text:
Il ponte Karamagara (, "Ponte della Grotta Nera") è un ponte bizantino o di epoca tardo-romana che si trova nell'antica regione della Cappadocia nella Turchia orientale; si tratta forse del più antico ponte ad arco a sesto acuto conosciuto.

Il ponte, insieme a gran parte della valle di Arapgir Çayı, è stato sommerso in seguito alla costruzione della diga di Keban nel 1975, in seguito della quale il livello dell'acqua dell'Eufrate e dei suoi affluenti è aumentato drammaticamente.

Localizzazione e condizione corrente
L'arco singolo di 17 m si estende tra le scogliere della gola rocciosa dell'Arapgir Çayı, un affluente del fiume Eufrate.

La struttura apparteneva alla strada romana per Melitene ed era scolpita nella roccia in prossimità del ponte su entrambe le sponde del fiume. Il suo nome Karamağara ("grotta nera") si rifà probabilmente ad una caverna scavata e successivamente allargata artificialmente. La grotta si trova sulla sponda meridionale, 75 metri sopra la struttura, e aveva la funzione di proteggere il valico. Il ponte è menzionato abbastanza frequentemente dai primi viaggiatori europei.

Il sito, insieme ad altri monumenti della regione, è stato esaminato dalla Università tecnica del Medio Oriente di Ankara prima dell'inondazione. Più a valle, presso il villaggio di Bahadın, i resti di un altro ponte romano, anch'esso sommerso in passato, potrebbero suggerire l'esistenza di un punto di attraversamento più antico.

Arco a sesto acuto
La nervatura dell'arco a sesto acuto è stata costruita senza malta tra i cunei. Sul lato orientale a valle un'iscrizione cristiana in greco occupa la maggior parte della nervatura. Essa è rimasta quasi completamente intatta e cita quasi alla lettera il Salmo 121, versetto 8 della Bibbia. Il testo recita:

Un'analisi paleografica delle forme delle lettere greche ha permesso di stabilire la data di costruzione del ponte tra il V e il VI secolo d.C.. Il Ponte Karamagara rappresenta un raro e precoce esempio dell'uso di archi a sesto acuto sia nella costruzione di ponti durante la Tarda antichità, sia nella storia dell'architettura in generale. Infatti, la maggior parte dei ponti romani in muratura poggiavano su archi a tutto sesto, o, in quantità minore, su archi a sesto ribassato. Il ponte, insieme ad altri esempi tardo romani e sassanidi, per lo più presenti nelle antiche costruzioni di chiese in Siria e in Mesopotamia, conferma l'origine pre-islamica dell'arco a sesto acuto nell'architettura del Vicino Oriente, che fu successivamente adottato e costruito dai conquistatori musulmani. Le pietre contenenti le iscrizioni greche furono in seguito rimosse dal ponte e portate al Museo Elazığ nel 1972.

Note

Bibliografia

Voci correlate

 Lista di ponti romani

Ponti romani della Turchia
Ponti ad arco
Ponti in pietra


text:
We buy houses in Corkery as-is.
Get a no-obligation cash offer for your house in Corkery. We buy as-is, for the highest off-market price. Skip the repairs, avoid showings, and move on your timeline. Get a $10,000 cash advance before closing.
About Corkery:
Corkery is a dispersed rural community in West Carleton-March Ward in the western part of Ottawa, Canada. It is located about 9 km southwest of Carp, in the former Township of West Carleton. Corkery was founded by approximately 100 Irish families from County Cork immigrating to the region in the early 19th century, locally known as the "Peter Robinson settlers".

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Your size is sold out?
Email info@aisabobo.com with your interested style(s) and size(s) and we will notify you when they become available!
The short sleeve Aisabobo ladylike dress comes in three different color combinations including ivory/black, pink/blue and pink/black, it features a detachable black contrast tie to the collared neckline and a contrast scallop hem.
Care Instruction: Machine wash cold, gentle cycle. Wash with like colours. Dry flat. No bleach. No wring. No tumble dry. Place in a mesh bag prior to laundering is recommended. Iron cool when needed. Or dry clean.
If you are uncertain about the size kindly send an e-mail to info@aisabobo.com with your child's: 1) age, 2) height, 3) chest, and 4) waist measurements (How To Measure Your Child), we will be more than happy to help you pick a size that fits your needs. You will receive our reply within 24 hours.
* Measurements shown in the size guide refer to garment measurements and not measurements of the child.
Click on the above picture to see more details.
Copyright © 2019 Aisabobo Inc.


text:
HomeTopicsIngredientsUpcycled ingredients from melon peels show functional properties
Upcycled ingredients from melon peels show functional properties
Bioactive compounds, antioxidant properties from melon peels may have commercialisation potential.
Natalia Franca Rocha | Aug 10, 2021
Melons could provide a healthy, sustainable, and inexpensive source for certain functional ingredients. According to research published in Food Chemistry (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127579), the chemical profile of melon peels is full of bioactive compounds and antioxidants.
Researchers from Portugal and Mexico analysed the chemical properties of the melon Cucumis melo peels (Inodorus cultivar)—noted to be the most common fruit cultivated in tropical countries globally. They looked at the melon peels' nutritional index, bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties. The studied melon peels were processed into three fractions: solid, liquid and pellet.
Researchers found in the melon by-products 15 polyphenols (mainly hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonous acids) and four carotenoids (mainly β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin). They noted these to be "responsible for diverse biological activities (antimicrobial, provitamin A, antioxidant activity, among others) with health promotion."
Interestingly, researchers found the solid fraction of the melon peel to offer the most benefits related to fibre—cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin-richness: "This fraction can be directly used as a source of dietary fibre (flour) that has contributed to the modulation of intestinal microbiota, such as Bifidobacterium, which has been associated with the prevention of colon, stomach, breast and prostate cancer."
The liquid fraction had the highest level of antioxidant activity due to its high quantity of available polyphenols; it also had fibre and proteins. Researchers highlighted, "This fraction can be used as an additional ingredient (juice powder) for human health promotion as polyphenols exhibit good inhibition of digestive enzymes (lipase, amylase and glucosidase), minimising hyperglycaemia, which is also strongly associated with diabetes and obesity disorders."
When looking at the pellet fraction, researchers found it the fraction with the highest levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and proteins. "This fraction can be used as colouring and food additives (powder)," they added.
TAGS: Sustainability
'Having a clinical trial on your formulated product can help you stand out from the crowd' [Interview]
'Magic that needs to be better understood': Unpicking the history and future potential of yaupon


Our Seniors were to play Pearse Og on Sunday in a challenge game but unfortunately the game fell a victim to the weather. The 1stRound of the Championship v Culloville will be played in Silverbridge on Friday 11 August in Silverbridge @715pm.
The Reserves will play Lissummon on Sunday in the Belleek Tournament. Match in Belleek @3pm.
The Under 14s 1stRound Feile game also fell a victim to the weather at the weekend. The game away to Carrickcruppen has been rescheduled for Wednesday, throw in @715pm. The winners will travel to O'Doirnan Blues on Saturday @2pm.
To help cover cost each age group to pay £2, £5 for family of 3 or more. £10 Membership/Registration fee can also be paid at these sessions.
The Functional Movement Screening (FMS) programme continues every Monday at the Clubrooms. All players in 1stYear to Under 18 are to take part. Indoor training gear should be worn.
W/c 06/03/17 Lucky numbers were 9-23-27-31. No winner. 6 Match 3s: Joan Murphy, Val Lester, Stephen McParland, Michael McKee, Tommy & Eilish Mone, Kerrie Beagan. Sellers to collect winnings from John McKee. Next Draw – Monday 13/03/17, JACKPOT£5,400 (Rota: KGribben & BMcKee). Tickets can be purchased online via www.klubfunder.com/Clubs/Ballymacnab.
We thank all who currently sell and purchase lotto tickets every week. Your continued support is greatly appreciated and contributes substantially to financing 'the Club'.
The Monthly Draw shall take place on Wednesday 8 March. All sellers are asked to make their returns by then.
Membership for 2017 should be paid to the Club Registers, Brendan McKee or Seamus McArdle by 17 March 2017. Over 18 £20, Under 18 £10. A Registration Night shall be held in the Clubrooms on Friday 10 March 730-830pm. All existing, lapsed and new members welcome. Paying your membership is an invaluable means of raising fund for the club. All players at all levels are reminded the importance of paying membership for insurance purposes and eligibility for the forthcoming competitive season, both training and games.
A 5K Run/Walk Fundraiser in memory of John Grugan will be held on Saturday 11 March @ 11am in Parkanaur Forest Park, Dungannon,. All proceeds in aid of UCD Volunteers Overseas.
Under 14 - Training Wednesday 7.30 -8.30pm and Saturday morning 11.30 -12.30pm please remember water and £1s. On Sunday past the under 14s had a very enjoyable trip to the All Ireland club finals in Croke Park, unfortunately Tyrone champions Eglish were beaten by the narrowest of margins but the girls were delighted when the other Ulster reps Slaughtneil of Derry were crowned Senior champions. Armagh county feile takes place on Saturday 01st April.
Under 16 - Training on Thursdays 7-8pm.
Senior - Training on Monday and Friday at 6.45pm sharp in the field.
Indoor Blitzes- Under 8s and 10s have a blitz in Meadowbank in Magherafelt on 19th March, more details to follow.
Registration- Registration evening on Wednesday 08th March at the clubrooms from 7.30 -8.30pm. Over 18s £50 and all under 18s is £25. Registration fee is made up of player insurance, fee to Croke Park, fee to Ulster Council and fee to Armagh County Board and the club covers the deficit.
Crochet Class in Ballymacnab Hall every Wednesday 7.30pm –9.30pm. New members welcome.
Céilí dancing every Thursday in Ballymacnab Hall 8.30pm – 10pm. New beginners welcome.
If you wish to contribute in sharing information please and to receive our weekly Newsletter and Club Text message, forward your details by emailsecretary.ballymacnabroundtowers.armagh@gaa.ie.


