Demonstrations of important features in this release are located in the [install-dir]/ipp/examples folder.
This example shows how to use the ippiResize functionality in single and multithread modes. Use the parallel_for loop functionality for external multithreading. The multithreading mode works if the project is built with Intel TBB support.
This example (ipp_fft) shows how to use the Intel IPP image linear transforms: Fourier transforms (fast and discrete) and discrete cosine transform (DCT).
Intel® IPP libraries contain native Intel® Many Integrated Core Architecture (Intel® MIC Architecture) libraries, which allow you to build the applications running totally (natively) or particularly (offloaded) on Intel MIC Architecture. This example shows Intel IPP use on Intel® Xeon Phi™ coprocessors.
This example shows threading for an image harmonization filter. Since internal threading is deprecated in Intel IPP functions, it is important to know how to externally thread a generic Intel IPP function, which is shown in the ipp_thread example.
Learn how to use Intel IPP image resizing functionality in an Android* environment. The source code introduces two Java* classes: IPPCore for library initialization and getting library information, and IPPResize, which performs image resizing.


Jim Ellis SAAB of Atlanta at 5892 Peachtree Industrial Blvd. is operating a Auto Dealerships for in Chamblee, GA. Since 2010 Jim Ellis SAAB of Atlanta has been help car owners. Contact the friendly people at Jim Ellis SAAB of Atlanta to get started with your automotive needs.


text:
Home Tags Greece
CPI TV Exclusive With HCC President Ioannis Lianos
CPI - July 28, 2021
Below, we have provided the full transcript of the interview with Ioannis Lianos, president of the Hellenic Competition Commission (HCC), recorded on July 22,...
CPI TV Ten Minutes With HCC President Ioannis Lianos
The Venture Capitalism Business Model for Start-Ups and the Debate on...
Petros Vinis - September 24, 2020
By Petros Vinis (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton)1 On August 27, Greece's PM Kyriakos Mitsotakis congratulated InstaShop, a grocery delivery platform with around 500,000 users...
The HCC Guide on the Detection and Prevention of Collusive Tendering
Lia Vitzilaiou - December 16, 2014
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Lia Vitzilaiou, Dec 16, 2014 On September 24, 2014, the Hellenic Competition Commission published...
Abusing Salty Snacks: A Bad Habit With Anticompetitive Effects
Lia Vitzilaiou - November 26, 2013
Lia Vitzilaiou, Nov 27, 2013 By its judgment No. 869/2013, the Athens Administrative Court of Appeals ruled on an appeal filed by TASTY FOODS S.A....
Interim Measures in Greek Competition Law
Lia Vitzilaiou - March 19, 2013
Lia Vitzilaiou, Mar 19, 2013 The provisions on interim measures of Greek competition law have been the object of much debate and legislative change over...
Liberalization of Closed Professions: Opening Pandora's Box
George Zohios - March 30, 2011
George Zohios, Mar 30, 2011 On February 16, 2011, the Greek parliament plenary passed a bill on liberalizing so-called "closed professions." The deregulation of closed...
Crisis Cartels: For Better or For Worse?
Lia Vitzilaiou, Mar 30, 2011 Cartels typically involve private agreements that limit quantities sold, thereby effectively raising prices; in turn this transfers income from buyers...
EC Competition Law vs. Greek Competition Law: Conscious Parallelism or Unconscious...
Lia Vitzilaiou - June 11, 2009
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle Lia Vitzilaiou, George Zohios, Jun 13, 2009 On April 30, 2009, one day before...

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Full EP Stream: Four Year Strong – "Go Down In History"
Tuesday, July 22, 2014 at 11:49 AM (PST) by The Torchbearer
Massachusetts pop-punks Four Year Strong are currently streaming their new album Go Down In History in its entirety, and you can give it a listen below.
Go Down In History was released today, July 22nd, through Pure Noise Records.
Add Four Year Strong to My Radar
More On: Pop Punk, Music, Four Year Strong, Pure Noise
Steffen Long7/22/2014 11:53 AM | Permalink
so surprised there's still a band from the "we listen to hardcore" pop-punk era that hasn't turned into a 90's alt rock band.
Oskar Glasbergen7/22/2014 12:11 PM | Permalink
I used to really like this band, but the whole "EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE EPIC" thing doesn't do it for me anymore.
Ryan Morrow7/22/2014 12:25 PM | Permalink
Olly Burgess
Emad Zia7/24/2014 6:14 AM | Permalink
these guys always have been good, and much better than the other bands in this "genre". ADTR is effin bad… shit lyrics and bad breakdowns, and that's the band everyone compares FYS to, but to me these guys are much better than the rest. The double time (in the old stuff), lyric contents, dont scream like they're hardcore or anhything. and they dont look like assholes.
More On Four Year Strong
Album Reviews:
Enemy Of The World
All Four Year Strong Album Reviews
Gow Down In History
Pure Noise Entertainment (buy album)
In Some Way Shape Or Form
Universal Republic (buy album)
In Some Way Shape Of Form
Enemy Of The World (Special Edition)
Universal Motown (buy album)
Four Year Strong Profiles: Dying Scene | Facebook


This contest has ended and the winner has been notified.
They say the best things in life are free. Take watches for example. Watches are great, but free watches are even better. Remember that review I wrote about the new Zelos Chroma in black and rose gold? Well, I am going to give that very watch away to one lucky reader. That's right, very same watch worn, evaluated, poked, prodded, and photographed by The Time Bum himself for the review.
Just go to the Rafflecopter box and follow the simple steps. The box will tell you what to do. The entry period runs from February 1, 2015 through February 28, 2015.


text:
Visit / What's at the Memorial / The Foxley-Norris Wall
The wall is named in tribute to the late Air Chief Marshal Sir Christopher Foxley-Norris, a Hurricane fighter pilot in 1940. He was the first President of the Battle of Britain Memorial Trust and, together with Lady Foxley-Norris, provided the funds that allowed plans for the wall to go ahead.
The Christopher Foxley-Norris Memorial Wall was unveiled by HRH Prince Michael of Kent in July 2005.
To see whether or not a relative of yours is featured on the wall, follow this link.
At the left hand end of the Christopher Foxley-Norris Memorial Wall is a brick plinth inset with an inscribed poem by veteran William Walker AE, who sadly died in October 2012 at the age of 99. The poem, Our Wall refers to the adjacent wall that list the names of those who flew in the Battle of Britain, and it has long been a favourite of the Battle of Britain Memorial Trust for that reason. It was Our Wall, together with William's other often-recited Absent Friends, that inspired the Trust to create an anthology of William's poetry, much of which is about… Read more
One of the country's most visionary leaders during the Battle of Britain is remembered at the far end of the Christopher Foxley-Norris Memorial Wall, where Lord Dowding's bust now sits alongside that of Air Chief Marshal Sir Keith Park. The bust of Lord Dowding, who, as Air Chief Marshal Sir Hugh Dowding, led RAF Fighter Command throughout the Battle of Britain in 1940, was carved by Will Davies, the sculptor who also created the bust of Sir Keith. It was unveiled on Wed 31 May 2017 by His Royal Highness Prince Michael of Kent GCVO, who was accompanied by guests including Wing… Read more


text:
agent : Jill@MarsalLyonLiteraryAgency.com
Jill Marsal
Marsal Lyon Literary Agency
PMB 121, 665 San Rodolfo Dr. 124, Solana Beach, CA 92075
http://www.marsallyonliteraryagency.com
twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jillmarsal
The Marsal Lyon Literary Agency is dedicated to helping authors successfully place their work. Our members have many years of experience in the publishing industry and possess a diverse and unique skill set. We have worked with many bestselling and award-winning authors, as well as first-time authors, and look forward to continuing to bring exceptional projects to the market.
Jill Marsal has been in the publishing industry for approx. 20 years, working as a Literary Agent with the Sandra Dijkstra Literary Agency for eight years and at Dorchester Publications and Tudor Publishing, editing women's fiction and suspense/thrillers. Jill also has a strong legal background and holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School. She practiced as an attorney with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati for five years.
On the fiction front, Jill looks for women's fiction, commercial fiction, mysteries, thrillers, psychological suspense, romance, and stories which have an original hook. She welcomes a dramatic storyline and compelling characters in interesting situations or relationships. If you have a novel that has a highly original concept or voice, Jill would love to see it.
On the non-fiction side, Jill's areas of interest include health, self-help, relationships, psychology, business, parenting, history, current events, and narrative non-fiction. She is particularly drawn to projects which will move readers or leave them thinking, which make provocative arguments or share interesting research, or which offer useful, new
General fiction, Mystery, Romance, Suspense/thriller, Fantasy/science fiction, Biography, Computers/technology, Business/investing/finance, History, Mind/body/spirit, Health, Lifestyle, Cookbooks, Sports, Science
Jill represents authors ranging from debut to New York Times, USA Today , LA Times, and internationally bestselling authors.
A few of the authors and projects Jill Marsal has represented include WSJ bestselling author Melinda Leigh's Say You're Sorry (Montlake), former Assistant Secretary of State and LA Times bestselling author Susan Shirk's China, Fragile Superpower (Oxford), WSJ bestselling Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson's The Challenger Sale (Portfolio), world-renowned health and beauty expert Dr. Howard Murad's The Water Principle: Saving Your Looks and Your Health Through the Science of Cellular Water (Wiley), Stanford University Professor Jo Boaler's Mathematical Mindsets(Jossey Bass), NYT and USA Today bestselling Lynn Cahoon's Tourist Trap mysteries, NYT bestselling Kristin Miller's In Her Shadow (Ballantine), and Angela Pisel's With Love from the Inside (Putnam).
Please see our website www.MarsalLyonLiteraryAgency.com
The Taryn Fagerness Agency, LLC, represents foreign rights on behalf of Marsal Lyon Literary Agency.
Taryn Fagerness comes from five years experience as the Subrights Manager of the Sandra Dijkstra Literary Agency. She's sold hundreds of books to foreign, audio and film markets, including work by Amy Tan, Lisa See, Irvin Yalom, Anchee Min and many more. She has experience selling subsidiary rights for New York Times bestselling authors, first time authors, and everyone in between, in nearly all genres including literary fiction, thriller/suspense, commercial fiction, romance, history, self-help business, and children's. She attends the major international book fairs, and she has exceptional relationships with foreign co-agents, foreign publishers, audio publishers and film industry professionals.
The foreign territories to which she sells are: Albania, Arabic, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Catalan, China, Czech, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and Vietnam.
Please send a query letter to Jill@MarsalLyonLiteraryAgency.com and write "QUERY" and book title in the subject line of the email.
Please include a contact phone number as well as your email address. If we are interested in your work, we will call or email you. If not, we will respond via email. We welcome unsolicited materials and look forward to reading your work.


