The Aruba Kinship Project is in Trans-Nzoia County in Kenya, close to the Ugandan border. The area is mainly agricultural, and is even referred to as the "bread-basket of Kenya". The most popular crops in the area are wheat, corn, tea, coffee and dairy farming.
A majority of the people who live in the community are Christians, and Christianity is continuing to grow as the Aruba Kinship Project and other churches work together to share the gospel with their neighbors. The Aruba Kinship Project also focuses on caring for children from this area who have lost their parents to the AIDs epidemic by giving them a home and a family.
As of this update, your gifts to Aruba are making it possible for Pastor Daniel and his team to serve the needs of the many desperate kids and community members with the programs marked above. And also because of you, Aruba's beautiful new kitchen is up and running. Thank you for caring about these kids and this community. We're so lucky to have you on our team! Did you know that Aruba's team has room to grow? Click here to learn more about becoming a monthly supporter so you can help more kids with Aruba!
Rescue and care for orphans every month! 100% of your gift will support the initiatives of the Aruba Kinship Project.


text:
Carnivorous Protestants and Radical Vegetarianism in Early Modern England
by doinghistoryinpublic on May 16, 2017
By Elly Barnett – @eleanorrbarnett
A meat-free diet is becoming increasingly popular in the UK. The number of vegans, for instance, who avoid all animal products as well as meat, has more than tripled since 2006.[1] Increasing awareness of environmental issues caused by the meat industry, concerns about animal welfare, new claims about healthy living, and greater access to a variety of foodstuffs, are among the driving forces of this trend. In the social media age, trend seekers aspire to the meat-free diets of several high-profile celebrities and the copious crafted-snaps of vegetarian and vegan #foodporn on Instagram. Most recently, comedian Simon Amstall's 'mockumentary', Carnage, envisaged a utopian vegan future (2067) in which now-elderly meat-eaters repent their carnivorous past. Yet, whilst the term 'vegetarian' was not coined until 1847, the question of whether or not to kill for food has concerned human societies across history.
In early modern England, Protestantism inherited a long-held Christian conception that meat-eating is central to the God-given hierarchy of nature. This had a Biblical precedent, as contemporary physicians like Thomas Moffett (1553-1604) pointed out. Genesis gives dominion to humans over animals (Genesis 1:26), and after the Flood it is declared, 'Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you' (Genesis 9:3). In fact, the Medieval Catholic Church had seen those who chose to avoid meat ordinarily as a threat to the established religion. In medieval France, for instance, the Inquisition tirelessly tracked down and burnt heretical Cathars, who were known for their meat avoidance.
Yet, the Catholic Church also sanctioned abstinence from flesh as a religious penance in monastic diets, and for the populace in the weekly fast days (Friday, Saturday and variably Wednesday), and the periods before Easter, Christmas, and other holy days. After the Reformation, the English Crown continued to enforce these routine religious days of abstinence.
This, however, was increasingly problematic for Protestant preachers and writers, who reemphasised the teachings of St Paul to claim that all foods could legitimately be consumed. Matthew 15:11 was most often quoted: 'Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man, but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man'. As Elizabethan writer Edward Jeninges declared, 'the eating of fleshe or forbearing to eate fleshe, is not anie matter or thing concerning saluation of man', which was granted sola fides (in faith alone) rather than in worldly acts.[2] The number of fast days was reduced, along with the worship of Catholic saints which they necessitated, and monastic abstinence was lost in the dissolution of the monasteries. The avoidance of meat was increasingly no longer an accepted expression of Protestant religosity.
Meat-eating, particularly beef, was also central to English national identity in the early modern period well into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In his Haven of Health (1584), English physician Thomas Cogan argued that 'beife of all flesh is most usual among English men…the common consent of all our nation doth sufficiency prove'. English travel writers persistently compared their beef and meat-based diet, a sign of their honesty and sincerity, to that of the pomp and temptation of the Italian and their 'sallets' and fruits.[3]
Those who sought a vegetarian diet in early-modern England were therefore unsurprisingly few in number. One of them, Thomas Bushell (1594-1674), a student of Thomas Bacon, moved to live in a cave on the Calf of Man and lived on a diet of herbs, oil, water, and honey. Bushell adopted religious arguments to support his dietary choice. He imagined that a vegetarian diet was closer to that of the Garden of Eden, and believed that mirroring this diet could bring about paradise on Earth, as had many ascetics before him, like St Jerome.[4] Similar ideas were central to the radical Protestant and largely vegetarian sect, the 'Ranters', who appeared after the Civil War in the mid-seventeenth century. Important among them was John Robins (fl. 1641-52), who claimed that he was the new Adam sent to recreate Eden on Earth. Roger Crab (1621-1680), who published radical vegetarian pamphlets, likewise preached that sinful meat-eating should be excluded from a Christian life.
Some early-modern arguments for a meat-free diet sound more familiar today. Although Bacon was not a vegetarian, he expressed a concern for animal welfare, arguing that compassion could be granted to animals, without denying humankind's God-given dominion over them. Like Crab, Bacon also thought that a meat-free diet was healthier; the Bible claimed that before the Flood people had lived up to 900 years without consuming meat. In his Utopia (1516), Thomas More (another carnivore) put forward a quasi-environmental reason for vegetarianism in his imagined idyllic community:
"They [the oxen and sheep] consume, destroy, and devour whole fields, houses, and cities…. For one shepherd or herdsman is enough to eat up that ground with cattle, to the occupying whereof about husbandry many hands would be requisite". [5]
The practice of vegetarianism, however, was associated with religious transgression in early modern England. Bushell feared that his hermit-like lifestyle would lead to accusations of Catholicism. Both Robins and Crab were suspected of Judaism and the 'Ranters' movement was condemned.
In the early modern period being a vegetarian was a radical choice. Some English Protestant reformers fought against the religious necessity to abstain from meat, whilst beef consumption was presented to the wider-world as essential to 'Englishness'. Today meat and beef consumption is deeply ingrained in English identity, and it continues as the centrepiece of the traditional Sunday meal. Dependent as it would be on the dissolution of these long held beliefs about food, the creation of the meat-free 'utopia' equally envisaged in the sixteenth century by Thomas More and today by Simon Anstell, would be far from a simple task.
[1] https://www.vegansociety.com/about-us/key-facts
[2] Edward Jeninges, A briefe discouery of the damages that happen to this realme by disordered and vnlawfull diet, London, 1590), STC2 14486, p. 27
[3] Thomas Olsen, ""Poisoned Figs and Italian Sallett: Nation, Diet and the Early Modern English Traveler," in Luigi Monga (ed.), Annali d'italianistica, 21 (2003), 233-54.
[4] Tristram Stuart, The Bloodless Revolution: Radical Vegetarians and the Discovery of India (London, 2012).
[5] Colin Spencer, The Heretic's Feast: A History of Vegetarianism (London, 1993), p. 186.
[Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrait_of_Roger_Crab._Wellcome_L0000657.jpg%5D
← When Numbers Lie – Cautioning Quantitative Enthusiasm
Royal Palace or Hellish Temple? Using Architectural Style as a Source →
My Blog Posts – Eleanor Barnett
Fad or philosophy? The old debate over the consumption of animals | Doing History in Public

