Structural studies in the Late Riphean to Vendian succession of the southeastern part of the Trollfjorden-Komagelva Fault Zone on Varanger Peninsula, Finnmark, have revealed the presence of two main sets of contractional structures, here grouped into D1 and D2 events. These folding and cleavage-forming episodes are superseded by two, separate extensional events, D3 and D4. Although only one of these four events (D3) has been directly dated in the actual study area, the probable ages of the disparate, contractional deformation episodes can be deduced from published geochronological data in neighbouring parts of Varanger Peninsula or Northwest Russia. The deformation history of this area shows the following sequence of main events: (1) Inversion of the pre-existing, Neoproterozoic, basinal regime occurred during an episode of SW-directed shortening, folding and associated cleavage development, with reverse faulting and minor sinistral strike-slip movements along the Trollfjorden-Komagelva Fault Zone. By comparison with the situation on the nearby Rybachi and Sredni Peninsulas in NW Russia, this D1 deformation and low-grade metamorphism is likely to have occurred during the Timanian orogeny at about 570-560 ± 10 Ma. (2) The D2 event represents the main Caledonian deformation and is characterised by SE-directed shortening (NE-SW-trending folds and NW-dipping cleavage) that gave rise to a moderate dextral strike-slip displacement along the Trollfjorden-Komagelva Fault Zone. Based on recent geochronology from NW Varanger Peninsula, this major contractional, epizone event is considered to be late-Finnmarkian, c. 470-460 Ma. It is likely that Siluro-Devonian Scandian deformation in the study area and along the fault zone was largely of brittle character. (3) A regional, extensional event, D3, is reflected in N-S fracturing and dolerite dyke intrusion. The dyke intrusion is dated to Late Devonian time at c. 375-370 Ma. (4) A younger extensional event, D4, is manifested in dip-slip normal faulting along and adjacent to the main fault zone, with breccias, gouge and quartzcalcite veining. The age of this episode is open to speculation – from Carboniferous to Cretaceous – but a Mesozoic reactivation seems highly likely based on our knowledge of offshore geology.


text:
Home » Exclusives » Rolls-Royce Phantom to Lamborghini Aventador SV: India's 10 most EXPENSIVE cars
Rolls-Royce Phantom to Lamborghini Aventador SV: India's 10 most EXPENSIVE cars
We Indians love expensive cars and exotics. Though most of us may never be able to afford them, when an exotic passes by, people gawk at them like anything. Ever wondered what are the most expensive cars available in our country? If so, we've compiled a list of the most expensive cars that are officially sold in India. Lets' take a look at them.
Rolls-Royce Phantom VIII EWB
Price: Rs. 10.48 crores
The series VIII Phantom was launched by the iconic British marque earlier this year in India. It has two variants, a standard one and an extended wheelbase model. The long-wheelbase version of the Phantom Series VIII comes with a hefty price tag and is the most expensive car you can buy in India. It's actually an all new car with a new chassis.
Rolls-Royce has always been known for their extremely sophisticated and luxurious interiors and this one is no different. The Phantom EWB gets new LED projector headlamps with LED DRL among other things like a larger grille than the preceding model. The Rolls-Royce claims Phantom VIII to be the quietest car in the world. This behemoth is powered by a 6.75-litre engine that generates 563 Bhp of power and 900 Nm of torque. The regular version of the Phantom VIII is priced at Rs. 8.99 crores.
Price: Rs. 8.4 crores
The gorgeous Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe (DHC) is one of the best luxury convertibles money can get you right now. Though it is based on the previous generation Phantom, it's still the most expensive convertible that you can buy in India. The fact that it's based on a last generation model doesn't sour the deal as that was also a fabulous car in itself. The car comes with enough features and toys that willl keep you busy for many days, yet you'll find a new feature every now and then. The Drophead Coupe is a rare car in India but one can find it quite often on the Mumbai roads.
It gets a 6.8 litre V12 engine that churns out 460 Bhp of power and 720 Nm of torque. It is mated to a six speed automatic gearbox. The Phantom DHC is regarded as extremely luxurious and gets similar features like the Phantom Coupe. It commands a hefty sticker price of Rs. 8.4 crores.
Price: Rs. 5.92 crores
One of the newer models to roll out of the Rolls-Royce company, the Dawn is only available in the convertible version. For those of you wondering it to be the same car as the RR Ghost, it's not. The Rolls-Royce Dawn is a completely redesigned vehicle and shares nothing except the doors and the grille with its sister models. It held the title of being the "Quietest convertible in the world" but that title has now gone to the Phantom DHC.
The Dawn can fit four adults in the car comfortably and the parameters of comfort are changed here. Comfort levels can't be compared to any typical vehicle because after all, this is a Rolls-Royce. It gets powered by a 6.6-litre V12 that generates a maximum of 563 Bhp and 820 Nm of torque. The Dawn also offers luxury equipment and features agile handling because of its adaptive suspension and performs extremely well on the bad roads with its magic carpet suspension technology.
The Aventador has been around for quite some time now as one of the hottest and slickest sportscar around. The oomph factor is taken even higher by the Lamborghini Aventador Roadster which probably is the most expensive sportscar that you can buy in India. The Aventador Roadster was announced in 2012 and the first car came to India in 2013. It held the title of being the most powerful roadster in the world for long. Currently the title has been taken over by arch rival Ferrari in the form of 488 Pista Spider with 720 Bhp on tap.
The Aventador can reach 100 km/h in just 3 seconds and can hit a top speed of 350 km/h. The Roadster version of the Aventador is not cheap as it has enough technological marvels going under it so as to ensure that the car is strong enough to contain the extreme 700 Bhp and 690 Nm from the V12 engine.
Another British manufacturer that is known for its superficially luxurious vehicles, The Bentley Mulsanne is a car to behold. The name comes from the Mulsanne straight (6 km in length) of the Le Mans racing circuit, where the team Bentley won six trophies at the legendary 24 Hours of Le Mans. This is the most expensive Bentley car ever made and offers out-of-the-world luxury. The car is powered by a 6.75 twin-turbo V8 engine that produces a maximum of 505 Bhp and 1100 Nm of torque. The car can do 0-100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds to reach a maximum speed of 296 km/h. It also offers impeccable luxury features which rival that of its arch rival Rolls-Royce.
The James Bond's trusted brand, Aston Martin is one more British brand to make it to this list. The most expensive grand tourer from the brand was reintroduced in 2012 to replace the ageing DBS. The car gets extreme aerospace level engineering and also gets parts made up of aerospace grade carbon fibre. Aston Martin says that this is the most luxurious car they have ever produced.
The Vanquish uses a 5.9-litre V12 engine that produces a maximum of 568 Bhp of power and 620 Nm of torque. It has a top whack of 324 km/h and can hit the figure of 100km/h in just 3.6 seconds. There is an 8-speed automatic gearbox mated to that powerful engine. Along with all this, it's a stunner to look at.
The 812 Superfast, as the name suggests, is one of the fastest car around. It can do a 0-100 km/h run in just 2.9 seconds and can reach a top speed of 340 km/h. This is the most powerful Ferrari to be launched in India along with being the most expensive one. The 812 is powered by a naturally aspirated V12 petrol engine that generates a maximum of 789 Bhp and 718 Nm of torque, which is a huge output for a car that doesn't depend on turbochargers/superchargers for that extra boost.
The front-mid engine layout of the car gives it a balanced weight distribution and makes it one of the best cars to drive around on a track.
The Rolls-Royce Wraith sits between the Ghost and the Dawn in the ultra-luxury Rolls-Royce line-up. It has a svelte coupe like body structure which looks stunning and can be easily identified on the road because of its drooping roofline. The Wraith is only available in a single variant ,that is, the two-door suicide-doors form.
The two-door coupe is powered by a 6.6-litre V12 engine that produces a maximum of 623 Bhp and 800 Nm of torque. Despite so much going under the bonnet, the Wraith's cabin is said to be one of the quietest in the Rolls-Royce line-up but that is an ongoing debate among the enthusiasts.
Lamborghini Aventador S
The S version of the standard Aventador is more powerful and sporty than its sibling. It was launched last year in India and it looks quite different from the regular Aventador as it gets a sportier design and updated aerodynamics.
The car is powered by a 6.5-litre naturally aspirated V12 engine that churns out a maximum power of 730 Bhp and 690 Nm of torque. The car gets carbon-fibre monocoque chassis and to reduce weight, parts like bonnet lid, rear air inlets and spoiler are all made up of carbon fibre. It can do 0-100 km/h in the bat of an eyelid (read 2.9 seconds) and can reach a top-speed of 350 km/h.
The Rolls-Royce Ghost, also called the baby Rolls (though it doesn't look a baby in any light) is the car which pulled Rolls-Royce back to its glorious days. It is the most affordable Rolls-Royce that you can buy and yet it is much more expensive than many of the luxury makes out there. The car was given the name 'Ghost' to honour the iconic Silver Ghost, which is the first ever Rolls-Royce car. The Ghost was updated in 2014 and received minor changes like LED headlamps and design tweaks.
The car gets powered by a 6.6-litre V12 engine that has twin-turbochargers and produces a maximum of 563 Bhp power and 780 Nm of torque. The engine comes mated to an 8-speed ZF automatic transmission.
« Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF drag race [Video]
Aprilia RS 150, Tuono 150 launch delayed: To get larger engine to rival next-gen Pulsar »

