Home Betting System Reviews Betting Gods Review – Do their tipsters make money?
Is using a quality tipster service something that can help you to place your bets more profitably? Or are you just paying out money for no real benefit? What makes using a tipster service better than simply choosing your own bets? In this article I'll be doing a Betting Gods Review.
There are a number of tipster services available just now. I've written a list of the best paid tipsters in this article. Betting Gods is one of the most popular of them. Is it any good, though?
The idea is that this service brings together a number of expert tipsters in one place. This means that even novice gamblers can start placing bets with confidence. First of all they need to decide which of the site's tipsters to use, though.
Tipster services on here start at £1 for 30 days and there are a range of different services to choose from. You can get advice on what to bet on at different sports. Such as football, horse racing, golf, tennis, boxing and more.
Of course, there is no guarantee that you will win money in this way. All that you are doing is increasing your chances by getting an expert gambler to guide you. It is important to remember that isn't a betting system that gives you an unfair advantage over the bookies. If the tipster is wrong you lose money.
This Betting Gods review will look at what it is all about. Should you be using Betting Gods to help decide what to bet on? Let's take a look at the details to see.
They say on their site that over 94,000 punters receive tips and previews from them every day. That is an impressive amount of customers in anyone's books. There is no doubt that this is one of the most popular tipster services around right now. If you are tempted to give it a try then you will find a very simple idea behind the service.
Their site is clearly set up and doesn't have too much information on it. There is no need to wade through tons of data before you get started. There is a blog and a FAQ page but no unnecessary other stuff to complicate matter. It is really all about the tipsters on here.
When you first enter on the Betting Gods site the first thing you might want to do it check out their comparison page. This is where you can find a list of their current tipsters. Here you can choose which one to follow.
This comparison page shows you different figures for each one. You see the monthly profit, strike rate, return on investment and bank growth for each tipster. You can filter by each of these different figures and then visit the tipsters that interest you.
For example, at the time of writing this Betting Gods review they feature three of their top tipsters. A golf betting expert with an average monthly profit of £312.70. A football tipster who wins an average of £673.39 each month. And a horse racing expert whose average monthly profit is £135.06.
These figures are purely an indication of how well they have done in the past. There is no guarantee that they will carry on getting the same results in the future.
Right now, they have a total of 9 horse racing tipsters to choose from. There are 4 football experts on the site. You can also choose from 2 golf tipsters. There is also a greyhound tipster and one who focuses on boxing bets.
If you are looking for a cheap and easy way to get started then you can sign up to get their free newsletters to your email address. This give you a way of giving the Betting Gods service a trial run. Yet, it obviously provides far less than you will get with their paid service.
Apart from the free newsletter service, you need to pay to receive regular tips here. The easiest way to get started is to take advantage of the £1 trial that runs for a full month. This lets you sample the service without spending too much on it.
After that, you need to choose which tipster to sign up to. Each one of them is free to set their own monthly subscription price. However, Betting Gods also recommend to their tipsters to charge between £20 and £40 each month.
You can sign up to as many tipsters as you want to. Just remember that you need to put on enough bets to cover the subscriptions and make money. If you sign up for a lot of experts then you will need to place a lot of wagers each month.
Once you pay for a full service you can access the tips in a number of ways. This is done through email, the member's section of the site and their app. In this way, it is easy to choose the access method that suits you best.
A nice touch on Betting Gods is that it is easy to cancel the service. However, the signs are that most of the people who sign up on here are happy with the service that they receive.
This is a simple tipster service. As we have seen, you start off by choosing your preference from a range of tipsters on different sports.
You don't even need to choose your favourite sport if you don't want to. Since you are relying on an expert, you can just pick the one who fills you with most confidence. It doesn't matter if it is boxing, football or whatever else.
Since each tipster works on a different sport the recommended bets are all different too. For instance, a football tipster may give advice on correct score, first goal scorers odds etc. They will also suggest the level of stake that you might like to put on.
The best idea is to follow these tips closely. If you do this then you will get the same overall profit that the tipster reports for the month.
The Betting Gods site also has a good blog that you can use to read the latest sports news. Here, you can read about upcoming events and suchlike. This is a nice site if you want to feel part of a passionate betting community.
They are also highly rated for the customer service and problem resolution they provide. It is worth pointing out that they also explain the bets rather than just list tips. This means that you can learn as you look through their suggestions.
There have been some suggestions in the past that not all of the tips are at achievable odds. This is a big problem and it is something that the people behind Betting Gods have commented on.
Having said that, most punters seem happy with the tips they receive. The services that they offer are certainly very clear and simple to understand.
There is absolutely no hassle about getting started here. The first step for many is to sign up for the free email newsletter. This will let you get a feel for the service without any risk.
If you want to sign up for a paid service then you need to register for it. Right on the site's home page you will see a button marked "Log In". If you aren't already registered then this will guide you through the registration process.
Once you have done this you will want to think carefully about which tipsters to follow. You will want to look carefully through the list of available experts before choosing. Which of them has a good profit over a period of time?
The £1 for the first month offer than allows you to find out all you need to know about the service. You can sign up for a few of them if you want to, but don't forget to cancel any that you don't like. After those first 30 days the full price kicks in.
Naturally, you will want to keep a good record of your betting. Are you placing enough bets to justify the service? Are you winning as much money as you expected to? Is there another tipster you want to try instead?
There is nothing to stop you from switching tipsters once you get started. Starting off with the right one in the first place would be better, though.
Unlike many other tipster and betting systems sites, Betting Gods isn't just run by one or two. The number of different tipsters who offer advice means that you get tips from a range of people.
In fact, the real key to using this service is in choosing the best tipster. New experts are added regularly, so you have to keep your finger on the pulse to choose wisely. They need to prove their work with a 16 week run before being added to the Betting Gods list, though.
The founder and owner of the site is called Darren Moore. He is also a director of Geeky Bonus Malta Ltd. This company is behind the likes of GeekyGambler and BonusBible.
Darren has given out a few interview to journalists in the past. In them, he says that he started this site to help punters stand a better chance of beating the bookies. He has also said that he wants to make the tipping industry more transparent and more genuine.
Darren also speaks a lot about the need for good customer service. He is proud of how they treat their customers and of how good their tipsters are. In addition, he says that the best approach is to stick to a tipster's advice rather than skipping some bets.
However, the site isn't about him. While other betting systems rely heavily on the personality and charisma of their owners, this isn't the case here. Darren doesn't even claim to be a betting expert, as it is the Betting Gods tipsters who do this work.
What Tipsters do they have?
At the time of writing Betting Gods have 18 separate tipsters covering football, horse racing, golf, greyhounds boxing & e-sports. That's a serious amount of services to manage!
I'm not going to cover all 18 services in this review as it will end up going on forever! Instead I'll just cover the most popular ones.
According to Betting Gods this tipster averages £306 a month to £10 stakes. This service will require some patience as it involves betting at long odds up to 200/1! The bets are all E/W so the place odds will be lower. However if you can't stomach losing runs then it would be best to check out a different tipster. The Golf Betting Experts current strike rate is just under 9%.
This us one of Betting Gods long standing horse racing services that has been active since 2014. Its got a long track record which 99% of other tipsters don't have. According to Betting Gods, this tipster has made over £10,000 profit since 2014 using £10 stakes. He has a respectable strike rate of 23%.
As the title suggests this tipster revolves around football with 1 – 2 tips being sent daily. According to Betting Gods, this service has made a profit of just under £7,000 since June 2017 which isn't bad going at all. The strike rate of the bets is 28%. The service specialises in football over / under bets.
There are plenty of online reviews for Betting Gods. This is hardly a surprise when you consider how many people have tried this site. This is one of the most popular betting sites that a huge number of punter have turned to for tips.
Of course, not all of the reviews are going to be positive when there are so many of them. However, it is safe to say that the majority of the people who have written about the site liked it. If you look for a Betting Gods review you will find plenty that are enthusiastic about their tips and customer service. You will also find Betting Gods review on Trust Pilot.
If you are thinking of joining then it makes sense to read some reviews. You might want to check out what people are saying about individual tipsters as well as the overall site. Have punters been winning as much as you want to win?
The fact that Betting Gods is set up to be as transparent as possible is a big help. I've noted that in this Betting Gods review. You can see exactly how well each tipster has been doing at any time. This is a great help that lets you get started with more confidence.
As we sat earlier, finding the same odds mentioned by the tipster can be a problem. This is one of the few issues that customers have mentioned. The people behind the site seem keen to resolve this problem, though.
A good sign is that they have been mentioned in a positive light by many reputable sites and newspapers. This isn't a little known site with no information about it. Plenty of people have decided that it is trustworthy and reliable.
Naturally, having good reviews doesn't automatically mean that you win here. At the end of the day, this is a tipster service. Even reputable tipsters with a good track record can get it wrong or go through bad spells. This isn't a mathematical system like matched betting that always wins.
There is no doubt that the Betting Gods site offers an easy to use system. You don't have to put much effort into it at all. It doesn't matter if you have never gambled on sports in your life before.
Indeed, all you need to do is wait for the day's tips to arrive. You then only need to decide whether to act on the day's tips or not. Using their app is a smart way of doing this very easily. Once you have the tips it is a question of placing your bets.
It is up to each punter whether they do extra research on each bet. For instance, if you aren't convinced by the day's tips then you might want to look into it further. If you are going to just accept the advice then you can place the best right away.
There is no guarantee that you will win every time. However, you aren't going to spend a huge amount of time on it either.
Who Could These Betting Tips Suit?
There are probably a few types of people who could be interested in using Betting Gods. Maybe you are fed up losing to the bookies. Perhaps you love betting but aren't completely confident in your own ability to make good decisions.
Some people might choose this service with the idea of sticking faithfully to the tips. Others might choose it to give them a starting point to place their own wagers. There is no reason to think that you need to bet in exactly the same way as everyone else.
In some cases, people sign up just because they love the thrill of betting. They may lack the time and experience to work out the best bets for themselves. If you work full time and want to enjoy betting with limited spare time then this is probably a good service for you.
As with all betting systems, it isn't right for everyone to use. If you want a guaranteed win you will want to look at matched betting. If you prefer to do a lot of research you might not need a tipster service at all.
However, there is a market for this sort of service. The popularity of Betting Gods shows that people want to get a helping hand. If you want to boost your chances of winning then this is a system to consider.
Giving that the tips can be tried for nothing with the free email service this is a good move. After that, paying £1 for a month's trial will let you understand more about how well it suits you.
It is clear that Betting Gods has made a lot of punters happy over the years. Their no frills tipster service gives generally solid tips that make sense. It is also good to see that a reasonable price is charged for the service.
If you know exactly what it is about then you can sign up without any fears. You aren't promised huge, consistent wins but you do get a better chance of profits. The only real problems come when someone doesn't understand the risks.
You can get started quickly and easily too. If you want to give your betting a boost then this is a simple way of doing it. That concludes my Betting Gods review.
could we use the tips that we get from the Betting Gods with any of your strategies?
Perhaps we could use tips the the bonus money that we get from a promotion like, bet 10 get 10, and then use that 10 bonus for a tip?
Hi Hugo, you would be best laying off the £10 free bet like you normally do and locking in a profit. Betting tips are not guaranteed like matched betting.


