text:
Colonist was a general cargo and passenger schooner built in 1861 at Dumbarton Scotland by Denny & Rankine. It spent nearly 30 years plying the Western Pacific-based out of Sydney. It wrecked and later re-floated on the remote Elizabeth Reef 550 km from New South Wales, as well as being involved in the gold rushes. Its master was murdered before it was finally involved in a collision in Sydney Harbour, in which it was sunk.

Ship description and construction

The Colonist was a wooden vessel with iron bolts and with a felt and yellow metal skin.
Length:
Breadth:
Depth:
She was rigged as a schooner although sometimes described as a brigantine. She was built by Denny & Rankine  in their 140 yard at Dumbarton in 1861.

Ship service history

Maiden voyage to the Pacific
When the vessel arrived in Dunedin, New Zealand in April 1862 after a four-month journey it was described as:

The Colonist left the Tuscars, being the last land seen on the British coast, on the 18th of December last, and. under all the circumstances, may be considered to have made a most successful voyage out. She is but a small schooner, of only 105 tons, but she withstood wonderfully the various winds and weather which she encountered in the different latitudes, and proved herself a capital little vessel in sailing qualities and otherwise. In the tropics she was becalmed for about a fortnight, and when off Kerguelen Island met with a very violent gale, during the prevalence of which she shipped a heavy sea, but was in no way disabled, and she made out Stewart's Island on the 13th of this month. The Colonist was only launched shortly before departure, her builders being Messrs. Denny and Rankin, Dumbarton. As she is exceedingly well fitted for the coasting trade, it is probable that she will be retained as a regular trader between this and other New Zealand ports.

From this journey the "very superior vessel" then made its way over to Newcastle where it was then sold into the Australian service and purchased by the Sydney company Haynes, Brown, and Co in July 1862 to be placed into the colonial trade "for which she is exceedingly well adapted" and described as having proved to be "a remarkably fast ship" and "capable or stowing 200 tons".

When the vessel was preparing to leave in June for Guam,  shipmaster Matthew McFie had William Hughes, one of the crew, charged with insubordination. While in court Hughes appeared "excessively loquacious and irregular in Court, being apparently under the influence of drink. In the course of his garrulous, but disconnected statement, he said that he was perfectly willing to go on board and resume duty". Due to this misconduct he was goaled for 24 hours.

1862–1864
During the first years of the Colonist'''s time on the Australian Coast it was mainly involved with the Sydney - Brisbane - Rockhampton run. The vessel was boasted about as making "the run from Sydney to Rockhampton in the short space of six days from  wharf  to wharf".

The vessel at this stage was mainly mastered by Charles Croft, who left in late 1863 to take command of the Faraway which was wrecked on Breaksea Spit at Maryborough on 9 February 1864.

1864–1865

During this period, the vessel was mastered by Joseph H. Scaplehorn and started to move off the Australian coast and venture into the western Pacific, visiting Guam, Batavia (Jakarta, Indonesia) and Foo Chow (Fuzhou, China).

Guam at that period was still under the command of the Spanish, while Batavia was the head of the Dutch East Indies, and Fuzhou was one of the five treaty ports which had been opened to the British at the end of the First Opium War 20 years earlier and just three years after the end of the Second Opium War.

The Colonist under Captain Scaplehorn completed one of the fastest passages on record at that time, having been only 65 days from Foo Chow to Sydney, by completing this voyage in four and a half months, it again proved the vessel to be possessed with no ordinary sailing qualities.

During 1865 the vessel was reported as sold by Messrs. L.E. Threlkeld and Co either to Messrs A, Tange and Co, for the sum of £1600 in January  (which may have fallen through) or alternatively at auction in November.

1865–1866: Masters Pearce, Mason and Kelly
The vessel continued to ply its trade on further visits to Fuzhou as well as trips to Petropavlovsk Russia just 10 years after the Siege of Petropavlovsk during the Crimean War. During one of these trips the vessel ran into a gale:

The schooner Colonist left Sydney on the evening of the 10th instant, for Petropaulovski, and has had to contend with the late prevailing N.E. gales, and had made good her passage until abreast of Smoky Cape, by which time all the head stays and gear had been carried away, and from the heavy working of the vessel, she commenced leaking, which increased to 700 strokes per hour, when Captain Kelly deemed it prudent to bear up. No sights were obtainable until Saturday last, when she was found to be abreast of Jervis Bay. The appearance of the schooner is a sufficient guarantee of the violent gales she must have encountered.

The vessel also undertook several trips to Hokitika, New Zealand, taking prospectors and supplies for the West Coast Gold Rush affecting that region.

1870: Wreck on Elizabeth Reef

During the period of 1869 and 1870 the Colonist had settled into a period of regular visits between Sydney and New Caledonia under the command of Alfred Douglas Millar Geach. During one of these regular runs the vessel hit Elizabeth Reef. After having left Sydney on 18 May 1870 with a full cargo of general merchandise and sailing for a day and a half, when it encountered a storm on the 21st it was thought to be off Lord Howe when

At midnight, on the 22nd, Captain Geach went below to mark off the schooner's track,  when the chief officer called out, "hard up," and within a few seconds she struck the reef on the south side. The schooner was under double-reefed canvas at the time, and a fearful sea running. All sail was kept on her for the purpose of hardening her on the reef. The first sea swept. over her, and burst through the mainsail; the second stove in the boat, and In this state she remained until daylight, when the boat haring been temporarily repaired the crew left on the 23rd, and got safe into; the lagoon in smooth water.

The next thing done was to construct a raft, on which the crew remained when it became dangerous to be on board the wreck; and it was, on consultation determined to make the boat as substantial as possible and a portion of the crew by this means might reach the mainland, and obtain assistance for those left on the reef. With considerable labour two strakes were added to the topsides, formed out of paling's which were on board, and on the 14th June all was ready for a start. The crew drew lots as to who should ,go in the boat, and they fell to Captain Geach, the chief officer, the steward, Mr. Simmens a passenger, and two natives.

On 21 June the schooner Joan Andrews under Captain Stewart, while on a run from Rockhampton to Sydney, picked up the crew in the lifeboat and brought them to Sydney. On the evening of 28 June the government vessel Thetis left Sydney for the reef and arrived there late the next day.

It was low tide when the ship's boat was launched approximately 400m from the wreck, and proceeded to the wreck by a combination of rowing and dragging. Aboard the boat was the chief officer of the colonist (Mr. Hawkins) had travelled with the Thetis when approximately 200m from the wreck they were met by the remaining crew of the Colonist. As the weather was unsettled and the tide was low it was decided to spend the night aboard the Colonist and tell the Thetis to stand off in deeper water.

They left the Colonist approximately 9 am the following morning with the six remaining crew of the vessel who had been on board the wreck for 40 days. During their stay a whaler had been seen but made no attempt to rescue them latter followed by a Brig which had stopped and lowered a boat but had been unable to find the entrance to the lagoon and sailed around the reef until the Thetis was seen when it then sailed away.

Salvage of the Colonist
The salvage operations commenced almost right away on 13 July 1870; the ketch Comet departed Sydney to salvage the cargo. This was sollowed by the schooner Scotia almost a fortnight later to assist, and by mid-September the Comet had again proceeded back out to the site.

When the Comet left the reef in late September to return to Sydney with salvaged cargo it left its captain (Paget) out on Elizabeth Reef with two carpenters as well as caulkers and riggers. At this stage they had already partially succeeded in getting the vessel off the reef.

By November the ketch had again returned from the wreck site with cargo from both the Colonist as well as the Douglas, and the scene was described as:

...masts and yards as well as hull of the Colonist are as sound as the day she was built. She has been thoroughly caulked from keel to covering board, and is now quite tight, her rigging has been refitted and sails bent. The tides have been very bad lately, but notwithstanding she has been floated more than halfway over the reef; and Captain Paget, who remains with one man at the reef, expects that she will be in deep water at the next spring tides. The Douglas still remains with royal yards aloft.

Captain Paget's salvage attempts continued until the Colonist returned to Sydney Harbour on 2 March 1871 with himself and four crew on board, more than eight months after having hit the reef. Upon its return it was placed on

Cuthbert's patent slip, Sussex street; and, upon examination, it appears extraordinary that considering she has been so long on the Elizabeth Reef, she has sustained so little damage. The frame of the vessel is intact; no straining is perceptible, and, with the exception of the ordinary chafing, the schooner has suffered no material injury.

1878: New Guinea gold prospecting

Gold was first discovered in Papua New Guinea in 1852 as accidental traces in pottery from Redscar Bay on the Papua Peninsula on Captain Owen Stanley's survey of Papua New Guinea's south coast. In early 1878, a missionary found alluvial gold about 40 miles inland from Port Moresby.

In March the Colonist, then owned by Mr. White, put together the first major prospecting party to travel to Port Moresby via Cooktown with about 25 prospectors travelling from Sydney and about another 10 being onloaded at Cooktown. They were described as "having a firm determination to give the reports of the existence of gold at New Guinea a fair trial for six months. They each ship about five cwt provisions and outfit, and many of them are equipped with guns and other defensive weapons, as well as with the appliances for prospecting." The sea journey was expected to take 25 days or so. The prospectors grouped together in parties of five or so, and were all paying for their own passage (about £12 each) as well as being "practical miners, and the majority of them have means of their own so that in the event of failing in their search they will not destitute if they return home."

Upon reaching Cooktown the ship took on additional provisions. "Stalls for nine horses have been erected between decks, immediately under the after hatch. Twelve horses will, we understand,-be taken, if three of the number can be stowed on deck. Each of the men from Sydney is armed with a rifle and revolver, and there are several fowling pieces amongst the party." As well as having items for trade including " tobacco, turkey red cloth, beads, ect, and all have expressed a determination to treat the New Guinea natives fairly; by paying for everything they may require, and otherwise respecting their rights, so as to keep up friendly relations with them".