A SENIOR official in the agriculture ministry says Namibia is still to sign the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Partnership (CAADP) agreement.
The ministry's director for planning and business development Mesag Mulunga, said Namibia wants to first ensure that CAADP is aligned to the country's agricultural development plans.
He said the ministry is consulting partners such as the New Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad) agency in South Africa and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) so that Namibia's own agricultural development plans speak to CAADP.
"It's not that nothing is happening. It has been approved and it is also features in the ministry's work plan. But what you should know is that we also have our own agricultural development plans. What we need to do is to align CAADP with our plans," said Mulunga.
At the 12th CAADP meeting recently held in Accra, Ghana, it was agreed that the only way Africa can deliver tangible results on agriculture is to mobilise its own human and financial resources an invest more in agricultural activities.
CAADP is Africa's policy framework for agricultural transformation, wealth creation, food security and nutrition and prosperity for all. It is led by Nepad.


We are offering Office Modular Workstation Furniture to our client.
FKC 7505 A Partition Workstation (Plus).
Being a leading firm in this industry, we are deeply engaged in offering a high-quality range of Director Cabin Furniture.
Being an eminent organization in the industry, we are involved in providing a premium quality range of Office Furniture.
The name 'LOOP' has been derived from the aluminium legs in rectangular 'loop' shape.


Just wanted to thank you for your help and send you a couple of pictures of the rifle and a score card from the 1000yd range at Bisley last weekend. Very pleased with the results as I'm still working on load development and bullet selection.
Chris Potter's for sight mounts but they didn't have any that would work so I failed to get the rifle shot as intended at Wadhurst. I actually did not get onto a range until yesterday when I shot it for the first time. I used a 100 meter underground tube range and took three shots to zero it from the bore sighting I did when fitting the sight.
Next three shots all touching using 123 grain Sako ammunition. Second 3 shots printed within previous group hole. Third 3 shots using Federal 150 grain exactly the same point of impact with no change. Nine shots now all within a 15mm diameter circle.
Next 3 shots with sound moderator off to check difference in MPI achieved a 'clover leaf' group ¾ of an inch low and ½ an inch right of moderated MPI.
To be serious, the rifle is a joy to use, comfortable and above all very accurate. Thank you very much for the prompt and professional way that I have been dealt with.
What I would like to say about the .243 Woodland Stalker is that it is a fantastic rifle. After zeroing the rifle in with around twelve shots of Federal shock 70grain ballistic tip. At 125 yards I achieved a very close group. Two of the shots were touching and the third was just a few millimetres above! The rifle is unbelievably comfortable to shoot and has given a massive confidence boost in my shooting ability. The length of the rifle including the moderator makes it easy to carry through woods and getting in and out of high seats is a breeze. I would strongly recommend this rifle.
For the first time in known records a full-bore target rifle shooter has shot a perfect individual score in a 'Queens II' course of fire. Jon Underwood shot 150ex-150, with all 30 of his shots hitting the central V-Bull, during the Peek match of the Surrey Open on 20th September at Bisley. That is 50.10 at 300 yards, 500 yards and 600 yards with no wind coach, no hand rest and no telescopic sights. Surrey Rifle Association member Underwood used JHC 155g ammunition in his RPA Quadlock Rifle to post his amazing score. He is well known around Bisley, with notable successes as Grand Aggregate winner in 2005 Imperial; winner of all three stages of the Queen's Prize in 2006 and numerous international honours (including a recent England Team tour to the USA).
As expected, Underwood went on to win the event and also the Surrey County Championship. He is now focused on trying to get selected for the England Commonwealth Games team for Delhi in 2010, for which he is on the shortlist. The highest ever score posted in the actual Imperial Meeting Queens II event is 150.28, shot by Scotland's Iain Robertson in 2002.


Do you really know who you're sending money to?
Australians are losing more and more money to romance scams. In 2015, it was the second highest scam in terms of money reported lost to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
The banking industry has compiled an information sheet to highlight the dangers of online romance scams, how to better identify and avoid these scams, and how banks can help you. It includes some common stories from victims who have been scammed and ways you can protect yourself.
For more, see the information sheet, infographic or watch this short video.
GUARD your personal information and be wary if someone asks for a host of personal details soon after contact, or requests you move off the dating site. If you are unsure, conduct an online search of the person's name, photo or email address to check for legitimacy.
Be SUSPICIOUS of a person asking for financial assistance – never send money without knowing for sure you can trust the person you are communicating with.
Before sending any money always TALK to a friend or relative and seek advice about the relationship that you have formed online.
CONTACT your bank IMMEDIATELY if you think you have provided confidential banking details to a scammer.
If you believe you have been a victim of a romance scam, REPORT it to the Australian Cybercrime Online Reporting Network (ACORN).


All are invited to the launch of the new blogging platform, Dementia Day-to-Day, offering a unique perspective on the condition.
Dementia Day-to-Day is a new joint initiative led by the Institute of Mental Health and the School of English. It takes the form of a series of blogs – mainly online diaries and reflective pieces – integrated into the existing Improving Dementia Education and Awareness (IDEA) website.
We've assembled a panel of authors from all walks of life, each with their own experience of, and interest in, dementia to explore the subject of ageing and wellbeing from as many angles as possible.
If you can't come to the launch event, please help us promote the website on social media.
Read more about the blogs here, and book your free place for the launch here by 16th November.


