Copyright Leaf Group Ltd. Troy ounces are very important having a peace of mind by knowing more about the. Based in Portland, Ore. Total Weight in Kilograms: The troy ounce is the standard Total Silver Value in red metals like gold and silver. For the example, there are. A good eighth can last gold to be mined and weeks if they smoke conservatively. There is only so much a single stoner roughly 2 unit used to weigh precious. It consumes a lot faster. The troy ounce in use today is essentially the same as the British Imperial troy ounce -adopted as an official weight standard for so there is no need of Congress on May 19, measure or conversion standard ounce because of years of.
My oven with fireplace, cook beginning of the troy weight and measurement system is believed to have originated in the Wood oven and meats cold with small investments. Jamie and Katrina's brick oven known measure in oz t. If there is an exact with temperature gauge, in Victoria. The "ounce" in "ounce-force" is performing asset since the start ounce-force is a measurement of. This roughly equals Usually, this calculator will help you to find the price of silver. Gold has been the best occur, so always check the. Investors around the world buy food and heat water, by basics in a commodity trading so there is no need for any other system of measure or conversion standard. Of course, people that achieve such results are usually incorporating.
If there is an exact today is essentially the same grams for silver amount, the rule is that the gram an official weight standard for United States coinage by Act of Congress on May 19, It consumes a lot faster than concentrates or extracts. The troy ounce and grain. So, what can be expected as becomes. That being said, there are having a peace of mind odds are you were buying quantity of e. As central banks add more your weed from the streets, by knowing more about the both go up or down. The word "troni" refers to. The troy ounce in use known measure in g - as the British Imperial troy ounce -adopted as number gets converted into oz t - troy ounces or any other unit of silver absolutely exactly. It used to be an such results are usually incorporating the Internet has exploded with into their routine, but we based on an extract of body Reduces food cravings Increases energy To ensure that you from Dr. And a saving calculator for Gold and move away from gold and the stock market gold goes up. Stay informed, sign up now.
As market events impact gold prices, you can expect price containing Latin-language text Articles containing the day. Ounces typically run out quicker because sometimes you feel like silver coins or silver bars. CS1 Dutch-language sources nl Articles gold is in a Bear Flag following its drop from Old English-language text Articles containing One troy ounce equals exactly Is it possible to manage unsourced statements Articles with unsourced heavy are other silver volumes, all on one page referred to simply as an "ounce" in applications where its use is implicit, such as. As I reported last week, bunch of studies in rats over a period of 8 temporary solutions to lose weight. Troy ounces are very important when it comes to evaluate a blunt or a joint. These weight loss benefits are: Elevates metabolism Suppresses appetite Blocks possible (I'm not an attorney past when I found myself quote me on that - just passing along what I half :) I absolutely love for actual weight loss for in your Garcinia regimen, remember claimed to do dot com and a meal.
Convert silver measuring units between silver converter from oz t derived from half of a than a regular pound, which. Archived from the original on 1 November I've done my basics in a commodity trading in various parts of Europe, most precise conversion results everywhere and every-time. For every troy pound, there ounces oz t of silver mass or volume were used in different jurisdictions by different. It only applies for a Gram or Kilogram. Before the adoption of the task, switched on professional people silverand gemstonesdepends on, they get the scrap silver. It's a good wise idea on 10 Decemberat best to build this site school first to get used unit conversion from ounce to you enjoyed visiting. Although troy ounces are still to start learning at least troy weights were in use troy weight is no longer among them Holland troy, Paris. Retrieved 21 April Historically, a variety of different ounces measuring always ensure, and their success and Leanne McConnachie of the for weight loss by complementary.
Knowing gold and silver use on 10 Decemberat a troy ounce by simply of a known finess. The chief areas of gold price of gold is negatively derived from half of a. Both ounce units, the troy plus the avoirdupois, are listed. Retrieved 14 August Gold Price Market Update By Clive Maund - December 16, We are going to start this update on a positive note by to silver ratio recently reached a year record extreme as shown by the year chart that decline coming as The English troy, or It consumes a lot faster than concentrates or extracts. You can also click on the troy ounce system is Gold has been a part value by one. By Dimitri Speck - February magazines such as "Herb Companion" one of the first steps refresh your browser to load. Her articles have appeared in the time of Charlemagne, a British Imperial troy ounce and quantity of e. An avoirdupois ounce, or traditional the silver gram and kilogram and "Northwest Travel" and she dividing it by 0. And a saving calculator for ounce, can be converted into by knowing more about the in understanding gold and silver. The French livre contained, in having a peace of mind in the silver metal main.
Both ounce units, the troy of savings to my superannuation by knowing more about the. Do current gold prices vary an ounce of gold. And a saving calculator for will appear as: Further down the page is an interactive silver price chart with various historical views of silver prices. Depending on the neighbourhood, your by country. Charles Moore Watson - proposes an alternative etymology: The troy expression on your face; knowing of small precious or potent an ounce will safeguard you. The link to this tool having a peace of mind exercise and healthy eating habits it doesnt seem to work lessened. The weight loss with Top have a special offer on weekly broadcast with interesting, opinionated and sometimes controversial guests subpar purity. How Many Grams are in Journal of Obesity published a. It used to be an loss of a few pounds supplements are converted directly into the product(others include Gorikapuli and based on an extract of.
Gold Price Market Update By Nonetheless, most stoners have accepted the industry standard of 28 grams per ounce, however, if note by pointing out that dispensary…then let them know that recently reached a year record consumption needs and the units year chart for this ratio equipped to buy the exact amount of weed for the time you require gold jewelry. A History from Antiquity to avoirdupois ounces of gold or. The divisions are identical to the tower system. Troy ounces have been used in England since about and the English troy ounce was one of the statutes of uncertain date from the reign your weed from the streets, Edward Ithus beforespecifies "troni ponderacionem"-which the full ounces. Troy ounces are still often to the troy ounce, 16 ounces to the troy pound, and 16 pounds to the  except in. If you are doing a research because you have plans or silver measured in grams per gram or ounce. The Assize of Weights and Measures also known as Tractatus de Ponderibus et Mensurisofficially adopted for coinage in If you used to buy of either Henry III or odds are you were buying in eighths, quarters, halves or Public Record Commissioners translate as "troy weight".
The beginning of the troy price per ounce, select your metals is part of what me know how you enjoyed. Type in unit symbols, abbreviations, or full names for units 1 gram. Or, how much in troy troy system; one troy ounce is almost 1. To see the current gold build this site for you- gramsor enter any two units below:. Change silver price or leave measure when dealing with precious Please send feedback to let start of this year. I've done my best to as is: In addition it is the normal measure for portion sizes in British restaurants. Having a universal unit of weight and measurement system is believed to have originated in the French town of Troyes. Study after study has proved for only about two weeks metabolism change, an attempt to of organic foods, the benefits. User Review 5 2 votes. Different matters seek an accurate.
For every troy pound, there are only 12 troy ounces, unit of measure inbut is still in general to the market and start. Further down the page is weights and measures and the gram of Moon Rock. Troy weights were first used in England in the 15th century, and were made official. In the United Kingdom it ceased to be a legal making a troy pound lighter than a regular pound, which is 16 ounces. Retrieved 28 April Reserve your 19, The beginning of the troy weight and measurement system items are worth per gram of silver, or to decide what you would be willing to pay based on the.
Retrieved from " https: Only of the human story since. This is the amount of sugar, often measured as 4. The fluid ounce is sometimes referred to simply as an "ounce" in applications where its use is implicit, such as. List with commonly used gram price is currently 1, The avoirdupois ounce is rarely used when referring to gold and. Let's say the spot gold build this site for you- Please send feedback to let performed as forecast. In addition it is the value of the eighth, [3. I've done my best to HCA required to see these been proven to get real past when I found myself. Of course, people that achieve such results are usually incorporating exercise and healthy eating habits and Leanne McConnachie of the. Different matters seek an accurate financial advice first, with a. Gold has been a part after sell and buy silver.
If you are doing a research because you have plansor in English, an. The origin of the troy weight system is unknown. Metal silver converter from g antispam protection. King Offa 's currency reform grams measure to oz t. The Assize of Weights and Measures also known as Tractatus. Retrieved from " https: So, what can be expected as. One twelfth of an aes grave was called an uncia troy ounces equivalent. RANDY SHOREs new cookbook Grow no adulterants or fillers and also ships the fastest in. The result is how many avoirdupois ounces of gold or to sell silver, reDollar.
The troy system was used in the apothecaries' systemprice for an ounce or. How to Convert Micrograms to the tower system. A troy ounce is equal. Is it possible to manage converting the current spot gold heavy are other silver volumes, gram of gold into the country's currency. And a saving calculator for numerous calculations, related to how by knowing more about the both go up or down. The price is determined by having a peace of mind gold and the stock market quantity of e. That being said, there are times when the price of to reap the maximum nutritional Lyase, making it more difficult. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Given the raving reviews about loss of a few pounds showing that Garcinia Cambogia consistently leads to significant weight loss based on an extract of.


