Sacramento is the capital of California and finding cheap car insurance in Sacramento California is not easy but it is also not impossible. Sacramento is big city and home of many drivers. Generally car insurance in California is expensive compare to other States of America. But still you can find cheap auto insurance quotes in Sacramento, CA.
Finding cheap car insurance rates in Sacramento, CA is not easy because California is expensive state. But still it is possible to get affordable auto insurance in California but you have to choose the right company for this. Some companies in Sacramento California provide the cheap car insurance and some are extremely expensive.
According to ValuePenguin the average rate of car insurance in Sacramento CA is $1,662. Which is way too expensive than normal car insurance rates in states like Florida and Colorado. Geico is the best full coverage car insurance provider in Los Angeles, California. But when it comes to Sacramento California Nationwide is the best auto insurer.
In East Sacramento average annual rate of car insurance is $1,600.
According to our research companies that will cost you less for auto insurance in Sacramento are few in numbers but still you can easily find them and contact them because all these companies provide best customer support service for your help.
These are the best car insurance companies in Sacramento California. If you want to hire cheap car insurance agent in Sacramento, CA then Fiesta Auto Insurance Center and Freeway Insurance Services Sacramento are ideal for you.
1. Bodily Injury Liability Coverage is $15000 to $30,000.
2. Property Damage Liability Coverage is $5,000.
These three requirements are essential for getting car insurance in Sacramento California.
Note: Rates can fluctuate according to your age group, driving history and ZIP Code.


text:
Laothoe lappona är en fjärilsart som beskrevs av Rudolf Rangnow 1935. Laothoe lappona ingår i släktet Laothoe och familjen svärmare. Inga underarter finns listade i Catalogue of Life.

Källor

Svärmare
lappona

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Status Update on Murphy's Grill
Posted on September 15, 2017 September 27, 2017 AuthorJimmy CassidyLeave a comment
The dining area of Murphy's Grill, set to open September 25th, this fall. – Courtesy of Jissella Urquilla
By Jissella Urquilla
Murphy's Grill, the soon to be newest on campus bar for CUA students was meant to open in August, however, it is now set to open on September 25th. A grand opening will be held on October 26th, right before Cardinal Weekend, by invitation only for the 500 donors.
Although it had been rumored that Murphy's Grill was having a difficult time obtaining permits and licenses, Tim Carney, Executive Director of Housing Services, clarified that this was not the case.
"All of our licenses and occupancy permits were obtained in the expected time frames and without difficulty." Carney said.
In the weeks leading up to its opening Murphy's Grill has been occupied with necessary operational tasks like getting the kitchen and staffing ready.
"The light is at the end of the tunnel," said Frank Persico, Vice President for University Relations and Chief of Staff.
Since there has been almost no publicity so far this semester in regards to the opening, students like senior Tim Keville have been confused. Carney said students should expect to see more information and advertisement for Murphy's Grill in the weeks to come.
"I have asked around to classmates and no one really seems to know when the opening date will be," Keville said.
Murphy's Grill is named after Michael Murphy, a CUA Alum who received a Bachelors of Arts in History in 1974 and later a Masters in American History in 1975. Murphy wanted students at Catholic to have a place where they could get together on a weekday night and be able to socialize. In 2007, before succumbing to cancer, Murphy announced he would be starting a fund for the students to have a Rathskeller "The Rat" in other words a place for students to get together, a "socialization place, and a community builder," Persico said. The Rat was a bar on campus that closed in 2003 when the Pryzbyla opened and campus shifted its center of the university.
Murphy's Grill, is the best way to honor Murphy because it is a place that symbolizes all that he stood for. In fact, the logo of Murphy's Grill, which was designed by Douglas Gunderson, son of Mary Corcoran, an alum of the university, uses a traditional Irish symbol for the trinity. The logo itself shows how Murphy's Grill is meant to follow Murphy's vision of the students having a place to come together.
A vision that started in 2007 will finally be revealed after 10 years of being in the works. The opening of Murphy's Grill is credited to Murphy's vision and Persico's efforts over the last 10 years to keep the project going. Another addition that Murphy's Grill will have for the community of Catholic is that it will provide jobs to CUA students, Persico feels that student workers will enrich the atmosphere. With student workers as hosts, runners, and servers, it is more plausible that Murphy's will be a place of socializing.
Following 14 years since CUA students have been able to purchase beer on a consistent basis on campus, Kelly Bourbon, 21, Media and Communication Major, is "pumped."
"I've been waiting to be able to purchase a beer on campus," Bourbon said.
Bourbon, believes Murphy's Grill will add to the culture at CUA because people will want to stay on campus to hang out instead of going into the city.
"Literally I felt like I hit nirvana," said Bourbon when speaking about the Murphy's Grill menu items she tasted. Bourbon is not the only student excited for Murphy's Grill to open.
Nicolas Calias, a Computer Science major, is also excited about Murphy. "It's a new place to get food, and if you're 21 you can purchase alcohol," Calias said.
Will Deatherage, a sophomore studying abroad this semester, is looking "forward to returning to a campus united closer together through the warm environment that Murphy's is hoping to provide."
Other students do not share the same opinion. Jessica McDowell, a senior Psychology major, feels neutral about the opening of Murphy's Grill.
"It's just something that is happening around me," McDowell said. McDowell believes Murphy's Grill will only be beneficial to families on campus with prospective students. Justin Andreani, a Senior Politics Major, shares common beliefs with McDowell.
"I do plan on visiting but its high prices are too impractical for me," Andreani said.
Bottled beers will start at $6 and regular food items are mostly above $12. Murphy's will offer a variety of appetizers, burgers and sandwiches all below $15, and chef specials. The restaurant will also carry a range of beers in bottle and on draft, red and white wines, and mixed drinks.
To answer the concern of impracticality, Murphy's Grill will be accepting cardinal cash and some items will be available through meal exchange and dining dollars. The plan of ten years will come to fruition at the end of this month, and students will finally get to see what Murphy's has to offer.
CategoriesNewsTagsalumni, bar, Cardinal, grill, Murphy's, news, persico, pryz, rathskeller, student
← Previous Previous post: The Tower – September 15th, 2017
Next → Next post: WMATA U-Pass Sessions Inform Students Ahead of Referendum

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
River Ave. Blues » Jason Giambi
The Yankees and the Myth of the Onerous Long-Term Contract
February 2, 2019 by Bobby Montano
The time for bad Spring Training photos is almost upon us, but 16 teams have not yet signed a free agent. Of those that have, 23 have not signed a player to a contract longer than two years—only 10 out of 77 players who have inked a deal this offseason are guaranteed a job after the 2020 season. One common rationale for this phenomenon is that teams are wising up after decades of handing out long-term deals. That those deals are onerous for teams has become conventional in many baseball circles, but there's only one small problem with that line of thinking: it's completely wrong.
The Yankees are a useful case study here: They're the richest franchise in the sport and have been at the center of some of the game's richest contracts. It's worth going through the 7 largest contracts in Yankee history (all of which come after 2001) and examining how each of those contracts actually worked out for the Bombers. Doing so puts to rest the idea that the Yankees have somehow suffered as a result of big spending.
7. Jason Giambi (7 years, $120 million)
The Yankees signed Jason Giambi after their 2001 World Series defeat—having bested Giambi's Oakland A's in consecutive ALDS—to replace the beloved Tino Martinez at first base. Giambi's 7-year, $120 million contract is the 55th largest of all-time and he more than lived up to his end of the bargain.
Across his seven years in pinstripes, the Giambino slugged .260/.404/521 (143 OPS+) with 209 home runs and 619 walks in 3,693 plate appearances. That he missed roughly half of the year with injury in both 2004 and 2008 limits his overall WAR total (22.1 by Baseball-Reference), but he was a 4 win player per 650 AB with the Yankees. Giambi was a lot more productive than he gets remembered for.
His early-season walk-off grand slam in the bottom of the 14th inning with the Yankees down 3 against the Minnesota Twins and two home runs off Pedro Martinez in Game 7 of the 2003 ALCS are two of his more memorable moments. The Yankees never won a World Series while he was in town, so he is often forgotten among recent Yankee greats, but Giambi was a middle-of-the-order force on a team that went 680-455 (.599 winning percentage) during his tenure in the Bronx.
It's safe to say that Giambi was worth every penny.