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


It is the responsibility of the Central Ohio Association of Finance Professionals, and its members, to comply with all aspects of Federal and State antitrust laws. Our members are competitors and any action or agreement which may eliminate, restrict or govern competition among members or their colleagues could be a violation of antitrust laws. Accordingly, any discussion or exchange of information concerning individual prices, rates, coverages, market practices, claims settlement practices, or any other competitive aspect of an individual company's operation, is strictly prohibited.
As members of the Association, please be mindful of the constraints of antitrust laws. Adherence to these guidelines during all COAFP functions protects members and the Association from liability. Penalties for violating antitrust laws are severe and could include criminal prosecution, fines or imprisonment.
Any questions regarding the meaning or applicability of this statement, as well as any concerns regarding activities or discussions at Association meetings, should be promptly brought to the attention of the Association President.
For more information on antitrust laws, please go to: https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws.


New account but no credits?
Sorry, the offer of 400 free print credits & 1 custom cover 8x8 photo book is valid for first time registrants only, and limit one offer per household.
Please do not try to refer yourself to get the extra free prints and photo book credits, all your account(s) will be suspended if we found out that you are repeated registrants. Thank you very much.
>Sorry, the offer of 400 free print credits & 1 custom cover 8x8 photo book is valid for first time registrants only, and limit one offer per household.
>Please do not try to refer yourself to get the extra free prints and photo book credits, all your account(s) will be suspended if we found out that you are repeated registrants. Thank you very much.
I had the same problem with my sister... She tried to register on the same computer as i did (with a different email address - hers) and we got the same message. As its only supposed to be one Member per household, it would be my guess that as you used your work computer maybe someone else has registered with this company either from your computer or from the same internet web address #, so it sees you as the same house hold.
We'll see what the company says when they answer you. They will probably credit your account.


THE STARK AND STERILE CLEAN LINES OF FASHION INSPIRED BY A SPACE ODYSSEY FOR THE MODERN AGE.
A STRANGE MINIMALISM FOR A STRANGE TIME.
Stylist Robin Fator of Dark Pony Designs.
Kenneth Jay Lane the Denari Necklace // Custom gauze top by stylist.


Happy Holidays from Stephen, Sylvester, me and Aquaman!
Heartfelt best wishes that abounding joy hold you both!
Thanks! Enjoy your Holiday season.
I'm glad that Christmas is over. Now I can relax. Made it through the Christmas Chaos and insanity.


text:
Gabriel Orozco
Commentators who have called Gabriel Orozco the defining artist of the 1990s have him right – although it is, of course, a double-edged compliment. The globetrotting Mexican artist effectively patented the approach that tied together the decade's hyper-pluralism: nomadic, intellectually fidgety, post-medium, post-studio. With a 1990s revival now gathering steam in other corners of culture, this retrospective of Orozco's work from 1990 to 2010 seems timely. It's also an opportunity for those of us who have only seen discrete extracts from his tireless production to try and discern – if they exist – some of the themes beneath his overarching geographical and formal restlessness.
Exist they do: Orozco's art here comes across as a perpetually playful, admirably inventive gaming with a stolid reality, the ultimatecertainty of which is the extinction of life. His iconic Black Kites (1997), a human skull patiently decorated with a pencilled checkerboard, seems to collapse the chess-match-with-Death scenario of Ingmar Bergman's The Seventh Seal into a single, sanguine image. Here, reflecting the show's unsubtle hang – a room devoted to "vehicles", and so on – it is paired with Obit Series (2008), eight large sheets of paper that extract and array countless headlines from New York Times obituaries, maintaining their font and point size, and murmuring wryly of what we consider important: "Charmed millions on TV" is a lot bigger than "One of the highest-paid portraitists".
Orozco almost always needs a starting point, something to up-end and coax into visual poetry. Frequently, his singular objects are in tension with the world of designed industrial goods, seeking to one-up them. This reflects, on the one hand, his funky, rough-edged restyling of Duchampian conceptualism: most obviously in Four Bicycles (There is Always One Direction) (2004), which ingeniously interlocks the bikes into a complex, unrideable geometric sculpture, like a hyper-expanded version of the French master's 1913 Bicycle Wheel. But it also speaks of art – and living – as a kind of battle of wits between the individual and the everyday.
So, say, the game of billiards isn't exciting enough for Orozco: he has to reinvent the game using an oval table and one ball suspended, like a pendulum, above the baize (viewers can come up with their own rules). An ordinary chessboard, meanwhile, is scaled up to a 16 x 16 grid, all the figures replaced with knights (Horses Running Endlessly, 1995), and the knights' move subsequently forms the compositional basis of a set of luscious geometric paintings, Samurai Tree Invariant (2006-7). Duchamp, too, was a chess master, and Orozco seems to share his complicated outlook on life, both fatalist and productive, knowingly just filling in the hours but doing so brilliantly.
What a retrospective asks one to consider, though, is the arc of an artist's career. Orozco begins brilliantly, and probably peaks in 1993 with La DS, his improbable, seamless compression of a Citroen DS, effectively removing its central third to create a gorgeous, silver bullet-like vehicle. In recent years, he has gravitated towards large-scale statements: Mobile Matrix (2006), a sculpture of a whale's skeleton (not on show here) and the vaguely Joseph Beuys-like Chicotes (2010), a floor-based taxonomic arrangement of sections of burst tyre that Orozco collected on Mexican highways. These works, for all their size, feel somehow thin and empty. If Orozco's career is a perfect parable of the 1990s artist's career, it also narrates the descent of so many artists of this generation into the manufacture of underwhelming spectacle, designed to fill the cavernous converted industrial shells where art now lives.
So, rewind. Turn back to 1993, and Breath on Piano, one of Orozco's singularly low-key photographs, a body of work devoted to making metaphorical hay with the slenderest of means. There's almost nothing to it: a black, polished piano top and a circle of breath which, after the photograph is taken, won't be around much longer. Here, the artist takes the manufactured world – embodied in the piano – and animates it with an evanescent wisp of moisture, the life force. The surface, you realise, looks like the lacquered lid of a coffin, and so the photograph speaks of endings far more profoundly than shredded tyres or whalebones. One wonders, is the Orozco who made it still with us?
Gabriel Orozco. Tate Modern, London. Until 25 April
credit Carol Schadford
credit Tate Photography
Tate Photography
Martin Herbert
It's also an opportunity to try and discern some of the themes beneath his overarching geographical and formal restlessness
Tagged as exhibition


text:
Q: WPF Autogenerated textbox control I need to create some Control,like that
First i must have 1 empty field. After I wrote some text in this field the new field is appear. And so on.
If i remove all text from field - old (right) field is removed too.
In my project i use MVVM.
I think about ListBox with TextBox DataTemplate. But don't understand how to correctly use events or something else.
Anyone have some idea or may be know ready control for WPF?
Thanks!

A: Problem was solved.
The main idea - to notify and to handle PropertyChange event in each item from collection.
our View:

<ListBox    Name="TrunkListBox" Height="160"
ItemsSource="{Binding YourSource}"
ItemTemplate="{DynamicResource YourDataTemplate}"/>

<DataTemplate x:Key="YourDataTemplate">
    <TextBox Width="200" Text="{Binding Number,Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"/>
</DataTemplate>

//VM for notification about propertyChange
public class TrunkElementViewModel : NotificationObject
{
    private string _number = string.Empty;
    public string Number
    {
        get { return _number; }
        set
        {
            _number=value;
            RaisePropertyChanged(() => Number);
        }
    }
}
//In my class when I initialize my data -add trunk_PropertyChanged event handler each element + add empty element
void SomeInit()
{
    if( SomeCollection already have items)
    {
    //get element and add event handler
    foreach (var item in SomeCollection)
    {
        var trunk = new TrunkElementViewModel { Number = substring };
        trunk.PropertyChanged += trunk_PropertyChanged;
        TrunkNumbers.Add(trunk);
    }
    //add empty element(must be everytime)
    var emptyTrunk = new TrunkElementViewModel();
    emptyTrunk.PropertyChanged += trunk_PropertyChanged;
    TrunkNumbers.Add(emptyTrunk);
}
//Hadling changing element event - add new empty item or remove empty
    void trunk_PropertyChanged(object sender, System.ComponentModel.PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
    var trunk = sender as TrunkElementViewModel;
    var positionElement = TrunkNumbers.IndexOf(trunk);
    //add new item in list
    if (TrunkNumbers.LastOrDefault() == trunk)
    {
        var nextTrunk = new TrunkElementViewModel();
        nextTrunk.PropertyChanged += trunk_PropertyChanged;
        TrunkNumbers.Add(nextTrunk);
    }
    //remove item from list
    else if (trunk.Number == string.Empty && TrunkNumbers.LastOrDefault() != trunk)
    {
        trunk.PropertyChanged -= trunk_PropertyChanged;
        TrunkNumbers.Remove(trunk);
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


