'Even the smallest offering may yet yield the greatest rewards.' A story from three perspectives. A Gondorian Guard, the Steward, and a seemingly fearless OC. Aragorn, Gandalf and Bergil make a appearance, too.
A peace treaty is reached between Gondor and Near Harad, ending the final conflict of the War of the Ring. Gaelien, youngest child of Aragorn and Arwen, is called back to Minas Tirith from her captainship in South Gondor and asked to enter a marriage with the heir of the king of Harad.
The Houses of Healing were meant to be a place for removing ills, not causing them; and in any case, Thorongil had not wished to be there at all.
Of all of Gondor's long history, no chapter is as tragic or as brutal as the Kin-Strife. The Kin Strife effectively started with the death of King Valacar in the year 1432 of the Third Age and ended some 16 years later. Castamir, claiming his pure Numenorean bloodline and a descendant of the Royal line, overthrew Eldacar, the rightful heir of the throne of Gondor, but who was of mixed Gondorian and Rhovanion blood.
This tale is but one of many, and tells of some of the people who got caught up in the dark and brutal civil war in Gondor. and,begins with Castamir claiming the crown of Gondor from the defeated King Eldacar.
This is a Gondorian tale co-written by me (Hanasian) and my wife (Elora).
Unless stated otherwise in the chapter notes, the Prologue and the odd-numbered chapters were written by Hanasian, and the even-numbered chapters were written by Elora. I would also like to thank my wife Elora for her editing and taking the rough edges from my writing.
Young Aragorn (as Thorongil) is tasked to investigate a troubling pattern in the Corsair raids that plague Gondor. This takes him to an epic journey to the wild parts of Arda. There he has to fight a terrifying set of foes, who have a chilling grand plan. Can Aragorn thwart it, and save his abducted friend in the process?
In Minas Tirith, a bored barkeep tends a quiet tavern, and gains an eventful afternoon when he is visited by some unexpected (and unusual) patrons. Unfortunately for him, Legolas has no idea how mortal currency works.
A poem written long ago concerning Aragorn's return, his crowning as High King and the Reuniting of the once-great Númenórean Empire. And how Isildur's Heir, according to prophecy, brought forth peace and the coming Age of Men.
Kayden finds Faramir in the House of Healing and promptly takes care of him.
Even the insects of Gondor feel compelled to offer tribute to the new King and Queen!
A holiday in Lossarnach takes a turn for the worst for Prince Thengel and his companions, who must rely upon the hospitality of the young mistress of Imloth Melui. But even under the blossoming trees of that fabled valley, life takes a turn from the idyllic. Where greedy relatives fail, Morwen and Thengel discover strength in friendship and perhaps something more.
An outspoken woman is holding forth in the taverns of Minas Tirith, and she's causing a bit of a stir. Curious, one of the King's guards engages her in conversation, and he receives an earful for his troubles. Freedom, it seems, is never free.
AU. The Quest failed and darkness rules the lands of Middle-earth. For the captives in the Land of Shadow, hope is bleak, and at best they strive to stand, even if only on their knees. And Sauron is set on bending Elessar to his will.
Mortality, the one thing he has given up to be with the one he truly loves. Yet above all else, who could bear to witness the passing of close bonds, but he to live on remembering the pain?
On a dark and stormy night, old Mithrellas finds herself unexpectedly hosting two men from the White City who've become separated from their party.


text:
Coalition for Respect begins second year
Alexandra Uri|August 31, 2015
The Coalition for Respect completed its first full year of working with Trinity University last year. According to the Trinity University Sexual Assault web page, the Coalition for Respect is "a committee of staff, faculty, and students" that "meets every semester to review the campus climate with respect to sexual misconduct. This group focuses specifically on compliance, policy, prevention and education, and advocacy."
The coalition highlights that sexual misconduct is a community-centered issue and the diversity seen in the coalition reflects that.
"The whole idea of the coalition is to give broad-based community involvement in this issue rather than to have students view this as an administration issue, because it's not," said David Tuttle, associate vice president and dean of students. "This is a community issue, and I think having this coalition really reinforced that it is a community issue."
The coalition includes three subcommittees, and each holds different responsibilities.
"There's Compliance, which works to make sure that we're up-to-date with the legislation. There's the Policy committee, which continues to revise and develop policy to make sure we're current, but that it's clear and students have input on the policy. And then the third subcommittee, that Sheryl Tynes leads up, is the Education and Prevention committee. That's probably the most important subcommittee. They do the events and programs," Tuttle said.
Last year the Education and Prevention committee put on events such as the Bystander Action NSO program, the Keith Edwards talk and the Spring Break Nacho Hour, among other events.
Currently there are no speakers or activities set up by the Education and Prevention committee for the fall semester. However, students are encouraged to attend the meetings put on every three weeks to bring new ideas.
"If we do something, we'd probably do it again in early spring semester. We don't have anything specific set up in the fall. But we did put magnets in the residence halls this year, and we're open," said Sheryl Tynes, associate vice president for academic affairs and professor of sociology.
The coalition also put out an annual report addressing the activities of the organization and the cases that were handled over the past year. The 2014-2015 report can be found on the Coalition for Respect Trinity University Facebook page.
"It reported on policies. It reported on programs that were done and it reflected the cases that were handled judicially," Tuttle said.
Students and faculty interested in being involved with the Coalition for Respect should follow the group's Facebook page for updates on meetings. Students should also expect an email regarding sexual misconduct in the first few weeks of school.
"The more that we have people involved from different areas, the more perspectives we have, the better," Tuttle said.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


In my previous Back to Basics post, I briefly went over porosity and how it plays a role in determining the best products and regimen for one's hair care.
The key to moisturizing is using a water-based product (meaning water is the first ingredient). Not an oil- or butter-based product, these are not moisturizers. They're sealants, they're emollients, but they are not moisturizers. When oils and/or butters are applied after true moisturizers, they lock in the moisture by coating the hair shaft and preventing the moisture (water) from evaporating.
My hair is in the medium to high porosity range so retaining moisture is a problem for me. When I moisturize, I seal afterwards to preserve the benefits of moisturizing. Depending on how I feel or what is nearest, I use water or a variation of hair mists and milks to moisturize. Then, I apply one of my oils or oil blends. If I want something heavier, I'll use a butter or a pomade.
Here are some of my favorite moisturizers. A full list is on the HG Products page.
Water: It doesn't get any simpler than this.
Shea Moisture Coconut & Hibiscus Hold & Shine Moisture Mist: In the past 4 years, I've probably gone through about 10 of these. It's moisturizing and light.
Oyin Handmade Hair Dew: It's a great hair milk that easily absorbs with no residue. Click here for a full review.
Here are some of my favorite carrier oils for sealing. They are all easily accessible and relatively inexpensive.
Castor oil: This is a very thick oil. It's also good as a scalp treatment. Whenever my edges look a little sparse, I use this consistently on a daily basis, and it works! I prefer to use Jamaican black castor oil or the extra dark version, but I also use the regular one. It's sold in most drugstores in the laxative section. Don't let that scare you though.
Coconut oil: This is one of those oils that actually penetrates the hair. I prefer extra virgin or virgin coconut oil because they are cold-pressed meaning it's produced at a lower temperature retaining the nutrients, aroma, and flavor. I love the way unrefined coconut oil smells and tastes. Yes, I cook with it also, and it's YUMMY!
Olive oil: I don't use this one as much, but it's something I always have on hand in the kitchen.
Properly moisturizing is key to everyone's regimen, but depending on your hair's characteristics, sealing might not be a necessity for you. Again, knowing your own hair will always be your best tool for maintaining it.
Click here to check out the first Back to Basics post on porosity and for more of my favorite products, click here!
Glad you like it! Thanks for commenting.