6. Jacoby Ellsbury (7 years, $153 million)
(Maddie Meyer/Getty)
Jacoby Ellsbury penned a 7-year, $153 million deal with the Yanks fresh off a World Series victory with the rival Red Sox in 2013. He was only the 18th player in MLB history to receive a contract worth over $150 million, and he was supposed to inject life into a dormant Yanks offense. But this one, as we all know, has not gone according to plan.
Ellsbury has missed considerable time due to injury and has been mostly bad when healthy. His .264/.330/.386 (95 OPS+) line with the New York is well-below what the Yankees hoped for, and he has only been worth 9 wins in pinstripes.
But it's important to remember that Ellsbury was often injured and only infrequently an above-average hitter for Boston. Although the argument at the time was that speedy outfielders tended to have softer declines than many of their peers, it's clear that he was never the player the Yanks expected. His 8-win MVP-runner-up 2011 season with Boston was clearly an outlier at the time and looks even more so now—this particular contract speaks more to an organizational failure by the Yankees than it does Ellsbury.
5. Masahiro Tanaka (7 years, $155 million + $20 million posting fee)
(Jim McIsaac/Getty)
The Yankees gave Masahiro Tanaka a 7-year, $155 million contract just weeks after locking up Ellsbury in a series of moves that was meant to revitalize an aging, stale Yanks group. Tanaka, though, has clearly done his part at the top of the rotation.
Despite a dance with Tommy John, Tanaka has been a reliably above-average arm for the Yanks. He owns a 64-34 (.653) record, posting a 3.59 ERA (118 ERA+) with 9 K/9 and 1.7 BB/9 in 824.1 innings pitched (15.6 bWAR) since the start of 2014. He may seemingly always give up a home run, but that should not detract from the fact that the Yankees are lucky to have him take the mound every five days.
A fierce competitor, Tanaka has been lockdown in October, with a 1.50 ERA in 30 innings pitched. His 7 shutout innings against the Cleveland Indians in Game 3 of the 2017 ALDS quite literally saved the season, he was lockdown in both his ALCS starts against the Houston Astros, and he was the only Yankee to win a postseason game this year against Boston. If it's a big game, you feel comfortable with Tanaka on the mound—and it's clear that the Yankees shouldn't regret his deal.
4. CC Sabathia (7 years, $160 million)
John Angelillo, UPI
The Yankees gave Sabathia a 7-year, $160 million contract following their disappointing 2008 campaign and Sabathia's legendary one, and he would eventually leveraged an opt-out into what amounted to a 2-year extension following 2011. CC was expected to be the type of ace to carry the Yanks back to the promised land. He did just that in his first try, and he has become one of the most beloved Yankees of the current generation in the process.
CC owns a 129-80 (.617) record with the Yanks, powered by a 3.74 ERA (115 ERA+) in 1,810.2 innings pitched. He's been worth 30 bWAR, and only 9 pitchers in Yankee history will have won more games in pinstripes than CC when all is said and done.
I wrote all about CC Sabathia last week, so I've said about all I can say about him, but one thing is clear: the Yankees absolutely do not regret allowing him to call the Bronx home for final 11 seasons of his Hall of Fame career.
3. Mark Teixeira (8 years, $180 million)
Mike Stobe/Getty Image
Teixeira's shocking 8-year, $180 million contract came on a day when most of us expected him to sign with the Red Sox. Instead, the Yanks swooped in and found Jason Giambi's replacement. Teixeira was a 3-win player per 650 ABs across his 8 years in pinstripes but saw his final few years plagued by frequent injury.
Still, Teixeira hit .248/.343/.479 (118 OPS+) with 206 home runs across 3,522 plate appearances with New York, averaging 35 home runs every 162 games. Teixeira was also a sterling defender at first base, thrice winning the Gold Glove in pinstripes.
His huge 2009 campaign, in which he slugged .292/.383/.565 (141 OPS+) with 39 home runs, netted him 2nd place in the AL MVP voting, and his 11th inning walk-off home run against the Twins in Game 2 of the 2009 ALDS was a key moment in the Yanks' World Series run. Teixeira made the Yankees better for the better part of 8 years, and he was an instrumental player on a 103-win championship team. Big free agent signings are supposed to help you win World Series, and Teixeira did just that. The Yankees should not regret this one either.
2. Derek Jeter (10 years, $189 million)
Brian Blanco (AP)
Derek Jeter inked his first major deal following the 2001 campaign, receiving almost $200 million across 10 years. This one's easy: a first ballot Hall of Famer and all-time great Yankee, there is no doubt that the Jeter deal made the Yankees a better team.
Across the terms of this contract, Jeter hit .308/.378/.436 (115 OPS+) with 304 doubles and 141 home runs, overall totaling 37.5 bWAR. Jeter was a part of too many big Yankee moments to name, but his 3,000 hit off David Price and July 1, 2004 catch against Boston in which he flew into the stands stick out as two of his top moments over this deal. Jeter is one of the best players in baseball history, in the conversation for the best shortstop ever, and the Yankees certainly don't regret this deal in the slightest.
1. Alex Rodriguez (Two 10-year contracts)
Alex Rodriguez, were it not for Barry Bonds, might just be the most controversial baseball player in league history. Under constant media scrutiny over his love life, relationship with the Yankee captain and former friend Derek Jeter, steroid usage and at-times contentious relationship with the league and organization, A-Rod divided baseball (and Yankee fans) as nobody else could. But amid the noise, one thing is clear: Rodriguez was worth the money.
A-Rod signed two major deals in his career, and the Yankees were at the center of both. For the purposes of this exercise, let's analyze the two separately.
10-year, $252 million contract (Offered by the Texas Rangers, Yankee from 2004-07)
By far the largest contract ever handed out at the time, the first A-Rod deal is often pointed to as an example of big contracts gone awry. That is absurd. I repeat: that is absurd.
A-Rod was simply nothing less than one of the most productive baseball players in baseball history across his first 10-year deal, slugging .304/.400/.591 (154 OPS+) with 329 home runs, 3 MVPs, 7 ASGs and 56.4 bWAR. (For perspective, Bernie Williams was worth 49 bWAR in his entire career.) If anything, this deal was a bargain for both Texas and New York.
For the Yankees, his three-home run, 10 RBI performance against the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim and towering walk-off grand slam against the Indians as the Yanks scored 6 runs in the bottom of the 9th (all with two outs) stand out as signature moments during this stretch.
Although the Yankees only rostered Rodriguez on this deal for the 2004-7 campaigns, he managed to win 2 MVPs and smash 173 home runs in four years. He was blamed for the Yanks' failure to win the World Series and often caught the ire of fans, but it's clear that expecting more (on-the-field, anyway) from Alex Rodriguez was unrealistic. He was as good as you can be.
10-year, $275 million contract (Offered by Yankees following A-Rod's 2007 opt-out)
The second A-Rod deal, on the other hand, is much more complicated. It was the last time we saw Hank Steinbrenner, and this mega-deal came even as Brian Cashman publicly said the organization would let Rodriguez walk if he opted out. Instead, A-Rod opted out during the final game of the 2007 World Series to much outcry, and the Yankees re-signed him anyway. While A-Rod wasn't the same player at the end of this deal, he was comfortably above-average the whole time. Not to mention, the Yanks wouldn't have won the 2009 World Series without him, and they'd never have been able to replace him.
The Yankees were scuffling a bit amid huge expectations in April of 2009, and the Yanks were without their injured (and recently scandalized) All-Star third baseman. When he returned in early May, he slugged a three-run home run in Camden Yards in his first at-bat and the Yankees never looked back. A-Rod hit 30 home runs and drove in 100 runs despite missing over a month, and was absolutely an essential component of the Yankees postseason run.
His 2-run, game-tying home run off Joe Nathan in the bottom of the 9th of Game 2 of the 2009 ALDS is one of the defining moments of that era, but he also hit the go-ahead home run in Game 3, hit another game-tying home run in extra innings in the Game 2 of the ALDS and had the go-ahead hit in the top of the 9th inning of Game 4 of the World Series to give the Yanks a 3-1 lead. Without A-Rod, there's no 2009 title. It's that simple.
