text:
I think that the reader is beginning to get the idea that following clues that the Cassiopaeans give is a lot of work. It is, and we are only getting warmed up here. I think you will also agree that we are having a little fun after all the grim facing of reality we have done in the other volumes of the Wave series. Once we have acknowledged that we may be in a prison, we can look on the journey out as a true adventure. And it is. Not only that, it is a lot of fun!
At this point in my research, I was still pursuing the alchemical line of thinking, certain that I had found significant clues to the Secret Masters of the world — at least in human terms. It was a puzzling pursuit. I had read reams of material on conspiracies, supposed revelations of "who was on first," and over and over again, when I followed the trail, I found lies and confusion, shell games and obfuscation.
Yet, circumstantial evidence pointed to the existence of a secret fraternity unknown in its entirety to the human race. Other so-called secret groups such as the Rosicrucians, Illuminati, Freemasons, Templars, and so forth, seemed to be merely red herrings created and destroyed by the true Secret Masters in their masterful manipulations of humanity and seekers after truth. I came across many allusions to the idea that, from time to time, they replenish their membership from some of these groups, but that the groups themselves were not "in on the secrets," and any one of them was as likely to be used in the next gambit of bait and switch as another.
I came to the realization that, if they existed, these Secret Masters possessed incredible knowledge and unsurpassed cunning. I realized, at one point, that the trails I was following had been followed by the greatest minds of the human race for millennia with no evidence of the truth being revealed by any of them at any given point. Who was I to think that I could accomplish what had never been done before?
Yes, over and over again this or that person claimed to have discovered the "greatest secret," to have found the evidence that there was some group that had long-term plans to take over the world, but in the end, the evidence would not hold up to scrutiny, or would slip away like mercury. The trail would come up against a locked door. I finally understood that this was the nature of the beast. It was deliberate. These Secret Masters manipulate our lives and experiences like puppet masters. I understood something else: they also leave clues here and there to lead potential members through a complex maze for purposes of possible recruitment. And many of these clues are so convincing, so synchronous, so cunningly set up that it is easy to come to the wrong conclusions — to believe that you have arrived at the Holy City, when, in fact, you have only come across a road sign pointing the wrong way. Apparently, they only admit the most clever and sincere seekers of truth who prove themselves through years of work and dedication. In the present time when conditions seem to be conducive to breaks in the veil, there seem to be even greater efforts being put forth to further conceal and obfuscate the matter. The wild claims and rumors being propagated by agents of disinformation serve only to further conceal the truth. We are in a veritable maelstrom of a shell game!
According to some sources, the number of members of the Secret Fraternity is fixed and in order for one to pass on, another must be put in his place. Because of the frequent lack of qualified candidates, some of the members must extend their life spans for many hundreds of years. This may sound pleasant to those who are addicted to life in the flesh, but to those who possess Great Knowledge, this seems to be actually a burden.
Another curious fact was, over and over again I came across what I called the Scottish Question. Every time I hit a brick wall in my research, it seemed that the only scant thread left lying, broken and untraceable, suggested something to do with Scotland.
But, to continue with the story, as a result of attending a showing of the David Hudson video, I was introduced to a woman who later attended two sessions where several of the threads we were following all came together.
However, on the twelfth of September, before the guest just mentioned scheduled to visit us, we had a private session for the purpose of asking a few questions about the David Hudson/monoatomic gold issue.
For those of you who aren't aware of what this is, a man named David Hudson "discovered" a substance that seemed to be exactly what many alchemical texts were talking about in terms of the "White Powder of Gold" that was not only the agent of transmutation for metals, but also for the human body. His claim was that taking this powder acted on the DNA in such a way as to effect a rapid and amazing healing and perfecting of the human body so that one was "spiritualized" to such an extent that superpowers were not only possible, but probable. At one point in his talk, he said that some people who had taken this powder over a period of time had described having "whole body orgasms" that just went on and on.
The gist of the reason for the video lecture was to raise money. That sort of bothered me, but it was awhile before I figured out exactly why. I wrote down some questions about the David Hudson work in my notes as follows:
1. Why, after spending purportedly 5.5 million dollars to isolate and attempt to patent Monoatomic Gold, has David Hudson's obsession for knowledge suddenly stopped short of self-experimentation? (I know, he says his wife won't let him, but that begs the question with something like what he claims to have discovered, especially if he is as convinced of what it is as he claims to be and is trying to "sell the public" on it.)
2. If David Hudson possesses the "Philosopher's Stone" why is he asking for money? The literature tells us that one part in one hundred thousand will transmute base metals into gold. Doesn't it work?
3. If The Secret Masters have existed these many thousands of years with the knowledge and use of this substance, and if they have kept it a continual secret, assassinating, if necessary, entire groups of people to protect the secret, why is it suddenly being allowed out now?
These were the issues in my mind on September 12, 1995, when we settled down to ask a couple questions about David Hudson:
Q: (L) OK, this David Hudson tape, about what he calls the Philosopher's Stone, what is this substance that David Hudson has discovered? We watched the video about it; I'm sure you guys watched it with us, so, what is this stuff?
A: Watch developments there only from a distance.
Q: (L) Is taking this substance as he is talking about, is it dangerous, as I kind of think it is?
A: Possibly.
Q: (L) So, in other words, I should not get involved in that, either?
A: Up to you.
Q: (L) I know it's up to me, but you said to watch it from a distance, so I'm assuming that is a clue …
Q: (L) OK, my feeling is that there is some negative energy manipulating David Hudson, even though he may be a positive and giving person who is trying to do positive things, and that …
A: This is often true!
Q: (L) I think that taking something like that to transform your consciousness without doing the work or having it occur naturally is very much like black magic. That's what I think. (F) It's too easy … I read over the years bits and pieces from various different sources that all the things he described in there are possible for those who are willing to sacrifice; to exert what to us would appear to be an extreme degree of ethereal and spiritual energy … (L) I am not even sure that it is a question of sacrifice, though it may be; but it also includes desire for knowledge and the natural destiny of the soul and … (F) Well, did Jesus take this gold powder?
Q: (L) Did Adolph Hitler take this kind of powder, or something similar?
Q: (F) That paints a rather bleak picture, doesn't it? (L) Could this powder be utilized to transform a person in a very positive way, enabling them to do great good?
A: Or could it be utilized to transform an entire race of beings into hypnotic submission!!!!!!!!!!!
Q: (F) Wow! (L) Put it in the water. (F) Or even just advertise it as the "Manna from Heaven!" I mean, remember who runs this world, and has for 309 thousand years, are they just going to sit back and say, "Oh, yeah, we'll just let this gold powder get spread round everywhere, and get totally defeated," just like that? I don't think so! (L) Oh, that's a scary thought! Well, I guess, unless you have … Do you have something you would like to tell us or communicate to us at the present time?
A: Reflect upon messages received and good-bye.
The last comment seemed, on the surface, to merely be a remark relating to the answers about monoatomic gold. And if it hadn't been for the dream I had that night, I would never have thought anything further about this more-or-less volunteered remark.
In this dream, I was a bride and was wearing a wonderful dress with flowers in my hair and there was a limousine waiting outside to take me to my wedding. I didn't know who the groom was, but there were a lot of people around me encouraging me to get in the car and go to meet the bridegroom. For some reason, I was filled with happiness and the joy of those around me was contagious, so, overcoming my hesitations, I went to the car, got in and was taken to the place of the wedding. I was aware that the day was a Saturday, and it seemed to be the fourteenth because something was said about Friday the thirteenth.
It turned out to be a big restaurant with a wonderful feast prepared and waiting. It was all decorated with flowers and streamers everywhere and many, many people were gathered in a happy and joyful crowd who cheered me as I got out of the car.
The bridegroom came forward to take my hand and we walked through the crowds of people to stand in front of a priest-like person who married us. I was overcome with happiness even though I could not see the groom's face.
As soon as we were married, the music began to play, and he took me out onto the middle of the floor where everyone had cleared a space, and we began to dance. It was like flying and we whirled and spun and it was happiness such as I had never experienced in my entire life and I awoke bathed in a sensation of ecstatic joy.
Now, I have all kinds of dreams, some of them are just mundane sorting of the subconscious. This kind doesn't leave much of an impression on me in any way, and the feel and flavor of them is pretty bland and unemotional. Some of my dreams are mundane prophetic dreams where I will dream about events that actually happen, though they are insignificant. These are a little stronger in terms of feel and flavor, but it is easy to tell from the lack of emotional content that they are not terribly important. Then, there are the dreams that warn me of actual danger wherein there is an actual drama that is unreal in terms of the actual actions and reality in which I live, but which are dynamically accurate because the actual "dangerous persons" are in the roles of the villains just to get the point across. These dreams are generally very strong in flavor and emotional content. But, only rarely have I ever had a happy dream that was so overwhelming that it shook me to the core.
This dream of the wedding had the most powerful emotional content of any dream I ever had, yet the dynamics of it were, in real terms, incomprehensible. I was already married and had five children, so I really couldn't think of it as anything but a powerful symbolic prophecy that I would somehow find the truth or something like that. I decided that I was being given a foretaste of my success in the quest for knowledge and understanding of the human condition. There are all kinds of ways you can interpret the symbols of a marriage, being a bride, dancing and attending a party.
But, in any event, I wanted to ask about it and did at the next session which was also attended by this young woman (RC) I had met via the David Hudson thread:
Q: (L) I dreamed the other night that I got married, and there was a big party, dancing, the limousine and so on … flowers, happiness. In my dream, I heard a voice saying that the wedding would be on a Saturday the fourteenth, following Friday the thirteenth, could you tell me anything about this dream?
Well, that was pretty final! The Cassiopaeans were simply not going to tell me anything about it and that was that. I was not yet fully conditioned to the fact that, in cases of the most important issues of my life, they will tell me nothing at all and their declining to answer was indeed most significant as the later events of my life proved.
In retrospect, I can see that this meeting and the presence of this individual was a trigger for a variety of things. She was Jewish and almost immediately began talking to me about her past life in Nazi Germany, how she had been experimented on by Dr. Mengele and had died as a result (or so she claimed). I shared with her my own belief and dreams about having committed suicide in Germany after my husband and children were taken and killed by the Nazis. My guest became very excited and was convinced that she had been one of my children. It was true that there was a strong rapport between us, but I wasn't sure that her interpretation was the correct one. However, she wanted to ask:
Q: (RC) What is my relationship to Frank and Laura from any past life connections? Did we know each other in Germany?
A: Maybe. Discover.
Q: (L) Now, I was looking at the astrological charts, just to see what kind of matches there were and it was a lot. (RC) According to astrology, that shows a past life connection.
A: Who were you?
Q: (L) You mean me?
Q: (L) I was just a German woman … (RC) I was wondering about Egypt?
A: But we are still in Germany! [It was clear from this, though only in retrospect, that the Cassiopaeans had an agenda in following this line. They were not answering RC, they were talking to me.]
Q: (L) All I know was that I committed suicide, my name was Helga, I think …
A: Who was your husband?
Q: (L) I don't know. He was Jewish. Is that what you are getting at?
A: OK. Who were your children?
Q: (RC) They asked who were the children. Was I one of your children?
A: Discover. When we say discover, we mean for you to use your given talents to learn, not to have us lead you by the hand every step of the way. If we were to do that, we would cheat you out of an opportunity to gain knowledge, and more importantly, understanding. Thus, we would be abridging free will!
