text:
Hamsik is priceless
If Gareth Bale is worth €100 million, then Marek Hamšík is priceless, said Rafa Benítez. It's impossible to argue with the Napoli boss.
By Kirsten Schlewitz Sep 12, 2013, 6:33pm CEST
Share All sharing options for: Hamsik is priceless
Dino Panato
Rafa Benítez has made himself alright in my book. When questioned about Marek Hamšík, the Napoli boss told Mediaset that Marek is, and I quote, "priceless".
Couldn't have said it better myself, Rafa.
In other words, no matter how many transfer rumors the Italian media try to cook up, Hamšík is not for sale. Not for €100 million. Not for some magical release clause that only Paris Saint-Germain can meet. Hamšík is Napoli. Napoli is Hamšík.
Thank goodness. Four goals in two games, and the Slovak has promised Benítez he'll get eleven more before the season is out. He's looked fantastic as captain, confident and in control as he guides the new-look partenopei. But somehow he remains humble, telling the press that he always has a decent start to the season, but it will be the strikers that end up with the most goals.
It might be Gonzalo Higuain that records the highest number of goals for Napoli this season, but it's almost certain that it will be Hamšík that remains priceless. The orchestrator, the creator, the leader and the scorer. I've never been so happy to hear that a player is not for sale.
And yes, I will cover every word spoken about Marek Hamsik. If someone writes about what he has for breakfast, I'm on it.


An attempt to fully design an exotic supercar complete with a functioning Big Block V8 to drive the rear wheels. This project is currently in the modelling phase, when it comes to creating the functionality the C# Wrapper for Nvidia's PhysX engine may be used. Blender 3D's animations will be used to create a prototype of the moving parts.
This is a working prototype of my Scale and Chord Finder application which will ultimately have a GUI and be MIDI-controllable. The application in this form is console-based and was implemented to test the functionality of the underlying class libraries and to allow sooner personal use of the tool in my own music productions.
This is an adaption of the "Png to Animated Gif Converter" standalone application also listed here. The idea is to improve my knowledge of SilverLight 5 and MVVM by taking an existing model and creating a view model and a view for it to attach to in SilverLight.
A company wide Intranet application featuring a built-in content management system and the ability for administrative application users to dynamically add databases as well as their content to the data structure. This application is now in use by a well known personal protective equipment company.
Specialist software written to control and read from a Bruel & Kjaer Band Pass Filter and a Bruel & Kjaer Measuring amplifier for the purposes of measuring ear defender noise reduction. This application is now in use by a well known personal protective equipment company.
A pair of applications demonstrating the use of interprocess communication using TCP sockets. The keyboard also uses DirectSound to playback and manipulate the sampled audio. Each application can be ran alone or together in IPC Mode.
One issue I came into during the development of this website was the creation of animated .gif files derived from a series of rendered .png files generated by Blender 3D. In order to preserve the transparency in each frame it meant having to convert each .png frame into a .gif one by one before compiling them together in a single animated .gif file. This software removes that labourious process by enabling the direct conversion of a batch of .png files with transparency and/or translucency into a single animated .gif with transparency. All other software I have used for this purpose appears to be unable to convert png transparency/translusency directly to gif transparency in a batch process with an animated gif as a result thus making this software a first, to my knowledge. This software will be a very useful utility for web design as it will vastly increase the speed of rasterizing web-safe 3D animations over the manual frame-by-frame conversion approach that I had previously used.
The software now performs its primary purpose of converting pngs to an animated transparent gif. V0.1 will include the remaining bug fixes for the transparency. V0.2, if released, will include support for handling png translucency.
An alternative approach to the XNA Menu Utility to provide front-end navigation support for an XNA game. Continuation of this project will depend upon potential integration issues between WPF and XNA vs. development speed of the XNA Menu Utility.
An attempt to create a reusable navigational interface for use in games in which the user must select 3D objects as information for entering the main game. I am currently in the process of finishing a container-control positional system for this project.
In this game one player attempts to fly an aircraft from one hangar to another passing through a series of gateways whilst other players attempt to stop him. This game is incomplete.
A 2D Top-Down Racing Game. The highest scorer wins; points are added for each traffic vehicle passed - the greater the difference in speed the greater the number of points.