text:
10 tech innovations we saw at the Cricket World Cup
By Jamie Carter
Tradition meets technology
(Image credit: ICC TV)
The ICC Men's Cricket World Cup is over, and the England (and Wales) team won it. Just. In the end it came down to the greater number of boundaries scored by England in the final against New Zealand, but throughout the tournament it was technology that proved decisive.
Unlike football, where Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology has taken an age to catch on, the International Cricket Council (ICC) has been tech-savvy for years.
From HawkEye and Hotspot to Batcam and Spidercam, here are all the gadgets, the tech and the innovations that helped the umpires make the right call and the broadcasters bring the action alive. Howzat?!
The Ashes 2019: how to live stream every England vs Australia game
1. STATSports trackers
(Image credit: STATSports)
During the World Cup the India National Cricket Team signed-up with UK sports technology company STATSports, whose wearable performance-monitoring tech is already used by Manchester United, Liverpool, Roma, Tottenham Hotspur and the Brazilian national football team.
Their wearable device is essentially a fitness tracker built into a base-layer vest that's loaded with sensors that measure distance, speed, acceleration, deceleration, high-speed running, and the dynamic stress load of each player.
It means better monitoring of the cardio stresses on bowlers, who can tire quickly, as well as the rotations of batters' ankle and knee joints. For us mere mortals, STATSports sells its GPS performance tracker (opens in new tab).
2. HotSpot
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
Part of the umpire's Decision Review System (DRS), HotSpot is all about leg before wicket (lbw).
The planting of a pad in front of the incoming ball to stop it hitting the wicket is the oldest trick in the book, but for the umpire, it can be desperately hard to judge whether contact was made with the batsman's pad or bat, or both – if it's bat and then pad, he can also be caught out.
Cue centuries of arguments until the arrival in 2006 of HotSpot, a tracking system that constitutes two SLX-Hawk infrared cameras that measures heat from friction to produce a frame showing the precise points of contact of the ball.
3. State-of-the-art TV coverage
You'd think that to cover 48 matches across 11 different venues would require some streamlined TV production plans. Not a bit of it. London-based Sunset+Vine, global production partner of the ICC, used a mobile outside broadcast unit, five technical teams, four production teams, 24 commentators, and 32 cameras to cover each match.
That included drones, super slow-mo, eight ultra-motion Hawk-Eye cameras, Buggy Cams, front and reverse view Stump Cams and Spidercam. A 15-second graphic countdown clock to DRS was shown on screen and in the ground.
However, there was one thing conspicuous by its absence from the World Cup: Ultra HD, which isn't a big thing in India, by far cricket's largest market for TV.
4. Hawk-Eye LBW detection system
Another part of DRS is Hawk-Eye, a tool that's long been a default part of cricket broadcasts across the globe.
Comprising six cameras, three at each end of the ground, Hawk-Eye essentially tracks the ball and predicts its path. If the ball is determined to have been heading for the stumps when a batsman's pad got in the way, it's lbw.
Hawk-Eye has been provided by host broadcasters at major cricket matches since 2001, and at ICC events since 2008, when it became part of the DRS.
5. TRACAB Optical Player Tracking
(Image credit: ChyronHego Corporation)
Already used in the Premier League, German Bundesliga and Spanish La Liga, as well as major international UEFA and FIFA tournaments, and Major League Baseball, it was about time ChyronHego's TRACAB made its way into cricket.
An advanced camera-based player and ball tracking system adopted by the graphics provider AE, this ICC-commissioned specialised version of TRACAB for live cricket shows viewers the exact field position of players as well as a range of data points, including running speed and distances covered.
6. Hawk-Eye UltraEdge
A sound-detection based system that's part of Hawk-Eye and DRS is UltraEdge. Aimed at helping the umpire better judge lbw decisions, UltraEdge comprises stump microphones that clearly differentiate between the sounds created by different sources, specifically the bat, pads and clothing of the batsman.
What makes it different from the rival Snickometer technology is that UltraEdge uses ultra-slow-motion cameras, so the audio and visuals can be synced.
With that information, the umpire can decide whether a batsman has nicked the ball ('caught an edge') or not.
7. Batcam
This UK-based live drone filming and broadcasting company supplied three machines to all the Cricket World Cup venues: BatcamFLY and BatcamDRIVE. BatcamFLY is a drone equipped with a 360-degree camera that can produce an eye-line shot before racing up to 400ft for an atmospheric overview/skyline shot.
A remote-controlled 10x zoom camera on wheels, Batcam DRIVE produced those low tracking shots of batsmen leaving the pitch. Traveling at up to 30mph and equipped with automatic collision avoidance, this rugged 80cm-high buggy is remote controlled and has GPS tracking.
It was used primarily to get ground-level replay shots from behind the wicket-keeper.
8. Spidercam
Every time a new batsmen came into bat during the Cricket World Cup, Spidercam swooped down over them.
It proved pivotal; installed at every ground during the World Cup, Spidercam's smooth aerial sweeps and angles were made even more pivotal to the viewing experience by their hosting of innovative augmented reality (AR) overlays.
Spidercam's shots formed the environment for pop-up AR graphics of key players, and even the trophy itself placed in the middle of the ground.
9. Piero graphics analysis system
Making its debut at the World Cup was Piero, a package of 3D graphics to help pundits analyze and explain sports events.
In use for 15 years on the UK's BBC soccer show Match of the Day, Piero is all about generating visual views of the field from any angle, and allowing pundits to manipulate players and draw lines.
It works by stitching together several camera feeds, and operates in conjunction with the CricViz data analysis and score predictor.
10. 360-degree replays
For the first time at a Cricket World Cup, broadcast coverage involved the production of 360-degree replays. Provided by Piero, using software that allows multiple camera feeds to be stitched together to create wraparound video, 360-degree video replays of matches were made available online on ICC TV.
It may be a game that's a few centuries old and full of quaint rules and traditions, but when it comes to technology there are few sports as cutting-edge as cricket. Now, about that lack of Ultra HD…
Jamie Carter
Jamie is a freelance tech, travel and space journalist based in the UK. He's been writing regularly for Techradar since it was launched in 2008 and also writes regularly for Forbes, The Telegraph, the South China Morning Post, Sky & Telescope and the Sky At Night magazine as well as other Future titles T3, Digital Camera World, All About Space and Space.com. He also edits two of his own websites, TravGear.com (opens in new tab) and WhenIsTheNextEclipse.com (opens in new tab) that reflect his obsession with travel gear and solar eclipse travel. He is the author of A Stargazing Program For Beginners (Springer, 2015),
See more World of tech news
I can't believe Age of Empires 2 is playable in a browser
I love the new MacBooks, but they badly need a dash of iBook color
Age of Empires 2 arriva su Cloud: ritorna un classico intramontabile
Is sleeping on your back good for you?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
The Dredging Contractors of America (DCA) is a non-profit trade association that has represented the interests of the U.S. dredging and marine construction industry and its members for over 30 years.
Creating a robust and unified American dredging industry
Develop Solutions that Protect the Jones Act, Promote the Private Fleet, and Create a Strong National Dredging Program
more about dca
DCA has been at the forefront of efforts that include establishment of formal partnering at the highest levels of the Corps, and other government entities, on issues such as over-depth dredging, emergency response, funding, contractual policy issues, project estimating, and the environment. Additionally, DCA is a respected industry partner for its ability to bring together a broad base of industry stakeholders and decision-makers to engage in open forum and continue the discourse concerning policy issues important to the industry as a whole.
Additionally, DCA serves as a vital resource to various other maritime industry groups for dredging expertise, both in Washington and across the country. These groups frequently consult DCA and its members on mutually important issues, while at other times DCA members are requested to provide input on technical and commercial issues that affect third-party projects.
DCA is a member of several organizations and works hand-in-hand with such groups as the American Maritime Partnership (AMP), the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA), the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA), and the National Waterways Conference (NWC). Serving on the board of the ASBPA, DCA is able to remain informed of and influence shore protection issues, as well as provide the industry an opportunity to corroborate with local, state, Federal, and private stakeholders.
DCA attends and monitors industry-relevant conferences and provides frequent updates to its members on matters of concern to the dredging industry. It also cosponsors several scheduled meetings during the year, including the National Dredging Meeting and the Industry/Corps Hopper Dredge Management Group (ICHDMG) meetings, providing input to develop agendas and recruit speakers for these meetings. At the National Dredging Meeting, DCA presents the William R. Murden Lifetime Public Service Achievement Award to an outstanding Corps of Engineers employee who has made significant contributions to the trade.
DCA assists in lobbying Congress on critical industry issues, the most important of which is authorization and funding for projects. DCA staff works closely with congressional and Corps staff to understand how budget decisions will affect the market and disseminate that information to association members. Staffers make clear the implications of budget cuts to government decision-makers familiar with the industry.
Upon approval by its Board of Directors, DCA may choose to tackle an issue on behalf of the general membership. These issues are typically handled by separate subcommittees. If an issue affects only a portion of the membership, then a Special Project Group may be formed, the costs of which absorbed by the affected members.
Every spring DCA conducts an annual conference where its members engage in social events and activities with each other and their spouses. The highlight of the meeting is a presentation by a prominent guest speaker(s) from the Corps whose discussions provide important information on issues affecting the dredging industry. The give-and-take opportunities afforded DCA members and Corps officials prove invaluable in creating a mutual understanding across the industry.
In summary, the Dredging Contractors of America provides a full range of association services to its members in order to create a robust and unified American dredging industry by developing solutions that preserve the Jones Act, promote the private fleet, and create a strong national dredging program.


