against what he described as a Christian campaign.
News organisations including the BBC were sent copies of a letter - allegedly from Bin Laden - that describes the US-led military attacks against the Saudi-born militant and Afghanistan's Taleban regime as a conflict of religions.
Bin Laden: Accused Pakistan of "standing beneath the Christian banner"
The letter exhorts Muslims in Pakistan to "stand in the face" of the attacks.
UK Prime Minister Tony Blair responded by issuing a statement of support for the Pakistani military ruler, General Pervez Musharraf, saying he "is trying to do his best for the people of Pakistan".
"I hope people realise that the desire of Bin Laden is to create Taleban-type states all over the world," added Mr Blair, who is on a diplomatic mission in the Middle East to shore up Arab support for the campaign against terrorism.
President Musharraf has allied himself with the US-led campaign, although this decision has brought him under intense pressure from Pakistani civilians, who have staged sometimes violent demonstrations against the attacks on Afghanistan.
The Bin Laden letter accused Pakistan of "standing beneath the Christian banner".
The BBC Arabic service was sent a copy of the letter by fax after a man speaking Arabic with an Afghan or Pakistani accent phoned the department.
The call for Pakistanis to rise up against their government comes at a sensitive time.
Christian worshippers were massacred on Sunday in eastern Punjab province by suspected Islamist gunmen.
This week, furious Pakistani demonstrators poured into the streets of the capital Islamabad, denouncing their president as a poodle of the United States.
Hussein Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador and political commentator, has warned that the demonstrations could have a damaging impact on President Musharraf's political effectiveness.
If the Pakistani public responds to Bin Laden's call to arms, then this could only deepen the country's destabilisation.


text:
Q: Perform animation within custom UIView only I'm facing similar problem as Animating a shape with CoreAnimation
I have a custom UIView
MyUIView
- (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect {
    // Right here, I might also draw some triangle, circle which I do not wish
    // to be animated.

    // ...
    // Calculate minX, minY, ... based on rect and self->value.
    // ...

    // Draw a rounded rectangle based on minX, minY, ...
    // The x-location of rounded rectangle will be different for difference self->value
    CGContextMoveToPoint(context, minx, midy);
    CGContextAddArcToPoint(context, maxx, maxy, midx, maxy, radius);
    ...
    ...
    CGContextDrawPath(context, kCGPathFillStroke);
}

// Usually trigger by controller via button clicked
- (void) setValueViaButtonClicked:(double) value {
    self->currentValue = value;
    dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
        [self setNeedsDisplay];
    });
}

Currently, whenever I click the button with a new value different from old value, I can see the rounded rectangle moved from old position to new position, but without animation.
I would like to have animation, only during explicit button click. For most of the examples I had seen, the animation code is performed within controller, by

*

*Animation is done through Layer and CGPathCreateMutable

*The creation of Layer and CGPathCreateMutable, is performed in view controller.

I was wondering, how am I possible to perform the above tasks through MyUIView's setValueViaButtonClicked? As without proper rect information from drawRect, how am I going to configure information for paths created from CGPathCreateMutable?

A: I think you don't use CoreAnimation but CoreGraphics to just draw the current state/value. Whenever it comes to animations instead of static images I switch to CoreAnimation layers. In your case I would create a UIView subclass and add a CAShapeLayer for your triangle (or whatever shape).
It would look like this:
@interface MyView ()
@property (nonatomic, strong) CAShapeLayer *shapeLayer;
@property (nonatomic, assign) double currentValue;
@end

@implementation MyView

-(instancetype)init {
  if (self = [super init]) {
    [self setup];
  }
  return self;
}

- (instancetype)initWithCoder:(NSCoder *)aDecoder {
  if (self = [super initWithCoder:aDecoder]) {
    [self setup];
  }
  return self;
}

- (instancetype)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame
{
  self = [super initWithFrame:frame];
  if (self) {
    [self setup];
  }
  return self;
}

- (void)setup {
  CAShapeLayer *shape = [CAShapeLayer layer];
  shape.contentsScale = [[UIScreen mainScreen] scale];
  self.shapeLayer = shape;
  [self.layer addSublayer:shape];
}

- (void)layoutSubviews {
  [super layoutSubviews];
  self.shapeLayer.frame = self.bounds;
  self.shapeLayer.path = [self bezierPathForValue:self.currentValue].CGPath;
}

