The medical term for hair loss is alopecia and there are many underlying causes. The most important differentiation which our experienced team of dermatologists will make when assessing your hair loss, is whether it is scarring or non-scarring hair loss as this has major prognostic and therapeutic implications.
At Atlantic Dermatology and Laser, our systematic approach to treatment reflects how seriously we take the problem of hair loss. We begin with a consultation and a thorough physical examination of the scalp. We follow up with lab work to look for internal causes, while in some cases a biopsy of the scalp is sent to a dermatopathologist with experience in hair loss. Medical treatment is then tailored to each patient's particular case, whether it be androgenetic alopecia, alopecia areata, telogen effluvium, frontal fibrosing alopecia or discoid lupus.
Fortunate enough to have received training at the UCT Hair Institute as well as offering a dermatologist with a special interest in hair within our practice allows us to provide our hair loss patients the most current treatment protocols. From the latest in evidence based medicine to cutting-edge platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapies, rest assured that we will do everything in our power to help you halt the further loss of hair and recover it where medically possible. Our team believes in the healing power of holistic medicine when we treat our patients. We focus on a comprehensive diagnosis of our patients' issues and integrative approach to treatment. We are committed to offering innovative treatments at the forefront of the latest research and will go above and beyond to ensure that you receive treatment of a superior quality.


text:
Dr Nelly Gauthier
Treatments for facial wrinkles and volume loss
Treatment for under-eye circles
Improvement of wrinkles
Beautifying the eye area
Lifting nasal tip and chin
Legal guidelines for Botox
Radiofrequency and ultrasound
Medical blepharoplasty
Laser Halo Hybrid
Juvéderm range (Voluma®, Volbela®, Volift® et Volite®)
Useful questions
Home > Legal notices
Legal notices for the website of Dr Gauthier
Welcome to www.docteurgauthier.fr the information website of Dr Nelly Gauthier, aesthetic doctor.
The site is edited by Dr Nelly Gauthier.
It is hosted in France by the company E-World Concept.
It complies with the code of conduct of the "Health On the Net" (HONcode) standard for medical and health websites.
All medical information provided on the site www.docteurgauthier.fr is given solely by Dr Nelly Gauthier.
The information published on the site is primarily destined for the general public, and it seeks to encourage, and not to replace, existing relations between the patient and the doctor.
Personal information concerning patients and visitors of the site www.docteurgauthier.fr, including their identity, are confidential. The party responsible for the site pledges on his/her honour to respect the legal conditions on the confidentiality of medical information applicable in France.
Information communicated by people visiting the site through this site will under no circumstances be communicated to third parties without the prior express consent of the person concerned. At any moment, visitors who have provided information have a right to access, modify, correct and delete their data, in accordance with:
1) Law No. 78-17 of 6th January 1978 on Information Technology, Data Files and Civil Liberties.
2) Law No. 2004-575 of 21st June 2004 regarding Confidence in the Digital Economy.
To exercise this right, please contact Dr Nelly Gauthier by post, email or telephone.
The website www.docteurgauthier.fr does not use any technology (particularly technology linked to cookies) to store information left by visitors during their visit.
The sources of information present on the website are taken from the work and texts of Dr Nelly Gauthier.
Any claims relating to the benefits or performance of a given treatment, product or commercial service, are accompanied by the relevant, weighted proof according to the information given by Dr Nelly Gauthier.
Dr Nelly Gauthier endeavours to provide information in the clearest possible way. Visitors to the site who would like to obtain more details or support can contact her by email and telephone. The number is on the contact information page: http://docteurgauthier.fr/contact/
Dr Nelly Gauthier created the information site www.docteurgauthier.fr for non-commercial purposes and has not received any funding to do this.
The website www.docteurgauthier.fr does not broadcast any advertising.
Editorial policy and conflicts of interest
Dr Nelly Gauthier is the author of the content published on this site. Dr Nelly Gauthier has not communicated any conflict of interest concerning the information published on this site.
Dr Nelly Gauthier accepts no responsibility for interruption of the website, technical problems or any damages resulting from the fraudulent intrusion by a third party leading to modification of the information available on the site.
Reproduction of any documents published on the website www.docteurgauthier.fr is authorised solely for information purposes for personal and private use, any reproduction and any use of copies made for other purposes being expressly forbidden.
All the articles, photographs and other documents on this site are the property of the owner Dr Nelly Gauthier or are published with the authorisation of their owners and are subject to copyright and intellectual property rights.
9 Rue de Marignan, 75008 Paris
Copyright 2017 Nelly Gauthier I Legal notices
Social networks of Dr Nelly Gauthier
Out of consideration for my patients, I commit to assure them a total discretion of their private life and not show any before/after aesthetic treatment picture.
Dr Nelly Gauthier is an aesthetic doctor in Paris specialised in non-surgical rejuvenation through Botox and Hyaluronic Acid injections.
My Facebook page could bother some people and some of my colleagues. I must therefore explain my reasons for creating this page.
In the media (and elsewhere) you can see anything and everything said about my profession, for example:
1 - we make people believe that everyone is having aesthetic medical-surgical procedures, which is FALSE.
2 - we make people believe that everyone is photoshopped, which is also FALSE.
3 - we make people believe that everyone is beautiful and never ages, which is FALSE.
4 - that all people who have undergone aesthetic medical-surgical procedures are ugly and pathetic, which is also FALSE.
All of this "misinformation" leads to errors, which are sometimes dramatic...
I love my profession, however, too often, respect is not given to the identity of my patients and, for me, it is crucial that it is respected because the social consequences are serious.
So, I said to myself that I needed to use images to explain how we age, what can be done through medical-surgical aesthetics and, above all, what cannot be done.
MY GOAL IS TO INFORM.
We all need to be able to identify with people, and that's the main function of celebrities. And, we also need to clearly identify what we don't want to happen to us... and it's through the physical evolution of celebrities that we can understand this.
I think that the images I regularly publish show the dangers and also the possibilities for improvement available, whether through pure aesthetic surgery, pure aesthetic medicine or a combination of the two.
It is a lot of work for me to show all of these angles but, as no one else was doing it, I decided to :-)
View my Facebook
for more information on our Cookies Policy and to configure them, Click here

