James – 6 – Did as well as he could given the defence that was stuck in front of him.
Johnson – 4 – Does this guy ever actually bother defending?
Terry – 3 – Exposed, once again, as a national joke.
Cole – 5 – I kind of sympathise with him because he was left completely exposed by his left winger, but this was pretty poor all the same.
Milner – 5 – Put in the only decent cross of the day, but contributed very little otherwise.
Lampard – 4 – Just as woeful as he's been throughout the tournament.
Barry – 4 – One paced and incapable of moving the ball forwards.
Gerrard – 3 – No positional sense, no discipline and no guts, but an almighty ego.
Defoe – 4 – Hit the bar while standing offside. Other than that, he made no contribution whatsoever.
Rooney – 4 – Yet again, almost every time he touched the ball it went to a German.
J. Cole – 5 – Looked no better than anybody else when he came on.
Heskey – 5 – Did absolutely nothing.
Wright-Phillips – 5 – Came on because Johnson had hurt himself. Capello should have left him on the pitch instead.
How embarrassing it was to listen to the BBC's pre-match broadcast, where we were told by their panel of 'experts' that England had a much stronger team man for man and that you wouldn't swap any English players for any German players. Straight away, I knew that that statement was nonsense, and I suspect that plenty of other people knew that as well. Off the top of my head I can honestly say that I would have quite happily swapped Mertesacker for Upson, Schweinsteiger for Barry, Ozil for Lampard, Klose for Defoe, Lahm for Johnson and Friedrich for Terry. That's just off the top of my head. But, of course, this is England's 'golden generation', a collection of, ahem, the world's greatest players who are better than everyone else and anything less than winning the World Cup is underachievement. This ridiculous level of media hype, that certain England players appear to have started to believe, is crippling the England team. As Phillip Lahm said after the game, 'maybe they underestimated us because our players are not as famous as the English players'. Germany showed us how to play and win football matches at this level: possession is nothing; you just need to have a solid defence and a team with no stars but one creative spark. Whenever you get the ball, you move it forward as quickly and accurately as possible with the object of creating chances. Everybody works hard and does their job for the team. That is why the Germany is a successful footballing nation, while the latest adventures of the 'golden generation' have resulted in a second round humiliation.
Lampard for Schweinsteiger: two that I'd have loved to have swapped before the game.
I can't go much further without putting the 'golden generation' myth to bed. You could look in almost every position in this current England team and replace the incumbent player with an England player from the last 20 years. In fact, let's just look at the four year period in between Euro '96 and the 2002 World Cup, the last tournament before the 'golden generation'. At this World Cup England have been able to choose Rooney alongside Defoe, Heskey or Crouch up front. Even in the botched Euro 2000 campaign, England had two very good strikers in Shearer and Owen, with the likes of Phillips and Cole in reserve. That's four strikers who are better than any of Rooney's potential partners, without even considering Sheringham at Euro 96. If you go back to the World Cup in 1998, you could have Michael Owen in the best form of his career before the injuries took their toll, so from the last 14 years, I'd have Owen and Shearer up front. In goal, Seaman is a better goal keeper than Green or James, while at centre-back Tony Adams was a much, much better player than John Terry currently is and anybody out of Sol Campbell, Gareth Southgate, Martin Keown and Rio Ferdinand would be better than Upson. Gary Neville in his prime easily beats Glen Johnson and it's only really at left back where you have to actually think about replacing the current player. Ashley Cole is one of the best left backs in the world, no doubt about that, so it's a complete toss-up as to whether or not you'd put his polar opposite, Stuart Pearce, in his place. In midfield, even at his current age Paul Scholes is much better than Lampard, Gerrard or Barry so he'd breeze his way into the centre, while Paul Gascoigne had more creativity than the rest of the current squad put together. To be honest, I'd probably prefer Paul Ince, David Batty and David Platt to the likes of Barry and Carrick. On the right, a fully fit David Beckham from 2002 would be better than James Milner and would offer the England team more from set pieces. The left of midfield has always been a problem position for England, but even Darren Anderton or Nicky Barmby would be a better option than watching Gerrard spend the full 90 minutes abandoning his position and leaving his full-back exposed. So there you have it, the best England team that you could put together from the last 14 years is Seaman, G. Neville, Adams, Campbell, Pearce, Beckham, Scholes, Gascoigne, Anderton, Shearer and Owen. The only player from the supposed 'golden generation' to even come close to getting a look in is Ashley Cole. Going back even further, I don't think that it's too much of a push to say that the 'golden generation' has, in fact, produced the worst England team for at least 20 years. That sounds like hyperbole or exaggeration, but when you look at the teams and players that could potentially have been fielded over the years, you realise that it is actually true.
The last hurrah for the last stragglers of the 'gold generation', thank goodness.
The long and short of it is this: asides from Rooney, who is a world class player despite his awful performances, and Cole, who is still one of the best left backs in the world, the England team is massively over-rated. Steven Gerrard may be the chest-thumping talisman figure for Liverpool who pops up every now and then with a vital goal, but it's no coincidence that as soon as Xabi Alonso packed his bags, Liverpool sank down the table. Most of England's star players are somewhere in between mediocre and good, but are made to look like world beaters thanks to their superior foreign team-mates. Would Lampard have developed into the type of player he is for Chelsea without Makelele? He's a good player, but he only flourishes in his role at Chelsea because he's got plenty of superior foreign team-mates surrounding him. Chelsea tried playing in a 4-4-2 system, but Lampard couldn't fit in and they were forced to revert to 4-3-3 so that he could benefit from having two players to back him up. If John Terry wasn't surrounded by the likes of Alex and Carvalho, who are there to mop up every single mistake he makes, he'd be seen as a very mediocre Premier League player. I have seen him mauled and rag-dolled all over the Britannia Stadium pitch by Mamady Sidibe, a free transfer from Gillingham. I have seen his superb man-marking allow Abdoulaye Faye to score an easy header while completely unmarked. I have seen him get so fed up of failing to win a single ball in the air against Stoke that he rolled around on the floor clutching his face pretending to be injured in an effort to get a Stoke player sent off. If you couple this with his general demeanour during the game (for example, when he had realised that the referee wasn't going to send the Stoke player off, he got straight back up to play and shouted at the referee for making him go off the pitch in accordance with the rules), you begin to realise why England fail so frequently. Pampered mediocrities led to believe that they're the best in the world and given a free rein on the pitch by the referee.
For my money, then, a second round defeat against a strong team is probably the most that this England team were capable of. A lesser manager probably wouldn't have even gotten us through the group stages, so there's no sense blaming Capello. That said, he has made some very strange decisions during the tournament and they have not benefited the team. Gerrard has absolutely no positional discipline on the left hand side and so the manager should have removed him and put him either in the middle or on the substitutes' bench. Matthew Upson is not up to Premier League football, never mind World Cup football, and so Capello would have been better off picking Dawson to partner Terry in the middle. Up front, Darren Bent was forced to miss out despite probably being a better option up front than Defoe, whilst Capello became just another in a shamefully long line of England managers to completely ignore the country's best target man, Kevin Davies. He may be well past his best and playing for an unfashionable club, but that says more about the state of English football than it does about Kevin Davies. Capello was right to stick by his system, but he persevered with the wrong players. Lampard cannot play without two holding players behind him, so bin him, bring in someone who fits the system and move on. Gerrard doesn't work on the left, so put him in the middle, put a real left sided player out there and move on. Rob Green is a Championship level goalkeeper and James has had a poor season, so play Joe Hart from the start and move on. Unfortunately, plenty of other things were out of Capello's hands. Somehow, Glen Johnson is the only right-back that this country can produce. He is a player who offers little in attack at international level and whose defensive frailties are even more exposed than usual. Capello cannot single-handedly overcome the 'player power' culture that has come to dominate the likes of Chelsea over the years, either. If John Terry doesn't like the manager at Chelsea, he forces him out, just like Shearer forced out plenty of Newcastle managers over the years. The England players don't like a bit of discipline and being made to work hard, so the likes of Terry openly question the manager's authority and methods in public in an attempt to make his position untenable and force him out. Capello cannot simply dispose of him though; if Terry went, Lampard would likely follow and then there would be media outcry as two of the darlings of the 'golden generation' had been senselessly exiled, despite obviously being two of the best players in the world. This current crop of England players are simply unwilling to work unless everything is dictated according to their terms and it is yet another reason why they will consistently fail to achieve anything.
