Time: 1 Hour 30 Mins.
Cream together the Butter, Brown Sugar, White Sugar and Canola Oil, until light and fluffy.
Add the Egg and yolk, Vanilla Extract and Maraschino Cherry Juice mix until combined.
Add 1/2 of the dry ingredients to the butter/sugar mix until combined, then add the other half until combined. Do not over-mix.
Roll dough into balls using a Tbsp. size scoop. Flatten slightly and place onto a non-greased baking sheet.
Take a Cherry and place into the center of the cookie dough, press the cherry down slightly.
Bake for 10-12 minutes, let cookies cool for at least 5 mins before transferring to a cooling rack.


text:
Q: Read a standalone Google Apps Script in a specific spreadsheet I have a script that I am running in an Apps Script created from Google Drive as follows:
var ssid="14ESdH--------------------------------HOn8A";

SHEET_NAME = "Chilled Sheet";
SORT_DATA_RANGE = "A3:F";
SORT_ORDER = [
{column: 2, ascending: true}, // 1 = column number, sort by ascending order
];

function autoSort(){
  var ss=SpreadsheetApp.openById(ssid);
  var sheet = ss.getSheetByName(SHEET_NAME);
  var range = sheet.getRange(SORT_DATA_RANGE);
  range.sort(SORT_ORDER);
}

When I run this script in the apps script the function works as it should.  I would now like to run this function from a button within the sheet.  Previously I have written a script that is like the below within the script situated within the spreadsheet itself:
function onClickButton() {
  var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
  autoSort(sheet);
}

Unfortunately, using this and editing it several times various ways I can't get the button on my sheet to read script onClickButton.  I deleted this out eventually and tried running the script autoSort with the button which also didint work.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I can run the sheet with a button that activates the autoSort script please?

A: Here's a diagram you can following to create and connect a button to a script.
Now with reference to this script:
function onClickButton() {
  var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
  autoSort(sheet);
}

You should note that you are including the parameter 'sheet'
But in this function definition there is no parameter.
function autoSort(){
  var ss=SpreadsheetApp.openById(ssid);
  var sheet = ss.getSheetByName(SHEET_NAME);
  var range = sheet.getRange(SORT_DATA_RANGE);
  range.sort(SORT_ORDER);
}

Personally I would always include all the values needed for the function to run within the function definition.
var ssid="14ESdH--------------------------------HOn8A";
SHEET_NAME = "Chilled Sheet";
SORT_DATA_RANGE = "A3:F";
SORT_ORDER = [
{column: 2, ascending: true}, // 1 = column number, sort by ascending order];

Perhaps you didn't notice that in the line  immediately above the comment is placed inside of the string for SORT_ORDER so that's not going to work.
function autoSort(){
  var SHEET_NAME = "Chilled Sheet";
  var SORT_DATA_RANGE = "A3:F";
  var SORT_ORDER = [{column: 2, ascending: true}];
  var ss=SpreadsheetApp.openById(ssid);
  var sheet = ss.getSheetByName(SHEET_NAME);
  var range = sheet.getRange(SORT_DATA_RANGE);
  range.sort(SORT_ORDER);
}

and since they're hard wired any way I would just do it like this:
function autoSort(){
  var ssid="14ESdH--------------------------------HOn8A";
  var ss=SpreadsheetApp.openById(ssid);
  var sheet = ss.getSheetByName("Chilled Sheet");
  var range = sheet.getRange("A3:F");
  range.sort([{column: 2, ascending: true}]);
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Yamask: 3 lbs. Female Trainer: 88 lbs.
37 Shadow Ball 80 100 Has a 0% chance to lower the target's Special Defense by one stage.
41 Grudge 0 -- When the user faints, the PP of the move that fainted it will be reduced to 0.
45 Mean Look 0 -- Prevents the target from leaving battle.
49 Destiny Bond 0 -- If the user faints this turn, the target automatically will, too.


8am-outside air temperature - 70 degrees, warming to 77 degrees by 10am. A southeast wind, 73-degree water temperature with one-foot seas, a mild north current and visibility of 40 feet.
Crew-Tom Campbell, Carmine Dilorenzo and myself. We added Eric Tatoy as a new Chiefy crew member today.
Crew-Chuck Van Buskirk, Tom Campbell, Carmine Dilorenzo and myself, all members of the South Florida Spearfishing Club www.spearfishing.org .
Tonight, was one of those "little nuggets" you find being tuned in to the local dive scene, bringing a tremendous amount of valuable information to divers. Force-E Dive Center force-e.com of Pompano Beach located at 1312 North Federal Highway hosted a Roundtable with the Dive Doctors.
8am-outside air temperature - 64 degrees, warming to 72 degrees by 10am. An east wind, 73-degree water temperature with seas two-three feet, a mild south current and visibility of 40 feet. We've experienced a cool front the last several days and it appears the water temperature has dropped from its consistent 77 degrees in December to a cool 73 degrees.
8am-outside air temp-57 degrees, warmed to 78 by mid-day. The water temperature is still 77 degrees and we had 50-foot of visibility with a gentle south current.
Crew-Tom Campbell, Stephen Norris, Peter de Villers and myself.


Started this discussion. Last reply by Cisco Mar 27, 2017.
Started this discussion. Last reply by Cisco Apr 3, 2017.
"Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 1, 2017, at Optimum Property Management, 230 Commerce, Irvine, Suite 250 Homeowner Forum at 6 PM"
""I should have waited a 5 more minutes as the moon was waking up behind our beautiful Cantada entrance.""
"Come and get your to know your neighbor! May 14, Cantada is hositing a party"
"I should have waited a 5 more minutes as the moon was waking up behind our beautiful Cantada entrance."
"We have had two reported auto burglaries in the last week: Serrano (gated) on Means and Presidio (not gated) on Costello per Tustin PD."
"We have had two reported auto burglaries in the last week: Serrano (gated) on Means and Presidio (not gated) on Costello per Tustin PD. FYI, Paul"
""Please remember to slow down especially while turning the corners."
"I saw lots of people having fun at the Pool this weekend!"


Free cdr viewer free software that lets you view coreldraw (.cdr) file, resize and convert them to other image formats (.bmp, .jpg, .gif, .png, .tiff)Details for file extension cdr sound file. troubleshoot, fix and learn about cdr and errors with extensive information from filext Moneycontrol offers you choice of email alerts on your investments for free! Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity. find stories, updates and expert opinion.


text:
What to Expect in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child
February 10, 2016 // Books // books/ children's books/ february 2016/ Harry Potter
In July 2007, we finally buried our heads into one of the most highly anticipated books of all time, and cried, ached, laughed, grimaced, shouted out loud and perched on the edge of our seats throughout our final adventure with Harry Potter. And as we finished that epilogue with a vague idea of what the future held for Harry, Hermione and Ron it was difficult to accept that we might never again sneak a peek at the magical world hidden from us simple muggles. J. K. Rowling might have kept us ticking over with plenty of revelations and extra details over the years, but the demand for an eighth Harry Potter book has never really gone away. Until it was revealed that Harry Potter and the Cursed Child would be hitting the West End in 2016.
The play was first announced in December 2013, with J. K. Rowling revealing that it would "explore the previously untold story of Harry's early years as an orphan and outcast". And that it does, but this is no prequel. Harry Potter and the Cursed Child takes place nineteen years after the Battle of Hogwarts when Harry is a middle-aged Ministry of Magic employee, married to Ginny Weasley and a father to three children. The story shines a light on Harry's second son Albus Severus Potter who bears the weight of his famous surname, while issues from Harry's past seem intent on disrupting the present. The play has been split into two parts, intended to be viewed on consecutive days, and excitingly this will be the first time an actor has officially played Harry Potter on stage.
While the play was undoubtedly some of the most exciting Potter news of the last few years, some fans were still disappointed that they wouldn't be allowed to curl up in a corner and savour the pages of an eighth Harry Potter book. Well we should know by now that J. K. Rowling would never leave us disappointed. The script of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child will be released in book form the day after the play opens on J. K. Rowling and Harry Potter's shared birthday (31st July). So we can finally read about life for Harry and his family in a world where his scar no longer hurts, he's no longer awoken in the middle of the night by awful visions and he might even have a chance of a happy and peaceful life.
We could not be more excited to catch up with our favourite characters as adults. And so to ensure we're as prepared as can be for Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, we've pulled together some of the key things we already know about Harry's world post-Voldemort:
Harry, Ron and Hermione all work for the Ministry of Magic and have worked hard to reform it into a much more fair and positive structure than it was during the first seven books. Harry and Ron are both Aurors, and Harry is head of department, while Hermione is fairly high up in the department of Magical Law Enforcement.
Ginny goes on to have a successful career in women's Quidditch, playing for the Holyhead Harpies before leaving to raise her and Harry's children. She now writes Quidditch correspondence for The Daily Prophet.
Harry and Ginny are married with three children; James Sirius Potter, Albus Severus Potter and Lily Luna Potter. Albus is the only one to inherit Harry's famed green eyes and is much quieter than his older brother James who likes to tease Al. Both boys attend Hogwarts, and Al shares his father's fear of being sorted into Slytherin, which he confides in Harry on Platform 9¾ .
Ron and Hermione are married and have two children. Rose Weasley is the same age as Albus and the two are good friends. Hugo Weasley is the same age as Lily Potter.
Lupin and Tonk's son Teddy is looked after by his grandmother but has a huge extended family of Lupin's friends (including Harry) who treat Teddy as a son. Teddy is spotted kissing Victoire Weasley (Bill and Fleur's daughter) on Platform 9¾.
Draco Malfoy marries Astoria Greengrass and has a son named Scorpius. Draco greets Harry with a curt nod at Platform 9¾.
George continues to run Weazleys' Wizard Wheezes with some initial help from Ron. He marries fellow Griffindor Angelina Johnson.
After a brief role as an Auror, Neville Longbottom becomes Hogwarts' Professor of Herbology. He marries Hannah Abbott who becomes landlady of the Leaky Cauldron. Harry asks Neville to be godfather to his children.
Let us know what you think Harry Potter and the Cursed Child holds in store for Harry in the comments box below.
Find Related Content // Books / books / children's books / february 2016 / Harry Potter / J K Rowling / news
← Richard and Judy Podcast – Mason Cross talks about The Samaritan
YA Books We Cannot Wait to Read in 2016 →