Published 04/23/2019 11:13:24 pm at 04/23/2019 11:13:24 pm in Lantern Fixture.
lantern fixture light fixture before left and after right painting antique wall ceiling lanterns olde good things egyptian revival style lantern.
all lanterns chandelier lanterns pendant lanterns shades of light simple mini pagoda lantern, outdoor hanging lights youll love wayfair , outdoor lighting shop our best garden patio deals online at outdoor lighting shop our best garden patio deals online at overstockcom, outdoor post lights amazoncom , exterior lighting fixtures progressive lighting hanging lanterns, belle collection light architectural bronze outdoor hanging belle collection light architectural bronze outdoor hanging lantern fixture pendant lighting led n, sea gull lighting perryton fourlight hall or foyer sea gull lighting perryton fourlight hall or foyer light fixture, gu cfl efficient lighting offers wide selection of energy star el energy star exterior wall mount lantern lighting fixture, lantern pendant lights lighting the home depot providence light bronze incandescent ceiling pendant, e american country loft wood wine barrel hanging fixture ceiling e american country loft wood wine barrel hanging fixture ceiling pendant lamp light for bar cafe living dining room restaurantin pendant lights from , modern outdoor wall lighting allmodern .


4 Signs of a Codependent Marriage As you and your spouse are attempting to mend your troubled marriage, you may possess a certain hostile mentality that makes giving him �... The fact that codependency is a reflection of a fixed personality pattern provides a clue as to why is is so hard to change. People live within the perceptions, beliefs and emotion of their personality. It is not so easy to �look in a mirror� and be different.
Change cannot happen if we do not change. Rely on peer support. Co-Dependents Anonymous is a 12-step group similar to Alcoholics Anonymous that helps people who want to break free of their codependent behavior patterns.
Are Narcissism & Codependency Destroying Your Marriage? F or 10 years, our work has been available online, offering a private, inexpensive alternative to marriage counseling . This work began with the release of Back From the Looking Glass � 13 Steps to a Peaceful Home (our easy to read reference book), now in its 11th edition.
Yet many people do manage to change the course of their marriage from codependency to mutual respect simply by starting two way communication. A great way to start the change process is to choose a small matter such as wanting a hug when your spouse comes home from work.


text:
Zero Counts
by Kyle Starr
Education, Gamification, Health Link
EyeWire
Years back, an odd desire to complete a coloring book developed. I never scratched the itch, but I may have just found a solution: EyeWire.
Gareth Cook, The New York Times:
In 2012, Seung started EyeWire, an online game that challenges the public to trace neuronal wiring — now using computers, not pens — in the retina of a mouse's eye. Seung's artificial-intelligence algorithms process the raw images, then players earn points as they mark, paint-by-numbers style, the branches of a neuron through a three-dimensional cube. The game has attracted 165,000 players in 164 countries. In effect, Seung is employing artificial intelligence as a force multiplier for a global, all-volunteer army that has included Lorinda, a Missouri grandmother who also paints watercolors, and Iliyan (a.k.a. @crazyman4865), a high-school student in Bulgaria who once played for nearly 24 hours straight. Computers do what they can and then leave the rest to what remains the most potent pattern-recognition technology ever discovered: the human brain.
Ultimately, Seung still hopes that artificial intelligence will be able to handle the entire job. But in the meantime, he is working to recruit more help. In August, South Korea's largest telecom company announced a partnership with EyeWire, running nationwide ads to bring in more players. In the next few years, Seung hopes to go bigger by enticing a company to turn EyeWire into a game with characters and a story line that people play purely for fun. "Think of what we could do," Seung said, "if we could capture even a small fraction of the mental effort that goes into Angry Birds."
EyeWire is the most addictive and challenging coloring book I have tried. It's easy to loose track of time while filling in the neuronal wiring, not to mention the increased level of difficulty that follows the tutorial. Bonus: It's for science!
Tagged education, eyewire, gamification, gamify, science, video games


Nashville, TN—HCA today announced the company will give up to $1 million to support the Nepal earthquake relief efforts of three international disaster relief organizations.
HCA will donate $250,000 to Doctors Without Borders and $250,000 to MedShare International, a non-profit that redistributes surplus supplies and equipment to those in need. Additionally, HCA will match up to $500,000 of donations from HCA employees and vendors to the American Red Cross to support its relief effort in Nepal.
Since 2010, HCA and The HCA Foundation have given charitable contributions totaling nearly $95 million. HCA has a long history of supporting major disaster relief efforts including those following the Ebola crisis in West Africa, Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines, the earthquake in Haiti, the Indonesian tsunami and Hurricane Katrina.
Founded in 1968, HCA is one of the nation's leading providers of healthcare services, comprising locally managed facilities that include 168 hospitals and 113 surgery centers in 20 states and the United Kingdom. Last year, employees and caregivers at HCA-affiliated hospitals were responsible for more than 20 million patient encounters. Eighty-five percent of HCA's hospitals reporting core measure performance data to The Joint Commission for 2013 are on TJC's current list of Top Performers on Key Quality Measures®, as compared to 36.9 percent of all TJC-accredited hospitals reporting 2013 data.


A shirt I made for a small shop focused on items inspired by the Disney theme parks. The concept was to create a shirt that celebrated the new Guardians Of The Galaxy film. The concept was geared towards a vintage band or radio station tee.


text:
A very special edition of Better World Leaders with Ben Bowen, Ronan MacDomhnaill and Sue Glendenning.
Welcome to the first episode for 2021 of Better World Leaders, another very special edition with 3 conversations with three guests returning to look ahead at the year we've just begun, anticipating what awaits us and provide advice and insights as to how best to prepare for lies ahead.
We're continuing the format elected to conclude this year with a reflective series of conversations with 3 leaders who have shared their view and insights during 2020. In this episode we posed each of them the same question – What awaits us in 2021 and how to prepare ourselves.
Our guests are;
Ben Bowen – Co-Founder and CEO of Shared Path, an Aboriginal Corporation and tech incubator and community education organisation, who joined us in Season 1 of Better World Leaders sharing his thoughts on the road ahead for all leaders intent on making the world better in 2021.
Sue Glendenning – Founder of Quantum Results Coaching and Advocate for female leadership, sharing insights on language, motivation and making sense of uncertainty. Based in Melbourne, Sue both endured and supported clients and family though a 4 month CoVid lock-down, and shares insights from this experience as well as perspectives from the USA.
Ronan MacDomhnaill – Founder of CRED, multiple Tech-preneur and Neuroscience Coach, Ronan shares deep personal experiences from this year and further back, setting a powerful example of a 'bounce-back' and how to lean into empathy, purpose and giving.
As always, great thanks and appreciation to the team who contributed to bringing Better World Leaders to you;
To Brendan Ward for production of all audio recordings and composition and performance of original music throughout each episode.
To Cooper and the team at RadioHub studios for technical support and creative guidance during the episodes that are recorded face-to-face. You can find out about Radio Hub's services here – https://www.radiohub.com.au/
To NokNok Studios for website design, hosting and advice. Find out about NokNok's awesome services herehttps://noknokstudios.com
To Cirasa Design for logo and site graphics – Find our about Cirasa'sinspiring work here