The Germans gave us an exhibition of what modern football is all about. England had something like 55% of the possession in the first half, but the Germans demonstrated that possession is virtually nothing. The opposition can do what they like with the ball in their own half, so long as when they eventually give it you back, and they will if you defend properly, you move the ball forward quickly and accurately, with the focus on creating chances. England tried to play with two defenders and the Germans punished them for it. Germany was patient when England had the ball and every player kept to his position. England did a good job of forming a back eight against the USA, but as soon as the Germans invited pressure upon themselves, the England players completely lost their shape. Typically, when the Germans launched a counter attack, Gerrard would be somewhere in the vicinity of the right sided attacking midfielder's position, Cole and Johnson would both be somewhere near the edge of the box and Lampard and Barry would be in the middle, preparing to jog back at around half the speed of their German counterparts. Three of the four goals came as a result of the Germans counter-attacking ferociously and catching the English players completely off guard and out of position, while the first was simply a routine they'd worked on in training to take advantage of one of the English defence's weaknesses. To be honest, the Germans were a joy to watch.
So what now for the future of the English game? Well, I personally wouldn't advocate a change of manager, although it appears to be on the cards. Capello is a very good manager who did the best he could with a bad hand and he should be given a chance to clear out the rubbish 'stars' from the England team before he leaves his post. It is pretty obvious, though, that fundamental changes to the English game need to be made. These are already being discussed at length and so I shall not go into that here, but I do think that the national football centre at Burton is an absolute must. As for the short term, if we must have a change in manager then there is likely to be a clamour for Redknapp or Hodgson. This is pretty reasonable, seeing as they've both been successful in recent seasons, but I fear that they'd just bring us more of the same. They'd go on telling us that the current English crop of players are amongst the best of the world and then try to take on the Spanish or Brazilians at their own game, resulting in defeat. If the top international teams formed a kind of 'Premier League', England would be the team with a big reputation but players who are, technically, massively inferior to their counterparts. There are two men in the Premier League who are good at getting results with this kind of team, Sam Allardyce and Tony Pulis. As Pulis is Welsh, that leaves us with Allardyce. It may not be pretty, but it sure as hell will be effective. Allardyce would get the current crop of England players playing to a system which accentuated their strengths and focused on the team, rather than putting a bunch of individuals into a formation and expecting them to perform as they do for their clubs. At Newcastle, Allardyce failed because he was stuck with prima donnas who didn't like being made to work hard and play as a team. For England, if the players didn't want to work then Allardyce could just ship them out and bring in two destroyers instead. Defending resolutely and bullying top teams into submission may not be the prettiest way to play football, but in the short term it's probably the only way to get the best out of the current team.
The 'golden generation', however, are a dead loss and need to be cut adrift as soon as possible.
James – 7 – Good safe hands for the majority of the match. He looked a calm, experienced head in a crunch game.
Johnson – 5 – Anything he did in the match, of which there was little good, was completely overshadowed by his persistent cheating. He was eventually booked for exaggerating contact, but he was very lucky to get away with a couple of other dives.
Terry – 7.5 – I was actually impressed with Terry, he was good at the back, was unlucky not to score and put in an exceptional, vital block. More of the same please.
Upson – 6 – Made one good block, but the rest of his game wasn't really up to much. Somehow, he's even slower than Carragher.
Cole – 7.5 – Not up to the level he performs at for Chelsea, but much, much better. He really got down the flank and gave his full-back a nightmare. How much better would he be with a left winger to help him out?
Milner – 8 MotM – His crossing ranged between awful and inch perfect, but his all round performance was probably as good as any England player this tournament.
Barry – 7 – A good, quiet game from Barry, but his forwards distribution left a lot to be desired at times.
Lampard – 6 – He still hasn't really impressed, he missed a good chance and everything he did well was cancelled out by a mistake.
Gerrard – 6 – He looked dangerous throughout the game, but he completely abandoned his position on the left hand side time after time.
Defoe – 6 – Got the winner, but that was almost his only touch of the game and I'm far from convinced by him.
Rooney – 6 – Better than his shocker against Algeria, but he looked low on confidence and was making poor decisions.
Cole – 6 – Didn't have a huge impact on the game.
Heskey – 6 – Also didn't have a huge impact on the game, but was at least a decent calming presence who was a useful get out ball in the tense last few minutes.
It's been a long time in coming, but England has finally arrived at the World Cup. Like our tournament to date, we started off sluggishly but unlike the tournament so far, we had a real flourish in the 25 minutes prior to half time and it continued for about 20 minutes after the break. In that period, we looked like we could have scored three or four and it was a complete turnaround from the last two games. We mustn't get carried away, however.
England have scored in the middle of a good spell! What, really?
Slovenia is not a team of world beaters. Slovenia is a team who finished in third place in a bog standard World Cup group and who never had any real hope of getting beyond the group stage. They are not a top, top team and there are certain things that we got away with against them that we will not get away with against the likes of Spain, Brazil and Uruguay (who remain my tip for the trophy). For a start, I'm a long, long way from being convinced by Jermain Defoe up front. He scored the winning goal and that's a big plus, even if it did go in off his shin. Would Heskey have gotten himself in that position to score? It's unlikely. That was one of Defoe's only touches over the course of the match, however, whereas Heskey would be involved in most of England's attacks. It would be alright if Defoe were the sort of player who will pop up almost every single game with a goal, but he isn't, at all. It's all a bit of a quandary really, and I don't envy Capello for having to make the call on Sunday. The more I look at it, we really are very, very weak up front. Defoe, Heskey and Crouch are all limited players and none of them is a world beater. Even in Euro 2000 we had two very good strikers to call on in Shearer and Owen. This year, we just have Rooney.
Secondly, Capello has to spend a lot of time thinking about what he does with his captain. Steven Gerrard simply does not work out on the left wing. He does not behave with any of the positional discipline that you would expect of a left winger. Instead, he plays the same game that he plays for Liverpool when he plays in the centre, apart from when defending in which case he drops back over to the left hand side. Throughout the game Gerrard appears all over the pitch when England has possession, but he is never where he is supposed to be. The ultimate effect is that we are left short if we ever move the ball over to the left and as good as he is, Ashley Cole cannot consistently take on two opposition defenders on his own. For what it's worth I would move Gerrard to the middle, take out Lampard and put Joe Cole on the left. Bizarrely, Capello doesn't seem to have considered this, as he showed when he brought on Cole to play behind the main striker while Gerrard stayed out wide. Gerrard's indiscipline will cost us in both defence and attack against the better teams unless it is nipped in the bud now.
We can at least be pleased with the performance that James Milner put in. Aaron Lennon is a good player, but there was something missing from his game against the US and Algeria. His failure to use his pace to get down the line to put a cross meant that he offered just as little in attack as he did defence. Milner, however, was a revelation after his bizarre cameo against the US. He was constantly getting balls into the box and whilst they were a bit hit and miss, when he got it right he got it very right indeed. The cross for the goal was inch perfect and there were one or two others that he put into the right areas. He's a player who has really come on quietly over the past few years and he is now starting to demonstrate why he is such a crucial player for Aston Villa. In a team that has been blighted by workshy, arrogant prima donnas, it's nice to see a quiet and hardworking player who also has a bit of talent. Hopefully we'll get a repeat performance against the Germans.
I have already mentioned in this article and others that I think Wayne Rooney is our only world class player. For some reason, however, he just hasn't turned up so far. A change of strike partners hasn't helped him and every minute that passes over the course of the game just seems to place more and more weight on his shoulders. I think that he's being affected by a combination of a lingering injury and feeling the massive, massive pressure that's on him to perform. The press are quite happy to remind him every time he sees them that he's seen as the single creative spark that England has who is capable of single-handedly winning the World Cup. He's constantly told that he's the best English player for a whole generation. I think once he gets one goal, he could well get another and the pressure would start to alleviate a little, but a lack of confidence caused by the pressure then begins to come into play. Against Slovenia, he quite often chose to pass when he would have been able to shoot, or shoot when he would have been better off passing. He had an excellent chance to score, but he fluffed his lines and ended up taking his shot with the ball already behind him. It was a top quality save, but a poor miss, regardless of whether or not he thought he was offside. I think we've seen the back of the player who will get so frustrated that he'll lash out on the nearest opposition player, so with careful management that shouldn't be a worry for us, but he needs something to happen for him soon because he's currently becoming a liability. Worse than that, he's an undroppable liability, somebody who England cannot do without, but who is holding England back.
Of course, a good 45 minute spell across the middle of the match won't be enough for us to beat the Germans. There's a reason that they haven't failed to reach the quarter finals since 1936 and it is engrained into their football culture. We cannot afford to let the game go beyond extra time; we must win it before the dreaded penalty shootout. Do that and maybe, just maybe I'll let myself suspect that it could be our year. We can potentially face Argentina in the quarter-finals and Portugal in the semi-finals, should we beat the Germans. It's all lined up for us to take our revenge for so many footballing disasters over the years. I'm feeling strangely optimistic.
