text:
Despite the dispensationalists' claim that their so-called literalistic premillennialism is superior to the other evangelical millennial views because Revelation 20:1-6 is one text that clearly sets forth their system, this view imposes the literalistic system unjustifiably and inconsistently on the most symbolic book in all the Bible, a book containing references to scorpions with faces like men and teeth like lions (Rev 9:7), fire-breathing prophets (Rev 11:5), a seven-headed beast (Rev 13:1), and more.
Response: First, it is not "literalistic" premillennialism. Dispensationalists recognize one can't be literalistic in one's interpretation of anything, including daily conversations. By "literal" we mean what everybody else means by it unless they are trying to give the term a spin it does not normally have in day to day usage. We mean what the "Nicene Council" meant when they posted the "95 Theses" and expected people to take their objections to dispensationalism at face value, believing that folks are smart enough to interpret any figures of speech correctly.
These objectors assert that, "dispensationalism has at least crippled the Church in her duty of proclaiming the gospel and discipling the nations" (Preface). When they wrote that sentence, these brethren took it for granted that people could identify the metaphor in it and make a literal sense out of it. That is, they assumed readers would know that "crippled" was not to be taken literalistically, but that it was functioning as a figure, meaning "harmed" or "impaired." Indeed, if they didn't think others would be able to derive a literal sense to the metaphor they would not have used it! They wish to be interpreted in a plain-sense manner, though not literalistically. They do not wish us to place some fanciful midrash upon their words so as to distort the plain sense out of all recognition. Well, this is how dispensationalists approach God's Word. They ask, "Can it be taken at face value? And if not, what are its parameters of meaning?"
This first question is crucial, for it is often not asked by Covenant theologians when they come up against prophetic texts. That said, let us see if the rest of this objection holds water.
First off, notice that Revelation 20:1-6 (actually 1-7) "is one text which clearly sets forth their system." This is true to a degree. It is one text. There are very many others! But this text does provide the duration of the future millennium. All one has to do is to read it to find out what that is. But can they? What about all the symbolism in the book? Dispensationalists will ask the questions put above: The first is, "Can it be taken at face value?" We answer, "Certainly! why not?" It is easy to interpret these verses literally. As non-dispensationalist George E. Ladd said, "The language of the passage is quite clear and unambiguous…The passage makes perfectly good sense when interpreted literally." (The Meaning of the Millennium ed. Robert Clouse, 37).
The trouble is not the difficulty in a plain-sense interpretation, but in what to do with that interpretation once it is allowed to stand. Amillennialists, for example, cannot allow it to stand as read. It would explode their system. They must make these verses mean something other than what they say. The first thing to do is to complain that Revelation is symbolic (as if this goes unnoticed among premillennialists). Then comes the pat objection that the numbers in Revelation are symbolic (this is usually done without any proof that they are to be so taken). The numbers in Revelation are not symbolic and always produce clear meanings when taken literally (this is even more the case when the number is repeated six times in the context as "1,000″ is here!).
From there the verb ezesan meaning "lived" or "came to life" is interpreted spiritually v. 4 and then literally in v.5. This entails making anastasis ("resurrection") in the context mean, they say, not physical resurrection (of people who had been beheaded remember!), but "the new birth"! We demur.
So whatever one makes of the other passages in the book of Revelation, chapter 20:1-6 means what it says. Finally, it must be seen within its larger context which clearly begins with the Second Coming in Revelation 19:11f. Again to cite Ladd: "Chapters 19-20 form a continuous narrative announcing the marriage of the Lamb, the victorious return of Christ, and his victory over his enemies." (Ibid. 35). Interpreted in its plain sense the passage proves premillennialism (though not necessarily in its dispensationalist form).
The Nicene Council are again employing what could be called a "hermeneutics of objection" whereby the plain teaching of a passage is disapproved of because it cuts across their theology.
Dispensationalism's claim that Revelation 20:1-6 is a clear text that establishes literalistic premillennialism has an inconsistency that is overlooked: it also precludes Christians who live in the dispensation of the Church from taking part in the millennium, since Revelation 20:4 limits the millennium to those who are beheaded and who resist the Beast, which are actions that occur (on their view) during the Great Tribulation, after the Church is raptured out of the world.
Response: While the passage in question does speak only of the martyrs of the Tribulation it does not assert that only they will experience the 1,000 year reign. For example, if the church is taken out of the world prior to the Tribulation, it seems reasonable to infer that, as the bride of Christ, its members will be with Christ in His earthly millennial kingdom. It appears the disciples and the twelves tribes of Israel will be there (Matt. 19:28); and the disciples were in the church (Eph. 2:20). This, then, is not a sound objection.
Despite the dispensationalists' view of the glory of the millennium for Christ and his people, they teach, contrary to Scripture, that regenerated Gentile believers will be subservient to the Jews, as we see, for instance, in Herman Hoyt's statement that "the redeemed living nation of Israel, regenerated and regathered to the land, will be head over all the nations of the earth…. So he exalts them above the Gentile nations…. On the lowest level there are the saved, living, Gentile nations."
Response: The quotation from Hoyt is to be found on page 81 of the book The Meaning of the Millennium and the reader is advised to consult it to see whether Hoyt cites Scripture for his view. Just saying something is contrary to Scripture does not make it so. What these brethren really mean to say is "contrary to our understanding of Scripture," which is a very different thing.
Hoyt paints the Millennial hierarchy like this: 1. Christ the King. 2. What Hoyt calls "a spiritual nobility" comprising the church, the OT saints and the tribulation martyrs. 3. The nation of Israel as head over all the other nations (Hoyt cites Deut. 28:1, 13; Isa. 41:8-16; 60:1-3, 12). Then he says, "On the lowest level there are the saved, living, Gentile nations."
Whether one agrees with every detail in Hoyt's description (which not all dispensationalists would), or with all the verses he uses (certain of which some might dispute), there is nothing "unbiblical" in his presentation. But this is beside the point of this particular objection, which seems to be contemptuous of the status of redeemed ethnic Israel in the future kingdom (a reading of Isa. 49, 55, 62 and Zech. 14 might help). Since Israel has never been "the head and not the tail" (see Deut. 28:1-13 – interpreting Israel as Israel), and a new covenant involving redemption has been made with them (Jer. 31:31ff.), dispensationalists expect God to be as good as His word and bring this to pass regardless of the personal feelings of anyone about the advisability of it.
What we have called a "hermeneutics of objection" is all that stands behind these kinds of arguments.
Despite dispensationalism's claim that the Jews will be dominant over all peoples in the eschatological future, the Scripture teaches that "In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria, and the Assyrians will come into Egypt and the Egyptians into Assyria, and the Egyptians will worship with the Assyrians. In that day Israel will be the third party with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, whom the Lord of hosts has blessed, saying, 'Blessed is Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, and Israel My inheritance.'" (Isa. 19:23-25).