Clearly there was something about my past life in Germany and my husband in that time that I was supposed to discover. Not only that, it struck me as strange for them to be directing me to think about this in this way immediately after my question about the dream of getting married which they had refused to answer in explicit terms. They were not answering my question, but they were trying to get something across without violating free will. Then, they said this:
A: We are receiving strong wave pattern surrounding subject we chose to cover, thus we interrupted inquiries! Moshe in Israel.
Q: (RC) Who is Moshe in Israel?
A: Moshe is IN Israel.
But we could get no more. They would not tell us who Moshe was or what the connection was. But, I did get to toss in a last couple of questions:
Q: (L) Is it true that there is an enclave of alchemists that live somewhere in the Pyrenees …
Q: (L) Is this the group that you referred to as The Quorum in a previous session?
Q: (L) Do these alchemists use this power as talked about by David Hudson to enhance their longevity and their physical health?
A: And to control.
Q: (L) Are there people in this enclave who live for literally hundreds, if not thousands, of years?
A: Open.
The Quorum had been mentioned by the Cassiopaeans almost exactly a year earlier. It happened this way:
Q: (L) I would like to know what is the origin of the Freemasons?
A: Osirians.
Q: (L) Can you tell us when the original Freemasons formed as a society?
A: 5633 BC.
Q: (L) Is Freemasonry as it is practiced today the same?
A: 33rd degree, yes.
Q: (L) So, there is a continuing tradition for over seven thousand years?
Q: (L) Is this organization with a plan to take over and rule the world?
A: Not exactly.
Q: (L) What is their focus?
A: Overseers of the status of Quorum.
Q: (L) What is the Quorum?
A: Deeper knowledge organization. Totally secret to your kind as of yet. Very important with regard to your future.
Q: (L) In what way?
A: Changes.
Q: (L) Can you get more specific? Is that changes to us personally?
Q: (L) Earth changes?
A: Also.
Q: (L) What is the relationship between this quorum and the Cassiopaeans?
A: They communicate with us regularly.
Q: (L) Do they do this knowing you are Cassiopaeans or …
Q: (L) Has there been an ongoing relationship between the Cassiopaeans and this quorum for these thousands of years?
A: For some time as you measure it.
Q: (L) Is the Quorum composed of members who are humans on this planet?
Q: (L) Would we know any of them as well-known figures?
A: Hidden. None you would know.
Q: (L) How do the Masons relate to the Illuminati?
A: Masons are low-level branch.
Well, this was pretty disturbing, to say the least. Here the Cassiopaeans were telling me that they were in contact with this Quorum which, as far as I could tell, were the Secret Masters of the world, and there seemed to be a lot of evidence, circumstantial though it might be, that this group did not have humanity's best interests at heart. At least, that was the propaganda. So, I brought it up again, determined to get to the bottom of this mystery:
Q: (L) On a number of occasions we talked about the Quorum and the Illuminati. They both seem to be the highest levels of secret organizations. What is their relationship to each other?
A: Quorum mostly alien; Illuminati mostly human. Meet: two halves of whole.
Q: (L) Well the Quorum was described as being in touch with the Cassiopaeans, that is yourselves, which you have described as beneficial beings, or Service-to-Others-oriented beings, is this correct?
A: Close.
Q: (L) The Illuminati has been described as being behind or with the Brotherhood of the Serpent which you have described as being connected with the Lizard beings …
A: Close. But not that simple.
Q: (L) Well, if the Quorum are supposed to be the good guys and the Illuminati are supposed to be the bad guys, and they both are at the high levels of Freemasonry, what is the story here? I do not understand!
A: Picture a circle or cycle first now, then contemplate for a moment before follow up.
Q: (L) OK, I am contemplating a cycling circle.
A: Now, two halves representing positive and negative. Two halves.
Q: (L) Well, what I am getting out of that is there are two halves and both sides are playing with the human race. Is that it?
A: No. This is complicated but if you can learn and understand, it will be a super revelation.
Q: (L) Well, go ahead and explain.
A: Ask step by step.
Q: (L) Why do we so often have to ask things step by step?
A: In order to absorb the information.
Q: (L) The Quorum is described as the good guys. The Illuminati are described as bad guys. And yet, they are both drawn from higher Masonic ranks, or so it seems. When a person in the Masonic organization reaches the higher levels, are there individuals from these two groups that are essentially recruiting Masons to one side or the other?
A: First, not exactly one side or another.
Q: (L) I am beginning to not understand something here …
A: Unblock.
Q: (L) I don't have a block here. If the Brotherhood AKA Illuminati AKA Lizzies AKA Beast AKA Antichrist are the ones who are screwing around with human beings, planning to take over this planet, how are they related or connected to the Quorum, which is in touch with …
A: This will take time to explain; be patient, it will be worth it. Ask step by step.
Q: (L) OK. What is the nature of evil?
A: Blend.
Q: (L) I don't understand. Are the Lizzies what we would consider to be evil or STS?
Q: (L) Are the Cassiopaeans what we would consider to be good or STO?
Q: (L) Yet, do the Cassiopaeans use and manipulate the Lizzies to accomplish certain things?
Q: (L) The Lizzies work independently and in opposition to the Cassiopaeans?
A: Independently, not in opposition. We serve others, therefore there is no opposition. Careful now. Step by step. If you do not fully understand answer, ask another.
Q: (L) Part of a whole. Part of a circle.
A: Blend. Picture a blending colored circle image.
Q: (L) Are you saying that at some levels the two halves overlap in some way?
Q: (L) Are you saying that some of the Quorum are good guys and bad guys and the same for the Illuminati because the two are on opposing sides of the circle but at the point of blending one is weighted more to one side and the other to the other side? And these organizations are where the interactions come together?
A: Closer.
Q: (L) Well, I don't get it. Let's leave it for the time being.
A: No. Now, please.
Q: (L) OK. So it is a blending. Does it have something to do with … in your case, Service-to-Others means that you even serve those who serve self, is that correct?
A: Yes; we serve you, and the Lizards have programmed your race to self-service, remember.
Q: (L) So, I am still a Service-to-Self individual, is that correct?
A: But moving slowly toward Service-to-Others. Not all humans are.
Q: (L) Does this mean that when beings who are members of the Quorum or Illuminati call for information or help, that you, because of your Service-to-Others orientation, are obliged to answer whoever calls?
A: Yes and no.
Q: (L) What is the "no" part?
A: If vibrational frequencies are out of pattern, we do not connect.
Q: (L) Is the activity of the Lizzies part of an overall grand plan or design?
A: All is.
Q: (L) Let's go on.
A: Must answer question. You will feel ecstasy once answered.
Q: (L) OK. A blending. Yet two halves.
A: Of a circle.
Q: (L) Who designed this circle?
A: Natural frequency wave. Some near conjunction blend both service patterns and each "camp" to create perfect balance.
Q: (L) OK, so the Illuminati are the higher level on the pathway of Service-to-Self and somehow, by reaching these higher levels, may even come to the realizations or frequencies which have caused their position to be modified or blended to where Service-to-Self becomes or incorporates or moves them to Service-to-Others realizations, is this correct?
A: Continue.
Q: (L) OK, the beings in the Quorum are those who are focused on Service-to-Others and they, in their pathway of Service-to-Others begin to understand that some Service-to-Others includes refusing to give to those who are Service-to-Self?
Q: (L) And the whole idea is to blend both pathways no matter which direction you come to it from?
A: Service-to-Others provides the perfect balance of those two realities; Service-to-Self is the diametrical opposite closing the grand cycle in perfect balance.
Q: (L) So it is necessary to have a pathway of Service-to-Self in order for the pathway of Service-to-Others to exist?
Q: (L) And those who are in the Quorum and the Illuminati …
A: Blends in middle.
Q: (L) So it is necessary to have the darkness in order to have the light…
Q: (L) And both the Quorum and Illuminati are drawn from the higher-level Masonic organizations …
A: Freemasonry is human reflection in physical of these processes.
We begin to see that everything is not quite as simple as we might have thought. You can't just say that the good guys wear white hats and the bad guys wear black T-shirts. There is no easy answer.
But, we knew this all along. We know it from our own natures, and from the fact that every family has black sheep and white sheep and everything in between. We can't get on our soapbox and declare that the Masons or Illuminati are implementing a plan to control the world and take away free will. On the other hand, there may certainly be elements in both organizations and others with such plans. And, of course, the practical implication of this is the fact that the followers of the Service-to-Self pathway use their free will to violate the free will of others through lies and deceptions. And, of course, the cleverest of these lies is to blame everything that they do themselves on someone or something else while they, themselves, continue to conceal their presence and true nature.
In recent times, this shell game has become quite interesting, to say the least. So, just who is on first here? Gary Allen writes in his book None Dare Call it Conspiracy:
It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics, crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy exists. The conspirators' success will be determined largely by their ability to do this. (Allen 1972)
How, precisely, is this done? Well, the chief way is through control of the media. Through the media, the most effective weapon is ridicule, satire and character assassination. These extremely potent weapons are used to redirect attention away from the issues. Even a person who doesn't care what other people think of him will find little cachet in the minds of reasonable persons with the stigma of absurdity attached to them.
In the present time, it seems that more people are becoming aware, so the ante has been upped a bit. It is no longer so easy to just ridicule those who suggest conspiracies because conspiracy theories are just "silly." Now it is necessary to add another ingredient to the mix. In this program, special agents are sent out to plant disinformation that expands and accelerates the conspiracy theories by overdrawing them to the point of absurdity. Gary Allen writes:
Some conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by expanding the conspiracy (from the small clique which it is) to include every knee jerk liberal activist and government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion that will support their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish," "Catholic," or "Masonic." These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but sadly play into the hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs. (Allen 1972)
Let me go in this direction for just a little bit longer to illustrate my point. Around the time of writing, a member of our Cassiopaea E-group discussion list, apparently a fan of David Icke, wrote:
I am noticing a serious problem here. The British Royals who are shape shifting/child sacrificing reptilians are never mentioned here. The Diana case is completely covered up. That story of "suicide" is complete crap. The Royals are alleged (I should say 100% guilty) to have ordered and been involved in the ritual Masonic sacrifice of Diana/Dodi (and allegedly the child). The Egypt Air crash has been labeled; "a gust of wind" "these things just happen." No they do not when they have massive 33 and 19.5 symbolism, totally beyond coincidence. These are 2 major examples of Masonic ritual sacrifices that have been blatantly covered up by the Cassiopaeans or someone involved in the info distribution process. Is there a Mason/Templar among us? I have seen every other site infiltrated. Once again this is just theory. But there is reason for concern. Not to mention the biggest event occurring above your home worldwide right now; chemtrail spraying. Just a military exercise? Give me a break, this is a totally massive worldwide spray that is intended to keep down the vibrational rate of the population and kill some in the process. Remember; disinformation is sandwiched between layers of factual info. Something stinks here, and the Cs or somebody need to do some explaining.
Well, as usual, I went to the recommended sites that were presented as sources of proof. On the subject of the death of Princess Diana, I found a list of questions as follows:
In Death of a Princess, Thomas Sancton and Scott MacLeod investigate the questions everyone has been asking since Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Al Fayed were killed in a Paris car crash in the small hours of August 31, 1997.
How was a drunken, drugged, nonlicensed driver allowed at the wheel of the Mercedes?
Why was the driver, off-duty Ritz Hotel assistant security director Henri Paul, called back to the hotel that night and assigned a job that was not his?