text:
About Town: 51st annual Palos Verdes Antiques…
About Town: 51st annual Palos Verdes Antiques Show and Sale's opening gala features 1960s theme
At the Palos Verdes Antique Show and Sale's opening night gala, guests came adorned in 1960s garb, befitting the theme – "Peace, Love and Antiques." From left is church rector, the Very Rev. Paula Vukmanic; former show chairman Darryl Tillman, and guests Sondra Scofield and Peggy Rollis. (Photo by Meredith Grenier)
By gqlshare | gqlshare@digitalfirstmedia.com |
PUBLISHED: June 7, 2019 at 11:45 am | UPDATED: June 7, 2019 at 5:14 pm
Prestigious dealers came from all over California and several neighboring states to the 51st annual Palos Verdes Antiques Show and Sale at St. Francis Episcopal Church, in Palos Verdes Estates. The three-day show, which is the oldest in California, kicked off with an opening night gala, organized by members of the church parish.
The evening's theme was "Peace, Love and Antiques," featuring musical entertainment from the top hits from 1969 and guests dressed in 1960s fashions. They wore a mix of pearls and pillbox hats, a la Jackie Kennedy, and tie-dye, hippie garb, adorned with peace signs and love beads.
Meredith Grenier
Marceil Greenway of Palos Verdes Estates and Anna May Labbe of Torrance arrived in mink. Greenway wore a 50-year-old mink stole..
A mink pillbox hat and a Judith Leiper lion gold buckle belt completed the 60s look. Labbe wore a sportier mink jacket, borrowed from Greenway.
Rancho Palos Verdes artist Pat Hinz displayed her de rigueur pearls as she admired jewelry from Elle of California. The dealer had come from San Ramon for the show.
Guests shared stories of their collections. Hinz, for example, collects crystal pieces, angels and statuary of judges. Her late husband of 63 years, Edward Hinz, Jr., culminated his distinguished career as a justice of the California Court of Appeal.
The Very Rev. Paula Vukmanic, church rector, collects crosses, art (from her former career as a professional artist) and jackets made from antique Indian cloth. She purchased them over the years from antiques show dealer Marcia Bell Crawford, owner of Once Upon A Time Antiques, near San Diego.
"I have six of these, which really means I have 12, since they are reversible," she said, showing off her jacket.
Guests also grazed on appetizers, provided by various church guilds and made bids on the silent auction.
About Town: 4,000 arts lovers flock to third annual South Bay Festival of the Arts
About Town: 'Reach for the Stars' gala honors longtime donors
Albertine Bellows, who until a few years ago was the show's chairwoman for at least 20 years, greeted guests as they sipped wine and sampled hors d'oeuvres. She continues to serve on the antique show's committee, and her son, Jamie, was co-chairman of the show with Wendy Pratt.
"I worked in the kitchen during the first show in 1969," Albertine recalled.
Guests made a point to visit their favorite dealers, such as silver expert Michael McHale. He and his wife, Gae, who live in Camarillo, have participated in the show since 1972. In his opinion, the best polish for silver is Hagerty Silver Foam. "Use it with hot water and a cotton rag," he said.
Guest De De Hicks stopped to greet McHale. She purchased a silver service set from him years ago.
"He's wonderful," Hicks said. "I can't praise him highly enough."
McHale, who has more than 10,000 pieces, makes house calls all over California. As with most of the other prestigious dealers, McHale has bought and sold silver for decades.
"I got into this because I love history," he said. "It is the repeat customers who have kept us in business nearly 50 years."
He and Gae do shows all over the country, but he admitted that their favorite is the Palos Verdes show and sale, traditionally held the last week in May.
Proceeds from the show will benefit the Mission and Outreach Ministries of St. Francis Parish. Major donors, called Saints, include Albertine Bellows, Lynn and Park Densmore, Anna Eakins and Elaine, and Lloyd Mistele, in addition to many other donors, known as Archangels and Angels.
Next year's show will be May 28, 29 and 30, with the gala opening night on May 27. Information: stfrancispalosverdes.org.
Martin Luther King Arts Winners
Congratulations to the first place winners of the 2019 Martin Luther King, Jr., Visions of Unity Arts Contest for Torrance High School students. The winners were announced at the 20th Awards Celebration at Torrance Memorial Medical Center. The contest was sponsored by the Human Relations Forum of Torrance, along with the Torrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance Unified School District; Volunteer Center South Bay; League of Women Voters, Torrance, and Palos Verdes Chapter of the Links, Inc.
First place for fine art went to Sunny Zhan, West High School; first place for photography, Chloe Chamberlain, South High School; Sculpture, Lauren Miller, South High School; Short story, Shune Kawaoto, North High School.
First place for essay was awarded to Aleeza Adman, West High School; and Poetry went to Island Villa, North High School. Lea Ann King was the contest coordinator. Information: 310-546-6668.
Asia America Youth Symphony
American soul and gospel recording artist and pianist Oleta Adams will join jazz musician David Benoit with the Asia America Youth Symphony Orchestra at 8 p.m. June 29 at El Camino College's Marsee Auditorium.
Orchestra founder Benoit will lead the orchestra in a varied program including the premiere of his "The Great Wall" for flute and piano, featuring Joseph Loi, flute and Adina Pak, piano. Information: 310-377-8977.
Meredith Grenier is a former Daily Breeze features writer. She can be reached at meredithgrenier@yahoo.com.
gqlshare