Response: We are glad to see an attempt to take a prophetic utterance at face value. However, our friends ought to have noted verses 16-18 which describe a certain deference to Judah. The passage does not deny the supremacy of Israel in the coming kingdom, it simply states that there will be some sort of spiritual and economic union between them. The verse should be understood in light of the verses given above regarding Israel's dominant role, although we must take care not to introduce these verses before we have fully exegeted this passage in its context. Bringing in the "Analogy of Faith" (Scripture with Scripture) too soon is often the means of twisting an intransigent passage to accord with prior assumptions.
The End of the Age
Jack Hampton - Wed, 08/24/2011 - 11:28am
In Dr. Henebury's article we read him quoting Robert Thomas saying the following:
Concerning the "unaccountability" of unbelievers in the Millennium, Robert Thomas writes: "the battle of 19:19-21 resulted in death for all those not faithful to the Messiah. However, the redeemed but nonglorified population on earth survives the battle, enters the Millennium (cf. 11:13, 12:13-17), and reproduces offspring some of whom do not become saved as they mature. These unredeemed will comprise Satan's rebellious army at the Millennium's end." (Revelation 8-22: An Exegetical Commentary, 410-411)
I do not see any evidence that the battle of 19:19-21 results in the death of all the unbelievers upon the earth. I believe that the following verses describe exactly how all of the unbelievers will be removed at that time:
" He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the age; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this age. The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father" (Mt.13:37-43).
Expansion?
Andrew K. - Tue, 08/30/2011 - 8:06pm
"Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David…I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime" (2 Sam.7:8,10).
In my view, these land promises will yet be fulfilled, only more so. That is, the land has been expanded to the whole earth, and Israel has been expanded from merely the ethnic descendants (while not excluding an ethnic remnant, even as is so today) to include spiritual descendants as well. (Although I do think Romans 11 makes it clear that a time will come when the Gentiles largely reject the gospel, only for it to return to many of those who self-identify as Jews.)
If I paid money for a car, and was delivered anything other than a car, the contract would be broken. The Lord made certain material promises to Abraham, David, etc. about their future state. Anything other than that violates the promise. The Lord did a valid and binding covenant with Abraham when he passed through the divided livestock. It was as binding a commitment as Abraham's culture permitted. I believe Abraham would have been surprised to discover that his biological descendants are not necessarily included, and physical land is not part of the deal.
But what if twenty cars were given? And a fleet of jets, and an airport? Would the contract be broken then?
神是爱
"Expansion" Plus Denial?
Paul Henebury - Wed, 08/31/2011 - 11:01am
Andrew, thank you for putting a rational claim together. I despair of people who equate citing selections from any book as teaching it. May I offer a few thoughts in reply?
Firstly, I welcome any solid critique or counter-proposal to dispensationalism. I am a "reluctant dispensationalist" because I am convinced it needs an overhaul. For one thing, calling it "Dispensationalism" is self-defeating, let alone defining it by such a theologically empty thing as a "dispensation." I have written about it, e.g., here: [url ]http://drreluctant.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/articles-on-dispensationalism/
Saying this does not mean that I am eager to depart for other fields. It means that while I accept "dispensational premillennialism," I do not think a system of theology can be built upon dispensational premises. Let me clarify: I believe the general hermeneutical approach is right, and a system can and should be erected on that approach, but it's not all about dispensations - which are incidental to the procedure.
Anyway, from my point of view it seems ironic that a position which rejects the plain sense of passages like Jer. 33:14ff. or Ezek. 36-37; 40-48 would employ the word "expansion" in such an ambiguous way. Since this view must read these and many other promises first with an attitude of denial (no future Davidic throne on earth in Jerusalem; no future Levitical priesthood, no future temple), then with a reinterpretation which alters the original terms of the promises, I find it a little disingenuous to use the word "expansion." While ,some sort of "expansion" may be in view, it is clear that a lot of replacement and change are envisaged. This word "expansion" seems to have been adopted only recently by supercessionists to appear a bit more PC. I am not at all accusing you Andrew of deception. But, just as the God you propose spoke misleadingly in the texts cited above, so to use "expansion" without coming clean on other agendas (E.g. the Church = the new Israel) looks to many of us to be less than candid.
Dr. Paul Henebury
I am Founder of Telos Ministries, and Senior Pastor at Agape Bible Church in N. Ca.
Gentiles Believers Are Not "Spiritual Jews"
Jack Hampton - Wed, 08/31/2011 - 12:24pm
Andrew K. wrote:
In my view, these land promises will yet be fulfilled, only more so. That is, the land has been expanded to the whole earth, and Israel has been expanded from merely the ethnic descendants (while not excluding an ethnic remnant, even as is so today) to include spiritual descendants as well.
At the Jerusalem Council the leaders of the church were faced with the fact that some were saying that the Gentiles must be circumcised and therefore become full fledged members of the commonwealth of Israel.
However, James used the OT to demonstrate that in the future, when the Lord Jesus returns, the Gentiles will be saved as Gentiles so he ruled that the Gentiles did not need to be circimcised:
"'After this I will return and rebuild David's fallen tent. Its ruins I will rebuild, and I will restore it, that the remnant of men may seek the Lord, and all the Gentiles who bear my name, says the Lord, who does these things" (Acts 15:16-17).
There is no hint that at the time when the Lord Jesus returns that the Gentiles will be considered as being anything other than Gentiles and therefore they are not "spiritual Jews," as some teach.
Gentile Believers Are Indistinguishable from "Spiritual Jews"
bagridd - Fri, 09/02/2011 - 2:57pm
Nevertheless, Gentiles are "made nigh" to "the commonwealth of Israel" by the blood of Christ":
Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: 13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
In the context of Acts 15:8-19, James used the OT to confirm how God, in the present, "... put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith (v.9)," to show that Amos' prophecy concerning the salvation of Gentiles had come to pass. Paul concurs in Romans 15:
8 Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: 9 And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, 'For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name'. 10 And again he saith, Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people (vs. 8-10).
Explicitly, Paul taught that, after the Lord Jesus' first coming, a Jew was a spiritual, not ethnic, individual, "For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God (Romans 2:28,29)."
Paul declares this 'circumcision of the heart' to be the condition of Colossian Gentiles: "And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ (Colossians 2:10,11)."
In Christ Jesus, a Gentile believer is indistinguishable, spiritually, from an 'inward Jew', "For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh (Philippians 3:3; cf. Galatians 3:27-29)."
For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


