text:
About Development
About the Node
Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals
Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Russell B. Fletcher, Richard M. Harland
Development 2003 130: 3111-3124; doi: 10.1242/dev.00531
Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq
Russell B. Fletcher
Richard M. Harland
At the border of the neural plate, the induction of the neural crest can be achieved by interactions with the epidermis, or with the underlying mesoderm. Wnt signals are required for the inducing activity of the epidermis in chick and amphibian embryos. Here, we analyze the molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction by the mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. Using a recombination assay, we show that prospective paraxial mesoderm induces a panel of neural crest markers (Slug, FoxD3, Zic5 and Sox9), whereas the future axial mesoderm only induces a subset of these genes. This induction is blocked by a dominant negative (dn) form of FGFR1. However, neither dnFGFR4a nor inhibition of Wnt signaling prevents neural crest induction in this system. Among the FGFs, FGF8 is strongly expressed by the paraxial mesoderm. FGF8 is sufficient to induce the neural crest markers FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 transiently in the animal cap assay. In vivo, FGF8 injections also expand the Slug expression domain. This suggests that FGF8 can initiate neural crest formation and cooperates with other DLMZ-derived factors to maintain and complete neural crest induction. In contrast to Wnts, eFGF or bFGF, FGF8 elicits neural crest induction in the absence of mesoderm induction and without a requirement for BMP antagonists. In vivo, it is difficult to dissociate the roles of FGF and WNT factors in mesoderm induction and neural patterning. We show that, in most cases, effects on neural crest formation were parallel to altered mesoderm or neural development. However, neural and neural crest patterning can be dissociated experimentally using different dominant-negative manipulations: while Nfz8 blocks both posterior neural plate formation and neural crest formation, dnFGFR4a blocks neural patterning without blocking neural crest formation. These results suggest that different signal transduction mechanisms may be used in neural crest induction, and anteroposterior neural patterning.
FGF8
Paraxial mesoderm
Xenopus embryo
Neural patterning
The neural crest, a transitory population of cells that is characteristic of vertebrate embryos, forms at the border of the neural plate, posteriorly to the diencephalon. After induction, neural crest cells undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and migrate into several locations to give rise to a large variety of derivatives (for a review, see Le Douarin and Kalcheim, 1999). Experimental manipulations in chick, fish and amphibian embryos have shown that both the ectoderm and the neural plate can give rise to neural crest cells when they are juxtaposed (Moury and Jacobson, 1989; Moury and Jacobson, 1990; Selleck and Bronner-Fraser, 1995; Mancilla and Mayor, 1996; Woo and Fraser, 1998). However, in vivo, the neural crest forms adjacent to three different tissues, the non neural ectoderm, the neural plate and the underlying paraxial mesoderm, all of which thus constitute potential sources of neural crest inducers (Schroeder, 1970). Although many studies have focused on neural crest induction by the ectoderm in the chick embryo (Dickinson et al., 1995; Basch et al., 2000; Knecht and Bronner-Fraser, 2002), a pioneering study by Raven and Kloos (Raven and Kloos, 1945) showed that the paraxial mesoderm can induce neural crest formation in the ectoderm of amphibians. More recent studies also show that recombining the paraxial mesoderm with naive ectoderm in Xenopus laevis embryos results in potent neural crest induction in the ectodermal part of the explant and that excising the paraxial mesoderm results in lack of neural crest formation in vivo (Mancilla and Mayor, 1996; Bonstein et al., 1998; Marchant et al., 1998). In chick embryos, some data also indicate that the melanocytes, which are neural crest derivatives, are induced after neural plate-paraxial mesoderm recombination (Selleck and Bronner-Fraser, 1995). Although tested separately in these experimental assays, the possibility that the inducing activities from the ectoderm and the mesoderm might act in concert during normal development remains to be explored.
In the amphibian embryo, the current analysis of the molecular basis of ectoderm-neural tissue interactions results in a two-step model of neural crest induction detailed below (reviewed by Aybar and Mayor, 2002; Knecht and Bronner-Fraser, 2002). Slug was generally used in these studies as a specific marker gene for neural crest development (Nieto et al., 1994; Mayor et al., 1995). In the first step of the model, in parallel to what happens during amphibian neural induction (Harland, 2000), BMP activity in the ectoderm must be attenuated by BMP antagonists. Neural crest forms after moderate BMP inhibition while neural tissue induction requires higher levels of inhibition (Marchant et al., 1998). However, the levels of Slug induction in these assays, using BMP antagonists alone, are very low compared with endogenous levels (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Marchant et al., 1998). This suggests that in the embryo, additional factors are required for normal levels of Slug expression and neural crest induction/maintenance.
Co-injection of BMP antagonists with molecules such as Wnts (Wnt7b or Wnt8), fibroblast growth factors (eFGF or bFGF) or retinoic acid (RA) results in strong neural crest formation in ectodermal explants (animal caps) (Mayor et al., 1995; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Villanueva et al., 2002). Although these molecules do not induce neural crest by themselves in vitro, the in vivo overexpression of positive regulators of the Wnt, FGF or RA pathways expands neural crest-forming domains, whereas blocking these pathways prevents normal neural crest induction in both embryo and explant assays (Mayor et al., 1997; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Villanueva et al., 2002). Together, these data suggest a second phase of induction where partially neuralized ectoderm is specified to become neural crest either by Wnts, FGF, RA or a combination. However, this model does not specifically address the mechanism by which paraxial mesoderm might induce the neural crest. Furthermore, both FGF and Wnt proteins play important roles in mesoderm induction and paraxial mesoderm development (Cornell and Kimelman, 1994; LaBonne and Whitman, 1994; Fisher et al., 2002; Vonica and Gumbiner, 2002) and reagents that affect neural crest induction might do so indirectly by their effects on the mesoderm (Mayor et al., 1995; Mayor et al., 1997; Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998). Finally, all three classes of molecules implicated in neural crest induction are also important neural posteriorizing agents (Lamb and Harland, 1995; Bang et al., 1997; Bang et al., 1999; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001; Kudoh et al., 2002). BMP antagonism results in the formation of anterior neural tissue that is not expected to form neural crest (Lamb et al., 1993; Knecht and Harland, 1997). This raises the possibility that posteriorization of this area into a neural crest-producing tissue would account for the Slug induction recorded after co-injecting Noggin/Chordin with Wnt/FGF/RA molecules. This correlation of neural crest induction with posterior identity has recently been demonstrated in embryos (Villanueva et al., 2002). Thus, whether induction of neural crest can occur independently from neural induction and patterning remains unclear.
In this study, we address two questions. First, what is the nature of the mesodermal signal(s) inducing neural crest in the ectoderm? Second, how is neural crest induction related to early anteroposterior (AP) patterning of the neural plate? To study the molecular mechanisms of neural crest induction by the paraxial mesoderm in the Xenopus laevis embryo, we focused on the neural crest-inducing properties of the dorsolateral marginal zone (DLMZ) on animal cap explants. Using various neural crest markers, we show that the DLMZ and the dorsal marginal zone (DMZ) exhibit qualitative differences in their inducing properties. In order to study the role of specific growth factor signaling in neural crest induction, we then took advantage of previously characterized molecular tools, consisting of broad range or more specific inhibitors of the Wnt and FGF pathways. These reagents include NFz8, GSK3, dnTCF3 and a truncated form of Dishevelled (Xdd1) for Wnt signaling, and SU5402, XFD and dnFGFR4a for FGF signaling (Amaya et al., 1993; Sokol, 1996; Mohammadi et al., 1997; Deardorff et al., 1998; Hongo et al., 1999; Deardorff et al., 2001), for reviews see (Galzie et al., 1997; Brantjes et al., 2002; Moon et al., 2002). We have also used these reagents in vivo to address whether neural crest formation can be uncoupled from repatterning of the mesoderm or changes in AP patterning of the neural plate.
RNA injections
Xenopus laevis embryos were staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (Nieuwkoop and Faber, 1994) and analyzed according standard procedures described by Sive et al. (Sive et al., 2000). Nuclear targeted β-galactosidase (pCS2-Nls-NlacZ, 100-200 pg) mRNA was co-injected with the test mRNA for lineage tracing. Capped messenger RNAs were synthesized using the mMESSAGE mMachine kit (Ambion).
To block the response of the ectoderm to endogenous Wnt molecules, we injected mRNAs encoding either xNFz8, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3), dnTCF3 or Xdd1. The pCS2-xNFz8 encodes a wide spectrum dominant-negative Wnt receptor (Deardorff et al., 1998), Xdd1 is a truncated form of Dishevelled, which acts as a dominant-negative in both the canonical and the non canonical planar cell polarity (PCP) pathways (Sokol, 1996; Wallingford and Harland, 2002). The pCS2-xGSK3, pT7Ts-dnTCF3, p64T-XWnt8 and pCS2-dnXWnt8 plasmids have been described previously (Christian et al., 1991; Molenaar et al., 1996; Pierce and Kimelman, 1996; Hoppler and Moon, 1998). We blocked FGF signaling in the responding ectoderm using either a dominant-negative form of xFGFR1, constructed by S. Dougan (pCS2-XFD-GFP) similar to the XFD construct published by Amaya et al. (Amaya et al., 1991), or a truncated FGFR4a (p64T-dnXFGFR-4a) (Hongo et al., 1999), subcloned into pCS108. XFGF8 (Christen and Slack, 1997) was subcloned into pCS107.
Tissue recombination, SU5402 treatment of the recombinants
Stage 10-10.5 DLMZ or DMZ were recombined with stage 8-9 animal caps (Fig. 1A) (Bonstein et al., 1998). Dissections and culture were performed in 3/4 Normal Amphibian Medium (NAM) containing gentamycin (100 μg/ml). The recombinants were harvested when sibling embryos reached stage 18. For inhibition of FGF signaling by the SU5402 (Calbiochem) (Mohammadi et al., 1997), the recombinants were cultivated in 50 μM SU5402 diluted into 3/4 NAM (Shinya et al., 2001; Maroon et al., 2002). Controls were grown in DMSO diluted in 3/4 NAM.
Neural crest marker induction after recombining ectoderm to mesoderm. (A) The DMZ (blue) or the DLMZ (yellow) are dissected at stage 10-10.5 as depicted. (B) Each type of mesoderm explant is recombined to the animal cap ectoderm (AC, red) of stage 8-9 embryos, to form the DLMZ-AC and DMZ-AC recombinants, respectively. (C) RT-PCR analysis of gene expression in the stage 18 recombinants shows that the DLMZ-AC recombinants express a whole range of neural crest markers at stage 18 (Slug, FoxD3, Sox9, Zic5, Snail and Twist, lane 5), whereas the DMZ-AC recombinants express only a subset of them (lane 7). Lanes 1, 2: controls (see Materials and Methods). Lanes 3, 4, 6: isolated AC, DLMZ and DMZ, respectively. (D) In situ hybridization for the four most specific neural crest markers studied (see text) on normal embryos around stage 18 seen in dorsal view, anterior is towards the bottom. Note that Slug and FoxD3 are restricted to the neural crest, whereas Zic5 and Sox9 are also expressed in other areas.
The in situ hybridization protocol was simplified by directly prehybridizing embryos younger than stage 20 after rehydration in PBT. The rest of the procedure remained unchanged. This shorter protocol allows a better staining of superficially located tissues (such as the neural crest).
The probes for Slug, Twist, Snail, Krox20, Cpl-1 and Otx2 have been described elsewhere (Richter et al., 1988; Hopwood et al., 1989; Bradley et al., 1993; Lamb et al., 1993; Mayor et al., 1993; Grammer et al., 2000). The Sox9 probe was a kind gift of R. Spokony and J-P. Saint-Jeannet (Spokony et al., 2002). Zic5 and FoxD3 in situ probes were derived from a X. tropicalis library made by A. Zorn (Khokha et al., 2003).
RNA isolation and Reverse Transcriptase-PCR assay
Preparation of total RNA and RT-PCR assay were carried out as described previously (Condie et al., 1990). For each lane of one given experiment, 15-20 animal caps or six to eight recombinants were pooled and analyzed. One non-injected sibling embryo serves as a positive control in the first lane of each PCR gel. The absence of DNA contamination was verified by omitting the reverse transcriptase in an equivalent total embryo sample (lane 2 of the PCR gels). EF1α was used as a cDNA loading control. Primers for EF1α, muscle actin, Krox20, Otx2, Xnot, MyoD and Twist have been described elsewhere (Rupp and Weintraub, 1991; von Dassow et al., 1993; Ribisi et al., 2000) (Xenopus MMR database http://www.xenbase.org/XMMR/Welcome.html). Specific primers used in this study are described in Table 1. Each of them was designed using MacVector 6.5.3 from the sequences published in GenBank so that they do not crossreact with related genes.
Primers used in this study
The DLMZ and the DMZ induce distinct subsets of neural crest markers in the ectoderm
Mesoderm explants were dissected at stage 10 to 10.5 (Fig. 1A) and recombined with a stage 8-9 animal cap (AC) (Fig. 1B). Neural crest formation in the recombinants was first assessed by the induction of Slug expression in the recombinants, as reported by Marchant et al. (Marchant et al., 1998) and Bonstein et al. (Bonstein et al., 1998) (Fig. 1C). The DMZ was dissected above the pigment line, indicating the future dorsal lip at stage 10 or along an equivalent width at stage 10.5 (Fig. 1A). When analyzed using RT-PCR at stage 17-18, DMZ explants grown in isolation expressed the notochord marker Xnot but very little muscle actin (MA) (Fig. 1C, lane 6). After recombination with animal caps, the DMZ-AC did not show Slug expression (Fig. 1C, lane 7). By contrast, the paraxial mesoderm (DLMZ) (Fig. 1A) expressed both muscle actin and Xnot (Fig. 1C, lane 4), and DLMZ-AC recombinants showed a strong Slug signal (Fig. 1C, lane 5). Previous studies have shown that the inducing tissue in this system is the DLMZ and that neural crest forms from the animal cap (Bonstein et al., 1998; Marchant et al., 1998). Xnot expression in the DLMZ area corresponds to the lateral extension of the notochord domain at stage 10.5 (Yasuo and Lemaire, 2001).