text:
Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Fifth Circuit › 1980 › United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ralph T. Miller & Joan Miller, Defendants,in Re Sub...
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ralph T. Miller & Joan Miller, Defendants,in Re Subpoena Duces Tecum of James M. Russ, Appellant, 660 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1980)
Unit B*
Nov. 2, 1981.
James M. Russ, pro se.
Don E. Christopher, Asst. U. S. Atty., Orlando, Fla., M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup, Chief, Appellate Section, R. Russell Mather, Tax Div., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Before HILL, FAY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, Circuit Judge:
This case is an appeal from an order entered by the district court holding appellant Russ in contempt for failure to comply with a pretrial subpoena duces tecum issued on behalf of the government. Appellant Russ is an attorney and a member of the Florida Bar. He became involved in these proceedings in the normal course of his representation of Mr. and Mrs. Ralph T. Miller, who are the defendants in a criminal tax fraud case presently pending for trial in the district court.1 The criminal case involves charges against the Millers for income tax evasion for the years 1973, 1974 and 1975, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 7201. The Millers operated a pawn shop as an unincorporated sole proprietorship. The subpoena at issue was issued pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) and commanded appellant Russ to appear and to produce:
two income ledger books for the years of 1974 and 1975 for the OK Pawn Shop, Daytona Beach, Florida, which books were previously given to agents of the Internal Revenue Service on October 26, 1976, by Charles Kleinschmidt, CPA on behalf of Ralph and Joan Miller, and which books were returned by agents of the Internal Revenue Service on March 28, 1978 to Marshall Barkin, attorney for the Millers.
(R. 414.) On appeal appellant justifies his refusal to comply with the subpoena based upon his assertion that compliance would violate the attorney-client privilege and his clients' constitutional privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. Upon appellant's refusal to comply, appellant was found to be in contempt, and fined $100 per day. Contemplating an appeal, the district court stayed imposition of the fine until ten days from the date of the decision of this court on appeal. Appellant filed a timely appeal.
The background facts can be briefly stated. The Internal Revenue Service investigation of the Millers' tax returns for the years 1973, 1974, and 1975 was conducted during 1975 and 1976. Although the audit was conducted as a civil audit, the revenue agent referred the investigation with respect to the 1973 return to the Intelligence Division2 on April 15, 1975. The Intelligence Division has responsibility for criminal tax investigations. Similarly, the 1974 return was referred to Intelligence on January 15, 1976. On both occasions, the Intelligence Division rejected the referral. In each case the revenue agent followed the Internal Revenue Manual which requires the agent to suspend his examination and refer the case to the Intelligence Division when he discovers "a firm indication of fraud on the part of the taxpayer."3 In each case, the agent complied with the requirement that the civil examination be suspended during the time a referral was pending before the Intelligence Division; accordingly, the revenue agent made no contacts with the taxpayers or their representatives during that time. In each case the civil audit was resumed when Intelligence rejected the referral. The Millers retained an attorney, Marshall Barkin, who in turn retained a certified public accountant on August 27, 1976, to assist him in his legal representation of the Millers. The ledger books at issue were delivered by Barkin to the accountant.
In October 1976, the Millers received a written demand from the revenue agent that they produce the two ledger books at issue; on October 26, 1976, the accountant turned over the two books to the revenue agent. The Service conducted handwriting and ink analyses of the ledgers and made photocopies of the ledgers. Upon demand by the Millers' attorney, the Service returned the original books but kept the copies. On October 28, 1976, the revenue agent again referred the Millers' tax returns for 1973, 1974 and 1975 to the Intelligence Division. This time the referral was accepted. Again following the Internal Revenue Manual, the revenue agent made no further contacts until February 18, 1977, when the revenue agent and a special agent4 visited the pawn shop, advised the Millers that they were under investigation for possible criminal violations of the tax laws, and advised them of their constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment and their right to legal counsel.
Neither the taxpayers nor their representatives were advised of the suspected criminal overtones at the time of any of the three referrals to Intelligence. They were not advised until February 18, 1977. However, neither the taxpayers nor their representatives ever asked whether the investigation had criminal overtones.
In due course the Millers were indicted, the Rule 17(c) subpoena was issued, appellant Russ' refusal to comply after having been ordered to do so resulted in the contempt order, and the instant appeal was filed.5 The only significant issue6 before us is whether the district court erred in rejecting appellant's reliance in refusing to produce two ledger books upon the attorney-client privilege, including the protection afforded by the attorney-client privilege to preexisting documents turned over to the attorney to obtain legal advice, when the documents would have been privileged in the hands of the client by reason of the Fifth Amendment. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 96 S. Ct. 1569, 48 L. Ed. 2d 39 (1976). We hold that attorney Russ had no attorney-client privilege with respect to the books, and therefore we affirm.
II. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT
All parties agree on one basic legal proposition, i. e., that if a document would have been protected in the client's hands by reason of the Fifth Amendment, then the attorney-client privilege protects the document assuming it otherwise qualifies as confidential information delivered to the attorney in order to obtain legal advice. Fisher v. United States, supra, so held. Otherwise, a client would be reluctant to turn over possession to an attorney, and the ability to obtain legal advice would be diminished.
III. DOES FISHER v. UNITED STATES PERMIT ONLY A NARROW FOCUS ON THE ACT OF PRODUCING A DOCUMENT
Before discussing the crucial attorney-client privilege issue, we consider and reject the government's argument that the Supreme Court in Fisher confined the Fifth Amendment's application to documents to a single, narrow approach. The government argues that Fisher permits only a single analysis, namely, a focus on the act of producing a document, so that the content of a document is no longer relevant. In Fisher the Court did analyze the act of producing. The Court said that the act of producing documents: (1) acknowledged the existence of the documents; (2) acknowledged taxpayer's possession and control of the documents; and (3) indicated the taxpayer's belief that the documents were the ones described in the subpoena. Without deciding whether the implicit admission of the first two aspects the existence and possession of documents might rise to the level of testimony within the protection of the Fifth Amendment, the Court held the existence and location of the accountant's work papers at issue there was a "foregone conclusion," that taxpayer's implicit admission would add nothing, and therefore that no constitutional rights were touched. 425 U.S. at 411, 96 S. Ct. at 1581. With respect to the third or authentication aspect, the Court found no substantial threat of self-incrimination because the documents at issue were accountant's work papers which the taxpayer could not authenticate in any event.
Applying this analysis, the government notes that the two ledger books at issue here were previously turned over to the Internal Revenue Service, that authentication by the agents is a "foregone conclusion" without the necessity of any admission by the Millers or their attorney, and that the existence and location of the books are likewise a "foregone conclusion." Therefore, the government argues there is no Fifth Amendment shield with respect to these books in the Millers' hands, and accordingly none in the hands of their attorney.
We assume arguendo that the authentication of the books, and their location and existence, is a "foregone conclusion," and accordingly that the testimonial aspects of the act of producing the books does not present a substantial threat of self-incrimination. In this regard, the government persuasively suggests that the facts of the instant case are more favorable to the government than Fisher. However, the government argument glosses over the fact that the Fisher court expressly did not address the question as to whether the taxpayer there could have been required to produce his own tax records or "private papers." The Court said:
Whether the Fifth Amendment would shield the taxpayer from producing his own tax records in his possession is a question not involved here; for the papers demanded here are not his "private papers," see Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. (616), at 634-635 (6 S. Ct. 524, at 534-535, 29 L. Ed. 746) ((1886)) ....
425 U.S. at 414, 96 S. Ct. at 1582. The Supreme Court did not overrule Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S. Ct. 524, 29 L. Ed. 746 (1886) nor can we. This court has only recently held that Boyd is alive, and that the framework for analysis of the Fifth Amendment protection against production of documents has two prongs: i. e., the Fisher analysis of the act of producing the documents, and the Boyd protection of private papers. United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1981). The Davis panel read the previous decisions of this court as rejecting the government's argument that Boyd has been overruled. See In re Oswalt, 607 F.2d 645 (5th Cir. 1979); In re Grand Jury Proceedings (McCloy and Sussman), 601 F.2d 162 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Hankins, 565 F.2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1978) clarified 581 F.2d 431, cert. denied 440 U.S. 909, 99 S. Ct. 1218, 59 L. Ed. 2d 457 (1979). Accordingly, we reject the government's argument that Fisher permits, in analyzing the Fifth Amendment's application to the production of private papers, only a narrow focus on the act of producing.
Having rejected the government's argument based on Fisher, we turn to the crucial attorney-client privilege issue. The government argues that the books at issue were no longer confidential because the books were voluntarily turned over to the Internal Revenue Service on October 26, 1976, and because the government now has photocopies thereof.
There is no dispute that a valid attorney-client privilege is a prerequisite to appellant's challenge to the subpoena. In United States v. Davis, supra, we held that in order for an attorney to raise the privilege against self-incrimination on a client's behalf "the information in the documents must be confidential and the transfer (from client to attorney) must have been made to obtain legal advice." 636 F.2d at 1040. In the instant case, the government does not suggest that the transfer to appellant was for any reason other than to obtain legal advice. Accordingly, that element is not in issue. The only issue before us relating to the attorney-client privilege is whether or not the two books remain confidential, notwithstanding their previous delivery to the Internal Revenue Service.7
A. Does the Previous Delivery Strip the Document of its Confidentiality Within the Meaning of the Attorney-Client Privilege?
We first address whether or not the previous delivery would, as a general rule, strip the books of their confidentiality. In United States v. Pipkins, 528 F.2d 559, 563 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 952, 96 S. Ct. 3177, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1191 (1976), this court held that Pipkins' voluntary disclosure of his handwriting style to the government stripped his subsequent handwriting samples of their confidential nature within the meaning of the attorney-client privilege. Pipkins had voluntarily given his handwriting sample to the postal inspector assigned to investigate the theft and forgery of a government check. After his indictment, Pipkins' attorney employed a handwriting expert who examined the forged check, the handwriting exemplars which Pipkins had previously given the government agent, and new handwriting samples which Pipkins provided at the request of the expert. The expert's report was adverse, and accordingly Pipkins did not call the expert as a witness for the defense. The prosecution's use of the expert was allowed by the district court over the defense objection based on the attorney-client privilege. Noting that one's style of handwriting is not intrinsically confidential, and that any hope of confidentiality was lost by the previous disclosure of his handwriting style to the government, this court held that Pipkins had failed to establish that his handwriting samples were confidential communications within the meaning of the attorney-client privilege. Accord United States v. Franklin, 598 F.2d 954, 957 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 870, 100 S. Ct. 147, 62 L. Ed. 2d 95 (1979). To the same effect, McCormick on Evidence, § 93 (2d Ed. 1972), in a discussion of the attorney-client privilege, provides:
When at an earlier trial or stage of the case the privilege has been waived and testimony as to the privileged communications elicited without objection, the prevailing view is that this is a waiver also for any subsequent hearing of the same case. In the words of Holmes, J., "The privacy for the sake of which the privilege was created was gone by the appellant's own consent, and the privilege does not remain in such circumstances for the mere sake of giving the client an additional weapon to use or not at his choice." The same reasons seem to apply where the waiver was thus publicly made up on the trial of one case, and the privilege later sought to be asserted on the hearing of another cause. How far does this argument of once published, permanently waived, apply to out-of-court disclosures made by the client or with his consent? Authority is scanty, but it seems that if the client makes public disclosure, this should clearly be a waiver, and even where privately revealed to a third person, or authorized to be revealed it should have the same effect, by analogy to the cases which deny privilege when a third person is present at the consultation.
(Footnotes omitted). Accord 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2328 (McNaughton rev. 1961). On the basis of the foregoing authorities, we conclude that the previous voluntary disclosure to the Internal Revenue Service of the two ledger books at issue here would strip the books of their confidential nature and thus defeat the attorney-client privilege.
However, we must address two arguments made by appellant which challenge the voluntary nature of the previous delivery of the books to the Internal Revenue Service. First, appellant argues that the accountant's delivery of the books to the revenue agent was procured by misrepresentation, deceit and fraud on the part of the agent. Second, appellant argues that the accountant lacked authority to turn over the books.
B. Did Misrepresentation, Deceit and Fraud on the Part of the Internal Revenue Service Taint the Previous Delivery?
Appellant's misrepresentation argument relies upon Stuart v. United States, 416 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1969), and United States v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297 (5th Cir. 1977). These cases involved allegations of misrepresentation and deception in Fourth or Fifth Amendment contexts. However, the situations are similar, and the same principles apply to the instant case involving the attorney-client privilege. In Stuart, the taxpayer worked at night and slept during the day. For the convenience of the revenue agent, the taxpayer turned over custody of her tax records to an accountant, at whose office the agent could more conveniently conduct the investigation. After discovering possible indications of fraud, the Internal Revenue Service issued a subpoena to compel the accountant to produce the taxpayer's records. The government conceded that, had the taxpayer retained possession of the records, she could have successfully asserted her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. This court refused to enforce the subpoena, because the taxpayer had delivered the records to the accountant for the convenience of the government, thus indicating that the government had a significant role in the transfer.
In Tweel, the taxpayer's accountant turned over to a revenue agent certain of taxpayer's tax records, which were copied by the agent. The taxpayer's conviction for tax evasion was reversed by this court on the ground that the district court erroneously denied taxpayer's motion to suppress the copies. We held that the accountant's consent to the search, by turning over the taxpayer's records, was obtained by the government by misrepresentation and deception, that therefore the search was unreasonable, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the evidence derived from the search should have been suppressed. Deceit and misrepresentation were present because the taxpayer's accountant specifically asked whether a "special agent" was involved, and received a negative answer despite the fact that the revenue agent knew at the time that the accountant's question was asked to ascertain whether the audit was criminal in nature, and despite the fact that the agent knew at the time that the audit was being conducted at the specific request of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the Department of Justice. The audit undeniably was a criminal investigation.