text:
Troubleshooting Mobile
Troubleshooting Computers
Mac & iOS
Tiny Tips
TechtipprMake Your Tech Life Easy
AskTippr
Want to Use Your Mobile for Creating Videos? This Guide Should Be Helpful
Asif Ahmed - Nov 29, 2020 0
Smartphones take away a lot of limitations creative filmmakers can find themselves in. From shooting videos in too crowded situations to putting the camera...
How to Fix Glitch / Corrupted Video After Exported from Final Cut Pro?
I have been using Final Cut Pro for editing my videos since 2016. Before that, I was using Vegas Pro. And I was using...
How to Download YouTube Videos to iPad?
Asif Ahmed - Sep 16, 2020 0
In our daily life, watching movies from YouTube on the iPad is a good way to relax. However, if you are in an environment...
Here's How to Get YouTube Premium Subscription for Cheap
Asif Ahmed - Aug 19, 2020 0
Here is a simple trick to let you subscribe to YouTube Premium for cheaper than the price that shows inside the YouTube app on...
What's the Fastest Way to Edit Insta 360 One X Footage
Asif Ahmed - Mar 7, 2020 0
I have been using the Insta 360 One X camera from the last few weeks and have, in fact, also posted an article talking...
Fix Silly Grammar Mistakes using Google Docs
By Anwer Khan
Buying GuideAsif Ahmed - Jan 5, 2021 0
Best Rode Wireless Go Mic Alternatives You Can Get On A Budget
If you are a content creator who is making videos on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, or any other platform, recording...
AskTipprAsif Ahmed - Jan 5, 2021 0
Bill of Materials and Knowledge Graphs
In the manufacturing world, the two terms bill of materials and knowledge graph are closely related. They are used...
How to FixAsif Ahmed - Jan 3, 2021 0
My Chromebook Touchpad has some weird issue. How to fix it?
I have been using the Lenovo Chromebook Duet for the last few weeks and it has been an excellent...
Anwer Khan
Anwer is passionate about helping others to understand this complex web called the Internet. He also has interests Mobile Phones, Movies and Golf.
In the past, we have shared quite a number of applications that will help you write faster, we have also shared articles about apps that can help you write better.
Some of them are paid, some of them are free, So you can use them according to your needs and budget.
But, if you are looking for a completely free solution that can help you write better by fixing your grammar mistakes, then you can use Google Docs.
You can use Proofreading with AI in Google Docs
It is quite an effective add-on for Google Docs which lets you proofread your articles using artificial intelligence, it not only identifies spelling mistake but also tells you about the incorrect usage of words with suggestions to use instead of them.
You can add this Add-on by clicking and add-ons then searching for Proofreading with AI, after adding at you can again click on Add-ons, then click on 'Proofreading with AI', then 'Start'.
It starts working to find spelling and grammar issues with the article that appear on the right-hand side all the browser window. once it is done finding issues you can click on given suggestions to fix your article with the recommended suggestion.
Note: To use 'Proofreading with AI', you need to create an account on their website and log in using your login credentials.
It's really is a tiresome method but only for the first time once you are done with all the things and set it up it's actually easier.
Alternatively, you can also use Grammarly, which is also available as a Chrome extension so that you can use it anywhere you have to type. It works even for social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter.
If you want to do it inside Google Docs then here is an even better solution that is coming soon or maybe it has arrived already, depending on when you are reading this article.
Google Docs' own AI based Grammar Checker
Google recently has added a new feature in Google Docs, it's called the Grammar checker, something similar to Microsoft Word, but much better thanks to the Machine Learning (ML), Google's new focus on making things smarter and more dependable.
Talking about Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI), Grammarly also claims to have a sophisticated intelligence system in place, that catches Complex grammar issues in articles.
But, there is only a handful of options available for the free users, you have to subscribe to the premium plan to use all the features.
Google machine learning algorithm will first be available to the G Suite users (a paid package of Google Software for small-scale businesses and individuals), and then it will eventually be rolled out to all the Google docs it uses.
You can also show your interest in using this new feature by filling up this form.
Looking at all the recent improvements by Google such as the Smart Replies app and Smart Compose feature in Gmail, it will be cool to have something like this in Google Docs as well.
Previous article6 Best Music Downloader App for iPhone
Next article10 Best Websites You Can Watch Free TV Shows Online And Legally
thirteen − nine =
Freshly Published
Asif Ahmed - Jan 5, 2021 0
In the manufacturing world, the two terms bill of materials and knowledge graph are closely related. They are used in the manufacturing world to...
I have been using the Lenovo Chromebook Duet for the last few weeks and it has been an excellent experience so far. Like I mentioned...
Four things I like about the Lenovo Chromebook Duet
So I got myself Lenovo Chromebook Duet as a new year gift and I can't put it down on the table ever since. I...
How to Watch IPL 2021 Online on Mobile
Asif Ahmed - Dec 30, 2020 0
There is an amazing craze of IPL in our country and very soon we will be able to watch IPL 2021. But because of...
Boost Your Productivity on MacBook with this Split Screen App
Mac & iOS Asif Ahmed - Dec 10, 2020 0
I am a big productivity freak, and I keep looking for ways to enhance my workflow. One of the tricks that I have been...
Turn Any Bluetooth Speaker into A Loudspeaker
Tiny Tips Asif Ahmed - Nov 24, 2020 0
One convenient way to address a large gathering without damaging your vocal cords is by using a loudspeaker. You can easily find an excellent sounding...
How to Post Photo and Video WhatsApp Status Without Losing Its Quality?
AskTippr Asif Ahmed - Oct 21, 2020 0
If you are one of those billion people who use WhatsApp daily, you may have noticed that it reduces the quality of photos and...
Software Asif Ahmed - Sep 16, 2020 0
© 2021 | Techtippr


text:
Sorry, there will never be a universal writing system
December 18, 2006 1:50 am by Neil Cohn
Jochen Gos emailed me awhile back with news of her new book Icon-Typing and website Icon-language which is a font that creates pictograms when a person types in their own language's sentences. Unfortunately, it's taken me a rather long time to finish this post about it.
While it's a fun idea, and reminiscent of other projects of the same nature, I should say that I do not consider any of these approaches to be "real" visual languages. And, perhaps dissapointing to some, I don't consider any enterprise that strives for a "universal pictographic writing system" to be a fruitful endeavor for multiple reasons.
I do think that the idea of a pictographic language stems from a deeply felt intuition that there is indeed a visual modality language, but cannot reconcile it with the assumptions our culture makes about graphic signs and language. Among the problems holding back these types of endeavors:
1. Semiotics – There is a general misunderstanding, both in and outside of academia, that there are only two types of graphic signs: those that map to "ideas" – mistakenly like Chinese or pictures – (ideographs) and those that map to sounds – like alphabets (phonographs). This is a gross over generalization that I attacked in my thesis ¡Eye
græfIk Semiosis!, trying to show that there is a much more graded system of expression at work here.
2. Grammar – All "univeral" pictographic languages must piggyback on the grammar of existing verbal languages. Verbal languages are vastly different in their grammars so much so that no possible universality could ever be reached. There is a deeper reason for this though: dividing pictograms into linearized individuated units denies the grammatical qualities inherent to the actual visual form. A grammar must arise up out of the signs themselves, not be imposed on signs from the outside (see again my paper ¡Eye
græfIk Semiosis!). An Example: A pictographic system might use a marker to show plurality paired with an icon. So, a pictographic symbol might express "men" like [MAN PICTURE]+[PLURAL MARKER] (not necessarily linearly)as opposed to just showing multiple men couched in an environmental setting. In one, the concept arises directly from the sign, in the other it's latching onto the way that verbal languages do it.
3. Morphology – Believing that pictograms from all languages can easily substitute in for the words of a language presupposes that all languages have "word" units like English. What would this do for a polysynthetic language like Greenlandic or Dene that chunks multiple meaningful units into a whole syntactic unit (i.e. a single "verb" in these languages might have the same quantity of information as an English sentence). Chunking up visual pieces like this betrays a bias for how European languages break up units, not all languages.
4. Linguistic relativity – To believe a universal writing system is possible assumes that all languages structure concepts the same way. This is simply not true. The aforementioned Dene has several forms of the same verb meaning, each one reflecting a different type of object (for instance, the verb "give" changes based on the texture and character of what is being given – whether its animate, granular, squishy, flat, etc). Less "exotic" differences are like that Japanese lacks plurals and definitive articles. Plus, given how widely languages differ, which morphemes would be worthy of visual conversion? Do you convert all of them (including things like transitivity or definiteness?) or just those most "visually relevant"?… and how would that not be a subjective decision based on the preferences of the speaker of a particular language? A speaker of English might be more inclined to need particular features (like plural) that differ from a Japanese person (like politeness). A universal writing system assumes that concepts are universal to express and do so in similar ways: a big assumption.
5. Transparency and Iconic Bias – There is a general belief that Iconic signs that look like what they represent are wholly transparent in their meaning and non-culturally relative in and of themselves. This is also untrue. While most all cultures seem to be able to decode what "realistic" drawings represent, they often are subject to entrenched variability. For instance, Australian drawing systems usually feature aerial viewpoints, which can lead to odd interpretations of lateral viewpoint representations. Furthermore, simplfying the "concept bundle" of images down to a one-to-one concept-to-sign ratio is extremely difficult.
Finally, the biggest issue here is that the visual form is implicitly considered as lesser than the verbal. It uses the verbal form to be translated into the visual without stopping to think that the visual form might already have its own visual language system naturally that doesn't need a verbal connection at all. Writing systems themselves are not a bad thing, but as an importation of one expressive modality into another they will always be subject to the constraints of the imported system.
A real, natural Visual Language should be able to stand alone without needing such connections to lean on, and would reflect the diversity of different cultures as well.
Just visiting your website!
Very nice!!!!Agatha


