text:
Detained migrants offered reunification with children if they sign deportation papers: report
"I signed it out of desperation… but the truth is I can't go back to Honduras; I need help"
By Charlie May
Published June 24, 2018 5:27PM (EDT)
(Getty/Win McNamee)
The Trump administration is reportedly giving Central American migrants who were separated from their families an opportunity to reunite. But it has nonetheless done so in the form of a harrowing ultimatum: In order to see their children again, detained migrants must voluntarily sign a deportation order.
A new report in the Texas Tribune cited an unidentified 24-year-old Honduran detainee who said he signed voluntary deportation paperwork out of "desperation" in order to hopefully be reunited with his 6-year-old daughter.
The two illegally crossed into the United States in May in order to claim asylum, and were separated under the Trump administration's zero tolerance immigration policy, which was first initiated in April. The Honduran man requested anonymity and went under the pseudonym "Carlos" out of fear of retaliation, the Tribune reported.
Carlos told the Tribune that there were about 20 or 25 other male migrants who have been split from their children and that they are detained inside the IAH Polk County Secure Adult Detention Center, a privately run Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility less than two hours outside of Houston. He also noted that "the majority of those detainees" received the same offer as he did — voluntary deportation in exchange for reunification.
"I was told I would not be deported without my daughter," Carlos told the Tribune. "I signed it out of desperation… but the truth is I can't go back to Honduras; I need help."
He added, "The kids aren't to blame for what's going on. We only came because we can't live in our country. We are looking for somewhere to live where our children can have a better future. In our country we can't do it."
Carlos has only spoken with his daughter once since they were separated, and he was told she was at a facility in Arizona.
"She's a prisoner," Carlos told the Tribune of his only conversation with his 6-year-old daughter. "She can't talk, she cries because she's locked up."
ICE spokesman Carl Rusnok responded to the allegations and said the agency "cannot research vague allegations."
"It is unprofessional and unfair for a media outlet to publish such allegations without providing names, dates and locations so that these allegations can be properly researched," Rusnok said, according to the Tribune.
Anne Chandler, Houston director of the Tahirih Justice Center, an organization that advocates for immigrant women and girls, said she heard of similar cases at the same privately run ICE facility as well, the Tribune reported.
But Cynthia Milian, a private attorney who works with the Tahirih Justice Center offered a bleak outlook for Carlos, and others, who hoped the U.S. government would reunited them with their children.
"I doubt they would put his child on a plane to get her to where he would get deported out from, especially if she's in Arizona," Milian told the Tribune.
She added, "I just don't see that happening."
The Tribune elaborated:
While migrant adults are prosecuted by the Justice Department and then detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, their children are placed in shelters funded and overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services.Chandler said it could take between one to two months to secure the release of an unaccompanied migrant child.
Many immigrant parents have been placed in removal proceedings and some have already been deported without their children.
A fact sheet released by the Department of Homeland Security on Sunday said that migrants who were ordered removed by the U.S. are able to "request that his or her minor child accompany them." However, it continued, "many parents have elected to be removed without their children."
The news of Central American migrants being offered reunification in exchange for volunteered deportation exemplifies how extraordinarily cruel the Trump administration's zero tolerance immigration policy was, and how deeply its consequences will be felt.
So far, as many as 3,700 children were separated from their parents before Trump reversed track and signed an executive order late last week that ended the policy. Since then, the president has repeatedly dehumanized undocumented immigrants as invaders, and also called for the elimination of due process rights for those who are undocumented, in a series of tweets on Sunday.
MORE FROM Charlie May
Anti-immigration Border Dhs Honduras Ice Immigration Migrants President Donald Trump Trump Administration


text:
Photos: Grassroot
The Clothing Designer Bringing Traditional Indian Crafts to the US
Anita Dongre started Grassroot to keep handcrafted clothing alive.
By Sonia Chopra Aug 29, 2017, 10:32am EDT
Racked has affiliate partnerships, which do not influence editorial content, though we may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. We also occasionally accept products for research and reviewing purposes. See our ethics policy here.
Share All sharing options for: The Clothing Designer Bringing Traditional Indian Crafts to the US
Designer Anita Dongre opened her first US store, Grassroot, in July in New York City's Soho neighborhood — and just three weeks later, back in India, she debuted a new high-end collection at Couture Week in Delhi. "It's always busy in fashion," she says when we speak on the phone. And while things are particularly hectic for Dongre — she runs a fashion empire, after all — what keeps her particularly active is a commitment to working with artisans from villages in India to ensure their craftsmanship doesn't get erased.
Dongre started Grassroot almost a decade ago, though her first brick-and-mortar store only opened less than three years ago. Now, there are two in Delhi and two in Mumbai, in addition to the new Soho location, and each makes the line's central tenet clear: Grassroot exists to support India's artisan clusters and their traditions.
Across India, the art of weaving and embroidery is dying off, and Grassroot works with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and other organizations like Self Employed Women's Assocation, a trade union, to sustain the crafts.
An artisan in Maheshwar
As the younger generation loses interest in the art, Dongre works with women artisans from villages across India and does what she calls "design intervention" — she helps them apply their talents to make more contemporary clothes, "recreating designs and color combinations" from traditional Indian garments for a modern, global shopper. "These skills are so valuable, and are passed down generation to generation," she says.