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Advocate (2019 film)
2019 documentary film
Rachel Leah Jones
Philippe Bellaïche
Lea Tsemel
27 January 2019 (USA)
23 May 2019 (Israel)
$16,942[1]
Advocate is a 2019 Israeli documentary film, directed by Rachel Leah Jones and Philippe Bellaïche. The film premiered at the 2019 Sundance Festival, and went on to win top prizes at Thessaloniki Documentary Festival, Kraków Film Festival, Hong Kong International Film Festival and Docaviv Festival. Advocate won the Emmy for Best Documentary in the 42nd News and Documentary Emmy Awards.
2 Production
4 Critical reception
5 Political fallout in Israel
Synopsis[edit]
Leah Tsemel (2019)
The film follows Jewish-Israeli human-rights lawyer Lea Tsemel as she navigates through the Israeli judicial system in defense of Palestinians accused of terrorism. The film includes archival footage of past cases Tsemel was involved in over a five-decade long career; interviews with Tsemel and her family members, including her husband, Michel Warschawski and their daughter and son, as well as interns and associates at Tsemel's law firm; and closely follows two contemporary cases represented by Tsemel and her co-counsel, Tareq Barghout.
The first case the film follows is that of 13 year old Ahmad, who together with his 15 year old cousin, Hassan, took to the street with knives. The episode led to the non-fatal stabbing of an Israeli teenager by Hassan, who was then killed by security forces. Though no evidence is presented that Ahmad participated in the stabbing, or planned to use his decorative knife to harm anyone, he is convicted on two counts of attempted murder. The second case is that of Israa Jaabis, who is charged with attempted murder for an act that is interpreted by Israeli officials as a suicide bombing gone wrong. Jaabis had set fire to her car, into which she had placed two butane tanks. She was severely injured, and a policeman was lightly injured. In this case as well, no intent was proven on her part, and Jaabis had a history of suicide attempts, and yet she was easily convicted.
Tsemel explains her commitment to representing Palestinian defendants, whether or not they committed the acts they are accused of, as her responsibility as a member and beneficiary of the conquering power, under which the Palestinians must live, and against which they are justified in struggling for their liberation. She says, "Israelis have no right to tell Palestinians how to struggle." When the television interviewer says she cannot understand this attitude, she answers, "You should try to understand me because I am the future." She calls herself "an angry optimistic woman", and while she is seen by some as a hero and role model, she is seen by others as a traitor, and has long been the recipient of death threats and vilification, including various epithets by which she is known, including "devil's advocate".
The film incorporates animation in several parts, to protect the identity of various persons.[2]
Production[edit]
Advocate was produced by the Israeli Home Made Docs,[3] by the Canadian outfit Film Option, and by Swiss groups Close Up Films,[4] RTS Radio Télévision Suisse and SRG SSR.[5]
Release[edit]
Advocate's world premiere took place at the 2019 Sundance Film Festival, where it was a nominee for the World Cinema Documentary Competition award. It premiered in Israel at the Docaviv festival on 23 May 2019, where it won the top award. The film opened the 2019 Human Rights Watch Film Festival in New York City, and plucked top prizes at the Kraków Film Festival,[6] Hong Kong,[7] Docaviv[8] and Thessaloniki[9] festivals. Advocate's Israeli theater premier took place on September 5, 2019, when it opened at theaters nationwide.[10]
The film opened in theaters in the United States on January 3, 2020, and ranked second in the list of in-year releases highest-grossing films for that week.[11]
Critical reception[edit]
The film was enthusiastically received by film critics and audiences alike. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a score of 100%, based on 18 reviews, including the New York Times, Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Los Angeles Times and Sight & Sound magazines.[12]
In her Modern Times review, Bianca-Olivia Nita calls Advocate "infuriating" as well as "inspirational and full of heart". She concludes: It ends in hope that, as long as there are people still living with compassion, there is still a chance for resolution, even if that resolution is – for now – nowhere in sight. It captures the humanity and pain that lays behind aggression and labels, building an insightful picture of a flawed judicial system. One that brings no justice and more pain for those living in what seems a hopeless conflict in a part of the world we choose" to see as very far away."[13]
The British Film Institute review calls the film "gripping", and terms it "by turns inspiring and despairing, settling as a deeply bittersweet portrait of a magnetic individual."[14] Georgia Del Don, reviewing Advocate for Cineuropa, warns viewers that "'the devil's advocate', as she's called by many of her Israeli colleagues, has none of the charisma or the motherly devotion of a Mother Teresa character, for example. In fact, it is around the nature of her charisma, which is impossible to label or pin down, that Rachel Leah Jones and Philippe Bellaïche construct their film, a portrayal of a strong female figure who defies each and every convention. Courageous, fun, seductive and unconventional to the say the least, Lea Tsemel embodies an ideal which goes beyond gender and which men and women can both aspire to."[15]
Hollywood Reporter critic Keith Uhlich points out that what would seemingly be a disadvantage to the film – the prohibition of cameras in the courtrooms – actually works to the film's dramatic advantage, heightening the drama of the defendants, attorneys, friends and family nervously waiting in corridors. He adds, "Watching these two trials through to their end lends additional credence to Tsemel's perspective that the Israeli legal system is rigged against Palestinians from the get-go, regardless of their guilt or innocence. How can justice prevail when autocratic impulses so consistently pervert democratic ideals?"[16]
In his Los Angeles Times review, Kenneth Turan wrote: "Lea Tsemel has been called a rebel with a lost cause and a whole lot worse. But as the intimate, powerful "Advocate" demonstrates, she lives up to the film's title in the purest sense of the word: She stands up for people. It's who she stands up for that causes all the controversy."[17]
Israeli critic, Erez Dvorah, writes that it is the very controversial nature of Tsemel and her work that makes Advocate required viewing for people from all quadrants of the political map, calling the existence of such a film "essential to the democracy of Israel, in an era where the media is more and more controlled by political agendas ... A society in which there is a categorical rejection of this type of film is a society taking a significant step farther away from what is commonly called 'democracy'".[18]
Following its being short-listed for an Academy Award,[19] a review of Advocate was published in Variety. Reviewer Guy Lodge calls Advocate "a sober, engrossing documentary... A gripping procedural that intelligently expands into more searching questions over the Israel-Palestine divide and one woman's precarious, often unpopular role as what some may call a mediator and others, well, a devil's advocate." Quoting Tsemel, who calls herself "a very angry, optimistic woman", Lodge notes that this is not a contradiction in terms, but rather: "it does highlight two traits that are rarely twinned, particularly to positive effect." He concludes: "Advocate isn't a bland hagiography, but a textured nonfiction character study of complicated heroism. You can't challenge the system, after all, without being a bit challenging yourself."[20]
The film won the Best Documentary Emmy award in 2021.[21][22]
Political fallout in Israel[edit]
Upon winning the top award in the Israeli Docaviv film festival, Israel's Culture Minister Miri Regev attacked the film and "the choice to make a movie focusing on a lawyer who represents, supports and speaks in the name of many who undermine the State of Israel's existence, use terrorism against its soldiers and people, and win legal and public support from Tsemel."[23] Right-wing activists and organizations, including Im Tirtzu, picketed Mifal HaPayis, Israel's national lottery company and the sponsor of Docaviv's main prize, which shortly after announced it would pull funding for future Docaviv festival awards due to pressure from right-wing activists.[24][25] The decision caused a media uproar,[26][27][28] and in response, hundreds of Israeli filmmakers, as well as academics and public figures signed an open letter in support of the film.[29] The Cultural Institutions Forum and multiple creative and artists associations mounted a protest before the organization's offices.[30][31] Two Sapir Award (also sponsored by Mifal HaPayis) judges resigned in protest,[32] while three writers (Naomi Levitsky, Leah Inni and Orit Wolfiler) withdrew their nominations for this award, and dozens of other writers announced that should they ever win this award, they would give some of the money to the filmmakers.[33]
Following the public outrage and many disruptions,[34] Mifal HaPayis announced in September that it would honor the commitment to fund the award, by providing the award monies to Docaviv instead of the filmmakers themselves.[35]
On November 6, 2019, the mayor of Ma'alot-Tarshiha, a municipality in northern Israel formed by a merger of a Jewish and an Arab town, cancelled the screening of Advocate that was scheduled for November 9, as part of the Docaviv Galilee Film Festival.[36] The cancellation followed a petition by right-wing residents of Ma'alot, and a letter to Mayor Arkady Pomeranets from then Culture and Sports Minister Miri Regev, urging him to forbid the showing of the film as "something that should never occur on a stage that is supported by the State of Israel", and acknowledging that she lacks the legal authority to do so herself.[37] Pomeranets accommodated Regev's request, though he himself had not seen the film, citing potential sensitivity of Ma'alot residents to the film's subject, due to the town having been the target of a terror attack in 1974,[37] and in spite of being aware that the Attorney General stated that the mayor lacks authority to do so.[38]
Docaviv responded that "The festival protests the arbitrary and unilateral decision on the part of the mayor to interfere in the content of the festival and to censor the grand-prize winning film of the Tel Aviv festival... We will not give a hand to censoring and silencing cultural and artistic works or to political maneuvers designed to do damage to the discourse that reflects the reality in Israel in all its different forms."[39] The Association for Civil Rights in Israel asked the deputy attorney general to instruct Regev that she acted illegally "and misled the mayor into believing that he is authorized to attack freedom of expression". The attorney general's office, on November 8, issued an opinion that "No basis was introduced that establishes such exceptional or extreme circumstances that would allow for freedom of expression to be violated by cancelling the screening.... The message projected by the leadership, that activities of cultural institutions and artists are constantly under the watchful eye of government authorities and subject to supervision and monitoring in order to adapt their content to government tastes – harms the foundation of freedom of expression."[38]
An alternative screening was quickly arranged in nearby kibbutz Kabri by Docaviv, and a protest screening was also arranged outside of the Ma'alot-Tarshiha cultural center by the Israel Documentary Forum and the Filmmakers Union.[40] At the cultural center screening, about 150 anti-censorship activists protested, while about 200 right-wing counter-demonstrators spat at them, threatened the festival's director and flung incendiary devices.[41][42] The police intervened and moved the right-wing demonstrators back, though two attending filmmakers, Yael Kipper and Ronen Zaretzky, were nevertheless attacked while leaving the event.[41] Ultimately, the police asked the organizers to end the screening to avoid further violence, and the organizers complied.[43] At Kabri, a right-wing demonstration was organized by activist Tsachi Eliyahu, who disrupted the screening, stormed the stage with his hands painted red, and proceeded to denounce the screening and the film.[41]
Liran Atzmor, on behalf of the Documentary Forum, said: "We have come to demonstrate, the creators' unions and the citizens of the north, who are deeply disturbed by the illegal act of the mayor of Ma'alot-Tarshiha. This is silencing and censorship ... The mayor axed it, but in spite of the attorney general informing him that his axe is illegal, he nevertheless did not allow this screening, so we came here with a big screen and a loudspeaker so that the people of the North can see the film and decide for themselves. It is a very slippery slope, if we do not oppose this now, every mayor will then decide [what content can be screened] and the artistic field will completely lose its power and autonomy."[42]
Notwithstanding the controversy, Advocate was screened in select theaters throughout Israel until January 2020, as well as on Hot's documentary Channel 8 and Hot VOD.[44][45][46]
Advocate is currently short-listed for the Academy Awards[19] and European Film Awards.[47]
2019 Academy Award Best Documentary Feature Shortlisted
Antenna International Documentary Film Festival Best Feature Film Nominated
Audience Choice Award Won
Asia Pacific Film Awards Best Documentary Feature Film Won
European Film Award Best Documentary Longlisted
Loft Film Fest CICAE Art Cinema Award Won
Cinema Eye Honors Unforgettable Documentary Subject Won
Copenhagen International Documentary Film Festival Politiken's Audience Award Nominated
Docaviv Best Israeli Film Won
Dokufest International Documentary and Short Film Festival Human Rights Award Nominated
Hong Kong International Film Festival Jury Award: Best Documentary Won
Golden Firebird Award Nominated
IDA Documentary Awards Best Feature Film Nominated
Best Director (Rachel Leah Jones, Philippe Bellaiche) Nominated
Israel Documentary Film Forum Best Documentary Feature Won
Best Editing Won
Krakow Film Festival Golden Horn Award for Best Feature-Length Documentary Won
Philadelphia Film Festival Best Documentary Feature Nominated
Producers Guild of America Outstanding Producer of Documentary Theatrical Motion Picture Nominated
Sundance Film Festival World Cinema - Documentary Nominated
Thessaloniki Documentary Film Festival FIPRESCI Award Won
Golden Alexander Award Won
Transatlantyk Festival: Lodz Kaleidoscope Award Nominated
UK Jewish Film Festival Best Documentary Won
2020 Palm Springs International Film Festival[48] GoE Bridging the Borders Award Won
Ophir Award[49] Best Documentary (over 60 minutes) Won
2021 Emmy Award[21][22] Best Documentary Won
^ "Advocate (2019)". Box Office Mojo. IMDb. Retrieved March 13, 2020.
^ جدلية, Jadaliyya-. "The Angry Optimistic Life and Times of Lea Tsemel: A Review of "Advocate"". Jadaliyya - جدلية. Retrieved 2019-09-11.
^ "HOME MADE DOCS". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2019-09-11.
^ "closeupfilms.ch – film production audiovisuel" (in French). Retrieved 2019-09-11.
^ "Review: Advocate". Cineuropa - the best of european cinema. Retrieved 2019-09-12.
^ "Advocate comes out on top in Krakow's International Documentary Competition". Cineuropa - the best of european cinema. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ Festival, Asian Film (2019-04-01). "43rd Hong Kong International Film Festival – Firebird Awards 2019". Asian Film Festivals. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ Goodfellow, Melanie (2019-05-30). "'Advocate' scoops top prize at Docaviv". Screen. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ User, PressOffice. "21st Thessaloniki Documentary Festival - The Awards". www.filmfestival.gr. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ "לאה צמל עורכת דין – סינמטק תל אביב" (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ "Domestic Box Office For 2020 (In-year release)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 6, 2020.
^ "Advocate (2019)", Rotten Tomatoes, Fandango, retrieved 2021-10-10
^ "Rebel with a lost cause". MTR. 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ "Advocate review: bittersweet portrait of a tenacious Israeli lawyer | Sight & Sound". British Film Institute. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ "'Advocate': Film Review | Hot Docs 2019". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ "Review: 'Advocate' reveals a rebel with a lost cause". Los Angeles Times. 2020-01-02. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
^ "ביקורת סרט - "לאה צמל, עורכת דין" : ככה נראית דמוקרטיה". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-06-30. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
^ a b "Film about lawyer who represents Palestinians shortlisted for Oscar". Middle East Monitor. 2019-12-17. Retrieved 2019-12-22.
^ Lodge, Guy (2019-12-20). "'Advocate': Film Review". Variety. Retrieved 2019-12-22.
^ a b Schneider, Michael (2021-09-30). "PBS Leads Documentary Emmy Tally Thanks to 'P.O.V.,' 'Frontline' (Full Winners List)". Variety. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
^ a b Beresford, Trilby (2021-09-30). "Israeli Film 'Advocate' Wins Best Documentary Emmy". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2021-09-30.
^ "Culture Minister Slams Award-winning Documentary on Israeli Lawyer Who Defends Palestinians". Haaretz. 2019-06-04. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ Magid, Jacob. "National lottery pulls funding for festival prize after divisive film wins". www.timesofisrael.com. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ "Mifal Hapayis walks back support for documentary - Israel News - Jerusalem Post". www.jpost.com. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "Docaviv responds to Israeli Culture Minister's attack on Advocate". Cineuropa - the best of european cinema. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "איגודי היוצרים הפגינו מול מפעל הפיס: "זה לא קזינו - לא מהמרים על התרבות"". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-06-30. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "תגובת איגודי היוצרים לפרשת הסרט "לאה צמל - עורכת דין"". איגוד הבמאיות והבמאים (in Hebrew). 2019-06-30. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "הפגנת יוצרים ואיום בהתפטרות מהמועצה: מחאה נגד מפעל הפיס". וואלה! תרבות (in Hebrew). 2019-06-29. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ "Artists protest Israeli lottery's decision to pull money from film - Israel News - Jerusalem Post". www.jpost.com. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "Des artistes protestent contre la décision de la loterie israélienne de retirer de l'argent d'un film - Israel News". Miroir Mag (in French). 2019-07-03. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "בעקבות סערת מפעל הפיס - שני שופטי פרס ספיר התפטרו". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-07-01. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "30 סופרים הודיעו: אם נזכה בפרס ממפעל הפיס, נתרום למימון הסרט על לאה צמל". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-07-04. Retrieved 2019-09-03.
^ "נאומו של יו"ר מפעל הפיס הופרע במחאה על פרשת "לאה צמל, עורכת דין"". וואלה! תרבות (in Hebrew). 2019-07-08. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ "מפעל הפיס חזר בו: המענק לזוכה דוקאביב, "לאה צמל, עורכת דין", לא יבוטל". www.haaretz.co.il (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ "Ma'alot Tarshiha mayor cancels screening of controversial documentary - Israel News - Jerusalem Post". www.jpost.com. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ a b "למרות התנגדות רגב וראש העיר, "לאה צמל" יוקרן בפסטיבל דוקאביב גליל". וואלה! תרבות (in Hebrew). 2019-11-07. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ a b Anderman, Nirit; Shpigel, Noa (2019-11-08). "Attorney General Condemns Nixing Film Screening on Lawyer Defending Palestinians". Haaretz. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ Felix007.com. "חד"ש | המשנה ליועמ"ש: ביטול הקרנת הסרט על לאה צמל – פגיעה דרמטית בחופש הביטוי". hadash.org.il. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ "הקרנה פיראטית לסרט על לאה צמל במעלות תרשיחא". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-11-08. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ a b c "Right-wing Protesters Threaten Organizers at Israeli Screening of Documentary on Human Rights Lawyer". Haaretz. 2019-11-10. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ a b "כ-200 מפגינים נגד הקרנת הסרט על לאה צמל במעלות תרשיחא". ynet (in Hebrew). 2019-11-09. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ ""לכו לעזה": הקרנת המחאה ל"לאה צמל" במעלות לוותה באלימות ופוצצה". וואלה! תרבות (in Hebrew). 2019-11-09. Retrieved 2019-11-16.
^ "סינמטק הרצליה - Herzliya Cinematheque". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
^ "לאה צמל, עורכת דין // ADVOCATE". מוזיאוני חיפה - שישה מוזיאונים במסגרת אחת (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2020-07-27.
^ "8 סרטים של HOT8 בפסטיבל דוקאביב 2019". HOT Magazine (in Hebrew). 2019-04-11. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
^ Dalton2019-08-27T13:20:00+01:00, Ben. "'For Sama', 'Honeyland' among 12-strong European Film Awards documentary longlist". Screen. Retrieved 2019-08-30.
^ Lattanzio, Ryan (2020-01-11). "Foreign Oscar Contenders Win Big at Palm Springs Fest: 'Parasite,' 'Beanpole,' 'Corpus Christi' Lead". IndieWire. Retrieved 2020-01-12.
^ "ynet - קולנוע". ynet (in Hebrew). Retrieved 2020-11-13.
Advocate at IMDb
Homemade Docs official website
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Advocate_(2019_film)&oldid=1054258036"
Israeli documentary films
Documentary films about Israel
Documentary films about human rights
Ophir Award Winners
CS1 French-language sources (fr)
CS1 Hebrew-language sources (he)