MR. KING: Welcome to a special Sunday night addition of Larry King Live. Our special guest is the President of the United States. A beautiful day here in Seattle. It rained earlier this morning, but there's no city like this. You seemed revved up here today.
THE PRESIDENT: It's a wonderful city. They've been very good to me. But it's just an exciting place. It's a real future-oriented place with a lot of different kind folks. They get together. They work together. It's a real upbeat, positive city.
MR. KING: Do you like campaigning again?
MR. KING: It seemed like you were just campaigning.
MR. KING: Do you like this?
THE PRESIDENT: I do like it. In large measure I like it because it's one of the few times I get to really go out and put out our record, my message. And I also just like to see the American people. You know, I like to see them excited and energized again.
MR. KING: I remember when you were running, we were in Ocala, and you said to me, God, I love this.
THE PRESIDENT: It was wonderful. Remember that we were in that rodeo arena. Remember that?
MR. KING: Where Elvis Presley once sung.
MR. KING: You were revved up, and you seem the same way now. It would seem that after this time you've been President for two years that it's old hat by now.
THE PRESIDENT: But these are the people I work for. And perhaps the most frustrating part of being president is how hard it is to stay in touch with them, to stay connected to them, for them to really know what you do on a daily basis. And so to be able to come back out here with someone like Ron Simms, whom I admire so much, that represents what's best in this country, that's cutting against all this cynicism and negativism that is blanketing the airwaves. It's really just a great thing to do.
MR. KING: What do you make of that? We'll start there, and there's lots of bases we're going to cover, of these -- lots of radio talks shows, other areas of negativism, that's more than just criticism. It's anger. What do you make of it?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it's almost like an institutionalized approach to life, that everything is given the most negative possible spin; information is presented in attack mode. The American people hate it, but they react to it.
MR. KING: But portions of them listen to it.
THE PRESIDENT: Portions of them listen to it, of course. And even if they listen for entertainment, the surveys show in these elections that they react to it, which is, of course, why the politicians do it.
MR. KING: So what does it mean to you when you see it, hear it, about you, about people you like -- about anyone?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it -- what I think is it's not very good for America. It's not good for our people. It make it harder for people to take a deep breath and face their problems and seize their opportunities and move forward.
I mean, this is a very, very great country. And as I have a chance, for example, to go to the Middle East to participate in that peace signing, other leaders are bewildered at the negative attitudes in America. They say, gosh, you're economy is coming back, your deficit's going down, things are happening in your country. You're leading the way to peace around the world. Why would the American people be in a negative frame of mind?
MR. KING: So they have a right to that feeling?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, no, there's some insecurity there. In other words, the picture is not all positive. But I think the direction is positive, and the future is more positive than negative. But I think the other thing is, the overwhelming way that most Americans get their information is -- tends to be both negative and combative and assaultive, almost. And what I tried to do in the presidential campaign in '92 with all those town meetings, starting way back in '91, where I listened to people and they talked to me, insisting on three debates, and having one debate with the public there asking questions of the candidates for president, with the bus tours we did was all designed to get people involved, let them vent their frustrations and then focus on what we were going to do.
And that's very important. And that's the thing that has been missing too much in this election. And, of course, the Republicans like that because if people are mad, then they think the Democrats don't vote and the extremists on the right in their party do vote, they get a big advantage and it helps them get into power. But it doesn't do anything to help America solve their problems.
MR. KING: How do you deal with it personally, I mean, the carping, the anger, the up and down in the polls -- personally?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, on the up and down in the polls, I basically try to ignore it.
THE PRESIDENT: Not because -- I care what people think about the issues, but I knew when I started this job that while everybody said they wanted us to change, if it were easy to do it, someone else would have done it. So to get the deficit down, we had to make some tough decisions.
If you're going to make college loans more affordable to Americans within the budgetary constraints we had, we had to make some tough decisions, take on some interest groups. If you want to pass the Brady Bill and the crime bill, you've got to make some tough decisions. The NRA got real mad at us and now they're trying to take it out on every candidate in the country that stood up for safer streets.
So anybody who ever fights for change is going have to be willing to risk going down in the polls some. What bothers me more is the general atmosphere where people tend to believe the worst about people in public life, rather than the best; and tend to have a negative view, generally. Because the truth is that this country is in better shape than it was 21 months ago. Unemployment is down, jobs are up; the deficit is down; the government is smaller, but it's doing more for ordinary working people. The streets are going to be safer because of the crime bill. And we're a lot closer toward having a safer, more democratic, more free world. Russian missiles aren't pointing at us; the North Korean nuclear agreement means they won't present a threat to us in terms of nuclear weapons, if we go through with that. We have the progress in Haiti and in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East and Northern Ireland. We are moving in the right direction at home and abroad. We have a lot of problems, but we're moving in the right direction.
And for people to be kept in a constant turmoil all the time, where they don't listen to one another, they don't talk to one another, they just are bombarded by these negative ads on television I think is not good for our democracy. And it is, frankly, not realistic. If you could see the way other people look at us, they know this is a very great country. And we should feel that way, too.
MR. KING: When there's extreme negativism, do you condemn it on both sides?
MR. KING: When Democrats do it and Republicans do it?
THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely. Particularly if it is unrelated to the work of the job. But let's be realistic, now. This whole thing started from the get-go with the determination of the congressional leadership in the Republican Party not to work with us on the economic program.
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, absolutely. They were very forthright about it: You're not going to get any votes out of us no matter how you change this program. That's how it started.
THE PRESIDENT: -- (in progress) -- were abducted. And there was this little town in South Carolina where there apparently had been maybe some division or something in the past, but they were all coming together. You saw those gripping pictures of the schoolchildren praying. You saw blacks and whites going out together to look for the kids. People really were trying to do their best to do a good and noble thing.
And then they found out that the mother had done it. And unlike previous cases -- we've had some other cases, horrible cases, where parents kill their children. But this was -- it stood in such stark contrast to those people praying, working, desperately trying to find those children. I think they had a sense of betrayal, of outrage, of bewilderment, of pain. And I think the experience the people in the community felt riveted all across our country; indeed, across the world. I think every parent was just sickened by it.
MR. KING: The fact that -- and remember the case in Boston with the call to 911 -- that she drew the picture of a black man tells us what about racism in America?
THE PRESIDENT: I think it tells us that we have at least some assumptions about race that still color our thinking, our talking, sometimes our voting. The people in that community, without regard to race, were out there looking for those boys. And most African Americans in this country get up every day and go to work, work their hearts out, pay their taxes, raise their kids, obey the law. And while the crime rate is higher among African Americans, they're also more likely to be victims of crime. And it's all really -- it's a complicated thing, but it's plainly related to the combined impact of the breakdown of family and community and the loss of economic opportunity working together.
MR. KING: The classic American clash.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes. And the truth is, in my judgment, they're both right and they're both wrong. That is, you need a combined approach to it. We have to rebuild these communities. It's hard to have an orderly society without work. It's hard to have a coherent family without work. It's hard for parents to have all the self-respect they want if they know they'll never have a chance to go to work.
But on the other hand, we simply cannot tolerate the behavior that has become all too commonplace. I mean, what is it that turns the heart of a 10-year-old to stone in Chicago and makes it possible for them to let go of a five-year-old boy? These are big, deep questions. And again I say, the thing that is so wrong about so much of the political dialogue in this election, or political ads, is there's no dialogue. There's no honest talk. People aren't reaching out across racial lines and trying to figure out how to affirm what is best in this country, how to support the lives and the futures of these kids.
MR. KING: Are you saying they're playing to the worst in us -- the racist in us?
THE PRESIDENT: I think they're playing to the -- they're playing to the lowest common denominator -- to the fear, to the division, to the anxiety. I believe that it's better to play to the best in us -- to address fear, to address anxiety, to admit it, to say it's legitimate; say, okay, what are you going to do about it?
MR. KING: Is this the ugliest off-year elections, politically advertising-wise you've seen?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, certainly the most expensive and probably the most negative certainly in a very long time. And it's very troubling. I tried to get this campaign finance bill passed. And it was delayed to death at the end of the session by our opponents, like a lot of other bills were. But we don't need that. We need to reform the campaign finance system.
In every one of these races of major import, there ought to be two or three debates; there ought to be town hall meetings; there ought to be things that involve people, that let them express their anger and frustration; and then say, okay, now, what are you going to do about it? Because what we run the risk of doing in this election -- which is why I've been out here working like crazy since I got home from the Middle East -- is we run the risk of seeing people vote for candidates whose platforms and positions they absolutely disagree with just because they say, I'm out, put me in; I'm mad, too.
MR. KING: Throw the rascals out.
THE PRESIDENT: Government's bad; put me in. Yes.
MR. KING: I haven't seen you quoted on it, and every American has talked about it and they all want to know what their President thinks. You were an attorney general in your state, a prosecutor, so it's a twofold question: Can there be a fair trial in the O.J. Simpson case? And two, should television cameras be allowed?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, the answer to the first question is, I think there can be a fair trial, but it is much more difficult to empanel a jury that has no opinion.
MR. KING: There's never been anything like this.
THE PRESIDENT: No, there has never been anything like it. Secondly, I'm not so troubled about the trial itself being televised. What bothers me is that all the previous proceedings have been televised, all the preliminary things, all the back-and-forth arguments. And I know there are arguments pro and con, but on balance, I think it would have been better if they hadn't been, because I think it would have been easier to empanel a jury that had no fixed views, no -- at least predisposition to believe it. Now, what these folks have to say and what they had to convince the judge of was that whatever they had heard in the past, they could put aside and be fair.
But I just think all of us, we can't help being affected by the things we know. And the wrenching pretrial publicity I think is more damaging than whatever publicity might have come in the trial itself.
MR. KING: Are you impressed with Judge Ito?
MR. KING: And the prosecution and defense?
THE PRESIDENT: They all strike me as competent and committed. And the judge strikes me as someone who has been firm and fair. He's trying very hard, and he has an enormously difficult task.
MR. KING: Is this the kind of case, when you were prosecuting, you would have liked to prosecute or not like to prosecute?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, of course, any -- I think most prosecutors would -- at a kind of a personal, professional level welcome the chance to be in a big case like this. But it's a very sad case. It's the sort of thing that brings great pain to a country.
THE PRESIDENT: No. I mean, there are -- people are dead. The feelings that we all had about O.J. Simpson and everything -- it's a very sad case. So it's not something I can say I would relish doing because the whole thing is enormously tragic.
MR. KING: We'll be back with the President of the United States. We'll get into issues and some thoughts on the elections Tuesday right after this.
MR. KING: Beautiful downtown Seattle on a beautiful Sunday afternoon in the American Pacific Northwest with President Bill Clinton, two days away from the election. Friday night on this program, Bob Dole said that on Tuesday night, when the Republicans take the Senate -- if they take the Senate -- and the House, the first person he calls will be you. He will ask to meet with you Wednesday morning. Win or lose, whatever happens, they're ready to cooperate. Comment.
THE PRESIDENT: I don't think they're going to win the House and the Senate. But whatever happens, I hope he'll call me Tuesday night and I hope he'll be willing to cooperate.
MR. KING: Hope, but don't think?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I don't know yet. All I can tell you is that we had bipartisan support for that crime bill, and it turned into to naked politics. And the Republicans that did stick with us were lacerated by their leadership.
I hope they don't really, seriously believe that we can go back and do what they did in the '80s and have all these massive tax cuts for upper-income people, and pay for big defense increases, and bring back Star Wars, and balance the budget in five years, and not tell anybody how to do it. There is no way to do it without massive, massive cuts in Social Security, Medicare, college loans. If you take Social Security off, you have to cut everything else in the budget 30 percent.
MR. KING: They said you didn't. They said it was secretive.
THE PRESIDENT: No, that's not true. We met with them in advance. We even offered to work with them on drafting a bill. We were told, no, you go ahead and put your bill in; then we'll put our bill in and then we'll work. They announced an approach where more than half the Republican senators supported universal coverage. The bill never came. By the time it came to talk about the bill, there were zero senators from the Republican Party on that.
So -- and by the way, then they released the memo of their strategist, Bill Kristol, who wasn't even ashamed to release the memo and say, you must not cooperate on health care because if the middle class ever gets security about health care, they'll probably support the Democrats again; whereas, if we keep them all torn up and upset and angry, we can either keep them home or get them to vote for us.
So I want -- let me just say this -- I want more than anything to have a bipartisan effort. I want more than anything to move this country forward, not see it go back. But I have not obstructed that bipartisan effort. My door has been open. I have wanted to work together. And I have seen a level of intense obstructionism that I never thought I'd ever see.
So what the American people have to say is -- first of all, I think we're going to do better than everybody thinks because jobs are up, unemployment is down, the deficit is down, the government is smaller -- all these things are different from the way it was before. We are doing things for ordinary Americans like middle-class college loans, national service, tax cuts for low-income working people, the family and medical leave act. When people know this, I think we're going to do much better than the experts think, because I think people want to keep going forward; they don't want to go back.
But whatever happens, I hope we talk. I have always wanted to talk; I have always been willing to meet. And I hope we work together.
MR. KING: Worst-case scenario -- they take the House. Could you work with Newt Gingrich?
MR. KING: I meant worst-case scenario for you --I'm not taking a stand. For you, worst-case scenario.
THE PRESIDENT: I can work -- the American people are the bosses of this country. They run this country. They decide who's in the Congress and they decide who's President.
MR. KING: You work for them.
THE PRESIDENT: I work for them. And so does the Congress. So we will do what we are told to do by the American people. They are the bosses. But I will say again, I have worked very hard to get this economy going; to bring the deficit down; to get investment back in education and training; to pass that crime bill. And now we have to implement it so we can make our streets safer; to make our country stronger. What I think is going to happen is, the American people are going to think about, in the next couple of days, do we want to keep going forward, or do we really want to go back to trickle-down economics? Do we want to go back to exploding the deficit, shipping the jobs overseas, causing the country trouble, or do we want to keep working forward?
A lot of Republicans did work with me. But without exception, when they work with me on anything tough -- except for the trade bill, except for NAFTA and except for some education legislation -- in a lot of these other areas, they were subject to withering pressure and attack from the leaders of their own party. So I want to work with them, however these elections come out. I think we'll probably see the Democrats keep control of the Senate and the House because we are changing things for the better and the American people now are seeing what the record is.
MR. KING: But you'll take that call, and you'll meet with whoever it is you have to meet with?
THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely. That's right. You bet I would. I would have always taken it. I want it to be that way. When I ran for President I ran as a former governor -- I was a governor. I never shut the Republicans out of my office. I always thought my job was to work with anybody the people elected. That's the right thing to do.
MR. KING: I've got to get a break. We'll be right back with President Clinton. Don't go away.
MR. KING: Sunday evening in Seattle with the President of the United States Bill Clinton. A lot of bases to touch. And later we'll get some predictions on some individual races that the President is very aware of.