While the designer — a household name in India — boasts three other brands that range from South Asian bridal couture to everyday dresses and other "boho-chic" clothing, Dongre explains that Grassroot has a different business model, "in the sense that it creates collections mainly to provide work to the artisans." She and her design team go to the (literal) drawing board and sketch out ideas; from there, whenever they identify artisans that need work, they amend the designs to suit the group's skills.
"The beauty is working within those parameters of what the artisan can do with the craft," she says. "And then bringing in a completely new fashion, style, and contemporary feel to it to make beautiful clothes that women will enjoy — with the added bonus that it's all handwoven or handcrafted. "
Here, she talks more about how she incorporates traditional designs into her collections, the importance of comfort in fashion, and what's coming up next.
Embroidered A-Line Midi Dress ($350)
Block Printed Dress ($130)
Grassroot is about reviving and sustaining artisan craftwork from all over India. Collaborating with so many different groups of artisans sounds logistically challenging. How does it work, in practice?
We have very small lines of production right now, because making things by hand is slow. For the US market, we just make 12 to 20 pieces per design, because the process takes a long time. I'd like to increase it and work with more artisan groups, but we don't want to overpromise.
Every group does a different craft, or does a craft in a different way. Weaving, embroidery, and bandhani, a tie-and-dye art made by plucking tiny knots in a fabric to create a design, are common traditions across India that we use in Grassroot designs, but no style or technique or way of stitching is the ever same across villages.
We have 29 states and so many more languages. And the number of languages we have, we have that many crafts. So every season there are different Grassroot collections, each made by different artisans.
How do you translate the traditional craftwork for a modern New York audience that's always looking for the next trend?
I keep the designs very timeless and classic. I have a simple indigo shirt in white, black, and blue, and it's just got this beautiful silk-on-silk embroidery. I have shift dresses; I've really done silhouettes that women will want to own. They're relevant, but they're not a fad of the moment.
The Soho store
The clothing is simple: You will wear it and treasure it, and I don't think you will ever throw it out or give it away. It's got a very, very classic style; I want the styles to be timeless. I want the designs to be something that are easy to wear, that are comfortable, and that make you feel good — not just something you wear for the moment.
I brought the store to New York because a New York woman will truly appreciate these handwoven and handcrafted traditions.
What do you hope that your collection and your new store can show Americans about India?
It's about Americans seeing the beauty of Indian crafts — and that's the exact response I've gotten. People have walked in off the street and have said Grassroot is so different and that they've never seen anything like it, but at the same time they relate to it because they can pick up a dress and it's something they can wear and walk right out of the store with.
I want people to walk in and discover the artisan handiwork. I want people to realize every garment has a beautiful story. I want them to love what we wear and wear it with love, and look after it and continue buying hand-crafted traditions, because otherwise they'll disappear.
Durga, a weaver
What about the next generation? How do you focus on growing and mentoring inside the industry?
I think, in my country, there's a new surge of everyone wanting to do something to revive the craft, because now we're all feeling that if we don't do something, the craft will die out with this generation. I've always said that this is not the job of any one designer or one fashion house — it has to be a collective movement. And the movement has begun in India, and most of the young designers today are so keen and so excited to work with revival of craft. A lot of them are opting to do that. That's a step in the right direction.
Even the Indian consumer is going through a sense of pride and an awareness to wear the craft, so Grassroot has been successful in India too because we all feel this need to hold on to what we have, because we might lose it forever otherwise. What we have is just so priceless. There's no other country in the world that has such a rich legacy of textile as India does.
People have been calling you the queen of pret [or ready-to-wear clothing]. How do you balance that with your couture lines?
I love it. Both are part of our lives. Pret is a part of my own personal life — I wear Grassroot every day. And couture and bridal are something so important to Indians because we love weddings and celebrations, and we love dressing up. I use craft in both, and I enjoy doing both. When you design a couture garment, it's this fantasy — you can put anything on it, and any amount of embroidery, and it's more larger than life. And with pret, you're looking for design solutions, something you're able to wear every day while still wearing hand-crafted design. I find both exciting.
Embroidered Black Sheer Shirt ($155)
Embroidered Indigo Sheer Shirt ($155)
I very much believe that bridal wear should be about comfort, and today's young woman is equally keen on being comfortable and looking great. So my bridal lenghas are very lightweight and have pockets. I practice gota patti on all my lenghas, which is a very lightweight craft that looks beautiful. Bridal wear doesn't have to be overdone; it can be simple and beautiful and elegant, and that's what I do.
What's next for you in the US?
Just starting this store has been overwhelming. I wanted to come and do this one store without thinking much more beyond it, but I would be happy to have a bigger online presence in the US, so I'm working on making sure the website works well from a customer service viewpoint. And I'll see where this takes me.
I'd like to open another store in the US by summer of next year, but right now I have my hands full with this one [Ed note: Dongre will be launching bridalwear in the New York store in the next few months as well] and getting the next collection out, and getting to know my artisans closer. It's always busy in fashion. You try to do it better every day, and that's what I'm doing.
Sonia Chopra is Eater's managing editor. You can subscribe to Namaslay, her newsletter about South Asian culture, here.
Man, It's a Hard One: Why Can't I Find a Vintage Santana 'Smooth' T-Shirt?
These Beaded Bags Are Fun as Hell
Your New Pet Rock Is This $2 Pumice Stone
View all stories in Shopping