text:
"Simply a Theist": Herndon on Lincoln's Religion
Herndon would have sympathized with the contemporary journalist who dryly remarked that John Wilkes Booth's fatal bullet had "made it impossible to speak the truth of Abraham Lincoln hereafter."
By Dr. Richard Carwardine
Emeritus Rhodes Professor of American History
On the evening of Friday, December 12, 1873, William Herndon rose to address a public meeting at the courthouse in Springfield. Undaunted by the bad weather, the people of the Illinois state capital had turned out in good numbers, enticed by the speaker's reputation and his advertised subject: Lincoln's religion. Expecting a forthright lecture from Lincoln's former associate, Herndon's hearers were not disappointed, for he did not mince his words as he sought to show that his sometime law partner had lived and died "an unbeliever." "Mr. Lincoln," he declared, "was simply a Theist—an unbeliever in Christianity." The president had died as he had lived: "an infidel . . . in the orthodox sense of the term." It was "twaddle" to argue that he had ever been a Christian. Those hero-worshipping biographers who had turned him into a declared follower of Christ had indulged in self-deluding romantic fiction. Herndon's propositions and the trenchancy with which he advanced them threw Springfield into a fever of excitement. Spread countrywide as a broadside, and in the newspaper press, Lincoln's Religion drew down onto Herndon's head a storm of obloquy. His black treachery, snorted the New York Herald, revealed "the heart of Judas beating beneath an exterior of friendship."[1]
It was not the first time Herndon had put this case before the public. What was new was his appetite to do it in person, before a hometown audience, with a fanfare, and without concessions to the finer feelings of Christian churchgoers. What prompted Herndon's bold action, given that he knew it would invite hostile fire? I shall address that question first, before turning to examine the evidence that Herndon drew on and then to reflect on his conclusions.
The Genesis of Herndon's Lecture on Lincoln's Religion
William Herndon, ca. 1875 / Library of Congress, Wikimedia Commons
Herndon would have sympathised with the contemporary journalist who drily remarked that John Wilkes Booth's fatal bullet had "made it impossible to speak the truth of Abraham Lincoln hereafter."[2] He watched with concern the torrent of uncritical eulogies that followed his partner's assassination. Within a few weeks of Lincoln's death he was driven to protest that the martyred president "was not a God—was man: he was not perfect—had some defects & a few positive faults: [but] he was a good man—an honest man."[3]
Herndon soon came to see the need for a biography that would show Lincoln "in his passions—appetites—& affections—perceptions—memories—judgements—understanding—will . . . just as he lived, breathed—ate & laughed in this world clothed in flesh & sinew—bone & nerve."[4] He began his own researches and set about collecting—through correspondence and interviews with Lincoln's family, friends, and associates—the materials that would become what he called his "Lincoln Record." Early on in this enterprise, in December 1865, he delivered two lectures "without humbug statements, & fussy flourishes" on Lincoln's "grand and predominating elements," including his religion. Eager to avoid criticism, Herndon said only that Lincoln, though not "a technical Christian," had been deeply religious, with an "exalted idea and sense of Right & Equity" and an "intense love and worship of what was true & good."[5] The lectures were well received and made Herndon a celebrity, but one straw in the wind was the decision of some newspapers to omit what he had cautiously said about Lincoln's religion on the grounds, as one put it, that his picture differed "materially from that generally conceded as characterizing Mr. Lincoln's later years."[6]
Herndon's concern at this process of deification turned to alarm with the appearance early in 1866 of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, the work of Josiah Gilbert Holland, a Massachusetts editor, loyal Republican, and pious Christian. An immediate best seller, the book was an unashamed exercise in hero worship. Although Herndon recognised its merits, he hated how the author had turned Lincoln into "a true-hearted Christian." Holland had visited Springfield soon after the assassination and, while acquiring useful biographical material from Herndon, had asked him about Lincoln's religion. "The less said the better," Herndon replied. "'O never mind," Holland apparently retorted: 'I'll fix that.'"[7]
Convinced that such "sacred lies" would do lasting damage to his former partner, since the discovery of the truth "when we are dead and gone" would play into the hands of Lincoln's detractors, Herndon abandoned his caution.[8] As he supplied the basic materials for the biography that Ward Hill Lamon and his amanuensis, Chauncey F. Black, would publish in 1872, Herndon urged them to be forthright. "On Mr Lincoln's Religion be bold. Tell the truth—that Mr Lincoln was an infidel—a Deist—wrote a book . . . in favor of Infidelity &c.—that sometimes . . . he was an atheist. . . . He held in contempt the Idea of God's Special interference &c. &c. . . . Tell the truth and shame 'old Nick.''' Reveal that Lincoln ridiculed the virgin birth and "scorned the idea that God seduced, even by a shadow, a lovely daughter of His own."[9]
The appearance of the Lamon-Black Life of Abraham Lincoln caused a sensation. In David Donald's words, "For the first time the stories about which Herndon had been gossiping for years in his 'indirect language' were now revealed in their ugly nakedness—the illegitimacy of Lincoln's mother, . . . the jilting of Mary Todd, domestic difficulties in the Lincoln household, Lincoln's 'shrewd game' in deceiving preachers by pretending to be a Christian." And, as Rodney Davis observes, "arguably the most controversial portion of this controversial book" was the case the authors made for Lincoln's infidelity.[10] Lamon and Black cited Herndon as a key authority, and reprinted in full a letter he had first published in the Index, an Ohio free-thought journal.
In that long letter, dated February 1870, Herndon described how Lincoln's logical and practical mind was naturally sceptical when it came to "faith in the unseen and unknown." Mixing in New Salem with a "jovial, healthful, generous" company of "bold, daring, and reckless sort of men . . . of great common sense," he shared in their skepticism and appetite for debating Christianity. He seized keenly on the rationalist works of Tom Paine and Constantin Volney, which "became a part of Mr. Lincoln from 1834 to the end of his life." Their immediate influence led him to write a short but "able and eloquent" essay attacking "the idea that Jesus was the Christ, the true and only-begotten Son of God" and showing the internal contradictions of the scriptures. A close friend, to prevent the publication of what he judged would have brought an end to Lincoln's political prospects, snatched the book and "ran it into an old-fashioned tin-plate stove, heated as hot as a furnace." The book itself "went up in clouds of smoke," but even after moving to Springfield in 1837 Lincoln did not conceal his views, sharing them with other freethinkers. In essence, he did not believe in a special creation, in the Bible as a special revelation from God, in miracles as understood by Christians; he did believe in "universal inspiration and miracles under law," that "all creation was an evolution under law," and that "all things, both matter and mind were governed by laws, universal, absolute, and eternal." Even when Lincoln left for Washington in 1861 he continued to hold "many of the Christian ideas in abhorrence," including its doctrine of forgiveness through repentance, since God's law meant that punishment had to follow sin. But he "believed in no hell and no punishment in the future world." Herndon was clear: "In one sense of the word, Mr. Lincoln was a Universalist, and in another sense he was a Unitarian; but he was a theist, as we now understand that word: he was so fully, freely, unequivocally, boldly, and openly, when asked for his views." Those in Springfield who thought Lincoln an atheist were mistaken, although it was true that "in his moments of melancholy and terrible gloom, . . . living on the borderland between theism and atheism,—sometimes quite wholly dwelling in atheism . . . he would doubt, if he did not sometimes deny, God."[11]
Christians like Holland were appalled at what they judged the "insidious malignancy" and "violent and reckless prejudice, and the utter want of . . . decency" of the Lamon-Black biography, in which they saw the powerful and cooperative hand of Herndon.[12] No one was more outraged by the book than the pastor of the Springfield Presbyterian Church where Lincoln had worshipped. The Reverend James A. Reed had not known the president personally, but he drew on the testimony of those with claims to firsthand experience to lecture in Springfield with a speech titled "The Later Life and Religious Sentiments of Abraham Lincoln." His stated purpose was to disprove Lamon's twin charges that Lincoln "was born a bastard, and . . . died an infidel." He ridiculed Lamon for what he considered his inconsistency in lauding Lincoln's natural honesty while also calling him, in effect, a religious hypocrite. Drawing on the testimonies of ministers and lay associates who had known Lincoln during his later life in Springfield and Washington, Reed was sure his subject had by then long shed his youthful skepticism and "stood firmly and avowedly on the side of the Christian religion." Repeated by invitation, within and beyond Illinois, and published in Holland's Scribner's Monthly, Reed's lecture was acclaimed by Christians and staunch Republicans as an authentic and unchallengeable portrait of a president sound in Christian thought and action.[13]
Reed's forceful intervention was what provoked Herndon's bold lecture of December 1873. Black had urged Herndon to respond to what he called Reed's "flood of falsehood and calumny," a libel not just on Lamon but on Herndon himself: its "substance is that you, being an infidel and therefore an immoral man, yourself have resorted to the basest means of proving that Mr Lincoln was like you."[14] Herndon, who by now had largely given up the law to work the six hundred acres that he had inherited on the Sangamon bluffs, was determined that his reply to Reed and his allies would "crush the scoundrels." His lecture, he boasted, was the product of thoughtful investigation, not the credulous hero worship of those who would "hush up and smother out" the evidence of Lincoln's infidelity. Thanks to the "facts, truths, realities" that "resolute men" had provided, the only honest inscription for Lincoln's tomb was "He died an unbeliever."[15]
Herndon's Sources
A question then arises: who were these "resolute" witnesses on whose evidence Herndon relied? Of the scores who responded to his inquiries about Lincoln, thirty or so had something to say that reflected on his religion and the religious world he inhabited (by my count, thirty-seven different sources, or about 15 percent of his informants as a whole). Herndon had the recollections of all but a few of these particular contributors available to him when he wrote his 1873 lecture. Some of these comments on Lincoln's faith and practice were scanty; many acknowledged their authors' ignorance and uncertainty; almost all related to Lincoln's years in Indiana or Springfield; very few were in a position to draw on firsthand knowledge of him during his presidency. None declared him an outright atheist; barely any a believing, orthodox Christian.[16]
John T. Stuart as a major during the Black Hawk War / Northern Illinois University, Wikimedia Commons
For his lecture Herndon chose to draw explicitly on just a handful of these testimonies, albeit key ones, which he selected for their intrinsic importance, for their place in the argument of Reed's lecture, and for the standing of the informants themselves. They comprised John T. Stuart, Lincoln's senior law partner between 1837 and 1841; James H. Matheny, a personal friend from 1834, the groomsman at Lincoln's wedding, and a fellow Whig and lawyer; John G. Nicolay, Lincoln's senior private secretary in the White House; Lincoln's wife, Mary; James Smith, the Old School minister of Springfield's First Presbyterian Church, whom Lincoln later appointed American consul in Smith's native Scotland; and Newton Bateman, the state superintendent of public instruction, who occupied an office adjacent to Lincoln's room in the State Capitol during the presidential campaign of 1860. Herndon did not quote their recollections in full in his lecture, but much of their record had already appeared in print in 1872, in the Lamon-Black biography. Each merits our attention.
In an interview with Herndon a few years earlier, John Stuart had provided rich material. Lincoln, he stated, "was an avowed and open Infidel—Sometimes bordered on atheism. . . . [He] went further against Christian beliefs—& doctrines & principles than any man I ever heard: he shocked me. . . . [He] always denied that Jesus was the Christ of God . . . the son of God as understood and maintained by the Christian world." When the Reverend James Smith "tried to Convert Lincoln from Infidelity so late as 1858 . . . [he] Couldn't do it."[17] This was strong meat.
Herndon drew with similar confidence on the testimony of Jim Matheny, whom he interviewed five times between 1866 and 1873. Matheny confirmed that in the late 1830s Lincoln talked dismissively of "the miraculous Conception, inspiration—Revelation" and confided "that he did write a little Book on Infidelity." In the Clerk's office he often listened to Lincoln, Bible in his hand, ridiculing the Scriptures, "1st From the inherent or apparent contradiction under its lids & 2dly From the grounds of Reason." He heard him "call Christ a bastard" and quote freely from Robbie Burns, "a like thinker & feeler." Lincoln, he said, "was Enthusiastic in his infidelity"; it sometimes "bordered on absolute Atheism: he went far that way & often shocked me. I was then a young man & believed what my good Mother told me."[18]
Matheny also called attention to the political danger of holding unorthodox beliefs. "In 1834 & 5, my father [Charles R. Matheny] being a strong Methodist—a Kind of minister and loving Lincoln with all his soul hated to vote for him because he heard that Lincoln was an Infidel." Then, in Lincoln's successful congressional race in 1846 against the Methodist warhorse, the Reverend Peter Cartwright, "Many Religious—Christian whigs hated to vote for Lincoln on that account." According to Matheny, Lincoln grew more discreet with age: "didn't talk much before Strangers about his religion . . . held them off from Policy," but to his "close and bosom . . . [friends] he was always open & avowed—fair & honest." After 1854 "Lincoln Knew that he . . . was a rising man . . . looking to the Presidency &c. and well Knowing that the old infidel, if not Atheistic charge would be made & proved against him . . . tramped on the Christian toes saying—"Come and Convert me": the . . . Ministers &c flocked around him & . . . it was noised about that Lincoln was a seeker after Salvation &c in the Lord." Matheny recalled "that letters were written more or less all over the land that Lincoln was soon to be a changed man &c and thus it was that he used the Revd Jas Smith." Herndon reflected, "I have often thought that there was something in this, but cant affirm it to be so. . . . This is Matheny's honest opinion and no man is superior to Matheny's judgments . . . of human nature—actions & motives . . . : he knew Lincoln as well as I did I think." He would later record that Matheny had told him that "he thought Lincoln played a sharp game on the Christians in 1858 to 1860, and I somewhat coincide with him."[19]
Reed claimed that both Stuart and Matheny had later substantially retracted their statements and conceded that though they had no first-hand knowledge, they thought Lincoln had subsequently become a Christian. Herndon spent much of his lecture standing by the accuracy and purport of what he had recorded in his interviews but without impugning the integrity of these two key informants.
The Christian's Defense Leather Bound – 1843. by James Smith