text:
Becoming Strangers
by Louise Dean
American Anthology of Contemporary Poetry
Kazantzakis
3 Billy Goats Gruff Rabbit Ear (Rabbit Ears/Book and Cassette)
Becoming Strangers is a different kind of love story—bittersweet, bitingly funny, and ultimately redeeming. The Amazon Book Review Author interviews, book 3/5(19). Becoming Strangers is the tale of two couples (a middle-aged Belgian pair and an elderly British man and woman) who meet at a luxurious resort in the Caribbean.
The story also delves into the lives of some of the staff and the other guests. I don't know how to rate this book. The blurbs made it sound like the most fantastic novel ever written/5.
A hit with readers and critics alike when it was published in England last year, Becoming Strangers is a different kind of love story, in which there's seldom a happy ending but sometimes a chance to redeem a life half-lived/5(19). Becoming Strangers Book Summary.
Two couples meet in a luxurious Caribbean resort - one pair older, the other younger. As their paths cross BookBrowse Review.
Full Review ( words). This review is available to non-members for a limited time. For. A hit with readers and critics alike when it was published, Becoming Strangers is a different kind of love story, in which there's seldom a happy ending but sometimes a chance to redeem a life half-lived.
Longlisted for The Booker prize. Winner of The Betty Trask Prize. Becoming Strangers book Winner of Le Prince Maurice. Nominated for The Guardian First Book Award/5(3). Becoming Strangers is a notably assured, engaging, and perceptive debut novel about two married European couples on holiday in the Caribbean.
Download Becoming Strangers EPUB
In telling their separate and Becoming Strangers book stories, in revealing their backgrounds and orchestrating their interactions, Louise Dean has crafted a "delicately powerful [and] impressive" account (Sunday Times, UK). BECOMING STRANGERS. by Louise Dean. BUY NOW FROM. AMAZON BARNES & NOBLE GET WEEKLY BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS: Each week, our editors select the one author and one book they believe to be most worthy of your attention and highlight them in our Pro Connect email alert.
Becoming Strangers by Louise Dean,available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide/5(). Submissions. Rules and how to enter The Booker Prize and The International Booker Prize Submissions.
Becoming Strangers is a different kind of love story, in which there's seldom a "happily ever after" but sometimes a chance to redeem a life half-lived.
From the Back Cover " Becoming Strangers, British author Louise Dean's insightful debut, scrutinizes the crumbling marriage of a chic couple at a Carribean resort."/5(18). A hit with readers and critics alike when it was published, Becoming Strangers is a different kind of love story, in which there's seldom a happy ending but sometimes a chance to redeem a life half-lived/5(18).
Buy a cheap copy of Becoming Strangers book by Louise Dean. After more than half a century of marriage, Dorothy and George are embarking on their first journey abroad together.
Three decades younger, Jan and Annemieke are Free shipping over $/5(2).
Details Becoming Strangers FB2
Becoming Strangers. Louise Dean book reviews: general fiction chick lit/romance sci-fi/fantasy graphic novels nonfiction audio books author interviews children's books @ DVD reviews @ We all start as strangers. The choices we make in terms of love are usually ones that seem inevitable anyway.
We find people irrationally compelling. We. Becoming Strangers (Pomeranian Books) eBook: Dean, Louise: : Kindle Store. Skip to main content. Try Prime EN Hello, Sign in Account & Lists Sign in Account & Lists Returns & Orders Try Prime Cart. Kindle Store. Go Search Hello Select your address /5(11).
Becoming strangers. [Louise Dean] -- Separately, two couples go on their last holidays together. Together, they discover what's been keeping them apart.
This is Louise Dean's first novel. Books of The Times; Becoming Strangers in a Stranger and Stranger Land. the book editor who befriended and signed contracts with Ms. Get this from a library. Becoming strangers. [Louise Dean] -- Two long-married, but unhappy, couples from England try to revitalize their relationships in the Caribbean in what may be their trip together.
'This is the great private problem of man; death as the loss of self. But what is the self. It is the sum of everything we remember. Thus what terrifies us about death is not the loss of the Author: Guardian Staff.
Becoming Strangers by Louise Dean and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles available now at When Adult Children Become Strangers The anguish is palpable in the comments to my post about parents and adult children "Finding The Balance." Even though I wrote the post a year and a half ago, it is still by far -- every day -- the most read post I've ever : Dr.
Kathy Mccoy. The one doing the welcoming usually maintains a great deal of power in this transaction, while the one being welcomed must trust the person who offers food, drink, and shelter. But Matthew 25 also reminds us that if we want to live like Jesus, we need to reflect on what it's like to be on the receiving end—as the stranger who is welcomed.
This must-read novel, based on the hit Netflix series, Stranger Things, explores Max's past--the good and the bad--as well as how she came to find her newfound sense of.
Description Becoming Strangers FB2
L'Étranger (French: [l‿e.tʁɑ̃.ʒe]) is a novel by French author Albert theme and outlook are often cited as examples of Camus's philosophy, absurdism coupled with that of existentialism, though Camus personally rejected the latter label. The title character is Meursault, an indifferent French Algerian described as "a citizen of France domiciled in North Africa, a man of Author: Albert Camus.
The Stranger study guide contains a biography of Albert Camus, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
The Stranger, enigmatic first novel by Albert Camus, published in French as L'Étranger in It was published as The Outsider in England and as The Stranger in the United States. Plot summary. The title character of The Stranger is Meursault, a Frenchman who lives in Algiers (a pied-noir).The novel is famous for its first lines: "Mother died today.
Or maybe it was yesterday, I don't. With 'Talking to Strangers,' Malcolm Gladwell Goes Dark Read by millions — but savaged by critics — the author has a new book on police. 'Talking To Strangers' Review: Malcolm Gladwell Explores Why It's So Hard The latest book by the author of Outliers and The Tipping Point looks at.
Gladwell's new book is called Talking to Strangers and, here we are, two strangers, conversing over tea in a fashionable Covent Garden hotel. Strangers. Welcome,you are looking at books for reading, the Strangers, you will able to read or download in Pdf or ePub books and notice some of author may have lock the live reading for some of ore it need a FREE signup process to obtain the book.
If it available for your country it will shown as book reader and user fully subscribe will benefit by having full access to all. So part of my recovery is this new habit of becoming a secret ally to a given stranger the moment I notice I'm tempted to become his secret enemy.
Not only does it make that particular instance a much more positive and enjoyable interaction for me, but it's quickly lightening up my overall relationship to strangers, even to the entire species. Verified Strangers," a new novel from Lena Dunham, tells the story of Ally, 32, single and nursing the kind of heartbreak that has taken years to mend (and may take a few more).
The Stranger is based on the book of the same name by Harlan Coben. Initially, the series opens on Adam Price, a football dad who is approached by the titular Stranger who has an allegation about the character's wife, Corinne.
Seaside letters
Emrys Williams
Temples and legends of Kerala
Utopia Guide to Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar & Vietnam
566 Pages0.64 MB1996 DownloadsFormat: PDF/EPUB
Using surveys
Crocodile Coast Crash
Amazing Spider-man £69-89 & annuals £4-5
Buffalo National River West (National Park)
The fashion guide.
Whitefriars
Position of England and France before the Military powers
Simple lessons in colour
Bound in love
Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation
Handbook of Germanists in Great Britain and Ireland.


text:
Museum of Childhood Tour - Descriptive Tour for Visually Impaired Visitors
Join artist Tessa Asquith-Lamb for a tour specifically designed for visually impaired visitors.
The Museum of Childhood has a place in the hearts of millions. The first museum in the world dedicated to the history of childhood, it displays toys and games from across the generations. The Museum also explores other aspects of growing up, from schooldays and clubs to clothing, health and holidays.
Free, but booking is essential, to book click on the Book Now button above or visit/phone Museum of Childhood reception on 0131 529 4142.
This tour will focus on Gallery One which has full disabled access.
Please meet in the Museum of Childhood entrance, near the shop. The tour will last one hour.
Archived event
This is an archive page for a past event
Find out what's happening now and upcoming in our What's on section.
Saturday 22 September 2018, 2:00pm
Museum of Childhood
Free Booking Essential
Museum of Childhood 42 High Street Edinburgh
Museum of Childhood by Ian Georgeson
The Museum of Childhood has a place in the hearts of millions. The first museum in the world dedicated to the history of childhood, it displays toys...