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


7245 Free images and vector silhouettes about ROUGH. Need a ROUGH image or vector? Find the best free stock images and vector silhouettes about ROUGH. Download all ROUGH images and vectors and use them even for commercial projects. No attribution required.


PHUKET: The big cleanup of Phuket is about to begin, sources in Bangkok and on Phuket confirmed to Phuketwan today, with the national government's welcome intervention coming at long last.
Official action is expected to target crimes, scams, rip-offs, taxi and tuk-tuk ''mafia'' and all the other issues that tourists have been complaining about on Phuket for years.
It's the first sign of a reaction from Thai authorities to tourists' complaints highlighted by the Chinese Ambassador, Guan Mu, and European Union ambassadors in recent meetings on Phuket.
Data about taxis and tuk-tuk numbers is being passed to the Department of Special Investigation, Phuketwan has learned.
The DSI held top-level talks with the Minister of Tourism and Sport, Somsak Pureesrisak yesterday.
More talks were being held today as the size and scale of the reaction to the big-picture issues became evident.
Sources among the Bangkok diplomatic community are also reacting with glee at what appears to be an earnest reaction by Bangkok to Phuket's needs.
''This is great news,'' Khun Chanchai said. ''It's good for Phuket. ''The Ministry of Tourism and Sport is actually trying to fix the problems.
Other sources confirmed that the overhaul of Phuket tourism will begin on July 25 - and will continue for some time.
Some news sources have focussed on DSI attention to Russian and Korean ''mafia'' but Phuketwan has learned that the crackdown will be widespread and address all the issues raised by the ambassadors.
Information about Phuket's tuk-tuks and taxis - which have a monopoly on Phuket and are the source of most tourist complaints - has been specifically requested by the DSI.
The Chinese ambassador was scathing about corrupt police and immigration officials when he met Phuket authorities while the EU ambassadors issued a statement listing their seven major issues.
Since his recent appointment, the minister has made at least two visits to Phuket and he appears to be in total agreement with the ambassadors about the need for action.
Khun Chanchai said today that the introduction of a special court for tourists would also be part of the project.
Crimes of violence involving tourists are to be the subject of a special study, he said, with the intention of developing a ''Phuket model'' that can quickly be applied to Pattaya and other destinations in Thailand.
Phuketwan understands that the Prime Minister and Phuket's Governor are meeting ambassadors from Thailand's Asian neighbors today.
.. An efficient and fairly priced public transport system in Phuket which is available to foreign tourists and residents alike.
.. An end to intimidatory and violent behavior by an element of tuk-tuk and taxi drivers.
.. Strict enforcement of marine safety standards, including flags on beaches to indicate when it is safe to swim.
.. Strict enforcement of standards of behavior for public officials, including police and Immigration, to ensure that foreign visitors and residents feel protected, treated in a fair way and never at risk of extortion.
.. An end to scams involving hiring of equipment such as jet skis or motorbikes.
.. Strict enforcement of road safety regulations.
.. Promotion of environmental issues, including monitoring of water quality.
Corruption Start a well-promoted public campaign to end corruption on the island and prosecute any official caught taking bribes. Investigate all allegations about Immigration officers and police. Create a corruption-free Phuket model for other provinces.
Sustainability Begin an investigation into what's required to keep Phuket a natural and appealing destination and set limits on development and tourist numbers based on the results of that investigation. Save the reefs and the beaches. Create a Phuket Beach Authority.
Transport Require all tuk-tuk and taxi drivers to register again and to meet international standards of service before being given new licences. Reduce their numbers by 10 percent a year for three years, offering alternative training. Introduce a call centre and abolish double-payment for journeys passengers don't make.
Crime Provide an extra 500 police for Phuket based on its actual population. Take up the Australian ambassador's suggestion of obliterating all illegal weapons and make the island a no-guns, no-knives zone.
Patong Awakes to a Burning Bike. Are Motorcycles Under Threat Again?
As a Patong resident, I'm looking forward to these changes, hopefully leading to improvements in quality of life.
Let's see, and good luck!
Bangkok finally reacts, and you still insist on being ''Doomy Dave.'' How long is it since you heard the birds singing and noticed the sun is shining?
After a decade of all talk, no action, I will believe this when I see it.
Not being negative, just realistic.
I am cautiously optimistic. Whether the buses run all the way to Kata by the end of next week will be a strong indicator of whether this is serious or just more PR.
At long last we hear that something "should" finally be done, how ever, the "proof is in the pudding," it can only be successful if corruption is followed through to the HIGHEST levels, this is the only way to eradicate it, otherwise it will return. All those involved in any form of scams, violence and corruption MUST be made to fear the law and its consequences, no pardons, no moving to other areas, NO CHANCE to ESCAPE justice. Dave, if "Bangkok" does the right thing then we should see a lot of new faces, in brown< from low ranks to high ranks, we should see new faces in many government departments and hopefully a new dedicated, hard working Governor... OH, and we should see a lot of new faces in jail(gaol), with 7 years left in this decade, this could change.. oops, am I becoming an optimist.
Great news, if there is any request for support from the local community, I will gladly report all places with illegal TukTuks and Taxis in my area (Kata/Karon).
I am optimistic considering that the Chinese ambassador got involved. Big and growing market for tourism world wide.
If this leads to action and improvements on the beautiful island of Phuket I will dance down Bangla Road on my next visit.
Wishfull thinking, but there seems to be an open door for changes. A very Good Luck from me.
Anyone ever noticed the lack of CCTV cameras in the immigration office...and other government office? If they were to be installed, it would make for great viewing.
According to other newspapers, the Department of Consular Affairs and the Anti-Money Laundering Office (Amlo) will visit illegal operators including 1,000 tour companies run by foreigners with Thai proxies in Phuket on July 25 to revoke their visas and seize their asset if proved they are illegal.
Good of PW to report this at least there is talk at a senior level, Ed, ThaiMike I think noting will happen as many of us who have been here a long time have often heard talk but no action from many sources. The majority of Thais will think as the money is coming in why change things. Does anyone really think they care about tourists, of course not what they care about is the tourist's money.
If this initiative from Bangkok fails for the same reasons (all talk, no action), then we truly have reached the end of the road.
Changes will come, or, everyone will know for 100% that nothing will ever change.
I'm hopeful, but true to type, pessimistic. I hope to be pleasantly surprised.
i think i heard this for the last 6 years i been living here..
cleanup for 2 weeks then back to "normal" again, sorry you need to switch out all goverment,police,immigration people down here to do anything..
Hmmm- I thought PW consistently (and vehemently)denied the presence of an 'mafias' on Phuket. Is the 'M' word now acceptable and are you changing your tune to reflect the reality of these 'cartels'?
monopoly is the word you are seeking. The misuse of 'mafia' is widespread.
Great article - well written - exciting content. As far as I can remember, going back 18 years, this is the first time the Bangkok authorities have shown such an interest? Hope for the future of Phuket at last.
Monopoly is the right word, but the means to retain that monopoly becomes mafia..
We can only hope....too long waiting with only talk and no action.
You can bet that if BKK does succeed in "cleaning up" Phuket, it'll be dirtier than ever within a month after they leave.
Lots of blah blah blah, lets see if Bangkok has the stomach for a fight.
Thai politicians are massive under achievers, just good at blowing hot air.
After living here for 8 years and seen how the wheels in the higher levels of corruption turn, I am joining the doubters too. I have seen how the politicians hot air has only added to global warming and nothing has improved here, only putrefied over the last four years, in the fight against crimes, scams, rip-offs, taxi and tuk-tuk eM's. When I see the corrupt politicians and officials being put behind jail cell bars, then and only then will I believe Bangkok is serious. Until then, I am with the doubters and realists here.
Thursday and Friday next week. Always great to get information in advance!
Bangkok finally doing something? Where do people think the money from Phuket goes? Some go to some powers that be in Phuket, but a lot of it goes to their controllers in BKK.
Hmm..more meetings and rhetoric...no timeline,no strategy no tactics.
So BKK has made a statement,although being aware of problems since whenever.
BKK pays officials to do their job in Phuket..they ain't done it....perhaps this is where the cleanup should begin.
Can someone explain the logic why the crackdown is announced in advance and is excactly lasting 2 days. But its a great start. So lets continue to complain at all levels. For all Germany speakers, in the last issue of the German Weekly Der Stern, there is a very critical and good article about the Phuket Mafia, surly will ruffle some feathers.
Tuk Tuks and Jetski cons are not the problem. Graft and apathy is the problem.
Solve that and many issues would go away?


text:
Q: VB6 val(parseString()) gives type mismatch but not when debug I have code that assigns a value to a double array. It seems to through an error "Type Mismatch".
datamax(i) = val(parseString(curpos, dummy, delimit))

The crazy thing is that if I debug.print out what is in the val() function first, the error does not happen.
Debug.Print parseString(curpos, dummy, delimit)
datamax(i) = val(parseString(curpos, dummy, delimit))

Any Ideas?

A: Can't tell what is wrong because you did not show enough code, but if I were to hazard a guess on why it works with the DebugPrint in front I'd say the parameters sent to parseString are ByRef and are being updated.  On the second call the result must be slightly different.  Try doing two Debug.Prints in a row:
Debug.Print "--->" & parseString(curpos, dummy, delimit) & "<---"
Debug.Print "--->" & parseString(curpos, dummy, delimit) & "<---"

And see if the value is the same each time.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


In space, no one can hear you shout "Have at thee!"…unless you've got lungs like the Prince of Power! Centuries in the future, Hercules embarks on an extraterrestrial odyssey and finds there are more gods in the heavens than he imagined! With his computerized comrade the Recorder, he wows worshippers, attacks avatars, and sires a son who may be an even more dangerous demigod than he is! Rigellians, Skrulls, carnivorous horses, and more! Plus: interviews with Bob Layton, creator of Herc's 24th century! Collects Hercules: Prince of Power (1982) #1-4, and Hercules: Prince of Power (1984) #1-4.
SKU: f18a6d1cde4b. Categories: COMICS, MARVEL COMICS. Tag: marvel comics.


