text:
Ames Community High School Assessment of Existing Building and Site Summary
Ames Community School District Phase 1 - Task 1 May 31, 2017
The development of the following summary has involved many representatives from the Ames High School community and stakeholders who were integral to the process. The following list represents participants and contributors throughout the process. Ames Community School District
Ames High School Faculty Participants
Luke Deardorff
School Board, President
Monica Behning
Mary Kautzby
Alisa Frandsen
School Board, Vice President
Keith Papin
Andy Fecht
Sam Reichart
Rodney Briggs
School Board, Director
Vicki Hales
Tracy Rial
Mike Espeset
Shelli Hassebrock
Rhonda Schmaltz
Tim Rasmussen
Kent Jahn
Aileen Sullivan
Darin Johnson
Joel Sullivan
Judge Johnston
Carol Vanwaardhuizen
Lewis Rosser
Bill Talbot
Dr. Tim Taylor
Dr. Mandy Ross
Spence Evans
Principal, Ames High School
Gerry Peters
Director of Facilities Planning & Management
Karl Hehr
Mark Jurgensen
Consultant Team Name
HAILA Architecture | Structure | Planning Ltd Architecture
John Haila Sam Stagg Chad West Art Baumgartner Leila Ammar Nathan McKewon
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (SOM) Architecture
Scott Duncan Michael Jividen Kayleen Kulesza Dan O'Riley Walaid Sehwail Adam Semel Scott Steffes
KCL Engineering Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
Mark LaCroix Jordan Vos
Snyder & Associates Civil Engineering
Don Marner Gregg Leaders
Taylor Ohde Kitchell
Steve Lang Gary Houdeshell Evan Heggen
HAILA ASP Ltd. • KCL Engineering • Taylor Ohde Kitchell • Synder Associates Inc. • 2017 May 31 Phase 4
Ames Community School District • Ames High School
Contents Part 1 | Executive Summary.................................................................................. 05 Part 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report.......................................................11 2.0 Physical Assessment Overall Assessment
Individual Building Physical Assessments
2.1 Functional and Philosophical Assessment Overall Assessment
2.2 Building Systems Assessment General Assessment
Area Specific Descriptions
Part 3 | General Findings and Observations........................................................ 49 Property 50 Facilities 50 Access 51 Parking Lots and Pavements
Utilities 51 Storm Water Management
Landscaping 52
Exhibits .................................................................................................................. 53 Building Additions Timeline Floor Plans
PART 1 | Executive Summary Introduction Phase 1 (of 2) for a high school project has been initiated by the Ames CSD to ask the following question: Should the district add-on and renovate the existing site and high school facility or should the district build a new high school facility? This report is an assessment of the existing high school facility and site and is the first step of five "Tasks" to help answer this question. This report has been generated by a design and construction management team including HAILA Architecture | Structure | Planning, Skidmore Owings and Merrill, KCL Engineering, Snyder and Associates, and TOK Construction. The team has been working together by participating in multiple building tours, observations, investigations, and meetings. Many discussions were had among the team with district administration, school administration, department leaders, and facility management staff. This effort has culminated in providing this Task 1 report. This Task 1 report offers a high level assessment on the physical and philosophical condition of the existing high school property and how both aspects impact the functionality, efficiency, and pedagogical validity of the existing facility. The physical condition component briefly describes the quality of the exterior envelope, the interior finishes, the status of existing infrastructure and building systems, ADA accessibility, security, and site amenities. The philosophical and functional assessment analyzes the circulation, size, adjacencies & wayfinding of spaces, and 21st Learning characteristics such as the need for collaboration, flexibility, daylighting, and high quality spatial atmosphere. The report is organized first by discipline and then building addition. The exterior envelope, structure, and interiors, organized by building addition, are covered first. The functional and philosophical aspects for each building are then addressed. Then the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are covered for each building. Finally, the exterior site amenities are covered at the end of the report. Physical Conditions The existing Ames High School facility consists of an aggregate of fifteen (15) building units that have been constructed over a period of fifty-six (56) years, from 1960 to present. The most recent substantial renovation/addition was completed in 2005 including a new kitchen, cafeteria, main entry/ reception, administrative offices, wrestling room, and a new athletic wing entrance. Each addition/renovation has its own unique characteristics with varying types and levels of construction and finishes throughout the facility. In general, the physical condition of the existing building is considered "fair to good". The majority of the exterior envelope is masonry with minor need for tuck-pointing maintenance. Many of the existing metal and single ply roofs have 10-20 years of life expectancy with the exception of the gym roof and the ballasted EPDM roof. These will need replaced soon. The majority of the gutters and downspouts need resized and replaced as they are causing overflow and staining of the exterior masonry. All of the exterior windows were replaced between 2011-2014. Maybe the largest problem concerning the exterior envelope is that most of the exterior masonry walls lack insulation and perform poorly concerning energy conservation. The existing structural systems are sound and adequate for continued use. There is no apparent immediate or long term threat of system failure. There is minor evidence of subtle shifting and cracking in various walls, but nothing substantial enough for cause of alarm. While the majority of the interior finishes are durable and have been well maintained, most are original to their respective building additions and need replaced and modernized. There is still some remaining asbestos on site, but internal processes are currently in place to have asbestos removed within the next few years.
HAILA ASP Ltd. • KCL Engineering • Taylor Ohde Kitchell • Snyder Associates Inc. • 2017 May 31 Phase 1
PART 1 | Executive Summary Physical accessibility and circulation are two of the largest problems facing the existing school. There are 15 different floor elevations represented throughout the school all connected by ramps and elevators that contribute to an even larger problem of congested internal circulation and difficult wayfinding. The many additions and renovations have resulted in a facility that is sprawling, disjointed, and difficult to navigate. Security and supervision is are other large problems,. There are currently eighty three exterior doors that must be secured. Electronic monitoring and access have been installed on some, but not all exterior doors. Many of the building additions cannot be closed or isolated due to egress requirements or physical constraints of the building. The location and function of the passenger elevator poses a security threat by allowing access to multiple levels and areas when the building is open after hours. The sprawling additions have also resulted in many corridors and areas that are not easily supervised and controlled. Functional and Philosophical Aspects The current enrollment of the high school is approximately 1,325 students with a future enrollment target of 1,400 to 1,600 students. The existing "cornerstone" spaces of the auditorium, gymnasium, cafeteria, and media center are too small and are difficult to add-on to. Most classroom spaces are currently adequately sized, but do not allow for much collaborative activity or flexible use. The majority of the corridors and stairs are too narrow and don't allow for efficient circulation. The corridors are very congested between classes and cannot accommodate effective collaborative activity during class time. The many sprawling and narrow corridors are also difficult for wayfinding and create hidden areas difficult to supervise and maintain security. The proximity of the larger "cornerstone" spaces and academic wings lack an inherent logic and are not conducive to simple circulation and wayfinding. For instance, public functions in the auditorium are only accessible through corridors adjacent to classrooms. The sprawling and disjointed additions have created long travel distances, unsupervised areas, and inefficient adjacencies such as the decentralized location of the cafeteria and confusing locker room locations. Many of these functional inefficiencies have lead to a less than ideal teaching and learning environment and some philosophical shortcomings. Collaborative and flexible spaces and classrooms are limited and lack the ability for cross curricular teaching and learning. Natural daylighting is not prevalent in every space. The majority of the building is dated, very institutional in its appearance and function, and is need of a complete interior face lift. Mechanical Systems A high level mechanical system review was performed for the majority of the facility. Areas not reviewed included the pool and green house. Several site walkthroughs were performed as well as a review of the existing construction documents. The intent of the assessment was to determine the general condition of the mechanical systems, their capacity for expansion, and the anticipated time frame for replacement. In general the mechanical systems were found to be in good condition; with the only exception being the fine arts addition. The fine arts areas have had minimal work since their initial construction; the majority of equipment is over 40 years old and is due for replacement. Although it was found that there is capacity for expansion with some of the HVAC central plant equipment; this expansion will be limited in areas and size. Current chilled system added capacity is estimated to be less than 100 Tons of cooling. Additionally; this expansion would need to take place
PART 1 | Executive Summary where taps are currently installed or near chilled water mains. The gymnasium area does not have these conditions. A breakdown of the mechanical systems per area has been described in detail in Part 2 of this report. Electrical and Technology Systems: A high level electrical and technology system review was performed for the majority of the facility. Areas not reviewed included the pool and green house. Several site walkthroughs were performed as well as a review of the existing construction documents. In addition, reviews were conducted with district staff to specifically review the The intent of the assessment was to determine the general condition of the electrical and technology systems, their capacity for expansion, and the anticipated time frame for replacement. In general, the main electrical service entrances to the high school are in good condition with some room for expansion. The most recent service could add in the range of 20% additional loads. The other services appear to be at their capacity. Beyond the service entrance, many of the branch panels and wiring are original to the construction in the older portion of the facility and are at their useful service life. The Iowa Communications Network (ICN) is the sole internet service provider for the high school. A fiber optic terminal services (FOTS) room was established inside the footprint of the building. Over time, this room has developed into a hub of internet connectivity for not only Ames High School but also for many other schools, businesses and organizations. Special coordination and phasing of this room will need to be addressed with any future plan of the high school as zero downtime will be allowed for these services. A range of Category 5, 5e and 6 cabling has been utilized for copper connectivity inside the high school. Several telecommunications rooms host wall mounted racks with a variety of room constraints or rack space constraints. The older cabling systems do not meet the current and future capacity needs of the data systems Honeywell intrusion, Software House access control and Genetec video surveillance are what comprise the school's security systems. Both the Software House and Genetec systems have had recent upgrades and/or extensions to the technology. An addressable Notifier 3030 fire detection and alarm system was installed in 2011. This system hosts voice evacuation features to allow for emergency communication announcements. A general description of the electrical and technology systems overall and briefly per area has been described in detail in Part 2 of this report. Potential Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) The Code of Iowa defines when an LCCA is required when it states that "… a public agency responsible for the construction or renovation of a facility shall… include as a design criterion the requirement that a life cycle cost analysis be conducted for the facility." (emphasis added)(470.2) Pertinent Code (470.1) definitions are as follows: • "'Facility means a building having twenty thousand square feet or more of usable floor space that is heated or cooled by a mechanical or electrical system or any building, system, or physical operation which consumes more than forty thousand British thermal units (BTUs) per square foot per year." • "'Renovation' means a project where additions or alterations exceed fifty percent of the value of a facility and will affect an energy system."