MuchBetter co-founder, Jens Bader, was named one of the most significant influencer and contributors to the payments industry at this year's PayExpo's Payments Power 10 Awards. This year's event received more than 2000 votes globally recognising the payments industry leaders, innovators, and game-changers over the last 12 months. The shortlist of 35 was created by PayExpo's global advisory board, partner and community, and featured leading innovators from Barclays, Facebook, PPRO, Paysafe and our very own CEO at MuchBetter, Israel Rosenthal.
Jens has been in the payments industry for more than 20 years and understands the challenges involved in running a payments company, knows what the customers need and has an enviable network of fellow payments professionals, which has been essential to helping MuchBetter to where it is today. He has been recognised by PayExpo voters for an amazing year of growth at MuchBetter, which is available in more than 160 countries worldwide.
A huge congratulations to Jens for winning this prestigious award and to Israel for being recognised in the shortlist amongst such strong contenders. Both are instrumental in the continued growth of MuchBetter.


text:
package de.decoit.simu.cbor.ifmap.enums;

import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;

/**
 *
 * @author Thomas Rix (rix@decoit.de)
 */
public class IfMapErrorCodeTest {
	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_AccessDenied() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("AccessDenied");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.ACCESS_DENIED, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_Failure() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("Failure");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.FAILURE, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_InvalidIdentifier() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("InvalidIdentifier");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.INVALID_IDENTIFIER, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_InvalidIdentifierType() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("InvalidIdentifierType");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.INVALID_IDENTIFIER_TYPE, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_IdentifierTooLong() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("IdentifierTooLong");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.IDENTIFIER_TOO_LONG, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_InvalidMetadata() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("InvalidMetadata");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.INVALID_METADATA, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_InvalidSchemaVersion() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("InvalidSchemaVersion");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.INVALID_SCHEMA_VERSION, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_InvalidSessionID() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("InvalidSessionID");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.INVALID_SESSION_ID, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_MetadataTooLong() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("MetadataTooLong");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.METADATA_TOO_LONG, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_SearchResultsTooBig() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("SearchResultsTooBig");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.SEARCH_RESULTS_TOO_BIG, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_PollResultsTooBig() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("PollResultsTooBig");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.POLL_RESULTS_TOO_BIG, result);
	}

	@Test
	public void testFromXmlName_SystemError() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("SystemError");
		assertEquals(IfMapErrorCode.SYSTEM_ERROR, result);
	}

	@Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
	public void testFromXmlName_null() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName(null);
	}

	@Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
	public void testFromXmlName_UnknownXmlName() {
		IfMapErrorCode result = IfMapErrorCode.fromXmlName("UnknownXmlName");
	}
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Humble Hockey exists for the unsung legends of the game. There are a lot of guys making gear out there, but we're here to write a different story. We're here to keep the grit, discipline, humility and integrity - that unmistakable culture of hockey - alive for generations to come.
A great t-shirt shouldn't have to crush your wallet. We source top quality product and press every single thing to order, so we can provide great gear you can count on without a crazy price tag.
And if your gear doesn't pass the test of your game - we'll take it back. Every time.
We're not here to compete, but we are here to get you the best product so you can play your best game. Our goal with the stick line is to offer top-of-the-line equipment without the "celebrity face" dollar sign.
Wondering how our stick stacks up?


02039696472 number has 0 comment and was searched 2 times.
Below is the information we have for the phone number 02039696472 . You can see notes and reports left by other users. Feel free to make your contribution.
Possible phone number formats are +4402039-696472, 4402039-696472,(02039) 696472, 02039-696472, +4402039696472 , tel:+44-02039-696472, +44 02039696472 , 02039696472 . If you want to know more details this numbers,click the button below.
Warn your friends against the phone number 02039696472 . Use Facebook, Twitter, Google+ to warn your friends.
Do you think the 02039696472 was a harass phone number?
Entire content of our web site is provided by our users. If you think this phone number is your private, please click here to contact the administrator to delete report. Delete phone number 02039696472 Report.