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Israel Acts to Expand Settlements in the West Bank as Netanyahu Meets with Obama
It's the first time President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have met since the resolution of the Iran nuclear deal — which Netanyahu loudly criticized, publicly implying that Obama was naive for championing it.
by Avi Asher-Schapiro
Photo by Olivier Douliery/EPA
Just hours before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Washington, DC to meet with President Barack Obama on Monday, press reports in Israel revealed that the government had approved the construction of 2,200 new settlement units in the occupied West Bank.
It was the first conference between the two leaders since the resolution of the Iran nuclear deal, which Netanyahu loudly criticized, but it's not the first time an announcement of expanded settlement construction has come at a critical diplomatic moment. In 2010, Israel announced a raft of settlement construction on the eve of a visit from Vice President Joe Biden — a perceived slight to the Obama administration, which had called for a halt in settlement construction to make room for peace talks between the Palestinians and the Israelis.
More than five years later, the so-called peace process is dead in the water. Multiple US-led efforts to jumpstart talks have failed, and over the past month violence has flared across Israel and the West Bank. Settlers have torched Palestinian homes, Palestinians have taken to stabbing Israelis in the streets, and the Israeli army has forcefully clamped down on protests.
Related: Israeli Police Shoot Dead Two Palestinian 'Knife Attackers'
As Netanyahu was on his way to make nice with Obama, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz broke news about the Higher Planning Council of the Civil Administration's decision to move forward with plans to construct 2,200 new units and retroactively legalize two illegal outposts built on Palestinian land east of the Palestinian city of Ramallah.
Although the plan was originally submitted back in 2014, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon gave the local council in charge of the area permission to push it along last month. Koby Eliraz, Ya'alon's personal adviser on settlement issues, attended a hearing held on October 21 to discuss the matter — a move that Haaretz highlighted as "unusual."
Though the settlements still need to go through several more phases of approval, groups in Israel and the United States that oppose the construction of such encampments in disputed Palestinian territory are calling foul on the decision, which are seen as an attempt to forestall legal attempts to vacate them on the part of Palestinians.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the liberal-leaning pro-Israel group J Street called on the Obama administration to criticize the development. "Time for the Obama Administration to call these moves what they are: illegal," he wrote on Twitter.
Related: Facebook Is Being Sued by 20,000 Israelis for Inciting Palestinian Terror
Hagit Ofran, the settlement watch director of the anti-settlement group Peace Now, said that the announcement is consistent with Netanyahu's vision for a permanently occupied West Bank.
As Netanyahu and Obama met publicly on Monday for a photo-op, settlements were not raised as a topic of conversation. The two traded platitudes about regional cooperation instead.
Obama said it was "no secret" that security in the Middle East had "deteriorated in many areas," adding that the "the security of Israel is one of my top foreign policy priorities."
"We're with you," Netanyahu replied. "We're with each other in more ways than one, and I want to thank you for this opportunity to strengthen our friendship, which is strong; strengthen our alliance, which is strong."
The Israeli prime minister made waves earlier this year when he disavowed a commitment to establishing a Palestinian state while campaigning for reelection, and has weathered international criticism for increasing settlement activity in the West Bank.
"I want to make it clear that we have not given up our hope for peace — we'll never give up our hope for peace," he added on Monday. "And I remain committed to a vision of peace of two states for two peoples, a demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish state."
Follow Avi Asher-Schapiro on Twitter: @AASchapiro
iran nuclear deal
Get the latest from VICE News in your inbox. Sign up right here.


text:
Black Heart Bart wins Cranbourne trial
black heart bart - AAP
Black Heart Bart is a step closer to making a racetrack return after winning a Cranbourne barrier trial.
The former Darren Weir-trained gelding, who won five Group One races during 2016/17, was officially retired after finishing unplaced in the Toorak Handicap in October.
Lindsay Smith has been tasked with resurrecting his career but first the gelding has had to pass a series of tests.
One of those was to compete in a barrier trial of at least 1000m with Racing Victoria stewards also requiring the results of a full body scan after the trial before they allow Black Heart Bart to race again.
Brad Rawiller, who rode Black Heart Bart in Monday's 1190m-heat, said he felt great despite not liking the heavy conditions.
"I don't think you could be more impressed than what he did today," Rawiller said.
"To be reinstated he needed to do a bit and at the same time he needed that, but it's the best he's been since his Group One year.
"For 12 months even though he'd been running well in those good races he probably wasn't at his best.
"That wasn't an ordinary trial today and he's beaten them quite well."
Another comeback galloper, Gailo Chop, ridden by Mark Zahra, won the opening trial over 1550m with trainer Matthew Williams saying he was on track for a tilt at the Cox Plate at The Valley.
Gailo Chop has not raced since finishing second to Winx in the Queen Elizabeth Stakes at Randwick in April 2018 after which he was sidelined with a tendon injury.
Following 12 months of rehabilitation, Gailo Chop has now had two trials in preparation for his return in the Makybe Diva Stakes at Flemington on September 14.
Williams said Gailo Chop would return to Cranbourne for another trial on September 2.
"Mark knows him really well and he said he felt great and his action was terrific," Williams said.
"It's obviously pretty heavy out there and he knocked up in the last little bit but he'll be back here on September 2 for another 1550-metre trial.
"It will be a pretty solid trial for him again as we'll be wanting to test him out a bit more and then he'll be right to kick off in the Makybe Diva at Flemington."


After submit filter in iRedAdmin> System> System log, i see "internal server error".
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 дек 22 13:38 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 root syslog 4096 янв 17 06:25 ..
Any relevant log in /var/log/iredadmin/iredadmin.log or /var/log/syslog, or /var/log/nginx/error.log?
If the user is Global admin the log is show corectly but if it is not internel error is shown.
We are using iRedAdmin Pro with SQL and the patch is already applied. Any other ideas?
Do you still get this error?
Possible to give me direct ssh access with root privilege and a testing admin account to reproduce and fix the issue?
I will try again on clean installation and on our test environment and will report.


The Lost Symbol has lost ground. According to Amazon's best-sellers list, Dan Brown's blockbuster novel has slipped quietly down to third place. At both Amazon and Barnes & Noble, the top two spots are occupied by pre-orders for the recently moved-up memoir by former Alaska governor Sarah Palin (Going Rogue: An American Life is now due in stores Nov. 17, well before its initial spring 2010 release) and Arguing With Idiots by lachrymose talking head Glenn Beck.
Is Symbol's slip to be expected? Are we experiencing a Brown-out of sorts, in which everyone who was going to buy the book has already bought it or borrowed it from a friend? The novel will likely see a resurrection in sales once the holiday season rolls around and gift purchases start up, but for now at least its iron grip on the best-seller charts has slackened.
And if that wasn't bad enough, a bookstore in Chicago is reporting that the latest Windy City-themed issue of Granta, a quarterly literary magazine, has been outselling Symbol. I never thought I'd see the day that Wole Soyinka, whose work is included in the issue, would be more in demand than the author of The Da Vinci Code. Maybe Chicagoans really do have something going for them, and I should start reconsidering my position on deep-dish.


The latest news from the Lead Designer of Ultimate General series.
Patch 0.68 "Our first big update"
We are happy to announce our first big update of Ultimate General: Civil War. It includes a comprehensive in-game guide to help not only the beginners but also those who would like to know a few more details about the game and its basic mechanics.
The in-game guide is available when you click the "?" icon in the upper left corner, at any time while you play.
The tutorial videos of the manual can also be found directly in our YouTube channel.
We also enabled many Steam Achievements. You can check how to unlock all the included achievements in this link.
The rest of the update offers several fixes and improvements based on your amazing and continuous feedback. Let's have a look at all the changes.
Enabled Steam Achievements for campaign and historical battles.
In-Game Guide added. The Ultimate General: Civil War manual covers all the basic aspects of gameplay and should help everyone to get started with the game.
Added message after the end of Battle of Antietam that the campaign shall continue when more battles are added. An auto-save is created to ensure you can continue later from this stage.
AI will be able to make more solid lines and protect its flanks better.
AI will desire to flank more and keep safe distance when needed.
AI will not merge into very dense, inefficient formations as before.
AI will be able to defend much more resiliently.
AI will defend fortifications and strategic areas intensively.
Increased fall back duration and nullified speed penalty of wavering/retreat so units disengage more easily from each other. Previously they would melee for too long.
When a brigade is created, the most experienced officer is auto-assigned from barracks.
Player receives 100% of weapons from captured units.
Confederates in Battle of Malvern Hill (North Campaign) will be not so well equipped as before.
The Union in Battle of Shiloh (South Campaign) may be less in numbers with more probability.
Fixed wrong date of "River Crossing" Battle.
In "River Crossing" battle the AI will have more brigades but smaller.
In battles of "Crossroads" and "Cross keys" the AI will have better distribution of forces, more units but smaller.
Reduced reputation cost of Government items about -25%.
Economy now not only reduces weapons prices but also reduces prices for Officers and increases sell prices.
2nd phase of first campaign battles resets morale and ammo for player's army.
Fixed wrong number of guns in battle recon bar.
Fixed issue that made possible to order items from Government with not enough reputation.
Fixed bug of deployed units that were placed outside of the battlefield.
Fixed multiple issues with battle restart.
Fixed multiple issues with advisor hints.
Fixed bugs that caused units to freeze at map corners.
Fixed pathfinding bugs for group movement.
Fixed bugs that happened when units collided with each other.
Fixed resolution issues that could make some systems unable to launch the game.
Various bug fixes that resulted in game freezing.
Improved cannon shot craters appearance.
Toned down some camp sounds that were too loud.
Now it's possible to save in first campaign battles.
Added VSync option. This should fix the issue of very high fps in menu for some systems.
Added name sorting in officer list.
Saves are sorted into list.
A few text fixes. Among those text fixes is a wrong message about Cavalry reinforcements in Gaines' Mill which was misconceived by many players as missing reinforcements.
Battle will not end suddenly when an objective is contested due to timer. If you find this issue happening in any more battles, please report with F11.


