Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and five co-defendants have been charged with conspiracy and related charges. Their trial, recently announced by president Barack Obama, will be held in federal court next year in New York. KSM has been labeled the "mastermind" behind the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and Obama has already declared him guilty. This article will analyze those conspiracy charges.
Conspiracy charges are very common in federal court, especially in the racist war on drugs, because it is easier to obtain convictions by positing a "conspiracy" than by proving defendants guilty of an actual crime. Now the federal government is using conspiracy charges in the racist war on terror.
Charging someone with "conspiracy" amounts to accusing that person of thoughtcrime. If a person imagines committing a crime, and discusses their thoughts with a second person who then mentions it to a third, all three people are vulnerable to conspiracy charges. This may be the case even when the first person is a government agent! A classic example is the case of the Liberty City 7, a hapless group of impoverished pot-smokers who, after being handed $50,000 by two undercover FBI agents, obligingly fantasized about blowing up the Sears Tower. In addition to indulging in pot-fueled verbal fantasies, these defendants supposedly committed one "overt act": they bought boots. The feds had to stage three show trials before they finally got a conviction, making a mockery of the Constitution's guarantee, "nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." The case of the Liberty City 7, and countless similar conspiracy cases in the federal courts, suggest that the world's leading wild-eyed conspiracy theorists are federal prosecutors.
The charge sheet against KSM and his co-defendants lists alleged overt acts, numbered 1 to 169, which the government claims furthered the 9/11 conspiracy. For the government to win the case, they need to convince the jury that each defendant committed at least one overt act that furthered the alleged conspiracy. A quick perusal of the charge sheet, however, shows no evident connection between the vast majority of these overt acts and any alleged conspiracy to commit mass murder.
But to be cleared of all 169 overt acts, the defendants' best strategy may be to force the government to prove that the posited "Osama and 19 hijackers" conspiracy actually took place. Hundreds of expert witnesses (many listed here) are available to prove that it did not. Evidence that the 19 alleged hijackers were framed, discussed in Jay Kolar's scholarly article "What We Now Know About the Alleged 9/11 Hijackers" and in the works of David Ray Griffin, suggests that the current defendants may also have been framed. Intelligence agencies and associated criminal networks routinely frame patsies to take the blame for terrorist acts, assassinations, and similar crimes (Webster Tarpley, 9/11 Synthetic Terror).
The list of 169 alleged overt acts attempts to paint a negative picture of each defendant. No mention is made of any positive attributes. The list does not mention their occupations, marital status, whether they have children or family, hobbies, or what schools they attended. By leaving these items out, the government makes it easier to picture these accused men committing a heinous crime.
We have analyzed the specific overt acts attributed to KSM and his five co-defendants in great detail. The government has taken a few people who may have known some of the alleged 9/11 hijackers and/or had a business or personal relationship with a few of them, and constructed a giant conspiracy theory.
KSM and the other men on trial are scapegoats, like the victims of Stalin's show trials and the Inquisition's witch trials. Apparently the most important evidence will come from alleged confessions extracted from men tortured and held for years in solitary confinement at the Guantanamo Bay (Gitmo) prison. It is critically important that the defense should point out, over and over, that the torture techniques applied to these defendants were developed specifically to elict false confessions, and that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has clearly stated that he "made up stories," i.e. gave false confessions under torture.
The Charge Sheet begins by listing the alleged aliases of the six accused men.
While reading this, please think like the jury and presume the defendants innocent. All defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
In conspiracy trials, the government counts on finding jurors who will presume the defendants are guilty because they would not be on trial unless they did something wrong. That kind of thinking wins a lot of false convictions for the government in federal court.
Conspicuous by his absence from the list of defendants is Osama bin Laden, who has never been charged in connection with 9/11 because, the FBI states, there is "no hard evidence" against him. If the list of overt acts were true, there would be plenty of hard evidence against him. This suggests that the charges against the six defendants cannot be true.
Please note that the charge sheet uses the conspiratorial term "aliases", instead of the more sensible term "nicknames", or simply "name variants". Most people have all sorts of forms of names they use; first name only, last name only, middle name, middle initial, hyphenated names, titles, nicknames, etc. In addition, names translated from Arabic can have alternate spellings in English. Also, in Arabic, extra middle names, and extra family names are more commonly used than in English.
The government needs to prove these are really aliases, and not just nicknames, innocent name variants, or different people with the same or similar sounding names.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show us the evidence!
1. In August 1996, Usama bin Laden issued a public "Declaration of Jihad Against the Americans," in which he called for the murder of U.S. military personnel serving on the Arabian Peninsula.
8. On or about April 3, 1999, and April 7, 1999, respectively, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) and Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) received visas in Jeddah, Saudia Arabia, in order to travel to the United States.
32. On or about March 26, 2000, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) submitted an application to the Florida Flight Training Center (FFTC) in Venice, Florida, and later enrolled.
37. On or about May 18, 2000, in Berlin, Germany, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) received a visa to travel to the United States.
38. On or about May 25, 2000, in Berlin, Germany, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) received a visa to travel to the United States.
39. On or about May 29, 2000, Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) traveled from Brussels, Belgium, to Newark, New Jersey.
40. On or about June 3, 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) traveled from Prague, Czech Republic, to Newark, New Jersey.
44. On or about June 27, 2000, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) traveled from Munich, Germany, to Atlanta, Georgia.
46. On or about July 7, 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) and Marwan Al-Shehhi (UA #175) opened a joint checking account at SunTrust Bank in Venice, Florida, with a $7,000 cash deposit.
48. Between, in, or about July 2000 and in or about December 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) and Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) attended flight training classes at Huffman Aviation in Venice, Florida.
60. On or about November 5, 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) ordered flight deck videos for the Boeing 747 Model 200 and the Boeing 757 Model 200, as well as other items from Sporty's Pilot Shop in Batavia, Ohio.
62. On December 2, 2000, Hani Hanjour (AA #77) traveled to Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
65. On or about December 8, 2000, Hani Hanjour (AA #77) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to San Diego, California.
67. On or about December 11, 2000, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) ordered flight deck videos for the Boeing 767 Model 300ER and the Airbus A320-200 from Sporty's Pilot Shop in Batavia, Ohio.
[Ordered just in time for Christmas, so it could be evidence that Atta is a Christian. Hopsicker cites witnesses, including Atta's girlfriend Amanda Keller, that Atta's behavior was at the opposite extreme from that of a practicing Muslim, much less a fanatic. According to Keller, Atta's favorite food was pork chops. See Hopsicker's video The Secret World of Mohamed Atta. Amanda Keller should be called as a witness.
71. In or about March 2001, having already earned his pilot's license in 1999, Hani Hanjour (AA #77) attended flight simulator training in Phoenix, Arizona, at Pan Am International Flight Academy, Jet Tech International.
72. On or about January 30, 2001, Hani Hanjour (AA #77) paid the balance of his simulator training with a Bank of America cashier's check in the amount of $5,745.00.
73. Between on or about January 31, 2001, and on or about February 6, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) and Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) took "flight check" rides around Decatur, Georgia.
74. On or about March 19, 2001, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) ordered flight deck videos for the Boeing 747 Model 400, the Boeing 747 Model 200, and the Boeing 777 Model 200, and another video from Sporty's Pilot Shop in Batavia, Ohio.
81. On or about April 23, 2001, Satam al Suqami (AA #11) and Waleed al Shehri (AA #11) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, via Emirates Flight #7 to London-Gatwick, England, and Virgin Atlantic Flight #27 from London to Orlando, Florida.
82. On or about May 1, 2001, Satam al Suqami (AA #11) and Waleed al Shehri (AA #11) opened a joint bank account at SunTrust Bank in Florida with a cash deposit of $9,000.
83. On or about May 2, 2001, Ahmad al Ghamdi (UA #175) and Majed Moqed (AA# 77) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, via Emirates Flight #1 to London-Heathrow, England, and United Airlines Flight #925 from London to Washington-Dulles, Virginia.
84. Beginning in or about May 2001, while in Florida, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) joined a gym and took martial arts lessons which included instruction in knife fighting.
86. On or about May 28, 2001, Ahmed al Nami (UA # 93), Hamza al Ghamdi (UA #175), and Mohand al Shehri (UA #175) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, via Emirates Flight #7 to London-Gatwick, England, and Virginia Atlantic Flight #5 from London to Miami, Florida.
87. On or about June 1, 2001, Ahmed al Nami (UA # 93), Mohand al Shehri (UA #175), and Hamza al Ghamdi opened bank accounts at SunTrust Bank in Florida with cash deposits of $4,700, $4,800, and $3,000, respectively.
89. On or about June 8, 2001, Wail al Shehri (AA #11) and Ahmed al Haznawi (UA #93) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates on Emirates Flight #7, via London-Gatwick, England, and Virgin Atlantic Flight #5 from London to Miami, Florida.
90. On or about June 18, 2001, Wail al Shehri (AA #11) opened a bank account at SunTrust Bank in Florida with a deposit of $8,000.
96. On or about June 27, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) and Saeed al Ghamdi (UA #93) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, on Emirates Flight #7 via London-Gatwick, England, and Virgin Atlantic Flight #15 from London to Orlando, Florida.
101. On or about June 29, 2001, Salem al Hazmi (AA #77) and Abdul Aziz al Omari (AA #11) traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to New York, New York, via Zurich, Switzerland.
102. On or about July 4, 2001, Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) traveled to New York, New York, from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
104. On or about July 9, 2001, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77), Majed Moqed (AA #77) and Ahmed al Ghamdi (UA #175) opened bank accounts at the Dime Savings Bank in New Jersey.
105. On or about July 12, 2001, Ahmad al Haznawi (UA #93) opened a bank account at SunTrust Bank in Florida with a deposit of $500.
106. On or about July 12, 2001, Saeed al Ghamdi (UA #93) opened a bank account at SunTrust Bank in Florida with a deposit of $4,500.
108. On or about July 18, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) opened an account at SunTrust Bank in Florida with a deposit of $1,000.
109. On or about July 18, 2001, Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) opened a bank account at Hudson United Bank in New Jersey with a $300 deposit.
114. On or about August 1, 2001, in Florida, Fayez Banihammad's (UA #175) Standard Chartered Bank VISA card was used for the first time in the United States to withdraw approximately $2,804.50.
115. On or about July 21, 2001, Salem al Hazmi (AA #77) opened a bank account at Hudson United Bank in New Jersey with a $500 deposit.
116. On or about July 26, 2001, Abdul Aziz al Omari (AA #11) opened a bank account at Hudson United Bank in New Jersey with a $100 deposit.
117. On or about August 4, 2001, at approximately 4:18 p.m., a vehicle rented by Mohamed Atta (AA #11) entered a parking garage at Orlando International Airport, Orlando, Florida.
123. On or about August 4, 2001, at approximately 9:04 p.m., the vehicle rented by Mohamed Atta (AA #11) departed the parking garage at Orlando International Airport, Orlando, Florida.
124. On August 13, 2001, Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) purchased two knives from Sports Authority, Boynton Beach, Florida.
125. On August 13, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) purchased a Stanley two piece knife snap set from Wal-Mart, Boynton Beach, Florida.
126. On or about August 17, 2001, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) took a "check ride" at a flight school in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
127. On or about August 22, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) used his VISA card in Florida to obtain approximately $4,800.00 cash, which was previously deposited into his Standard Chartered Bank account in the United Arab Emirates.
130. On or about August 25, 2001, Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) and Majed Moqed (AA #77) reserved tickets for American Airlines Flight 77, scheduled to depart Washington Dulles International Airport, Dulles, Virginia, at 8:10 a.m. and arrive at Los Angeles, California, on September 11, 2001.
131. On or about August 26, 2001, tickets were reserved for Waleed al Shehri (AA #11) and Wail al Shehri (AA #11) on American Airlines Flight 11, scheduled to depart Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachusetts, at 7:45 a.m. and arrive at Los Angeles, California, on September 11, 2001.
132. On or about August 27, 2001, tickets were reserved for Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) and Mohand al Shehri (UA #175), on United Airlines Flight 175, scheduled to depart Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachusetts, at 8:00 a.m. and arrive at Los Angeles, California, on September 11, 2001.
133. On or about August 27, 2001, tickets were reserved for Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) and Salem al Hazmi (AA #77) on American Airlines Flight 77 for travel on September 11, 2001.
134. On or about August 27, 2001, tickets were reserved for Saeed al Ghamdi (UA #93) and Ahmed al Nami (UA #93) on United Airlines Flight 93, scheduled to depart from Newark International Airport, Newark, New Jersey, at 8:00 a.m. and arrive at San Francisco, California, on September 11, 2001.
135. On or about August 27, 2001, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) purchased a Leatherman Wave Multi-tool from a Target department store in Laurel, Maryland.
136. On or about August 22, 2001, and August 27, 2001, in Miami, Florida, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) purchased a Global Positioning System ("GPS") device, other GPS-related equipment, and schematics for Boeing 757 cockpit instrument diagrams.
137. On or about August 28, 2001, tickets were reserved for Mohamed Atta (AA #11), Abdul Aziz al Omari (AA #11), and Satam al Suqami (AA#11) on American Airlines Flight 11 for travel on September 11, 2001.
138. On or about August 28, 2001, tickets were reserved for Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) on United Airlines Flight 175 for travel on September 11, 2001.
140. On or about August 29, 2001, tickets were reserved for Ahmed al Ghamdi (UA #175) and Hamza al Ghamdi (UA #175) on United Airlines Flight 175 for travel on September 11, 2001.
141. On or about August 29, 2001, tickets were reserved for Ahmed al Haznawi (UA #93) on United Airlines Flight 93 for travel on September 11, 2001.
142. On or about August 30, 2001, tickets were reserved for Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) on United Airlines Flight 93 for travel on September 11, 2001.
143. On or about August 30, 2001, Hamza al Ghamdi (UA #175) purchased a Leatherman Wave Multi-Tool from Lowe's Home Improvement, Boynton Beach, Florida.
144. On or about August 31, 2001, tickets were reserved for Hani Hanjour (AA #77) on American Airlines Flight 77 for travel on September 11, 2001.
158. On or about September 11, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) possessed a handwritten set of final instructions for a martyrdom operation on an airplane using knives, copies of which were also found at the crash site of United Airlines Flight 93 and in Nawaf al Hazmi's (AA #77) Toyota Corolla at Washington Dulles International Airport.
[This is one of the most important claims in the entire government case. If they can't prove this one, they don't have much of a case. There are several reasons not to believe it, especially if Atta's "handwritten set of final instructions" is the same five-page document that leading Middle East expert Robert Fisk, and every Muslim with whom he has discussed the matter, agree could not possibly have been written by an actual Muslim?
159. On September 11, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) and Abdul Aziz al Omari (AA #11) flew from Portland, Maine, to Boston, Massachusetts.
160. On or about September 11, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) possessed an operating manual for a Boeing 757/767 Simulator, pepper spray, a knife, and a German travel visa.
161. On September 11, 2001, Mohamed Atta, Abdul Aziz al Omari, Satam al Suqami, Waleed al Shehri, and Wail al Shehri hijacked American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767, which had departed from Boston, Massachusetts, at approximately 7:59 a.m. They crashed Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan at approximately 8:46 a.m., causing the collapse of the tower and the deaths of 87 passengers and crew members on board, and thousands of persons in and around the World Trade Center. (See Charge Sheet Appendix A for list of individuals killed on Flight 11 and at the site of the World Trade Center).
162. On September 11, 2001, Marwan al Shehhi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Fayez Banihammad, Mohand al Shehri, and Ahmed al Ghamdi, hijacked United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which had departed from Boston, Massachusetts, at approximately 8:14 a.m. They crashed Flight 175 into the South Tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan at approximately 9:03 a.m., causing the collapse of the tower and the deaths of 60 passengers and crew members on board, and thousands of persons in and around the World Trade Center. (See Charge Sheet Appendix A for list of individuals killed on Flight 175 and at the site of the World Trade Center).
[The government needs to prove that the alleged hijackers actually hijacked the planes--a claim that has been questioned by many scholars, notably Elias Davidsson. The first step would be to prove that the named individuals were on the planes via authenticated security videos and passenger lists, ticket stubs, and testimony from airline employees. Oddly, while this evidence should have been put forward the moment the government accused the 19 individuals (i.e. on September 12th, 2001) no such evidence has ever been made public. Additionally, even if the prosecution were able to prove that someone was on an airplane, that is not proof that they hijacked it. The government clearly needs to prove that all the alleged hijackers were actually on the planes ascribed to them, and actually hijacked the planes. Since no plane sent out a hijacking code, that is evidence the planes were not hijacked. Media claims about alleged cell phone calls supporting the hijacking story have been cast into doubt by many scientists including A.K. Dewdney, while at least one specific claim--Bush Administration member Ted Olson's story about getting two calls from his wife describing the hijacking of Flight 77--has been proven false by the FBI, American Airlines, and the Pentagon.
To our knowledge, the only direct evidence reported that any specific alleged hijacker actually participated in any alleged hijacking is an alleged recording of Atta's voice speaking to the passengers on FL11. But the 9/11 Commission does not say the voice is Atta's; it only states that the voice is believed to be Atta's. We have listened to the voice attributed to Atta, and agree that the speaker's accent sounds Israeli, not Egyptian. The defense should call a linguist to testify about this.
163. On September 11, 2001, Hani Hanjour, Khalid al Mihdhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf al Hazmi, and Salem al Hazmi hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, which had departed from Dulles, Virginia, at approximately 8:20 a.m. They crashed Flight 77 into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, at approximately 9:37 a.m., causing the deaths of 59 passengers and crew members on board and 125 persons in the Pentagon. (See Charge Sheet Appendix A for list of individuals killed on Flight 77 and at the Pentagon).
164. On September 11, 2001, Ziad Jarrah, Saeed al Ghamdi, Ahmed al Nami, and Ahmed al Haznawi hijacked United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, which had departed from Newark, New Jersey, at approximately 8:42 a.m. After resistance by several passengers, Flight 93 crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, at approximately 10:03 a.m., killing all 40 passengers and crew members on board. (See Charge Sheet Appendix A for list of individuals killed on Flight 93).
[This is where the defense, if given a fair trial, should be able to show photographs of the alleged crash site that do not show an airplane, along with witnesses to that effect.
Another problem with this alleged overt act is that passenger Todd Beamer's reported phone call, according to FBI documents, did not end until 10:49 a.m., 46 minutes after FL93 allegedly crashed, and passenger Jeremy Glick's reported phone call did not end until 11:43 a.m., 100 minutes after FL93 allegedly crashed.
168. On or about October 7, 2001, in Afghanistan, Usama Bin Laden praised the September 11 attack, and vowed that the United States would not "enjoy security" before "infidel armies leave" the Arabian Peninsula.
107. On or about July 14, 2001, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Mohamed al Kahtani received a visa to travel to the United States.
118. On or about August 4, 2001, Mohamed al Kahtani traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, via Emirates Flight #7 to London-Gatwick, England, and Virgin Atlantic Flight #15 from London to Orlando, Florida, which was scheduled to arrive at 4:40 p.m.
119. On or about August 4, 2001, Mohamed al Kahtani arrived at Orlando International Airport, Orlando, Florida, with $2,800 in his possession, and attempted to enter the United States. Al Kahtani also had an itinerary listing the telephone number 0505209905, a phone number associated with Mustafa al Hawsawi.
120. On or about August 4, 2001, Mohamed al Kahtani stated to an officer of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service that there was someone "upstairs" in the airport to pick him up. When asked the name of the person, so that the immigration inspector could verify al Kahtani's intentions in the United States, al Kahtani changed his story and stated that no one was waiting for him.
122. On or about August 4, 2001, after being told his application for entry into the United States was going to be denied, Mohamed al Kahtani withdrew his application and was placed on board Virgin Atlantic Flight 16, which was scheduled to depart Orlando, Florida, at 8:25 p.m. and traveled back to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, via London, England.
7. On or about April 3, 1999, Khallad Bin `Attash traveled to San'a, Yemen and applied for a visa to travel to the United States using the alias "Salah Saeed Mohammed Bin Yousaf." This application was denied.
10. In or about November 1999, Khallad Bin `Attash and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) traveled from Qandahar, Afghanistan, to Karachi, Pakistan, where they moved in with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. With the assistance of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Khallad Bin `Attash and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) began using CDs, books, and other materials to learn about flying airplanes.
11. While living in Karachi, Khallad Bin `Attash, and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) used computer simulators to learn how to fly planes, and studied and researched flight timetables for United States air carriers with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in order to coordinate the simultaneous hijacking of multiple aircraft.
15. In or about December 1999, Khallad Bin `Attash traveled to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in order to assess airline security, collect information regarding air carriers for flights in Southeast Asia, and facilitate onward travel for Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) and Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) from Kuala Lumpur to the United States.
16. In or about December 1999, before Khallad Bin `Attash departed from Pakistan on his casing trip to Kuala Lumpur, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave him a razor knife to secrete on his person while traveling in order to assess airline security measures. Bin `Attash carried this razor knife on flights to Malaysia, Bangkok, and Hong Kong. On these flights, Bin `Attash collected information on United States air carriers, such as the number of passengers on the flights that were in first class, business class, and economy class.
17. In or about December 1999, Khallad Bin `Attash devised a scheme in order to assist Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) in traveling to the United States. In order to hide al Hazmi's previous travel to Pakistan, Bin `Attash directed al Hazmi to purchase two different tickets for travel to Malaysia, one using a fraudulently issued Yemeni passport, which masked his travel to Pakistan and Afghanistan on his valid Saudi passport.
19. Upon his return, Khallad Bin `Attash prepared a written report and briefed Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Mohammed Atef (a/k/a Abu Hafs al Masri, the military commander of al Qaeda) on airline security and Bin `Attash's ability to get the razor knife on board the flights.
61. In or about December 2000, Khallad Bin `Attash provided Hani Hanjour (AA #77) with an email address in order to contact Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) in the United States.
27. On or about January 3, 2000, Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) and Ali Abdul Aziz Ali ordered the "CityBird" video online and had it shipped to Ali at Post Office Box (P.O. Box 16958), Dubai, United Arab Emirates. After receiving the video, Ali delivered the video to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in Pakistan.
28. On or about January 3, 2000, Marwan Al-Shehhi (UA #175) and Ali Abdul Aziz Ali also purchased 747 flight simulator computer software.
34. In or about April 2000, at the direction of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali spoke over the telephone with Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) (who was in the United States), who requested Ali Abdul Aziz Ali send funds.
35. On or about April 16, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali transferred approximately $5000 to Nawaf al Hazmi, through a third party, in San Diego, California.
45. On or about June 29, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (using the alias Isam Mansar) transferred approximately $5,000 from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) in New York, New York.
47. On or about July 18, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (using the alias "Isam Mansur") transferred approximately $10,000 from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to the joint SunTrust Bank account of Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) and Mohamed Atta (AA #11) in Venice, Florida.
50. On or about August 5, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (using the alias "Isam Mansour") transferred approximately $9,500 from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to the joint SunTrust Bank account of Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) and Mohamed Atta (AA #11) in Venice, Florida.
53. On or about August 29, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (using the name "Mr. Ali") transferred approximately $20,000 from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to the joint SunTrust Bank account of Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) and Mohamed Atta (AA #11) in Venice, Florida.
56. On or about September 17, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali (using the alias "Hani (Fawaz TRDNG)") transferred approximately $70,000 from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to the joint SunTrust Bank account of Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) and Mohamed Atta (AA #11) in Venice, Florida.
63. On or about December 5, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali helped Hani Hanjour (AA #77) open a banking account at the Deira, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Citibank (hereinafter Hanjour Citibank account), and provided approximately $3,000 to Hanjour to deposit in the account.
64. In or about December 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali reserved a plane ticket for Hani Hanjour (AA #77) to travel to the United States to join the other operatives already there.
66. Upon Hani Hanjour's (AA #77) arrival in San Diego, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) contacted Ali Abdul Aziz Ali to advise him that Hanjour had arrived safely.
68. On or about December 26, 2000, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Karachi, Pakistan, and returned to Dubai on or about January 5, 2001.
69. On or about January 28, 2001, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali deposited $5,000 in Hani Hanjour's (AA #77) Citibank account.
85. On or about May 26, 2001, Mohand al Shehri (UA #93), Ahmed al Nami (UA #93), and Hamza al Ghamdi (UA #175) purchased plane tickets to travel from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Miami, Florida via London, UK. They all listed 050 7696327 as their contact number, a phone number associated with Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.
88. On or about June 6, 2001, Ahmad al Haznawi (UA #93) and Wail al Shehri (AA #11) purchased plane tickets to travel from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Miami, Florida via London, England. They both listed 050 7696327 as their contact number, a phone number associated with Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.
97. While the non-pilot hijackers were in Dubai, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa al Hawsawi assisted them by purchasing clothing, food, lodging, rental cars, traveler's checks, and making travel arrangements.
99. On or about June 26, 2001, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali traveled from Dubai, United Arab Emirates to Karachi, Pakistan. Between, on, or about June 27, 2001, and on or about July 14, 2001, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali met with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and advised Mohammed that Ali was willing to do anything to help the mission (referring to the "Planes Operation") which, based on past conversations between Ali and Mohammed, included being a martyr. Mohammed advised Ali to apply for a United States visa to travel to the United States.
139. On or about August 28, 2001, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali applied for a visa to travel to the United States on September 4, 2001, for a period of one week. This application was denied.
153. On or about September 10, 2001, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali flew from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Karachi, Pakistan.
20. Between November 1999 and February 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mohamed Atta (AA #11), Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175), and Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) traveled from Hamburg, Germany, to Qandahar, Afghanistan to attend an al Qaeda training camp.
21. In or about January 2000, Usama bin Laden chose Ramzi Binalshibh, Mohamed Atta (AA #11), Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175), and Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) to participate in the "Planes Operation" in the United States.
22. In or about January 2000, Usama bin Laden and Mohammed Atef tasked Ramzi Binalshibh, Mohamed Atta (AA #11), Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175), and Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) to obtain flight training for a martyrdom operation and report to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed on their progress.
23. In or about January 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mohamed Atta (AA #11), and Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) filmed videos to serve as their "martyr wills" in anticipation of dying in an attack against the United States.
24. In or about January 2000, Mohammed Atef sent Ramzi Binalshibh and Mohamed Atta (AA #11) to Karachi, Pakistan, to meet with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed for the first time to discuss future communication protocols between Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the hijackers.
36. On or about May 17, 2000, in Berlin, Germany, Ramzi Binalshibh applied for a visa to travel to the United States, which was denied.
41. On or about June 13, 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh sent a Moneygram wire transfer from Hamburg, Germany, in the amount of 5,789.26 German Deutschmarks (U.S. $2,708.33) to Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) in New York, New York.
42. On or about June 15, 2000, in Berlin, Germany, Ramzi Binalshibh applied for the second time for a visa to travel to the United States, which was denied.
43. On or about June 21, 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh sent a Moneygram wire transfer from Hamburg, Germany, in the amount of 3,862.76 German Deutschmarks (U.S. $1,803.19) to Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) in New York, New York.
49. On or about July 26, 2000, in Germany, Ramzi Binalshibh wired 3,853 Deutschmarks (U.S. $1,760.61) from Hamburg, Germany, to Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) in Sarasota, Florida.
51. In or about August 2000, Ziad Jarrah (UA #93), while attending flight training at Florida Flight Training Center, assisted Ramzi Binalshibh in his attempt to enroll in flight training with him.
52. On or about August 14, 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh wired 4,739.32 German Deutschmarks (approximately U.S. $2,200) from his account in Germany to the Florida Flight Training Center (FFTC).
54. Beginning in September 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh attempted to enroll in the Aviation Language School in Miami, Florida.
55. On or about September 15, 2000, in San'a, Yemen, Ramzi Binalshibh applied for a visa for a third time to travel to the United States, which was denied.
57. On or about September 25, 2000, Ramzi Binalshibh wired $4,118.13 from Hamburg, Germany, to Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) in Nokomis, Florida, via Western Union.
58. On or about October 25, 2000, in Berlin, Germany, Ramzi Binalshibh applied for a fourth and final time for a visa to travel to the United States, which was denied.
59. When Ramzi Binalshibh was unable to obtain a visa to travel to the United States, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed named Binalshibh as his main assistant in the "Planes Operation" due to his knowledge of the details of the plot. Mohamed Atta (AA #11) was selected as the "emir" of the group and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) was selected as Atta's "deputy." Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave Mohamed Atta (AA #11) full authority to make operational decisions in the United States.
70. In or about late January 2001, Ramzi Binalshibh traveled from Germany to Afghanistan to notify Usama bin Laden, Abu Hafs al Masri, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that Mohamed Atta (AA #11), Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175), and Ziad Jarrah (UA #93) had completed their initial flight training in the United States.
128. On or about late August 2001, Ramzi Binalshibh sent a message to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed notifying him that Mohamed Atta (AA #11) had chosen September 11, 2001, as the date of the operation. Khalid Sheikh Mohammad reported the date to Usama bin Laden, who began preparing al Qaeda members and their families in Afghanistan in anticipation of the expected United States military response. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed traveled from Afghanistan to Pakistan shortly after having been notified.
145. On or about September 3, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi, using the alias Hashem Abdollahi, and listing the contact phone number 050 7692590, sent $1,500 to Ahad Abdollahi Sabet, an alias for Ramzi Binalshibh.
167. In late September 2001, Usama bin Laden, Ramzi Binalshibh, Mustafa al Hawsawi and other members of al Qaeda met near Kabul, Afghanistan, to discuss the September 11 operation; this meeting was videotaped and later released by al Qaeda for propaganda purposes.
75. In or about April 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi traveled to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from Karachi, Pakistan, at the direction of al Qaeda's Media Committee.
91. On or about June 23, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi opened a bank account at the Standard Chartered Bank in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, and obtained an ATM card in connection with the checking account.
92. On or about June 24, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi opened P.O. Box #19738 in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
93. On or about June 25, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175), accompanied by Mustafa al Hawsawi, opened a current account, fixed deposit account, and VISA card account at the same Standard Chartered Bank branch used by al Hawsawi two days earlier. Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) provided al Hawsawi with a letter to grant him the authority to pick up Banihammad's ATM and credit card.
94. On or about June 25, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi opened a fixed deposit account and applied for a VISA card at the Standard Chartered Bank in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
95. On or about June 25, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi purchased plane tickets for Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) and Saeed al Ghamdi (UA #93) to travel from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Orlando, Florida, via London, England. They both listed 0505209905 as their contact number, a phone number associated with Mustafa al Hawsawi.
98. Each hijacker was given between $6,000 and $10,000 in cash by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or Mustafa al Hawsawi with instructions to keep a few thousand dollars for themselves and to give the remaining money to Mohamed Atta (AA #11) for operational expenses.
100. On or about June 28, 2001, Abdul Aziz al Omari (AA #11) and Salem al Hazmi (AA #77) purchased plane tickets to travel from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to New York, New York, via Zurich, Switzerland. They both listed 050 5209905 as their contact number, a phone number associated with Mustafa al Hawsawi.
110. On or about July 18, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi took power of attorney over Fayez Banihammad's (UA #175) Standard Chartered Bank accounts in the United Arab Emirates.
111. On or about July 18, 2001, using his power of attorney, Mustafa al Hawsawi picked up Fayez Banihammad's (UA #175) VISA and ATM cards from Standard Chartered Bank in the United Arab Emirates.
112. On or about July 23, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi withdrew 500 Dirhams (U.S. $136.24) from an ATM in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, from the Standard Chartered Bank account of Fayez Banihammad (UA #175).
113. On or about July 23, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi sent a package using the alias "Hashim," to Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) in Delray Beach, Florida, listing the mobile phone number 5209905 and P.O. Box #19738, SHJ, United Arab Emirates.
121. On or about August 4, 2001, in between 4:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m., a total of five phone calls were placed using a calling card associated with Mohamed Atta (AA #11) from a pay telephone in Orlando International Airport to telephone number 971-50-520-9905, a phone number associated with Mustafa al Hawsawi.
129. On or about August 25, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi applied for a supplemental Standard Chartered Bank VISA card in the name of Abdul Rahman Abdullah al Ghamdi, and attached a photograph of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the supplemental applicant.
146. On or about September 4, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) sent a Federal Express package containing Fayez Banihammad's (UA #175) ATM card and a blank check to Mustafa al Hawsawi's Post Office Box (#19738) in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Mustafa al Hawsawi collected the package on or about September 8, 2001.
147. On or about September 5, 2001, Fayez Banihammad (UA #175) wired approximately $8,000 from his Florida SunTrust account to the Standard Chartered Bank account, over which Mustafa al Hawsawi had power of attorney.
148. On or about September 8, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) wired $2,860 to "Mustafa Ahmed" in the United Arab Emirates. Mustafa al Hawsawi obtained the funds, using a true name photo identification, at the Wall Street Exchange, Dubai, United Arab Emirates on or about September 9, 2001.
149. On or about September 8, 2001, Mohamed Atta (AA #11) wired an additional $5,000 to "Mustafa Ahmed" in United Arab Emirates. The funds were received by Mustafa al Hawsawi, using a true name photo identification, at the Wall Street Exchange, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, on or about September 10, 2001.
150. On or about September 9, 2001, Waleed al Shehri (AA #11) wired $5,000 to "Ahanad Mustafa" in the United Arab Emirates. The funds were received by Mustafa al Hawsawi, using a true name photo identification, at the Al-Ansari Exchange, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, on or about September 11, 2001.
151. On or about September 10, 2001, Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175) wired $5,400 to "Mustafa Ahmad" in United Arab Emirates. Mustafa al Hawsawi collected the funds using a true name photo identification, at the Al-Ansari Exchange, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, on or about September 11, 2001.
152. On or about September 10, 2001, Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77), using the alias "Rawf Al-Dog," attempted to send a package to Mustafa al Hawsawi's P.O. Box #19738, Al Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, containing a First Union VISA check card in the name of Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) and other account information.
154. On or about September 11, 2001, in United Arab Emirates, Mustafa al Hawsawi deposited approximately 60,000 Dirhams (U.S. $16,348) into his Standard Chartered Bank account.
155. On September 11, 2001, prior to the hijackings taking place in the United States, in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Mustafa al Hawsawi transferred approximately 24,000 Dirhams (U.S. $6,534) from Fayez Banihammad's (UA #175) Standard Chartered Bank account into his own account, using a check dated September 10, 2001, and signed by Fayez Banihammad (UA #175). Mustafa al Hawsawi then withdrew approximately 5000 Dirhams (U.S. $1,361), nearly all the remaining balance in Banihammad's (UA #175) account, by ATM cash withdrawal.
156. On or about September 11, 2001, in United Arab Emirates, Mustafa al Hawsawi prepaid approximately 150,000 Dirhams (U.S. $40,871) to a VISA card connected to his Standard Chartered Bank account.
157. On or about September 11, 2001, Mustafa al Hawsawi flew from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to Karachi, Pakistan.
166. On or about September 13, 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed used the supplemental VISA card connected to Mustafa al Hawsawi's Standard Chartered Bank VISA account to make six ATM withdrawals in Karachi, Pakistan.
2. In 1996, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed met with Usama bin Laden in Afghanistan and discussed the operational concept of hijacking commercial airliners and crashing them into buildings in the United States and elsewhere. This plan was ultimately approved by Usama bin Laden.
3. Between 1996 and 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Usama bin Laden, and Mohammed Atef (a/k/a Abu Hafs al Masri, the military commander of al Qaeda), proposed and discussed potential targets for attack by hijacked commercial airliners and decided to target economic, political, and military buildings in the United States and Western Pacific.
13. In or about 1999, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed requested and received funding for his idea of hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings from Usama bin Laden (hereinafter the "Planes Operation").
25. As part of the operational security for the "Planes Operation," Khalid Sheikh Mohammed instructed both Mohamed Atta (AA #11) and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77) to meet in places in the United States where tourists frequent so they would not stand out.
26. In or about January 2000, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed told Ali Abdul Aziz Ali that "Marwan" (identified by Ali as Marwan al Shehhi (UA #175)) would be traveling to meet Ali in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed directed Ali and al Shehhi (UA#175) to use the internet to order a video entitled "CityBird," depicting cockpit operations in a Boeing 767-300 while flying throughout the world.
29. On or about January 15, 2000, Khalid al Mihdhar (AA #77) and Nawaf al Hazmi (AA #77), the first two hijackers to reach the United States, traveled from Bangkok, Thailand, to Los Angeles, California, on United Airlines Flight # 2, with orders from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to undergo flight training, learn English, and affiliate with a mosque to help them assimilate in the United States.
76. Between in or about September 2000 and in or about July 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed instructed the non-pilot hijackers to travel to their home countries to obtain "clean" passports (a passport not reflecting travel to Pakistan or Afghanistan), visas from other Western countries, and visas to the United States, then return to Pakistan. Following the hijackers' return to Pakistan, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed sent them to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to await final travel to the United States. On several occasions, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed provided the non-pilot hijackers with chemicals in an eye dropper to remove any Pakistani stamps from their passports.
77. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed personally trained the hijackers and informed them that they were going on a martyrdom operation involving airplanes, but at the time of their training they were not made aware of the specific targets.
79. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed directed al Qaeda to film martyr videos of some of the hijackers, several of which were released publicly through al Qaeda's media wing, As Sahab Productions.
80. From on or about April 19, 2001, until on or about August 4, 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed ordered that the non-pilot hijackers be sent to the United States and gave the hijackers operational guidance on how to avoid detection during their travel to the United States.
165. Between on or about September 11, 2001, and on or about September 21, 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others in his Karachi, Pakistan, guesthouse recorded many news stories of the attacks for future use in propaganda films.
169. On or about late 2001, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed attended a meeting with Usama bin Laden when Usama bin Laden confirmed al Qaeda's involvement in the September 11, 2001, plot in a videotaped message.
Of the 30 alleged overt acts attributed to KSM, only a few even claim an action that is illegal. Overall, only 100 of the alleged overt acts are attributed to the defendants on trial. Only 20 of the alleged overt acts have two defendants working together in the conspiracy. Not a single alleged overt act has three or more defendants working together in the same overt act. Even if the alleged 9/11 hijackers really hijacked the planes--an allegation for which there appears to be no evidence--the entire case against KSM is very weak. Once evidence gained from torture is removed, there will be no relevant evidence left. If KSM and his co-defendants put on a reasonably good defense, and receive a fair and impartial jury, they will easily win the trial. Unfortunately, it has been reported that five of the defendants will plead guilty. They have been broken by years of torture and other subhuman treatment at Gitmo. Like others broken by torture, they may have internalized whatever the torturers told them. Oddly, the one defendant that has no evidence against him whatsoever, Kahtani, is the only one not coming to New York for his trial.
Rolf Lindgren (photo here) holds a BA in Mathematics. He is a member of the Libertarian Party and former Vice-Chair of the LP of Wisconsin. He has extensive experience dealing with the federal criminal "justice" system. He is a 9/11 researcher since 2006, when he first met Dr. Kevin Barrett. He has a bachelor's degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He works as a Loan Officer and lives in Middleton, Wisconsin. Rolf is a defender of Galileo and James Madison.
Dr. Kevin Barrett is the author of three books including the brand-new Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters, which deconstructs the "war on terror" through Socratic questioning. A Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, he has taught languages, literature, humanities, religious studies, and folklore at colleges and universities in the U.S. and abroad. Dr. Barrett ran for Congress in 2008. His website, which links his radio shows, is TruthJihad.com.
We would also like to thank Dr. James H. Fetzer, Michael Brick, Andrew Kornkven, and Bruce Rideout for assistance with this article.


Here's my take on a solo over the classic jazz tune 'Bluesette'. I always find that if you're able to work on and give your energy to just one tune, you can really experiment with ideas and look to create something. It's a real motivation to record you own playing and listen back. Remember, learning is a process!


text:
Rearin' Back is an album by saxophonist Sonny Stitt recorded in 1962 and released on the Argo label.

Reception
Down Beat magazine's Harvey Pekar said in his April 11, 1963 review that "Stitt solos brilliantly... Stitt conceives and executes extremely complex passages so easily that some have come to take his work for granted."

The Allmusic site awarded the album 3 stars.

Track listing
All compositions by Sonny Stitt except as indicated
 "Rearin' Back" - 5:15
 "Wee" (aka Allen's Alley) (Denzil Best) - 4:04 (mistitled as the standard We on the original LP)
 "Little Girl Blue" (Lorenz Hart, Richard Rodgers) - 3:34
 "Cut Plug" - 4:13
 "Queen" - 7:00
 "Carpsie's Groove" - 6:10
 "Bunny R." - 6:14

Personnel
Sonny Stitt - alto saxophone
Ronnie Mathews - piano
Arthur Harper - bass
Lex Humphries - drums

References

1962 albums
Argo Records albums
Sonny Stitt albums
Albums produced by Esmond Edwards

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Q: Matrix Derivations-Research First off, I know that this problem is extremely long and can be intimidating. I have put a lot of work and thought into it.
In reference to what  loup blanc has responded with, I am not dismissing his answer, I just do not understand it. Please either respond according to my what, or elaborate on a different approach with as much elaboration as I have put in please.
$DT_3(R)$ is the upper triangular matrix with the diagonal being the same element over the real field R, for example $\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\\0&a&d\\0&0&a\end{bmatrix}$ where $a,b,c,d ∈R$. Based on this, we will show how the following conditions hold true.
  Determine all mappings s.t $DT_3(R) \to DT_3(R)$  and the following conditions are true:
$(1) d(A+B)=d(A)+d(B)$
$(2) d(αA)=αd(A)$  where $α$  is a scalar
$(3) d(AB)=Ad(B)+d(A)B$
Let's suppose  $\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\\0&a&d\\0&0&a\end{bmatrix}$ $\to \begin{bmatrix}f(a,b,c,d)&g(a,b,c,d)&h(a,b,c,d)\\0&f(a,b,c,d)&i(a,b,c,d)\\0&0&f(a,b,c,d)\end{bmatrix}$  where $f,g,h,i$ from $R^4 \to R$
Also, suppose
 $A=\begin{bmatrix}a&b&c\\0&a&d\\0&0&a\end{bmatrix}$ and $B=\begin{bmatrix}x&y&z\\0&x&v\\0&0&x\end{bmatrix}$
We will now work on finding the restrictions on f,g,h,i s.t. the above conditions, starting with condition
$(1) d(A+B)=d(A)+d(B)$
therefore
$d(A+B)=\begin{bmatrix}f(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)&g(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)&h(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)\\0&f(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)&i(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)\\0&0&f(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)\end{bmatrix}$
This is the left side of the equation. Now to show the right side
$d(A)+d(B)=\begin{bmatrix}f(a,b,c,d)+f(x,y,z,v)&g(a,b,c,d)+g(x,y,z,v)&h(a,b,c,d)+h(x,y,z,v)\\0&f(a,b,c,d)+f(x,y,z,v)&i(a,b,c,d)+i(x,y,z,v)\\0&0&f(a,b,c,d)+f(x,y,z,v)\end{bmatrix}$
Taking each of the elements in the above matrix and adding the respective elements together, we get the following equations:
$f(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)=f(a,b,c,d)+f( x,y,z,v)$
$g(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)=g(a,b,c,d)+g( x,y,z,v)$
$h(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)=h(a,b,c,d)+h( x,y,z,v)$
$i(a+x,b+y,c+z,d+v)=i(a,b,c,d)+i( x,y,z,v)$
Therefor f,g,h,i preservee addition.
Condition (2) states $d(αA)=αd(A)$  where $α$  is a scalar. We will take matrix A from above and multiply it by a scalar. We will show the left side of the equal sign first, then we will show the right side.
$d(αA)=\begin{bmatrix}f(αa,αb,αc,αd)&g(αa,αb,αc,αd)&h(αa,αb,αc,αd)\\0&f(αa,αb,αc,αd)&i(αa,αb,αc,αd)\\0&0&f(αa,αb,αc,αd)\end{bmatrix}$
The right-hand side will then be
$αd(A)=\begin{bmatrix}αf(a,b,c,d)&αg(a,b,c,d)&αh(a,b,c,d)\\0&αf(a,b,c,d)&αi(a,b,c,d)\\0&0&αf(a,b,c,d)\end{bmatrix}$
Thus,
$f(αa,αb,αc,αd)=αf(a,b,c,d)$
$g(αa,αb,αc,αd)=αg(a,b,c,d)$
$h(αa,αb,αc,αd)=αh(a,b,c,d)$
$i(αa,αb,αc,αd)=αi(a,b,c,d)$
Therfore f,g,h,i are linear transformations
(3)  Now to show how condition (3) holds. We will be using matrix A and matrix B from above. As before, we will start with proving the left side of the equal sign, and then progress to proving the right side, therefore showing that condition (3) is true as well.
$A=\begin{bmatrix}(a&b&c\\0&a&d\\0&0&a\end{bmatrix}$      $B=\begin{bmatrix}x&y&z\\0&x&v\\0&0&x\end{bmatrix}$
$d(AB)=Ad(B)+d(A)B$  $\to$
$\begin{bmatrix}f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)&g(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)&h(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)\\0&f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)&i(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)\\0&0&f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)))\end{bmatrix}$
=$\begin{bmatrix}(af(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)x &ag(x,y,z,v)+bf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)y+g(a,b,c,d)x&ah(x,y,z,v)+bi(x,y,z,v)+cf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)z+g(a,b,c,d)v+h(a,b,c,d)\\0&af(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)x&ai(x,y,z,v)+df(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)v+i(a,b,c,d)x\\0&0&0)\end{bmatrix}$
Since the above matrices equal each other, we can say that corresponding entries are equal to each other as well. From this point, we will match up each corresponding element in the matrices and set them equal to each other, formulating a set of 4 equations.
$Equation 1: f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)= af(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)x$
$Equation 2: g(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=$ $ag(x,y,z,v)+bf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)y+g(a,b,c,d)x$
$Equation3:h(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=ah(x,y,z,v)+bi(x,y,z,v)+cf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)z+g(a,b,c,d)v+h(a,b,c,d)x$
$Equation4:i(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=ai(x,y,z,v)+df(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)v+i(a,b,c,d)x$
Now that we have equations to work with, we would like to then simplify these equations so that we may then be able solve them. We will start with equation 1.
$Equation 1: f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)= af(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)x$
Starting with the left hand side,
$f(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)$
$=f[(ax,0,0,0)+(0,ay+bx,0,0)+(0,0,az+bv+cx,0)+(0,0,0,av+dx)]$
$=axf(1,0,0,0)+ay+bx(0,1,0,0)+az+bv+cx(0,0,1,0)+av+dx(0,0,0,1)]$
If we assign $f(1,0,0,0)=a_1,  f(0,1,0,0)=a_2, f(0,0,1,0)=a_3, f(0,0,0,1)=a_4$, we then have the following equation:
$axa_1+aya_2+bxa_2+ a_(2 ) a_3+bva_3+ cxa_3+ava_4+dxa_4$
Following the same process with the rest of the equation givs:
$axa_1+aya_2+bxa_2+ aza_3+bva_3+ cxa_3+ava_4+dxa_4= axa_1+aya_2+aza_3+ ava_4+ aa_1 x+ba_2 x+ca_3 x+ da_4 x$
When we cancel out terms on either side, we get
$bva_3=aa_1 x$.
If we remember,all $a,b,c,d,x,y,z,v Є R$, we can substitute and solve to further simplify the equation. If we set $a=0$, we then get that $a_1=a_3=0$
Taking our equation $f(a,b,c,d)=aa_1+ba_2+ca_3+da_4$, and substituting in our zero values, we are left with $f(a,b,c,d)=ba_2+da_4$. We can use our new information to simplify the other 3 equations. Let us begin with equation 2.
Equation 2:  Using the same process as above, we will begin to simplify equation 2: $g(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=$ $ag(x,y,z,v)+bf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)y+g(a,b,c,d)x$
If we assign $g(1,0,0,0)=b_1,  g(0,1,0,0)=b_2, g(0,0,1,0)=b_3, g(0,0,0,1)=b_4$,
we get $axb_1+ayb_2+bxb_2+azb_3+bvb_3+cxb_3+avb_4+dxb_4= axb_1+ayb_2+azb_3+avb_4+ bxa_1+bya_2+bza_3+bva_4+ aya_1+bya_2+cya_3+dya_4+ axb_1+bxb_2+cxb_3+dxb_4$
Canceling out terms on either side and also canceling out any terms that have $a_1$ and $a_3$ since they equal 0, we get:
$bvb_3=bya_2+bva_4+bya_2+dya_4+axb_1$
If we have $b=0$ and $a=0$, then we are left with $0=dya_4$, therefore $a_4=0$
$bvb_3=bya_2+bva_4+bya_2+dya_4+axb_1$
Taking the same equation and setting  $b=0$ and $v=0$, we then have $0=axb_1$, therefore $b_1=0$
$bvb_3=bya_2+bva_4+bya_2+dya_4+axb_1$
Once again taking the same equation, this time setting $b=1$ and $v=0$, gives us $0=2ya_2$, therefore, $a_2=0$
$bvb_3=bya_2+bva_4+bya_2+dya_4+axb_1$ and once again taking the same equation, this time just canceling out all the terms that are equal to 0, gives us $0=bvb_3$, which means that $b_3=0$ Giving us $g(a,b,c,d)=ab_1+bb_2+cb_3+db_4=bb_2+db_4$
So far, we have solved and gotten that  $a_1=a_2=a_3=a_4=0$ and  $b_1=b_2=0$ . If we apply this to equation 1: $f(a,b,c,d)=ba_2+da_4$, we now have $f(a,b,c,d)=0$
Equation 3: $h(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=ah(x,y,z,v)+bi(x,y,z,v)+cf(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)z+g(a,b,c,d)v+h(a,b,c,d)x$
Using the same process as above and assigning  $h(1,0,0,0)=c_1,  h(0,1,0,0)=c_2, h(0,0,1,0)=c_3, h(0,0,0,1)=c_4$, and if we assign $i(1,0,0,0)=d_1,  i(0,1,0,0)=d_2, i(0,0,1,0)=d_3, i(0,0,0,1)=d_4$ we then have the following equation:
Equation 3 is now $axc_1+ayc_2+bxc_2+azc_3+bvc_3+cxc_3+avc_4+dxc_4= axc_1+ayc_2+azc_3+avc_4+ bxd_1+byd_2+bzd_3+bvd_4+ cxa_1+cya_2+cza_3+cva_4+aza_1+bza_2+cza_3+dza_4+ avb_1+avb_2+cvb_3+dvb_4+ axc_1+bxc_2+cxc_3+dxc_4$
Canceling out all terms gives
$bvc_3= bxd_1+byd_2+bzd_3+bvd_4+avb_2+axc_1+dvb_4$
If we assign $b=0$ and $a=0$, we then have $0=dvb_4$, so therefore $b_4=0$
Taking the same equation
$bvc_3= bxd_1+byd_2+bzd_3+bvd_4+avb_2+axc_1+dvb_4$ and now setting $b=0$ and $v=0$, we have $c_1=0$
$bvc_3= bxd_1+byd_2+bzd_3+bvd_4+avb_2+axc_1+dvb_4$ Taking this equation once again, and deleting the last two terms since we now know that they are 0,  gives us $bvc_3= bxd_1+byd_2+bzd_3+bvd_4+avb_2$ and if we set $b=0$, we now get $0=avb_2$, which tells us that$ b_2=0$
Now, taking Equation 2 from above $g(a,b,c,d)=ab_1+bb_2+cb_3+db_4=bb_2+db_4$, we now know that $g(a,b,c,d)=0$
$h(a,b,c,d)=ac_1+bc_2+cc_3+dc_4=bc_2+cc_3+dc_4$
Equation 4: $i(ax,ay+bx,az+bv+cx,av+dx)=ai(x,y,z,v)+df(x,y,z,v)+f(a,b,c,d)v+i(a,b,c,d)x$ .
Using the same process as above to simplify Equation 4, we get:
$axd_1+ayd_2+bxd_2+azd_3+bvd_3+avd_4+dxd_4=axd_1+ayd_2+azd_3+avd_4+dxa_1+dya_2+dza_3+dva_4+dxa_1+dya_2+dza_3+dva_4+ava_1+bva_2+cva_3+dva_4 axd_1+bxd_2+cxd_3+dxd_4$
Canceling out all terms gives
$bvd_3=axd_1+cxd_3$
If we set $x=0$, we get $d_3=$0 And if $d_3=0$, then $d_1=0$
$i(a,b,c,d)=ad_1+bd_2+cd_3+dd_4=bd_2+ dd_4$
In my conclusion, I have that
$f(a,b,c,d)=0$
$g(a,b,c,d=0$
$h(a,b,c,d)=bc_2+cc_3+dc_4$
$i(a,b,c,d)=dd_4$

A: By linearity, it suffices to know $d(I_3),d(E_{1,3}),d(E_{1,2}),d(E_{2,3})$. Jason proved that $d(I_3)=0$. It is not difficult, but not very funny, to show that $d(E_{1,3})=\begin{pmatrix}0&0&q+v\\0&0&0\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$, $d(E_{1,2})=\begin{pmatrix}0&v&w\\0&0&0\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$ and $d(E_{2,3})=\begin{pmatrix}0&0&p\\0&0&q\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}$ where $p,q,v,w$ are arbitrary numbers.
Use $E_{1,2}^2=E_{1,3}^2=E_{2,3}^2=0_3$ and $(E_{1,2}+E_{2,3})^2=E_{1,3}$.
EDIT. It is not difficult to see that $d$ is a derivation over $T_3$ (the set of upper triangular matrices) that satisfies $d=0$ over the diagonal matrices. Since $\mathbb{R}$ is a field, it is well-known that a derivation over $T_n$ is inner. Here $d=\delta_U:X\rightarrow UX-XU$ where $U=\begin{pmatrix}0&p&0\\0&-v&-w\\0&0&-v-q\end{pmatrix}$. Note that $U\notin DT_3$.

A: Pardon me for elaborating on loup blanc's solution for cele's benefit here; my elaboration would simply be too long for a comment.

For any $ A,B,C,D \in \Bbb{R} $, we have
$$
  \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix}
= A \underbrace
    {\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}}_{I_{3}} +
  B \underbrace
    {\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}}_{E_{12}} +
  C \underbrace
    {\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}}_{E_{13}} +
  D \underbrace
    {\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}}_{E_{23}}.
$$
The matrices $ I_{3} $, $ E_{12} $, $ E_{13} $ and $ E_{23} $ thus form a basis for the $ \Bbb{R} $-vector space $ {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) $. Note also that $ {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) $ is an $ \Bbb{R} $-algebra under matrix multiplication.
Conditions $ (1) $, $ (2) $ and $ (3) $ say that the map $ d: {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) \to {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) $ is a derivation, i.e., a linear transformation that obeys the Leibniz Rule.
We know from linear algebra that a linear transformation is entirely determined by its values on a vector-space basis. Hence, $ d $, being a linear transformation, is entirely determined by its values on $ I_{3} $, $ E_{12} $, $ E_{13} $ and $ E_{23} $.
In what follows, $ \bullet $ shall denote matrix multiplication.

Firstly,
$$
  d(I_{3})
= d(I_{3} \bullet I_{3})
= I_{3} \bullet d(I_{3}) + d(I_{3}) \bullet I_{3}
= 2 \cdot d(I_{3}),
$$
which gives us $ d(I_{3}) = \mathbf{0}_{3} $.

Secondly,
$$
  d(E_{12} \bullet E_{12})
= E_{12} \bullet d(E_{12}) + d(E_{12}) \bullet E_{12}.
$$
However, $ E_{12} \bullet E_{12} = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, so $ d(E_{12} \bullet E_{12}) = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, which yields
$$
(\clubsuit) \qquad E_{12} \bullet d(E_{12}) = - d(E_{12}) \bullet E_{12}.
$$
Suppose that $ d(E_{12}) = \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix} $. Then $ (\clubsuit) $ implies that
\begin{align}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \\
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix} 0 & A & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Hence, $ D = 0 $ and $ A = - A $, which also gives us $ A = 0 $. Therefore,
$$
d(E_{12}) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & B & C \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
$$

Thirdly,
$$
  d(E_{13} \bullet E_{13})
= E_{13} \bullet d(E_{13}) + d(E_{13}) \bullet E_{13}.
$$
However, $ E_{13} \bullet E_{13} = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, so $ d(E_{13} \bullet E_{13}) = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, which yields
$$
(\spadesuit) \qquad E_{13} \bullet d(E_{13}) = - d(E_{13}) \bullet E_{13}.
$$
Suppose that $ d(E_{13}) = \begin{bmatrix} A' & B' & C' \\ 0 & A' & D' \\ 0 & 0 & A' \end{bmatrix} $. Then $ (\spadesuit) $ implies that
\begin{align}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0  & 0  & 1  \\ 0 & 0  & 0  \\ 0 & 0 & 0  \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix} A' & B' & C' \\ 0 & A' & D' \\ 0 & 0 & A' \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix} A' & B' & C' \\ 0 & A' & D' \\ 0 & 0 & A' \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0  & 0  & 1  \\ 0 & 0  & 0  \\ 0 & 0 & 0  \end{bmatrix}, \\
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & A' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & A' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Hence, $ A' = - A' $, which gives us $ A' = 0 $. Therefore,
$$
d(E_{13}) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & B' & C' \\ 0 & 0 & D' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
$$

Fourthly,
$$
  d(E_{23} \bullet E_{23})
= E_{23} \bullet d(E_{23}) + d(E_{23}) \bullet E_{23}.
$$
However, $ E_{23} \bullet E_{23} = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, so $ d(E_{23} \bullet E_{23}) = \mathbf{0}_{3} $, which yields
$$
(\heartsuit) \qquad E_{23} \bullet d(E_{23}) = - d(E_{23}) \bullet E_{23}.
$$
Suppose that $ d(E_{23}) = \begin{bmatrix} A'' & B'' & C'' \\ 0 & A'' & D'' \\ 0 & 0 & A'' \end{bmatrix} $. Then $ (\heartsuit) $ implies that
\begin{align}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix}
      A'' & B'' & C'' \\ 0 & A'' & D'' \\ 0 & 0 & A''
      \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix}
      A'' & B'' & C'' \\ 0 & A'' & D'' \\ 0 & 0 & A''
      \end{bmatrix}
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \\
      \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0   \\ 0 & 0 & A'' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
& = - \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & B'' \\ 0 & 0 & A'' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Hence, $ B'' = 0 $ and $ A'' = - A'' $, which also gives us $ A'' = 0 $. Therefore,
$$
d(E_{23}) = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & C'' \\ 0 & 0 & D'' \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
$$

Organizing the information that we have, we find that there exist $ p,q,r,s,t,u,v \in \Bbb{R} $ such that
\begin{align}
d(E_{12}) & = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & p & q \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix},\\
d(E_{13}) & = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & r & s \\ 0 & 0 & t \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix},\\
d(E_{23}) & = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & u \\ 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
We proceed to show that $ r = t = 0 $ and $ s = p + v $.

Observe that
$$
  d((E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet (E_{12} + E_{23}))
= (E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet d(E_{12} + E_{23}) +
  d(E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet (E_{12} + E_{23}).
$$
However, $ (E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet (E_{12} + E_{23}) = E_{13} $, so
$$
  d(E_{13})
= (E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet d(E_{12} + E_{23}) +
  d(E_{12} + E_{23}) \bullet (E_{12} + E_{23}).
$$
This implies that
\begin{align}
    \begin{bmatrix} 0 & r & s \\ 0 & 0 & t \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
& = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0     \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
    \begin{bmatrix} 0 & p & q + u \\ 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} +
    \begin{bmatrix} 0 & p & q + u \\ 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
    \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0     \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \\
& = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} +
    \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & p \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \\
& = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & p + v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Hence, $ r = t = 0 $ and $ s = p + v $.

We now have a more complete description of $ d $, namely, there exist $ p,q,u,v \in \Bbb{R} $ such that
\begin{align}
d(E_{12}) & = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & p & q \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix},\\
d(E_{13}) & = \begin{bmatrix}
              0 & 0 & p + v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0
              \end{bmatrix}, \\
d(E_{23}) & = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & u \\ 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}

Finally, to show that $ p $, $ q $, $ u $ and $ v $ have no more interdependence, consider
$$
M =  \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix}
\quad \text{and} \quad
M' = \begin{bmatrix} A' & B' & C' \\ 0 & A' & D' \\ 0 & 0 & A' \end{bmatrix}.
$$
Then
\begin{align}
    d(M)
& = A \cdot d(I_{3}) + B \cdot d(E_{12}) + C \cdot d(E_{13}) + D \cdot d(E_{23})\\
& = A \cdot \mathbf{0}_{3} +
    B \begin{bmatrix} 0 & p & q     \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} +
    C \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & p + v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} +
    D \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & u     \\ 0 & 0 & v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \\
& = \begin{bmatrix}
    0 & B p & B q + C (p + v) + D u \\ 0 & 0 & D v \\ 0 & 0 & 0
    \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Similarly, $ d(M') = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & B' p & B' q + C' (p + v) + D' u \\ 0 & 0 & D' v \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix} $. Next, observe that
\begin{align}
M \bullet d(M') & = \begin{bmatrix}
                    0 & A B' p & A B' q + A C' (p + v) + A D' u + B D' v \\
                    0 & 0      & A D' v \\
                    0 & 0      & 0
                    \end{bmatrix}, \\
d(M) \bullet M' & = \begin{bmatrix}
                    0 & A' B p & B D' p + A' B q + A' C (p + v) + A' D u \\
                    0 & 0      & A' D v \\
                    0 & 0      & 0
                    \end{bmatrix}.
\end{align}
Hence,
$$
M \bullet d(M') + d(M) \bullet M' = \\
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & (A B' + A' B) p & (A B' + A' B) q + (A C' + A' C + B D') (p + v) +
                      (A D' + A' D) u \\
0 & 0               & (A D' + A' D) v \\
0 & 0               & 0
\end{bmatrix}.
$$
As
$$
M \bullet M' = \begin{bmatrix}
               A A' & A B' + A' B & A C' + A' C + B D' \\
               0    & A A'        & A D' + A' D \\
               0    & 0           & A A'
               \end{bmatrix},
$$
we obtain
$$
d(M \bullet M') = \\
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & (A B' + A' B) p & (A B' + A' B) q + (A C' + A' C + B D') (p + v) +
                      (A D' + A' D) u \\
0 & 0               & (A D' + A' D) v \\
0 & 0               & 0
\end{bmatrix}
$$
as well. Therefore, $ d(M \bullet M') = M \bullet d(M') + d(M) \bullet M' $ without any further hypotheses.

Conclusion: A map $ d: {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) \to {\text{DT}_{3}}(\Bbb{R}) $ is a derivation if and only if there exist scalars $ p $, $ q $, $ u $ and $ v $ such that
$$
  d \!
  \left( \begin{bmatrix} A & B & C \\ 0 & A & D \\ 0 & 0 & A \end{bmatrix} \right)
= \begin{bmatrix}
  0 & B p & B q + C (p + v) + D u \\ 0 & 0 & D v \\ 0 & 0 & 0
  \end{bmatrix}.
$$

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Searchable database for information on segments, with titles and original airdates.
Wow, there's 7th episode of Black Mirror!
@DiannaMuircast My recollection is that they are in order. Tho I tend to go to for simple episode lists.
@CutToTheChaseLA Hi Chase! No new episode of Revenge aired this week. Check ( for future air dates.
@MisfitGay We have the rights to stream new episodes of Bobs Burgers the day after they air. Check ( for air dates.
@Craig_Jarrett @SethMacFarlane That's not how they're listed on . I guess it doesn't really matter.
@stichomancery You can check the on-air schedule here: ( Please add the show to your Favorites for notifications!
@Since9Duece No worries! You can also check ( for show schedules.
this shows my LOST viewing schedule for the next 6 years. Dang.
@GrrAargh Yes. Look at the gaps for Buffy when it orginally aired.
@SenorRajD This lot are touring?
Sons of Anarchy est de retour pour une ultime saison 7 \:D/ Shakespeare serait fier (et membre d'un motorcycle club).
@brotherzee Great show! It should have run for more than one season!
@MarcFi Why was this great show starring Paxton Whitehead, Linda Thorson, Bob Fraser and Michael Richards cancelled?
Happy Birthday to both the original and animated @StarTrek series! Live Long and Prosper!
@FlynnyZM Whoa! All 343 episodes?? You should make the 'dun-dun!' sound as her text alert on her phone! Hahaha.
@mirandalarae We're up to date for that show- it's taking a break per ( Thanks for your patience.
@ThatKhanyoKidd check dates. S03e18 was released in April 2014.
¿Es capaz @antena3com de emitir una serie en orden? Transporter NO (por mucho que sean episodios auto-conclusivos).


While preparing my remarks here today I happened to find on my ancient computer an earlier lecture on globalization which I delivered from this very same podium slightly over eight years ago. I was gratified to find that most if not all which I than said remains, to my mind at least, more or less valid today.
Perhaps this need to be said because for a rather long time we have been talking about globalization as something completely new and stressing the new nature of the challenges it poses, while already we are seeing the emergency of a new generation in our universities and elsewhere who are much more familiar with globalization and all sorts of things global, while the Cold War and Soviet Communism, to mention two items which dominated the thinking and discourse of my generation, are just ancient history as far as they are concerned.
But, contrary to what Henry Ford claimed, history is not bunk. As a historian myself I always stress the vital importance of knowing one's history, because those who do not know where from and how they have arrived where they are, will be able to see or influence their future either. This does not mean that one should become a prisoner of your history, but those who do not know it and recognize their history will have even more difficulties in liberating themselves from its shackles.
Thus it is important to recognize, that the consequences of a global market, the growth of multinational corporations, the internationalization of capital markets and the increasing flows of transnational financial transactions, all of which lead ti a growing interdependence between countries and peoples, is not a new phenomenon. This kind of internationalization has taken place for centuries, even if it has not always progressed evenly – remember the over 30 year setback after 1914.
Nevertheless I think that it does make sense to talk about globalization as something, or at least somewhat distinct from the internationalization we have known for centuries. Already the accumulated quantitative changes in terms of trade interdependence, transnational investment and money flows can arguably be presented as having been transformed into qualitative change. And whereas the former forms of internationalization occurred in a pre-industrial or industrializing world, we are now living in an increasingly post-industrial world where the influence of new information and communication technology (ICT) has in many ways changed our societies as well as the nature of transnational exchange.
If I had to state the powerful factor behind the fall of the Soviet Empire and the collapse of communism I would opt for the micro-chip.
The old bogey of the power wielded by large-scale corporations has also receded, as we are witnessing the emergence of truly global companies, not only in terms of their trade and production but also in terms of ownership. And even those companies who still have a clearly identified home country are progressively less able and interested in resorting to the resources of their home governments to safeguard and further their interests, which of course was the norm during the heyday of gunboat diplomacy.
Last but not least I want to point to the decisive way in which population growth has changed the world. During my own lifetime I have seen the growth of the world's population from 2,3 billion people to 6,3 billion today. And even if the rate or growth has started to decrease this figure will have reached at least 9 or even 10 billion before a levelling off will occur.
even know for certain what all the consequences will be, but it is safe to assume that we cannot hope to have more than a few decades at best to change the nature of Man's interaction with his environment to meet the requirements of socially, economically and ecologically sustainable development.
For this reason it does not make sense to discuss globalization without taking into account the number one challenge of sustainable development we face in the world: Climate Change, diminishing fresh water resources and other environmental issues. Already it is difficult to discuss these without talking about the economy and social issues, but tomorrow we will be talking also about security – including hard military security – in connection with global environmental issues.
Neither does it make much sense to continue debating whether globalization is good or bad. It is an inevitable fact of life and rather than discussing the inherent "good "or "bad "in it, we should concentrate on gaining better understanding of the dynamics behind globalization and the practical and pragmatic issues of managing globalization. But for the record I can say that I regard globalization as something which is, on balance, a positive rather than a negative phenomenon, as measured by the potential it has for enhancing human security and the quality of life.
The challenge is, however, that these benefits are not distributed equally around the world or inside different societies with many people becoming distinctly losers in this development. On the contrary it seems that income and wealth differentials are increasing, both within countries and regions and between them.
The second huge challenge is exercising democratic control over the processes involved in globalization. In a sense this means giving an adequate answer to the question "who is in charge?". While democracy has never in history been so widespread in terms of the absolute number of people and the relative proportion of all people in the world who can elect or dismiss their governments in more or less free and fair elections, there is also a growing feeling, particularly in the older and established democracies, that democratic elections have become irrelevant as those elected are not really in charge and increasingly resort to mouthing the slogans of TINA – meaning "there is no alternative"-doctrine used to justify whatever is the current neo-liberal programme of the government in office.
Diminishing belief in the possibilities of democracy has led to growing voter apathy on the one hand, and increasing belief in the necessity of and justification for extra-parliamentary activism.
Democracy has been essentially a national project, and when the power of national governments to steer the economy have been eroded and taken over by international agreements and organisations and/or anonymous global market forces, they have been perceived to have become impotent. This perception corresponds to reality, even if this impotence has often been exaggerated with the intention of getting electorates to acquiesce more easily in what governments actually have themselves chosen and/or to dismiss the possibility for alternative choices.
Globalization calls for global democracy. I don't mean that this could begin with a globally elected world parliament or even end in one, but national democratic institutions – which are still far from universal in member states of the UN – have not been able to come up with meaningful mechanisms for supernational democracy into the sphere of what necessarily is and will for the foreseeable future remain inter-governmental cooperation in international organisations. Only the European Union can with any credibility claim to have tried to address the issue of bringing democracy into its intergovernmental supernational decision-making. And in the EU it is, in my opinion, rather the efforts to involve the national parliaments of the members states in exercising control over the proceedings and decision-making in the Council more than the European Parliament as it exists today, that can enhance the inadequate democratic legitimacy of the union.
Democracy needs stable and legitimate institutions, but they are not enough. A vibrant civil society, free and accessible media and a fair distribution of resources for civic and political participation are also necessary. Here the globalization of civil society can be seen as having developed in some respects further than transnational institutions.
I make a specific point of mentioning the European Union because I regard the EU at present, with all its well-known faults and shortcomings ,as our best available instrument in endeavouring to achieve better management of globalization.
You may have noted, that I have said little about Interpreting the New Order, which is the subject of this conference, at least in comparison with managing globalization. As a lapsed social scientist I don't want in any way to underestimate the importance of studying and interpreting globalization, or perhaps I should say different globalizations. I have, on many occasions, lamented the insufficient use of social sciences as an aid in decision-making. But this may not always be the fault if politicians, social scientists should also ask themselves, are they really engaged in producing the kind of knowledge and contributing to the kind of understanding which is needed if we wish to understand and manage globalization.
Ans what does managing globalization actually entail? One way of approaching the answer is to divide the fields of global management into issues related a) to the environment, b) to security, peace and crisis management, c) to human rights, democracy and the rule of law and d) to trade, development and the economy. This can be a helpful tool a kind of check-list although trying to separate these four fields from each other is of course misleading, as they all interact and influence each other. Although one can argue that dealing with the environment is the most important one as failure to address it will sooner or later make all the issues irrelevant, it is also true that we cannot deal with climate change and other environmental challenges unless we also approach them as security, democracy and economic issues.
I think it is to the credit of the European Union that it can be identified as the international actor that has best understood the interdependence of all these aspects of globalization, and the need for a comprehensive approach to all of these at the same time.
European thinking on security and globalization issues as embodied in the Union's Security Strategy and other strategies and Finnish thinking as embodied in our White Paper on Security and Defence or in the Helsinki Process on Globalization and Democracy we have launched go well together.


Sue Makeup Box 10 is a classic sue doll game for little girls. Hope you enjoy online playing this flash game Sue Makeup Box 10.
10500 girls played Sue Makeup Box game 10 game online, please share this funny games with your friend!


Explore communion at CC and Communion Classes for grades 5-8.
Adults are invited to celebrate communion every Sunday during worship services. We invite all adults who are seeking a deeper relationship with Christ to receive communion with us. We believe that Jesus' body and blood are present in the bread and wine.
5th-8th graders should complete our Student Communion Class (First Communion) before participating in communion during worship. We offer a one-day class every winter (Jan) and spring (April or May). Our upcoming classes will be listed on the church calendar or on the Events Page.
You can sign up for the next class below.
Adults and high schoolers who wish to understand Communion on a deeper level are invited to contact Pastor Andrew.