If slightly larger DMZ explants were cut, extending beyond the stage 10.25 dorsal lip, they variably expressed muscle actin and Slug upon recombination (not shown). Thus, for consistency in the experiments illustrated in this study, we dissected the DMZ as a narrow band of tissue taken at stage 10-10.5, and cut DLMZs that contained robust Slug inducing activity.
To characterize the neural crest induced by the DLMZ in this explant assay in more detail, we analyzed several other genes in addition to Slug, all expressed mainly by the neural crest around stage 18 (Fig. 1C,D). Snail (Essex et al., 1993; Mayor et al., 1993), Twist (Hopwood et al., 1989), Zic5 (Nakata et al., 2000), Sox9 (Spokony et al., 2002) and FoxD3 (Pohl and Knochel, 2001; Sasai et al., 2001) were all upregulated when the DLMZ was recombined with animal caps (Fig. 1C, lane 5). FoxD3 responded in a very similar manner to Slug: in particular, neither was induced in the AC-DMZ recombinants (Fig. 1B, lane 7). Both showed weak expression in the mesoderm, corresponding to what was observed in vivo (Fig. 1C, lanes 4 and 6) (Linker et al., 2000; Sasai et al., 2001). By contrast, Sox9, Zic5 and Snail expression were also upregulated in the AC-DMZ, although at a low level in the case of Sox9. Interestingly, Snail and Zic5 induction was as strong with the DMZ as with the DLMZ, perhaps reflecting the normal expression of these genes in the midline of the anterior neural fold (Fig. 1D) (Linker et al., 2000; Nakata et al., 2000).
This analysis suggests that neural crest induction observed in this recombination assay reproduces the complexity of in vivo mechanisms. Because of their basal expression in the isolated animal caps and/or mesoderm explants, Snail and Twist were not analyzed further in this study. We focused on Slug, FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5, which were specifically upregulated in the recombinants.
Blocking Wnt signaling does not prevent induction of neural crest by the DLMZ
The canonical Wnt pathway has been shown to be important in neural crest formation in other systems. In addition, the Slug promoter contains LEF-TCF binding sites suggesting a direct regulation by this pathway (Vallin et al., 2001). To test the hypothesis that the DLMZ requires Wnt signals to induce neural crest, we blocked the response of the ectoderm to Wnt signaling using the antagonists NFz8, GSK3 and dnTCF3. The xFz8 receptor has been shown to mediate the activity of Wnt1, Wnt2c, Wnt3a, Wnt5a, Wnt7b, Wnt8 and Wnt11 efficiently (Deardorff et al., 2001). NFz8, a truncated and diffusible form of xFz8, acts on gastrulation movements and neural plate patterning as expected for a Wnt antagonist, but does not prevent dorsal mesoderm specification (Deardorff et al., 1998). In contrast to NFz8, glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) and dnTCF3 prevent Wnt signaling in a cell autonomous manner (Brantjes et al., 2002; Moon et al., 2002).
In this series of experiments, positive controls of Wnt inhibiting activity showed that 400 pg of NFz8 mRNA efficiently blocked XWnt8-induced secondary axis formation (100% reversal of double axis formation, after co-injecting 400 pg of NFz8 and 50 pg p64T-XWnt8 mRNAs, n=31, not shown). Moreover, the injected embryos displayed defects in dorsal neural tube closure, as shown when Wnt signaling is blocked (Wallingford and Harland, 2002). Thus, injections of 400 to 800 pg of NFz8 mRNA per embryo were generally used in the next experiments, although doses above 1 ng were also tested. Moreover, as Wnt antagonists, NFz8 and GSK3 overexpression is expected to anteriorize the neural plate and, later, increase cement gland formation (Deardorff et al., 1998; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). After injecting GSK3 or NFz8 (400 to 1600 pg) in the animal hemisphere of two- or four-cell stage embryos, the cement gland was enlarged in more than 96% (n>53) of the embryos (Fig. 2A). This phenotype was used as a routine control, when sibling embryos were analyzed for neural crest formation as described below.
Wnt signaling is not required for neural crest induction by the DLMZ. (A) The activity of different Wnt antagonists is monitored by analyzing cement gland formation in stage 20 injected embryos: Wnt antagonism results in a striking enlargement of the cement gland [top panels, control embryos; middle panels, NFz8 mRNA treated (800 pg); bottom panel, GSK3 mRNA treated (800 pg)]. (B-E) Slug expression in explants. (B) DLMZ, (C) AC, (D) AC-DLMZ control recombinants, (E) NFz8 (800 pg) injected AC-DLMZ. The top four recombinants in E are also stained forβ -galactosidase activity. Strong Slug expression is found in the ectoderm of about half of the recombinants in D and E. (F) RT-PCR analysis after injecting increasing amounts of NFz8: lanes 3-6 and 7-10, 0-400-800-1600 pg of NFz8 mRNA injections in AC and AC-DLMZ, respectively. 400-800 pg injections do not block response to DLMZ signals. Lanes 1 and 2, controls (see Materials and Methods); n.i., non-injected. (G) GSK3 (800 pg) or dnTCF3 (1 ng) mRNA injections do not prevent the ectoderm to form neural crest in response to the DLMZ. (H) Xdd1 (1 ng) injections do not prevent neural crest marker induction either. (I) The AC+DLMZ recombinants elongate in the same way as controls even in presence of 400 pg of NFz8 (middle) but their elongation is abolished by injections of 1600 pg of NFz8 in the ectoderm (bottom).
NFz8 or GSK3 mRNAs were injected into in the animal hemisphere of two- to four-cell stage embryos, sometimes with NlacZ mRNA for lineage tracing. Animal caps were cut at stage 8-9 and recombined with uninjected DLMZ explants. The recombinants were grown up to stage 17-18, fixed and processed for in situ hybridization with a Slug antisense probe or for RT-PCR analysis. In some explants, β-galactosidase activity was revealed before the in situ procedure. After an equivalent treatment, isolated DLMZs or animal caps did not express Slug (Fig. 2B,C). In control recombinants, the animal cap-derived tissues exhibited Slug staining, either as a strong domain of expression or as individual dispersed cells (Fig. 2D). Weaker and more internal Slug expression was detected in the DLMZ-derived tissues (Fig. 2D), consistent with Slug being expressed in the mesoderm (Mayor et al., 2000).
We first blocked signaling by putative endogenous Wnt molecules using NFz8. After injections of 800 pg of NFz8 mRNA, a similar proportion of the recombinants exhibited Slug staining, being virtually identical to controls (Fig. 2E). This observation was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. After recombination, control explants strongly expressed Slug and other neural crest markers (n=151, on average, 8-10 recombinants were used for each lane; Fig. 2F, lane 7). Moderate to high doses of NFz8, which are fully active in the biological tests described above, did not prevent the induction of any of the neural crest markers tested (400 pg/n=81 and 800 pg/n=76, Fig. 2F, lanes 8 and 9). This was also true when the explants were analyzed at stage 12, shortly after initial neural crest induction (not shown). In some cases, however, the induction of Slug and Sox9 was reduced compared with controls (lane 9).
Massive doses of NFz8 resulted in inhibition of Slug, FoxD3 and Sox9, but not of Zic5 (1200-1600 pg/n=21, Fig. 2F, lanes 10). This was correlated with a striking lack of elongation of the recombinants, suggesting that these higher doses affect the development of the mesoderm itself rather than the response of the ectoderm (Fig. 2I). Although Xnot was expressed normally in the recombinants, muscle actin and MyoD, which were expressed at the same levels in the 0-800 pg NFz8 injected recombinants, were slightly diminished in the 1600 pg NFz8 injections (Fig. 2F-lane 10 and not shown). This suggests that other aspects of the specification of the DLMZ could also be perturbed by the highest doses of NFz8. Such perturbation could secondarily alter the DLMZ signaling activity and account for the reduction of neural crest induction seen in lane 10.
We thus focused on 400-800 pg NFz8 doses (lanes 8 and 9): the decrease in Slug and Sox9 neural crest markers expression, in lanes 9, could either reflect the requirement for a Wnt signal acting directly on the ectodermal cells or a change in the DLMZ-inducing properties. To avoid Wnt-dependent changes in the signaling properties of the DLMZ, we blocked the response to the canonical and non canonical Wnt pathways intracellularly in the ectoderm, by injecting either GSK3 (300-400 pg/n=38 and 800-1000 pg/n=40), dnTCF3 (1 ng/n=10) or Xdd1 (1 ng/n=10) (Fig. 2G-H and not shown). None of these blocked the induction of neural crest markers by the DLMZ (Fig. 2G, lanes 6-8 and Fig. 2H). However, the injection of NFz8 or GSK3 did modulate the expression of other genes, such as Krox20 or Otx2, but not Pax3 (not shown). We conclude that neither canonical nor PCP Wnt-dependent pathways are required directly for the ectoderm to respond to the DLMZ neural crest-inducing activity. Blocking Wnt signals by diffusible antagonists perturbs DLMZ development and most probably its signaling properties. However, if Wnt signaling is not perturbed in the mesoderm, the DLMZ can induce neural crest in the ectoderm, suggesting alternative or redundant pathways for neural crest induction.
FGF signaling is required for neural crest induction by the DLMZ
FGFs bind to one of four tyrosine-kinase receptors, FGFR1-FGFR4, which lead to activation of MAP kinase or phosphatidyl inositol pathways, eventually modulating target gene expression (for a review, see Galzie et al., 1997). Blocking signaling by FGFRs, in vivo or in vitro, has employed either a truncated dominant-negative form of FGFR1, XFD (Amaya et al., 1993) or a synthetic inhibitor (SU5402) that binds to the kinase domain of FGFRs (Mohammadi et al., 1997).
In the first approach, we blocked FGF signaling in the explants by growing them in presence of 50 μM SU5402. Two DLMZs were dissected out of each stage 10 embryo and used to make two recombinants, one was cultivated in the SU5402 solution, the other in the control DMSO medium. RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 3A) showed that the SU5402 treatment completely suppressed Slug induction (Fig. 3A-lane 4, n=19). However, it also prevented normal development of the paraxial mesoderm from the DLMZ as shown by the lack of muscle actin expression. Under these conditions, the lack of Slug induction could be a secondary effect caused by abnormal DLMZ development.
FGF signaling is required for neural crest induction by the DLMZ. (A) RT-PCR analysis after SU5402 treatment of the recombinants shows the lack of Slug induction, as well as defective paraxial mesoderm development (MA). Lane 3, DMSO treatment; lane 4, SU5402 treatment. (B) XFD injections (500 pg) in the ectoderm prevent normal induction of the most specific neural crest markers Slug and FoxD3 by the DLMZ. Zic5 and Sox9 are still induced. (C) Similar injections with dnFGFR4a (500 pg) do not prevent neural crest marker induction by the DLMZ. (D) Using situ hybridization, the recombinants show a strong downregulation of Slug expression after XFD injections (third panel) but not after dnFGFR4a injections (fourth panel). First panel, XFD-injected animal caps; second panel, control recombinants.
To avoid perturbing FGF signaling in the DLMZ part of the recombinant, we injected XFD into the embryos used for animal cap explants (500 pg). The XFD-injected caps did not express Slug (Fig. 3D, XFD-AC) or the other neural crest markers (Fig. 3B, lane 3). When they were recombined with wild-type DLMZs, in situ analysis showed that most of Slug expression was lost (Fig. 3D, compare AC+DLMZ with XFD-AC+DLMZ). Both Slug and FoxD3 induction were lost after XFD injections when analyzed by RT-PCR, whereas Sox9 expression was only slightly diminished and Zic5 expression was essentially unchanged (Fig. 3B, lanes 5 and 6, n=18). The loss of both Slug and FoxD3, the most specific neural crest markers, indicates that the DLMZ does not induce proper neural crest if the ectodermal part of the explant is unable to respond to FGF signals. In addition, this experiment suggests that different mechanisms control Sox9 and Zic5 induction or maintenance. Another dominant-negative FGFR construct, dnFGFR4a, was tested to address potential specific roles of the distinct FGFRs. This mRNA perturbed several aspects of in vivo development (see below) but interestingly, dnFGFR4a injections resulted in normal expression of all the neural crest markers tested, both by in situ and RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 3C,D; n=36). Thus, different FGFRs are not equivalent and induction of crest by DLMZ may involve FGFR1 rather than FGFR4a activity.
FGFs and FGFRs are expressed in the recombinants
We analyzed the expression of FGF3, FGF4 (eFGF) and FGF8 in explants during the period of neural crest induction, i.e. stages 10.25-14, using semi-quantitative RT-PCR (Aybar and Mayor, 2002). FGF3, FGF4 and FGF8 were detected in the isolated DLMZ but not in the isolated animal caps at all stages analyzed (Fig. 4A,C). In the DLMZ, the expression of FGF genes preceded that of myotome markers such as MyoD and muscle actin, which appeared around stage 12 (Fig. 4A, lanes 5 and 6), similar to Slug in the ectoderm (Linker et al., 2000). Thus, FGF genes and FGF8 in particular are expressed in the DLMZ during gastrulation and early neurulation, and this expression is maintained without the need for external signals.
FGF signaling in the recombinants. (A) FGF3, FGF4 and FGF8 are expressed in the DLMZ cultivated in isolation, from stage 10.25 to stage 14 (lanes 3-6; DLMZ dissected at stage 10.25 and cultivated up to the stage indicated). (B) FGFRs are differentially expressed in the DLMZ-AC (lane 5) and DMZ-AC (lane 7) recombinants. In particular, FGFR1 and FGFR4a expression is maintained at stage 18 in AC-DMLZ recombinants (lane 5). (C) Isolated animal caps do not express FGF3, FGF4 or FGF8. (D) SU5402 treatment does not suppress FGFR1 and FGFR4a expression in the recombinants.
The expression of the different FGF receptors has been described in animal caps grown in isolation (Friesel and Dawid, 1991; Golub et al., 2000). Interestingly, this study showed that FGFR1 and FGFR4a genes are expressed when animal caps are dissected but their expression is maintained only in the presence of ongoing FGF signaling (Friesel and Dawid, 1991). We therefore analyzed FGFR1-FGFR4 expression in the different kinds of explants used in this study. FGFR2 expression was maintained in the isolated animal caps, consistent with previous results (Fig. 4B, lane 3) (Friesel and Brown, 1992). This expression was also present in all the recombinants containing ectoderm or DMZ (Fig. 4B, lanes 5-7). FGFR3 was more specifically found in the DMZ-containing explants (Fig. 4B, lanes 6 and 7) but was expressed at much lower levels in DLMZ or AC-DLMZ recombinants (Fig. 4B, lanes 3-4). Most interestingly, FGFR1 and FGFR4a expression was hardly detected in the isolated AC or DLMZ (Fig. 4B, lanes 3 and 4) but was present if both tissues were recombined (Fig. 4B, lane 5). This suggests that when the ectoderm and the DLMZ are in contact, interactions between the two parts of the recombinant sustain FGFR1 and FGFR4a expression. To test whether this was due to an active FGF signaling in the recombinants, we cultivated them either in DMSO or in SU5402 as described above. Although this prevented Slug and muscle actin expression (Fig. 3), both FGFR1 and FGFR4a were normally expressed in these explants (Fig. 4D). We conclude that, non-FGF signals act in the AC-DLMZ recombinants to maintain FGFR expression when FGF signaling is blocked.