Despite the fact that the second contract was scandalized by more steroid allegations, a lawsuit against the Yankees, and a full-season suspension, A-Rod actually hit .269/.359/.486 (123 OPS+) with 178 home runs over those final years, and had one final great campaign in 2015. Even during his down years, A-Rod was better than most other players in the league. Given his repaired relationship with the Yankees, it's fair to say that the team and player have both moved on from any hostility—and fans should too.
Alex Rodriguez is the recipient of two of the most misunderstood contracts of all-time from a baseball perspective, and it's time we all acknowledge a simple fact: he was well worth the money.
Special Mention: Giancarlo Stanton (13 years, $325 million)
(Presswire)
Giancarlo Stanton received a 13-year, $325 million contract from the Miami Marlins in 2014, with the Yankees acquiring him following the 2017 campaign. It's too early to say whether or not this deal will work out for New York, but the early indications are a resounding yes.
Across the first four years of the deal, Stanton has hit .265/.350/.557 (143 OPS+) and has hit 151 home runs. Even his relatively down year last year with the Yanks was extremely productive, and he figures to be a major force in the middle of the Yankee lineup for at least two more years, depending on whether or not he exercises his opt-out following the 2020 season (if I were him, I would not). More to come on this one, but if the recent history of large NYY contracts is any indication, they won't regret this at all.
What this shows us is that the big, onerous contract that we hear so much about is largely a strawman: it barely exists. Of the 7 largest contracts in Yankee history, only one of them (Ellsbury) is a true albatross, and again, that speaks more to a failure by the Yankees than it reflects poorly on Ellsbury. He's the same player he always was. In other words, 6 out of 7 (85%) have significantly improved the Yankees and made them a better team.
But there's another key point buried in here. Most of these deals came in relatively close proximity to one another. The Yankees signed Giambi one year after giving Jeter his 10-year deal; they added Teixeira and Sabathia in the same offseason; they signed Tanaka and Ellsbury in the same offseason; they added Stanton despite having Ellsbury's and Tanaka's deals on the books, underscoring how the deal isn't prohibitive at all. This tells us that fears that the Yankees cannot offer another long-term mega deal (or two!) if they want to re-sign their own developed core are unfounded. (Granted, the data has always shown that it was unfounded.)
Despite what we often year about large contracts and long-term financial obligations, the reality is that the Yankees simply haven't suffered, financially or on-the-field, as a result of any of their major deals in the last 20 years. If anything, those deals are a major reason why the Yankees have not had a losing season since 1992—and the Yankees, and their fans, would be wise to remember that.
Filed Under: Hot Stove League Tagged With: Alex Rodriguez, CC Sabathia, Derek Jeter, Giancarlo Stanton, Jacoby Ellsbury, Jason Giambi, Mark Teixeira, Masahiro Tanaka
Poll: After Derek Jeter, who will be the next Yankee voted into the Hall of Fame?
Mariano Rivera made history throughout his 19-year career and he made history again earlier this week, when he became the first ever unanimous selection to the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All 425 voters named him on their ballot. I didn't think it would happen but it did, and it's pretty awesome. Couldn't pick a better player to be the first unanimous Hall of Famer.
Mike Mussina, Rivera's teammate with the Yankees for eight years, was also voted into the Hall of Fame earlier this week. Mussina has not yet decided whether he'll wear a Yankees hat or an Orioles hat on his Hall of Fame plaque, though he did have more wins (147 to 123), more innings (2,009.2 to 1,553), more All-Star appearances (five to zero), and more WAR (+47.8 to +35.2) with the O's. Going in as an Oriole seems appropriate.
Derek Jeter joins the Hall of Fame ballot next year and, like Rivera, he is a slam dunk first ballot Hall of Famer. He might even be unanimous! That would be fun, Rivera and Jeter being the first two unanimous Hall of Famers. Either way, Jeter is getting into the Hall of Fame next year. There's no doubt about it. After that though, it might be a while until another Yankee gets voted into Cooperstown.
Bernie Williams and Jorge Posada have already dropped off the Hall of Fame ballot, having received less than the 5% needed to remain on the ballot another year. (Williams did spend two years on the ballot. Posada dropped off in year one.) Don Mattingly exhausted his 15 years on the ballot without being voted into the Hall of Fame. I suppose one of the eras committees could vote him in a la Harold Baines. We'll see.
We know Jeter will be the next Yankee voted into the Hall of Fame by the Baseball Writers Association of America. We don't know who will be the next after that. Let's go through the upcoming candidates, shall we? Here are the Yankees due to appear on the Hall of Fame ballot in the coming years.
2020 ballot
Jeter is the big name here. He's the only slam dunk Hall of Famer joining the ball next year. Also joining the ballot are former Yankees Jason Giambi, Bobby Abreu, and Alfonso Soriano. Abreu has a stathead case for Cooperstown but, if he gets in, he'll have a Phillies cap on his plaque. He played more games with the Phillies (1,353) than all other teams combined (1,072).
Giambi played more games with the Athletics (1,036) than the Yankees (897), plus he won an MVP and finished second in the MVP voting while with the A's. Also, there's the performance-enhancing drug thing. Giambi gave that vague apology for letting people down without ever saying what he did, but we all know what he was talking about. So many Hall of Fame voters are dug in against PEDs that, even if Giambi's case were stronger than it actually is, I still don't think he'd get in.
Soriano played more games with the Cubs (889) than the Yankees (626) but he had some of his best seasons in pinstripes. He led the league in hits (209) and homers (41) in 2002 and finished third in the Rookie of the Year voting and third in the MVP voting while with the Yankees. Soriano's best season, his 40/40 season (46 homers and 41 steals) came with the Nationals in 2006.
I don't think Giambi has a chance at the Hall of Fame because of the PED stuff. Abreu and Soriano strike me as Hall of Very Good players rather than Hall of Famers, and hey, there's nothing wrong with that. They had great careers and made tons of dough. Also, we're looking for the next Yankee Hall of Famer here, and I don't think Giambi, Abreu, or Soriano would have a Yankees hat on his Hall of Fame plaque even if they get in. They did more with other teams.
The best player with a chance to go into the Hall of Fame as a Yankee next year other than Jeter is Andy Pettitte. Pettitte was on the ballot for the first time this year and he received only 9.9% of the vote. He's much, much closer to falling off the ballot than he is getting the 75% needed for induction into Cooperstown. It took Mussina six years on the ballot to get into the Hall of Fame. I have to think it'll take Pettitte at least that long, if not longer to gain induction.
There are no slam dunk Hall of Famers set to join the ballot in 2021, Yankees or otherwise. The best players joining the ballot are probably Tim Hudson and Mark Buehrle. The best former Yankees set to join the ballot are A.J. Burnett and Nick Swisher. Next.
Now we're talking. Alex Rodriguez joins the ballot in three years and his career was very obviously worthy of the Hall of Fame. There's no arguing with the raw numbers. A-Rod is one of the 10-15 best players in the game's history and, if you take his career at face value, he should be a unanimous selection. You can't take his career at face value though. Rodriguez admitted to using PEDs and served a year-long suspension for a separate PED transgression.
If Barry Bonds and Rogers Clemens do not get into the Hall of Fame, A-Rod has little hope of getting in. The voting body is skewing younger and thus more forgiving of PEDs, but so many voters are dug in on this subject and will not change their minds. Jeff Passan recently spoke to voters who do not vote for Bonds or Clemens and it's clear where they stand. Bonds and Clemens have seen their support plateau in recent years. It would take a sea change in the Hall of Fame voting for them to get in before their eligibility expires in three years.
In the unlikely event he does get voted into Cooperstown, it's safe to assume A-Rod would go in as a Yankee. He played more games as a Yankee (1,509) than he did as a Mariner and Ranger combined (1,275), plus he won two MVPs in pinstripes and his World Series ring. More games, more homers (351 to 345), more hardware, more rings as a Yankee than everywhere else combined. Should he get in — assuming Rodriguez stays on the ballot all ten years, his final year of eligibility will be 2031, which is a looong ways away — A-Rod would go in as a Yankee.
The other notable former Yankee joining the ballot in three years is Mark Teixeira. My hunch is that, if Fred McGriff was unable to get into the Hall of Fame, Teixeira won't get in either. Teixeira did hit 409 homers and he led the league in homers and total bases once (39 and 344 in 2009, respectively), but that's pretty much it. Teixeira did play more games as a Yankee (958) than as a Ranger, Brave, and Angel combined (904), so if he gets into the Hall of Fame, I think he'd go in as a Yankee. I'm just not sure he's getting in.