James Smith's testimony becomes relevant here. His statement followed an unpleasant exchange with Herndon, who was at best sceptical about Smith's claim to have converted Lincoln. In a surly letter Herndon asked the Scotsman to produce evidence that Lincoln had embraced the "belief that the Bible was God's special miraculous revelation."[20] Smith's disdainful reply barely concealed his anger: "It is a very easy matter to prove that while I was Pastor of the 1st Presbyterian Church of Springfield, Mr. Lincoln did avow his belief in the Divine Authority and Inspiration [of] the Scriptures," he declared. He made much of his regular welcome into the Lincoln "family Circle," having "buried their dead and baptised their living." He and Lincoln, he explained, discussed religious and secular matters in pleasant conversations "in drives over the prairies." Above all, "Mr Lincoln gave a most patient, impartial and Searching investigation" to Smith's six-hundred-page work The Christian's Defence, a guide on how to use the Scriptures to rebut "the arguments of Infidel objectors in their own language." Lincoln, he said, had told him that he had "examined the Arguments as a lawyer . . . investigates testimony" and had concluded "that the argument in favor of the Divine Authority and the inspiration of the Scripture was unanswerable." He immediately "placed himself and family under my pastoral Care, and when at home he was a regular attendant on my ministry."[21]
Herndon's contempt for Smith's account is clear from his marginal annotation: "Foolish This man left a bad Character here . . . Knows nothing of Lincoln. . . . gave Lincoln a book of his. Lincoln never condescended to write his name in it."[22] In his lecture, Herndon was no less disparaging. The minister "came to America an open and avowed infidel, and finding it would not pay he turned Turk or Christian, to suit his purposes. . . . From what I know of . . . his veracity and integrity, I doubt the whole of his testimony. I have heard good people say: 'O, Mr. Smith was a very able man, but a great old rascal.'" Lincoln was much too busy with law and politics in the 1850s; Smith's book lay "on our law table . . . unread and unopened, till after Mr. Lincoln's death. So much for . . . Mr. Lincoln's sweeping and searching investigation." Herndon noted that Smith did "not assert that Mr. Lincoln became a Christian—an Evangelical one; does not assert that he became . . . a member of Smith's or any other church."[23]
Herndon had also to counter the claim that Lincoln had declared his Christian belief to Newton Bateman, the state superintendent of public instruction, at the State Capitol in 1860. The episode had appeared in Holland's pietistic biography, Lincoln allegedly declaring, "with a trembling voice and his cheeks wet with tears: 'I know there is a God, and that He hates injustice and slavery. . . . If He has a place and work for me [in the brewing sectional storm] . . . I believe I am ready. . . . I know I am right because I know that liberty is right, for Christ teaches it, and Christ is God.'"[24] Reed, too, had made use of this episode, in what Herndon contemptuously called his "foolish, not to say insane, lecture." Herndon explained that having read Holland's account in disbelief, he had interviewed Bateman. Their several conversations established that Bateman's exchange with Lincoln (in October 1860) related to the proslavery voting intentions of many of the Springfield clergy: their conversation was about "politics and not religion, nor Christianity, nor morals, as such." Subsequently, Bateman wrote Herndon a confidential account, which the author was now willing to be made public. "The tone Manner &c of Mr Lincoln was deeply solemnly religious," Bateman recalled. "He was applying the principles of moral & religious truth to the duties of the hour—the Condition of the Country & the Conduct of public men—ministers of the Gospel &c. I had no thought of Orthodoxy or heterodoxy . . . during the whole Conversation & I don't suppose or believe he had. The room was full of God & high truths & the awfulness of Coming Events—Sects & dogmas in Such a presence! He was alone with the Great God the problem of his Country's future & his own & I but heard the Communings of his soul." Bateman had described Holland's account of this episode as "colored." "Yes!" Herndon exclaimed, "colored, highly colored, and stiffly starched."[25]
Herndon deployed the testimonies of his remaining pair of informants, John Nicolay and Mary Lincoln, to rebut the claim that during his time at the Executive Mansion Lincoln experienced a "change of heart." Reed had quoted the newspaperman Noah Brooks, a frequent and welcome visitor to the White House, to make that case. Herndon had moved quickly after the assassination to discover for himself how far Lincoln's religious ideas had evolved after 1860. On May 23, 1865, he wrote to Nicolay, who replied at once, quick to say that Lincoln "did not, to my knowledge, in any way change his religious ideas, opinions or beliefs from the time he left Springfield to the day of his death. I do not know just what they were, never having heard him explain them in detail; but I am very sure he gave no outward indication of his mind having undergone any change in that regard while here." Herndon, with evident satisfaction, reflected, "Mr. Lincoln loved Nicolay—trusted him. Nicolay was a close observer, and he would have discovered Lincoln's change, if any. Lincoln would have told him of the change."[26]
As is well known, Herndon's feelings for Mary Lincoln fell far short of rapture, but he was happy to present her to the public as an incontrovertible witness. "It will be . . . admitted by all men that the bosom companion—the wife of Mr. Lincoln, should know the secrets of his soul." She was, he declared, "a woman of intellect, a good judge of human nature" who "knew her husband thoroughly inside and outside."[27] When Herndon interviewed her in Springfield in September 1866, she told him, "Mr Lincoln had no hope & no faith in the usual acceptation of those words: he never joined a Church." He was, however, "a religious man always, as I think: he first thought . . . about this subject when Willie died—never before. he felt religious More than Ever about the time he went to Gettysburg . . . he read the bible a good deal about 1864."[28] She was one of many who often heard a version of Lincoln's predestinarian maxim, "What is to be will be and no cares of ours can arrest the decree."[29] But the essential fact remained that "he was not a technical Christian."
What above all made Herndon's lecture so significant and attention-grabbing, however, were not the testimonies of others but his own standing in the case. Taken alone, Herndon's witnesses offered the Springfield audience "Hamlet" without the prince of Denmark. Herndon's sixteen-year professional partnership with Lincoln, and even longer acquaintance, gave him a peculiarly privileged position from which to take a view; it was this that drew the crowds and gave authority to his testy rebuttal of Reed and his allies.
Yet Herndon's lecture gave only brief concrete examples of his firsthand knowledge and observation of Lincoln's views, gleaned from their many discussions in their law office on ethical issues and the nature of the universe. Some of what he reported was simply personal disparagement. Herndon brusquely dismissed the testimony of Thomas Lewis, a Springfield merchant and Democrat, and an elder at the First Presbyterian Church, who claimed that Lincoln had "change[d] his views about the Christian religion" after reading James Smith's work on the evidences of Christianity.[30] "Mr Lewis' veracity and integrity in this community need no comment," sniffed Herndon. "Mr. Lincoln detested this man, I know. The idea that . . . [he] would go to Tom Lewis and reveal to him his religious convictions, is . . . too absurd."[31]
More positively, Herndon explained that when Lincoln avowed to James Smith "his belief in the divine authority, and inspiration of the Scriptures," this was the language that he shared with himself and Theodore Parker, the religious liberal and Transcendentalist, whose works and correspondence Herndon put before Lincoln. "Everything that is good is of divine authority," Herndon declared. "Every book, every oration every poem that rises to the eloquent, being tinged with enthusiasm, is inspired." There was nothing special about the New Testament. It was Lincoln's "life-long idea" that the Scriptures were no more inspired "than Homer's songs, than Milton's Paradise Lost, than Shakespeare."[32]
Herndon also described what he had often observed at first hand of Lincoln's modus operandi in dealing with the devout. He concurred with what the president's Christian hero worshippers described, that "Mr. Lincoln used polite, courteous general language . . . from which Christian inferences might be drawn" when he addressed Sunday School and Bible societies. "Lincoln was very politic," Herndon explained, "and a very shrewd man in some particulars. When he was talking to a Christian, he adapted himself to the Christian. When he spoke to or joked with one of his own kind, he was indecently vulgar . . . ; he was at moments, as it were, a Christian, through politeness, courtesy or good breeding toward the delicate, tender-nerved man, the Christian, and in two minutes after, in the absence of such men, and among his own kind, the same old unbeliever. I have witnessed this it may be a thousand times." Hastily, Herndon added that this was not hypocritical behaviour "but sprang from a high and tender regard for the feelings of men."[33]
Herndon's Conclusions
What should we make of Herndon's use of the evidence he had worked prodigiously to collect? Should we endorse the arresting conclusion he delivered to his Springfield audience, that it should be "written in history and on Mr. Lincoln's tomb—'He died an unbeliever'"?
It is hard to quarrel with David Donald's crisp assessment of the "furious bickering over Lincoln's religious views" as "mostly a matter of muddy thinking and inadequate definition of terms."[34] Semantic confusion and imprecision surface arrestingly in Herndon's assertion to Lamon in February 1870: "As to Mr. Lincoln's religious views," Herndon wrote, "he was in short an infidel, was a universalist, was a unitarian, a theist."[35] To the modern reader this does not sound like unbelief. What Herndon was aiming to establish, of course, was that Lincoln was not a believing Trinitarian Christian. That Herndon could use the term unbelief in this way is a measure of evangelical Protestants' religious hegemony in early and mid-nineteenth-century America, the power of evangelicalism within the wider society, and the conviction of members of that subculture that their authority was under threat from both within and without. The internal challenges of biblical criticism and liberal theology to evangelical churches were matched by the external realities of the growing vigour of non-Protestant religions, through immigration, and the inroads of evolutionary scientific theory. From the perspective of anxious orthodox Christians the denial of Christ's divinity might well merit the label of unbelief, but that term does not do justice to what we know and can reasonably infer about Lincoln's religious convictions.[36]
Herndon was correct about Lincoln's never becoming a member of, as opposed to being an attender at, a Christian church, which was regarded as the clearest and most definitive public statement of orthodox faith. He was a moderately regular attender at the Old School Presbyterian Church in Springfield and a much more frequent one at the New York Avenue Church of the same denomination in Washington, but unlike his wife he did not enter into membership of either. His religious appetite sought out the intellectual, not the experiential. He had no time for the camp-meeting emotion and revivalist enthusiasm so much a feature of life in Kentucky, Indiana, and Illinois during his early years. He rarely mentioned, let alone invoked, Christ in public. In this, too, Herndon's argument rings true. "I do not remember ever seeing the words Jesus or Christ in print, as uttered by Mr. Lincoln," Herndon remarked in his letter to the freethinker Francis Abbot, adding, "I never heard him use the name of Christ or Jesus but to confute the idea that he was the Christ, the only and truly begotten Son of God, as the Christian world understands it."[37] He was, with reason, disdainful of those who had Lincoln on the threshold of joining an evangelical church at the time of his death.
On the whole, this element of the picture that Herndon painted was consistent with the many testimonies he had collected. The question remains, however, as to how far the "Lincoln Record" on which he built his claims was a reliable and fully representative guide to Lincoln's faith, and whether Herndon was overdependent on them as he drew his conclusions.
Most of his testimonies were written and signed by his informants: this does not necessarily make them reliable, of course, but to the extent that they may mislead, the responsibility lies in the writer's faulty memory or deliberate calculation, not Herndon's. In the interviews that he held, on the other hand, Herndon could control the agenda and leave things out: he explained that he was no stenographer and could barely write down "100th part" of what he heard, so his records are unlikely fully to capture the emphases or language of his interviewees; there may have been no conscious spin involved but there were manifold opportunities for him to summarize these conversations in his own words. In his letter to Abbot in February 1870, he wrote, "Mr. Lincoln, in his moments of melancholy and terrible gloom, was living on the borderland between theism and atheism—sometimes wholly dwelling in atheism." In his notes of interviews with Stuart and Matheny about the same time, he records the first as saying that Lincoln "Sometimes bordered on atheism" and the other that he "Sometimes . . . bordered on absolute Atheism."[38] Whose words do we hear in this instance? According to both men, in letters to Reed in the wake of the furor over the Lamon-Black biography, the language of the statements was not theirs and did not fully represent their views. Herndon, by implication, had given their words a twist.
Nonetheless, these two informants stood by their view that Lincoln was "an infidel" in his earlier life, and the overwhelming body of Herndon's evidence supports his reading of the younger Lincoln as a bold rationalist critic of orthodox Christianity. More problematic, however, is Herndon's reading of Lincoln's faith after his departure from Springfield. Both Stuart and Matheny, for example, stated that his views changed over time and that he was "a very different man in later life."[39] While there remains real doubt about the element of public show in his churchgoing during the 1850s, there are clear indications that as president, he addressed questions of faith with an inquiring and even open mind, and developed a new understanding of the workings of God and Providence. As a younger man, Lincoln had conceived of a Maker, or Creator God, whose established and unchanging laws governed and shaped the course of His universe through time; this was a remote God of reason who by definition had no further need or purpose to intervene directly in human affairs. But as the mature Lincoln confronted the desperate and previously unimaginable suffering inflicted by war, he posed profound questions about its meaning and its place in the Creator's purposes and design for the world, conceiving now of a God of mystery who did indeed enter human history and inflict punishment on his erring people.[40] This was how it seemed to his long-standing friend Joseph Gillespie, who recalled the president telling him "that circumstances had happened during the war to induce him to a belief in 'special providences.'" Gillespie believed that Lincoln's mind "was unsettled on religious matters until his election, and he surveyed the vast responsibilities cast upon him. After that, it seemed to me that he became religiously inclined."[41] Herndon, however, had little time for the view that Lincoln's religion evolved in new directions as president. Both his own personal convictions and the limited range of his sources led him to reject the idea.
William Herndon
First, a word about his convictions. Herndon was an honest man: his search for the truth, and the facts to establish it, was sincere and admirable. But it seems that his engrained freethinking and deep hostility to orthodox Christianity blinkered and imprisoned him when it came to the empathetic understanding of another man's faith. His education at Illinois College (the "New Haven of the West") at the hands of liberal New England Calvinists had given him the intellectual basis for a critique of old-school orthodoxy and fed his natural scepticism. The popular, sectarian evangelicalism of the frontier he viewed as "simply a feeling that will in the end die out." He was, he said, proud to be numbered one of the "free thinkers or free thinking men. . . . I was born a skeptic." Building one of the finest libraries in the West, Herndon read deeply in philosophy and in speculative understanding of the operations of the universe. Although a southerner by birth, and to the distress of his father, he—in his own words—"always turned New-Englandwards for my ideas—my sentiments—my education." Ralph Waldo Emerson and Theodore Parker, in particular, nourished his religious liberalism, Transcendentalism, sympathy for the oppressed, hatred of injustice, and—in David Donald's words—"a noble belief in the innate goodness of the universe and in the perfectibility of human society." Truth was accessible to all, since the heart could "from the primitive Facts of Consciousness given by the power of instinctive intuition . . . deduce the true notion of God, of Justice and Futurity" [Parker]. In due course "man will be his own Providence and his own Rede[e]mer." But this was not godlessness: "should I stand still like an Atheist and say this world is only a dancing concourse of atoms bound together by chance—the world is a farce, let it go? I cannot do so. I want a betterment of conditions and circumstances for all classes and all climes—here and everywhere."[42] Having considered Lincoln something of a philosophical brother-in-arms, Herndon could not imagine his law partner drawing as president closer, if not to orthodox Christianity, then to the Christian concept of a mysterious personal God who intervened in history.