Didn't senior officials of the Al Fayed-owned Ritz know that Paul was a chronic alcoholic and that he was drinking in the hotel that very night?
What was the role of the paparazzi that had stalked the couple all day long and pursued them in that final high-speed chase?
Why was Dodi so spooked by the photographers, to the point of changing normal security procedures and exposing himself and the princess to unwarranted risks?
What do skid marks, paint, and glass fragments tell us about the involvement of a second car?
Who was the driver of the second car, why didn't he stop, how did he escape, and how did the police organize a nationwide manhunt aimed at tracking him down?
And so on. These are all good questions similar to "why was JFK's parade route changed at the last minute?" And "why was he allowed to dispense with his bullet proof bubble?" And "why did the authorities not pursue the gunshots from the grassy knoll?" And on and on, ad infinitum.
If any of you have read Jim Garrison's book On the Trail of the Assassins,1 or if you have watched Oliver Stone's movie of the same name (and have sufficient synapses on your neurons), you will be convinced to an extreme degree of probability that there was a conspiracy to murder JFK. Not only that, you will be in agreement with a large segment of the world's population that the Warren Report was a sham and somebody got away with murder. And it may even make you sick to think about it, but it won't matter.
During the period of time that St. Petersburg Times journalist, Tom French, was interviewing me for his article, he attended a number of sessions. At one of them, the subject of the Stone movie and Garrison's book came up during a discussion that I have on tape. Mr. French, an investigative reporter, opined that Oliver Stone did a terrible disservice to the American people by making his movie which was so "misleading" and was based on so much "erroneous speculation." Needless to say, we were rather astounded by this remark and asked him what he believed. He fell back on the Warren Commission report as being the definitive conclusion!
Now, remember, this is a really nice and sincere guy who believes he is doing his job well. I have absolutely no doubts about that. But he still believes that the Warren Commission gave us the correct answer: that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK "all by his lonesome." I wonder if he is still of the same opinion after Gerald Ford admitted to doctoring the report? Probably so. Some people have an infinite capacity for shoving the truth under the rug, and when they are journalists, we have no hope for unbiased journalism. How many more of them are exactly like that? Innocent and brainwashed. It's "Mom, apple pie and all that!"
But, getting back to Jim Garrison's book: the careful reader will note that Garrison reports some incidents that are described as "sheep dipping"2 of undercover agents that simply do not make sense. In order for some of the events he uncovered to happen, whoever was managing things would have had to have time travel capabilities. That is to say, for certain scenarios to have played as they were reported, well in advance of JFK being elected president, someone would have had to know years in advance that 1) Kennedy was going to run for office; 2) that he would be elected; 3) and that he would need to be assassinated. Who could know these things that far in advance?
Jim Garrison did not seem to note this problem though he did express extreme bafflement at the results of his investigation. The very fact that he was reporting what he found, what the many witnesses attested to, and which was in some cases impossible, indicates that he was not trying to promote a hyperdimensional Control System. Yet, in the end, that is the only rational explanation for the reported sequence if the facts, as presented, were accurately portrayed.
In fact, some of the items collected by Garrison actually pointed away from his suspects, yet he reported them nonetheless, so we have no logical reason to assume that he was grinding a personal ax in the writing of his book.
We find the same issues present in the above list of questions about the death of Princess Diana. For the scenario that developed to have been part of a conspiracy, it would have to have been a hyperdimensional Control System with space/time management capabilities. In such a case, whether or not Masons, Jews, Templars or anybody were implicated would be somewhat moot, because if they were, it was very likely completely unconscious and it serves no purpose to fling such accusations around other than further obfuscation of the real source of the conspiracy.
Regarding the death of Diana and Dodi, I wrote to the list member as follows:
What is decided at "higher levels" can manifest in many ways at this level. The bottom line is: nobody dies unless they have reached a "check-out" point in their "life blueprint." Whether they agree at some level to participate in an event that leads them down a path to being murdered or otherwise …
… Now, all of you know (or should by now) that I have researched the "alien phenomenon" and have received much info about it from the Cs over the years. And, you know, if you have read the website, that it does not seem to be a very pretty picture. You also may know that I have followed many "paper trails" that relate to secret societies and conspiracies and have read many different views of these matters in an attempt to "sort out" the subject. In the end, when you delve deeply into these things, you find endless lies and confusion — layer after layer of them.
It is at this point that you have to begin to think.
What could possibly be the reason for this? And you finally realize that the very effect you have observed is the desired objective — Lies and Confusion. And that is where the rubber hits the road and you understand that if you take as truth the wrong view, you are no better than anyone who believes the most blatant and obvious lie, even if the lie you believe is far more subtle and cunningly devious. It still boils down to the fact that you have been deceived and made a fool of — if not food!
So, I understood that great caution needed to be employed in studying these matters. I also understood that the greatest minds of all time have been applied to these problems for millennia — with no real result of "waking up mankind." So, what is the deal here? Why is it so that suddenly, at this particular point in time, different people think that they have "plumbed" the mystery — have found the "Greatest Secret" and can now expose it for the world to view and believe as true?
Well, when you consider the great machine behind these lies, the apparent (though not proven) hyperdimensional nature of the reality from which ours is manifested, you come to realize that it is not going to be that easy!
When I read David Icke's book The Robot's Rebellion, the main fault I found in his searches for the evidence of a global conspiracy was his reliance on what other people have said before, as well as what he was being "fed," with very little checking of the sources or using of cerebral abilities to really think about what he was saying. I was very put off with his beginning that referred to that old hackneyed idea of the "Luciferian Rebellion" and the "out of synch" energy of evil and all that — because I had already been through that belief system and found its errors and the root of those errors. Still, I felt that this was a pretty good compilation, even if I would have liked a little less hysteria and a lot more documentation.
As it has been noted before, asking for proof of some of these things is like asking for mercury to stay between your fingers. Just isn't going to happen. So, at best, we have "tracks" and circumstantial evidence that piles so high that it would certainly convict in a court of law, but yet the mainstream community wants the "smoking gun" or the "UFO Cadillac" on the White House Lawn. Not gonna happen.
So, when I ask for "sources," you must understand that I mean the sources of the idea, the key to the chain of evidence that has been followed, even if that evidence is merely circumstantial. At the same time, I do realize that there are some "hard facts," that taken together with other "hard facts," can be connected as "circumstantial evidence" chains — and we really need to look for these things.
But, getting back to David Icke. Yes, I realized that he had followed a similar path that I did when I was researching conspiracies back in the 80's for the writing of the Noah Syndrome. There was very little new in that book for me. But, he made rather short shrift of the "alien question." That troubled me. He wasn't "getting it" at the deepest level, in my opinion.
Let me explain my reasoning for this. When one deeply studies "conspiracy" theory, one comes face to face with a consortium of "Hidden Masters" who are evident in their tracks, but can never be "seen," so to speak. We find Masons, Illuminati, Templars, Priory of Sion, Rosicrucians, Elders of Zion, and a host of other minor and major players. They come and go on the stage of history like actors playing many different parts. As soon as one "loses its force" another comes into power and holds sway for a time and then becomes "known" and obvious and is replaced.
The next thing is the "time" factor. When we consider conspiracies that have been in place for many thousands of years (and, yes, there is a pile of circumstantial evidence for this) we have to consider what I call the "pay-off" factor. We can study the lives of the various people who are supposed to have been "masters of the game" in these different secret societies that have been exposed from time to time, and determine that it is clear that they are human and that they are being used as "screens" and "red herrings" to draw attention away from something else.
The very idea of a group of people who live and die in the ordinary way being motivated to put events into motion that may benefit someone else a thousand years down the road, and who then suffer exposure and ignominious death or other unpleasant consequences would, on the one hand, bespeak someone who is devoted to serving others, yet it is clear that this is not the touted agenda. So, we can only conclude that they are serving themselves, and that leaves us with the blank as to what they get out of it!
Standard psychological theories apply here, and we realize that either these people are extremely stupid, and in that case, the whole conspiracy would fall apart rather quickly rather than having lasted for thousands of years, or we must think that these people are being used by someone or something else, for its own ends. And, in that case, we have to realize that the various proposed sources of the conspiracy, whether it is Masons or Rosicrucians or Illuminati, are merely another facet of the smoke screen.
Once we have realized that, we realize that if we jump on the bandwagon of accusations and "we have discovered the secret," we may very well be falling for the same old Machiavellian ploy that has been used for millennia.
Well, I puzzled over this for a long time — a period in which I was not considering a hyperdimensional reality. I simply could not see the motivation for any group of men, who must be at least somewhat ordinary, to perpetrate such a plan with no apparent "payoff". Supposedly, many of them would "put a certain action" in gear that would only bear fruit a few hundred, or many hundreds, of years in the future to their time, and then they would be exposed and killed or otherwise done away with. Again, such self-sacrifice is either a symptom of pure STO, or evidence of someone else behind the scenes.
So, David Icke found these things … so have many others. It's been fairly common stuff for a very long time. Some may be true; some may be red herrings. Of course, putting it all together in this day and time, and tracking it through the centuries is an interesting exercise — if one is then able to see the fact that there is a "puppetmaster" that has set this whole thing up to lead astray those who are more clever than others, but not yet clever enough to see the unseen element.
Well, fine and good. He wrote this book and it made a big splash. What next? Well, his next book was a huge disappointment because I could see that "they" had gotten to him. Now, just imagine this scenario: a person discovers all these things that he wrote about in his first book … (or thinks he is "discovering" them) — very similar to what I wrote in Noah, (but was completely unable to get it published and had no resources at the time to do it myself), and he gets it published, it gets promoted, and a lot of folks begin to think that maybe nothing is as it seems.
Well, clearly, David was going in the right direction. He might even be able to figure it out once he came to a full understanding of the "hyperdimensional" factor.
What do you think the "Puppet Masters" are going to do now?
And remember, you are not dealing with human minds here… you are not dealing with ordinary logic … you have no hope of figuring out their next "move" except to pay close attention to the action. And, I only knew this because I had taken great pains to study not only the evidence, but who gathered the evidence, how and why and then what happened to them after … So, I knew that there were repercussions to speaking out. And David is a very personable and dynamic person. Not only that, I think he has a real drive for truth (even if he doesn't have a "nose" for it).
So, here he is, David Icke on the "Truth Train," picking up a lot of passengers, and building a lot of steam. Well, I think that if a couple guys in three piece suits knocked on his door one night and said "Mr. Icke, we are here to make you an offer …" he probably would have slammed the door in their faces. At least, I would like to think that. But, maybe something like that did happen and he invited them in.
But, what is more likely is this: Somebody knocked on his door (figuratively speaking) and said: "Mr. Icke, I see that you have a great deal of courage and you are making a lot of waves, and I came to you to tell you my story about what is behind the scenes of these conspiracies that you talk about. And, I am afraid for my life, so you must be very careful and help me … so we can reveal to the world the Greatest Secret!"
And, of course, being a person who is "dedicated to truth," and a person who wants to "save the world," and all that, Mr. Icke invited this person onto his "truth train." But, he didn't realize that this person was an agent of the Puppet Masters … and that this person would secretly be slipping nuclear bombs into the firebox of the steam plant of the engine of his train… and that this nuclear power would speed the train up so fast that not only could it no longer stop to pick up new passengers, it would eventually run off the track and crash and burn.