At the arrival of the Colonist in Port Moresby it presented papers from the colonial secretary in Brisbane to William Bairstow Ingham (whom Ingham is named after) appointing him "agent for the Queensland Government" in the area. At that stage Ingham, Kendall Broadbent (a naturalist who collected the first frill-necked monarch) and Andrew Goldie (naturalist who has the Goldie's bird-of-paradise named after him) were the only European inhabitants of Port Moresby in early 1878, with Ingham having only arrived two months earlier. Ingham's stint as the Queensland Government agent was short, as on 28 November 1878,  he and 6 others were murdered and eaten on Brooker (Utian) Island in the Calvados Chain of the Louisiade Archipelago.

By August the Colonist had left the prospectors returning to Sydney.

1889: Murder of Shipmaster William Greenlees

On 22 May 1889 whilst the Colonist was lying at anchor in Havannah Harbour in the New Hebrides Group the shipmaster William Greenless was shot and killed by the supercargo of the vessel Henry Ernest Weaver.

HMS Lizard was lying at Havannah Harbour at the time and a boat from her went all to the Colonist upon the report of firearms on board being heard. On boarding the schooner It was found that the captain had been shot while lying in his berth, and the body subsequently carried up and laid on the main hatchway. Weaver, the supercargo, was arrested by the officer from the Lizard with a sheath knife and two revolvers were taken from him, and he was convoyed to the Lizard, where evidence of the mate of the schooner and other eye-witnesses of the murder was taken. Subsequently HMS Opal arrived at Havannah Harbour from Noumea and Captain Bosanquet as senior officer and Deputy-Commissioner for the Western Pacific, assembled a High Commission Court on May 23 the result of the inquiry was that Weaver was committed or trial on a charge of wilful murder, and was remanded to the Court at Fiji and he and the witnesses were to be sent to Suva by the A.U.S. N Company's steamer Gunga.

Captain William Greenlees (Greenless) had been running vessels along the east coast of Australia since August 1855. He had worked his way up from smaller vessels and by 1868, he was the master of the 106-ton schooner Native Lass and was involved in blackbirding. From 1873 he was the captain of the Colonist for a number of runs, mainly involved in a Sydney Rockhampton run. 1877 – 1879 he was master of the schooner Heron, again actively impressing labour from the Pacific Islands. While in 1884 he was in command of the Brigantine Water Witch which was wrecked on Masthead island. Upon his death his widow was provided with £100 from the National Shipwreck Relief Society which was £30 above the membership entitlement.

Henry Ernest Weaver (captain / supercargo), had been married in London in 1873 and then made his way to Brisbane. In March 1875 the master (Goodall) of the Queen May, a regular blackbirding vessel, died whist unloading supplies at Rockhampton. The mate then took over command but was then caught by floods in Rockhampton. So Henry Weaver was appointed as captain but after about a day and a half at sea the crew reported Weaver as insane and had fears for his safety. Alexander Goodall, aged 18, and a son of the just deceased Captain Goodall, was chosen by the crew as master and he proceeded back to Gladstone and handed Weaver over to the authorities.

By 1876 Weaver was declared insolvent by his own petition due in part "to sickness, want of employment, and pressure on the part of creditors" with a debt of £212 14s. 6d. with no assets. By 1879 he had been appointed sub-lieutenant of the Queensland Government schooner Pearl.

In May 1884 Weaver was sentenced to 9 months imprisonment for "obtained goods to the value of £6 15s from W. Royle by means of a valueless cheque".

Prior to the Colonist leaving, Sydney Weaver had endeavoured to induce a friend of his to visit an island with him. Weaver related an extraordinary tale of hidden wealth on the island which was known only to him. The vessel cleared ostensibly for the Christmas Islands with no cargo and only a quantity of spades and firearms on board. The charts on board the schooner showedthe position of Christmas Islands and, as Weaver took all the sights himself, no one on board but he knew where the vessel was going.

The Colonist put into Havannah Harbour for provisions and afterwards visited several islands. Weaver continually boasted that the clearance of the vessel was fictitious and often repeated to the officers the tale of the hidden wealth.

Additionally Weaver had told various stories, as that he was on important business for the Imperial Government of a private nature, that he was going to play the part of Rajah Brooke on some island to the north, and that he was going to an island where there was an immense quantity of pearl shells ready collected, and waiting for him.

In the High Commissioner's Court at Suva, Fiji, on 19 August 1889, before the Hon. Henry Spencer Berkeley, Chief Judicial Commissioner, Captain Weaver was sentenced to death by hanging. This sentence was then commuted to imprisonment for life.

Captain Weaver later returned as a passenger of the steamer Norkoowa from the Solomon Islands in March 1906 and landed in Brisbane suffering from malaria just under seven years after the murder.  By late March he had made his way down to Sydney.

By August 1908 Weaver had organised a syndicate of ten men who had committed to paying £100 each to charter a vessel to go to Malaita Island in the Solomons, partly for treasure and partly to look for minerals that Captain Weaver said he knew to exist.  The Wheatsheaf was charted and Weaver represented himself as head chief or king of the island. Upon reaching the Solomons the vessel went to Aola,  then to Tulagi, the seat of government, and Woodford plantation. They went from there to Maululu, Maribo, and Sao. Here Weaver had some trouble with the natives. Weaver indicated to his investors that there had been a great earthquake which had altered the face of the island, and that his great friend the previous chief had been dead for two years.

A meeting amongst the investors was held, and as the result Captain Weaver was told that they had no confidence in him; thus at Sao he resigned his command.

Captain Weaver was returned to Sydney in the steamer Moresby in September. The Wheatsheaf continued on, in an attempt to recoup costs, but found nothing. Charles Mason, one of the investors, shot himself with a revolver in the head 180 miles east of Moreton Bay.

1890: Collision and sinking

The Colonist left Kiama for Sydney at 6:20am on Saturday 1 March 1890 loaded with blue metal and entered Sydney Heads at about 3pm that day and beat up the West Channel of the harbour. At 4:45 the vessel was on a tack from Shark Point heading for Garden Island, when the steamer Adelaide came into sight on the northern side of Pinchgut. The Colonist had cleared Bradleys Head and was midway between there and Garden Island with the Adelaide heading to Clark Island when the collision occurred. The Colonist was struck on the starboard side aft of the fore rigging with the schooner sinking almost immediately.

Two of the crew took to the rigging and managed to clamber aboard the Adelaide via its anchor chains. Two of the crew and Captain Wilson were picked up from the harbour although the mate Frederick Taylor was lost and his body recovered several days later.

The survivors who were picked up from the water were picked up by the skiff half decker Young Oscar. It first picked up the master who was in a life ring, exhausted, and after some difficulty was gotten aboard over the stern. Another then clambered aboard; they then saw a man face down and lifeless who they managed to drag aboard. After they worked on him for 20 minutes he regained consciousness.

The mate's body was recovered on Wednesday floating somewhat near the scene.  At the Marine Court of Enquiry it was found that the captain of the Colonist was at fault by lufting his vessel across the bows of the steamer Adelaide but under the circumstances they considered nothing more than a "reprimand and cautioned to be more careful in the future" would be required.

Wreck site and wreckage

The vessel was described to have sunk:

"The schooner was about three cable lengths off Bradley's Head"
"I could judge the collision occurred exactly half way between Garden Island and Bradleys head"
"The collision took place between Bradleys Head and the north of Garden Island about three and a half cable lengths from the former point not quite halfway between the two"

The Marine Board ordered the removal of the schooner which had sunk in the channel and this was conducted on Wednesday 23 April with the vessel

Blown up by dynamite last night. It was intended to have fired the charges at 5 o'clock in the evening; but at that hour the sunken vessel was so thickly surrounded by boats, it was deemed inexpedient to proceed with the work, and 9 o'clock was decided upon. The knowledge that large numbers of fish would be thrown to the surface stunned by the shock influenced the attendance of small boats to a marked degree in the afternoon, and though there were not nearly so many at night the number was larger than was expected, and caution had to be observed.

Three mines were laid, each of 50lb., and were successfully fired. Amass of the wreckage was thrown to a great height, the vessel's mainmast also coming up. An immense volume of water was thrown into the air, and, after matters had subsided, it was seen that vast numbers of fish of all sizes and descriptions were floating on the surface. A grand haul was made by the boats on the spot one of the largest fish picked up, familiarly known as a jewfish, was found to measure 7ft. in length. It is intended to send the divers down at daylight today, and as the mines were so placed as to blow the bottom out of the schooner, and so release the topsides and the deck, the hull should now be readily floated. The work was carried out solely by the Naval Brigade gunroom officer assisted by a few certificated men of the force, under the direction of the gunnery and torpedo instructors, Messrs. Rickwood and Baxter.

Over the next days the pilot steamer Captain Cook hauled away the mainmast and another charge of gun-cotton was used to blow
the foremast out of the submerged hull. The mast and topsail yards sank, and they sent a diver down to clear it so that it might be towed away. The hull of the Colonist'' was well down in the mud.

The wreck lay in 20m of water on a silty bottom and was found on 13 May 2013. The muntz metal outline that originally clad the outside of the hull and a pile of basalt which was the final cargo of blue metal from Kiama are all that was visible. The bow can still be made out (basically pointing to the harbour bridge) and some concreted near here which is most likely anchor chain.