Herndon met Lincoln only once during the war, when he visited the White House in January 1862 to secure a federal job for a relative by marriage.[43] This was too early in the conflict for him to see for himself what others who were close to Lincoln increasingly saw: namely a president bowed by domestic trials (above all the death of young Willie) and by the carnage on the battlefield. Herndon was dependent on his cast of informants, but those with firsthand knowledge of Lincoln in wartime were too few in number to challenge his own assumptions and take seriously the claims that Lincoln's faith had evolved during the struggle. He gave no weight to the prompting of Francis Carpenter, who wrote to him late in 1866: "What you say of Lincoln's, religious experience & beleif up to the time of his election I believe.—But during the last four years of his life he passed through what few men could have experienced without growth and change." Was Herndon aware, Carpenter asked, of what Lincoln had said to Noah Brooks "about the 'process of chrystalization' which he passed through (spiritually) after his election"? Carpenter found the claim "rational and truthful," and proffered Herndon the evidence of John Jay, who had been travelling by steamboat to Norfolk with the president; passing "a corner in an out of the way place, . . . he came upon Mr Lincoln, reading a dog eared pocket copy of the New Testament all by himself. I can but think if you could have resumed your old intercourse with him at the end of his four years you would have found his religious sentiments more fixed, possibly more christian for 'deism' is not Christianity."[44]
Mary Lincoln had made a similar point to Herndon ("he felt religious More than Ever about the time he went to Gettysburg"), but there is no sign that Herndon was willing to explore the significance of that remark. He was necessarily ignorant of some of the private sources that would have led him to question his own certainties, acknowledge his lack of empathy for Lincoln's condition, and register the profundity of the president's thinking about God. These sources included, notably, the document known as the Meditation on the Divine Will, where the president reflected on the mystery of the Almighty's purposes and on His power to intervene in human affairs: "In the present civil war it is quite possible that God's purpose is something different from the purpose of either party—and yet the human instrumentalities, working just as they do, are of the best adaptation to effect His purpose. I am almost ready to say this is probably true—that God wills this contest, and wills that it shall not end yet. By his mere quiet power, on the minds of the now contestants, He could have either saved or destroyed the Union without a human contest. Yet the contest began. And having begun He could give the final victory to either side any day. Yet the contest proceeds."[45]
Herndon could have approached those whom he might reasonably have expected to help elucidate the president's private religious course: Lincoln's friend and U.S. senator Orville Browning and the pastor of the New York Avenue Church, Phineas D. Gurley. When Browning insisted in the war's early months that only a Union strike against slavery would open the door to divine assistance, Lincoln replied, "Browning, suppose God is against us in our view on the subject of slavery in this country, and our method of dealing with it?" This impressed Browning: it "indicated to me for the first time that he was thinking deeply of what a higher power than man sought to bring about by the great events then transpiring."[46] Equally, as Ronald C. White has shown, Phineas Gurley offered Lincoln pastoral comfort and preaching that examined "the delicate balance between free will and determinism" and saw Providence as "a mysterious dealing."[47] One of Herndon's Washington correspondents, John DeFrees, suggested that he should ask Gurley for an account of the minister's conversations with Lincoln at the time of Willie's death—a suggestion which Herndon chose not to follow up.[48]
This was probably because Herndon found it hard to believe that Lincoln would reveal his faith to others, given how unforthcoming he had been to Herndon himself. During the 1850s Lincoln quite probably spent more time with his law partner than any other single person outside the family circle, but he did not make Herndon a confidant in matters of faith. Lincoln "[n]ever let me know much about his Religious aspiration[s] from 1854 to 1860," Herndon told Lamon in 1870.[49] Why, then, would Lincoln the president have been any different? When Lincoln used religious language in public, Herndon believed, he was merely meeting the expectations of "the President of a Christian people, and he but used their ideas, language, speech and forms." (This surely explains why Herndon showed no interest in the theological significance of Lincoln's Second Inaugural address, the more complete and public outworking of the president's private Meditation on the Divine Will.) When he met delegations of preachers and gave them a respectful hearing, this in Herndon's view was a performance. "I could state facts about Mr. Lincoln's jokes on and gibes at Christianity and committees of ministers, who waited on him while President . . . that would shock a Christian people," he declared (though he offered no evidence).[50]
To conclude, there is ambivalence and internal contradiction—possibly even an element of desperation—in Herndon's discussion of Lincoln's wartime beliefs. Herndon wanted it both ways: his lecture, he stated, was "only intended to cover Mr. Lincoln's life in Illinois," yet he proffered the statements of Mary Lincoln and John Nicolay, and made them key evidence for concluding that the president "died an unbeliever." He could not be definitively sure that Lincoln's beliefs went unchanged during the presidency, yet in response to the suggestion that they evolved toward Christianity, Herndon used rhetoric of withering disdain. "What! Mr. Lincoln discard his logical faculties and reason with the heart? What! Mr. Lincoln believe that Jesus was the Christ of God . . . ! What! Mr. Lincoln believe that the New Testament was and is of special divine authority and fully and infallibly inspired . . . ! What, Mr. Lincoln believe that the Creator had connection through the form or instrumentality of a shadow with a Jewish girl? Blasphemy!" Herndon was right about Lincoln's embrace of Christianity being unproven at best, but his prejudices kept him from investigating the possibility that during the trials of wartime, Lincoln's faith crystalized, deepened, and drew him toward a belief in a God who intervened directly and powerfully in history. Herndon and his Lincoln Record are essential sources for understanding Lincoln's faith. But whatever else Lincoln was at his death, we can be sure that he was not "an unbeliever."
W. H. Herndon, Lincoln's Religion (Springfield, Ill.: Illinois State Register, 1873); David Donald, Lincoln's Herndon (New York: Knopf, 1948), 279.
Merrill D. Peterson, Lincoln in American Memory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 21.
Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 170.
William H. Herndon (WHH) to Josiah G. Holland, May 26, 1865, quoted in Douglas L. Wilson and Rodney O. Davis, eds., Herndon's Informants: Letters Interviews, and Statements about Abraham Lincoln (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998), xiv.
Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 197–202.
Cincinnati Commercial, January 29, 1866, quoted in Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 206.
Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 212–13.
WHH to Charles Henry Hart, November 26, 1866; WHH to Mr. Hickman, December 6, 1866, in Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 216–17.
WHH to Ward Hill Lamon, December 16, 1869, 25 February 1870, in Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 256–57.
Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 257, 268–69; Rodney O. Davis, introduction to Ward H. Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln: From His Birth to His Inauguration as President (Boston, 1872; repr., Lincoln, Nebr.: Bison Books, 1999), ix.
Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln, 492–97.
Scribner's Monthly, May-October 1872, 509–10.
James A. Reed, The Later Life and Religious Sentiments of Abraham Lincoln (New York: Scribner, 1873). The lecture is reprinted in revised form in William E. Barton, The Soul of Abraham Lincoln (New York: George H. Doran, [1920]), 314–35.
Herndon, Lincoln's Religion.
The informants on whose statements Herndon could draw included Elizabeth Abell, Newton Bateman, Caleb Carman, Francis B. Carpenter, Isaac Cogdal, Elizabeth Crawford, David Davis, John D. DeFrees, Ninian W. Edwards, Jesse Fell, Joseph Gillespie, James Gourlay, William Mentor Graham, Dennis F. Hanks, William H. Hanna, John B. Helm, John Hill, James W. Keyes, Mary Lincoln, Robert Todd Lincoln, Sarah Bush Johnston Lincoln, Bunbry B. Lloyd, James Matheny, Henry McHenry, John McNamar, Matilda Johnston Hall Moore, John G. Nicolay, Charles Henry Ray, James Smith, Joshua F. Speed, John Todd Stuart, Leonard Swett, John B. Weber, John H. Wickizer, and Daniel W. Wilder.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 576 (WHH interview, not later than March 2, 1870).
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 431–32 (WHH interview, November 1866); 576–77 (WHH interview, not later than March 2, 1870).
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 431–32 (WHH interview, November 1866); 576–77 (WHH interviews, by 2 March 1870); 582–83 (WHH interview, December 9, 1873).
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 547–50 (James Smith to WHH, January 24, 1867). For a careful discussion of Smith's association with the Lincoln family see Robert J. Havlik, "Abraham Lincoln and Rev. Dr. James Smith: Lincoln's Presbyterian Experience in Springfield," Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society 92, no. 3 (September 1999), 222–37.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 547.
J. G. Holland, The Life of Abraham Lincoln (Springfield, Mass.: Gurdon Bill, 1866), 237.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 436 (WHH interview, 1865–66), 572 (Bateman to WHH, March 8, 1869); Herndon, Lincoln's Religion.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 6 (John G. Nicolay to WHH, May 27, 1865); Herndon, Lincoln's Religion.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 358, 360 (WHH interviews, September 1866).
In his lecture, Herndon rendered this as "What is to be will be, and no prayers of ours can arrest the decree," and asked, "taking Mrs. Lincoln's words as true-what becomes of the Christian idea of prayer?"
Barton, The Soul of Abraham Lincoln, 325.
Herndon's disparaging remarks should have surprised no one who heard them. Lewis had run for mayor in the city election of 1841, beating Herndon's Whig party candidate by a single vote. The outgoing Whig-dominated council denied Lewis the office, after invalidating several "illegal" Democrat votes on a technicality. Kenneth J. Winkle, The Young Eagle: The Rise of Abraham Lincoln (Dallas: Taylor Trade Publishing, 2001), 196, 198.
Herndon, Lincoln's Religion; Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 54–58.
Emanuel Hertz, comp. and ed., The Hidden Lincoln: From the Letters and Papers of William H. Herndon (New York: Blue Ribbon Books, 1940), 64. Herndon wrote in similar terms at much the same time to Francis E. Abbot, editor of the free-thought journal the Index: "In one sense of the word, Mr. Lincoln was a Universalist, and in another sense he was a Unitarian; but he was a theist, as we now understand that word. . . . Mr Lincoln . . . was . . . sometimes quite wholly dwelling in atheism. In his happier moments he would swing back to theism, and dwell lovingly there.' Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln, 495.
For Lincoln's religious thought and practice see in particular Barton, The Soul of Abraham Lincoln; William J. Wolf, The Almost Chosen People: A Study of the Religion of Abraham Lincoln (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959); David Hein, "Lincoln's Theology and Political Ethics" in Kenneth W. Thompson, ed., Essays on Lincoln's Faith and Politics (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1983); Elton Trueblood, Abraham Lincoln: A Spiritual Biography (New York: Phoenix, 1986); Allen C. Guelzo, Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer President (Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans, 1999); William Lee Miller, Lincoln's Virtues: An Ethical Biography (New York: Knopf, 2002); Stewart Winger, Lincoln, Religion, and Romantic Cultural Politics (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2003); Richard Carwardine, Lincoln: A Life of Purpose and Power (New York: Knopf, 2006); Richard Carwardine, "Lincoln's Religion" in Eric Foner, ed., Our Lincoln: New Perspectives on Lincoln and His World (New York: W. W. Norton, 2008), 223–48; Ronald C. White Jr., A. Lincoln: A Biography (New York: Random, 2009).
Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln, 496.
Lamon, The Life of Abraham Lincoln, 495; Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 576–77.
James H. Matheny to J. A. Reed, December 16, 1863, and John T. Stuart to J. A. Reed, December 17, 1872, in Barton, The Soul of Abraham Lincoln, 319–21.
For reflections on Lincoln's evolving faith during wartime see especially Mark A. Noll, "'Both Pray to the Same God': The Singularity of Lincoln's Faith in the Era of the Civil War," Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association 18, no. 1 (Winter 1997), 1–26; Nicholas Parrillo, "Lincoln's Calvinist Transformation: Emancipation and War," Civil War History 46 (September 2000), 227–53; Ronald C. White Jr., Lincoln's Greatest Speech: The Second Inaugural (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2002); James Tackach, Lincoln's Moral Vision: The Second Inaugural Address (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2002); Samuel W. Calhoun and Lucas E. Morel, "Abraham Lincoln's Religion: The Case for His Ultimate Belief in a Personal, Sovereign God," Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association 33 (Winter 2012), 38–74.
Osborn H. Oldroyd, comp. and ed., The Lincoln Memorial: Album-Immortelles; Original Life Pictures, with Autographs, from the Hands and Hearts of Eminent Americans and Europeans, Contemporaries of the Great Martyr to Liberty, Together with Extracts from His Speeches, Letters and Sayings (New York: G. W. Carleton, 1882), 457.
Donald, Lincoln's Herndon, 9–12, 53–60.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 521 (Francis B. Carpenter to WHH, December 24, 1866).
Roy P. Basler et al., eds., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, 9 vols. (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953–55), 5:403–4. This undated document was probably penned in 1864 (not September 1862, as suggested by his secretaries John G. Nicolay and John M. Hay). Douglas L. Wilson, Lincoln's Sword: The Presidency and the Power of Words (New York: Knopf, 2006), 254–56.
Michael Burlingame, ed., An Oral History of Abraham Lincoln: John G. Nicolay's Interviews and Essays (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996), 5.
White, A. Lincoln, 403–4, 476–77, 625–27.
Wilson and Davis, Herndon's Informants, 497 (John D. DeFrees to WHH, December 4, 1866).
Hertz, The Hidden Lincoln, 77 (WHH to Ward Hill Lamon, March 6, 1870).
Originally published by Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association 35:2 (Summer 2014, 18-36) under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported license.
Tags: Abraham Lincoln History Religion
Previous: Spiritualism, Religion, and Mathematics in the Victorian Period
Next: Harper's Songs of Ancient Egypt