Bleu cheese sauce with mild sauce topped with lots of cheese then topped with chicken dipped in mild sauce.
Order online for takeout, delivery, and dine in: Chicken Wing Pizza from Pizza Barn. Serving the best pizza in Elkland, PA.


text:
Home / Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee / Grant Congruency
PHS Policy and the NIH Grants Policy Statement (Part II, Terms and Conditions) require institutions to verify, before award, that the IACUC has reviewed and approved those components of grant applications and contract proposals related to the care and use of animals. The process is referred to as "Congruency Review" and is performed by the UNC Office of Animal Care & Use (OACU) which serves as the administrative office for the IACUC.
Excerpt from section 4.1.1.2 "Verification of IACUC Approval" of the NIH Grants Policy Statement:
"It is an institutional responsibility to ensure that the research described in the application is congruent with any corresponding protocols approved by the IACUC."
The following funding agencies require Congruency Review:
All NIH subdivisions (e.g. NCI, NHLBI, NIAID, NIDDKD, NIAAA, etc.)
US Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)
USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
American Heart Association (AHA)
American Cancer Society (ACS)
March of Dimes (MOD)
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF)
This list will be updated if/when other agencies adopt the requirement.


In this video update, AMO President Lynn Dollin summarizes AMO's 2018 Pre-Budget Submission.
AMO encourages all municipal governments to reinforce the submission's themes in discussions or presentations with provincial officials. Municipal governments wishing to make an oral presentation to the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs during the week of January 15, 2018 should provide their contact name, mailing address, phone number, and email address to the Clerk of the Committee by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, January 8, 2018. The Committee will be travelling to Thunder Bay, Sudbury, Ottawa, Kitchener-Waterloo and Windsor during the week of January 15, 2018. Please contact the Clerk for itinerary details.


In our preparatory kinematics and dynamics course of about 500 students, we replaced traditional immediate feedback homework with mastery-style homework. This mastery mode required students to perfect a set of questions before moving on to the next level of increased difficulty, and implemented narrated animated solutions to provide instructional support, if necessary.
Student behavior within the system and students' resulting performance illuminated both strengths and obstacles of implementation for this type of homework in a large class of struggling students. Data from the semester-long study will be shown, as well as explained in context as a tool to improve the material and delivery for our next semester of students.


text:
This is Fate Wednesday Update 30 September 2020
karina comments that she believes that he is also very happy with the marriage, He goes to Maira where a child bumps into him so he loses his balance due to which the Mehndi pours onto Preetas hand, the elders say that the brides mehndi got applied on Preetas hand, everyone is shocked to see the situation, both karan and Preeta are standing in the middle of the hall, she feels that it is a signal from god who also believes that they are meant for each other but in reality Preeta is perplexed.
This is Fate Tuesday Update 29 September 2020
Sarla wonders why the god is doing this to Preeta as it should not have happened, karina comes thanking karan for saving the Thali before taking him away, Rishab wonders if he should believe in all this but is happy that the mehndi got applied on Preeta's hand, Rakhi also wonders what the god wants to happen, Preeta leaves the hall.
Karan is still searching for Preeta but karina asks him to sit, Sarla walks out when she bumps into janki asking what she is doing here even when she ordered them to not come to the hall, she explains that she knows that her daughters have grown up so now they would not listen to her, Janki explains that she knows what Sarla is saying but god is trying to show everyone what is written in the fate of them all, Sarla mentions that Preeta always has to face bad things in her life, she is her mother and knows what she is feeling so is aware of the fact that Preeta will never tell her so she will leave as she cannot see anything.
Preeta stops in the hall, she remembers what Karina said about the Mehndi that the one who it gets applied to is the true wife, She si thinking when Shrishti comes asking if she needs any proof which was given to her she explains that they are meant for each other and are husband and wife, Preeta says that it is not the case as this was all an accident but Shrishti tries to explain that it is a sign from god assuring that she is meant for him, Preeta is really confused but Shrishti makes her realize that she is the one who is made for karan but it is Maira who has come in between them, Preeta says that if this is the case then she will ask Maira to back out from the wedding, Shrishti is very tensed asking if she still doubts her feelings, Preeta then exclaims that she believes that karan is made for her and is written is her kundali Bhagya.
Preeta explains that god has created both of them for each other and they are each others kundali Bhagya, she then agrees to ask maira to back out from the marriage as it cannot happen. They both rejoice at the decision.
Karan is looking at the Mehndi while Rishab stares at him, so he asks him what is the reason and if he wants to as something, then Kartika comes explaining that they both heard what the ladies were saying and that the bride should be the first one who gets to wear the Mehndi but it was Preeta who got the Mehndi so she should be the one, Rishab pleads with her to stop as if she continues then he wuld get mad which would spoil Karan's mood but Karan insists that he is aware of everything, he explains that he knows she is trying to say that he is the one who to be with Preeta but he does not want to hear about anything. Kartika mentions that she has understood each and everything but he answers that it should be the case with Karan.
Maira is with the beautician getting the Mehndi applied when Rakhi asks Karina to also get it applied but she explains that she will get it done once when Maira is completed with it, Karina wonders where Ramona is so Sherlyn explains that she will go and call her, She goes to Shrishti asking where both Preeta and herself were as they were not in the hall, she advises that they both should stop seeing the dream of becoming a member of the Luthra family as it cannot happen, however both of them get into a heated argument which ends with Sherlyn loosing as she has to remain quiet otherwise the truth regarding herself and her child would come out so she remains quiet, Shrishti goes to sit with Maira explaining that Preeta is waiting for her on the terrace so she should go as Preeta has some important information regarding Karan.
Maira reaches the terrace where Preeta is waiting and pleads that she should not marry Karan, Maria asks what she means and gets angry after that Preeta says that she should not marry him as he is already married and she got married to him, Maria explains that she is saying this after the fact that her mother also tried to warn her that she should stay away from the Luthra family, Maira explains that she will marry him even when she says that he is not a good and honest person, but Maira is adamant that she will marry him, Preeta shows her the mehndi which got applied to her hands as this would mean that they are still married, Preeta explains that Maira should move on in her life and leave Karan as she can marry someone else, Maria is not interested in anything that Preeta is saying mentioning that she can think about herself and so will marry Karan and the marriage between Preeta and Karan is just a joke.
Preeta gets really angry asking why did she say that her marriage is a joke and she should stop thinking about Karan, Maira gets really angry saying that she is just a passing by girl who is eager to take selfies with Karan, Maira explains that she should stop thinking about anything so tries to leave, Preeta stops her saying that she should see the sign from god, Maira turns and removes the Mehndi in anger but Preeta is really satisfied saying that she cannot remove it as it is a sign from god, Maira mentions that she has also the Mehndi of Karan's name, but Preeta says that she got it after it was applied on her hands.
Prithvi enters the hall thinking that he came to meet Preeta when Janki said that she could not meet with him, he thinks that he will make everyone pay as he is his biggest fan, he then sees Rishab so wonders what he is doing in the hall when there is no relation with him so he thinks that Rishab should focus on his wife and not come near Preeta, Prithvi is standing when Rishab sees him so asks him to come closer.
Preeta is wondering what she has said to Maira and thinks that she should never has said them all as if anyone hears them then it will create a lot of problems, she turns only to find that Karan is standing behind her, he asks where she has been as he asked her to stay with him as he needs her, she explains that they cannot be together but never replies when karan asks the reason, she thinks by herself that if she comes closer to him then will come to realize the love that they feel for each other.
Prithvi asks what Rishab is doing in the hall and he in retaliation asks the same question due to which they both are left stranded with question, Prithvi answers that he came to meet Preeta but when Rishab is to answer which creates a tensed situation.
Preeta mentions that they cannot stay together and tries to leave but karan stops her asking the reason so she leaves, Karan also walks behind her. Prithvi explains that Rishab has come for Preeta to which Rishab says that he is an idiotic person who is off no use and he does not even except to see him help, then Sherlin calls Rishab which leaves Prithvi as he did not expected to see her and then he tries to hide , she walks beside him and they bump into each other, Sherlin kneels to pick [ her phone Prithvi seeing the opportunity quickly hugs a leady until Sherlin leaves.
The lady asks who he is as she didnot recognize him, he also says that he does not know her to which she asks the reason he hugged her, he answers that he thought she was her aunt when she was coming but when he saw her she was not her so he apologizes, then he enquires about who the groom is and knowing that the function is of Karan Luthra who is about to get married to maira, then Prithvis mentions that he always liked karan and whenever they played karan would always loose, he then apologizes explaining that they cannot talk too much, so he thinks that he will be the one top get Preeta as karan is marrying someone else and then he will have no problem on their side.
Some goons are standing outside the hall thinking that they will have no problem in robbing the women who are attending the function as then they will get really rich, they plan to enter in disguise with their faces covered, Both Preeta and Karan leave the hall as Preeta is upset with him.
Sherlin is siting with Maria explaining that she will show her the designs which will look really nice on her, Maira is still thinking off what Preeta said to her that no one can separate them both, they are sitting when Rakhi comes with Dadi asking if the Mehndi has dried out, Karina and Ramona are also really happy, Dadi explains that if the Mehndi is darker in shade then the husband loves the wife even more, Maira is shocked hearing this then wonders what Preeta said that the bride was the first one to get the mehndi applied, they think that they should remove the Mehndi.
Karina calls Shrishti asking her to take Maira to the brides room and get the Mehndi cleaned so that they should find out how much both of them will love each other, Sherlin also decides to go with her, Maira says that she thinks Shrishti will do something bad to her so she does not want anything to happen, Sherlin assures that she will make sure everything is alright, Dadi also asks Rakhi to come with her, Ramona asks the reason she sent Shrishti with Maira, Karina explains that she sent her as she wants that they both realize that they are just servants and nothing more.
Karan is constantly asking Preeta to stop so she finally stops, he asks why is she running away from him as he is the client of their hall so she ahs to be with him, she explains that she cannot as she doesnot understand what he wants, she can not be with him, he says that she was the one who said that he means nothing to her so why is she feeling nervous when he asked her to be near him, she thinks then explains that she will not run away from him and will make sure that he finishes all the traditions that are involved in a wedding.
Maira enters the room with Shrishti, Sherlin asks her to go and get the oil, she leaves after which Maira asks what she thinks as both the Arura sisters are really getting on her nerves, she mentions that Preeta called her saying that she should back out from the wedding as they both are made for each other, Sherlin assures her that everything will be alright and there is nothing to worry about, Shrishti comes after which Sherlin taunts her which causes a heated quarrel amongst them both after which Sherlin leaves the room.
Shrishti asks Maira if she came from the side of the groom or the bride as she is just a guest, Shrishti explains that it is a sign from god as if she will go and tell everyone that both preeta and karan are made for each other then everyone will believe her, Rakhi and Dadi enter asking what they were talking about, Maira says that she was appreciating how good she looks with karan, Dadi explains that she is true, Shrishti explains that Preeta is also her daughter in law which angers Dadi.
Prithvi is looking for preeta when he bumps into Ramona's they get in a misunderstanding after which he asks her about Preeta, she is shocked as why he asked her to which eh replies that he knows she is the host of the function which is why he asked her as he is really sharp in judging a person that his mother tells her, he again asks her to which she apologizes saying that she cannot help him but there is someone in the function then points towards Sherlin, Prithvi is shocked to see her in the party.
Read Next: This is Fate Thursday Update 1st October 2020
UPDATE 3782 This Is Fate 394 Update 4709 Wednesday Update 675