text:
Carlucet is een gemeente in het Franse departement Lot (regio Occitanie) en telt 208 inwoners (2004). De plaats maakt deel uit van het arrondissement Gourdon.

Geografie
De oppervlakte van Carlucet bedraagt 33,6 km², de bevolkingsdichtheid is 6,2 inwoners per km².

Demografie
Onderstaande figuur toont het verloop van het inwonertal (bron: INSEE-tellingen).

Externe links

Gemeente in Lot

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Our FFL Info is listed at the bottom of this page.
Modern Armory sells firearms and custom firearms only in accordance with Federal, State, and Local firearm laws.
1. Verify that the product you wish to purchase from Modern Armory meet your state, county, or city firearm laws.
If you do not receive an email order status update within two business days after placing your order, please give us a call at 817.203.3060.
4. Contact your FFL and tell them you would like to transfer a firearm from Modern Armory. This transaction is soley between you and the FFL holder.
If you are ordering a Rifle or complete lower receiver, before your order ships, we must receive a signed copy of an FFL for the firearm(s) or components purchased. Please e-mail licenses to [email protected] or mail to 7724 County Road 1228 Godley, TX 76044. Licenses on file with Modern Armory are not required unless we notify you otherwise. Licenses are not required for accessories. *Due to federal regulations, guns and complete lower receivers can only be shipped to federal firearms license (FFL) holders. If you are not an FFL holder, you can contact your local gun store for their FFL information, and we will ship the product to their location. If your rifle is being shipped to CA, CT, HI, MD, MA, NJ, NY, or WA, please contact us for special arrangements.
No transfer fee will be charged if you are also purchasing a firearm from us at the same time as long as the number of guns being transferred in equals 3 or less.


Measurements: 29" Long, 12" Top Cuff- can stretch around 17.5 thigh circumference. Petite thighs can turn these into thigh high warmers.
Designed for: Dance, Barre, Aerial silk, having #legsfordays.
Beautiful colour, and perfect fit! Super cozy!
Super soft, comfortable and pretty! These leg warmers were exactly what I was looking for!


text:
Q: How to see what targets will be built in SCons? I have quite a large C++ project consisting of several shared libraries and executables. The project is built by SCons. My customers require that any patch must contain as few binary files as possible. In other words, I have to know before the build what targets are going to be built. Moreover, if A.cpp produces libB.sl which in turns affects libC.sl and D.bin I need to get only the libB.sl as the output. I cannot find a simple way to do that. Are there any recommendations?

A: All the information you request in your question can be obtained before building, by parsing the output of the following command.
>> scons --dry-run --tree=all --debug=explain

This will not build anything (--dry-run), will list all the files that need to be rebuilt and why (--debug=explain), followed by the dependency tree (--tree=all).
So you should be able to scrape from the output of this command the list of object files that need to be be re-built because of .cpp file code changes, and then parse the dependency tree to resolve which binaries you will have to include in your patch based on whatever rules you want to parse the dependency tree with.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


They did not make any comments or statement during the controversy.
Skylar and Smith are very close and, at the moment, are living together with plans to get engaged sometime next year.
The Davie Police Department tells us someone from Ross' Miami home discovered the rapper around am on Thursday in bed breathing heavy, yet unresponsive.
Not only did Fiddy post details from the reports, but he then commented: "Look I didn't tell that ni66a to use drugs, shi come with it.
According to sources, they started dating in 2011 so that makes, 6 years this year. There was even a video that showed the 27-year-old beauty had no whatsoever feelings for this guy.
So is basketball star Skylar Diggins currently engaged to her boyfriend, Daniel Smith? You might have previously heard of the Instagram war between Sky's boyfriend, Daniel Smith and a guy named, Drake that continued quite some period of time in the year 2014. So initially Drake started off the war with Smith by posting a series of pictures of Skylar Diggings on his Instagram account which got Daniel fueled.
But the couple preferred to share the news of their engagement via social media, instead of making it big by throwing a lavish party and inviting their friends and relatives. He was Gavin Lueking, a professional photographer whom the duo appeared to be quite fond of as he posted their pictures on his Twitter account. Married my best friend this weekend, officially making me the happiest woman on earth!
Thanks to everyone who has sent their love and support. A post shared by " target="_blank" rel="noopener"Without a second thought, Skylar Diggins said yes to her best friend, Daniel Smith. They both seemed to love each other to moon and back as they got bound in the holy matrimony in early May this year.
Jun 21, 2016. WNBA player Skylar Diggins is engaged to her longtime boyfriend, former college football player Daniel Smith — see her engagement ring here!
Is Skylar Diggins currently engaged to her longtime boyfriend Daniel.
Dec 17, 2017. You may be well aware of the fact that is WNBA star Skylar Diggins has long been in a relationship with Daniel Smith. But did you know when exactly they started dating? According to sources, they started dating in 2011 so that makes, 6 years this year. So is basketball star Skylar Diggins currently engaged.
Aug 4, 2016. Skylar Diggins' boyfriend Daniel Smith was introduced to the world via social media. Diggins took to Instagram to post a picture with the caption, "My good-looking honey and I". Unfortunately, she didn't initially identifying the man on her arm. Have no fear dear reader, we wouldn't do that to you. Questing for.
May 3, 2017. WNBA star Skylar Diggins tied the knot with her longtime boyfriend, Daniel Smith, over the weekend. Click here to read and find out more on her big day.
Daniel Smith & Skylar Diggins' Wedding — See Pics Of Her Dress.
May 3, 2017. Daniel Smith and Skylar Diggins' wedding was totally perfect. See pics of her dress here.


