text:
FATHER MARSDEN'S EXPERT – ELIZABETH MOBERLY – THEOLOGIAN.
Post date 6th Jun 2020
129 Comments on FATHER MARSDEN'S EXPERT – ELIZABETH MOBERLY – THEOLOGIAN.
www.zagria.bligspot.com
Elizabeth Moberly is a British research psychologist and theologian.
Moberly is the author of Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic, in which she suggests several possible causes of male homosexuality and a therapeutic cure.
Moberly was involved in ministry to homosexuals as Director of Psychosexual Education and Therapy for BCM International. She subsequently became involved in cancer research.
Moberly is a theologian and self-proclaimed psychoanalyst. She thinks that the primary cause of homosexuality is the failure of bonding with the same-sex parent, and that homosexuality is a reparative drive to repair this lack of affection. She advocates homosocial bonding instead. She implies that gay activists are basically dishonest.
She coined the term 'reparative therapy' to describe her therapeutic approach to restore one's sense of gender identity. Where the failure of bonding is particularly severe, 'a defensive detachment from the same sex implies disidentification: not just an absence of identification but a reaction against identification'. In other words, transsexuality is extreme homosexuality.
Her research did not involve psychotherapy with any gays or transsexuals.
She simply did an extensive review of the previous writings of Irving Bieber, Lawrence Hatterer, and Sigmund Freud. No trained psychologist or psycho-analyst would restrict themselves to just these three writers.
She admitted that she had done no new research.
Her work was never peer-reviewed by any psychologists or psycho-analysts.
The American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Academy of Pediatrics have all condemned reparative therapy as ineffective.
She was invited to speak at ex-gay conventions in the US in the movement that produced NARTH (National Association for Recovery and Treatment of Homosexuality).
Moberly's opinions continue to be endorsed in Christian circles as 'scientific'.
She now works in cancer research.
Elizabeth R. Moberly. Psychogenesis: The Early Development of Gender Identity: London & Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1983.
Elizabeth R. Moberly. Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic. Cambridge: James Clarke 1983.
Jeffry G. Ford. "Reparative Therapy is Neither". http://jgford.homestead.com/Fordessay.html.
Elizabeth Moberly. "Homosexuality and The Truth". Leadership U. March 1997.www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9703/opinion/moberly.html with reponses at www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9706/correspondence.html.
I was unable to find a clear statement of what qualifications, if any, Moberly has. No writers claim that she has any qualifications in either psychology or psychoanalysis. The assumption is that she has a degree, a PhD even, in theology. Sometimes Cambridge is mentioned, sometimes Oxford. Or maybe she was a child in Cambridge.
No respected scientist or medic nowadays supports the designation "disordered" to homosexuality.
More interesting scientific study will be done into the whole area of sexual orientation and what determines it.
Father Marsden & Co must reach back 40 or 50 years to find "experts" that back their positions.
We must never allow our own, even unrecognised, prejudices to inform out theology or psychology.
From the theological and pastoral perspectives there are serioys and important questions to be asked about the development and presence of the homomafia in the church.
From the spiritual and even mental and physical health point of view the behaviours of some homosexual priests and seminarians is a very big problem that has to be addressed.
But the answer is not to be found in putting people back in societal chains or in telling them they are going to hell.
A NEW ORATORY RESIDENT
"To live in the House of the Lord all the says of my life".
← FATHER MARSDEN'S PHAMPLET – THE PRIEST AS SPIRITUAL FATHER. → Irish Seminary Leaders Defy Vatican Ban, Welcome Gay Men Called to Priesthood
129 replies on "FATHER MARSDEN'S EXPERT – ELIZABETH MOBERLY – THEOLOGIAN."
Bradsays:
7th Jun 2020 at 3:09 am
This issue never resolved itself.
I can only share my discussions.
One practicing Psychiatrist I once had a conversation with said Homosexuality is either in utero chemically caused or Relational/ Developmental. The Dysfunctional Developmental could be fixed if the patient wanted to. If motivated to.
We know now today there is no Gay genetic gene. If genetic it's very very minimal influence, less than 1%.
I do think they need to not be recruiting 14 year olds for priesthood and barring teens from dating. 25years of age at the least. I do think optional Celibacy should be allowed.
I also think that irreversible gays need to speak out against grooming and gay Predation of youth passionately.
Did the psychiatrist say whether heterosexuality occurred for one or other of the same reasons? Chemically in utero, or relationally/developmentally? I get the impression that he would attribute its genesis, well, to Genesis, that is, to human ontology, a derivative of the Judeo-Christian God. It is a pity you didn't ask him.
If heterosexuality is, anthropologically, an innate characteristic of human nature, then why not homosexuality, and the rest? It seems to me that the failure to attribute the latter in the same way is religion rather than science talking, even in modern-day psychiatry, that is, chemically or relationally, homosexuality, unlike its counterpart, is considered an aberrhation/dysfunction and, therefore, unintended by God.
There is no being 'born that way'. No way.
7th Jun 2020 at 10:07 am
Maybe I misunderstand you, Magna, but would you not agree that – regardless of the so-called gay gene – sexual orientation is to some extent innate rather than learnt or elective behaviour? It is so much bound up with our identity that I would say as we grew into maturity we negotiate a kind of deal with ourselves between self-acceptance and freedom of choice. Homosexuality is part of the human condition, and one of the bright spots of social change in recent years is that western societies at least have been comfortable with NOT having to tie human beings down with binary labels. Being gay is like having dark hair, but should you want to dye it blond, that's okay too. Curious how people like Father Marsden get so vexed about this, but it's their problem, not ours.
I apologise for not making myself clear.
Yes, I do agree with you. Totally.
The strange thing, to me, is that no one is preoccupied with the scientific genesis of heterosexuality: no one is looking for the heteronormative gene, or epigene. This is because, I suspect, that even in biogenetics there remains at least a vestige of the unspoken assumption that heterosexuality is, well, innate to human nature; no need to explain it, therefore (assuming, of course, that it could be explained scientifically, which I doubt).
The preoccupation with explaining homosexuality, on the other hand, comes from the obverse side of that coin: that homosexuality is not innate, but dysfunctional, and, therefore, in need of explanation.
Of course, as successive hypothesies on the etiology of homosexuality fail to gain acceptance, the prejudice that homosexuality is dysfunctional inevitably grows: if it cannot be explained, then it was never intended as an normative sexuality.
I once spoke with a young man troubled about his homosexual inclination. He told me that he never had a troubled relationship with either of his parents, that he had got on well with his siblings, and that he had never been sexually abused. However, from the time he was around eight years of age, he 'awakened' to the fact that he found other males attractive. He never, for one moment, thought this odd and unacceptable (This would be instilled in him later by his peers.), and he was completely comfortable with the experience.
I am convinced, like Freud, that homosexuality is a natural and normal point on the spectrum of human sexuality. I am persuaded, too, that the prejudice against it, and hostility to it, has historically come, not from any supernatural deity, but from the scribes of the three Abrahamic faiths: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
It is astonishing (Actually, it is frightening.) how much personal damage can be done, almost worldwide, by just one person's unempirical, and unproven, pet theory on the cause of human homosexuality, and her prescription for its 'treatment', when this is facilitated by a religious and/or moral prejudice about the orientation, and a willingness among supposedly objective and rational human beings to believe, and to proclaim, the most outlandish and untested propositions against it.
We will never know just how many gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender men and women, teenaged boys and girls, around the world have been harmed physically and psychologically, or driven to suicide, by the 'ethic' of Dr Elizabeth Moberly, and its promotion by such men as Father David Marsden, SCJ. It is practically unthinkable that Moberly's homespun pseudo-science (she was neither a professional psychologist nor psychoanalyst when she wrote her book, 'Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic') would have garnered even a fraction of the ready acceptance and respect it eventually did were it not for a preconceived willingness among a certain public to accept her thesis with minimal or non-exisistent critique. Adolf Hitler's book, 'Mein Kampf', was successful for the same reason, given burgeoning anti-semitic prejudice in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s. Very often, people believe what they want to believe, and require little persuasion. Moberly had a tailor-made audience for her vaudevillian ideas.
And be under no illusion about the damage that could be caused by Moberly's self-styled 'reparative therapy'. It's potential risks, according to the American Psychiatric Association, 'are great, including depression, anxiety, and self-destructive behavior'.
The American Psychoanalytic Association was less reserved, and stronger in its criticism of the 'therapy': attempts to change a person's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, it said, 'are against fundamental principles of psychoanalytical theory and OFTEN result in substantial psychological pain…'
'Reparative therapy', and its etiological premises, are being increasingly rejected around the world. It has, for example, been disavowed by every reputable health organisation, mental and otherwise, in the United States, including the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Why, then, does a man like Marsden ignore all of this REAL sceince and instead plump for a lone and discredited, eccentrically unscientific voice on the subject, Dr Elizabeth Moberly? What is making him so desperate? And so reckless with whatever intellectual and personal reputation he might have left?
What indeed? 😕
She's a quack, her "cancer research" should also be exposed.
Okay, Bishop P. , I'm game. But give me a while: I'll first have to obtain a copy of the book, and then to wade through the sludge of her reportedly difficult-to-decipher jargon.
I've noticed that people who lack professional qualifications and accredidation for their work often express it in a highly personal, high-falutin, esoteric language to hide the fact. Moberly, apparently, is no exception. 😨
It would be good to know her qualifications ???
I agree: I believe she is a quack, but a highly articulate one.