text:
The Santa Clara Formation is a geologic formation in the southeastern Santa Cruz Mountains, in Santa Clara County, California.

Geology
It was formed during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene Ages of the Neogene Period resp. the Quaternary Period, during the Cenozoic Era.  It is composed of fluvial boulder to pebble gravel, sandstone, and siltstone locally including thin bedded lacustrine mudstone.

It preserves fossils dating back to the Neogene period.

See also

 List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in California

 Paleontology in California

References

Further reading
 USGS.gov: "Geologic maps and structure sections of the southwestern Santa Clara Valley and southern Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California"
  AAPG Datapages/Archives: "The Santa Clara Formation as a Record of Late Cenozoic Uplift of the Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Clara County, California"

Geologic formations of California
Neogene California
Pliocene California
Pleistocene California
Sandstone formations of the United States
Siltstone formations
Fluvial deposits
Lacustrine deposits
Paleontology in California
Geology of Santa Clara County, California
Santa Cruz Mountains

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Home › Entertainment › Music › Country Music › Shania Twain Sends Social Media Into a Frenzy With PCA's Appearance: PHOTOS
Shania Twain Sends Social Media Into a Frenzy With PCA's Appearance: PHOTOS
by Suzanne Halliburton December 6, 2022
written by Suzanne Halliburton December 6, 2022 9:31 pm
Rich Polk/E! Entertainment/NBC via Getty Images
When you're an official, all-everything kind of icon, what should you wear on the red carpet? If you're Shania Twain, you go vintage and throw it back to your signature look.
That would be faux leopard. Remember back in the late 1990s, when Twain was one of the hottest country music performers? She wore a fabulous faux leopard ensemble for her music video "That Don't Impress Me Much" and showed the industry that a country music star also could be a fashionista.
And on the red carpet for the People's Choice Awards, Shania Twain went retro. At age 57, she might look better than she did a quarter century ago, pink hair included.
Judge for yourself:
Shania Twain really said 🗣"let's go girls"🗣 with her #PCAs arrival! 👏 pic.twitter.com/5QCWSxFp0m
— E! News (@enews) December 7, 2022
At any age, it's difficult to look fabulous in such an outfit. Twain wore a leopard print bandeau top. Her black velvet skirt was long and form fitting. Technically, she covered her tummy, but with see-through black netting. As one fan wrote on Twitter "excuse me abs."
Twain wore a matching leopard scarf and hood. Chris Horan, who is Shania Twain's stylist, told E! that designer Rodarte created the custom-made gown. It features "elements of major moments: of her career.
"I wish I looked half this good," replied a Shania fan. (Ditto). Another fan wrote: "The woman's 57, kids."
Still another wrote: "I love her so much! Go Queen!"
Shania Twain performed a medley of some of her greatest hits at Tuesday's People's Choice Awards. She also received the Icon Award. on stage (Rich Polk/E! Entertainment/NBC via Getty Images)
Well, you get the idea. Shania Twain is timeless. Except she does tweak her lyrics to reflect the time. When she sang "That Don't Impress Me Much," Tuesday, she name-dropped fellow Canadian Ryan Reynolds, who was in the audience at Barker Hangar in Santa Monica, Ca.
The People's Choice Awards announced last month that Twain would receive its Icon honor. She also performed a medley of her hits Tuesday night. Twain hadn't appeared at the People's Choice Awards since 2005, when she won for "Favorite Country Female Singer."
Twain also is getting ready for a world tour. She announced more dates earlier Tuesday for her "Queen of Me" Tour. She posted on Twitter: "I'll be kissing my horses goodbye in April because mamma's going on the road for the entirety of 2023!"
We do know that Mamma looked pretty good on Tuesday night, too.
Back in November, Shania Twain said: "I'm so incredibly honored to be named 'Music Icon. I have some of the greatest fans in the world. They have supported me since the early days, and it's their love and passion that keeps me going. I'm thrilled to go back on tour and bring my new music and fan favorites to them, and what better way to start than at the 'People's Choice Awards!'"
She definitely met expectations.


Nashville: Evidently Partying in her White SUV at 3am, blasting loud music, and spewing fumes from her Porsche, Katie Quackenbush woke up a poor homeless man who was trying to sleep on the sidewalk. The 54 year old man, Gerald "Doug" Melton yelled at the woman in the Porsche to be quiet, which led to a shouting match, and then Quackenbush jumped out of her SUV and allegedly shot Melton twice. She then fled the scene, leaving Melton bleeding on the sidewalk. He is in critical condition in hospital. The Diva Quackenbush is in jail for attempted murder. Here's the official press release from the City of Nashville about the incident, which is dated 9-11-2017.
Midtown Hills Precinct detectives tonight charged Katie Quackenbush, 26, with attempted murder for the August 26th shooting of a homeless man outside 901 19th Avenue South near Music Row.
The victim, Gerald Melton, 54, was critically wounded and remains hospitalized at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
The investigation, which is being led by Detective Anthony Chandler, shows that Melton was trying to sleep on the sidewalk at 3 a.m. when he became disturbed by exhaust fumes and loud music coming from a Porsche SUV. Melton said he asked the driver of the Porsche, alleged to have been Quackenbush, to move the vehicle. An argument ensued, with both parties yelling at each other. Melton said he walked back to where he was attempting to sleep. Quackenbush is alleged to have gotten out of the Porsche armed and, as the argument continued, fired two shots at Melton. He suffered a critical abdominal wound. He said the shooter got back into the Porsche and fled.
Bond for Quackenbush, of 45th Avenue North, is set at $25,000.
What is interesting is that Crooner Quackenbush and her friend drove away and did not report the incident or call an ambulance for Melton, who she shot in the stomach. The incident took place at 3am on Saturday August 26, and it was not until Monday September 4th that an attorney for Quackenbush called the police to fess up to who it was that shot the homeless man. Maybe it took her a week to line up an attorney.
The homeless man can be seen in a youtube video, playing a love song on his guitar and singing. He evidently has been down on his luck in his musical career, and forced into homelessness and sleeping on cardboard on a famous Music Row street in Nashville, where he dreamed of making it as a singer.
Meanwhile, Quackenbush comes from a well-to-do family. Her father is a big attorney in Amarillo, Texas, and is giving interviews about his daughter's innocence, painting her as a victim. Click here to read the story in the Washington Post..