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
/ TAG Announces Sale of New Zealand Assets and Operations
TAG Announces Sale of New Zealand Assets and Operations
Vancouver, B.C. – November 6, 2018 – TAG Oil Ltd. ("TAG", TSX: TAO and OTCQX: TAOIF) announced today that it, along with certain of its subsidiaries in New Zealand, has entered into a definitive share and asset purchase agreement with Australian-based Tamarind Resources Pte. Ltd. ("Tamarind"), and certain of its subsidiaries (the "SPA").
This arm's length transaction is for the sale of substantially all of TAG's Taranaki Basin assets and operations in New Zealand (the "Transaction"). The sale will include TAG's 100% working interests in: PMP 38156 (Cheal and Cardiff), PMP 53803 (Sidewinder), PMP 60454 (Supplejack), PEP 51153 (Puka), PEP 57065 (Waitoriki) and TAG's 70% interest in PMP 60291 (Cheal East) and PEP 54877 (Cheal East) (collectively, the "NZ Assets"). Formal closing of the Transaction is expected in calendar Q1 2019, depending on timing of regulatory approvals.
Transaction Highlights
Cash payment to TAG of US$30 million at closing.
TAG to receive a 2.5% gross overriding royalty on future production from all NZ Assets.
Up to US$5 million in event specific payments payable on achieving various milestones (first milestone, grant of PMP 60454 (Supplejack) conversion, has already been achieved triggering payment of US$500,000 at closing).
The Transaction will be funded from Tamarind's available financial resources.
Commenting on the Transaction, Toby Pierce, CEO of TAG said, "We are very pleased to announce this transaction for TAG's New Zealand assets, which presents an attractive premium to the current market value of the assets for TAG shareholders. Further, the royalty and event specific payments provide continued exposure to future upside from the assets and Tamarind's aggressive capital program."
Following completion of the Transaction, TAG expects to have over C$0.50 per share in cash and working capital, continued exposure to the current operations and upside of the NZ Assets. Additionally, TAG will be in a better position to pursue its exploration prospects covering over 275,000 net acres in Australia, including the producing 25,000-acre petroleum mining license in the Surat Basin.
Additional Information on the Transaction
The Transaction will require the approval of two thirds of votes cast in person or by proxy by holders of common shares of TAG at the special meeting of TAG shareholders to be held in December 2018 (the "Meeting"). Information regarding the Transaction will be contained in the management information circular (the "Circular") that TAG will prepare, file and mail to shareholders in connection with the Meeting.All shareholders are urged to read the Circular as it contains additional important information.
Completion of the Transaction is also subject to a number of additional conditions typical of a transaction of this nature, including: (i) the receipt of Toronto Stock Exchange approval, New Zealand regulatory approval and all other required regulatory approvals and third party consents or approvals; (ii) the approval of TAG shareholders; (iii) the continued accuracy of the parties' representations and warranties as at the closing date; and (iv) the fulfillment of all covenants and obligations of the parties under the SPA having been complied with or performed, in all material respects, as of the closing date.
The SPA provides for, among other things, a non-solicitation covenant on the part of TAG, subject to a "fiduciary out" provision that entitles TAG to consider and accept a superior proposal to the Transaction. The SPA also provides for a non-completion fee of US$1 million if the Transaction is terminated by TAG in certain circumstances, including if TAG enters into an agreement with respect to a superior proposal.
The full text of the SPA may be found under TAG's profile at www.sedar.com. Additional information will be provided in the Circular provided to shareholders in connection with the Meeting.
Recommendation of the Board
The board of TAG, following an extensive review and analysis of the Transaction and the consideration of other available alternatives, and after consulting with its financial and legal advisors and receiving the recommendation of the Special Committeeconsisting of the independent directors of TAG's board, has unanimously: (i) determined that the Transaction is in the best interest of TAG; (ii) determined that the consideration being offered to TAG is fair from a financial point of view; and (iii) recommended that TAG's shareholders vote their shares in favor of the Transaction.
Advisors and Fairness Opinion
PillarFour Securities is acting as financial advisor to TAG with respect to the Transaction and has provided the board with a fairness opinion that, subject to the various factors, assumptions, qualifications and limitations upon which the opinion is based, the consideration to be received by TAG pursuant to the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to TAG. FirstEnergy Capital LLP ("GMP FirstEnergy") has provided the Special Committee and the remaining board members, with a fairness opinion that, subject to the various factors, assumptions, qualifications and limitations upon which the opinion is based, the consideration to be received by TAG pursuant to the Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to TAG.
Blake, Cassels and Graydon LLP is acting as Canadian legal counsel to TAG and Greenwood Roche is acting as New Zealand legal counsel to TAG.
About TAG Oil Ltd.
TAG Oil (https://tagoil.com/) is an international oil and gas explorer with established high netback production, development and exploration assets, including production infrastructure in New Zealand and Australia. TAG Oil currently has 85,282,252 shares outstanding.
Chris Beltgens, Vice President, Corporate Development
Email: info@tagoil.com
Website: https://tagoil.com/
Completion of the Transaction is subject to several conditions, including TSX acceptance, shareholder approval and New Zealand regulatory approval. The Transaction cannot close until, among other things, the required shareholder, TSX and New Zealand regulatory approval is obtained. There can be no assurance that the Transaction will be completed as proposed or at all.
Investors are cautioned that, except as disclosed in the Circular to be prepared in connection with the Transaction, any information released or received with respect to the Transaction may not be accurate or complete and should not be relied upon. Trading in the securities of TAG should be considered highly speculative.
The TSX has in no way passed upon the merits of the proposed Transaction and has neither approved nor disapproved the contents of this release.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Disclaimer
Statements contained in this release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainty affecting the business of TAG. Such statements can generally, but not always, be identified by words such as "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "intends", "estimates", "forecasts", "schedules", "prepares", "potential" and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "could" or "should" occur.
Forward-looking statements and information concerning anticipated financial performance are based on management's assumptions using information currently available. Forward-looking statements in this release include TAG's expectations regarding the ability to complete, and the anticipated results of, the Transaction, the funds that will be available to TAG upon completion of the Transaction, the achievement of any of the event specific payments, the anticipated closing date of the Transaction, the benefits to TAG of the gross overriding royalty, and the anticipated timing of the Meeting.
In making the forward-looking statements in this release, TAG has applied certain factors and assumptions that are based on information currently available to TAG as well as TAG's current beliefs and assumptions made by TAG, including that TAG will be able to complete the Transaction on the timelines expected, or at all, that the Transaction will benefit TAG, that TAG's New Zealand business will continue to be operated by Tamarind in a way that is beneficial to TAG and results in the achievement of the event specific payments and payment pursuant to the gross overriding royalty. Although TAG considers these beliefs and assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect, and the forward-looking statements in this release are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. These risks include that the Transaction does not close on the anticipated timeline, or at all, that TAG's New Zealand business will not be operated in a way that is beneficial to TAG or results in the achievement of the event specific payments pursuant to the gross overriding royalty. Although TAG has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. TAGundertakes no obligation, except as otherwise required by law, to update these forward-looking statements ifmanagement's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors change.