Her book, 'Homosexuality: A New Christian Ethic" is still in print, and is available on Amazon (ebay, too, probably) for £7.00 plus delivery charge.
In my opinion, the book should be withdrawn from general sale, and made available only for academic reasearch and for discussion in university tutorials.
I recently watched the movie, Boy Erased, which is based on the autobiographical account of a teenager's experience of 'reparative (or 'conversion') therapy' in the United States. No one should underestimate the personal damage that can be caused by this rogue pseudo-science.
In the end, Sigmund Freud, one of Moberly's three sources for her pet theory on homosexuality, admitted that this orientation was, after all, just another point on the spectrum of human sexuality and, therefore, natural and normal for a particular demographic.
Magna, as I read and summarised Marsden's book for the blog why dont you do the same and summarise Moberly's book for us?
Msays:
It's clear that Marsden's views on homosexuality and the priesthood are based on pop psychology with no serious academic or scientific foundation, and completely out of balance with modern day understandings of sexuality and homosexuality. Why was he even let near seminarians in formation and given the freedom to disseminate his discredited and damaging views ? We really should be depriving him of the oxygen of publicity, but keep up an awareness of his activities so that we can prevent him spreading his homophobic and damaging views.
Excellent comments from Magna and M. Very curious how little is known about Moberley. She appears to have no professional profile, yet is cited as an authority by Marsden on unsupported crack-pot theories which were out of kilter even forty years ago. Marsden's desperate determination to push this agenda raises big questions about his own state of mind and suitability for any kind of professional work – does he claim any expertise in therapy or psychology? However, no matter how right and proper it was for Mullaney and Oakley to get rid of him, the fact remains that his bonkers and toxic views on sexuality are indeed those of the Catholic Church. That is why day after day it is the work of this blog to expose the institutionalized dysfunction and indeed abuse enabled and supported by this morally and intellectually bankrupt organization.
When you refer to the views of the Catholic Church what exactly do you mean?
The Church in its self-understanding has always included the concept of how any of the beliefs it teaches has been understood and received by its members – the sensus fidelium, or the exercise of human reason. Recent examples of intellectual positions it has espoused which have not been received by its people include: artifical contraception is immoral (Paul VI); discussion of whether women may be priests is forbidden by law (JPII, Bendict XVI). The gay question is well on the road to becoming another.
7th Jun 2020 at 12:19 pm
10.54 exactly true for most of history, but since the rigid wishy washiness imposed since John XXIII and JP II (as well as appearing to a far lesser degree rather intermittently before) there is no longer hope for this ethos.
Worthy points. Correct, too. But in practice (ever the caveat) Humanae Vitae remains a pillar of Roman Catholic sexual ethics, despite its not being well and widely received by Catholics worldwide.
7th Jun 2020 at 6:29 pm
I see what you are saying. However a an item of official belief in the face of an overwhelmingly negative reception by the faithful is hollow.
No one know this better than the church's teaching authority.
In relation to 'real science', the psychiatric industry considered homosexuality a psychopathology. Homosexuality was finally removed from the DSM in 1987.
The psychiatric industry are responsible for frightening harm done on all levels.
See psychiatry' s role in the holocaust by Dr. Peter Breggin.
What sometimes appears to be science is simply ideology.
See breggin.com for psychiatric abuses occurring today.
Precisely. It is indeed ideology speaking on this matter, from the perspective of Moberly and Marsden, since there is no mainstream science to accredit their views on homosexuality.
It amuses me when Pope Francis or the Vatican speaks of 'gender ideology' and 'gender colonisation' in relation to LGBT issues when they fail to recognise the log of homo-ideology (the strict sexual and moral binary) informing their own.
Poignantly there weren't the stereotypes in my infancy. People were just people. I never got told I needed a badge, to beg permission to be unique, neither did the neighbours (that I was aware), or the kids in the playground, or my parents.
Maybe that was because you were expected to fit, or pretend to fit, a heteronormative stereotype.
If you meant 12.23, there literally weren't stereotypes back then.
Yes, I was referring to that post.
Quite so @9:47, it is sobering to be reminded of the medical profession's shameful collusion in the persecution and torture of gay men such as Alan Turing. Curiously back in the fifties Churchmen including Westminster's Cardinal Bernard Griffin were in favour of decriminalization on compassionate grounds. However, while the Church was able to cope with gays as victims in and out of the confessional whilst living suitably with loneliness and shame, the tone changed with gay liberation and agitation for equal rights.
While not knowing much about Griffin I imagine his compassion was also for world intellectual sanity (logic and honesty, which reportedly used to be "catholic" values up to a little before my time – away from orphanages) and not just for loneliness and shame. The modern day religious-materalist monolith having abolished logic and honesty, has to "confect" some loneliness and shame to have "compassion on". Even by the standard of the time Turing should have just been fined a few shillings.
@10:54 that is not what sensus fidelium means.
It would have been more helpful had you gone on to tell us what it means, then.
Thank you for the Breggin reference, very valuable.
Marsden is thoroughly discredited...says:
Does it matter whether a person's sexual orientation is caused by chemical, in utero, circumstances, or environmental, developmental, relational causes ? The simple fact is that the person is the person, no matter what sexuality they present with and for whatever reason. That is who they are. So, that person should be accepted as he/she is, rather than as we would like he/she to be so that the person conforms to our own prejudices and wishes. We do not accept that we can discriminate against a person because they have a particular colour of hair, or skin, or eye shape, or one leg or arm, or have a particular psychological or emotional makeup – all of which can be caused by a variety of reasons. So, this notion that de facto a homosexual person cannot be a priest simply because he is homosexual is not tenable. It might be more productive to say that a homosexual person cannot be a priest because he can't keep his todger in his pants, given the mandatory requirement of celibacy for clergy (itself questionable, and in many circumstances damaging), just as it would be for a heterosexual person. We should just reject the views of the likes of Marsden, and move on to more important issues. Let Marsden and his kind wind themselves up about this single issue, but he should not be allowed to wind us up. Two seminary rectors, I am presuming with the approval of their bishops, have kicked him out of seminary formation involvement, which indicates that the more sane and sensible wing of the Church rejects his views. He should not be allowed back in to seminary formation, nor should he be allowed to dominate the argument.
How would you deal with the question which follows logically from your well-made argument of where pedophilia fits into your schema?
I agree. But do you accept that there is a problem with very promiscuous seminarians and priests?
I certainly agree, Pat, but the problem is that they persist in a morally bankrupt system, which rewards their perverse and duplicitous behaviour. How much happy and respected Gorgeous is now that he is out of it and getting on with his life. Rather than constantly holding him up as an example of what goes wrong in the clerical system, why not now recognize him as someone who went through it and came out into a more honest and integrated life. Not that he was ever the worst: he was always up front about his sexuality, and had the courage to stand up for himself and others. I for one am glad that he got some positive validation in yesterday's posts.
I am happy, very happy, to acknowledge that MJB appears to have moved on in life and is now doing excellent work as a lay chaplain in the Irish health services.
He does go into seminary at 19 – and we were all very immature at 18 or 19. Indeed when I received my own papers recently through the hood.officer of Diarmuid Martin I discovered that the seminary's only concern about me was my immaturity. And, as I wrote to DM, "what would you expect from an 18 year old but immaturity".
We must also remember too that MJB, apart from his own actions, was used in many ways by others.
We can only wish him well in his new life.
Yes, I do accept that. I am clear that as long as the Church insists on celibacy for its clergy, then anybody who puts themselves forward for priesthood and makes public promises about celibacy should be expected to observe them. The issue at stake here is one of integrity and honesty. I do not care about celibacy per se, I care about people being honest about how they live that promise. In fact, I am of the view that celibacy, except for those who have a particular calling and charism, is fundamentally damaging to the vast majority of priests who are required to promise it. But, if they decide to make that promise, then they should be expected to honour that promise. There are some seminarians and priests who are particularly promiscuous, with each other, out cruising, keeping numerous sexual relationships going at once. They fall in to the category of lacking integrity and honesty that I have talked about. More than that, they are living lives that are damaging to them and to the Church, and when uncovered they should be dealt with robustly rather than the silly nonsense we see of sending them off for 'treatment', and giving them numerous chances to live the promise they have made. Which they don't. In any other walk of life or profession, if you transgress the accepted and agreed mores of that way of life, you are disciplined and terminated if you do not conform. So it should be with clergy who brazenly and consistently transgress against their promise of celibacy. Even though, as I have said, celibacy itself is not something that I believe priests should be forced to promise. But, as long as they are, and as long as they freely undertake that promise, I don't think it unreasonable to expect them to keep it.
10-02am
It appears to me a number of different but interrelated issues are conflated under the umbrella issue 'homosexuality in the priesthood' I agree with 10 am. The person is a person, that is who they are, their 'being in the world'.
The problem is, as the late journalist, Tim Russert pointed out in a tv interview in 2003,
most priest-offenders of child sexual abuse acted out against teenage boys. "They are not, strictly speaking, pedophiles but ephebophiles. What's the link between ephebophila and homosexuality" ?
Donald Cozzens, one of the panelists and once a rector of the diocesan seminary in Cleveland replied, " I'm reluctant to raise the issue. I want to be kind to gay seminarians and gay priests who are leading celibate lives. But we have to ask the question, when we find that 95% percent of the victims are teenage boys." (See prologue in : ' Whistle: Tom Doyle's Steadfast Witness for Victims' by Robert Blair Kaiser).