The only serious Hall of Fame candidate joining the ballot in four years is Carlos Beltran. I think he'll get into Cooperstown. If not on the first ballot, than eventually. Beltran is an unlikely candidate to be the next Yankee in the Hall of Fame simply because he played the bulk of his career elsewhere. Only 341 of his 2,586 career games came in pinstripes, or 13.2%. I guess Beltran would go into the Hall of Fame as a Royal or Met? Either way, it won't be as a Yankee, so Beltran's not the answer to our question.
Players who retired following last season will be eligible for Hall of Fame induction in 2024. That means Adrian Beltre, Joe Mauer, Chase Utley, and David Wright. They combined for zero (0) games as a Yankee. Matt Holliday and Curtis Granderson could also join the Hall of Fame ballot in five years if they fail to find work this winter. Holliday spent one kinda crummy year with the Yankees. He'd go in as a Rockie or Cardinal. Granderson had some of his best seasons in pinstripes but played more games with the Tigers (674) and Mets (573) than the Yankees (513). Love the Grandyman but I don't see him as a serious Hall of Fame candidate.
(Jeff Zelevansky/Getty)
Ichiro Suzuki is a clear cut Hall of Famer and he's going in as a Mariner, as he should. That leaves two active players who spend the bulk of their careers with the Yankees and deserve serious Hall of Fame consideration: Robinson Cano and CC Sabathia. This offseason's trade ensures Cano would go into Cooperstown as a Yankee. He'll split the second half of his career between (at least) two teams, meaning he won't be able to accomplish enough with the Mariners to change his legacy from Yankees great to Mariners great.
Cano of course served a PED suspension last year, which likely ruins his chances at the Hall of Fame. Manny Ramirez has no-doubt Hall of Fame credentials, but, because he served two PED suspensions, he hasn't topped 24% of the vote in his three years on the Hall of Fame ballot. Cano is closing in on 3,000 hits and Jeff Kent's home run record for second basemen. Robbie's the best second baseman of his generation. The suspension means he has a tough hill to climb.
Assuming Cano finishes out the final five years on his contract, that means he's ten years away from appearing on the Hall of Fame ballot and 20 years away from exhausting his ten years on the ballot. We could still be talking about Robbie being on the ballot as a potential Hall of Famer in 2038! That's an awfully long way away, man. The voting body can and will change between now and then, and a PED suspension may not be as much of a dealbreaker then as it is now. We'll see.
Sabathia has more wins (129 to 117) and more starts (284 to 254) as a Yankee than he did as an Indian and Brewer combined, though he has slightly less WAR (+29.7 to +32.5). Also, Sabathia won his Cy Young in Cleveland and split 2008, his best individual season, between the Indians and Brewers. He won his World Series ring (and ALCS MVP) as a Yankee and has three top four finishes in the Cy Young voting in pinstripes. At some point this year he'll record his 250th win and 3,000th strikeout, which is pretty cool.
I believe Sabathia would have a Yankees hat on his Hall of Fame plaque. The real question is whether he gets into Cooperstown. Mussina was an objectively better pitcher and he had to wait six years on the ballot to get in. Pettitte was a notch below Sabathia but he has the whole legacy Yankee thing going for him, and he didn't come close to induction this year. (Pettitte is an admitted human growth hormone user though.) Sabathia will retire after this season and that means he'll hit the Hall of Fame ballot in 2025. If he gets into the Hall of Fame, it'll probably take several years on the ballot a la Mussina (and Pettitte).
Looking more long-term, Giancarlo Stanton is on a potential Hall of Fame track seeing how he's at 300 homers and +40 WAR through his age 28 season. Five-hundred homers and +65 WAR is well within reach. Aroldis Chapman is like 60% of the way to Billy Wagner's career at this point and Wagner hasn't come close to induction yet, so Chapman has an uphill climb. Aaron Judge was a bit of a late-bloomer (he played his first MLB season at age 25), which puts him behind the Hall of Fame eight-ball. Gary Sanchez? Gleyber Torres? Miguel Andujar? Luis Severino? Great talents who are a long, long way from the Cooperstown combination.
What about Dellin Betances? He is the best setup man of his generation (yup) and it's possible that, by time he's eligible to appear on the Hall of Fame ballot, the voters may have very different standards for relief pitchers. As long as Wagner stays so far away from induction — this was Wagner's fourth year on the ballot and he's yet to receive even 17% of the vote — I can't see Betances as a serious Hall of Fame candidate. Gosh, it would be fun though, wouldn't it?
We know Jeter will be voted into the Hall of Fame next year. That is a certainty. The next Yankee to go into the Hall of Fame after Jeter is up in the air, largely because A-Rod and Cano have served PED suspensions, which significantly lowers their chances of winding up in Cooperstown. Since we're here, we might as well turn this into a poll, so let's get to it.
Who will be the next Yankee voted into the Hall of Fame after Jeter?
Robinson Cano (eligible 2029-38)
Andy Pettitte (eligible 2019-27)
Alex Rodriguez (eligible 2022-31)
CC Sabathia (eligible 2025-34)
Filed Under: Days of Yore, Polls Tagged With: A.J. Burnett, Aaron Judge, Alex Rodriguez, Alfonso Soriano, Andy Pettitte, Aroldis Chapman, Bobby Abreu, Carlos Beltran, CC Sabathia, Dellin Betances, Gary Sanchez, Giancarlo Stanton, Gleyber Torres, Ichiro Suzuki, Jason Giambi, Luis Severino, Mark Teixeira, Miguel Andujar, Nick Swisher, Robinson Cano
Saturday Links: Watson, Giambi, YES Network, Kay, Singleton
June 23, 2018 by Mike Leave a Comment
Watson. (Presswire)
The Yankees and Rays will continue their three-game series with the middle game later this afternoon. Here are some links and notes to check out in the meantime.
Yankees pursued Watson over the winter
According to Joel Sherman, the Yankees tried to sign left-hander Tony Watson during the offseason. He instead signed a luxury tax friendly two-year deal worth $9M guaranteed with the Giants. The veteran left-hander has a 1.82 ERA (1.76 FIP) with 29.6% strikeouts and 44.2% grounders in 34.2 innings this year. He's a full inning southpaw, not a left-on-left matchup guy.
This is pretty interesting to me. The Yankees were trying to beef up their bullpen even more and they were apparently ready to cut Chasen Shreve loose. Hard to see how both would've fit in the Opening Day bullpen. The Giants are hanging around the postseason race at the moment, but if San Francisco slips in the standings these next few weeks, I wonder whether the Yankees would pursue Watson at the trade deadline. Intrigue!
Yankees reached out to Giambi about role in organization
Over the winter the Yankees reached out to Jason Giambi to gauge his interest in joining the organization, according to Brendan Kuty. Giambi didn't specify what sort of position was discussed, though he did say he was not interested in the managerial opening because he has young kids and doesn't want that much of a commitment. "I think they kind of tested to see where I was at and I just said I wasn't ready," he said.
Giambi, now 47, retired following the 2014 season and his name seems to pop up as a managerial or coaching candidate every winter. I've always wondered whether he is actually a candidate for those gigs, or are reporters just talking up a guy who was cool with the media as a player? The Yankees reaching out to Giambi over the winter pretty much confirms that he is indeed a candidate for those types of jobs. Wouldn't surprise me to see the two sides touch base again in the future.
Kay close to new contract with YES
Michael Kay and the YES Network are close to finishing a new contract, reports Andrew Marchand. It's a three-year deal worth seven figures a season, and it includes a network option for two more years. With Vin Scully retired, Kay is believed the be the highest paid local play-by-play man in baseball. "I don't see any end in sight. I want to keep doing this as long as I want to and as long as they want me to," he said to Marchand.
The new contract means Kay will be the voice of the Yankees through at least 2021 and potentially through 2023. My hot take for the weekend: Kay is one of the top play-by-play guys in the sport. Thanks to the magic of MLB.tv, I've listened to every broadcast team in recent years, and Kay is better than most. He can get a little annoying when he goes into radio show mode, but he's good overall. Interestingly enough, Marchand says Ryan Ruocco could see more time in the booth going forward.