Let's try not to take on the Germans at their own game, let's just beat them in ordinary time instead.
James – 6 – Did all that was asked of him but never looked confident and his defence looked like strangers to him.
Johnson – 5 – Can't defend and he never showed any of his supposed attacking prowess. Unfortunately he's all we've got.
Carragher – 6 – Even if he's slow and clumsy, he did a decent job of getting the basics right, unlike everybody else.
Terry – 5 – Another shaky performance.
Cole – 5 – Was more willing to get up the flank, but was poor in his control of the ball and his he ultimately contributed very little.
Lennon – 5 – Struggled to get into the game and when he did, he made some very poor decisions.
Lampard – 4 – His tournament must end now if England are to progress.
Barry – 5 – Some good defensive play in the first half, but as the game went on his distribution got worse and worse.
Gerrard – 5 – Showed promise when he drifted into the middle, but you cannot, you absolutely cannot, just abandon your post like that with absolutely no discipline whatsoever. He was played on the left wing and he left that area of the pitch completely empty most of the time.
Heskey – 6 – Not as good as he was against the USA, but once again he was the only player in England's attack to actually turn up and do a job. He gets more criticism than he deserves.
Rooney – 4 – The pressure seems to be really getting to him. When I've seen him in person, he has almost never given the ball away. This time, every time the ball touched him it would almost instantly return to Algeria.
Wright-Phillips – 5.5 – Just plain not good enough.
Defoe – 5 – Offered absolutely nothing.
Crouch – 5 – Barely touched the ball.
Let's make no bones about it; this performance was simply not good enough. We weren't stifled by a team that set out to defend, as Algeria had no such intention and were just as courageous as us. Like the USA, Algeria is a very poor side comprised mostly of players who play several levels below England's superstars. The fact that one of their biggest stars, Madjid Bougherra, spent a large portion of his time at Crewe Alexandra and Sheffield Wednesday should tell you an awful lot about the quality of player that they have. Responsibility has to lie with both the players and the manager. You may disagree with the team that Capello fielded, I know I did, or even his system, but the 11 players out there should have been capable of scoring at least one against such a poor team. Lampard have several opportunities to put England players through on goal, but instead chose to take a hopeless shot from thirty yards or give it away, Gerrard cost the team width and balance by choosing to spend the entire game sitting in the middle and Rooney seemed to completely buckle under the pressure, having now failed to do anything productive in 180 minutes of football.
I worry that the manager has fallen prey to one of Sven's biggest weaknesses. We all knew with depressing certainty in Euro 2004 that no matter how poorly David Beckham played, he would be guaranteed to play the full 90 minutes. I get the impression that the manager thinks that certain players seem to do so well for their clubs and are so highly rated by everyone that they must play, no matter what. The fact is this: England have only one world class player, Wayne Rooney. The likes of Gerrard, Lampard and Terry are good players, but are massively limited and selfish in an England shirt. They stand out in the Premier League, but that is because they get away with murder thanks to the assistance of their superior foreign team-mates and the referee. All three can do the spectacular stuff, but are simply nowhere near world class. They get all the plaudits simply because they are English players who do the spectacular stuff for their side. Gerrard may still score screamers from the edge of the box in the last minute for Liverpool, but it's no coincidence that he's been powerless to stop their slide since the sale of Xabi Alonso. The manager must make some gutsy calls in time for the next game. He's the man who shipped Ronaldo out of Real Madrid, so I don't think it's beyond him.
He would do well to learn from Stoke City's example. On paper, most teams would probably fancy themselves against Stoke, but there is a rigid system packed full of players who fill a very specific role in that system. If players don't fit in, they don't get in the team. People may tear their hair out when the likes of Tuncay and Kitson can't hold down a place, but the right players play in the right system and it works. For what it's worth, I believe that England has the right system, but we are picking the wrong players for that system. The midfield is currently the weakness and 2 chances created in 180 minutes of football goes a long way to showing that. Gerrard finally seems to have hit form for England and he's been sandwiched into the left wing position. On a good day, he's ineffective there, and on a bad game like last night he's completely free of discipline and just wanders about doing whatever he pleases, completely abandoning his post. Joe Cole, the only player in the England squad with experience of playing on the left wing at international level and one of England's few creative sparks, seems to be behind Lennon, Wright-Phillips, Gerrard and Rooney in the picking order for the left wing position. This just does not make sense. Gerrard is probably England's best central midfielder and is wasted out wide, keeping somebody who can play in that position out of the team (sound familiar, Stoke fans?). The odd one out is Lampard, who for all his superstardom is simply not good enough. I suspect some supporters will be unable to cope with the loss of somebody who is 'obviously' good, but if you cannot fit in, you are nothing to the team. Barry should partner Gerrard, but we'd be much, much stronger in the centre if Paul Scholes had been convinced to return. He's done his job very quietly this season and he doesn't get forward as much these days, but Scholes is still the best English central midfielder. He can receive the ball off the defence and his range of passing is then superb. England sorely misses somebody like him. Up front, the Heskey and Rooney partnership is probably the best we have, but their roles need to change slightly. Heskey should drop a little deeper and Rooney should focus on spearheading the attack as an out and out striker rather than falling back into midfield. At the very least, those small tweaks would us through to the next round, but Capello must have the guts to stand by his system and get rid of Lampard.
So what of last night's game? I think 'nervy' is a bad description, but the pressure certainly showed. Every single player on the pitch was so desperate to stand out that they made some very poor decisions and were not playing for the team. Carragher nearly scored an own goal trying to unnecessarily clear a cross that was going straight to James, Terry headed a ball into a dangerous position when it was sailing out for a goal-kick. In attack, Rooney and Cole were guilty of taking on too many defenders, while Lennon was obsessed with fancy flicks instead of doing the simple job of getting down the line and putting balls into the box. Gerrard wanted to take the starring role in the middle rather than settling down on the left. Lampard went for long shots when there were better options while Barry did a decent job of winning the ball but tried ambitious passes that almost always failed. Perhaps Capello has kept the players on their toes too much and now they are desperate to stand out in case they lose their place. I think the old 'fear of failure' is starting to creep back in as well, something that Sven combated pretty well. This is going to be a very big few days and the manager must handle the players well. Clough always said that his players were at their best when they were relaxed and enjoying themselves and you're inclined to agree. A bit of team spirit and camaraderie would not go amiss. It's all well and good to see Rooney mouthing off at the camera last night and complain that the players are living in a bubble, but Capello must create a bubble for the players now, isolated from the prying eyes of the press and the criticism of the supporters. 6 days is no amount of time to create a hard working team ethic, but it is what must be done. They must learn to fight tooth and nail for each other and for their nation.
Ultimately, few players played well. Heskey was average at best when it came to doing what was expected of him and Carragher was better than Terry, but that really is as good as it gets. The midfield was absolutely dire and chance creation was minimal. It's unlikely that we'd have taken any chances that were created because the top English goalscorer last season had to come all the way back into the middle at actually touch the ball. Ashley Cole would probably have been more effective on the left if he had a left winger to help him out, rather than having to do all the work on his own. England failed to outshine the Algerians in a game that was ultimately a stalemate. Great if you're Algerian, a disaster for England. This was simply not good enough.
Thank goodness that game will be on the BBC. If I have to listen to another 90 minutes of commentary from those idiots at ITV I may end up putting the television through the window. Everything ITV do is amateurish, cheap and pathetic, be it their football coverage or shows such as the X-Factor. There are too many adverts to make it watchable, but when you listen to Tyldsley, Beglin, Southgate and all the rest trying to talk about football, you realise that the adverts are actually the best bit. Tyldsley and Townsend are so incapable of tactically analysing a game that when somebody suggests something novel like changing the system, they become like a dog with a bone and will just not shut up about it, despite it being apparent that it will simply not happen. In the studio, the panel just spout some extra nonsense to go with it all. The fact that Adrian Chiles, a decent bloke whose forte is a more informal, jokey programme such as Match of the Day 2, is fronting the supposedly ultra-sleek and professional World Cup show says it all. The BBC's standards are pretty low as well, embarrassing even, so thank goodness for the insights of Mick McCarthy.
Somebody please shut them up.
England can beat Slovenia and fulfill their potential, but they must play the right players for the system.
Green – 4.5 – Had two big saves to make, one of which he dropped in his own goal and the other of which he got very lucky with.
Johnson – 5.5 – Untroubled defensively, but he was massively frustrating on the ball. Every time it came to him in the England half he was so slow to move it on that it inevitably went sideways and any attacking impetus was lost.
King – 5.5 – Never really looked all that assured and he never really inspired confidence.
Terry – 6 – Steady performance.
Cole – 5.5 – No troubles in defence, like Johnson, but his distribution was shockingly poor.