24/34 Moo 5, T. Bo Phut, Koh Samui, Suratthani 84320, Thailand.
and crystal clear sea await you here!
Book direct with hotel Best price guarantee!
Samui Honey Cottages Beach Resort is a family run hotel in Samui. Our staff is helpful and friendly in a more casual ambience compared with five-star hotels. Our guests will be absolutely impressed by our authentic Thai hospitality and be treated as part of the family.
Samui Honey Cottage Beach Resort was founded in 1991. In the initial stage it was a family-run restaurant. The restaurant kept growing and then we started running a hotel with only two rooms. Later we made a big investment in hotel business in 2001. During that time, our marketing strategy was giving good customer services, so they would come back again. Also, we got new customers from word-of-mouth. And loyal customers have come back to our hotel every year..
Samui Honey Cottage Beach Resort is situated on Choeng Mon Beach of Samui Island. Our hotel is located near the airport and pier, so it is convenient to go to other nearby islands..
Besides, Choeng Mon Beach is praised as traveller's paradise due to its pure and peaceful nature which offers real relaxation. We offer various types of rooms such as backpacker rooms, bungalows in the garden and pool areas. Guests can stay close to nature and admire the beauty of Choeng Mon Beach..
You can see Pha-ngan island from the beach in front of the resort. Besides, you can relax on the long private beach with powdery white sand..


DigitalGlobe was founded in 1993 under the name WorldView Imaging Corporation, became EarthWatch Incorporated in 1995, before finally becoming DigitalGlobe in 2002.
In 1993, the United States Department of Commerce granted DigitalGlobe (then WorldView), the first license allowing a private enterprise to build and operate a satellite system to gather high-resolution digital imagery of the earth for commercial sale.
Pokok-pokok Sunnah menurut kami ialah, berpegang kepada apa yang para sahabat Rasulullah s.a.w. berada di atasnya, dan meneladani mereka � .


A literary and intellectual history of the Haudenosaunee.
A foundational text for understanding the field of Aboriginal Studies.
A multidisciplinary analysis of the Canadian West.
A groundbreaking introduction to Inuit literary criticism.


As one of the vital authoritative awards of China's tourism and leisure industry selection, it is an objective and comprehensive choice for the global tourism industry. It has overseas and much-reaching significance and influence within the leisure and tourism industry. In this awards ceremony, diplomatic envoys from the embassies of various international locations in China, company of overseas tourism bureaus, lodges, airline firms, automobile industry, outdoor activity, SPA salon, IT trade, style and luxurious trade attended the grand ceremony together.
Because of cash laundering rules, further documentation for identification functions may be required once you make your funding. Details are contained in the prospectuses or other constitutional paperwork of the related iShares Products. The securities issued by iShares Physical Metals plc are restricted recourse obligations that are payable solely out of the underlying secured property. If the secured property is inadequate any outstanding claims will stay unpaid.
In respect of the merchandise mentioned this doc is intended for information functions solely and doesn't represent investment advice or an offer to promote or a solicitation of an offer to purchase the securities described inside. This document will not be distributed with out authorisation from BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited. Our client base encompasses tour operators, hotels and vacation locations, plus every type of transport and leisure experience.
We are going to use your personal info to supply you or our consumer with products or services. As part of this, we could use your personal data in the middle of correspondence referring to these services or products. Such correspondence could also be with you, our consumer, other members of the BlackRock Group, our service suppliers or public or judicial authorities with the required authorisation.


text:
Boża droga życia – ogólnoświatowa seria zgromadzeń religijnych o charakterze międzynarodowym, zorganizowanych przez Świadków Jehowy, które rozpoczęły się w maju 1998 roku, a zakończyły się w styczniu 1999 roku. Myślą przewodnią kongresu był werset biblijny z Księgi Przysłów 10:29 (NW): "droga Jehowy jest twierdzą".

Cel kongresu
"Przyjmowanie dalszych pouczeń o najlepszej drodze życia – o Bożej drodze życia". Program kongresu wykazał, że "Jehowa uczy swój lud, jak ma chodzić Jego drogami. Udziela wskazówek za pośrednictwem Biblii, "niewolnika wiernego i roztropnego" oraz swego świętego ducha (Mt 24:45–47; Łk 4:1; 2 Tym 3:16)".

Kongresy międzynarodowe na świecie
Zgodnie z ogłoszeniem podanym 5 października 1996 roku na dorocznym walnym zgromadzeniu statutowym Pensylwańskiego Towarzystwa Biblijnego i Traktatowego – Strażnica, Ciało Kierownicze oprócz setek zgromadzeń okręgowych zorganizowało 32 kongresy międzynarodowe w Ameryce Północnej, Afryce, Azji, Europie, Ameryce Łacińskiej i na Karaibach. Na każdym z nich przemawiali członkowie Ciała Kierowniczego. W dziewięciu międzynarodowych kongresach w Ameryce Północnej uczestniczyli delegaci ze 160 krajów. Podjęto na nich starania, aby w rodzinnych krajach uczestniczyli misjonarze Biblijnej Szkoły Strażnicy – Gilead, absolwenci Kursu Usługiwania, słudzy międzynarodowi brygad budowlanych, członkowie rodziny Betel usługujący za granicą.

Zorganizowano 32 kongresy międzynarodowe w 13 krajach: w Australii, Brazylii, Grecji, Kanadzie, Kenii, Korei Południowej, Kostaryce, Niemczech, Portoryko, Republice Południowej Afryki, Stanach Zjednoczonych, Wielkiej Brytanii i Wybrzeżu Kości Słoniowej.

Stany Zjednoczone
Pierwsze zgromadzenie z serii kongresów międzynarodowych odbyło się w dniach od 22 do 24 maja w San Diego w Kalifornii. Wśród uczestników, obecnych było 45 misjonarzy z 14 krajów. Przeszło 14 500 delegatów z 87 krajów odwiedziło również Biuro Główne Świadków Jehowy, Farmy Strażnicy oraz Centrum Szkoleniowe Towarzystwa Strażnica.

Dwa tygodnie później – w dniach od 5 do 7 czerwca – na tym samym stadionie odbył się kongres w języku hiszpańskim. Uczestniczyło w nim 25 181 osób, w tym ponad 3100 delegatów z Argentyny, Chile, Hiszpanii, Kostaryki, Meksyku, Peru, Salwadoru i Urugwaju.

W dniach od 12 do 14 czerwca odbył się kongres w Pontiac w stanie Michigan. Uczestniczyło w nim 42 763 delegatów, reprezentujących co najmniej 44 kraje, w tym 345-osobowa delegacja Świadków Jehowy z Czech, ponad 300-osobowe delegacje z Republiki Południowej Afryki i Wielkiej Brytanii oraz delegacje z 14 krajów europejskich, 8 afrykańskich, 2 azjatyckich i 20 Ameryki Północnej i Południowej.

W dniach od 3 do 5 lipca odbyło się siedem zgromadzeń w kalifornijskim Long Beach. W obiektach Centrum Kongresowego zgromadzenia odbyły się w językach angielskim (12 659 obecnych), chińskim, japońskim, koreańskim, tagalskim, wietnamskim (552 obecnych) i włoskim. Uczestniczyły w nim delegacje z Dalekiego Wschodu, obu Ameryk, Europy i Afryki.

Kongres w języku hiszpańskim odbył się w dniach od 10 do 12 lipca w Houston w stanie Teksas, a uczestniczyło w nim 34 257 osób, w tym 2820 delegatów z 14 państw. Byli oni zakwaterowani w 1217 domach miejscowych Świadków Jehowy.

W dniach od 17 do 19 lipca odbył się kongres w Belleville w stanie Michigan. Uczestniczyły w nim delegacje ze Stanów Zjednoczonych, Barbadosu, Czech, Etiopii, Holandii, Kenii, Nigerii, Węgier oraz Wielkiej Brytanii.

Australia
W dniach od 30 października do 1 listopada, odbyły się trzy kongresy międzynarodowe w Australii – w Brisbane, Melbourne i Sydney.

Brazylia
W São Paulo kongres odbył się w dniach od 18 do 20 września. W tym samym terminie odbyły się również zgromadzenia w 16 innych miejscach, m.in. na stadionie Maracanã w Rio de Janeiro. W 17 kongresach uczestniczyły 516 333 osoby, w tym delegaci z 15 krajów, a wśród nich 54 misjonarzy, w tym 23-osobowa grupa działająca w Mozambiku.

Grecja
W dniach od 21 do 23 sierpnia kongres odbył się w Atenach, a uczestniczyły w nim 39 324 osoby z 21 krajów.

Kanada
W czterech kongresach zorganizowanych w Kanadzie uczestniczyły delegacje z 52 krajów.

W dniach od 12 do 14 czerwca odbył się kongres międzynarodowy w Montrealu. Program przedstawiano w językach: francuskim, portugalskim, greckim i arabskim. Uczestniczyły w nim 33 242 osoby, w tym 4071 delegatów zagranicznych, m.in. z Francji, Brazylii, Belgii, Gwadelupy, Martyniki oraz z 13 krajów afrykańskich.

W dwa kolejne weekendy czerwca (19–21, 26–28) zorganizowano dwa kongresy w Vancouver. Uczestniczyły w nich 22 273 osoby, w tym delegaci z południowo-wschodniej Azji i Europa Północnej.

W dniach od 26 do 28 czerwca kongres odbył się w Toronto. Uczestniczyło w nim 41 381 osób, w tym delegacje Świadków Jehowy z Kanady, Niemiec, Polski, Finlandii, Austrii oraz innych krajów Europy i Afryki.

Kenia
W kongresie, który odbył się w grudniu w Międzynarodowym Centrum Sportowym im. Daniela Arapa Moi w Nairobi, uczestniczyły 24 502 osoby, w tym delegacje z 16 krajów.

Korea Południowa
63 886 osób – w tym 3046 delegatów zagranicznych – uczestniczyło w kongresie na Stadionie Olimpijskim w Seulu, który odbył się w dniach od 18 do 20 września. Po raz pierwszy od 1958 roku Świadkowie Jehowy z Filipin uczestniczyli w międzynarodowym kongresie za granicą. W tym samym terminie odbyło się jeszcze 11 zgromadzeń okręgowych, a ogólna liczba obecnych wyniosła 63 886 osób.

Kostaryka
W dniach od 1 do 3 stycznia 1999 roku kongres odbył się w San José. Uczestniczyło w nim 34 431 osób, w tym delegaci zagraniczni, którzy przybyli 42 samolotami.

Niemcy
W dniach od 31 lipca do 2 sierpnia kongresy odbyły się w pięciu miastach.

W Berlinie na Stadionie Olimpijskim, program kongresu przedstawiono w języku niemieckim, polskim i rosyjskim. W kongresie uczestniczyła delegacja z Polski. W Dortmundzie kongres został zorganizowany na Westfalenstadionie. Program przedstawiono w języku niemieckim, greckim, hiszpańskim, portugalskim i tureckim. Kongres w Monachium odbył się na Stadionie Olimpijskim, a program został przedstawiony w języku niemieckim, angielskim i włoskim. W Norymberdze kongres odbył się na Frankenstadionie, program przedstawiono w języku niemieckim, polskim, serbsko-chorwackim. W kongresie uczestniczyła delegacja z Polski. W Stuttgarcie program w języku niemieckim, francuskim i niemieckim migowym został przedstawiony na Gottlieb-Daimler-Stadionie.