text:
Ubisoft Will no Longer Sell DLC That Affects The "Full Game Experience"
//cdn.themis-media.com/media/global/images/library/deriv/1008/1008766.jpg
Ubisoft's VP of live operations Anne Blondel-Jouin says the company will no longer sell DLC that "gamers have to buy for the full experience".
Got some really good news today for games everywhere: Ubisoft VP of live operations Anne Blondel-Jouin has told Gamesindsutry.biz [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-22-no-more-dlc-that-gamers-have-to-buy-for-the-full-experience-ubisoft] that the company is dramatically changing its DLC policy following the success of Rainbow Six: Siege. Essentially, Ubisoft will no longer sell DLC that affects the "full game experience," and future Ubisoft DLC will be strictly limited to cosmetics that do not alter gameplay.
"No more DLC that you have to buy if you want to have the full experience. You have the game, and if you want to expand it - depending on how you want to experience the game - you're free to buy it, or not," explained Blondel-Jouin.
She spoke of Rainbow Six: Siege [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/tag/view/rainbow%20six%20siege?os=%20rainbow%20six%20siege] as the biggest catalyst for this change. All new maps for the shooter were released for free to all players, and the only DLC involves customizing existing and purchasing new characters.
"The way we monetise Rainbow Six is that people are happy about the new characters, and they can customise them with weapons and charms, but even if they don't do it, they will have the exact same experience of the other gamers," she added.
"[DLC should be] just an extra piece of revenue for us, which comes from gamers being happy. If gamers were not happy, we would not ask for that extra money."
Free DLC seems to be more and more prevalent these days. All of Titanfall 2 and Overwatch's maps are also released as free updates, in an effort to avoid splitting the player base.
Source: Gamesindsutry.biz [http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-22-no-more-dlc-that-gamers-have-to-buy-for-the-full-experience-ubisoft]
thebobmaster_v1legacy
I'll believe it when I see it. Ubisoft is not exactly known for being consumer friendly, though.
Siege released with 20 operators and has since added 8 new operators. The 20 original operators unlock for between 500-2000 renown, escalating with each operator you unlock from the same unit, and you gain between 100-350 renown per match, depending on if you win or not. In comparison the DLC operators are 25,000 renown each, but unlock automatically for season pass holders. That's roughly 125-150 matches to play to unlock one, with each match taking 10-30 minutes. If we assume 130 matches at 15 minutes each that's 32,5 hours player to unlock one of those 8 DLC operators. Or, if you will 280, hours to unlock all 8, on top of the 15-30 hours needed to unlock all the original operators and the attachments to all your operators gear.
I mean, it is technically free, but the price point is obviously set-up so that you won't be getting all DLC operators without a massive investment of time. I like Rainbow Six: Siege and I find its' DLC plan to be rather benign (since the original 20 operators provide you with plenty of options if you don't want the DLC), but playing over 300 hours to get the "full experience" seems a lot like DLC that blocks off the full game experience to anyone but the most ardent follower (I've played R6:S consistently since July and have some 120 hours logged).
008Zulu_v1legacy
Steven Bogos said:
This still sounds like they can strip out story based content, to repackage as extra missions if they so desire.
Zulnam
Sounds like the replacement of DLC with microtransactions.
Guess we'll have to see how it unfolds.
Janichsan
Zulnam said:
As long as it's really only cosmetic crap, I would be fine with that.
Queen Michael
has read 4,010 manga books
This is logically impossible. If you change anything in a game, then it's not the same experience anymore.
Amaror
And yet Watch Dogs 2 just launched with extra missions as preorder bonus. Truly cosmetic, right ubisoft?
Grouchy Imp_v1legacy
Queen Michael said:
The changes she's talking about are purely cosmetic, nothing changes in the mechanics of the game. Therefore the gameplay experience remains the same.
OT: I quite like the RS:S model of DLC. The major updates, the maps, the operators and all the weapon mods are all free, and only the weapon/player skins cost any real-world money. Ok, the DLC operators are a *lot* more expensive than the regular operators (at 25k renown each), but between Skull Rain (the last DLC) and Red Crow (the new DLC) being released I've clocked up in excess of 70k renown allowing me to buy and fully equip the two new operators and still have a healthy chunk left over.
Gethsemani said:
I agree with most of what you say, but the renown per match you've quoted seems to be the amount you get for Terrorist Hunts and casual online matches. Playing ranked matches nets you around 600 to 1000 renown per match in my experience, which greatly increases the speed at which you can afford the full roster.
Neurotic Void Melody
Bound to escape
Amaror said:
I'm not sure they're capable of travelling back in time for that one.
Darth Rosenberg
Xsjadoblayde said:
It/this still rather smarts, given their fairly horrid pre-order/season pass policy for it is one of the main reasons I'm reluctant to toss money at Ubisoft (for the first time since Child Of Light, I think) for what looks like a pretty decent game (distinguished by its non-sociopathic/non-psychopathic lead and options for non-lethal progression).
Darth Rosenberg said:
Oh definitely, it is a welcome change as long as they stick to it. It's just that it doesn't seem that simple to go back and amend a game that has already been released and sold with all the dizzying editions. One could hope they would (especially as I only have the vanilla edition hehe!), but this is only the first mention of such an idea, so I'm not expecting much.
ShakerSilver
Professional Procrastinator
Grouchy Imp said:
It's not the same. Cosmetics may not be a part of your experience, but they clearly are a big part of other's experience given the widespread love for character customization and other graphical changes through costumes, mods, etc. While I personally find more enjoyment through a game's mechanics and gameplay to be the most important part of a game, the way people have deemed gameplay as the only important thing to game and everything else is expendable to excuse sanctioning off of certain kinds of content for microtransactions/DLC is disingenuous to games as an audiovisual medium.
But hey, if we're going to go down that route let's just ship the game with simple placeholder graphics and sell the actual finished graphical assets as "cosmetics". I mean it's all cosmetic so it should be fine, right?? Hell, you know what's also "cosmetic" and "optional" to game? Story. I wonder how many people would be okay with a game shipping without actual narrative to engage the player and only directing the player through bland instructions, while the actual story and characterizations of a game that dresses up those objectives was some "story DLC". It's just story and doesn't affect gameplay so it's fine, right?
Samtemdo8_v1legacy
Can I have an example where a Ubisoft game does sell DLC that negatively affects the Full Game Experiance to those that does not have it?
OldNewNewOld
Of course they won't.
They will change the label of the same DLC and sell it as "Expansion" packs.
ShakerSilver said:
I think you've gone a bit overboard with your examples there. We're not talking about whether or not a game ships without a main campaign line, we're talking about whether the player's gun is cobalt or brushed aluminium. The former clearly affects how everyone experiences the game, while the latter really only affects how an individual player experiences the game. I play RS:S fairly regularly, and I can tell you with all honesty that you can't really tell at a distance if a player has a weapon skin or not. Ok, if they kill you you can see in the kill-cam that their weapon was painted a different colour, but you really can't tell otherwise. I wasn't saying that people don't get enjoyment from customising their inventories, I was merely pointing out that a weapon skin has no mechanical effect on the game - it doesn't make the gun fire faster or more accurately, it doesn't reduce recoil etc, therefore the flow of the game is unaffected regardless of how individually stylized the avatars are.
This conveniently comes after the launch of WD2...which has so much ripped-from-the-game DLC that you have to pay just to get a god damn extra difficulty mode.
Seriously? That counts as DLC now? Frickin' difficulty modes?!
Paragon Fury
The Loud Shadow
It works pretty well, and the Season Pass they've offered alongside Siege has worked well - I'm definitely getting Season 2 of it.
And you get the maps for free, which are the big thing; yeah, saving on Operators is nice, but of the 8 they've released in a full year, only Blackbeard could've been said to have been "necessary" for enjoyment; all the others were just nice options that weren't required.
Seriously? I've played quite a lot of ranked in the previous season and even there I only see a modest increase of 50 or so per loss (for 150-200 renown for a loss) and about 100 for a win, for 350-450 for a win. Terrorist Hunts yield about 100-150 renown, depending on type.
Paragon Fury said:
Valkyrie is also considered S-tier and is generally considered an absolute must for high ranked play. Which means that the Season 2 operators are the ones that stand out as incredibly useful. Of the remaining 6, the Canadian and Brazilian operators are good but situational and the Japanese ones are poised to both take their place along Douchebeard and Valkyrie in the top tiers of rankings, due to the extreme utility their abilities offer.