As written above, my external (WD) harddisk drive cannot be accessed. At first it ask me to format my drive but i clicked no. then i used testdisk to write to the table. and then i restarted my computer. but then now it says drive is not accessible? How???!!! NEED HELP!!!
But I've no idea about your current partition table.
Would it be possible to give me some infos from TestDisk and Analyse about your current partition structur (partition table)?
When i clicked quick search it shows this.
At least your partition table looks ok.
Do you have no access to all three partitions?
At your second screen, where your partition are listed green, if you check a partition and press p, do you see your data or an error message?
I don't see any faulty boot sector either, because if a boot sector would be faulty, TestDisk wouldn't list that partition after Quick Search.
Please let me know did you see your data and another screen from your disk management console would be appreciated also!
Sometimes it was necessary to add a drive letter in the disk management console and some other user experienced problems about ownership.
'Main' is J: drive, 'others' is K: drive and school is L: drive.
what do you mean green list?
If you check your partition "others" in testdisk, and press p, did you see your data or an error message.
If you're able to list your data in TestDisk you should copy them to another intact drive/partition.
I don't recommend to copy the entire disk.
Recycler and System volume information are system folders and can cause trouble.
Everything else can be copied.
This is what i get when i go press p in 'others' K: drive. I can't see my info in the drive. But other drives can see.
Unfortunately it looks like that your file system from your K:-drive (others) is damaged.
CRC-error (Cyclic Redundancy Check) means that the checksum is not valid and indicates a damaged file system.
Windows doesn't display the label "others" but only local disk.
A safe solution would be datarecovery software.
But you can teste to have a rebuild of your boot sector as a diagnose.
As long as you don't confirm at Write as long you're not going to change anything.
It's only intended to have another try to list your data and copy them to another intact disk or partition.
It's the same procedure as described in my link above.
In the menu Advanced you must select your partition "other" to diagnose it.
Run rebuild BS as explained in the other topic.
Don't use Write or Repair MFT.
Have another try to list your data.
If you still would have an empty partition, the next step would be datarecovery software.
Hi, You said to Rebuild BS. but after that this page shows up. so am i suppose to list or dump it?