- (UIBezierPath *)bezierPathForValue:(double)value {
  UIBezierPath *path = [UIBezierPath bezierPath];
  [path moveToPoint:...]; // points are depending on currentValue
  return path;
}

- (void)setValueViaButtonClicked:(double) value {
  double oldValue = self.currentValue;
  self.currentValue = value;

  // update model value
  self.shapeLayer.path = [self bezierPathForValue:value].CGPath;

  CABasicAnimation *pathAnimation = [CABasicAnimation animationWithKeyPath:@"path"];
  pathAnimation.fromValue = (id)[self bezierPathForValue:oldValue].CGPath;
  pathAnimation.toValue = (id)[self bezierPathForValue:value].CGPath;
  pathAnimation.duration = 0.3f;
  [self.shapeLayer addAnimation:pathAnimation forKey:nil];
}

@end

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


In my law practice, friends, family, and random callers seek advice and information about Georgia Law. A recent question focused on Truancy in Georgia. A rural community had a parent arrested for a child's purported 12 or so unexcused absences. The question: does it just happen out of the blue or is there some process before a parent is arrested? Georgia law requires that children between the ages of 6 and 16 attend school. If a child has 5 or more unexcused absences that parent or guardian in control of the child can be charged with a misdemeanor, sentenced to up to 30 days in jail, community service and/or a fine of between $25 and $1000. Each unexcused absence beyond the 5 days can be treated as a separate crime. OCGA 20-2-690.1. In my experience, school systems prefer to deal with the issue by speaking with parents and resolving issues. Only when the parent and child fail to improve on the problem or provide a reasonable explanation do parents go to jail. School systems are required to have a truancy protocol to address these incidents before reaching the arrest and charging level. OCGA 20-2-690.2. Providing written excuses and communicating with the school and the Truancy team can help parents avoid arrest in most cases. Failure to get a child to school on time is the responsibility of the parent under Georgia law. Judges and schools prefer for a child to be school, learning. No one wants to do the paperwork associated with arresting someone, having to appear in court, and deal with the Court system if they don't have to.
My problem with the way this is reported is that it's always reported as "Mother arrested for child's 3 unexcused absences", which means 3 over the limit, after she went and found excuses for some of the others – and not 3 total.
The media…in my experience many reporters learn enough to write something down but don't always have the whole story or have access to someone with complete information.


text:
Q: Full calendar sheduler with an extra long resource I'm having trouble showing a vertical scheduler.
this is what i'm using:
$('#timetable').fullCalendar({
        schedulerLicenseKey: 'CC-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives',
        editable: true,
        resourceAreaWidth: "100px",
        defaultView: 'timelineMonth',
        slotLabelFormat: ['MMMM','D'],
        eventAllow: function(dropLocation, draggedEvent) {
            var originalEvent = $('#timetable').fullCalendar('clientEvents', draggedEvent.id)[0]
            return dropLocation.start.isSame(originalEvent.start) && dropLocation.end.isSame(originalEvent.end)
        },
        header: {
            left: 'today prev,next',
            center: 'title',
            right: 'timelineWeek,timelineMonth,agendaToDisplayFourWeek'
        },
        views: {
            agendaToDisplayFourWeek: {
                type: 'timeline',
                slotDuration: {hours: 12},
                duration: { month: 3 }
            },
            timelineMonth: {
                eventOverlap: false,
                slotDuration: {hours: 24},
                slotLabelInterval: {days: 1},
                type: 'timeline',

            },
            timelineYear: {
                eventOverlap: false,
                slotDuration: {hours: 1},
                slotLabelInterval: {days: 1},
            },

        },
        resources: [
        { id: 'a',  title: 'Bahamas' },
        { id: 'b',  title: 'Longbeach' },
        { id: 'c',  title: 'Mentawai' },
        { id: 'd',  title: 'Wau' },
        { id: 'e',  title: 'Sin asignar' },
        { id: 'e1',  title: 'Sin asignar' }
        ],
        events: [
        { id: '1', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event 1' },
        { id: '6', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event a' },
        { id: '2', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event 2' },
        { id: '3', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event 3' },
        { id: '4', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event 4' },
        { id: '5', resourceId: 'e', start: '2018-07-01', end: '2018-07-10', title: 'event 5' }
        ]
    });

this produces the next result:
https://codepen.io/monxas/pen/VdRwwM?editors=0010
as you can see there's some unintended behavior at the bottom part.