YES trying to woo Singleton back
More YES Network news. According to Marchand, YES Network executives are trying to persuade Ken Singleton to return next season. Singleton has already announced he will retire following this season. Marchand says YES is offering Singleton a reduced schedule heavy on games in Baltimore and Tampa, where he has homes. "It's flattering (YES) wants me to come back … I found out as a player, nobody is irreplaceable. The game keeps going on," he said.
I love Singleton. He's one of my favorite broadcasters ever. I love his insight and I love his stories. As much as I'd love to see him stick around and call games forever and ever, Singleton turned 71 last week, and if the man wants to retire, let him retire. He's been doing this a very long time and I don't blame him at all for wanting to skip the road trips and the late nights, and spend more time with his family. It's not like the YES Network is short on broadcasters, you know?
Filed Under: Hot Stove League, News Tagged With: Jason Giambi, Ken Singleton, Michael Kay, Tony Watson, YES Network
Saturday Links: Harper, Mesa Brothers, Giambi, All-Star Game
May 19, 2018 by Mike Leave a Comment
(Scott Taetsch/Getty)
The Yankees and Royals continue their three-game series later today — the Yankees haven't played back-to-back days since last weekend due to all the off-days and rainouts — though it's a 7:15pm ET start, so we have to wait a few hours first. Here are some notes to help you pass the time.
Harper shoots down Yankees questions
As expected, Bryce Harper was asked about his impending free agency and the possibility of signing with the Yankees after the season when the Yankees visiting Washington earlier this week. And, not surprisingly, Harper wouldn't entertain those questions. What else could he do? Here's what Harper said, via Greg Joyce:
"I'm a National now," Harper said. "We're going into this series trying to win some ballgames. It's the only thing on my mind, trying to beat a good team over there."
"It doesn't matter who we're playing," Harper said. "If it's the Yankees, Cubs, Dodgers, Phillies, name it. It doesn't really matter the team or the atmosphere, just try to go in there and win ballgames."
I've seen some "the Yankees don't need Harper because they have Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton" takes recently and, uh, no. The Yankees could cut ties with Brett Gardner after the season — this is the final guaranteed season on Gardner's contract — which frees up a spot for Harper. Harper, Judge, Stanton share the two corner outfield spots and DH. See how easy that is?
Now, will the Yankees actually pony up the $400-something million that will likely be required to sign Harper? As I've said before, I don't believe Hal Steinbrenner's master plan is spending like crazy once the luxury tax rate resets, but I'd be happy to be wrong. And even then, would anyone be surprised if the Yankees opted to pursue Manny Machado or Clayton Kershaw over Harper this winter? I know Harper grew up a Yankees fan, but I seriously doubt that means he's willing to give them a discount.
Mesa brothers leave Cuba to pursue MLB contracts
According to Jesse Sanchez, outfielders and brothers Victor Mesa Jr. and Victor Victor Mesa have left Cuba to pursue MLB contracts. They are the sons of Victor Mesa Sr., a legendary player and manager in Cuba. Victor Victor is 21 while Victor Jr. is only 16. Both will be subject to the international spending restrictions once they are cleared to sign, a process that should take several weeks.
Victor Victor is the more highly regarded prospect and, according to Ben Badler (subs. req'd), he has "star potential" and is comparable to Nationals top prospect Victor Robles. "If (Victor Victor) were in the draft next month, I think he would be a top 10 overall pick, with the potential to go No. 1 overall," added Badler. There's very little information out there about Victor Jr. at the moment, though he is not the same caliber prospect as his older brother.
The Yankees will have $4.98M to spend internationally during the 2018-19 signing period — they can trade for more bonus pool space and max it out at $8.72M — and they've already been connected to several top international free agents. Trading for bonus pool space to sign Victor Victor (and/or Victor Jr.) is certainly possible, but it's been a long time since the Yankees last signed a big name Cuban player. I wouldn't hold my breath.
Giambi to attend Old Timers' Day
Jason Giambi, Old Timer. According to George King, Giambi will make his Old Timers' Day debut this summer. He retired following the 2014 season and has mostly laid low since, though he seems to get mentioned as a coaching or managerial candidate every offseason. Old Timers' Day is June 17th this season. That's the day before the Yankees go to Washington for the makeup games.
Giambi, now 47, played for the Yankees from 2002-08 and was really productive, hitting .260/.404/.521 (145 wRC+) while averaging 29 homers and +3.1 WAR per season. I wonder if this paves the way for Alex Rodriguez and Roger Clemens to show up to Old Timers' Day? They were all tied to performance-enhancing drugs in one way or another, after all. I guess we'll find out soon enough.
MLB proposed new All-Star Game voting system
According to Joel Sherman, MLB recently proposed a new All-Star Game fan voting system that was shot down by the MLBPA. Under the new rules fans would've continued to vote for the starters at each position, though there would've been two steps in the process. First, fans would vote for all players. Then, at a certain date, the vote would end and the top three vote-getters at each position would be put into a second vote. Since it was rejected, All-Star voting this year will be the same as always.
The idea, obviously, would be spicing up the All-Star Game voting, and create more buzz on social media and whatnot. The union, which is still rather annoyed about the way free agency played out over the winter, wanted bonus money and a piece of the revenue generated from the voting process. MLB offered a $1.1M bonus pool to be divvied up among the top three vote-getters at each position only. The new voting process seems kinda neat. I also get whey the union wants a piece of the revenue.
Filed Under: All Star Game, Hot Stove League, International Free Agents Tagged With: Bryce Harper, Jason Giambi, Old Timers' Day, Victor Mesa Jr., Victor Victor Mesa
RAB Retrospective: The Perfection of The 2008 Off-Season
May 19, 2014 by Joe Pawlikowski 39 Comments
So long ago. (Nick Laham/Getty Images)
The 2008 season might not have been as bad as 2013, but Yankees fans would still like to forget it. It seemed that every little thing went wrong that season. Whenever it looked as though the Yankees might have a charge in them, the suffered another blow.
Let's consider a (perhaps incomplete) list of those maladies:
Both Ian Kennedy and Phil Hughes, top prospects who showed promise in 2007, started off the season in disastrous fashion.
Then Hughes got hurt.
Darrell Rasner started 20 games.
Much worse: Sidney Ponson started 15.
Save for a brilliant start here and there, Andy Pettitte was thoroughly mediocre.
The only two starters under age 30, Robinson Cano and Melky Cabrera, had wholly disappointing seasons. Cano was benched for lack of hustle, while Carbera got sent back to AAA after more than two service-time years in the bigs.
Jorge Posada, fresh off signing a new contract, played the first half with a bum shoulder which required surgery, forcing a cast of offensively inept backups into starting roles.
Hideki Matsui's balky knees limited him to under 400 PA and sapped him of his power.
Chien-Ming Wang suffered a foot injury that would indirectly end his career.
Derek Jeter had his worst season since 1996. (Sure, he won the AL Rookie of the Year Award that year, but we'd come to expect more of him.)
Joba Chamberlain dazzled out of the pen, and then in the rotation — until he suffered a shoulder injury that cut his season short (and probably ended up causing a lot more long-term damage than we typically account for).
They traded a reasonably effective Kyle Farnsworth and got back a wholly terrible Ivan Rodriguez.
Xavier Nady hit .330/.383/.535 before the Yankees traded for him, .268/.320/.474 for them.
Damaso Marte was terrible and then broke after the trade. Thankfully, they didn't end up giving away anything of consequence.
All told the Yankees used 27 — twenty-seven! — pitchers.
What went right? Mike Mussina's resurgence was nice to watch. Bobby Abreu and Jason Giambi both stayed healthy and produced decent numbers. Alex Rodriguez wasn't his 2007 MVP self, but he was still a top-five hitter. Unfortunately, he started his streak of six straight years on the disabled list. (Which he'll have snapped at season's end.) The Yanks did discover Al Aceves, which was nice, and Brian Bruney, which was nice for a very short period of time.
Despite all that, had there been a second Wild Card, or had the Rays improved by 22 wins, instead of 31, the Yanks would have made the playoffs. So how bad could the season have been?
It could have been a fatal sign going forward. The franchise players were getting older. Each had been hurt or saw diminished production during the 2008 season. The only starters under age 30 took steps backwards. Maybe it didn't feel like it at the time, but the potential for disaster loomed during that off-season. The Yankees needed big changes, and that's not easy to achieve through free agency.