PowerMenu is listed in OS Enhancements category and made available by Thong Nguyen for Windows. Unfortunately, we have not yet reviewed PowerMenu. If you would like to submit a review of this software, we encourage you to submit us something!
What is PowerMenu software from Thong Nguyen, what is it used for and how to use it?
PowerMenu is a small app that adds "Always On Top", "Minimize To Tray", "Priority" and "Transparency" sub menus to all top level system menus.
Download and install PowerMenu safely and without concerns.
PowerMenu is a software product developed by Thong Nguyen and it is listed in System category under OS Enhancements. PowerMenu is a free software product and it is fully functional for an unlimited time although there may be other versions of this software product. You can run PowerMenu on all modern Windows OS operating systems. PowerMenu was last time updated on 17.07.2005 and it has 6,230 downloads on Download.hr portal. Download and install PowerMenu safely and without concerns.
What do you think about PowerMenu?
Download.hr periodically updates software information of PowerMenu from the software publisher (Thong Nguyen), but some information may be slightly out-of-date or incorrect. PowerMenu version 1.5.1 for Windows was listed on Download.hr on 17.07.2005 and it is marked as Freeware.
All software products that you can find on Download.hr, including PowerMenu, are either free, freeware, shareware, full version, trial, demo or open-source. You can't download any crack or serial number for PowerMenu on Download.hr. Every software that you are able to download on our site is freely downloadable and 100% legal. There is no crack, serial number, keygen, hack or activation key for PowerMenu present here nor we support any illegal way of software activation. If you like software product please consider supporting the author and buying product. If you can not afford to buy product consider the use of alternative free products.
Is it safe to download and install PowerMenu?
PowerMenu was checked for possible viruses by various leading antivirus software products and it is proven to be 100% clean and safe. Although, no malware, spyware or other malicious threats was found we strongly advise you to check product again before installing it on your PC.
Please note that laws concerning the use of PowerMenu may vary from country to country. Please be sure that you are using PowerMenu in accordance with the law in your country.
How do I uninstall PowerMenu in Windows Vista / Windows 7 / Windows 8 / Windows 10 OS?
Make sure the "PowerMenu" is highlighted and then make right click, and select Uninstall/Change.
How do I uninstall PowerMenu in Windows XP?
Make sure the "PowerMenu" is highlighted, then click "Remove/Uninstall."
How do I uninstall PowerMenu in Windows 95, 98, Me, NT, 2000?
Select "PowerMenu" and right click, then select Uninstall/Change.


text:
Why a social media uproar won't hurt Oatly's bottom line
4th September 2020 Blog 4 minute read
Twitter was aflame, as it often is, when it became more widely known recently that Oatly had done A Bad Thing. The alternative milk brand received a $200 million investment from Blackstone, a controversial private equity firm – and major Republican Party donor – accused of indirectly contributing to the deforestation of the Amazon through financial links to a Brazilian infrastructure development (Blackstone strongly denies the allegations). Oatly brands itself as being committed to sustainability, so their involvement with Blackstone went down about as well as you'd expect on social media.
But research we released last week suggests Oatly's money men needn't worry. While boycotts were a recurring theme on Twitter and Instagram, people in the 18-24 age bracket – the generation generally assumed to be fond of a boycott – aren't likely to abandon Oatly in favour of other brands riding the alternative milk train.
Our survey of 1,000 people aged 18-24, students and non-students alike, revealed that only 6% would 'boycott a brand whose social values don't align with my own'. So, in any given group of 30 to 35 young people, only two would potentially boycott Oatly even if all of them disagreed with their new partnership. That contrasts pretty sharply to what you will have heard on Twitter.
When it comes to public opinion, however, social and society aren't in unison. This is a difficult time for Oatly's social media team, certainly, but not for their finance team. Social mustn't be considered the touchstone of how consumers consume. Twitter is almost a neutrality-free zone; anyone seen tweeting,: "Oatly have teamed up with Blackstone and I've no strong opinions on the matter" should be exposed as a bot (and not a very good one).
If you're angry, you tweet. If you're nonplussed, you don't. And the story's nature meant Oatly would never have expected to receive a welcoming party of thumbs-up hand-clap emoji.
We asked some of our young poll respondents for their reaction. They were oblivious, unfussed, or oblivious and then unfussed.
"I drink Oatly and I won't be boycotting them, because it's too hard to find alternatives even if I was that bothered," said Kate (22) at Leeds University. Chloe (22) at Imperial College, told us: "I think people would be more likely to boycott if there were more brands available, but the alternative milk market is still being developed and it's becoming more popular."
Kamsi (20) at Queen Mary, shared similar views. "Taking a step back," he said, "companies do a lot of things somewhere in their supply chain that contributes to deforestation, but boycotting them isn't so easy. If another company were just as accessible as Oatly, then a boycott could be more successful."
Although ethical consumerism is a subject for another blog, or the final season of The Good Place, this broader view also explains why Oatly, in particular, have taken such heat on social media. Oatly, however, proudly claim to prioritise sustainability and do their business ethically. Brand purpose is at the forefront of everything they do. They have a comparatively high proportion of purpose-driven consumers. They use a nice font. The words, "We promise to be a good company" are emblazoned on their milk cartons.
That's probably why they haven't shied away from the furore. Good PR still matters, of course – it's vital to match a brand's communications with its business objectives. And Oatly decided to take ownership of the controversy. They're responding to negative tweets and Instagram posts in a very open manner, and the statement on their website is transparent even about the finances involved. Their homepage even proclaims 'WELCOME BLACKSTONE' on a giant, jaunty moving banner.
Oatly's defence is that partnering with Blackstone "steers capital that would've otherwise gone into another commercial investment into sustainability instead", and that, "If we just shut out the companies that may make less sustainable choices, we won't give them a chance to improve". Some critics may be placated; others won't.
Ultimately, though, Oatly won't suffer greatly from any boycott proposed on Twitter. They just owe their social media team a week off.
Written by Simon Lucey, founder of Hype Collective


text:
1993 Chrysler 300 prototype surfaces, $35,000 puts it in your garage
The Chrysler 300 was on hiatus in 1993, but a prototype reviving the name was built. That car is still around, and is currently listed in the Hemmings classifieds with an asking price of just $35,000.
The 300 is one of Chrysler's most recognizable nameplates, with an original production run stretching from 1955 to 1971 (with a brief return for 1979). "Letter car" versions like the 300C and 300D built a reputation as upscale performance cars in the 1950s and 1960s, and Chrysler did eventually bring the 300 name back in 1999 as a tribute to those cars.
1993 Chrysler 300 prototype (photo via Hemmings)
This prototype predates those production cars, though. It's based on the first-generation LH sedan platform, which underpinned the Concorde, New Yorker, and LHS, as well as the Eagle Vision and Dodge Intrepid.
The prototype has the LHS's more formal roofline and upright taillights, but with a different front-end treatment incorporating round headlights and a new grille, plus a custom interior with Italian Bronze and Black leather upholstery.
According to an accompanying article posted on Hemmings, the car may have been built by ASC as a proposal for a full-glass roof for the LH sedans, with the company giving the car the full 300 treatment to really sell the idea.
Power comes from a 3.5-liter V-6, likely the same engine fitted to the LHS. The ad doesn't give other mechanical details, but the LHS's 4-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive likely carried over as well.
Currently located in Minot, North Dakota, the car has 1,000 miles on the odometer and is in drivable condition, according to the listing. What appears to be the same car was listed for sale in 2010 with 350 miles. That ad said the car cost $145,000 (in 1993 dollars) to build.
It's still possible to get a new 300, but not for long. The 2023 Chrysler 300C gets a 6.4-liter V-8 and limited production run of 2,200 units to mark the end of production, although the 300 will reportedly live on as an EV.
Jay Leno checks out off-road legend Rod Hall's Ford Bronco
Class of 2023: Hagerty's top 10 classic cars to buy this year
Review: 2024 Mercedes-Benz AMG C 63 S E Performance trades rowdy for clinical
2023 Mercedes-Benz Maybach S-Class Haute Voiture targets fashion crowd
Not just blowing smoke: Risks highlighted by exposure …
Mark Robinson's possible run for North Carolina governor …
NC mother arrested after 3 children killed in fire …
Go Red for Women returns to an in-person event; encourages …
Despite Bon Secours investigation, hospital transparency …
Invasive species to deforestation: Virginia evaluates …
Portsmouth's casino may see competitive edge with …
No school resource officer for Richneck as students …
Family calls for justice for young father killed …
Facing shortage, Norfolk PD not expecting return …


text:
package org.deidentifier.arx.gui.worker.io;

import org.deidentifier.arx.ARXAnonymizer;
import org.deidentifier.arx.gui.resources.Resources;
import org.xml.sax.SAXException;