text:
Aperçu Apple Podcasts
Episode 19 - Meditation and conversation with Alice Waters Pleine Présence
In this episode which was recorded live at the Parisian urban farm La Plantation, Lili Barbery-Coulon interviewed Alice Waters. Renowned American chef, activist and founder of non-profit organization The Edible Schoolyard, Alice Waters created the famous restaurant Chez Panisse in Berkeley in 1971. She is convinced we can change the world through the connection of our senses and education. A "delicious revolution" as she likes to name it, that has inspired thousands of chefs around the globe and has even inspired a French version of the Edible Schoolyard called "école comestible" (listen to episode 17 to learn more about this). Alice Waters just published her second cook book in French : L'art de la cuisine simple (co-published by Keribus and Actes Sud). This episode is in English. If you want to listen to the French translated version, go and listen to episode 18.
About Lili Barbery-Coulon
Former journalist (French Vogue, M, the magazine of Le Monde), Lili Barbery-Coulon is the author of three books in France: Pimp my breakfast, La reconciliation, L'oracle des mantras. Kundalini yoga and meditation teacher, she is the founder of the podcast Pleine Presence (which means full presence in French) which gathers interviews of people who inspire her for their positive impact on their environment. This episode is the first she records in English. And hopefully not the last!
https://www.chezpanisse.com/1/
https://edibleschoolyard.org/
https://www.ecolecomestible.org/
https://www.keribus-editions.com/alice-waters-tome2/
https://lilibarbery.com/
https://www.instagram.com/lilibarbery/
Plus d'épisodes
Les Podcasteurs
Classement des podcasts dans Forme et santé
Somnifère, le podcast pour s'endormir
Lucile Woodward
Métamorphose, éveille ta conscience !
Anne Ghesquière
Louie Media
Psychologie et Bien-être |Le podcast de Psychologue.net