FGF8 enhances neural crest formation in embryos and is sufficient to induce neural crest markers in explants
As FGF8 has recently been shown to be involved in neurogenesis without inducing mesoderm (Hardcastle et al., 2000), we decided to focus on this member of the family and analyze its potential activity in neural crest formation. We examined FGF8 gene expression at gastrula and early neurula stages. FGF8 appears initially as a ring around the blastopore and is reinforced dorsally by stage 11-11.5, when neural crest induction is thought to begin (Fig. 5E) (Christen and Slack, 1997). FGF8 expression level is then enhanced in the dorsolateral mesoderm at stage 13 and onwards, whereas it is downregulated in the dorsal midline (Fig. 5E). FGF8 is thus a good candidate to mediate the FGF-dependent DLMZ activity on neural crest induction. To test this hypothesis in whole embryos, we analyzed Slug expression after FGF8 mRNA injections. Compared with control sibling embryos (Fig. 5A), 50 pg of FGF8 mRNA injections were followed by a strong increase in Slug expression (Fig. 5B, yellow arrows indicate the injected side). This upregulation was not correlated to an expansion of the MyoD domain (Fig. 5C,D, small red arrow). Interestingly, when the injected cells (lacZ staining) were located in the anterior part of the neural plate, this region expressed Slug, suggesting that these injections transformed the anterior neural fold into a more posterior structure (Fig. 5B, red arrow) (Christen and Slack, 1997). However, in the embryo, co-factors from the surrounding tissues, such as the mesoderm or the ectoderm, could also be recruited for FGF8 activity on the neural crest.
FGF8 induces neural crest in vivo and in vitro. (A-D) In vivo injections of FGF8 mRNA in one of two-cell stage embryos, analyzed by in situ hybridization for Slug (A,B) or MyoD (C,D) at stage 18-20. (A) Control embryos. (B) FGF8 mRNA unilateral injections result in a strong overexpression of Slug on the injected side (yellow arrows) and sometimes in the contralateral side and the anterior neural fold (red arrowheads). (C) Control embryos. (D) FGF8 mRNA injections (injected side indicated by yellow arrowheads) do not expand paraxial mesoderm, they even reduce it in some embryos (embryo on the right) (red arrowhead). (E) FGF8 mRNA is expressed as a ring around the blastopore at stage 11 (top), reinforced dorsally (red arrows). Later on, FGF8 is expressed in the DLMZ and downregulated in the midline (bottom, red arrow). (F) FGF8 mRNA injections induce neural crest markers in animal caps. RT-PCR analysis shows the induction of FoxD3 and Zic5 by 100 pg of FGF8 mRNA, but not of paraxial mesoderm formation. (G) When the caps are analyzed earlier (stage 15), increased doses of FGF8 induce strongly FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5. By stage 19, FoxD3 and Zic5 expression was not maintained.
To test FGF8 activity in a more defined assay, we injected animal caps with 100 pg of FGF8 mRNA at the two- to four-cell stage into the animal pole, cut animal caps at stage 9 and grew them in isolation up to stage 17-18. This did not result in the induction of muscle actin expression, confirming that these injections do not induce paraxial mesoderm (Fig. 5D, lanes 3-4). Nonetheless, the neural crest markers Zic5 and FoxD3 were clearly induced by FGF8 injections. Slug expression was only slightly upregulated in the FGF8-injected animal caps, at much lower levels than in the recombination assay, and Sox9 was not consistently present (Fig. 5F). This first result indicates that FGF8 alone is sufficient to induce the expression of some genes characteristic of the neural crest, although not as efficiently as the DLMZ. To understand FGF8 activity better, we then increased the injected doses and saw that 500 pg of FGF8 consistently induced Sox9 expression when observed at stage 17-18 (data not shown). In addition, we found that, when the animal caps were analyzed at an earlier stage (stage 15), a very strong induction of FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 was obtained (Fig. 2G). However, when sibling animal caps from the same injection series were fixed a few hours later, at stage 19, the expression of all markers, except for Sox9, had vanished (Fig. 2G). This demonstrates that FGF8 is able to elicit a strong but transient induction of FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5. This is obtained in the absence of mesoderm induction and without need for additional downregulation of BMP signaling. By contrast, we did not obtain Slug induction above the background levels shown in Fig. 2F, and thus we conclude that FGF8 does not significantly induce this gene under our experimental conditions.
In conclusion, these data suggest that FGF8 alone is sufficient to mediate both the DLMZ-specific induction of FoxD3 and the common DMZ/DLMZ induction of Zic5 and Sox9. Second, because, in vivo, FGF8 injections show a potent Slug upregulation, we conclude that this aspect of FGF8 activity requires interactions with other DLMZ-specific factors. Moreover, in the AC-DLMZ or AC-DMZ recombinants, the expression of neural crest markers is induced and maintained, indicating that other molecules must reinforce and sustain FGF8 inductive activity.
In vivo inhibition of Wnt or FGF signaling result in anteriorization of the neural plate prior to neural crest induction and affects paraxial mesoderm development
Previous studies have shown that both Wnt and FGF signals are required for normal expression of Slug in the Xenopus embryo (Mayor et al., 1997; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Villanueva et al., 2002). However, these signaling molecules are also required for multiple steps of early development, such as mesoderm formation or neural plate AP patterning (Ribisi et al., 2000; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). We repeated the analysis of Slug expression under similar experimental conditions (Fig. 6A) and also tested expression of the rhombencephalon marker Krox 20 in parallel (Fig. 6B) (Bradley et al., 1993). Moreover, we analyzed mesoderm development in these assays, by staining the embryos simultaneously for Slug mRNA and with the monoclonal antibody 12-101, which stains differentiated muscle (Kintner and Brockes, 1984).
In vivo analysis of neural crest and neural plate patterning after modification of Wnt signaling. (A,B) Control embryos stained for Slug and Krox20 at stage 19. (C,D) Wnt8 mRNA injections (50 pg) are followed by the extension of Slug and Krox 20 domains together, in the posterior parts of the embryos (arrows). (E,F) dnWnt8 mRNA injections (50 pg) result in reduction of both Slug and Krox 20 expression (arrows).
After overexpression of Wnt8, as previously shown (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998), the Slug expressing domain was expanded posteriorly (Fig. 6A,C). However, Krox20 was also expanded in a similar manner, showing that the whole rhombencephalon area was enlarged (Fig. 6B,D) and that the neural crest increase observed could be a consequence of modifications in neural patterning. Conversely, blocking Wnt signals with a dominant-negative form of XWnt8 resulted in reduction of both Slug and Krox20 (Fig. 6E,F), suggesting again that neural crest modifications observed previously could be interpreted in terms of general neural patterning (Villanueva et al., 2002).
To avoid the diffusible effects of NFz8, we also inhibited Wnt signaling cell-autonomously using GSK3 injected either in one half of the embryo or into the prospective neural fold at the 16-cell stage. Control injections did not alter Slug expression (Fig. 7A,D) or paraxial mesoderm formation (Fig. 7A). However, in both types of GSK3 injections, the decrease or a lack in Slug expression was correlated with altered paraxial mesoderm and neural patterning (Fig. 7B-F). Thus, in these in vivo assays, we have not been able to dissociate the effects of Wnt signaling on neural crest formation from those on neural plate and mesoderm patterning.
In vivo GSK3 injections perturb neural crest, neural plate and mesoderm development. (A-C) Injections in one of two-cell stage embryos of lacZ (A) or GSK3 (300 pg) plus lacZ mRNA (B,C). The GSK3 injected side (white arrow, pink lacZ staining) displays greatly reduced Slug expression (B, red arrow, blue staining), abnormal Krox20 expression (C, red arrow, blue staining) and reduction of the paraxial mesoderm marker 12-101 staining (B,C; black arrows, brown staining). Red and black arrows in A indicate normal staining for Slug (blue) and 12-101 (brown), respectively. (D-F) GSK3 (150 pg) was injected into one dorsoanimal blastomere at the 16-cell stage to target one neural fold and reduce the effect on adjacent tissues. (D) Controlβ -galactosidase staining. (E) The injected area shows reduction in both Slug (red arrow) and 12-101 staining (black arrow). (F) Ectopic expression of the anterior neural plate marker Cpl-1 is induced ectopically (red arrow), showing that neural patterning is also affected.
Neural plate patterning and neural crest induction can be uncoupled in vivo
To understand better how Wnt or FGF signaling might affect neural crest formation by changing early neural patterning, we analyzed NFz8 and dnFGFR4a effects on AP neural pattern. We compared the AP neural pattern at stage 11.5 to Slug expression in sibling embryos fixed around stage 18. Blocking of Wnt signaling by NFz8 mRNA injections, or of FGF signaling by XFD injections in vivo, resulted in a reduction of Slug expression together with perturbed gastrulation and neural plate formation when observed at stage 18 (Fig. 8A-C). However, by marked contrast, dnFGFR4a injections resulted in dramatic gastrulation defects without obvious downregulation of Slug expression levels (Fig. 8D). The Slug expressing domain was shifted around the blastopore in the most affected embryos, but we did not observe as strong a decrease in Slug staining as after NFz8 or XFD treatment. To test if this observation was correlated with distinct activities of these molecules on neural AP patterning, we fixed the injected embryos at stage 11.5, i.e. before neural crest induction is established, and when Slug expression is hardly detected (not shown). At this stage, neural AP pattern is already well established and the Otx2 expression domain is restricted to the anterior part of the neural plate (Fig. 8E) (Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). This domain corresponds to the presumptive forebrain and midbrain and does not give rise to neural crest. After NFz8 dorsal injections at the two-cell stage, we observed a clear anteriorization of the neural plate, assessed by the posterior border of the Otx2 domain (Fig. 8F). The area between the blastopore and the posterior limit of the Otx2-positive area was reduced or absent (blue bars). This corresponds to a strong reduction of the neural crest-forming structures, the rhombencephalon and the spinal cord. Similarly, dnFGFR4a injections resulted either in a moderate reduction of the posterior structures (Fig. 8G, left embryo) or their complete absence (Fig. 8G, right embryo). When similar dnFGFR4a-injected embryos fixed at stage 18, the Slug-positive domain formed around the blastopore corresponded an area where Krox20 was expressed. However, Krox20 was strongly reduced and abnormal (not shown). This result indicates that dnFGFR4a injections do perturb neural AP patterning deeply without resulting in a deficiency in Slug induction and maintenance. This implies that, in vivo, although we could not separate the roles of dnXWnt8, NFz8 or XFD injections on neural and neural crest patterning, these two phenomena can be uncoupled if we injected dnFGFR4a. We conclude that neural crest formation is not a strict consequence of proper neural plate patterning, although it is closely related to it, as signaling via FGFR4a is required for neural patterning but not for neural crest formation.
Neural crest formation can be experimentally uncoupled from neural plate patterning. (A-D) Injected embryos were analyzed around stage 18 and stained for Slug expression. (A) Control embryo. (B) XFD injections result in gastrulation defects and loss of most Slug staining. (C) NFz8 injections most often produce an abnormally shaped neural plate, gastrulation defects and reduced Slug expression. (D) dnFGFR4a-injected embryos show severe gastrulation defects but still present a strong Slug staining (the right hand embryo is shown in side view). (E,F) Similar injections were analyzed at stage 11.5-12 for Otx2 expression. Otx2 labels the area anterior to the neural crest-forming regions. It is found further from the blastopore as development proceeds (blue bars measure the distance between the posterior part of the Otx2 domain and the blastopore; anterior is indicated by the red star). (E) Stage 11.5 (left) and stage 12 (right) control embryos. (F) NFz8-injected embryos show a strongly reduced posterior neural crest-forming domain. (G) dnFGFR4a injections result either in normal sized posterior domain (left) or strongly reduced ones (right). Both types of embryos will show a strong Slug expression at stage 18 (D). Red stars indicate anterior.
In this study, we show that the paraxial mesoderm of Xenopus embryos induces neural crest by an FGF-dependent mechanism and that FGF8 is sufficient to induce neural crest markers in the naive ectoderm without requiring additional BMP antagonists. Moreover FGF8 can cooperate with additional factors to modulate Slug expression in vivo. Wnt signaling, via the canonical or the planar cell polarity pathways, is not necessary for the response of the ectoderm to the paraxial mesoderm. In examining the relationships between neural plate patterning and neural crest formation in vivo, we show that blocking Wnt signaling affects both AP neural patterning and neural crest formation; by contrast, a truncated FGFR4a acts on neural pattern but does not block neural crest induction and maintenance.
The paraxial (but not the axial) mesoderm, induces a whole range of neural crest-specific genes in the ectoderm
Elegant experiments using albino Xenopus embryos have shown that the ectoderm can form neural crest in response to DLMZ signals and that the DMZ was a less efficient Slug inducer than the DLMZ (Bonstein et al., 1998; Marchant et al., 1998). We show here that the induction of Slug by mesoderm explants is closely correlated to the presence of muscle actin in the inductive tissue, i.e. to the presence of some paraxial tissue (Fig. 1). When DMZs are cut medially, they consistently fail to induce Slug. This suggests that the quantitatively lower activity of the DMZ reported previously might reflect some variability in the width of the explants. We also show that the DLMZ is able to induce a whole range of neural crest markers: Slug, FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 (Fig. 1C, lane 5). By contrast, the DMZ does not induce Slug or FoxD3 but upregulates Zic5 and Sox9 expression at various levels (Fig. 1C, lane 7). The distinct inducing activities of the DLMZ and of the DMZ might be due either to a dorsal-to-lateral increasing gradient of neural crest inducing activity or to a different combination of inducing molecules produced by each kind of tissue. According to the first hypothesis, Zic5 and Sox9 genes would be upregulated by low levels of this inducer, whereas Slug and FoxD3 activation would require a higher concentration. According to the second hypothesis, the DMZ would express a molecule able to induce Zic5 and Sox9 whereas the DLMZ would express an additional signal(s) required for inducing either the complete range of neural crest markers or Slug and FoxD3 specifically. We therefore consider Slug and FoxD3 to be most characteristic of neural crest induction because they are specifically induced by the DLMZ and because their in vivo expression pattern is mostly restricted to the neural crest (Fig. 1D).