W kongresach uczestniczyły 217 472 osoby, w tym około 45 000 delegatów z zagranicy (m.in. 700 delegatów z Czech i 700 ze Słowacji – kongres w Norymberdze oraz 150 misjonarzy). Program przedstawiono w 13 językach.

Portoryko
Wskutek przejścia huraganu Georges  do użytku nadawało się tylko jedno z czterech planowanych miejsc zgromadzeń. W dniach od 25 do 27 września kongres odbył się na Estadio Hiram Bithorn w San Juan, uczestniczyło w nim 15 065 osób.

Republika Południowej Afryki
W grudniu zorganizowano cztery kongresy międzynarodowe, które odbyły się w Kapsztadzie, Durbanie, Johannesburgu i Pretorii. Uczestniczyło w nich 83 858 osób, a 1626 zostało ochrzczonych. W RPA zorganizowano również 18 zgromadzeń okręgowych, w których uczestniczyło 53 901 osób, a 1065 zostało ochrzczonych. W programie kongresów ogłoszono wydanie Pisma Świętego w Przekładzie Nowego Świata w języku tsonga.

Wielka Brytania
W dniach od 24 do 26 lipca kongresy odbyły się jednocześnie w dziewięciu miastach: w Edynburgu, Leeds, Manchesterze, Wolverhampton, Dudley, Norwich, Londynie, Bristolu i Plymouth. Obecni byli delegaci z przeszło 60 krajów oraz misjonarze z 45 krajów. Program przedstawiono w językach: angielskim, francuskim, hiszpańskim i pendżabskim. Tydzień później odbyło się zgromadzenie w języku greckim.

Wybrzeże Kości Słoniowej
W Abidżanie kongres odbył się w grudniu. Program przedstawiono w języku francuskim, angielskim i twi. W Wybrzeżu Kości Słoniowej działało 6000 głosicieli, a w kongresie uczestniczyło 16 009 osób, w tym 500 delegatów zagranicznych.

Pozostałe kongresy
Oprócz serii kongresów międzynarodowych w około 150 krajach na całym świecie zorganizowano setki zgromadzeń okręgowych.

Angola
W roku 1998 zorganizowano w Huambo pierwsze zgromadzenie okręgowe w języku umbundu, uczestniczyło w nim przeszło 3600 osób.

Czechy
Uczestnikom kongresów zorganizowanych w Czechach udostępniono wydany w języku czeskim dwutomowy leksykon biblijny Wnikliwe poznawanie Pism (wydany w języku angielskim w 1988 roku).

Kuba
Władze kubańskie wyraziły zgodę na wizytę – w dniach od 1 do 8 grudnia – międzynarodowej delegacji 18 Świadków Jehowy (z Australii, Austrii, Belgii, Nowej Zelandii, Portoryko, Wielkiej Brytanii, Włoch i Stanów Zjednoczonych), w tym 3 członków Ciała Kierowniczego (William Lloyd Barry, John E. Barr i Gerrit Lösch), którzy uczestniczyli w kongresach, które odbyły się w trzech kubańskich miastach: w Hawanie, Camagüey i Holguín. Zgromadzenia odbywały się w odkrytych obiektach zbudowanych przez Świadków Jehowy za zgodą władz.

Luksemburg
W dniach od 17 do 19 lipca kongres w języku niemieckim odbył się w Patinoire de Kockelscheuer w Kockelscheuer, a w języku portugalskim w Victor-Hugo-Halle w Luksemburgu-Limpertsbergu.

Łotwa
W hali sportowej w Rydze odbyło się pierwsze zgromadzenie zorganizowane na Łotwie. Program przedstawiono w trzech językach: łotewskim, łotewskim migowym i rosyjskim.

Polska
W Polsce zorganizowano 22 zgromadzenia. Na kongresach w Bydgoszczy, Gdańsku, Kaliszu, Katowicach, Koszalinie, Krakowie, Lublinie, Łodzi, Olsztynie, Poznaniu, Rzeszowie, Szczecinie, Wałbrzychu, Warszawie, Wrocławie i Zielonej Górze program był przedstawiany również w języku migowym, a w Olsztynie także w języku rosyjskim.

 Od 26 do 28 czerwca:
 Białystok, (stadion BKS Hetman),
 Jastrzębie-Zdrój (Stadion Miejski),
 Lublin, (stadion RKS Motor),
 Łódź (stadion KS Start),
 Zielona Góra (stadion MOSiR)
 Od 3 do 5 lipca:
 Gdańsk (stadion BKS Lechia),
 Poznań (stadion Olimpia; przeszło 8000 obecnych),
 Rzeszów (stadion ZKS Stal),
 Starachowice (stadion SKS Star),
 Zabrze (stadion KS Górnik)
 Od 10 do 12 lipca:
 Częstochowa (stadion CKM Włókniarz),
 Kraków (Stadion Cracovii),
 Olsztyn (stadion OSiR),
 Wałbrzych (stadion)
 Od 17 do 19 lipca:
 Bydgoszcz (stadion WKS Zawisza),
 Katowice (Stadion GKS Katowice),
 Warszawa (stadion KS Legia),
  Wrocław (Stadion Olimpijski),
 Zamość (stadion OSiR)
 Od 24 do 26 lipca:
 Koszalin (stadion KS Gwardia),
 Kalisz (stadion KS Calisia)
 Od 7 do 9 sierpnia:
 Szczecin (stadion KS Arkonia).

Rosja
Zorganizowano kilka zgromadzeń w Rosji. W lipcu w kongresie w Barnauł uczestniczyło 1730 osób, w tym 40 Ałtajczyków.

Salwador
W San Salvador kongres odbył się kilka dni po przejściu huraganu Mitch. Świadkowie Jehowy udzielili pomocy ofiarom huraganu w dotarciu na zgromadzenie. Wypożyczono autobusy, przygotowano kwatery i pomoc medyczną. W kongresie uczestniczyło 46 855 osób.

Szwajcaria
W dniach od 10 do 12 lipca kongres w języku francuskim odbył się w Palexpo w Genewie, a w języku włoskim w dniach od 17 do 19 lipca na Stadio Resega w Lugano. Kongres w języku niemieckim miał miejsce w dniach od 24 do 26 lipca na Hallenstadion w Zurychu.

Publikacje wydane z okazji kongresu

 Co się dzieje z człowiekiem po śmierci? (broszura),
 Przykładaj się do czytania i pisania (broszura, po polsku brak),
 Czy istnieje Stwórca, który się o ciebie troszczy? (książka).

Oprócz tego na kongresach ogłoszono wydanie Chrześcijańskich Pism Greckich w języku arabskim, alfabetem Braille'a w języku hiszpańskim oraz Pismo Święte w Przekładzie Nowego Świata w języku tsonga.

Ważne punkty programu
 Dramat biblijny (przedstawienie kostiumowe): "Rodziny, pielęgnujcie zwyczaj codziennego czytania Biblii!" (wydany potem w formie słuchowiska)
 Wykład publiczny: "Jedyna droga do życia wiecznego".

Przyjęto rezolucję "W dalszym ciągu podążajmy drogą Jehowy", wyrażającą zdecydowanie dalszego kroczenia drogą Bożą.

Przypisy

Linki zewnętrzne

Kongresy Świadków Jehowy
Wydarzenia 1998


Related Surname Info: Looking for descendants of Patrick Forde who married Anne Wynn from Innishmagrath and settled in Muckros, Fenagh Parish. Children were: James, b. 1854; Charles, b. 1856, Ellen, b. 1858 (Chas. & Ellen may have died young.) sons Wm b. 1860, Francis, b. 1864, Thaomas b. 1866 and Patrick, whose brother Francis was "double entered" in the Fenagh RC baptism book, was probably.... well, 1862? Ford was also spelled Forde. Any and all responses welcome. The five Ford boys who emigrated settled in New Haven, CT, within a five-block radius of each other in Sacred Heart Parish. Bernard, my grandfather, was illiterate. His grandchildren have come a long, long way, thanks in part to the hard work of their parents, who were first-generation born in US.


text:
Artificial IntelligenceElevatus is Powering the Evolution of HR Technology Through Artificial Intelligence and Experiencing a Huge Surge in Demand
Elevatus, the industry's leading AI technology provider has positioned itself as a transformational player in strategically powering the evolution of HR technology. Elevatus' momentum has led to an explosive business expansion of 335% growth 1Q 2020 versus 1Q 2021. This tremendous growth, escorted the need for companies worldwide to implement and adopt Elevatus' AI technology to advance and run their businesses more efficiently.
Key verticals, ranging from leading banks, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, and medical providers across the globe, have adopted Elevatus to keep up with technological advances and gain a competitive edge. Industry leaders now aim to thrive in this digital age by gearing up with Elevatus' AI technology, which is distinct from any other offering in the market. Elevatus' growth has also been paired with an esteemed award that acknowledged Elevatus as the best AI-powered hiring platform in the 2021 Technology Innovator Awards, amongst 900 other companies.
Elevatus is continuously defining the market with numerous innovations, by providing two bespoke AI solutions; EVA-SSESS and EVA-REC. The state-of-the-art video interviewing software and hiring platform are creating a ground-breaking change in the recruitment industry. By offering a range of modern, agile, nimble, and innovative features – Elevatus' AI solutions are baffling industry leaders and empowering them to take charge of today's increasingly agile and growing workforce.
Case studies were conducted on existing clients and have shown that by implementing Elevatus' advanced technology they were successfully able to achieve the following results:
An increase in ROI by 130%
A 96% reduction hiring costs
An 82% reduction in time-to-hire
A 75% improvement in candidate experience
A 90% increase in decision accuracy
Elevatus' sublime growth and success in the past year, has been powered by its focus on developing its advanced line of technologies from AI, machine learning, agility, innovation, and adaptability – to smoothly set up companies worldwide with hiring success.
Elevatus' best-in-class AI technology now supports 5 different languages including English, Arabic, Swedish, French, and German. The AI is also able to learn a new language in record-breaking time. By supporting a wide array of languages, Elevatus can now seamlessly adapt to the user's language and offer a unique, localized, and interactive experience.
"Our rapid growth is the result of our dominant position in the market. Through our relentless focus on growth and innovation, we became the trusted technology provider for hundreds of esteemed companies. Just within a year, Elevatus has not only grown remarkably, but it has also grabbed the attention of global business partners who are very keen on acquiring Elevatus' technology." said Yara Burgan, CEO of Elevatus. "This proves to be a great testament of our commitment to offer top-notch technology and services. We take pride in knowing that Elevatus is not only heading in the right direction, but we're also getting praise and acknowledgement for our hard work and innovation by well-regarded organizations."
Elevatus is at the forefront of innovation and is raising the industry bar with its pioneering technology and endeavors. Undeniably, the tech provider is quickly becoming a trusted tech leader due its core dedication to breakneck innovation and customer success. It's an exciting and pivotal time for Elevatus, who is headstrong bolstering towards new horizons, and is on the road to create more record-breaking achievements in the near future.
Twenty20® Solutions Merges with Skyhawk
Medius' AP Automation achieves SAP® Certification as integrated with SAP S/4HANA® and SAP S/4HANA Cloud