text:
Cases for year 1895
Search U.S. Supreme Court Cases By Year 1895
Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 1760. Supreme Court opinions are browsable by year and U.S. Reports volume number, and are searchable by party name, case title, citation, full text and docket number. Some early cases from the court may not be available.
FindLaw maintains an archive of Supreme Court opinion summaries from September 2000 to the present. Summarized cases are browsable by date and searchable by docket number, case title, and full text.
Browse by 1895 Decisions
ABRAHAM v. ORDWAY , 158 U.S. 416 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 274
ALLEN v. US , 157 U.S. 675 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 788
ALLISON v. US , 160 U.S. 203 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 693
ANDES v. ELY , 158 U.S. 312 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 295
ANDREWS v. SWARTZ , 156 U.S. 272 (1895) February 4, 1895 No. 710
ANSBRO v. US , 159 U.S. 695 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 558
ARD v. BRANDON , 156 U.S. 537 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 141
BAKER v. WOOD , 157 U.S. 212 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 162
BALLEW v. U.S. , 160 U.S. 187 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 547
BALTIMORE & O R CO v. GRIFFITH , 159 U.S. 603 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 53
BALTIMORE & P R CO v. MACKEY , 157 U.S. 72 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 84
BAMBERGER v. SCHOOLFIELD , 160 U.S. 149 (1895) December 9, 1895 No. 48
BANNON v. U.S. , 156 U.S. 464 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 807
BARDON v. LAND & RIVER IMPROVEMENT CO. , 157 U.S. 327 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 138
BARNEY v. RICKARD , 157 U.S. 352 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 218
BATCHELOR v. US , 156 U.S. 426 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 775
BEARD v. US , 158 U.S. 550 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 842
BEARDSLEY v. ARKANSAS & L R CO , 158 U.S. 123 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 199
BELL SILVER & COPPER MINING CO. v. FIRST NAT. BANK , 156 U.S. 470 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 154
BELT, EX PARTE , 159 U.S. 95 (1895) June 3, 1895
BENNETT v. HARKRADER , 158 U.S. 441 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 58
BERGEMANN v. BACKER , 157 U.S. 655 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 709
BEUTTELL v. MAGONE , 157 U.S. 154 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 118
BLACK DIAMOND COAL-MINING CO v. EXCELSIOR COAL CO , 156 U.S. 611 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 200
BOARD OF FLOUR INSPECTORS FOR PORT OF NEW ORLEANS v. GLOVER , 160 U.S. 170 (1895) December 9, 1895 No. 88
BORGMEYER v. IDLER , 159 U.S. 408 (1895) October 28, 1895 No. 582
BOSTON & A. R. CO. v. O'REILLY , 158 U.S. 334 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 197
BOYD v. JANESVILLE HAY-TOOL CO. , 158 U.S. 260 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 305
BROWN v. SPILMAN , 155 U.S. 665 (1895) January 14, 1895 No. 92
BROWN v. US , 159 U.S. 100 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 863
BROWN v. WEBSTER , 156 U.S. 328 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 160
BUCKLIN v. U. S. , 159 U.S. 680 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 246
BURKE v. AMERICAN LOAN & TRUST CO , 155 U.S. 534 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 102
C & A POTTS & CO v. CREAGER , 155 U.S. 597 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 94
C A TREAT MFG CO v. STANDARD STEEL & IRON CO , 157 U.S. 674 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 353
CALIFORNIA v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO. , 157 U.S. 229 (1895) March 18, 1895
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF HAVERHILL , 155 U.S. 610 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 87
CARR v. FIFE , 156 U.S. 494 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 215
CARR v. NICHOLS , 157 U.S. 370 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 789
CENTRAL LAND CO OF WEST VIRGINIA v. LAIDLEY , 159 U.S. 103 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 239
CENTRAL R CO OF NEW JERSEY v. KEEGAN , 160 U.S. 259 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 373
CHICAGO, K. & W. R. CO. v. PONTIUS , 157 U.S. 209 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 716
CHICAGO, M & ST P R CO v. US , 159 U.S. 372 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 47
CITIZENS' SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. PERRY COUNTY, ILL , 156 U.S. 692 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 56
CLARK v. REEDER , 158 U.S. 505 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 262
CLUNE v. US , 159 U.S. 590 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 517
COCHRAN v. U.S. , 157 U.S. 286 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 815
COFFIN v. U.S. , 156 U.S. 432 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 741
COLVIN v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE , 157 U.S. 368 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 874
COLVIN v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE , 158 U.S. 456 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 991
CONNELL v. SMILEY , 156 U.S. 335 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 14
CONNORS v. U.S. , 158 U.S. 408 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 512
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC LIGHT CO v. MCKEESPORT LIGHT CO , 159 U.S. 465 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 10
CONSOLIDATED ROLLING-MILL CO. v. BARNARD & LEAS MFG CO , 156 U.S. 261 (1895) February 4, 1895 No. 70
COOPER v. DOBSON , 157 U.S. 148 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 179
COOPER v. NEWELL , 155 U.S. 532 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 129
CORINNE MILL, CANAL & STOCK CO v. JOHNSON , 156 U.S. 574 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 216
CORPORATION OF THE CATHOLIC BISHOP OF NESQUALLY v. GIBBON , 158 U.S. 155 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 277
COUPE v. ROYER , 155 U.S. 565 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 53
COWLEY v. NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. , 159 U.S. 569 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 67
CUNNINGHAM v. MACON & B.R. CO. , 156 U.S. 400 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 91
CUTLER v. HUSTON , 158 U.S. 423 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 229
DAVIS & RANKIN BLDG & MFG CO v. BARBER , 157 U.S. 673 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 818
DAVIS v. SCHWARTZ , 155 U.S. 631 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 75
DAVIS v. US , 160 U.S. 469 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 593
DAVIS v. WAKELEE , 156 U.S. 680 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 181
DE JONGE v. MAGONE , 159 U.S. 562 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 56
DE SOLLAR v. HANSCOME , 158 U.S. 216 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 303
DELAWARE & HUDSON CANAL CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA , 156 U.S. 200 (1895) January 14, 1895 No. 452
DR S A RICHMOND NERVINE CO v. RICHMOND , 159 U.S. 293 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 59
DU BOIS v. KIRK , 158 U.S. 58 (1895) April 22, 1895 No. 240
DUNBAR v. U.S. , 156 U.S. 185 (1895) January 28, 1895 No. 693
DUNHAM v. JONES , 159 U.S. 584 (1895) November 18, 1895
EBY v. KING , 158 U.S. 366 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 336
ELLENWOOD v. MARIETTA CHAIR CO. , 158 U.S. 105 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 234
EMERT v. MISSOURI , 156 U.S. 296 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 120
EPISCOPAL CITY MISSION v. BROWN , 158 U.S. 222 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 250
EVERS v. WATSON , 156 U.S. 527 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 180
FOLSOM v. TOWNSHIP NINETY-SIX, ABBEVILLE COUNTY , 159 U.S. 611 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 354
FOLSOM v. US , 160 U.S. 121 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 550
FOX v. HAARSTICK , 156 U.S. 674 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 577
FRISBIE v. US , 157 U.S. 160 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 811
FROST v. WENIE , 157 U.S. 46 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 172