Summary of voyages

References

1861 ships
Ships built on the River Clyde
Maritime incidents in 1890
Merchant ships of Australia
Schooners of Australia
Ships sunk in collisions
Shipwrecks of the Sydney Eastern Suburbs Region
1851–1870 ships of Australia
1871–1900 ships of Australia
History of Papua New Guinea
History of the Solomon Islands
1861 in Scotland
History of West Dunbartonshire


text:
Who we are, why we exist.
How we work,
Our programmes of work.
News, views
The latest from us.
Funding and support to develop, apply and test innovative approaches to help transform planned care services in Wales.
Do you have an idea that could make a positive difference to planned care pathways, or that could help to reduce or alleviate demand for planned care services in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic?
The Planned Care Innovation Programme presents an exciting opportunity to drive change across the spectrum of planned care services in Wales, providing funding and support to transform new ideas into prudent, sustainable models of planned care.
Applications are invited across the broad themes of referral, guidance, treatment, follow-up and in the measurement of demand and outcomes. It is open to those working in the delivery and management of planned care services in Wales – including from primary, secondary and tertiary care, and from community, social care and third sector organisations.
The Planned Care Innovation Programme applies the successful Bevan Exemplar model of innovation to the critical need to transform planned care services in Wales. It is funded by the Welsh Government and led by the Bevan Commission.
For guidance and details of upcoming Information Sessions, visit www.bevancommission.org/plannedcare
Sign up to join our mailing list and stay up to date with Dragon's Heart Institute
Join the conversation today. We want to hear from you
Help us connect and work with even more people.
© Dragon's Heart Institute 2022
Site by jamjar

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
'Singles' and other movies made in Seattle
Take a look at the movies shot in Seattle
LEVI PULKKINEN
Sep. 18, 2015 Updated: Oct. 12, 2020 11:42 a.m.
Seattle's grunge-era movie -- Cameron Crowe's "Singles" -- turned 25 on Sept. 18. Check out some of the other films shot in Seattle.
Promotional poster
"Tugboat Annie" – Starring Marie Dressler and Wallace Berry, this 1933 film drew from stories based on the life of tugboat tycoon Thea Foss.
Alfred Eisenstaedt/Time & Life Pictures/Getty Image"You Came Along" -- This 1945 comedy-romance was written by a woman known for neither -- Ayn Rand. The film told the story of a terminally ill Air Force officer who makes a stop in Seattle.
Seattle P-I/MOHAI"It Happened at the World's Fair" -- The King came to Seattle for this 1962 romp. He's pictured above at the Westlake Monorail station with Governor Al Rosellini (left) on Sept. 5, 1962. The ham was reportedly from Presley's Tennessee farm.
Getty Images"The Slender Thread" -- Sidney Poitier and Anne Bancroft starred in this 1965 drama about a crisis line receptionist who takes a call from a suicidal woman.


text:
Shop Shop > The New Yorker - August 19th 1972
The New Yorker - August 19th 1972
Edition of The New Yorker, good to very good condition
Number of items:
Oxfam Bookshop Coventry
Trading for over 30 years, the Coventry books & music store has a wide selection of academic textbooks, literature, poetry, and plays, alongside fiction, crime, travel and children's books. We have one of the largest sci-fi departments in the country, stocking hundreds of comics (many rare and out of print), graphic novels, games, collectables and prints. Our music department carries collectable and out of print titles on vinyl, CD, and DVD. We also have many film & music reference books and biographies. The newest addition is a poster department selling classic and rare posters from music and cinema. So come on - send yourself to Coventry!


text:
Home News Feed Powered by DMLNewsApp REPORT: Obama CIA Director John Brennan blasts assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist,...
REPORT: Obama CIA Director John Brennan blasts assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist, Ilhan Omar responds
Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan condemned the killing of an Iranian scientist believed to be linked to Tehran's nuclear program Friday, calling it "criminal" and "highly reckless."
Details on the attack remain slim, but local outlets have reported that Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was killed after a truck full of explosives concealed, by a pile of wood pulled alongside the scientist's sedan before detonating in the town of Absard, located just east of Tehran.
Iran's foreign minister said that attack on Fakhrizadeh had "serious indications" that Israel was involved in the assassination but did not provide additional details – though there are expected to be international repercussions.
Brennan blasted out the following statement in a series of Twitter posts:
This was a criminal act & highly reckless. It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict. Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits.
This was a criminal act & highly reckless. It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict.
Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits. https://t.co/0uZhyBTM3S
— John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) November 27, 2020
I do not know whether a foreign government authorized or carried out the the murder of Fakhrizadeh. Such an act of state-sponsored terrorism would be a flagrant violation of international law & encourage more governments to carry out lethal attacks against foreign officials.
These assassinations are far different than strikes against terrorist leaders & operatives of groups like al-Qaida & Islamic State, which are not sovereign states. As illegitimate combatants under international law, they can be targeted in order to stop deadly terrorist attacks.
Somalian refugee Rep. Ilhan Omar shared Brennan's statement, and tweeted, "Speaking out against violations of international law isn't partisan issue, it's also not being on the side of Iran. It's about balance and not plunging the world into more chaotic state than we are already in."
Speaking out against violations of international law isn't partisan issue, it's also not being on the side of Iran. It's about balance and not plunging the world into more chaotic state than we are already in.
Read John's thread ⬇ https://t.co/Xe39BHOH8r
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) November 27, 2020
Previous articleREPORT: Nascar member and bride killed in tragic car crash on honeymoon to Florida Keys
Next articleREPORT: Possible Biden pick for CIA director would mark first Black person to hold the intelligence position
David Walker November 27, 2020 at 6:54 pm
Too bad it wasn't omar the 'm' mouth of ignorance .
Francis November 27, 2020 at 6:56 pm
Stfu already 😡
Elliott November 27, 2020 at 7:07 pm
Omar and Brennen belong together……………… IN THE SAME JAIL CELL!
Gay Preator November 27, 2020 at 7:08 pm
Flagrant violation of International Law. Kind of comes back home: Flagrant violation: this guy should know all about that.
Douglas Schmitt November 27, 2020 at 7:08 pm
You two commies just need to leave the country neither of you are worth the air you breath….oh and right now we have a responsible government…….it when you socialist co.mies get in office is when we will have to worry, or at least we the people will have to worry
Jil November 27, 2020 at 7:09 pm
Where did all these people with poor judgement come from???
Jc November 27, 2020 at 7:34 pm
Too bad they weren't there with him.
Random Citizen November 27, 2020 at 7:56 pm
Both Brennan and Omar are anti-American, anti-Semitic Islamists. She should be arrested and deported for immigration fraud. He should be tried for treason.
Vinnie November 28, 2020 at 11:06 am
Totally agree! Brennan should be in jail or maybe even worse for treason!!
MarkO November 27, 2020 at 8:04 pm
Two criminals (one an anti Semite) commiserate over the death of a terrorist.
Mars November 27, 2020 at 8:05 pm
Take out Brennan and Omar too please. I'm asking for a Christmas miracle.
James Larkey November 27, 2020 at 9:00 pm
He got what he deserved if you ask me. If you play stupid games you get stupid prizes.
Jean Casanave November 27, 2020 at 9:23 pm
So Brennan is speaking on something that is short on details…so what else is new?
Foot in mouth as usual.
Morgan November 27, 2020 at 9:29 pm
Brennan, upset his mad scientist in a Terrorist country that is trying to get nukes was killed. Whose side is Brennan on? Never mind. He's an Obama lackey-he's an enemy of the state. Traitorous scum
Jo coffelt November 28, 2020 at 12:40 pm
The side of Joe Biden/Obama war mongers. They just cant wait to get us in another war/conflict!


text:
Is Our Military Prepared for Another 9/11 Attack?
September 21, 2022 Oliver North Uncategorized
For more than a week, many of us have been reflecting on an event even more dramatic than the demise of a beloved British monarch: the deadliest terror attack in history on Sept. 11, 2001, which killed 2,977 and injured more than 6,000 innocent victims in New York City, at the Pentagon and in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Notably, 21 years ago, our British allies were first to endorse invoking Article 5 of the NATO Charter, "… an attack on one is an attack on all …"
We must now focus on how we will respond if, God forbid, an adversary is planning another devastating attack on our homeland. Is our government doing everything necessary to protect our country and citizens? We don't think so.
Twenty-one years ago, our military responded quickly and effectively to the 9/11 terror attack. Within hours, U.S. and allied intelligence agencies knew it was planned and perpetrated by al Qaeda, headed by Osama bin Laden, and protected by Afghanistan's vicious Taliban regime. Within days, several thousand U.S. Special Operations troops and CIA Special Activities Division personnel were in the region, linked up with indigenous allies.
On Oct. 7, we launched an aggressive air-ground operation to drive Taliban troops and al Qaeda terrorists out of Kabul. On Nov. 25, the 15th U.S. Marine Expeditionary Unit deployed southwest of Kandahar — the first American combined-arms combat force to arrive in Afghanistan. By Christmas 2011, the Taliban and al Qaeda were driven from power and into caves along the Pakistani border.
Osama bin Laden, the architect of the 9/11 terror attacks was found and killed on May 2, 2011, during a raid by U.S. Navy Seals. The story should have ended then. But it didn't.
For nearly two decades after the 2001 victory against al Qaeda and the Taliban, the U.S and our 22 allies in the International Security Force coalition attempted to build a "pro-western, anti-Islamic-terror government" in Afghanistan. It cost nearly 2,500 U.S. military personnel killed, over 22,700 wounded and more than 3,700 American civilian contractors killed. Thanks to the Biden administration, these lives were squandered.
No one in their right mind argues that honorably ending the war in Afghanistan was the wrong thing to do. The Trump administration's plan for a "conditions based" withdrawal was the correct approach. But doing the "right thing" the wrong way is always potentially disastrous.
The Biden "National Security Team" has done everything wrong. Their decision in July 2021 to abandon the vital, multi-runway, secure base at Bagram, less than 70 kilometers (43 miles) north of Kabul, guaranteed calamity.
The president's subsequent promises to "… get all American citizens and Afghan allies out by Aug. 31" were phony and cemented catastrophe. More than a thousand Americans and tens of thousands of Afghan contractors became hostages to the Taliban and al Qaeda.
Leaving billions of dollars' worth of advanced military equipment at Bagram will result in these weapons and materiel being used against us and our allies by innumerable terrorist organizations. Worse yet, our open southern border offers terrorists of all stripes an open door to commit atrocities against American citizens.
Our credibility as a reliable partner in a confrontation with Communist China, Iran, North Korea or Vladimir Putin's Russia has been irreparably damaged. Crucial allies like Israel now have doubts about U.S. trustworthiness.
The Biden administration furthers our decline by turning the world's finest military force into WOKE social justice warriors. Very few of those we need in our all-volunteer military want to serve in a WOKE socio-cultural laboratory.
While our enemies prepare terrorist attacks against us, our "leaders" are forcing our troops to avoid gender-based pronouns and hate one another. God help us.
Oliver L. North is a combat-decorated U.S. Marine, founder and CEO of Fidelis Publishing and Fidelis Media. Find out more about him at www.olivernorth.com. David Goetsch is a Marine Corps veteran, member of the Florida Veterans Hall of Fame, professor of business, and Christian counselor. Find out more about him at www.david-goetsch.com. Their new book "Tragic Consequences" is available at www.faithfultext.com.
COPYRIGHT 2022 OLIVER L. NORTH AND DAVID GOETSCH
Oliver North
Previous Post:Guaranteed Income: A Slap in the Face to Workers
Next Post:They're All Open-Borders Hypocrites
I've made so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. I'm using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here's what I do.
For more details visit————➤ 𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐡𝟏𝟏.𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐭.𝐜𝐨𝐦
NO due to "Woke" leadership
Terry Crews Point Out What is Really Wrong With Nick Cannon's Comments July 16, 2020
Hispanic Teen Recounts Being Nearly Beaten to Death in Racist Attack by Anti-Trump Actress Meryl Streep's Nephew September 16, 2020
Sarah Silverman Blasts Cancel Culture Claims it Will Push People to Join Hate Groups October 27, 2020