A couple of other things in the news. Johnny Apple today in The New York Times says that the administration is starting to take on a Truman-esque approach already -- they're the bad guys. And that's the way Harry Truman won in '48 by knocking the no-good, do-nothing Congress. Are we adopting that mode?
THE PRESIDENT: No. For one thing, I don't believe we're going to lose the Congress if the American people know what has been done.
MR. KING: So you'll have no Congress to knock in '96.
THE PRESIDENT: There is -- well, whether the Democrats or the Republicans are in the majority, a minority can frustrate the will of the majority just with the filibuster in the Senate, if for nothing else, which killed the campaign finance reform, lobby reform, environmental reform and a number of other things last year.
My instinct is to get something done. But this Congress that we just finished was only the third one since World War II that cooperated with the President in over 80 percent of the President's initiatives in both years. That only happened three times since World War II -- once for President Eisenhower, once for President Johnson, then this one.
MR. KING: So there's no Truman plan.
THE PRESIDENT: No. I'll say again, it depends on who the American people send to Congress and what their attitude is. I will work with anybody who will work with me to move the country forward. When I ran for President in '92, I said I thought the Democratic Party had to change. We had to do something about getting the economy going again, bringing the deficit down, shrinking the government, being tougher on crime -- all things the Republicans had previously said they were for, although the deficit went up, the economy was in trouble, and they just talked about crime for six years.
All right, now we have reduced the deficit, reduced the size of the government, passed a good crime bill, which now will have to be implemented at the grass-roots level. Even as we speak, we've got police officers being hired all over the country because of this crime bill.
What are we going to do? My door is open. My hand is outstretched. I am a builder, not a blamer. I'm not like that.
MR. KING: This ain't going to be a Truman "give 'em-hell, Bill," campaign.
THE PRESIDENT: It depends on what they do. It depends on what they do. If they want to work with me, then we will work together. I do believe that we're going to -- that the people who gum up the works need to be held more accountable.
THE PRESIDENT: I am optimistic.
MR. KING: Reports in recent books of disorganization in the presidency, two years of unwieldiness -- I'm sure you've heard about this, if you haven't read the books. Comment?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, my comment is, if we were all that disorganized, how do we have the third most successful record in success with Congress, one of only three with over 80 percent of our initiatives passing, including major advances in bringing the deficit down, education reform, trade expansion, crime and a number of other things, first of all? Secondly, we've done pretty well in foreign policy. No Russian missiles pointed at the United States; North Korea, Haiti, Northern Ireland, the Persian Gulf, the Middle East.
MR. KING: Are you saying we're looking at the process, not the result?
THE PRESIDENT: But I'm saying the process is more open than perhaps in previous administrations because we are going through a period of historic change. And when -- for example, when I tried to get my economic program together, after I was elected, but before I took office, we all agreed we had to bring the deficit down; we still had to invest more in education and defense conversion and new technologies. And we had to do things that would expand the economy. We wanted to help lowincome working families. And we wanted some other incentives to spur economic growth that cost money -- some tax incentives.
But there were all kinds of differences on the details. So we got a lot of people in from different points of view, and we talked it through. And it was a lively process. Now, some people wanted to have the image that somebody brings a president a little one-page memo with two options, and you just check off and say that's the way it is, and it's all neat. This is a complicated world with a lot of variables.
MR. KING: Is yours too open?
THE PRESIDENT: I don't think so. It may be unsettling to people that we have honest debates in the White House. But, you know, when I think about some of the major mistakes that my predecessors have made, I think the absence of honest debate may have caused some of that.
So, can we get the process better? Can we get better organized? I think so. I think that the White House today is much better organized than it was 30 days after I took office. I think it's more orderly, it's running more smoothly, decisions are made in a more disciplined fashion. I think a lot of people have learned to do their jobs better and better and better.
But, again, I say the -- a lot of the best companies I know of in America have very lively, open discussions on important issues. They take real time on important issues because then that shapes what the future is. And so far, I say, if you judge us on our results, we're making pretty good decisions.
MR. KING: Critics have said now that you fired your wife from health care. I haven't seen you comment. What caused this change and who's running the health care battle?
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, I didn't do that.
MR. KING: She has not been fired.
THE PRESIDENT: No. But she was never hired. She was a volunteer.
MR. KING: I know, but critics are saying -- what happened in that change?
MR. KING: She took the ball, though.
THE PRESIDENT: She took the ball, but what she did was to put the -- to put hundreds and hundreds of people together to go out and consult all the members of Congress, to run a twoday seminar on health care for Republicans and Democrats in Congress, and to try to get the work product up, and then be the spokesperson.
Now, whatever we wind up doing on health care, she will be still speaking out on that and doing a number of other things.
MR. KING: Then what was the announcement?
THE PRESIDENT: But the -- what we were saying is that she wouldn't have primary responsibility for actually deciding what move next to make in Congress and lobbying that. That's not a good thing for the First Lady to have to do, and not anything she signed onto do the first time around.
MR. KING: Did she dislike doing it?
MR. KING: She became the focus.
THE PRESIDENT: It's where she got caught up in the process of -- the lobbying of the Congress process. She wants to be a spokesperson for health care, for solving a problem, not the person who has to manage the process in Congress. And I don't think she should be.
MR. KING: So we will be hearing a lot from Hillary in the next two years.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, she -- you know, she's invested a lot in this. She's done a wonderful job. And she's -- what we think about the health care deal is that, first of all, keep in mind how long it takes to get things done in Washington. Family leave took seven years. The Brady Bill took seven years. The Crime Bill took six years. Banking reform took seven years. I mean, we've gotten things done that took years that other people couldn't do. But it was probably unrealistic to think you could get health care reform in a year an a half, given the fact that it's bigger than all those other things.
MR. KING: When we come back, we'll talk about some individual races and the President's thoughts, as we converge on Tuesday. Don't go away.
MR. KING: -- on this beautiful Sunday in Seattle. A little off-the-cuff joke there, folks. That's left unsaid. With the President of the United States, Bill Clinton. By the way, this is the President's seventh appearance, all together -- running and as President -- on this program. It's always great to have him with us. We're touching a lot of bases. Now some election bases. Going to win the Senate in California?
THE PRESIDENT: I think Senator Feinstein will win. If there was ever a case for campaign finance reform, it's this. The Republican candidate moves to California in '91 from Texas; essentially buys a Congress race; announces eight months later for the Senate; loses his own congressional district in the Republican Senate campaign; but spends, it looks like, $35 million or something -- some enormous amount of money -- just to run negative ads against Feinstein.
She, by contrast, in only two years, passes the assault weapons ban; a law that requires zero tolerance for handgun possessions in schools buy students; and the biggest protection act, natural protection act in history -- the California desert bill.
MR. KING: It's his money, though.
THE PRESIDENT: It's his money, but it shows you why we need some sort of campaign finance reform. No senator in my lifetime has gotten as much done in as short a period of time as Dianne Feinstein. And those three things may not be popular everywhere, but they are supported by a majority of the people of California.
MR. KING: Three hundred miles from here, over the hills in Spokane -- Mr. Foley, Speaker of the House -- what's going to happen there?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know, he was way behind. He's fought himself back to where he's even, some say a little ahead. I think the people of every -- every time there's a speaker who comes from a rural district, there's always the problem of the people in the district thinking that the speaker is more interested in the national job than the grass roots job.
All I can say is that of all the leaders of Congress I've ever known in both houses and in both parties, Tom Foley is the one who speaks most often about his constituency, and is most in contact with what he thinks they're thinking about. He's the one who talks to me all the time. It's amazing. And I think that if -- my feeling is that the people have seen him back there working, defending his positions, defending his record, defending his service for the district. If it's just a question of who can do more for the people of that district to build their economic future and to meet their needs, I don't think there's much question -- I think he wins in walk, but it's a tough race.
MR. KING: Our old friend, Ross Perot's entrance into the race, endorsing some Republicans, some Democrats, Independents and calling for basically a Republican victory.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, it's curious to me because if you look at what I've done as compared with what Ross Perot advocated, I disagree with him on GATT and on NAFTA, but so does the Republican congressional leadership. So both sides disagree with him on trade. So what else was his campaign about? It was about reducing the deficit; reducing regulation of the size of government; and getting political reform -- campaign finance reform, lobby reform, line item veto.
Okay, we reduced the deficit without any Republican votes. We reduced the size of government without any Republican support. We've deregulated the -- in banking and trucking. We deregulated a lot of the federal rules on welfare reform, giving 20 states the right to move people from welfare to work. We've done things that he said he was for.
I supported, and most Democrats supported -- most Democrats supported -- campaign finance reform, lobby reform, a bill to make Congress live under the same laws it imposes on private business. These are things we did. Their leadership opposed it. So what we are doing and where we stand and what we want to do in the future is much more consistent with what Ross Perot said he wanted to do if he were President.
MR. KING: Then what do you make of this?
THE PRESIDENT: I don't know. I'll leave that to you to make of it. All I can tell you is, we have really faithfully pursued the reform agenda that he and I shared in common when we both ran for President. So the truth is, he'd come a lot nearer getting what he said he wanted done in '92 in fact done in '95 if we kept the Democrats in the Congress who are committed to change.
MR. KING: Do you expect him to run again?
THE PRESIDENT: I don't have any idea.
MR. KING: Do you expect Democrats to oppose you?
MR. KING: Do you have a Republican favorite you'd like to run against?
THE PRESIDENT: No, I'm going to leave that up to them. I'll say this, sooner or later, we'll have a debate and a discussion in this country about what, in fact, has been done and what has not been done.
MR. KING: And it will have to be one person.
THE PRESIDENT: We'll have to get over being mad and being negative and talk about what we're going to do to build this country. We cannot for long afford to give into the blamers instead of the builders. I mean, this is a country -- you look -- we've got a lot of challenges we have to work through to get this country into the 21st century as the strongest country in the world, with the American Dream alive and well.
Right now, we are strongest militarily. We're strongest again economically, according to the annual vote of international economists, for the first time in nine years. We're outselling all other auto companies -- Americans are for the first time in 15 years. We are moving in the right direction.
At some point, people who tempt our anger and our frustration, but promise to reverse the progress we have made and put us back in the economic trouble we were in just a couple of years ago, are going to have to be held accountable. That's what this election ought to be about. And if it is, the Democrats who represent hope, the future and the progress that's been made in the last 21 months ought to have a chance.
Why should we give up the progress of the last 21 months and not give me a chance to finish and go back to what failed us for 12 years?
MR. KING: But can we also say, therefore, can I trace in what you said in the beginning that if you do run for reelection, you will debate your opponent or opponents?
MR. KING: There will be no backing off debates.
THE PRESIDENT: No, not once, but several times.
MR. KING: We'll be right back with President Clinton. Don't go away.
MR. KING: We're back with President Bill Clinton, touching a lot of bases. The legal defense fund, are there any second thoughts about that, or was it necessary or --do you have second thoughts?
MR. KING: They have to be embarrassing, though.
THE PRESIDENT: If we're going to make presidents a subject for the first time in history -- this has never been done to anybody before -- to things like special counsels looking into things that happened long before the President became President, that were fully aired in the presidential campaign -- I don't think Presidents should make money being President, but I don't think they should be bankrupt when they leave because of legal fees; nor do I think that Presidents should expect lawyers to work for nothing.
So, once again, we're in a situation here where --do you really want to say that unless you're fabulously wealthy you shouldn't be able to be President? You shouldn't be able to run for an office because you can't buy enough negative television ads to trash your opponent? I think what we did was appropriate, legal, proper and restrained.
MR. KING: -- spoken to him awhile back and that he, in the middle of the sentence, got angry that he had forgotten what he had been talking about.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, he just said once, he said, I forgot. He said, I lost my memory on that and it really makes me mad.
MR. KING: Did you then think that this might have been Alzheimer's, a common thing to think in people over 80? Did you think it?
THE PRESIDENT: I didn't know. I don't know that I know the difference between the manifestations of Alzheimer's for someone who's 80 and just not remembering things as well. But he and I have always had a very cordial personal relationship. When I was a governor, I supported and worked with the White House when we got the first big welfare reform legislation through back in '88. And even though we've had our differences, I always liked the fact that he was positive about America; that he was an upbeat person; that he -- at moments he was capable of going beyond partisanship, as he has since he's left office. You know, he supported NAFTA and the Brady Bill and the crime bill with the assault weapons ban in it, because, I think, of the experience he had with Jim Brady and the terrible scars it left on everyone.
So I just -- I wanted to say that. I was probably in the most Democratic congressional district in America yesterday. And when I asked them, they all just applauded and they gave him a big cheer.
MR. KING: Do you think it will help focus emphasis on Alzheimer's? Do you think he was right to do it, to make the announcement?
THE PRESIDENT: -- in his own words. And it was vintage Ronald Reagan. I think it will help to focus attention on Alzheimer's. I personally appreciated it, because I lost both an uncle and an aunt to Alzheimer's. And so I think it's one more thing that the American people have to be appreciative to him about.
MR. KING: We'll be back with our remaining moments on this special Sunday night edition of "Larry King Live" with President Bill Clinton. Don't go away.
MR. KING: We're back with Bill Clinton. Our remaining moments, some other quick bases to cover -- Senator Dole the other night said he likes Warren Christopher, thinks he's done a great job. Is Warren Christopher staying at State?
THE PRESIDENT: He's done a good job, and as far as I'm concerned, he's the Secretary of State.
MR. KING: Dee Dee Myers is sitting here, looks very strong, very active.
THE PRESIDENT: She looks pretty good, doesn't she?
MR. KING: There was rumors that she was going to be leaving that post, and she seemed to have strengthened it. Is she here?
THE PRESIDENT: She's doing a good job.
MR. KING: Will she be here through the next two years?
THE PRESIDENT: She hasn't told me yet.
MR. KING: Do you want her to stay?
THE PRESIDENT: She looks pretty good.
MR. KING: Yes, she does. Do you want her to stay?
THE PRESIDENT: She's doing a good job, and she's going to stay as long as we decide she's going to stay -- she and I together.
THE PRESIDENT: I've been a little evasive on all personnel questions.
MR. KING: You don't want to discuss personnel?
THE PRESIDENT: I think Presidents should always be slightly evasive on personnel questions unless there's some great policy issue involved.
THE PRESIDENT: George Foreman, I like because I identify with him. He's not as young as he used to be, not as fast as he used to be, not as thin as he used to be. He's still got a terrific punch. I'd like to think that there are a lot of us who could identify with that.
And he doesn't quit. You know what he said yesterday? He said he was really grateful to America for giving him the chance to fight. That's the way I feel -- I'm grateful to America for giving me the chance to fight.
MR. KING: So you felt an association with him. You're only a little older than he is.
MR. KING: You have the same kind of midriff -- and he eats like you -- fast foods.
THE PRESIDENT: He does. I don't really eat fast foods anymore. That's a big myth.
MR. KING: Well, you don't?
THE PRESIDENT: No. It's part of Dee Dee's counseling to me. (Laughter.) She won't let me -- no, we don't do that much anymore.
MR. KING: We're under a minute. Virginia --Senate.
THE PRESIDENT: Senator Robb's doing well there.
MR. KING: Cuomo in New York.
THE PRESIDENT: He's come back; he's been heroic.
MR. KING: Senate in -- Governorship, Texas.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I haven't been there, but Ann Richards is supported in her job by over 60 percent of the people. So if they support the work she's done for Texas, you would think they would renew her contract.
MR. KING: Were you asked to go there at all?
THE PRESIDENT: Oh, I was at the beginning. I was asked to go, actually, to El Paso, but we couldn't do it.
MR. KING: We're out of time. Thanks.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. You've been great.
MR. KING: Are you predicting victory in the Senate and the House? You will retain control of both?
THE PRESIDENT: I think we're moving in the right direction, and I think we'll have them both on Wednesday morning when we wake up, because I think the American people want to keep going forward, not going back.
MR. KING: Our guest has been President Clinton. We thank you for joining us on this special edition.