GILFILLAN v. MCKEE , 159 U.S. 303 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 26
GILLIS v. STINCHFIELD , 159 U.S. 658 (1895) November 25, 1895 No. 661
GOLDEY v. MORNING NEWS OF NEW HAVEN , 156 U.S. 518 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 55
GOLDSBY v. US , 160 U.S. 70 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 620
GOODE v. US , 159 U.S. 663 (1895) November 25, 1895 No. 616
GRAND RAPIDS & I R CO v. BUTLER , 159 U.S. 87 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 198
GRAY v. CONNECTICUT , 159 U.S. 74 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 258
GREEN v. BOGUE , 158 U.S. 478 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 327
GRIMM v. US , 156 U.S. 604 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 424
GULF, C & S F R CO v. HEFLEY , 158 U.S. 98 (1895) April 29, 1895 No. 255
GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO. v. SHANE , 157 U.S. 348 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 212
HARTER v. TWOHIG , 158 U.S. 448 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 251
HAWS v. VICTORIA COPPER MINING CO , 160 U.S. 303 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 66
HAYS v. STEIGER , 156 U.S. 387 (1895) March 4, 1895
HILTON v. GUYOT , 159 U.S. 113 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 130
HOOPER v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA , 155 U.S. 648 (1895) January 7, 1895
HORNE v. SMITH , 159 U.S. 40 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 341
HUDSON v. PARKER , 156 U.S. 277 (1895) February 4, 1895 No. 16
HYDE v. CONTINENTAL TRUST CO OF CITY OF NEW YORK , 157 U.S. 654 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 894
ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. BROWN , 156 U.S. 386 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 632
IN RE BUCHANAN , 158 U.S. 31 (1895) April 17, 1895 No. 12
IN RE CHAPMAN , 156 U.S. 211 (1895) February 4, 1895
IN RE DEBS , 158 U.S. 564 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 11
IN RE KEASBEY & MATTISON CO. , 160 U.S. 221 (1895) December 16, 1895
IN RE LEHIGH MIN & MFG CO , 156 U.S. 322 (1895) March 4, 1895
IN RE NEW YORK & P R S S CO , 155 U.S. 523 (1895) January 7, 1895
IN RE QUARLES , 158 U.S. 532 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 14
IN RE ROBERTSON , 156 U.S. 183 (1895) January 22, 1895
IN RE SANFORD FORK & TOOL CO. , 160 U.S. 247 (1895) December 23, 1895
IN RE STREEP , 156 U.S. 207 (1895) January 28, 1895
INTERIOR CONST. & IMP. CO. v. GIBNEY , 160 U.S. 217 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 99
ISAACS v. US , 159 U.S. 487 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 609
JERSEY CITY & B R CO v. MORGAN , 160 U.S. 288 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 97
JOHNSON v. ATLANTIC G & W I TRANSIT CO , 156 U.S. 618 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 77
JOHNSON v. SAYRE , 158 U.S. 109 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 871
JOHNSON v. US , 157 U.S. 320 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 740
JONES v. EAST TENNESSEE, v. & G.R. CO. , 157 U.S. 682 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 253
KEANE v. BRYGGER , 160 U.S. 276 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 94
KEELER v. STANDARD FOLDING-BED CO. , 157 U.S. 659 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 52
KENNEDY v. MAGONE , 158 U.S. 212 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 232
KEYES v. EUREKA CONSOL MINING CO , 158 U.S. 150 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 228
KOENIGSBERGER v. RICHMOND SILVER MIN. CO. , 158 U.S. 41 (1895) April 22, 1895 No. 260
KOHL v. LEHLBACK , 160 U.S. 293 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 650
LAMBERT v. BARRETT , 159 U.S. 660 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 771
LAMBERT v. BARRETT , 157 U.S. 697 (1895) April 15, 1895 No. 928
LAST CHANCE MINING CO v. TYLER MINING CO , 157 U.S. 683 (1895) April 15, 1895 No. 831
LAZARUS v. PHELPS , 156 U.S. 202 (1895) January 28, 1895 No. 105
LEHIGH MIN. & MFG. CO. v. KELLY , 160 U.S. 327 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 617
LEHIGH VALLEY R CO v. KEARNEY , 158 U.S. 461 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 314
LEM MOON SING v. US , 158 U.S. 538 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 946
LINDSAY v. FIRST NAT BANK OF SHREVEPORT , 156 U.S. 485 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 132
LINDSAY v. TURNER , 156 U.S. 208 (1895) January 28, 1895 No. 191
LITTLE ROCK & M R CO v. EAST TENNESSEE, V & G R CO , 159 U.S. 698 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 65
LUTCHER v. US , 157 U.S. 427 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 271
MADDOX v. BURNHAM , 156 U.S. 544 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 144
MAGONE v. WIEDERER , 159 U.S. 555 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 23
MARICOPA & P.R. CO. v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA , 156 U.S. 347 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 195
MARKET STREET CABLE R CO v. ROWLEY , 155 U.S. 621 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 161
MARKHAM v. US , 160 U.S. 319 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 544
MATHER v. RILLSTON , 156 U.S. 391 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 139
MATTINGLY v. NORTHWESTERN VIRGINIA R CO , 158 U.S. 53 (1895) April 15, 1895 No. 140
MATTOX v. U.S. , 156 U.S. 237 (1895) February 4, 1895 No. 667
MCCABE v. MATTHEWS , 155 U.S. 550 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 109
MCCARTY v. LEHIGH VAL R CO , 160 U.S. 110 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 314
MCCORMICK v. HAYES , 159 U.S. 332 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 37
MCDOWELL v. US , 159 U.S. 596 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 552
MCGAHAN v. NATIONAL BANK OF RONDOUT, NEW YORK , 156 U.S. 218 (1895) February 4, 1895 No. 104
MCKEE v. LAMON , 159 U.S. 317 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 33
MCKEE v. LATROBE , 159 U.S. 327 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 35
MCKNIGHT v. JAMES , 155 U.S. 685 (1895) January 14, 1895 No. 841
MEXICAN NAT R CO v. DAVIDSON , 157 U.S. 201 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 880
MICHELS v. OLMSTEAD , 157 U.S. 198 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 100
MILLS v. GREEN , 159 U.S. 651 (1895) November 25, 1895 No. 732
MOORE v. MISSOURI , 159 U.S. 673 (1895) November 25, 1895 No. 493
MOORE v. U.S. , 160 U.S. 268 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 719
MORGAN v. POTTER , 157 U.S. 195 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 690
NATIONAL BANK OF RONDOUT, N.Y. v. SMITH , 156 U.S. 330 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 113
NATIONAL CASH-REGISTER CO v. BOSTON CASH INDICATOR & RECORDER CO. , 156 U.S. 502 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 155
NATIONAL PARK BANK OF NEW YORK v. REMSEN , 158 U.S. 337 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 316
NEEL v. PENNSYLVANIA CO , 157 U.S. 153 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 188
NEW ORLEANS C & L R CO v. LOUISIANA EX REL. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS , 157 U.S. 219 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 29
NEW YORK, L E & W R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA , 158 U.S. 431 (1895) May 27, 1895 No. 263
NEWPORT NEWS & M.V. CO. v. PACE , 158 U.S. 36 (1895) April 22, 1895 No. 223
NORFOLK & W R CO v. PENDLETON , 156 U.S. 667 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 153
NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. v. URLIN , 158 U.S. 271 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 272
OLD NAT. BANK v. GERMAN-AMERICAN NAT. BANK , 155 U.S. 556 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 85
ORCHARD v. ALEXANDER , 157 U.S. 372 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 192
PACIFIC R. CO. v. U.S. , 158 U.S. 118 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 233
PALMER v. VILLAGE OF CORNING , 156 U.S. 342 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 137
PATTON v. US , 159 U.S. 500 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 36
PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. v. WABASH ST. L & P R CO. , 157 U.S. 225 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 158
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL BRYANT v. HOLLADAY , 159 U.S. 415 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 566
PITTSBURGH & SOUTHERN COAL CO. v. BATES , 156 U.S. 577 (1895) March 4, 1895