Ray-Ban prescription glasses RB5150 Tortoise - Acetate - 0RX5150560848 | Ray-Ban® Australia Shop Ray-Ban prescription glasses RB5150 Tortoise - Acetate - 0RX5150560848 at Ray-Ban® Australia. ???PDP_DISCOVER_TEXT??? Ray-Ban® Australia ???PDP_WEBSITE_TEXT???


text:
Q: Why is the magnetizing current in a transformer always constant irrespective of the load? Under no load condition, magnetizing current is required to set up the main flux. When a load is connected to the transformer secondary, an EMF is induced in the secondary winding which opposes the main flux. This secondary flux reduces the primary-induced EMF which in turn causes more primary current to compensate the flux produced by the secondary winding. To produce more flux, more magnetising current is needed. So  why is the magnetising current always constant?

A:
Why is the magnetizing current in a transformer always constant
irrespective of the load?

Ignoring core loss current (a step too far), there are two different currents taken by the primary winding: -

And clearly, providing there is still the same applied voltage at the primary terminals, the magnetization current remains constant (if series losses LP and RP are small).
Image from my basic website.

When a load is connected to the transformer secondary, an EMF is
induced in the secondary winding which opposes the main flux.

The EMF is there all the time irrespective of a load being present.

A: The magnetising current is, by definition, that current required to set up the flux in the core.
Whether the secondary is supplying a load current or not, the core flux is generating a voltage in both primary and secondary windings that is (to first order, neglecting primary loss resistance) constant. So the flux is constant. So the magnetising current is constant.
When the secondary supplies a current, that will also cause the primary to draw additional current. These currents are however load currents, with the primary and secondary currents cancelling each other out, to leave only the magnetising current causing flux in the core.

A: Yes, exactly -- all that you're missing is a formula to express how the currents and fluxes vary with load.  Your doubt concerns whether, and how, the magnetization nearly cancels out.  Maybe they go up by ratio?  Heck, maybe it even goes down instead?*
The simple truth is that: for every mA drawn at the secondary, the same current (divided by ratio) is added to the primary.  A superposition.
*In fact it does, simply because more current flow, means more voltage drop, so some of the supplied primary voltage, and received secondary voltage, disappear as losses.  Thus, core flux also decreases (taking, for the moment, the assumption that core flux remains proportional to applied voltage (EMF) over frequency).  Resistance is usually small (~5% at full load) so the flux only drops by about as much at full load.

A: By definition, the magnetizing current is the current required to set up the flux with an open secondary.
Yes, when the secondary is delivering current to a load, the primary must draw more current, but this fraction of the current is taken to be different from the magnetizing current.
Note the phrases "by definition" and "taken to be" -- you can view this any way you want, but in the end you can make the math easier if you take the transformer to be a linear device* and take the magnetization current to be a separate thing from the load current, and the primary current required to supply it.
* It isn't a linear device, but it's close enough that you can take it as one for the first cut, or even the final cut if you allow for your linear model not being 100% accurate.