Lennon – 6 – When he got the ball, he was our only direct attacking threat. Not perfect by any means, but plenty to build on and a much better option than anything else we've got.
Gerrard – 7 – I think that this must have been Gerrard's first good game for England since he played against Germany at Euro 2000. He did a decent job of getting from box to box, making himself an effective part of our 'back eight' and doing a good job when he had the ball.
Lampard – 5 – Completely anonymous, he never got into the game.
Milner – 5 – I can only think that the pressure of the occasion got to him, because his cameo was bizarre.
Heskey – 8 Man of the Match – The missed chance was the only blot on his performance. He held the ball up well, won it in the air and was the fulcrum of our team. Once he went off, the game was dead.
Rooney – 5 – Did not turn up.
Wright-Phillips – 4 – An absolute liability and no better than Walcott. Every time he touched the ball it went straight back to the USA.
Carragher – 5 – none of our centre-backs are especially quick, but Carragher looked slow and out of touch.
Crouch – 6 – Little time to make any impact, but when he came on our attacking threat effectively ended.
I'm yet to look at the Sunday newspapers, but I imagine that there's some degree of panic mongering and that Rob Green has become something of a scapegoat. I can imagine all sorts of puns involving 'Soylent Green' of 'Putting Green'. There's no point rounding on the England team after this performance, though. That's the sort of behaviour reserved for fickle gloryhunters. This performance was by no means up to scratch, but there was plenty of potential and with some minor tweaking, as opposed to a complete overhaul, England should qualify from the group with ease. There were a number of positives.
The first was how effective England was when the USA had the ball and tried to launch an attack. Capello has a reputation as a pragmatist who can build a strong defensive unit and it showed last night. I never had any confidence in our centre-backs, but whenever the USA had the ball, England dropped back and formed a virtually impenetrable back eight. As soon as the USA had the ball in the England half, they had two options: they could either play it back to their defenders who would panic and give it away or they could take a shot from thirty yards. It's something that's gone largely un-noticed in the aftermath of the game and I suspect that Capello will be very pleased with the defensive side of his team.
Gerrard's performance was another big bonus. Normally for England the manager persists with him because he's such an effective, talismanic figure for Liverpool, but he completely fails to deliver. It's always been hard to say why; it could be a lack of motivation, being partnered alongside an unsuitable player or just struggling in an unfamiliar position. He seemed really fired up last night and I suspect it had something to do with him having been handed the captain's armband and having become the team's leader on the world stage. Hopefully, he may be thinking that he can be the same talismanic captain for England that he is for Liverpool. He tracked back well, his tackling was good, he won it in the air and there were no problems with his distribution. He had a quieter second half, but there can be no real complaints with his performance.
After Heskey's man of the match display last night, I think that we have the right system, but we need to tweak the personnel a little. I can appreciate the argument for playing 4-5-1 with Gerrard behind Rooney, but it is not one that I can advocate. When we played it long, Heskey generally won it, held up the ball and brought other players into the game. That was when we created chances. When we tried to play possession football, the same thing happened over and over again. We'd start from the back, play it across the back four and run out of ideas. Johnson would get the ball in a position where he could press forward and work with Lennon to get the ball in the box, but he was too indecisive. He ended up trapping the ball, getting surrounded and playing it sideways. Cole tried to press forward with the ball, but his distribution was uncharacteristically poor. If we are to play possession football, it must be with an emphasis on keeping the ball in the opposition half so that they are under permanent pressure. There's an awful lot to be said for Stoke's approach of getting the ball into the box at every opportunity. What England was playing was not effective possession football, it was tippy-tappy. Worse still, it was tippy-tappy that always had the same end result, the long ball up to Heskey. They may as well have saved five minutes and just played it long in the first place. This is why I fear the 4-5-1 system. Neither of our central midfielders was coming deep to receive the ball off the defenders. They were both jostling for the starring role and were hoping that somebody would come in and do such menial work in the way that they have become accustomed to when playing for their clubs. The defence were completely isolated and ultimately we ended up with only one way of getting the ball forwards. The difference with playing Gerrard behind Rooney is that we're left with nobody to win these long balls and we'll just end up giving it away every single time.
This must be the first little tweak to the current 4-4-1-1 system. One of Lampard and Gerrard must be dropped or moved asides because the two simply do not work in the middle together. Neither of them will come deep, receive the ball and start an attack. They want to finish the attack and take the plaudits for their part in a vital goal. Last night we were crying out for a player like Gareth Barry to just sit back and take the ball and move it on. This role has recently been mastered by Paul Scholes at Manchester United, who sits on the halfway line, demands the ball off his defenders and then players a pin-point 30 yard pass to a team-mate. Unfortunately, he couldn't be convinced to come out of retirement and so the only viable alternative is Barry. I think the way forward is to play Joe Cole on the left, put Gerrard and Barry in the middle and drop Lampard. Somebody has to miss out for the good of the team. We've then at least got two ways of getting the ball forwards and hopefully that would allow us to bring the likes of Lennon into the game more. For now, though, I can see no sense whatsoever in getting rid of the only get out ball that we had tonight and the only player to play really well. The fact that he was our only get out option when we had the likes of Gerrard, Johnson, Cole and Lennon on the pitch is something that seriously needs addressing.
The other change that needs to be made is in goal. I am not going to go over the top in criticism of Rob Green. He made a horrible, horrible mistake on the big stage and his confidence will now be shot to pieces. I don't know if he'll be able to pick himself up in the next few days, but I get the impression that there could be a disaster on our hands if we pick him again. Unfortunately, there is also a pretty persuasive argument for not swapping goalkeepers. Whoever comes in will know that there is an incredible amount of pressure on them not to make the same kind of stupid mistake the Green did, else they'll be out of the team and a national villain. To be honest, Capello could and perhaps should have avoided this whole situation before the World Cup even began. At Stoke this season, I have seen a number of perspective England goalkeepers. Joe Hart for Birmingham was virtually single-handedly responsible for the 4 points that Birmingham took from Stoke this season. Paul Robinson produced a string of good saves home and away. Rob Green, however, had a big part in the three goals that Stoke scored against West Ham this season (as did Matthew Upson for that matter) and got away with dropping a long throw onto Fuller's head last season when the referee disallowed the resulting goal. Whenever I have seen Green his positional sense has been questionable, he has been uncertain on crosses and he has failed to inspire any kind of confidence in him. Joe Hart has matured into a good shot-stopper who has added the ability to command his box to his repertoire. He is the in-form goalkeeper high on confidence and he should have been tried out in the warm up friendlies and he should have played yesterday. It's no use going over the top on Green; he's out of his depth and should never have been picked.
Finally, Capello needs to take a long, hard look at his two centre-backs. King was poor and may well miss the next few games through injury. Neither he nor Terry looked very good in the air, either. This didn't surprise me with Terry, as I've seen at first hand that despite the bravado, he's not one of those defenders who will eat up absolutely everything played high into his own box, but I thought King would cope better. The biggest concern, however, was pace. Terry and King are slow, but their immediate back-up, Carragher, was horrifyingly slow and it nearly cost us a goal. Upson is no better and I'm afraid that I don't know enough about Dawson to suggest that he'd be a better option. If King is injured, I think that Carragher is over the hill and Upson just plain isn't good enough, so I suppose it would have to be Dawson who came in. He's young and inexperienced, but it's an opportunity for Terry to show off his leadership skills and guide him through.
In short then, a disappointing result and performance, but no real disaster. It showed that the system we are using is the right one, but that we need to make slight changes. Capello is a smart manager who will learn from his mistakes and will hopefully get it right next time out. He doesn't seem to be the sort to shy away from the big calls, but I have a horrible feeling that both Lampard and Gerrard will feature in the next fixture. I think that there will be a lot of emphasis on the fact that the England team weren't too far away from where they wanted to be last night but that there is room for improvement all over the pitch.
P.S. What an absolute pleasure it was to have Mick McCarthy as the pundit for Nigeria's game against Argentina. Having a manager currently plying his trade in the Premier League gave a far greater insight into what was going on on the pitch than anything that Lawrenson or even the unbearable Beglin have ever come out with. If only he commentated on England's games.
Just a brief first blog here. As a lifelong supporter of Stoke City and England, I'll be watching every England match at the World Cup and analysing it on here in the aftermath. The games between South Africa and Mexico and France and Uruguay have been fairly disappointing so far, but I have no doubt that there will be some real fascinating and entertaining matches on display.
I'll be back with my report after the game against the USA. I'm afraid to say I have a horrible feeling about it, but I'm sure that Capello's England will prove me wrong.
World Cup Sunday review – haircuts, names,villains and birthday wishes.