text:
Richard Florida and Bill Bishop, in their different ways, have pointed out the increased geographic clustering of the educated/creative classes. Broadly speaking, the creative classes tend to cluster in urban areas near oceans, leaving the vast middle "hollowing out," as Richard Longworth put it.
This wasn't always true. As late as the 1970's, middle-class life in, say, Ohio wasn't all that different economically or politically than middle-class life in New Jersey. (New York City was always something of an outlier.) But various dynamics over the last generation or two have clustered demographic likes with likes. Now there's less economic or political diversity within counties, and much more between them.
Most community colleges in America were built before what Bishop calls The Big Sort. Far more were built in the decade leading up to 1970 than have been built in the four-plus since. They were monuments to middle-class ubiquity, built on the assumption that middle-class-hood was attainable just about everywhere in the country.
I was reminded of that in looking at this story in IHE, and especially at the accompanying map. Broad swaths of Pennsylvania don't have community colleges in them, so some local four-year colleges are retrofitting two year programs to make up the difference. At a time when middle-class-hood is more fervently desired than ever, its institutional incarnation is becoming harder to sustain.
The divergence shows up in a number of ways. What many job-seeking academics refer to as the "two-body problem" is often, at least in part, a two economy problem. Since academics tend to partner with other academics or professionals, moving two of them to one of the hollowing-out regions can be a major challenge. It's hard enough to find individual professional jobs in places like that; finding a pair can be daunting. That means we tend to have severe underemployment in the metro regions -- where options exist, and people are reluctant to leave -- while colleges in the hinterlands have trouble recruiting.
It also means that issues of cultural 'fit' are growing more complicated. An article in Slate yesterday claimed that regional accents in the U.S. are actually becoming more distinct, rather than less. I think that's another symptom of The Big Sort. As each region becomes more distinctly itself, it's harder for transplants to feel at home. Where Ohio may once have been a reasonably viable option for a young academic fresh out of grad school, it may not be quite so welcoming now.
Place becomes even more complicated when an increasing percentage of instruction is delivered online. At least theoretically, online instruction can be delivered from anywhere to anywhere, as long as both ends have broadband access.
Now, with President Obama issuing a stay of deportation for people under age 30 who came to America as children, the definition of who belongs in a particular place is getting even more muddled. (Apparently, some Republicans are considering banning Federal financial aid from any colleges that allow undocumented students to pay in-state tuition. There's community, and then there's community.) Community colleges, by dint of the "community" part, are tied to particular places. As those places become more polarized, and as instruction becomes more removed from those places, some of the baseline assumptions of the colleges come into question.
None of this is the fault of the colleges, exactly. But the places for which they were built -- places in which instruction happened onsite, and in which middle-class-hood was attainable almost anywhere -- are fading away, and we haven't really come to grips with what is replacing them.
Program Note: My publisher sent me the "speak now or forever hold your peace" draft of the book, so I'll be spending next week poring over that. The blog will return the day after Labor Day, white shoes safely stowed away.
Selling Liberal Arts to 18 Year Olds
How do you sell the idea of liberal arts to an 18 year old?
Admittedly, the question scans differently at different institutions. At the snooty/exclusive liberal arts colleges, the sale has already been made. At a community college in a non-affluent area -- my beat -- the issue is a little trickier.
The liberal arts major is the largest major on campus, though that's partly a function of its use as the 'default' or 'effectively undecided' major. (For financial aid reasons, we can't have an "undecided" major as such.) It works reasonably well as a default major, since it's comprised of transferable gen ed courses. For a student who switches into another program after a semseter or two, typically everything they've taken will carry over. The liberal arts greatest hits -- intro to psych, freshman composition, college algebra -- "count" in almost every other program anyway, so it's a reasonable choice for a student who needs some time.
But some of us like to think that there's value beyond the old chestnut of "getting your gen eds out of the way, " as real as that is. Yes, it transfers well, but why would they want to transfer in the first place?
There's the classic "intellectual calisthenics" argument -- it makes you smarter -- but the appeal of that is probably limited. It plays into the "scold" stereotype of academics that doesn't make us many friends. And it doesn't address the real -- and largely valid -- economic concerns that are never far from the surface for so many students.
Aspirational sociology can also work. These are the courses that the rich and powerful take. Do you think there might be a reason for that? Of course, that can also backfire; students could hear it as "these courses are for people with money, not people like you."
I'm thinking that the best sales approach -- yes, I said sales -- involves more showing and less telling. And that's true of almost any field.
Scientists and engineers have an advantage here; they have great toys to show off. The engineering folks can show off their robots and Van de Graaf generators. But even the more bookish fields have some great hooks, if only they'd bother to use them.
Poli sci sounds boring, but it's the study of money and power. Sociology sounds dreary, until you see it as showing the ways that a society organizes sex, power, and family. Literature can seem stuffy, but it's about how other people think, and how stories work.
Incoming students may not know any of that. They may be put off by unfamiliar labels, or by an inability to locate the immediate relevance. And telling them to take eventual relevance on faith doesn't quite cut it; the whole point of the liberal arts is to free yourself from having to take statements like that on faith. It's self-defeating, and students sense that.
In the rush to fulfill requirements, I worry sometimes that many students never really get a chance to watch faculty love what they do. Enthusiasm is contagious, and there's something attractive about watching someone really engrossed and enthused in a subject. (Though his politics were not mine, one of my favorite professors from college was a historian who was palpably tickled to teach what he taught. His stories were rich, polished, and funny as hell. The enthusiasm made an impression vivid enough that I still remember it.) That's difficult with heavy teaching loads, or with professors freeway flying from one college to the next. But it's possible even in difficult circumstances, if only students get in the door in the first place.
I don't think many young students are persuaded by the usual "this is good for you" speech. In a way, that's actually to their credit. But they can be persuaded by example.
Wise and worldly readers, have you seen or found ways to make the more bookish subjects appealing to 18 year olds who may not even recognize the names of the disciplines?
The Grant Program I'd Love to See
I spend a fairly alarming amount of my time these days on grant-related projects. Each is worthy in its own way, of course, but they have certain limitations in common.
The dollars come with a time limit, and they require management. Each has its own reporting requirements. For the ones that work directly on academic issues, one or more full-time faculty have some time bought out by the grant so they can work on the grant project. (Put differently: with every new grant, either we increase our adjunct percentage, or we decrease our course offerings.) Each requires a liaison to somewhere else, and several of them require a full-time project director.
For certain academic disciplines -- STEM, mostly -- so many projects are brewing that simply covering classes is becoming a challenge. (Last week someone from Student Affairs practically begged me to open up more sections of math, since they were having an awful time finding slots for students. I explained that I can't just conjure up faculty on short notice. But with available adjuncts finite, every course release for yet another project is yet another section we can't run.) Some projects are actually bumping up against each other, which creates issues when the funding streams can't be crossed.
Meanwhile, other academic disciplines -- nearly everything outside of STEM -- are largely on their own.
So for any philanthropists or politicians out there who'd like to do some good, here's an idea:
Give open-ended grants to hire full-time faculty to teach classes.
That's the one expense category I'm expressly forbidden to apply to any of the grants we have. And it's the one I most desperately need.
A time period of just a few years won't do it. When you have a tenure system, each year gets closer to a lifetime commitment. The funding needs to be sustained over time.
In research universities, positions like these are usually called "endowed chairs." But that's more high-falutin' (higher falutin'?) than I need. I'd settle for endowed assistant professorships.
In an attempt not to hollow out the instructional core any more than it already is, my college handled the last few budget cuts largely with cuts to the administrative side. That means that we just don't have any more fat there to cut. If anything, in some areas we're running so lean that the opportunity cost of things we just can't do are starting to mount. And the costs for IT, regulatory compliance, and benefits just keep climbing. State funding isn't in free fall anymore, but it's nowhere near where it was even five years ago. And there are political and moral limits to how much faster to increase tuition and fees.
So if we're to maintain the level of day-to-day instruction, a new paradigm in grants could not come at a better time.
Adjunct Materials
This one is particularly for the experienced adjuncts, especially those who frequently teach in multiple settings.
What materials do you find the most useful, when you get a class at a new department?
(Yes, I know, some would just appreciate a full-time paycheck, medical insurance, etc. I know. Let's just stipulate that and move on.)
I'm asking because some of the departments here are taking a fresh look at some of what they provide, and I'd like to make the handouts as useful as possible.
Are sample assignments useful? Sample student work? Suggested reading lists?
In my own adjuncting days, I wasn't given much: in one memorable case, all I got was the one-paragraph course description from the catalog. While the freedom was nice, I couldn't help but wonder how closely what I did actually matched what the course was supposed to achieve. There was really no way of knowing.
What would you find useful?
Ask the Administrator: What Does "College Ready" Mean?
A new correspondent writes:
I'm curious as to your definition of "college ready."
I teach first-year writing at a community college, and I genuinely love it. I love teaching writing, and I love teaching at a community college. One of the things I love most about CCs is the wide range of students who enroll; not only do we get the fresh-out-of-high-school students, but we gets students who have been working longer and developing professionally since the time I was in middle school, or longer. (I'm in my mid-30s.) I recently heard a colleague bemoan that students today weren't "college-ready," although I have to admit I didn't get the chance to ask her what she meant by that - her comment was made in context of her dislike of teaching that first level of writing because students weren't "college-ready." (I had to take a non-credit math class in college before I was permitted to take the lowest level of math class that would be permitted for my major. I had also been out of school for almost 10 years. Not college ready?)
I find such an attitude dismissive towards students who may, in fact, have been strong students, academically speaking, when they were in high school, but may need a refresher, or need an instructor who can finally make sense of any writing and reading issues they faced while enrolled in school previously. There are skills skills that need to be taught; one of the reasons one attends college to begin with is so that one can be taught those skills. There are always learning curves, both academically and in terms of attitude.
Does it mean that the students who come to college shouldn't need first year English? Should their writing skills be such that they shouldn't need to take writing courses at all? Do we tell students who are in their 40s and 50s, who have spent decades developing professionally without having gone to college, that they're not college ready simply because they might never have been strong writers? (Especially if they've been out of school for a few decades.) I wonder if she meant that students' attitudes and expectations were not what they should be, or what we would like them to be.
In any case, I'm curious as to how you define "college ready," and if you think students come to college really ready or if there are other thing that we could do in the trenches to help them.
I'm reminded of the exchange between Homer and the pawnshop guy on an early episode of The Simpsons, when Homer tried to pawn his tv. "Is it cable ready?" "Ready as it'll ever be..."
Ready is a relative term. And some level of skepticism is warranted, since every generation inevitably finds its successors lacking in something. Kids today don't even know who Tabitha Soren was! Unthinkable.
That said, I think there are two "default" assumptions about "college readiness" that have general currency.
The first is the student who places immediately into college-level courses, who has the finances, transportation, and books all arranged, and who has a clear goal in mind. This student is optimally prepared to succeed in college, and it would be glorious if more students arrived like this. Students who know what they want are likelier to attain it, and students who have their various ducks in a row at the outset are well-situated to succeed. That's no guarantee, of course, but the odds are far better. (There's a bit of a chicken-and-egg question with students like this. Do they succeed because they're prepared, or are they prepared because they're the type that tend to succeed? I'd guess it's some of each.)
The second is the student who has identifiable risk factors, but who can still get it together. This is the more common type of student; it sounds like you were one yourself. This is the student with some academic gaps, some economic or family challenges, and, sometimes, some old, unhelpful habits that tend to die hard.
The exclusive colleges like to outsource the second type of student to colleges like mine. That way, they can spend their vastly greater resources on students who are nearly guaranteed to thrive. That would be fine, if people who should know better didn't go around crowing about differences in graduation rates, and drawing unfounded conclusions based on flawed measures.
The challenge for faculty at colleges who take more of the second type of student -- and, yes, sometimes the third type, the ones who just aren't ready -- is in focusing on the goal, rather than the gaps. The gaps can be easy enough to see -- sometimes they hit you squarely in the face --
and sometimes they make a painful impression. That's especially true for folks who teach the introductory and developmental courses year after year. Whatever progress you make with a given set of students in a semester, you have to hit "reset" and start over again the next semester. Over years and even decades, the strain of that sometimes gets the better of some people. They start to complain about "kids today," and how they just don't measure up, and how too much (fill in the blank -- comic book reading, television watching, web surfing, social networking...) has reduced their brains to mush, not like the Good Old Days When They Were Young...
It's called "burnout," and I've seen good people fall prey to it.
If we put aside the bitterness and selective memory of "golden age" appeals, though, it's increasingly clear that there are a few things people can do to help prospective students, and new students, succeed at greater rates than they otherwise would.
One, simply enough, is to convey to students an expectation that they will succeed. This is why burnouts are so toxic; their fatalism is self-fulfilling. Students have been known to rise, or fall, to the expectations set.
Another is to help students identify goals early on. We often make the mistake of foregrounding the gaps instead. "You aren't at the college level for math or writing, so you'll need to spend a year retaking courses you hated the first time before you take anything that counts." Students tend to find that demoralizing. It's one thing to endure a long, hard slog when there's a clear purpose behind it; it's quite another when the whole enterprise just seems like an expensive quagmire.
On my own campus, for example, I've been heartened to see a shift in career advising from the last semester to the first semester. Instead of waiting for students to be nearly done before talking about career goals, we get them as they walk in. The idea is to help students figure out what they actually want. Once the goal is in mind, it's much easier to have discussions about pathways and strategies.
(Before the flaming, let me clarify that frequently the goal involves transfer and moving on to higher degrees. It's not at all antithetical to the liberal arts. Besides, if memory serves, a fair number of students at snooty liberal arts colleges have career goals when they arrive.)
Yes, it would be great if the high schools did a better job. But at the college, we can't control that. What we can do -- and are starting to make progress toward doing -- is to treat students as potential successes, and as people to be taken seriously. Have the epistemological humility to admit that anyone who declares with absolute certainty who will and won't make it is either lying or toxic. Some folks with impressive early promise fizzle, and some who don't look like much when they get here catch fire. The job of the folks on the front lines is to create the conditions under which actual students -- not the idealized versions dimly recalled from undergrad days at selective places - can find their way.
One guy's definition, anyway. Wise and worldly readers, how would you define college ready?
Where Do You Write?
People who write freehand have long had plenty of choices, but those of us who compose at the keyboard were long tied to wherever the computer (or typewriter) was. They were appliances, far too cumbersome (and fragile, and expensive) to carry around. In college, I wrote in the campus computer center; in grad school, I wrote in my bedroom. Even into the 2000's, I wrote in the basement, because that was where the computer was.
Cheaper and lighter laptops, and now tablets, have given us keyboard composers some of the geographic mobility of our pen and paper colleagues. Which means, among other things, that we have to make choices that used to be made for us.
Picking a writing spot is partly a function of life circumstances. As a Dad, I need to be home a lot, so just schlepping off to a local cafe every day isn't an option. (In grad school, it would have been.) Even closing myself off in some isolated room of the house doesn't fly for long. So I've learned to make peace with interruptions, and to do what can be done at the kitchen table.
(Learning to work with interruptions is where parenting and administration are remarkably similar. In both cases, interruptions simply come with the territory.)
Laundromats make surprisingly good writing spots, since the white noise of the dryers is just enough to keep me focused. The waiting room at the music place where TB and TG take lessons works really well, even though the wifi is spotty; the muffled sounds from the practice rooms provide good background noise, and the limited time and lack of other things to do provide a nice deadline effect. I've even found a few cheap lunch spots near campus where I can get good wifi and a start on a blog post during my lunch break. As an introvert, the occasional writing lunch keeps me sane.
Location also varies depending on the kind of writing. For blog posts or other short pieces, I have a lot more flexibility than I do with, say, a book manuscript. If I need several pieces of paper surrounding the keyboard, for various reasons, then the laundromat or takeout place just won't do. Proofreading long pieces on the screen doesn't work for me; when I'm in Rewrite Hell, I need to be close to a printer. And coffee. And a music source. And no sharp objects.
Writing in the office is hit-and-miss. I don't write blog posts there -- kind of a church/state thing -- but there's a surprising amount of "daily business" writing that has to happen. The office has a quick printer, which is a plus, but the pace doesn't usually lend itself.
I've heard from many faculty that they don't usually write in their offices, either, and for similar reasons. The location is too public; you're sort of on call, and the interruptions can be serious.
Wise and worldly readers, where do you write? Is there a particular spot that works consistently, or do you have to mix it up? I'm especially curious about folks with youngish kids. How do you balance focus with accessibility?
Fear Week
My Twitter account got hacked yesterday, so if you follow my feed and got a sketchy-seeming DM from "me," ignore it. In retrospect, I should have picked a less obvious password than "PaulRyanLooksLikeEddieMunster12." Live and learn.
Shark Week has brought the classic parental dilemma: the kids want to see the shows, but get scared to death while they watch. The Girl is suddenly scared of sharks in the shower. Part of me wants to shield them from the shows, but part of me thinks that learning to manage fear is an important part of growing up, as long as it isn't much fear, and it isn't well-founded. I remember being the same way about UFO's as a kid. I'd watch some program on them -- In Search Of was a particular favorite -- and then be all jumpy for the rest of the night.
I hate to see them spooked, but I also remember kind of enjoying the idea of UFO's.
So we're rationing the viewing, and sometimes accompanying them while they watch. And appreciating the fact that it's only a week. Shark documentaries just aren't nearly as engrossing as Leonard Nimoy talking about spaceships.
I heard today that a key rule changed this summer. Apparently, part-time enrollment will now be enough for students to be on their parents' health insurance. (Until now, they needed full-time status.) Not surprisingly, we're seeing a sudden change in the ratio of part-time to full-time students, with the former growing and the latter shrinking.
If the usual trends hold, this will result in lower "on-time" graduation rates, but I'll take it anyway. I just hope the folks who like to punish us for graduation rates don't take this as ammunition, but something tells me they will.
Slate magazine is pretty hit-and-miss, as a rule, but its series this week on "progressive rock" is a hoot. I grew up in a cultural wasteland that was years behind the rest of the country, so the backwash of the prog rock movement was the soundtrack to every school bus ride for years. Burnouts with boomboxes would blast Rush from the back of the bus while the rest of us wished we were someplace else.
Seeing prog rock placed in some sort of musical context feels like solving a puzzle. I had heard many of the pieces over the years, but couldn't make sense of them. Apparently, some of its early proponents were quite self-aware about building rock on European -- as opposed to African-American -- music. That's why they were all about "trilogies," and "codas," and umlauts, and all the rest of it. (It also helps me appreciate This Is Spinal Tap even more; the druids/stonehenge sequence was pure prog rock.) It was both angry and intensely theatrical ("welcome back my friends, to the show that never ends..."), which is probably why I found it unlistenable. It's just awful. It's preposterous, yet entirely without humor. It manages to be technically complex, yet basically simpleminded.
To this day, I can't hear "New World Man" or "Mr. Roboto" without wanting to leave the room immediately, and, preferably, take a shower (without sharks).
So it's helpful to see that this wasn't just some sort of beer belch from the gods of music. It was actually trying something. The thing in question was misguided, racist, and stupid, but in its time and place, you can sort of see how they got there. And knowing that it was still in the air years later, where I was subjected to it incessantly, tells you everything you need to know about growing up in a cultural afterthought. There's nothing quite like revisiting the sounds of the school bus to feel better about life today.
The Late Registration Two Step
Say the word "August" to any experienced administrator, and you'll see an involuntary shudder. Sometimes it's followed by a low, guttural moan, or sometimes by an abrupt curl into a fetal position. We've even been known to run for the nearest hills, crossing streams to hide the scent. August is the season of shoehorning students into remaining sections.
It's an awful practice. Since students often make plans at (or slightly past) the last minute, we keep taking students until the last minute. But "taking students" can mean different things. The late registrants are allowed to enroll, but finding the classes they want -- especially at the times they want -- is another matter entirely. Daytime sections of the most popular classes -- developmental and introductory gen eds -- typically fill by mid-July or so. By early August, openings occur singly and randomly. Assembling a workable full-time schedule of popular classes in late August requires a planetary alignment.
And that's just on the academic end. The late enrollee has less time to arrange financial aid, buy books, and get transportation and childcare arrangements aligned. So it's not surprising that the numbers consistently show that the last students in are the first students out.
Internally, it would be worlds easier to close enrollment a month or two before the start of the semester. But doing that would lead to a significant enrollment drop. Given the degree to which our budgets have shifted away from appropriations and towards tuitions, the impact of that kind of drop would be devastating. We no longer have the margin for error to try it.
On the political side, while we're being attacked for "high" attrition rates, we're also expected to be there for displaced workers as soon as they need us. If we say to someone who was laid off in July "try again in January," that doesn't help anybody. So we're caught between setting students up to fail, on the one side, or bending the world to our needs, on the other.
So I'm thinking of a late registration two-step, as a way of both addressing the academic need for student readiness and the political need for responsiveness. I'm hoping that my wise and worldly readers can provide helpful feedback before I start spending political capital on it locally.
we combined shorter terms with earlier registration cutoffs?
Concretely, it might look like this. Break both the Fall and Spring semesters into halves. (I'll call them sessions A and B. So September and October could be Fall A, and November and December would be Fall B.) Run courses in 7 or 8 week formats, with twice as much class time per week as now. (Alternately, when appropriate, we could use hybrid formats.) Have students take fewer classes at a time, but spend more time on each class. And have enrollment deadlines, say, two weeks before the start of each session.
That way, a student who showed up in the first week of September would be told she could register for the classes that start in late October. That would give a realistic window for financial aid and childcare arrangements, but wouldn't force the student to wait until January. (It would also help the student who went great guns in the beginning of the semester, but whose life intervened in November. In this format, the student would have, say, six credits to show for it.) She wouldn't be shoehorned into a sure-to-fail combination in September, but she would only have to wait a couple of months, and would actually be in a position to succeed.
We've found locally that the shorter the class, the higher the success rate. (Summer classes have higher rates than Fall or Spring, and January have the highest of all.) That's consistent with the national research I've seen, too. So I'm thinking that breaking the semester into smaller chunks, and forcing students to register well in advance for whatever chunks they take, might be the best of both worlds.
I've been told that this could be a severe headache for financial aid, for technical reasons. But are there other reasons this wouldn't work? Better yet, has anyone out there actually lived through a system like this? How did it work? Or is there something I'm not seeing?
Of Systems, Silos, and States
Cal State is refusing admission to graduate students from California; it's only taking out-of-staters, citing the need for their sweet, sweet tuition surcharges.
It's ridiculous, but it's also sane. Cal State is being starved of funding, and it's acting to protect itself. That's what independent institutions do. If they can protect themselves while serving the public, they generally will, but if it comes down to "serve or survive," they'll choose to survive. In the absence of a coherent system, the silos will do what makes sense for them. Besides, if a silo took the ethical high road and chose suicide, it couldn't serve in-state students, either; at least this way it can maintain its own programs, and maybe feed the local workforce a bit.
From a systems perspective, the issues California is facing are perfectly designed to rend public higher education asunder and turn it over to the for-profits. But the state isn't thinking in systems, and it certainly isn't building them. It has an old master plan -- a fairly intelligent one, actually -- but it prefers not to fund it. So it turns the local campuses loose, and they do what they have to do to protect themselves. In the meantime, students who can't get classes have the option of continuing to work the drive-through window for a few more years while they wait, or of going online and signing up for a for-profit.
The irony, of course, is that a fiscally-driven "go your own way" policy actually winds up costing much more. Students who attend for-profits consume far more financial aid than students who attend publics -- especially at the two-year level -- and less educated workers are less productive, and therefore less helpful as a tax base. It's a false economy.
(The issues at the City College of San Francisco are similar. There, the basic lack of central administration has allowed the departments to go their own way; now, the college is in serious trouble with its accreditor. A college that's just a collection of silos isn't viable.)
Governor Brown seems to be trying, but he's necessarily just putting out fires at this point, and even that isn't a sure thing. If this Fall's tax referendum doesn't pass, the damage will get even worse.
There's a dramatic leadership vacuum at the heart of the matter.
It's clear that the state of California lacks the ability and/or willingness to restore the status quo ante. In the absence of a tremendous economic boom that makes everything okay, the best they can offer is to slow the decline. This is not inspiring, and it is not sustainable.
Instead, this is the time to build, and sell, a new, coherent vision. The late twentieth century model just isn't cutting it anymore, and a generation of students can't wait forever. Get shut out of classes enough times, and the University of Phoenix starts to look pretty good. It may be mercenary and it may be expensive, but it's there. It will let you in. The only open port in a pretty bad storm can look awfully good, compared to the alternative.
Whatever else you want to say about the for-profits, they work as a system. They have centralized leadership, and they're clear on what they're trying to do. They're significantly hampered by the need to serve two masters, but given the muddled perspective of most of the nonprofits at this point, serving only two masters doesn't seem so bad.
The publics don't need top-down control; they need a single animating vision. That vision can't just be "restore the staffing levels of 1968." It needs to acknowledge the realities of Baumol's cost disease, the desire for online courses, and the failings of the traditional model. But more importantly, it needs to play offense. It needs to inspire, rather than defend. It can't be indignant, backwards-looking, or apologetic. It needs to be palpably better -- in terms that resonate with regular people -- than the for-profit alternative.
CIrcling the wagons, like Cal State, may briefly slow the decline. But that's not good enough. It's mistaking the tool for the task, the silo for the system. It's time for the next generation of leaders to step up.
Ask the Administrator: Humanities Grad School?
An Australian correspondent writes:
I'm a current postgraduate student from Australia in my first year of a two year Master of Philosophy (Masters by research) degree in an evergreen humanities discipline. I'm interested in doing my PhD in the US for reasons that are long and not really logical (though I'm stubbornly set on it). I was wondering if you (or your readers) could assist me in figuring out how competitive PhD (tuition and stipend, preferably) scholarships are over there in the humanities? Or, if that's the length of a piece of string, what (aside from a strong academic record) are US graduate colleges and universities looking for?
I am teaching this semester and will teach again in at least one of the semesters next year. I have one minor academic pub and several non-academic but discipline-relevant pubs currently and will hopefully glean more from my thesis before I'd be applying. I've presented at one conference and have three more papers in the works/planned. I've also worked on a number of projects as a research assistant.
This would make me highly competitive at an Australian institution to receive funding but I'm also aware that our equivalent of tuition is government-paid, making all domestic scholarships stipend-only and therefore (I believe) less competitive. I'm currently juggling many things alongside my thesis/research and am slowly reaching the point where I'll need to say no to opportunities - loving and feeling insanely grateful for all of them, having a strategic reason for choosing one over another would be helpful.
I've argued for years that anyone who can envision being happy in any other endeavor should avoid doctoral programs in liberal arts fields. The jobs for which those degrees prepare you are either adjunct or vanishingly rare, and if Paul Ryan's plans get enacted, they'll become even rarer than they already are. The entire institutional edifice of non-profit higher education is groaning, under both external attack and the weight of internal flaws that I may have mentioned once or twice over the years.
In other words, the best plan is to do something else.
That said, if you absolutely will not hear of anything else, my quick advice would be to limit yourself to the tippity-top programs in your field, and to avoid taking on debt. The opportunity cost of doctoral programs is herniating enough without adding debt payments. (If you graduate and can't find a permanent job, those debt payments can be brutal.) The best programs sometimes offer highly desired candidates multi-year packages consisting of a combination of fellowships and teaching assistantships. If you can find a package like that at a well-respected program, and you can keep your living expenses down, you have the best chance of emerging relatively unscathed.
In terms of what doctoral programs in the humanities are looking for in prospective students, I'll have to defer to those among my wise and worldly readers who work in those programs. That's not my world.
There was a time, long ago, when the indentured servitude of graduate school made some degree of sense. For a brief period in the 1960's, there were academic jobs aplenty. At that point, one could argue fairly that an early-career period of material sacrifice would pay off well over time. (That same argument worked for law school until about five years ago, and it still mostly works for medical school.) But that hasn't been true for a long time. At this point, graduate programs exist mostly to generate teaching assistants and research assistants. When it comes time to try to make an adult living, you're on your own.
The puzzler, to me, is that the system has survived as long as it has. I've seen references to the "forty-year job crisis," which strike me as self-refuting. After forty years, it's not a crisis; it's the way it is. It's normal. In fact, over the longer sweep of American history, the flush academic job market of the 60's stands out as the aberration. The mistake academics keep making is to keep assuming that the exception was the new rule, and that two generations of regression to the mean are flukes. Yet smart people continue to pour into graduate school, convinced that they'll be the exceptions.
Good luck. If you must do a doctoral program in the humanities, this route should at least offer the best chance for a happy outcome. But if the best offers you get are for nothing-special programs at which you'd have to borrow money for living expenses, don't do it. Just don't.
Wise and worldly readers, what do you think? Would you advise crossing the globe for a doctorate in an evergreen discipline?
Why Men Should Take Women's Studies
Women's studies courses were some of the most useful courses I've ever taken.
I'm not kidding.
Moreover, I can imagine them being incredibly useful for other men in management roles.
That flies in the face of cultural stereotypes, I know. Courses like those are usually held up -- by those who like to make such arguments -- as among the most self-indulgent of the purely academic enterprises. They elicit snickers from some. I get that. But there's a tremendous value in them that rarely gets expressed, even by supporters of courses like those.
At their best, the women's studies courses I took -- yes, I used the plural -- helped with two incredibly important management skills. They helped me learn to navigate complex and emotionally charged issues, and they helped me learn to depersonalize categories.
These skills are useful every single day.
I was reminded of this a few days ago, when I was on the receiving end of an extended, vitriolic outburst. It would have been easy, if unhelpful, to respond in kind, or to try to respond point by point. Without betraying any confidences, it was based on different sets of assumptions crashing into each other.
Getting through that and coming out in a better place required the patience to first try to figure out where it was coming from. It required accepting that the reason I was being yelled at was my office, as opposed to me personally. And it required emotional self-control in a charged setting that was moving pretty quickly.
Looking back afterwards, I realized that women's studies classes were the first academic setting in which I honed those skills.
As a clueless -- if well-meaning -- straight young white guy from the suburbs, I went into those classes without malice, but with some pretty glaring blind spots. And back in the late 80's and early 90's, some of the theoretical issues were, um, let's go with "at an early stage of refinement." Some discussions were conducted with appropriate academic distance, but some of them got pretty raw. And it was easy to fall into the demonization/defensiveness spiral that we all know so well.
But it was also where I was first blindsided by arguments about things I thought I already understood. I remember being struck dumb when someone made the point that the question of mothers working for pay registered differently in low-income communities, where the "choice" was never a choice. I hadn't thought of it from that angle. And I remember repeatedly getting flustered as statements that had seemed obviously correct were parsed for unintended, but real, effects on folks I wasn't thinking about.
If that isn't preparation for administration, I don't know what is. Everything here has ripple effects, and dealing with those ripple effects is a huge part of the job. For some of us, the patience to take those seriously is a learned skill. (There's always a temptation to just throw up your hands, say "screw it," and do what you wanted to do in the first place.) And learning to at least think about possible unintended effects is incredibly helpful.
I won't claim that all was sweetness and light. There was some groupthink, and heaven knows that the prose style of, say, Gayatri Spivak, can sap the will of even the most tenacious reader. Some of it was a bit much, and at least back then, the standards of proof weren't always what they could have been.
But that's not really the point. The point was to develop habits of mind that acknowledged that even things that seem obvious may have more to them, and to be able to separate, say, an attack on "patriarchy" from a personal attack as a guy. It wasn't always fun, but it was incredibly useful.
It wasn't marketed as vocational, but I use it on the job every single day. For any guys out there considering administration or management, I really can't recommend it highly enough.
Cash Cow or Money Pit?
Yesterday I received two emails in rapid succession that fairly begged for a single response. One of them seemed quite confident in asserting that developmental education is a cash cow for community colleges. The other seemed equally confident that developmental education is a money drain for community colleges.
Those can't both be right.
In truth, I'm not even sure I could answer the question confidently about my own college. Developmental courses tend to be more expensive in that they run smaller, so we have fewer tuitions to amortize the cost of the instructor. But they also tend to be staffed with adjuncts, who make less money. (We're getting more of a full-time presence, but it's a slow process.) They have lower pass rates than credit-bearing classes, so there's an attrition loss. Developmental students also make considerable use of the tutoring center -- especially in math -- which is a cost center in its own right. That said, though, developmental classes don't need chemistry labs or a lot of specialized equipment, which many credit-bearing classes do.
Annoyingly, our state funding is independent of current enrollment figures. (It's based on a decades-old snapshot of enrollment, adjusted in across-the-board increments since then. Current enrollment fluctuations affect tuition/fee revenue, but they don't affect our appropriations.) So the idea that we're trying to cadge more money out of the state is false. It's a nice theory, but it just doesn't hold.
More to the point, both credit-bearing and developmental instruction are run at losses. That's where the public appropriations come in. The idea is to price education below the cost of providing it, to encourage people to take advantage of it. The theory behind that is that an educated workforce and citizenry is a public good. (I believe strongly in this theory for any number of reasons, but that's another post.) Other parts of the college are run for profit -- non-credit courses, summer camps, the bookstore -- but those profits are used to partially offset the losses from core instruction.
In other words, it isn't as simple as saying "developmental courses are cash cows" or "developmental courses are money pits." All credit-bearing instruction loses money, more or less, and the biggest money pits are likely the low-enrollment upper-level classes that require specialized spaces, like music, studio art, Nursing, or lab science. But I don't hear the same questions being asked of those.
It gets even more complicated when you factor in the students who pass through developmental courses and then go on to take credit-bearing courses. A non-trivial portion of our upper-level enrollment consists of students who made it through developmental classes. Lose that pipeline, and over time, we'd see effects even on the high end.
Theoretically, I guess, lower enrollments could lead to staffing cuts that would save money. But the first round of cuts would be the lowest-cost people, who, by definition, would save the least money.
To my mind, the relevant question with developmental courses isn't so much whether they generate profits. It's whether they generate success. If they do, then I can see a valid business case for a "loss leader" model; if they don't, then I see a valid educational case for junking them, or at least re-envisioning them in a pretty drastic way. (I'm in the latter camp.)
Of course, there are also the much larger issues of social mobility, the failings of an economically segregated K-12 system, and the fixed costs associated with physical plant. (If enrollment drops five percent, library costs don't drop at all, so the cost per remaining student automatically goes up.)
I'd prefer to see the debate shift. I can see a valid social argument for public investment that maintains social mobility for people who have been excluded, even if the payoff occurs only over time and off the balance sheet of the college itself. (Economists call that a "positive externality," and it's another argument for a public subsidy.) To the extent that's true, let's discuss how best to improve opportunity, rather than calculating the cost of the poor to three decimal places. Frugality as selective as this isn't really about frugality.
Some ideas from the business world translate to academia better than others.
At my college, we're running an experiment with a summer math workshop. It's targeted at students who either took the math placement test and didn't like the results, or who are soon to take the placement test and are concerned about the possible results. The goal is to refresh the memories of students who may be a little rusty, but whose basic math competencies are stronger than a cold test might indicate. The theory is that an adult student who hasn't been in a math class since high school might not remember immediately how to multiply fractions, but with a quick refresher would be right back on top of it. Therefore, a quick refresher that saves a full semester or two of remediation is a good investment.
Until recently, we've charged students a nominal fee for the workshop, and have had very low enrollments. This year, as an experiment, we ran it at no charge to the students. Enrollments have more than quintupled; still lower than I'd like, but a dramatic improvement. (The workshop doesn't carry academic credit, so we have much more flexibility about charges, seat time, and the like than we would for a credit-bearing class.)
Apparently, labeling it "free" made a tremendous difference. Now we'll finally have enough enrollment to have meaningful numbers in assessing the program's effectiveness.
Now the folks at South Georgia Technical College are applying that same magic word -- free -- to textbooks. According to IHE, it's sponsoring a textbook rental program, much like K-12 public schools do. Students are issued their books as part of their tuition, and return the books at the end of the semester. Enrollment has jumped since they announced the program.
In the business world, of course, the notion of "free" as a magic word is well-known. It's used to get people in the door -- or whatever the web equivalent of that is -- and/or to get them to buy more once they're in. ("Buy two, get one free") A successful business can use "free" items as loss leaders, making up the foregone earnings on the back end.
In higher ed, we've generally been more reluctant to think that way. We give away plenty for free -- office hours, library access, etc. -- but don't market it that way. As such, we get the downside of providing freebies -- lost income -- while losing much of the upside. When budgets are tight, it can be hard to justify internally giving away something that's costly to produce.
In the case of the math workshop, the hypothesis is that students who can shorten (or skip) the time they would have spent in developmental classes will retain and graduate at higher rates. Instead of getting frustrated and leaving after a semester or two, the student actually stays the full two years and leaves as a graduate, rather than a dropout. Multiply that by enough students, and the increased tuition/fee revenue more than covers the cost of the workshop. Better yet, it does so in an ethically defensible way. (South Georgia Technical College seems to be making a similar calculation: increased enrollments will more than pay for the cost of providing free textbook rentals.) The trick is in finding ways to make freebies sustainable, or even -- dare I say it -- profitable. If they work, both the math workshop and the textbook rental ideas strike me as potentially profitable over the long term, but in ways that actually benefit students.
In an era of tuition hikes, I'm thinking that "free" may become even more attractive than it already was.
Obviously, it would have to be managed carefully. If a program conceived as profitable becomes a drain, the college has a decision to make. And suddenly charging for something previously free tends not to go over well. (cough Netflix cough) Alternately, a program that's sustainable at a smallish size might quickly outgrow its bounds. "Free" works best when it's still a novelty, as opposed to an entitlement; I don't see students breaking down doors for office hours, generally speaking.
But in a time when we're trying all sorts of surcharges, user fees, price hikes, and service cuts to balance budgets, it's heartening to see that some conscious movement in the other direction could actually work. If the internet has taught us anything at all -- other than that cats love cheeseburgers -- it's that there's a market for free.
Ask the Administrator: The Place-Bound Theater Major
I'm facing a conundrum and I haven't been able to get any clarity or guidance on it for some time. I've been doing theatre in one form or another for the past thirteen years. First acting, then design, now I'm in an MA program at an R1 in Theatre History/Theory/Lit. I'm doing very well, I'm only halfway in, and I've presented at a national conference, and am holding down an A average. For a person who barely passed high school, this is pretty good.
However. I'm faced with some horrible economic realities, namely, that I will probably not be able to find a job. Not because I'm untalented, unhygienic, or lazy, but because I have the combination of a "useless" degree field, and I have to stay within the Chicagoland area (for a variety of long-winded reasons). The thought of working my tail off for five or more years at a PhD, and then being limited to only to Chicago, doesn't seem right to me. Besides, there is only one theatre PhD in Chicago, and that's Northwestern, the top university in my field. And I used to work there as a secretary before I went to grad school, so they will never know me as anything but a secretary.
I can't teach in my program as an MA student (for reasons that are beyond me), and I've been thwarted at every turn (applying to direct at a private high school, proposing an independent course for another department, etc.). I have no teaching experience, and I'm looking at having absolutely zero when I graduate in May. This is the kiss of death for me, isn't it? How can I get more teaching experience to land that community college teaching job?
Ideally, I'd love to either balance a class at a CC while teaching at a private high school (certification in IL happens only in Normal, hours from Chicago) or be full time at a CC. I just want to teach. My minor in college was Art History, so I don't have a broad area to teach in, outside of theatre. I don't have the credentials, anyway. If I wanted to tack on certification in English, I'd have to do 2.5 years at a university an hour away, and then I would only be certified in English. More schooling on top of what I've already got seems nightmarish to me, at the moment.
I've got a very extensive background in theatre design, both costume and scenic, and I've worked for two of the most elite theatre companies in Chicago. I'm talented there. Would it make sense for me to buck up and try and get a terminal MFA in Costume/Scenic Design? Would it make my chances at getting a job at a CC better, since I'd be able to show, with my degree, that I could also teach design classes?
I have a substantial and (so I've heard) impressive portfolio of design work as of right now. I haven't done any design work for a few years now, but it's not a skill that goes away. Would just having the portfolio to point to be enough, or would the MFA really increase my chances?
The thought of three more years of grueling schooling, probably more loans, is really unattractive at the moment, I gotta say...
I'm willing to do just about anything to prepare myself for the job market in May, but I'm really getting discouraged. I want to be able to make a decent living (I'm talking $45K as the dream salary, here) while teaching theatre. How do I go about making myself an attractive candidate, even without a PhD under my belt?
My first thought is to diversify your targets. At the community college level, generally speaking, the Ph.D. isn't a deal-breaker. (In most cases, it's not even a tiebreaker.) So I certainly wouldn't recommend going after one if a community college is your goal. Although it's not my field, my impression is that the same holds true for most private high schools; a doctorate may be nice, but it's not going to get you the job, and it's not a requirement.
Unfortunately, the full-time faculty market is very much a national one. Even community colleges typically do national searches for full-time faculty at this point. The Chicago area is more cosmopolitan than most -- I can't bring myself to use the term "Chicagoland," because it reminds me too much of "Wayne's World" -- but it's still a pretty small slice of the country. Picking an overcrowded field, and then limiting yourself to a single city, is pretty high-risk.
From a narrow career perspective, the clear long-term strategy would be to adjunct a little to gain experience and to see whether teaching actual community college students really appeals to you. With a little experience, you'll have a better sense of how much you want the actual job, and you'll be a more attractive candidate. It might also buy you some time, during which the factors holding you in one region may or may not dissipate. Of course, adjuncting pays terribly, so in the meantime there's a bread-and-butter issue to address.
Of course, you could also construe the possible careers more broadly. Professorships of theater are pretty rare, and the folks who have them tend to hold onto them. (We hire a new full-timer roughly once every ten years or so.) But those aren't the only avenues available. Acting (and other theater related) classes happen in other venues, both official and unofficial. And if you can sell yourself convincingly as someone who can teach public speaking, even better.
There's also the time-honored option of the day job. In this economy, they aren't as easy to get as they once were, and they can be pretty uninspiring, but at least they can keep you afloat whjle you're trying to make something else happen.
What I would not do is recommend spending yet more years, and money, piling up more degrees. I don't see them paying off, and I do see the debt payments (and opportunity cost) growing. A Master's is enough, if you're a good teacher and the right opportunity comes along. More than that won't make you a better teacher, and outside of a few, rarified settings, it won't create more opportunities, either. Instead, I'd look at getting some teaching experience, both for the information it will give you -- do you really enjoy this? -- and to make you a more appealing candidate.
Good luck. You've got a tough row to hoe.
Wise and worldly readers, I hope someone knows something I don't. Is there another, better option for a place-bound theater major?
Ask the Administrator: What Does "College Ready" M...
Ask the Administrator: The Place-Bound Theater Maj...
Ask the Administrator: How Do I Get the Job?
No-Kid Week


A callous and cruel system.
During his sojourn at the church, Oliver-Bruno tried to explain his ongoing resistance. "I want to fight for my family – I don't want to stay with my arms crossed," he said. "I want the authorities to hear me and see the damage they're causing." To ICE, "Mr. Oliver-Bruno is a convicted criminal." But to state legislators and others, he is fightinga "callous and cruel" system. "What is legal and what is just is often not the same thing," said CityWell's pastor Cleve May, one of those arrested. "For those who would take offense at us, (we) can only say to you, 'We care more about justice than we do for laws.'" If you still take offense, watch video of the scene, and see a police state in action.


text:
A new PayPal regulation, according to the cryptocurrency community, would increase adoption.
Oct 10, 2022 14:23 | by zhixian
Source: COVER ART/ILLUSTRATION VIA CRYPTOSLATE
PayPal was forced to backtrack the decision after it drew the ire of its users and major stakeholders, including Elon Musk.
Twitter's crypto community has argued that PayPal's now-canceled misinformation policy could drive more people toward crypto adoption.
The policy
The policy would have allowed the payments company to sanction users for misinformation by fining them up to $2,500.
The firm had stated that its list of prohibited activities included "the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials" that "promote misinformation" or "present a risk to user safety or wellbeing."
PayPal continued that it would independently review each offense, and the user may be liable for up to $2,500 in damages for each violation. In addition, only actions on the PayPal platform would be subject to the policy.
The firm, however, was forced to backtrack on the decision after it drew the ire of its users and major stakeholders, including Elon Musk.
The company's spokesperson reportedly said:
"PayPal is not fining people for misinformation, and this language was never intended to be inserted in our policy. We're sorry for the confusion this has caused."
Crypto community calls for crypto adoption
Those in the crypto community have argued that this move could be the catalyst that drives more people into the industry.
Santiago Santos, the host of the crypto podcast Empire, tweeted, "PayPal censoring speech and blocking payments is the best thing that has happened for the adoption of crypto payments with stablecoins. At this rate, web3 adoption will happen more because of the reckless actions of web2 companies."
Others also agreed with this view, with the president of Bianco Research, Jim Bianco saying that "crypto fixes this."
Meanwhile, James Lavish added that this shows what to expect with CBDCs. "You think PayPal is bad. Wait until you see what they can do with CBDCs," he said.
However, not everyone believes that crypto exactly fixes censorship. Some clarified that only Bitcoin (BTC) is above censorship, and every other token is mostly centralized and prone to censorship.
They gave examples of the recent halt of the BNB Chain, the freezing of crypto assets during the Freedom Convoy protest in Canada, and the US OFAC decision to sanction Tornado Cash.
By Oluwapelumi Adejumo | Original link
Why Investing in Bitcoin at the Moment is a Better Bet Than Holding the British PoundBack to NewsLayer 2 Networks Optimism and Arbitrum Now Support Lido's stETH Token