Neural crest induction by the paraxial mesoderm requires functional FGF-FGFR1 signaling
Previous studies have shown that neural crest formation can be induced by a combination of BMP antagonists plus Wnt/FGF signals in Xenopus animal cap assays (Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998). Moreover, the same classes of molecules regulate the expression of Slug and FoxD3. FoxD3 is induced by a combination of either chordin+bFGF or chordin+Wnt3a (Sasai et al., 2001). Similarly, Slug is upregulated in animal caps by combining chordin with either eFGF or XWnt8 (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998). The regulation of Zic5 and Sox9 genes has not yet been studied, although these genes are required for neural crest development in vivo (Nakata et al., 2000; Spokony et al., 2002). Both Wnt and FGF signals are expressed in the paraxial mesoderm. They might play a role in mesoderm development itself, as well as mediating mesodermal signaling activities toward the ectoderm. These activities could be redundant and do not exclude the possibility that alternative mechanisms may also be active.
To analyze the mechanisms of action of the DLMZ, we blocked the response of the ectoderm to either endogenous Wnt or FGF signals, in the DLMZ-AC recombination assay (Fig. 2). Many previous studies have used secreted antagonists such as dnWnt8 to block Wnt signals in embryos or in explants: this results in downregulation of Slug in Xenopus (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998) and blocks Pax3 induction by the chick paraxial mesoderm (Bang et al., 1999). After NFz8 injections in the ectoderm of the recombinants, we only saw a moderate downregulation of Slug, Sox9 and Pax3 at high doses (Fig. 2; data not shown). By blocking the intracellular downstream canonical and PCP Wnt pathways, we show that none of the four neural crest markers analyzed depend directly on Wnt signaling to be induced by the DLMZ. Therefore, the effects of diffusible antagonists observed in these recombination assays might reflect a Wnt-dependent modulation or maintenance of the paraxial mesoderm-inducing activity, or indicate that the Wnt pathway may have an overlapping activity.
By contrast, blocking FGF-FGFR1 signaling, by injecting XFD in the ectoderm, strongly reduced the induction of Slug, FoxD3 and to a lesser extent Sox9 (Fig. 3). The induction of Zic5 was unaffected by the XFD injections. The most affected genes corresponded to those specifically induced by the DLMZ but not by the DMZ. This suggests that the DLMZ-specific aspect of neural crest inducing activity requires functional FGF signaling, probably through FGFR1. FGF signaling is also required in vivo for normal neural crest formation as XFD injections strongly downregulate Slug expression (Mayor, 1997) (this work). Interestingly, we found that dnFGFR4a did not affect neural crest induction. In contrast to this observation, FGFR4a plays a prominent role in neurogenesis (Hardcastle et al., 2000). This raises the attractive possibility that different FGFRs might display different roles in neuronal versus neural crest development.
FGF8 induces neural crest
We show that the DLMZ expresses FGF3, FGF4 and FGF8 at gastrula and early neurula stages (Fig. 4). We further show that FGF8 can account for the neural crest induction by the DLMZ, either alone or in cooperation with other DLMZ factors (Fig. 5). First, in vivo FGF8 expression is detected at early gastrula stages as a ring around the blastopore, it is then reinforced in the DLMZ area. Second, FGF8 mRNA injections in vivo are followed by a large increase in Slug expression without expansion of the paraxial mesoderm. Finally, FGF8 injections in the animal cap assay induce the expression of neural crest markers without inducing mesoderm formation. This contrasts with previous studies using FGF4 (eFGF) or bFGF in similar assays, which showed (1) mesoderm induction, (2) absence of neural crest induction by FGF4 or bFGF alone and (3) requirement for co-expression with a BMP antagonist (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Mizuseki et al., 1998). The unique properties of FGF8 on neural crest can be compared with its ability to induce neurogenesis without mesoderm induction, when it is expressed from blastula stages (Hardcastle et al., 2000). Other FGF molecules can also be direct neural inducers, but only if they are expressed after the period of competence to form mesoderm, and in tissue that has attenuated BMP signaling (Lamb and Harland, 1995). FGF8 is thus a good candidate for mediating FGF neural-specific roles during the period of early neural crest development defined by Aybar and Mayor (Aybar and Mayor, 2002).
Is FGF8 a neural crest inducer?
To be considered a physiologically significant activity, a neural crest inducer must satisfy the following properties. First, it should be expressed by tissue(s) with a neural crest inducing potential, in early neurula stage embryos. FGF8, which is expressed in the paraxial mesoderm as early as stage 10, satisfies this first condition (Fig. 5E). By contrast, Wnt1 expression is detected by stage 14, i.e. after Slug induction (Deardorff et al., 2001). Thus, Wnt1 and Wnt 3a, which act via Xfrizzled-3 and Kermit, are more likely to play later roles in neural crest development, such as maintenance of the induction or fate choice (Dorsky et al., 1998; Basch et al., 2000; Dorsky et al., 2000; Deardorff et al., 2001; Jin et al., 2001; Tan et al., 2001). Thus, in amphibians, the activity of an ectoderm-restricted Wnt, equivalent to the chick Wnt6 gene, remains to be found (Garcia-Castro et al., 2002). The activity of β-catenin on early neural crest formation (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998) could rather reflect a role of Wnt7b and Wnt 8, which are present in the early ectoderm/neurectoderm and paraxial mesoderm, respectively (Bang et al., 1999; Wu et al., 2003).
Second, the activity of the inducer should be necessary to obtain neural crest formation, although this can be missed if redundant pathways are activated in the same assay. We show here that FGF signaling is required to mediate paraxial mesoderm induction of Slug and FoxD3 (Fig. 3). Active FGFR1 signaling is also necessary in vivo (Mayor et al., 1997). Further analysis by a selective knockdown of FGF8 will determine if FGF8 is specifically required in the DLMZ for neural crest induction or if other FGFs have overlapping activity.
In addition to these two properties, the neural crest-inducing activity could be mediated either by a single factor or a combination of molecules. Tested separately, these molecules might be able to evoke neural crest formation even if the robust induction of neural crest markers and further development of neural crest cells might require additional inputs. In Xenopus animal cap assay, FGF8 induces FoxD3, Sox9 and Zic5 (but Slug is only very slightly upregulated) (Fig. 5F,G). Moreover, the induction by FGF8 in this assay is transient, showing the requirement for other factors to maintain and complete the induction of the full range of neural crest markers. It has been shown by similar experiments that, although they do not induce neural crest markers by themselves, Wnts, eFGF and bFGF synergize with noggin or chordin to induce neural crest (Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998; Mizuseki et al., 1998). The cooperation of FGF8 with other molecules such as BMP antagonists or Wnts in the maintenance of neural crest induction remains to be explored.
FGF8 activity must be modulated to become a potent crest-inducing activity, as FGF8 is expressed in both dorsal and dorsolateral marginal zones (Fig. 5), and these have qualitatively different neural crest-inducing activity (Fig. 1). FGF8 might account for DMZ-DLMZ common induction of Zic5 and Sox9. However, in the recombinant assay, neither XFD nor dn FGFR4a injections prevented Zic5 or Sox9 induction, supporting the idea that redundant inducing mechanisms are provided by the DLMZ (Fig. 3). In addition, Zic5 and Sox9 are not restricted to the neural crest, but also expressed in the anterior neural fold and the prospective otic placode, respectively. They are thus expected to respond to neural crest specific inducers as well as to other signals (Fig. 1). Our study also revealed distinct regulation for Slug and FoxD3. Both genes were considered specifically induced by the DLMZ (Fig. 1) and this induction requires FGF signaling (Fig. 3). However, FGF8 is sufficient to induce expression of FoxD3 but not of Slug. Cooperation of FGF8 with additional signals could account for the expansion of the Slug domain observed in the embryo (Fig. 5). Alternatively, our in vitro conditions might not induce the right relative levels of FoxD3/Sox9/Zic5: each of these factors is necessary for normal neural crest development and/or Slug expression. In particular, overexpression of FoxD3 can either increase or prevent Slug activation, suggesting that a fine balance is controlled in the embryo (Pohl and Knochel, 2001; Sasai et al., 2001). Finally, we cannot rule out the possibility that the neural crest induction we observed in the isolated ectoderm occurred secondarily to FGF8-induced neural tissue (Hardcastle et al., 2000), secondary to the formation of a border between the ectoderm and induced neural tissue. Further experiments will test if FGF8 is a direct neural crest inducer or if it switches on a developmental program eventually resulting into neural crest induction. However, by its neural crest inducing activity in the animal cap assay, FGF8 stands as an excellent candidate inducer when compared with previously proposed ones such as WNT8 or WNT7b, which do not act alone in this assay (Chang and Hemmati-Brivanlou, 1998; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998).
In the chick embryo, the ectoderm can induce neural crest from early neural tissue and WNT6 signaling seems necessary and sufficient to mediate this activity (Garcia-Castro et al., 2002). In Xenopus, blocking Wnt signaling strongly downregulates neural crest formation in vivo, whereas in animal cap assay, Wnt signals require additional downregulation of BMPs to act on Slug induction (LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998). Combined with our data, this suggests that, in vivo, both the ectoderm and the mesoderm participate in inducing the neural crest and that they have different requirements to achieve neural crest induction. The coordinate activity of both Wnt and FGF pathways may account for the robust neural crest formation observed in normal embryos.
Neural crest induction and neural plate posteriorization
Neural crest induction is achieved experimentally by combining the same classes of molecules as those required for neural plate patterning: BMP antagonists, Wnts and FGFs. All three kinds of molecules have been shown to downregulate Bmp4 expression or BMP4 activity, either in Xenopus or in chick embryos (Lamb et al., 1993; Lamb and Harland, 1995; Baker et al., 1999; Wilson et al., 2000). In addition, FGF and Wnts also posteriorize the neural plate (Lamb and Harland, 1995; Domingos et al., 2001; Kiecker and Niehrs, 2001). We show here: (1) that Slug expression in vivo strongly correlates to proper neural and mesoderm development (Figs 6, 7), but (2) that blocking FGFR4a signaling strongly affects the AP neural pattern without preventing robust Slug expression (Fig. 8). We conclude that although the AP position of the Slug-positive domain might vary under these conditions, Slug induction can occur independently of AP neural patterning. Thus, we postulate that the loss of Slug expression observed after blocking Wnt or FGFR1 signaling (Mayor et al., 1997; LaBonne and Bronner-Fraser, 1998) (this work) reflects a role of these pathways in neural crest formation, on top of their role on neural patterning (Villanueva et al., 2002).
In conclusion, our study shows that, in the Xenopus embryo, (1) normal early development of the neural crest can occur in a context of abnormal AP neural patterning in vivo, (2) the paraxial mesoderm induces neural crest by an FGF-dependent pathway and (3) FGF8 is likely to mediate this activity. Our data still agree with the two-signal model of neural crest induction, and even suggest a multiple-signal model: in this model, the neural crest would arise in a location where a 'cocktail' of positive regulators is expressed. We propose that simultaneous moderate downregulation of BMP4 signaling, upregulation of ectodermal-derived factors (Wnt) and mesoderm-produced FGFs provides this suitable environment.
We are grateful to Drs T. C. Grammer and J. B. Wallingford for their critical reading of the manuscript, to all the members of the Harland laboratory for their constant enthusiasm and help, to Dr D. Frank for helpful advice on explant procedure and preliminary observations with NFz8, and to Drs P. Klein, D. Kimelman, J.-P. Saint-Jeannet, D. Turner and R. Moon for the gift of materials. This work was supported by the NIH. A.-H.M.-B. is supported by the College de France and an EMBO Long Term Fellowship.
Amaya, E., Musci, T. J. and Kirschner, M. W. (1991). Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 66,257 -270.
Amaya, E., Stein, P. A., Musci, T. J. and Kirschner, M. W. (1993). FGF signalling in the early specification of mesoderm in Xenopus. Development 118,477 -487.
Aybar, M. J. and Mayor, R. (2002). Early induction of neural crest cells: lessons learned from frog, fish and chick. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12,452 -458.
Baker, J. C., Beddington, R. S. and Harland, R. M. (1999). Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos inhibits bmp4 expression and activates neural development. Genes Dev. 13,3149 -3159.
Bang, A. G., Papalopulu, N., Kintner, C. and Goulding, M. D. (1997). Expression of Pax-3 is initiated in the early neural plate by posteriorizing signals produced by the organizer and by posterior non-axial mesoderm. Development 124,2075 -2085.
Bang, A. G., Papalopulu, N., Goulding, M. D. and Kintner, C. (1999). Expression of Pax-3 in the lateral neural plate is dependent on a Wnt-mediated signal from posterior nonaxial mesoderm. Dev. Biol. 212,366 -380.
Basch, M. L., Selleck, M. A. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (2000). Timing and competence of neural crest formation. Dev. Neurosci. 22,217 -227.
Bonstein, L., Elias, S. and Frank, D. (1998). Paraxial-fated mesoderm is required for neural crest induction in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 193,156 -168.