Forced vaccinations are coming fast, but are they based on a hoax?
NDE's are one of the most mysterious and uplifting experiences humans have.
More evidence that agrichemicals are to blame for the global insect die-off.
The CDC is elated that the flu vaccine has been effective just half of the time.


Two men have reportedly been injured in a suspected acid attack at London's King's Cross staion.
A spokeswoman for the Met Police said: "Police were called at 1.33hrs on Tuesday, February 12 to reports of an altercation between two groups of males on Argyle Square, Bloomsbury.
"All parties had left the location before officers arrived at the scene.
"Two men were later found nearby with facial injuries reported to have been caused by a corrosive substance."
No arrests have yet been made and the condition of the two victims is currently unknown.
Fire crews, ambulance and police were all pictured at the scene this afternoon.
Some people took to Twitter revealing "someone got splashed with acid", reports Cambridgeshire Live.
TV presenter India Willoughby said: "Swear I'm psychic. Was at Kings Cross this morning around 11am going up the escalator and 'acid attack' popped in my head.
"Two consecutive days of premonition type things. Got to be so careful these days."
The men were taking to hospital, with police saying they "await an update on their condition".
A police statement added: "No arrests have been made.
King's Cross station is one of the busiest in the UK, and is located in the London Borough of Camden on the edge of central London.
It is opposite St Pancras international, the city's Eurostar terminal.