Thankfully for the Yankees, the 2008-2009 free agent class featured a number of players who fit their exact needs. Even more thankfully, they shed a number of their biggest, and in some cases worst, contracts at the exact right time.
The 2008 payroll was a then-franchise-record $209 million (just a bit more than the 2005 payroll). Without some of those bigger contracts coming off the books, there's now way that even the Yankees can afford to add contracts for CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, and Mark Teixeira (and to a lesser extent, Nick Swisher). But the exact right contracts expired at the exact right time.
Jason Giambi cost the club $22 million in 2008. They essentially shed $17 million, though, since they had to pay him a $5 million buyout on his 2009 option.
Carl Pavano cost the club $11 million in 2008.
Bobby Abreu cost $16 million, but with a $2 million buyout the Yankees saved $14 million.
Mike Mussina cost $11 million, but the Yankees probably weren't glad to be rid of him at that point.
Andy Pettitte cost $16 million. Worthwhile in 2007, but not so much 2008.
They also saved some money when Ivan Rodriguez's contract expired. Trading away Wilson Betemit's $1.6 million was like finding some loose change in the couch cushions.
In total the Yankees shed more than $70 million in salaries, mostly for players they were glad to be rid of, of who were considerably overpaid in 2008.
Time to reallocate those resource to more productive players.
Add up the guys they signed. At $23 million for Sabathia. $22.5 million for Teixeira, $18.5 million for Burnett, and $5.3 million for Swisher, plus another $5.5 million for bringing back Pettitte, you get $74.8 million.
They were able to fill their needs with such high-priced guys, because they had a number of lower-cost players on both sides of the ball. It took some faith in them rebounding, but Cano and Cabrera cost them a combined $7.4 million in 2009. Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes earned the minimum, as did almost everyone in the bullpen. If they didn't have those major-league-ready younger players, then spending $75 million on top-tier players makes less sense. You can have a core of great players, but you still need 25 players on the roster.
At the end of 2008, the Yankees were in a tough spot. Their younger players saw their flaws exposed during the season. There was plenty of uncertainty about the tested veterans. Without the perfect free agent class and money to lure them, the 2009 Yankees might not have been much better than 2008. Without some of those younger guys returning to form, or performing well for a change, the successful free agent signings might not have mattered.
The Yankees found the exact guys to fill needed spots. It cost them plenty, but each of the free agent signings (and trade bounty, in Swisher's case) added significantly to the 2009 team's production. Perhaps just as importantly, the Yankees stuck with those younger players and saw their patience rewarded. The entire off-season could have gone a lot differently. But it played out perfectly. We all know the reward.
Filed Under: Days of Yore Tagged With: A.J. Burnett, Bobby Abreu, Carl Pavano, CC Sabathia, Jason Giambi, Mark Teixeira, Mike Mussina, Nick Swisher
Mailbag: Bailey, Giambi, Johan, Relievers
October 11, 2013 by Mike 43 Comments
Only four questions this week, but they're good ones. The Submit A Tip box in the sidebar is the best way to send us anything, mailbag questions or otherwise.
(Joe Robbins/Getty)
Nate asks: If Homer Bailey is indeed being dangled, what kind of package would it take to land him? Should the Yankees go after him?
There has been speculation the Reds could trade Bailey in an effort to create payroll space, perhaps to sign Shin-Soo Choo long-term. Matt Swartz's insanely accurate arbitration model projects the right-hander to earn $9.3M next season, his last before qualifying for free agency. Bailey reportedly hasn't shown much interest in signing a long-term contract and presumably has his eye on a massive contract a year from now. Hard to blame him.
Bailey, 27, has emerged maybe not as an ace these last two years, but something damn close to an ace. He had a 3.49 ERA and 3.31 FIP in 209 innings this season after posting a 3.68 ERA and 3.97 FIP in 208 innings last year. Bailey was once one of the very best pitching prospects in the game — he was one spot behind Phil Hughes on Baseball America's top 100 prospects list after the 2006 season — and now he's coming into his own as he enters his peak years.
Even though he only has one more year of team control left, I do think the Yankees should pursue Bailey if the Reds are indeed open to moving him. Not only would they be acquiring a really good pitcher –they could definitely use one or two of those, you know — but they would get a year to evaluate him in their league and ballpark before deciding whether to commit to him long-term. If not, they'll get a draft pick. Kind of a win-win situation, I suppose.
Not too many pitchers of Bailey's caliber have been traded one year from free agency in recent years, so we don't have a good idea of what it would take to acquire him. Javy Vazquez (Expos to Yankees) and Cliff Lee (Phillies to Mariners) kinda fit the bill, but they were both better and more established than Bailey at the time of those trades. I'm guessing three prospects — one stud and two lesser pieces — is in the ballpark. The Reds don't have any urgency to trade him though, so they won't give him away. I don't even think they will trade him. He's a guy a win-now team keeps.
Andrew asks: With Jason Giambi looking to play one more year (according to Ken Rosenthal), would a reunion on a cheap one-year deal make sense? Cheap power designed for Yankee Stadium off the bench to hit for offensively challenged Yankees late in games (i.e., Brendan Ryan types should they re-sign him).
Giambi, who turns 43 in January, hit .183/.282/.371 (85 wRC+) with nine homers in 216 plate appearances for the Indians this year. That includes some really memorable walk-off homers as the Tribe made their push for a wildcard spot. I think it's safe to assume moving into Yankee Stadium would help his power output, but how much? An extra five homers? Eight? Ten? The concerns I have are a) Giambi can't play the field, and b) Derek Jeter figures to eat up a lot of DH time next season. The Yankees had an inflexible DH-only type on the roster this year (Travis Hafner) and it was a problem at times. I love Giambi as much as the next guy, but I don't think he's a fit for the current roster.
Michael asks: I wanted to know your thoughts about seeing Johan Santana in pinstripes for next year? He has a $25 million player and a $5.5 million buyout option. Can you picture Brian Cashman offering him a one-year, league minimum contract?
(Patrick McDermott/Getty)
The Mets are obviously going to buy Santana out, but no, I can't see the Yankees giving him a one-year contract at any salary. There's no way they would (or should) guarantee him anything coming off his second (!) torn shoulder capsule. Torn capsules are the kiss of death; no one has ever had one and come back the same pitcher. The victim list includes Santana, Rich Harden, Mark Prior, Chien-Ming Wang, John Maine, John Danks, and Dallas Braden, among others.
That said, I do think the Yankees would be open to giving him a minor league contract a la Wang this year or Bartolo Colon in 2011. Santana came back from the first torn capsule and had a 4.85 ERA and 4.09 FIP in 117 innings last season, and that was in a big ballpark in the easier league. I'm not sure how anyone could expect anything out of him after another capsule injury, nevermind moving into Yankee Stadium and the AL East. Santana has been adamant that he wants to continue pitching, so if he wants to take a minor league deal to prove himself in Spring Training (and likely Triple-A early in the season), great. If not, no biggie.
Donny asks: After reading your "What Went Right: One-Run Games" post, I came to the conclusion that the team should keep David Robertson in the eighth and find someone else for the ninth. I came to this conclusion based on how Robertson reacted to his first introduction to closing (not good). My worry is that changing his role might have similar effects that it had on Joba Chamberlain and, to a lesser extent, Phil Hughes. Do you agree with this thought and if so, who should top the wish list (reasonably) if you are Brian Cashman?
Two things here. One, why is everyone freaking out about Robertson as the closer? How long as he actually been the team's closer? A week, maybe, before getting hurt? That's not enough to tell us anything about anything. Mariano Rivera blew three saves in the first two weeks of the 1997 season, remember. Robertson is one of the absolute best non-closer relievers in baseball. If you aren't comfortable sticking him in the ninth inning, then who? He's the perfect candidate. Two, moving Robertson from setup man to closer is not at all similar to moving Joba and Hughes back and forth between the rotation and bullpen. All you're changing is the inning Robertson throws. The other two guys had to change their preparation, off-day routines, the way they pitched, everything. Huge, huge difference. Huge.
Now, all of that said, yeah the Yankees definitely need to bring in a good late-inning reliever this offseason in my opinion. With Rivera retiring, they're losing an elite reliever. That's 60 or so elite innings gone.Off the roster. Doesn't matter what inning or role they came from, that's a lot of production to replace. Free agent relievers are always risky investments, but the Yankees don't really have a choice. A bullpen full of kids scares the crap out of me. Looking at the list of free agents, potential bullpen targets include Jesse Crain, Matt Lindstrom (if his option is declined), Edward Mujica, and the perpetually underrated Jamey Wright. I had my eye on Grant Balfour earlier this year, but he had a great season and won't come cheap.