text:
local Settings = {}

local Textbox = require "action.textbox"
local Strategies = require "ai.strategies"

local Data = require "data.data"

local Bridge = require "util.bridge"
local Input = require "util.input"
local Memory = require "util.memory"
local Menu = require "util.menu"

local START_WAIT = 99

local settings_menu
if Data.yellow then
	settings_menu = 93
else
	settings_menu = 94
end

local desired = {}
if Data.yellow then
	desired.text_speed = 1
	desired.battle_animation = 128
	desired.battle_style = 64
else
	desired.text_speed = 1
	desired.battle_animation = 10
	desired.battle_style = 10
end

local function isEnabled(name)
	if Data.yellow then
		local matching = {
			text_speed = 0xF,
			battle_animation = 0x80,
			battle_style = 0x40
		}
		local settingMask = Memory.value("setting", "yellow_bitmask", true)
		return bit.band(settingMask, matching[name]) == desired[name]
	end

	return Memory.value("setting", name) == desired[name]
end

-- PUBLIC

function Settings.set(...)
	for __,name in ipairs(arg) do
		if not isEnabled(name) then
			if Menu.open(settings_menu, 1) then
				Menu.setOption(name, desired[name])
			end
			return false
		end
	end
	return Menu.cancel(settings_menu)
end

function Settings.startNewAdventure()
	local startMenu, withBattleStyle
	if Data.gameName ~= "red" then
		withBattleStyle = "battle_style"
	end
	if Data.yellow then
		startMenu = Memory.raw(0x0F95) == 0
	else
		startMenu = Memory.value("player", "name") ~= 0
	end
	if startMenu and Menu.getCol() ~= 0 then
		if Settings.set("text_speed", "battle_animation", withBattleStyle) then
			Menu.select(0)
		end
	elseif math.random(0, START_WAIT) == 0 then
		Input.press("Start", 2)
	end
end

function Settings.choosePlayerNames()
	local name
	if (Memory.value("player", "name2") == 80) then
		name = "G"
		Textbox.PlayerName(name, false)
	else
		name = "A"
		Textbox.PlayerName(name, false)

	end
end

function Settings.pollForResponse(forcedName)
	local response = Bridge.process()
	if not INTERNAL or Strategies.replay then
		response = forcedName
	elseif response then
		response = tonumber(response)
		Data.run.voted_for_name = true
	end
	if response then
		Bridge.polling = false
		Textbox.setName(response)
	end
end

return Settings

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
The Speed of Light May Be Slower Than the Speed of Light
We might have to restart science. The "speed of light" not only refers to the actual speed theorized from Einstein's theory of...
Thursday, 26 June 2014 - 11:11AM
The Universe Should Have Collapsed After the Big Bang?
In the aftermath of the proposed evidence for inflation theory and the discovery of the Higgs boson, cosmologists from Kings College...
Existence of the God Particle Confirmed?
Scientists have been searching for the Higgs boson, a type of particle first theorized in 1964, for over four decades. Two years ago,...
Monday, 23 June 2014 - 12:50PM
NASA Has A Plan For Killer Asteroids And It Doesn't Involve Bruce Willis
Experts believe that a killer asteroid - one large enough to level an entire city - will hit Earth approximately every 500...
Friday, 20 June 2014 - 2:57PM
New Study Says Quantum Particles Can Travel Through Time
Physicists from the University of Queenland assert that quantum particles may be able to become "unstuck in time," after simulating...
Friday, 20 June 2014 - 9:59AM
If Spacetime Is a Superfluid, It Could Explain Everything
Thinking of spacetime as a liquid could be the holy grail of theoretical physics: a theory of everything. Several different...
Expansion of the Universe Calculated with Unprecedented Accuracy
Scientists have now measured the rate of expansion of the universe with astonishing accuracy. Two teams of physicists have...
Wednesday, 18 June 2014 - 10:37AM
Physicists Claim that Consciousness Lives in Quantum State After Death
Does quantum mechanics predict the existence of a spiritual "soul"? Testimonials from prominent physics researchers from institutions...
Tuesday, 17 June 2014 - 4:57PM
Did a Disk of Dark Matter Cause the Dinosaurs to Go Extinct?
The scientific community widely accepts the notion that the extinction of dinosaurs was caused by a collision between the Earth and a...
Monday, 16 June 2014 - 1:54PM
The Real Warp Drive: NASA's Plans for Spaceship that Travels Faster than Light
NASA scientists Mark Rademaker and Harold White have been working on their design for a ship that can travel faster than the speed of...
Thursday, 12 June 2014 - 5:02PM
Computer Game Used to Simulate Universes with Alternative Laws of Physics
"Second Life," the virtual world in which users create avatars in order to build and explore their own world, allows physicists to...
Friday, 06 June 2014 - 10:30AM
Prominent Scientist Claims that Afterlife is an Alternate Universe
A book titled, "Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Nature of the Universe" was recently...
Big Bang Evidence Fumble Might Invalidate Multiverse Theory
In March 2014, researchers believed that they had found gravitational waves, or ripples in spacetime that serve to confirm the Big...
Confirmation of Big Bang Theory Might Just Have Been Space Dust
Last March, the BICEP2 telescope captured images that seemed to confirm the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe. While these...
Friday, 30 May 2014 - 2:33PM
Astrophysicist Designs Solar System that Could Hold 60 Earths
Sean Raymond of Bordeaux University has created the ideal stellar system that can hold as many habitable planets as possible without...
Friday, 30 May 2014 - 11:19AM
21-Year-Old Discovers Galaxy that Swallowed Another Galaxy
San Jose State undergraduate Michael Sandoval recently discovered a stellar object that astronomers don't have a name for yet. They...
Thursday, 29 May 2014 - 11:29AM
New Avenues Opened in the Search for Dark Matter
Cosmologists and Physicists met in Cambridge, MA last week to discuss the possibilities of switching gears regarding the focus of dark...
Wednesday, 28 May 2014 - 5:18PM
Biggest Star in Existence Explodes into Supernova
Scientists confirmed that the star labeled SN 2013cu exploded into a supernova. The star, which had 20 times the mass of the Sun, was...
Tuesday, 27 May 2014 - 11:46AM
One Step Closer to Time Travel? Pulses of Light Could Travel Through Wormholes
Luke Butcher, a research fellow at the University of Cambridge made science fiction fans very happy when he recently theorized that we...
Scientists Will Announce A Major Discovery In Astrophysics On Monday
A media alert has been posted stating that scientists from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) are preparing to...
Friday, 14 March 2014 - 11:52AM

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
News Sample – Budget
Hiring Freeze – Isthmus, Nov. 30, 2017
"The police are very good at playing politics come budget time," she says. "They have by far the largest budget of any department. They never get cut. And their budget increases at a much higher rate than other departments."
Konkel says she doesn't see the same urgency to increase other departments' budgets. "As the city grows, we have more streets to plow, more garbage to pick up and more services needed on every level. The police seem to be able to make the case on why they need more and more, while other agencies are consistently told to get by with less."
The police department currently has 486 commissioned officers and 176 civilian employees. The agency has grown faster than any other, adding more than 130 full-time positions since 1999.
Off Limits – Isthmus, August 18, 2016
Former Ald. Brenda Konkel is skeptical of the calculation, noting that Madison has other police agencies working within its borders — the Capitol Police and UW Police — that aren't included.
She says much of what the police do could be considered public relations, such as playing euchre at senior centers or basketball with high schoolers. "It's like they have a PR machine at work, trying to improve their image," she says. "And other departments can't [afford] paper."
Madison City Council to consider $25,000 for Nehemiah poverty program – Cap Times, Sept. 15, 2015
Tenant Resource Center executive director Brenda Konkel questioned that process, saying it seems like the money "just fell out of the sky for a particular agency."
Laptop City Hall: Brenda Konkel says city buses are no place for military ads – Cap Times, Feb. 21, 2012
Konkel notes that the $10,000 is mostly for just the first three months of this year but that if the military extends its buy through the rest of the year the city will earn around $38,800. "Are the lives of our children in Madison worth this money to us?"
Council OKs operating budget after veto threat from Soglin – Wis. State Journal, Nov. 17, 2011
Activist and former Ald. Brenda Konkel questioned why the city should deliver so much money to Overture when the city faces huge challenges with poverty and other social problems.
"The budget is a statement of our values," she said.
Madison cozies up to business – Isthmus, April 16, 2009
. . . the problem with Madison's approach to business isn't that it's too hostile, but too random. "Instead of saying, 'Let's spend $5 million on economic development,' we do things ad hoc and throw money at things," she says. "Anything that looks like economic development, people fall all over it. But there's no rhyme or reason to it."
Konkel Raises Serious Concerns About Integrity of City Budget Process – City Press Release, Oct. 15, 2007


text:
The architects behind the US plan for Middle East peace
Jared Kushner, David Friedman, Jason Greenblatt in charge of US-Middle East peace plan despite no political experience.
Trump with Kushner, Netanyahu, Greenblatt, and Friedman [Susan Walsh/AP]
There are at least three things that Jared Kushner, David Friedman and Jason Greenblatt all have in common. One is that they are all Orthodox Jews, and another is that prior to their appointment as officials in the Trump administration, all three men had no prior political or diplomatic experience.
The third is that this triad has connections to Israel, or more specifically, to the illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Both Friedman and Kushner, through a family charity, have for years donated to the hardline Bet Il settlement, located on land belonging to the Ramallah area. Greenblatt studied at a yeshiva during the 1980s at a settlement bloc near Jerusalem, where he also guarded it with an M-16 assault rifle.
All three men were deemed by President Donald Trump as the best candidates to draft a US plan for Middle East peace, a task that not only is daunting in scope, but one that requires an immense amount of political finesse.
The plan, which has been dubbed the "deal of the century", shies away from decades of US foreign policy in the Middle East, where previous administrations preferred a two-state solution as the most practical political settlement regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
It envisioned an Israeli state alongside a Palestinian one based on the 1967 borders, with occupied East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.
Yet Kushner et al chose to tackle their mission by using a different approach: focusing on the economic prospects of the Israel-Palestine conflict, and despite being in the third year of Trump's presidency, keep mum about the political aspect, which will be discussed at an unknown future date.
The economic aspect will be addressed in a two-day "workshop" starting on Tuesday in Bahrain's capital, Manama. Neither the Palestinians – who are boycotting the event and severed ties with the US over what they call its "pro-Israel bias" – nor the Israelis will be present in an official capacity.
Dubbed "Peace to Prosperity" by the White House, the meeting largely revolves around the creation of a $50bn global investment fund, of which $28bn will be invested directly into the economies of the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip in the form of business ventures.
According to the Washington Post, "Kushner and other US officials have linked peace and economic development to Arab recognition of Israel and acceptance of a version of the status quo on Palestinian 'autonomy' as opposed to 'sovereignty'."
The event has been criticised by Palestinians across the political spectrum as a plan to buy out Palestinian rights, without addressing core political problems – chiefly the Israeli occupation that has devastated the day-to-day lives of Palestinians for decades.
Al Jazeera takes a closer look at the architects behind the US attempt at Middle East peace.
Jared Kushner is interviewed at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, DC [Kevin Lamarque/Reuters]
Kushner is a White House senior adviser and has been primarily tasked with heading the US efforts for a Middle East peace plan.
The 38-year old is also Trump's son-in-law having married Ivanka – known as Trump's favourite out of his five children – in 2009.
He also serves as the president's lead adviser on relations with China, Mexico and Canada.
Prior to his official role, Kushner was a real estate developer and CEO of the family company after taking the reins from his father, Charles.
Kushner was also chairman and publisher of Observer Media, which he bought in 2006.
He attended Harvard after his father gave the university a $2.5m donation. Doubts have been raised about whether the younger Kushner was admitted based on merit alone, or because of his father's generous tax-deductible offering.
His role in the White House has been criticised not only for nepotism, but also for cashing in on business opportunities – a conflict of interest. According to investigative journalist Vicky Ward, Kushner did not disclose his stake in Cadre, an online commercial real estate broker he founded in 2014 with his brother, Joshua. In 2018, his stake went up to $50m.
The Kushner family regards Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a family friend, who during trips to the United States would visit their home. Sometimes if Netanyahu spent the night he would sleep in Jared's bedroom.
Kushner's parents became known as among the most prominent funders of Democratic politicians on the East Coast. Trump ran as a Republican.
In an interview earlier this month, Kushner said he remains uncertain about the ability of Palestinians to govern themselves.
"The hope is that over time they can become capable of governing," he told Axios on HBO, when asked about whether Palestinians can expect freedom from Israeli interference.
Greenblatt visits the Nahal Oz settlement outside the Gaza Strip in southern Israel [Amir Cohen/Reuters]
A lawyer by trade, Greenblatt worked for Trump for nearly two decades as an executive vice president and legal counsel at the Trump Organization.
He was appointed by the president as the US envoy for international negotiations and Trump's special adviser on Israel.
In 2016, Trump told reporters that Greenblatt is "a person who truly loves Israel".
"I love to get advice from people that know Israel, but from people that truly love Israel," Trump said.
Greenblatt has said his main sources of information about the Israel-Palestine conflict come from daily email alerts, the powerful Zionist lobby group American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and a weekly Jewish radio programme.
"I also speak to people that I would say are involved in the Israeli government at certain levels and hear their thoughts," Greenblatt said.
He admitted prior to his appointment by Trump that he had no Palestinian contacts, and the last time he met a Palestinian was when he was a yeshiva student at the Yeshivat Har Etzion settlement bloc in the occupied West Bank more than 30 years ago.
Greenblatt has previously shown an aversion to the two-state solution. In April he said "there is no reason to use the term" because "every side sees it differently".
Much like his boss Trump, Greenblatt often takes to expressing his opinions and carrying out informal diplomacy on Twitter, often sparring with officials from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
During an informal Security Council meeting last month, Greenblatt said the council's "obsessive" focus on Israeli settlements is a "farce". Settlements – which under international law are illegal and have been a major roadblock in peace talks – aren't keeping Israel and the Palestinians from negotiating peace, he said.
He has also blamed the main UN Palestine refugee agency, UNRWA, for prolonging the Palestine refugee problem. Last year the US cut off its roughly $300m annual donation to UNRWA.
Greenblatt has previously likened the Middle East peace process to a business transaction.
"If you take out the emotional part of it and the historical part of it, it is a business transaction. Land is going to be negotiated, water rights are going to be negotiated, security issues are going to be negotiated," he said in 2016.
US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee [Chip Somodevilla/AFP]
Appointed as US ambassador to Israel in 2017, Friedman was formerly a bankruptcy lawyer affiliated with the Trump Organization. He was also Trump's campaigner adviser.
His strong support for Israel and its settlement enterprise is showcased in heading the American Friends of Bet Il Institutions, where he also donated money to the settlement for many years. The organisation, which actively supports the expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank, is committed to opposing the two-state solution.
Far from adopting a politically neutral stance that is expected of ambassadors under international diplomatic protocol, Friedman has not minced his words regarding his support for Israel.
On the eve of the 71st Nakba anniversary – which commemorates the ethnic cleansing of more than half the Palestinian population in 1948 by Zionist paramilitaries – Friedman also claimed Israel's secret weapon was it was "on the side of God".
Earlier this month, Friedman angered Palestinians by saying: "Under certain circumstances, I think Israel has the right to retain some, but unlikely all, of the West Bank."
The US envoy's words echoed Netanyahu's speech just before he swept to victory in Israel's elections last April, when the prime minister declared his intention is annex part of the West Bank.
The Palestinian foreign ministry issued a statement rebuking Friedman as being "ignorant in political work".
"Friedman's remarks are an extension of the US administration's policy, which is fully biased in favour of the occupation and its expansionist colonial policies," it said.
The ministry added it is considering whether Friedman's "racist rhetoric" is enough to submit a complaint against him to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for "threatening peace and security in the region".
Friedman's influence resulted in the Trump administration dropping the word "occupied" from official US references to Palestinian territories, and to close the PLO office in Washington, DC last year.
He also lobbied Washington to refer to the occupied West Bank by its biblical name used by Zionists, "Judea and Samaria".


I'm so thankful my dad didn't come to all of my football, basketball and baseball games. He was thankful too. He never even pretended that perfect attendance at our ball games was a goal, or that his identity was tied into whether or not he showed up. Of course I was excited to see him on occasion standing down the first base line just outside the fence, with his tie loosened cheering me on while I tried to crush the ball. But those days he wasn't there I knew why- he was working. His absences were a real gift to me, a gift I didn't fully appreciate until decades later. Dad refused to make me the center of his world.
I recently stumbled upon a pretty gross disorder called Pradar-Willi Syndrome (PWS). The few who are diagnosed with this annually, never get full when they eat. Left without the sensation of satisfaction the individual keeps eating and eating and eating, right into obesity and possibly an early grave. When an individual is inflicted with PWS, good things (like food) can become deadly things.
Many children today are being over-served in the attention department. When children take the place of Jesus as the center of the home, they're set up for failure outside the home. A sociologist has quipped that ours is the boomerang age, where children leave the home only to return and settle in for extended adolescence. How did this happen? When you were the one everyone orbited around in your home, and then when you left and discovered you're not the center of the world, of course you'd want to come back to the one place you were.
1. The gift of not being number one. My parents are deep lovers of Jesus, and they always reminded us that we've been called into something so much bigger than us, the kingdom. Our extra-curricular activities were scheduled around church attendance, missions trips and service projects (not the other way around).
2. The gift of seeing a man work. Dad's absence communicated loudly he works. When kids (on occasion) would ask where my dad was, I could tell them he was at work. Work is a good thing. His work paid for my athletic fees, cleats, equipment and uniforms.
3. Resilience. Children are a lot more resilient than we give them credit. My father was easily gone over 100 days a year, and that's a conservative estimate. While he came to everything he could, he missed a lot. What were the results? Me and my three siblings are all educated, contributing, healthy members of society. We've ventured into almost every region of the country hundreds and thousands of miles away from our parents and each other, where we've had to start lives and build churches, businesses and community. We've got a grit to us because our parents refused to coddle. Thanks dad (and mom).
So relax. Missing a game or a piano recital isn't a bad thing, it can actually do your children some good.


Bahubali Ravaji Doshi and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ANR.
2. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. In all connected matters, this Court has directed the Reference Court to release 50% of the amount deposited by the State without security and the remaining 50% with security to the satisfaction of the Court.
3. That order will govern the case of the appellants as well. The High Court may adopt the same pattern in all the connected cases, so that parties do not have to unnecessarily travel to this Court.
4. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.


I know, I know. Being based in the UK we ought not to celebrate it. But we'll take any excuse to pig out on delicious food. Plus, Thanksgiving dinner is a good way for us to get together with our mates & celebrate the anniversary of our coast-to-coast road trip across the States.
There were 7 of us for dinner, 5 pitching in with cooking (what we hope are) traditional American Thanksgiving dishes, adapted from Heston recipes.
This didn't go quite according to plan. The assumption was Lee would buy a turkey crown to feed the 7 of us. Instead he produced a full bird that would feed 12.
Without a vessel big enough to brine the thing, or enough time to low-temperature cook it, Lee had to deal with this the old-fashioned way. The butter and herbs gave us fantastic crispy skin and great flavour in the meat. Don't think the dry breast was quite what Heston intended though.
Look at that ingredient list! Heston's Sage and Onion and Parsley and Celery and Brandy and Chestnut and Cranberry and Caraway stuffing recipe.
Actually quite easy make. You just need some scales, big mixing bowl and a pan.
Weight your dry and fresh breadcrumbs, and put them in the big mixing bowl. Then add the measured / weighed ingredients that don't need cooking: caraway, chestnut etc.
Next, start frying the other ingredients one at a time, then add to the bowl. As one finishes just tip it in then start on the next. Simple & efficient.
I thought it'd be quicker to flame off the brandy rather than just boil it. This led to what I can only describe as "Four Solid Minutes of Pure Fear" as 3 foot flames errupted into the air. You can't use the extractor fan, it'll pull more air in, feeding the fire. All I could do was hold the pan in mid-air until the flames died down.
As delicious and crowd-pleasing as they were when we made them last Christmas. But, on account of the rectangular shape Heston has you serve them in, still dubbed "the flapjacks".
Despite a complicated list of ingredients, (and cornmeal polenta rather than actual corn) these turned out to be delicious. In lieu of jalapenos Declan used diced fresh chillies, which gave a warming kick. These would be exceptional with a classic Chilli Con Carne.
My only regret was that this didn't come as a loaf so we could make leftovers sandwiches.
Declan's verdict after making this this was a "posh version of green beans in chicken soup" (A recipe he'd cooked the previous year). There's no denying the similarities, but this was a far, far superior dish to that.
Heston's Christmas Gravy recipe uses chicken stock, and Heston's Chicken Stock recipe uses a pressure cooker. Our plan was to bypass additional hassle by just slinging everything into a pressure cooker.
We used the technique from Heston's Channel 4 Chicken Stock recipe: adding skimmed milk powder. It looks so, so wrong.
The results spent an hour in a pressure cooker with a lot of softened onion, mushroom and carrot. The whole lot was then sieved, reduced, strained through muslin and infused with thyme and rosemary.
There was a really strong carrot flavour, which we think had also led to some overpowering bitter notes. Taking a trick from Heston's chocolate recipes we lessened the bitterness with a touch of salt. Turns out the fault lay with reducing the sauce with a fast, aggressive boil. You want no more than a simmer. Lesson learned.
At serving we added the veg from the turkey roasting tray plus the roasting juices, mashed everything together, and strained again. The gravy lost a lot of it's smooth refinement but gained a whole lot of body and flavour. I'll go with the Jamie method of a masher and a sieve over the complex pressure cooker work in future.
The first ominous aspect of this recipe is holding the potatoes at an exact 72°C for 30 minutes. Not all that bad if you're at the stove anyway (and actually less effort than making a risotto).
This was no problem for us as, to paraphrase Hans Grüber, "Now I have a Sous Vide Cooker. Ho, ho, ho." I just dumped the spuds into the main vessel and set a timer. After that more boiling and then running them bit-by-bit through the ricer.
No short-cuts for the next brutal step though: pushing the potatoes through a sieve. This might've been more difficult as we'd used "less" butter (still a full 250g block, but to 1.5kg of spuds, rather than a "mere" 1kg).
It's a gruelling task that took over half an hour. The result is impressive though: a smooth, refined purée. We compared the sieved and unsieved potatoes and there's a noticeable difference. Although it does have end up like a very posh instant mash. Refined or not, I am never doing 1.5kg of this ever again.
The potato skin-infused milk really does add a lot of extra flavour. That's worth repeating for any future mash recipes.
This is a simple business of attacking a mandolin with potatoes (and the tip of my right ring finger) until you've enough to fill a dish. Don't try to be clever by adding garlic to the onions as you sauté them, it's flavour will overpower the rest of the dish. Whoops.
The sweet potatoes had a tendency to curl at the edges while cooking. You can remedy this by placing a similarly sized dish on top with some weights in (cereal bowls worked for us).
The least popular of the dishes, but one of the easiest to make. We'd love to try this properly with actual potatoes one day soon.
"Wow! You can actually buy real cranberries! I thought they were a myth in the UK". When shopping for the ingredients Dan was impressed at even being able to find the necessary ingredients in somewhere as humble as Leigh Asda.
It's a super-simple recipe (Put cranberries, orange juice, sugar and vodka in a pan, heat for ten minutes). Dan was certain the 15ml of vodka wouldn't be noticeable enough in the finished dish so doubled the quantity.
We dubbed this "Vodka Jam" thanks to its hefty kick. Regardless, it was a brilliant and traditional Thanksgiving addition.
Felicity Cloake's take on perfection often means being able to produce a dish with much less fuss and faff than Heston (though her pumpkin pie filling isn't quite so simple). Butternut squash is roasted, blended and strained before being blended with lots of maple syrup, condensed milk and few seasonings then baked until just set.
Our pastry was a variant on that used for Heston's Lemon Tart recipe. We just replaced the lemon zest for orange. We also strayed from the instructions when blending the egg yolks and icing sugar. Heston says to do this with a hand blender in a tall vessel, but we found this leaves a quarter of your mixture stuck behind the blender's blades. It's much easier to just whisk them together with a fork.
This made a great dessert. Not too heavy, warmly spiced.
Thanksgiving recipes are significantly different to Christmas recipes. At least that's how it seems to us Brits. Turkey, gravy and stuffing are a common starting point, but the various side dishes really make the difference.
We didn't know if adapting Heston's existing recipes to make American classics would work, but it did. This was a fantastic meal, a great excuse to get together and a lot of fun to make and eat.
Would any of our American readers tell us if this was accurate or not, and would you try these Heston's Thanksgiving recipes for your next Thanksgiving? We'd love to hear your thoughts.
Hey, that looks pretty tasty. I hadn't seen that cranberry sauce recipe before, I'll have to give it a go sometime.