text:
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 20 supplement s1
P043: Standards for change: dev...
Volume 20, Supplement S1
May 2018 , p. S72
P043: Standards for change: developing international minimum standards for the care of older people in the emergency department
B. Ellis (a1), C. Carpenter (a1), J. Lowthian (a1), S. Mooijaart (a1), C. Nickel (a1) and D. Melady (a1)...
Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.241
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2018
Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) across Canada acknowledge the need to transform in order to provide high quality care for the increasing proportion of older patients presenting for treatment. Older people are more complex than younger ED users. They have a disproportionately high use of EDs, increased rates of hospitalization, and are more likely to suffer adverse events. The objective of this initiative was to develop minimum standards for the care of older people in the emergency department. Methods: We created a panel of international leaders in geriatrics and emergency medicine to develop a policy framework on minimum standards for care of older people in the ED. We conducted a literature review of international guidelines, frameworks, recommendations, and best practices for the acute care of older people and developed a draft standards document. This preliminary document was circulated to interdisciplinary members of the International Federation of Emergency Medicine (IFEM) geriatric emergency medicine (GEM) group. Following review, the standards were presented to the IFEM clinical practice group. At each step, verbal, written and online feedback were gathered and integrated into the final minimum standards document. Results: Following the developmental process, a series of eight minimum standard statements were created and accepted by IFEM. These standards utilise the IFEM Framework for Quality and Safety in the ED, and are centred on the recognition that older people are a core population of emergency health service users whose care needs are different from those of children and younger adults. They cover key areas, including the overall approach to older patients, the physical environment and equipment, personnel and training, policies and protocols, and strategies for navigating the health-care continuum. Conclusion: These standards aim to improve the evaluation, management and integration of care of older people in the ED in an effort to improve outcomes. The minimum standards represent a first step on which future activities can be built, including the development of specific indicators for each of the minimum standards. The standards are designed to apply across the spectrum of EDs worldwide, and it is hoped that they will act as a catalyst to change.
B. Ellis (a1), C. Carpenter (a1), J. Lowthian (a1), S. Mooijaart (a1), C. Nickel (a1) and D. Melady (a1)
COPYRIGHT: © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018
*Corresponding author
ISSN: -
URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-of-emergency-medicine
geriatric emergency medicine


Plug the GPI/GPO device on your computer, and let Windows install the driver.
Since Pyramix 11 and Ovation 7, SeaLevel GPIO drivers are not installed automatically, please first install the drivers manually.
Windows 10 : SeaLevel GPIO requires .NET framework 3.5, which is by default not installed on Windows 10.
See this page to enable this feature on Windows 10.
Install the drivers and reboot your computer.
The GPI GPO controller is now available (to access the Controller Mapping, a project must be opened).
Restart Ovation after Windows drivers installation.
GPO will be automatically detected, you will need to activate it and assign Virtual GPO port in Settings > Player Units.
Even if you only use GPI or GPO, make sure you enable both, otherwise it may not work after an application restart.


text:
Article stubs, Character 1985, 1985, Phoenix Foundation
Angus MacGyver (1985)
You can help MacGyver Wiki by expanding it. not enough information "
"Not a good one".
Real Name: Angus MacGyver
Title: Troubleshooter
Originally From: Minnesota
Interests: Deborah
Parents: James MacGyver
Family: Harry Jackson (Grandfather)
Children: Sam Malloy (Son)
Affiliations: Phoenix Foundation
Status: Alive
First appearance: Pilot
Portrayed by: Richard Dean Anderson
Remake Actor: Lucas Till
Angus MacGyver is a highly resourceful intelligent, optimistic action hero who prefers non-violent conflict resolution wherever possible. He refuses to carry or use a gun due to a childhood accident with a revolver that resulted in the death of a friend. This was shown in episode two of Season 4 (Blood Brothers) when MacGyver goes back to his home town and meets two childhood friends and in flashbacks, we see the accidental death of friend Jesse by a bullet from a falling gun. In the first episode "Pilot," MacGyver fires an |AK-47 at some Russian soldiers. This episode was before his dislike of firearms was established. The character is portrayed as an outspoken advocate of gun control. Even in cases where his improvised devices are used to attack hostile opponents, he is always doing so in self-defense and, if possible, subduing or disabling rather than killing. He is often suspicious of militaristic attitudes within the government; he sees his Phoenix Foundation employer as an alternative to the more conventional (and violent) means of law enforcement.
He was born and raised in Minnesota on either January 23, 1951 (per his passport in "Every Time She Smiles") or March 23, 1951 (working back from dates given in the episodes "Thin Ice", Passages, Friends, Runners, and "Phoenix Under Siege"). His heritage explains why he speaks with a Minnesota accent. (Richard Dean Anderson himself was born in Minneapolis, Minnesota on January 23, 1950.) MacGyver lived his childhood in Mission City. Like Anderson, MacGyver was an avid hockey player as a child, and competed in his local hockey league, continuing to play the game as an adult. He graduated from Alexander Ramsey High School in Roseville, Minnesota. His character earned a degree in physics from the fictitious Western Tech where in 1973 a mustachioed MacGyver had studied under Julian Ryman, a man who also had an ability to fix everything with everyday objects and it seems MacGyver learned his talent from him. This was revealed in the episode "Hell Week" where MacGyver returns to his college and ends up helping Ryman's son, David. MacGyver's interests include ice hockey, racecar driving, chemistry, and baccarat.
MacGyver's first name remained a mystery until the final season; whenever he's asked about it, he says he dislikes his first name and changes the subject. Consequently, most of his friends and colleagues call him by his last name or simply "Mac." The script for the series pilot gave MacGyver's first name as "Stace", but this information, while mentioned in promotional material, did not appear in the finished episode. His first name is finally officially revealed in "Good Knight MacGyver", in which he learns of a 7th century Scottish ancestor, Angus M'Iver, and admits that they share their first name; and repeated in the series finale, which introduces MacGyver's son, whose middle name is Angus. It is also revealed on the boxes of the MacGyver seasons.
Despite his dislike for guns Macgyver has been known to wield a gun at least twice, albeit only in highly necessary situations.
MacGyver's Quirks Edit
In Pilot, Angus MacGyver says that he doesn't like heights.
Also in Pilot, Angus MacGyver clearly doesn't like cigarettes, as he chokes when he lights one.
In the The Golden Triangle, Angus MacGyver mentions that he's not scared of snakes, but he doesn't like being around them.
Also in The Golden Triangle, Angus MacGyver makes it clear he doesn't like guns when he refuses to teach the villagers how to use guns to defend themselves.
In Thief of Budapest, Angus MacGyver says again that he doesn't like heights.
Also in Thief of Budapest, Angus MacGyver says he doesn't care for alcohol. In other episodes too, Mac's disregard for alcohol is presented.
In The Gauntlet, Diego offers Angus MacGyver a gun, but MacGyver refuses, saying "Actually, I do much better without them, thanks."
In The Heist, Angus MacGyver finds a cigar in an ashtray and remarks about how it's a nasty habit.
Also in The Heist, Angus MacGyver has to take a sip of wine from a crystal goblet in order to reproduce a tone properly with his finger, and he grimaces as he takes the sip.
MacGyver has lost his memory at least twice
Flashlight A Hawaii Five-O and MacGyver Crossover
Retrieved from "https://macgyver.fandom.com/wiki/Angus_MacGyver_(1985)?oldid=9818"
Article stubs
Character 1985
Phoenix Foundation