This article is guest posted by Welly Mulia.
The idea of building and running a profitable Internet business from the comfort of your own home sounds great, and I've seen a lot of people get very excited at the thought of doing this.
As great and awesome that may sound, one has to carefully think about the effects of building an Internet business, both from the positive and negative aspects.
You might think that there can ONLY be positive effects since everyone out there is talking how they are making 5 or 6 figure per month easily and effortlessly.
Of course there are going to be NEGATIVE effects as well. Not only in business, in everything that we do there are always going to be 2 sides to every coin.
So what kind of negative effects are we talking about?
You see, when trying to build a successful online business, 99% of the time you're NOT going to make any money at all when you're just getting started.
Because you're still learning the ropes of the game.
Let me ask you this question: "Let's suppose you have never played tennis before, but you want to be good at it. Can you be good at the sport in a very short period of time?"
The same thing goes when trying to build a successful Internet business from scratch without much knowledge and experience. Heck, it's not just about building an Internet business, it applies to every endeavor that you're trying to learn and conquer.
Business in general, not just Internet or online business, is about investing for the future. I'm not talking about investing in shares, bonds, options or the likes. I'm talking about investing in our business NOW so that the business generates profits for us in the future.
Like what I've said earlier, when you're just starting out to build your Internet business, your income for the first few months will most likely be zero. Even if you've managed to earn any money during this time, they will most likely be pennies.
You work on your business 30 or 40 hours per week and you don't see any results. What do you do? Do you give up like most people do? Or do you continue to work hard and fine tune your business along the way?
You may only start to see results a year or two from now, but when you've successfully made that first dollar, then it's going to be easier to make subsequent dollars.
Once you hit the next breakthrough in your business, your business has the potential to grow exponentially.
In fact, it's very possible to grow your business exponentially while working less. You do this by having systems and quality team members in place to run the business WITHOUT you.
This is what I call the entrepreneur spirit.
Contrast this when you work as a full time employee for a company. You get paid a fix salary each and every month. You have peace of mind and can concentrate on your work because you know that at the end of the month you're going to get paid by the company.
You get your full time salary at the end of the first month, at the end of next month, the month after, and so on. However, your income increases on a linear basis (usually only once per year).
Initially when just starting out, most people would rather be in the full time employee position because of the fix salary they can bring home every month. However as time goes on and the business keeps on improving, people would no doubt choose to be in the business owner position rather than just an employee whose income increases only linearly.
But that's just how it works.
Entrepreneurs are rewarded for their determination and perseverance during the toughest of times, and are rewarded when their business starts to take off and make them even more money while working less.
Employees who have been enjoying consistent, fixed income continue to bring in that amount for the rest of their working lives while still having to work the normal 9 to 5.
Having read this far, you should now have a clearer picture of the risks and rewards associated with building and running your own online business. Don't simply jump in and get your feet wet at the thought of making money online from your Internet business. Consider carefully the advantages as well as disadvantages as outlined above.
INSTANTLY Claim Your $488 FREE Internet Marketing Gifts That Will Show And Teach You How To Build A CONSISTENT Four Figure Per Month Online Business FAST!


With patch 1.2, would-be Jedi and Sith are swarming back to Star Wars: The Old Republic. If you're among those masses, then it's time to boost your stats by collecting all of the hidden datacrons throughout the galaxy. Sure, you might've found one or two by now (or maybe even most), but our complete step-by-step guide will transform you from a Padawan to Master in no time.


text:
In Deutschland ist der Begriff erwerbsfähiger Leistungsberechtigter (ELB) ein Begriff aus dem Recht der Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende im Zweiten Buch Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB II). Der Begriff definiert den elementaren Tatbestand, der vorliegen muss, damit eine Person Leistungen nach dem SGB II beanspruchen kann.

Bis zu der rückwirkend zum 1. Januar 2011 in Kraft getretenen Änderung der SGB II wurde statt von einem Leistungsberechtigten von einem Hilfebedürftigen gesprochen. Die Rechtslage wurde durch die Änderung der Begrifflichkeit nicht geändert. Die Definition des alten Begriffs wurde unverändert für den neuen Begriff übernommen.

Legaldefinition
Die Legaldefinition eines erwerbsfähigen Leistungsberechtigten findet sich in  Abs. 1 SGB II. Demnach ist ein erwerbsfähiger Leistungsberechtigter, wer:

 das 15. Lebensjahr vollendet und die Regelaltersgrenze ( SGB II) noch nicht erreicht hat,
 erwerbsfähig ist,
 hilfebedürftig ist und
 seinen gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland hat.

Auch wer diese Kriterien nicht erfüllt, kann Leistungen in Form von Sozialgeld erhalten, wenn er mit einem erwerbsfähigen Leistungsberechtigten in einer Bedarfsgemeinschaft lebt (siehe  Abs. 2 SGB II). Die Bundesagentur spricht hier auch von einem nichterwerbsfähigen Leistungsberechtigten.

Erwerbsfähigkeit
Erwerbsfähig ist nach  Abs. 1 SGB II, wer nicht wegen Krankheit oder Behinderung auf absehbare Zeit außerstande ist, unter den üblichen Bedingungen des allgemeinen Arbeitsmarktes mindestens drei Stunden täglich erwerbstätig zu sein. Dies schließt sowohl Personen aus, bei denen eine Minderung der Erwerbsfähigkeit auf unter 3 Stunden festgestellt wurde, als auch Personen, die nicht unter den üblichen Bedingungen des allgemeinen Arbeitsmarktes erwerbstätig sein können (sondern z. B. nur in einer Werkstatt für behinderte Menschen).

Ausländer gelten nach  Abs. 2 SGB II als erwerbsunfähig im Sinne des Gesetzes, wenn ihnen die Aufnahme einer Beschäftigung nicht erlaubt ist und auch nicht erlaubt werden kann. Die Möglichkeit, eine Beschäftigung vorbehaltlich einer Zustimmung nach  AufenthG aufzunehmen (sogenannte Vorrangprüfung), ist für die Feststellung der Erwerbsfähigkeit ausreichend. Da es eine separate Arbeitserlaubnis nur noch in Ausnahmefällen gibt und eine erteilte Aufenthaltserlaubnis in fast allen Fällen mit einer Berechtigung zur Erwerbstätigkeit verbunden ist, dürfte dieser Ausschlussgrund bei Ausländern nur in sehr seltenen Fällen zutreffen.

Hilfebedürftigkeit
Hilfebedürftig ist nach  Abs. 1 SGB II, wer seinen Lebensunterhalt nicht oder nicht ausreichend aus dem zu berücksichtigenden Einkommen oder Vermögen sichern kann und die erforderliche Hilfe nicht von anderen, insbesondere von Angehörigen oder von Trägern anderer Sozialleistungen, erhält. Demnach kann auch hilfebedürftig sein, wer zwar erwerbstätig ist, dessen Einkommen aber nicht ausreicht, um sich (und gegebenenfalls die anderen Mitglieder der Bedarfsgemeinschaft) zu versorgen (sogenannter Aufstocker).

Nach  Abs. 4 SGB II ist auch hilfebedürftig, wem der sofortige Verbrauch oder die sofortige Verwertung von zu berücksichtigendem Vermögen nicht möglich ist oder für den dies eine besondere Härte bedeuten würde. In diesem Falle sollen Leistungen als Darlehen gewährt werden ( Abs. 5 SGB II).

Leben Hilfebedürftige in Haushaltsgemeinschaft mit Verwandten oder Verschwägerten, so wird nach  Abs. 5 SGB II vermutet, dass sie von ihnen Leistungen erhalten, soweit dies nach deren Einkommen und Vermögen erwartet werden kann. Eine solche Haushaltsgemeinschaft liegt nur vor, wenn diese Personen gemeinsam wohnen und auch wirtschaften; die Beweislast hierfür liegt beim Grundsicherungsträger.

Bedarfsgemeinschaft

Nach  Abs. 3 SGB II bilden bestimmte Personengruppen eine Bedarfsgemeinschaft, sodass sie stets zusammen veranlagt werden. Dies sind:

 der erwerbsfähige Leistungsberechtigte selbst
 die im Haushalt lebenden Eltern oder ein im Haushalt lebender Elternteil eines unverheirateten, erwerbsfähigen Kindes, das noch nicht 25 Jahre alt ist und der im Haushalt lebende Partner dieses Elternteils
 als Partner der leistungsberechtigten Person
 der nicht dauernd getrennt lebende Ehegatte,
 der nicht dauernd getrennt lebende Lebenspartner
 eine Person, die mit dem erwerbsfähigen Leistungsberechtigten in einem gemeinsamen Haushalt so zusammenlebt, dass nach verständiger Würdigung der wechselseitige Wille anzunehmen ist, Verantwortung füreinander zu tragen und füreinander einzustehen,
 die dem Haushalt angehörenden unverheirateten Kinder von den in den Nummern 1. bis 3. genannten Personen, wenn die Kinder noch nicht 25 Jahre alt sind und ihren Lebensunterhalt nicht aus eigenem Einkommen oder Vermögen sichern können.