text:
About Team Alchemy
MH370 - The Perspective No-One is Talking About
Team Alchemy
The Malaysia Airlines MH370 saga has more questions than answers.
For over a month now the world has watched and wondered how it is possible to lose an international airliner? The raw emotions of confusion, bewilderment, distress, anguish and pain have been evident to all – broadcast daily by international media.
Slowly the questions have turned to how it is feasible that not only can a Boeing 777 be lost, but that it cannot be found?
Confusion has given way to anger, especially for the families of those lost on the plane.
As 'search and rescue' has given way to 'search and explain', the ire of the families has fallen on the leadership of the international team tasked with finding the missing plane – a role with shifting responsibility but lacking real accountability.
At times over the past month I have often felt lost as I have struggled to absorb the endless theories, opinions and guesses as to what has happened to MH370. I am no expert on flight paths, radar systems, black boxes or background checks, so can't offer any clues as to what really happened on that plane.
I do however, understand a bit about effective collaboration – and what it looks like in its best and worst forms. The international search team is operating closer to the latter.
The game of "you show me yours then I'll show you mine" being played by the military of many of the 26 nations involved in the search mission has been damaging. The upshot of it is that we now face a very real possibility that we may never find the plane or its passengers.
The mud-slinging and blame-laying between nations involved in the search mission has been unbelievable.
China has criticised the U.S for failing to pass on information, then levelled the same accusation at supposed allies Malaysia *1. Malaysia then returned fire by saying misinformation by China "made us distract ourselves from the search and rescue to search areas that had already been searched." *2
Not to be left out of the Southeast Asian squabbles, it has been reported that Thailand did not pass on information to Malaysia that the aircraft had crossed the Malay Peninsula.
The Philippines have also joined the finger pointing game, saying that China chose to send search vessels from much farther afield than was necessary so that they could keep ships closer to home that are applying military pressure on the Philippines.
The reason behind all of this?
The integral instruments to the search mission are also vital instruments to military defence programmes.
Radar systems, surveillance craft on the sea and in the air, military analysts and satellite imagery have all been necessary in the search for the missing aircraft MH370. Those very same systems are also essential cogs in the military defence structures of many of the countries involved.
By being unwilling to divulge information which may inadvertently tip other countries off about the relative strength of their own military, each nation involved in the search is hurting the chances of bringing closure to the 239 families coupled to the fate of the missing plane.
True collaboration involves a leap of faith. It requires those involved to commit unreservedly to the overarching, super-ordinate goal. In a successful collaborative relationship partners are open and honest with one another and trust that the other party is competent, committed and reliable.
For evidence of a successful rescue mission that required complex international collaboration we needn't cast our memories back too far at all. Faced with extreme pressure from the global media, the team which saved "Los 33" – the 33 Chilean miners trapped underground for 69 days in 2010 was a perfect example of how complementary skills from contributing nations can come together to succeed in a time of need.
The plan to rescue the miners included the deployment of three large, international drilling rig teams, nearly every Chilean government ministry, the expertise of the NASA space agency and more than a dozen multi-national corporations from nearly every continent; the rescue was truly a global effort. *3
To my mind there are two main differences between the rescue efforts of MH370 and "Los 33"…
A willingness to put aside individual objectives to work for the 'super-ordinate goal'. How saddening it is to think that perhaps more could have been done to save 239 lives had key decision makers been less concerned with protecting their own positions first. The need for cross country military involvement appears to have been a significant constraint to openness and true commitment required for successful collaboration over the disappearance of flight MH370.
A strong hand of leadership. Compare the strong, open and unifying leadership and communication of the Chilean Government vs. the incompetence, misinformation and the lack of clear unifying vision and plan from the Malaysian government and airline. This has resulted in various other nations trying to step into the leadership vacuum created, but lacking the mandate to own the ultimate accountability for the collaborative efforts and mission.
Of course hope remains, and so the search continues for an explanation for mysterious disappearance of MH370. One cannot help but wonder though that with strong, unifying leadership, real commitment, and open, trust based collaboration perhaps a more successful outcome may have been achieved days or weeks ago.
www.theconversation.com: "The diplomatic fallout from flight MH370 reveals a region on edge"
www.cbc.ca: "China's unusual anger and finger-pointing"
www.wikipedia.org: "2010 Copiapó mining accident"
www.themalaysianinsider.com: "Search for MH370 bares mistrust between the 26 nations, says US daily"
Subscribe for blog updates and new Team Alchemy features
Literature Review: Katzenbach & Smith
The Generation Game - Liz Keene, UK
Coaching a team in crisis? Leave them to it and let it happen…
The team mandate - all you need to know
Who's the leader around here?
The rise (and rise) of teams
Team Alchemy System Accreditation (Nice, France)
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year from Team Alchemy
Is there Team Alchemy at the Rugby World Cup?
My Favourite Global Collaborative Events of 2014
Teamwork Lessons From The Animal Kingdom
© Team Alchemy 2016


text:
BlogThe Writing ProcessHow to Master "Show, Don't Tell"
How to Master "Show, Don't Tell"
Kyle A. Massa
Speculative Fiction Author
Most writers have probably heard the phrase "show, don't tell" more times than they care to recount. That advice has been given so often it's bordering on triteness. So in this post, we're going to take several steps further. Here's how to master show, don't tell.
First, Why Does "Show, Don't Tell" Matter?
Take Lessons from Other Mediums
First Draft: Tell, Final Draft: Show
Recognize When It's Okay to Tell
Bartholomew was apprehensive. He was nervous and he was worried, and more than anything, he was afraid of what might come next.
You still awake? Just checking. I wouldn't blame you if you dozed, because that was pure telling. The magic of writing is making people feel a certain way without instructing them to feel that way. So when we tell—or simply state exactly what's going on and how a reader should feel about it—we extract that element of magic.
Showing is the remedy. Let's try that same passage, only we'll show instead.
Bartholomew licked his lips and checked his watch. Again. His right hand was trembling so he clamped it behind his back with the left. But that only passed the tremor to his right foot, which set to tapping on the sidewalk. He breathed in and let out a rattling exhale.
See the difference? Here we've shown that Bartholomew is nervous rather than telling the reader. This creates a much more vivid scene and establishes a stronger sense of storytelling.
Now that we see the value of showing over telling, let's examine a few ways to make it happen.
A grammar guru, style editor, and writing mentor in one package.
"Show, don't tell" applies particularly well to writing prose because it is one of the easiest storytelling mediums to tell with. If you're writing from a first-person perspective, for instance, you can simply state a character's feelings. In other mediums, this is more difficult.
Take screenwriting as an example. Since it's a visual medium, it's more necessary to show and more difficult to tell. For example, take one of the most famous lines in cinema history:
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."
Those are Rhett Butler's parting words to Scarlett O'Hara at the end of Gone With the Wind. They show us a clear message without outright telling us: Rhett and Scarlett's romance is over, and it's not coming back.
In other words, screenwriting as a medium offers fewer opportunities to tell. They're still there, but they're not so plentiful (and generally not so tempting) as those in prose writing.
So let's take a lesson from screenwriting. Since it's a visual medium, it might help us to show more by treating our writing like it's a visual medium. Rely on realistic dialogue to describe a character's inner feelings rather than direct description. Evoke feelings—don't state them. Use nuance when establishing mood rather than pounding the reader over the head with it.
The process is not the work. And we all know that showing is difficult, especially in a first draft. So when you're writing, remember that just because you're telling now doesn't mean you can't show later. Let me give you an example.
Let's say I'm writing a character whose defining trait is her anger. When I'm writing a first draft, I might not know this character all that well. I might need more time with her to learn more about her. Furthermore, I might need to be more blunt and less subtle so I can learn the character better.
Therefore, it's okay to tell in the first draft. See below.
Grumlee is always mad. She hates when people giggle at her odd name, so she gets really angry.
This is lousy writing, but it's clear. Grumlee is an angry person. Now that I've told myself that about my own character, I can go back in a later draft and show my readers.
When Grumlee heard the giggle, her fists clenched and her back went rigid. Were they laughing at her? She turned slowly, face red, fists now trembling.
Lesson learned: just like any rough draft, it's okay to start basic and add nuance later. So don't be afraid to show first, then tell later. Also, another lesson learned: don't poke fun at people named Grumlee.
You need not always avoid telling. In fact, there are some instances where you probably should tell instead of show. The classic example is the mirror.
You know the scene I mean. In many books, you'll encounter a scene where a character conveniently discovers a mirror on the wall. They peer into said mirror, and then the writer has an excuse to show you what the character looks like.
Does it work? Sort of. You're showing what the character looks like rather than outright stating it. However, this moment almost always feels contrived. And the more hoops you jump through to find a convenient way to show your character's looks, the more contrived it feels.
Instead, this is a moment where it's best to simply describe your character. Just use your narrative voice to offer pertinent physical details. Is it telling? Yes. But in this instance, telling will not only save you time—it will end up feeling more natural than engineering a situation where you can describe the character.
Look for other moments like this in your work. They're definitely around. If a scene feels contrived because you're showing too much, try telling a bit more. Or if you're wasting time setting up a way to show something, try telling it instead.
"Show, don't tell" is good advice, but it doesn't show us (or tell us) the whole picture all by itself. Use these tips to master the phrase. Your writing will be better off for it.
Kyle A. Massa is the author of the short fiction collection Monsters at Dusk and the novel Gerald Barkley Rocks. He lives in upstate New York with his wife and their two cats. Learn more about Kyle and his work at his website, kyleamassa.com.
Some great advice that gives me a better idea of how to write better. Many thanks
By guestcolin992 on 04 December 2019, 10:03 AM


text:
Papp Éva (Nagybánya, 1958. március 25. –) színésznő, egyetemi oktató.

Életútja

1981-ben végzett a marosvásárhelyi egyetem Szentgyörgyi István Színművészeti Intézetében. A Szatmárnémeti Északi Színházhoz szerződött. A kitűnően éneklő és táncoló művésznő drámai erejű alakításaival is sikert aratott.

1981-ben tragikus baleset érte. Felfelé ívelő pályafutásának ez vetett véget: 1991 óta mozgásában korlátozott, ezért a Marosvásárhelyi Művészeti Egyetemen beszédtechnikát és beszédművészetet tanít színészhallgatóknak. 2005-ben (tudományos doktorival egyenértékű) DLA-fokozatot szerzett a budapesti Színház- és Filmművészeti Egyetemen. Egyetemi adjunktus (2011-es adat ).

Családja

Férje Kilyén László Attila, színművész.