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Cool swimsuit, as in the photo. Delivery super fast, 2 weeks before the Stavropol Territory. Thank you seller.
The size is well suited to the design is pretty and it is very well designed goes very well even on small chest, to see in the future if it will last ..


text:
In der Handball-DDR-Liga der Frauen gewann in der Saison 1985/86 die BSG Einheit/Sirokko Neubrandenburg die Staffel Nord und die BSG Halloren Halle die Staffel Süd. Beiden gelang ungeschlagen der sofortige Wiederaufstieg in das Oberhaus.

Staffel Nord
Verlustpunktfrei sicherte sich die Betriebssportgemeinschaft (BSG) Einheit/Sirokko Neubrandenburg den Staffelsieg und stieg postwendend wieder in die Handball-DDR-Oberliga auf. Als Aufsteiger aus der Handball-DDR-Bezirksliga traten die Spielgemeinschaft Lok/Motor Süd-Ost Magdeburg und die BSG Schiffselektronik Rostock an. Beide Gemeinschaften schafften den Klassenerhalt, wobei dies Rostock erst in der Relegation gegen die BSG Fortschritt Cottbus aus der Südstaffel gelang. In die Bezirksliga stiegen die BSG Chemie PCK Schwedt in der Saison 1980/81 noch in der Oberliga spielend und die BSG Motor Hennigsdorf ab.

Abschlusstabelle

 Aufsteiger in die DDR-Oberliga 1986/87   Teilnehmer an der Relegation zum Verbleib in der DDR-Liga   Absteiger in die Bezirksliga  (A) Absteiger aus der DDR-Oberliga 1984/85  (N) Aufsteiger aus der Bezirksliga

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Saison dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Torschützenliste

Staffel Süd
Den Staffelsieg sicherte sich ungeschlagen der Absteiger aus der Handball-DDR-Oberliga die BSG Halloren Halle. Damit kehrt Halle nach nur einem Jahr wieder in das Oberhaus zurück. Der Betriebssportgemeinschaft (BSG) Fortschritt Cottbus gelang am letzten Spieltag-Wochenende noch der Sprung auf den zehnten Tabellenplatz, der zur Relegation berechtigte. In dieser unterlagen sie jedoch der BSG Schiffselektronik Rostock aus der Nordstaffel und stiegen wie die beiden anderen Aufsteiger aus der Handball-DDR-Bezirksliga Lommatzsch und Gotha nach nur einem Jahr wieder in die Drittklassigkeit ab.