/**
 * Second version of the ARX XML vocabulary.
 *
 * @author Fabian Prasser
 */
public class Vocabulary_V2 extends Vocabulary_V1 {

    @Override
    public void checkVersion(String version) throws SAXException {
        try {
            int thisVersion = getVersionNumber(ARXAnonymizer.VERSION);
            int fileVersion = getVersionNumber(version);
            if (thisVersion < fileVersion) {
                throw new SAXException(Resources.getMessage("WorkerLoad.10") + version); //$NON-NLS-1$
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new SAXException(Resources.getMessage("WorkerLoad.10") + version); //$NON-NLS-1$
        }
    }

    @Override
    public String getAnonymity() {
        return "a"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getChecked() {
        return "c"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getHeader() {
        StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder();
        b.append("<!-- ARX XML Vocabulary Version 2.0 -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- n = node                       -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- i = id                         -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- t = transformation             -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- a = anonymity                  -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- c = checked                    -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- p = predecessors               -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- s = successors                 -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- l = infoloss                   -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- f = min                        -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- u = max                        -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        b.append("<!-- z = attribute                  -->\n"); //$NON-NLS-1$
        return b.toString();
    }

    @Override
    public String getId() {
        return "i"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getInfoloss() {
        return "l"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getMax2() {
        return "u"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getMin2() {
        return "f"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getNode2() {
        return "n"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getPredecessors() {
        return "p"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getSuccessors() {
        return "s"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getTransformation() {
        return "t"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    @Override
    public String getVocabularyVersion() {
        return "2.0"; //$NON-NLS-1$
    }

    /**
     * Converts a string version to an integer version
     *
     * @param version
     * @return
     */
    private int getVersionNumber(String version) {
        version = version.replace("-alpha", "");
        version = version.replace("-beta", "");
        version = version.replace(".", "");
        if (version.length() == 2) {
            version = version + "0";
        }
        return Integer.valueOf(version);
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