A: Magnetizing current is only dependent on the primary voltage.
This is  critical to understanding the acoustic hum when a huge transformer is interrupted and then put back online. The magnetizing flux is stored in the Transformer steel core from the phase of cutoff voltage. If the cut-in voltage phase in not the same then an offset flux is stored which can saturate cores momentarily and create a loud hum with tons of forces on the windings of xxx MVA transformers, until it dissipates and balances out.
The normal test for large power transformer core saturation is to test it in production at 10% over or the max voltage rating and measure the dominant 5th and any other harmonics relative to the fundamental with some acceptance criteria.
Other
It might be any harmonic that is dominant and that depends on the BH slope near saturation and thus the slew rate of the voltage induced current.
A different effect is primary inductance drops 10% which is the max rated current value.
Each industry tends to choose a test method according to customer requirements.  Wind farms and solar panels often raise commutation spikes that can increase voltage and thus magnetizing transients and thus harmonics with a different impedance.
Sometimes these grid tied inverters see neighbouring farms with high harmonic currents get absorbed by better GTI's and this current of different harmonics flowing in both  directions can blow the fuse. I saw data to suggest this was happening on Duke Energy grids.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Teeranun Srihong, president of KBank, said crowd-funding would be a mega-trend of fund mobilisation in Thailand for the next few years because in the digital era, technology was opening new opportunities for businesses and artists.
KBank believes it can be a tool to facilitate payment services for the campaign owners who require funds, the portal website and the campaign supporters. Having the payment system overseen by a bank will also make it trusted by those worried about fraud.
Crowd-funding can be a solution |for small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups. By focusing on digital |technology, the bank believes it can |jointly develop other platforms with Asiola, besides providing a payment gateway.
Teeranun said that although KBank would earn fee income from this partnership, that was not its motivation. The bank wants to participate in new markets, and crowd-funding is creating flows of money in the digital system.
In the first phase, Asiola will offer crowd-funding platforms to artists who are inspired to conduct campaigns and want funds from their fan base to support their campaigns. The returns from this phase will be reward-based.
Supporters can give funds from Bt50 to Bt500,000 for each campaign.
If the fund-raising fails to reach the target, KBank as the payment gateway will give money back to the campaign supporters.
Asiola expects six to eight campaigns |per month, a number that should |double next year, said Jon Lor, a founder of Asiola.
Asiola believes that around 84 per cent of the artist campaigns using its crowd-funding platform will achieve their fund-raising targets because they have sufficient fan bases and can use social networks to communicate with their fan clubs, said Montonn Jira, one of the founders of the Asiola website.
Montonn said the next phase of Asiola's crowd-funding programme for SMEs would be equity-based, which will have to be supported by the KBank network.


If you want to buy one of our villas for sale in La Sabatera-Moraira, we guarantee a totally different lifestyle, you can enjoy the advantages of an exceptional villa set in an unbeatable environment.
Imagine enjoying your private pool, with your friends or family in the summer that is approaching. Feel the pleasant sensation of the sea breeze on your skin while you rest in a hammock in your leafy garden or think about how life could be in a house with large rooms illuminated by the sun through its magnificent windows.
Enjoy unbeatable evenings in a magnificent setting with your loved ones or the pleasant walks along the Mediterranean beaches any time of the year.
If you want to live very close to the sea and in an exclusive urbanization do not think any longer and buy one of our villas for sale in La Sabatera-Moraira. Do not wait any longer and this summer you can enjoy the advantages of living on the Costa Blanca North, where there are unbeatable possibilities for leisure, culture or sports.
Moraira is a small town located on the Costa Blanca, internationally famous for its wonderful coves and spectacular beaches.
Here you have the option to practice different water sports as it has a marina, as well as other very interesting sports options such as hiking or cycling routes.
The wonderful climate of the Costa Blanca is ideal for outdoor activities.
It is now the ideal moment for you to make a great investment and buy one of our villas for sale in Las Sabatera-Moraira.
The Casas Ambiente real estate offers a magnificent selection of the best villas in the area so you can choose the one that best suits your needs.
If you also need the help of a professional for the installation of some other particular requirement, we will gladly offer you contacts of trusted professionals.


The objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of precarious employment in the European Union (EU) using a multidimensional approach, 8 years into the economic crisis (2014).
We use data from the Flash Eurobarometer 398 among salaried workers (n = 7702). We calculated the proportion and its 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%) for each of the precarious employment dimensions (not having the ability to exercise rights, vulnerability, disempowerment and temporariness), the prevalence of precarious employment (presenting at least one dimension) and the proportion of workers presenting one, two, three or four dimensions.
Two out of three workers had a precarious employment. The prevalence of precariousness was higher in Eastern (72.64%; CI 95%: 61.78; 81.34) than in Nordic European countries (51.17%; CI 95%: 44.30; 58.00). The most prevalent dimension was not having the ability to exercise rights (42.39%).
Precarious employment is an important social determinant of health. Therefore, the EU policy-makers should take into consideration the new forms of employment and legislate accordingly.