PITTSBURGH &C COAL CO. v. LOUISIANA. , 156 U.S. 590 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 10
POLLOCK v. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. , 157 U.S. 429 (1895) April 8, 1895 No. 893
POLLOCK v. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. , 158 U.S. 601 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 893
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE CO v. MAYOR, CITY OF BALTIMORE , 156 U.S. 210 (1895) January 28, 1895 No. 828
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE CO. v. ADAMS , 155 U.S. 688 (1895) January 21, 1895 No. 649
PULLMAN PALACE-CAR CO v. METROPOLITAN ST R CO , 157 U.S. 94 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 146
RALLI v. TROOP , 157 U.S. 386 (1895) April 1, 1895 No. 46
REAGAN v. US , 157 U.S. 301 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 755
RICH v. BRAXTON , 158 U.S. 375 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 17
RICHARDS v. CHASE ELEVATOR CO , 159 U.S. 477 (1895) November 11, 1895
RICHARDS v. CHASE ELEVATOR CO , 158 U.S. 299 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 310
RISDON IRON & LOCOMOTIVE WORKS v. MEDART , 158 U.S. 68 (1895) April 22, 1895 No. 164
RITCHIE v. MCMULLEN , 159 U.S. 235 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 15
ROBERTS v. NORTHERN PAC. R. CO. , 158 U.S. 1 (1895) April 22, 1895 No. 124
ROUSE v. LETCHER , 156 U.S. 47 (1895) January 21, 1895 No. 582
RUSSELL v. MAXWELL LAND-GRANT CO. , 158 U.S. 253 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 321
RUTLAND R CO v. CENTRAL VERMONT R CO , 159 U.S. 630 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 51
SALTONSTALL v. WIEBUSCH & HILGER , 156 U.S. 601 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 150
SANFORD FORK & TOOL CO. v. HOWE, BROWN & CO. , 157 U.S. 312 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 190
SAYWARD v. DENNY , 158 U.S. 180 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 951
SEEBERGER v. WRIGHT & LAWTHER OIL & LEAD MFG CO , 157 U.S. 183 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 219
SHERMAN v. U.S. , 155 U.S. 673 (1895) January 14, 1895 No. 664
SHIELDS v. COLEMAN , 157 U.S. 168 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 793
SHIPMAN v. STRAITSVILLE CENT MINING CO , 158 U.S. 356 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 306
SHIVER v. U.S. , 159 U.S. 491 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 548
SIMMONS v. BURLINGTON, C R & N R CO , 159 U.S. 278 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 11
SIOUX CITY & ST P R CO v. COUNTRYMAN , 159 U.S. 377 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 30
SIOUX CITY & ST P R CO v. US , 159 U.S. 349 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 20
SONN v. MAGONE , 159 U.S. 417 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 16
SOUTH CAROLINA v. WESLEY , 155 U.S. 542 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 796
SPARF v. US , 156 U.S. 51 (1895) January 21, 1895 No. 613
SPENCER v. MCDOUGAL , 159 U.S. 62 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 245
ST LOUIS & S F R CO v. GILL , 156 U.S. 649 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 173
ST LOUIS, C G & FT S R CO v. MISSOURI EX REL. MERRIAM , 156 U.S. 478 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 751
STATE OF INDIANA v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY , 159 U.S. 275 (1895) October 21, 1895
STATE OF INDIANA v. GLOVER , 155 U.S. 513 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 57
STATLER v. US , 157 U.S. 277 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 770
STEWART v. MCHARRY , 159 U.S. 643 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 366
STOKES v. U.S. , 157 U.S. 187 (1895) March 18, 1895 No. 746
STONEROAD v. STONEROAD , 158 U.S. 240 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 11
STREEP v. US , 160 U.S. 128 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 623
STUART v. CITY OF EASTON , 156 U.S. 46 (1895) January 21, 1895 No. 151
SWEET v. RECHEL , 159 U.S. 380 (1895) October 21, 1895 No. 18
TEALL v. SCHRODER , 158 U.S. 172 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 275
TEXAS & P R CO v. INTERSTATE TRANSP CO , 155 U.S. 585 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 95
TEXAS & P R CO v. SMITH , 159 U.S. 66 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 133
THE BAYONNE , 159 U.S. 687 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 215
THE BEACONSFIELD , 158 U.S. 303 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 943
THE CALEDONIA , 157 U.S. 124 (1895) March 11, 1895 No. 107
THE LUDVIG HOLBERG , 157 U.S. 60 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 136
THE OREGON , 158 U.S. 186 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 270
THIEDE v. PEOPLE OF TERRITORY OF UTAH , 159 U.S. 510 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 633
THORN WIRE HEDGE CO v. WASHBURN & MOEN MFG CO , 159 U.S. 423 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 57
TIOGA R CO v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA , 158 U.S. 440 (1895) May 27, 1895
TODD v. U.S. , 158 U.S. 278 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 822
TOWNSEND v. ST LOUIS & S COAL & MINING CO , 159 U.S. 21 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 308
TOWNSEND v. VANDERWERKER , 160 U.S. 171 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 73
US EX REL SIEGEL v. THOMAN , 156 U.S. 353 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 125
US v. BURR , 159 U.S. 78 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 4864
US v. CHAVES , 159 U.S. 452 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 196
US v. PIATT , 157 U.S. 113 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 166
US v. SALISBURY , 157 U.S. 121 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 167
US v. SAYWARD , 160 U.S. 493 (1895) December 23, 1895 No. 75
US v. WESTERN UNION TEL CO , 160 U.S. 53 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 19
U. S. v. E. C. KNIGHT CO. , 156 U.S. 1 (1895) January 21, 1895 No. 675
U. S. v. UNION PAC. RY. CO. , 160 U.S. 1 (1895) November 18, 1895 No. 334
U.S. v. ALLRED , 155 U.S. 591 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 552
U.S. v. BERDAN FIREARMS MFG. CO. , 156 U.S. 552 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 128
U.S. v. SMITH , 158 U.S. 346 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 289
U.S. v. SWEENY , 157 U.S. 281 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 889
UNION PAC R CO v. WYLER , 158 U.S. 285 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 217
UNION PAC. RY. CO. v. HARRIS , 158 U.S. 326 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 896
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN BELL TEL. CO. , 159 U.S. 548 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 745
VIRGINIA v. TENNESSEE , 158 U.S. 267 (1895) May 20, 1895
WAILES v. SMITH , 157 U.S. 271 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 872
WALDRON v. WALDRON , 156 U.S. 361 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 97
WALTON v. MARIETTA CHAIR CO , 157 U.S. 342 (1895) March 25, 1895 No. 234
WASHINGTON & I R CO v. COEUR D'ALENE R & NAV CO , 160 U.S. 77 (1895) December 2, 1895 No. 585
WASHINGTON & I R CO v. COEUR D'ALENE R & NAV CO , 160 U.S. 101 (1895) December 2, 1895
WASHINGTON & I R CO v. OSBORN , 160 U.S. 103 (1895) December 2, 1895
WEEKS v. BRIDGMAN , 159 U.S. 541 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 44
WESTMORELAND v. US , 155 U.S. 545 (1895) January 7, 1895 No. 765
WHEELER v. U.S. , 159 U.S. 523 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 571
WHITE v. EWING , 159 U.S. 36 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 913
WHITE v. MILLER , 158 U.S. 128 (1895) May 6, 1895 No. 103
WHITE v. VAN HORN , 159 U.S. 3 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 261
WHITNEY v. TAYLOR , 158 U.S. 85 (1895) April 29, 1895 No. 278
WHITTEN v. TOMLINSON , 160 U.S. 231 (1895) December 16, 1895 No. 619
WINONA & ST P LAND CO v. MINNESOTA , 159 U.S. 540 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 38
WINONA & ST. P. LAND CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA , 159 U.S. 526 (1895) November 11, 1895 No. 31
WINTER v. CITY COUNCIL OF MONTGOMERY , 156 U.S. 385 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 533
WISCONSIN CENT. R. CO. v. FORSYTHE , 159 U.S. 46 (1895) June 3, 1895 No. 238
WOOD v. BEACH , 156 U.S. 548 (1895) March 4, 1895 No. 143
WRIGHT v. US , 158 U.S. 232 (1895) May 20, 1895 No. 766
Browse United States Supreme Court Opinions
Browse opinions by calendar year:
View by volumes »