text:
← Representing the People's Challenge today…
Christmas Greetings and update →
People's Challenge – Supreme Court report – Days 3 and 4
Posted on 11/12/2016	by kathryna1
This final report summarises the key developments in court on Wednesday and Thursday. The transcripts for both days are here and here.
Lord Pannick QC finished his submissions on Wednesday morning, covering the legality of the use of prerogative powers to frustrate legislation, the absence of any Ministerial power to trigger Article 50 in EU-related Acts of Parliament made after 1972 and the need for an Act, rather than any other Parliamentary step, such as a motion in both Houses, to give the authority the law demands.
He began with a guided tour of the 1972 European Communities Act, explaining how section 2 protected the Act against being repealed by implication through later Acts of Parliament, making ministerial action to set it aside very unlikely, and that section 3 would make no sense at all if the Government is right. He then took the court to the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002. If the Government is correct, he said, Article 50 could be invoked nullifying every right it created despite the Act remaining on the statute book. Similarly, the Communications Act 2003 imposed regulatory functions on Ofcom to enforce EU law which would be senseless were Article 50 invoked without Parliament first deciding how to deal with them. Parliament needed to be fully involved so that its intentions in passing such legislation were not frustrated.
Next, Lord Pannick discussed the De Keyser case. "Have I been mispronouncing that case all my adult life?" asked Lady Hale. "You say De Keyser, I say De Keyser" quipped Lord Pannick, making the first joke in legal history to be reproduced for charity in T-shirt form.
"Whatever it is called" he continued "that is not the only type of case where the courts will impose limits on the exercise of prerogative power. Here, we submit there simply is no prerogative power to act under a treaty so as to defeat, nullify, frustrate statutory rights. That is one additional principle. Another principle is where the exercise of prerogative powers would frustrate the provision made by Parliament; that is ex parte Fire Brigades Union."
Mr Eadie was therefore wrong, said Lord Pannick, to argue that the De Keyser case set the only limits on prerogative power. As for the argument that post-1972 legislation showed Parliament setting limits on the prerogative but deliberately choosing not to in relation to Article 50, this was wrong too because the Green Paper for the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 showed the Government's intention had been only to replicate the Ponsonby Rule and was mindful of further legal protection where there are "treaties that require changes to UK law… the enactment of prior legislation which, of course, requires the full assent of Parliament". Other statutory changes had been made to increase the powers of the then European assembly.
Lord Pannick and the Justices then debated the effect of the 2015 EU Referendum Act. Might it be said that the 1972 Act had 'clamped' the Government's power to use the prerogative to change law but the 2015 Act had "dismantled" that clamp, asked Lord Kerr. Lord Pannick said that must be wrong because the 2015 Act said nothing at all about empowering ministers, less still changing 40 years of constitutional arrangements, and would need very clear language to have that effect. What legal effect did it have then, Lord Neuberger wondered. Lady Hale beat Lord Pannick to the answer: "But the Act did have an effect. It provided for the referendum."
Last, Lord Pannick discussed what would need to happen were the court to dismiss the appeal – nothing short of express parliamentary authorisation for the invocation of article 50 would do and that would need to be in the form of an Act, not a resolution because only an Act can change the law. Lord Sumption summarised this point neatly a little later: "resolutions are political acts, whereas legislation directly affects the law."
Dominic Chambers QC followed with submission for Mr Dos Santos, tracing the history of the parliamentary sovereignty principle, the way it dovetailed with EU law ("EU law rights solely take effect under English domestic law through the will of Parliament") and the 2015 Act. It was identical in structure and purpose to the Act which set up the 1975 EEC referendum, that time, the Government had accepted Parliament would need to pass further legislation had there been a 'leave' majority.
Next the court heard from QCs David Scoffield and Conan Lavery arguing the appeals brought against Mr Justice McGuire's judgment in the McCord, Agnew and others case which was decided a few days before the Divisional Court gave judgement and came to a different conclusion. Mr Scoffield first argued that the Northern Ireland Act 1998, like the 1972 Act, was not neutral on the U.K.'s continued membership of the UK – it assumed that it would be a member and created rights and duties based on the assumption with the effect that it would need to be repealed, or substantially amended, before notice could be given under Article 50. It was a "further conduit" for EU law to pass into UK law. Both the Good Friday Agreement and the British-Irish Agreement reinforced this, he said, as was recognised by Lord Bingham in the Robinson case.
Secondly, invocation of Article 50 without Parliamentary authority would "circumvent" the arrangements had been made with Northern Ireland for legislative consent motions endorsing future constitutional changes. In other words, the Government was attempting to use a prerogative shortcut when the lawful route involved consultation with the representatives of the people of Northern Ireland. Mr Lavery said he went even further. "It would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland", he submitted, because "being part of the EU was "part of a constitutional settlement" envisaged by the Good Friday agreement and there had been "a partial transfer of sovereignty".
They were followed by the Lord Advocate of Scotland, James Wolffe QC, who argued "the power to change the laws of Scotland were given to parliament, and to those who parliament has authorised, and not to the Crown". That sounded in the Claim of Right Act 1689 and the Act of Union of 1707. The Sewel Convention meant "that Westminster would not normally legislate with regard to devolved matters in Scotland without the consent of the Scottish Parliament". When it came to invocation of Article 50 "the United Kingdom has to make that decision in accordance with its constitutional requirements. I say that those constitutional requirements include an act of parliament" and that Act had to be preceded by a legislative consent motion in the Scottish Parliament.
Mr Wolffe's submissions were concluded on Thursday morning. He was followed by Richard Gordon QC for the Welsh Government who made an opening submission that the case was "elementary, a child of six, with respect, could understand this point". Lord Carnwath was sceptical "your child analogy does not really work, because obviously the child is told he cannot go out in the garden, still has the power to go out in the garden, and indeed he may well disobey the constraint and do it."
Mr Gordon then developed similar arguments to those of the Scottish Government. Consultation with the devolved administrations over certain decisions was "the only glue" holding together the UK constitution. By evading the, the Government was trying to "drive through" constitutional change of a "seismic nature". But some Justices wondered what this added to the main Miller argument. Lord Mance asked "If we agree with Lord Pannick and reject Mr Eadie, your case is largely unnecessary, except insofar as you rely on the Sewel convention." Mr Gordon replied "Yes. Yes."
Next was People's Challenge QC, Helen Mountfield, the first and only female advocate to speak in the case (though not the only barrister – Anneli Howard and Jess Simor QC are in the Miller and Dos Santos teams).
"My clients are a group of ordinary British citizens, and a Gibraltarian citizen." Helen began. "They are all people who will be affected, in very significant aspects of their lives, by a decision to leave the EU and the profound changes that this decision will make to the law of the United Kingdom and their rights as European citizens. They have been crowd-funded by many thousands of relatively small donations from private individuals."
They were not asking the Court "to decide whether, in the light of the result of the referendum, the United Kingdom should leave or should not leave the EU. Nor is it being asked to compel either the government, or Parliament, to do anything. All the Court is being asked to do is to consider whether, as a matter of law, an intended act of the Appellant, to notify the EU of a decision to leave on behalf of the UK, would be lawful in the absence of express statutory authority."
By arguing that authority was not needed Mr Eadie "invites this court to find that 'the Government can trigger Article 50 in exercise of the royal prerogative, even though this will alter domestic law, because it has what he described as "untrammelled" or "unconstrained" prerogative power. We disagree. We reject the false assumption that the foreign relations prerogative extends to permit the government to dispense with national law."
Mr Eadie had chosen the wrong starting point for the legal analysis "because it conveniently by-passes the biggest hurdle which he faces in his appeal." The right one was to ask "what are the limits if any of the prerogative power to make and unmake treaties?"
The answer to that was that "there is no prerogative power to change or dispense with the law as it stands outside the prerogative, whether that pre-existing law is contained in the common law or in Acts of Parliament". That was clear from the 'historical inquiry' Lord Bingham had said was needed in all case where prerogative power was in dispute. Mr Eadie had accepted that, Helen added, "but it is striking that despite positively commending that approach to you, Mr Eadie did not undertake any such enquiry, but put his claim for a wide untrammelled prerogative to change the law at the basis of general assertion."
The People's Challenge team had undertaken the inquiry, she said, and the results were striking, Helen explained. The Case of Proclamations, the Bill of Rights, Article XVIII of the Union with Scotland Act 1706, the King v London County Council, Bancoult No 2., Nicklinson, Pretty, Fitzgerald v Muldoon, Fire Brigades Union and Hayden all show that the prerogative cannot generally be used to dispense with or suspend the law of the land. And there was nothing special about the foreign relations/treating making prerogative in this sense as the authorities in our Written Case demonstrated. There was an "orthodox" answer to the question the case raised. The historical cases gave the answer: the foreign relations prerogative cannot be used to change the law or to vary the sources of law which apply in the UK.
Further, though no judge had been asked to decide whether the UK could withdraw without an Act of Parliament, a series of them had said they assumed that was so. For example, in Blackburn Lord Denning had said "[i]f her Majesty's Ministers sign this treaty and Parliament enacts provisions to implement it, I do not envisage that Parliament would afterwards go back on it and try to withdraw from it. But, if Parliament should do so, then I say we will consider that event when it happens. We will then say whether Parliament can lawfully do it or not."
Helen's second key submission was that, by triggering Article 50, the Government would in fact dispense with law, and remove EU law rights. The People's Challenge group and those who support them "consider that their EU citizenship is a fundamental part of their identities and that, if they are to be deprived of it, their elected representatives in Parliament should, in law, be responsible for that", she told the Court.
EU law, and the rights that flowed from citizenship "is part of domestic law so far as this court is concerned, 'because Parliament has so willed'" as Lord Mance had said in the Pham case.
Yet the Government argued that by passing the 1972 Act "Parliament simply created an empty legal vessel, which the Minister could, at any time, fill or empty at will by using his foreign relations prerogative." That, Helen submitted, "is not right on the language of the Act, and it is not right when you look at statutory intention." It could not be squared with the EU Treaties themselves becoming a feature and source of law under the 1972 Act, its purpose or the very serious consequences for rights that could not be replicated if the Government was correct.
Helen finished her submission by responding to two questions the Justices had raised earlier in the week. First, could the 2015 EU Referendum Act in some way revive or legitimize use of a prerogative power put into abeyance by the 1972 Act? The answer was 'no'. There was no power to do away with rights in the first place, but even if that was wrong, clear, and express statutory language was needed. The 1972 Act was a constitutional statute. It could not be overridden by assumptions or implications. To hold that the 2015 Act, by implication had such an effect would be an act of judicial legislation. As for the legislative arrangements for making a decision on whether another state could withdraw from the EU, these had nothing to do with the UK's own withdrawal.
The People's Challenge was seeking "to uphold the Divisional Court's judgment not only for its determination of the issue before this court, but also because of the importance, in a democratic society, based on separation of powers and the rule of law". The Court should dismiss the Government's appeal.
There was an immediate and positive reaction to Helen's submissions on social media and later from press commentators such as the Guardian's John Crace.
Helen was followed by Manjit Gill QC speaking for non-EU national carers of EU national children. "This is no time to turn a flexible constitution into a slippery one and let go of its bedrock fundamentals", he argued. Patrick Green QC for Fair Deal for Expats then argued that ministerial involvement in EU law making was illustrative of parliamentary sovereignty in action, not unrestrained use of the prerogative.
Lord Keen QC and James Eadie QC then mounted their last stand for the Government on devolution issues and the main issues in the case respectively. "We do not assert a power to repeal the Dangerous Dogs Act," Mr Eadie began, taking the Court back to one of Lord Pannick's first submissions about that legislation having greater constitutional status than EU law if the Government was right. But it backfired. Had the Dangerous Dogs Act being an EU directive, but identical, it could be disapplied using Article 50, he accepted. Mr Eadie's closing gambit was to draw attention to Wednesday's House of Commons resolution calling on the Government to give notification. This too failed to impress the Justices. "If the resolution had been enough for your purposes, then there would have been no need for this appeal" Lord Sumption shot back.
Lord Neuberger adjourned the case indicating that judgement would be forthcoming in the New Year as soon as possible.
Before then, there will be one further update discussing what could happen next, depending on the outcome.
This entry was posted in Article 50, brexit, Supreme Court and tagged Article 50, brexit, Supreme Court. Bookmark the permalink.