text:
ХАЈДЕГЕРОВА ФИЛОЗОФИЈА У СВЕТЛУ ЖИВОТВОРНОГ ХУМАНИЗМА
Устај радниче!
Нови Свет је Могућ
Последња револуција
Filozofski aspekti modernog olimpizma
Olimpijska podvala
Sport, kapitalizam, destrukcija
Trajko Rajković
Video prilozi sa Ducijevim nastupima
Film: Olimpijski plamen
Na Srpskom
Vaše Porudžbine
Transformation of Liberalism into Authoritarianism
Autor: spanac1942
Kategorija: Philosophy of Olympism
19 Vreme čitanja
Coubertin regards democracy as a political means of the bourgeoisie which should be applied as long as it is useful. Writing in the times of the great economic crisis in 1929 on the basic conceptions of IOC, Coubertin concludes: "It was first necessary to establish the basic rules of the International Olympic Committee and to have them recognized by all nations. This was not an easy task, since its Constitution was in obvious opposition to the ideas of the day. For it repudiates the principle of delegation so dear to our parliamentary democracies – the principle which, having rendered great services, seems to be less efficient every day."(1) The "efficiency" of democracy is not assessed according to its possibility of realizing the basic human and civil rights, but according to its efficiency in keeping the workers in submission and ensuring a stabile development of capitalism. At the same time, Coubertin openly states that IOC was founded as an authoritarian organization and is thus a prototype of the political structure of society he was arguing for ever since he set out towards the Olympic heights. It can be said that IOC is a symbolic organic link connecting Coubertin's original Olympic idea with fascism.
Coubertin doesn't trust democracy because it is such a political form of the rule of capital over man which is not capable of ensuring a stabile development of capitalism and with its "political liberties" offers a possibility of a political organization of the workers, which at the times of crisis can jeopardize the ruling order. Concerned about the fate of capitalism after the Russian and Munich Revolutions, Coubertin sharply criticizes the bourgeoisie which, unlike the aristocracy, neglected the "care" about the workers and thus turned them against the ruling order. Coubertin: "The capitalist bourgeoisie is taking a risk of paying a high price for the selfish calculation that made it establish democracy. It has never wanted to help the working class acquire other skills except the ones that can make its service more productive by increasing its productive capabilities. It even denied it access to those neutral knowledge's which, as it was nicely expressed by priest Wagner, offer 'access to a sublime life'. It created spiritual wealth and keeps it under close watch so as to preserve its monopoly." (2) In fact, Coubertin wants to say that the working "masses" were given the civil rights only to help the bourgeoisie to overthrow the aristocracy and seize power, and that it did not build an adequate mechanism of spiritual control over the workers which at the times of crisis would efficiently pacify (depolitize) them and thus "neutralize" the possibility of enjoying the (formal) rights they won.
Instead of a social order based on the "rule of law", Coubertin advocates the establishment of a new order of privileges analogous to the feudal order. He does not argue for ancien régime since that order, like the Christianity, proved to be incapable of keeping the "masses" in submission. Coubertin opts for the bourgeoisie and entrusts it with a "historical" task to restore, by way of sport as the modern (positivist) religion, the indisputable dominant status of the nobility before the French Revolution, to give the working "masses" and the woman the status they had before the Revolution and to for ever deal with the emancipatory heritage of civil society and national cultures. He seeks to create a peculiar bourgeois aristocracy which claims power not on the basis of its "blue blood", but relying on its power to gain it and its resolve to maintain it for good. Not a divine authority, but the authority of sheer force, which appears in the guise of a "natural right" – that is the power order should be based on. It is no accident that from the "heroic age" of ancient Greece, when demos had not yet appeared on the political scene, Coubertin creates an idealized picture of the world which serves as a civilizatory excuse for the Social Darwinist order he advocates. In the civil and human rights Coubertin sees a concession which the ruling "elite" had to give in order to preserve power – only one lost battle in the war between the "rich" and the "poor" (working "masses") that has been going on since the beginning of time – an evil which should be dealt with once and for all. From such a political conception comes also Coubertin's "utilitarian pedagogy": to militarize the bourgeoisie and to create from it, through sport and physical drill, a "master race" is it's most important task. The more sport and Olympism we have, the less democracy there is! – This could be the "practical" postulate of Coubertin's Olympic philosophy. "The seeds of authoritarianism" in Coubertin's conception, were planted with Comte's idea of progress, which is the guiding principle of Coubertin's Olympic philosophy. Marcuse: "Comte's belief in the necessary laws of progress did not exclude practical efforts in the direction of such social reform as would remove any obstacles in the path of these laws. The positivist program of social reform foreshadows liberalism's turn into authoritarianism. In contrast to Hegel, whose philosophy showed a similar tendency, Comte slurred over the fact that the turn is made necessary because of the antagonistic structure of civil society. Classes in conflict, he held, are but vestiges of an obsolete regime, soon to be removed by positivism, without any threat to the 'fundamental institution of property'."(3)
At the time when capitalism appeared the oncoming bourgeois class fought for a "civil state" not in order to abolish the class privileges and for the sake of human emancipation, but to acquire power. At the time of strengthening of capitalist dynasties and the creation of colonial empires, Coubertin tries to bring things to a conclusion: the ruling bourgeois "elite" is to create such a political system that will insure indisputability and eternity of its power. In the new circumstances, the advocation of the original conceptions of liberalism becomes for "progress" a harmful moralism – it does not meet the interests of the class for which it was created, which means that it is at odds with the political spirit of liberalism on whose wings develops Coubertin's conception. Coubertin clearly refers to that when he speaks of the workers (as well as of the "lower races" and the woman) as of people deprived of their elementary human and civil rights. The principles the new bourgeois class used in the 17th and 18th centuries to come to power and achieve its political and economic interests, now appear dangerous, for they offer a possibility to the proletariat, the child of industrialization, to come to power by using the instruments of the "civil state". Political realism is the basis of Coubertin's utilitarism and here Coubertin does not differ much from his predecessors. Indeed, his ideas are different from theirs, but politically he shares the same standpoint: he too defends the interests of the bourgeoisie by adapting to new historical circumstances. Hence it is no accident that libertarian impulses of liberalism appear not in Coubertin, but in Marx and his followers: Marx is the advocate of the emancipatory (universally human) spirit of liberalism, as opposed to Coubertin who argues for its political (class) spirit.
Coubertin's Olympic doctrine deals with the emancipatory ideas of the French Revolution which are the basis of man's inalienated "human rights" (droits de l'homme) and of the "rights of the citizen" (droits de citoyen) and thus are the foundation of modern legislation. Speaking of the French Revolution, Coubertin concludes that "only the form changed while the essence remained the same", (4) from which follows an endeavour to abolish all those (customary, religious, moral and legal) norms and institutions that serve for the protection and execution of those rights. For Coubertin, the relations in feudal society are also "democratic", although not so democratic as in civil society. To what extent Coubertin, fighting for an absolutization of the (self) willedness of the ruling "elite", ignores the acquired level of civil and human rights, can be seen from his shameful bearing in the "Dreyfus affair": instead of asking from those who were campaigning against Dreyfus to prove their allegations, Coubertin asks the accused to prove his innocence! Coubertin, with an aristocratic contempt, mocks the guiding principles of the Revolution, proclaiming them a sheer nonsense. He denies man the right to freedom: man is not born free, but as a master of a slave, depending on his race, gender and class. Coubertin, then, denies man the right to equality: "It is useless to fight against the oldest and basic social law – the law of inequality", (5) claims Coubertin. Interestingly, Coubertin reduces the claim to equality to the claim to uniformity, "overlooking" the fact that equality logically presupposes individual differences. The privileges acquired by birth are the foundation of Coubertin's theory on human rights. Racial, class and gender differences are the basis of human (social) inequality. As far as the principle of brotherhood is concerned, Coubertin denies that human beings are brothers: "Brotherhood is not for people – it is for angels", (6) claims Coubertin reducing the bourgeois to a "civilized" beast, the worker to a "beast of burden" and the woman to a sow with a halo. The abolishment of the rights of the oppressed to a happy life is another Coubertin's contribution to the "perfectioning of the world". Here Coubertin shares the view of De Maistre: the misery of the oppressed is inevitable and is thus the source of a "happy life" of the master "elite". Coubertin also deals with other basic human rights. The man's right to life is subordinated, as we have seen, to the right of the order to survival: war is the highest test of "a male's maturity", while readiness to kill and capability of killing another human being represent the cardinal human virtues. What Coubertin took over from the revolutionary spiritual heritage of the bourgeois class from the 19th century is nationalism, which was to become the main tool for fanaticizing both the bourgeois youth (colonialism) and the proletariat (destruction of the class conscious). Olympism becomes the means for directing the dissatisfaction of the oppressed against other nations and for concealing the class exploitation – in the guise of a "fight for the national interest".
Speaking of Comte's "positive theory of authority" Marcuse concludes: "Comte outlines a 'positive theory of authority', envisaging a society with all its activity based on the consent of individual wills. The liberalist tinge of this picture is shaded over, however. The instinct to submit triumphs, as the founder of positivist sociology renders a paean to obedience and leadership. 'How sweet it is to obey when we can enjoy the happiness … of being conveniently discharged, by sage and worthy leaders, from the pressing responsibility of a general direction of our conduct'. Happiness in the shelter of a strong arm – the attitude, so characteristic today in Fascist societies, makes juncture with the positivist ideal of certainty. Submission to an all-powerful authority provides the highest degree of security. Perfect certainty of theory and practice, Comte claims, is one of the basic attainments of positivist method." (7) Unlike Comte's man, Coubertin's man has not reached the level of development where he would have his "own will" which, trying to insure a more certain existence, he can "voluntarily" transfer to a higher authority. Included from his early childhood in the hierarchy of relations based on the principle "might is right" and natural selection, man can do no more but oppress the weaker and court the stronger – in order to survive. Human "will" moves between the tyrannical power and the instrumentalized "mercy" of the ruling "elite", the key levers with which social order and peace can be insured. In addition, according to Coubertin, the oppressed cannot count on happiness, only on misery. Coubertin, a "humanist", offers a "sports republic" where sufferings of the oppressed will be alleviated, not because they are to be helped, but to decrease "the hatred" that the poor have for the rich and thus prevent their struggle for a better world. In that context, Coubertin, unlike many other bourgeois theorists, does not regard sport as a means for protecting the main values of capitalism, (8) but as a reward to the oppressed for their obedient acceptance of the order in which they are deprived of their basic human and civil rights.
Comte seeks to form a special body which will take care of the strategic interests of capitalism and will be the indisputable source of the ruling political will. He insists on the authority of a systematized and indisputable "knowledge", based on an absolutized authority of facts – which becomes a peculiar (positivist) "Holy Scripture". Marcuse writes on that: "Social questions, because of their complicated nature, must be handled 'by a small group of intellectual elite'. (…) All the sciences will be poured into the same crucible and fused into a well-ordered scheme. All concepts will be put to the test of 'one and the same fundamental method' until, in the end, they issue forth ordered in 'a rational sequence of uniform laws'. Positivism thus will 'systematize the whole of our conceptions '." (9) Following Comte, Coubertin establishes IOC as the supreme spiritual body with an authoritarian character as the main source of the ruling political will – which looks after the strategic interests of the ruling parasitic classes. The members of IOC become the "holy guardians" of capitalism who are "self-elected" (among the most eminent representatives of the "elite") and are not responsible to anyone. Diem cites Coubertin's words about IOC, which are intended to justify the fascist rule in Germany. "We are not elected; we are self-recruited, contrary to the public opinion which is getting more and more used to putting all organizations into the yoke of the electing principle. Independence and stability is what allows us to perform great acts." (10) Modern Olympism is the reaction of the bourgeoisie to the ideas and movements that seek to overcome the established (capitalist) order and a way of dealing with the idea of future. It is of its nature a totalitarian spiritual movement and is thus the tool of the ruling "elite" for preventing the ideas "competitive" to capitalism from being developed. "Free competition" is possible only on the basis of and within an indisputable domination of capitalist ideology. Only the views that contribute to the "perfectioning" of the established order are acceptable, but not the ideas that can become the political platform of people deprived of their rights in the struggle for just society. Political pluralism and positive society are incompatible. In Olympism, "freedom of choice" and the end of history coincided.
If we compare Coubertin's conception with the doctrine of John Stewart Mill, we shall see that, unlike Coubertin, Mill does not depart from man's animal nature, nor does he abolish the civil state; his philosophy propounds a radical elitism that becomes a form of legitimizing political authoritarianism – which is characteristic of Coubertin. Mill: "No government by a democracy or a numerous aristocracy, either in its political acts or in the opinions, qualities, and tone of mind which it fosters, ever did or could rise above mediocrity except in so far as the sovereign Many have let themselves be guided (which in their best times they always have done) by the counsels and influence of a more highly gifted and instructed one or few. The initiation of all wise or noble things comes and must come from individuals; generally at first from some one individual. (….) It does seem, however, that when the opinions of masses of merely average men are everywhere become or becoming the dominant power, the counterpoise and corrective to that tendency would be the more and more pronounced individuality of those who stand on the higher eminences of thought." (11) Trying to prevent the citizens from becoming relevant factors in the establishment of the political will of society – one of the basic demands of liberalism – Mill deprives the citizen of reason (which is present in Bacon, Hobbes, Lock, Rousseau, Bentham), which is the basis of "social contract" and "civil society", and establishes a monopoly over "intellect" as the source of the ruling political will, in the hands of the ruling class. The citizens are no longer a constitutive factor of the ruling political will, let alone the bearers of progress, but are reduced to a "mass" of idiots as opposed to "talented" individuals who are expected to establish a "balance" between stupidity (incapability of making "real" political decisions) and cleverness (capability of making such decisions). "Talent" and "knowledge" lose their evaluative, and acquire an objective dimension, which becomes a mask hiding the prevailing interest: making clever (political) decisions becomes the privilege of the ruling "elite". Mill tries to deal with the democratic formation of the citizens' political will, which means with the struggle between different political interests and thus with the development of "public dialogue" and "democratic publicity": depriving "common people" of intelligence becomes a form of making the working people unsuitable for defining the political will of society. Instead of Comte's social engineers, Mill offers peculiar social sages who determine the direction in which society is to develop. Expressed in the modern way, it is the creation of a "council for strategic issues", which through the prism of existential and long-term interests of the ruling class will estimate the correctness of political decisions of the current authority – and this is the role that Coubertin gave to IOC. Since they are the indisputable bearers of "wisdom", any critique especially that by the "lower classes", is meaningless: the authority of God is replaced with the authority of "knowledge". The realization of such a concept involves the establishment of the authoritarian power capable of compelling the "common people" ("lower classes") to obediently accept the rule of one (dominant) will. Practically, it is a fight against the pluralism of ideas and political pluralism. "Social order", which should enable a stable development of capitalism and insure indisputable rule of capitalist monopolies, becomes the supreme political principle.
It is no accident that in Coubertin, just as in Mill, a call to equality in society comes down to a call to people's uniformity. The starting point for determining the "difference" between people are not their individual faculties and talents, but their social position and class, reason being the exclusive quality of the ruling classes. However, the very demand for reason, as well as for the observance of norms that are obligatory on all, is opposed to Coubertin's positive voluntarism. Coubertin seeks to replace the democratic order, in which the "number" is the determining factor, with an order in which a self-recruiting "elite", from the richest social stratum, has indisputable power. His ideal political structure of society is the one in which the "elite" can gain absolute power over the working "masses". Unlike Mill, who, like Plato, expects the "most intelligent" people to direct the development of society, Coubertin thinks that the "bearers of progress" are those most loyal to capitalism and most determined to defend it: Olympism is not founded on the rule of reason, but on the rule of force. In addition, it is not the individual free will and reason that are the starting points for establishing volonté général as the foundation of social (civil) community, but it is the "interest of the race (nation)" behind which are hidden the class interests of the bourgeoisie. "The universal" becomes the means for absolutizing and totalizing the dominant will of capitalist monopolies. Modern Olympism excellently demonstrates the endeavour to present the partial interest of the bourgeoisie as the "universal interest" of mankind. The symbols used in mythologizing the Olympic Games ("peace", "international cooperation", "progress" and the like) are a "smoke-screen" hiding the true nature of the Games – which is totally opposed to the proclaimed "Olympic ideals". The very fact that the leading people of IOC (Pierre de Coubertin, Henri de Baillet-Latour, Sigfrid Edstrøm, Avery Brundage, Juan Antonio Samaranch…), during the one hundred years of its existence, have been the members, propagators and open sympathizers of the fascist parties and movements clearly shows the true nature of modern Olympism. The insistence on the maxim that "sport has nothing to do with politics", on the part of the Olympic officials and the ruling oligarchies, is only a hopeless attempt to conceal the truth that Olympism (sport) is the exclusive means of the ruling class for spiritual enslavement and pacification of the oppressed.
Coubertin proclaimed utilitarism the cardinal principle of his Olympic doctrine. There are no civilizatory obstacles to the ruling self-willedness: everything is allowed and justified if it is of benefit to the ruling class. Underlying Coubertin's conception is the characteristic logic of monopolistic capitalism contained in the principle: "Destroy the competition!" It is an endeavour to turn the increasing economic power of the capitalist monopolies into a totalitarian and global political power of the bourgeoisie, capable of dealing once and for all with the emancipatory heritage of modern society and libertarian struggle of the oppressed. The concentration of the ever greater economic power in the ever fewer number of hands, on the one hand, and the increasing number of those deprived of their rights approaching the possibility of dethroning the ruling oligarchy, on the other hand – this is the starting point of Coubertin's doctrine. At the same time, Olympism involves a unity of the struggle for survival and the struggle for preserving the ruling order. This is what completely integrates man into the existing world and appears in sport in a "pure" form: it is not the institutions and norms, but the ruling capitalist relations that become an indisputable totalizing power.
spanac1942
Pogledaj sve tekstove
Olympism and the Idea of Social Justice
Olympism and Art
Olympism and Phenomenology of Play
Olympism and the "Oasis of Happiness"
+ 381 011 689 36 69
ljubodragsimonovic.com
Noviji tekstovi
Ко је Грета Тунберг?
Живот као уметничко дело
Марина Абрамовић и крај уметности
Schools, education and upbringing
200 years have passed since the birth of Karl Marx
Robert on Здрави, лепи и срећни – Дуња Симоновић Братић
Томислав Николич on Здрави, лепи и срећни – Дуња Симоновић Братић
A New World is Possible
Articles in Czech
Articles in Dutch
Articles in Italian
Articles in Norwegian
Articles in Portuguese
Articles in Russian
Articles in Spanish
Articles in Turkish
Audio – ekstrakovan iz video klipova
Čomski
Contac with Duci
Ducijeva nova E-mail adresa – KONTAKT
Ducijevi javni nastupi, tribine – Obaveštenja o tome
Hajdeger (srp)
Knjige | Books
Komentari na postere i ilustracije
Novi svet je moguć
Olimpizam ruski
Philosophy of Olympism
Poslednja revolucija
Tekstovi na Srpskom
The Last Revolution
Ustaj radniče
Video download -Instrukcije
Video in English
Video in Russian
Video in Spanish
Meta Linkovi
Pratite Ducijev rad i na fejsbuku