Bradley, L. C., Snape, A., Bhatt, S. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1993). The structure and expression of the Xenopus Krox-20 gene: conserved and divergent patterns of expression in rhombomeres and neural crest. Mech. Dev. 40,73 -84.
Brantjes, H., Barker, N., van Es, J. and Clevers, H. (2002). TCF: Lady Justice casting the final verdict on the outcome of Wnt signalling. Biol. Chem. 383,255 -261.
Chang, C. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1998). Neural crest induction by Xwnt7B in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 194,129 -134.
Christen, B. and Slack, J. M. (1997). FGF-8 is associated with anteroposterior patterning and limb regeneration in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 192,455 -466.
Christian, J. L., McMahon, J. A., McMahon, A. P. and Moon, R. T. (1991). Xwnt-8, a Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing growth factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis. Development 111,1045 -1055.
Condie, B. G., Brivanlou, A. H. and Harland, R. M. (1990). Most of the homeobox-containing Xhox 36 transcripts in early Xenopus embryos cannot encode a homeodomain protein. Mol. Cell Biol. 10,3376 -3385.
Cornell, R. A. and Kimelman, D. (1994). Activin-mediated mesoderm induction requires FGF. Development 120,453 -462.
Deardorff, M. A., Tan, C., Conrad, L. J. and Klein, P. S. (1998). Frizzled-8 is expressed in the Spemann organizer and plays a role in early morphogenesis. Development 125,2687 -2700.
Deardorff, M. A., Tan, C., Saint-Jeannet, J. P. and Klein, P. S. (2001). A role for frizzled 3 in neural crest development. Development 128,3655 -3663.
Dickinson, M. E., Selleck, M. A., McMahon, A. P. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1995). Dorsalization of the neural tube by the non-neural ectoderm. Development 121,2099 -2106.
Domingos, P. M., Itasaki, N., Jones, C. M., Mercurio, S., Sargent, M. G.,Smith, J. C. and Krumlauf, R. (2001). The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway posteriorizes neural tissue in Xenopus by an indirect mechanism requiring FGF signalling. Dev. Biol. 239,148 -160.
Dorsky, R. I., Moon, R. T. and Raible, D. W. (1998). Control of neural crest cell fate by the Wnt signalling pathway. Nature 396,370 -373.
Dorsky, R. I., Raible, D. W. and Moon, R. T. (2000). Direct regulation of nacre, a zebrafish MITF homolog required for pigment cell formation, by the Wnt pathway. Genes Dev. 14,158 -162.
Essex, L. J., Mayor, R. and Sargent, M. G. (1993). Expression of Xenopus snail in mesoderm and prospective neural fold ectoderm. Dev. Dyn. 198,108 -122.
Fisher, M. E., Isaacs, H. V. and Pownall, M. E. (2002). eFGF is required for activation of XmyoD expression in the myogenic cell lineage of Xenopus laevis. Development 129,1307 -1315.
Friesel, R. and Dawid, I. B. (1991). cDNA cloning and developmental expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors from Xenopus laevis. Mol. Cell Biol. 11,2481 -2488.
Friesel, R. and Brown, S. A. (1992). Spatially restricted expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 during Xenopus development. Development 116,1051 -1058.
Galzie, Z., Kinsella, A. R. and Smith, J. A. (1997). Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors. Biochem. Cell Biol. 75,669 -685.
Garcia-Castro, M. I., Marcelle, C. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (2002). Ectodermal Wnt function as a neural crest inducer. Science 297,848 -851.
Golub, R., Adelman, Z., Clementi, J., Weiss, R., Bonasera, J. andServetnick, M. (2000). Evolutionarily conserved and divergent expression of members of the FGF receptor family among vertebrate embryos, as revealed by FGFR expression patterns in Xenopus. Dev. Genes Evol. 210,345 -357.
Grammer, T. C., Liu, K. J., Mariani, F. V. and Harland, R. M. (2000). Use of large-scale expression cloning screens in the Xenopus laevis tadpole to identify gene function. Dev. Biol. 228,197 -210.
Hardcastle, Z., Chalmers, A. D. and Papalopulu, N. (2000). FGF-8 stimulates neuronal differentiation through FGFR-4a and interferes with mesoderm induction in Xenopus embryos. Curr. Biol. 10,1511 -1514.
Harland, R. (2000). Neural induction. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10,357 -362.
Hongo, I., Kengaku, M. and Okamoto, H. (1999). FGF signaling and the anterior neural induction in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 216,561 -581.
Hoppler, S. and Moon, R. T. (1998). BMP-2/-4 and Wnt-8 cooperatively pattern the Xenopus mesoderm. Mech. Dev. 71,119 -129.
Hopwood, N. D., Pluck, A. and Gurdon, J. B. (1989). A Xenopus mRNA related to Drosophila twist is expressed in response to induction in the mesoderm and the neural crest. Cell 59,893 -903.
Isaacs, H. V., Tannahill, D. and Slack, J. M. (1992). Expression of a novel FGF in the Xenopus embryo. A new candidate inducing factor for mesoderm formation and anteroposterior specification. Development 114,711 -720.
Jin, E. J., Erickson, C. A., Takada, S. and Burrus, L. W. (2001). Wnt and BMP signaling govern lineage segregation of melanocytes in the avian embryo. Dev. Biol. 233, 22-37.
Khokha, M. K., Chung, C., Bustamante, E. L., Gaw, L. W. K., Trott, K.A., Yeh, J., Lim, N., Lin, J., Taverner, N., Amaya, E. et al. (2003). Techniques and probes for the study of Xenopus tropicalis development. Dev. Dyn. (in press).
Kiecker, C. and Niehrs, C. (2001). A morphogen gradient of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling regulates anteroposterior neural patterning in Xenopus. Development 128,4189 -4201.
Kintner, C. R. and Brockes, J. P. (1984). Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating limb regeneration. Nature 308, 67-69.
Knecht, A. K. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (2002). Induction of the neural crest: a multigene process. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3,453 -461.
Knecht, A. K. and Harland, R. M. (1997). Mechanisms of dorsal-ventral patterning in noggin-induced neural tissue. Development 124,2477 -2488.
Kudoh, T., Wilson, S. W. and Dawid, I. B. (2002). Distinct roles for Fgf, Wnt and retinoic acid in posteriorizing the neural ectoderm. Development 129,4335 -4346.
LaBonne, C. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1998). Neural crest induction in Xenopus: evidence for a two-signal model. Development 125,2403 -2414.
LaBonne, C. and Whitman, M. (1994). Mesoderm induction by activin requires FGF-mediated intracellular signals. Development 120,463 -472.
Lamb, T. M. and Harland, R. M. (1995). Fibroblast growth factor is a direct neural inducer, which combined with noggin generates anterior-posterior neural pattern. Development 121,3627 -3636.
Lamb, T. M., Knecht, A. K., Smith, W. C., Stachel, S. E., Economides, A.N., Stahl, N., Yancopolous, G. D. and Harland, R. M. (1993). Neural induction by the secreted polypeptide noggin. Science 262,713 -718.
Le Douarin, N. M. and Kalcheim, C. (1999). The Neural Crest. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Linker, C., Bronner-Fraser, M. and Mayor, R. (2000). Relationship between gene expression domains of Xsnail, Xslug, and Xtwist and cell movement in the prospective neural crest of Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 224,215 -225.
Mancilla, A. and Mayor, R. (1996). Neural crest formation in Xenopus laevis: mechanisms of Xslug induction. Dev. Biol. 177,580 -589.
Marchant, L., Linker, C., Ruiz, P., Guerrero, N. and Mayor, R. (1998). The inductive properties of mesoderm suggest that the neural crest cells are specified by a BMP gradient. Dev. Biol. 198,319 -329.
Maroon, H., Walshe, J., Mahmood, R., Kiefer, P., Dickson, C. and Mason,I. (2002). Fgf3 and Fgf8 are required together for formation of the otic placode and vesicle. Development 129,2099 -2108.
Mayor, R., Essex, L. J., Bennett, M. F. and Sargent, M. G. (1993). Distinct elements of the xsna promoter are required for mesodermal and ectodermal expression. Development 119,661 -671.
Mayor, R., Morgan, R. and Sargent, M. G. (1995). Induction of the prospective neural crest of Xenopus. Development 121,767 -777.
Mayor, R., Guerrero, N. and Martinez, C. (1997). Role of FGF and noggin in neural crest induction. Dev. Biol. 189,1 -12.
Mayor, R., Guerrero, N., Young, R. M., Gomez-Skarmeta, J. L. andCuellar, C. (2000). A novel function for the Xslug gene: control of dorsal mesendoderm development by repressing BMP-4. Mech. Dev. 97,47 -56.
Mizuseki, K., Kishi, M., Matsui, M., Nakanishi, S. and Sasai, Y. (1998). Xenopus Zic-related-1 and Sox-2, two factors induced by chordin, have distinct activities in the initiation of neural induction. Development 125,579 -587.
Mohammadi, M., McMahon, G., Sun, L., Tang, C., Hirth, P., Yeh, B. K.,Hubbard, S. R. and Schlessinger, J. (1997). Structures of the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor in complex with inhibitors. Science 276,955 -960.
Molenaar, M., van de Wetering, M., Oosterwegel, M., Peterson-Maduro,J., Godsave, S., Korinek, V., Roose, J., Destree, O. and Clevers, H. (1996). XTcf-3 transcription factor mediates beta-catenin-induced axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 86,391 -399.
Moon, R. T., Bowerman, B., Boutros, M. and Perrimon, N. (2002). The promise and perils of Wnt signaling through beta-catenin. Science 296,1644 -1646.
Moury, J. D. and Jacobson, A. G. (1989). Neural fold formation at newly created boundaries between neural plate and epidermis in the axolotl. Dev. Biol. 133, 44-57.
Moury, J. D. and Jacobson, A. G. (1990). The origins of neural crest cells in the axolotl. Dev. Biol. 141,243 -253.
Nakata, K., Koyabu, Y., Aruga, J. and Mikoshiba, K. (2000). A novel member of the Xenopus Zic family, Zic5, mediates neural crest development. Mech. Dev. 99, 83-91.
Nieto, M. A., Sargent, M. G., Wilkinson, D. G. and Cooke, J. (1994). Control of cell behavior during vertebrate development by Slug, a zinc finger gene. Science 264,835 -839.
Nieuwkoop, P. D. and Faber, J. (1994).Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) . New York: Garland.
Pierce, S. B. and Kimelman, D. (1996). Overexpression of Xgsk-3 disrupts anterior ectodermal patterning in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 175,256 -264.
Pohl, B. S. and Knochel, W. (2001). Overexpression of the transcriptional repressor FoxD3 prevents neural crest formation in Xenopus embryos. Mech. Dev. 103,93 -106.
Raven, C. P. and Kloos, J. (1945). Induction by medial and lateral pieces of the archenteron roof with special reference to the determination of the neural crest. Acta. Neerl. Morphol. 5,348 -362.
Ribisi, S., Jr, Mariani, F. V., Aamar, E., Lamb, T. M., Frank, D. andHarland, R. M. (2000). Ras-mediated FGF signaling is required for the formation of posterior but not anterior neural tissue in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 227,183 -196.
Richter, K., Grunz, H. and Dawid, I. B. (1988). Gene expression in the embryonic nervous system of Xenopus laevis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85,8086 -8090.
Rupp, R. A. and Weintraub, H. (1991). Ubiquitous MyoD transcription at the midblastula transition precedes induction-dependent MyoD expression in presumptive mesoderm of X. laevis. Cell 65,927 -937.
Sasai, N., Mizuseki, K. and Sasai, Y. (2001). Requirement of FoxD3-class signaling for neural crest determination in Xenopus. Development 128,2525 -2536.
Schroeder, T. E. (1970). Neurulation in Xenopus laevis. An analysis and model based upon light and electron microscopy. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 23,427 -462.
Selleck, M. A. and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1995). Origins of the avian neural crest: the role of neural plate-epidermal interactions. Development 121,525 -538.
Shinya, M., Koshida, S., Sawada, A., Kuroiwa, A. and Takeda, H. (2001). Fgf signalling through MAPK cascade is required for development of the subpallial telencephalon in zebrafish embryos. Development 128,4153 -4164.
Sive, H. L., Grainger, R. M. and Harland, R. M. (2000). Early Development of Xenopus laevis: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
Sokol, S. Y. (1996). Analysis of Dishevelled signalling pathways during Xenopus development. Curr. Biol. 6,1456 -1467.
Spokony, R. F., Aoki, Y., Saint-Germain, N., Magner-Fink, E. and Saint-Jeannet, J. P. (2002). The transcription factor Sox9 is required for cranial neural crest development in Xenopus. Development 129,421 -432.
Tan, C., Deardorff, M. A., Saint-Jeannet, J. P., Yang, J., Arzoumanian, A. and Klein, P. S. (2001). Kermit, a frizzled interacting protein, regulates frizzled 3 signaling in neural crest development. Development 128,3665 -3674.
Vallin, J., Thuret, R., Giacomello, E., Faraldo, M. M., Thiery, J. P. andBroders, F. (2001). Cloning and characterization of three Xenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by Lef/beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 276,30350 -30358.
Villanueva, S., Glavic, A., Ruiz, P. and Mayor, R. (2002). Posteriorization by FGF, Wnt, and retinoic acid is required for neural crest induction. Dev Biol 241,289 -301.
von Dassow, G., Schmidt, J. E. and Kimelman, D. (1993). Induction of the Xenopus organizer: expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. Genes Dev. 7,355 -366.
Vonica, A. and Gumbiner, B. (2002). Zygotic Wnt activity is required for brachyury expression in the early Xenopus laevis embryo. Dev. Biol. 250,112 .
Wallingford, J. B. and Harland, R. M. (2002). Neural tube closure requires Dishevelled-dependent convergent extension of the midline. Development 129,5815 -5825.
Wilson, S. I., Graziano, E., Harland, R., Jessell, T. M. and Edlund, T. (2000). An early requirement for FGF signalling in the acquisition of neural cell fate in the chick embryo. Curr. Biol. 10,421 -429.
Woo, K. and Fraser, S. E. (1998). Specification of the hindbrain fate in the zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 197,283 -296.
Wu, J., Saint-Jeannet, J. P. and Klein, P. S. (2003). Wnt-frizzled signaling in neural crest formation. Trends Neurosci. 26,40 -45.
Yasuo, H. and Lemaire, P. (2001). Role of Goosecoid, Xnot and Wnt antagonists in the maintenance of the notochord genetic programme in Xenopus gastrulae. Development 128,3783 -3793.
Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Development.
You are going to email the following Neural crest induction by paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos requires FGF signals
Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from Development
Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Development web site.
Dosage-dependent requirements of Magoh for cortical interneuron generation and survival
GDE3 regulates oligodendrocyte precursor proliferation via release of soluble CNTFRα
Suppressor of Fused (Sufu) controls cerebellum granule cell proliferation by suppressing Fgf8 and spatially regulating Gli proteins
Show more RESEARCH ARTICLES
2019 on the Node
Read about the most-read posts, scientists on tour and a glimpse into what to look our for in 2020.
Interview – Madeleine Linneberg-Agerholm, Yan Fung Wong and Josh Brickman
Three Copenhagen-based researchers discuss their new paper, which exploits naïve human embryonic stem cells to generate in vitro models for the extra-embryonic endoderm.
Publishing peer review reports
To continue working towards transparency around the editorial process, Development now publishes a 'Peer review history file' alongside published papers. Read more about the policy and see the reports for yourself in one the first papers to publish the reports (under the 'Info & metrics' tab).