So, what do I mean? Well, yes, we know that the Cs have talked about underground bases, about genetic experiments and the creation of a "Master Race" breeding ground for the Nephilim — they have talked about Drachomonoid controllers of our realm and they have talked about many of the same bizarre things that David Icke talks about … the difference is in the "deeper explanations" and the "mode of response."
I will give you an example: First of all, the "sources" of David Icke's information about the Reptilians from "the constellation Draco" are extremely questionable. When I began to track this idea, the closest I could come to it was that it originated with folks who claimed to have been given this info by reptoids!
So, let's get this straight: we are trying to uncover a conspiracy, and we go to somebody who we suspect is part of the conspiracy, and ask them what the whole thing is about? Or rather, they came to someone who then reported what they were told, and this became the basis for the "knowledge" about the Drachomonoids. That's like asking Richard Nixon what was on the missing tape.
Other information he writes about relates to pedophile abuse by public figures. That sets the warning bells off immediately because accusations of sexual aberration have been used throughout millennia to smear and destroy many people and groups, most notably the Templars and Cathars. Nevertheless, the inflammatory dwelling on these kinds of things in prurient and graphic detail bespeaks an almost fiendish delight in just simply talking about it. And that is not to say that I don't think that such things go on — god only knows the awful stuff I have had to deal with in the course of doing hypnotherapy. So, that is not the issue. What IS the issue, is the creation of the "us against them" hard-line philosophy that focuses on people and not the true hyperdimensional source of the control.
A couple of David's sources include Cathy O'Brien and Arizona Wilder. Regarding the former, her accusations of truly bizarre sexual abuse, pedophilia, and assorted disgusting factors are well-publicized on the net, and we have already discussed them, so I won't repeat them here. And, yes, the Cs have confirmed that there is, indeed, something along this line going on, though with modifications to the story.
The bottom line is: we have to wonder exactly why it is that Cathy O'Brien and Arizona Wilder have been allowed to "come out of the closet?"
Now, one correspondent wrote to me that the revelations of Cathy O'Brien made were very carefully orchestrated so that the information came out in a way that was able to protect her from the possibility of being "hit." In other words, if she had been killed after the book came out, it would be seen as "confirmation" of her story.
So, how to do the conspirators do damage control with Cathy O'Brien?
Well, the answer is simple: Arizona Wilder!!!
Icke tells us that Wilder "conducted human sacrifice rituals for some of the most famous people on Earth, including the British Royal Family." Arizona says (in Icke's book, The Biggest Secret):
"The Queen — I have seen her sacrifice people and eat their flesh and drink their blood. One time she got so excited with blood lust that she didn't cut the victim's throat from left to right in the normal ritual. She just went crazy, stabbing and ripping at the flesh after she'd shapeshifted into a reptilian. When she shapeshifts she has a long reptile face, almost like a beak, and she's off-white colour.
"Prince Charles — I've seen him shapeshift into a reptilian and do all the things the Queen does. I have seen him sacrifice children."
"The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn't died for a long time, they have just metamorphised (sic). It's sort of cloning, but in a different way … They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now … The Queen Mother is 'Chief Toad' of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent." (Icke, The Biggest Secret, 1999)
Now, just think about what this has done here (or could do to the less subtle and informed reader). The first thing is that it has placed the focus of blame on human beings. Human beings are shapeshifting Reptilians in cahoots with "ethereal" demonic reptoid beings. And you can see where that is leading back to, can't you? Yes, that old time religion! We have a "Luciferian Rebellion" going on here, and those pesky reptoids are really just demons in service to Satan. Of course, being demons, we have absolutely no hope of doing anything at all without help from somewhere "out there," most likely prayers or rebukes to "get thee behind me, Satan!"
So, not only have we accomplished a huge coup in terms of hiding the true nature of the real conspirators, we have advanced the cause of disempowering human beings by reinforcing their beliefs in the same nonsense that has kept them captive for over two thousand years.
Why would that be so?
The aim of religion is to create a completely controlled artificial environment composed of thoroughly predictable human behaviors — made predictable because they have been programmed through centuries of lies and obfuscations presented in the form of a story that is actually untrue, and wholly misrepresentative of the real negative aim.
For centuries these programs have been set up through space/time manipulation. Various prophets or religious leaders have been influenced to preach, prophesy or teach philosophies designed to lay a foundation for later takeover — possibly in our present time. It doesn't matter that the religions are essentially good or seem to be positive. What matters are the programmed responses. If a person is programmed to believe in Jesus, if a figure appears to them presenting itself as Jesus, and uses fourth density technology to stimulate the release of certain neuropeptides that can induce feelings of bliss, the individual is primed and ready to obey any command of said being whether it is to "kill them all and let God sort them out," as was the general rule of the Inquisition, or "insult everyone who doesn't believe that Di and Dodi were sacrificed by reptilian royals."
Recently a parody of door-to-door evangelizing was sent around the Internet. It was so exceedingly irreverent that it probably was too shocking for many people to understand how truly enlightening it was. For those who may not have seen it, I am going to include it here because it makes very important points that need to be emphasized:
John: "Hi! I'm John, and this is Mary."
Mary: "Hi! We're here to invite you to come kiss Hank's ass with us."
Me: "Pardon me?! What are you talking about? Who's Hank, and why would I want to kiss His ass?"
John: "If you kiss Hank's ass, He'll give you a million dollars; and if you don't, He'll kick the sh*t out of you."
Me: "What? Is this some sort of bizarre mob shakedown?"
John: "Hank is a billionaire philanthropist. Hank built this town. Hank owns this town. He can do whatever he wants, and what He wants is to give you a million dollars, but He can't until you kiss his ass."
Me: "That doesn't make any sense. Why …"
Mary: "Who are you to question Hank's gift? Don't you want a million dollars? Isn't it worth a little kiss on the ass?"
Me: "Well maybe, if it's legit, but …"
John: "Then come kiss Hank's ass with us."
Me: "Do you kiss Hank's ass often?"
Mary: "Oh yes, all the time …"
Me: "And has He given you a million dollars?"
John: "Well no. You don't actually get the money until you leave town."
Me: "So why don't you just leave town now?"
Mary: "You can't leave until Hank tells you to, or you don't get the money, and He kicks the sh*t out of you."
Me: "Do you know anyone who kissed Hank's ass, left town, and got the million dollars?"
John: "My mother kissed Hank's ass for years. She left town last year, and I'm sure she got the money."
Me: "Haven't you talked to her since then?"
John: "Of course not, Hank doesn't allow it."
Me: "So what makes you think He'll actually give you the money if you've never talked to anyone who got the money?"
Mary: "Well, he gives you a little bit before you leave. Maybe you'll get a raise, maybe you'll win a small lotto, maybe you'll just find a twenty-dollar bill on the street."
Me: "What's that got to do with Hank?"
John: "Hank has certain 'connections.' "
Me: "I'm sorry, but this sounds like some sort of bizarre con game."
John: "But it's a million dollars, can you really take the chance? And remember, if you don't kiss Hank's ass He'll kick the sh*t of you."
Me: "Maybe if I could see Hank, talk to Him, get the details straight from him …"
Mary: "No one sees Hank, no one talks to Hank."
Me: "Then how do you kiss His ass?"
John: "Sometimes we just blow Him a kiss, and think of His ass. Other times we kiss Karl's ass, and he passes it on."
Me: "Who's Karl?"
Mary: "A friend of ours. He's the one who taught us all about kissing Hank's ass. All we had to do was take him out to dinner a few times."
Me: "And you just took his word for it when he said there was a Hank, that Hank wanted you to kiss His ass, and that Hank would reward you?"
John: "Oh no! Karl has a letter he got from Hank years ago explaining the whole thing. Here's a copy; see for yourself."
From the desk of Karl
1) Kiss Hank's ass and He'll give you a million dollars when you leave town.
2) Use alcohol in moderation.
3) Kick the sh*t out of people who aren't like you.
4) Eat right.
5) Hank dictated this list Himself.
6) The moon is made of green cheese.
7) Everything Hank says is right.
8) Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.
9) Don't use alcohol.
10) Eat your wieners on buns, no condiments.
11) Kiss Hank's ass or He'll kick the sh*t out of you.
Me: "This appears to be written on Karl's letterhead."
Mary: "Hank didn't have any paper."
Me: "I have a hunch that if we checked we'd find this is Karl's handwriting."
John: "Of course, Hank dictated it."
Me: "I thought you said no one gets to see Hank?"
Mary: "Not now, but years ago He would talk to some people."
Me: "I thought you said He was a philanthropist. What sort of philanthropist kicks the sh*t out of people just because they're different?"
Mary: "It's what Hank wants, and Hank's always right."
Me: "How do you figure that?"
Mary: "Item 7 says 'Everything Hank says is right.' That's good enough for me!"
Me: "Maybe your friend Karl just made the whole thing up."
John: "No way! Item 5 says 'Hank dictated this list himself.' Besides, item 2 says 'Use alcohol in moderation,' Item 4 says 'Eat right,' and item 8 says 'Wash your hands after going to the bathroom.' Everyone knows those things are right, so the rest must be true, too."
Me: "But 9 says 'Don't use alcohol,' which doesn't quite go with item 2, and 6 says 'The moon is made of green cheese,' which is just plain wrong."
John: "There's no contradiction between 9 and 2, 9 just clarifies 2. As far as 6 goes, you've never been to the moon, so you can't say for sure."
Me: "Scientists have pretty firmly established that the moon is made of rock …"
Mary: "But they don't know if the rock came from the Earth, or from out of space, so it could just as easily be green cheese."
Me: "I'm not really an expert, but I think the theory that the Moon was somehow 'captured' by the Earth has been discounted. Besides, not knowing where the rock came from doesn't make it cheese."
John: "Ha! You just admitted that scientists make mistakes, but we know Hank is always right!"
Me: "We do?"
Mary: "Of course we do, Item 5 says so."
Me: "You're saying Hank's always right because the list says so, the list is right because Hank dictated it, and we know that Hank dictated it because the list says so. That's circular logic, no different than saying, 'Hank's right because He says He's right.' "
John: "Now you're getting it! It's so rewarding to see someone come around to Hank's way of thinking."
Me: "But … oh, never mind. What's the deal with wieners?"
Mary: She blushes.
John: "Wieners, in buns, no condiments. It's Hank's way. Anything else is wrong."
Me: "What if I don't have a bun?"
John: "No bun, no wiener. A wiener without a bun is wrong."
Me: "No relish? No mustard?"
Mary: She looks positively stricken.
John: (He's shouting.) "There's no need for such language! Condiments of any kind are wrong!"
Me: "So a big pile of sauerkraut with some wieners chopped up in it would be out of the question?"
Mary: Sticks her fingers in her ears. "I am not listening to this. La la la, la la, la la la."
John: "That's disgusting. Only some sort of evil deviant would eat that …"
Me: "It's good! I eat it all the time." (Mary faints.)
John: (He catches Mary.) "Well, if I'd known you were one of those I wouldn't have wasted my time. When Hank kicks the sh*t out of you I'll be there, counting my money and laughing. I'll kiss Hank's ass for you, you bunless, cut-wienered kraut-eater." With this, John dragged Mary to their waiting car, and sped off.
Did you get it? Did you really get it? And did you see how accurately it portrays the whole religious mindset? Most importantly, did you notice how good rules can be posited for the express purpose of establishing faith in rules that are not only lies, but are actually detrimental to growth and development? And did you notice how cleverly this little skit actually captured the dynamic of the true believer?