I received a call from a Constable Kelly who was investigating some woman posing as me to try to get money from my Royal Bank account via Visa. I was to call the 1-800 number on the back of my credit card. When I called this number, someone called Spencer said the call had been forwarded to him, because there was an attempt at identity fraud.
He seemed to have enough information about me including the name of my son. We were to catch this person when she went to the bank at 3 pm to withdraw $15,000. The bank was on to this scheme and would give her the money in counterfit $100 bills. I was to go to the bank beforehand to withdraw the money for safekeeping and to make note of the tellers and traffic.
I could only get $5 grand at one time and arranged to have $10K for a cash pickup 4 days from now (April 4, 2018). When I returned home, Spencer phoned and I told him I had $5K cash. He said he would call me at 4 pm to let me know if the scheme worked. I called Visa and found that no one by the name of Spencer was employed for that morning, so I talked to Lisa and another person who advised me that it was a scam, and not to answer the phone.
The phone rang 3 times at 4 pm, and once this morning and I have not answered. I might try to tape the call. I have informed the bank manager and checked my accounts to see if any withdrawals occurred.
Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Bank Examiner Scam.


text:
Unitary Executive: Too Much Power for One Person?
Posted by Rina Shah | Sep 8, 2020
This article is an excerpt from the Shortform summary of "The Federalist Papers" by Alexander Hamilton. Shortform has the world's best summaries of books you should be reading.
What is unitary executive theory? How does Federalist Paper 70 address concerns about a unitary executive?
Unitary executive theory is a concept in the Constitution where the President controls the Executive Branch of government. Federalist Paper 70 defends this structure.
Read more about Federalist 70 and what it says about unitary executive theory.
What Is Unitary Executive Theory?
Some opponents of the new Constitution feared that a unitary executive was dangerous because it placed executive authority in the hands of one individual. But this was the only way such authority could properly be wielded according to Federalist 70. Experiments in government by committee had proven unsuccessful, whether with the consuls of ancient Rome or with the executive councils that had existed in some of the states and colonies.
Federalist Paper 70 points out where the lack of a unitary executive could go wrong. In times of great national emergency, such as war, executive councils failed to move with the necessary speed and decisiveness required for effective action. They tended to be torn by rival factions and forced to settle on compromise solutions to pressing issues.
Furthermore, Federalist 70 notes that they made it difficult for the public to properly assign blame or credit for acts of government—a crucial right in a free republic. People would never be sure which factions or individuals on the executive council were responsible for which decisions.
With the checks on the unitary executive authority we described earlier in the chapter, it was clear that the President would not become too powerful. It was unnecessary, therefore (and dangerous) to dilute the power of the chief executive by placing it in multiple hands.
Term Duration and Term Limits
It was also important that the president be elected to a term that was long enough for him to gain sufficient experience with national administration. Having a fixed, four-year term would provide the young nation with the stability and predictability in government that it had so sorely lacked under the Articles of Confederation.
There was little to fear in this, as many state constitutions elected their governors to even longer terms. If the people disapproved of the president's performance, they were free to vote him out at the next election.
The ability of the president to run for reelection was also essential to effective government. If the President was barred from maintaining his office past the next election, he would have little motivation to do it effectively. After all, there would be no reward for good performance by the unitary executive.
Term limits deprived the people of the option to reelect presidents of whom they approved. Imposing term limits would hamper the effectiveness of the executive branch (making the president a lame-duck the second he assumed office), introduce destabilizing inconsistency in government, and deprive the nation of the talents of capable officials who had proven themselves to be effective leaders.
(Shortform note: These warnings against presidential term limits went unheeded almost immediately. George Washington began an informal precedent of only serving two terms, one that was followed by every president for nearly 150 years, until Franklin Roosevelt was elected to a third term in 1940 and a fourth in 1944. The Twenty-Second Amendment, passed in 1951, gave Washington's precedent the force of law, limiting presidents to two terms in office.)
Like what you just read? Read the rest of the world's best summary of Alexander Hamilton's "The Federalist Papers" at Shortform .
Here's what you'll find in our full The Federalist Papers summary :
The genius of the founding fathers in how they designed the United States Constitution
Why it was critical for the United States to form a union rather than stay separated as colonies
How Alexander Hamilton anticipated social issues that are still relevant today
Rina Shah September 8, 2020 September 23, 2020 Ethics, Society
← Penelope in The Absolutely True Diary: Junior's Friend
Testimonium Flavianum: Does it Mention Jesus? →
Rina Shah
An avid reader for as long as she can remember, Rina's love for books began with The Boxcar Children. Her penchant for always having a book nearby has never faded, though her reading tastes have since evolved. Rina reads around 100 books every year, with a fairly even split between fiction and non-fiction. Her favorite genres are memoirs, public health, and locked room mysteries. As an attorney, Rina can't help analyzing and deconstructing arguments in any book she reads.
The Dangers of a Surveillance Economy, According to Zuboff
Emily Kitazawa September 2, 2022 September 15, 2022
How to Take Care of Our Environment With Mutual Care
Katie Doll January 13, 2023 January 16, 2023
Adam Grant: Why Do People Give?
Hannah Aster August 23, 2021 September 1, 2021
Understanding Communism: Basic Principles and Ideas
Carrie Cabral October 28, 2020 October 31, 2020
5 Common Communication Problems + How to Fix Them
Carrie Cabral June 25, 2020 June 28, 2020
Tim Harford: Is Globalization Good for the Economy?
Darya Sinusoid July 17, 2021 July 20, 2021

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Valentino: The Last Emperor
Valentino is undeniably one of the most important designers in modern fashion history, and certainly well deserving of the title "The Last Emperor". The film opens today in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco but has already premiered at the Toronto Film Festival and Venice Film Festival.
Enjoy the clip from the new documentary and then head over to Style.com for the Q&A Interview with director Matt Tyrnauer.
I can't wait to see this film! And best part from the clip above:
"Compared to us, the rest are making rags."
— Lagerfeld, whispered to Valentino


Unigin Screen has sold many screens and installed for many entertainment / theme parks / fun fairs over the world.
Unigin Screen is a professional metal screen manufacturer and we fabricate the products which have been applied to dome screen projection system, Three-dimentional (3D) dome screen, Immersive dome screen, Immersive dome screen theatre, Immersive theater, digital dome screen, giant dome screen, dome screen cinema, dome screen projection and the dome screen with flying simulator.
Additionally, UniginScreen also provides dome cleaning service to customers.
The entertainment industry has a relates to media equipment of interaction experience theater, multi-media fly simulator, 3D technology, virtual environment, projected experience theater, dome screen theater, high resolution immersive dome screen, stereo theater to make audiences immersed in the scene they are seeing and imagining they are being.
The entertainment industry with experiencing theater / dome screen theater has immersive theater, open experience theater, multi-media theater, virtual environment, digital dome screen, interaction dome screen theater, fly simulation theater, geometry theater and sphere screen cinema are bringing people into the scene they are seeing.
Museum has both of the projection type which are dome screen projection system, 360 degree dome screen projection and stereo dome screen projection.
1. Unigin Screen provides the customers for dome cleaning service to prevent the screens from the dusts.
2. Unigin Screen can satisfy all requirements from customers′ needs and find out the most appropriate solutions.
UniginScreen has sold many screens and been there for installation for many entertainment / theme parks / fun fairs over the world. These products are built for experiencing theater and dome screen theater which belong to entertainment industry media equipment. This can bring people getting into the scene that they are seeing currently and start their adventure journey. Unigin Screen can see the giant cinema screen, dome screen, U-shaped screen and 3D hard metal screen will be the trend of the future.


text:
Judge is an occupational surname of British origin. The first recorded instance of the surname is in 1309 in the Middle, English Occupation Register,  Worcester, England.

Notable people with the surname include:

In arts and entertainment
Arline Judge (1912–1974), American actress
Christopher Judge (born 1964), American actor
David Judge (actor) (born 1983), British actor
Frank Judge (born 1940s), American poet, publisher, translator, journalist, film critic, teacher, and arts administrator
Gurbani Judge (born 1987), Indian Actress and Model better known as VJ Bani
Jack Judge (1872–1938), British songwriter
Jonathan Judge, American television director and producer
Malcolm Judge (1918–1989), British cartoonist
Mark Judge (writer) (born 1964), American author and journalist
Maureen Judge (born 1955), Canadian filmmaker
Mike Judge (born 1962), American actor, animator, writer, producer, director and musician
Simran Judge, Indian-American actor

In government and politics
Carl Judge, Australian politician
David Judge (born 1950), British political scientist
Francis G. Judge (1908-1994}, American politician
Igor Judge (born 1941), British judge
John Judge (politician) (born 1944), American politician
Patty Judge (born 1943), American politician
Thomas Lee Judge (1934–2006), American politician
Virginia Judge (born 1956), Australian former politician