We agree with the government that the instant case is distinguishable from both Stuart and Tweel, and instead is controlled by United States v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 831, 91 S. Ct. 62, 27 L. Ed. 2d 62 (1970), and its progeny. Tweel itself cited Prudden and its progeny and specifically acknowledged that the party asserting fraud on the part of the government had the burden of proving some affirmative misrepresentation by clear and convincing evidence, and that silence can be equated with fraud only where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. The Tweel panel found that the silent misrepresentation there was intentionally misleading and material. 550 F.2d at 299.
In Prudden, the taxpayer turned over documents to a revenue agent during the course of a civil audit, and later, after being indicted for tax evasion, the taxpayer moved to suppress the documents, asserting violations of his Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights. For purposes of the instant case, the relevant Prudden facts were that the revenue agent did not advise the taxpayer when the investigation was referred to the Intelligence Division, and that the agent continued contacts with the taxpayer even after referral. Finding the district court's ultimate finding of fraud, deceit and trickery to be clearly erroneous, we held:
(T)hat the mere failure of a revenue agent (be he regular or special) to warn the taxpayer that the investigation may result in criminal charges, absent any acts by the agent which materially misrepresent the nature of the inquiry, do (sic) not constitute fraud, deceit and trickery. Therefore, the record here must disclose some affirmative misrepresentation to establish the existence of fraud, and this showing must be clear and convincing.
424 F.2d at 1033.
In United States v. Ponder, 444 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1971), the taxpayer's records were turned over to the Internal Revenue Service during the course of a civil audit. The taxpayer was later indicted and sought to suppress the records on the basis of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The court assumed that the criminal phase of the investigation began after the records were in the hands of the Internal Revenue Service, but before the copies were made. Rejecting the taxpayer's argument that the Service was under a duty to advise of the change in status to that of a criminal case, and relying upon United States v. Prudden, supra, and United States v. Tonahill, 430 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 943, 91 S. Ct. 242, 27 L. Ed. 2d 247, this court held:
Prudden and Tonahill hold that evidence received from the taxpayer after the criminal investigation commenced is admissible, even though no notice or Miranda warnings were given. A fortiori the evidence received from Ponder before the criminal investigation commenced is not rendered inadmissible merely because it was copied thereafter.
These cases recognize that evidence obtained for criminal use by deceit, fraud and misrepresentation might be suppressed, but held that failure to advise the taxpayer that a criminal investigation was being made did not amount to such conduct.
444 F.2d at 819.
In the instant case, appellant asserts as evidence of misrepresentation or deception only that the revenue agents did not advise taxpayers or their representatives when the investigation was referred to Intelligence. The record here affirmatively shows that neither the taxpayers nor their representatives ever asked any questions relating to whether the audits were civil or criminal. We conclude that the facts here are more favorable to the government than those in Prudden and Ponder and accordingly those cases are controlling. There is no evidence in this record that the selection of these returns for audit had criminal overtones,8 as in Tweel. Nor did the taxpayers here or their agents ask if the audit had criminal overtones, as had been done in Tweel. We conclude that Tweel is inapposite. Nor is there any evidence that the books at issue were turned over to the agent as an accommodation or convenience to the agent; thus, we find Stuart inapposite. Accordingly, we hold that appellant has failed to carry his burden of proving that the government was guilty of misrepresentation, deception or fraud in connection with the transfer of the documents from taxpayer's accountant to the Service.
C. Did the Accountant Lack Authority to make the Previous Delivery?
Appellant also argues that the accountant did not have authority to turn the books at issue over to the revenue agent, and therefore that such previous disclosure cannot form the basis of a holding that the attorney-client privilege was waived. Acknowledging that the district court found that the previous disclosure by the accountant was voluntary, appellant argues that a waiver of the privilege against self-incrimination must be knowing and intelligent, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S. Ct. 1019, 82 L. Ed. 1461 (1937), and that the government has the burden of proof with respect thereto. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 36 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1973); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S. Ct. 1788, 20 L. Ed. 2d 797 (1968). Appellant combines this burden of proof argument with an assertion that the record does not support a finding that the government satisfied its burden; appellant concludes that the district court's finding was erroneous. We reject appellant's argument. The cases cited by appellant to support a shift of the burden of proof to the government are Fifth Amendment cases, not attorney-client privilege cases.9 With respect to the attorney-client privilege, it is well established that appellant, the party asserting the privilege, has the burden of proof. Weinstein's Evidence, P 503(a) (1) (01).
At oral argument, appellant argued that the issue of the suppression of these books was not properly before the district court in its hearing on August 22 and 27, 1980, perhaps attempting to excuse his own failure to introduce evidence to satisfy his burden of proving that the accountant lacked authority to turn over the books. Appellant argues that there were two motions to suppress pending just before the hearing, taxpayers' August 8, 1980, Motion to Suppress Defendants' Statements and Records, and taxpayers' August 6, 1980, Motion to Suppress Statements and Acts of Defendants' Attorney and Accountant, that the suppression of the books was at issue only in the latter motion, and that the latter motion was deferred by the district court's order of August 21, 1980. We reject appellant's argument for several reasons. First, the August 8, 1980, motion, which even the accountant concedes was the subject of the hearing,10 specifically referred to the two books at issue as having been turned over by the taxpayers' accountant to the revenue agent on October 26, 1976 (R. 289) and specifically sought as relief: "(a)n order ... suppressing ... any records turned over to any government agents prior to February 17, 1977; and (a)n order ... suppressing as evidence any fruits, leads, and derivative evidence ... developed from the statements and/or records obtained from the defendants and their attorney and accountant prior to February 17, 1977." (R. 294) Second, the district court's August 21, 1980, order, which appellant relies on as establishing that consideration of the two books was deferred, expressly held that all pending motions would be heard at 8 a. m., August 22, 1980, "except the Motion to Suppress Statements of Marshall Barkin (the attorney) and Charles Kleinschmidt (the accountant) and Bill Lewis (associate of the accountant) ... the motion to suppress statements will be heard during the course of the trial if and when such statements are offered." (R. 317, emphasis added). The only exception related to statements of taxpayers' attorney and accountant. Moreover, the expressed reason for deferring consideration of the statements precludes any misunderstanding that consideration was also being deferred on the two books, which the government was seeking in order to conduct pretrial tests. We conclude that it was clearly contemplated that the issue of the production of the two books would be heard at the hearing conducted on August 22, 1980, and continued to August 27, 1980.
Also at oral argument, appellant argued that there was no evidence in the record to support the implicit finding of the court below that the accountant had authority to turn over the books. We reject this argument for three reasons. First, appellant, as the party asserting the attorney-client privilege, had the burden of proving that the privilege applies. If there were a failure of proof, appellant's assertion of the privilege would fail. Second, the district court relied in part on the proceedings in a related case, Subpoena Duces Tecum of James M. Russ, Attorney for Ralph T. Miller and Joan Miller, Case No. 80-47-Orl-Misc-R (Middle District of Florida, April 11, 1980), where Judge Reed, after an extensive hearing, concluded that the books had been voluntarily turned over. Those proceedings were incorporated into the record below at appellant's request. Appellant has failed to include those proceedings as part of the record on appeal, and accordingly we cannot say that there is no evidence to support the finding. Third, the record on appeal does contain the power of attorney executed by the taxpayers. That power of attorney "appoints (both the attorney and the accountant) as attorney(s) in-fact to represent the taxpayer(s) before any office of the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the following Internal Revenue tax matters ...: income tax liabilities for calendar years 1973, 1974, and 1975." (R. 275, exhibit C). The record before us also discloses the fact that the accountant did, in fact, negotiate with the revenue agent on behalf of the taxpayers. In discussing whether disclosures made by an attorney waive a client's attorney-client privilege, Wigmore says:
Since the attorney has implied authority from the client ... to make admissions and otherwise to act in all that concerns the management of the cause, all disclosures (oral or written) voluntarily made to the opposing party or to third persons in the course of negotiations for settlement, or in the course of taking adverse steps in litigation ... are receivable as being made under an implied waiver of privilege, giving authority to disclose the confidences when necessary in the opinion of the attorney. This is so unless it appears that the attorney has acted in bad faith toward the client.
8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2325 (McNaughton rev. 1961). Appellant's only proffer of evidence is an affidavit of the accountant stating that "without prior direct consent, permission or specific authorization of Mr. and Mrs. Miller, I presented to Internal Revenue Service ... two bound ledger books." (R. 415). This would not be sufficient to show that the accountant acted in bad faith or exceeded his implied authority to negotiate and make disclosures in the course thereof.
In summary, we hold that appellant has failed to carry his burden of establishing the applicability of an attorney-client privilege. In the absence of an attorney-client privilege, appellant cannot assert the Millers' Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Thus, appellant's refusal to comply with the subpoena was not justified, and the district court's judgment of contempt was appropriate. For the foregoing reasons, we
AFFIRM.
FAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
Most respectfully, I dissent. Judge Anderson has written a detailed scholarly analysis of the facts and law surrounding the issues presented. In my opinion, however, the majority opinion has lost sight of the single most important question presented:
Does the voluntary production of personal papers during a civil tax audit constitute an absolute unconditional waiver of all rights (including the Fifth Amendment) when criminal proceedings follow thereafter?
The government has copies of the two income ledger books. The information contained within those papers is available and usable in the criminal proceedings. But, that is not what is before us. What is presented to us is a court order requiring the production of the original documents because,
"The attorney for the Government has determined that further handwriting and ink analysis is necessary in order to develop possible additional evidence for use at the trial of this case. In order for the Government scientists to perform such analyses, it is necessary that the original ledger books be made available to them for testing (R 223)."
To conclude that the previous voluntary disclosure of the two ledger books during a civil audit equates with the stripping from the books their confidential nature, for all purposes, and thus defeats the attorney-client privilege is too big a jump for me. The government could have conducted whatever tests it desired, but it did not. The taxpayers demanded the return of the two ledgers. The books (originals) were returned. The taxpayers then sought legal advice from Mr. Russ and turned the ledgers over to him. Mr. Russ is raising the taxpayers' rights under the Fifth Amendment. I would uphold his right to do so.
The "testimonial aspect" of producing documents surely covers more than mere authentication. These are private personal papers. Boyd is alive! To suggest, as the majority opinion does in footnote 7, that this case can be decided without reaching the Fifth Amendment issue, is to ignore the very guts of the only question presented. The appellant refused to produce the ledgers upon the grounds that such an act would violate his clients' constitutional privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment. Based upon the authorities cited, but not followed, by the majority, I would uphold that refusal.
Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452 October 14, 1980
The record shows that appellant Russ' representation of his clients has been effective and commendable in every respect
The Intelligence Division has now been renamed the Criminal Investigation Division
Defendant's Exhibit "T" contains the pertinent portion of the Internal Revenue Manual. The referral directive is found in Part (10)91(1) of that exhibit
The term "special agent" is used to describe an agent who works in the Intelligence Division
Prior to the issuance of the subpoena in this case, the grand jury, investigating the Millers for alleged income tax evasion, issued a subpoena for the same ledgers. Appellant Russ filed a motion to quash on behalf of the Millers. A hearing was held on the motion; but before the district court could rule on the motion the prosecutor and IRS agent obtained a search warrant for Russ' office and seized the ledgers. During the search, the agents searched through files and documents of a personal and private nature relating to Mr. Russ and his clients. The district court properly ordered the ledgers returned, reasoning that the search warrant was unreasonable and that the search and seizure interfered with the Millers' Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. While the issue is not before us, we do express our shock at this apparent circumvention of the then pending judicial process and intrusion upon the attorney-client relationship. The district court ruled that the evidence sought here was not the fruit of that illegal search, and appellant has made no argument to the contrary, either in the court below or on appeal
Appellant Russ also argues that the government has improperly used the Rule 17(c) subpoena as a discovery device. We find no merit in this argument. The Supreme Court, in United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 94 S. Ct. 3090, 41 L. Ed. 2d 1039 (1974), recognized that a Rule 17(c) subpoena was not intended as a tool for discovery, but rather was intended to expedite trials by providing a time and place before trial for inspection of subpoenaed materials. The Supreme Court adopted a four-part test, under which the moving party must show: (1) that the documents are evidentiary and relevant; (2) that they are not otherwise procurable reasonably in advance of trial by the exercise of due diligence; (3) that the party cannot properly prepare for trial without such production and inspection in advance of trial and that the failure to obtain such inspection may tend unreasonably to delay the trial; and (4) that the application is made in good faith and is not intended as a general "fishing expedition." The Supreme Court also recognized that enforcement of such subpoenas was committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. We are satisfied that the instant subpoena is well within the above-stated four-part test, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in enforcing the instant subpoena
Much of the argument in the briefs and at oral argument has been directed to the issue of whether the previous voluntary disclosure of the books to the revenue agent and the resulting fact that the Service has in its possession photocopies of the books, has stripped the books of any testimonial aspect of Fifth Amendment significance. In other words, would production of the books now constitute merely the production of paper and ink, rather than production of the testimonial aspect of the content of the books, and if so, would any Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination have been dissipated? Following the time-honored principle that courts will decline to reach constitutional issues if the case can be decided on nonconstitutional grounds, Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 56 S. Ct. 466, 80 L. Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., dissenting in part), we decline to reach this Fifth Amendment issue in the instant case
In fact the record here affirmatively demonstrates that the returns were routinely selected for audit
Cf. United States v. Ponder, 444 F.2d 816, 819 (5th Cir. 1971), refusing to suppress on Fourth and Fifth Amendment grounds copies of business and financial records which had been made by the Internal Revenue Service from originals which had been voluntarily turned over during a civil audit. The court said, "The Fifth Amendment ... protects against compulsion and not voluntary acts, and must be asserted by refusing to deliver records in a case such as this." 444 F.2d at 819
The purpose of the hearing was expressly to consider all pending motions, with only the one exception mentioned below in the text. The two books were put in issue for that hearing not only by the taxpayers' August 8, 1980, motion, but also by the government's pending motion to subpoena those books