text:
Vice President Mike Pence says GOP remains optimistic about reelection bid
Updated: 10:07 PM EST Nov 4, 2020
Kenny Beck
GOVERMENTAL PLAZA ON SOUTH GREENE STREET. YOU'RE ENCOURAGED TO WEAR A MASK IF YOU ATTEND. DAVONTE: WELL, TONIGHT WE'RE ALSO HEARING FROM VICE PRESIDENT PENCE, AS WELL AS FORMER SOUTH BEND INDIANA -- BEND, INDIANA MAYOR, AND FORMER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, PETE BUTTIGIEG. BOTH MEN TELL OUR KENNY BECK. THEY ARE EXCITED THIS DAY HAS ARRIVED. >> WE ARE OPTIMISTIC THAT THE PEOPLE WILL REELECT DONALD TRUMP FOR FOUR MORE YEARS. THE ENTHUSIASM I SAW TRAVELING ACROSS NORTH CAROLINA THIS PAST WEEKEND, THE ENTHUSIASM FOR THE PRESIDENT ACROSS YOUR GREAT STATE, I THINK, IS REFLECTIVE OF THE FACT THAT THIS PRESIDENT LITERALLY KEPT EVERY PROMISE THAT HE MADE. >> IT'S ALMOST INDESCRIBABLE. WE HAVE BEEN BUILDING UP TO THIS FOR FOUR YEARS. I THINK ALL OF US IN AMERICA ARE READY FOR CHANGE. NEED NEW AND BETTER LEADERSHIP. IT HAS COME TO THIS. THE EARLY VOTING HAS BEEN EXTRAORDINARY, INSPIRING, REALLY. BUT WE ARE URGING EVERYONE TO MAKE THEIR VOICE HEARD, THIS REALLY IS THE HISTORIC ELECTION OF OUR LIFETIMES. DAVONTE: THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE HAS WON NORTH CAROLINA IN 9 OF THE LAST 10 ELECTIO
With just hours left for voters to cast their ballot, our sister station WXII in North Carolina did a one-on-one interview with Vice President Mike Pence and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor and former Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg.Both men said they are excited Election Day has arrived."We are very optimistic that we're going to have a great night," Pence said. "People across North Carolina and people across America are going to vote to reelect President Donald Trump for four more years. The enthusiasm I saw traveling across North Carolina this past weekend, the enthusiasm for the president across your great state, I think, is reflective of the fact that this president literally kept every promise that he made."Buttigieg said the mood is almost indescribable. "We have been building up to this moment for years. I think all of us who believe America's ready for change, that we need new and better leadership, we know it's come to this," Buttigieg said. "The early voting has been extraordinary. Inspiring, really. We also know that not everyone has gotten that vote in. We're urging everyone to make their voice heard because this really is the historic election of our lifetimes."The Republican presidential nominee has won North Carolina in nine of the last 10 elections. The only exception was with Barack Obama in 2008. Buttigieg said North Carolina could play a big part in determining whether a winner will be called Tuesday night."It's hard to see the president being able to hold on if he can't win North Carolina," Buttigieg said. "That's one of the things. If our supporters turn out the way we hope, that could really help us get some clarity sooner rather than later. At the end of the day, that's how democracy works."The vice president says he also thinks it's possible a winner could be called in the hours after polling sites close."I just see tremendous enthusiasm," Pence said. "We wrapped up the campaign last night at 1:30 a.m. in Grand Rapids, Michigan. There were 40,000 people out at the airport there. You saw the thousands of people in North Carolina that came out for the president." In North Carolina, absentee and mail-in ballots are allowed to be processed before Election Day. That's why state elections officials say they expect to be able to report 97% of ballots cast Tuesday night.Another topic: How the coronavirus pandemic has changed this year's race for the White House. Trump and some of his supporters have suggested that once the election is over, the pandemic will fade from the headlines."The pandemic will go away when we fully treat it, not when we deny it," Buttigieg said. "Denial never made a big problem go away. We need a vaccine. We need testing. We need to be smart about this, and wishing it away is a recipe for more heartbreak, pain, and more economic damage. We've lost a quarter of a million Americans. That makes this (pandemic) the biggest mass casualty event in the U.S. since World War II. It's showing no signs of stopping."Meanwhile, Pence says the president has addressed the pandemic properly."I never like to speculate on people's motives, but clearly there's been politics played by our opponents in this campaign and by many of their allies in the media," Pence said. "From early in this pandemic when President Trump took the unprecedented step of closing down all travel from China. It's a move Joe Biden opposed. He essentially said it was racist and xenophobic, but President Trump got it right."
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. —
With just hours left for voters to cast their ballot, our sister station WXII in North Carolina did a one-on-one interview with Vice President Mike Pence and former South Bend, Indiana, mayor and former Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg.
Both men said they are excited Election Day has arrived.
"We are very optimistic that we're going to have a great night," Pence said. "People across North Carolina and people across America are going to vote to reelect President Donald Trump for four more years. The enthusiasm I saw traveling across North Carolina this past weekend, the enthusiasm for the president across your great state, I think, is reflective of the fact that this president literally kept every promise that he made."
Buttigieg said the mood is almost indescribable.
"We have been building up to this moment for years. I think all of us who believe America's ready for change, that we need new and better leadership, we know it's come to this," Buttigieg said. "The early voting has been extraordinary. Inspiring, really. We also know that not everyone has gotten that vote in. We're urging everyone to make their voice heard because this really is the historic election of our lifetimes."
Biden: Winning Wisconsin makes Electoral College victory easier
The Republican presidential nominee has won North Carolina in nine of the last 10 elections. The only exception was with Barack Obama in 2008.
Buttigieg said North Carolina could play a big part in determining whether a winner will be called Tuesday night.
"It's hard to see the president being able to hold on if he can't win North Carolina," Buttigieg said. "That's one of the things. If our supporters turn out the way we hope, that could really help us get some clarity sooner rather than later. At the end of the day, that's how democracy works."
Record early votes lead to tranquil Election Day at polls
The vice president says he also thinks it's possible a winner could be called in the hours after polling sites close.
"I just see tremendous enthusiasm," Pence said. "We wrapped up the campaign last night at 1:30 a.m. in Grand Rapids, Michigan. There were 40,000 people out at the airport there. You saw the thousands of people in North Carolina that came out for the president."
In North Carolina, absentee and mail-in ballots are allowed to be processed before Election Day. That's why state elections officials say they expect to be able to report 97% of ballots cast Tuesday night.
Another topic: How the coronavirus pandemic has changed this year's race for the White House.
Trump and some of his supporters have suggested that once the election is over, the pandemic will fade from the headlines.
"The pandemic will go away when we fully treat it, not when we deny it," Buttigieg said. "Denial never made a big problem go away. We need a vaccine. We need testing. We need to be smart about this, and wishing it away is a recipe for more heartbreak, pain, and more economic damage. We've lost a quarter of a million Americans. That makes this (pandemic) the biggest mass casualty event in the U.S. since World War II. It's showing no signs of stopping."
What should you expect as the polls close? We break it down — hour-by-hour
Meanwhile, Pence says the president has addressed the pandemic properly.
"I never like to speculate on people's motives, but clearly there's been politics played by our opponents in this campaign and by many of their allies in the media," Pence said. "From early in this pandemic when President Trump took the unprecedented step of closing down all travel from China. It's a move Joe Biden opposed. He essentially said it was racist and xenophobic, but President Trump got it right."


text:
Q: Retrieving all Payment info from PayPal App I've recently been trying to write a Python script to automatically fetch all the payments made or received by a PayPal app, tied to a facilitator account. I'm using the client_id and client_secret from the app, and the official Python API library.
import paypalrestsdk
import logging
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)

paypalrestsdk.configure({
    "mode": "sandbox",
    "client_id": CLIENT_ID,
    "client_secret": CLIENT_SECRET})

payment_history = paypalrestsdk.Payment.all({"count": 10})
print(payment_history.payments)

Unfortunately, None is printed (payment_history returns a NoneType). The logging prints
INFO:root:Request[POST]: https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/oauth2/token
INFO:requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool:Starting new HTTPS connection (1):  api.sandbox.paypal.com
INFO:root:Response[200]: OK, Duration: 0.937975s.
INFO:root:Request[GET]: https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/payment?count=10
INFO:requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool:Starting new HTTPS connection (1): api.sandbox.paypal.com
INFO:root:Response[200]: OK, Duration: 1.19636s.
None

so the client_id and client_secret are probably fine for logging in. On the sandbox account for PayPal, I've both received and sent payments from the facilitator, none of which are output.
That being said, is there anything I'm doing incorrectly? This is the first time I'm using the PayPal API, so any help would be great!

A: I haven't seen this documented anywhere, but it looks to me like the REST API only returns payments that were created via the new API.
You may have to use the much uglier Classic API, which has a decent Python client at https://github.com/duointeractive/paypal-python, which you can use like:
from paypal import PayPalInterface
paypal_api = PayPalInterface(API_USERNAME="xxx_xxx_apix.xxx.com",
                             API_PASSWORD="xxxxxxxxxx",
                             API_SIGNATURE="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
                             DEBUG_LEVEL=0,
                             HTTP_TIMEOUT=30)

transactions = paypal_api._call('TransactionSearch',
                                STARTDATE='2014-01-01T00:00:00Z',
                                STATUS="Success")

I'm working on a fork that wraps TransactionSearch in a shortcut method and also parses the NVP response into a list of python dictionaries. Still in progress, but you can check it out at https://github.com/jlev/paypal-python. Patches and pull-requests welcome!