More than that, the totally illogical and nonsensical dynamic of "believe this or you will be damned, punished or otherwise left out of some exclusive club" is the essence of STS stalking wherein confusion and cross-purpose prevents a clear perception on the part of the stalkees. What is the designed objective of this stalking? It is twofold.
First, the effect of stalking is sort of like stampeding a herd of cattle so that they run into a dead-end canyon or corral and have no way out. Bit by bit, they are consolidated into an us-against-them mode. Even though, on the surface, it may seem that this mode is positive or STO (i.e. save the world because it is wrong or flawed, or blighted with original sin) the very fact that it is formed in the dominator mode of perceiving salvation outside, or from some other source, no matter how it is presented, means that it can more easily be taken over body, mind and soul at a level that is unseen and unseeable.
Many people believe they are playing out the basic antagonism and self-protection roles of Satan vs. God. They believe that sending love and light to those "in need" is appropriate, without realizing that this activity is predicated upon a deep belief that there is something wrong, in error, in rebellion, and thus becomes again us vs. them.
The primary objective of negative stalking is to persuade the free choice of the targeted consciousness to align with negative higher-density existence, through strongly influenced, but not robotic, behavior patterns. It doesn't matter that the believer thinks he is following the teachings of Jesus, Brahma or Allah. If he is following the STS agenda, no matter how he was deceived to believe it is right, it is still the STS agenda, and by virtue of being a true believer, he can, at any time, be co-opted to the fourth density STS hierarchy by the appearance of an "angelic" being, or the receiving of a "benevolent message, prophecy, or healing." It is only with knowledge of these conditions that anyone has any hope of being able to see through the ploys and the programs.
The second objective of stalking is to create a belief in defensive measures that are totally and completely ineffective. Then, the same beings that advise us to pray, to rebuke Satan, to just say no to abductions, take great pains to make sure that these techniques seem to work. The result is that more and more people will be deluded into thinking that they are actually protected by silly rituals and prayers such as "surrounding themselves with light" and other nonsense. Don't be fooled. Reptoids are not demons. They are not etheric minions of Satan. They are variably physical, techno-wizards and they use our own energy to interact with us. Only knowing how to make that energy unavailable to them will provide any protection at all.
Now, yes, we know that human beings — all human beings — have reptilian genetics, and bird genetics and just the whole gamut. But by disinforming people about the true nature of the fourth density STS hierarchy and state of existence, as such people as Arizona Wilder and others do; by making humans the "physical" or "paraphysical" Reptoids, the attention is drawn away from the actual Control System of beings of hyperdimensional, variable physical capability.
In a funny, twisted way, there is some truth there. Reptoid beings can shapeshift into human appearing beings. The problem is, according to the understanding of hyperdimensional existence, they have some difficulty doing this and holding the frequency, so that even when they do it, it is a very bad imitation. Witness Men-In-Black cases. And, of course, human beings can be easily controlled by fourth density beings through their genetics, their minds, their chemistry, and by setting up dramas in which other people who may or may not be active agents of the STS hierarchy act as vectors of thinking and activity.
So, do you see the inversion in the Arizona Wilder story? That ordinary human beings can be Reptoids and we would just never know it. This amounts to loading the truth train with nuclear speed capabilities to run it off the track! Take a little grain of truth, exaggerate it all out of proportion, twist it, and toss it out there to outrage the sensibilities of the rational thinkers, and to dupe the non-critical thinker into believing a scenario that prepares him to be further manipulated. If, in the end, the whole story is discredited through associated ideas that can be proven false, a very effective screen has been dropped over the true activities of fourth density negative beings. Meanwhile, everyone is looking in the direction of something that is merely a distraction … the oldest game in the world — the shell game of reality.
Just a few days after I had written the above referenced message to the E-group, an event transpired to confirm it. There is a curious thing that I would like to note here in passing: It seems that the STS mode of manipulation includes synchronous events and or "signs and wonders" before a choice is made to do something, which, in fact, weight the choice. STO seems to refrain altogether from any kind of overt contact or demonstration, leaving the will entirely free. But then, there is always the little confirmations after the choice has been made and the action initiated.
In this case, as I was reading through my e-mail, I came across a response to our David Icke fan on the E-group, with a link to a website that was purported to expose the evil intentions of the Masons via the Denver Airport murals. What caught my eye was the remark that a particular mural had been removed. So, I clicked on the URL to have a look. The e-mail I wrote immediately after will explain:
From: "Laura Knight-Jadczyk"
Date sent: Sat, 28 Oct. 2000 16:38:18 -0400
Subject: DENVER MURALS DETAILED ANALYSIS
1st member wrote:
make sure to click on "next image" at the bottom for a Detailed Analysis of every portrait… http://www.50megs.com/bridgeoflove/simonvol10/den.html
2nd member wrote in response:
You are a little behind the times. I agree that this mural is *very* disturbing; however, it was also removed a year ago.
I responded to the exchange as follows:
It made me curious about what mural would have been removed, so I went and had a look at the picture, which, as it happens, was never one of the "Denver Murals." It is Poussin's painting entitled "Winter," and we do have it on our Denver Airport page and it is explained in the text that it is Poussin's painting …
Now, why would someone else have a picture of Poussin's painting included as a "Denver Mural" if they had not mistakenly thought it was a Denver Mural because it was on a page of pictures of the Denver Murals, only they simply did not bother to read the text telling that it was not one of the murals????
I think I will have a look at the other images on this site … the originals from our pages are from photos taken by a close friend and member of our group at our request, and I know there are certain little glitches in her photographic technique and a couple of angles and extra features in the pictures when she did not get the picture framed properly. How much you want to bet that the pictures from this other site are stolen from ours??? (taking odds …)
As it turned out, sure enough, the pictures were stolen from our site without credit given. Ark came in to have a look at it since he had been the one who did the scans and made the catalogue. So, he followed up my post with one of his own:
Laura already wrote about it a while ago, but let me try to make it completely clear. This is a very good example of how disinformation connects and works." Our former-list member (who is now unsubscribed) wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 25 Oct. 2000
make sure to click on "next image" at the bottom for a Detailed Analysis of every portrait.. http://www.50megs.com/bridgeoflove/simonvol10/den.html
Ark here: When you go there — what do you see? You see OUR pictures. I mean, really ours, because they were taken by a friend of ours on her trip to Denver, then scanned and put on our web site. We have the original photographs.
OK, so David Icke's friends "borrowed" our material without quoting the source. But that is not all. WE have a little "Catalogue" page, which I did myself: Denver_cat.htm
On this page, together with scans of the Denver murals photos, I put an image of a famous painting, "Winter" by Poussin, because Cassiopaeans suggested that there is a hidden relation: Denver.htm
So, what did our David Icke associate do: he "borrows" also the Poussin painting (again without quoting Cassiopaean web site), but he states that this is from pictures taken at Denver!
That is how Lizzies work: least effort.
Clearly sooner or later someone will discover that his "Winter" is NOT from Denver, but an old painting. What will happen? All the story about mind control and about Denver murals will become suspect. Origin of all of that will be forgotten. Laws of sandwiching truth between lies will be at work. Baby will be tossed out with the bath water. The Denver Airport issue will be ignored because lies are connected with it.
Of course, we could start making noise about "copyrights" and about nonsensical interpretations. But is it worthwhile? Is it not better to write a web page explaining on a live example how disinformation works?
Another example is the contrail issue. The group here talked about it quite a bit and the idea being promulgated that contrails are being used to commit genocide on the human race. Well, think about that for a moment. It would sure be a lot easier to commit genocide with land-based vectors — a lot more economical and easier to hide than making such a big display of contrails and then having people connect them with sickness. That does not compute logically.
Not only that, if such things were being done from aircraft as is suggested, it is no problem at all to do it without leaving a trace: invisible vapors dispensed from low flying craft rather than clearly obvious, long-lasting contrails that get everyone excited and worked up in hysterical formation of theories and terror. So, think about that for a moment. Do you suppose that the result is the intended effect? Terror and hysterical conspiracy theories? What will happen next when these theories are exposed as nonsense, which is very likely?
Meanwhile, just what are we being distracted from observing by paying so much attention to something that is so blatant that we would have to think those boys in Black Ops were really having a bad day to come up with something so obvious? All anyone has to do is read Machiavelli to understand some of the tricks and machinations of the Control System and to see clearly that what is apparent is only the distraction from what is really being done "behind the curtain."
Well, meanwhile, the buildup continues. Just today, November 1st, 2000, I received the following so-called "proof" of the genocidal purpose of the "chemtrails", written by a member of the "robots-rebellion" discussion group. Before I discuss the piece, I think it's necessary to include a short discussion on this whole "chemtrail" issue, as it's currently getting a lot of play among alternative news communities and dissenters.
A few things that should be considered when talking about so-called "chemtrails". Obviously, there is some "spraying" that goes on and it's not for the benefit of humanity. I've heard a few stories from people about very low-flying planes dispersing stuff that lands and makes people sick. Spraying that actually affects a designated area beneath the sprayer (the plane in question) must be at a fairly low altitude otherwise what is sprayed will not come down on the area beneath the spraying. This is due to the fact that our atmosphere has a number of layers and each layer has its own temperature, wind speed and direction. Very often, things in one layer take a very long time and distance to mix or mingle with other layers, if they mix at all. Usually, the wind speeds in the upper layers are such that anything deposited there might only penetrate to lower weather layers, after many thousands of miles of travel. It's a very nonlinear situation and highly unpredictable. So, chemical spraying that you can see above in the sky, which then falls on the area below it, must be low altitude spraying.
Therefore, trails that are very high in the sky that have no hope of interacting with the ground below them cannot properly be called "chemtrails" except, perhaps, if a chemical is being sprayed that is supposed to affect the weather (and even that is done fairly low). For example, "cloud seeding" is believed to promote condensation by dispersing dry ice crystals or silver iodide into the atmosphere using airplanes and ground-based stations. It is done to clouds, but doesn't create them. Plus, it, too, must be done at a fairly low altitude in order for the effects to affect the area below the activity. Otherwise, the higher wind speeds in the upper layers will carry the silver iodide away, disperse it, and the desired effect will not be had.
Small private planes fly at a maximum of 12,000 feet, while passenger airliners fly from 25,000 to 45,000 feet (military and specialty planes can fly much higher, up to several hundred thousand feet). This is significant because cirrus clouds (with thin, wispy strands and tufts) form above 26,000 feet, at which altitude aircraft exhaust can freeze, forming visible trails and thus turning into cirrus clouds. High-altitude convection and turbulence can give these clouds particular appearances (e.g., "fall streaks", cirrocumulus and cirrus uncinus clouds) and all-together cirrus clouds have a net heating effect on the Earth. Cirrus clouds can be a sign of upper air disturbance and future stormy weather or thunderstorm remnants. Additionally, they tend to develop after heavy air traffic.
Now, what is wrong with the picture presented above? The altitude of cirrus clouds is in the stratosphere, which has atmospheric conditions that allow the formation of jets flying at such heights. Yet many jetliners that crisscross the skies with trails are obviously flying much lower than the altitude designated for cirrus clouds. For example, you can search Youtube for a video called "clandestine cloud seeding at low altitude which shows a plane forming a contrail within the troposphere. This is not cloud seeding. It is evidence that the atmosphere layer that the plane is flying through is very cold. Now, whether that is a problem or not depends on where and what time of year the video was made. In some cases, cold air that low would not be out of season, so to say.