text:
Q: AngularJS show image on mouseover In this fiddle, I want to hover over "Your Truly" and have the image appear, while the text disappears. Does an app have to be initialized for this to work? I didn't think it did...
The angular HTML look like this (I didn't move my whole app in here, just trying to get this part to work)

      Yours Truly

,

A: It is possible to make something like this work without making a proper controller, though I'd discourage it. That said, I went ahead and got it working anyway:

  This growing collection of studies, curated by

      Yours Truly

  ,
  is focused primarily
  on studies dealing with eh tohp ah key pig*. As a fan of mooshoo and aigeiaig, I'm open to
  working with any dataset ranging from yakdkat studies to lakuktauka. If you would like
  to submit a study for publishing, or if you have any questions about a particular study,
  please feel free to Contact Me. Thank you for visiting, and happy wamotiem!

This will display the image when you hover over "Yours Truly", and hide the image when you move the mouse away. The main thing preventing your example from working was the missing ng-app directive from the top-most element. Aside from that, I also cleaned up some of the logic to make it easier to reason out what was going on.
Here's a JSFiddle if you want to see it in action: https://jsfiddle.net/kv4qvu3w/2/

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Nepal on Sunday adopted its new fully secular and democratic constitution, achieved after seven years of painstaking deliberations, amid violent protests by minority Madhesi groups over a seven province federal structure.
"I announce the presented constitution of Nepal, passed by the constituent assembly and authenticated by the chairman of the constituent assembly, effective from today, September 20, 2015, before the people of Nepal," President Ram Baran Yadav said as he unveiled the statute in parliament.
"I call for unity and cooperation of all at this historic moment," he said at the special ceremony at the constituent assembly hall in Naya Baneshwor to mark the Himalayan nation's transformation into a secular, federal democracy from a Hindu monarchy.
He added: "The constitution is the common document of all of us to protect our freedom, independence, geographic integrity, and sovereignty in people."
With this the interim constitution has been annulled.
President Yadav said the newly promulgated 'Constitution 2072' has institutionalised republicanism in the nation. He hoped that the constitution would lead Nepal to economic development.
The new constitution has given an opportunity to maintain unity in diversity in the nation and ensure rights of all, he added, while addressing the final meeting of the CA as the assembly unanimously endorsed an acknowledgement motion, thanking the president for announcing commencement of the statute.
It has been endorsed by 85 per cent of the 601 members of the CA and has the provision of a bicameral legislation.
The lower house or the house of representatives will have 375 members and the upper house has 60 members.
The constitution has 37 divisions, 304 articles and 7 annexes. The seven provinces will be finalised by a high-level commission within a year.
Today's historic moment came amid protests by Madhesi groups over the issue of federating the country.
Violence surrounding the federal structure that will divide the country into seven provinces has triggered violence in the Himalayan nation, claiming at least 40 lives including one reported on Sunday.


text:
10 TV shows and films to watch on NOW TV this October
Jon O'BrienSunday 24 Sep 2017 8:00 am
There are some great new shows coming (Picture: Rex)
From the revival of a misanthropic comedy legend to the premieres of a medical drama, transatlantic action adventure and family superhero series, October's NOW TV schedule should have something for everyone.
On the film front, there are also first showings for a return to form from a former master of suspense, an Oscar-nominated adaptation of Tony Award-winning play and a long-awaited sequel to a 90s cult classic.
Here's a closer look at the 10 titles you need to keep an eye out for over the next 31 days.
A United Kingdom (Sky Cinema, Oct 1)
Directed by Amma Asante, A United Kingdom shines the spotlight on a little-known piece of post-WWII history – the controversial relationship between a white London office worker and the King of Botswana.
Playing the two leads, Rosamund Pike and David Oyelowo are excellent in a compelling cross-cultural romance, which proves that sometimes love can conquer all.
Curb Your Enthusiasm Season 9 (Sky Atlantic, Oct 2)
Following a six-year hiatus, TV's most unashamed curmudgeon will return for a belated ninth helping of heavy improvisation, social awkwardness and second-hand cringe.
This time around, the fictionalised version of Larry David will appear on Judge Judy, cause offence at a funeral and add to his singing in the shower repertoire, while Bryan Cranston, Carrie Brownstein and Nick Offerman are just some of the star names confirmed to make cameos.
Vice Principals Season 2 (Sky Atlantic, Oct 3)
The jury's still out on this grown-up high school sitcom, which sees two warring, and extremely unlikeable, teachers team up to take down their new principal.
Danny McBride essentially plays the same character he always does – an obnoxious, shouty manchild – but the show itself has its amusing, if unapologetically mean-spirited, moments.
T2 Trainspotting (Sky Cinema, Oct 6)
There were initial doubts over whether one of 90s cinema's quintessential gangs would still have the same effect now they're in the full throes of middle age.
Of course, we should have known to trust director Danny Boyle, as T2 Trainspotting is a triumphant, and surprisingly emotive, reunion which recaptures the spirit, if not necessarily the thrills, of the original.
The Gifted (Fox, Oct 8)
Marvel's X-Men universe gets a little bigger with this sci-fi drama executive produced by Bryan Singer.
The Gifted stars Stephen Moyer (True Blood) and Amy Acker (Person Of Interest) as an everyday couple forced to go on the run when they discover their children possess mutant abilities.
Early reviews have been positive, with TV Line praising its 'instantly engaging promise' and 'solid ensemble cast.'
Split (Sky Cinema, Oct 13)
One of this year's surprise hits, Split proved that M. Night Shyamalan still possessed the storytelling skills that briefly saw him hailed as his generation's answer to Hitchcock.
The psychological thriller also sees James McAvoy deliver a tour-de-force performance as a man with 23 different personalities, one of which just happens to be a murderous psychopath.
Fences (Sky Cinema, Oct 15)
Based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning play, Fences picked up four Oscar nods earlier this year, with Viola Davis winning Best Supporting Actress (despite the fact she's in virtually every scene).
Denzel Washington is just as magnetic in a powerful, if inevitably slightly stagey, 1950s race relations tale whose themes sadly remain all too timely.
More: Film
Pro-life Patriots star Benjamin Watson is producing a documentary on abortion
Alison Brie gives us Stranger Things vibes as she takes on creepy Netflix movie Horse Girl
Marvel's Eternals using fake title 'Sack Lunch' as filming takes over Camden
The Walking Dead Season 8 (Fox, Oct 23)
Airing just a day after its US premiere, the eighth season opener of The Walking Dead is also the show's centenary episode. But that doesn't mean the end is in sight – showrunner Scott Gimple recently stated that it will help to set up the next 100.
Adapted from the comic book series' All Out War storyline, the eighth season will follow Rick (Andrew Lincoln) and the rest of the survivors as they prepare for battle with Negan and the Saviours.
Bounty Hunters (Sky 1, TBC)
(Picture: Andrew Lipovsky/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank)
Jack Whitehall and fast-talking Oscar-nominated actress Rosie Perez aren't the first two names you'd necessarily put together for an action adventure comedy.
But the pair will attempt to become an unlikely dream team, one in which Whitehall plays a posh, young uptight Englishman (really pushing himself there) who inadvertently becomes embroiled in an international incident, while Perez plays the bounty hunter who comes to his rescue.
The Good Doctor (Sky Living, TBC)
Fresh from his masterful performance in Bates Motel's final season, Freddie Highmore immediately returns to screens with a leading role in The Good Doctor.
The baby-faced Brit plays an autistic young surgeon who leaves his hometown to start a new post at prestigious paediatric department.
Adapted from a hit Korean show, the premise doesn't sound particularly exciting, but Highmore can make pretty much anything watchable, while creator David Shore (House) also has good form when it comes to offbeat medical dramas.
MORE: The 20 best animated films on Netflix
MORE: 10 geeky films on Netflix that everyone should watch
MORE: The 20 best sci-fi and fantasy films on Netflix
Denzel WashingtonFreddie HighmoreJames FrancoJames McAvoyNOW TVRosamund PikeSchoolThe Walking Dead
Boy, 15, arrested after pupil stabbed with scissors during school fire drill
Laurence Fox claims Sikh soldier in Sam Mendes war epic 1917 is 'forcing diversity' on viewers
Marvel's Eternals using fake title 'Sack Lunch' as filming takes over Camden for the week
A National Treasure 3 is happening and Disney are behind it
Mysterious Doctor Strange 2 synopsis sparks debate from Marvel fans
Home › Entertainment › Film