want your product to be built ASAP? with perfect cooperative engineering team?
Solution for every business related problems, readily and skillfully.
Calculate every possible risk in your business, take control over them.
Before talking destination, we shine a spotlight across your organization to fully understand it.
zpzen developed web sites still over publishing the years.


text:
Coaches' Bios
Cheyenne Wimberley
Cheyenne Wimberley made the NFR as a teenager on April Hemp and then decided to further her education while rodeoing professionally. In her series, Cheyenne shares some highlights of her junior career, anecdotes about her experiences with horses and rodeo friendships and what made some of the top barrel horses of years past so special.
Amy Jo Reisdorfer
Amy Jo Reisdorfer is from Cheyenne, Wyoming, where she and her husband Nate live with their blended family of 6 kids. Reisdorfer attended the University of Wyoming on a rodeo scholarship, qualifying for the College National Finals Rodeo each year of her intercollegiate career, as well as for the Mountain States Circuit Finals Rodeo for three years.
"When I started college, I was on the horse show team, but I tried Mo (a barrel horse of Vickie Segelke's) and immediately liked the speed of barrel racing," said Reisdorfer. "I gained a full ride to be on the rodeo team from that point forward. I did everything on him," said Reisdorfer. "I did English and everything in the show world growing up and I'm super grateful for that because I think it helped the barrel racing take off for me right from the start."
Reisdorfer has made seven trips to the MSCFR on multiple horses. She earned her MS in Animal Veterinary Science and coached for the rodeo team at Laramie County Community College in Cheyenne, Wyoming, while working on her Masters.
"I thought about teaching, but I love coaching and riding," said Reisdorfer, who currently rides for the public and coaches her sons who are standout junior rodeo athletes competing in Colorado and Wyoming. Among her biggest personal wins Reisdorfer counts the Colorado vs. The World Championship in 2019.
Kelly Yates
Kelly Yates is a four-time National Finals Rodeo qualifier and has won innumerable rodeo, futurity and divisional barrel titles in the course of her career. Yates, her dad, Dick, and her brother, J.D., are the only father, daughter, and son team to have qualified for the National Finals Rodeo in the same year, which they accomplished in 1984.
Yates and her legendary performer and producer, the home-bred Firewater Fiesta, were also a team synonymous with victory. Together they secured three National Finals Rodeo qualifications, and Fiesta was named the 2000 and 2001 American Quarter Horse Association/Women's Professional Rodeo Association Barrel Horse of the Year. Yates rode Fiesta to the WPRA Reserve World Championship in 2001.
These days Yates continues to dominate in the WPRA/PRCA Mountain States Circuit region and has competed in countless Mountain States Circuit Finals Rodeos and Ram National Circuit Finals Rodeos. She is a four-time MSC champion (1990, 2001, 2003, 2010). Yates is teamed with several standout barrel horses, among them one of Fiesta's offspring, Fiestanozshezfamous, aka "Gucci."
Jordon Briggs
A household name in the barrel racing industry, Jordon Briggs is a two-time Barrel Futurities of America World Champion and two-time Wrangler National Finals Rodeo qualifier. She and her husband Justin and daughter Bexley, age 3, live in Tolar, Texas, where they raise and train some of the best barrel racing and team roping horses in the industry. Consistently ranked among the top futurity riders in the business, Jordon has built the reputation of breeding and training exceptional barrel horses that have gone on to have winning rodeo and aged event careers with other riders. For more information visit Briggs Performance Horses on Facebook.
Shali Lord
Shali Lord is a multiple-time National Finals Rodeo qualifier who lives in Lamar, Colorado, with her husband Phy, and kids Slade and Stealy. Lord first made the NFR in 2005 finishing third in the world riding SX Docs Slider. More recently Lord has teamed with Freckles Ta Fame ("Can Man"), finishing ninth in the WPRA World Standings in 2019 with $173,391. She is a three-time Mountain States Circuit Finals Rodeo champion (2008, 2018, 2019) and was the MSCFR average winner in 2017. In 2007 Lord was the Dodge National Circuit Finals Rodeo champion riding Cashin Ease.
The Lord family manages a large cattle operation where they also raise and train performance horses.
Andre Coelho
Andre Coelho, a native of Sao Paulo, Brazil, lives in Bennett, Colorado, with his wife, Renata, and two young daughters. Coelho works as the resident trainer for Bill and Cheryl Kennedy's Smoke Creek Quarter Horses. Coelho had established a flourishing barrel horse training business in Brazil where he became a dominant force in ABQM, the Brazilian equivalent to AQHA. However, committed to testing his skills further, Coelho traveled to the United States regularly to ride with leading trainers before making the decision to move to the U.S. and test himself against the competition. He has worked as head trainer at Smoke Creek Quarter Horses for the past several years, and in 2019 became the first Brazilian to win a top futurity in the U.S., which he accomplished riding Smoke Creek's Tiny's Stormy Weather to the 5-States Futurity title.