Yet the trails left by these low-flying aircraft act like cirrus clouds used to act at much higher altitudes. The most logical (and scariest) conclusion: the cold layer of the upper atmosphere has gotten lower and probably thicker and therefore, more airplanes flying at lower altitudes are forming contrails in that icy air which used to be the much higher domain of cirrus clouds.
Again, if you understand about the layers of the atmosphere, temperatures, winds, then you will realize that what is happening is not spraying of the human population or even intentional weather manipulation, it is the evidence that our planetary atmosphere has changed dramatically in the past twenty years or so (which, incidentally, is when I began noticing the changes in cloud formation).
Also notice that the trails left by planes at much lower altitudes generally dissipate quickly. What is bad news is that they leave any trail at all at those altitudes! And knowing how layers that form cirrus clouds function from the above, you can pretty well understand that they are not spraying stuff on the ground below. But certainly, there can be the natural formation of cirrus clouds by plane exhaust or fuel dumping and low level spraying of "stuff" at the same time. I would suggest that such cases are cover-ups the same way the endless "gray alien abductions" are a cover-up for what aliens are really doing on this planet.
Do these activities have any effect on the weather? Undoubtedly they do, which is the net effect of heating of the atmosphere by cirrus clouds, but that is not intentional. What seems to be happening is that the area of weather phenomena — the troposphere — seems to have been compressed by an expanding (or dropping) stratosphere and the stratosphere itself seems to have changed its characteristics. This is very concerning! These are signs and symptoms that something very unusual is going on in our cosmic neighborhood, because weather changes are taking place on other planets, too. I can guarantee you that they aren't doing "chemtrails" on Mars or Jupiter or Saturn.
Also, if you study the work of James McCanney, you will come to the understanding that the five layers of the Earth's atmosphere are also layers of alternating electrical charge. This is important. McCanney also discusses how these electric flows around and on the Earth interact with the sun to create our weather and climate. Piers Corbyn is becoming famous for utilizing similar principles for far more accurate weather predictions than the mainstream climatologists are able to work up. The fact that Corbyn can predict the weather as accurately as he does argues against the "chemtrails" being a weather modification activity. His method is concerned with solar activity, not so-called "chemtrails".
Regarding these layers of electromagnetism surrounding the Earth, in 1958 some things were done that may very well have a strong bearing on the conditions of our planet in the present day. I would like for you to think about this in respect of climate change, so-called "chemtrails" and HAARP.
Between August and September of 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the earth's surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this "the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken." It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it. This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole. This was reported only much later, on August 13-20th of 1961 in Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). The report said that the US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the International Union of Astronomers.
On July 9th, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: "one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height". (K.H.A., 29 June 1962). These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. "In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the earth's magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles". (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). … This was the experiment which called forth the strong protest of the Queen's Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK.
… "On the 19th of July … NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9th, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt" (K.H.A. 5 August 1962). …
"… Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the earth]." Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high-altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state. According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to destabilize at their normal levels." 3
Additionally, during the 1980s, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45-meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).
Keep in mind now that, while they are out there blowing up our atmosphere, they want to blame Global Warming on the masses of regular people! I think that I have presented more than sufficient food for thought on the topic of so-called "chemtrails" to suggest that, yes, there is something really wicked going on, but it ain't what you think. In fact, it's worse.
Now, with that said, the "robots-rebellion" group member wrote:
So you haven't yet figured out the airborne conditioning-agent release program that is being operated by the government. I'll give you some hints, but first I'll give you a little information about myself. I'm a retired government scientist with an advanced degree in one of the health-related disciplines. I do not use my real name for fear of retaliation, either against me, or against members of my family. I always try to route my e-mail communications so that they appear to come from another source, usually from one somewhere within the government. Sometimes I use the Internet resources of the public library — whatever it takes to hide my true identity and confuse those who don't want the sort of information I possess to fall into the public's hands. I have a small circle of friends who are, or were, in key positions within our military and several government agencies. These are not the very top level personnel, but mid to upper mid-level people, scientists and analysts, who are in positions where they can see the day-to-day activities of what's going on, who are charged with implementing the details, but who are never quite privy to the schemes behind the work they do. Each of my contacts has been able to supply me with a portion of the puzzle, but separately, none of them understands the whole story.
Right away we have a problem because the "source" does not identify himself except to say that he uses all kinds of methods to prevent anyone from knowing who he is. So, basically, we come down to having to take his word for everything he is saying. And, he speaks so calmly and rationally, too! He sure must be a "dinkum" guy! And how courageous he is to even speak under such threat! Aren't we lucky to be hearing all he has to say?
This whole paragraph is so blatantly loaded with psychological "triggers" designed to induce confidence that it actually screams, "Methinks he protests too much!" But, let's go on here:
I'll tell you what I've pieced together so far. But I have to admit that this information frightens me because there is no place I can go with it. What am I supposed to do — write my congressman? I believe that would be like signing my own death warrant.
Oh, wowie zowie! He's a guy just like the rest of us! We are scared and we feel helpless too! And again, we see how brave he is to even whisper the great revelation he is going to give us!
This whole chemtrail issue is related to the plan for decreasing the world population to around 450-500 million — and starting with the US first. Why? The people of the US are the only ones with even the remotest chance of stopping this. That is, if they knew about it. That's why the US has to be the first to go.
Wait a minute here! He says that the people of the good ol' U.S. of A. (stand up and salute, boy!) are the ones who have to go first because they (yer durn tootin' pilgrim!) are the only ones who could stop this dire and dreadful plot if they knew about it! Let's just gloss right over the fact that we are talking about an atmospheric ocean of deadly poison blazoned across the sky! So, the homies here in the land of golden grain and purple mountains have to be gotten rid of first, in great secrecy so they won't catch on! Ooooh! I see it now! The chemtrails are just a distraction… no? They are the real thing? But, I don't understand! I thought it was supposed to be a secret! Well, never mind…
You have to understand that the world's elite covet the US for its geographic diversity — and they would love to return this country to its condition as it existed prior to Columbus setting foot here, but without the Native Americans this time of course.
Now that is about the lamest crock of nonsense I ever heard! You boys in Black Ops better go back to school! You are suggesting that power and greed aren't the motivators they used to be!? And at the same time, you are pulling out the "sacred Native American" ploy!
You may have already heard how several national parks have been designated as world biospheres — that's the plan for all of North America, a giant nature park and playground that will be devoid of annoying human beings (that would be us).
Never mind the fact that those "annoying human beings" have been and are the source of labor, wealth, and power for millennia, and it would be a lot easier to reduce the population with some well-placed anti-fertility agents in the water or the soda pop drunk by practically every man, woman and child in the country! Not only that, it would be a lot cleaner and neater because you wouldn't have all those icky dead bodies to burn or bury!
And the people actually involved in doing the spraying, as well as those who will take part in the rest of the plans, are being duped into believing they will be spared, that is, permitted to live and remain on this continent as administrators and caretakers of this vast nature preserve.
And do you think that we are stupid enough to buy into this story, knowing that, if such a thing were actually being done, even those who are purported to be doing it at the deepest levels could have no guarantee of escaping the effects of it? Are they living in bunkers and going around wearing gas masks? For months and years? Why would they do that when there are so many other easier ways of accomplishing genocide if that was what they really wanted? Oh, I know! They have vaccines. That's why they are so confident that only the designated ones will succumb. Stupid me! Never mind that vaccines have been found to be deplorably ineffective and the chances of them not working are about the same as the chances that you will get the disease from the vaccine!
I understand that about 150 to 200 thousand people are projected as necessary for maintenance purposes. But it's likely these people will not be Americans. Those in charge wouldn't want to risk the possibility of some sort of revolt, so the workers will probably be brought in from Europe and Asia.
Do you hear that, my fellow Amurrikins? Furriners in our land! Them's fightin' words, boy! (Another psychological ploy.)
There are rumors floating about the Internet that the chemtrails are part of some sort of secret program the government is doing to protect the US from future biological attacks. Nothing could be further from the truth. The plan is to sensitize, or condition, the US population to being wiped out by influenza A. Over the past few years, people have been encouraged to get flu shots to protect them against the generally non-lethal strains that circulate through the population during flu season. Each year the US government has guessed which strains were most likely to spread. They seem to always guess right — don't they?
This flu season, the government protected people with a trivalent vaccine that included the A/Beijing/262/95-like (H1N1) and the A/Sydney/5/97-like (H3N2). It also contained the B/Beijing/184/93-like hemagglutinin antigens. For those not familiar with virology, the H and N refer to proteins on the outside of the virus, the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase, which are responsible for the virus attaching to, and then invading, a host cell. The public has been quite pleased with the success of the vaccines offered so far. But that will change in the future.
Now, curiously, I think our guy may be onto something. As he says, the rumor about "protecting the U.S. from future biological attacks" is just that, nonsense. But then he introduces an idea that could get us somewhere. Now just suppose, for the sake of argument, that a hellacious flu strain does erupt? And what if people who have some idea that this is related to contrail activity become hysterical and say "SEE?! We told you!" And further, what if these people begin to form groups to spread the rumor, to protest, or otherwise act in a way that could be interpreted as a "threat to the security of the peace" of the U.S.A? What a perfect opportunity to slam controls on the Internet, freedom of speech and assembly, and any of a number of other sanctions against those who might be termed insurrectionists. Are we beginning to smell a setup here?
Researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (or USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick in Fredrick, MD have reconstructed and modified the H1N1 Spanish Flu virus, making it far more deadly than it ever was back when it was responsible for the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed over 20 million worldwide and over 500,000 here in the US. Consider that it could have killed many more, but back then, people couldn't hop on a jet and travel from New York to LA in five hours. Now, our ability to travel will increase the spread and will be our downfall.
The flu vaccines contain killed virus and protect the body well against challenge by that particular strain, but work poorly against other strains not included in the inoculation. At some point, the vaccine stockpile will include the more lethal modification of the 1918 H1N1 in its live form. Most people receiving this vaccine will simply be renewing their annual flu shot, and the vaccine will still include the inactivated version of the more benign form of H1N1 (as was included in this year's vaccine). The presence of the milder strain in the inoculum will slow down the progression of the more lethal H1N1 form, so people will become sick more slowly — but they will still eventually die. It will just take a few weeks longer. In the meantime, they will be carriers for the lethal form of the virus, passing it on to everyone with whom they make contact. And as people hear that others are dropping dead from the flu, they will flock to get their own vaccination. And the entire population will be more receptive to infection because their lungs will have been preconditioned to guarantee it.
Now wait a minute here! I thought we were talking about "chemtrails?" What's this nonsense about spreading the flu via person-to-person contact? Are we talking out of both sides of our mouth now?
If you will remember back to 1968 and '69, the Hong Kong flu, which was influenza A type H3N2, killed over 30,000 people in the US alone. That was a fortuitous learning event for some because it taught them that the flu could still conceivably be used to wipe out a population. But at the same time, it pointed out the need to precondition the populace so that those who might normally be resistant could be rendered susceptible.
Hence the development of the vaccine program and the aerial spraying procedures to condition the population. The purpose of the chemicals in the chemtrails is to help the viral envelope fuse with lung cells, permitting easier penetration and infection.
This is nonsense. The potential fatalities from a "tweaked" virus would not even need a "conditioning agent." I think our guy better read up on his recombinant DNA. Once again, we have serious logical inconsistency.