Reicht das Einkommen der Bedarfsgemeinschaft nicht aus, um die gesamte Bedarfsgemeinschaft zu versorgen, gilt die gesamte Bedarfsgemeinschaft im Verhältnis des eigenen Bedarfs zum Gesamtbedarf als hilfebedürftig. Dabei wird das Einkommen beider Ehegatten und der noch nicht 25 Jahre alten Kinder gemeinsam berücksichtigt ( Abs. 2 SGB II). Dies gilt als problematisch, insbesondere wenn keine bürgerlich-rechtlichen Unterhaltsansprüche bestehen und die vom Gesetz fingierten Unterhaltszahlungen an die Bedarfsgemeinschaft tatsächlich nicht realisiert werden können, etwa im Verhältnis von erwachsenen Kindern zu ihren Eltern oder im Verhältnis von unechten (nicht verheirateten) Stiefeltern zu ihren Stiefkindern. Eine Widerlegung der Bedarfsgemeinschaft ist im Gesetz nicht vorgesehen. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht hat jedoch mit Beschluss vom 27. Juli 2016 die grundsätzliche Rechtmäßigkeit der Einbeziehung volljähriger Kinder in die Bedarfsgemeinschaft der Eltern bestätigt, wobei es davon ausging, dass bei ernstlicher Verweigerung der Unterstützung durch die Eltern das Kind nicht in die Bedarfsgemeinschaft mit einzubeziehen sei. Diese Entscheidung wurde in der Öffentlichkeit stark kritisiert; sie führe faktisch zur Zerstörung des familiären Bandes, indem Eltern gezwungen würden, ihre Kinder auf die Straße zu setzen, damit diese Sozialleistungen erhalten. Durch das Konstrukt der Bedarfsgemeinschaft sei Armut ansteckend wie Lepra, die Betroffenen würden ähnlich wie Leprakranke ausgegrenzt.

Individuelle Ausschlussgründe
Auch wenn die Voraussetzungen erfüllt sind, um als erwerbsfähiger Leistungsberechtigter zu gelten, können bestimmte Gründe dennoch zum Leistungsausschluss führen.

Stationäre Unterbringung
Nach  Abs. 4 SGB II besteht kein Anspruch auf Leistungen, wenn die antragstellende Person in einer stationären Einrichtung untergebracht ist.

Die Definition von "stationäre Einrichtung" war in der Rechtsprechung umstritten. Ursprünglich verwendeten die Gerichte hierzu den Begriff der "gesetzlichen Fiktion der Erwerbsunfähigkeit". War die Person so in den Tagesablauf der Einrichtung eingebunden, dass eine theoretische Erwerbstätigkeit mit einem Umfang von mehr als drei Stunden nicht möglich schien, galt der Leistungsausschluss. Dies führte zu kuriosen Entscheidungen, so wurden etwa auch Freigängern Leistungen nach dem SGB II zugesprochen, obwohl diese leistungsrechtlich bereits vollständig in das System des Strafvollzugsgesetzes eingebunden sind. Aufgrund dessen gilt seitdem ein ausdrücklicher Ausschluss für Strafgefangene, selbst wenn sie aufgrund von Vollzugslockerungen in der Lage sein sollten, eine Erwerbstätigkeit in dem geforderten Umfang auszuüben.

Schließlich entschied sich das Bundessozialgericht dazu, diesen Begriff aufzugeben. Eine stationäre Einrichtung ist nunmehr dadurch definiert, dass sie Leistungen im Sinne des  Abs. 2 SGB XII erbringt (Pflege, Behandlung usw.), diese auch tatsächlich stationär erbracht werden (und nicht etwa ambulant) und dass die Person auch tatsächlich untergebracht ist.

Von diesem Leistungsausschluss macht das Gesetz zwei Ausnahmen. Zum einen greift der Leistungsausschluss nicht, wenn die Person für einen Zeitraum von voraussichtlich bis zu sechs Monaten in einem Krankenhaus untergebracht ist. Unter dem Begriff "Krankenhaus" fallen nicht nur Krankenhäuser im engeren Sinne, sondern auch Vorsorge- und Rehabilitationseinrichtungen wie etwa Entzugskliniken; wer Kostenträger der stationären Unterbringung ist, spielt für die Frage des Leistungsausschlusses keine Rolle. Maßgeblicher Zeitpunkt für die Prognose ist der Tag der Aufnahme in das Krankenhaus. Führte eine vergangene stationäre Unterbringung bereits zu einem Leistungsausschluss und erhielt die betroffene Person aus diesem Grund bereits Leistungen nach dem SGB XII, so führt eine unmittelbar anschließende weitere stationäre Unterbringung in einem anderen Krankenhaus nicht zur Leistungsberechtigung nach dem SGB II; auf die voraussichtliche Dauer dieser Unterbringung kommt es nicht an.

Zum anderen greift der Leistungsausschluss dann nicht, wenn die Person von der stationären Einrichtung aus eine Erwerbstätigkeit mit einem Umfang von mehr als drei Stunden am Tag tatsächlich ausübt.

Bezug einer Altersrente
Der Bezug einer Rente wegen Alters, Knappschaftsausgleichsleistung oder einer ähnlichen Leistung öffentlich-rechtlicher Art führt nach  Abs. 4 SGB II zum Leistungsausschluss. Dieser Personengruppe wird typisierend unterstellt, dass sie mit Eintritt des Rentenbezugs endgültig aus dem Erwerbsleben ausgeschieden sind und keine Eingliederung in Arbeit mehr benötigen.

Als "ähnliche Leistung öffentlich-rechtlicher Art" können auch ausländische Renten zählen, wenn sie mit einer deutschen Altersrente vergleichbar sind, selbst dann, wenn das Renteneintrittsalter im Ausland niedriger ist als in Deutschland.

Verstoß gegen die Erreichbarkeitsanordnung
Nach  Abs. 4a SGB II ist von Leistungen nach dem SGB II ausgeschlossen, wer gegen die Erreichbarkeitsanordnung der Bundesagentur für Arbeit verstößt. Zwar enthält der Gesetzestext inzwischen eine neuere Regelung, nach  Abs. 1 SGB II gilt jedoch die alte Regelung solange weiter, bis eine spezielle Anordnung für den Rechtskreis SGB II erlassen wurde.

Da die Erreichbarkeitsanordnung ursprünglich für Bezieher von Arbeitslosengeld konzipiert war, sind entgegen dem Wortlaut der Regelung bei bestimmten Personengruppen Ausnahmen von der Pflicht zur Erreichbarkeit zu machen. So müssen sich Bezieher von Sozialgeld nicht der Erreichbarkeitsanordnung unterwerfen, da bei dieser Personengruppe eine Vermittlung in Arbeit von vornherein ausgeschlossen ist. Ebenso ist die Erreichbarkeitsanordnung nicht anwendbar, wenn ein Bezieher von ALG II nicht der Vermittlung zur Verfügung steht, weil er alleinerziehend ist und ein Kind unter drei Jahren betreut.

Ausländer
Die Behandlung von Ausländern im Zweiten Buch Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB II) ist eines der umstrittensten Regelungen, die in der kurzen Geschichte bereits zahlreiche Änderungen erfahren hat. Besonders durch die im EU-Vergleich hohen Regelsätze und insbesondere die EU-Osterweiterung im Jahr 2004 mit ihrem Einschluss zahlreicher ärmlicher Länder in den Schengen-Raum ziehen verstärkt EU-Ausländer nach Deutschland, um Leistungen nach dem SGB II zu beanspruchen. Ende 2017 bezogen 438.850 EU-Ausländer Leistungen nach dem SGB II, davon 164.851 aus Bulgarien und Polen.

Relativ unproblematisch sind hierbei folgende beiden Fälle:

 Ausländer, die Anspruch auf Leistungen nach dem Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz haben, insbesondere Asylbewerber und Ausländer mit einer Duldung
 nicht erwerbstätige Ausländer und ihre Familienangehörigen für die ersten drei Monate ihres Aufenthalts, außer sie haben einen Aufenthaltstitel aus völkerrechtlichen, humanitären oder politischen Gründen ( Abs. 1 Satz 3 SGB II); nicht hierunter fallen ausländische Familienangehörige deutscher Staatsbürger. Der Europäische Gerichtshof hat die Zulässigkeit dieser Regelung im Fall Garcia-Nieto bestätigt.

Sehr problematisch ist hingegen der dritte Fall; hiernach sind Ausländer ausgeschlossen, deren Aufenthaltsrecht sich ausschließlich aus dem Zweck der Arbeitssuche ergibt, und ihre Familienangehörigen. Dies betrifft insbesondere EU-Bürger, die neu nach Deutschland einreisen und weder erwerbstätig sind noch ein anderes Aufenthaltsrecht etwa als Familienangehöriger eines Erwerbstätigen geltend machen können.

Nimmt der EU-Ausländer eine Erwerbstätigkeit oder eine selbständige Tätigkeit im Inland auf und erwirbt er dadurch ein Aufenthaltsrecht als Arbeitnehmer, entfällt der Ausschlussgrund und er hat einen Anspruch auf (ergänzende) Leistungen nach dem SGB II. Als Erwerbstätigkeit in diesem Sinne ist dabei jede Arbeit anzusehen, die nicht "völlig untergeordnet und unwesentlich" ist. Dabei spielen die Höhe des Gehalts und die Anzahl der Wochenstunden keine ausschlaggebende Rolle. Ist jedoch die Wochenstundenanzahl geringer als 10 Stunden, muss im Einzelfall geprüft werden, ob es sich in diesem Fall noch um eine Erwerbstätigkeit im Sinne des EU-Rechts handelt. Anhaltspunkte hierfür können etwa eine langjährige Betriebszugehörigkeit sein oder die Gewährung von Arbeitnehmerrechten wie bezahlten Urlaub, Lohnfortzahlung im Krankheitsfall oder ein gültiger Tarifvertrag. Nach einem Jahr erwirbt der EU-Ausländer ein dauerhaftes Aufenthaltsrecht als Arbeitnehmer und kann auch im Falle der Arbeitslosigkeit zeitlich unbegrenzt Leistungen nach dem SGB II beziehen. Dauerte die Erwerbstätigkeit weniger als ein Jahr an, behält der EU-Ausländer noch für sechs Monate ein Aufenthaltsrecht als Verbleibeberechtigter. ( Abs. 3 FreizügG/EU).