In any other profession abusive, bullying, sexually promiscuous behavior, particularly in a professional training context such as a seminary, would not be tolerated for a variety of different reasons. That doesn't seem to be the situation in the catholic church seminary training/formation system.
Finally, how does a man like Mr. McCarrick rise so high up the government of the church, acts as a roving ambassador and is eventually defrocked following public scandal?
Apparently, many of his colleagues knew of his behaviour but remained silent.
What does their complicit silence suggest? It stinks!
Perhaps the real question might be whether there is a connection, or not, between the repressed homosexual priest or seminarian and an attraction to the classic "twink"?
What's the link between ephebophilia and homosexuality? Precisely that between ephebophilia and heterosexuality.
If you believe that heterosexual men don't find underage, post-pubescent teenaged girls sexually attractive, you are either seriously self-deluded, or an out-and-out liar.
This may sound horrible, but there is saying: 'Old enough to bleed (menstruate), old enough to breed'. Indeed, the Catholic Church once sanctioned marriages between grown men, and little girls, and permitted intercourse when it considered the girl anatomically developed enough to bear children (around thirteen years of age).
Of course, because this attraction exists does not mean that men will act upon it, but it does exist.
Laws governing the age of consent for consenual sex may have evolved, but that primal urge remains, though taboo.
What is different about priests offending sexually with underage, but post-pubescent teenaged boys is, I believe, the insidious effect of clericalism in the Church. The sense that one is superior to others, and has power over them, along with the belief that the clerical structure will provide unaccountability is a powerful temptation and aphrodisiac; and sometimes it is succumbed to with total lack of emphathy, and great cruelty.
Good comment Magna. We all need a set of brakes!
2.44, Magna, you are right, but an unfortunate variation is the flaunting (accompanied by grins and cackling) of "not having acted out" in the group confessions.
I'm afraid it does matter, very much indeed. Until quack theories on the etiology of homosexuality are throughly discredited, we will continue to have quack theorists, like Dr Elizabeth Moberly.
I have lost count of the number of such theories I have come across, and all were expounded from one, very simple (and I do mean 'simple'), unproven but widely accepted premise on homosexuality: that it is unnatural, and therefore not gifted by God.
The 'science' that informs this premise is predominantly biblical, which is, in many respects, as fsr removed from the real thing as it is possible to get.
Another very good comment, MC.
Re set of brakes:
Apparently, studies in various countries consistently show between 10% and up to 25% of psychiatists, psychotherapists, psychologists, counsellors etc, abuse their positions of
professional power including the manipulative sexual exploitation of clients.
Father Marsden's reign of terror in seminaries is over! He should never be allowed to be around vulnerable young men with that psychobabble destructive crap. He had an agenda and pushed his unverified personal ideas because he MUST struggle with his own sexuality.
It's ok to be gay
11-33 am
That may well be the case. But what about those such as McCarrick?
What about the 'playing the game' to be ordained? Morally corrupt?
If so,how extensive or widespread is such behaviour?
Unfortunately, irregulars such as the SSPX and that Transapline shower on Papa Stronsay would no doubt be open to Miss Marsden and his psychobabble. Also, Sadie, the Lady Farnborough and Abbess of St Michael's Abbey would probably be another devotee to the shaman's ramblings. All have young queer trainees.
Sadie is so fractured, she would be pro and anti Marsden depending on the way the wind was blowing.
She espoused a very liberal agenda when she entered Farnborough, and look at her now!
I see what you mean. Look at the state of her.
http://www.traditionalcatholic.org.uk/2010RosaryCrusade/Photos_3_files/Media/IMG_6702/IMG_6702.jpg
I have a different point of view from Fr Marsden about sexuality but I dont dispute his account of the serious problems in Oscott College which were completly denied by the Rector now Bishop Oakley and the Archbishop of Birmingham and I dont think that Fr Marsden's own views or prejudices alter anything about the facts of the lives of the students and staff in that place supposedly set apart for the formation of celibate priests. Everyone knows exactly what goes on but the silence is more shocking.
'Everyone knows.' Really? A logical fallacy, to begin with.
And how do you know?
Eyewitnesses passed the word on, big time. There is now a picture of a whole underground railroad, Valladolid or Maynooth – Oscott – Allen Hall and / or Wonersh and / or direct into dioceses. It involves less than half of faculty and inmates but "enough" to have a significant bad impact, overall. The same pattern has occurred throughout the States and Italy, and in the "sodalities" and orders. The cause is because the Vatican took its eye off Jesus and Holy Spirit and insisted the focus be solely on the meme. Remedy: not PR but ditch the two idols, Rome and eucharist.
Err reading this blog perhaps? Sorry Father I should have said Fr Marsden is an evil self hating homophobe who makes up lies and that the young men at Oscott are servant leaders who may have their individual flaws but don't we all?
When the credits roll at the end of "Boy Erased" we learn that the bogus quack therapist who ran the "conversion" centre himself later came out as gay, left the "profession" and got married to another bloke. Maybe there is hope for Father Marsden.
Why is it that Fr Marsden could only hold his views because he's supposedly a repressed homosexual himself ? You seem to think that heterosexual men could never be homophobic, do you know any straight men? Most are not gay allies supporting Pride they are either not interested to the point of contempt or extremely derogatory, who do you think uses the word gay to mean rubbish or inferior only repressed self hating gays? I don't agree with Fr Marsden by I don't need to see him as a repressed self hating gay man who just needs to go to gay bar and then all his views would change
KO'Brien is the highest-profile to posture publicly the views peddled by Marsden, but not the only one. Anyone publicly espousing the 'intrinsically disordered' line would want not to have any skeletons in the cupboard because it's the first thing that springs go mind when someone utters it. It's a weak diversionary tactic which inevitably returns to bite.
Another rubbish comment at 10:51.
Produce the evidence for your outrageous generalisations 'contempt' and google 'projection'.
You have answered your own objection @10:51. Those straight men who are not interested in gay rights, are not interested in gay issues tout court, so Harry Redknapp said on TV last year that he thought John Barrowman was the first gay guy he had ever met. However, that did not mean he thought JB was intrinsically disordered – even when he owned up to a crush on Harry's dishy Premier League football son. It's Father Marsden's relentless interest not indifference which raises questions.
My friend's 9 year old came home from school saying he was being called "gay". My friend had to tell him not to take it seriously.
Poor advice from an emotionally absentee parent. Neglect is not good.
He's a nine-year-old kid, for heaven's sake.
12.31, what? Not emotionally absentee. "Called". Air of "authority" (assumed by others). An attempt by others by propaganda to back him into a corner. Because you are contradicting your own position (like the Romanists), we don't know where you are coming from.
But don't you wonder why Marsden has such a 'beef' with homosexuality? Why he pokes around in the pseudo-intellectual muck for something, anything, to attack it with?
Doesn't that make you wonder, even a little, about what is driving the man to such self-discreditng lengths?
I find the subliminal psychology of Marsden fascinating. So too, by the way, would Pope Francis. Didn't he, in fairly recent times, link rigidity in such matters to personal self-ambiguity?
2.09 Magna, PF is no credit to the issue, the arch ambiguous one, the employer of Mr McCarrick (of the public scandal about the public scandal about the public scandal, which two HUNDRED bishops / VGs / seminary staff brazened out for THIRTY years), and disguising brutal rigidity in bendiness doesn't take much cleverness.
Citing such an ueber cynic might even come over as – erm – ueber cynical.
Since lockdown, hell has been deprived of her children! (Touching a raw nerve with Littleton.)
Rome and the Eucharist or the clerical caste as it is understood?
John Barrowman has a very sleazy Predatory reputation, I don't know how any father reacts to someone saying how much they fancy their son or daughter, how would your father have responded ? Mine would have knocked him out cold
clerical caste as it is understood by even (and especially) the handwringingest of the Hierarchy = Rome + eucharist, precisely
The sole and ultimate twin shibboleths on which we all must be immolated
No independence of mind. No proportion. No respect. Reifying nominalising, solely.
12.13 reputedly Queensbury blamed those "like Rosebery" for corrupting the dead brother of Alfred Douglas.
That post has just made me howl.
Incidentally, on a serious note: Genesis 1:31 says…
'And God looked upon His creation and said: 'Behold, it is beautiful."
Therefore, could the answer to these scientists, biologists and psychologists questions be all around us in His beautiful creation? That includes, YOU and I. Even beneath the unsettedleness of this world there is love, beauty and justice, yearning and groaning, travailing even, to reveal itself. Maybe we just have to open our eyes more to see it x
Off topic, but interesting nevertheless about priesthood and celibacy.
I have just learned that a group exists in America and/or Canada for involuntary celibates ('incels', for short). These are people, men and women, who want (And how! 😨) sexual intercourse, but can't perform the deed. Seemingly, the experience can leave some of them highly frustrated (as, of course, it would 😕), but worse, with a simmering resentment that can boil over in lethal violence against those capable of doing what they can't.
Now I know that priestly celibacy is supposedly voluntary, but is it really? Priesthood, yes. But celibacy? Isn't there constraint here, too: no vow or promise of celibacy, then no priesthood.
The madness continues. 😨
Ah but why priesthood? You yourself used to say the time has gone when Romanism had any use? To my family it looked like a step down, all along – less useful than the coalman and barely more reputable than the dentist.
Because priesthood is top dog (in terms of personal ontology, deference, and privilege) in a traditionally ridgid, hierarchical church.