In religion
Mychal Judge (1933–2001), American Catholic priest
William Judge (1850–1899), American Jesuit priest
William Quan Judge (1851–1896), Irish-American mystic, esotericist, occultist, Theosophist

In sport
Aaron Judge (born 1992), American baseball player
Alan Judge (English footballer) (born 1960)
Alan Judge (Irish footballer) (born 1988)
Betty Judge (1921–2015), Australian athlete
David Judge (field hockey) (1936–2015), Irish field hockey player and coach, represented Great Britain at the 1964 Olympics
Joe Judge (baseball) (1894–1963), American baseball player
Joe Judge (American football) (born 1981), American football coach
Joe Judge (footballer) (born 1947), Scottish footballer
Ken Judge (1958–2016), Australian football player and coach
Matthew Judge (born 1985), English footballer
Michael Judge (born 1975), Irish snooker player
Peter Judge (cricketer) (1916–1992), British cricketer
Samantha Judge (born 1978), British hockey player
Tim Judge (born 1964), American former professional bicycle motocross racer

In other fields
Anthony Judge (born 1940), Australian knowledge management researcher
Barbara Judge (1946–2020), American-British lawyer and businesswoman
Bernard M. Judge (1940–2019), American journalist
Darrell Lynn Judge (1934–2014), American physicist
Joan Judge, British history professor
Mark Judge (architect), British architect
Oney Judge (1773–1848), American slave of George Washington's family
Paul Judge (1949–2017), British businessman and government advisor, endowed Cambridge Judge Business School

See also
Judge (disambiguation)

References

Occupational surnames
Surnames of British Isles origin
English-language occupational surnames

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Trains from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick
Smethwick (Any)
Home Destinations Smethwick Galton Bridge Trains from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick
From How Wood (Hertfordshire), our trains run up to 1 times per hour to Smethwick.
Train journey information from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick
How much is a train ticket from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick by train?
Catch the train from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick from just £7 one-way when you book in advance.
How long does it take to travel from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick by train?
Our fastest train to Smethwick takes 2 hours 55 minutes. Journey times may be slightly longer on weekends or public holidays. Use our Journey Planner to access downloadable timetables, live departures and arrivals. Stay connected while on the move with our free on-board WiFi and entertainment service. Access a range of entertainment, including TV programmes, magazines, short films, news and more!
How many trains a day are there from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick?
There are up to 21 trains per day from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick.
Are there any direct trains from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick?
No, it is not possible to travel from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick direct. Use our Journey Planner to access downloadable timetables and find information on live departures and arrivals.
What time is the first train from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick?
The first train departs from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick at 06:15. Book your tickets in advance and enjoy a few more minutes of hitting snooze.
What time is the last train from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick?
The last train from How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick departs at 22:54.
Smethwick Galton Bridge
How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Tring
How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Long Buckby
How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Crewe
How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Tipton
More trains from Smethwick
Smethwick to Fenny Stratford
Smethwick to Duddeston
Smethwick to The Lakes (Warks)
Smethwick to Penkridge
Smethwick to Wood End
Wolverton to Birmingham Snow Hill
Lidlington to Earlswood (West Midlands)
Five Ways to Bilbrook
Worcester Shrub Hill to Warwick Parkway
Ridgmont to Yardley Wood
More tickets types between How Wood (Hertfordshire) to Smethwick


text:
Imagining an Alternative Pandemic Response
I received my first shot of the Moderna vaccine yesterday -- which naturally got me thinking about how this should've been accessible much, much sooner. I don't think anyone's particularly happy about the way that our pandemic response played out, but there's probably a fair bit of variation in what people think should've been done differently. What alternative history of COVID-19 do you wistfully yearn after? Here's mine (imagining that these lessons were taken on board from the start)...
In early Feb 2020, with Covid declared a "global health emergency" by the WHO, American scientists prioritize preparing a low-dose "challenge strain" of the virus in case it is needed for emergency immunity research.
By early March, as the seriousness of the pandemic becomes clear, the emergency research protocols are approved by the president, and hundreds of volunteers enlisted (mostly young and healthy, but also some terminal patients and elderly altruists who want to help produce a better world for their great-grandkids).
A strict (but temporary) lockdown is implemented for the last two weeks of March, to buy time while the nation waits on the results of the emergency immunity research. "Immunity passports" grant lockdown exceptions to those who have already recovered from the illness. Those in possession of immunity passports are highly favoured for "essential work" to minimize transmission risk to others. There are reports of occasional "pox parties" as some groups pursue immunity via uncontrolled infection, but these are widely condemned as premature and irrational with immunity research results expected any day now...
Finally, the early results are revealed, with the tested vaccines proving surprisingly effective. Deaths in the placebo group spark public outrage that high-risk individuals weren't given access to a life-saving vaccine (while scientists push back against this, writing op-eds to explain to the public the importance of placebo-controlled trials for quickly verifying efficacy). Under immense public pressure, Congress passes billions of dollars of funding to ramp up vaccine production as quickly as possible -- with the aim of vaccinating everyone over 70 years of age by the end of summer, and every adult in America by the end of 2020.
Challenge trials continue for other candidate vaccines. Meanwhile, evidence that younger people are at minimal risk from low-dose viral exposures, whilst still securing at least short-term immunity after recovering, creates pressure on public health authorities to approve the targeted use of controlled, low-dose inoculation to create "firewalls" of immunity to contain local outbreaks and protect the most vulnerable populations until vaccine production has ramped up sufficiently. Elder care facilities and other institutions are required to use immunity-certified workers to protect their vulnerable populations, or risk bankruptcy when sued for reckless endangerment.
Over the summer, most college students secure immunity certificates (half via controlled inoculation, half via uncontrolled "pox parties") so as to be able to attend classes in-person come the fall. A small proportion of these individuals fail to self-isolate as required while infected, sparking minor outbreaks in their local communities, and much public debate about whether deliberate non-consensual viral exposure should be criminalized. With widespread testing availability and contact tracing protocols in place, most of the local outbreaks are able to be contained, and epidemiological models suggest that community spread was still reduced on net compared to an alternative situation in which most college students remained susceptible to infection -- as a larger proportion could then be expected to accidentally spread the virus through their communities. So, despite some grumbling from the general public, inoculation continues through the summer.
By Fall, most elderly and youths have secured immunity (via vaccines for the former group, and inoculation for the latter), and so there's a general sense of "returning to normalcy". Early immunity certificates begin to expire, prompting booster inoculations to ensure continued immunity. Many cautious middle-aged folks continue to socially distance until they're able to be vaccinated. But with so many immunity-certified younger adults employed in service roles from childcare and teaching to restaurant and grocery deliveries, even the most Covid-cautious are generally able to feel as secure as they wish to be in their day-to-day lives, without excessive disruption. Youth unemployment is the lowest that it's ever been.
The biggest political dispute concerns what to do about middle-aged institutional workers (e.g. teachers and elder-care workers) who lack immunity certification while refusing inoculation or (if available) vaccination. Teacher's Unions argue that their members should receive full pay for offering online classes, even if no students sign up -- as the latter prefer the in-person schooling provided by the swelling ranks of inoculated "Teach for America" grads. The inoculated argue back that it isn't fair to tax them more to subsidize those who freely choose to contribute less than they do. Eventually a compromise is reached by which teachers can be covered by generous unemployment compensation while taking a temporary "personal leave" from their workplace.
By the end of 2020, most American adults have been vaccinated, and the government is able to sell off tens of millions of excess doses to other countries where troubling "variants" of the virus are starting to cause alarm...
[P.S. Yes, I know that realistically no policy rollout would go this smoothly. But I still think it can be worth imagining better ways things could have gone, to help motivate taking alternative policy suggestions seriously in the first place. Once it's on the table and recognized as a legitimate option worthy of debate, we of course need to delve into more detail regarding possible implementation failures, risks, etc. I'm happy for folks to discuss any of that in the comments. You're also welcome to set out your own alternative vision for how you wish pandemic policy had unfolded...]
Labels: ethics - pandemic Posted by Richard Y Chappell at 11:01 am
Phil Tanny 6:23 pm, May 01, 2021
You ask, "What alternative history of COVID-19 do you wistfully yearn after?"
I wish that the pandemic might remind us that really big, really bad things actually can happen, and that this insight would cause to renew an interest in nuclear weapons.
You know how we are now regretting that we've lived in denial about the reality of pandemics for decades, and thus weren't adequately prepared for the current pandemic? We're making that same mistake today with nuclear weapons.


text:
In latest UFO disclosure, Congress admits to being briefed on possible threat of flying saucers
The US military appears to be under observation by these strange objects, and Congressional leaders are clamoring for more information.
UFO's, Area 51, and the threat of extraterrestrial visitors to the United States have all been part of recent news cycles, often in unexpected ways.
The American obsession with the strange phenomenon has been rampant ever since the alleged crash of a flying saucer on a ranch just outside of Roswell, New Mexico in 1947. The official government explanation for the incident is that a weather balloon made of then-rare materials fell from the sky, prompting a bit of a panic for the citizens of the southwest, however, that story has been largely met with skepticism among those investigating the incident.
Now, some 70 years later, strange craft are still zipping about the skies above the United States, with American military personnel finally revealing the extent to which our government has been studying the subject.
The Navy even released an incredible video of an encounter between fighter jet pilots and a "tic-tac" shaped craft from the early 2000's.
Now, further disclosure of the government's attempts to study these craft is being revealed, as Congressional leaders admit to being briefed by military leaders on the incidents.
The Senators on the Intelligence Committee were given the briefing about a series of encounters between US Navy planes and unidentified aircraft, one of them has said.
A spokeswoman for Senator Mark Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, confirmed the briefing took place.
"If naval pilots are running into unexplained interference in the air, that's a safety concern Senator Warner believes we need to get to the bottom of," Rachel Cohen told Politico.
President Donald Trump has indicated that, despite being similarly briefed on the encounters, he does not believe that the objects are of extraterrestrial origin.
The news comes just days after a video purporting to show an elongated, oval-shaped UFO hovering above the infamous Area 51 military base was released by an amateur investigator.
In this article:Area 51, congress, Featured, military, UFO
POTUS makes controversial decision regarding Iran strike, not a minute too soon
Shocking new Pentagon reports puts nuclear warfare back on the table