text:
NBC, the pernament 4th Place network.
Location: LI
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 5:34 pm Post subject: NBC, the pernament 4th Place network.
Throughout the past year, NBC has denigrated from a ratings powerhouse to a network with lots of commercial and creative misfires.
Earlier this year, Conan O'Brien becomes the host of the Tonight Show. However due to various reasons, Jay Leno stays on NBC and gets a 5-night a week show at 10:00. Thus eliminating an hour for scripted shows. It was doomed from the start and the ratings for Leno have been so-so at best. Conan though is now trailing David Letterman, who went ahead due to lackluster reviews and of course details about David Letterman's personal life.
And then Heroes who in year 4 has the lowest ratings it's ever gotten. Its gotten so bad that it now doesnt even have commercials promoting what's going to happen on the show.
They have very few scripted, non-football shows that are hits. Aside from the Office, and the best show on TV 30 Rock (which is more critical than commercial and its success last year was mainly to Tina Fey's Sarah Pailin impression on SNL.) They have a decent new show, Community though but it's probably not going to be a smash hit.
And now NBC canned one of their shows "Southland" which was to premiere its 2nd season in a few weeks but it got axed before it aired.
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/wasnt-nbc-boasting-about-this-show/
NBC has a very cloudy future ahead. After football, it should be entrenched in 4th Place. Maybe the Winter Olympics will save them, but I doubt it.
Things go in cycles. NBC's franchise got old and are largely gone. The network's ability have shows earlier in their life pick up the slack when others retire, especially the Thursday night monster, sort of fools us into thinking that NBC would be a pernament #1 or #2.
The other networks had their ups and downs. NBC avoided it for what... close to 30 years? 25?
Some of CBS's franchises are longer of tooth. The entire CSI/NCIS franchise is. I like the addition of Fishburn, but I also liked Griss and can see the show losing some of its fanbase. Their Comedy Monday isn't what it once was at its peak, and only looks "hitty" because there are so few comedy hits still on TV.
FOX and ABC are American Idol and Dances With Stars central. Neither are young franchises. In terms of drawing, Desperate Housewives and Lost on ABC are past their peak and pretty clearly getting long of teeth. One gets the feeling that if either of those reality franchises hits the wall on FOX or ABC that the networks will hit the wall.
The Leno concept isn't going to be a ratings winner, but with the costs it looks like it could be a $$$ winner. If it is, it's likely that other networks will follow in replacing expensive money losers with cheaper programing. That always was the push towards Reality Shows: it's cheaper than star driven comedies and dramas. If we see other networks follow suit, it will drag them downward while NBC is already well positioned.
Do they need an anchor and a couple of other hits? Of course.
NBC was saved by Bill Cosby and Cheers in the 1980's, and revived in the 1990's by Seinfeld, friends, and the George Clooney version of ER.
With CBS, the original CSI's ratings have declined rapidly I guess due to Fishburne and that tough Thursday night timeslot. NCIS seems to be the crown jewel now, Goth Girl and all. And CBS' Monday Night comedies are doing very well. They're up from last year.
Lost's final season is this year. It was announced for over a year that Lost would end, so the writers and producers have the ending planned already. And while Lost doesnt have monster ratings, it hasnt exhibted a fall from grace, and it still has a very rabid fanbase. So Lost will get a moment in the sun this May.
Fox's main breadwinners are Idol and House. But that new show Glee could be up there soon. But 24 is for sure going to end very soon. There's rumors about its demise and the whole gimmick is very stale at the moment. Its a show that should've ended a few years ago, IMO.
corrado wrote:
I wouldn't say that Cosby "saved" NBC. He simply took them to #1.
I also wouldn't say that Seinfeld "revived" the network. It became a "hit" when it moved to 9:30 on Thursdays in Cheers final season, and moved all the way up to #3 the following year when it moved into Cheers 9 PM slot. It largely was just a continuation of the success NBC's long Thursday Night MSTV ratings. Friends & ER came along the next year and were hits from day one. If NBC had dipped out of #1, prior to that three headed monster hitting its peak, it wasn't like NBC had collapsed akin to what's going on now or other networks had.
NCSI is "hot", but it's also in its 7th year and just got the dreaded "franchise expansion". Not saying it's going to fall off the cliff. But if it's peaking, it's not exactly a show that's going to anchor CBS's lineup for another 7 years.
I wouldn't write of the entire CSI franchise yet. Just that it's peaked. CSI in season 9 finished #4 last year, it's best since season 6. I also think Fishburne is fine in it and will likely catch his stride. I'm not entirely sure what the issue was with Riley (Lauren Lee Smith), since I thought she was okay as well... I was so tired of Sara that I was glad to be gone with here and have a bit of a spunky female member of the casy added.
Miami peaked some time ago, though it's remains reasonably popular (don't know if it's still the World Most Popular Series anymore). NY never really took off, but looks like it had its best ratings ranking ever last year.
That said, you have series in their 10th, 8th and 6th seasons. For a normal series, you'd be safe betting they were past their peak.
Lost wasn't a monster ratings draw, but it was a consistent Top 15 which is pretty much Top 10 for drama/comedy these days with the reality crap boggarting the top (thanks to a pair of episodes from Idol and Dancing).
I've never been totally sold that House is truly a "big hit". It's got the monster lead-in. It does well in holding the audience, but I think without Idol it would find itself a lot lower.
But it's also a show that in its 6th year.
Anyway, I don't think NBC is dead forever. We've been around long enough to see networks in the tank and rolling out crappy new shows year after year after year. Then they catch lightening in the bottle and look unbeatable.