Existing Building Assessment Report
P2.0 Physical Assessment
Overall Assessment.............................................................................................................................................12 Individual Building Physical Assessments.........................................................................................................15 2.1 Functional and Philosophical Assessment Overall Assessment............................................................................................................................................ 23 Individual Building Physical Assessments........................................................................................................ 25 2.2 Building Systems Assessment General Assessment.......................................................................................................................................... 34 Area Specific Descriptions................................................................................................................................. 37
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report 2.0 Physical Assessment A. Overall Assessment
The following assessment is general in nature and applies to the high school facility as a whole. Individual building assessments are located in Section B of Part 2.0. Exterior Envelope Newer windows were installed over a four-year period (2011 - 2014) throughout the facility and are generally in very good condition. In the original building units I, II, and III, original glass block above the windows has been covered with insulated metal panels. It would be ideal to revert back to the originally designed window opening sizes to allow more natural daylight into the building. Overall, the existing masonry is in relatively good condition. Some maintenance of masonry is needed (tuck pointing) at various locations (See Figure 2).
Figure 1: Algae growth at Masonry
Figure 2: Recommended Tuckpointing Example at 1960 Original Building
Much of the building has sloped standing seam metal roofs which were installed over the original flat roof system, circa 2000 - 2002. The metal roofs are generally in good condition and should last another 10 to 20 years, with the exception of the gymnasium roof, which is showing signs of wear and need of replacement. Water from the metal roofs flows to perimeter gutters and downspouts. The downspouts appear to be undersized, causing water from the gutters to overflow and drain onto the adjacent masonry. As a result, staining of masonry and algae growth is visible at many locations of the building. (See Figure 1) The remaining roofs which are not standing seam metal consist of a combination of single ply membrane roofing systems – both adhered and ballasted EPDM as well as TPO systems are present. According to Gerry Peters, these roofs are in good condition and are inspected each Spring using
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report infrared technology to identify any potential problem areas. The fully adhered EPDM roofing should last another 10 years; however, the ballasted roofs are likely at the end of their life span and will require removal and replacement. The adhered TPO roofing will probably last another 15 to 20 years before replacement is necessary. Structural Systems Overall, the structural systems are in very good condition and suitable for reuse. The original building and the Unit II and Unit III additions are constructed with concrete columns and beams, indicating that the corridor walls in this portion of the building are not load bearing. This is advantageous and would allow reconfiguration of spaces without adversely affecting the overall structure. Interior Conditions & Finishes Overall, the interior finishes have been well maintained and are in serviceable condition, with some areas of the building better than others. The materials and finishes in the original buildings are dated and need to be replaced and modernized. (See Figure 3) Hazardous Materials Some asbestos containing materials (ACM) are present in the form of floor tile & adhesive and piping insulation within the mechanical tunnels. The District has completed a hazardous materials assessment and is currently engaged in routine abatement of hazardous materials.
Figure 3: Dated Interior Finishes
Accessibility Although the existing facility contains fifteen (15) different levels, most spaces in the facility are considered officially accessible, with the exception of several restrooms. (See Figure 4) Despite the official accessible status of the building, these fifteen different levels throughout the building do pose circulation concerns particularly regarding safety and wayfinding. The ramps are not always apparent for visitors or new students and parents and the subtle level changes in several primary corridors can be considered a safety risk. The building contains a passenger elevator and a freight elevator, which are not centrally located and are difficult to find. The freight elevator is in need of replacement. A lift located just to the east of the Media Center is no longer used and has been closed off. (Figure 5) Many of the doors throughout the facility have knob operators in lieu of lever handles, which is problematic for persons with disabilities.
Figure 4: Inaccessible Bathroom
Figure 5: Abandoned Lift at Media Center HAILA ASP Ltd. • KCL Engineering • Taylor Ohde Kitchell • Snyder Associates Inc. • 2017 May 31 Phase 1
Security Security is a challenge through the entire facility. There are a total of eighty-three (83) exterior doors that must be secured. This has been addressed via electronic access controls which have been installed at various locations. Visual supervision of corridors and other common spaces is very difficult due to the facility's configuration, with many blind spots present throughout; this condition currently requires all staff to be present in the common areas during class changes. Gerry Peters has indicated that the location of the passenger elevator poses a security challenge because it allows access to several areas of the building when used after hours. Unobstructed access to many areas of the building is possible when the building is used for after-hours events, such as performances in the auditorium and events held in the Gymnasium. The District would like to strategically compartmentalize the building to restrict access during after-hours events and in the event of an emergency situation, such as a building intruder.
Corridors, Common Spaces, and Exterior Entrances
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report B. Individual Building Physical Assessments
The following items are unique to each individual building within the high school facility. General items that apply to the high school facility as a whole are located in Section A of Part 2.0.
1960 - Original Building
Exterior Envelope The original building does not contain insulation within the exterior wall assembly and is not energy efficient. Some of the exterior walls are clad with wood siding, referred to as T-111 siding (See Figure 6), at locations where original glass block clerestory window openings have been covered up. Insulated metal panels are present at original window openings within the interior courtyards. The wood siding is in poor condition and needs replaced. Alternatively, reverting back to the originally designed window openings would be ideal, allowing more natural daylight into the building. The roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels which were installed over the original flat roof system.
Figure 6: T-111 Siding
Interior Finishes Floors: Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT), carpet Walls: Glazed masonry tile, concrete masonry units (CMU), gypsum board partitions Base: Glazed masonry tile, resilient base Ceilings: Acoustical tile ceilings Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Lockers: Metal Structural Systems Concrete columns and beams at corridors; load-bearing exterior masonry walls. Building 1 is primarily slab on grade with mechanical tunnels below, with a lower level mechanical room. The roof structure of Building Units I, II, and III consists of a combination of steel bar joists with precast concrete roof panels or steel deck and some concrete structural elements.
1962 - Unit II Addition
Exterior Envelope The original building does not contain insulation within the exterior wall assembly and is not energy efficient. Original glass block clerestory window openings have been covered up. Roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels which were installed over the original flat roof system. Interior Finishes Floors: Vinyl Composition Tile (VCT), carpet Walls: Glazed masonry tile, concrete masonry units (CMU), gypsum board partitions, some movable partitions Base: Glazed masonry tile, resilient base Ceilings: Acoustical tile ceilings Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Lockers: Metal Structural Systems Concrete columns and beams at corridors; load-bearing exterior masonry walls; cast-in-place concrete foundation walls at basement level. Building Unit II is comprised of 2-stories and has a basement level with daylight views to the south. The roof structure of Building Units I, II, and III consists of a combination of steel bar joists with precast concrete roof panels or steel deck and some concrete structural elements.
1963 - Unit III Addition (Remodeled in 1994)
Exterior Envelope Exterior Envelope: The original building does not contain insulation within the exterior wall assembly and is not energy efficient. Original glass block clerestory window openings have been covered up. Roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels which were installed over the original flat roof system; fully adhered EPDM exists at roof of semi-circular building protrusion on west side Figure 7: Unit II & III at Courtyard
Interior Finishes Floors: Carpet, rubber tile at Weight Training Room Walls: Glazed masonry tile, concrete masonry units (CMU), gypsum board partitions Base: Glazed masonry tile, resilient base Ceilings: Acoustical tile ceilings Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Lockers: Metal The lower level of this portion of the facility contains the Weight Training Room and adjacent locker rooms. This space is in very good condition with updated finishes. Structural Systems Structural System: Concrete columns and beams at corridors; load-bearing exterior masonry walls; cast-in-place concrete foundation walls at basement level. Building III is comprised of 2-stories and has a basement level with daylight views to the west. The roof structure of Building Units I, II, and III consists of a combination of steel bar joists with precast concrete roof panels or steel deck and some concrete structural elements.
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report
Figure 8:Swimming Pool Building
1965 - Swimming Pool
This portion of the existing facility has reached the end of its useful life and needs to be demolished. There are several deficiencies, including a leaky pool basin and structural deterioration, that must be addressed, and the costs to make repairs far outweigh the benefit of keeping the existing facility operational. The District is currently involved in a design process and discussion that envisions a new Aquatic Center to be placed potentially somewhere on the existing site. The link between the Swimming Pool and Gymnasium is also showing significant wear and should be included in the demolition of the Swimming Pool building. Evidence of water infiltration can be seen at the subgrade foundation walls as well as residue on the walls that could be caused from storage of pool treatment chemicals in this area of the building. (See Figure 9) Figure 9: Water Infiltration
1965 - Stadium Addition
This portion of the existing facility is in good condition and includes the stadium with bleachers, a concessions building, a track, a football field, and a storage building.
1966 - Gymnasium Addition (Original Gymnasium) Exterior Envelope Brick veneer masonry; roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels. Both of which are in relatively good condition. Roof is showing signs of wear and is in need of replacement. (Figure 10) Interior Finishes Floors: Vinyl composition tile (VCT) at corridors; terrazzo at concessions area; wood gym floor Walls: Interior brick masonry; concrete masonry units (CMU) Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Exposed precast concrete plank; exposed roof structure (painted); suspended wood-paneled cloud at concessions area Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal
Figure 10: Gymnasium Roof Wear
Structural Systems Structural System: Load-bearing exterior masonry walls; steel trusses and bar joists; steel acoustical roof deck
1972 - Fine Arts Addition
Auditorium, Vocal, Orchestra, Band, Art, Dark Room Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; single ply TPO membrane roof, installed 2011
Figure 11: Auditorium
Interior Finishes Floors: Vinyl composition tile (VCT); carpet; sealed concrete Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU); interior brick masonry, gypsum board partitions Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Precast concrete plank; exposed structure (painted); acoustical ceiling tile (ACT); wood panels in auditorium Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Millwork: Cabinets in Art Rooms - poor condition / need replaced Structural Systems Load-bearing exterior walls; steel trusses & bar joists; steel roof deck Miscellaneous The auditorium contains a control room, audience seating, an orchestra pit, a stage, and a back stage area with fly loft and set construction area. The existing lighting, sound system, fly loft components, curtains, etc. need replaced and are not suitable for reuse. The Art Rooms are in fair to poor condition and are in need of upgrades. The roof consists of TPO membrane, which is in relatively good condition.
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report 1978 - Chemical Storage Building Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; roof assembly consists of wood sheathing and asphalt shingles Interior Finishes Floors: Sealed concrete Walls: Gypsum board Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Gypsum board Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Structural Systems Load-bearing wood stud exterior wall framing; wood roof rafters
Figure 12: Greenhouse & Chemical Storage Building
Miscellaneous This building was originally built to house chemicals needed for the science curriculum. It is now used for file storage and is not worth salvaging for reuse due to its awkward configuration with respect to the remainder of the building and its use of combustible construction materials, which are no longer code compliant.
1985 - Greenhouse Exterior Envelope Aluminum framing with glazing Interior Finishes Exposed structure; concrete pavers Structural Systems Pre-engineered aluminum framing system Miscellaneous This building is in fair condition and needs maintenance. The connection of the greenhouse to the original building is reported to be problematic and a source of water infiltration, a condition that will need to be addressed.
1986 - Gymnasium II Addition Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation is present; roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels Interior Finishes Floors: Synthetic Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU) Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Exposed structure (painted) Doors: Hollow metal Structural Systems Load-bearing exterior walls; steel trusses and bar joists; steel acoustical roof deck
1989 - Guidance Area Addition Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity insulation; concrete masonry units (CMU) - glazed face; roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels Interior Finishes Floors: Carpet Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU); gypsum board partitions Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Acoustical ceiling tile (ACT) Doors: Wood Structural Systems Load-bearing exterior walls; steel columns & beams; steel bar joists; steel roof deck
1995 - Media Center & Science Classrooms Addition Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation; concrete masonry units (CMU); roof consists of sloped standing seam metal panels Interior Finishes Floors: Vinyl composition tile (VCT); sealed concrete; carpet Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU); interior brick masonry; gypsum board partitions Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Acoustical ceiling tiles (ACT); exposed roof structure (painted); tectum acoustical panels Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Millwork: Lab casework - good condition Lockers: Metal (not recessed) Structural Systems Structural System: Load-bearing exterior masonry walls; sloped steel bar joists; steel columns & beams in Media Center
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report 1998 - Fitness Center Addition (Cheer and Dance Room)
Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation; concrete masonry units (CMU); roof consists of a ballasted EPDM membrane Interior Finishes Floors: Athletic mat over wood interlocking dance floor (which can be relocated) Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU) Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Exposed roof structure (painted) Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Structural Systems Load bearing masonry exterior walls; steel bar joists; steel roof deck
1999 - Band Room Addition
Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation; concrete masonry units (CMU); roof consists of standing seam metal roof panels Interior Finishes Floors: Carpet; need to be replaced soon Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU); movable partition wall Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Exposed roof structure (painted) Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Structural Systems Load bearing masonry exterior walls; steel bar joists; steel roof deck
2005 - Kitchen, Loading Dock, and Cafeteria Additions Exterior Envelope Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation; concrete masonry units (CMU); roof consists of an adhered EPDM membrane - good condition
Figure 13: Cafeteria Addition
Interior Finishes Floors: Terrazzo; quarry tile; sealed concrete Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU) Base: Resilient base; quarry tile Ceilings: Exposed structure; acoustical roof deck; acoustical ceiling tile (ACT) Doors: Hollow metal Structural Systems Load-bearing exterior masonry walls; steel columns & beams; steel bar joists; steel roof deck; steel acoustical roof deck in Cafeteria Miscellaneous The Cafeteria space is in good condition with the exception of a dated paint scheme. The central kitchen is in very good condition and produces food for the high school as well as three (3) of the elementary schools, equaling approximately 3,000 students
2005 - Wrestling Room Addition Exterior Envelope Exterior Envelope: Brick masonry veneer; cavity wall insulation, concrete masonry units (CMU); roof consists of an adhered EPDM membrane - good condition Interior Finishes Floors: Sealed concrete Walls: Concrete masonry units (CMU); gypsum board partitions Base: Resilient base Ceilings: Exposed roof structure (painted) Doors: Combination of wood and hollow metal Structural Systems Structural System: Load bearing masonry exterior walls; steel bar joists; steel roof deck
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report 2.1 Functional and Philosophical Assessment A. Overall Assessment
The following assessment is general in nature and applies to the high school facility as a whole. Individual building assessments are located in Section B of Part 2.1 Functional Capacity and Efficiency: The current enrollment at the High School is approximately 1,325 students. The District would like for the facility to be able to accommodate 1,400 to 1,600 students. The existing "cornerstone" spaces (auditorium, gymnasium, cafeteria, and media center) are not large enough, in some cases, to accommodate current student population or large enough to accommodate the District's projected student growth. These types of spaces are not easily expanded and while they could continue in service, attempting to reuse them to accommodate the future enlarged student population would be detrimental and limiting to the District's goals and desires. The existing facility's configuration has challenges that make it difficult to accommodate the desired number of students. • The Auditorium is too small. It only contains 596 seats and 800 seats is desirable quantity. • The Gymnasium is too small to accommodate the desired amount of spectators of 2000 and limits the amount of teams who can practice at one time. This space is considered extremely inefficient as it also functions as a "corridor" where students walking through the gym interrupt the current class in session. • The cafeteria is too small to meet the desired lunch room function/need of seating 800 students at one time. • Most of the corridors are too narrow and are often congested between classes • The Media Center is too small to accommodate 300 students which is the desired amount of students to be utilizing the space at one time. Circulation & Size: Most of the existing corridors are too narrow to accommodate the current population of students. Adding more students to accommodate the target enrollment of 1600 will only exacerbate the current problem. The District would like to have wider corridors to not only reduce congestion, but also solve another problem of a lack of collaborative space in the corridors. Circulation throughout most of the existing facility is problematic in several ways: • Wayfinding is extremely difficult for anyone who is not familiar with the facility. • Corridors are narrow and congested during class changes. In particular, Spence Evans noted that the corridor intersections are especially crowded and difficult to navigate. • Congestion is experienced in common areas during events, such as basketball games and auditorium events. • Stair widths are narrow and get congested during class changes. • The sprawling effect of the building additions and renovations has created many hidden areas and corridors that cannot be supervised and also contribute to poor wayfinding. This sprawling effect has also contributed to the lengthy amount of passing time between classes. The typical classroom size and functional capacity is generally adequate throughout the academic wings to serve most of the current teaching and learning practices. However, most classroom spaces are too small to accommodate a wide variety of uses or lack the size to be more flexible in their arrangement of equipment and furniture. Future classrooms need to be approximately 10% 20% larger to appropriately accommodate a more collaborative and flexible teaching and learning environment. Adjacencies & Wayfinding: The current facility does not have a centralized commons/hub/lobby as a social space and orienting/ entry space, with visual access or physical proximity to all of the four Public and Semi-Private areas
often used for athletic or community functions and frequently accessed by the public. The existing cafeteria addresses some of this functionality, but is not in close proximity to all the primary Public and Semi-Private spaces. • Athletics • Performing Arts • Administrative offices • Academic Wings Much of the current building is a single story, and the facility's footprint is quite large, with spaces located far apart from each other, resulting in overall inefficiencies in the use of the facility. Some of the inefficiencies include: • Travel distances & proximity of spaces to each other. This is mostly evident in the proximity of the academic wing with other teaching and learning areas. • Large expanses of exterior walls (some not insulated) & roofs, which contributes to heat loss/gain and overall poor energy conservation. • Multiple HVAC systems in place to serve various wings & spaces • Multiple data closets (currently over 10) are difficult to maintain & service • Difficulty for teachers / staff to collaborate • Monitoring and supervision of common spaces requires a lot of staff capacity. • Set up and break down of tables in Cafeteria for events • The sprawling and disjointed additions and corridors have created a problematic scenario for the locker rooms. The location of athletic and PE locker rooms in proximity to the areas they serve is very spread out and is cause for inefficient use of time and use of space. Philosophical Assessment | 21st Century Learning: A common term often used in educational curriculum and planning today is 21st Century Learning. This term encompasses many aspects of the current thinking in educational leadership and educational space planning. Ideas and concepts like Student Centered Teaching and Learning, Collaborative Learning Environments, Creative and Critical Thinking, Highly Technological Learning Environments, Exciting Spatial Environments with an emphasis on Natural Daylighting, and Flexibility in Teaching Styles and Environments, all oriented around preparing kids for life after high school all embody the concept of 21st Learning. The four most important aspects of 21st Century Learning environments that should be incorporated into the modern education facility are Collaboration Spaces for faculty and students, spaces that promote Flexibility and Multiple Functions, the incorporation of Natural Daylight into all learning, teaching, and training spaces and the need for spaces to have a Positive and Attractive Learning Environment. Some of these aspects are represented in the existing high school building, but many are not represented or supported. 21st Century Learning concepts are promoting the delivery of education beyond what the traditional classroom setting can accomplish. Classrooms, office suites, and even corridors are being utilized for collaborative learning and teaching. The District would like to have flexible activity spaces throughout the facility that can be used for collaboration, including corridors. The current building does not have many of these types of spaces, and more building area would be necessary to accomplish this goal. The District would like to have a centralized faculty office area that can accommodate all teachers in one space (or as few spaces as possible) to promote interdisciplinary communication and collaboration. The current building does not currently have this type of space; rather, teacher's "offices" are dispersed throughout the facility making it difficult to implement cross curricular teaching and learning. There are many learning environments within the existing school that have natural daylight, but there are some that have very limited daylight or no natural daylight at all. The District would like more natural
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report light to be available in as many spaces as possible. The most recent addition to the high school was nearly twelve years ago. The original building was built in 1960. Many of the older corridors of the academic wing(s) are very institutional and lack exciting space or design. Some spaces have received surface upgrades and renovations, but overall most spaces are outdated and in need of updating the appearance to provide a vibrant and exciting learning environment.
B. Individual Building Philosophical Assessments
The following items are unique to each individual building within the high school facility. General items that apply to the high school facility as a whole are located in Section A of Part 2.1
Circulation/Size • Single story building (Horizontal Organization) • Corridors are too narrow for adequate circulation and cause heavy congestion primarily at the corridor intersections and at locker bays. • It is difficult to close off this wing for security purposes during public events. • In general most classrooms are adequately sized to accommodate current classroom functions. However, they are not able to accommodate much collaborative or flexibility of use. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The academic wing (1960, 1962, and 1963 building additions) is a substantial distance from other learning and support areas creating difficulty in getting to more remote parts of the building between classes. • The courtyards are not used in delivering education and are difficult to maintain due to minimal access (and are often unsightly). • The "loop" condition of the academic wing is not conducive for wayfinding for new students, parents, or visitors. • The "horizontal" organization does not allow for cross curricular learning due to lack of proximity to different class types. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The current organization of classrooms, corridors, and teacher work space is not conducive for collaboration between teachers and teachers, students and students, and teachers and students. • The corridors are narrow and will not accommodate collaborative activities. • Some areas have smaller rooms that may be used for breakout activities, but are not consistently sized or placed. Flexibility • Some spaces are able to incorporate a limited amount of varied configurations. Many of the typical classrooms are not adequately sized to accommodate a wide variety of configurations and teaching styles. Larger classrooms are necessary to fully explore more collaborative efforts and flexibility of use. Daylight • Most classrooms and teaching areas are adjacent to exterior walls and have a moderate amount of daylight with views to the outdoors and courtyards. More natural daylight is possible if the full existing openings would be utilized. • The courtyards offer natural daylight to the adjacent classrooms.
Spatial Atmosphere • Most classrooms and learning environments are dated and in need of surface improvements to provide more lively and vibrant spaces. • Corridors are long and very institutional in their appearance and function. • The majority of the furniture is dated and should be replaced with current furniture conducive to collaborative activities.
Circulation/Size • Three story building (Vertical/Horizontal Organization) • The main entry foyer for students is often congested at the beginning and end of the school day. • The stairs are narrow and cause congestion between classes. • Corridors are too narrow for adequate circulation and cause heavy congestion primarily at the corridor intersections and at locker bays. • It is difficult to close off this wing for security purposes during public events. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The academic wing (1960, 1962, and 1963 building additions) is a substantial distance from other learning and support areas creating difficulty in getting to more remote parts of the building between classes. • The courtyards are not used in delivering education and are difficult to maintain due to minimal access (and are often unsightly). • The "loop" condition of the academic wing is not conducive for wayfinding for new students, parents, or visitors. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The current organization of classrooms, corridors, stairs and teacher work space is not conducive for collaboration between teachers and teachers, students and students, and teachers and students. The corridors are narrow and will not accommodate collaborative activities. • Some areas have smaller rooms that may be used for breakout activities, but are not consistently sized or placed. • The "vertical" organization cannot accommodate cross curricular learning due to limiting size of stairs (too narrow) and lack of openness between stories. Flexibility • Some spaces are able to incorporate a limited amount of varied configurations. Many of the typical classrooms are not adequately sized to accommodate a wide variety of configurations and teaching styles. Larger classrooms are necessary to fully explore more collaborative efforts and flexibility of use. Daylight • Most above ground classrooms and teaching areas are adjacent to exterior walls and have a moderate amount of daylight with views to the outdoors and courtyards. More natural daylight is possible if the full existing openings would be utilized. • The courtyards offer natural daylight to the adjacent classrooms. • Half of the below grade classrooms do not have natural daylight. Spatial Atmosphere • Most classrooms and learning environments are dated and in need of surface improvements to provide more lively and vibrant spaces.
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report • Corridors are long and very institutional in their appearance and function. • The majority of the furniture is dated and should be replaced with current furniture conducive to collaborative activities.
Circulation/Size • Three story building (Vertical/Horizontal Organization) • The stairs are narrow and cause congestion between classes. • The primary corridors are very wide and allow for non-congested circulation. • It is difficult to close off this wing for security purposes during public events. • In general most classrooms are adequately sized to accommodate current classroom functions. However, they are not able to accommodate much collaborative or flexibility of use. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The academic wing (1960, 1962, and 1963 building additions) is a substantial distance from other learning and support areas creating difficulty in getting to more remote parts of the building between classes. • The courtyards are not used in delivering education and are difficult to maintain due to minimal access (and are often unsightly). • The current size of the weight room is barely adequate for most functions and there is a desire to increase the size of the weight room area by a factor of two. It is located in the basement level in the academic wing not in close with other athletic or physical education spaces. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The current organization of classrooms, stairs, and teacher work space is not conducive for collaboration between teachers and teachers, students and students, and teachers and students. • The primary corridors are very wide and allow for some collaborative work activities and break out sessions. • Some areas have smaller rooms that may be used for breakout activities, but are not consistently sized or placed. • The "vertical" organization cannot accommodate cross curricular learning due to limiting size of stairs (too narrow) and lack of openness between stories. Flexibility • Some spaces are able to incorporate a limited amount of varied configurations. Many of the typical classrooms are not adequately sized to accommodate a wide variety of configurations and teaching styles. Larger classrooms are necessary to fully explore more collaborative efforts and flexibility of use. Daylight • Most above ground classrooms and teaching areas are adjacent to exterior walls and have a moderate amount of daylight with views to the outdoors and courtyards. • The courtyards offer natural daylight to the adjacent classrooms. • Half of the spaces in the basement do not have any natural daylight. Spatial Atmosphere • Most classrooms and learning environments are dated and in need of surface improvements to provide more lively and vibrant spaces. • Corridors are institutional in their appearance and function. • The majority of the furniture is dated and should be replaced with current furniture conducive to collaborative activities.
Due to the physical degradation of the building structure and the pool itself, the pool building will likely be demolished in its entirety and replace with a new swimming pool facility. Refer to the Physical Assessment portion of this report for a physical condition status. Circulation/Size • The general form of the pool building is not conducive for internal circulation. • The pool is too small to accommodate the current need of the swim teams. • The pool deck is too small. • The locker rooms are too small to accommodate large events and not located near other locker room facilities to accommodate multi team events. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The pool is isolated from other spaces making it easy to isolate from other spaces during public events, but difficult in terms of overall building navigation during a typical school day. 21st Century Learning & Teaching In general, the pool is not being utilized effectively for PE, etc. due to its physical state, size, and limitations. Flexibility • The pool is primarily used for competitive swimming and is not conducive for other curricular activities or public engagement. Daylight • A lot of natural daylight is present Spatial Atmosphere • Appearance is old and dated • The radial symmetrical roof structure is not conducive to the backstroke during swim meets.
Circulation/Size • The bleacher capacity is adequate, per input from administration. It is the District's desire to continue using the stadium in its current condition. • An underground tunnel connects the stadium locker rooms, which are located below the grandstand, and the gymnasium. This tunnel is used frequently to access the Training Room, according to input from administration. However, Gerry Peters indicated that the City of Ames fire chief has concerns about the safety of the tunnel's use in an emergency event. • The tunnel is very concealed and is difficult to supervise. • The stadium bleachers are in close proximity to the 1986 gym addition and causes circulation congestion during game day events. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The stadium would benefit from a more clear and prominent sense of arrival. Currently, the only access for a visitor to the stadium is through a set of doors in the breezeway that connects the gymnasium and pool. • The primary function of these locker rooms is to serve the football team, soccer teams, and the boys and girls basketball teams. While they serve the sports that utilize the stadium, the locker rooms, coaches offices, and other athletic support spaces are not in close proximity to the main school
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report building and other athletic facilities they serve. The use of the space by other functions or groups is difficult. The locker rooms in the stadium should not be serving functions in the gymnasium. This proximity is not ideal. • An additional training room is necessary at the stadium if the tunnel is closed and abandoned. • The discus and shot put areas are separate from the track area and must be included in all proposed design layouts. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The use of the space for collaboration among staff or students is limited due to its proximity with other athletic spaces. Flexibility • The artificial turf of the stadium is conducive to a wide variety of uses for PE curriculum, athletic practice and competition, and community use and engagement. • Recent upgrades to the stadium and concessions building have greatly increased the functionality and usability of the stadium and the spaces immediately surrounding this area. Daylight • The support spaces are underground and offer no natural daylight to interior spaces Spatial Atmosphere • A more prominent entry to the stadium would greatly benefit the user experience.
1966 - Gymnasium Addition (Original Gymnasium) Circulation/Size • The current competition gymnasium is undersized. The seating capacity is approximately 1,800. The District would like to have the capacity to seat 2,000 spectators. • The current concessions area lobby is too small to accommodate events. The District would like to have concessions adjacent to a larger commons area. • Corridor access to the gym, the gym floor surface, and access to the bleachers are at different floor elevations. Accessible entry to the gym from the main building and main floor (elevation) is limited. • The skywalk which connects the Fine Arts wing and Gymnasium is used infrequently and is very difficult to supervise & monitor. As a result, the District would like to eliminate this connector. • The size and quantity of locker rooms are generally inappropriate for the function and location they serve. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The proximity of the gym to the main entry of the building is such that one must walk through "private" classroom/corridor areas to enter the gym. There are other exterior "Activity" access points to enter the gym, but this promotes visitors entering the gym through a less than secure entry. • General access to the gym is difficult for large groups for public or school related events due to a lack of adequate common space or "pre-function" space adjacent to the gym. • The location of the concessions area is not conducive for circulation or wayfinding. • Multiple levels of bleachers are not conducive for circulation or wayfinding. • The Competition Gymnasium and Practice Gymnasium are currently located adjacent to each other. The District prefers that these spaces be separated from each other to allow concurrent events to occur in each gymnasium. Disruptions are common between the two spaces during PE class time, athletic practice, competition, and public events. It is difficult to utilize both spaces at the same time due to their proximity. Ideally these two functions have some amount of functional separation to accommodate more efficient use of the spaces.
• The locations of most locker rooms is dysfunctional and inefficient. Four locker rooms adequately sized to accommodate home, visitor, and PE functions should be located immediately adjacent to the gymnasium. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA Flexibility • The size of the gym is large enough to accommodate many different PE curricular activities. • The quantity of equipment (BB hoops, etc.) is adequate to support the current PE curriculum, but there are not enough BB hoops and full size court space(s) to accommodate an efficient BB practice. • There are not enough VB court spaces with adequate separation to host a tournament efficiently. Daylight • There is no daylight in the gymnasium Spatial Atmosphere • The Gymnasium is not currently air conditioned. • The gym is dated and in need of surface upgrades to provide a more vibrant and exciting atmosphere.
Auditorium, Vocal, Orchestra, Band, Art, Dark Room Circulation/Size • The current auditorium is undersized. The seating capacity is currently 596. The District would like to have the capacity to seat 800 persons for concerts and theatrical productions. • The backstage and side stage areas are very small and are limited in their capacity for production support, storage, set construction, and overall functionality of the auditorium. • Accessibility to the auditorium and within the space is very challenging. Access to the auditorium, band, orchestra, and vocal rooms in a wheelchair is achieved by utilizing a very long ramp that originates east of the Media Center. In addition, the riser heights within the audience seating area are inconsistent and pose a tripping hazard. • The auditorium area also suffers from lack of common, pre-function space for gathering before, during, and after performances. • Changing rooms are inconveniently located on the upper level - accessed via a spiral stair, which hinders the flow of theatrical productions. • Visual supervision of this area of the building poses a challenge for teaching staff. • The orchestra pit is underutilized due to accessibility limitations. • Band, vocal, orchestra, and ensemble rooms are not adequately sized for current size of classes. These rooms will be even less functional when the school hits its target enrollment. • The vocal room has built-in multi-tiered risers which pose a challenge for accessibility. • Accessibility to the art rooms is similar to the condition of the auditorium, band, orchestra, and vocal rooms. They are only accessible by stairs and ramps. Many openings and corridors leading to the art rooms are also non compliant with ADA. • The general size and shape of most of the art rooms are small and non orthogonal. While these traits offer some interest among staff and students circulation, functionality, and efficient use of space are lacking.
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The auditorium is located a long distance away from the main entrance and parking areas. Once inside the building, it is a challenge to find the auditorium for anyone not familiar with the facility. • The vocal, orchestra, and band rooms are located immediately south of the auditorium, but have no immediate access to the back stage or side stage of the auditorium. Current proximity to the auditorium is important, but access is very limited. The rooms are also remotely located from the other academic spaces. • Several fine arts offices and other support space are inconveniently located on the level above, but do have views into the classrooms below. Uniform storage and sheet music storage are also located on the upper level. Visual supervision of this area of the building, especially the east corridor is problematic. • The art rooms and dark room are located in this wing and physically isolated from the other academic spaces. These spaces are hard to find and navigate for new students and parents. Ideally these rooms are in closer proximity to the academic wing. • An ICN/FOTS room is currently located in the lower level on the west side of this wing. This room serves as a hub for the City of Ames, Story County, and the State of Iowa, per input from Karl Hehr, IT Director. This room is served by a natural gas powered back-up generator located to the southwest of the building. It is critical that any design scheme take into consideration the implications of keeping these services operational with little to no down-time. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The stage is too small to accommodate a large ensemble with multiple disciplines at one time. • Each art room is too small to accommodate collaborative activities among multiple visual art subjects and there is no common space among the art rooms to accommodate multi class collaborative efforts. Flexibility • The multiplicity of rooms can accommodate a diverse offering of visual arts curricula, but each room is relatively inflexible within itself. • The auditorium is rarely used for educational curricula despite its original design intent. This is likely due to its poor accessibility and lack of functionality. A movable partition wall that can create multiple areas within the auditorium is rarely utilized. Daylight • There is no natural daylight in the auditorium (None preferred) • All art rooms have natural daylight • The darkroom does not have daylight (None preferred) • The original band, orchestra, the ensemble room and vocal room are without daylight. The band room addition does have natural daylight. Spatial Atmosphere • The environment of the auditorium is dark, dated, and not welcoming. This space should be updated. • The performance arts and the visual arts spaces are old and outdated aesthetically and need surface upgrades.
1978 - Chemical Storage Building See Physical Assessment
1985 - Greenhouse Circulation/Size • Accessibility is a challenge, as the floor level of the classrooms does not align with the level of the greenhouse. • Size to be the same or larger if build new. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • A pond and outdoor classroom exist in the courtyard west of the greenhouse, between Building Units I and II. • The greenhouse is adjacent to two science classrooms (biology) and one social studies classroom. Ideally the greenhouse is located in closer proximity to more science based classrooms. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The greenhouse is currently used as a collaborative learning tool for classes and this function should be maintained or replicated. Flexibility • NA Daylight • Sufficient Daylight Spatial Atmosphere • Dated and in need of upgrades and repairs
1986 - Gymnasium II Addition Circulation/Size • The size of the practice gym is too small and can barely accommodate a full sized basketball court. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The practice gym is immediately adjacent to the competition and the two spaces are too close to each other. Disruptions are common between the two spaces during PE class time, athletic practice, competition, and public events. It is difficult to utilize both spaces at the same time due to their proximity. Ideally these two functions are separated to accommodate more efficient use of each space. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA Flexibility • The flooring is not hardwood and is not conducive for BB or VB practice. Daylight • There is no natural daylight. Spatial Atmosphere • Space is dated and in need of upgrade • A new wood floor is necessary to help accommodate current and future PE curricular and athletic needs. 32
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report 1989 - Guidance Area Addition Circulation/Size • The guidance area is easily accessible and is adequately sized. • The individual offices are adequately sized. • Two more office are necessary to meet future needs. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The guidance area is centrally located within the academic area and close to the main office area. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA Flexibility • NA Daylight • Limited natural daylight to offices adjacent to exterior. Spatial Atmosphere • This area includes Student Services and is in very good condition with updated finishes.
1995 - Media Center Addition Circulation/Size • The Media Center is not large enough to accommodate the target capacity of 300 users. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The Media Center is currently located on the far west end of the facility, which makes it a "destination location." Ideally, this space would be more centrally located and near the academic wing so that it is readily available for everyone's use. • The Media Center contains the main I.T. backbone equipment for the school. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The main large open area of the Media Center is large enough to accommodate group and collaborative activities. • Currently the Media Center area does not have nearby break-out rooms and conference rooms to accommodate student group meetings, faculty collaboration, or faculty/student collaboration. • The District would like for the Media Center area to have private rooms nearby that can be used by a group of students and/or staff for meetings and collaborative work. The current space has perimeter rooms, but they are currently used as offices. Flexibility • The volume of the space is generous and is conducive to many types of activities and uses. Daylight • The Media Center has ample natural daylight via clerestory glazing and exterior windows that allow views to the adjacent Pohl Prairie. Spatial Atmosphere
• The overall space is dated and could use surface and finish upgrades. • The majority of the furniture is dated and should be replaced with current furniture conducive to collaborative activities.
1995 - Science Classroom Addition Circulation/Size • Each science classroom is just adequately sized and equipped for each specific science curriculum, except for the chemistry space. Ideally the chemistry space has both a classroom space and lab space. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The science rooms are located near the academic wing, but are not immediately adjacent to the other biology classrooms or the greenhouse. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The science classrooms are currently sized to accommodate only a singular class at one time. The District's desire is to create rooms that are bigger and more flexible (adjustable classrooms) to allow for 21st Century Learning programming and the integration of other disciplines, including STEM, as well as promote collaboration and Socratic discussions Flexibility • The science classrooms are large enough to accommodate each current designated class, but are not large enough to accommodate large group work or collaborative activities with other classes or groups. Daylight • Some rooms have a small amount natural daylight and some do not have any daylight. There are storage closets located along the exterior walls limiting the potential for daylighting to be increased. Spatial Atmosphere • These rooms are dated and in need of surface upgrades.
1998 - Fitness Center Addition (Cheer and Dance Room) Circulation/Size • This space is used for dance and cheer practice. The Fitness Center is only accessible through the gym/concessions area or through the wrestling room. • The size is too small and the footprint configuration is a truncated square that is not conducive for the function of this space. • The roof structure is too low and will not accommodate the aerial routines performed in this space by the cheerleader and dance teams. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • This space is adjacent to the wrestling room and located near the gym/concession area. This space is in close proximity to other similar athletic spaces. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA
PART 2 | Existing Building Assessment Report Flexibility • This space has a special floor system and is only appropriate for the specific function of athletic training. Daylight • There is one moderate sized window for daylight in this space. Spatial Atmosphere • This addition is relatively new with no immediate need for surface upgrades.
1999 - Band Room Addition Circulation/Size • This addition has been very helpful to allow more people to practice at once or offer space to accommodate multiple bands at one time. However is currently undersized to accommodate the future target quantity of students. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • This space contains a large, movable partition wall that can be opened to adjacent band room to create one large space for band practices. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA Flexibility • The use of the partition wall can accommodate a large group or multiple smaller groups to practice at the same time. Daylight • There is minimal daylight in the band room addition.
2005 - Kitchen, Loading Dock, and Cafeteria Additions Circulation/Size • The current capacity of the cafeteria is 600 students. The District would like to have the capacity to seat 800 persons. There are currently two periods of lunch, with the option for seniors to leave campus during lunch. The District would like to have the seating capacity in order to require that all lunches occur at the school for all grade levels. The administration would like to maintain the number of lunch periods to two. • The interior circulation of the cafeteria and kitchen is functional and adequate. • The proximity of loading docks for delivery of supplies for the kitchen is good. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The internal adjacencies of the kitchen, cafeteria, and respective support functions of this area are very functional and efficient. However, the location of these spaces is not centrally located within the school and creates inefficiencies in circulation. • This addition has placed the reception and administrative offices in proximity to a new main entry, but as a result has removed these spaces from other administrative functions and offices located in Building Addition number three. Ideally all administrative functions and offices are immediately adjacent to one another and near the main entrance.
• There is an outdoor eating space immediately adjacent to the cafeteria and is utilized frequently when weather is favorable, per input from administration. This size of this outdoor area and its proximity to the cafeteria are to be maintained or increased. The location of the outdoor eating area is not ideal near the main entry and parking lots. Visual control of this outdoor space from the Cafeteria seems to be adequate. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • The cafeteria is adequately sized to support collaborative activities and group work. Flexibility • The cafeteria is used for lunch, study hall, and social functions. While a commons area separate from the cafeteria used for group work, collaboration activities, and social activities would be beneficial and help with efficient use of the cafeteria it is ultimately not a specific need at this time. Daylight • There is ample daylight in the cafeteria. • The administration office area has ample daylight. Spatial Atmosphere • The cafeteria space is 12 years old and in need of surface upgrades. (paint walls, ceiling, and wall graphics) • The administrative office area is relatively new and up to date.
2005 - Wrestling Room Addition Circulation/Size • The wrestling room is too small for the current wrestling program and needs to be larger to accommodate practices. This space can only accommodate two full sized wrestling mats at one time. The staff would like to accommodate four full sized mats at one time. Adjacencies/Wayfinding • The wrestling room is near the gym and other athletic functions/spaces. • Restrooms and locker rooms are located remotely from this space. • Sound isolation would be good for this space. 21st Century Learning & Teaching Collaboration • NA Flexibility • The wrestling room's only function is wrestling training due to the special flooring system and mats covering most of the floor. This specialized functionality is to be maintained. Daylight • There is ample daylight in the wrestling room. Natural light is provided via windows in the exterior wall.
2.3 Building Systems Assessment A. General Assessment
The following assessment is general in nature and applies to the high school facility as a whole. Individual building assessments are located in Section B of Part 2.1
B. Area Specific Descriptions
General Findings and Observations
Property...............................................................................................................................................................50 Facilities...............................................................................................................................................................50 Access..................................................................................................................................................................51 Parking Lots and Pavements..............................................................................................................................51 Utilities..................................................................................................................................................................51 Storm Water Management................................................................................................................................ 52 Landscaping........................................................................................................................................................ 52 Exhibits................................................................................................................................................................ 53 Building Addition Timeline Floor Plans
HAILA ASP Ltd. • KCL Engineering • Taylor Ohde Kitchell • Synder Associates Inc. • 2017 May Ames 31 Community Phase 1 School District • Ames High School 49
PART 3 | Site - General Findings & Observations
Ames High School Satellite Image
The high school site is located on 70.7 acres owned by the Ames Community School District. The high school building and facilities are located on the east half of the property. The west half of the property consists of timber, a large drainageway and 27 acres of prairie remnant known as the Richard W. Pohl Memorial Preserve. In 1970, the Ames Unified School District and the Iowa Chapter of The Nature Conservancy entered into a 49-year lease for this Preserve. This lease will expire in 2019. This site could potentially be impacted should a street extension be desired from the high school to Stange Road. The high school site is bordered by Ridgewood Avenue to the east, and 20th Street and residential housing to the north. Iowa State University owns the property west of the school site which is student housing and south of the school site which is the Squaw Creek floodplain area.
The high school faces northeast and is parallel with Ridgewood Avenue. Additional facilities on the site include the football/soccer/track stadium which is south of the high school building. Southeast of the high school is a softball field, 8 tennis courts and 3 practice fields. With the recent construction of the high school athletic facilities located at the 24th Street site, the softball field could potentially be removed. There is space at the new athletic facility site as well for 9 tennis courts in the future. It should be noted that the existing tennis courts are part of an agreement with the City of Ames and are available for the community to use.
PART 3 | Site - General Findings & Observations Access
The primary access drive is from Ridgewood Avenue, which provides access to the front of the building with a loop drive and drop-off with reserved parking stalls. Three additional access drives occur along 20th Street. The first access is to the primary parking lot. The second access drive is to a front loop drive, drop-off area, and parking stalls. The third access drive is to the west side of the building, which leads to a parking lot and drive extending to the lower stadium area. In an effort to provide improved access to the high school, a potential street extension from the high school, west, to Stange Road is being studied. This would improve access to the high school site from the west and relieve traffic on 20th Street and Ridgewood Avenue during the day and during large events. Sidewalks provide access from the streets and the parking lots to the building entrances. A sidewalk south of the high school connects to a community trail.
Parking Lots and Pavements
The parking stall count at the high school site totals 782 stalls. The current City of Ames site ordinance for high schools requires one parking stall per two students to determine total parking stalls to be on site. Today's student count based upon 1,250 students requires 625 stalls. Future projections with 1,600 students results in 800 parking stalls required, which the current site is short by 18 stalls. The total parking count at the high school is comprised of the following categories: • Student parking of 551 stalls • Faculty/staff/visitor parking of 216 stalls • Handicap parking of 15 stalls A preliminary review shows that the pavements in the drives and parking lots at the high school are in various conditions. • Faculty/staff/visitor parking lot in the northwest corner of the high school building, 149 stalls – poor condition. Will likely replacement in the next two years. • Student parking, main lot, 396 stalls – fair condition. Will likely require repairs or replacement within the next 4-6 years. • Access drives and loop drop-off areas from Ridgewood Avenue and 20th Street – good condition. Will likely require repairs or replacement in the next 10-15 years. Pavement replacement is expensive and phasing of this work over a period of years is recommended. The existing sidewalks will need to be monitored and replaced as necessary over time.
There are public utilities located along the right-of-ways of 20th Street and Ridgewood Avenue. These utilities are routed into the site and to the building in a number of areas, which is typical for a site with multiple phases of construction over a period of time. A primary fiber optic line is routed north and south along the west side of the high school building. This fiber optic line needs to remain and be protected, as it serves the building and the surrounding community. The existing high school building has many utilities which are routed around the building and are very congested in areas due to the number of building projects constructed over time. If building additions or improvements are made, the utilities in that area will need to be located, reviewed, and rerouted as necessary with each new project. This can result in higher construction cost for any utility updates that might be needed at that time, but is typical for a site that has been developed.
PART 3 | Site - General Findings & Observations Storm Water Management
The site has a storm sewer system in place which provides storm water drainage for the current facilities. If the existing pavement on-site is ever removed and replaced or modified, the site would be required to meet the City of Ames current storm water management requirements. Hard surfacing improvements, including additional buildings, additional pavement, or pavement improvements will have the most impact on the existing site. Any such changes will result in the need to provide space on site for storm water management, such as detention basins for storm water storage and storm water quality improvements. Another method for providing storm water detention is providing underground storm water storage, which uses less green/lawn space, but could result in higher cost for construction.
Landscaping has been added to the site at various times over the years. Any new projects and improvements will need to meet City of Ames latest landscape requirements.
Ames Community School District • Ames High School 52
12 - 1995 Media Center & Science Addition 13 - 1998 Fitness Center Addition 14 - 1999 Band Room Addition 15 - 2005 Kitchen, Cafeteria, & Wrestling Room Addition
04 - 1965 Swimming Pool
05 - 1965 Stadium Addition
06 - 1966 Gymnasium Addition
07 - 1972 Fine Arts Wing
SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"
BASEMENT FLOOR
AMES COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1921 AMES HIGH DR., AMES, IA 50010
AMES HIGH SCHOOL - BUILDING ADDITIONS & TIMELINE AMES HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMMING
11 - 1989 Guidance Area Addition
03 - 1963 Unit III Addition
10 - 1986 Gymnasium II Addition
02 - 1962 Unit II Addition
08 - 1978 Chemical Storage Building
09 - 1985 Greenhouse
01 - 1960 Original Building
Building Construction Timeline
Ames High 2015 School Picture Flyer.pdf
Ames High Transcript.pdf
Ames High Handbook with cover.pdf
Optimism for a Budget Deal & High School Requirements Task Force ...
Sevier County High School HVAC Renovations Phase III.pdf ...
High School Biology 9-10 Writing Task 1.pdf
Ames School Board Presentation.pdf
School District Boundary Task Force
High School Profiles-Final_AJ High-1.pdf
Task 1 -
Maine Township High School District Uses Google Apps & 1:1 ...
School Profile - Natick High School
DN489 - High Efficiency, High Density 3-Phase ... - Linear Technology
DN489 - High Efficiency, High Density 3-Phase Supply Delivers 60A ...
ePub High School Chemistry Unlocked (High School ...
MARINA HIGH SCHOOL
1. movement phase -
McAuley High School Level 1 Multivariate
Beautiful Danger Book 1 Dark Oak High School ...
Ebook HIGH SCHOOL MATH 2011 ALGEBRA 1 ...
Ames High School Phase 1 - Task 1.pdf
Kent Jahn. Darin Johnson. Judge Johnston. Mark Jurgensen. Mary Kautzby ... Karl Hehr Technology Director ... Ames High School Phase 1 - Task 1.pdf.
22MB Sizes 0 Downloads 50 Views
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Ames High 2015 School Picture Flyer.pdf. Ames High 2015 School Picture Flyer.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.
Street address: City, State and Zip or Postal Code: Country if outside U.S.: Your phone: Your email: Your date of birth: Your full name at graduation (if different):.
action, desegregation, and discrimination: Dr. Tim Taylor | 415 Stanton Ave., Ames, IA 50014 | 515.268.6660 |[email protected] student handbook.
Nov 25, 2015 - a not-for-profit company founded to educate citizens about state government. ... Optimism for a Budget Deal & High School Requirements Task Force ... and 6:00 a.m. Monday mornings; check CT-N's online program schedule.
Nov 25, 2015 - Optimism for a Budget Deal & High School Requirements Task ... and 6:00 a.m. Monday mornings; check CT-N's online program schedule.
Be sure to support your topic with evidence from. your research. Include a bibliography of your sources. Page 2 of 2. High School Biology 9-10 Writing Task 1.pdf.
Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. High School Profiles-Final_AJ High-1.pdf. High School Profiles-Final_AJ High-1.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.
used an outdated, text-based email system and a calendaring application that ... curricula to incorporate the cloud-based suite. .... and pay for software licenses.
Exercise: Problem. I wonder if Year 13's tend to send more text messages per day than Year ... Do you think everyone who doesn't have a phone would feel confident ... center best? The mean or the median? Why? 7) What about measures of spread. When sh
PDF [Ebook] Beautiful Danger Book 1 Dark Oak High School Free iBook Download, Save or Read Online Beautiful Danger Book 1. Dark Oak High School PDF, iBook, ePub File From Our Online Library. PDF File: Beautiful Danger Book 1 Dark Oak High School. Bea
Report Ames High School Phase 1 - Task 1.pdf


Our Client, an educational company in Kuwait is seeking a Female P.E teacher for its all Girls School in Kuwait. You should be flexible and capable to work in a multi-cultural environment. The successful candidates will be highly committed team players with drive, energy and a passion for student learning.


text:
"Tornado-S" will cover the western direction: missile brigades of the Western Military District will be re-equipped with a new MLRS
MLRS "Tornado-S" will cover the western direction, missile brigades of the Western Military District will be re-equipped with new multiple launch rocket systems, a fundamental decision on rearmament has already been made. Reported by "News" with reference to the military department.
The Ministry of Defense has decided to re-equip the ZVO missile brigades with the Tornado-S MLRS, which are to be replaced in the Smerch MLRS troops. According to the newspaper, the 79th Guards Rocket Artillery Brigade will be the first to receive the new MLRS, then the rearmament of other units will begin. The military department clarified that the rate of rearmament will depend on the supply of new equipment.
Rearmament at the Tornado-S MLRS began in early 2019. The 439th Guards Rocket Artillery Brigade, stationed in the Astrakhan Region, was the first to receive a set of MLRS, the MLRS participated in the Kavkaz-2020 exercises. At present, the 232nd Rocket Brigade of the Central Military District is being rearmed on the Tornado-S.
Earlier, the Ministry of Defense said that by 2017 the Tornado-S MLRS would completely replace the Smerchi and Hurricanes in the troops.
The Tornado-S was developed as a replacement for the Smerch MLRS. Like the Tornado, the Tornado-S has 12 guides for 300-mm rockets. A key feature of the new MLRS is the automated guidance and fire control system (ASUNO), which allows you to simultaneously control the firing of the division, automatically calculate target data and direct the guide packets in horizontal and vertical planes. Tornado-S missiles can be adjusted in flight, which significantly increased the accuracy of hitting a target at a distance of more than 100 km. The control adjustment system is located directly in the rocket.
"Tornado-S" - the most powerful and long-range MLRS. The missile range is up to 120 km. The developers promised to increase it to 200 km. The installation allows you to hit objects at the entire tactical depth of the battle formations of the enemy. Moreover, these systems can be quickly transferred from one section to another. Columns of wheeled vehicles are capable of making rolls up to 300-500 km per day. MLRS tests were held in the 2015 year.
Reports from the militia of New Russia for 27-28 September 2014 of the yearLegendary Grads will be replaced by a new multiple launch rocket system
marchcat 26 March 2021 11: 10
A formidable descendant of the famous "Katyusha".
lucul 26 March 2021 12: 06
Paired with Orlan -10, Tornado-S are capable of doing business. The range would have to be increased up to 200 km ...
Flooding 26 March 2021 12: 25
I'm wondering how Tornado-S can replace Hurricanes if they are not bicaliber, unlike Hurricane-1M?
And they only use 300mm ammunition.
This should mean that it is planned to abandon the 220mm caliber.
But this is unlikely. Yes, and Uragan-1M, in that case, why was it necessary to develop?
nonsense 27 March 2021 10: 57
Yes, I will say more - why was it necessary to develop at one time the MLRS "Smerch"? - Tactical missiles of the "Tochka" type would have cost less ... I "stuck" them (TR Tochka) on the same MAZ 543, four pieces in the manner of the S-300 air defense system and bullet yourself ... IMHO and the accuracy is higher, and the area of In the case of using cassette warheads, more than Smerch will have ... Games of the military-industrial complex for the development of the military budget - just like now!
and if a blow to the area?
jonht 26 March 2021 11: 14
Interestingly, all types of BB migrated from the Tornado to the Tornado-S? Or maybe they added new ones?
Orange bigg 26 March 2021 11: 49
Quote: jonht
Of course they did. News from 2017.
... Izvestia reports that the newest Russian 300-mm Tornado-S multiple launch rocket system will receive a long-range high-precision guided missile with a guidance system based on GLONASS signals. At this stage, it is in a high degree of technical readiness and is being tested. Before the launch of the missile, corrected by GLONASS, the coordinates of the target are put into its homing head. In flight, the rocket, with the help of gas-dynamic rudders, corrects its trajectory in order to accurately hit a given point. The ammunition, which is developed and produced by the scientific and production association "Splav", will be capable, according to experts, of hitting even miniature targets no more than one meter in size at a distance of several hundred kilometers, regardless of the weather and time of day.
. "Tornado-S" in 2018 should begin to replace the ultra-long-range systems "Smerch". Depending on the type of ammunition "Tornado" destroys the enemy at a distance of more than 100 to 200 kilometers. On the new MLRS, the missile guide tubes were placed in special containers. Thanks to this, recharging with a crane takes a matter of minutes. On "Tornadoes" it takes 15-16 minutes, since each rail is recharged separately.
https://topwar.ru/108838-dlya-rszo-tornado-s-razrabotana-novaya-raketa-s-sistemoy-navedeniya-po-signalam-glonass.html
knn54 26 March 2021 11: 23
What can I say - accurate and powerful.
Lara Croft 26 March 2021 11: 33
MLRS "Tornado-S" will cover the western direction, missile brigades of the Western Military District will be re-equipped with new multiple launch rocket systems, a fundamental decision on rearmament has already been made.
The missile brigades of the Russian Army are armed with OTRK ("Iskander"), not MLRS, the author again confused something ...
So the MLRS "Tornado-S" can replace the MLRS "Smerch", which are in service with the RABr., About which the author himself further indicates in the text:
According to the newspaper, the first new MLRS will receive 79-I guards rocket artillery brigade
The first set of MLRS received 439-I guards rocket artillery brigadestationed in the Astrakhan region
Thus, after reading the article, kind and gullible members of the forum cannot understand which connections will receive the indicated MLRS, and the author does not see the difference in the difference between RBR., RBR. and ABR.
RABr. in SV, a little one at a time ... as a result, the good news superimposed on the author's nonsense, turning the article into nonsense ...
komandir8 26 March 2021 22: 06
It seems that many characters writing on military topics have no idea what they are talking about.
Dodikson 26 March 2021 11: 44
and how does Tornado-S differ from the Tornado except for the LMS?
Piramidon 26 March 2021 13: 38
Quote: rudolff
A new name. The first and foremost difference. Everything else fits into the word "modernization".
Rebranding from the military-industrial complex.
Your dollop of shit counts.
venik 26 March 2021 11: 48
".....the 79th Guards Rocket Artillery Brigade will be the first to receive new MLRS, then the rearmament of other units will begin...... "
Well, thank God! .... It looks like "the process has begun"! And it's already 5 years since the tests ended ... It's time already!
xorek 26 March 2021 12: 20
"Tornado-S" will cover the western direction:
So yes, but I think they will trample from the south and east .. This is where you need to cover the border!
The West loves to fight with someone else's hands .. There the bai have already grown fat on the oil and gas left by the Soviet Union ..! And if you set them up by blocking their accounts in the west .. They'll screw up with screams! This is where the invasion has to wait .. Trust me
Soldatov V. 26 March 2021 12: 31
Fine, but there must be a will to win and love for the homeland. Remember Gorbach, what kind of army was and fucked everything up, and then the drunkard drank everything. Accuracy is up to a meter in a few hundred kilometers, but the will, the courage is there to launch? The drones are almost over the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet. fly and no one can give a command to shoot down. Sports teams were forbidden to play under the flag of their homeland, and they went to speak. Soon ships from Russia will be banned from flying under their own flag. Entry into the Black Sea should be permissive from Russia. Wants the West of the war let it get it ...
Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich 26 March 2021 12: 53
In many ways, in many ways, I agree with you, but
Quote: V.
The West wants war, let it get it.
Cool!!! Are you personally ready to be in the trench for an hour?
Yes, ready. For the future of Russia. Experience - 1.5 years Stillet launch group 2
... well, if only "For the future of Russia" ... Well then yes, then of course ...
"For the sake of honor and prestige, than to grow old,
Maybe it's better to die for Russia? "
Only this is what I have a doubt: in due time. in the USSR and the USA, studies were carried out independently of each other, which showed that even a local direct military conflict between the USSR and the USA would develop into a full-scale nuclear war with corresponding consequences ...
Both the US and Russia are still nuclear powers ...
Then the question is: how will we assess our shooting down of an American reconnaissance drone over neutral territories?
How can we force them to ask us for permission to enter the Black Sea?
If a local armed conflict really escalates into a full-scale nuclear war, neither the United States nor we will have any future!
Do not agree?
At this point in time, the accuracy of the missiles can be said to be absolute, and the power of the charges has decreased. Modern calculations show that the world will not disappear as a result of the exchange of blows.
Why is the US behaving so arrogantly? They calculated that in the event of war, 100-200 million would die, but 100 million out of 320 would remain alive. The elite would seem to survive on superyachts and shelters.
According to unmanned aerial vehicles, this is an aircraft with reconnaissance and guidance equipment with a certain radius of action. Part of it flies with ammunition (and suddenly with nuclear ones). That's just the operator lost contact with the UAV and the electronics went crazy and attacked the target, the same headquarters of the fleet.
And sho as they say in Ukraine? Closer than the radius of action, you cannot be allowed to approach the border. You need to negotiate with a potential enemy, if he does not want to, send the order of our actions in the event of a UAV. Believe me, there will be no war, even if we shoot down the scout Poseidon with the crew. By the way, how many of them were shot down on Baltic and north. And Powers remember.
Likewise, with the calls of ships into the Black Sea. For example, an English destroyer came in without permission to jump on it. Who will intercede for them? They are falling apart even without war. The Queen is already reading the Holy Scripture.
The future is always whether we want it or not. By the way, even without Russia and the United States, there is someone to unleash a full-scale nuclear war.
Glory to Berkut 26 March 2021 12: 37
We take a ruler, a map and understand in which areas of concentration self-detonation of warehouses, headquarters, airfields, parks with equipment and (alaverdy) air conditioners can occur
Victor Tsenin 30 March 2021 23: 42
Tornadoes will upgrade to Tornado-C?
> Tornado-S "- the most powerful and long-range MLRS.
The most powerful in the Russian Federation, you wanted to say?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl