Why your employees are NOT leaving your company?
He was well connected with the employees, good friends with many of them, and for sure knew what was going on under the surface.
The public reasons why people are leaving the company are typically better salary and/or perks, better office location or other non-work related reasons, and moving to something different type of work (e.g. from an enterprise to a startup, or from services business to a product company).
But after salaries and "perks" are already on the market level, not much can be done. Paying those "insanely high" salaries is not typically an option if the company plans to still stay in the business.
Instead of looking for the reasons why people are leaving, finding the reasons why people are NOT leaving is usually more challenging, but also can be much more rewarding.
Social reasons to stay can be sometimes strong: good atmosphere and work culture, friends working in the same company, and so on.
Sooner or later the social reasons alone are not enough, especially for the talented and ambitious employees. They start to look for both something meaningful to work with and their own professional career.
If a company has an inspiring mission, a purpose for its existence, and vision about the future it immediately differentiates it from the companies next door with different missions, or typically, no mission.
It easy to say that "no, our employees are not wasting their time with such philosophical questions", but I bet that at least subconsciously they do. (or you've been hiring robots with no free thinking and creativity..?) And at least when they get an offer from another company that communicates well their inspiring purpose and goals.
Then define your company vision, long-term goal what the company will be in the future, how the company will look like, how people outsiders will see and recognize it. A five years horizon is typically good, long enough to actually do things, but short enough for employees to mirror it against their personal career plans.
Avoid fancy words and management jargon in communications, the mission and vision are useless if the employees can't understand them or dismissing them just as "the latest management fad".
Communicate, communicate, communicate, and repeat.
The employees are not going to go and read the new fancy mission statement from the company website or newsletter, you need to tirelessly communicate and explain them.
Involve your employees, make them feel it's their company and their mission, not just a place they go to work for a monthly salary.
Inspiring company mission and vision can help differentiate the company from competitors who only provide a place to sit in front of a computer… and a monthly paycheck.
But people are selfish animals. They need to know and understand "what's in it for me?".
A company, department, or team goals are important and can be inspiring, but not necessarily as such motivating for the individuals to stretch to reach them, or even stay in the company if a slightly better offer appears.
Even after understanding the new vision what the company is targeting, many people don't necessarily automatically think or see how they themselves, and their career plans, fit into the picture.
To play it safe, you can freely assume that none of them does. Not even your key managers.
So, your next job as a manager is to cascade the company vision and goals down into the organization, either directly to each employee (in a smaller company) or to middle managers and continue from them to the employees.
For each individual, explain their personal position now, how their career path within the company fits into the big picture and their personal benefits of making those higher goals happen.
A lot of hard work again? Yes, the rewards are worth it. If you succeed, you not only have employees who are not only staying in the company but also working hard to make your company goals happen. What else could you wish for?
Make sure the company is paying at least market salaries, otherwise you make poaching the best people too easy for the competitors.
Define your company mission and vision, and communicate them tirelessly until every employee understands them.
Cascade down the company vision and goals in the organizations until every employee knows how their personal career path fits into the big picture, and more importantly, how they will personally benefit from the company achieving those goals.


text:
Q: Solution verification to complex analysis problem, prove $f$ is a polynomial.
Let $f$ be entire, $|f(z)|\leq 3|z|^4+1$ prove $f$ is a polynomial with deggre $\leq 4$

Similar questions have been asked here, but non answer satisfies me, so I tried a way I get, I just want someone to verify this.
$f^{(4)}(z_0)=\frac{4!}{2\pi i} \int_c\frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^5}dz$,
$|f^{(4)}(z_0)|\leq 4! \frac{3|z|^4+1}{|z|^5|(1-\frac{z_0}{|z|^5})|}|z|=4!\frac{3+\frac{1}{|z|^4}}{|(1-\frac{z_0}{|z|^5})|} $, where $|z|$ comes from the length of the line (instead of $r$)
leting $|z|\rightarrow \infty$ we get $|f^{(4)}(z_0)|\leq 72$ since $z_0$ is random from Liouville's theorem $f^{(4)}(z)$ is constant, it follows $f$ is a polynomial with deggre $\leq 4$

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Educating Leaders 2018 is the premier learning and networking event for leaders in the osteopathic medical education community and beyond. Attendees will engage in thought-provoking plenary presentations, interactive concurrent sessions, special receptions and other exciting events and collaborative programming focused on timely issues facing our nation's health care and medical education systems.
Free Get more Influencer Lists for #EducatingLeaders18.
Free Read more Tweet Transcripts for #EducatingLeaders18.
Upgrade Get access to all #EducatingLeaders18 tweets, filter out the noise and more.
Data for #EducatingLeaders18 can be up to 15 minutes delayed.


Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 March 2015, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.
Reason(s): Dmitryne nominates s:ru:Лентапедия/Дворников, Михаил for deletion. Community strongly refuse to deletion (see s:ru:Викитека:К удалению/Архив/2015#Лентапедия/Дворников, Михаил). Then Dmitryne nominates several others articles of Лентапедия for deletion (s:ru:Викитека:К удалению/Архив/2015). In Jan. 26 Dmitryne send me email with a unsubstantiated accusation of s:ru:User:Lozman and some others. In Feb. 25 the newbie OstapBinder nominates for deletion s:ru:Лентапедия/Аун Сан Су Чжи (s:ru:Викитека:К удалению) and MedvedevDmitriy joins to the discussion.
Reason(s): Conflicts and edit warring in articles related to and including fa:ملایر. Continuous disruption, even after sysop warnings. The users have so far broken the three-revert rule by supporting each others reverts.
Discussion: There have been severa discussions if Koka11 and Rrjedha have the same user, but the discussions are in Albanian like here and here.
This page was last edited on 13 April 2015, at 00:00.


can I have been mastering?
can you have been mastering?
can he have been mastering?
can we have been mastering?
can they have been mastering?
can I not be mastering?
can you not be mastering?
can he not be mastering?
can we not be mastering?
can they not be mastering?
can I not have mastered?
can you not have mastered?
can he not have mastered?
can we not have mastered?
can they not have mastered?
can I not have been mastering?
can you not have been mastering?
can he not have been mastering?
can we not have been mastering?
can they not have been mastering?