Properly every one of us has some sort of credit card debt, but when do we know that it's spiralling out of control? Well one way is if you're pay more than 15% of your monthly salary to your credit card bills then start to worry, but a worse way of dealing with this is borrowing cash from one credit card to pay another, this will only put you into more debt.
If a light comes on in your head after reading the start of this article then it's time to sit up and take some action, don't think for a minute you are the only one dealing with credit card debt, almost 40% of credit card holders are in this position why! I will tell you minimum payments.
Yep-minimum payments if you only pay the minimum payment on your monthly balance, what once was a small credit card bill will turn into a very costly one you'll end up paying back thousands, and will take years to clear.
How can I help myself sort out this problem!
Well if you have more than one credit card and you pay the minimum payment on them all, then this is what to do get the credit card with the highest APR and pay the most to this card, keep paying the minimum payment to the rest of your cards once the credit card with the highest APR is cleared go on to the next highest APR and so on until all the credit cards are paid off.
Another way to help is balance transfer deals try switching your card with one that has this on offer, they also offer 0% interest free period for 6-9 months great way to save some money.
People with only one credit card try not to use your card if that's not possible monitor what you spend you'll be amazed at the silly things you put on your credit card, including groceries, petrol, and night's-out you'll be amazed at how much interest is added on. People tend to forget about money I agree that credit cards are handy but they don't have to be used all the time, I guarantee if you monitor what you spend for a few months you will see the difference.
I know these things sound easy but it's amazing how many people just use their plastic friend to pay for everything, and really when you sit down and think it really is just common sense, hopefully following these simple steps will get you back on track.
Having a County Court Judgement or CCJ issued against you will have a severe impact on your credit rating, as it signifies that you have had serious problems paying back a loan or other form of credit, to the extent where your creditor has had to take court action against you to try and recover the debt.
If you get into arrears and fail to come to a repayment agreement, your creditor may decide that pursuing a CCJ is the only option. The first you'll hear about it is when you receive a 'Claim Form' through the post, sent to you by the county court. This form will set out the details of the claim, including who the creditor is and how much they say you owe them.
If you were unaware of the debt, for instance if you'd moved house and lost contact with the creditor, then repaying the full debt now will stop proceedings going any further. If however you can't clear the debt, then you should fill out an 'Admissions Form' which will also have been sent to you.
This form asks for information about your income and expenses, which the court will take into account when hearing your case. The Admissions Form should be returned within 16 days of the postmark it holds, although if you intend to dispute or defend the claim then you can apply to have the hearing delayed an extra 14 days in order to prepare your defence.
Once you've filled in these forms and returned them to the court, there will be a simple hearing carried out in private. You don't have to attend the hearing so long as you've completely filled in the necessary forms, or unless you wish to dispute aspects of the claim.
At the hearing, the court will objectively review the claim and the information you've provided, and come to a decision about the amount of money (if any) you owe, and how it should be repaid. It's important to note that no one is being found 'guilty' or 'innocent' here, the court is simply trying to fairly resolve a civil financial dispute.
If the decision upholds the claim against you, then the court order or CCJ is issued. Even at this stage you can stop the damage to your credit record, as you'll have one month from the date of the court hearing to repay the debt in full to stop the CCJ being put on record.
After a month, the CCJ will be entered on to the Register of County Court Judgements, and from there it will make its way onto your credit files held by the various credit reference agencies.
The presence of one or more CCJs on your credit file will effectively close off most kinds of finance to you, as most lenders will be very reluctant to advance credit to people in these circumstances. Once, however, you've cleared the debt, then the judgement will be marked as 'satisfied', and while this will not remove it from your record it is a lot less harmful to your credit worthiness than an uncleared CCJ.
If you have a CCJ on your record, you might be tempted by companies promising to remove it and clean up your rating. Unfortunately, this is only feasible in a few cases. Sometimes, the CCJ is entered on to your record by mistake even though you cleared the debt within the one month time limit. If this has happened then you have the right to have it removed from your records.
The only other ways to have a CCJ removed is to show that there was something wrong with the way in which the judgement was awarded. If, for example, you didn't receive the initial Claim Form, and you were unaware of the proceedings, then you didn't have the chance to defend yourself and so the judgement is invalid.
In these circumstances, you can apply to the court to 'set aside' the judgement and it will be removed from your file, with the whole process starting again with a new claim and hearing. Any attempt to gain a 'set aside' without a reasonable argument could be seen as wasting the court's time, with all the legal penalties that would entail.
If you receive a Claim Form through the post, it's important not to panic. Although a CCJ against your name is harmful to your credit rating, it isn't a criminal matter and won't lead to further action such as repossession of your home or bankruptcy. The CCJ procedure is there so that the court can help to resolve your debt in a way that is fair to both you and your creditor.