Abschlusstabelle

 Aufsteiger in die DDR-Oberliga 1986/87   Teilnehmer an der Relegation zum Verbleib in der DDR-Liga   Absteiger in die Bezirksliga  (A) Absteiger aus der DDR-Oberliga 1984/85  (N) Aufsteiger aus der Bezirksliga

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Saison dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Torschützenliste

Relegation
In den Spielen der beiden Tabellenzehnten wurde der fünfte Absteiger in die Bezirksliga ermittelt.

|}
 Absteiger in die Bezirksliga

Aufstiegsrunde zur DDR-Liga
Fünf Mannschaften aus den 15 Bezirksligen stiegen in die DDR-Liga auf. In fünf Gruppen zu je drei Mannschaften, ermittelten die 15 Bezirksmeister bzw. aufstiegsberechtigten Vereine die Aufsteiger. Die Erstplatzierten jeder Gruppe stiegen auf. Jede Mannschaft bestritt in ihrer Gruppe zwei Heimspiele und zwei Auswärtsspiele.

Staffel 1
In der Staffel 1 spielten die Meister aus den Bezirken Rostock, Neubrandenburg und Frankfurt (Oder).
Abschlusstabelle

|}

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Aufstiegsrunde dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Staffel 2
In der Staffel 2 spielten die Meister aus den Bezirken Potsdam, Cottbus und Leipzig.
Abschlusstabelle

|}

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Aufstiegsrunde dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Staffel 3
In der Staffel 3 spielten die Meister aus den Bezirken Schwerin, Magdeburg und Berlin.
Abschlusstabelle

|}

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Aufstiegsrunde dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Staffel 4
In der Staffel 4 spielten die Meister aus den Bezirken Gera, Karl-Marx-Stadt und Dresden.
Abschlusstabelle

|}

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Aufstiegsrunde dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Staffel 5
In der Staffel 5 spielten die Meister aus den Bezirken Halle, Erfurt und Suhl.
Abschlusstabelle

|}

Kreuztabelle
Die Kreuztabelle stellt die Ergebnisse aller Spiele dieser Aufstiegsrunde dar. Die Heimmannschaft ist in der linken Spalte aufgelistet und die Gastmannschaft in der obersten Reihe.

Literatur

Weblinks

1985
Handballsaison 1985/86

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


What About A Reverse Glide Path Strategy?
Saving for College: Is the 529 Plan Optimal?
Financial Planning: The Importance of Asking Why?
Withdrawal Rates During Retirement: Are We Being Too Conservative?
Getting Your Comprehensive Financial Plan Together – What Do I Need?
Are You Saving Too Little or Too Much for Retirement?
Advisor Risk - How Would You Rate Your Advisor's Risk?
Why Your Will May Not Be Enough. Do You Need an Estate Plan?


text:
The High Arctic relocation (, ) took place during the Cold War in the 1950s, when 92 Inuit were moved by the Government of Canada under Liberal Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent to the High Arctic.

The relocation has been a source of controversy: on one hand being described as a humanitarian gesture to save the lives of starving indigenous people and enable them to continue a subsistence lifestyle; and on the other hand, said to be a forced migration instigated by the federal government to assert its sovereignty in the Far North by the use of "human flagpoles", in light of both the Cold War and the disputed territorial claims to the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Both sides acknowledge that the relocated Inuit were not given sufficient support to prevent extreme privation during their first years after the move.

History

In August 1953, seven or eight families from Inukjuak, northern Quebec (then known as Port Harrison) were transported to Grise Fiord on the southern tip of Ellesmere Island and to Resolute on Cornwallis Island. The group included the family of writer Markoosie Patsauq. The families, who had been receiving welfare payments, were promised better living and hunting opportunities in new communities in the High Arctic.  They were joined by three families recruited from the more northern community of Pond Inlet (in the then Northwest Territories, now part of Nunavut) whose purpose was to teach the Inukjuak Inuit skills for survival in the High Arctic.  The methods of recruitment and the reasons for the relocations have been disputed.  The government stated that volunteer families had agreed to participate in  a program to reduce areas of perceived overpopulation and poor hunting in Northern Quebec, to reduce their dependency on welfare, and to resume a subsistence lifestyle. In contrast, the Inuit reported that the relocations were forced and were motivated by a desire to reinforce Canadian sovereignty in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago by creating settlements in the area. The Inuit were taken on the Eastern Arctic patrol ship  to areas on Cornwallis and Ellesmere Islands (Resolute and Grise Fiord), both large barren islands in the hostile polar north. While on the boat the families learned that they would not be living together but would be left at three separate locations.