If you're surfing through cheap deals on copper tattoo machine frames UK, uk.dhgate.com is the best place for you. You can also take a look at our extensive range of tattoo machine rca liner to find the perfect one to enrich your life. If you are seeking for affordable tattoo machines remover with the best quality, we have great collections of designs for you. Whether you'd like new arrive tattoo machine UK or stainless steel tattoo machine gun tips UK, just pick one at DHgate in no time, you'll feel "it's worth every penny" when you get your parcel. What's more, cheap deals on coil tattoo machine liner await you every day. Free and fast shipping to UK!


text:
The Bold and the Beautiful's Harley Graham in Two Movies!
Harley Graham, who plays Thorne and Darla's daughter Alexandria on The Bold and the Beautiful, has two new movies coming out!
Her first project, "Six and a Half", is a short film, which has been selected for the annual Slamdance festival. The film is about a little girl (Graham) who tries to catch a frog in a pond, but gets hurt in the process. She blames the frog and seeks revenge. "Six and a Half" is only five minutes long and will screen at the festival on January 17 at 8:30 PM and January 20 at 6:00 PM.
Held in Park City, Utah, Slamdance's sole mission is to nurture and support truly independent works. They are known for premiering new films by first-time writers and directors working with limited budgets.
Harley will also be seen in the feature length film, "Dance Flick". In the grand tradition of "Scary Movie" and "Date Movie", "Dance Flick" is written and directed by the Wayans brothers and spoofs (what else?) dance movies. Harley will appear as Cindy Brady in the film set to be released in August of this year.
Soaps.com congratulates Harley Graham on her new projects and can't wait to see her on the big screen!
Ex-B&B Star Jennifer Finnigan in...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Skip to Menu Skip to Search Contact Us Bulgaria Websites & Languages Sharing tools Skip to Content
Search www.sgs.bg
Home › Our Company › About SGS › SGS in Brief › SGS in Bulgaria
SGS in Bulgaria
We have been operating in Bulgaria since 1991. Today, we have more than 330 experts located throughout the country with a head office in Sofia and operational offices in Varna and Burgas on the Black Sea coast, in Russe on the Danube River, as well as in Plovdiv and Svilengrad. As a result, we are the leading provider of inspection, certification, verification and testing services in Bulgaria.
Our accredited laboratories offer a broad range of services for oil, gas and chemical products, consumer goods, agricultural products, the industrial and environmental sectors, microbiology, GMO, soils, water, textile, management systems certification and much more.
Local accreditation
We were the first Bulgarian company in the field of inspection and certification services, training and analysis to gain a certified Quality Management System in accordance with EN ISO 9001:2000, and more recently EN ISO 9001:2008.
We hold numerous local accreditations from UKAS, SAS, Bulgarian Accreditation Service and more. We are also an accredited management system certification body for a range of standards, including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, FSSC 22000, OHSAS 18001, ISO/IEC 20000-1, ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 50001.
We are also accredited by the International Register of Certified Auditors (IRCA) for training provision.
SGS is the first international organization to be accredited by GOSSTANDART of Russia to perform GOST R certification.
To find out more about our service, contact your local office today.
SGS Bulgaria Ltd.
Megapark Business Centre
Floor 6, Office C
115G, Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd.
Sofia, 1784
t +359 88 923 5638
f +359 29 81 81 43
Call +359 88 923 5638
Bulgaria Websites & Languages
SGS Bulgaria