Fontosabb szerepei

Az egyetem Stúdió Színházában

1980
Arabella (Sütő András: Káin és Ábel)
Juhász Katalin (Fejes-Presser: Jó estét nyár, jó estét szerelem)
Vera (Vampilov: Vadkacsavadászat)
1981
Mandikó (Popescu: Kerti törpe)

A szatmárnémeti Északi Színházban

1984
Kikiáltó (Fejes-Presser: Jó estét nyár, jó estét szerelem)
1986
Olga (Heltai Jenő: A tündérlaki lányok)
1987
Crina (Sorbul: Vérvörös szenvedély)
1988
Lena (Musatescu. Titanic keringő)
Laura (T. Williams: Üvegfigurák)

Jegyzetek

Források
Magyar színházművészeti lexikon / Papp Éva

Egy szomorú bohóc históriája - Interjú Kilyén László Attilával
Színház- és Filmművészeti Egyetem (Budapest): Papp Éva doktori dolgozatának címe a 2005-ös részben
Papp Éva: A művészi beszéd útja a közbeszédtől a versmondásig, Színház- és Filmművészeti Egyetem, Budapest, D.L.A.-képzés, mesteri pályamunka, 2005.
Marosvásárhelyi Színművészeti Egyetem 2010-ben végzett évfolyamának vizsgaelőadásai - Vezető tanár: Papp Éva
Népújság (Maros megyei közéleti napilap): Nyitott kapuk a Művészeti Egyetemen -Versenytánctól a színészmesterségig (2010) - 3 x Papp Éva
Színház.hu: Nyitott kapuk Marosvásárhelyen, a Színházművészeti Kar magyar tagozatán (2011) - újra 3 x Papp Éva

Magyar színésznők
Magyar beszédtanárok
Magyar színészpedagógusok
Nagybányaiak
Magyar egyetemi, főiskolai oktatók
Marosvásárhelyiek
1958-ban született személyek
Élő személyek


text:
A Fine-Dining Chef Goes for Italian Simplicity at San Lorenzo in Shaw
Former Tosca chef Massimo Fabbri serves rustic Tuscan food in a casual setting.
Written by Mimi Montgomery
| Published on July 5, 2018
San Lorenzo's main dining room. Photograph by Rey Lopez.
You may know chef Massimo Fabbri's name from Tosca, the high-end Italian restaurant he helmed for years, or its shuttered sister restaurant, Posto.
But he's recently turned in white tablecloths and elaborate courses for a more casual, pared-down vision. His latest restaurant, San Lorenzo, recently opened for dinner seven nights a week in Shaw. The intimate, 2,000 square-foot space is an homage to the Tuscan osterias he grew up with as a kid in Italy.
The tagliata is meant to serve several people, and is prepared simply—sea salt, pepper, and Tuscan olive oil. Photo by Rey Lopez.
"I thought I would step back," says Fabbri of the easy, less expensive menu. Now, he wants to focus on things that are "so simple, but so good," just like he found in his hometown of Monsummano Terme in Tuscany.
That less is more mentality is evident in dishes like pappardelle with a simple rabbit ragu using white wine, olive oil, and herbs; the branzino filled with tomatoes, potatoes, and olives; or gelato and sorbet made in-house. Splurges like the $96 T-bone steak are big enough to feed a crowd, and Tuscan-style pork ribs come with a menu annotation that "yes, you can use your fingers."
The branzino is filled with tomatoes, potatoes, olives, and fresh herbs. Photo by Rey Lopez.
Behind the bar is a variety of Tuscan wines and cocktails that nod to Fabbri's hometown. Photo by Rey Lopez.
Wines—75 percent of which come from Tuscany—also aim to be approachable. A good number of bottles are available in the $30 to $50 range.
The cocktail menu is full of nods to Fabbri's hometown, too. The Morandi (gin, basil, prosecco, and lemon sorbet) is named after the street where Fabbri's father was born, and the Superpesca (rum, ginger beer, and lime) is named after his brother's fishing store.
The Tuscan vibe continues in the decor, with turn-of-the-century photos of Fabbri's hometown, pink Carrara marble tables, and painted Tuscan tiles gracing the floor. Art Deco Murano glass chandeliers from Venice hang from the ceiling, as does a sculpture-like chandelier that a local artist made with actual olive branches.
The pappardelle is served with rabbit ragu, which was on the menu at Tosca. Photo by Rey Lopez.
But the most personal part of the whole space may be in the name itself. Fabbri's son is named Lorenzo, after the patron saint of chefs, and the restaurant's logo is a nod to the crown, olive branches, and bay leafs that line the crest of Fabbri's hometown.
San Lorenzo Ristorante + Bar; 1316 9th St., NW.
More: Italian restaurantMassimo Fabbrirestaurant openingSan LorenzoShaw
Mimi Montgomery
Mimi Montgomery joined Washingtonian in 2018. Her work has appeared in Outside Magazine, Washington City Paper, DCist, and PoPVille. Originally from North Carolina, she now lives in Petworth.
A Big Outdoor "Winter Wonderland" Pop-Up Is Opening in Shaw


The EFC's Operations Professionals Network autumn meeting will be taking place on the 3rd and 4th December 2018 in Philanthropy House, Brussels.
The Operations Professionals Network is a European-level peer-learning and support network of operations managers of international foundations. It provides a safe space for learning, exchange and discussion on key finance, IT, administration, operational, HR and capacity development issues foundations are facing. OPN currently has 14 foundation members from 6 countries.
This autumn meeting will see the group collectively take stock of how philanthropy can harness the opportunities and mitigate the risks of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning, while the subgroups will be diving into a range of topical peer learning exchanges.
For more information please contact Stefanos Oikonomou.


The first and easy thing to say about my obvious need to catch Anne Carson reading in London [Southbank Centre Poetry International Festival opening event Tuesday Nov 3] is that having gone only to see/hear the most significant poet in the English language actually read, perform, be in public the whole event was an instructive delight.
Carson was the last on of 6 poets, all of whom were worth seeing/hearing -if not memorable as such or as yet- but notable for me were Mimi Khalvati; the poems, the range of forms including a very relaxed form of ghazal and the performance which was practised but bound up with the character, rhythm presence of the work; a rare thing actually. I realised that I'd thought of her [forgive me!] as establishment; sturdy and unspecial, and was wrong.
Kristiina Ehin from Tallinn in Estonia [as she kept on remarking as if it were the last surviving Indus Valley village in the middle of the Great Rann of Kachchh] was a fascinating and harder to weigh performance. Striking in appearance, with a lovely steely quiet, her work trawls deeply in the Baltic and specifically Estonian culture, language mythology and custom. There was a strangeness about it all that was affecting, though it's possible that without the peculiar pronunciation which chimed so well with the peculiar sources, references and innocent passion within the work it might not read like much.
I was surprised too by Bill Manhire, whose work I didn't know though he has a dim, too dim, familiarity to me. So it was a real surprise and pleasure to watch and listen to work I'd read only with reluctance come alive in the poet; who managed a nice physical twist and rhythm that is not something you affect in public. Great! I hate poet's anecdotes but his were good, and were outdone by the poems in the end. Tight little things, sharp witted, but a long one built cleverly from a peculiarly expressed notice about fire alarms in a hotel in Copenhagen into something of compelling insistence.
Carson trumped all of this, of course. She's something quite else; a different order of poet. Watching her I know she knows it somewhere in her body, but appears both to know and not to know. I guess that is precisely the tone of the work isn't it? -knowingness and otherwise.
Nox I already admire greatly and treasure someone even aspiring to write work like this in our time. She read a selection from it; a peculiarly difficult thing to arrive at I would think -though there is not so much to choose from in fact. There were some, two I recall [I've not played back my recording of it yet] of the words from Catullus' epitaph  for his brother which run through the 'book' on the left page, with their full etymological being running to some length. She read these as if they were poems in themselves; another example of a casually effective radicalism.
She also read some of the very moving segments that mourn the life and death [in 2000] of her own brother -another epitaph. At the end [as in the poem] she offered her own translation of the Catullus and it rang deep bells in me as she did so. Throughout I couldn't avoid the obvious fact that here she was reading a real epitaph to a real brother, missed, loved, unable to leave alone -despite having not seen him for 30 years since he ran away from home and the law in Canada and began an initially India-centred wandering before the death of an adored girl broke him down.
If you've not read the poem, stop reading this and go right now to a place where you can; shelf, bookshop, library… I'm not going to critique it here nor, I realised as I walked out into a balmy early Winter night by the river and back to my Fruit Store, will it inspire any work of my own.
Anyway, I know how powerful that text can be from readings I've given of it and Carson was having that same effect on me. I was shaken by it and by this association, unable to pretend to dissociation, realising that I'm destined to return to the subject if not the object, who was recovered to life by means of that poem of mine a year later. A very tentative recovery by correspondence, followed by a return to the gloom of silence. A different silence, one almost as long now but different, as I say.
I left thinking that I would be reading something similar [it's necessary that I inject some form of widely recognised modesty at this juncture right? There] in a similar hall in 10, 20 years. The same story, a banal one. As I walked, caught my hands on some hard green holly upon which the gold leaves of [Canadian Maple?] winter were predictably now mounted, I realised not only that I didn't want to do that but that I'm spared it. That these poets' epitaphs, which I've already written much earlier in my life than at least one of them [C. was nearly 30 when he wrote his, died soon after], are definitively endgames, afterwords, conclusive.
I realised that there was something I wanted to write, and walked composing out loud before reaching the Fruit Store and starting again over midnight to arrive at a precise and clear e.thing which is very different to the great poets' epitaphs. It is about -and about isn't really a fitting word- my access to the prefaratory, the pre- a word [or prefix] linked uncannily to the preposition per- [itself linked to the Sanskrit para- which GN Devy defines as a movement out, towards the other] which my young friend and Entertainer and I had searched for recently and formed a list that I then found only slightly more fully articulated in Carson's Nox. I dwell there, with this pre-ness, this preface, beginning and future, the rhythm of that not one of endings, epitaphs and after-lifes [the ones constructed from this life; I'm all for the after-life of an exceptional line.].
It would be fair, decent, humble, generous to post that text in here wouldn't it? But I'm not going to, certainly not now or yet. I suppose I'm thanking Anne Carson, not only for the poem she had written and the intense pleasure, inspiration and relief that it gives me that something so singular exists in the world but also because her reading of it was such a generous act. It's explosive material and explodes within as it's read and explosivity of this kind is unpredictable. It looked to me as if it was in her mind more than once during the reading that she didn't really want to be doing it -and wondered how or why she was. That she might even recognise it as the mourning that it enacts, a kind of other-wordly or -timely ritual.
I hit those epitaphs hard and rebounded all the way to the prefaratory in a very concentrated period of time. That is how good Anne Carson's writing is, this is the realm of condensed, crystalline absolutes. Everything is starkly clear when writing or poetry is this good. It is done. She has done it with finality. Which frees up the rest for the rest of us.
> A good interview piece around Nox from Publisher's Weekly, here.
> ND editor Declan Spring's blog on Carson [including James Laughlin's first words; "I may have a book for you to work on, it's by Anne Carson who writes like no other."] and the making of Nox, here.
> Kristiina Ehin is published by Arc here.
Wow, what an idea, thanks for sharing!
Cape's [early, catch-up] editions of AC are distinctively fine, even collectible. Could it be that London publishing has earnt a rep for being a bit closed off to things, a tad unadventurous, dare I say? [a New Directions in London, for example, is a nonsensical thought!] RR is obviously, and I mean this genuinely, an exception; poet and publisher as he is [not least also of the damn fine poet Mark Doty]. No, the teeth, the grit, the magnificence and salute are all the real thing -and further admirable qualities.
"The book: Waking up in Toytown by John Burnside (Jonathan Cape, £16.99). Sequel to Burnside's childhood memoir A Lie About My Father describing how he tried to run away from drink, drug abuse and borderline mental illness – apophenia, a search for some overarching narrative of meaning – to what he hoped would be a normal life.
I already re-read Carson but this piece [using the term "sui generis qualities" as a positive rather than a negative!] actually does make me want to go back to Burnside, and Robertson's work too. It's true that Burnside never quite clicked for me, but also that Cape stopped sending me his books two, perhaps three books ago! File under pending… and let's hope I'm soon embarrassed.