Das Bundessozialgericht entschied im Oktober 2010, dass der Leistungsausschluss nicht für EU-Ausländer gilt, deren Herkunftsstaat Unterzeichner des Europäischen Fürsorgeabkommens (EFA) ist. Die Bundesregierung erklärte darauf jedoch einen Vorbehalt zum EFA, wonach sie dieses für das SGB II nicht mehr anwenden will. Der Europäische Gerichtshof bestätigte den Leistungsausschluss in zwei Fällen. Im Fall Dano entschied das Gericht, dass der Leistungsausschluss für Ausländer erst recht zulässig ist, wenn sie überhaupt kein materielles Aufenthaltsrecht geltend machen können (sogenannte "Erst-Recht-Regelung"). Im Fall Alimanovic entschied das Gericht, dass auch der Leistungsausschluss für Ausländer, deren Aufenthaltsrecht sich aus dem Zweck der Arbeitssuche ergibt, zulässig ist. Das Bundessozialgericht entschied daraufhin, dass der Vorbehalt zum EFA zwar zulässig ist, Ausländer stattdessen aber Hilfe zum Lebensunterhalt nach dem SGB XII beanspruchen können, wenn sie einen verfestigten Aufenthalt in Deutschland (mindestens sechs Monate) haben. Dies hat eine große Kontroverse in Deutschland ausgelöst, mehrere Gerichte haben sich ausdrücklich gegen die Entscheidung des Bundessozialgerichts gestellt, Städte wie Offenbach am Main kündigten an, EU-Ausländer zukünftig in ihr Heimatland abzuschieben. Die Schwierigkeit in diesem Fall liegt darin, dass das Bundesverfassungsgericht im Jahr 2013 zum Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz entschieden hat, dass das Grundrecht auf ein menschenwürdiges Existenzminimum nicht migrationspolitisch relativierbar ist, Ausländern das Existenzminimum also nicht verweigert werden darf, um den Anreiz zu senken, nach Deutschland zu emigrieren bzw. bereits in Deutschland befindliche Ausländer dazu zu ermutigen, in ihr Heimatland zurückzukehren. Es ist zu erwarten, dass es zu diesem Thema noch weitere Reaktionen vonseiten den Gerichten oder der Politik geben wird.

Mit dem Gesetz zur Regelung von Ansprüchen ausländischer Personen in der Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende nach dem Zweiten Buch Sozialgesetzbuch und in der Sozialhilfe nach dem Zwölften Buch Sozialgesetzbuch regelte die Bundesregierung mit Wirkung zum 29. Dezember 2016 die Leistungsberechtigung von EU-Ausländern neu. Diese sollen nunmehr erst nach einem rechtmäßigen Aufenthalt von fünf Jahren Leistungen beziehen können, anderenfalls werden ausschließlich die Kosten der Rückreise ins Heimatland sowie Überbrückungsleistungen als Sachleistung bis zur Rückreise erbracht. Ein Rückgriff auf das SGB XII ist nunmehr ausgeschlossen. Außerdem sind nunmehr auch solche EU-Ausländer ausgeschlossen, deren Aufenthaltsrecht sich aus dem Schulbesuch oder der Berufsausbildung eines Kindes in Deutschland ergibt; die Vereinbarkeit dieser Regelung mit Europarecht ist allerdings umstritten.

Auszubildende
Auszubildende sind ebenfalls erwerbsfähige Leistungsberechtigte. Betreiben sie jedoch eine Ausbildung, die nach dem Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz (BAföG) zumindest dem Grunde nach förderungsfähig sind, sind sie nach  Abs. 5 SGB II von Leistungen ausgeschlossen und können lediglich die Leistungen für Auszubildende beanspruchen. Hierbei kommt es lediglich auf die abstrakte Förderfähigkeit an, ob der Auszubildende tatsächlich einen Anspruch auf diese Leistungen hat oder ob er aus individuellen Gründen ausgeschlossen ist (z. B. wegen eines Fachrichtungswechsels), spielt keine Rolle. Auch ein Studium an einer Fachhochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung löst einen Leistungsausschluss aus, obwohl eine solche Ausbildung aufgrund von  Abs. 6 BAföG ausdrücklich von der Förderung ausgeschlossen ist.

Ob eine Ausbildung tatsächlich betrieben wird, kann in Grenzfällen strittig sein, etwa bei einem Student während eines Urlaubssemesters. Hier kommt es darauf an, ob der Student noch in eine bestimmte Fachrichtung eingeschrieben ist (und damit an Veranstaltungen teilnehmen und Prüfungen ablegen kann) und ob er tatsächlich während des Urlaubssemesters als Student tätig ist. Ist mindestens eine der beiden Kriterien nicht gegeben, wird die Ausbildung nicht betrieben und der Student kann Leistungen nach dem SGB II beanspruchen. Dies hat dann aber zur Folge, dass der Student während des Urlaubssemesters auf die Aufnahme einer Vollzeittätigkeit verwiesen werden kann.

Mit dem Neunten Gesetz zur Änderung des Zweiten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch wurde der zuvor geltende strikte Leistungsausschluss für Auszubildende erheblich gelockert. Auszubildende, deren Ausbildung nach den ,  oder  SGB III (Berufsausbildungsbeihilfe) förderungsfähig ist, sind anders als bisher nicht länger von Leistungen ausgeschlossen, außer sie sind beim Ausbilder oder in einem Internat untergebracht. Erhalten Personen Bafög für den Besuch einer Schule (Leistungen nach  BAföG) oder studieren sie und leben noch bei den Eltern, können sie das erhaltene Bafög mit Leistungen zum Lebensunterhalt aufstocken. Das gilt auch, wenn der Antrag noch in Bearbeitung ist oder allein wegen zu hohem eigenen Einkommen oder Einkommen der Eltern abgelehnt wird.

Ob der Leistungsausschluss auch auf Personen zutrifft, die Ausbildungsgeld beziehen, war in der Rechtsprechung umstritten. Problematisch sind hier insbesondere die Fälle, in denen der Auszubildende in einem Internat z. B. eines Berufsbildungswerks untergebracht ist, da hier zwar die Kosten der Internatsunterbringung übernommen werden, nicht aber die Kosten für die Wohnung, auf die die Auszubildenden an den Wochenenden und in den Ferien weiterhin angewiesen sind. Dadurch droht den Auszubildenden die Obdachlosigkeit. Mit der Gesetzesnovelle wurde aber nunmehr klargestellt, dass es auf die Förderungsfähigkeit der Ausbildung, anders als nach der bisherigen Rechtslage, nicht mehr ankommt. Allerdings kommt unter Umständen ein Härtefalldarlehen in Betracht, was das Bundessozialgericht konkret im Falle einer Berufsvorbereitenden Bildungsmaßnahme gebilligt hat.

Ein Leistungsausschluss tritt nicht ein bei Aufnahme einer beruflichen Weiterbildung, die nach dem Aufstiegsfortbildungsförderungsgesetz gefördert wird (sogenanntes "Meister-BAföG"). Allerdings mindern die als Unterhaltsbeitrag gewährten Leistungen den Bedarf des Leistungsbeziehers und lassen so unter Umständen die Hilfebedürftigkeit entfallen, dies gilt entgegen der sonstigen Regeln zur Anrechnung von Einkommen auch bezüglich des als Darlehen gewährten Teils.

Angehörige von Auszubildenden, die mit ihnen in einer Bedarfsgemeinschaft leben (z. B. Kinder), können weiterhin Sozialgeld beanspruchen.

 Abs. 6 SGB II normiert einige Ausnahmen, bei denen ein Anspruch auf SGB II weiterhin gegeben ist, obwohl eine förderungsfähige Ausbildung betrieben wird:

 Wer eine allgemeinbildende Schule (Gymnasium, Fachoberschule, Berufsvorbereitungsjahr, Berufsgrundbildungsjahr) besucht und von Leistungen nach BAföG deswegen ausgeschlossen ist, weil er noch bei den Eltern lebt, hat einen Anspruch auf Arbeitslosengeld II.
 Wer eine Abendschule besucht und älter als 30 Jahre alt ist, sodass kein Anspruch auf Leistungen nach BAföG besteht, kann während des Schulbesuchs Arbeitslosengeld II beziehen.

Einzelnachweise

Sozialversicherung (Deutschland)
Arbeitslosigkeit (Deutschland)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Linda Bradfield addressed the SAHISA Central Region meeting of 10 November 2015 on the topic of responsible digital citizenship.
What Does it Mean to be a Responsible Digital Citizen?
Linda Bradfield of St Mary's School Waverley addressed the SAHISA Central Region meeting of 10 November 2015 on the topic of responsible digital citizenship.
ITSI provides educators and students with a digital solution that enhances and simplifies the teaching experience at every touchpoint.
SAHISA Central Region will hold a one-day regional conference on 16 March 2017 at St David's Marist Inanda.