text:
Femmes Fatales Nov 22 2020
She had more facets and more talent than most.
This photo shows U.S. actress, poet, screenwriter, playwright, journalist, and activist Ruby Dee. That's a lot of professions, but we're mainly concerned with her acting. In pursuit of that passion she appeared in such films as St. Louis Blues, Raisin in the Sun, and on television shows like The Fugitive and Peyton Place. This is a mighty nice image of one of Hollywood's most respected multi-hyphenates. It's from 1962.
Louis BluesRaisin in the SunThe FugitivePeyton PlaceRuby Deeliteraturetelevision
Vintage Pulp Aug 26 2020
Ancient Zapotec treasures bring out the tomb raider in everyone.
This poster was made for the 1953 adventure Plunder of the Sun, a title which may sound familiar from David Dodge's 1951 novel. The movie starred Glenn Ford, Patricia Medina, and Diana Lynn, and follows the basic gold hunting theme of the book, but with numerous plot details altered, and the exotic locations around Latin America—particularly Peru—condensed to only Havana and the province of Oaxaca, Mexico. The Havana scenes were shot in Mexico, but the Oaxaca scenes were indeed shot in southeastern Mexico, with location work at the Zapotec ruins in Monte Alban. You can practically hear the head honcho at Wayne-Fellows Productions saying, "I love this book, but we've got to make it cheaper. Why go all the way to Peru when there are perfectly good ruins in Mexico?" The Oaxaca locations are great, though, and extensively used, which really helps the film. Are we saying Plunder of the Sun is good? Well, no we aren't. It doesn't have the depth needed to earn a place in the top ranks of vintage cinema, but it's well shot, and its proto-Indiana Jones feel is interesting enough to keep you watching. We have a few promo images below, and you can learn more about the plot by checking our write-up on the novel here.
MexicoOaxacaHavanaPlunder of the SunGlenn FordDiana LynnPatricia MedinaCharles Roonerposter artcinemamovie review
Vintage Pulp May 30 2019
Mari Atsumi goes searching for her place in the sun.
Above, two beautiful posters for Taiyo wa mita, aka I Saw the Sun, with Mari Atsumi. We couldn't track this one down but we know it's a drama set in a seaside town and know it premiered in Japan today in 1970. We already shared a really nice promo image for the film here, and if we learn more we'll report back.
JapanTaiyo wa mita太陽は見たI Saw the SunMari Atsumiposter artcinemapinku
Femmes Fatales Sep 22 2017
She was Japan's best sailing actress.
This fantastic sea-themed Daiei Film Co. promo image shows Japanese pinku actress Mari Atsumi, who by now probably needs no introduction. But in case she does, click here to see and read everything we've posted on her. The image comes from her 1970 film Taiyo wa mita, aka I Saw the Sun.
JapanDaiei Film Co.Taiyo wa mita太陽は沈まないI Saw the SunMari Atsumipinku
Vintage Pulp Mar 16 2015
This trip sucks! Next time let's just pay extra for first class!
The Mercenaries, aka Dark of the Sun isn't a movie many remember, but we're going to remember it, because this is a great pre-CGI action film—not perfect, but well above average. Based on Wilbur Smith's novel Train from Katanga, and starring Rod Taylor, Jim Brown, Peter Carsten, and Yvette Mimieux, it tells the story of two mercenaries in the civil war-torn Congo hired to ride a military train upcountry, rescue a group of stranded people, and retrieve $50 million in uncut diamonds languishing in a time-locked safe. They have to do it within three days, which means making rushed preparations—notably, enlisting the aid of a dodgy ex-Nazi who commands the Congolese mercs needed to round out the mission. This Nazi is a really bad human, so it's no surprise he gets into a chainsaw fight with the protagonist shortly after they meet. You'd think the hero would expect the unexpected from the guy after that—but no. The Japanese poster above, while not perfectly descriptive of the action, gets the mood of The Mercenaries across effectively, and it opened in Japan today in 1968.
JapanCongoMetro-Goldwyn-MayerTrain From KatangaThe MercenariesDark of the SunRod TaylorJim BrownYvette MimieuxWilbur SmithPeter Carstennazisposter artcinemamovie review
Politique Diabolique Oct 14 2013
London drug raid uncovers no drugs but raises serious questions.
Over the weekend, a squad of drug cops raided the London flat of a woman named Natalie Rowe based on what they described as a "tip from a member of the public." The drug cops found no drugs, no drug paraphernalia, no sign that drugs had ever been consumed in the apartment. Why is this such an interesting story? Because Rowe, formerly a prominent madam who procured women for paying male customers, is mere days from publishing an autobiography in which she details early 1990s sex and drug parties attended by various Tory politicians. She claims one of the politicians was current Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne. He appears in the photo above with Rowe, along with what she says is a line of cocaine (in full, fat view between the yellow vase and the wine glass).
After the raid Rowe made an official complaint to police, saying she suspected she was targeted because of her forthcoming book. She was quoted in the tabloid The Sunday People: "I'm not into conspiracy theories. I'd like to think the fact I've been unfairly targeted by the police has nothing to do with the fact my book is about to be published, which happens to be very embarrassing for the Chancellor. But it's certainly made me wonder." Well, we're into conspiracy theories and we'll just come out and say that, especially in light of all the other dubious police activity in Great Britain these days, you'd have to be willfully blind to think the raid occurred for any other reason than at the behest of an influential government official.
Think about it. Would a mere "tip from a member of the public" trigger an expensive full-scale drug raid, with no corroborating intelligence whatsoever, such as surveillance, reports from undercover police, or multiple complaints from neighbors? If so, any Brit with a personal enemy now knows how to ruin that person's day. A single tip will bring a phalanx of police crashing through their door. Does your neighbor's dog bark late at night? Call the drug cops. Did some total ass get a promotion you wanted? Call the drug cops. So, let's dismiss with this "tip from a member of the public" nonsense. Clearly, a full-scale drug raid that takes place with no corroborating intelligence doesn't occur because of some random tip. It occurs because someone with great influence wants it to happen.
Were we to speculate, we'd suggest that the cops were searching for anything that would justify serious charges against Rowe and cast doubt on whatever she has written. But it seems they failed to find any leverage. Do we actually care if George Osborne hoovered rails of coke in his youth? Not in the least. It puts him in the same company as many politicians, including Barack Obama, who wrote in his autobiography of how in his youth he did "a little blow." But the raid, which looks to us like pure abuse of power, is certainly a troubling event in a country that many residents already believe is morphing into a police state. Is some plebe threatening your status and/or power? Call the drug cops. In any case, we've got our Kindle charged and ready for Rowe's book.
LondonThe Sunday PeopleGeorge OsborneBarack ObamaNatalie Roweprostitutiondrugs
Vintage Pulp Sep 21 2013
You know the saying there's a thin line between love and hate? Duel in the Sun shows just how thin.