Whether the officer had probable cause to believe the person was driving or operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, a controlled substance or a controlled substance analog or any combination of alcohol, a controlled substance and a controlled substance analog, under the influence of any other drug to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving, or under the combined influence of alcohol and any other drug to a degree which renders the person incapable of safely driving, having a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, or having a prohibited alcohol concentration or, if the person was driving or operating a commercial motor vehicle, an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more and whether the person was lawfully placed under arrest for violation of s. 346.63 (1), (2m) or (5) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith or s. 346.63 (2) or (6), 940.09 (1) or 940.25.
Whether the officer read the Informing The Accused Form.
Whether the person refused to permit the test. The person shall not be considered to have refused the test if it is shown by a preponderance of evidence that the refusal was due to a physical inability to submit to the test due to a physical disability or disease unrelated to the use of alcohol, controlled substances, controlled substance analogs or other drugs.
If it is determined that the person refused the test, there will be an order for the person to comply with assessment and a driver safety plan and their license shall be revoked.
If you refused to submit to a sobriety test, you can't wait to contact Attorney Rudolph directly at 920-730-8533.


text:
Q: How to fill up a list based on another list's value in InfoPath I have a list which holds country values. This list is shown in a drop down. I have another drop down for states. When I select the country, the state drop down should be populated with the states of the selected country. I am new to InfoPath and I don't know how to achieve this.
In C# I would write something like this (please ignore syntax):
if(state.country == countryDropDown.SelectedValue)
StateDropDown.add(State);

How can I do the same in InfoPath?

A: In the state drop down list, add a filter so that you only show the states belonging to the country. Here is a link showing you how http://koobarspoint.blogspot.com/2010/06/cascading-drop-downs-with-infopath-2010.html (no code behind is required)

A: if your data is in sharepoint list then you can use CAML query to fetch the data
You need to create repeating field and bind that repeating field to staet dropdown.
To fetch the state based on country selected is -
string strCountry=this.maindatasource.createnavigator().selectsinglenode("xpath of country dropdown",namespacemanager).value;

SPList oList = web.Lists["Name of List"];
SPQuery oQuery = new SPQuery();

oQuery.Query = "<Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='column name which contains countries' /><Value Type='Text'>" + strCountry + "</Value></Eq></Where>";

SPListItemCollection oListItemCollection = oList.GetItems(oQuery);

foreach (SPListItem Item in oListItemCollection)
{
   root.SelectSingleNode("xpath of field inside repeating table",NamespaceManager).SetValue(Item["Name of column which holds state"].ToString());

}


As St. Peter's Square was being readied for this year's Nativity scene, a nearby mobile healthcare facility was serving the city's homeless and poor, according to an article on the CatholicPhilly.com website.
Doctors volunteering from healthcare facilities in Rome clinics and nurses from the Italian Red Cross staff the clinic.
For the second time, the Pontifical Council for Promoting New Evangelization organized the free healthcare initiative in conjunction with Pope Francis' celebration of the World Day of the Poor, which was to be celebrated Nov. 18.
This year, it is offering extended morning and evening hours.


text:
De geelbandgrasmineermot (Elachista subocellea) is een nachtvlinder uit de familie grasmineermotten (Elachistidae).

De spanwijdte van de vlinder bedraagt tussen de 8 tot 10 millimeter.

De soort komt voor in Europa. In België is de soort zeldzaam, in Nederland zeer zeldzaam.

Waardplanten
De geelbandgrasmineermot gebruikt kortsteel als waardplant.

Externe links

Geelbandgrasmineermot
Dier uit het Palearctisch gebied


Most of you should have seen the countdown timer for Black Friday already. It's now been extended for another 3 days.
If you haven't grab your Black Friday Deal, this will be your LAST CHANCE to get everything WA has to offer at just $0.82/Day!
Follow the countdown timer you see in your account. That will be the time remaining.
Black Friday is the ONLY time when Wealthy Affiliate has such promotion. No Christmas sale, no New Year sale, nothing.
If you haven't done so, I highly recommend you to take action before it ends.
I know for those of you who haven't taken action, MONEY is always the problem.
But trust me on this...investing in Wealthy Affiliate is one of the best decisions I've made in my life so far (although I'm just 21 years old LOL).
I have referrals who're willing to go as far as borrowing money from friends/family members just to grab this opportunity. This shows amazing commitment. And I'm sure these people will succeed because they're commited depite the lack of money.
They will put in even more time and effort into building their own businesses online because they're serious about this.
I'm not recommending you to do so. But it's just an option for you. There will always be a way for you to make something happen. It all depends on how desire you are to achieve your goals.
The bigger your WHY, the smaller your HOW!
What will happen if you don't achieve them?
How much time & effort are you willing to put in to achieve them?
I wish you all the best and really hope that you can join us at this Black Friday Deal if you haven't done so.
Thanks Jerry, you're an inspiration.
hey hi Jerry -- already done back when!
Really like this " The bigger your WHY, the smaller your HOW! "
thanks Jerry, I´ve done at day 25 joint to WA black Friday festivo promotion.
Thanks, just added it notification to me websites!
Thanks to the extension I was able to catch the deal.
Sandy. I have a question though; I was already a yearly member, does my renewal date start now or at the end of my first annual renewal date. I look forward to working with you Jerry, in the upcoming year. I have begun Boot Camp and currently setting up my site.
Your Black Friday offer will simply extend another year to your current membership expiry date.
I'm not surprised it has been extended, knowing Kyle it will be all down to the sale going very well or better than expected so much so he extended it!.
That's right! This is my first year promoting WA Black Friday and it has been crazy. Gonna have my first 5 figure month soon!!


On the Nissan R35 GT-R, the car has a computer controlled dual clutch and transmission. The computer control allows for the car to drive semi-smoothly from idle by just the right amount of slip to engagement. Launch control will hold the car to a certain RPM to allow a quicker off the line start, and faster 0-60 times.
Originally it took the mode selector switches in R-R-OFF to activate launch control. Eventually in LC3,4,and 5 launch control could be activated with VDC ON.
LC1 was the first version of launch control. It was a violent clutch drop, wheel spin, and wheel hopping, 1st gear death. Undocumented officially, with the setup switches in R-R-OFF, the car would allow for a 4500 rpm automated clutch drop. Done a few times is no big deal, however when done 26 times in a row, owners managed to kill GR6 gearboxes. Specifically they sheared the teeth off first gear. After a bit of an uproar, the launch control was changed to what we call LC2. LC2 allowed for 3000 rpm launches and was much less violent than the LC1 launches. LC2 was retro fitted to most 2009 GT-R's, standard on the 2010 cars.
- Launch Control remains, but the maximum allowable engine speed with the VDC system switched off will be reduced from the current 4,500 rpm to between 3,000 and 3,500 rpm. The clutch engagement program will also change to reduce driveline stress, e.g., less abrupt engagement on launch.
- When launching with the VDC on, the new programming will allow for higher engine speeds and a more aggressive clutch engagement than the current setup.
- Nissan reiterated that launching the GT-R with the VDC off is not covered by the warranty.
For 2011 launch control was again revised, and would allow for a 3300 rpm launch with R-R-R, making the launch covered under warranty.. However, if the car got a lot of wheelspin, the car would bog and loose power, basically falling on its face.
Cobb Tuning has been working tirelessly on the upgrades. Just recently they got the LC4 version of the Nissan launch control to work on the 2009-2010 Nissan GT-R. Along with getting the LC4 version to work, Cobb has also downloaded and ported the LC5 software over as a alpha for the Accessport with TCM control - 006. Its great to see Cobb Tuning keeping the Nissan GT-R community updated with all the latest tweaks to get all they can get out of their cars.


Many of us tend to live our lives with a lot of "things that need to happen before I am satisfied" conditions. There can be a variety of things such as getting a new car, or bigger house, or new outfit or shoes, or cleaning up that mess in the basement / garage / guest room, or quitting the smoking / drinking / over eating habit, or finding the right man or woman, or finishing school, or a better job, or paying off the credit card… Well you get the idea.
I would contend that for many of us there is quite a list. And what we might not really realize is that by the time these conditions are met, we will have found new items that have been added to the list.
Here is an thought, act like these conditions have already been achieved. Imagine that you already have the things you want. How does it make you feel? Imagine it. Feel the feelings of having it. For material things, you may want to develop a specific plan to get the thing you desire. Realize though, generally, we are really chasing the feeling we get from having that thing.
More importantly, act how you think the person that has achieved those goals would act. If you wish you were a vegetarian, when you are choosing a food ask yourself what would a vegetarian eat. Choose that food. If you wish you didn't smoke, play the role of a non-smoker. Do what they would do instead. If you want to lose weight, every choice you make, make the choice a healthy person would make. Imagine what they would do and do it. If you wish your house was cleaner, imagine you have a clean house and take the actions that someone with a clean house would have. It is a subtle shift in thinking but can make a world of difference.
Play the role. Become a childlike for a moment and put every ounce of your new condition into that role. Feel it. Act as if things are already the way you want them to be. Before you know it, they will be.


To order any Hammock or Hammock Chair, please contact Linda Skinaway directly. Please note which product you want to order (hammock or chair), as well as which color you want.
Please note that Hammocks weigh approximately 7 3/4 lbs. and Chairs weigh approximately 4 lbs. each. The additional bar and hardware packet weigh 1 1/2 lbs combined. Shipping prices are based on actual weight of package with insurance added.
©2009-2012 Hammocks by Linda, Linda Skinaway. All Rights Reserved.