text:
Sharam Kohan PhD
Archive for the 'National Origin Discrimination' Category
`We are only following the law'
Kohan, Project Director & Editor - June 30, 2018 @ 7:20 am · National Origin Discrimination, Philosophy
`We are only following the law' doesn't explain immigration policy during Nazi era or now
Holocaust historians' first impulse is to reject comparisons between those dark decades and our present. We don't want to be perceived as abusing history for political purposes or engaging in overly emotional analyses.
But then comes a moment when it's not possible to avoid parallels.
For me, that moment came two weeks ago.
I study the American response to the Holocaust. I was researching the U.S. officials' false claim that the nation's inflexible immigration laws gave them no choice but to deny visas to hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees in the 1930s and early 1940s – and historians' repetition of this false claim. From every media outlet came Trump administration officials spewing similar hollow arguments.
The law made me do it
During the Nazi era, the claim was based on the 1924 immigration law that set annual worldwide quotas, as well as country-by-country limits, on the number of immigrants to be admitted to the United States.
The problem with the claim and the idea that U.S. officials had no choice but to follow the law and limit immigration is that the quotas were never even close to being filled from 1933 to 1945, the 12 years of the Nazi regime.
About 200,000 refugees from Nazi Europe were admitted during that period to the U.S., while at least another 200,000 could have been under existing quotas. The quota for Germans of about 26,000 was filled in just one year, in 1939. In every other year, the quota ranged from 7 percent to 70 percent filled.
The law didn't prevent U.S. officials from admitting more refugees. Officials chose to interpret and implement the nation's immigration laws so as to exclude as many refugees from Nazi Europe as possible.
Yet at the time, and in many historical accounts, officials consistently blamed the law. That includes Assistant Secretary of State Breckinridge Long, who explained why his administration could not help European Jews in 1943.
"American immigration policy was expressed [solely] in the laws enacted by Congress, which the executive branch had no power to alter," said Long.
I want to know why so many historians cling to "the law-made-me-do-it" narrative, assuming that that narrative was all history.
It wasn't.
As criticism of the Trump administration's policy of separating families at the border ramped up in mid-June, U.S. officials trotted out their version of Long's argument – though in less elevated language.
Asked why the administration adopted the "zero tolerance" policy, which led to criminal prosecutions of all those crossing the border seemingly illegally, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said during a Thursday press conference, "because it's the law, that's what the law states."
Front page of The New York Times, July 19, 1941. US Holocaust Memorial Museum
Pressed again, Sanders said, "Again, the laws are the one, the laws that have been on the books for over a decade and the president is enforcing them."
Sanders wasn't the first Trump administration official to blame "the law" for immigration policy.
"We don't deport anyone," John Kelly declared, when he was still Homeland Security secretary. "American law deports people."
Nor has Sanders been the last.
Kelly's successor, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the president have all said at various times – and then taken it back – that they had no choice.
Jobs and security
The Trump administration has justified its anti-immigrant policy as a way to help unemployed Americans. So did the Hoover administration and then the Roosevelt administration.
Faced with the Great Depression, Hoover decided in 1930 to limit the number of immigrants allowed into the country, because – supposedly – they would take Americans' jobs.
Hoover did it by changing the interpretation of a decades-old provisionthat enabled officials to deny visas to those who were "likely to become a public charge." Under the new interpretation, almost every applicant was found likely to become a public charge with no guidance or consistency in what that meant.
Immigration dropped 90 percent in the first five months.
From 1933 to 1945, the Roosevelt administration continued to use this interpretation of the likely-to-become-a-public-charge clause and other provisions to keep immigration under what the law allowed, even after the economy picked up.
The Trump administration has claimed immigrants are more likely to commit crimes and to be national security risks, using unrepresentative anecdotes and amorphous fears to justify its policy.
So did the Roosevelt administration. One State Department lawyer maintained that officials should deny visas to those who had criminal tendencies, even if they have no criminal record.
Government officials during the Roosevelt administration also assumed a large proportion of immigrants, particularly Jewish ones, were communists determined to subvert democracy. They denied visas on that basis.
Officials also assumed German Jewish refugees would be spies for the Third Reich. That was based upon the flimsiest of evidence: a Cuban ambassador's claim some Jewish refugees celebrated the fall of Paris to the Nazis and a former U.S. ambassador to France's allegation that German Jewish refugees made up half the 200 spies the French Army arrested.
"I believe you should instruct our counter-espionage services of all sorts to keep an especially vigilant eye on the Jewish refugees from Germany," William Bullitt, the ex-ambassador, wrote Roosevelt. "Sad, isn't it?'"
Breckenridge Long, who worked to stop refugees from the Nazis from coming to the U.S.National Archives
Jewish refugees didn't turn out to be spies. Of the 23,000 "enemy aliens" who arrived in 1940, for example, fewer than one-half of 1 percent were taken into custody for questioning. Only a fraction of those were indicted – for violating immigration regulations, not for espionage.
Denials of visas based on national security concerns and other reasons, however, meant that just 21,000 refugees entered the United States between Pearl Harbor and the war's end, with quotas from Axis-controlled countries only 10 percent filled. Historian David Wyman estimates that the U.S. could have saved nearly 200,000 victims of the Nazis by allowing them to enter the country.
Who gets to be American
Based on my research, I have concluded that U.S. government officials' fears about refugees from Nazism being public charges, criminals or security risks were primarily pretexts for their real concern. That concern was that allowing in too many refugees would fundamentally alter the nature of American society.
Many decision-makers, particularly in the State Department, hailed from the WASP elite and perceived ambitious Jews as threatening their exclusive domains. The fewer Jews in the United States, the greater the chance of preserving the country as it had been and as they wanted it to continue to be. These officials justified any position and tolerated any cruelty, including refusing to change immigration policies once it was known the Germans were exterminating all of Europe's Jews.
Roosevelt administration officials turned out to be both right and wrong in their fears.
They were right that the European refugees who came before, during and after the war, though small in number, reshaped the world of higher education, the arts and the sciences and contributed to the rise of the postwar meritocracy. That postwar meritocracy broke down the class-based system that kept Jews and Italians and eventually blacks and Latinos out of elite institutions.
But they were wrong that these changes undermined American democracy or changed the country's spirit.
The nation was better off letting in 200,000 refugees between 1933 and 1945. It would have been even better off filling the quotas and allowing in the additional 200,000 refugees. And it would have been better off still had the country admitted anyone in need and tried to save all those who were imperiled as the Holocaust unfolded.
Some might object, probably under their breath, that these refugees were different. They were "good" refugees.