Choosing a Hollywood, FL, auto repair shop can make a difference in the maintenance your vehicle receives. In Hollywood, FL, working with the team from Jap Auto Pro can help ensure you receive fast, prompt service from a locally owned and operated company that uses only high quality products. We have master technicians on site and offer a 1-year, 12,000 mile warranty on all repairs.
A dependable Hollywood, FL, auto repair shop can help keep your vehicle maintained and running for a long time. Come to us in Hollywood, FL, for regular maintenance. The trained staff at Jap Auto Pro is here to help keep your vehicle on the road so you spend less time waiting around and more time accomplishing all the things you need to do. Call to schedule your appointment today.
Copyright © Jap Auto Pro. All rights reserved.


Banks was a highly accomplished London genre painter working at the height of the Victorian era. Like his contemporary artists Frederick Daniel Hardy, Charles Sillem Lidderdale, Alfred Rankley and William Bromley, Banks specialized in tightly done paintings often centered on children in playful or amusing situations.
While little is known about Bank's education, it would not be surprising to learn that he, in fact, attended the Royal Academy Schools for his instruction. Banks, while living at 1 Georgina Terrace, exhibited his first work at the Royal Academy in 1856 – Little Nell – and in total, exhibited only 4 works there – Beg, sir! (1857); A Winter Day's Recreation (1872) and The Broker Jar (1873). He also exhibited 1 work at the British Institution in 1857 entitled The Mountain Girl and exhibited his painting A Visit to the Cottage at the Royal Society of British Artists that same year.