If you look at Amazon at face value, it may be hard to make the decision to invest. After all, we're talking about a company with a PE ratio of over 300. However, I'm here to tell you that AMZN is a great move. Today we'll talk about why.
When I started looking into AMZN about a year ago, Prime was one of my biggest gripes with the stock. I just couldn't understand how the product could be profitable. For those of you who don't know about Prime, the cost of the service is $99 per year. That works out to $8.25 per month. For that cost, consumers get free 2 day shipping on quite a few products, free streaming videos and far more. Considering the average cost of shipping, it seems that at this price, AMZN would be losing money if consumers purchased only 2 products per month. However, looking into what Prime actually does for Amazon, it's clear to see that it's starting to become profitable.
Ultimately, it boils down to the amount of money Amazon Prime members spend on the retail website. Recent reports show that 74% of consumers that have signed up for Amazon Prime spend more on the website now that they are members. Not to mention that nearly 50% of Prime members spend more than $800 per year at the online retailer's site. Moreover, 68% of members that have been members for at least 4 years spend more than $800 per year on Amazon. When you look at the amount of members signed up for the service, it's easy to see that this is a significant source of revenue for AMZN.
When you first think of Amazon, chances are that the first thing you're thinking about is online retail. However, the company has a hidden weapon that's building in importance rather quickly. That secret weapon is called Amazon Web Services, also known as AWS. AWS is a cloud computing service that gives companies and consumers incredible infrastructure in the cloud. Not to mention, it's already incredibly popular.
According to CNN Money, Amazon Web Services is currently on pace to bring in more than $7 billion this year alone. That growth is continuing as well. In fact, most recent estimates show that AWS is likely to bring in $16.2 billion in revenue in the year 2017. That's huge! In fact, at $16.2 billion per year, Amazon Web Services alone would be worth about $160 billion!
Late last year, I lost hope in Amazon's stock. I got tired of seeing losses on earnings report after earnings report. However, I'm starting to realize the plan for the company. More importantly, I'm starting to see that they got the plan right! The reality is that Jeff Bezos isn't too concerned about profits at the moment. Instead, this genius CEO is focused on using low prices to build his brand, he's focused on using money that comes in to expand services and infrastructure. While this plan isn't bringing in massive profits at the moment, it's likely to bring in the big bucks down the road. All in all, I used to have a relatively bearish opinion with regard to what we could expect from this stock. However, with time, my opinion has made a complete 180. Ultimately, even at a valuation over 300 times earnings, AMZN is a great pick for those looking for long run growth.
What Do You Think About Amazon Stock?
Where do you think Amazon stock is headed and why? Let us know in the comments below!
I was lucky enough to buy Amazon stock back at $290 in January. I don't usually "catch a falling knife" but I figured that it would be one of my long-term buys. Little did I know that it would reach above $600 so quickly, so I sold. The price just seems to have had too much growth, too fast. Yes, Amazon has a bright future, but the growth will be incremental and will be subject to the law of diminishing returns. After all, it's much harder for a multi-billion company to grow 20% than it is for a newer, multi-million dollar company.
I guess if one were to buy Amazon and hold it for fifty years it wouldn't make too much of a difference. I agree with you that Amazon is a great pick for the long run, but this current price has me a little concerned. You're right – over 300 times earnings. Gulp!
I know there's opportunity for more growth but look at the share price growth in the last 10 months or so. Imagine if this article had been published a year ago before it'd already gone up 80% or so.
So a year ago when the stock price was much lower, you couldn't see the future potential for AMZN. Now that traction has been achieved and the business model is working the way Jeff Bezos intended, and the future is bright, and the stock market has already built all of this into the stock price, you recommend it as a buy.
I really wish your blog could have had some meaningful economic analysis about the future of AMZN, instead of merely stating the obvious.
You have inspired me to start a stock picking blog and to monetize it Mr. Rodriguez. Every day I will post a blog about a stock that has done really well in the past year, and recommend it as a long term hold.


I am in Peru at the moment... In San Blas, Cusco to be exact. This hippest part of Cusco it seems. Everything I want and need is here. Shawn, the owner of Antigua Cusco Hotel and where I had been staying, helped me set up my art studio behind his hotel. And any old materials lying around he said I could use. Result!
So, I'm working on a piece for Qura, a cool cafe in the area. I stumbled across it on the search for good coffee and an acai bowl. The place looked good inside with some nice art on the wall, but there was one blank white wall waiting to be filled. I sent my website to the owner offering to create a piece for the space and he texted me that night saying he loved my work and yes let's do this!


text:
Actor, 87, divorcing wife, 28, because won't have sex with him finds new lover
An 87-year-old Russian actor who wants to divorce his 28-year-old wife for not having sex with him has found a new lover a year younger than his spouse.
The Weirdest and Wildest Sex News of 2017
Before we get to the end of 2018, let's take a look back at some of the crazy crap that went down tin 2017!
11 signs you have a good sex life, even if you think you don't
Whether you're in a new relationship, playing the field, or in a long-term commitment, it's natural to wonder about the state of your sex life.
But the truth of the matter is, a 'good' sex life means something different for everyone.
If you're getting what you want and need, and you feel comfortable communicating your wants and needs with your partner, your sex life is probably pretty great.
Porn Star Daizha Morgann Shares Sex Advice
Daizha Morgann is as known for her racy social media presence as for her excellent octopus tattoo, which runs down her entire back down to her calves.
10 Weird Sexual Fetishes You Never Knew Existed!
There has been millions of researches on sexual psychology and still it's a highly controversial topic to talk about. Human sexuality is complicated and vast and this might surprise most of you but when it comes to sexual fetishes and eroticism, humans have no boundaries at all!
Webcam girl reveals the WEIRDEST thing that's happened during her kinky career
Sex in Strange Places
Not Sexting? Then you're wierd!
Looking at 734 Playboy Centerfolds in One Sitting