But that is not how they were perceived at the time. And that is exactly the point and precisely the parallel.
Bullying: Often A Tolerated Form of Violence by Employers
Kohan, Project Director & Editor - March 27, 2018 @ 6:35 am · Bullying, Human Resources, National Origin Discrimination, Race-Based Harassment and Retaliation, Racial Harassment, Retaliation
Violence in the workplace starts far before clench hands fly or deadly weapons douse lives. Where disdain and animosity routinely uproot cooperation and communication, violence has happened.
It is time to treat workplace bullying equipollent to sexual harassment or racial discrimination, to identify the perpetrators, establish rules of conduct and penalties, and even pass laws proscribing and penalizing bullying.
Bullying in the workplace is very far reaching today, however before we can come to comprehend it, we should comprehend that bullying is not quite the same as innocuous incivility, impertinence, rudeness, prodding and other well-kenned forms of interpersonal torment. Bullying is a type of violence, however, it rarely includes fighting, battery or homicide. It is often sub-lethal, non-physical violence. And as research data show, bullying crosses boundaries of gender, race and organizational rank.
Attributes of Bullying
In what manner can an issue so common not trigger societal shock? Silence by targeted employees is understandable in light of the fact that disgrace comes from being controlled and humiliated.
Co-wokers' silence bodes well in a dread tormented condition when individuals are uncertain on the off chance that they may next be targeted.
Notwithstanding how bullying is displayed – either verbal assaults or key moves to render the target ineffective and unsuccessful – it is the assailant's want to control the objective that spurs the activity.
Bullying incorporates abuse that incorporates same-sex and same-race badgering. Research has found that in just 25% of bullying cases does the objective have secured amass status and in this way qualify the offenses as sexual harassment or racial discrimination. A college overview led by University of Illinois analysts found a comparable strength of bullying over types of illegal harassment. The fact that many types of bullying are not illegal makes it barely noticeable despite the fact that it is three times more common than its better-perceived, unlawful forms.
Men and women can be bullies. Women make 58% of the culprit pool, while men speak to 42%. Research likewise demonstrates that when the targeted individual is a woman, she is harassed by a woman in 63% of cases; when the objective is male, he is bullied by a man in 62% of episodes. Most bullying is same-sex provocation which makes up the dominant part of bullied individuals (80%).
Bullying is almost imperceptible. It is non-physical, and almost dependably sub-deadly working environment viciousness. Workplace homicide gets featured on the news as striking uncommon occasions even in the violent United States. Corporate chiefs focus intensely on aversion and reaction forms, topped with zero tolerance rules.
Strikingly, bullying is psychological violence, for the most part incognito and once in a while clear. It is mental savagery, both in its inclination and effect. Despite how bullying is exhibited – either verbal attacks or overt moves to render the objective ineffective and unsuccessful – it is the attacker's intention to control the objective that spurs the activity. The significant hazard is mental harm, however, counseling is not offered by employers to complainants who report bullying.
The trademark normal to all bullies is that they are controlling contenders who misuse their agreeable targets. Most domineering jerks would stop if the tenets changed and tormenting was rebuffed.
Bullying nearly resembles the phenomenon of abusive behavior at home. Both were covered in silence before being conveyed to open consideration. Accomplice viciousness casualties at first were reprimanded for their destiny. In the long run, the conduct was workplace harassing merits a similar advancement from acknowledgment to disallowance. The glaring distinction amongst local and work environment mental viciousness is that the last finds the abuser on the employer's payroll.
Why Employers Should Address Workplace Bullying?
Bullying is 3 times more pervasive than sexual harassment. Illegal discrimination and harassment require noteworthy speculations of time and cash to recognize, adjust and avert. Employers definitely recognize what to do about harassment. Bullying is costly: employment practices liability can be significant. A bullied employee, frequently the most capable employees, are driven from the workplace. Turnover is costly.
What Employers Should Do?
Employers should create values-driven policy. An ideal anti-bullying policy should include a declaration of unacceptability; the organization must state its displeasure with the misconduct; hostile workplace protections for everyone; extend rights to everyone regardless of protected group status; extend, combine or replace existing anti-violence & anti-harassment policies; inescapable definition, reserve prohibitions only for severe incidents, to clarify the threshold for taking action; non-punitive separation for safety; documentation of adverse impact to discourage frivolous complaints or abuse of the policy; incorporate perpetrator pattern & practice over time; credible enforcement processes; credible third-party investigation & adjudication process; foster employee trust, to remove influence of personal relationships; progressive disciplinary action not zero tolerance, to allow for change in conduct; retaliation prohibition to count offenses of retaliation separately, to stop the cycle of violence.
EEOC Issues Enforcement Guidance on National Origin Discrimination
Kohan, Project Director & Editor - November 21, 2016 @ 5:53 am · National Origin Discrimination
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued its updated enforcement guidance on national origin discrimination to replace its 2002 compliance manual section on that subject, the federal agency announced today.
The Commission has also issued two short user-friendly resource documents to accompany the guidance: a question-and-answer publication on the guidance document and a small business fact sheet that highlights the major points in the guidance in plain language.
"EEOC is dedicated to advancing opportunity for all workers and ensuring freedom from discrimination based on ethnicity or country of origin," said EEOC Chair Jenny R. Yang. "This guidance addresses important legal developments over the past 14 years on issues ranging from human trafficking to workplace harassment. The examples and promising practices included in the guidance will promote compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws and help employers and employees better understand their legal rights and responsibilities."
On June 2, EEOC published a proposed guidance for public input on www.regulations.gov. The guidance issued today reflects the Commission's consideration of feedback received on the proposal from approximately 20 organizations and individuals.
EEOC's enforcement guidance documents are approved by the Commission, set forth the agency's interpretation of the law, and explain how federal anti-discrimination laws and regulations apply to specific workplace situations. The enforcement guidance on national origin discrimination discusses Title VII's prohibition on national origin discrimination as applied to a wide variety of employment situations and highlights promising practices for employers to prevent discrimination. The guidance also addresses developments in the courts since 2002, as well as topics such as job segregation, human trafficking and intersectional discrimination.
In fiscal year 2015, approximately 11 percent of the 89,385 private sector charges filed with EEOC alleged national origin discrimination. These charges alleged a wide variety of Title VII violations, including unlawful failure to hire, termination, language-related issues, and harassment.
EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov.
Sharam Kohan
Quantum Mechanics: Realistic Approaches
Hispanic-Preference Hiring
Hypergrowth Organizations
Race-Based Harassment and Retaliation
Use of Criminal Background Checks