text:
Чешка Шлеска или Шлезија, Шљонск (, , , ; понекад Моравска Шлеска или Шлезија (, , , ), је једна од историјских три историјских чешких земаља (земаља чешке круне). Налази се на крајњем северо-истоку Чешке Републике и чини њен мали део. Иако се често назива и само Шлеска или Шлезија, Чешка Шлеска чини тек мањи део историјске области Шлеска. Некада је била позната и као Аустријска Шлеска или Шлезија, а од 1918. до 1945. године као Судетска Шлеска или Шлезија (, , , ).

Географија
Чешка Шлеска се простире на крајњем северо-истоку земље кроз Моравско-Шлеског краја и мањим делом кроз Оломоуцки крај. То је подручје западно и источно од града Острава који је и највећи град у том региону.

Област обухвата Судетске планине. На истоку, реке које чине границу са Пољском, односно пољским делом Шлезије су Одра, Опава и Олша, док границу са Моравском чине реке Одра и Остравице на југу ове регије. На југоистоку, Чешка Шлеска се граничи са Словачком.

Међу већим градовима су Острава, Опава, Чешки Тјешин и Карвина.

Историја
Током средњег века, територија је наизменично падала како под Чешку, тако под пољску управу. Почетком 13. века, Шлеска се формирала као историјска земља у области долине реке Одре. Делила се на горњу и доњу Шлеску. Доња Шлеска се распала на још мање територије којима су управљали различити владари. Област око реке Опаве је припадала Моравској, а Отакар II од Чешке је дао свом ванбрачном прворођеном сину Николи да управља поседима у тој области у 13. веку. Никола I тада постаје оснивач бочне стране династије Пшемисловића и војвода од Опаве. Ове области је заузео и ујединио Иван Луксембуршки у периоду од 1327, до поптуног присаједињења Шлеске Чешкој краљевини 1335. године.

У каснијем периоду, ова област потпада под Хабзбуршком монархијом, односно под Аустријско царство. Ипак, након Рата за Аустријско наслеђе у периоду од 1740. до 1748. године, велики део Шлезије пада под Пруско краљевство, а мали део који приближно одговара данашњој Чешкој Шлеској остаје у Аустријском царству. Тада је ова територија била позната као Аустријска Шлеска.

Након Првог светског рата, због релативне немачке већине, Чешка Шлеска потпада под Републику Немачку Аустрију, али Споразумом из Сен-Жермена из 1919. године, ова област потпада под новоформирану Чехословачку. У периоду од 1918. до 1945. године, област је била позната и као Судетска Шлеска. Након Минхенског споразума из 1938. године, област окупира Немачка, а током Другог светског рата, цела Шлеска ће се наћи под немачком окупацијом. Након ослобођења од окупације, Чешка Шлеска поново потпада под Чехословачку, а због декрета тадашњег чешког председника Едварда Бенеша, Немци бивају протерани из те области.

Култура и становништво

Већина становништва данашње Чешке Шлеске су Чеси, а мањим делом Пољаци. Говоре већином чешким језиком. Постоје и мањи дијалекти, попут Лашког дијалекта, кога чешки лингвисти сматрају делом чешког језика, док пољски лингвисти сматрају да је његовог порекло у пољском језику. У мањим местима на граници са Пољском, ка пољском граду Ћешину, Пољаци говоре локалним шлеским дијалектом.

Због открића угља у близини Остраве, крајем 19. и током 20. века ова област је била захваћена наглом индустријализацијом. Због тога је Острава постала највећа индустријска конурбација, састављена од чешког и пољског дела. Данас су многобројне фабрике опустеле због смањене индустријске производње.

Познате личности
 Мартин из Опаве, хроничар из 13. века и свештеник
 Ханс Кудлих, аустријски политички активиста из 19. века
 Иван Лендл, бивши професионални тенисер, који је играо за Чехословачку и Сједињене Америчке Државе
 Јохан Палиса, аустријски астроном
 Јурај Трановски, чешки свештеник и химнописац, познат и као Словенски Лутер
 Грегор Мендел, аустријски свештеник, биолог, ботаничар и математичар који се сматра зачетником класичне генетике

Види још
 Чешке земље

Референце

Литература

 S. Bąk, Mowa polska na Śląsku, Wrocław and Warsaw 1974.

Спољашње везе
 www.ostrava-city.cz Званична страница града Остраве
 www.opava-city.cz Званична страница града Опаве

Чешка
Региони Чешке Републике
Историја Чешке
Шлеска

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
John Neff Productions
The Ascots
Journey Platinum Award
GerryBeckley-America&John_fs
John_Neff_&_David_Lynch_in_Paris_fs
John&GeorgeBenson_fs
John&MikeDuke-WetWillie_fs
John&MikePorcaro-Toto_fs
John01_fs
MixingMichaelFrantiFilm_fs
Walter_Becker_&_John_Neff_fs
CJP BAND
3Elites
3Rickenbackers
Ascots_Booking_Card_fs
Concert02_fs
Jag-Jazz
OldGibsons&Amps
OrangeJohn
The_Ascots_Aug_1965_fs
The_Ascots_Oct_1965_fs
Zurich1975
The Ascots Band
The Ascots were a group of Mid-Michigan teenagers who decided to try for a shot at the top at the ripe old age of 14 and 16.
The band lineup was John Neff, Lead Guitar,Backup Vocals and Songwriter; Chris Chappell, Lead Singer; Bob Pelmear, Bass Guitar, Backup Vocals and Songwriter; Dale Kath, Rhythm Guitar and Backup Vocals; and Frank Giglio, Drums.
The band started in 1964, rehearsing in the basement of St. Benedict's School in Pontiac, Michigan.
Chris, John and Dale were big fans of The Beach Boys and the whole Surf/Hot Rod movement. Bob was into the emerging Beatles and English Beat scene, and Frank, two years older than the rest of us, was into the hard core 'Rock 'N' Roll' era of Chuck Berry, Little Richard, The Kingsmen and the burgeoning Detroit-based Soul Movement.
In August of 1965, they had a chance to record a single, of a song written by Bob ("Who Will It Be") and John ("So Good"). The songs were recorded in a two hour afternoon session, and mastered in a session in October of 1965, by Tom Neff, John's older brother and a recording enthusiast.
In March of 1966, they played a 'Sock Hop' at Notre Dame High School in Detroit, with The Shades of Blue ("Oh, How Happy") and The Capitols ("Cool Jerk"). Dave Prince, afternoon Drive DJ of AM powerhouse WXYZ was there as the hosting DJ, and he was given a copy of the newly-pressed 45rpm record. He announced a new song by "Detroit's newest recording act – The Ascots", and played the B-Side of the record – 'So Good'. The kids got up and danced!
When the band came on to play live, the audience was revved up and ready! The Ascots received a huge ovation and even the other, more established acts were very kind in their comments about the young startup act.
Dave Prince asked if he could take the record back to the station, and John agreed. He started playing it in his shift, and Rosalie Trumbull, the Program Director for Windsor, Ontario-based CKLW, called him to say that she was getting requests from listeners for the record, yet she couldn't find it.
Dave called John, who promptly sent her a copy, and she had the record played on the station.
Meanwhile, John's Dad Robert, had the 45 re-pressed and sent to record stores.
The Ascots' fame culminated in a Cobo Hall, Detroit performance opening for The Turtles, on the "Happy Together" tour in the Spring of 1966.
The Ascots broke up the following year, after Bob went back to the Felice brothers, starting a band which would yield John's second record, "Maple Street Park".
Jim Stiel replaced Bob as Bassist, and the band continued until mid 1967. John then went back into a band with Joe and Paul Felice and Bob Pelmear, called "The Tribe". This band ened up being managed by Ed "Punch"Andrews, of Bob Seger fame.