Duel in the Sun was a huge movie. We mean important stars, vibrant Technicolor, David O. Selznick in the producer's chair, King Vidor directing the action, and a gigantic promotional budget. It's a movie made by people absolutely sure they're dealing with the hit of the year. Not because the movie is good. But because with so many important people involved it simply had to succeed. And like so many other movies of that stripe, its failures are manifold. We could talk about the overcooked score, the bombastic acting, the improbable script, and more, but there's no point. Let's just say a story about two people who love each other so much they end up shooting each other in the final scene is going to be hard to pull off under the best of circumstances. Spoiler alert, by the way. Or were we supposed to write that first?
Well, in any case, the best of circumstances are not those provided by Duel in the Sun's old West backdrop. Still, though, if a movie is big enough it can bludgeon people into acceptance, and Duel in the Sun today rates well on various review sites. But all of those reviewers are wrong. And the funny thing is they know it, too. They all say things like, "Preposterous but worth the ticket price because it's beautifully shot." One critic calls it "fragmented and ultimately destroyed by its obsessive producer," yet goes on to give it a positive recommendation. You see what we mean? Even professional critics sometimes suffer from cognitive dissonance. A movie that is destroyed by its producer is not good—period—and movie going shouldn't be a mercy fuck.
On the plus side, Gregory Peck is always fun to watch and Jennifer Jones as the dusky Pearl Chavez cannot fail to stir something inside you, but the whole proposition is just silly. Really. If you want to see a big studio flick implode spectacularly, this may be the one. And if you want to know how studios began to understand that they didn't need to make good movies to make money, this is a prime example, because in adjusted currency it remains one of the most successful productions of all time. But at least the promo poster is a total winner. It was made for the movie's Japanese premiere, which was today in 1951.
JapanDuel in the SunDavid O. SelznickKing VidorJennifer JonesGregory Peckposter artcinemamovie review
Femmes Fatales Aug 16 2012
American actress Jennifer Jones, seen here in a promo shot from her movie Duel in the Sun, 1946.
Duel in the SunJennifer Jones
Intl. Notebook Jul 8 2010
Pulp Intl. at the Festival of San Fermin.
The Pamplonistas thought of it, but Hemingway made it famous. It's the Festival of San Fermin, with its central event, the encierro, or running of the bulls. The shot at top shows it the way Hemingway probably saw it; the subsequent photo shows how many people visit the Festival today. As we mentioned in a previous post, Ernest Hemingway inspired multitudes to imitate his lifestyle. His descriptions of the encierro, which he folded into the narrative of his exquisitely romantic and desolate debut novel The Sun Also Rises, exposed the English-speaking world to Pamplona's signature event. And like the bulls, the people came running.
The encierro happens fast. We were camped out near the beginning of the route, where the bulls are released, and they simply blazed by. There is no running "with" the bulls at that point—they rattle past like a freight train. We've been told, though, that after this uphill stretch, two tight turns, and some mid-course congestion, they tend to slow down a bit, which invites closer interaction with the runners, aka mozos. We saw none of that. In the few seconds we had we shot three photos, which you see just below. In the first two, the runners are looking back at the approaching horde of men and beasts, and in the third the bulls are a blur.
You've probably heard that the encierro is dangerous, but the truth of that depends on your idea of danger. Deaths average two per decade, including one last year. That isn't going to get most people quaking in their espadrilles, but injuries are common—this morning there were four minor horn wounds, one broken ankle and, we'd guess, several dozen bruises and scrapes. So the question is, how do you like those odds? The odds for the bulls are not so good—six will be killed in the plaza de toros this evening. We won't bother with any polemics about the tradition of bullfighting, or animal murder, depending on your view. We're not from Spain, thus we don't feel we have the right to comment. How's that for a refreshing attitude?
Below, we've expropriated photos of some of San Fermin's finest cornadas, which we'll have to take down in a day or two to avoid any copyright issues. In panel 13 you see last year's fatal goring (a horn through the top of the left shoulder, severing the brachial artery and shredding a lung), and in panel 14 you see a horn piercing the underside of an unfortunate mozo's chin, though non-fatally. These are both atypical injuries—a bull rakes upward with its horns and usually hooks a human in the groin region (or the ass if you happen to be running away like a sensible person). In the final shot, panel 15, you see how the men of Pamplona separate themselves from the boys—in the plaza de toros they crouch en masse in the bull's path and force it to leap over them. You want to show you've got true cojones? Try that.
SpainPamplonaFestival of San FerminThe Sun Also RisesErnest Hemingwayliterature
Swindles & Scams Feb 25 2010
Committee finds that News of the World hacked on an industrial scale.
In Britain, a growing scandal has ensnared Rupert Murdoch, head of News International, and Andy Coulson, who was editor of the News International paper News of the World before becoming communications director for Conservative Party leader David Cameron. In short, News of the World hacked into voicemail accounts and computerized police records, and also extracted confidential information from banking computers. Murdoch claims to have known nothing about it, but yesterday a committee of MPs concluded an investigation into the matter by accusing News International execs of engaging in "obfuscation" and suffering from "collective amnesia."
While Murdoch has taken some heat for the mess, the investigation into the hacking has increasingly turned toward Andy Coulson, who, while editor of News of the World, employed four private investigators to dig up dirt on public figures. Nineteen victims of the hacking have been identified, but records show that ninety-one were targeted. To make matters worse, Scotland Yard resisted investigating the matter, has refused to comply with Freedom of Information requests concerning the investigation, and failed to notify those whose cellphone pin codes were found in possession of one of News of the World's PIs. This means that public figures who suspect being targeted by News of the World have been forced to launch their own investigations to discover whether they were victims.
If all this seems to point toward a culture of criminality within News of the World, also consider that the paper recently paid a £792,000 settlement to a reporter who experienced harassment at the hands of Coulson, and last year paid out another large settlement to Professional Footballers Association head Gordon Taylor for illegally intercepting his phone records. Back then News International and Rupert Murdoch issued statements assuring the public that the reporter responsible for the phone tampering, Clive Goodman, was an "aberration" within the company. Now, half a year later, a bipartisan committee of MPs has described the hacking as having taken place "on an industrial scale."
Perhaps most interesting is the fact that, while Murdoch claims to have no knowledge of these matters, his newspapers, which he touts as exemplars of balanced reporting, hid the story in their Thursday editions. While The Guardian and other papers devoted multiple pages to what is one of the biggest scandals of the year and quoted directly from the official report, Murdoch's Sun buried 135 words on the matter between an ad and a weather map of Ireland, his Times printed a mere 230 words, and his Daily Telegraph was able to manage only 325.
BritainRupert MurdochAndy CoulsonDavid CameronGordon TaylorNews of the WorldThe GuardianThe SunDaily Telegraph