In Relocation to the High Arctic, Alan R. Marcus proposes that the relocation of the Inuit not only served as an experiment, but as an answer to the Eskimo problem.  The federal government stressed that the Eskimo problem was linked to the Inuit's reluctance to give up their nomadic ways in areas that were supposedly overpopulated and went so far as to provide detailed accounts of poor hunting seasons and starvation within the Inukjuak area as a direct result of over-population. However, the federal government knew the area in question was in the midst of a low trapping season due to the end of a four-year fox cycle.

New communities

The families were left without sufficient supplies of food and caribou skins and other materials for making appropriate clothing and tents. As they had been moved about  to a very different ecosystem, they were unfamiliar with the wildlife and had to adjust to months of 24-hour darkness during the winter, and 24-hour sunlight during the summer, something that does not occur in northern Quebec.  They were told that they would be returned home after two years if they wished, but these promises were not honoured by the government.

The relocatees included Inuit who had been involved in the filming of Robert J. Flaherty's film Nanook of the North (1922) and Flaherty's unacknowledged illegitimate son Josephie. However, Flaherty had died in 1951, prior to the relocation.  Eventually, the Inuit learned the local beluga whale migration routes and were able to survive in the area, hunting over a range of  each year. Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) reports from the time stated that the two colonies were generally successful in terms of morale, housing, and subsistence living.

Re-evaluation
During the 1980s, the relocated Inuit and their descendants initiated a claim against the Canadian Government, arguing that "there is overwhelming evidence to suggest that the central, if not the sole, reasons, for the relocation of Inuit to the High Arctic was the desire by Canada to assert its sovereignty over the Arctic Islands and surrounding area", and in 1987 sought $10 million in compensation from the federal government.

Following public and media pressure, the federal government created a program to assist the Inuit to return to the south, and in 1989, 40 Inuit returned to their former communities, leading to a break up of families on generational lines, as younger community members often chose to remain in the High Arctic. Those that remained are described as being fiercely committed to their home.

In 1990, the House of Commons of Canada standing committee on Aboriginal affairs asked the government to apologize to the Inuit who had been moved to the high Arctic in 1953, to provide compensation to them, and to formally recognize the residents of Resolute and Grise Fiord for their service to Canada's sovereignty.  In response, the government commissioned the "Hickling Report", which absolved them of wrongdoing, arguing that the Inuit had volunteered to be moved, and that they had been relocated due to the harsh social and economic conditions in Inukjuak. The report, written by a long-time government official, was strongly criticized by academics and the media.

In contrast, a Canadian Human Rights Commission report submitted in December 1991 argued that there was clear evidence that there were government concerns about Arctic sovereignty at the time of the relocations and an understanding that the settlements would contribute to Canadian sovereignty.  The report concluded that the Government of Canada had broken its promise to return the relocatees to Inukjuak after two years if they wished. A further report, written by Trent University professor Magnus Gunther, examined the various claims of academics disputing what had occurred during the relocations.  It concluded that the government had acted with humane intentions, and as a result Tom Siddon, Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, stated that it would be "inappropriate for the government to apologize" or provide compensation.