text:
About your privacy and cookies
We use cookies to help make our website and services better. You consent to our use of cookies if you continue to use this website.
Necessary Preferences Advertising Learn more about cookies
Barnsley Council
Sign language videos
Roadworks and closures
Important information about frozen vegetables
The Food Standards Agency and Public Health England are reminding people that most frozen vegetables, including sweetcorn, need to be cooked before eating. This includes when adding them to salads, smoothies or dips.
Frozen sweetcorn is the likely source of an ongoing outbreak of listeriosis affecting five European countries including the United Kingdom.
Listeriosis is a rare but serious foodborne illness caused by the bacterium listeria monocytogenes can be more serious for individuals who have weakened immune systems as well as the elderly, pregnant women and infants. There are no known cases in Barnsley at this time.
People should always follow manufacturers' instructions when preparing their food. If the product is not labelled as 'ready to eat', the cooking instructions should always be followed before eating the food hot or cold.
How would you rate your online experience?
A - Z Directory
Barnsley Facebook Page
Barnsley Twitter Page
© 2019 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council. All rights reserved


This entry was posted in art, the boys, Uncategorized, writing general. Bookmark the permalink.
12 Responses to Getting back to normal… whatever that is.
Aww, the boys sure do look like they enjoying a selfie/easy. Lots of writing and art going on, I wonder how you manage to find the time to do all that you do, and have an easy of your own!
The human really enjoys your 30 day art challenges on FB.
Hi. Hi… Thanks for stopping by.
Looks like Bugsy and Knuckles are getting their easy on. Congrats on making it through the challenge!
The boys look very cozy. They're definitely having an easy Sunday.
Beautiful art and such cute kitties.
Wow, you created some beautiful flower art for this challenge – and of course the boys came through with a nice selfie!
Well done with the challenge, Lou! We are enjoying the new blog — so much great information. And looking good, Bugsy and Knuckles. Hugs to you all.
Awwwwww. They look perfect. They are the most gorgeous boys!