But what about those few individuals who don't succumb to the flu? Probability alone demands that there will be some who survive — pockets of the population that are either not reached or somehow (and this is less likely) are resistant to the lethal H1N1 strain. At this point you must also remember that our military personnel have been immunized against a variety of pathogens, including the anthrax bacillus. For those geographically isolated areas where the flu doesn't do its job, it's a fairly simple matter to lay down anthrax spores and then send in what's left of the military to take care of anyone still breathing. The anthrax spraying will probably come under the guise of a flu protection program to save those still alive after the epidemic.
Well, the story is getting so wild and absurd that my willingness to exert the energy to comment further has just succumbed to extreme boredom. Here's the wrap-up. I think you can figure it out if you can keep from falling on the floor laughing.
And the military, having been exposed to civilians with the flu, will eagerly await their own flu shots. I should emphasize that this is a last resort scenario. Those orchestrating the plan will not want to use anthrax until all other possibilities are exhausted — this because of the long-term viability of anthrax spores. To scatter them over the countryside would mean the area would be dangerous for use by humans, at least those not vaccinated against the bacteria. And think about this for a moment. Why do you suppose agencies like Fish and Wildlife are so eager to reintroduce wolves and other species into areas of the country that haven't seen these animals for generations? It's all part of the plan to restore this land to what the elite envision as its early paradise-like state, with wild animals freely roaming the uninhabited plains and forests. Granted, it will take some time to clean up the place and to maybe destroy a lot of small towns that might otherwise be considered a blight on the landscape. But for the global elite it will be a small price for us to pay for their enjoyment.
Did we forget anything? Oh, yes! Egypt Air Flight 990! Another dreaded Masonic conspiracy. And, right here, direct from the casino show palace in Las Vegas, we have that paragon of scientific virtue, Richard Hoagland and his Enterprise Mission! Let's make Star Trek REAL!
I think we all need to remember that in the late summer, early fall of last year, Mr. Hoagland and his group were predicting an imminent cometary impact based on "inside information" from a "reliable source." We never even thought it was worth exerting our energy to ask the Cassiopaeans, but they brought it up themselves when we were asking about the prospects of a Y2K disaster (another hysteria of the very kind we are discussing):
Q: Next question, and I think this one will be quick: can you make any comments on the likelihood of this Y2K situation getting out of hand and bringing on the "New World Order" or causing the institution of Martial Law, or causing people to need to store food, guns, ammunition and take all their money out of the bank? There is an AWFUL lot of hysteria out there about this…
A: Ask them what happened on November 7th.
Q: Oh, you mean the big Hoagland prediction that something was going to strike the earth… supposedly revealed to him by a "confidential informant" who somehow proved his "reliability," by having "inside information" and so forth. In other words, another spate of disinformation?
A: Yup!
We read at Richard Hoagland's web site the following about Egypt Air Flight 990:
The first problem we had with the apparent crash of this flight was in the numbers. Many of our regular readers wrote to us and pointed out the excessive number of "19.5" and "33" coincidences related to this flight. According to an Egypt Air official, Chairman of the Board, Eng. Mohammed Fahim Rayan, live on CNN, the plane spent "nineteen and a half hours" in the United States on this particular series of flights. In fact the exact time (according to the New York Port Authority timeline) was specifically 19 hours and 47 minutes (!), the so-called "tetrahedral value" (see below) we have cited on so many occasions. The flight number 990 is of course divisible by three as 330, or 330 X 3 (33-3 anybody?) Add to that the fact that according to the Pentagon there were 33 Egyptian military officers on board, the plane was at 33,000 feet when it began its horrendous crash dive (down to just over 16,700 feet when transponder contact was finally lost), it had picked up 33 passengers in Los Angeles, it disappeared exactly 33 minutes after take off, and it had just over 33,000 flight hours — and we of course were very interested. [Note: all of these numbers have been reported, but not necessarily confirmed at this time].
Now, note the last line above, a disclaimer. "All of these numbers have been reported, but not necessarily confirmed at this time."
Does it stop them from speculating and starting rumors? Does it produce in them a desire to check those "reported numbers" out before such speculation? Do they even bother to put a large notice at the top of the article stating that it is only speculation?
Nope. And the correspondent on the Cassiopaea e-group forwarded this website as proof that the crash of Egypt Air Flight 990 was a Masonic Sacrifice, and that the Cassiopaeans and yours truly were "protecting" the Masons!
Well, we have wandered very far afield, and now it is time to have some more fun! So, let's get back to our narrative.
A year had gone by since the discussion about the Quorum and I was still buried in alchemy and secret societies, trying to figure out just what the central issue of all of these mysterious allusions could be. The dream of getting married had come on the exact day that I actually would get married some three years later, though I did not yet know this. The following week, with RC present again, I decided to pursue the Scottish Question.
Q: (L) OK, a year ago we talked about the Quorum and I did not understand. Now, what I would like to know is, is the understanding I have acquired in the past two weeks regarding this group … [I was referring to the possibility of a real human conspiracy lasting for hundreds, or thousands of years, which would be possible with the use of David Hudson's Monoatomic Gold, or something similar. I had begun to think that, not only was it possible for purported alien beings to have space/time manipulation abilities, but that maybe some humans did as well. This certainly made some conspiracy theories a lot more plausible.]
A: You need some review. Not just about the "Quorum," but also about many important subjects, and tonight, we intend to have some free-flowing energy, if you don't mind. In other words, we may supersede questions, when appropriate. However, it may be necessary for you to begin the process by asking a question.
Q: (L) OK, square one: Is the Quorum composed of semi-humans who have been alchemists, who are presently in possession of a substance called "the elixir of life" and which David Hudson calls "monoatomic gold?"
A: And much, much more! Monoatomic gold is but one minor issue here. Why get lead astray by focusing upon it solely? It would be akin to focusing on the fact that "Batman" can fly! Is that the only important thing that "Batman" does in the story? Is it?
Q: (L) Of course not! (RC) Batman fights crime!
A: What we mean is that alchemy is but one minor piece of the puzzle.
Q: (L) OK, I understand. But, understanding the alchemical connection, and its potential for extending life and opening certain abilities, makes it more feasible to think of a group that has been present steadily and consistently for many thousands of years on earth.
A: They are not the only ones! Let us go to the root. Who, or what made you?
Q: (RC) The Creator. (L) Prime Creator.
A: How? And who is Prime Creator?
Q: (L) Everything, I guess.
A: You are "Prime Creator."
Q: (RC) We are creators, but we aren't the Prime Creator …
A: Prime Creator Manifests in you.
Q: (L) OK, so at the root is Prime Creator.
A: But… who was secondary?
Q: (RC) The Sons of God? The Elohim?
A: Who is that? Remember, your various legends are "seen through a veil." Here comes a shocker for you … one day, in fourth density, it will be your descendants' mission to carry on the tradition and assignment of seeding the third density universe, once you have the adequate knowledge!!! In this part of your third and fourth density universe, specifically your "galaxy" it is the region known as Orion that is the one and only indigenous home of human type beings … reflect on this! Indigenous home base, not sole locator. What you are most in need of review of is the accurate profile of "alien" data.
Q: (RC) I thought that humans originated in Lyra and then a war broke out there and they ended up in Orion.
A: Lyra is not inhabited. There have been homes in all places, but some were/are transitory, and some are not. Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is the absolutely accurate profile of Orion to follow: This is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy! This is a region that extends across third and fourth density space for a distance as vast as the distance between your locator and it. There are 3,444 inhabited "worlds" in this region. Some are planets as you know them. Some are artificially constructed planetoids. Some are floating space barges. And some are "satellites." There are primary homes, traveling stations and incubator laboratories all in second, third and fourth densities. There are overseer zones in fifth and sixth densities. Approximately one half is STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many other colonies, located elsewhere, this is called, in translation, Orion Federation. Orions created Grays in 5 varieties, as cybergenetic beings, and installed them on Zeta Reticuli 1, 2, 3, and 4, as well as on 2 planets orbiting Barnard's Star. The Reptilians also inhabit 6 planets in the Orion region in fourth density, and are owned by the Orion STS as slaves, and, in some cases, pets!!! The name "Orion" is the actual native name, and was brought to earth directly. Study the legend of the "god" of Orion for parallels.
I still was not getting where I wanted to go with the Scottish Question. The issue of just who was on first, and who was really trying to take over the world as promulgated by the many conspiracy theories was uppermost in my mind. One of the main tenets of these theories is that it is a Jewish conspiracy. From almost the very beginning, the Jews were seen as the enemy. Even though they were the progenitors of Christianity. It seems that the Christian antipathy was almost an Oedipal impulse to kill the father. I had a deep feeling that there was an important clue here, and that it did, indeed, relate to the Scottish Question.
Q: (L) Are the Orion STS the infamous redheaded Nordic aliens?
A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
Q: (L) OK, if it started with the Nordic types, and that is where the other humanoid combinations came from, what genetic combinations were used for human beings? Black people, for instance, since they are so unlike Nordics?
A: The Nordic genes were mixed with the gene pool already available on Earth, known as Neanderthal.
Q: (L) What was the genetic combination used to obtain the Oriental races?
A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as "Lemuria," and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic ray environment then existent on earth.
Q: (L) OK, what about the Semitic and Mediterranean peoples?
A: Each time a new flock was "planted," it was engineered to be best suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only exception, as they had to be moved to earth in an emergency.
Q: (L) If races are engineered on earth to be best suited, what factors are being drawn from or considered regarding the Semitic race?
A: They are not engineered on earth, but in Orion lab as all others. They were "planted" in the Middle East.
Q: (L) What genetic type were the Atlanteans?
A: They were the same as the "Native Americans."
Q: (L) Why do some Native Americans believe they come from the Pleiades?
A: Where are the Pleiades?
Q: (L)Well, near Orion. (RC) Oh, OK. So, they are considering the Pleiades part of Orion. What about Sirius?
A: Sirius is confused as a locator because it appears in similar location in the sky in the northern hemisphere. The American Indians were confused in the translation because of similar-seeming location due to vantage point.
Q: (RC) Well, but Sirius is clearly Sirius! It's the brightest star in the sky … it's in all the legends! How could it be translated wrong? This is not clear! The star charts are very specific!
A: How have YOU translated YOUR legends wrong?
Q: (F) I think the point is that it is clear that we, in our present culture, are easily able to get things very wrong, even from the more recent times; so it is not a great consideration to think that the more ancient legends can also be distorted, embellished, and misrepresented.
A: Review what we said at the beginning of this session.
Q: (L) Did the Dogon come from Sirius?
A: All humanoid types originated in Orion region, there are and have been and will continue to be literally millions of colonies.
Q: (L) If a lot of the information that is being propagated these days is confusion or disinformation, what is the purpose of all this?
A: You answered yourself: Confusion and disinformation.
Q: (L) I have a theory that the truth, in any large degree, will not be known until just prior to some sort of transition …
A: You expect "truth" then?
Q: (RC) Absolutely! (L) Considering how things are from personal observation, this may be unrealistic …
A: All there is is lessons, no short cuts!
Q: (L) I want to get back on my question that you have not answered … I want to know who exactly, and why exactly, genetically engineered the Semitic people, and why there is such an adversarial attitude between them and the Celts and Aryans.
A: It is not just between the Jews and Celts, if you will take notice. Besides, it is the individual aural profile that counts and not groupings or classifications. But, to answer your question: there are many reasons both from on and off the planet.
Q: (L) Why was Hitler so determined, beyond all reason, even to his own self-destruction, to annihilate the Jews?
A: Many reasons and very complex. But, remember, while still a child, Hitler made a conscious choice to align himself with the "forces of darkness," in order to fulfill his desires for conquest and to unite the Germanic peoples. Henceforth, he was totally controlled, mind, body, and soul, by STS forces.
Q: (L) So, what were the purposes of the STS forces that were controlling Hitler causing him to desire to annihilate an entire group of people?
A: To create an adequate "breeding ground" for the reintroduction of the Nephalim, for the purpose of total control of the third density earth prior to elevation to fourth density, where such conquest is more difficult and less certain!
Q: (L) Do you mean "breeding ground" in the sense of genetic breeding?
A: Yes. Third density.
Q: (L) Did they accomplish this goal?
Q: (L) So, the creation of the Germanic Master Race was what they were going after, to create this breeding ground?
Q: (L) And, getting rid of the Jews was significant? Couldn't a Germanic master race be created without destroying another group?
Q: Why?
A: Because of fourth density prior encoding mission destiny profile.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: This means encoding to activate after elevation to fourth density, thus if not eliminated, negates Nephalim domination and absorption. Jews were prior encoded to carry out mission after conversion, though on individual basis. The Nazis did not exactly know why they were being driven to destroy them, because they were being controlled from fourth density STS. But, Hitler communicated directly with Lizards, and Orion STS, and was instructed on how to create the "master race."
Q: (L) And they were going to use this as their basis to introduce a new blend of the Nephilim … (RC) And the New World Order … their version of it. (L) Meanwhile, back to the Celts: obviously if the lizard beings thought that the Aryans/Celts were a good breeding ground for this Nephilim Master Race, then it must be because there is something genetically inherent in them that makes them desirable in this sense. Is this correct?
A: No, not in the sense you are thinking. We suggest that you rephrase this question after careful reflection on the implications.
This was startling information, to say the least. And, true to form, Prince Lizard Machiavelli was in evidence in this cunning effort to make the Jews a scapegoat, all the while manipulating them through their own religion to be and act the part of the scapegoat. Oh, what a tangled web we weave!
After RC and her husband went home, I went to bed in a strangely excited state. I knew it was going to be difficult to get to sleep, so I began to practice meditative breathing exercises to relax myself. Suddenly, I saw a face right before me. It was as clear and real as if someone had entered the room. It is difficult to convey to anyone how truly solid and three-dimensional this face was. I did not know this face, but it was a man with light hair and glowing eyes and he looked at me so kindly and lovingly before he vanished like a popping balloon. I was so startled that I nearly lost my breath altogether, but with firm effort, I resumed my meditation and soon went to sleep.
I was pretty driven in the following days to try and figure out what it was about the purified Aryan genetic strain that was so desirable to the Reptoid beings. I wanted to find the exact series of questions that would bring forth the information that I needed to understand this problem. I finally thought I had figured out a way to ask the question:
Q: (L) I have thought about my question from the last session and I want to ask it this way: You have said that Hitler received instructions from higher density beings about creating a master race. Why were the Aryan genetic types seen to be more desirable for creation of this Germanic master race?
A: Both similarity and ancestral link most unblemished from Orion third and fourth density stock.
Q: (L) So they were essentially trying to breed a group of people like themselves?
Q: (L) Well, I don't exactly understand why they had to put a lunatic like Hitler in charge of such a project and have him work at eliminating the undesirable strain …
A: Not point. How would you suggest creation?
Q: (L) OK. They were preparing this breeding ground, so to speak. Obviously this was for the introduction of some other genetic strain. What was this?
A: Nephalim.
Q: (L) Well, if the Nephilim are coming in ships, thirty-six million of them, why bother to create half-breeds here?
A: Yes, but having an "advance party" makes third density conquest much easier.
Q: (L) So, this master race was supposed to get everything ready …
Q: (L) OK, what is it about the Semitic genes that was considered to be so undesirable in the creation of this master race at the third density level, excluding the "prior encoding" for fourth density activation issue?
A: Would blemish genetic characteristics inclined to ruthlessness and domination.
Q: (L) So, you are saying that there is something, some genetic tendency or set of genes in the Semitic type that would counteract this?
Q: (L) But isn't the nature of a person determined by their soul and not the physical body?
A: Partially; remember, aural profile and karmic reference merges with physical structure.
Q: (L) So you are saying that particular genetic conditions are a physical reflection of a spiritual orientation? That the soul must match itself to the genetics, even if only in potential?
A: Yes, precisely.
Q: (L) So a person's potential for spiritual advancement or unfoldment is, to a great extent, dependent upon their genes?
A: Natural process marries with systematic construct when present.
Q: (L) Well, if that is the case, and the aliens are abducting people and altering their genes, can they not alter the genes so that higher-level souls simply cannot come in?
A: Not incarnative process, natural biological processes. Incarnative involves strictly ethereal at fifth density and lower, and thus is enveloped in triple cycle "veil" of transfer which is impregnable by any means. However, any and all first, second, third, and fourth [density] processes can be manipulated at will and to any degree if technology is sufficient.
At this point, the background for my questions that led to the 3-5 code references was nearly set up. There were secret societies everywhere you looked: Celts, Aryans, Jews, Masons, Illuminati and alchemists; Rosicrucians, Templars and the Quorum. What a mess! During a discussion of all these secret societies with my guest, RC, I was informed that I must read all of the Holy Blood, Holy Grail series of books if I ever expected to understand anything.
Now, at some point in the early part of 1992 I had read an article about the book Holy Blood, Holy Grail, and I did think that the hypothesis presented by the authors, i.e. that Jesus had been married to Mary Magdalene and had children, was certainly possible, but not sufficiently interesting to me to warrant pursuing that particular line of investigation.
To familiarize the reader who has not pursued such subjects with the basic hypothesis, let me just say that when Holy Blood, Holy Grail was published in 1982, it aroused a firestorm of controversy. The local St. Petersburg Times, Florida, published a review that quoted the Rt. Rev. Montefiore as saying: "Academically absurd … howler after howler."
This was balanced by a quote from one of the book's author's, Henry Lincoln saying: "Is it more plausible that a man should be married and have children, or that he should be born of a virgin, attended by choirs of angels, walk on water and rise from the grave?"
Excellent point, in my opinion.
The Duke of Devonshire who would be, according to the premise of the book, one of Jesus' descendants, pronounced it "absolutely obnoxious." Quoting from the Times article:
Research began with Lincoln's preparation of a 1972 BBC documentary on a 19th century French priest, Bérenger Saunière. The cleric reputedly amassed great wealth after discovering and deciphering four parchments hidden in a hollow pillar of his church at Rennes-le-Château, a hilltop village in the south of France.
The authors say they have discovered those parchments, or facsimiles, still exist and disclose the existence of a secret society called the Prieuré de Sion, founded in the 11th century at the start of the Crusades. Its aim was to guard the Holy Grail — according to medieval legend, the cup used by Jesus at the Last Supper.
The authors claim the society remains active, and that its adherents over the years included Isaac Newton, Andre Malraux, Victor Hugo, Claude Debussy and Charles de Gaulle.
According to the authors, the words "Holy Grail" are a mistranslation of early French words for "royal blood," and the true purpose of Prieuré de Sion is to protect alleged royal descendants of Jesus and prepare the way for their accession to world power.
To bolster their description of the society, they provide several chapters of scholarly references from legends, romances, paintings, documents and the Bible.
All this is controversial enough, but author Leigh said it led the three to reexamine the conventional interpretations of the New Testament. That study led them to propound a "hypothesis" that:
Jesus literally had a claim to being "king of the Jews" and was descended from the royal house of the Israelite King David.
He married Mary Magdalene and had at least one child by her.
He and sympathizers staged his Crucifixion and Resurrection and he survived into old age somewhere outside the Holy Land.
Mary Magdalene and her offspring made their way to southern France — then Roman-ruled Gaul.
Jesus' bloodline mixed with that of the Franks and started the Merovingian dynasty of the early Middle Ages.
The Merovingian line extends into the modern noble houses of Europe, so Jesus' descendants are alive today.
The book's contentions have started a religious firestorm.
"It is a sign of the degeneracy of the times that a publisher like Jonathan Cape should take this book," said Anglican Bishop Montefiore.
Montefiore catalogues what he calls "79 instances … of gross errors, vital omissions, gravely misleading statements or the adoption of way-out hypotheses."
Another Anglican bishop, Rt. Rev. Mervyn Stockwood, was even less reserved. "Let them write a second book suggesting that Caesar married Boadicia and that the offspring is Ian Paisley," he was quoted by The Times of London as saying.
The authors say they are merely making reasonable suppositions based on careful research and new evidence. They add that serious work on medieval history has been obscured by the furor over their conclusions." (St. Petersburg Times, January 19, 1982, byline: Mark S. Smith)
As I say, I didn't pay much attention to it other than filing it away in my mind. I was certainly never motivated to read the book. But, the subject was mentioned in a most curious way by the Cassiopaeans in our discussions about Jesus, and, like many important clues, it went right over my head. The question I asked was mainly concerned with the remarks in the Bible about the family of Jesus and I wanted to see what the Cassiopaeans would say about the purported "brothers" of Jesus, as well as the claim of the Catholic Church that his mother, the Virgin Mary, had lived her entire life as a sanctified virgin. So, I thought I would just slip the subject in there and see what came out of it:
Q: (L) Did Mary and Joseph, once together, subsequently have other children?
A: No. But Jesus did.
Q: (L) How many children were there?
A: Three.
Q: (L) Is that, as some people claim, the true meaning of the search for the Holy Grail, that it is not a cup but the "Sang Real," or holy bloodline?
Q: (L) And what happened to the children?
A: Survived and multiplied fruitfully.
Q: (L) Are there any descendants of Jesus living today?
A: 364,142.
There are several things about the above comments that are worthy of note. The first thing is that the Cassiopaeans volunteered the comment in response to a different question. They almost never do this unless it is something that is vital to know. At the time I was not aware of the significance of this fact. The second thing is the number of descendants. Anyone who does genealogy knows that this number, while seeming to be rather large, is actually very small. We are talking about 2,000 years of reproductive history where, if each of the three children really did multiply fruitfully, there would be a lot more than close to 400,000 descendants. But, the significance of that didn't occur to me at the time either.
My guest, RC, told me that it was only in this book that I would find out the real key to who was on first, and in her opinion, it was the Priory of Sion! The who? The Prieuré de Sion! They were at the bottom of everything. Until I knew about them, I could not claim to know anything. Well, heck! I had hardly ever heard of them except in the article mentioned above. How come I had never come across a mention of them anywhere else? I had certainly dug pretty far and deep. Just who were these guys?
Maybe we can find out? After all, learning is fun!
1 Fletcher Prouty's book, JFK: The CIA, Vietnam, and the Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy, is another must read.
2 U.S. intelligence term for camouflaging or disguising the true identity of equipment or individuals, especially for the use of military equipment or services — including personnel — in clandestine intelligence activities, generally under the direction of a nonmilitary sponsor.
3 http://www.kingsleydennis.com/Rosalie%20Bertell%20-%20Back
ground-on-the-HAARP-Project.pdf
Tags: Esoterica, history, Laura Knight-Jadczyk, The Wave Volume 1
Posted in The Wave Volume 4