text:
Codelco plans to purchase Anglo American's mines in Chile
Chilean copper producer Codelco has announced that it is considering acquiring Anglo American's mines in the country.
Chilean copper producer Codelco has announced that it is considering acquiring Anglo American's mines in the country.
Anglo American is currently reviewing its asset portfolio and intends to sell off less-profitable businesses.
To assist the company during the sale process, Anglo will appoint its joint brokers Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley.
The company aims to offload at least three of its copper mines in Chile and a $1bn smelter by mid-year, and to retain its copper operations, which include Los Bronces and Collahuasi.
"The company aims to offload at least three of its copper mines in Chile and a $1bn smelter."
Codelco recently created a special smelter business division, according to an industry source.
Anglo American posted a net debt of $12.9bn as at 31 December 2014, compared with $10.7bn in 2013, with $15.1bn of liquidity, as well as $1.7bn of bonds maturing this year and $1.6bn maturing next year.
The group's reported underlying earnings before interests and tax (EBIT) of $4.9bn, represents a 25% decrease owing to sharply weaker commodity prices, partially offset by weaker producer country currencies, as well as increased production and sales volumes.
Codelco develops its operations through six mining divisions and the Ventanas smelter and refinery, which the company has owned since May 2005.
The company also has ownership interests in several important mining companies, such as in Minera Gaby and El Abra.
Chile Mining Industry Fiscal Regime Analysis including Governing Bodies, Regulations, Licensing Fees, Taxes and Royalties, 2022 Update
Base Metals Mining in Chile to 2020 - a Focus on the Copper Industry
Base Metals Mining in Chile to 2020 – a Focus on the Copper Industry
Chile Copper Mining Market by Reserves and Production, Assets and Projects, Fiscal Regime including Taxes and Royalties, Key Players and Forecast, 2022-2026
Chile's Mining Fiscal Regime 2019
Anglo American Plc


The Washington Post has a report out today detailing how failures to address the sexual abuse of children and young women go far beyond USA Gymnastics. And it includes some pretty big numbers on how many reports of possible sexual misconduct are lodged from many of these sports each year.
More than 290 coaches and officials associated with America's Olympic sports organizations have been publicly accused of sexual misconduct since 1982, according to a Washington Post review of sport governing body banned lists, news clips, and court records in several states. The figure spans parts of 15 sports and amounts to an average of eight adults connected to an Olympic organization accused of sexual misconduct every year — or about one every six weeks — for more than 36 years.
The reason, the Post found, will feel remarkably similar to the reported motivations of USA Gymnastics: Leaders want to win gold medals, and give that a priority over everything else. Instead of working to prevent abuse, leaders instead set up systems for "limiting legal risk," as the Post put it.
As Olympic officials discussed their handbook in 2011, however, several mentioned a common concern: that the handbook could get them sued by victims, who would use it as evidence Olympic officials knew abuse was a problem but weren't doing enough to stop it.
"While several NGBs expressed that the handbook sets the proper focus . . . there is also a perception that publishing the handbook will increase their risk of legal liability," Malia Arrington, a USOC executive in charge of abuse prevention, wrote Blackmun in a December 2011 memo made public by the USOC this year in communication with the Senate.
Of course, there is another way to avoid being sued for sexual abuse—stop it from happening in the first place. That idea, however, didn't seem to cross the minds of those in power at these sports, at least not as described by the Post's reporting. You can read the full report here.


text:
Main Menu ☰
Home Diary & News January 2021 update on Malawi project
January 2021 update on Malawi project
Published on Saturday 2 January 2021
We have received a further update from USPG about the programme we are supporting in Malawi as part of our Mission Action Plan. Click here for more details about the project.
St Mary's at home Cookbook
Tennis Car Parking
Church Repairs 2019
© St Mary's Church, Wimbledon (2021)
St Mary's Church, 30 St Mary's Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 7BP, UK
Parish Office: 020 8946 2605
St Mary's, along with St Mark's, St Matthew's and St John's, is part of the Wimbledon Team Ministry in the Church of England.
Page Last Modified: 28th March 2020
Login | CPL | Webmail
My ChurchSuite


See web site for seasonal hours.
Buy one, get one free on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday.
Take exit 333 from I75. Go east on Walnut Avenue for 5.0 miles. Take a right on Airport Road. We are located 2 blocks on the left 2817 Airport Road).


SANTIAGO, Nov 28 (Reuters) - Canadian fertilizer giant Nutrien will auction its 23.77 percent share in Chile´s SQM on Dec. 3, the Chilean stock exchange said on Wednesday, a final step toward completing the sale of a coveted stake in the world´s No. 2 lithium producer to China´s Tianqi .
In a statement, the local stock exchange said the minimum bid would be set at $65 per share, for a total package price of $4.066 billion.


Piers Morgan addressed one of the "most fascinating aspects" of the Egypt protests – the way social media has been a driving factor in the story.
In some ways, it was a necessity – Piers spoke to Sarah El Sirgany (Twitter: @Ssirgany) who reported all day Friday by Twitter, when her newspaper website was shut down.
Sirgany is an editor at Daily News Egypt, whose website was shut down. So she turned to Twitter and continued reporting. "The good thing that happened in Egypt is there was a crossover from the virtual world to the real world," she said.
"Piers Morgan Tonight" is live tonight at 9pmET with more on the Egypt story.
What happened to the interview with Colin Firth? I'm less than impressed that no announcement has been made as to when that will air. I think people that are interested in your show are more interested in your interviews than hearing more news – the same news that is available on all other networks including CNN. It's back to MSNBC for me.
Yes, it's fascinating how powerful social media has been and will be for social demonstrations as those of Tunisia and Egypt. Piers is right, social media now is a driving factor in story. Tyrans, watch out!
Pier's interview subject this evening was to be Kid Rock, can you tell us when that interview will air?
Piers is just not an educated man...no sense of courtesy or respect to his guests. For true world NEWS I am looking to CCTV...CNN can do only 1 story a day, or week, it seems..too bad..MOST professionals can walk and chew gum at the same time!
Piers – your interview with Dan Rather was your worst yet. You spoke over him and asked him questions and then didn't let him answer. Then, you cut him off when he was trying to answer your question "If you were President Obama, what would you do?". I would really like to know what Mr. Rather would have said. What is it about the media that stays so far away from Dan Rather – a smart, articulate newsman with a wealth of experience.
It looks like the internet is back on.
There are 5 million registered facebook users in Egypt who can now get back online again.
Facebook is growing rapidly in Egypt. Registered members there have more than doubled in the last year.
BBC America & Link TV have far better world news coverage with more content and less fluff and propaganda (for those complaining about news quality). And for those upset that they missed their useless celebrity interviews and were forced instead to watch history-making events in Egypt instead...shame on you. It's because of numbnuts like you that America's intellectual capital has become virtually non-existent. Step out of the shallow end of the pool...or turn the channel to FOX where all the other brainless twits get their information!


text:
Sigle
 Certified Ethical Hacker – certificazione professionale nel campo informatico
 Conférence Episcopale de Haïti – Conferenza episcopale haitiana
 Conferencia Episcopal de Honduras – Conferenza episcopale honduregna

Persone
 Aleš Čeh – ex calciatore sloveno (1968-   )
 Nastja Čeh – calciatore sloveno (1978-   )

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


The application had many questions about our family and Jewish background. It took me a while to go through the questions and answer as best as I could. One of the questions asked us to describe our aliyah plan. I did not have an answer for that. There were still so many unknowns. Where were planning to live? How were we going to make a living in Israel? So, I left that question blank.
Simcha scanned our birth certificates, marriage certificates, health forms, passports and a form regarding our visits to Israel over the past 7 years. I sat by the computer and named each document and uploaded it to our application. We payed the small fee to apply and then we smiled at each other. We were just one step closer to making our dreams a reality.
We received an email from NBN requesting Apostilles for Simcha's birth certificate and marriage certificate. Around 9 years ago, my husband legally changed his name to use his Hebrew name, Simcha, instead of an English name given at birth. Therefore, his birth certificate and marriage certificate required a special Apostille attached. This was a whole day affair. (Nefesh B'Nefesh may offer some reimbursement for using a third party vendor to complete the necessary paperwork, but Simcha decided to do it on his own.) Simcha spent the day driving to the places he was born and we were married to get a certification from each office. He then drove to the New York Department of State in Manhattan to get the Apostilles attached to each document. When he got home he uploaded those documents to our application.
Simcha and I went to New York City with all our documents in hand. We were interviewed about our Jewish background, financial status and careers and our plans for making aliyah. At this point we were more prepared with answers about cities we want to look into, career options and financial plans. The whole interview was about a half hour. We were asked to get new passports for ourselves as well as one daughter as our passports would be expiring within a year of our planned aliyah. The next step is to apply for our visas when we get closer to the aliyah. However, once you receive your visa, you cannot visit the country as a tourist.
We had our Jewish Agency interview on November 15, 2017, we submitted our final document on December 7, 2017, and we were approved for aliyah on December 12, 2017.
Now the fun begins. Start by researching communities you may be interested in visiting on your pilot trip. Nefesh B'Nefesh has a community resource page with contact information of residents of each community. We emailed many people with a list of questions that were important for us. Here is a list of questions we used for our preliminary community search.
1. How long ago did you move to Israel and was this community your first stop?
2. How did you choose this community and what other communities did you look into?
3. How many Anglo families live near you?
4. Did the community have sufficient resources to help you and your family transition into Israeli society? What are they?
5. Do you feel that your children are integrating well into Israeli society?
6. Where do you and your spouse work? How is the commute?
7. Where do your children go to school and are you happy with it?
8. What type of housing is available in your community and how affordable is it?
9. How would you describe the hashkafa of your shul and specific neighborhood within this community (if it even breaks down neatly)?
With the information we gathered, we were able to narrow our community search to a few options. We focused on visiting those communities on our pilot trip.
Besides communities, make a list of other information you would like to gather on your pilot trip. Since we have school aged children, we planned to visit schools in each community we were considering. We also looked at furniture stores, shopping areas, and housing options in each neighborhood. Check out my daily blogs for the information we gathered on our pilot trip.
If you are able to, set up some meetings with potential employers and people that may be able to help you find a job once you land. The more people you meet, the larger the network you will have when you are ready to start a serious job search. Most importantly, have fun! It is a very stressful and overwhelming trip, so take time to relax and get excited for your move!
Start thinking about what you are planning to bring and contact lift companies for shipping quotes. Read all about Lifts in the Aliyah Guide.