In July 1994, the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples held hearings to investigate the relocation program.  The Inuit evidence overwhelmingly highlighted that they had been forcibly relocated, while government officials argued that they had moved voluntarily. The official who had been in charge of the relocation tried to suggest that witnesses had changed their stories in order to claim compensation, and that the move had been a success.  The Commission found that the government of Canada had determined to "rehabilitate" the Inuit of Port Harrison, weaning them from dependency and "moral decline" by moving them to better lands with abundant game for hunting, and that inadequate preparations were made for them.  The commission recommended an apology and compensation for the survivors, as well as acknowledgment of the role the relocatees played in establishing a Canadian presence in the High Arctic. In their report, the commission noted that "There is therefore no doubt that the presence of Inuit settlements in the High Arctic, once established, did contribute to the maintenance of Canadian sovereignty." Simultaneously, the report found that colonizing the High Arctic, while before and after the relocation was important to Canadian national sovereignty, "[...] but that, in the period when the decision was taken, sovereignty was not in the minds of decision makers." Thus, in the eyes of the government, the maintenance of Canadian sovereignty through the High Arctic Relocation was a convenient by-product of what the report considers economic and social concerns. In the end, however, the report concluded that, "Even if sovereignty is assumed not to be a factor, this relocation was an inappropriate solution to the government's economic and social concerns. Sovereignty was, however, a material consideration, and the influence of sovereignty on the
relocation serves only to reinforce the Commission's conclusions about the inappropriateness of the relocation. However, the precise extent to which sovereignty influenced the relocation is difficult to determine." The claims of the Inuit were, therefore, at least partially supported by the report. The federal government refused to apologize, but established a "Reconciliation Agreement" in March 1996, creating a $10 million CAD trust fund for relocated individuals and their families.  The government admitted that the Inuit suffered "hardship, suffering and loss in the initial years of these relocations" but required recipients to "acknowledge that they understand that in planning the relocation, the government officials of the time were acting with honourable intentions in what was perceived to be in the best interests of the Inuit at that time."

After nearly five decades, an official government apology was given on 18 August 2010 to the relocated families for the inhumane treatment and suffering caused by the relocation.  John Duncan (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) stated: "The Government of Canada deeply regrets the mistakes and broken promises of this dark chapter of our history and apologizes for the High Arctic relocation having taken place.  We would like to pay tribute to the relocatees for their perseverance and courage...The relocation of Inuit families to the High Arctic is a tragic chapter in Canada's history that we should not forget, but that we must acknowledge, learn from and teach our children.  Acknowledging our shared history allows us to move forward in partnership and in a spirit of reconciliation."

Two generations on, the term The Relocated remains emotive.

In the media
Carvers Looty Pijamini (of Grise Fiord) and the late Simeonie Amagoalik (of Resolute) were commissioned by Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated to build a monument to commemorate the Inuit who sacrificed so much as a result of the Government relocation of 1953 and 1955. Pijamini's monument, located in Grise Fiord, depicts a woman with a young boy and a husky, with the woman sombrely looking out towards Resolute Bay. Amagoalik's monument, located in Resolute, depicts a lone man looking towards Grise Fiord. This was meant to show separated families, and depicting them longing to see each other again. Pijamini said that he intentionally made them look melancholy because the relocation was not a happy event. The monument was unveiled in September 2010, and received praise from the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

The High Arctic relocation is the subject of Zacharias Kunuk's film Exile. The film was produced by Isuma, who also released Atanarjuat: The Fast Runner, the first feature film ever to be written, directed and acted entirely in Inuktitut.

The High Arctic relocation is the subject of the film Broken Promises - The High Arctic Relocation by Patricia Tassinari (NFB, 1995). The relocation is also the subject of Marquise Lepage's documentary film (NFB, 2008), Martha of the North (Martha qui vient du froid). This film tells the story of Martha Flaherty, granddaughter of Robert J. Flaherty, who was relocated at 5, along with her family, from Inukjuak to Grise Fiord (Ellesmere Island). Lepage later released the 2013 web series Iqqaumavara, telling the stories of several other affected people.

Larry Audlaluk was a toddler when his family was relocated from Inukjuak on Hudson Bay to Grise Fiord in 1953; his father died 10 months later. His life story, What I Remember, What I Know: The Life of a High Arctic Exile (2020), provides a detailed personal account of  the danger and death that they faced.

See also

Dislocation of Sámi people
Environmental inequality in Europe
Human migration
Human rights in Canada
Indian removal
Thule relocation

References

Further reading

History of human rights in Canada
Inuit history
Forced migration
Territorial disputes of Canada
Indigenous rights in Canada


text:
/**
 * NetworkSearchParameter.java
 *
 * This file was auto-generated from WSDL
 * by the Apache Axis 1.4 Mar 02, 2009 (07:08:06 PST) WSDL2Java emitter.
 */

package com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.o;

/**
 *
A {@link SearchParameter} for setting the search network. Currently
 * we
 *             support two network setting options:
 *

 *
Google search network

 *
Google search network and AFS

 *

 *
This element is supported by following {@link IdeaType}s:
 * KEYWORD.
 *
This element is supported by following {@link RequestType}s:
 * IDEAS, STATS.
 */
public class NetworkSearchParameter  extends com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.o.SearchParameter  implements java.io.Serializable {
    /* The network targeted for this search.
     *
     *
Currently we can support two options:
     *