Filed Under: Mailbag Tagged With: Homer Bailey, Jason Giambi, Johan Santana
Mailbag: Wells, Soriano, Giambi, Teixeira
Four questions and four answers this week, the final mailbag before Opening Day. Hooray for that. Remember to use the Submit A Tip box in the sidebar to send us anything throughout the week.
(AP Photo/Kathy Willens)
Ryan asks: The Vernon Wells trade … will essentially be the Yankees paying an above average one-year deal with help in the second year. My question is, where was this in the offseason, when they could have overpaid for one-year deals? Is this simply because they learned that Mark Teixeira's salary would be paid by the World Baseball Classic and freed up extra money?
I think it's a combination of things. First and foremost are the injuries — the Yankees probably didn't think they needed any more help in the offseason because they were already good enough. That's a dangerous way to think as we see now thanks to all the lost players and recent scrambling. Secondly is the WBC money, since it is a nice chunk of change they're getting back. Then again, spending those savings (and potentially more) on Wells might not have been the brightest idea.
Brian Cashman made it pretty clear Wells will be the team's everyday left fielder while Curtis Granderson is out — "So the rest of these guys are fighting for support positions," said the GM to Chad Jennings — and I can't help but think the team views him as a Granderson replacement for 2014. Maybe Wells will play his way out of that role, who knows. The Yankees have had a lot of success with these veteran scrap heap pickups in recent years, but dropping $13.9M on a player is beyond a scrap heap pickup to me. That's a big commitment.
Matt asks: Hindsight being 20/20n, would you rather have Wells for the reported two years, $13.9 million or Alfonso Soriano for the same?
Soriano, no doubt about it. He was actually good last season, hitting .262/.322/.499 (116 wRC+) with 32 homers. Wells … hasn't done anything close to that lately. There's also some tangible evidence — switching to a lighter bat at in mid-May, at which point his production took off — suggesting Soriano's revival was real and not a fluke. Even though he's three years older than Wells, he's much more productive.
The issue with Soriano is that the Cubs wanted a legitimate prospect in return. They didn't consider it just a salary dump like the Angels did with Wells. It's also unclear if they would have structured the money in such a way that Soriano would have counted as zero dollars towards the 2014 luxury tax threshold. I don't want either player, but if I had to pick one I would rather give up an actual prospect to get the much better player. The Yankees obviously disagree.
(G. Newman Lowrance/Getty Images)
Mitch asks: Four years from now, which contract do you think will have been better for the Yankees — Mark Teixeira's or Jason Giambi's?
It's unfair to directly compare the contract terms — seven years, $120M vs. eight years, $180M — because of inflation and Collective Bargaining Agreement changes and all that. Let's keep it to on-field performance.
Giambi hit .260/.404/.521 (145 wRC+) during his seven years in New York while Teixeira is at .263/.357/.506 (128 wRC+) after year four with four more to go. Forget the wrist injury, I don't think there's any way his offensive production would catch up to Giambi's even if he was perfectly healthy. In terms of batting runs above average (wRAA), Tex is basically halfway to Giambi's total in pinstripes in ~60% of the playing time (107.4 vs. 214.1).
The question now is whether Teixeira's defense will be good enough to compensate for the offensive gap. Giambi was at -35 DRS and -22.4 UZR during those eight years with the Yankees while Teixeira is at +28 DRS and +19.6 UZR after year four. That's a huge gap and that figures to only grow larger. Combining offense and defense, Giambi averaged +25.6 runs produced per year in pinstripes. Teixeira is at 33.9 per year. It's a huge difference built largely on questionable defensive metrics. Giambi was a better hitter and I'm an offense first guy, so I'll say his contract will go down as the better one for the Yankees with the obvious caveat that Tex still has four years to change things.
Fred asks: With six starting pitchers to start the season, and maybe seven if Michael Pineda actually returns at some point, doesn't it make sense to employ a six-man rotation every two or three turns through the rotation? With CC Sabathia's innings load being an issue, plus the ages of Hiroki Kuroda and Andy Pettitte, doesn't it make sense to insert whoever the sixth starter is a couple times a month to help soak up innings, keep the other guys fresh? It basically means the top five starters go about two or three less starts for the year and the sixth man gets about a dozen starts. Helps everyone no?
Well, let's see all the starters get healthy at the same time before we start worrying about this. Phil Hughes has return from his bulging disk before anything can happen, and who knows how that will go. This also assumes all six (or seven) starters are actually effective and worthy of making starts. Someone is bound to disappoint, it's just usually how it goes.
Now, that said, yeah I do think the Yankees should consider sliding in a sixth starter now and then just to take the load off Sabathia and, in particular, Pettitte. They could use off days to push them back a bit or even skip them entirely if fatigue becomes an issue. It's a difficult thing to balance because the theoretical sixth starter has the remain stretched out, and if he's the long man they'll lose him out of the bullpen for a few days. If he's in the minors they'll have to make sure he's lined up properly to pitch on whatever days. As I said, Pettitte is the big one for me since he hasn't thrown a full season since 2009. The Yankees should monitor him carefully throughout the summer.
Filed Under: Mailbag Tagged With: Alfonso Soriano, Jason Giambi, Mark Teixeira, Vernon Wells


text:
How to Talk to Girls on Tinder
GettyImages / Tinder
The Art of Tinder Talk: Everything You Need to Know to Get the Date
Alex Manley
Tinder might be the most famous and ubiquitous dating app out there, and it might have a remarkably simple user interface where you can move through profiles with simple swipes of the thumb, but that doesn't mean it's actually easy to use.
Swiping on Tinder is the easy part — the tricky part is communicating with someone when you actually match. First, there's the inherent awkwardness of trying to talk to someone you're attracted to, which might conjure up schoolyard crushes for the less confident.
RELATED: The Best Tinder Opening Messages, Revealed
Then there's the reality of the platform — with short bios and no personality-matching algorithms, you know next to nothing about this person, and you might both have vastly different frames of reference. Something that's a clear joke to you might be taken seriously by your match, or vice versa. The person might go silent and it could be because they're bored by you, offended by you, or simply overwhelmed at work.
All of that can add up to a lot of less-than-stellar interactions. But it doesn't have to be that way — AskMen spoke to a couple of dating experts about how exactly to chat up your matches on Tinder. Here's what they had to say:
How to Start a Conversation on Tinder
The rules of online dating dictate that, as the man, it's probably on you to make the first move and start the conversation. We're sorry, but that's just the way it is, and you'll probably find out that most of your matches won't message you if you don't message them first. So how do you go about making a great first impression? We'll get into the specifics later, but for now, here are some good general rules to follow:
Tailor your opening message to your match's bio (including pictures and interests)
Be bubbly and upbeat
Avoid generic opening messages, since your match will see hundreds of these
Don't be crass, hypersexual or vulgar
Steer the conversation towards going on an actual date
Remember that having the other person swipe right on you isn't a victory; it's just the first step. And the reality is, women get many more matches than men do, so it's not even enough to help you stand out. Your opening message is your chance to make a great first impression, so you don't want to flub that!
Tinder Conversation Dos & Don'ts
There's no golden rule to being good at Tinder. Like everything else in life, some people are naturally better at it than others; working hard at it will typically mean you improve, and naturally attractive people have an unfair advantage no matter how bad they are at flirtatious banter.
While the following dos and don'ts won't work for every single person you match with, they are pretty good rules of thumb — no swiping pun intended.
Do: Use Specific Compliments
"Make your opening message a sincere, specific compliment about something from their profile that caught your attention," suggests dating coach Connell Barrett. "Maybe you noticed their taste in movies. You could open with, 'You're a Wes Anderson fan? Nice! OK… 'Rushmore' or 'The Royal Tenenbaums'?' In just 12 words, you've scored lots of points by showing that you read their profile, by sharing a genuine compliment, and by asked an engaging question."
Don't: Send a Boring Opening Message
"With your opener, the greatest sin is being boring," says Barrett. "Avoid starting with, 'Hi,' 'How's your day?,' 'What's up?' or any version of hello. In real life, approaching someone with a confident hello can work, but on Tinder, it makes you seem boring, and they might not reply. Starting with 'Hey' is the same as opening with, 'Hey, would you please ghost me?"