Enjoy a night out with friends at this chic establishment that features designer furniture around and industrial style bar with splashes of pop art. Stingray Bar & Lounge offers a Mexican inspired menu, ocean views, delightful cocktails and a choice of 50 in house tequilas!
Menu items include Hot Wings, Slow Spit Roasted Cuban Pork Belly Taco and the Colonels Finest Chicken Burger.
Visit Stingray Bar & Lounge at 7 Staghorn Avenue, Surfers Paradise. Open daily from 12pm to 12am.


Amy June Strange, 83, passed away on Monday, March 18, 2019.
A celebration of her life was held on Wednesday, March 20, 2019, at Minton Chatwell Funeral Home in Panhandle.
Amy was born on May 28, 1935 in Saddle Mountain, Okla. to Harvey Holden and Dorothy Pauline Eppler. She married David Quannah Strange on Dec. 24, 1952 in Las Cruces, N.M. Amy enjoyed reading and watching Hawaii 5-0. She worked as the director of food service for El Paso Independent School District and in Canutillo, where she retired. Amy coached her daughters in softball and led them to the championships. She followed her husband all over the world.
She is preceded in death by her parents; one grandchild; and one great-grandchild.
Survivors include her husband, David of Panhandle; daughters, Carla Jo Martinez of Panhandle, Jo K. Strange of Amarillo, Donna Strange of Erick, Okla., Linda Martinez of Amarillo and Paula and husband Rex Poole of Panhandle; 15 grandchildren; numerous great and great-great-grandchildren; and one sister, Craah Gunn of Amarillo.