The government continues to propose ideas to win over the protestors, but so far they are only superficial.
Vladimir Putin has finally, albeit reluctantly, been drawn into a dialogue with the opposition protestors who have come into the street seeking reform. Yet he has done so in his own peculiar manner: he ingeniously deduced what was really wanted and came out publicly [via three recent articles] with ideas to match. For example, the prime minister concluded that the protesters wanted interesting and better-paying jobs. So, Putin first promised some 25 million new jobs.
But it seems to me that it is not exactly good jobs the protestors are after. Nor is it really justice, fair elections and an actual political choice. In reality, they want more opportunities that allow them to climb up the socio-economic ladder and to influence the situation in the country. This is precisely why some analysts are positive that if President Dmitry Medvedev had run for a second term, there would have been no protests. But had Russia's creative class really been in tune with the system, they would have understood that Putin remained the one in control and Medvedev's much-emphasized differences from his mentor were only illusions constructed by the government.
Yet the fact that the creative class wanted to believe this delusion is easy to explain. Medvedev meant at least a faint illusion of imminent change and, more important, change that would open the path upwards. Very few can put up with diligent drudgery coupled with slow career advancement, especially bearing in mind that people have been misleadingly assured that they have received a good education and that this would inevitably result in a great job. Incidentally, the government is still upholding this myth. Putin prides himself on Russia being one of the top four nations globally in terms of the proportion of people with a higher education – even though the current quality of Russian higher education has been questioned an infinite number of times. And his idea of creating a list of the 100 books that every Russian high school student should read does not warrant a comment.
Either way, the protesters do not need jobs. They already have jobs. What they really want is a vantage point and access to the upper levels of society. They are actually scared that the doors have closed for another 12 years. It is now being hinted that, if they keep quiet, it will be a mere 6 years, but they no longer have enough confidence.
The government actually discerned the need for social mobility and political influence before the elections, but its response was fairly cynical. It increased the overall number of civil servants, replaced some 60 governors and seriously reshuffled the State Duma in an attempt to show the public some new faces and give them hope that they, too, have a chance at taking part in the system. But the people saw through this stunt and as a result, many of the newly appointed governors and newly elected Duma deputies have already become objects of ridicule and mockery while simultaneously failing to instill a faith in an upward trajectory.
The government is now facing a difficult and unpleasant choice. It is too dangerous to keep the public shut out from power any longer, but it dreads letting them in: not everyone has finished the reading list.
Konstantin Simonov is the general director of the National Energy Security Fund.


Suffolk University Interior Design - This is the latest information about Suffolk University Interior Design, this information can be your reference when you are confused to choose the right design for your home.
Suffolk University Interior Design. Here are a number of highest rated Suffolk University Interior Design pictures on internet. We identified it from well-behaved source. Its submitted by direction in the best field. We believe this nice of Suffolk University Interior Design graphic could possibly be the most trending topic in the same way as we part it in google plus or facebook. We attempt to introduced in this posting previously this may be one of astounding reference for any Suffolk University Interior Design options. Dont you arrive here to know some other unique pot de fleurs pas cher idea? We essentially hope you can easily tolerate it as one of your mention and many thanks for your become old for surfing our webpage. divert part this image for your beloved friends, families, outfit via your social media such as facebook, google plus, twitter, pinterest, or any supplementary bookmarking sites.
Interior, Bathroom Napkin Tray was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Bathroom Napkin Tray has viewed by 77287 visitor.
Interior, Beach Themed Bathroom Mirrors was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Beach Themed Bathroom Mirrors has viewed by 41358 visitor.
Interior, Olive Garden Concord Mills was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Olive Garden Concord Mills has viewed by 57970 visitor.
Interior, Interior Design School Portland was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Interior Design School Portland has viewed by 32495 visitor.
Interior, Commercial Bathroom Soap Dispenser was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Commercial Bathroom Soap Dispenser has viewed by 3099 visitor.
Interior, Homemade Living Room Decorations was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Homemade Living Room Decorations has viewed by 48816 visitor.
Interior, Paris Inspired Bedroom Decorating was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Paris Inspired Bedroom Decorating has viewed by 72322 visitor.
Interior, Regent Park Swimming Pool Schedule was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Regent Park Swimming Pool Schedule has viewed by 3742 visitor.
Interior, Gym In Living Room was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Gym In Living Room has viewed by 29659 visitor.
Interior, Madison Square Garden Concert Seating View was posted June on this site by Enesher.com. More over Madison Square Garden Concert Seating View has viewed by 54554 visitor.


The Safety Department provides a quadrilateral formation dedicated to confronting and processing safety issues pertaining to aviation, workplace, and tactical and explosives operating environments.
We are dedicated to the preservation of our human and material assets. We endeavor to implement and enforce federal, state, and military-unique standards designed to protect our forces and enhance unit readiness. We provide core safety services to all activities assigned to MCAS Camp Pendleton. We provide safety services where required to tenant commands and other activities aboard MCAS Camp Pendleton in the area of facilities inspections, tactical safety, and explosives safety. We conduct mishap investigations, provide workspace safety assessments, host command safety briefs and stand downs, provide safety indoctrinations to newly assigned personnel, assist in abatement of workspace hazards, inspect explosives storage facilities and operating areas, implement OSHA standards, and provide tactical safety support.
The Safety Department is determined to use its limited resources effectively to stimulate leadership commitment and personnel participation in comprehensive workplace safety and health programs.
We are dedicated to improving the quality of our efforts and know that to be successful we must become a department that is driven by commitment to excellence in service. The first step is to listen and respond to our customers. Accordingly, we will conduct safety surveys to learn more about how we may better serve our Marines and civilian personnel. Because workplace inspections are one of the Safety Department's principal activities and because voluntary efforts to improve working conditions ultimately depend on strong enforcement, our surveys will focus primarily on inspection processes.
The focus of effort for the MCAS Camp Pendleton is to assure the safety and health of our Marines and civilian personnel by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach, and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual improvement in workplace safety and health.


text:
Well, this is sad and somewhat shocking:
"The band is heading in a new direction and it is time for me to move on"
Janet Weiss, the drummer of Sleater-Kinney, has announced her surprise departure from the band after 24 years.
In a statement on Twitter, Weiss said: "After intense deliberation and with heavy sadness, I have decided to leave Sleater-Kinney. The band is heading in a new direction and it is time for me to move on. I will never forget the heights we reached, or the magnificent times Corin, Carrie and I shared.
I don't care why Weiss left the band, and I don't think it's anyone's business. The music industry is very difficult to understand right now. In one sense it's easy—there's no money but you get to play for free! And in another sense, it comes down to whether there are enough people willing to support you and help you through the tough times. For Sleater-Kinney, I would have thought there would be enough of a support system there to let the members have some freedom and some real opportunities to go out and play. But, when you get into a creative setting, things can fall apart. It's sad, and it's frustrating, but think of how it is for them.
Some people just get to the end of that road, and they don't want to play anymore. Some people get to a point where it is just too much of a difficult decision—leave your family, leave the people you love, go on the road, and end up breaking even or less at the end of a tour. Or it's a great living, and you could do very well, but at what cost? You just never know why people do what they do and why they stop doing what they do.
You can't begrudge someone who moves on and leaves your favorite band. You can't hold it against them because, unless you've been where Weiss has been, you just can't know why they need to go in a different direction.
Tagged: Bands, Musicians, News
Millions of Dollars For This?
David Gilmour's heavily customized "black Strat" guitar recently sold at auction for $3.9 million dollars. I guess it is no different than any other valuable piece of history, but, really, we're talking about a musical instrument.
This particular guitar spent some time on display in the 1990s at the Hard Rock Cafe in Dallas, Texas. While it was there, various patrons stole pieces from it whenever possible because it wasn't kept in a glass case. So, virtually all of the components have been swapped out—the fingerboards, the electronics, everything. Nothing on it is original anymore.
Here's what a 1969 Fender Stratocaster would have cost you back in the day:
It's pretty amazing to me that something anyone could have bought for a few hundred dollars would end up being worth so much, especially after being turned into Frankenstein's monster, but oh well.
The scam that surrounds vintage guitars is alive an well.
Tagged: Editorial, Instruments, Guitars