When you combine such a narcissistic, demi-god self-conception with a burgeoning sense of sexual privation over the very people, the laity, you consider inferior (though, of course, you would never publicly admit this 😇), there is a rumbling cognitive dissonce that, without Christlike self-discipline (And where is that when needed?) can erupt in fiery self-relief, and, like Vesuvius on dear old Pompey, destroy everything in its reach, including children.
It's amazing the things done, and the moral rationales for them conceived, when the interaction of sexual privation and aggrievement over it is heightened by the catalyst of opportunity to offend. And priests, with that rigid hierarchial structure supporting them, were never short of such opportunity.
Yes I know – especially in "orphanages". In my native region a chance was missed, years ago. Though the churches were packed, priests (and catholic schools) were few and far between. We didn't happen to have become Methodists or congregationists, and the C of E vicar was a bit "loud". Only my Dad (an ex "knight" and I do stress ex) was a less infrequent "communicant" than mum & us. I think most families in our neck of the woods were similar minded at that time. Most of my RE was from the totally secular school. Now, religion has to equate to hysteria and mysticism – a big step backwards. We used to do things because they were simple and solid – not because they had been plugged on telly by a Paul VI or a Cliff Richard.
It doesn't matter to the goons what the matter "is" or "isn't" supposed to be – as long as they can turn everything INTO not only AN issue but preferably as many conflicting ones as possible!
Like the other commenter I thought it was ordinary for a boy to like other boys, and in our deep and wide mental scheme that of course didn't pin us to funny schemes. Everyone is basically attractive to everyone, taken together. I know I'm lucky not to have been targetted by ideologues (except I'll tell you a story). A bloke that didn't get round to marrying yet (if at all) was a bachelor, we didn't need special permission.
12.50 your vesuvian landscape reminded me (despite myself) of a loose-tongued one (ex Valladolid), good job there are vacancies in beach evangelising for some to relish!
Utter madness😵, as in confusion! 😜
They all promise knowing full well they'll be like a rat up a drain pipe the first gents they come across.
In Two Parts - Part 1says:
IN TWO PARTS:
1. Father Marsden's psychology of homosexuality and its relevance to suitability for priesthood is reprehensible, and has rightly been called out on this blog. At the same time, Fr David Marsden SCJ did put his finger on a rather inconvenient fact and truth about culture in some of our seminaries, in his open letter to the bishops. It was conveniently sidestepped by Oakley and + Longley, but to any careful observer there is no doubt that Marsden was highlighting something that is a reality. To what extent, I am not sure, but from what I see and hear, both of seminarians and newly ordained priests, I am sure that in most of the seminaries in England, Ireland and Scotland there is a culture of gayness and associated lifestyle which persists in many forms – it may be out and out promiscuity, a sexualised culture, language etc., excessive use of alcohol or interest in the fripperies of clerical life like lace and vestments, the use of feminised names, or even the right wing orthodoxy of some for whom liturgical and moral theological rigour is a good cover for their own lack of integration and psychological health. I think there is sufficient evidence to warrant some kind of questioning about this culture in our seminaries, rather than just denying it and brushing it under the carpet.
The big question here, which + Pat keeps asking, is the predominance of homosexual orientation, behaviour and culture amongst priests and seminarians. Why is this the case ? It is a phenomenon, I think, largely of the last 40 years or so. Before that, whilst evidenced in some small numbers, by and large homosexual behaviour was very much a taboo matter, both inside and outside the Church. Societal, as well as Church, restraints kept it under wraps. What has happened in the last 40 years is the acceptance – quite rightly and justly – in society at large that homosexual orientation and sexual activity is not something that is a dysfunction but a normal and healthy way for some individuals to express their sexuality. That change has brought much more of the positive than it has of any negative, both for society as a whole and for individuals. It is not surprising, therefore, that this 'acceptance' is reflected in the Church, and young men who have been brought up in this open and transparent society will reflect that, if and when they enter seminary. Some will take seriously the celibacy / chastity culture as part of their lifestyle, others will not. It is the latter group who by and large present as being out of step with what they, the seminary authorities and the Church profess about life as a priest and seminarian. For whatever reason, this dislocation has been allowed to exist in our seminaries, indeed in the priesthood in general, partly because by this stage those very people have themselves become the authorities, rectors, bishops. And so we find ourselves where we are now.
Hey there "in two part" ever heard of effing paragraphs??? Whose going to read a dense post like your two posts? So you've wasted your time.
Yes, there are paragraphs if you look for them....says:
Actually, there are four paragraphs in the piece. It's just that the post doesn't seem to render them very well. In Part 1 the paragraphs begin: a. Father Marsden's psychology…… b. The big question here. In Part 2 the paragraphs begin: a. I have worked in sector ministries…. b. the Church is entitled rightly or wrongly…. Now, if you want to read the piece, and then make some constructive comments, and perhaps contribute to the debate, that might be helpful and you might be able to illuminate us with your argument. Okay ?
Exactly. Who's going to read through all that?
In two parts.
Thank you. Excellent comments. 👍
Jim Ssays:
Well I am surprised at Marsden as sending it to the key holders was madness in itself.
Especially when Rome has been looking at Seminary Education so he should have sent it straight there instead Oakley gets appointed a Bishop.
Poor thinking on Marsdens part.
He will be a loose odd ball in the SJC order and they will be stuck what to do with him as it is only the Congregation of Religious that can remove him.
2. I have worked in sector ministries pretty much my whole priestly life. I can tell you that in those ministries – industrial, prison, hospital, military etc – the prevalence of homosexual priests is obvious, with a good number of them actively homosexual. I would say that the prevalence of actively homosexual clergy in these sector ministries is proportionately larger than in the general clergy. This should be no surprise, as these kinds of ministries set the priest somewhat apart from the usual cultural oversights that one would find, say, in a parish. They have more independence of action, more distance from Church authorities, and usually more material resources so that they are financially independent. From my experience, this state of affairs is tolerated in these kinds of ministries. The institutions / organisations that employ these priests are by and large hands off when it comes to issues of sexuality, and generally will have very proactive and positive inclusion and integration policies. They simply do not interest themselves in the sexuality, or even sexual behaviour of their employees, as long as it is legal and consensual. Also, the employment status of the priest in these ministries is by and large with the institution rather than with the Church, and that gives them a certain independence and latitude of action. Father Despaired has illustrated this culture in military chaplaincy, and whilst there is much about his book that is questionable, I would suggest there are elements of it which illustrate an inconvenient truth about homosexual culture and activity in some sector ministries / chaplaincies.
The real issue here is not about orientation. It is about behaviour. All of these priests will have been asked to make a promise or vow of celibacy. They have freely done so. It is not unreasonable to expect that they observe this promise / vow. Not to do so simply means that they are living a life of lies, duplicity, dishonesty, and lack of integrity. That is not good for them or for the Church or for the people to whom they minister. I make no moral judgement on their sexual orientation, or indeed on the sexual activity itself, which I perfectly accept in other circumstances is legitimate and honest. I only make a judgement on the duplicity and lack of integrity involved in their behaviour when set against their promise / vow of celibacy. I do not think that is unreasonable. If they are not able to keep their promise / vow of celibacy then it is perfectly acceptable for them to go and do something else. That is why, as + Pat is now saying, MJB can be viewed as someone who is living a life of integrity and honesty, now that he is (I think ?) formally outside the clerical state.
The Church is entitled, rightly or wrongly, to set out its teaching on sexuality and sexual behaviour. It is perfectly allowable for it to have a mandatory requirement for celibacy for priesthood. I happen to think it is wrong on both counts, but that is another debate. However, I also think it perfectly acceptable that the Church is able to expect that those who freely take on these obligations of priesthood then live them out with as much honesty and integrity as possible. If I have a moral point of view, it is about honesty and integrity or the lack of it, rather than about sexual orientation or behaviour.
The other day someone wisely said that when faith in God goes, so, too, do morals. And faith will go, and go quickly, in the absence of personal spirituality: a personal, daily relationship with God, nourished with regular, consistent prayer.
Anyone who presents himself for priesthood who isn't spending at least two hours daily in prayer is asking for serious trouble, as is the bishop who will ordain him.
And any seminarian who is too gregarious (for example, uncomfortable being on his own for too long and in and out of other students' rooms too often) is neither spiritually nor psycologically suited to priesthood, and must not be ordained. I don't give the proverbial whether he is homosexual, heterosexual, pansexual, or asexual (the last might be a considerable advantage, mind 😕).
Excellent comment, MC. 😎 I'm in total agreement.
12.23, 12.24 and 1.25 – spot on, the beer swilling and the superficial ideology now have to trump everything.
12.24 My I am worried now as there is two suppose to be first class chaplains in the Forces belonging to a Diocese that are due back to the diocese.
However I should have clicked on as they were Kitty's and Mattie's friends and still visit Mattie.
One in his 50's and other early 40's but I hope they are left in the forces now.
Is this an entry to an essay competition?
Mcleadership Mcuniversity are also plugging Ravi Zacharias, by some curious coincidence also unqualified, in the name of – wait for it – of course – "apologetics".
Zacharias traded on his Billy Graham looks. Was Moberly posing as an alter Anscombe or Foot?
Because the RCC doesn't do as suggested here recently – send candidates to a standard theology location then knock 'em into shape in parishes – as even the C of E does – instead opting for all this conditioning – the "catholic" church in England and elsewhere isn't used to critiquing theology. She appears to have acquired hers just after Rome insisted we embrace "mass media" as substitute for relating.
Just a few points:
Apparent homosexuality is seen in other animals than humans – apparent because obviously we can't ask their opinions!
I have a pet theory of my own which is that the incidence of permanent homosexuality is likely to increase as the world's population increases, in an attempt to maintain homeostasis.
However of course Kinsey famously observed that sexuality wasn't as fixed as it is thought to be.
I have two things which make me wonder what the hell is going on –
In societies where a different sexual behaviour from ours is the norm – for example intimacy between men and boys in ancient Greece – the majority seem to follow that behaviour which makes me wonder how fixed sexuality is.
And the fact that homosexuality used to be attributed to an excess of heterosexuality just blows my mind every time.
And yet despite that my own sexuality is firmly fixed and the thought of having a go for the other team is bizarre to say the least.
"Apparent homosexuality is seen in other animals than humans – apparent because obviously we can't ask their opinions!" A small point but probably of its own importance somehow – this is "dominant" and "submissive". Ideologues would like us to reduce our capacity of informed consent to an animal level. I think this is separate from the rest of your acceptable argument.
Indeed at 12:27 pm, sexuality is a rum and complex business. Though I share the view that sexual orientation is fluid or at least on a spectrum, I too am atypical in that my own orientation is pretty well fixed, so that, like you, I have no inclination to bat for the other side. Despite the scientific leaps in medicine, physics, IT and so on, why we are as we are is still largely unknown – viz consciousness and the working of the brain. It is therefore all the more absurd that somebody such as Father Marsden or any other crank or quack should pronounce with such confidence on matters they have no way of verifying.
Despard - not Despaired !says:
I meant Father Despard, not Fr Despaired. Sorry. Autocorrection's fault.
Fly Onth Wallsays:
This sexuality stuff is causing a mighty ruckus hi. How does one explain church deviancy through the ages. Was on thauld Netflix last night. Fictional film but a great quote is "the church invented hell to keep the people in fear" When asked about Gospel Values the Cardinal replied God is up there I'm down here…..
Hi Flyagwa but hi, the Church didn't invent hell hi. Jesus told and warned us about hell but numerous times hi but.
The fake ones are the convenient distraction from whatever truths get obscured, about the real ones, by the ever decreasing circles. At all at all.
Other than the obvious, what has this topic got to do with the homomafia in the priesthood?
Alf Rileysays:
Ref added photo – new meaning to "adherence" –
TRINITY HOMILY FROM THE ORATORY
I love The bishopbuckleyspodcast | TRINITY 2020, let's play it!
https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-a2sxn-df053f
Alf R.says:
Pat how can we get your videos on a normal computer?
Can we get sound track only (if it's easier)?
And is there any difference between bishoppatbuckley.org and podbean?
The http://www.bishoppatbuckley.org is a live video without recording facilities.
The podbean is the voice only recording of the homily.
In order to have a regular church webcam with live and recorded the set up is £3,000 and I cannot afford that. Sorry.
Litllep***k ?says:
Littleprick seems to be getting off lightly today. Have we moved on ? What a shame if we have, because there is so much more mileage in Littlewank and his antics. Trust me ! He was around the seminary system for nine years. I was only there for five. But our paths crossed and, oh, there are so many little stories to tell, Auntie !
Perhaps we could leave off the offensive name-calling. Do I infer correctly that your experiences relate to Wonersh? If you have anything of substance then you should disclose them – without giving names if necessary. But I don't think it is really acceptable to imply misconduct to an identified person without content. The same goes for the young Leeds priest concerning whom all kinds of stuff has been suggested, so readers are left to imagine whatever takes their fancy.
Twisted sistersays:
C'mon girl, give us all the details!
1.32, genuine bean spilling is always delivered in a middle of the road tone, did you notice.
There are mature readers here who have made mature critiques. If you are not willing to join in, are you trying to paint us as otherwise? No doubt you are on the side of the actual predators like those who were posting comments several months ago.
That a fellow predator may also fall victim to you, doesn't make it right.
Two things I am delighted that the formation team must have found you unsuitable and asked to leave.
So you constantly pick on Father Littleton and if anything it is very unchristian of you.
Secondly if you have any concerns or any information that is factual give it to Archbishop Wilson or if you want to remain anonymous send it to Bishop Pat who would raise your concerns.
Or do you just like keep bitching about Father Littleton.
After watching the You Tube I have raised the concerns with Archbishop Wilson and hope he takes appropriate action.
Well done you....!says:
Well done you ! But don't expect much to happen. You certainly won't hear about it because + Wilson will not want to be seen giving in to or taking notice of complaining laity. If anything is said or done it will be all done on the QT. We might see Litteprick's videos and blogs removed, and that would be a wise move on his part. Out of sight, out of mind. Silly little twerp has brought this all on himself by putting himself out there in such a ridiculous, self-satisfying, limelight seeking way, immature idiot that he is. What did he expect ?
I wonder why his PP hadn't twigged that this nitwit was prancing around the place making such a fool of himself and grandstanding in the name of tradition and orthodoxy. He really should have put a stop to this guys antics in the first place. If I was + Wilson, I'd be having a word with him as well as with Littlewanker.
I see you are taking your own advice and contacting bishops, archbishops, cardinals and nuncios.
Get someone to proofread it.
The Church dodged a bullet in booting you out, you alcoholic old Queen.
Our Lady of Knock pray for you.
1.32 You seem to be holding a right grudge for Fr Littleton. Do tell about your 5 years in seminary, where they all spent with Littleton or were you like ships passing in the night? What's your beef? You sound a little repetitive and therefore boring. So put up or shut up!
Pray, do tell @ 1:32pm
Creeping floorboards and funny noises, Tocatta and Fugue bellowing away from the pipes of the chapel organ at all hours.
Come on @ 1:32pm! You can't tease us all like that then say no more.
Bitch! x
That's a Neanderthal comment at 12:13 and also a rather unpleasant slur on John Barrowman. Jamie Redknapp would have been aged about forty at the time, and would hardly have needed his dad to knock anyone's block off; morever, he has always cultivated a metro look, so would more likely have been rather flattered, or at least taken it with good humour.
Did your father sit around watching the celebs on the telly as much as you do? Jamie Rednapp is straight he's not ever going to fancy John Barrowman back so why say it? What about a straight man saying your son's wife is my secret crush ? What would your mother say if a gay man said your father is his secret crush ? No the reality is you have a different standard to gay men's lusts to anyone else's, all gay sexual harassment is just a compliment or light hearted that's the first step to tolerating abuse no one needs uninvited sexual comments at any age, you've obviously not been on the receiving end of any Father
Absolute nonsense.
John Barrowman's lusts? Is that what you do when you fancy someone your sexual opposite? Lust? Or are you just being human?
I'm not gay, but if John Barrowman told me he found me quite fanciable, I'd take it as a bloody compliment, even though I couldn't return the attraction. Sure, if he crossed a boundary and touched, say, my butt, he'd likely get a smack in the gob.
I always wonder about alledgedly straight people when they express high dudgeon at a complimentary remark from a gay or lesbian person. What's the matter? Are they afraid that a closet door will be wrenched open?
Pat what is the criteria for your formation programme.
The Oratory Society does not go looking for vocations. We are open to people approaching us and we try and discern vocation with them.
We would want to look at a persons physical and mental health, their knowledge of theology and scripture, the presence of a strong spirituality and prayer life, their desired ministry etc.
Pat are you open to ex Maynooth Seminarians possibly discerning in your Oratory Society of Prayer and Ministry.
Pat, a word to the wise. Don't accept ex-seminarians. They have more baggage than a pre-lockdown jumbo jet.
I'll be in touch about this, +Pat, once I've finished prunining and sprucing up my Father's garden at home. Gardening is a real labour of love.
Lots of weeds… entangled… but after a few gentle tugs they finally begin to loosen their grip from the earth bed revealing the rich and healthy soil beneath.
I am certain that gardening will always be for me, but I have been known to get a tat carried away with the weeding part. Maybe you are the Bishop to help me harness this.
Eitherway, your faithful servant in Christ Jesus
Daisysays:
I've got a spare professional Dell mini pc here with an HD cctv camera. You can get really good software free offline which is quite easy to use.
I can send over in post if you like?
Can even install if you don't know any techies by your end…
That's an extremely kind offer. Can you explain how it would work, the software involved and the need for web hosting etc.
Hi +Pat, I will have a look at the name of the software this evening, but it basically allows you to record (or go live) edit etc. from a Windows pc. You could host the link from your current website / IP address if it is static.
But once the Masses or talks are recorded, they can sit on the pc/acting as a mini server (I'm assuming you don't have a server because this site is possibly maintained remotely by a company), so peoole can choose and view at leisure.
I'll sent a link possibly on YouTube tonight.
Ps sorry if it seems a bi too techy 😂
Pat how is your formation house different to Maynooth please explaine in detail.
BCM International describe themselves as a "family of ministries" i.e one of those self-referential smorgasbord thingys.
Sadly the Ford essay doesn't seem to be at that link.
Father Phillip Smith formally of Southwark Archdiocese now Army chaplain. Godson of Msgr Gerald Ewing.
Any dirt?
A lot of dirt. Father xxxxx held a now infamous homily at a Sunday mass at Wankers back in 2018 where he openly bragged and boasted about all the bottoms he had had in his life.
In 2011, an Amazon reviewer of the book describes, "This book was stock reading in the late eighties and early nineties. Me and my ex-gay friends lapped it up eagerly as we discovered the reasons for our sinful desires. I began to hate my father for the things he had supposedly done, or not done, to me. I also had a series of extremely harmful close-friendships with male Christian friends in an attempt to 'top-up' my masculinity and make me straight. This resulted in a serious break-down which still affects me years later. I first started to 'see the light' when my best friend from university told me that he had had a bad relationship with his father but that hadn't made him gay.
This woman needs exposing as a charlatan. She has messed with the heads of many serious Christian men and women and seriously screwed us up. As far as I'm aware she only has a doctorate in theology and so her attempts in the psychological world are not informed by any foundations in psychology. Apparently, she has gone into cancer research now, presumably expounding the belief that cancer is caused by having a bad relationship with the family pet in childhood and can be healed by buying a dog in adult life!"
It sounds like Marsden is an anti-fag fag and Moberly an anti-fag fag hag.
Moochie Carta at 4:16pm "…..I'm not gay ……"
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Carta, it's actually quite a boundary crossing to use intense language, especially from one with influence. Who have you been trying to chat up then?
The Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland, +Amy Turtle, said today that in order for churches to reopen for worship, young volunteers would be required to assist with cleaning, giving readings and the general ministering of the Eucharist.


text:
Foam with 'forever chemicals' dumped at Dayton airport, records show
By Ismail Turay Jr.
Records show crews at the Dayton International Airport disposed of firefighting foam multiple times — including accidental spills — in recent years, discharges which followed guidelines in place at the time but which introduced PFAS chemicals into the environment.
The foam products contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ― or PFAS, a group of toxins common in industrial and other uses. They have been linked to cancer, and have become a local and national environmental concern.
Several miles from the airport testing site, drinking water wells at Aullwood Audubon Farm Discovery Center and surrounding Butler Twp. homes have been found to be contaminated with PFAS, and property owners are seeking answers to how this could have occurred.
ExploreIncreased salt in water table could pose threat to environment, human safety
Between 2014 and 2020, firefighters spilled or discharged the Federal Aviation Administration-mandated substance called aqueous film forming foam — also referred to as firefighting foam or AFFF — that's used to extinguish jet fuel and other highly flammable liquid fires on airport grounds, according to city of Dayton documents that the newspaper obtained through a records request. The chemicals tend to seep into groundwater.
AFFF has about 50% PFAS by volume, meaning that each discharge is "highly, highly concentrated," said Abinash Agrawal, a Wright State University earth science professor and groundwater expert. In addition, AFFF dissolves in water easily, and can move quickly through the soil to reach the groundwater, he said. So it's likely that the toxins used at the airport migrated to Butler Twp., and contaminated the wells there, he said.
The Dayton Daily News Path Forward project digs into solutions to the biggest issues facing our community, including the safety and sustainability of our drinking water.
The city of Dayton, which operates the airport, said there's no correlation between the use of firefighting foam at the airport and the toxins detected in nearby communities. The city, however, has two separate lawsuits pending against PFAS manufacturers and Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the Department of Defense, in part because it claims the base's use of firefighting foam contaminated a well field used by the city of Dayton to supply drinking water.
ExploreWater Panel report: Dayton water quality good, with PFAS seen as a 'threat'
"Unfortunately, PFAS is pervasive in our society, and was used in food products, septic systems and numerous other industrial applications," the city said in a statement. "It is our understanding that the Ohio EPA has not determined the source of the PFAS contamination at Aullwood, and that an extensive study of the area's geology and groundwater flow would be necessary to even begin to make this determination, especially with the numerous potential sources in the area."
The Ohio EPA and the Ohio Department of Health confirmed to the Daily News that they have not determined the source, nor has the state scheduled a study.
After high levels of PFAS were detected at Aullwood last year, The Ohio Department of Health sampled 49 wells in the surrounding community. The aim was to determine the severity of the problem and make recommendations on next steps and health risks to property owners. The purpose of the testing was not intended to determine the source of contamination, the agency said.
How dangerous are PFAS?
PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals that were developed in the 1940s. They are found in numerous industrial and consumer products such as carpeting, upholstery and food packaging. Manufacturing and processing facilities that use the substances in products, airports and military installations are partially responsible for releasing the chemicals into the air, soil and water, according the the U.S. EPA.
Most people in the United States have been exposed to PFAS because the chemicals have been widely used for more than 80 years, the agency said.
Exposure to PFAS, dubbed forever chemicals because they're considered chemically nearly indestructible, can lead to increased risk of high blood pressure or pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, increased cholesterol levels and changes in liver enzymes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The toxins can also cause decreased vaccine response in children, small decreases in infant birth weights and increased risk of kidney or testicular cancer.
ExploreFAA urges airports to use firefighting foam with 'forever chemicals' only in emergencies
Exposure to the toxins in drinking water is higher when compared to exposure in consumer products, the CDC said. Some products that may contain PFAS include:
Some grease-resistant paper, fast food containers/wrappers, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes and candy wrappers
Nonstick cookware
Stain resistant coatings used on carpets, upholstery and other fabrics
Water resistant clothing
Personal care products (shampoo, dental floss) and cosmetics (nail polish, eye makeup)
Paints, varnishes and sealants
The U.S. EPA does not regulate PFAS, although it's inching closer to doing so. On Monday the agency announced it plans to set aggressive drinking water limits for PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Act and will require PFAS manufacturers to report on how toxic their products are, according to media reports. In addition, the government will designate PFAS as hazardous substances under the so-called Superfund law that allows the EPA to force companies responsible for the contamination to pay for the cleanup work or do it themselves.
The agency said it expects a proposed PFAS rule by 2023.
For now, the U.S. EPA's recommended health advisory level for forever chemicals is 70 parts-per-trillion. A part per trillion is equal to about a grain of sand in an Olympic-size pool. The level is expected to be much lower when the law is enacted.
Ohio adopted the federal PFAS levels. However, a handful of states, including New York and Michigan, have set their levels at 10 and 24 ppt, respectively.
Aullwood's PFAS level, when the Ohio EPA sampled the center's well water last year, was 96 parts per trillion. The center is located at 9101 Frederick Pike in Butler Twp., between the city of Englewood on the west and Dayton International Airport to the east.
PFAS discharges on airport grounds
Firefighters disposed of firefighting foam along with a dry, non-toxic chemical agent known as Purple-K that's also used to fight fires, starting in 2013, according to the documents obtained by the Daily News. Gil Turner, the airport's director of aviation, said he doesn't know if firefighting foam was used in previous years because there are no records available. Purple K and AFFF were released into a grassy area on the airport's northeast corner at a designated training area on airport grounds during annual FAA mandated training and equipment testing, Turner said.
Firefighting foams were either spilled or discharged at the training site five times in 2014, 2015, twice in 2016 and 2020, according to records.
In nearly every discharge recorded, the airport specified that the foam was "sprayed in grass away from drain." The FAA's requirement to use AFFF and designate a testing area did not include spraying the foam in the grass; that was the airport's plan, Turner said. Officials avoided spraying the foam directly into the storm drain because they wanted to ensure that it doesn't get into nearby groundwater and rivers, he said.
Spraying the foam away from the storm drains or directly in the grass doesn't do enough to protect groundwater, Agrawal said. Either way, the AFFF would seep into the ground and contaminate the water. While the airport has a permit to use firefighting foam, it is prohibited from releasing the foam and other non-storm water discharges into the drains, according to the Ohio EPA.
Based on the firefighting foam discharges and other evidence, Agrawal, the Wright State groundwater expert, said he believes the airport is the likely source of contamination in the area. He reviewed the city's documents and also took into consideration the fact that the State of Ohio and some residents detected various levels of the toxins in more than 70 wells throughout the community the past year.
"The groundwater aquifer in the area is fractured bedrock, Agrawal said. "The fractures can allow rapid movement of PFAS-contaminated groundwater to flow downhill to the west, but the contaminated water can also move to the private and public water wells that are actively pumping in the area."
Agrawal and other scientists from the U.S. EPA and the Ohio State University are conducting their own investigation into the source of the chemicals, he said.
Hydrogeologist Linda Aller, who has tested more than two dozen wells in the area for the chemicals, said the airport is a possible source for the contaminations..But until a study is done to determine the source of PFAS in the area, one can't be certain, said Aller, who works for Westerville-based Bennett and Williams Environmental Consultants Inc.
Search for non-toxic firefighting foam
The airport stopped discharging the substances into the ground in 2020, after officials learned about the hazards associated with AFFF, Turner said. The city then replaced one of their three trucks, known as Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting — ARFF — with one that allows them to test the AFFF internally. Airport officials used an $833,800 FAA grant to purchase the vehicle.
They also spent $31,800 to retrofit the other two ARFFs with internal AFFF testing equipment.
"While required by federal law to use the current foam to protect life and property, the Dayton Airport continues to lobby the FAA to adopt firefighting foams that do not contain PFAS, and that can effectively put out fires and save lives in the event of an accident," Turner said.
FAA is working to move away from AFFF-laden PFAS. In a statement to the Daily News, the agency said it continues to partner with the Department of Defense to find a firefighting foam that protects travelers and that does not harm human health or the environment.
To date, the statement continued, the FAA built a testing center to support the necessary research. Despite the impacts of COVID19, officials have performed more than 400 research tests with 15 commercially available and prototype products, and additional research is underway on new foam formulations.
In addition, the bipartisan infrastructure bill includes $10 billion for other agencies to help communities clean up PFAS. Also, the Biden administration this year created a new council that will identify pragmatic approaches that deliver critical protections to the American public.
Recently, the FAA issued an alert to airports, recommending that they use firefighting foam only during emergencies in an effort to limit PFAS.
How widespread is PFAS in local communities?
The Dayton region and the State of Ohio have been grappling with PFAS since 2016, when they were detected in the groundwater at Wright-Patt and Dayton. Then in 2018 Dayton officials sued multiple PFAS manufactures. The city also sued Wright-Patt and the DoD in May, saying contaminated water from the base continues to migrate into the Dayton's well field, and the Air Force failed to address the problem. Both lawsuits are pending.
In 2020, as part of Gov. Mike DeWine's efforts to address PFAS, the Ohio EPA tested all 1,500 public drinking water systems across the state for the chemicals. It was during that process that the agency detected PFAS levels at 96 ppt in Aullwood's drinking water. A short time later, the Ohio Department of Health set out to determine how widespread the problem is in the surrounding community.
The tests determined that five of the wells had PFAS levels below the limit set by the state. Those water systems are located within the boundaries of Old Springfield Road on the north, and Kershner Road on the south. The area, which the ODH said is "most affected," borders the airport on the east. State health officials issued a citizen's advisory urging residents in that area to test their wells for PFAS.
Tests of the remaining 44 wells did not detect PFAS, although it's possible that the contaminants are in the water. Those wells are located in the area that borders Neal-Pearson Road, between Kessler Frederick Road to the north, and Interstate 70, between Meeker and Dog Leg roads to the south. Property owners in that area were advised of the possibility of PFAS in the area. But the ODH is not recommending that they sample their well water, although property owners are free to do so if they choose.
About the Path Forward
Our team of investigative reporters digs into what you identified as pressing issues facing our community. The Path Forward project seeks solutions to these problems by investigating the safety and sustainability of our drinking water. Follow our work at DaytonDailyNews.com/PathForward.
Ismail Turay Jr.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


This is a Flickr badge showing public items from stevenjgarner tagged with stevenjgarner. Make your own badge here.
The only basic SEO principles used were a bookmark on delicious.com, an article digg.com, and placement of some comments on a few leading online discussions, and some Flickr.com photos (all submitted to search engines). This is with a score of only 35/100 on websitegrader.com. No paid Adwords or any other commercial work - although I have now placed an Amazon advertisement for my least disliked Postfix book.


text:
COMSTOCK RESOURCES, INC. REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2022 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS AND ANNOUNCES REINSTATEMENT OF QUARTERLY DIVIDEND
By: Comstock Resources, Inc. via Globe NewsWire
November 01, 2022 at 16:20 PM EDT
FRISCO, TX, Nov. 01, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Comstock Resources, Inc. ("Comstock" or the "Company") (NYSE: CRK) today reported financial and operating results for the quarter ended September 30, 2022.
Highlights of 2022's Third Quarter
Generated highest quarterly operating cash flow in the Company's history of $533 million or $1.92 per diluted share.
Free cash flow from operations was $286 million in the quarter.
Retired $250 million of debt in the third quarter and reduced leverage to under 1x.
Adjusted net income to common stockholders for the quarter was $326 million or $1.18 per diluted share.
Adjusted EBITDAX increased 93% in the quarter to a record high $598 million.
Oil and gas sales, including realized hedging losses, were $692 million, 76% higher than 2021's third quarter.
Strong results from Haynesville shale drilling program with 17 (15.2 net) operated wells turned to sales since our last update with an average initial production of 29 MMcf per day.
Board of directors approved reinstatement of a quarterly common stock dividend to commence in the fourth quarter.
Commenting on the quarter, Jay Allison, the Company's Chief Executive Officer said, "Comstock delivered record cash flow and free cash flow from operations in the third quarter. The record-setting financial results we have had so far this year have repositioned our balance sheet to be a strength of the Company and has allowed us to reinstate our quarterly cash dividend."
Financial Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
Comstock's revenues in the third quarter of 2022 totaled $692.4 million (after realized hedging losses of $304.5 million). Net cash provided by operating activities (excluding changes in working capital) generated in the third quarter was $532.9 million, and net income available to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2022 was $351.2 million or $1.28 per share. Reported net income in the quarter included a pre-tax $33.2 million unrealized gain on hedging contracts held for risk management. Excluding this item and certain other items, adjusted net income available to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2022 was $325.6 million, or $1.18 per diluted share.
Comstock's production cost per Mcfe in the third quarter averaged $0.82 per Mcfe, which was comprised of $0.35 for gathering and transportation costs, $0.22 for lease operating costs, $0.19 for production and other taxes and $0.06 for cash general and administrative expenses. Production cost was $0.74 per Mcfe in the second quarter of 2022 and $0.65 in the third quarter of 2021. The increase in production cost in the quarter is attributable to the higher natural gas prices realized this year which has resulted in higher production tax and higher gathering and transportation expenses. Comstock's unhedged operating margin was 89% in the third quarter of 2022 and 85% after hedging. Comstock's margin is one of the highest in the industry.
Financial Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 totaled $1.7 billion (after realized hedging losses of $679.0 million). Net cash provided by operating activities (excluding changes in working capital) generated during the first nine months of 2022 was $1.3 billion, and income available to common stockholders was $608.0 million or $2.24 per share. Net income during the first nine months of 2022 included a pre-tax $102.6 million unrealized loss on hedging contracts held for risk management and a $46.8 million loss on early retirement of debt. Excluding these items and certain other items, adjusted net income available to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 was $735.0 million or $2.68 per diluted share.
Comstock's production cost per Mcfe during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 averaged $0.75 per Mcfe, which was comprised of $0.31 for gathering and transportation costs, $0.22 for lease operating costs, $0.16 for production and other taxes and $0.06 for cash general and administrative expenses. Production cost was $0.61 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. The higher 2022 production costs are attributable to higher 2022 realized natural gas prices. Comstock's unhedged operating margin was 88% during the first nine months of 2022 and 84% after hedging.
Drilling Results
Comstock drilled 21 (14.8 net) operated horizontal Haynesville/Bossier shale wells in the third quarter of 2022 which had an average lateral length of 10,275 feet. The Company also participated in an additional seven (0.7 net) non-operated Haynesville shale wells in the third quarter of 2022. Comstock turned 17 (15.2 net) operated wells and 18 (0.6 net) non-operated wells to sales in the third quarter of 2022 and currently expects to turn an additional 11 (8.7 net) operated wells to sales in the fourth quarter of 2022.
Since its last operational update in August, Comstock has turned 17 (15.2 net) operated Haynesville/Bossier shale wells to sales. These wells had initial daily production rates that averaged 29 MMcf per day. The completed lateral length of these wells averaged 9,899 feet.
Reinstatement of Quarterly Dividend
Comstock's Board of Directors approved the reinstatement of the Company's quarterly cash dividend, with the first dividend to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2022, at an annual dividend rate of $0.50 per share ($0.125 per quarter). Comstock last paid a common dividend in 2014. The fourth quarter dividend will be payable on December 15, 2022 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 2022.
Earnings Call Information
Comstock has planned a conference call for 9:00 a.m. Central Time on November 2, 2022, to discuss the third quarter 2022 operational and financial results. Investors wishing to listen should visit the Company's website at www.comstockresources.com for a live webcast. Investors wishing to participate in the conference call telephonically will need to register at https://register.vevent.com/register/BI39ce5cb8026c4144ae9a888f217e28ae. Upon registering to participate in the conference call, participants will receive the dial-in number and a personal PIN number to access the conference call. On the day of the call, please dial in at least 15 minutes in advance to ensure a timely connection to the call. The conference call will also be broadcast live in listen-only mode and can be accessed via the website URL: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/uhgfab48.
If you are unable to participate in the original conference call, a web replay will be available for twelve months beginning at 12:00 p.m. CT on November 2, 2022. The replay of the conference can be accessed using the webcast link: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/uhgfab48.
This press release may contain "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein. Although the Company believes the expectations in such statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Information concerning the assumptions, uncertainties and risks that may affect the actual results can be found in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") available on the Company's website or the SEC's website at sec.gov.
Comstock Resources, Inc. is a leading independent natural gas producer with operations focused on the development of the Haynesville shale in North Louisiana and East Texas. The Company's stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CRK.
COMSTOCK RESOURCES, INC.