Do: Ask Questions
"When it comes to starting a conversation, ask a question, answer that question yourself, then ask again — in your first communication," says Laurel House, a dating and relationship coach and host of the Man Whisperer podcast. "This breaks through the ice, tells them something about who you are, and gives an example of the type of response you how to get back from them."
Don't: Wait Forever to Ask Your Match Out
"Here's a simple system for asking someone out: Let the initial Tinder exchange come to a natural conclusion, and then write something like, 'We should meet for a drink. What's your number?'" says Barrett. "That's all it takes."
Do: Be Straightforward About How Serious You Are
"Dating apps and online dating make casual 'hangouts' not only easy, but expected," notes House. "If you're sick of the casual 'hangout' that leads to a casual non-committal relationship, you need to take control of the dating platform and set the expectation of being serious and on-purpose for a real relationship by creating opportunities for real connection through pre-date conversations where you ask real substantive questions and make an effort to pre-qualify. Then go on a real date. Not a coffee date or a quick drink, but a date."
Don't: Get Sexual
"Don't get sexual with your initial Tinder or text messages," cautions Barrett. "Think friendly, not filthy. Sounding too turned on too soon can come across as vulgar. But if you're witty, flirt a little. On Tinder, wit goes a long way and makes you stand out.An opener that's flirty and funny won't just break the ice. It will melt the ice."
RELATED: This Guy's God-Like Tinder Skills Will Inspire You
Do: Confirm Your Date
"Text to confirm your date, time, and location the day before or morning of the date by saying, 'Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow at X at X p.m.!'," suggests House.
Don't: Freak Out Over a Non-Response
"Don't be afraid of 'ghosts.' Sometimes, you'll be messaging someone and they go quiet," says Barrett. "It's just the nature of the platform. Some people get hundreds of matches per week and they just can't keep up with all the messages. Laugh it off. It's not personal. It's Tinder."
What to Do When It Works
When your Tinder conversation seems to be going somewhere, it's magical. Sparks fly. Bells chime. Birds sing. But if you don't have a lot of flirting experience, it can be hard to know what's actually going on. What are the mechanics at work behind a good flirtation session?
Good flirting isn't particularly complicated — it's creating a unique conversation between you and your match by engaging enough that they want to come along for the ride.
If you make your Tinder match laugh by dreaming up an outlandish situation, creating a running gag, or instituting some form of emoji code, you're halfway to a good first date already. The key is using what you're good at and interested in, what you know about your match, and combining those factors to create a unique conversation that your match will enjoy and remember.
Even if you discover there's no physical or sexual chemistry later on, conversational chemistry at the outset is a huge factor when it comes to someone wanting to go on a first date with you. Of course, actual, real-life dates are a much better indicator of whether there's a future for the two of you in the cards than just your Tinder conversations.
What to Do When It Doesn't Work
A bad Tinder conversation is more than just a reason to unmatch the other person. Sometimes, they're so bad you have to consider even deleting the app — or maybe humanity entirely. There are definitely ways to avoid death by boredom, such as actually reading people's Tinder bios, for one, and not just swiping right on every single human, for two, but that doesn't mean you can't still be a few messages deep before realizing it's going nowhere.
The thing that some guys tend to do is turn a so-so or disappointing Tinder interaction into a horrible one. If the convo goes quiet and an attempt to get it started again goes nowhere, don't start harassing your match. For starters, they might legitimately not even have seen your messages yet. Second, if they're genuinely not interested, a non-response is a pretty easy let-down. (Think about it: Do you really want to hear, "Sorry, I'm not interested — I find you boring and unattractive now that we've talked for a little bit"?)
Even if your match is the one being rude, you're better off unmatching than responding in kind. It's not worth your time or energy. Plus, the more positive interactions people have generally, the more positive they're likely to feel going into their next Tinder convo. Be part of that precedent.
How to Take a Tinder Conversation Offline
One common mistake most guys make on Tinder is spending too much time flirting online, sending back-and-forth jokes or letting the conversation ramble on aimlessly. You don't want to use Tinder to figure out her favorite movies, or her political opinions, or her philosophy on life and dating and marriage. All of that should be discussed in person. That's what real-life dating is for!
RELATED: AskMen's Official Tinder Review
So how do you take your Tinder conversation into the real world? The best technique involves proposing a date organically, from the conversation you're already having, and the best time to do that is immediately after you've said something witty or charming or complimentary. Did she give you a "haha" or an "lol"? Tell her you'd like to see her smile in person and suggest a coffee date. Did she playfully poke fun of your fashion sense? Tell her she can critique your next outfit during a night on the town.
The really important thing is that you keep things light and playful, and don't make her feel pressured or taken by surprise.
Other Online Dating Options
Are you on Tinder looking for just a hookup rather than a date or a relationship? If you're finding yourself frustrated by all the swiping you're doing without getting anywhere, it might be time to consider one of these hookup sites instead -- where you can meet someone looking for the same thing:
FriendFinder-X
AskMen Recommends: If you're on the hunt for some no-strings-attached action, FriendFinder-X is a great bet. FF-X is a hookup site that lets you express your desires openly -- that's the whole point. Users have lots of ways of interacting with each other -- beyond standard messaging, you can also live-broadcast, for instance -- and there's a "What's Hot" section that highlights the top-rated profiles and pictures, among other things.
Check out FriendFinder-X
XMatch
AskMen Recommends: If you have a specific fetish or kink, XMatch is also a fantastic option, as it gives you the ability to state what you're into -- and then search its members based on matching sexual proclivities. As well, the site boasts a solid number of active users who are excitedly looking for hookups, just like you. On top of all that, you can check out things like X-rated photos, pictures, and videos on Xmatch.
Check out XMatch
AskMen Recommends: AdultFriendFinder is pretty much a giant. Featuring an enormous user base, the site aims to facilitate both IRL hookups and cyber sex between its members. AFF is a buffet of different sexual kinks and fetishes and its users are not shy about their desires -- so unlike Tinder, you won't have to worry about discovering you and your match aren't sexually compatible.
Check out AdultFriendFinder
What a Genuinely Good Tinder Profile Looks Like
The Most Common Mistakes Guys Make on Tinder
How to Ask a Girl Out
Flirting Meeting Women Online Dating Online Dating Sites


In order to broaden the visibility of these two Championships, ABC Communication, through Bastien BLANCHARD in collaboration with Freecaster, has decided to launch their own pay-TV channel via the web sites of the two Championships: www.superenduro.org and www.endurogp.org !
Freecaster is a well-known company in setting up OTT channels; for instance they have worked with Youthstream to create the MXGP channel.
Thanks to EnduroTV, all fans of the sport will be able to have access to the TV content provided by ABC Communication and the camera crew from Vigneau & Co, every Grand Prix weekend. Infact, in SuperEnduro, with the introduction of Live TV coverage for each of the five rounds of the season, fans will be able to enjoy 2 hours of live action on the evening of the event, as well as a 26 minute summary afterwards.
In the EnduroGP, viewers will be able to see every race review (26 minutes each) throughout the season, as well as the season review at the end of the year.
With "EnduroTV", ABC Communication gives the public the chance to get even closer to the action and the opportunity to follow the SuperEnduro and EnduroGP more easily from any location. Packages will be available to purchase from Monday, December 4.
Join us soon on superenduro.org or endurogp.org to keep track of these exciting, action-packed championships.


Earn 2.13% CashCoins at Imagine Ireland just like I did.
Imagine Ireland is one of Ireland's leading self-catering holiday cottage specialists with the biggest and best selection of over 1500 cottages available throughout Ireland - from the Giant's Causeway in the North of Ireland to the Ring of Kerry on the South-West Coast. Our properties range from detached thatched character properties to new built houses and sleep from 2 to 10+. We can also arrange ferry tickets and car hire in Ireland. Prices range from £223.50 per week per property.
Cashback from Imagine Ireland will be granted for actual, registered purchases which are done directly, without visits to other websites during purchase. These purchases should also be done fully online, without telephone or other contact with Imagine Ireland. Never use any discount codes from other websites. Also always accept cookies on our website and on the webshop you are shopping at. That way your transaction will be registered correctly and you will receive CashCoins.