Iron Chad
House was on at 8:00 PM EST last year and this year. It doesn't have a lead-in, it's a hit on its own. It originally premiered as an Idol follower, but hasn't needed the Idol lead-in since the 2nd season, which is when it was moved to Mondays to bolster other dramas like Bones, Prison Break, 24 after the awful 6th season and now Lie to Me. Monday is a non-Idol day.
A little known tOA fact is that all of the Overnight TV Ratings go through the department I work in at Nielsen.................................
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:51 am Post subject:
Here's a recap of what happened in NBC Land over the past week:
They cancel the Jay Leno Show due to pressure from affilates and decide to bring him back to 11;35, but for a half-hour while Conan's Tonight Show moves to Midnight. Conan though refused to, and has based NBC without end this week on his show, and its either going to be him leaving NBC and Leno having an entire hour at 11:35, or a slim chance of Leno leaving and Conan getting the Tonight Show at 11:35. I dont see that one happening.
Meanwhile the other late-night shows headed by Letterman have bashed NBC and Leno as well. Letterman feeling like a kid in a candy store seeing NBC crumble.
While NBC deserves a lot of the blame, some blame too should go to the whining affilates for being upset that their local news rating were very low due to Leno's show leading in. Just stupidity from a lot of parties here.
If I was Conan, I'd say the hell with NBC and go to Fox. That way his show could regain the edge it has lacked (before this week) and FOX is perfect for that sort of edge. All the while sticking it to NBC.
Here's some literature of this week's happenings:
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/nbc-officially-cancels-leno-at-10pm-nothing-else-a-done-deal/
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/nbc-indicates-changes-coming-to-jay-leno-show-due-to-affiliate-issues/
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/conan-obrien-resigning-tonight-show/
http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/jeff-zucker-threatens-to-ice-conan-ill-keep-you-off-the-air-for-3-12-years/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Yep... this has been a total clusterfuck.
Jay's 59, soon to be 60, and it wasn't a bad time for the network to look to the long term of the franchise and getting their next franchise host. 1992-2009 is a strong 17 year run. Conan was 46 when he took over, which would have them looking again at a 15 year or so window with a host. The succession was something they'd planned out all the way back to 2004... lots of long term thinking here. Jay even put a happy face on it back then in wanting to avoid the Leno-Letterman bad blood story from succeeding Johnny.
Jay of course doesn't really want to go into the sunset when the time game and probably felt like he was pretty close to his peak. NBC feared he would head to Fox or ABC, so they essentially gave him a primetime version of the tonight show.
Financially, the move made sense. The cost of Jay's show is cheap compared to the typical 10 PM dramas NBC was rolling out, especially the extremely expensive (at its peak) ER which just went off the books after last year. And the Leno show actually was pulling in ratings in the 1.5 - 2.0 range that the network looked at as making $$$.
Their big misjudgement was the impact on Local News, which has long been a cash cow for affiliates but has been in the past few years starting to take a pounding. The era of high priced anchors is fading and you're seeing other cutbacks. But to remain a profit center for affilliates, they feel the need to get a lead-in.
Ratings for local news on NBC have dropped considerably. And that's really been the killer of the concept.
What's funny is that it's a concept that *might* have worked at FOX where Local News is quite a bit less critical to affilliates than it is to NBC/ABC/CBS affilliates where it's been an institution for half a century.
No one is really handling it very well at the moment.
Would be interesting to see if anything comes out of this that moves either one of them to FOX. Here in Portland, the 10 o clock news on KPTV (independent channel way back when that became FOX back in the 90's) is the highest rated news program here and routinely outdraws most of the stuff the other networks put on here regularly at that hour. Would imagine that the new show would be at 11pm or delayed (if it was a 10pm national broadcast) here in Portland as there's no way KPTV would drop their long-standing news program for a Leno or Conan talk show.
One of them will leave NBC, there's no doubt...and it's looking to be Conan since Jay was the only one with some sort of a backup clause in his contract.
http://www.tmz.com/2010/01/14/jay-leno-conan-obrien-nbc-the-tonight-show/
THat's pretty much it. A shame.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/business/media/15conan.html
Keep in mind, this is Dick Ebersol, one of the masterminds of the XFL, calling something an astouding failure.
Conan O'Brien to make TBS his new late-night home
That's a bit of a shocker. I'll be interested to know why he isn't headed to Fox.
Less strings attached I'd imagine as well as a bigger budget. Time Warner is throwing money trying to grab the 20-30 year olds to their late night programming.
CFTV wrote:
I had forgetten this post when I saw your facebook picture and was wondering:
"Chris got an Emmy? Please don't tell me that he edits a TV show I really don't like!"
Then I clicked on the link and remembered. :)
Here's a more detailed link:
http://www.deadline.com/2010/04/conan-obrien-makes-tbs-deal/
I like this move actually. It fits in to the out of the box mentality that "Team Coco" has. Instead of going for the big move to FOX, they're keeping it sort of small-scale and going to TBS. This was something I never saw coming.
Plus instead of being left to the wolves against Leno and Letterman, and with perhaps a lot of affilates with FOX not showing Conan at 11, Conan can not not have that big of ratings pressure now. The big competition though is Comedy central with the Daily Show/Colbert Report. But those shows are online and repeat dozens of times throughout the day. So that's not big of a worry there.
Points also go to George Lopez for willingly agreeing to move rather than make a scene ala Leno.