September 30, Nine Months Ended
Natural gas sales $ 994,979 $ 488,303 $ 2,376,774 $ 1,133,783
Oil sales 1,936 22,873 6,324 61,571
Total oil and gas sales 996,915 511,176 2,383,098 1,195,354
Gas services 193,090 — 322,575 —
Total revenues 1,190,005 511,176 2,705,673 1,195,354
Production and ad valorem taxes 24,531 16,675 60,080 36,468
Gathering and transportation 44,740 35,402 113,797 96,596
Lease operating 28,608 26,576 79,873 77,150
Exploration — — 3,363 —
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 129,065 128,739 354,994 359,313
General and administrative 10,165 8,052 27,451 23,952
Gain on sale of assets — (14 ) (21 ) (93 )
Total operating expenses 418,927 215,430 944,808 593,386
Operating income 771,078 295,746 1,760,865 601,968
Other income (expenses):
Loss from derivative financial instruments (271,335 ) (510,319 ) (781,654 ) (756,026 )
Other income 56 197 506 1,008
Interest expense (41,393 ) (49,954 ) (132,204 ) (170,645 )
Loss on early retirement of debt — — (46,840 ) (352,599 )
Total other expenses (312,672 ) (560,076 ) (960,192 ) (1,278,262 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 458,406 (264,330 ) 800,673 (676,294 )
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes (102,810 ) (23,976 ) (179,610 ) 74,168
Net income (loss) 355,596 (288,306 ) 621,063 (602,126 )
Preferred stock dividends (4,411 ) (4,411 ) (13,089 ) (13,089 )
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $ 351,185 $ (292,717 ) $ 607,974 $ (615,215 )
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $ 1.50 $ (1.26 ) $ 2.61 $ (2.66 )
Diluted $ 1.28 $ (1.26 ) $ 2.24 $ (2.66 )
Basic 232,482 231,747 232,170 231,519
Diluted 277,715 231,747 277,605 231,519
OPERATING RESULTS
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Forma (3) As Reported 2022 Pro
Forma (3) As Reported
Gas production (MMcf) 128,902 127,121 128,896 367,758 361,248 366,272
Oil production (Mbbls) 21 29 346 66 75 1,034
Total production (MMcfe) 129,025 127,296 130,968 368,152 361,700 372,474
Natural gas sales $ 994,979 $ 484,012 $ 488,303 $ 2,376,774 $ 1,123,967 $ 1,133,783
Natural gas hedging settlements (1) (304,489 ) (114,538 ) (114,538 ) (679,038 ) (138,907 ) (138,907 )
Total natural gas including hedging 690,490 369,474 373,765 1,697,736 985,060 994,876
Oil sales 1,936 1,941 22,873 6,324 4,684 61,571
Oil hedging settlements (1) — — (2,606 ) — — (5,489 )
Total oil including hedging 1,936 1,941 20,267 6,324 4,684 56,082
Total oil and gas sales including hedging $ 692,426 $ 371,415 $ 394,032 $ 1,704,060 $ 989,744 $ 1,050,958
Average gas price (per Mcf) $ 7.72 $ 3.81 $ 3.79 $ 6.46 $ 3.11 $ 3.10
Average gas price including hedging (per Mcf) $ 5.36 $ 2.91 $ 2.90 $ 4.62 $ 2.73 $ 2.72
Average oil price (per barrel) $ 92.19 $ 66.93 $ 66.11 $ 95.82 $ 62.45 $ 59.55
Average oil price including hedging (per barrel) $ 92.19 $ 66.93 $ 58.58 $ 95.82 $ 62.45 $ 54.24
Average price (per Mcfe) $ 7.73 $ 3.82 $ 3.90 $ 6.47 $ 3.12 $ 3.21
Average price including hedging (per Mcfe) $ 5.37 $ 2.92 $ 3.01 $ 4.63 $ 2.74 $ 2.82
Production and ad valorem taxes $ 24,531 $ 14,508 $ 16,675 $ 60,080 $ 30,589 $ 36,468
Gathering and transportation 44,740 35,349 35,402 113,797 96,543 96,596
Lease operating 28,608 23,747 26,576 79,873 67,613 77,150
Cash general and administrative (2) 8,323 6,250 6,250 22,533 18,661 18,661
Total production costs $ 106,202 $ 79,854 $ 84,903 $ 276,283 $ 213,406 $ 228,875
Production and ad valorem taxes (per Mcfe) $ 0.19 $ 0.11 $ 0.13 $ 0.16 $ 0.08 $ 0.09
Gathering and transportation (per Mcfe) 0.35 0.28 0.27 0.31 0.27 0.26
Lease operating (per Mcfe) 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.19 0.21
Cash general and administrative (per Mcfe) 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05
Total production costs (per Mcfe) $ 0.82 $ 0.63 $ 0.65 $ 0.75 $ 0.59 $ 0.61
Unhedged operating margin 89 % 84 % 83 % 88 % 81 % 81 %
Hedged operating margin 85 % 79 % 78 % 84 % 78 % 78 %
Oil and gas capital expenditures:
Proved property acquisitions $ — $ — $ — $ 205 $ — $ —
Unproved property acquisitions 12,214 5,248 5,248 37,396 18,649 18,649
Total oil and gas properties acquisitions $ 12,214 $ 5,248 $ 5,248 $ 37,601 $ 18,649 $ 18,649
Exploration and development:
Development leasehold $ 3,011 $ 721 $ 733 $ 8,298 $ 6,759 $ 6,794
Exploratory drilling and completion 18,606 — — 49,003 — —
Development drilling and completion 204,954 141,637 141,637 619,373 454,524 454,524
Other development costs 15,563 17,171 18,719 52,500 22,511 26,795
Total exploration and development capital expenditures $ 242,134 $ 159,529 $ 161,089 $ 729,174 $ 483,794 $ 488,113
(1) Included in gain (loss) from derivative financial instruments in operating results.
(2) Excludes stock-based compensation.
(3) Excludes results of the Company's Bakken shale assets, which were sold in October 2021.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended
ADJUSTED NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
Unrealized (gain) loss from derivative financial instruments (33,154 ) 392,870 102,616 610,764
Loss on early retirement of debt — — 46,840 352,599
Non-cash interest amortization from adjusting debt assumed in
acquisition to fair value — 2,565 4,174 9,962
Exploration expense — — 3,363 —
Adjustment to (provision for) benefit from income taxes 7,580 (11,169 ) (29,959 ) (153,777 )
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders (1) $ 325,611 $ 91,535 $ 734,987 $ 204,240
Adjusted net income available to common stockholders per share (2) $ 1.18 $ 0.35 $ 2.68 $ 0.79
Diluted shares outstanding 277,715 276,886 277,605 276,368
ADJUSTED EBITDAX:
Net income (loss) $ 355,596 $ (288,306 ) $ 621,063 $ (602,126 )
Interest expense (3) 41,393 50,259 132,204 171,511
Income taxes 102,810 23,976 179,610 (74,168 )
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 129,065 128,739 354,994 359,313
Stock-based compensation 1,842 1,802 4,918 5,291
Loss on early extinguishment of debt — — 46,840 352,599
Total Adjusted EBITDAX (4) $ 597,552 $ 309,326 $ 1,445,587 $ 823,091
(1) Adjusted net income available to common stockholders is presented because of its acceptance by investors and by Comstock management as an indicator of the Company's profitability excluding loss on early retirement of debt, non-cash unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments, gains and losses on sales of assets and other unusual items.
(2) Adjusted net income available to common stockholders per share is calculated to include the dilutive effects of unvested restricted stock pursuant to the two-class method and performance stock units and preferred stock pursuant to the treasury stock method.
(3) Includes realized gains or losses from interest rate derivative financial instruments.
(4) Adjusted EBITDAX is presented in the earnings release because management believes that adjusted EBITDAX, which represents Comstock's results from operations before interest, income taxes, and certain non-cash items, including loss on early retirement of debt, depreciation, depletion and amortization and exploration expense, is a common alternative measure of operating performance used by certain investors and financial analysts.
OPERATING CASH FLOW(1):
Reconciling items:
Deferred income taxes (benefit) 78,060 16,339 148,389 (84,942 )
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs 1,444 4,012 8,542 17,587
Operating cash flow $ 532,853 $ 255,442 $ 1,287,341 $ 658,393
Increase in accounts receivable (155,682 ) (57,189 ) (359,600 ) (97,379 )
(Increase) decrease in other current assets (15,494 ) (4,678 ) (25,214 ) 850
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses 156,873 39,395 301,956 56,689
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 518,550 $ 232,970 $ 1,204,483 $ 618,553
FREE CASH FLOW(2):
Exploration and development capital expenditures (242,134 ) (161,089 ) (729,174 ) (488,113 )
Other capital expenditures (603 ) (23 ) (713 ) (69 )
Preferred dividends (4,411 ) (4,411 ) (13,089 ) (13,089 )
Free cash flow from operations $ 285,705 $ 89,919 $ 544,365 $ 157,122
Acquisitions (12,347 ) (5,248 ) (54,492 ) (18,649 )
Proceeds from divestitures — 50 93 261
Free cash flow after acquisition and divestiture activity $ 273,358 $ 84,721 $ 489,966 $ 138,734
(1) Operating cash flow is presented in the earnings release because management believes it to be useful to investors as a common alternative measure of cash flows which excludes changes to other working capital accounts.
(2) Free cash flow from operations and free cash flow after acquisition and divestiture activity are presented in the earnings release because management believes them to be useful indicators of the Company's ability to internally fund acquisitions and debt maturities after exploration and development capital expenditures, preferred dividend payments, proved and unproved property acquisitions, and proceeds from divestiture of oil and gas properties.
2022 December 31, 2021
Cash and cash equivalents $ 38,648 $ 30,663
Accounts receivable 627,338 267,738
Derivative financial instruments 2,368 5,258
Other current assets 40,470 15,077
Property and equipment, net 4,440,022 4,007,146
Goodwill 335,897 335,897
Operating lease right-of-use assets 99,622 6,450
Accounts payable $ 617,463 $ 314,569
Accrued costs 150,327 135,026
Operating leases 38,024 2,444
Derivative financial instruments 285,713 181,945
Total current liabilities 1,091,527 633,984
Long-term debt 2,261,697 2,615,235
Deferred income taxes 345,806 197,417
Derivative financial instruments — 4,042
Long-term operating leases 61,676 4,075
Asset retirement obligation 29,235 25,673
Other non-current liabilities 8 24
Mezzanine Equity:
Preferred stock 175,000 175,000
Common stock 116,879 116,462
Additional paid-in capital 1,098,605 1,100,359
Accumulated earnings (deficit) 403,932 (204,042 )
Total stockholders' equity 1,619,416 1,012,779
Ron Mills
VP - Finance and Investor Relations
Comstock Resources
rmills@comstockresources.com