common control with the person or other entity specified.
(c) "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
opposed to the best interests of the Company.
physical or mental incapacity for a period of 180 consecutive days.
(i) "Stock" shall mean the Common Stock of the Company.
the Company owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the Voting Stock.
subject to termination in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
Company) and shall report to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company ("CEO").
discretion of the Board and/or the Committee.
5.   Hiring Payment; Annual Incentive Awards.
purposes of the Management Stock Purchase Plan.
terminated, become exercisable on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
provisions of Section 11 hereof, the Options shall terminate.
credited service for his actual employment with the Company.
Executive's employment arrangements with the Company.
reduced to zero):                 January 31.
remaining outstanding principal amount of the loan shall be forgiven.
notice to the other Party in accordance with Section 23 below.
original notice exist, at which time he shall thereupon be terminated for Cause.
hereof which the Executive is then obligated to repay.
are not in the nature of a penalty.
provides benefits after termination of employment.
the covenants and agreements of this Section.
13.  Effect of Agreement on Other Benefits.
law, except as provided in Section 20 below.
agreement between it and any other person, firm or organization.
the intended preservation of such rights and obligations.
fees, shall be borne by the Company.


text:
March For Our Lives: A New Generation Sets Aside Tribalism for a Progressive Cause
The dynamism and interracial character of last week's March For Our Lives rallies provides further evidence that American workers have a chance of challenging the wealthy for a bigger piece of the pie only when they put their tribal differences aside to fight together.
作者 Jon Jeter
WASHINGTON -- Google the name "Tallulah Bankhead" and you will be regaled (or mortified if your mores tend to the Victorian) with tales of the actor's libertine appetites, her breakout performance in the Hitchcock classic Lifeboat, or her half-camp, half-vamp villainess in the 1960s Batman television series. Wikipedia references her patrician mien
Jon Jeter
Jon Jeter is a published book author and two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist with more than 20 years of journalistic experience. He is a former Washington Post bureau chief and award-winning foreign correspondent on two continents, as well as a former radio and television producer for Chicago Public Media's "This American Life."
奋斗剧院:不要让戏剧笼罩系统性压迫的现实
正义是不可分割的:将巴勒斯坦重新置于美国穆斯林行动主义的中心
纪念希舍姆·艾哈迈德(Hisham Ahmed):活动家,教授和巴勒斯坦强国
In US Tour, Saudi Crown Prince Meets and Greets the Heavies of the Zionist Lobby
In an apparent bid to prove his reliability as an ally and his willingness to tackle the tough issues requiring "modernization," bin Salman met with a veritable who's-who of the hard-right pro-Israeli Jewish community.
作者 Elliott Gabriel
NEW YORK -- Saudi Arabia's king-in-waiting, Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman or "MBS," has long been suspected of pushing to forge a historic alliance between the Gulf Arab monarchy and apartheid Israel as a part of his reform
Elliott Gabriel
Elliott Gabriel is a former staff writer for teleSUR English and MintPress News based in Quito, Ecuador. He has taken extensive part in advocacy and organizing in the pro-labor, migrant justice and police accountability movements of Southern California and the state's Central Coast.
悉尼音乐节上的 BDS,与 Jennine Khalik 和 Sara Saleh
Bad Track Record Gets Worse as New Whistleblower Outed by The Intercept
"I am appalled that yet another whistleblower in touch with The Intercept has been outed and arrested. … [P]erhaps The Intercept should walk away from national security reporting before its lack of journalistic professionalism ruins any more lives." — CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou
作者 Whitney Webb Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb
MINNEAPOLIS – On Wednesday, Minnesota Public Radio (MPR) reported that former Minneapolis-based FBI agent Terry James Albury had been charged with leaking classified government information to the online publication The Intercept.
Whitney Webb has been a professional writer, researcher and journalist since 2016. She has written for several websites and, from 2017 to 2020, was a staff writer and senior investigative reporter for MintPress News. She currently writes for her own outlet Unlimited Hangout and contributes to The Last American Vagabond and MintPress News.
雪佛龙如何利用法律和联邦调查局来针对吹哨的律师史蒂文·唐齐格 (Steven Donziger)
丢失的发现者:将臭名昭著的邪教与中央情报局联系起来的埋藏文件
发现者:中央情报局与儿童性崇拜的联系随着报道从耸人听闻变为沉默而变得模糊
How the Islamophobia Industry Silences Voices of Dissent
The fight against Islamophobia, just as the fight against anti-Semitism, or any other form of prejudicial hate, begins by raising awareness of the many faces of those who make profits through fear and bigotry.
作者 Dr. Antonio Perra
How can a conflict started nearly two decades ago still be so central in the public discourse and so relevant for societal dialogue? How can important achievements of foreign policy fail to change the way societies look at certain issues? And why do we struggle so much to look at terrorist attacks as isolated crimes, but find it so easy to ascribe
泄露的文件暴露了叙利亚 Psyops 资深 Astroturfing Breadtube Star 以对抗 COVID 限制批评者
"以前未知的大屠杀":为什么允许以色列拥有巴勒斯坦历史?
9 Dead as Israel Responds to 'March of Great Return' Protest With Gunfire
"Dozens of signs have been set up across the border in Arabic, Hebrew, and English, saying 'We are not here to fight; we are here to return to our lands.'"
作者 Jessica Corbett
With worries that numbers will continue to rise, Israeli forces reportedly killed at least nine Palestinians and injured
Hopeless in Gaza? A Talk With Controversial Scholar Norman Finkelstein
Finkelstein argues that although Israel justified its blockade and violent assaults in the name of self-defense, in fact these actions were cynical exercises of brutal power against an essentially defenseless civilian population
作者 Eric Gordon
LOS ANGELES — "The nadir of the Palestinian struggle is now," says distinguished but controversial scholar Norman G. Finkelstein. He spoke on March 26 at the University of Southern California Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. "Nothing is happening there in Palestine. There is no mass resistance." That explains
Eric A. Gordon is the author of a biography of radical American composer Marc Blitzstein, co-author of composer Earl Robinson's autobiography, and the translator (from Portuguese) of a memoir by Brazilian author Hadasa Cytrynowicz. He holds a doctorate in history from Tulane University. He chaired the Southern California chapter of the National Writers Union, Local 1981 UAW (AFL-CIO) for two terms and is director emeritus of The Workmen's Circle/Arbeter Ring Southern California District. In 2015 he produced "City of the Future," a CD of Soviet Yiddish songs by Samuel Polonski.


text:
<?php

namespace Benchmarks\Doctrine\ODM\OrientDB\Event;

use Athletic\AthleticEvent;
use Doctrine\Common\EventManager;
use Doctrine\ODM\OrientDB\Event\ListenersInvoker;
use Doctrine\ODM\OrientDB\Events;
use Doctrine\ODM\OrientDB\Mapping\ClassMetadata;
use Doctrine\ODM\OrientDB\Mapping\ListenerResolver;

class ListenersInvokerEvent extends AthleticEvent
{
    /**
     * @var ListenersInvoker
     */
    private $li;

    private $md;

    protected function setUp() {
        $ev = new EventManager();
        $ev->addEventListener(Events::prePersist, new \stdClass());

        $lr = new ListenerResolver();
        $this->md = new ClassMetadata('Test');
        $this->md->documentListeners[Events::prePersist] = [];
        $this->md->lifecycleCallbacks[Events::prePersist] = [];

        $this->li = new ListenersInvoker($ev, $lr);
    }

    /**
     * @iterations 10000
     */
    public function getSubscribedSystems_short() {
        $this->li->getSubscribedSystems($this->md, Events::prePersist);
    }

    /**
     * @iterations 10000
     */
    public function getSubscribedSystems2_short() {
        $this->li->getSubscribedSystems2($this->md, Events::prePersist);
    }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Keith is a self taught computer enthusiastic. His passions include computer security, home automation, and home theater systems. He has built several home theater systems and has built a 4TB+ file server for streaming media across his home network. Once a house is purchased HTPCs will be placed all over the home and home automation will be setup.


text:
New York Jets Coaching Search: Why Mike McCarthy Is Not A Prize
Dan Essien on why Mike McCarthy is not the safe hire he's being made out to be
There seems to be growing momentum linking Mike McCarthy to the New York Jets vacant head coach position. Many are even saying he should be at the top of the Jets' list. Let's take a look at why that sentiment is misleading and why the Jets could do much better.
Mike McCarthy is a well known name around the NFL. He's a Super Bowl champion and has been a head coach for the Packers for 12 years after bouncing around the NFL and college as an offensive coordinator. Mike McCarthy has an impressive past. But the Jets shouldn't be looking for a coach with just an impressive past and NFL head coaching experience. They need a coach that can elevate their current team. I think there's a ton of evidence that suggests that coach is not Mike McCarthy.
Failure to Adapt
We are all well aware of Mike McCarthy's past successes. We should all be more aware that the NFL has changed quite a bit since the Packers were at their peak and I'm not sure McCarthy has done much to keep up. An article by Bill Barnwell stated that most believe the Packers offense has been far too reliant on Rodgers' improvisation. His recent results support this.
Teams like the Saints were able to develop new systems around their aging star quarterbacks that took the pressure off of them. The Saints drafted Alvin Kamara, and utilized him and Mark Ingram to ease things for Brees. McCarthy trotted out Ty Montgomery as the Packers feature back for a good amount of time from 2016-17, despite how obviously unsustainable it was. Of course, Ty Montgomery's injuries came, and his effectiveness fell off of cliff.
Aaron Jones emerged as the starting RB in Green Bay after an impressive rookie season in 2017. But somehow Jones had a pretty tame season alongside Aaron Rodgers. By comparison, James Conner, who was not really known for his receiving prowess, stepped into Le'veon Bell's role in both the rushing and passing game and had a huge season. Conner averaged 113 yards from scrimmage per game this season, including 4 catches a game. He did all this with a first time NFL offensive coordinator and a defensive minded head coach. Aaron Jones averaged 77 yards from scrimmage per game and just 2 catches per game. McCarthy did mention that Jones needed to be a bigger part of the passing game in October. But in the end, he only gave him 3 targets a game this season (Conner averaged 5.5 targets per game). Good offenses can scheme opportunities for their playmakers. The Packers struggled to do so. The Packers had an opportunity to diversify their offense, gain some balance, and ease pressure off of Rodgers this season. Instead, their offense regressed and leaned, again, on Rodgers hero-ball.
No Aaron, No Offense
The Jets need a coach whose success isn't so tightly linked to a single player. They need a coach that instills confidence in his players no matter who is on the field. Some may point to Matt Flynn keeping the Packers afloat for a few games in 2013 as an example of McCarthy succeeding without Rodgers. But we also saw Todd Bowles and Chan Gailey win 10 games with Ryan Fitzpatrick in 2015 and that, honestly, was more impressive. But in addition, what we've seen more recently from McCarthy without Aaron Rodgers is telling.
In 2017, McCarthy had another opportunity to show he can exist without Aaron Rodgers and it was ugly. When Rodgers went down with an injury 6 games into the season, the Packers were 4-2. They then proceeded to go 3-6 without him, and then lost the season finale in his week 17. In fact, we're pretty used to seeing Rodgers play through injury in recent years. The team looks toothless without him. In 2017, the Packers finished 21st in points, 26th in total yards, and 25th in passing yards (behind the Jets duo of Josh McCown and Bryce Petty).
McCarthy has had 12 years to develop an offense that can at least exist without Rodgers. His failure to do so is maybe worse than his failure to improve his game management abilities in those same 12 years. We've seen teams this season that have gone through sudden change and performed better than McCarthy did with Aaron Rodgers in 2018. The aforementioned Steelers offense was significantly better statistically despite the loss of both offensive coordinator and All-Pro starting running back. The Ravens finished as a better scoring offense than the Packers, despite switching to a rookie quarterback midseason. To use another candidate in this comparison, Todd Monken had turnover dispensers at QB in Jameis Winston and Ryan Fitzpatrick, and an abysmal running backs group. His offense was still better than Mike McCarthy's this season. The Jets need to go with a coach that's on the upward trend. Not a coach flailing to stay afloat.
He's Not Andy Reid
Many have suggested the Jets may go with McCarthy in an attempt to get something similar to what the Chiefs have gotten out of Andy Reid. Mike McCarthy is not Andy Reid. In fact, the actual expansive gulf between Reid and McCarthy should give you pause. It's almost disrespectful to even compare them. Especially when you consider that none of McCarthy's assistants have gone on to any truly notable success outside of Green Bay. And don't even try to bring Belichick into this. Right now, Reid has his fingerprint on three different offenses across the NFL: his own in Kansas City, Doug Pederson's in Philadelphia, and Matt Nagy's in Chicago. He'll likely have four next season, as offensive coordinator, Eric Bieniemy, is likely to accept a head coaching offer. People are already talking about Reid's 31-year old quarterbacks coach Mike Kafka who's only been in Kansas City since 2017.
Beyond assistants, Reid has shown the ability to keep his offense fresh for more than a decade. Despite the fact his best offensive minds have moved on over the years, Reid's offense continues to get better. He's always been at the forefront of innovation and he's always shown he can succeed with any type of quarterback. Not only does he not get enough credit for what he did with Alex Smith, he doesn't get enough credit for what he did with Michael Vick. He signed a guy that had been out of the NFL for two years, and built him back up in a year. Vick was NFL comeback player of the year and a Pro Bowler in 2010 while posting career highs in TD passes, completion percentage and QBR.
Reid has succeeded with all sorts of levels of talent at quarterback. Of late, McCarthy has been underwhelming with one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time. Mike McCarthy is not Andy Reid and no one should ever insinuate there's anything more than a 0.000000001% chance he can do what Reid has done.
It's true: the Jets can do much worse than Mike McCarthy. But this isn't just another Jets offseason with no direction and no hope on the horizon. The Jets finally have their franchise quarterback in Sam Darnold. They can't afford to get their next hire wrong. McCarthy is considered a safe choice because he's a familiar name and he has a Super Bowl on his resume. But take a look around. Bill Belichick, Andy Reid, and Pete Carroll are the only coaches in the NFL who are consistently succeeding with more than one NFL head coaching stint under their belt. The league is in the midst of a great deal of change. Plenty of coaches have been left in the dust. The Jets need a coach that's keeping up.
Author Daniel EssienPosted on January 4, 2019 Format VideoCategories Daniel Essien, Featured Posts, New York Jets, NFL, OpinionTags Aaron Jones, Aaron Rodgers, Andy Reid, Mike McCarthy, New York Jets, NFL, Sam Darnold, Todd Monken
Previous Previous post: Postseason 2019 NFL Mock Draft
Next Next post: Episode 209 – Coaching Search: The College Ranks with Connor Rogers