The Globe Ring is a single piece full glass Ring that reflects the light of the world around you. It is not a crystal ball nor a fortune telling object.
Style this spere ring with your next evening look.


text:
И́горь Дави́дович О́йстрах (27 апреля 1931, Одесса, СССР — 14 августа 2021, Москва, Россия) ― советский и российский скрипач, дирижёр и педагог. Народный артист СССР (1989).

Биография

Родился в Одессе в семье скрипача Давида Фёдоровича Ойстраха (1908—1974) и пианистки Тамары Ивановны Ротаревой (1906—1976). С раннего детства начал заниматься музыкой; в шесть лет уже играл на скрипке, а через два года на фортепиано.

В 1949 году окончил Центральную музыкальную школу при Московской консерватории, в 1955 — Московскую консерваторию по классу скрипки у своего отца Д. Ф. Ойстраха, в 1958 — аспирантуру, под его руководством.

Ещё будучи студентом, одержал победы на Международном конкурсе скрипачей Всемирного фестиваля молодежи и студентов в Будапеште (1949) и Международный конкурс скрипачей им. Г. Венявского в Познани (1952).

В 1958 году, после окончания аспирантуры, был принят в штат Московской консерватории, с этого же года ― солист Московской филармонии.

Творческий почерк скрипача характеризуется интеллектуальным, расчётливым подходом к исполнению, реалистичностью интерпретаций. Выступал в дуэте со своим отцом, а также с оркестром под его управлением, сделав множество совместных записей. Также неоднократно выступал с И. Менухиным и с известными оркестрами мира под управлением таких дирижёров, как О. Клемперер, Ю. Орманди, К. М. Джулини, Г. Караяна, Г. Шолти, М. Лорин, З. Мета, С. Озава, Г. Рождественский и другими.

С 1968 года выступал как дирижёр. Дирижировал ансамблем солистов оркестра Московской филармонии. За границей его дирижёрский дебют состоялся в Копенгагене в феврале 1968 года. Выступал с симфоническими оркестрами Московской филармонии, Ленинградской филармонии, оркестрами Лондона, Берлина, Вены, Брюсселя.

Гастролировал во многих странах мира. Его дебют на Западе состоялся в Лондоне, в Королевском Альберт-холле. Затем последовали гастроли в США, Европе (Австрия, Дания, Франция, Великобритания, ГДР, Чехословакия), Канаде, Южной Америке, Японии и Австралии.

Среди его записей ― Второй скрипичный концерт Б. Бартока, сонаты И. С. Баха для скрипки и клавесина (вместе с женой Н. Зерцаловой), поэма Е. Ф. Светланова памяти Д. Ойстраха.

Был членом жюри престижных скрипичных конкурсов, среди которых Международный конкурс имени П. И. Чайковского, Конкурс имени королевы Елизаветы, Международный конкурс скрипачей имени Генрика Венявского, Московский Международный конкурс скрипачей им. Давида Ойстраха.

С 1996 по 2010 год преподавал в Королевской консерватории Брюсселя (профессор).

Со своей семьей жил и работал в Брюсселе (Бельгия).

Вернулся в Россию в 2011 году.

Скончался 14 августа 2021 года в Москве на 91-м году жизни от острой сердечной недостаточности. После кремации прах музыканта захоронен на Новодевичьем кладбище.

Семья
 Жена (с 1960) — Наталья Николаевна Зерцалова (12.12.1930—21.08.2017), пианистка, более 50 лет выступала в ансамбле с мужем.
 Сын — Валерий Ойстрах (род. 19.09 1961), скрипач, преподаёт в Королевской консерватории Брюсселя с 1996 (профессор).
 Внук — Роберт Ойстрах (род.2012).

Звания и награды
Государственные:
 Заслуженный артист РСФСР (1968)
 Народный артист РСФСР (1978)
 Орден Дружбы народов (1980)
 Народный артист СССР (1989)

Другие награды, поощрения и общественное признание:
 1-я премия Международного конкурс скрипачей Всемирного фестиваля молодежи и студентов (Будапешт, 1949)
 1-я премия Международного конкурса скрипачей им. Г. Венявского (Познань, 1952)
 Почётный член Бетховенского общества в Бонне
 Почётный член общества А. Венявского в Познани
 Почётный член общества Э. Изаи в Брюсселе
 Почётный член обществ Ф. Мендельсона и Р. Шумана в Лейпциге
 Профессор Моцартовского общества в Вене (1981)
 Президент общества С. Франка в Льеже (1990)
 Почётный профессор Музыкального королевского колледжа в Лондоне (1990)

Фильмография
 1954 — В праздничный вечер (фильм-концерт)

Список литературы
 Татьяна Берфорд, Князь Игорь, сын Давидов. Игорь Ойстрах в жизни и в искусстве, СПб.: Издательство им. Н. И. Новикова, 2013
 Артур Штильман, Знаменитые и великие скрипачи-виртуозы XX века. Издательство "Алетейя" Санкт-Петербург,2017
 Виктор Юзефович,  Царь Давид,Издательство "Особая книга",2017. Проект альбома удостоен гранта Президента Российской Федерации.

Примечания

Ссылки

 Игорю Ойстраху, народному артисту СССР
 Мишустин поздравил скрипача и дирижера Игоря Ойстраха с 90-летием
 Биография на сайте «Яндекс. Словари»
 Игорь Ойстрах на сайте «Культура»
 Благотворительный фонд имени Д. Ойстраха

Академические музыканты России
Академические музыканты СССР
Выпускники Центральной музыкальной школы
Выпускники Московской консерватории
Лауреаты Международного конкурса скрипачей им. Венявского
Умершие от сердечной недостаточности
Похороненные на Новодевичьем кладбище

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Tecumseh Soccer Club is a Canadian soccer club based in Tecumseh, Ontario, just east of Windsor, that competes in the women's division of League1 Ontario.

History
The club was founded in 1999 through the merger of the Tecumseh Soccer Club and the North Shore Soccer Club that existed within Tecumseh, bringing together the competitive and recreational programs. In 2009, Tecumseh Soccer Club, separated from the recreational program and now concentrates on the competitive program only. The club obtained an OPDL license in 2017 and a National Youth License in 2019.

In 2020, the club fielded a team in the League1 Ontario Women's U21 reserve division, but the season was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This was one of their two U21 teams, supplemented by their large OPDL player pool.

In 2021, the club joined League1 Ontario, fielding a team in the Women's Division, where they will play out of the University of Windsor Stadium. While not an official member of the men's division, they fielded teams in the men's reserve divisions in 2021. In 2022, they struck an affiliation with local club Whitecaps London SC to allow Whitecaps London players to progress to the Tecumseh League1 Ontario women's team.

Seasons
Women

References

Soccer clubs in Ontario
League1 Ontario teams
Women's soccer clubs in Canada


It wasn't until Wikipedia got hold of the image that things started to go downhill. "They decided that because the monkey pressed the button, I had no entitlement to it," Slater explains. Their argument was that as the monkey took the image, it should have the copyright. However, since it is an animal, it can't have a copyright and therefore the image is public domain. This completely ignored the creative input that Slater had to give for the picture to occur in the first place.
The takedown requests by Slater were ignored, and he decided to give up. That was until the annual Wikipedia conference came around two years later. "At their 2014 Wikimania conference, they used printed out boards of my monkey selfie as mascots, and were encouraging people to take their own selfie with the selfie, with Jimmy Wales himself doing this," recounts Slater.
It was at this point that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) reared their head. They had been following the debate about whether or not a monkey can own a copyright, and decided to jump on the case to prove their own agenda.
After spending hundreds of thousands of dollars hiring lawyers, PETA decided to take the issue to court, in a bid to further the argument that animals should be awarded the same rights as humans. But in order to argue for copyright on someone's behalf in the US, you need the legal guardian of that person on your side. Obviously, the monkey couldn't represent itself, so PETA found a primatologist who worked with the macaques and who claims that she has known the monkey in the image from birth.