Ok ok I know Easter isn't for another couple of weeks so technically we are a little bit early on the Easter egg front but I do have a valid reason for this picture.
Our school held their annual Easter egg raffle this week and my eldest daughter happened to win the big prize as well as an extra egg, lucky girl. But would stood out about this moment was her generosity shining through because when she collected her prize the teachers happened to hear her say, "this is for my girls", meaning her sisters.
I'm the lucky one having such kind and caring children!
What a fabulous selection to win, and how generous of your daughter to share.
Is it wrong that I want to eat that all at once?
Mm the chocolates! The sheep is so cute!
Aww! What a lovely, thoughtful girl you have!
Aww you have a very lovely girl there and that Caramel egg looks delicious!


text:
Big East Bubble Watch: Volume II
Posted by Justin Kundrat on March 3rd, 2020
With only about a week remaining until the Big East Tournament, things only continue to get more interesting (looking at you, Providence). There's still plenty of bubble movement to monitor, but the upper-tier teams are all but locked in. Below is Rush the Court's second bubble evaluation of the Big East. All figures below are from WarrenNolan.com.
Seton Hall: 21-7 (13-3); NET: 12; SOS: 10.
Creighton: 21-7 (11-5); NET: 13; SOS: 17.
Villanova: 22-7 (11-5); NET: 17; SOS: 3.
Butler: 20-9 (8-8); NET: 20; SOS: 35.
Analysis: Lock city with this group. At this point, it's difficult to see any of these four teams missing the NCAA Tournament. Villanova, Seton Hall and Creighton are shaping up to be somewhere in the #2-#4 seed range, while Butler is a #5 or #6 seed in most brackets. Sure a loss here or there will hurt seeding, but there isn't a scenario whereby any would miss the Tournament at this point. You can thank the strength of the Big East for providing so few opportunities for Q2/Q3 losses.
Should Be In
Markus Howard Likely Has His Team Dancing Again (USA Today Images)
Marquette: 18-10 (8-8); NET: 25; SOS: 4.
Analysis: A late season stumble hasn't helped Steve Wojciechowski's group secure a spot in the Tournament, but it would take a drastic collapse at this point for the Golden Eagles to miss out. However, with two road games at DePaul and St. John's remaining, an opportunity exists for two more damaging losses and a first round Big East Tournament exit. Even if those losses are in the Q1 or Q2 category, the damage is more in the name and signalling (see Creighton's loss at St. John's). One more win would put this team into lock territory and ensure a 9-9 conference record without much NET slippage. Consider me shocked if they miss the Dance.
Not Quite There
Xavier: 19-10 (8-8); NET: 43; SOS: 11.
Analysis: Xavier picked up a low-key massive win at Georgetown on Sunday, thanks to a Naji Marshall go-ahead three pointer with only a few seconds remaining. The win may have oddly been their second best of the season, giving Travis Steele's group a third Q1 victory and solidifying a worst case 19-12 regular season record. Xavier is already in most brackets at this point, generally in the #9-#10 range, which is comfortable enough to be optimistic but not enough for anyone to breathe easily. The good news is the Friars' two remaining games (at Providence; vs. Butler) are Q1 opportunities and winning one of those games would likely ensure a bid. The bad news is that losing both would mean a 3-11 record in Q1 games, a bit of an eyesore in terms of overall analysis.
Providence: 17-12 (10-6); NET: 44; SOS: 9.
Providence Caught Fire (USA Today Images)
Analysis: Wow. After being left for dead two months ago, the Friars have seen their NET creep up from #146 in December to a glowing #44 after their big win at Villanova on Saturday. Providence has plenty of bad losses to weigh down an otherwise stellar resume, but the late season surge has resurrected this team into very real bubble chatter. Per BartTorvik, the Friars have ranked eighth nationally in adjusted efficiency since the start of February, bolstered by a defense that quite simply isn't showing any weaknesses. Like Xavier, Providence is projecting as a #10-#11 seed, but it has seven Q1 victories, a number few teams in the country can match, much less bubble teams. However, Providence's remaining two games are at home against Xavier and DePaul, a Q2 and Q3 game, respectively. It'd be wise to win both, or at least beat DePaul, in order to avoid a fifth blemish on its record. That said, the Friars are playing as well as any team in the country right now and it would be a shame to leave them out.
Georgetown: 15-14 (5-11); NET: 60; SOS: 16.
Analysis: Xavier's gain was Georgetown's loss — such is life in the Big East. With a 15-14 record and 5-11 record in conference play, the Hoyas are effectively dead. The fringe here is the slightest of fringes. Essentially, Patrick Ewing's group will need to win at Creighton, beat Villanova and then advance to the Big East Tournament finals if it wants to sniff an at-large bid at the end of next week.
Justin Kundrat (175 Posts)
Villanova grad, patiently waiting another 10 years for season tickets. Follow Justin on twitter @JustinKundrat or email him at justin.kundrat@gmail.com
This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2020 at 4:31 pm by Justin Kundrat and is filed under big east, feature, microsites. Tagged: bubble teams, bulter, creighton. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


But just when it seems like things are becoming normal, Gordie's biological father comes back into the picture, demanding a place in his life. Now there's nothing to stop Gordie from falling into a tailspin that could cost him everything – including his relationship with Sarah, the first girl he's trusted with the truth. With his world spinning out of control, the only one who can help Gordie is himself – if he can find the strength to confront the past and take back his future.


A perfect size for travel.
I'm a totally natural, really effective crystal deodorant that won't leave embarrassing white marks on your clothes.
I work by leaving a thin layer of natural mineral salts on your skin. These mineral salts are a natural deodorant and inhibit the formation of body odour on your skin.
I'm made purely from Ammonium Alum, a natural antibacterial mineral salt that has been used for natural odour protection for hundreds of years.


text:
The National Student > Opinion
If we want to take back our democracy, let's have a look at the House of Lords
Gursimran Hans at City University, London
Imagine a body that meets to help decide laws that has no elected members. It consists of people that have been judged to be of an appropriate standing and the children of previous members (who elect one another amongst themselves) as well as some long-serving bishops. That, in a nutshell, is the House of Lords.
Traditionally, the Lords has been more powerful than the Commons.
In 1911 and the 1940s, legislation was changed to tip the balance of power in favour of those elected to sit in on the green benches of the lower house.
Those sitting on red benches, cannot stop legislation, only delay it. They cannot force amendments which the Commons doesn't want and cannot delay a bill for more than two parliamentary sessions or one year.
It's vital to have an upper chamber, in my view.
This prevents complacency in the lower chamber and keeps the chance of majoritism at a low. In the same way that a credible opposition does.
But the House of the Lords isn't really fit for purpose. The way in which hereditary peers are selected, though losing their influence is a flashback to a more autocratic era. 26 Church of England bishops are in play, but more than half of Britain is no longer describing itself as religious.
Now, I'm someone, who doesn't often discuss my religious views, because they're quite complicated and confused. But what I do believe is that whilst religion has a positive role to play in society and individual lives, it shouldn't play a role in government.
The proverbial really hits the fan when that happens.
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (pictured above) was a staunch secularist despite being a strong, religious man. By founding the Republic of Turkey as a secular, democratic state, he moved it on from the corrupt "sick man of Europe" days of the old Ottoman Empire.
Turkey grew and the current President is trying to undo his vision, look at how that's going.
To be truly democratic, I think you must be secular, how can everyone be equal under the eyes of the law, if one religious group constitutionally (albeit un-written) has more influence than an another?
Members of the Lords are entitled of up to £300 per day, plus travel expenses and subsidised costs in restaurants. They can opt out and get a measly £150 instead.
Attending the Lords can mean as little as walking into the Palace of Westminster and walking straight back out after you've been seen by others.
There are over 800 members (798+27 on a leave of absence or disqualified) too, only China's People's Congress is a large government chamber, it's worth mentioning the Chinese state has a population of around 1,200,000,000.
All these Lords are claiming taxpayer's money on expenses.
Article continues below...
More stories you may like...
Exams are no use in essay-based subjects
We all love puppies, but universities must do more to tackle student stress and anxiety
Love Island is unintentionally shining a light on domestic abuse
Reform would involve a more streamlined number, a smaller house would cost far less and could help remove members not that interested in turning up. All members would have to turn up and contribute.
Which they would also be more inclined to do if the chamber was more democratically elected.
Currently, there is no proportion.
Despite receiving around 80% of the votes at the last general election, the Tories and Labour have only just over half of the seats in the Lords combined with 452 of the 798 current members. The Liberal Democrats who have performed atrociously in the last two general elections and look a million miles away from even their zenith under Kennedy are on 100 seats.
There are several different ways that an alternative Lords might like.
One might argue it should be done based on proportional representation of General Elections. But there can be massive swings in opinion in between elections. Also, proportional representation isn't an idea that I buy.
It certianly shouldn't be used for the Commons, it creates weak governments and forces parties into coalitions of chaos - remember that term?
They will more than likely be a reality rather than hyperbole under PR in the Commons.
Having it in one chamber and not the other can lead to arguments that it should be used in both and then we need to look at the reality of an exactly proportional Lords.
UKIP would've gained 13 seats in 2015 if the Lords was capped to 100 members. This more than the Lib Dem's with 8 and SNP with 5. First Past the Post can often cut out fringe parties and only give them power when a significantly spread number of the electorate want them to.
If everyone in London wanted UKIP to gain power for example, that would be 73 seats in the Parliament. If no-one else did, then that wouldn't be enough to form a government, perhaps in this extreme scenario it may be enough to be a junior coalition in power, but as much of that 73 would be Labour seats, I suspect the Tories could hold onto power.
Now, proportionally as a size of the electorate, those London votes alone would account for 14 seats in a 100 seat Lords, and presumably, a significant percentage would come from outside of London, giving UKIP a higher figure. FPTP helps prevent certain parts of the country having too much influence, although I would admit in Scotland there's a demographic deficit due to the size of constituencies.
An FPTP Lords would be little more than an extension of the Commons.
Thus, the third way would be similar to the Welsh Assembly.
In this system, there will be constituencies who can elect members, these constituencies would be larger and be under a first past the post system.
Then you "top it up" - using PR - half elected by FPTP and the other by PR - creating a balance where perhaps the most popular party is a slightly better position, but a lot more compromise is necessary and fringe/extremist groups are kept in check.
And if there's one thing you need in upper chambers - it's compromise. You need it in all aspects of politics, but here is the one place more than others it is non-negotiable. Upper chambers exist to ensure there's moderation and compromise.
That is just one solution, and I'm sure over the coming years, more and more solutions will be put forward. But one thing is certain - the House of Lords is far from democracy and any reform to make it more democratic would be welcome.
Why I have a problem with Chris Lilley's comedy
What it means to be proud in 2019
The "feminine hygiene" industry does not want what's best for you
Why Boris Johnson would be a disaster for Britain
The government must do more to tackle climate change
Dry Your Eyes Mate: Why I Feel No Sympathy for Theresa May
How Glee changed the world
Death and debauchery
Mercedes sold for 20 dollars
Playlist: An introduction to Ninja Tune
Interview: Newton Faulkner
The University Of Life In NYC
Rupert Murdoch 'so over' Page 3?
England's ODI Exploits: A progress report
5 things to leave at home when you go to university
5 reasons why everyone hates Michael Gove
Student Cook of the Year competition launched