Come learn about the HIPAA Security Rule and learn the basics of what you need to do to become compliant. The webinar will break down the Security Rule in an easy way to understand what should already be in place or needs remediation within your organization. A review will be performed on of the details of the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards needed to protect your organization. In addition, the Omnibus Rule and the Breach Notification rule will be discussed. With the amount of information out on the Internet we will look at additional resources that are available to help you with your HIPAA Security Rule compliance efforts.
Business Associates that work with providers and/or hospitals.
Do you need to know more about the HIPAA Security Rule? Is your organization even compliant? Do you have the correct policies and procedures in place? When did you have a risk assessment last and was it actually a true assessment? What would you do if you had a disaster and when was the last time you tested your contingency plan? These are just some of the questions you should already understand and have answers.
The HIPAA Security Rule created national standards and safeguards to protect individuals' personal health information that is created, used, maintained, or used for treatment, payments, and healthcare operations. These safeguards must be implemented to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI that is created, received, maintained, or transmitted. Unlike other regulations, the Security Rule does not specify how the safeguards are implemented but what is required to protect ePHI.
Currently, Brian Freedman is the Chief Information Security Officer for TiffaSec Security Consulting. Mr. Freedman has earned his Masters of Science in Information Systems and has over 20 years working in IT and Information Assurance. Mr. Freedman leverages deep project management and technical experience to lead key elements to several Health-Information Technology (IT), Privacy and Security initiatives.
Mr. Freedman has hands-on experience with both the public and private sector healthcare networks and systems: He has worked at one of South Carolina's largest independent physicians practice, as its CIO and Information Technology Director. In his role as CIO, he was responsible for the oversight of all operational and technology functions for 33 Primary Care Physician offices and Specialist clinics. He served as the HIPAA Compliance Officer and managed a team of IT specialists in support of electronic medical records and practice management systems. He drafted and/or rewrote all related policies and procedures for the HIPAA final rule, and designed and delivered a HIPAA training program to more than 650 employees. Mr. Freedman also created and implemented an annual risk management / analysis program to focus on both HIPAA and Meaningful Use compliance. The risk management program developed by Mr. Freedman has provided the practice with a continuous risk management program.
He has co-authored a book on PCI Compliance and is the Technical Editor of a handbook on IT Regulatory and Standards Compliance. In addition, Mr. Freedman is an Adjunct Instructor for the Department of Network Systems Management at a local Technical College where he teaches classes in Information Systems, Networking, Information Assurance, and Regulatory Compliance (HIPAA and PCI). He holds some of the leading industry certifications from Microsoft and Cisco. He is also a CISSP, CISA, PMP, and is a Certified HIPAA Compliance Officer (CHCO).


text:
Home > tv > Top Gear Patagonia Special, BBC Two
Top Gear Patagonia Special, BBC Two | reviews, news & interviews
Top Gear Patagonia Special, BBC Two
Men in sheds provoke diplomatic incident
by Matthew WrightMonday, 29 December 2014
1300 miles through Argentina, downhill all the way
Despite appearances, Jeremy Clarkson aspires to be taken seriously, as readers of The Sun and The Sunday Times will know. With this Top Gear Special he managed it, being chased from Argentina into Chile by a stone-wielding mob that appeared to have designs on his personal safety, in an incident widely trailed in the news media at the beginning of the month.
The cause of this outrage was the choice of Clarkson's car for their drive from the top to the bottom of Patagonia, a Porsche with a number plate ending in FKL, letters widely interpreted as a taunt about the Falkland Islands. The final destination of Clarkson, May and Hammond was the port of Ushuaia, the capital of Tierra del Fuego, which was, as we were reminded several times, the base of the Argentinian ship Belgrano, sunk during the Falklands War. Clarkson maintains that his number plate was a coincidence, though the choice of destination, and the hints of trouble dropped from early in the first programme, suggest a carefully planned provocation.
The humorous incidents en route fitted a pattern of lame contrivance that even viewers new to the programme would easily anticipate. One of the cars breaks down, triggering abuse towards the driver, while the other two speed off; then there's a prank or visual joke, the most dismal of which featured a likening of Richard Hammond re-fuelling his Ford Mustang, with its rear-facing petrol cap, to an act of love. Then there's the encounter, in the middle of nowhere, with three saddled horses, ostensibly to get them over a locked gate, but in fact to facilitate James May's falling off a horse and sustaining three cracked ribs. Perhaps they're saving the banana skin for next time? Or would the audience find that rather subtle?
The reason they're popular is that all three of the presenters are skilful and effective at their bloke-focused personas. They can all be genuinely witty, and the characters they have devised (basically, Clarkson is daddy, May mummy and Hammond junior) act extremely well as foils for one another. Clarkson and May are looking paunchy and leathery these days, but Hammond seems younger than his age (45), and so altogether, with jokes pitched at the under-13s, and their increasing resemblance to the protagonists from the now defunct Last of the Summer Wine, they have every significant male viewing demographic covered.
The scenery was spectacular, though we didn't learn anything new about the places they drive through. There were informative flashes about car design and the story of Butch Cassidy, but never sustained for long enough. If they could be bothered, these series could have much more substantial travel or engineering content. Clarkson crossed with Michael Palin or Dan Cruickshank would be a fine thing indeed. But with the exception of a reflective moment from Clarkson about the death of his father, the serious stuff is generally just there to set up the next gag.
According to more sober voices, the mob was roused by a right-wing Argentinian tabloid that likes to stir up nationalist feeling, choosing the Sun journalist and his entourage as its focus on this occasion. It's hard not to let an ironic smile flicker over the lips. Unlike the provocations of more serious comic talent such as Sacha Baron Cohen or Monty Python, to which Clarkson and his team bear superficial resemblance, the Top Gear trio doesn't challenge prejudice but confirms it, provoking xenophobia in a few unthinking Argentines, while humorously justifying it in themselves. Watch both episdes back-to-back as I did (for purely professional purposes), and you feel slightly queasy, as if you've eaten far too much junk food at once.
They get away with it by pretending not to take themselves at all seriously. No sooner do some viewers begin to take offence than they pre-empt their criticism by poking fun at themselves. It's a very effective rhetorical strategy, used by many a right-wing populist. So it is that by the final scene, the humour's back, with a mock-up of Butch Cassidy's escape. But we all know it's not for real, and unlike Butch, the threesome will soon be back, hamming their noisy way through another unfortunate country.
Perhaps they're saving the banana skin for next time? Or would the audience find that rather subtle?
Top Gear: Fifty Years of Bond Cars, BBC Two
Listed: The Facts about Factual TV in 2014
Evita, Dominion Theatre
Left-wing humorists, of
Left-wing humorists, of course, never employ self-deprecation; they only rip it out of other people. This, of course, makes them better, somehow...
This review is shit.
Permalink Submitted by Agustin (not verified) on Tue, 17/07/2018 - 21:51
The Day We Walked on the Moon, ITV review - it was 50 years ago to the day You've heard it all before, but this was an entertaining ride
Inside the Social Network: Facebook's Difficult Year, BBC Two review - how big can it get? A force for good or Big Brother in the making?
8 Days: To the Moon and Back, BBC Two review - intimate peek at life in lunar capsule Insightful doco-drama combines re-enactments with real cockpit audio
Charles I: Downfall of a King, BBC Four review - beheaded monarch upstaged by exotic presenter Decadence, pomp and popery prove fatal to the Stuart court
Cyclists: Scourge of the Streets?, Channel 5 review - can we make the roads a safer place? Provocative documentary unlikely to promote harmony on the highway
Dark Money, BBC One review - powerful idea poorly executed Story of Hollywood child abuse fails to launch
On making The Left Behind: 'We've plugged into the mains' The director of Killed By My Debt introduces his new BBC drama about a hate crime
Stranger Things 3, Netflix review - bigger, dumber, better Netflix's retro adventure plays to its strengths in latest season
Gentleman Jack, BBC One, series finale review - Anne Lister weds with pride Sally Wainwright's triumphant homage to a lesbian pioneer reaches a romantic climax. CONTAINS SPOILERS
Inside the Ritz Hotel, ITV review - glitz and glam, but no detail Celebrity-packed documentary is all about the presentation
Judi Dench's Wild Borneo Adventure, ITV review - national treasure meets natural wonders Renowned thespian takes guided tour of the tropical rainforest
Inside the Bank of England, BBC Two review - economical with the actualité The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street keeps her secrets closely guarded


text:
Toddler news
Thomas the Tank's new multicultural engines
Our first look at the new engines from India, Brazil, China and Mexico
By Jessica Gibb
Thomas the Tank Engine is getting 14 new friends – from all over the world.
Among the new characters are engines from India, Brazil, China and Mexico – and 4 are female trains.
The new characters will be introduced in a film called The Great Race that's coming to cinemas in May.
Currently, there are around 100 characters inhabiting the isle of Sodor – most of them are male and white (as far as we can tell).
The move to make the cartoon more diverse reflects the show's popularity around the world – and The Great Race takes inspiration from this summer's Olympic Games in Rio.
"This story is a way to help him understand that there is a bigger world out there," Vincent D'Allev, who oversees Thomas & Friends for Mattel, told The New York Times.
So let's have a look at some of the new characters…
Raul of Brazil
Yong Bao of China
Ashima of India
Carlos of Mexico
Photos: Mattel
Adele smashes gender norms by dressing son as Frozen princess
Is this the LEAST sexist toy catalogue ever?
Bricks or dolls – which are better toys for girls?


"What is the discussion about at school regarding the Florida High School shooting?" I asked my kids last night. That guns should be eliminated from society was the gist of their response.
I like President Trump's suggestion to arm teachers and school staff. It makes no sense to make schools gun free zones. You never hear about mass shootings at police stations. Crazy people are the problem, not guns. And if they knew they'd be taking return fire, they might reconsider the value of their life and not kill the innocent.
Read more from Coulter here.
I have previously written about preparing your child to face an active shooter situation. If you haven't already part I of my series on How to Help Your Child Before Tragedy Strikes at School, do so now. It's never too early to think ahead.
In times like these, it's easy to make emotional suggestions because of the urge to "do something," but it helps to take a minute and remember why we have the Second Amendment in the first place. The following was published in the local paper The Conway Daily Sun over Thanksgiving weekend. It was written by Isaac Hadam, a 17-year old Madison, New Hampshire resident who is president of the Constitutional Awareness Pact, which encourages everyone to read and understand the U.S. Constitution.
In the wake of the horrific shootings in Las Vegas and Texas, some people are clamoring for classic "gun control" laws. Senators Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) have led the charge after this recent act of evil in Texas.
Others have been more radical by calling for the complete repeal of the Second Amendment. One of the most notable was Michael Moore, who, after the Las Vegas shooting called the Second Amendment "ancient and outdated." In a Facebook post, Moore, called for the complete repeal of the Second Amendment. His proposed "28th Amendment" would allow people to get guns but, would make the process incredibly difficult.
But is the Second Amendment really out of date and in need of repealing? To answer that question we need to know what the Second Amendment was supposed to do, and to do that, we need not look further than what the Founders themselves said.
Now these first three quotes explain that the Second Amendment protects the right of individual citizens to own arms. This next quote, however, sums up why the Founders believed we needed the Second Amendment in our Constitution.
This quote makes perfect sense, because the Founders understood how important it was to allow citizens to own guns, considering that was how America became an independent nation.
There can obviously be restrictions on someone owning a gun if they are a criminal.
But the Founders didn't give us the Second Amendment to protect hunting rights, because on the frontier states that was a given, seeing you would die if you couldn't hunt. Rather, it was meant as a final safeguard from government tyranny. The Founders understood that sooner or later evil men who lust for power would attempt to seize it, and that was a major reason for the creation of the Second Amendment; to stop such seizures from happening.
If the truth is told, I would wager that the people of Venezuela really wish that they had a "right to keep and bear arms" at this point. Venezuela is a perfect example of why the Second Amendment is so important to our freedoms.
I think the case for not allowing people who are violent criminals to own guns is pretty substantial, and those laws are already on the books. Based on what we know now, the killer in Texas shouldn't have even owned the weapons he used because of his violent past. However, just because he slips through the cracks doesn't mean that we try to take away guns from law abiding citizens, considering the killer was stopped by a hero with a gun; an AR-15 no less.
Instead, we make sure that the laws on the books that prevent and punish violent criminals from owning guns, are faithfully executed.
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, put there by our Founding Fathers, is there so that we can protect ourselves from evil men, like the one in Texas, and from a tyrannical government, like the one in Venezuela. That is why we have the Second Amendment.