text:
Instagram bots in the debate of free labor
By: Edo Druiventak
About Edo Druiventak
In the recent years there has been a growing trend of Instagram bots creating accounts, liking content and posting comments on Instagram. For a cheap price, these bots are offered as a service, by sites such as Gramista to users who want to inflate their engagement with other users. These Instagram bots serve, specifically, as an effective marketing mechanism, mimicking human behavior, in order to attract the attention of users in the hopes that the users will follow or like them in return.
In an article, conducted by Digiday.com, an Instagram influencer has admitted the usage of Instagram bots, in order to artificially inflate the engagement with users. The influencer states that there was a necessity to grow followers, as brands pay influencers for their reach and their capability to make the products well known on certain platforms. Brands are willing to pay users to advertise products, as users are tended to click more on an ad if a friend likes that particular ad. In other words, this influencer reflects on the notion that user activities on Instagram can be seen as part of labor, as building a substantial followers base is fundamental to attract brands, which are willing to pay users to promote a product.
In this article I point out that Instagram bots, offered by web services such as Graminsta, allow us to critically reassess if user activities can be seen as a form of free labor that is being exploited by platforms such as Instagram. In the debate of free labor Terranova argues that web services are reliant on the activities of users, without financially compromising them for their activities. Simultaneously, Terranova argues that free labor is not necessarily exploited, as users voluntary generate activities and they seem to enjoy it. (Terranova 2012, 34). I argue that Instagram bots implicate the concept of free labor and exploitation, as it reveals the marketing and capitalistic objectives of (some) users on Instagram. Within this line of thought I argue that there is an asymmetrical relationship, between users and Instagram, as both strive for profit, but Instagram is extracting most economic value. Although one could argue that Gramista artificially generates the activities of users and thus they do not actually do the work, I argue that this argument is too black and white, as the Instagram bots work in such an unnoticeable way (due to the manner in which they mimic human behavior and the possibility for users to manually produce and consume content while the Instagram bots are active) that it blurs the lines between human production/consumption and technological production. Lastly, by considering Instagram bots as part of the production process of activities and content on platforms, I implicate concepts such as prosumer (Ritzer & Jurgenson 2008) and produser (Bruns 2008), which describes the blurring line between production and consumption on platforms that are typically referred to as human activities.
How do the Instagram bots on Graminsta work?
Graminsta is a service that puts science in marketing, by copying human behavior. To start the activities users need to connect their Instagram accounts, with the web service of Graminsta (image 1). In the dashboard users are presented with the current status and other vital information concerning their Instagram account. In the dashboard users can activate and deactivate functions like the Liker and Follower/Unfollower (image 2). The function Liker automatically likes other users content and is based on the notion that other people will like in return. You can adjust the speed level of this function. So it is possible that the Liker will like content on a slow level, but also on speed level. The smart mode will automatically follow and unfollow users. The basic idea is that when you follow people, they will follow you back. After a while when the smart mode has recognized that you've followed a maximum of followers it will start to unfollow those users, without them even knowing. The aim is to keep the amount of users that you follow low, while your followers base keeps on growing. In the setting users can target people according to hash tags, locations, blacklists and time zone.
Image 1: Add instagram account to Gramista
Image 2 Dashboard Gramista
Produser, Prosumer, Free labor and exploitation on Instagram
Fundamental to the debate of free labor is the intersection of production and consumption of content on Web 2.0 platforms such as Instagram. This intersection of production and consumption has led to portmanteaus such as:
Produser; which blurs the boundaries between the passive roles of users as media consumers and the active role of users as producers of media content. (Bruns 2008)
Prosumer; which elaborates on the intersection between production and consumption and adds that there is a trend towards users doing unpaid work, by offering products at no cost. It simultaneously raises questions concerning whether users are being exploited for their unpaid labor, as the owners of Web 2.0 enterprises extract value from this labor (Ritzer & Jurgenson 2008).
While these concepts are very useful to elaborate on in the discussion of how users are active producers and passive consumers of media content, these concepts seem to neglect the productivity of actors such as bots. One could argue that with regard to Instagram bots, that when we speak of the production of activities on Instagram, there is an intertwinement of active human and technological actors. I point out that this is due to that Instagram bots work in such an unobtrusive manner that it is possible, for users to manually produce and consume content, while the Instagram bots are active. This makes it difficult for other users to distinguish human activities from the activities of bots on the platform.
The blurring lines between human activities and the activities of Instagram bots is interesting, because it allows us to consider Instagram bots as an actor in the discussion of free labor, as they contribute to the production of media content. A scholar who elaborates on the notion of free labor and exploitation is Terranova, who points out that users can be seen as a source of monetary value in the digital economy, as web services are reliant on the participation and active contribution of users (2000). However, she point out that free labor is not necessarily exploited, as free labor is voluntarily given and users seem to enjoy the activities they undertake (Terranova 2012, 34). I argue that to some users the motives to (artificially) produce content is not simply, because they enjoy it, but that they see their activities as a way to market themselves in order to extract economic value. I argue that the Instagram bots play a significant role in this marketing process, as they stimulate the circulation of the content, and inflate the reach and influence of users on Instagram. One could point out that users are exploited for their labor on Instagram, as this platform draws on the audience participation to valorize the advertising space they sell to advertiser, but do not pay their audiences for it. As both parties (users and Instagram) try to maximize profit, users suffer infinite level of exploitation as the revenue of Instagram is forecasted to be at 5.5 billion and users are not compromised for their activities (Arvidsson & Colleoni 2012, 136). This creates an asymmetrical relationship between users and Instagram. In this sense, one could argue that users are exploited in the same sense as underpaid workers, because the notion that users voluntarily produce content and enjoy the activities on the platform does not always apply, as there are users whose motives are driven by marketing and capitalistic purposes.
Conclusion/Discussion
In this article I have discussed how Instagram bots implicate the notion of production and consumption on Instagram, by shedding light on the intertwinement of human and bot activities. I've argued how the use of Instagram bots reveals the marketing and capitalistic purposes of users and how their activities can be seen as a form of free labor that is exploited by Instagram, creating an asymmetrical relationship between users and Instagram. Although these insights are interesting, there are some shortcomings such as that Arvidsson & Colleoni argue that labor on online prosumer platforms are hardly related to time and that is what is being valorized is not the amount of likes or comments, but the ability to mobilize affective attention and engagement (2012, 135, 144). Due to the short length of this article I suggest that in further research one could take up this shortcoming by arguing that for users the time spent building ones account (artificially or not), is the time they need to invest to produce the equivalent of their own livelihood. Another shortcoming of these insights is that not all users have marketing and capitalistic motives and thus the notion of Instagram bots are not applicable for every user. To conclude, I want to suggest a solution for the asymmetrical relationship, where Instagram incorporates a function into their interface, where users can choose to promote a brand and get paid according to how many other users they have reached and influenced.
Arvidsson, Adam, and Elanor Colleoni. 2012. "Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet." The Information Society 28 (3): 135–50. doi:10.1080/01972243.2012.669449.
Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York:
Peter Lang. Ritzer, G. and Jurgenson, N. (2008) 'Producer, Consumer . . . Prosumer?', paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Boston, MA.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. "Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy." Social Text 18 (2): 33–58.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2012. "Free Labor." In Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory, edited by Trebor Scholz, 33–57. New York, NY: Routledge
Tags: bots, free labour, Instagram, produser, prosumer
− three =
« Dust in the wind: On air pollution and objectivity
The iPhone nudge and the choice to budge »
Free labor? An attempt to determine the value of user generated content – for the user
Writings on the value of user generated content tend to stress the (market) value users produce for companies such...
By Joep Hegger	on 10/04/11	1
Sharing or Free Labour? The Value of User-Generated Content on Lonely Planet's App Trips
Before going on holiday you probably ask a friend or family member for advice on the best cafe's, museums...
By Karis Mimms	on 09/25/17	0
#CopyPaste – The battle between Instagram and Snapchat
There is a battle going on between Instagram and Snapchat.. but who is on the winning hand? A-team...
By Arabella	on 09/21/16	0


For many irrigated lands in the western U.S., the potential exists for salt to accumulate in the root zone — the top few feet of soil, where plants' roots are prevalent. Such an accumulation of salt may adversely affect trees, shrubs, and other landscape plants.
Why is soil salinity of concern in arid and semi-arid regions?
What factors determine the degree to which salt accumulates in irrigated soil?
What management practices are available to control soil salinity?


Over the counter beauty products have their effectiveness, but are often limited by government restrictions on how much active ingredients are allowed in these formulas. So when a brand finds a way to introduce even higher levels of actives, while increasing efficacy and maintaining the safety of its products, it's a win-win for everyone. Says Kiehl's scientific director Dr Geoff Genesky, "We applied our vitamin C expertise to formulate our new version of Powerful Strength Line-Reducing Concentrate. But it still took a lot of work! Vitamin C is especially difficult to work with because it is highly unstable and can lose its effectiveness. Vitamin C efficacy degradation is especially a concern when it is used in high concentrations, like in Powerful-Strength. In fact, we tried 89 different variations before we created the perfect formula." Talk about trying till you succeed. The new formula has a pleasant aroma and feels light on the skin.
By combining two key ingredients — and increasing the concentration of vitamin C from 10.5 to 12.5 per cent — the brand successfully plumps lines and reduces wrinkles. Says Dr Genesky, "Studies have demonstrated that skin's hyaluronic acid content decreases with age and becomes more susceptible after increased amounts of sun exposure. We combined hyaluronic acid and vitamin C in the formula for better results, faster. Through its ability to immediately absorb into upper layers of the skin and provide a plumping effect, our formula with hyaluronic acid is effective in smoothing skin texture and diminishing facial lines." Although this is targetted at lines, it also improved the overall look of skin, so it looks radiant and even-textured.


Shop our selection of Fantasyard products at Unbeatablesale.com and get the biggest markdowns today! Unbeatablesale.com has over 700,000 products in stock with 204 of them being Fantasyard and related items.
We also offer a price match guarantee on our large selection of Fantasyard items, so you don't have to worry about overpaying for brand name and quality products. We also believe that the satisfaction of our customers comes first and foremost. We strive to provide the kind of customer service that will make Unbeatablesale.com your only on-line store for online retail products. Unbeatablesale.com offers around the clock online ordering and values your privacy; we will not sell or provide your information to any third parties. Shop secure and hassle-free today!


...everyone lives the same lifestyle, but unlike a typical "spoiled brat" he actually wants to help people and he believes that he is giving quality advice and commentary, even though it is clearly nonsense. He gives advice in the way that a teacher might explain something to a child; he is not "trying to be funny" nor is it done in an overly cartoonish way.
I'm now installing and learning Magento2.3.1. I have got error following HTTP error 500. [php7:error] [pid 5570] ...in /var/www/html/app/design/frontend/Smartwave/porto/Magento_Catalog/templates/product/view/[kirjaudu nähdäksesi URL:n] on line 18, referer: Please advice me for solve this problem. I am looking for someone who can give me advice on an ongoing basis.
As a frelancer I am having a variety of on-client apps, hosted Email and storage with different pro...who can give me an initial overview/guidance and develop a plan on how to get onboarded to Google. Besides, I am starting to collaborate with other colleagues and need some advice/guidance/best practices on how to structure the documents in G-drive.
I am the director of a CIC, (Community Interest Company CIC) in UK. I want the two agreements mentioned above to protect me fr...voting rights etc and also his profit share be subject to his time keeping and absents etc, and share buyback limits if he leaves within a set time? Also I will be looking for advice on any other clause I should be listing.
...incoming calls and texts from unwanted person. To be secret I will pay for someone who can develop this app or someone who will find this app and work on my phone. Please be advice that Huawei Mate 10 PRO cannot be rooted, if someone know how i will do it but it doesn't exist root for this phone Please bid after you know that you have something!