When your child is ill, it can be scary, but we are here to help you!
Real time texting with the Nurture Pediatrics doctors for our established patients.
Urgent medical concerns receive a response within 15 minutes.
Protect 8pm-8am. Doctors need sleep and family time, too!
If your medical concern does not need a response before 8am, do not send it at night. Wait until 8am.
Patients who make a habit of sending non-urgent messages at night (8pm-8am) will lose texting privileges.
Free email type communication for non-urgent needs, anytime.
You will receive a response by the next business day, if not the same day.
On-line scheduling (use your computer rather than your phone for scheduling same day visits).
View and print Lab results, vaccine records, patient care summaries.
On-line bill payment options available.
This line is only for pharmacies, hospitals and consulting doctors.
Our staff is available to help you register a new patient, schedule appointments, answer general office questions and billing questions M-F 8:30am -5pm, Sat 9-11:30am (during school year).
During office hours (M-F 8am-5pm, Sat 9-11:30am), send an OhMD text message instead of calling.
After Hours (after 5pm and before 8 am), send an OhMD text for urgent messages and for non-urgent needs send a patient portal message.
Protect 8pm-8am by sending only truly urgent OhMD text messages at night. The messages are delivered to the doctor real time. If it does not need a response before 8am, send the message by the patient portal or wait to text until after 8am.
Life threatening emergencies (unconscious, not breathing)– call 911 immediately!
Poisonings – call Poison Control first: 1-800-222-1222 Then send OhMD text.
Fever 100.4 in a baby less than 1 month old is an emergency, please call us.
Urgent, but not emergency => send a text message instead of calling.
Non-urgent => during office hours, send a text message; after hours, send a patient portal message.
Medical consults by phone are available for a $20 consult fee that is not billed to insurance. This fee is waived for true medical emergencies at the discretion of the doctor.


text:
Project:1867 – Trouble in the Home District
Up until 1834, there had been a conflict between those in Upper Canada who were reform-minded and those who were allied with the Conservative Family Compact. But those in the reform movement had no desire for radical change or an American style republic, but there were also some that were. The same remained on the Tory side, there were those who were moderates who thought that some change might not be a bad thing, but others who wanted stricter controls, those who wanted to turn Upper Canada into a perfect England, where English was supreme, and the only church was the Anglican church. But like so many years before, everything started to hinge in 1834; the avalanche had started, it was too late for the pebbles to vote.
Toronto's First Post is in reality the Fourth Post office of the City of York. Today it remains a functioning Post Office and a Museum.
Pacemaker Crown Graphic – Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 1:4,7/135 – Rollei RPX 400 @ ASA-320 – Pyrocat-HD (1+1+100) 18:00 @ 20C
On the 6th of March, 1834, the town of York incorporated as a City by an Act of the Provincial Parliament and signed into Law by Sir John Colborne, the Lieutenant-Governor. The municipal elections for the city provided a new battleground between the Tories and the Reformers. Despite the city being a large body of Conservatives, William Lyon MacKenzie managed not only to get himself elected as an Alderman, a term used for those who sat on City Council but also managed to convince the other aldermen to elect him mayor. During this period, the position of Mayor was elected by the City Council, not the electorate of the city. Taking a page out of American President Andrew Jackson's book, MacKenzie began to remove those who allied themselves with the Tories from their posts within the city's government and positioning those who were allied with him in their place. The council itself proved to be a hostile place, with MacKenzie often brawling with the other aldermen or causing them to fight amongst themselves. All the while, MacKenzie continued to print offensive content in The Advocate against both those Tories on Council and in The Legislative Assembly, a body he remained a member. Despite the malfunction in the Toronto Council, some bills managed to pass to allow for better fire suppression and control. However, the bigger issues such as the city's debt, sanitation, and roads remained outstanding. It didn't help that the city was limited on how much it could raise taxes.
The Children of Peace continued to be a centre for the Society of Consitutional Reform.
Mamiya m645 – Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N – Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-400 – Kodak HC-110 Dil. B 5:00 @ 20C
But the mayorship was only a distraction for MacKenzie when four-year term on the Assembly expired, MacKenzie threw himself into election mode. As did many other reformers and their success again yielded control of the Assembly. With Bidwell returned to the Speakers Chair, he still put MacKenzie on the hunt. Like before MacKenzie opened the book on everything done by the Upper Canada Parliament, he investigated the Banks, the Canada Company, the Welland Canal, and more. He compiled everything into a single report, loftily titled the Seventh Report on Grievances. He read his report aloud in the Legislative Assembly before sending it onto the Colonial Office in London. In London, MacKenzie's report would not be the only one that they would receive. Two similar reports had arrived from British North America, one from Lower Canada and the reform-minded men under Joseph Louis Papineau and New Brunswick. All three together called into question the entire Colonial System. Change it seemed was on everyone's mind. A great change had passed through England a few years back with the signing of the Reform Bill, but those changes did not affect the Parliaments of the Provinces because they were nothing more functions of the bureaucracy of the Colonial Office. The interesting this was that the Colonial Office decided to deal with both Upper and Lower Canada differently as both seemed on the edge of Revolution. To Lower Canada, they sent Sir John Colborne as their new Lieutenant-Governor. Colborne having proved himself in combat during the Battle of Waterloo and having a military-minded governor might reduce the threat of armed insurrection. Their response to Upper Canada proved a little more interesting. Looking back, the appointment of Sir Francis Bond-Head to the Governorship was a mistake, Bond-Head, had little in the way of experience in colonial administration, getting the governorship only through his connections within the government. His most recent post had been to administer the new Poor Laws in England, and by his writing and zeal in executing these laws in helping the less fortunate, they felt that Bond-Head would be a liberal reformer, someone to help bridge the widening gap between the reformers and Tories. The Colonial Office had also received a response written by Chief Justice John Beverly Robinson in response to MacKenzie's Report and promptly told Bond-Head to pay the document no mind.
A panel depicting MacKenzie presenting the Seventh Grievance Report to the Upper Canada Parliament. Part of a Rebellion Memorial from the 1938 which was removed in the 1960s and installed in the 1970s at the MacKenzie House in Toronto.
Nikon F5 – AF Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4D – Kodak Tri-X 400 @ ASA-800 – Ilford Microphen (Stock) 11:00 @ 20C
Sir Francis Bond-Head arrived in Toronto in January 1836 and was welcomed with great fanfare, and he decided to shake things up. First and foremost he approached several of the moderates among the Reform Camp, John Rolph and Robert Baldwin among them, to be on his Executive Council. Rolph accepted immediately, Baldwin, however, had some misgivings. Baldwin went to his father and other members of the reform society for guidance. Explaining that he would feel wrong accepting the post to Bond-Head's invitation, while he had maintained a civil tone with those in the Assembly in the Tory camp, he had spoken out against them in private. The elder Baldwin would convince his son to accept Bond-Head's invitation. And when Baldwin was again approached by Bond-Head, he accepted. While many in the reform camp celebrated, the more radical derided. MacKenzie among them who felt he should have been among those appointed. But the presence of reform-minded men in the Executive would be short-lived. When Baldwin began to make suggestions towards the idea of Responsible Government, Bond-Head soundly chastised the timid lawyer, suggesting that he and others familiarise themselves with their new role before taking on anything major. Baldwin among others, including a few moderate conservatives resigned their posts in protest. Their response paled against the response from the Reform controlled Assembly who sent a scathing letter of rebuke to Bond-Head and then refused to pass any money bills, denying Bond-Head the needed tax income from the Province. It was the only card they had to play against Bond-Head. In his dual role as both Colonial Administrator and Commander-In-Chief of the British Army stationed in Upper Canada, Bond-Head could have drawn the needed money out of military coffers, but instead, Bond-Head decided to show the Reformers exactly who held power. He ordered the Assembly dissolved and a new set of Elections called.
Today the CBC Broadcast Centre in Toronto sits on the site of the Third Parliament Building in Toronto where much of this drama took place.
Nikon F6 – AF Nikkor 35mm 1:2D – Kodak Tri-X 400 @ ASA-400 – Kodak D-76 (1+1) 9:45 @ 20C
The elections of 1836 proved one of the nastiest in the history of Upper Canada Politics. The reform camp struggled to separate themselves from the radical members like William Lyon MacKenzie. And MacKenzie struggled to separate himself from the label of Traitor. He argued that loyalty to Canada was not disloyalty to England. The splitting of the reform vote played right into the hand of the Tories and the Family Compact. But the Tories had help from Bond-Head. Usually, the Governor separated themselves from the Provincial Elections, to give the electorate some illusion of free elections. Bond-Head had no illusions of what side he was on. While he had great respect for Robert Baldwin and several others among the moderate reformers, he had learned from the start to take a great deal of council from the Family Compact, especially John Beverly Robinson, the Chief Justice of the Province. And the Tory-controlled Executive and Legislative Council had their tricks up their sleeves in changing the borders of the ridings within the Province to downplay the power of the Reform vote. They also made use of various Tory groups such as the Orange Order or Town Line Blazers to disrupt the rallies by Reform candidates either verbally or violently. They also showed up at polling stations on election day to ensure the men voted the right way. The result would be exactly what the Compact wanted, a Tory-controlled Assembly. Even MacKenzie who enjoyed wide support throughout the Toronto Township lost his seat.
The Village of Bond-Head is one of the few areas of Ontario that take their name from Sir Francis Bond-Head.
Mamiya m645 – Mamiya-Sekor C 150mm 1:3.5 N – Ilford HP5+ @ ASA-400 – Kodak HC-110 Dil. B 5:00 @ 20C
Those few reformers that made it into the Assembly began to raise concerns over the legality of the election. MacKenzie called out Electorial Fraud, and his ally in the Assembly, Charles Duncombe spoke out at length. An investigation was launched but ultimately found nothing. MacKenzie would not take this lying down, he immediately restarted his printing presses and began to publish a new newspaper, and there was no hiding what he wanted. The first edition of The Constitution saw publication on the 4th of July, 1836. He decried the move by the British Parliament to limit the power of the Legislative Assembly in Lower and Upper Canada, removing their control over passing taxes over to the Governor. He had gone over to the full out radical reform; he had lost all trust in the Colonial System, the Provincial Government, even England herself. MacKenzie spoke out in public, holding rallies throughout Upper Canada, often those rallies were disrupted by Tory Thugs. These rallies attracted wide attention, especially from those in the rural areas of the Home District, where those directly affected by the stranglehold of the Family Compact often eeked out an existence. And while MacKenzie continued to claim he desired a non-violence revolution to establish a proper Republic, often Liberty or Death Banners flew at his rallies. In secret, however, with the help of Charles Duncombe, MacKenzie and his supporters formed small vigilance committees, ready to lead and rise in armed demonstration should a non-violent approach fail to achieve the results he desired. Many rallied to his cause as leaders, Samuel Lount, Peter Matthews, John Rolph, Charles Duncombe, and Anthony Van Edgmont. These men formed MacKenzie's inner circle; each would then form their circle of trust around themselves.
An example of a Gordon Quarter Press on display at the MacKenzie House and Printery, such presses were used to print handbills such as the ones MacKenzie seemed so fond of publishing.
Mamiya m645 – Mamiya-Sekor C 45mm 1:2.8 N – Ilford FP4+ @ ASA-100 – Kodak D-23 (Stock) 6:00 @ 20C
Many in the government saw MacKenzie as a direct threat to the security of Upper Canada and watched as even Lower Canada began to spiral down into open armed revolt throughout the remainder of 1836. The strange thing was that Bond-Head seemed to play down the threat of MacKenzie and his band of radicals. The truth was that Bond-Head and many in the Family Compact were worried about MacKenzie and the threat he posed to Upper Canada. No one wanted open rebellion or civil war; even the Compact knew that their power was at the mercy of London and even that could be snatched away. At the urging of Robinson, the Executive and Bond-Head downplayed the threat, presenting a face of calm and order and hoping that such actions would calm the masses. MacKenzie continued to nothing more than whip up public fury at the government but did little to move towards an armed rebellion. That is at least until the death of King William IV on the 20th of July 1837. Here MacKenzie saw his chance, the death of a king meant early elections in the Legislative Assembly if the reform movement could again take control they might have a chance at change. The Assembly, with the blessings of Bond-Head, voted against dissolving. MacKenzie spoke out, publishing handbills featuring a declaration of independence. He called for an immediate Constitutional Congress, the establishment of a Republic with Marshall Spring Bidwill appointed as acting Chairman until proper elections could be arranged. Many saw this as direct treason, even the hardliners in MacKenzie's camp took a step back urging MacKenzie to calm down. But the forces in Lower Canada were already preparing for armed revolt and were about to present a perfect opportunity to act.
The former house of Dr. Charles Duncombe in St. Thomas, Ontario. Today it is a local military museum.
It is hard to figure out who is to blame about the sudden radicalisation of William Lyon MacKenzie, ever since his first jump into Provincial Politics he had been swayed by those who surrounded him. He picked and chose the ideas and ideologies he would follow based on his ideas on how a government should be run. And yes there was a great deal of corruption and backroom dealings in Upper Canada. And yes, the actions of the Family Compact and the Colonial Office certainly factored into the rise of radical reform within Upper Canada. But MacKenzie was not the only one who had a bone to pick a similar movement had risen in Lower Canada for much the same issues as those in Upper Canada faced. In the end, it was MacKenzie's choice to fall into open treason. Many in the Reform Movement would turn their back on MacKenzie, even Robert Gourlay who first opened this can of worms in 1818 declared MacKenzie little more than a traitor. But MacKenzie's fall from grace had only begun. Today there is little to remind us of these early days of the Upper Canada Rebellion. Most of the action took place in the Third Parliament Building, the building survived until 1892 and housed the United Canada Parliament and the first Parliaments of the Province of Ontario. Today the land on Front Street in Toronto is home to Simcoe Park and the CBC Broadcast Centre. A memorial to MacKenzie's Grievance Report would be installed in Niagara Falls in 1938, however, it was dismantled in the 1960s and put into Storage. It can be found today along with a Rebellion Memorial at the MacKenzie House Museum on Bond Street in Toronto. A small unincorporated village in Bradford West Gwillimbury takes the name Bond Head after Sir Francis Bond Head. The Sharon Temple of the Children of Peace is also open to the public today as a museum and has a great deal of Rebellion and Reform History on display.
On: 5 June, 2019
In: Project:1867
Tagged: Acts of Confederation, Anthony Van Egmond, believeinfilm, Canada, Canadian History, Charles Duncombe, crown graphic, Family Compact, filmisalive, filmisnotdead, History, Ilford FP4+, Ilford HP5+, Kodak D-23, Kodak D-76, Kodak HC-110, Kodak Tri-X 400, Mamiya m645, Mamiya-Sekor, Nikkor, Nikon F6, ontario, Peter Matthews, Political History, Project:1867, Pyrocat-HD, Reform Movement, Rollei RPX 400, Samuel Lount, Schneider-Kreuznach, Sir Francis Bond-Head, Sir John Beverly Robinson, St. Thomas, The Constitution, Toronto, Toronto History, Upper Canada Rebellion, william lyon mackenzie
Previous Post: WCA Hike – Exploring the 1st and 2nd Canals
Next Post: #photochat – 6 June 2019 – Photojournalism