text:
Q: Clean way to log response from debugQuery in SolrNet We have added a property that let us add debugQuery=true as option when querying Solr from our application. Sometimes the queries can be complex, so we need to see what parts of the query takes time. However I have not been able to find any good way to get the response from Solr without using ISolrConnection.Get() and build up the query manualy (and getting the raw XML). Today we do like this:
var solr = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrOperations<SolrDocument>>();
var qo = new QueryOptions();
        qo.AddFilterQueries(AuthorizationIncludeQuery(solrQueryParameter.AccessibleDocuments));
        qo.AddFilterQueries(new SolrQuery("person_id:" + solrQueryParameter.PersonId));
        qo.Start = solrQueryParameter.Start;
        qo.Rows = solrQueryParameter.Rows;
        qo.Fields = new[] { "*", "score" };

if (Constants.SolrDebugEnabled)
{
      var debugParams = new List<KeyValuePair<string, string>> { new KeyValuePair<string, string>("debugQuery", "true") };
      qo.ExtraParams = debugParams;
}
try
{
   return solr.Query(searchQuery, qo);
}

Since we use ISolrOperations<T> and return SolrQueryResults<T> The extra parameters gets "lost" in the process. Any way to read out the extra parameters without too much rewriting?

A: A quick look at the SolrQueryExecuter class on GitHub
gave me the answer. I basicly implemented the Execute method in my code:
private static SolrQueryResults<SolrConsistencyCheckDocument> FindAllDocumentsWithDebugEnabled(string searchQuery, QueryOptions qo)
{
        var directConnection = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrConnection>();
        var queryResult = new SolrQueryResults<SolrConsistencyCheckDocument>();
        var debugParams = new List<KeyValuePair<string, string>> { new KeyValuePair<string, string>("debugQuery", "true") };
        qo.ExtraParams = debugParams;
        var parser = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrAbstractResponseParser<SolrConsistencyCheckDocument>>();
        var solrQueryTest = new SolrQueryExecuter<SolrConsistencyCheckDocument>(
            parser,
            directConnection,
            ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrQuerySerializer>(),
            ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrFacetQuerySerializer>(),
            ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<ISolrMoreLikeThisHandlerQueryResultsParser<SolrConsistencyCheckDocument>>());
        var parameters = solrQueryTest.GetAllParameters(new SolrQuery(searchQuery), qo);
        var resultq = directConnection.Get(solrQueryTest.Handler, parameters);
        var responseXML = XDocument.Parse(resultq);
        LogDebugElement(responseXML);
        parser.Parse(responseXML, queryResult);
        return queryResult;
    }


text:
Q: .htaccess redirect works, but not rewrite here is my .htaccess file, it works because the first rewriterule correctly redirects .html -> .php, but I am hoping to remove the .php extension also. if anyone could help me correct my code here I'd appreciate it.
Options +FollowSymlinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.+)\.html$ http://vbwtest.comeze.com/$1.php [R,NC]

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f
RewriteRule ^([^/]+)/$ $1.php

A: Try this.This will rewrite all your requests.
Options +FollowSymlinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.*)\.html$ $1.php [nc]

A: Remove the R flag from your rewrite rule:
 RewriteRule ^(.+)\.html$ http://vbwtest.comeze.com/$1.php [NC]

The R in [R,NC] tells it to redirect instead of just rewriting.


text:
Budget 2021: Big announcement? PM-KISAN samman nidhi yojana scheme list benefits may be hiked from Rs 6,000 to Rs 10,000
By rajtechnews • On January 27, 2021 • In News	News Comments Off on Budget 2021: Big announcement? PM-KISAN samman nidhi yojana scheme list benefits may be hiked from Rs 6,000 to Rs 10,000
In what could be seen as the effort of the Modi government of trying to fulfill its promise of doubling farmers income by 2022-23, it is highly likely that the farmers might see an increase in the amount disbursed among them under Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi Yojna (PM-KISAN). This could be also seen as the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government trying to reach out to protesting farmers. Ever since the Centre introduced three agricultural laws last year, it is speculated that this time the government has a complete focus on farmers. In the Budget 2021, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman is most likely to introduce another perk to the farmers, where the amount under the PM-KISAN will be bumped up from Rs 6,000 a year to Rs 10,000 a year, reported DNA.
Preparations for the Budget 2021 presentation have started. Due to the three agricultural laws, in the midst of the farmers' movement on the Delhi border, the government can make several big announcements in the interest of farmers in the budget.
Experts believe that Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman may take a decision keeping interest of the farmers in mind in the upcoming budget with a view to please the farmers who are protesting against the agricultural law.
The farmers have demanded that the annual farming amount is insufficient for agriculture and should increase. The budget estimate (BE) for the financial year 2019-20 was around Rs 1.51 lakh crore, which may go up to Rs 1.54 lakh crore in the next financial year 2021-22.
It is expected that under the Kisan Samman Nidhi scheme (PM-KISAN), the central government can increase the existing annual installment from Rs 6,000 to Rs 10,000.
The government gives Rs 6,000 annually to farmers, under which the farmers receive Rs 2,000 every three months. Farmers say that the amount received under the PM-KISAN scheme is 500 rupees per month, which is quite low. In such a situation, for farmers with more land, six thousand rupees is very less assistance.
The allocation for rural development has also been increased to Rs 1.44 lakh crore in 2020-21 as compared to Rs 1.40 lakh crore in 2019-20. Under the PM Agricultural Irrigation Scheme, the funds increased from 9,682 crores in 2019-20 to Rs 11,127 crore in 2020-21, and under PM Crop Insurance Scheme the fund increased from Rs 14,000 crore in 2019-20 to 15,695 crore in 2020-21.
This scheme came into action on December 1, 2018. Under this, the central government sends six thousand rupees annually to the farmers' account as an installment of two thousand rupees thrice a year. According to the PM-Kisan Samman Nidhi website, there are 11.47 crore beneficiaries of this scheme.
Source:- zeebiz
E-passports for Indian Citizens from 2021
Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana 2021 – Apply Application Forms Details
About rajtechnews
Get Rs. 2,00,000 life-insurance at Rs. 330/year with PMJJBY
Full list of public and bank holidays in 2019 in India
Cable TV to cost less: TRAI's tariff order allows you to choose cable channels
Paytm Mall – Get Rs 200 Cashback on Rs 299 Fashion Accessories Shopping
Paytm offers cashback of Rs 1,000 on bus ticket bookings; Check details
Flipkart Big Saving Days Sale to Bring Deals and Discounts on Smartphones, Electronics Starting May 2
WhatsApp Testing 24 Hours Option for Disappearing Messages on Android, iOS, Web: Report
IRDAI tells network hospitals to provide cashless treatments to Covid 19 patients; check complaint link
'i-Verify' portal for police verification and clearance certificate process launched
Domino's India Database Hacked: 1 Crore Credit Card Details, 18 Crore Order Details Leaked
Copyright © 2014 Qlue Themes