text:
package io.druid.java.util.common.granularity;

import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
import com.google.common.primitives.Longs;
import org.joda.time.DateTime;
import org.joda.time.format.DateTimeFormatter;

import java.nio.ByteBuffer;

/**
 * DurationGranularity buckets data based on the length of a duration
 */
public class DurationGranularity extends Granularity
{
  private final long duration;
  private final long origin;

  @JsonCreator
  public DurationGranularity(
      @JsonProperty("duration") long duration,
      @JsonProperty("origin") DateTime origin
  )
  {
    this(duration, origin == null ? 0 : origin.getMillis());
  }

  public DurationGranularity(long duration, long origin)
  {
    Preconditions.checkArgument(duration > 0, "duration should be greater than 0!");
    this.duration = duration;
    this.origin = origin % duration;
  }

  @JsonProperty("duration")
  public long getDuration()
  {
    return duration;
  }

  @JsonProperty("origin")
  public DateTime getOrigin()
  {
    return new DateTime(origin);
  }

  public long getOriginMillis()
  {
    return origin;
  }

  @Override
  public DateTimeFormatter getFormatter(Formatter type)
  {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method should not be invoked for this granularity type");
  }

  @Override
  public DateTime increment(DateTime time)
  {
    return new DateTime(time.getMillis() + getDurationMillis());
  }

  @Override
  public DateTime decrement(DateTime time)
  {
    return new DateTime(time.getMillis() - getDurationMillis());
  }

  @Override
  public DateTime bucketStart(DateTime time)
  {
    long t = time.getMillis();
    final long duration = getDurationMillis();
    long offset = t % duration - origin;
    if (offset < 0) {
      offset += duration;
    }
    return new DateTime(t - offset);
  }

  @Override
  public DateTime toDate(String filePath, Formatter formatter)
  {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method should not be invoked for this granularity type");
  }

  @Override
  public byte[] getCacheKey()
  {
    return ByteBuffer.allocate(2 * Longs.BYTES).putLong(duration).putLong(origin).array();
  }

  @Override
  public DateTime toDateTime(long offset)
  {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method should not be invoked for this granularity type");
  }

  public long getDurationMillis()
  {
    return duration;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(Object o)
  {
    if (this == o) {
      return true;
    }
    if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) {
      return false;
    }

    DurationGranularity that = (DurationGranularity) o;

    if (duration != that.duration) {
      return false;
    }
    if (origin != that.origin) {
      return false;
    }

    return true;
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode()
  {
    int result = (int) (duration ^ (duration >>> 32));
    result = 31 * result + (int) (origin ^ (origin >>> 32));
    return result;
  }

  @Override
  public String toString()
  {
    return "DurationGranularity{" +
           "duration=" + duration +
           ", origin=" + origin +
           '}';
  }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


LegalRaasta offers LLP Registration in Mumbai. We at LegalRaasta make LLP registration easy for our clients.You just need to fill the form and we will contact you. Then we will ask you for the required documents. Once submitted, you will get LLP registered within 15-30 days after it.
A limited liability partnership whose turnover does not exceed, in any financial year, forty lakh rupees, or whose contribution does not exceed twenty-five lakh rupees shall not be required to get its accounts audited.
If partners of such limited liability partnership decide to get the accounts of such LLP audited, the accounts shall be audited in accordance with these rules.
4.A person shall not be qualified for appointment as an auditor of a limited liability partnership unless he is a Chartered Accountant in practice.
5.An auditor or auditors of a limited liability partnership shall be appointed for each financial year of the LLP for auditing its accounts.
For more details contact LLP Registration in Mumbai.


text:
Featuring state-of-the-art facilities
Official opening of Mechanical Engineering complex
The completion of the new Ainsworth Building at University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney marks the beginning of a new era for the School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. The building is named after philanthropist and businessman Len Ainsworth.
Waterman Sydney was involved on the project from inception in 2012 working with the university providing input into the concept for Hydraulic and Fire services before novating to the builder for the detailed design and construction phases.
Australia's Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull recently opened the development which forms the cornerstone of the precinct, and features state-of-the-art refrigeration, laser and mechatronics labs, as well as wind tunnels, a flight simulator, and machines for tensile and compression testing.
The precinct boasts a new 350 seat lecture theatre and various new formal teaching spaces, a new collaborative student space and café, new purpose designed teaching space, computer laboratory spaces and a solar thermal energy system on the roof, which doubles as a working lab. The development caters to 1600 mechanical engineering undergraduates, 200 postgraduate coursework students and 130 research students.
Waterman's Associate Director of Hydraulic & Fire, David Tennent, worked on the project from inception through to completion. He commented; "I remember our first day working on this project and we knew that it would hold many challenges due to the varying components of new build and re-use spaces. The whole team embraced the challenges and what we delivered is an outstanding educational facility that will benefit engineering students long in to the future."
Coventry University development commended at IStructE Annual Awards 15 November 2021
The redevelopment of Coventry University's Faculty of Arts and Humanities received a commendation in the 'Education' category at the Annual Awards in the Midland Regional Group.
St Mary's Calne school's new library wins Small Project of the Year at Building Awards 4 November 2021
The new 660 sqm library at the heart of this outstanding Wiltshire independent school scooped the 'Small Project of the Year (up to £5m)' award.
Coventry University shortlisted at IStructE Annual Awards 22 October 2021
The redevelopment of Coventry University Faculty of Arts and Humanities has been shortlisted at the Annual Awards in the Midland Regional Group.
Royal College of Pathologists wins RIBA London Award 2 September 2021
The Royal College of Pathologists' stunning new HQ has won a RIBA London Award at the RIBA Regional Awards.
Chisolm Institute of Tafe, Berwick Campus
The project incorporated the design of a new multi-purpose sports and amenity building at the existing Berwick Campus in Melbourne.
LaTrobe University Bendigo Campus
This project incorporated the construction of three new buildings on two sites in Bendigo.
Deakin University, Central Precinct
The project involved the construction of four new buildings built around a central atrium. The building houses teaching, sports, lecture theatre, data centre, retail, and office accommodation type areas.
Chisolm Institute of Tafe, Frankston Campus
The project involved a new multi-purpose education building (Building A), and redevelopment of a Workshop building (Building B).


text:
Q: React TypeError: this.props.message.map is not a function I am trying to display messages on the screen which I receive from api. I checked in the debugger (here are the screenshots https://ibb.co/gShTG8g https://ibb.co/dQmfwJp) where all the stages are going fine, but in the end I get an error called TypeError: this.props.message.map is not a function. Here is my actual code, link to api https://rapidapi.com/ajith/api/messages
Messages.jsx
import React from "react";
export class Messages extends React.Component {
    render() {
        const MessageList = this.props.message.map((item, index) => {
            return

{item.Message}

        });
        return(

                {MessageList}

        );
    }
}

MessagesContainer.js
import React from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import {Messages} from "./Messages";
import {getMessagesThunk} from "../../Redux/users-reducer";

class MessagesContainer extends React.Component {

    componentDidMount() {
        this.props.getMessagesThunk();
    }

    render() {
        return(
            <>
                <Messages {...this.props} />
            </>
        )
    }
}

let mapStateToProps = (state) => ({
    message: state.usersPage.messages
})

export default connect(mapStateToProps, {getMessagesThunk})(MessagesContainer);

users-reducer.js (Here is a part of my code)
let initialState = {
    messages: [],

};

        case MESSAGE:
            return {
                ...state, messages: action.messages
            }

export const getMessage = (messages) => ({type: MESSAGE, messages})

export const getMessagesThunk = (messages) => {
    return (dispatch) => {
        usersAPI.message(messages).then(response => {
            if(response.data) {
                dispatch(getMessage(response.data.Message))
            }
        })
    }
}

Api.js
import axios from "axios";

    const instance = axios.create({
        params: {category: 'love'},
        withCredentials: true,
        headers: {
            "API-KEY": "6bec01a1-e00c-42ca-ab9d-a03ad2e730cc",
            'x-rapidapi-key': 'bf490d72a0msh3bf159a87e0c27fp107a51jsn062ca1b9b00e',
            'x-rapidapi-host': 'ajith-messages.p.rapidapi.com'
        }
    })

    export const usersAPI = {
        message() {
            return instance.get(`https://ajith-messages.p.rapidapi.com/getMsgs`)
        },
    }

A: This is because the message is not an array you can loop through. It's a simple string.