     *
number of google search impressions

     *
number of search impressions on the google
     * search network(AFS)

     *

     *                     This field is
     * required and should not be {@code null}. */
    private com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.cm.NetworkSetting networkSetting;

    public NetworkSearchParameter() {
    }

    public NetworkSearchParameter(
           java.lang.String searchParameterType,
           com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.cm.NetworkSetting networkSetting) {
        super(
            searchParameterType);
        this.networkSetting = networkSetting;
    }

    /**
     * Gets the networkSetting value for this NetworkSearchParameter.
     *
     * @return networkSetting   * The network targeted for this search.
     *
     *
Currently we can support two options:
     *

     *
number of google search impressions

     *
number of search impressions on the google
     * search network(AFS)

     *

     *                     This field is
     * required and should not be {@code null}.
     */
    public com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.cm.NetworkSetting getNetworkSetting() {
        return networkSetting;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the networkSetting value for this NetworkSearchParameter.
     *
     * @param networkSetting   * The network targeted for this search.
     *
     *
Currently we can support two options:
     *

     *
number of google search impressions

     *
number of search impressions on the google
     * search network(AFS)

     *

     *                     This field is
     * required and should not be {@code null}.
     */
    public void setNetworkSetting(com.google.api.ads.adwords.axis.v201601.cm.NetworkSetting networkSetting) {
        this.networkSetting = networkSetting;
    }

    private java.lang.Object __equalsCalc = null;
    public synchronized boolean equals(java.lang.Object obj) {
        if (!(obj instanceof NetworkSearchParameter)) return false;
        NetworkSearchParameter other = (NetworkSearchParameter) obj;
        if (obj == null) return false;
        if (this == obj) return true;
        if (__equalsCalc != null) {
            return (__equalsCalc == obj);
        }
        __equalsCalc = obj;
        boolean _equals;
        _equals = super.equals(obj) &&
            ((this.networkSetting==null && other.getNetworkSetting()==null) ||
             (this.networkSetting!=null &&
              this.networkSetting.equals(other.getNetworkSetting())));
        __equalsCalc = null;
        return _equals;
    }

    private boolean __hashCodeCalc = false;
    public synchronized int hashCode() {
        if (__hashCodeCalc) {
            return 0;
        }
        __hashCodeCalc = true;
        int _hashCode = super.hashCode();
        if (getNetworkSetting() != null) {
            _hashCode += getNetworkSetting().hashCode();
        }
        __hashCodeCalc = false;
        return _hashCode;
    }

    // Type metadata
    private static org.apache.axis.description.TypeDesc typeDesc =
        new org.apache.axis.description.TypeDesc(NetworkSearchParameter.class, true);

    static {
        typeDesc.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/o/v201601", "NetworkSearchParameter"));
        org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc elemField = new org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc();
        elemField.setFieldName("networkSetting");
        elemField.setXmlName(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/o/v201601", "networkSetting"));
        elemField.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/cm/v201601", "NetworkSetting"));
        elemField.setMinOccurs(0);
        elemField.setNillable(false);
        typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField);
    }

    /**
     * Return type metadata object
     */
    public static org.apache.axis.description.TypeDesc getTypeDesc() {
        return typeDesc;
    }

    /**
     * Get Custom Serializer
     */
    public static org.apache.axis.encoding.Serializer getSerializer(
           java.lang.String mechType,
           java.lang.Class _javaType,
           javax.xml.namespace.QName _xmlType) {
        return
          new  org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.BeanSerializer(
            _javaType, _xmlType, typeDesc);
    }

    /**
     * Get Custom Deserializer
     */
    public static org.apache.axis.encoding.Deserializer getDeserializer(
           java.lang.String mechType,
           java.lang.Class _javaType,
           javax.xml.namespace.QName _xmlType) {
        return
          new  org.apache.axis.encoding.ser.BeanDeserializer(
            _javaType, _xmlType, typeDesc);
    }