Briggs blamed the accident on me. We forgot to lock the door. Both of the children are asleep. The water is waist-deep. She's open-minded. Ninja certainly isn't as smart as Marcel thinks he is. This is the TV station where my uncle works as an announcer. There was some dew this morning. Mum often says that time is money. Let me go tell Jennie that you're here.
Why does Ellen not want to hang out with us? She's a pescetarian. If he should hear the news, he would be shocked. That old bridge is anything but safe. Sonny said you were driving drunk. This is a matter of great importance. What's wrong with my plan? The company wants to employ 20 people. This room has three windows. Shel got up early so he could see the sunrise.
I have a warrant for Andy's arrest. Sanford touched his hat in greeting. There is a twenty minute delay. His father consented to my plan against his will. I have a few purchases to make in this store. There were a lot of cars on the street. Human rights? Send human rights to hell, where they belong. That's what the neocons think about human rights. We'll see what Eric has to say. I'm only here because of you. He is not such a man as to flinch from danger.
We are all responsible for this situation. Tolerant is mistaken. I heard voices outside. I go to school here, too. This institution came into being after the war. What exactly is the difference? Timo is the only one we can rely on. The real Princess was left standing below in the courtyard. Richard doesn't need to come into work tomorrow. Where did you exorcize them?
You don't think that that is weird at all? Gerald is always throwing his weight around. We must help Sriram. You speak German, don't you? It is not the best solution. Shut up and watch the movie. The bank loaned the company one million dollars. Nobody is ferpect. I don't have much to lose. I wasn't good enough.
I know all about what has happened. Cease fire! I brought you a little housewarming gift. That's what I promised. All the guests did justice to his wife's cooking. I beat you. If you're going to come around later, give me a ring first, so I can make sure I'm home. I was pleased to meet you. I came into a pair of tickets from a friend. I've been wondering about that.
I met them on Friday the 13th. The class start at ten. What are the chances that Anderson will actually come? It is impossible for me to get there before noon. I can't take that risk. Oskar made a fist. My father is proud of the fact that he's never been in a traffic accident. No is kind to us. Barrett will handle the rest. Margot can't walk any more.
Our team is amazing. "What time did you go to sleep last night?" "Around 2:30." She has a magnetic personality. He stuck his head in the sand like an ostrich. Something is obviously not right with Jos. I'm waiting for a train. Without water, the soldiers would have died. Does it not happen to any teachers? They aren't laughing at that time. He tried his best, but in the end he was defeated.
After I sign these release papers, you'll be on your way. That CD is my son's. Ric helped her mother decorate the Christmas tree. We were made to stand in line. Because Syed admitted he had taken bribes, he didn't get reelected. Though he is young, he never wastes time. Kevyn tries harder. The friend educates the friend. I hope you recover soon. I will never go shopping with Jason again.


text:
1395 Drives
1395-B67N-C1-P1
Rated 5 with 2 reviews
Revisions: Ser A
Description: The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 digital DC drive is a non-regenerative type of digital DC drive from the Allen-Bradley Bulletin 1395 series. It has an input voltage rating of 460 Volts and an output power rating of 10 Horsepower. The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 digital DC drive also has an optional adapter and a standard contactor. The contactor's Horsepower rating can be anywhere between 2 and 30 Horsepower. The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 digital DC drive supports an operating temperature range of 0 to 55 degrees Celsius and a storage temperature range of 0 to 65 degrees Celsius.
Request a quote for 1395-B67N-C1-P1
Repairs: We offer repair service for the 1395-B67N-C1-P1.
Technical Specifications for 1395-B67N-C1-P1
Manufacturer Rockwell Automation
Brand Allen-Bradley
Voltage 460V AC, 50/60 Hz., Three-Phase, AC Line Fuses
Power 7.5 (10) kW (HP)
Type Non-Regenerative
Contactor/Shunt Standard Contactor
Rating 1.5 (2-30)
Product Lifecycle Status* Discontinued/Obsolete
*The Allen Bradley 1395-B67N-C1-P1 has been discontinued by the manufacturer, however we specialize in obsolete parts and can likely still supply surplus and/or refurbished replacement 1395-B67N-C1-P1 units instead of migration.
About 1395-B67N-C1-P1
The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 is a microprocessor digital DC drive manufactured by Allen Bradley. It has a power rating of 460 Volts AC, 50 to 60 Hertz, non-regenerative, three‑phase, with a standard 40 to 60 Hp contactor, AC line fuses, 7.5 kW 10 Hp, power of output 1.5 kW, 20 to 30 Hp. The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 Digital DC Drive features a DC contactor, an open chassis, a fused AC input, basic inputs and outputs and field regulation over a 6 to 1 speed range with DC tach or encoder feedback. Its programmable functions include five adjustable preset speeds, two adjustable jog speeds, "S" ramp, ten adjustable motor operated pot (MOP), tapered current limit, current limit, and an independent acceleration and deceleration that can be adjusted in the range 0.1 to 6554 seconds. The drive exhibits protective features such as field loss, motor overload, instantaneous overcurrent, field economy, and feedback loss.
The 1395-B67N-C1-P1 can have any of the following optional adapter boards installed such as discrete, multi-communications, digital reference, ControlNet, and node. There is an auxiliary contact on the motor contactor and a DB contact on the main motor contactor, which is normally closed. Its external output has an N.O. relay contact that indicates when the drive has a fault or is de-energized or when the drive is ready for operation. The contact rating is 1A at 24 Volts DC or 0.5A at 120 Volts AC. Power supply for the 1395-B67N-C1-P1 is ±10 Volts DC 4 mA. This drive operates at an ambient temperature 0 degrees to 55 degrees Celsius (32 degrees to 130 degrees Fahrenheit). It should be stored in a dry and clean environment that free of gas or corrosive material.
Technical Description of 1395-B67N-C1-P1
1395 Digital Drive: 460V AC, 50/60 Hz., Three-Phase, AC Line Fuses, 7.5 (10) kW (HP), Non-Regenerative, Standard Contactor, 1.5 (2-30),
Repair Services for 1395-B67N-C1-P1
Our highly skilled technicians can repair your 1395-B67N-C1-P1. All of our repairs come with a 1 Year DO Supply Warranty. Please contact us for additional information about our repair process.
Revisions for 1395-B67N-C1-P1
Please refer to the manual for more information about the 1395-B67N-C1-P1 such as the wiring diagrams, data sheets and migration or obsolescence details.
Revision Part # Also Known as Availability
1395-B67N-C1-P1 Ser A
1395-B67N-C1-P1/A, Series A, Rev A Request Quote
Common misspellings:
l395-B67N-C1-P1
1395-867N-C1-P1
1395-B67N-Cl-P1
1395-B67N-C1-Pl
1395B67NC1P1
Dimensions For 1395-B67N-C1-P1
Resolutions For 1395-B67N-C1-P1
1395-B67N-C1-P1 PDF


The LulzSec boat sails away. Was it worth the ride? Should you care?
Just a day after the 'retirement' of hack-the-world-and-expose-random-people's-data cyberbreach group LulzSec, and the official announcement is old news.
The world is already in a questioning frenzy about what happens next.
Sadly, the questions are often of an unanswerable sort: inviting speculation, possibly even wild speculation; or trying to squeeze conclusions from unsupportable, possibly even wildly incorrect, starting points.
But LulzSec never made any particular claims about sophistication. Also, it trumpeted only its successes, and didn't enumerate those sites which it tried to hack but failed.
You'll have to make your own mind up on that. You can read LulzSec's press releases, and you can look at the LulzSec Twitter feed. Do you think they're honourable, and can be taken at their word? Does it matter? Do we not collectively care enough about security and privacy to lift our game regardless?
That's a rather generic and mixed bag of things LulzSec hopes to have achieved. Both love and hate, for example; both approval and disapproval.
You have to decide for yourself whether this outcome is subsumed in the desire to have provoked inspiration, or whether LulzSec's inspiration was merely to persuade others to start stealing data too.
So, instead of allowing yourself to be sucked into the raft of speculation about LulzSec, its skills, its motivation and its achievements, why not take interest in some financially punchy evidence of the risk which cybercrime in general poses to our economy?
Last week, for instance, the FBI announced a co-ordinated twelve-country bust against a cybergang who'd been selling fake anti-virus, also known as scareware.
The estimates by the FBI, which are perfectly believable, is that this one group managed to trick close to a million people into spending an average of $75 each on software which is a worthless pack of lies. A believable pack of lies, but lies nevertheless.
So if you must speculate about cybersecurity and the lessons to be learned, try to guess what percentage of the total amount stolen in scareware scams alone each year is represented by this one $72,000,000 bust.


We shall be closed on Monday, July 3rd and Tuesday, July 4th, so that our employees can spend the vacation weekend with their households. By far my favourite a part of buying at Cease and Shop is a nifty little hand-held scanner that you would be able to pick up by the doorway with a few grocery luggage to scan your retailer purchases without ever having to wait in line! Fartorade: The parody of Gatorade, it is a drink that provides you that particular enhance of vitality that you want for these sports activities. This watch is a feature-laden sports watch ideally suited for the sports activities enthuist, especially in the course of the winter climate. We love extreme sports and activities and introduced them together all in one place – Balbriggan, Solely 10 minutes from Dublin Airport.