text:
La Catedral de San Juan Bosco es el principal templo católico de la ciudad de Comodoro Rivadavia, provincia del Chubut, en Argentina. Se encuentra en la intersección de la calle Belgrano y la Avenida Rivadavia, y corresponde a la diócesis de Comodoro Rivadavia, sufragánea de la arquidiócesis de Bahía Blanca.

De estilo gótico-moderno e inaugurada por el monseñor Argimiro Moure el 26 de noviembre de 1978 y se la consagró el 9 de junio de 1979 por el monseñor Mariano Pérez, primer obispo de Comodoro Rivadavia.
Algunos elementos de la catedral, como los vitrales, provienen de Turín, Italia. Cabe destacar que fue la primera catedral en el mundo dedicada al fundador de la Congregación de los Salesianos.

Aunque la catedral fue inaugurada en 1978, permanece desde entonces inconclusa. En el acabado externo de su campanil los malos cálculos de ingeniería no permiten el peso de los materiales para su terminación que permitiría revestirlo.

Historia

El primer antecedente de un templo católico en la zona de Comodoro Rivadavía tuvo lugar en 1923 con la construcción del templo de Santa Lucía. Fue erigido a 3 kilómetros al norte, en los entonces yacimeintos petroliferos fiscales.

El presbérito Domingo Pérez fue designado párroco de Comodoro Rivadavia en 1928. Para ese entonces la única iglesia del lugar, era la Parroquia Santa Lucía en km 3. El 27 de abril de 1932, el párroco efectuó un pedido al Comisionado municipal solicitando un terreno ubicado en la calle Rivadavia entre Belgrano y España en la zona del "Chenque Chico". El pedido se presentó junto a un croquis similar a la iglesia de Km 3. La Municipalidad respondió el pedido el 9 de agosto del mismo año. De este modo, la comunidad católica recibió un terreno con 20 metros de ancho por 60 de largo, con frente a la calle Belgrano y callejones.

En 1936, el Consejo Deliberante de la ciudad consultó al reverendo Gregorio Salvá, para elegir al santo patrono de la ciudad. Para ello, consultaron el santoral correspondiente el 23 de febrero (día de la fundación del pueblo) y eligen a San Pedro Damián.

Con el auge despertado por el petróleo el pueblo no tuvo edificio religioso propio. Funcionando siempre en locales prestados, galpones y garajes hasta que en 1935 se edificó el colegio María Auxiliadora y la capilla del colegio funcionó como el templo parroquial.

El 6 de agosto de 1941, el monseñor Nicolás Esandi empezó la construcción de una parroquia autponoma de Km 3. La misma fue nombrada San Pedro Damián, en el bolevar de la avenida Rivadavia, inaugurandose el 24 de diciembre de 1949, actualmente denominada Cripta San Pedro Damián y ubicada en el subsuelo de la Catedral. Su  edificación bajo tierra se debío a los peligros que en 1941 representaba desde Europa la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Por esa razón, se propuso una edificación subterránea, que sirviese también de resguardo para la población ante posibles bombardeos.

A partir de la Gobernación Militar de Comodoro Rivadavia, la obra del templo toma un nuevo y vital impulso. En 1944, el "Chenque Chico" fue desmontado por orden del general Ángel Solari, en aquel entonces comandante de la "Agrupación Patagonia". En 1947, se presenta el proyecto del ingeniero Guillermo Martín, para construir la catedral de la ciudad. La cripta fue finalizada y santificada en 1949.

El 11 de febrero de 1957, el papa Pío XII crea la diócesis de Comodoro Rivadavia teniendo jurisdicción en las provincias de Chubut y Santa Cruz, la gobernación de Tierra del Fuego y las Islas del Atlántico Sur. Su primer Obispo, el Monseñor Mariano Pérez, decidió nombrar como Patrono de la Diócesis a San Juan Bosco. Los planos iniciales de la construcción, por orden del gobernador militar, fueron ejecutados por el ingeniero Guillermo Martín, pero luego renovados por el arquitecto Pedro Carballo, quien le otorgó su estilo gótico que hoy luce.

En 1958 empezó la construcción de la catedral, que finalizó en noviembre de 1978. Se tardó 20 años en edificar y con continuas modificaciones que la convirtieron en un edificio no preparado para su funcionalidad.
En 1963, el Papa Juan XXIII bendijo la imagen de San Juan Bosco.

Su primer Obispo Monseño apenas tuvo tiempo, antes de su traslado en 1964, para ver la iniciación de las obras de la catedral.

El 9 de junio de 1979, se realizó la ceremonia de consagración del templo, a la que asistió el presidente de facto, el general Jorge Rafael Videla.

El 23 de julio de 2009 la imagen y reliquia de Don Bosco permanecieron unos días en la catedral, en una peregrinación que atravesó varias ciudades.

En 2011, estrenó su novedoso sistema de sonido y se volvió el primer templo católico del país con un sistema de bafles colgantes.

Desde 2012 se supo que su sistema de calefacción sufrió avería desde hace unos inviernos lo que produjo que su número de fieles disminuyera drásticamente y además le impidiera desde entonces refugiar en las noches gente desamparada.

El 12 de enero de 2013, sufrió un robo vandálico que destruyó una vidriera para ingresar al templo, que había sido traída en 1959 de la ciudad italiana de Turín junto a la figura de San Juan Bosco, el patrono de la Patagonia. Había sido bendecido por el papa Juan XXIII. El saldo substraído fue de $5.000 de limosna y una rifa en horas de la madrugada en pleno centro de la ciudad.

El 27 de mayo de 2015 los murales de la catedral fueron declarados patrimonio artístico por la ordenanza número 11.697/14, aprobada por el Concejo Deliberante de Comodoro Rivadavia. Según la Comisión Evaluadora del Patrimonio Histórico, Cultural y Natural de la ciudad, constituye una importante contribución al patrimonio de la ciudad por su valor artístico y testimonial. Por lo tanto se promueve su protección, preservación, gestión e intervención. El mural lleva el nombre de "La visión de Don Bosco", mide 7,5 metros de ancho por 15 metros de alto, se sitúa al fondo de la nave central y su autora la artista plástica Dolores Ocampo de Morón.

En 2017 la fachada de la iglesia fue dañada con grafitis ofensivos. Los mismos fueron causados por organizaciones feministas en sus marchas "Ni una menos" por el centro de la ciudad. Según el movimiento feminista el escrache no fue contra los cristianos o personas que trabajan en la catedral sino en rechazo de las políticas que practica la institución católica. Pese a la denuncia pública en los medios las feministas se negaron a pedir disculpas.

Las pintadas generaron el rechazo de la comunidad en general. En los grafitis se plasmaron frases a favor del aborto y en contra del culto católico.

En junio de ese mismo año comenzó la restauración de la pintura y trabajos de revoque en sus paredes exteriores.

Características
El edificio religioso se halla sobre un bulevar de la avenida Rivadavia, entre Belgrano y España y junto con los ex baños públicos que se encuentran algunas cuadras más arriba, son las únicas dos construcciones de Comodoro que fueron construidas sobre un bulevar. Lo estratégico de la ubicación elegida se denota en la esquina de la intersección de las calles Rivadavia y Belgrano; lugar con alto valor simbólico, político y social de Comodoro Rivadavia. Allí se ubican edificios como esta Catedral, la Escuela N.º 83 (primera de la ciudad) y el Comando del Ejército. Estas edificaciones marcan el centro de la ciudad fue destinado a estos tres edificios con sus respectivas instituciones como la educación, la religión y las armas. Fueron dispuestos como instituciones centrales y umbilicales de una ciudad estratégica para la provincia del Chubut.
A pesar de la ubicación estratégica que posee el edificio religioso, hoy sufre los problemas de espacios y accesibilidad. Además se ubica peligrosamente entre una avenida por ambas manos y dos calles altamente transitadas.

La catedral fue construida con ladrillo y hormigón. Posee 62 m de largo y 20 m de ancho, mientras que la profundidad de la nave es de 17 metros. Además, posee doce columnas que representan a los 12 apóstoles. Lo angosto del terreno que ocupó sobre el bulevar condiciona su funcionalidad, dado impide la accesibilidad a discapacitados y no posee los jardines que cualquier catedral brindaría, siendo todo el espacio en cemento. Además se ubica peligrosamente entre cuatro calles altamente transitadas.

La torre, que posee una cruz de aluminio de 11 m, llega a una altura de 60 m. En la cruz se colocó  un cofre que contiene las intenciones como sentido de ofrenda de todos los fieles que colaboraron en la construcción de la catedral.

En el interior hay un muro del ábside, obra de la artista Dolores Ocampo de Morón. Otros artistas que también trabajaron aquí fueron Jadwiga Szymanski de Koprowoski (Calvario) y Marta Moroder (estatua de María Auxiliadora).

En la actualidad sufre los problemas de las napas freáticas, la falta de baños en su interior y la falta de accesibilidad para los discapacitados motores por su mala ubicación y falta de planeamiento funcional. El padre párroco de la catedral comentó sobre estos problemas:

Divisiones
El edificio se subdivide en 4 partes las cuales están todas juntas, pero constituyen distintas secciones que no están comunicadas entre ellas:

 edificio catedral propiamente dicho;
 cripta San Pedro Damián, ubicada en el subsuelo de la catedral, se corresponde con la parroquia San Pedro Damián, inaugurada el 24 de diciembre de 1949, construida en forma subterránea, ya que se creía que era un buen refugio antiaéreo a dónde la población podría recurrir;
 librería cristiana San Pablo tuvo apertura en 2010, se halla en planta baja; es la 15.ª sede del país y ofrece una variedad de artículos con un catálogo de más de 900 productos.
 obispado de la diócesis de Comodoro Rivadavia;
 estacionamiento/concesionaria: ubicada en la parte posterior del edificio un espacio cementado que se alquila a particulares. Al estar justo en el tramo final de la pendiente de la avenida Rivadavia sufre accidente de distintos vehículos que pierden el control.

Galería

Véase también
 Arquitectura en Argentina

Referencias

 Clemente I. Dumrauf: Historia de Chubut, 1992, p 495f.

Enlaces externos

Catedrales de Argentina del siglo XX
San Juan Bosco
Arquitectura en Comodoro Rivadavia
Turismo en Comodoro Rivadavia
Arquitectura moderna en Argentina
Arquitectura de Argentina de 1978
Diócesis de Comodoro Rivadavia
Comodoro Rivadavia
Comodoro Rivadavia

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Pumpkin carving never gets old. Even as I get old, it is still fun to carve pumpkins. It is a fun way to express your sense of humor. This submission is just that. A fun, humorous design by someone that I bet is not quite fresh from the cradle.