}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


EZFishing brings you Minnesota's most comprehensive list of fishing locations, providing interactive maps that show each location's GPS coordinates, nearby facilities (like restaurants, gas stations, marinas and fishing shops), their current and forecasted weather and, if available, their water conditions.
Find any of the 10042 locations currently available in EZFishing database, to check fishing reports, maps, directions, weather and water conditions.
Fishing regulations and licensing, guides/outfitter services and local fishing clubs in Minnesota.
Are you familiar with the fishing regulation in Minnesota?
Minnesota Fishing Special Permits & Licenses.
Buy Your Minnesota Fishing License Online.
Here are a few websites of Minnesota's agencies involved in regulation and conservation.
Check out what is the latest fishing buzz in Minnesota.
DNR Prompts Parents to "Take Your Kid Fishing"
Adults are considered ages 16 and up. Minnesota is known for its many bodies of water, but it is helpful to know which ones are good fishing spots. " Spring Lake, Skyline, up here in Saint Peter is the Saint Peter Fence Fishing Pond," said Stevens. "
ST. PAUL—Owning a fishing license won't be a barrier for Minnesota families looking to fish in parks this weekend. The Department of Natural Resources is hoping to "reel" families into the outdoors through their Take-A-Kid Fishing Weekend. Friday, June 6 .
Along with their grandpa, two of my sons and I enjoyed a great day of fishing Pool 5A of the Mississippi River on the Minnesota-Wisconsin border. We found a mess of walleyes that wanted meat, nothing else, no matter how hard I tried to rotate in enticing .
The Weekender: Take A Kid Fishing, Circus Saurus, and More!
A rainy day did not hamper the 320 anglers fishing the 10th annual Fleet Farm Minnesota Fishing Challenge—a multi-species, fundraising fishing tournament Saturday, June 2. Due to the heavy overcast skies and intermittent rain, the two-person teams found ..
Why are hundreds of dead fish lining Lake Nokomis?
"Because it was mostly the same species of fish, all about the same age, then it's probably some sort of fish disease," said Sean Sisler, a fish health consultant with the Minnesota DNR. Sisler adds that fish are more susceptible to disease when they're ..
Hard to beat a slip bobber and live bait. Jarrid Houston of South Range is a fishing guide (houstonsguideservice.com) on Minnesota and Wisconsin inland waters, the St. Louis River and, in winter, on Lake Superior.
Look up the following list of fishing clubs in Minnesota.
Check out the most popular locations in Minnesota.
Check out the most popular titles about fishing in Minnesota on sale at Amazon.com.


Pill bugs are common invertebrates that are found in many biomes around the world, including temperate forests, rainforests, and grasslands. The pill bug is not an insect but is an isopod. They are more closely related to shrimp and crayfish than to insects and are the only crustacean that has adapted to living their entire life on land. They prefer moist areas, often living in soil and under decaying leaves, rocks, and dead logs. Pill bugs mostly eat decaying vegetable material like vegetables.


Applying these concepts to Cowichan Tribes we can see that much of this work has been done already through the Treaty process and our delegated sub government institutions such as Quw'utsun Syuw'ents, Ts'ewulthtun Health & Lalum utul Smun'eem agencies.
The key word to self government modis is "self" and we, Cowichan Tribes is the "self" for our future. How we plan for our future services and how this impacts future generations.
The People, currently Cowichan Tribes boasts over 5000 members, over half of the population live on reserve. However, many of our members are off reserve, away from our traditional territory and even out of the country. It is very diverse in terms of population and in its geographic representation.
The Land, our land which is a fragment of our original territory has been affected by a dense growing population. In the future we can plan on more issues regarding this; however our resolve has never been stronger to protect what we have left and what we will attain through the Treaty process.
Laws & Jurisdiction, meaning our regulation (Band Resolutions or Bylaws) is a growing field. We already have some delegated authority in Child Safety issues, fisheries, and Community Justice. Cowichan Tribes does not have three attorneys in its membership.
Institutions, as mentioned, Cowichan Tribes has developed quite a few agencies to provide services. Each is successful in what they do and provide. However growing edges might be in the areas of cultural alignment and transparency and fairness resolutions.
Resources, simply means our businesses, our employees, revenue sources, and financial management. A big portion of this means capacity building, meaning developing our own talent to fill the roles we need for the future of managing our resources. This includes all our departments helping to steer our youth into meaningful education tracts and life experiences that benefit the future of Cowichan as a whole.
Much of this also means coming to grips with colonial thinking. The important aspects of this process will be in showing the importance of healing from colonial thinking, capacity building, and enabling the big picture thinking. This big picture is our shared future as Cowichan People.