In the first part I discussed the origins, activities and initial reactions to the TST through 2001. Here's the subsequent fallout. By 2002 we'd slowed down the TST forages due to several factors: (a) We were told that WE might be litigated if someone became ill or died (Hepatitis A, the flesh-eating staphylococcus, West Nile, etc.) because WE took them there! (b) Self-employed, I lost so much work time that I had to file for bankruptcy in late 2002. I became depressed over this and the spiritual downside of guiding the TST and the only change observed was the increasing number of warning signs put up without any other restraining factors.
Laguna's competitive surfing future is looking bright these days, especially among the junior high age group. Much thanks is due to a group of parent volunteers who've contributed to what looks like a bumper crop of young talent. This week I caught up with Thurston Middle School Surf Team volunteer coaches Eric Zuziak and Scot Grierson, who shed some light on what's happening here in the Laguna lineup. What inspired you guys to get involved with the TMS Surf Team? SG: I saw an opportunity to continue a great tradition of surfing in Laguna by supporting middle-school-aged competitive surfing.


text:
Q: Find the set of values of an unknown for which the equation has 3 real roots. I am given an equation $y = x(x-2)^2$ and I am asked to find the set of values of $k$ such that $y=k$ has 3 real roots.
I already differentiated the equation and got $3x^2-8x+4$. And I also calculated the minimum and maximum values. When $x=2$, it is a minimum and when $x=2/3$, it's a maximum.

A: I think you've got almost everything you need. Next, find the $y$ values at the local minimum and local maximum.
Your polynomial increases until it reaches the local maximum, decreases to the local minimum and increases again after that. For any value of $k$, $y=k$ can have at most one root in each of these sections, and the only way to have roots in all three is if $k$ is between the minimum and the maximum.


In our 26 years of running surf camps we not only answered thousands of surf related questions while coaching our students, but we have fielded thousands of questions from concerned parents who wish to send their children to our surf camps. That is why we have devoted this page to you guys. Since 1992 we have been making surf dreams come true being on the forefront of innovation in the surf camp industry. Our mission is to provide a high-quality safe surfing experience for all participants, regardless of gender, race, age, ability or previous experience.
One Question we get asked year after year by parents is "what is it that separates you guys from other summer sports camps?" I have a long list of answers to this question but will only list the top 5.
Thats right we have been running surf camps since 1992. One of the longest running surf camps in the Industry. We are now teaching sons and daughters of some of our original students.
We have one of the best beaches for learning to surf in Southern California. Why? Consistent waves for all levels with lack of crowds. We have never had to cancel a session due to bad weather or lack of surf and when learning with us you don't have to worry about experts flying by you while you are learning being an intimidating factor.
Our crew of Certified Surf Instructors and camp counselors not only provide a safe camp environment. But they have years of experience to share with their students. All counselors are adults, some are former professional surfers, all have experience teaching and working with children of all levels, background checks have been performed and all are CPR First Aid Certified.
Many times we are asked if we are only a soft surfboard beginner type of surf camp. We do Specialize in Introducing the sport of surfer to first time and beginner surfers. But we also specialize in coaching Intermediate and Advanced Surfers helping them get to the next level.
$895 for an overnight surf camp. You can't get a better deal than that from other sports camps. Plus we have one of the most forgiving cancellation policies in the Industry.
We know that choosing a summer camp is a big decision and you probably have more questions. Feel free to call our office 949-498-7862 or E-Mail Us and we would be happy to answer them. You can also view our Frequently Asked Questions page and see our Daily Schedule below.
Note: Daily schedule may vary due to surf and weather conditions (tides and wave size). We will have a surf shop tour one afternoon during the week. Weekend schedule varies with more outside activities planned. If you have any further questions that we have not answered feel free to E-Mail Us.