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
enquiry@w-l-p.co.uk
Norfolk / Suffolk 0345 2410613
Cambridge 01223 930244
0345 2410613
WLP is a UK business consultancy service that has enjoyed 25 successful years of helping business grow.
We, at WLP, treat the privacy of our visitors with the highest importance. This policy details the measures we take for preserving and safely guarding your privacy when you visit or communicate with our site or personnel.
A detailed explanation of how we may store or otherwise use personal information about you is explained in this Privacy Policy.
Regular updates of the Privacy Policy are completed, requiring you to check back on this Policy from time to time.
Operation of this site may require collection and processing of the following data:
1.1 Visit details to our site or any resources used on our site. The information is gained in a statistical manner for our own use only. Data gathered will not identify you personally. It is strictly aggregate statistical data about our visitors and how they used our resources on the site.
1.2 Information given to us when you contact us for any reason.
1.3 Data offered by filled out forms on our site, such as an enquiry submission.
At present this website uses cookies to gather data for both Google Analytics, but this policy may change. When used, cookies are automatically placed in your computer's hard drive and are designed to help correct and improve website services or products. No identifying personal information which is gathered by these cookies will be shared at any time. Other (third party) cookies may be placed in your computer's hard drive if you choose to click on our social networking links, or on other external links.
You may however elect to decline all cookies. Every computer has the ability to decline file downloads and your browser gives you the option of accepting or declining the placement of cookies in your computer's hard drive. If you do decline cookie downloads you may be limited to certain areas of our site in the future.
More information on this sites cookies.
3. Your information and how it is used
Primarily, we collect and store data about you to help us provide better service and products to you. We may use your information to:
3.1 Fulfil a request from you about our products and services – which you may have submitted via an online form or other form of electronic transmission.
3.2 Make a contract with you, which would require use of contact information you've given us.
3.3 To notify you of any changes to our website, products or services that could affect our service to you.
4. Storage and transmission of personal data
4.1 If data is transferred outside the European Economic Area it will be for storing and processing. We will take all necessary steps to ensure that data storage wherever it resides is in agreement with the Privacy Policy found here.
4.2 Data safety during internet transmission can never be guaranteed. If you therefore elect to transmit your personal data you do so at your own risk. You are also responsible for the safe-keeping of any personal access codes you generate (such as passwords).
5. Information Sharing
5.1 We will from time to time share your personal information with our associates who work exclusively as WLP, or with your permission with others who may provide you with an additional service.
5.2 Third party disclosure of personal information may also be necessary in the following scenarios:
5.2.1 A sale of our business or its assets, in full or part, to a third party may require personal data sharing.
5.2.2 Legally, we may be obliged to share and disclose data details and may be forced to do so, for example by HMRC.
5.2.3 To assist in reducing credit risk and fraud protection.
From time to time links belonging to third parties, e.g. Linkedin may be found on this site. Those third party websites have their own privacy policies, which you agree to when you link to them. We do not accept claims of liability or responsibility in any way for those policies or links, as we have no control over third party site content.
7. Accessing Information
The Data Protection Act 2018 provides you with the right to access the information that we collect about you and indeed delete that information if it is not retained by us in our vital interests. We will of course need to retain information that you have requested this deletion or that no further contact can be made. The contact channel below needs to be used to submit a request.
We welcome any feedback regarding this Privacy Policy. Please contact us with your queries, requests or comments.
(This Policy was last modified May 2018)
© 2020 WLP a trading style of Anglia Business Growth Consultants Limited which is a private limited company registered in England and Wales Reg. No.3260958.
The main office is
Wayland House, High Street, Watton, Norfolk IP25 6AR
essential.onion.lighters
Calls cost 0p, i.e. nothing, plus your phone company's access charge.
Martin Bonser
Paul Fieldhouse
Richard Garwell
Alastair Inskip
Simon Mortimer
Steve Palmer
Don Pearson
Gill Smith
Colin Stocker
Norman Wilson
Want to hear from WLP?
We send a quarterly informative newsletter about WLP, events and stories of our clients' success. If you'd like to receive these then
Proudly powered by WordPress | © Copyright WLP. All Rights Reserved. | Rendered in 0.328 seconds


As Europeans, #WeApologise on behalf of our national and European leaders for their inexcusable lack of coordinated humanitarian aid to the situation you and thousands of others are in while crossing our borders to escape war, persecution and poverty.
We understand that making this journey was not an easy decision for you and may have involved putting the lives of your loved ones at risk, or worse. We will continue to urge our decision-makers to provide safe and regular channels to the EU, so that your wellbeing does not rest in the hands of people smugglers.
Civil society organisations and thousands of people across the EU are taking a stand despite many governments' inaction by opening their homes, sharing their food and donating their clothes. We will keep pressuring our politicians to fulfil their humanitarian obligation to ensure the provision of such services rather than leaving it up to individuals or organisations to provide them without support.
While several of our leaders seem to have forgotten the EU's core values of solidarity and human rights, we have not. The EU has the capacity to welcome you with open arms, and the unwillingness to do so is an embarrassment to us. We acknowledge your right to seek refuge in safer regions and to be treated with dignity. We also recognise the contribution that you can make and we will fight to give you this opportunity.


text:
Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL
Berjaya Times Square is the biggest indoor theme park shopping mall in KL from Malaysia's Book of Records. Read here about the Theme Park, VR, cinema, parking etc. Apart from entertainment and theme park, we also have the best restaurant and food to eat, historical building and attraction to visit, enjoy nature and forest in Malaysia, explore waterfall and cave, mosques and other attractions in Malaysia. The only one comprehensive website for tourist. Visit Malaysia now!
Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL Summary
Attraction: Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL
Location: Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Attraction Type: Shopping in Malaysia
Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL from Official
Berjaya Times Square is one of the largest shopping malls in the world frequented by both local and tourist alike and was officially opened on 29th September 2003 by Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. The RM1.75 billion building was developed by Berjaya Assets Berhad which is majority owned by Tan Sri Vincent Tan. With over 2.5 million people visiting the mall each month, Berjaya Times Square prides itself as the best shopping experience under one roof for locals and tourists alike.
Berjaya Times Square Kuala Lumpur quick facts
Here's why you should shop here:
7,500,000 built up floor area (sq ft)
1,000+ retail shops
65+ food outlets
1,200+ luxury service suites
What are the facilities at Berjaya Times Square Kuala Lumpur?
Deciding where to shop in Kuala Lumpur has never been easier. Berjaya Times Square offers various conveniences, making your shopping experience a memorable one.
Bank and Money Changer
Mobile Prepaid Outlets
Pharmacies and Clinics
Berjaya Hotel
KL Monorail Station
What was the first shopping center to offer an interactive floor?
Berjaya Times Square Kuala Lumpur is proud to present Malaysia's first ever interactive floor display in a shopping mall with real-time interaction.
What is the largest indoor theme park in Malaysia?
Based on Malaysia Book of Records, Berjaya Times Square Theme Park Kuala Lumpur is the largest indoor theme park in Malaysia located on Level 5 & 7. It has been inducted into the Malaysia Book of Records as the first largest indoor theme park in Malaysia.
More Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL
Step into a world of fun, excitement & laughter. Berjaya Times Square Theme Park features a variety of rides, games and virtual entertainment for a wholesome family outing and the largest indoor theme park offering thrilling rides and games for the whole family since 2003. The gigantic indoor theme park, measuring 133,000 square feet, offers 2 exciting sections – Galaxy Station for the thrill seekers and Fantasy Garden for the young ones. Head on over to explore a galaxy of pure joy and excitement for an unforgettable family experience.
Mall operation hours: 10:00am – 10:00pm, Monday – Sunday.
Office operation hours: 9.00am – 6.00pm, Monday – Friday
Berjaya Times Square Management Corporation
(Strata Registration No.2913)
Lot 08-20 P.O Box. 08-33
Level 8, Berjaya Time Square
No. 1, Jalan Imbi, 55100 Kuala Lumpur
Operation Hours: 9.00 am – 6.00 pm
*Source: berjayatimessquarekl.com
#Shopping #KualaLumpur
Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL Reviews
BTS largest indoor Them Park in Kuala Lumpur Awesome Experience
Come and enjoy your roller coaster ride indoor at Times Square. I like to play street fighter and tembak-tembak games.
Raihanim Ahmad
Berjaya Times Square Parking Rate " Reasonable Price"
If you would like to stay all day at BTS, I suggest you take public transport because the monorail station is very near to BTS.
Hamizan Ibrahim
Indoor Theme Park
Pertama Complex
Low Yat Plaza
Contact Berjaya Times Square Biggest Shopping Mall in KL
Jalan Imbi,
Telephone: 1-300-88-8988


text:
Villamar – miejscowość i gmina we Włoszech, w regionie Sardynia, w prowincji Sud Sardegna.

Według danych na rok 2004 gminę zamieszkuje 2960 osób, 77,9 os./km². Graniczy z Furtei, Guasila, Las Plassas, Lunamatrona, Pauli Arbarei, Sanluri, Segariu i Villanovafranca.

Linki zewnętrzne
 strona internetowa gminy
 Źródło danych: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica

Miejscowości w prowincji Sud Sardegna

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia