text:
Compensation Design & Communication
Stock Options, ESOPS & Stock
Employee Assistance Programs – EAPs
Company Health Benefit Plan Design
Employee Health Benefit Education & Communication
Open Enrollment Advice for Employees
Open Enrollment Advice for Management
Understanding Benefits – Employees
Relocation – Moving for Work
Savings & Retirement
Pensions & Defined Benefit Plans
Retirement Planning for Employees
Hiring & Staffing
Candidate Assessment & Testing
Contingent & Temporary) Staffing
Downsizing & Layoffs
Labor Relations/Unions
Benefits law
ERISSA
Global Employment Law
Wages & Hours
Immigration Law & Employment
Workplace Law for Employees
Safety & Workplace Violence
Job Search Technology
The Internet & the Workplace
Training & Career Development
Keeping Your Job
Union Organizing
Global Human Resources Management
Global Business Issues
Management Ethics
The HR Profession
Opinions/Blogs
The Ever-Expanding Wide World of Work Job Board List
Wide World of Work Lists
WWoW Employment Trends Dashboard
$6.7M Settlement of FCRA class action against Kelly Services gets preliminary nod
26/01/2017 | Filed under: News | Posted by: admin
By Joy Waltemath
By Lorene D. Park, J.D.
A federal district court in Michigan granted preliminary approval of a settlement that would end a putative class action by job applicants who claimed Kelly Services violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by including a release of liability and other information in what should be a stand-alone disclosure that a background check may be procured. Kelly agreed to create a settlement fund of $6,749,000 that would benefit a class of potentially 220,000 individuals. The court requested further information, before final approval, justifying attorneys' fees and named plaintiffs' incentive award (Hillson v. Kelly Services, Inc., January 23, 2017, Michelson, L.).
Alleged violation of "stand-alone disclosure" requirement. When the named plaintiffs applied to work for Kelly Services in 2012 and 2013, they allegedly received a form disclosing that Kelly might have a background check run to assess employability. But contrary to the FCRA's requirements in Section 1681b(b)(2)(A)(i), this initial disclosure was not in a stand-alone document consisting solely of the disclosure. It included a waiver stating: "To the fullest extent permitted by law, I release Kelly, its employees, agents, successor and assigns, from any and all claims . . . in any way related to the procurement of a consumer report about me, or any subsequent investigation(s) of my background or personal history." There was also a disclaimer: "this authorization is not a contract for continued employment."
Proposed settlement. According to the plaintiffs, there are about 220,000 applicants who received virtually identical disclosures. After discovery, mediation sessions, and negotiations, the parties reached a settlement and sought court approval. Under the agreement, Kelly would create a settlement fund of $6,749,000, none of which would revert to Kelly. Of this, up to 33 percent (around $2,250,000) will go for class counsel fees, $330,000 for administrative expenses, and named plaintiffs would receive incentive awards of $2,500 each. If all 220,000 potential class members make a claim, the payout will be about $41 for an "Adjudicated Ineligible" member and $14 for those with favorable background checks. Kelly also agreed to remove the waiver and disclaimer.
In exchange, the parties proposed that class members who don't opt out agree to forever release any and all claims "arising out of or relating directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever to the facts alleged or asserted in the Complaint . . . and which relate directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever to Defendant's procurement of consumer reports . . ."
Standing under Spokeo. First, the court addressed whether the plaintiffs established a "particularized" and "concrete" injury as required for Article III standing under the Supreme Court's ruling in Spokeo. It was a close question because they did not claim that, in signing a form that included a waiver and disclaimer, they did not understand that they were authorizing Kelly to obtain their consumer report. Indeed, they acknowledged that none of the class members suffered "actual damages" based on the disclosure's wording. So the question was whether this procedural violation was concrete enough. Noting the Sixth Circuit has not yet ruled on the issue and other courts are divided, the court declined to "fully weigh in on this split in authority" and held that, under the particular facts here, there was a "risk of real harm" because of the waiver. In signing the form, an applicant could believe she was agreeing not to sue Kelly if it ran a background check, not that she was granting permission to run the check.
Agreement is "fair enough." On the merits, the court explained that at the preliminary approval stage, it is not deciding whether the settlement is fair and reasonable but instead deciding if it is "fair enough" to expend effort and expenses in sending potential class members notice and in processing opt-outs and objections. Here, the agreement met that mark. As to procedural issues, the settlement arose from arms-length, non-collusive negotiations and was proceeded by sufficient discovery. The mediations and associated briefing reflected that the parties have a deep understanding of the strength and weakness of their positions.
In terms of substantive fairness, the court found the amount of recovery for class members fair when compared to the likely amount of recovery at trial. The plaintiffs (understandably) seek statutory as opposed to actual damages and, assuming they showed at trial that Kelly willfully violated the FCRA, each class member would receive somewhere between $100 and $1,000. In reviewing the claim, the court found it was more likely around $100 given the violation was merely technical. Also, there was good reason to think the plaintiffs might not be able to show Kelly knew it was violating the stand-alone disclosure provision or took a risk "substantially greater" than that associated with a careless reading of the FCRA provision at issue. With this in mind, the court preliminarily found the amount of recovery fair. It also found that the allocation of the settlement fund was fair.
As for what the potential class members are giving up in exchange, the court found the scope of the release—which the parties narrowed after the court previously expressed concerns about its breadth—was reasonable. It represented a typical release tied directly to the claim at issue.
Court wants more info on fees and incentive. With respect to attorneys' fees, the court found that 33 percent of the settlement fund was in the ballpark of a reasonable award, but it wanted further briefing in order to better evaluate the reasonableness. The court noted that the settlement was not contingent on an award of fees and a full analysis was not necessary at this time. The court also directed the parties to reconsider the $2500 incentive payment to named plaintiffs or to further justify it when seeking final approval, because it represented over 25 times what other class members would receive and substantive fairness also involves considering whether named plaintiffs receive preferential treatment.
Notice, opt-out procedures approved. After reviewing the first proposed postcard notices, which provided putative class members with a summary of the settlement and most information required by Rule 23, the court found two significant omissions: (1) a description of the release of claims; and (2) a description of how the class is divided into two groups. Before the preliminary approval hearing, the parties revised the notices to include the information and concluded it was good enough, especially when supplemented by a long-form notice explicitly referenced in the postcards, and which included all of the information required by Rule 23. The court also approved the proposed claims process, including the opt-out and objection procedures. It noted that the post cards clearly inform class members they must submit a written notice to opt out and direct members to a settlement website for further instructions.
Preliminary class certification granted. Having decided that the settlement agreement was procedurally and substantively fair, the court addressed the Rule 23 requirements for class certification and preliminarily certified a class for the purpose of settlement. Of note, about 40,000 of the 220,000 potential class members had a consumer report that Kelly did not identify as favorable, so it could be inferred that the parties viewed these class members differently, as their settlement grants them three times the recovery. Nonetheless, the court found the plaintiffs' claim typical of the "Adjudicated Ineligible" group because the claims of both classes were identical: they received and signed a disclosure that did not comply with the FCRA. The difference between the groups was the extent of the privacy breach, because those ineligible had potentially embarrassing information revealed without valid authorization.
Source:: $6.7M Settlement of FCRA class action against Kelly Services gets preliminary nod
List your business in the premium web directory for free This website is listed under Human Resources Directory
Contact WOW
Wide World of Work
San Diego, USA Pacific Time, GMT -8
Email: contact@wideworldofwork.com A DIGITAL SHADOW MANAGEMENT WEBSITE	Powered by WordPress - Designed by Gabfire Themes


If you're doing business online, then you can do business with us! Our fulfillment service providers have well-established technology-driven business-to-business and business-to-consumer e-commerce support operations across all of North America. In addition to fulfillment services, many of our providers offer value-added services, such as integration of your online storefront to their backend fulfillment systems.
Our goal is to become a direct extension of the manufacturer in providing remote warehousing, inventory storage, put-away, picking, packing and next day shipping of forward moving products, a fulfillment solution.
To learn how we can help with your fulfillment requirements, Request a rate quote.


text:
Q: Aggregating using Spring mongo group after a project is not finding the correct field I have a collection with a dataset that looks like:
{
    "resource" : "10.10.10.10",
    "statistics" : {
        "connections" : 17
    }
}
{
    "resource" : "10.10.10.10",
    "statistics" : {
        "connections" : 24
    }
}

I want to use Mongo's $group/$push mechanism to return a dataset that looks like:
{ "_id" : "10.10.10.10", "statTotals" : [ 17, 24 ] }

In Mongo shell, I can that by doing:
db.testcol.aggregate([ { "$project" : { "resource" : 1 , "total" : "$statistics.connections"}} , { "$group" : { "_id" : "$resource" , "statTotals" : { "$push" : "$total"}}} ])

Now I want to do this using Spring's Mongo data solution in Java. The operations I'm currently trying to use are:
ProjectionOperation projOper = Aggregation.project("resource").and("statistics.connections").as("total");
GroupOperation groupOper = Aggregation.group("resource").push("total").as("statTotals");

Unfortunately, this is generating a pipeline which looks like:
{ "aggregate" : "event" , "pipeline" : [ { "$project" : { "resource" : 1 , "total" : "$statistics.connections"}} , { "$group" : { "_id" : "$resource" , "statTotals" : { "$push" : "$statistics.connections"}}}]}

In the $group, the $push is being done against $statistics.connections instead of $total so the results come back blank.
Any help would be greatly appreciated on this. At first I thought this might be https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAMONGO-1254 but I've tried using both 1.7.2 as well as 1.8.1 and get the same results.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


New discoveries in the field of developmental cognitive neuroscience hold great promise for improving current teaching methods. Yet there remains a significant gap between the scientific discoveries that could improve our education system and the application of this knowledge. This meeting will highlight cutting-edge developments in cognitive neuroscience that could improve current teaching methods and will include a careful review of the current obstacles to applying these methods in the classroom as well as the related emotional, sociological, and environmental factors. Keynote lectures will feature Goldie Hawn (The Hawn Foundation) and Carl Wieman (White House Office of Science and Technology Policy).
Schools are under great pressure to provide students with a body of knowledge and skills in safe and secure environments so these children can navigate the heady seas of childhood and emerge as well-adjusted, successful, and happy adults. In recent years, neuroscience has become an important and essential ingredient of teaching excellence. Great teachers have always sensed what methods worked; yet, advances in brain-imaging technology and cognitive neuroscience and psychology research have now made it possible to correlate experiential knowledge with empirical scientific research and emergent educational theory. That the nurturing environment of an "optimistic classroom" yields more focused, joyful attitudes toward learning among children points to a direct correlation between events at the cellular level of the brain and human behavior and thought processes. When teachers effectively use strategies to reduce emotional distress and build a positive learning environment based on how the brain processes sensory input and data, students gain emotional resilience and learn more efficiently and at higher levels of cognition. The better children understand their thoughts and feelings and the more they know about their brains, the easier it is for them to be aware and in control of their behavior and dispositions. To establish the optimal educational environment, children's brains need to be open and ready for learning if they are to acquire new information and process it effectively. In fact, children may learn the tools of self-awareness and emotional regulation that promotes optimal learning. By cultivating greater self-awareness, children can understand better how to respond to their world reflectively instead of reflexively. As researchers and practitioners are demonstrating, teachers as well as students benefit from being able to connect the neuroscience of learning to the arts of teaching and learning.
Directions to the Aspen Meadows Resort/Aspen Institute.
For any additional information and for special needs, including child/family care resources available to conference attendees, please email Crystal Ocampo.


The exemplary Watson College of Education Professional Development System (PDS) Partnership has established collegial working relationships with twelve school districts (including one Department of Defense) and two charter schools.
The university recognized early that true systemic reform of teacher preparation would require honest and sustainable partnerships among schools of education, public schools and the general public. Since 1993, the PDS has grown to include over 2,000 partnership teachers.
In 2006 the PDS was awarded the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Teacher Education by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities. In March of 2014, the PDS won the National Association of Professional Development Schools (NAPDS) award for Exemplary PDS Achievement.
For more information about this award, please visit the following link.
Interested in becoming a partnership district or school?
Are you a new or returning site coordinator?
Are you a new or returning partnership teacher?
Are you a teacher candidate ?


text:
SCOREGolf
2022 RBC PGA Scramble
Japanese star says he always plays for his country but is extra motivated to win after devastation back home.
Added incentive for Ishikawa
PALM HARBOR, Fla. – Part of Ryo Ishikawa wishes he could fly home to Japan to see his family and find ways to help a country devastated by an earthquake and tsunami and now facing concerns over a nuclear meltdown.
The 19-year-old realizes there is little he can do but try to play his best golf.
Ishikawa, the biggest golfing star in Japan with nine victories, is in the middle of a three-tournament stretch at the Transitions Championship and will be in America through the Masters.
He grew up northwest of Tokyo, some 480 kilometres from the Miyagi prefecture that was hardest hit by the calamity. His family is safe and he speaks to them every day. But his heart is hurting.
"It almost pains me that I am out there and the people of Japan are going through the worst crisis," Ishikawa said Tuesday. "I never for once felt lucky that I am here, meaning that my heart and soul are with the people of Japan. Even though I am physically here, my mind is there. Thousands are struggling over there as I speak here today.
"I would like to perform at my best with them in my thoughts."
Ishikawa learned quickly of the destruction last Friday, then finished off his best round on American soil with a 65 at Doral. The rest of the week was a struggle, however, and he closed with a 78 to tie for 42nd.
The teen sensation attributed that more to the Blue Monster at Doral than the distraction of what is happening at home. And he is determined not to let it bother him on the Copperhead Course at Innisbrook this week.
"I wish I could go over there and assist with the search-and-rescue teams," he said. "In reality, even if I were to go back, there is very little that I could actually do. I couldn't bring them a whole lot of food or go back into the areas that were hit. We're not allowed in there right now. The only thing I can do is train hard, play hard, play great golf and provide some good news for the people of Japan."
He will play the Arnold Palmer Invitational next week at Bay Hill, then go to Augusta National to prepare for the Masters, which is to be played April 7-10. Ishikawa said he will go home right after the Masters, and he still plans to play the Japan Golf Tour's opening tournament that next week.
Ishikawa has not been able to bring his extraordinary success in Japan over to American soil, a priority for him. If there were ever a time for him to break though, he could not think of a better one.
"I would love to win for the people of Japan, but that is a thought I always carry when I play overseas," he said. "Given this crisis, my motivation is at the highest it has ever been. There is no negative pressure. I just feel very focused and zoned in. And if I could produce such a brilliant result . . . and if the bright news could be a source of encouragement for the people of Japan, I would be at my happiest."
Tags: Golf News, ryo ishikawa, Tournaments
Jason Logan loves checking out unique new products at the PGA Show. Here's what caught his eye this year.
Staff21 hours ago
Silverman's magical week keyed by new mindset
com MEMBERSHIP
content and WIN prizes!
Powered by i-River Integrated Solutions.
TOP 59 PUBLIC

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


These beautiful stud earrings are set with round brilliant diamonds in 4 prongs.
Earrings are 5.3 mm from front to back.
These earrings were just polished by our jeweler and graded by our GIA graduate diamond grader.


custom dining chairs s chair toronto.
antique dining room chairs beautiful furniture sets for sale in ontario.
diamond and opal engagement rings rose gold wedding ring luxury vintage floral with solid black.
watercolor abstract art free print of blue paint stroke artwork.
oil bunners natural yankee burner asda.
decorative garden gates metal contemporary unique gate on sale outdoor.
pet memorials ideas ornaments gift paw print custom dog ornament memorial for the garden.
single stone rings diamond engagement ring gold.
grandma birthday gifts gift for grandmother mothers day frame nana personalized pinterest.


Gretchen's Prayer is the second of Parish Alvars's two Illustrations of German Poetry. Gretchen is the tragic heroine of Goethe's brilliant epic melodrama 'Faust', published in 1808, and widely considered to be the greatest work of German literature. The scene is set on the city ramparts, where Gretchen is at a shrine dedicated to the Mater Dolorosa, set in a niche in the wall. She places flowers in a vase, and kneels to pray.
2010 Engraving contains two versions of the work.
Compiled and edited by David Watkins.
sur Béatrice di Tenda. Opus 38.


aww.. another one fell for the cuckoo-clock-cliché. at least you skipped the lederhosen, which is also not swiss at all. but it's nice to see that swiss bank accounts are still considered 'cool'..
I'd switch to any bank that gave me free cheese!
Hopefully it's Swiss cheese. Made from high altitude Alpine meadow flower fed milk cows.
You can have the chicks, I'll take the cheese.
Heck, I'd open a bank account for "high altitude Alpine meadow flower fed milk cows" any day!
Crud…I mean CHEESE from said cows!
Hey, Adam, we need an "edit" button for when we accidentally post before reviewing what we wrote. I was so concerned about getting the html tags right, I forgot to say cheese.
Awww, maaaaaaan! I hate it when that happens . . .
It's designed this way deliberately, Jeff, so we can all laugh at what you (or I or anyone else) posted without proofing.
Dude. Preafrooding: you're doin' it wrong.
But you get to empty your change jar in such a pretty place!
My bank used to give out umbrellas or turkeys. I like the cheese idea, I'll tell the Bank President.
I like the way it looks in the second panel. Because of the distance, it's like Nerd just says "Boom! Have checkbook and cheese!" and they appeared in Bug's hands magically.
In all seriousness, I'd love to have a bank that would work for me instead of the merchant. By that I mean a bankcard that automatically cancels any automatic billing (subscriptions/renewals/etc.) *unless* I specifically indicate I want it renewed.
The world would beat a path to their door, cheese not-Swiss-standing.
That's capitalism for ya. It's more profitable to screw customers than to please them.
No. That's "Corporate Greed" for ya. Capitalism has nothing to do with screwing over customers.
Heh, I actually had a Swiss bank account once. (Got it when I studied there for a year) Turns out, they actually have NEGATIVE interest, so eventually I had to cancel it as I ended up with negative numbers in my account after a few years. Guess they charge extra for the anonymity or something….


Portions of Mesa Drive between Peach Tree Hills Drive and Central Road will be closed to through traffic for approximately six days beginning Friday, October 13, for roadway and utility improvements as part of the 2017 Mesa Development Water Rehabilitation project.
Access to residences and businesses will be maintained during construction and motorists wanting to avoid possible delays should seek an alternate route. Detour routes around the construction will be in effect. RoadRUNNER Transit will not be impacted.


It has been seven years since Sanātana Gosvāmī's Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava, translated with commentary by Gopīparāṇadhana dāsa, came to us via The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, Northern Europe division. The worn and taped dust jack of my copy and its many similarly treated pages testify to my repeated immersions in this book, which unfailingly offers up further riches with each reading.
In short, Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava is an extraordinary book. A spiritual as well as a literary masterpiece, this finely wrought work directly conveys to the keen reader the blessings of its great devotee author, who not only opens up for us a path into the Vṛndāvana-līlā of Śrī Kṛṣṇa but also makes himself our companion on the way.
Gobsmacked—only the UK slangword conveys my condition as I stood there, robbed of speech and motion as my friend turned and quit the room, leaving me alone and wondering over the gulf between his and my reception of the work.
Taking up the offending book, I tried to replicate my friend's way of reading. I let my eyes run down the pages, skipping from one bold-faced verse translation to the next. I saw the problem right away.
That kind of reading will not do. It is natural enough, being the usual way we size up a potential read on a library or bookstore shelf—or on Amazon (where you can tap your way through the first pages of a possible purchase).
And, I confess, I subjected Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava to the same sort of treatment when it first came into my hands. But almost immediately I saw the fault of it. And it is a grave fault, a fault that dooms lives.
Learning how to read Sanātana Gosvāmī's book, giving it all due attention, endows the fortunate reader with a life-saving ability, a honed skill in rescue and recovery for the soul. This is the epitome of remedial reading—bhavauṣadha, a cure for the affliction of material existence.
Accessing the mysteries of Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava begins with giving full regard to the original Sanskrit language of the texts. The work is an exemplary instance of the sophisticated poetic art of a high culture, and as such, it realizes that astounding concentrated expression of beauty and sense and feeling that characterizes poetry at its best. The language of such works is often formidably difficult, but here we find the opposite. The Sanskrit is highly accessible.
This is because Sanātana Gosvāmī has employed to great advantage two elements that renders the language, especially in the matter of grammar, quite simple. This tactic well serves his aim: to distill and condense the narration of Kṛṣṇa's Vṛndāvana-līlā, as recounted in the first forty-five chapters of the Tenth Canto of Śrīmad Bhāgavatam, into a refined, concentrated, and easy-to-consume elixir.
In the process of intensifying the sweet taste of the recounting of Kṛṣṇa's pastimes, Sanātana Gosvāmī refashions them all into his personal heartfelt hymns of direct address and offerings of homage. As a result, the reader is enabled to savor Kṛṣṇa-līlā enriched by Sanātana Gosvāmī's own appreciations of it, seasoned, as it were, by a precious, transcendent condiment. Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava is thus the literary form of mahā-mahā-prasāda.
The narration, with singular elegance, has been refashioned into a kind of devotional performance, a formal practice or sādhana, and its privileged reader is enlisted into rehearsing it together with the author, who has employed all his mastery of language in service both to Kṛṣṇa and the reader. That service: to transfigure and transport the reader from idle bystander to spirited player in Kṛṣṇa's Vṛndāvana-līlā.
As readers, we need to take full advantage of the author's two simplifying devices: First, the wholesale use of the classical Sanskrit compound. Second, the almost exclusive reliance on two grammatical indicators of devotional action: the vocative, indicating calling out to or addressing someone, and the dative, indicated giving or offering something to someone.
Thus, even novice chanters of the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra—whose knowledge of Sanskrit may include no more than three words—are already receiving some preparation for Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava. In fact, it is evident that the mahā-mantra itself has served as the inspiration, model, and template for that work. Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava, by recasting Śrīmad Bhāgavatam in the image of the mahā-mantra, discloses to the attentive reader the treasure-trove inherent in the chanting of Hare Kṛṣṇa, and the work thus enriches and enlivens the practitioner's own nāma-japa and nāma-kīrtana.
Before going any further, let me make clear that my own knowledge of Sanskrit is elementary. I studied the language in a one-semester university course (designed to give students of Indo-European linguistic an overview), but after that, full engagement in ISKCON and my own mental challenges in the matter of languages combined to retard much progress. Still, I can read Devanāgarī, I have a smattering of grammar and vocabulary, I can look up things in Sanskrit-English dictionaries and in some grammar books. Dear reader, I hope my own lack of expertise will serve as a testament to the accessibility of Sanātana Gosvāmī's great work, and encourage everyone, at whatever level of Sanskrit learning, to engage with the original text.
Here I'll go over some verses from Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava in order demonstrate the process of reading them, taking advantage of the kind work of Gopīparāṇadhana Prabhu.
The verses I've selected are special, for in them the author's feelings become most nakedly expressed.
"Vow" does not adequately translate the word vrata, although making a vow forms an important part of a vrata. A vrata, in the full sense, is a prescribed ritualistic undertaking, usually of some difficulty, which one commits to and fulfills under a solemn vow, with the aim of achieving a (usually) pious end. It is a "meritorious act of devotion or austerity" (Monier-Williams). The gopī–vrata honored the standard practice of unmarried girls to satisfy the goddess Katyāyani, so that they may be given in marriage to a desirable husband.
As recounted in first six verses of this chapter, the gopīs, having reached the appropriate age, carefully performed the katyāyani–vrata, each longing for none but Kṛṣṇa as bridegroom. Their devotion captured Kṛṣṇa's heart.
When we turn to the full verse translation (given in bold type), we find the holy name gopa–kanyā–vrata–prīta rendered into English by a complete sentence: "You were pleased by the vow of the cowherd maidens." The meaning is simply and lucidly conveyed in standard English, but we notice at once how the concentrated expressive power of the Sanskrit poetry has become unavoidably diluted, and the vocative sense is lost.
It is well known that poetry as such defies translation. Language is poetic when as many of its elements as possible are used to produce the aesthetic effect. The sound and rhythm of the words are as vital as their lexical meanings, and all forms of literary special effects and word play are granted their field day. The inspired poetry or kavya of ancient and medieval Sanskrit is especially proof against efforts to being replicated in modern English. Therefore, in his translations Śrīla Prabhupāda has supplied his readers with the materials we need to access the original—the original language, the word-for-word meanings, the text translation, and the purport. Gopīparāṇadhana Prabhu has wisely followed in his footsteps.
Opting for clarity and directness in his verse translations, Gopīparāṇadhana dāsa knows that they are only one element toward a deeper realization of the text through the original language. And in Śrī Kṛṣṇa Līlā Stava, direct, unmediated access to the original language become feasible for us, because of Sanātana Gosvāmī's use of the simple and simplifying device of the compound. Taking additional help from Gopīparāṇadhana dāsa's work, any of us, with a little effort, can learn to read the Sanskrit texts directly, that is, without any need for a mental translation.
Looking at each verse on the page, we can easily and conveniently direct our attention as needed, weaving our way back and forth among the original Sanskrit text, the appropriate word-for-word rendering, and the full verse translation. Soon, even if our memory power has been much vitiated by modern life, we can read the Sanskrit directly. This will prove to be worth the effort. A translation inevitably dilutes the concentrated expressive power of the Sanskrit poetry. Moreover, in this particular case, direct reading brings us some way toward an immediate experience or realization of the transcendent unity of Kṛṣṇa, whose names, forms, activities, abodes, associates, and descriptions, are, each and every one, a vessel that contains the whole.
The second pada (or half-line) of the verse is: prasīda varadeśvara. This utterance is an interjection into the Bhāgavatam narrative by Sanātana Gosvāmī. He directly pleads to Kṛṣṇa, prasīda, formed from the root pra-√sad, means "be merciful" or "be gracious." He means, "Be merciful to me!" And he addresses Kṛṣṇa as the īśvara, the Lord or the master. Of what or whom? Of vara–da, all those who give (da) blessings (vara). We have just heard in the previous line Kṛṣṇa extolled as one pleased by the vrata of the gopīs, undertaken to obtain the blessings of gaining Kṛṣṇa as their husband. In other words, they asked Kṛṣṇa to give them Kṛṣṇa. Here Sanātana Gosvāmī himself joins in their prayer. He shows his hopefulness by addressing Kṛṣṇa as the best and greatest of all who give blessings. The greatest giver would have to be the greatest both in the liberality of his giving and in the value of his gifts. Kṛṣṇa is both. Sanātana Gosvāmī's plea here, at the outset of this episode, anticipates his full articulation of it five verses later (228).
Perhaps the most peculiar, and initially dismaying, feature of Sanskrit is it complex system of conditional phonological change known as [given in devanagari here] (sandhi), or combination. Various kinds of environmentally conditioned changes occur in all languages, but no other has for formalized and systematized them as has Sanskrit.
In the verse translation, Gopīparāṇadhana Prabhu renders this one compounded word into a complete English sentence: "You thief, You stole the clothes of the gopīs engrossed in playing in the water!" (Here, our translator shows us the tone of mock reproach—a blend of pleasure and indignation—expressed in the gopī's response.) Making good use of the all facilities provided by Sanātana Gosvāmī and Gopīparāṇadhana Prabhu, we should quickly be able to savor the intense taste contained in the original language.


text:
Geiserbox
Zecron
Education in Spain
High standing gastronomy course
Guided tour of the winery
Experience in Spain
Invest in Spain
International Lobby
Selling in China
Legal advice to companies
Your headquarters in China
China has brought 1,731 grams of samples from the Moon
China will have the world's largest radio telescope in January
China`s Factory growns
The unstoppable advance of Grupo Hormiga
China is the key to the world's largest free trade agreement
China made loans to poor countries
When the coronavirus started spreading across the globe last month, Pakistan's foreign minister called his counterpart in Bejing to make an urgent request: the country's economy was plummeting, so the government needed to restructure thousands of millions of dollars in loans from China.
Beijing has received similar requests from Kyrgyzstan, Sri Lanka, and several African nations that want to restructure their debt, extend payments, or forgive tens of billions of dollars in loans due this year.
Each of these requests further counterproducts China's desire to become the largest provider of banking services in the developing world. Twenty years ago, China began making global loans left and right, channeling hundreds of billions of dollars to different countries with the intention of expanding its sphere of influence and becoming a political and economic superpower. The borrowers pledged ports, mines and other crown jewels.
As the world economy falters, more and more countries are reporting to Beijing that they are unable to make debt payments.
China will have to make difficult decisions. If you restructure loans or forgive debts, it could cause great strain on your financial system and enrage the Chinese people, who are already suffering from their own slowdown. On the other hand, if China demands payments now that countries are already angry with Beijing for its handling of the pandemic, it could jeopardize its mission to become a nation with global influence.
"On the political front, China is already on the defensive," said Andrew Small, a researcher with the American fund, the German Marshall Fund. He added that if China exercised the right to take possession of the goods for non-payment, "it would have in its possession strategic assets in countries that now cannot even feed its people."
China's global reputation is at stake. Several countries have openly questioned its role in the coronavirus outbreak, with Chinese officials initially downplaying the severity and ease of transmission of the disease. Beijing now sells and donates face masks and other equipment to help improve its damaged image. A wrong decision could cause a significant setback in your global ambitions.
On the other hand, the financial risks are also enormous. The Kiel Institute, a German research group, estimates that China has made loans to the developing world of at least $ 520 billion, the vast majority in recent years. In such a case, Beijing has lent more money than the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund.
The main motive for these loans is the Belt and Silk Road Initiative, President Xi Jinping's $ 1 trillion program that aims to finance infrastructure projects around the world and win some allies in the process. Since the program started in 2013, China has awarded some $ 350 billion to different countries, half of which are considered high-risk debtors.
China has already scrapped the idea of a massive debt cancellation, but hinted that it is ready to negotiate. In some cases, agreements have already been finalized: the Kyrgyz government announced in April that China agreed to reschedule the payment of $ 1.7 billion of debt, without giving further details.
Others also hope for some help. "We have not only asked China for help," explained S.R. Attygalle, the Sri Lankan Treasury secretary, spoke of requests made to Japan and the China Export-Import Bank. For now, he said, the Development Bank of China has extended a line of credit by $ 700 million to help Sri Lanka resist, reduced the interest rate and delayed the payment program for two years.
Outside of these measures, Chinese officials have not yet decided how to deal with the problem, according to some people aware of part of the deliberations.
Reducing debt "is neither easy nor effective," Song Wei, an official in the research division at the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, wrote in the Global Times, a newspaper controlled by the Communist Party. "What China could do to help is revive loan-financed projects and realize sustainable gains, rather than simple measures like offering debt cancellations."
China's loans differ from almost all other loans made to developing countries, either by wealthy nations or by institutions like the World Bank. They usually have higher interest rates and shorter maturities, so they must be refinanced every two years. Many times national assets are used as collateral or collateral. Due to these characteristics, the banks controlled by the Chinese government have enough confidence to lend money to poor countries.
In some places, loans have skyrocketed. Djibouti's debts to China jumped to more than 80 percent of its annual economic output. Ethiopia's debt to China is equivalent to 20 percent of its annual output, while that of Kyrgyzstan is around 40 percent.
Everything seems to indicate that Beijing played down the risk that all developing countries could experience serious credit problems at the same time. China still insists on treating the debts of different countries on a case-by-case basis. However, the leaders of those nations are increasingly calling for comprehensive global measures to be put in place to help them solve their problems.
"China wants to keep the countries of the Belt and the Silk Road divided, because together they are stronger than separately," said Benn Steil, director of International Economy at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). .
In April, the Prime Minister of Pakistan called on institutions and rich countries to reduce the debt of developing nations. Two weeks later, the Group of 20, to which China belongs, announced that they would freeze debt payments from the world's poorest countries until the end of the year.
However, Song, the Commerce Ministry official, wrote in the Global Times that preferential loans from the China Export-Import Bank "do not have any debt relief applied to them." The Export-Import Bank of China is the piggy bank for the Belt and Silk Road program, which has funded more than 1,800 projects worth more than $ 149 billion, the lender revealed last year.
Chinese officials insist they will continue to carry out projects in the developing world. Pakistan last week authorized a $ 5.8 billion contract to build a dam for an alliance between a Chinese government-owned company and the Pakistani Army business unit. Detailed financing information was not disclosed.
The problem is that, if China adopts an intransigent stance, the debtor nations could agree to try to form a united front. They could disclose the amounts of their loans from China, as well as the applicable provisions, which would generate even more attention to the problem. Other countries could change the way they make loans, thus forcing China to change its methods or relax its rules.
"This is a key moment for China," said Scott Morris, a researcher at the Center for Global Development expert group. "Due to the variety of countries that could be in default, there could be a great risk for China. Will you accept an inevitable reduction in part of these debts? Or will they be willing to seize the assets of those countries during such a difficult time? "
infobae.com
Legal Inormation
EurochinaBridge
Why EurochinaBridge
Plaça Francesc Macià 7, Plt. 17 - 08029 Barcelona (Spain)
WECHAT: sfabogados2016
Calle Las Barcas 2, Plt. 2 - 46002 Valencia (Spain)
9F, No.525 Xizang Middle Road, 200003, Huangpu District, Shanghai (China)
+86 021 63731579 |
© Copyright 2021 EurochinaBridge. All rights reserved.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more


United States ambassador Kevin Whitaker has threatened to cut aid to Colombia unless the powers of the country's war crimes tribunal are curtailed, according to newspaper El Espectador.
The newspaper talked to almost all senators and house representatives who were present at the two breakfasts at Whitaker's mansion in Bogota, despite the ambassador's request to maintain confidentiality.
According to one of the senators present at a private meeting on April 1, the ambassador threatened the US could pull the plug on financial aid if Congress did not remove the war crimes tribunal's power to shield demobilized FARC leaders from extradition as agreed in a 2016 peace deal.
He said that if Congress did not approve the extradition [clause], the United States could take steps, such as ending to send $500 million in aid to the country.
The ambassador said his government was Colombia's largest benefactor and that since 2016, when the agreement was signed, they have contributed US$1 billion, which would be put at risk if the US's main interest in Colombia, extradition, was affected. [Senator Ivan] Marulanda replied that Colombians cared more about peace in their country than American money.
The JEP currently has the powers to test evidence before allowing extradition to shield demobilized FARC leaders from being extradited on possibly bogus claims.
The court's powers were put to the test in April last year when the US requested the extradition of FARC leader "Jesus Santrich" on an unsubstantiated drug trafficking charge.
The April 1 meeting with the senators went relatively well because Whitaker had invited mainly conservative and far-right senators who already opposed the war crimes tribunal.
But a second meeting with the members of the House Commission that was studying Duque's controversial objections to the JEP's statutory law did not go down well at all.
Also in this meeting the ambassador threatened to cut aid to Colombia because, according to Whitaker, "love is money," on representative said.
Five of the six representatives present at the meeting told El Espectador that the ambassador's attitude became "intimidating" and "hardly diplomatic" after the lawmakers defended the war crimes tribunal's power to keep war criminals accused of thousands of crimes against humanity in the country.
Representative [John Jairo] Cardenas explained the reasons why he opposed the objections, arguing legal and not political reasons. From that moment on, the atmosphere became tense and even, with a whiff of arrogance, he rebuked Cardenas saying: 'I don't understand what this silly stuff is about'. So, Jose Daniel [Lopez] spoke and pointed out the principle of separation of powers and then the ambassador's tongue slipped, saying: 'Don't bother me with legalities'. Then he brought up the issue that the United States' affection for its friends is expressed with money. 'Love is money' was the phrase he used.
The lawmakers initially agreed to to the ambassador's request to keep the meeting confidential, but changed their mind after Whitaker's allegedly rude efforts to defend his country's interests against that victims of the armed conflict who have claimed that Washington's extradition policy has already frustrated justice for hundreds of thousands of victims of war crimes.
The US government's… policy of inaction… has led to the obstruction of attempts made to continue with human rights investigations in Colombia. The result is at least 239,758 Colombian victims who remain without truth, justice and reparation.
The president of the Constitutional Court, which was supposed to have dinner with the ambassador that evening, called Whitaker to tell him they would not accept the invitation. The ambassador subsequently withdrew the invitation.
Days later, against the US ambassador's will, the House of Representatives dismissed the objections of Duque and Whitaker and voted to return the war crimes tribunal's statutory law to the presidential palace for signing.
The Senate is expected to do the same as soon as its president, far-right Senator Ernesto Macias, decides to put the vote on the legislative agenda.


text:
Joe's Garage: Acts I, II & III
Rykodisc Records, 1979
For a good portion of his career, Frank Zappa was obsessed with writing plays based around his songs. I can count three that immediately come to mind: the God-awful Thing-Fish, the decent Civilization - Phaze III and today's review subject, Joe's Garage. Originally split into two releases, Zappa's label Barking Pumpkin combined the two albums, as did Rykodisc when Zappa arranged to have them re-issue his entire catalog.
But after several listenings spanning several years, I still can't understand why people consider this disc to be a masterpiece. Sure, it has some great songs, but the ridiculous "play" that ties the songs together is more of a distraction.
Zappa's main role on the album is as the narrator, "The Central Scrutinizer," who leads the listener into an examination of the damage music can do in the world of the future (one undoubtedly run by Tipper Gore). and what the pursuit of music does to the "hero" of the story, Joe. The title track is a throwback to the '50s sound that inspired Zappa to become a musician and which he often worshipped in his music (check out the album Cruisin' With Ruben And The Jets).
But the story quickly dissolves into a diatribe against organized religion ("Catholic Girls"), the seedy side of the music industry ("Crew Slut") and how the music industry screws artists ("Keep It Greasey"). Were the diatribe not so personal, it would be humorous.
I won't deny there are some great songs on this album. "Keep It Greasey" has proven itself to be a good track through repeated live performances - though I could have lived without the jazz-like diddling that took up over half the track. The instrumental "Watermelon In Easter Hay" is some of Zappa's best work, and features a controlled guitar solo from one of the best guitarists ever.
But Zappa, who ran afoul of the PMRC for some of his sexual and scatological lyrics, shows why he was singled out on Joe's Garage. From the humorous look at the result of obtaining a STD ("Why Does It Hurt When I Pee") to a description of scoring with a robot and enjoying gay sex with another ("Sy Borg") to getting "plooked" as payment for crimes ("Dong Work For Yuda," "Keep It Greasey"), there are times that Zappa pushes the envelope too far.
And the rest of the album is not able to maintain a level of excellence that would set it apart from other works by Zappa. His album Sheik Yerbouti is one that can rise above occasionally weak performances to stand out among the best. Unfortunately, Joe's Garage can't make the same claim. Songs like "Fembot In A Wet T-Shirt," "Packard Goose" and "A Token Of My Extreme" do not rank among Zappa's best. (And to this day, I'll never understand why Zappa chose to look like a mechanic covered in motor oil on the album covers - it made me think the album was about what happened at a car repair shop at first.)
Once again, I commit heresy by dropping the curtain on the spot-free image of an album that diehard fans of an artist consider to be among their best work. If you're one of those who consider Joe's Garage to be one of Zappa's best albums, then I'd say you haven't been listening to most of Zappa's backcatalog.
User Rating: A
© 1997 Christopher Thelen and The Daily Vault. All rights reserved. Review or any portion may not be reproduced without written permission. Cover art is the intellectual property of Rykodisc Records, and is used for informational purposes only.


text:
Women's Health Speakers Related to Matt Katz Related to Matt Katz Women's Health womens-health
Kristie Kennedy
Women's Worth and Wellness Expert
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Olympic Gold Medal Gymnast
HYPERGROWTH '17 Speaker: Nastia Liukin, Five-Time Olympic ...
/ 1 reviews
Two-Time Emmy Award-Winning Journalist; Anchor of "Inside Edition: & Best-Selling Author
Academy Award-Winning Actress Known for "Boyhood"; Activist, Humanitarian & Author
Equal Pay Trailblazer: Patricia Arquette
Actress, Comedian & Women's Activist; Best Known for her Characters on "The Carol Burnett Show"
Abby Wambach
6-Time U.S. Soccer Athlete of the Year; Two-Time Olympic Gold Medalist & FIFA Women's World Cup Champion; Pay Equity & LGBTQ Rights Activist
Abby Wambach - "Wolfpack" and Demanding Gender Equality On ...
Naples, FL, USA / 7 reviews
Actress & Mental Health Advocate
Olympic Legend, Award-Winning Philanthropist, American Record-Holder in the Long Jump & Founder of the Jackie Joyner-Kersee Foundation
East Saint Louis, IL, USA
Stand-up Comedian, Actress & Television Host
Olympic Gymnast, Gold Medalist, Captain of the "Fierce Five" & the "Final Five"
Leslie Mouton
Award Winning Journalist & Breast Cancer Survivor
San Antonio, TX, USA
Chef, Co-Host of Food Network's "The Kitchen" & Author of "The Comfort Table: Recipes For Everyday Occasions"
The Hamptons, NY, USA
Dr. Ian Smith
Doctor, New York Times Bestselling Author, Medical Contributor & Co-Host of "The Rachael Ray Show"
2011 Academic Festival: Keynote Address by Dr. Ian Smith
Maureen McCormick
Actress Known for "The Brady Bunch" and Season 23 of Dancing With the Stars
Actress Best Known for "The Hunger Games" Film Series and "Pitch Perfect"
Elizabeth Banks Talks Directing New 'Charlie's Angels' | PeopleTV
Dr. Jackie Walters
Owner of Comprehensive Women's OB/GYN; Two-Time Breast Cancer Survivor; Cast Member of Bravo's "Married to Medicine"
Actress, Activist and Vital Voices Global Ambassador
Venice, CA, USA
Monica Rogati
Former VP of Data, Jawbone
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Emmy Award-Winning Actress; Social Activist & Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipient
Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipient - Marlo Thomas
Devin Alexander
NBC's "The Biggest Loser" Chef, Host of PBS's "America's Chefs on Tour" & Author
Former New York Times Reporter & Columnist; Best-Selling Author of "At Home in the World" & "Labor Day"
Writing Your Story with Joyce Maynard
Lafayette, CA, USA
Mary LoVerde
International Work-Life Balance Expert
Actress Known for her Role as Miranda Hobbes on HBO's "Sex and the City"; Former Candidate for Governor of New York
Cynthia Nixon for Governor
Retired World No. 1 Tennis Player & International Tennis Hall of Famer; Breast Cancer Survivor, Gay Rights Activist & Author
Soleil Moon Frye
Social Media Expert, Entrepreneur & Eco-Leader; Author of "Happy Chaos"; Alzheimer's Awareness Advocate
Lee Rhodes
Accidental Entrepreneur with a Mission to Give Back; Founder of glassybaby
Author, Award-Winning Foreign & War Correspondent; President of the Jury of the Prix Bayeux-Calvados for War; Current Middle East Editor at Newsweek
Amanda de Cadenet
Founder & CEO of #Girlgaze


Extreme sports Games - BikeGames.com - Play fun free bike games.
Land your car on the concrete patch.
Reach a piece of clothing to save your progress. Reclaim your bike to unlock the high-score drive mode.
Perform tricks by replicating the symbols on the mat.
Multiply your score by linking tricks. Land on the downslope and score double!
Taking parking to the next level!
Bounce on as many bombs as possible that the helicopters drop. Similar to Indestructible Tank.
Stay balanced as you go off jumps grabbing all the stars, then touching the flag to progress.
Drive your 4x4 ATV over hills as you keep balanced and keep from rolling into deadly pits.
Ride your BMX bike over hills as you perform enough stunts to unlock new levels.


text:
Adrian Vermeule's authorized theories illuminate a rising rift amongst US conservatives
Adrian Vermeule wired up the explosive however didn't stick round to look at it go off.
A Harvard regulation professor and conservative scholar, Vermeule had been engaged on a brand new authorized philosophy for years when the Atlantic journal requested him to put in writing about it in March 2020. Identified in academia for his provocative commentary, Vermeule let unfastened, declaring that the dominant conservative authorized principle within the US had "outlived its utility".
Originalism, the speculation arguing that the US structure needs to be interpreted within the gentle of its authentic meant that means, had united social conservatives and free-market libertarians for 40 years. It was as easy for common voters to know because it was efficient at poking holes in liberal reasoning. And it was instrumental in notching up a string of authorized victories in any respect ranges of American jurisprudence. However right here was a authorized gentle arguing forcefully that it was time for one thing higher. Vermeule proposed another known as "frequent good constitutionalism" and argued conservatives ought to focus much less on limiting authorities and extra on guaranteeing it has "the ability to rule effectively".
Vermeule filed his essay, after which the current Catholic convert gave up social media for Lent.
Whereas he was on hiatus, regulation Twitter blew up. Critics on the left dubbed him a fascist and an authoritarian flirting with "bargain-basement theocracy". One steered he may've gone "stir loopy" in the course of the early days of lockdown. On the best, institution attorneys attacked Vermeule as an apostate, a traitor, a fraud. William Pryor, a possible Supreme Court docket nominee, has since given three speeches and written two articles castigating Vermeule as "absurd" and "unsuitable", charging that he depends on "invented historical past".
The talk rapidly took on a lifetime of its personal. A crowd of younger social conservatives rallied round Vermeule, beginning a web site to debate his work, similtaneously old-line conservative publications and main originalist students made him a goal. The dying of originalism has been a more-or-less everlasting matter of debate at rightwing think-tanks and universities ever since.
That is far more than a tempest in a law-school teapot. American conservatives waged a well-funded, shrewdly co-ordinated, decades-long marketing campaign to take over the nation's authorized system. With Donald Trump's appointment of three conservative Supreme Court docket justices, they decisively received. The results grew to become clear this June when the courtroom revoked the constitutional proper to abortion, struck down a New York gun management regulation and restricted the federal authorities's energy to struggle local weather change. Affirmative motion and voting rights are subsequent on the courtroom's lengthy checklist of agenda objects.
Two years in the past, Vermeule's essay set off a storm exactly as a result of it prefigured the mental disaster now engulfing American conservatism. Particularly, the right way to wield judicial energy and the right way to clarify it to a sceptical public? On that, the pugnacious 54-year-old Harvard prof has a couple of extra radical proposals.
"He's a very candy man," John Yoo defined. Yoo, a conservative regulation professor on the College of California, Berkeley and finest recognized for writing the authorized memo authorising the usage of torture by the George W Bush administration, has recognized Vermeule for almost three a long time. "He jogs my memory of an eccentric aristocratic Englishman, a Brideshead Revisited type of man accumulating butterflies. He doesn't even know the right way to drive a automobile."
That is the Adrian Vermeule who reveals as much as lunch at a restaurant close to the Harvard campus in August. Owlish and delicate, he's carrying a rumpled polo shirt and tennis footwear. Vermeule could enjoyment of skewering on-line opponents however, in particular person, he's unfailingly mild-mannered and well mannered — to our waiter, to the staffer who cleans up the shards of the empty glass he inadvertently knocks over, to me once I dive into my salad earlier than he has even had an opportunity to say a blessing over his meals.
It's a Friday, when observant Catholics eschew meat, so Vermeule orders an Unattainable Burger, noting as an apart that as a result of the Jesuits declared capybara, the South American rodent, to be non-meat, he might have eaten that.
Vermeule can also be a person who needs to show American jurisprudence the wrong way up. "From the attitude of my tutorial cloister, the Atlantic piece was simply an incremental step," he says. "I believe originalism is coming unglued in quite a lot of methods. There actually is such a factor as pure regulation and pure cause in regards to the governance of society. When our society will get sufficiently violent and decaying, folks begin to discover extra that perhaps there actually is an intrinsically higher solution to do issues."
The "pure regulation" he's referring to is the idea that society needs to be ruled by unchanging ethical rules. The concept is rooted in classical regulation relationship again to Greco-Roman occasions and was fleshed out by the medieval Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas. Whereas most authorized students, each on the left and the best, prioritise particular person rights and liberties, Vermeule argues that the group is paramount. "Nearly all liberties are, in a way, social. That's, all workout routines of human powers have an effect on the society round one and vice versa," he says.
Vermeule's "higher solution to do issues" implies that legal guidelines needs to be interpreted to adapt with precepts "written within the hearts of all folks". When he talks in regards to the US authorities ruling "effectively", he means not simply conservative issues equivalent to preserving conventional household construction and banning abortion, but in addition addressing inequality, the opioid epidemic and local weather change.
Understanding why these concepts have touched off such a frenzy amongst American conservatives requires realizing a little bit of historical past. Between the late Thirties and Nineteen Seventies, the US Supreme Court docket handed down a collection of landmark choices that ended segregation, eliminated prayer from public faculties and guarded privateness and abortion rights, amongst many others. The federal authorities, in the meantime, expanded dramatically to struggle poverty, regulate enterprise and defend the setting. All of it was made attainable by a progressive authorized custom that seen the US structure as a dwelling doc, one which needs to be interpreted with altering occasions.
Proper-leaning students sought an mental framework that might not solely justify a U-turn on social points but in addition empower them to rein within the federal authorities. Their reply was originalism. The speculation, generally referred to as textualism, was first articulated within the Nineteen Seventies by Robert Bork, a Yale professor and appeals courtroom choose who was seen as so radical on the time that six Republicans joined Democratic senators to dam his 1987 appointment to the Supreme Court docket.
However in the long term, Bork's strategy allowed conservatives to enchantment over the heads of the Supreme Court docket to a better, ostensibly much less political, authority: the 18th-century authors of the structure. That authority was all-white, all-male, Christian and included slaveholders, so it unsurprisingly supplied ammunition for attacking progressive choices.
Originalism entered the sensible realm within the Eighties when regulation college students at Harvard, Yale and the College of Chicago banded collectively to type the Federalist Society. Its said targets included fostering "an appreciation of the rule of regulation in defending particular person freedom and conventional values". The group is now one of the highly effective authorized organisations in America, with chapters at a whole lot of regulation faculties. Six of the 9 Supreme Court docket justices are present or former members. The Federalist Society didn't simply promote originalist concepts by way of speeches and networking occasions. It additionally vetted judicial appointments for Republican presidents and supplied monetary backing for younger conservative students. Adrian Vermeule was one among them.
Raised in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Vermeule grew up steeped in classics. His mom Emily was a Harvard professor and one of many main archaeologists of her era. His father Cornelius was a curator of classical artwork on the Museum of Superb Arts in Boston. Childhood summers spent in Cyprus, Greece and western Turkey left Vermeule with a fascination with the societies historically seen as the inspiration of western tradition. "The general impression that one will get each from the classical world and . . . even the structure of life within the Mediterranean world at this time is that polities, even literal cities, needs to be human-scaled and ordered to the nice of people," he says. "It shouldn't be all monumental skyscrapers."
After a stint at boarding college, he attended Harvard, the place he steered away from the small however vocal band of undergraduate conservatives that included Yoo. As a substitute, Vermeule buried himself in historical Chinese language philosophy, graduating summa cum laude in 1990. The topic, he says, was akin to the classical custom by which he had grown up, however totally different sufficient to provide him scope for unbiased pondering. On the suggestion of his then girlfriend, he took and aced the LSATs and stayed on to attend Harvard Regulation College.
Vermeule's skill to put in writing and his fluency in Mandarin made him stand out among the many college students vying for prestigious clerkships with conservative judges. He spent the 1993-94 judicial time period working for David Sentelle, who remains to be a senior choose on the DC Circuit Court docket of Appeals. Federal jurists rent solely a handful of clerks annually and rely intently on them to assist analysis and draft the opinions they situation.
Many regard their clerks as a type of prolonged household, and Sentelle was no exception. Vermeule "had among the many finest recollections for circumstances of any clerk I've ever had", Sentelle says. "My impression of him on the time was that he was strong traditionalist and originalist." Sentelle provides that he's "very shocked" by Vermeule's present work.
The next yr, Vermeule clerked on the Supreme Court docket for the late Antonin Scalia. This not solely marked him as an up-and-coming conservative authorized scholar however introduced him into shut contact with the motion's most influential mind. Bork could have articulated originalism, however Scalia wrote a lot of it into regulation within the 30 years he sat on the excessive courtroom. "In that interval of his profession, he was much less fascinated with originalism than in traditionalism and a classical strategy to regulation," Vermeule says of Scalia. "He was a proponent of govt energy and the executive state . . . I used to be a fan of presidential authority. I used to be a fan of deference to the executive state as a result of, again then, that's what he was doing."
Sentelle advised me that Scalia as soon as quipped that Vermeule was "the primary particular person to move by way of the Sentelle and Scalia chambers and be a conservatising affect".
Vermeule has been instructing at Harvard since 2006. One of many nation's largest regulation faculties, Harvard attracts college students with a full panoply of political beliefs. It's residence to leftist and feminist journals in addition to the de facto home organ of the Federalist Society, the Harvard Journal of Regulation and Public Coverage, and produced 4 of the 9 present Supreme Court docket justices (two liberals and two conservatives).
Although he's on sabbatical this time period, Vermeule often teaches the principle administrative regulation class in addition to a seminar on the classical authorized custom. He's widespread with college students, together with some who disagree with frequent good constitutionalism. "He has been completely sort and welcoming of opposing views within the classroom," says Eli Nachmany, a current graduate who took three of Vermeule's courses as a result of "he's top-of-the-line academics I've ever had".
However Vermeule's eclectic, typically snarky Twitter feed places others off. In the course of the 2020 election, he tweeted quite a few claims of faux voting, together with "Lol the election isn't over till Workforce Joe fixes up your poll for you". Individually, he wrote that atheists "can't be trusted to maintain an oath" and posted the commercial for a conservative convention with the caption: "The very first group for the camps". He advised the scholar newspaper that it was a sardonic commentary about how if the far left got here to energy they'd finally ship all Republicans to gulags. However critics interpreted it as a Holocaust joke.
Final yr, 11 pupil teams known as on Harvard Regulation College to sentence his "extremely offensive, discriminatory, and violent statements in on-line posts", together with the 2020 election jokes and a few they described as "anti-LGBTQ+". Harvard declined to touch upon the episode, as did Vermeule, though he mentioned, "Harvard is doing very well when it comes to making a respectful local weather for educational freedom in comparison with a bunch of different regulation faculties."
Vermeule enjoys reaching throughout ideological divides to work with colleagues equivalent to Cass Sunstein, a former Obama administration official and co-author of the behavioural principle ebook Nudge. Although they disagree on many issues, they share an enthusiasm for empowered technocrats and labored collectively on Regulation and Leviathan, the 2020 ebook that Vermeule considers an vital precursor to frequent good constitutionalism.
"Individuals who have a very slim or partisan view of the world say, how are you going to write with Cass Sunstein? To begin with, I don't consider myself as a Republican, however second of all, it's such a slim method to have a look at regulation," Vermeule says. "He and I share a bunch of commitments which can be very suitable." Particularly, each are followers of the New Deal, Franklin D Roosevelt's activist authorities within the Thirties. "New Sellers thought regulation had a goal. It was to serve human wellbeing. To me, it matches like a glove with the classical view of regulation. It's not purported to be some autonomous entity. Optimistic regulation is a human judgment that's supposed to advertise the nice of the group."
He jogs my memory of an eccentric aristocratic Englishman. He doesn't even know the right way to drive
Vermeule's 2016 conversion to Catholicism contributed to his mental improvement, though he rejects the concept his theories are purely religiously pushed. Raised as an Episcopalian, he grew to become estranged from the denomination at a time when it was changing into extra liberal, ordaining feminine and homosexual bishops. His Twitter feed sprinkles retweets about Catholic feast days and audiences with Pope Francis amongst authorized issues. His conversion was dubbed a "miracle" by conservative authorized scholar Robert George of Princeton, who posted photos on Fb of Vermeule and his sponsors after the ceremony.
Vermeule has given interviews with non secular media by which he credited the Virgin Mary ("a really nice Girl") for his conversion and expressed damaging views in regards to the energy of the regulation to maintain society on monitor. "I put little inventory or hope or religion in regulation," he advised First Issues, a conservative non secular journal. "If [the] tradition sours and curdles, so will the regulation; certainly, that course of is effectively underneath method and its tempo is accelerating. Our hope lies elsewhere."
Vermeule's shot throughout the originalists' bow two years in the past was fired at a time when American conservatives had been experiencing a second of ache and doubt vis-à-vis the courts. Regardless of delivering victories on gun rights and company regulation, justices had repeatedly shied away from overturning Roe vs Wade, the landmark 1973 case holding that the structure protects abortion rights. On homosexual rights, the courtroom had moved markedly to the left.
For a lot of, the nadir got here with Bostock vs Clayton County, when Neil Gorsuch, one among Trump's appointees, used textualist methods to argue that the 1964 civil rights act prohibited anti-gay and anti-transgender discrimination within the office. To these dedicated to conventional definitions of the household, the ruling confirmed that originalists had misplaced their method. "Expressly originalist choices like Bostock have been a seamless catastrophe from a socially conservative standpoint [and] have metastasised by way of the authorized system," Vermeule says.
However Vermeule had far deeper issues with the route of American authorized thought, and his answer was to succeed in again even additional in time. Whereas the originalists draw their authority from the US's foundational paperwork, he argues that the structure and the Declaration of Independence are merely America's method of codifying a lot older rules of a simply society. The concept of pure regulation has been round since at the least Aristotle. "That is an enchantment over the pinnacle of originalism to one thing much more conventional," Vermeule explains.
He additionally appears to be like overseas, arguing that judges ought to take into account whether or not there's worldwide consensus when figuring out the right way to interpret legal guidelines and the structure. In his view, the US has been an outlier on points equivalent to homosexual marriage and, till this summer season, entry to abortion within the second trimester of being pregnant. "One in all my targets in all that is the extraordinary parochialism of the American authorized scene," he says. "You may go to a Federalist Society occasion now and listen to American regulation professors say that in case you're doing one thing apart from originalism, you're not doing the regulation. That will suggest that there isn't a regulation being achieved all through most of Europe, Latin America and Asia."
Advisable
Vermeule's pure regulation strategy resonates with some youthful attorneys who reject conventional conservatism's hostility to massive authorities and its scepticism of local weather change. A lot of them fear in regards to the waning of the nuclear household, international warming and the opioid epidemic and dream of a way more muscular strategy, modelled on progressive successes such because the civil rights motion and the New Deal.
"I went from pondering I've these eccentric gripes to 'I'm not alone','' says one 30-something lawyer who based Ius & Iustitium, a web site and Twitter account dedicated to the topic that has almost 7,000 followers. "Originalism has exhausted itself. You want an ethical framework. When you fake you don't have one, you're mendacity to your self."
Pure regulation fanatics additionally draw power from the truth that Clarence Thomas, now the longest-serving Supreme Court docket justice, has regularly referenced the strategy regardless of his standing as a number one originalist. Some, together with Vermeule, argue that Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion within the case putting down abortion rights is traditionalist, quite than originalist, partly as a result of it depends on circumstances that predate that authorized motion.
Fairly other than the content material of his views, Vermeule's efforts to root his theories in historical past are considerably problematic. His article and a follow-up ebook, Widespread Good Constitutionalism, cites comparatively few particular circumstances — virtually not one of the actually well-known choices — to justify his declare that pure regulation has all the time been utilized in constitutional interpretation. "It strains credulity to suppose {that a} dissenting opinion from 1905, a Supreme Court docket determination from 1936 and a state-court determination from 1889 might set up that dwelling frequent goodism is deeply rooted within the American custom," Pryor, the main originalist choose, wrote in one among his assaults on frequent good constitutionalism.
Though the Declaration of Independence particularly references "nature's regulation", Vermeule's critics imagine he depends an excessive amount of on Aquinas and different Catholic philosophers from the Center Ages. "A ebook that attempted to significantly examine the pure regulation background of the structure . . . can be an enormous contribution. This ebook makes use of that opening as a type of excuse for a bait and change," says William Baude, a College of Chicago regulation professor and an originalist. "The founders didn't depend on Aquinas. That they had a way more Enlightenment variation on it; it was liberty first and authorities second. Vermeule paints it the opposite method round."
Throughout our conversations, I inform Vermeule that as somebody fed up by gridlock in Washington, I discover elements of his imaginative and prescient of a simply and empowered state interesting. His views actually sound nearer to mine than current conservative Supreme Court docket rulings which have hog-tied authorities efforts to manage weapons, company marketing campaign contributions and carbon emissions. However the place are the protections for particular person liberty and minority rights? It's all very effectively to say the federal government needs to be empowered to behave within the frequent good, however in a deeply divided America, who will get to determine what the frequent good is?
Vermeule replies that I'm asking for an excessive amount of element from an mental framework. "We struggle on a regular basis over what counts as liberty, whose conception of liberty, whose conception of equality. The frequent good is not any totally different," he says.
It's simply not true that liberal democracy is the sine qua non of a simply political order
But the real-world penalties of Vermeule's theories are stark and at occasions off-putting. In his view, particular person rights solely matter once they contribute to the betterment of the broader group. He not too long ago gave an interview to the Beijing Evaluate, {a magazine} owned by the Chinese language Communist celebration, by which he performed down the significance of democracy. He additionally has good issues to say about Poland's traditionalist Regulation and Justice ruling celebration, which has been sanctioned by the EU for infringing on judicial independence. "Neither the classical civilian regulation nor the doctrine of the Catholic Church have ever mentioned that liberal democracy is the one permissible type of authorities," he says. "It's simply not true that liberal democracy is the sine qua non of a simply political order."
I thought of this final thought when Yoo later advised me, "He's not a real-world, putting-it-into-practice type of man. Communism seemed like a good suggestion in principle, too."
The apparent query about frequent good constitutionalism is whether or not its enchantment amongst conservatives has peaked now that the Supreme Court docket has overturned Roe. Vermeule's critics are likely to suppose so. "The tip of this [Supreme Court] time period took loads of the wind out of Professor Vermeule's sails," says Joel Alicea, an originalist scholar at Catholic College in Washington. If that's the case, Vermeule's star flip could show short-lived.
Predicting which mental currents will take maintain in America lately is a idiot's errand, however there could also be some clues later this month. Vermeule can be this yr's speaker at a prestigious Harvard lecture collection that Scalia inaugurated in 2008. His concepts will even be centre stage 10 days later at a discussion board sponsored by the Federalist Society's journal that lists 23 audio system and moderators, together with 4 sitting judges.
Vermeule plans to tackle Scalia's legacy, arguing that the justice's finest work got here within the first a part of his profession and that that work was in keeping with frequent good constitutionalism. "I'm going to say that early Scalia is the hero," he says. "I'm going to differentiate between 'authentic Scalia' and 'advanced Scalia' and say authentic Scalia is a classical lawyer." He's smiling as he tells me in regards to the speech. "It is a bit impish, however I can't assist myself."
Brooke Masters is the FT's US funding and industries editor, and an affiliate editor
Comply with @FTMag on Twitter to search out out about our newest tales first
Tags: Adrian, among, conservatives, growing, illuminate, legal, rift, theories, Vermeules
Previous Trump asks U.S. Supreme Courtroom to step into authorized battle over Mar-a-Lago categorized paperwork
Next Synthetic Intelligence Danger Incident Database launches to maintain authorized, monetary professionals sensible about evolving AI Danger and rules.
Moontoon


Corbett is adept at the well-placed, acute image; two girls caught by lightning are 'a puzzle in each others' arms' in 'Lightning', rabbits have unnerving, 'bead-berry eyes' in 'Nocturne', and she uses juxtapositions that are often startling – and startlingly beautiful. For example, a fox tosses a sheep corpse over its back 'like a crown of blossom' in 'Fox at Midnight', and the 'Mountain Pony' settles 'the bird of its fear' on a concrete floor.
There's a density to the diction, caused by strong consonance. Follow the recurrence of f, t and l sounds in these two other examples of beautiful, acute imagery: Hale Bopp is 'a fist of flung glitter' in 'Comet', and in 'Rivers, Roads', '...the city just left' is '...frost on leaf, just that'. The packed repetition of consonants slows the line down, forcing the reader to enunciate clearly and giving the words a deliberated weight, which underscores the evident rhythmic control of the lines. Corbett shares that control with her presiding spirit, Elizabeth Bishop, whose work furnishes several of the poems with epigraphs.
I'm aware there are other scansion possibilities, especially at the start of that last line, but this is how I'd read it. Notice the slip back into iambic rhythm at the end, releasing the narrator into the night through which she runs. Notice also, the dense patterning of those hard consonants, not to mention the use of rhyme. When this occurs, the poem seems a solid, precise thing, shaped by axes and chisels. This is distinctively Corbett; her music.
This poet is clearly beginning to look well beyond the sphere of the immediately personal (which is often allied with a contemporary, physical perspective on the pastoral). One sequence of poems derives its subject from photographs by Jeff Wall. Another takes the news not only as its subject but also its substance; it was created by collaging headlines that appeared at the start of the Iraq War. And it is when given a subject not directly related to the autobiographical self that Corbett's gifts really come alive. 'Dreaming History', set in a time of civil war, and the sequence 'Testimony', based on the murder of Peter Falconio, are vivid, urgent and convincing. I wonder what Corbett's imagination might do outside the confines of the modern lyric poem. I'm looking forward to the appearance of the verse novel on which she's currently working.
I can't help thinking she's a little ill-served by the emphasis placed on her work's autobiographical content. Would I have known about "the troubled childhood spent in north Wales, redeemed by a love of horses" if I hadn't read the blurb on the back of Other Beasts? I'm not sure. I might have guessed something. A more interesting question is, do I need that knowledge to enjoy and make meaning of this collection? And there I think the answer has to be no.
Of course, Corbett writes out of her autobiography. How can a lyric poet – or indeed, any writer – fail to do otherwise? But the writing has to move beyond the details of a life, otherwise, as Billy Collins has observed, the poem risks failing 'to take advantage of the imaginative liberty that poetry offers' and becoming no more than 'an entry in the log of the self's journey'. [i] I don't find the closed, charged chamber of the confessional poem in Other Beasts, nor a meander through the past's titbits. Instead, I find a series of beautiful, unsettling, lyric moments, and several compelling sequences that look outwards to the contemporary and wider world.
[i] Billy Collins (2001), 'My Grandfather's Tackle Box: The Limits of Memory-Driven Poetry' in Poetry, Vol. 178, No. 8, pp. 278-287, p. 281.
Meryl Pugh has reviewed for Poetry London and Poetry Review. She obtained a distinction in the MA in Creative and Life Writing at Goldsmiths College, University of London. A pamphlet collection, Relinquish, was published by Arrowhead Press in 2007.


I will describe in some detail the President's new budget proposal, then provide a few big picture reactions to it.
I have been keeping my recent posts fairly short. This one is instead more of a reference post, and it is not for the faint of heart. I hope it is useful, I know it is long. Consider yourself warned.
and new spending cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, other entitlements, and defense.
Compared to the budget he proposed in February, he offers no new proposals in non-security discretionary spending (I think), taxes, or Social Security.
The President's timeframe could foul up the normal budget calendar. This is a consequence of him waiting to go second.
The President proposes a budget deficit "of about 2.5% in 2015" and that is "on a declining path toward close to 2.0% toward the end of the decade." (That second test is a mess.) Compared to what he argues he proposed in February (using OMB scoring), that's only 0.7 percentage points lower in 2015 and only 1 percentage point lower in 2021.
Budget credibility: Quite low, for three reasons.
Several of the largest specific proposals described below have very low credibility (they're almost gimmicks).
All proposals of this nature phase in their changes over time, but these proposals push that farther than most. The later the pain begins, the more time there is for Congress to undo it. The President's proposal backloads the savings so much that they talk about a 12-year window rather than the traditional 10 years. That's a sign of a weak proposal.
OMB says the President's February budget reduces the 2021 deficit to 3.1% of GDP. CBO said the same policies would result in a 4.9% deficit in that year. That's a big gap, and the same will likely be true here. CBO is likely to say that the President's specific policies don't come close to hitting his stated deficit targets. If they're right, the trigger would not be a failsafe and would kick in with big tax increases.
While the President reiterates two big tax proposals from his February budget, he does not propose explicit new tax increases.
Despite having signed a law last December that prevented income, capital gains, or dividend tax increases for all Americans, the President stresses that next time he will insist that tax rates on "the rich" should go up. Next time begins in 2013. Small business owners, this means you.
He also reiterates his proposal to limit itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers. The lion's share of revenue loss from individual tax expenditures comes from broad-based and wildly popular preferences: the deductibility or exclusion of home mortgage interest, of retirement plan contributions, of charitable contributions, of state and local income and property taxes, of employer-provided health insurance, and of capital gains. The last two times he proposed this he had almost zero Congressional support, including from his own party.
While he is not proposing new explicit tax increases beyond those he proposed in February, his new trigger proposal would likely result in big tax increases.
The President proposes a new debt trigger, similar to policies in place a couple of decades ago. (The most well known is called "Gramm-Rudman-Hollings.") The trigger is new and important.
The President's proposal is structured as an if … then … proposition.
… then certain mandatory spending programs are cut across-the-board, and certain taxes are increased, by enough to ensure the debt meets the "if" test.
The President's team thinks that his specific policy proposals would reduce the deficit enough that the trigger would never kick in. He therefore calls it a "failsafe." In past years the term "backstop" has been used for similar triggers. Under this logic the trigger is not used to force cuts, it's used to ensure them.
If, however, the President's scoring is wrong and too optimistic, or if the trigger becomes law but the specific policy changes don't, then this proposal serves a new purpose: it would be a mechanism that automatically changes policy unless Congress acts to stop it. That's a big distinction. As a general rule, a backstop trigger has a much better chance of being sustainably implemented than an action-forcing trigger.
What happens if the trigger kicks in?
How does this affect Congress' incentive to legislate?
The President's proposal is similar to past triggers in that it exempts all discretionary spending, Social Security, and interest on the debt. While past triggers limited the amounts that Medicare and Medicaid could be cut, the President's trigger appears to exempt them entirely. The White House fact sheet says the trigger "should not apply to Social Security, low-income programs, or Medicare benefits." Elsewhere it says the trigger applies only to mandatory spending.
Assuming that "low-income programs" includes Medicaid, this means the trigger appears to apply to at most about $300 B (if triggered this year) in "other mandatory" spending. Half of that would hit federal retiree payments, a quarter would hit veterans' benefits (if not defined as "low income"), and the rest would hit smaller things like farm subsidies.
It therefore appears that the President's trigger would exempt more than 90% of government spending from the automatic across-the-board cut.
[in] spending through the tax code." In other words, the trigger would somehow (how??) automatically reduce tax expenditures across-the-board (rather than raising rates, it appears). No past trigger has included a tax increase. This is new.
The fog lifts. The across-the-board trigger would apply to less than 10% of federal spending and would also raise taxes. And since it would apply only to itemized deductions, it's only going to hit a portion of those paying income taxes, which is only a portion of all Americans.
The trigger is, in effect, a tax increase trigger on those who itemize deductions, with a little other mandatory spending thrown in for good measure.
The overwhelming impact of the trigger would be to raise taxes on those who itemize. A much smaller portion of triggered deficit reduction would come from automatic spending cuts.
When you combine the automatic nature of this policy with the absence of specific policies needed to sufficiently reduce spending in the long run, the effect of this trigger would be to shift the burden of future entitlement spending increases away from deficits and onto higher income taxpayers. The future default would be that entitlement spending would grow at an unsustainable rate, and taxes on "the rich" would grow to hold deficits below 3% of GDP.
Since the overwhelming burden of the trigger would be through tax increases, it would significantly advantage the Left in future fiscal policy battles. Big spenders/taxers would know that, if no future legislation were enacted, automatic tax increases would kick in. They would therefore be better able to walk away from what they think is a bad deal. This is incredibly dangerous if your goal, like mine, is to cut government spending.
The President proposes specific changes ("cuts") to Medicare and Medicaid, but it's questionable how real most of them are. He sets numeric goals for additional savings in discretionary spending, both for defense and nondefense, as well as for "other mandatory" programs, but he does not offer specific spending cut proposals in any of these areas. In some cases that's legit, in others it's not.
He once again punts on the largest component of federal spending, Social Security ($727 B this year).
The President proposes incremental changes to Medicare that would slow its growth in the short run. These changes focus on cuts to provider payment rates. Doctors, hospitals, and other providers of medical goods and services would receive fewer dollars per service.
The easiest way to think about government Medicare spending is that it's the product of three factors: the number of people eligible for benefits, times the amount of services each person receives, times the government payment per service. The President focuses entirely on the third factor: government dollars per service. The President contrasts his approach to Paul Ryan's, in that Ryan tries to get at all three factors. More on this in a later post.
The President singles out drug manufacturers as a specific target for budgetary savings, and otherwise relies almost entirely on the so-called IPAB (Independent Payment Advisory Board) that was created by the health care laws last year. The IPAB is a bunch of appointed officials who, under current law, have authority to recommend changes in Medicare provider payment rates. The President would dial up the budget savings target for the IPAB and give them the authority to force those changes if Congress did not act. A Democratic majority Congress last year rejected giving IPAB this forcing authority, and Congressional Republicans hate it even more.
Giving the IPAB forcing authority is a Medicare parallel to the President's tax trigger. He thus has a trigger backed up by a trigger.
Budget credibility: The drug savings proposals are real. The IPAB savings are at best highly questionable. The President gets the overwhelming majority of his proposed savings from the latter. Since Medicare savings are the largest component of the President's proposed new spending "cuts," reliance on the untested IPAB as a backdoor procedural mechanism is a key budgetary weakness in the President's plan.
The President proposes establishing a consistent federal "match rate" across Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Both are shared federal-state programs, in which the Feds pay a portion of each dollar spent and the State pays the rest. Each State has a different federal "match rate," and these match rates vary within and across programs for different types of services. This is potentially a good reform, but it's not clear whether the overall effect would be to increase or cut overall federal spending on these programs. That is super important.
He dings Medicaid reimbursement for drugs, but his big Medicaid savings will come from cracking down on States' attempts to gimmick their accounting to draw down more federal matching dollars for each State dollar spent. While I want to wait for the specifics, as a general matter this is very good policy, especially for federal taxpayers. Governors will hate it and push back hard, because several of them use these gimmicks to solve their State budget problems.
He's also got some "reforms" to address high-cost beneficiaries and users of prescription drugs.
Budget credibility: The match rate, drug reimbursement provisions, and State gimmick provisions are real and would save money. I am skeptical that the high-cost beneficiary/drug provisions would actually reduce spending by any significant amount.
"Other mandatory spending" excludes the Big 3 entitlements: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. For comparison, in FY2011 those three programs combined will spend $1,493 B, while all other mandatory programs combined will spend $615 B. So while other mandatory is a whole lot of money, it's small relative to the Big 3. And the Big 3 are the source of future spending growth, not other mandatory.
Under current law the biggest components of other mandatory spending are the low-income support programs (aka "welfare", $280 B this year combined): cash welfare, food stamps, earned income tax credits, etc. Federal employees' retirement is big ($146 B this year), and this year unemployment insurance payments are huge ($129 B). Other big chunks are veterans' benefits ($78 B) and agriculture subsidies ($16 B).
Budget credibility: Zero. Without specifics, or at least per program targets (e.g., $X B from farm subsidies, $Y B from federal retirees), this is just pulling numbers out of thin air.
He is proposing additional cuts to defense and security discretionary spending. Details are TBD.
On the non-security side it appears he simply takes the new appropriations deal and extends it for ten years. But while he claims $200 B in non-security discretionary savings over 10 years in addition to the $400 B in savings from the President's budget, it appears that he is relabeling what has already been decided in the recent appropriations deal.
As a policy matter this is smaller and therefore less important than the other changes listed above, but it's a political flashpoint. Reporters should ask the Administration and CBO how the President's new non-security discretionary spending proposal compares to a straight extension of the new FY11 appropriations soon-to-be-law. It's even possible that he is proposing to increase spending and, in effect, "undo" some of this year's deal in future years. We can't tell until we see this comparison.
Budget credibility: Since discretionary spending totals can be enforced by spending caps that have a long history of enforceability, credibility here is fairly high. Unlike for "other mandatory" spending, you don't really need to propose specifics to establish a credible and enforceable path for future discretionary spending. At the same time, you should be very skeptical of the presentation of the claimed non-security "savings." This appears to be a misleading presentation. It looks like they are cutting only defense/security discretionary.
Here are four broad reactions to the new proposal.
unsustainable promises made by past elected officials, enshrined in entitlement benefit formulas.
The President's proposal addresses none of these forces. It instead spends most of its effort on everything but those factors. His proposed Medicare and Medicaid savings, while large in aggregate dollars, are quite small relative to the total amount to be spent on those programs, and he lets the largest program in the federal budget (Social Security) grow unchecked. While Bowles and Simpson focused their efforts on the major entitlements and also addressed other spending areas and taxes, the President's proposal does the reverse, focusing on other mandatory spending, taxes, and defense. That's a short-term focus.
Second, this proposal "feels" to me like the recently concluded discretionary spending deal. It's the size of a typical deficit reduction bill that Congress usually does every five or so years. I'm sure the affected interest groups are even now preparing to invade Washington to explain how a 3-5% cut will devastate them. The problem is that our fiscal problems are now so big that they require much larger policy changes.
Third, while framed as a centrist proposal, the substance leans pretty far left. It's deficit reduction through (triggered) tax increases on the rich, plus defense cuts, plus unspecified other mandatory cuts and process mechanisms that might cut Medicare provider payments. Centrist Democrat proposals do all of these things, but they also reform Social Security and Medicare, usually through a combination of raising the eligibility age, means-testing, and raising taxes.
Fourth, the President's speech was campaign-like in its characterization of and attacks on the Ryan plan.
The President's proposal could be the opening bid in a negotiation with Congressional Republicans. When you combine this substance with the President's aggressive partisan attacks and framing of the Ryan budget, however, it's hard to see how this leads to a big fiscal deal this year or next. A small incremental bill, which "cuts" spending by a couple hundred billion dollars over the next decade, is possible. But the chances of a long-term grand bargain in the next two years just plummeted from an already low starting point.