The lucky girlfriend of Australia's hottest cop has revealed he's a hopeless romantic who lavishes her with flowers and whisks her away to top-notch hotels.
Tayla Lange, 22, met Mason Jago on Tinder two years ago.
Despite Mason receiving saucy propositions from men and women all over Australia since his cheeky selfie went viral, Tayla isn't worried.
'Mason and I are completely happy in our relationship.
I'm not really the jealous type. I trust him,' she says.
The 25-year-old police constable admits to feeling a little 'embarrassed' and 'surprised' about his new-found heart-throb status.
'I've never considered myself as a hottie. I'm just an average Joe,' he says.
However, Mason's colleagues at Gatton station in Queensland are certainly not letting him forget it anytime soon!
'Everyone has been bagging me out. I'm the joke of the station,' Mason laughs.
Despite feeling a little 'overwhelmed' by the attention, Mason is taking it all in his stride.
'I love all the handcuffing jokes: "He can handcuff me or arrest me any day," "I wonder if he takes his handcuffs home and does naughty things," – those sort of ones are all pretty amusing,' he says.
However, Mason's mum is not so impressed.
'She's terrified about it all,' he reveals.


By: Patricia Kime Click to read about the author.
Patricia Kime is a freelance writer who specializes in health care and medicine. She lives in Arlington, Va.
Active duty troops and TRICARE beneficiaries now have access to a new tool in the battle of the bulge: FDA-approved weight-loss drugs that curb appetite, boost metabolism, or block absorption of starches and fats.
The Defense Health Agency (DHA) in May added four generic weight-loss medications to DoD's pharmacy formulary -- phentermine, benzphetamine, diethylpropion, and phendimetrazine - and said it would cover several other medications, including liraglutide, lorcaserin, and orlistat, under certain circumstances.
The idea is to make more FDA-approved weight-loss therapies available to TRICARE patients but also give active duty personnel struggling with weight some alternatives for meeting standards, explained Dr. Donald Shell, director for disease prevention, disease management, and population health policy and oversight in the office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.
"It's clear from the scientific literature, if you can reduce excess body fat in the individual then you lower their risk of comorbid diseases related to excess body fat … this is the general literature, not specific to DHA or Health Affairs, but a 5 to 10 percent reduction in body weight can lower blood pressure, decrease insulin requirements for diabetics. It's in the best interest for preventing major chronic diseases," Shell said.
Survey results released this year by RAND Corp. found that nearly 15 percent of U.S. troops were obese in 2015, meaning they had a body mass index of 30 or higher. An additional 51 percent were clinically overweight, registering BMIs between 25 and 25.9, although the report noted that in some cases of troops with high muscle mass, BMI is an inadequate measure of body composition and fitness.
Among all DoD beneficiaries, which includes family members, retirees and their family members, the prevalence of obesity has reached 23 percent, according to the Health Care Survey of DoD Beneficiaries.
While obesity levels in the military are lower than the general U.S. population (a third of whom fall under the clinical definition of obese), they can have a significant impact on readiness, RAND analysts noted.
To be considered for weight-loss medication prescription under TRICARE or the Military Health System, patients must have a BMI higher than 29, or 26 if they have a related condition such as diabetes, high blood pressure, or sleep apnea.
Obtaining a prescription will take commitment under the new policy. The drugs require prior authorization, and patients will be required to participate in behavior modification, to include dietary changes and exercise, for at least six months before receiving the medication. They must continue these lifestyle changes while taking the drugs.
Active duty troops must also be enrolled in their service-specific health and wellness program and adhere to their service's policies.
DHA has instituted a step-therapy approach to prescribing the medications that starts with a three-month trial of generic phentermine for most patients. If a patient does not lose 5 percent of their weight while on phentermine, they may be prescribed another medication, including one of the non-formulary drugs. Within that category, there are similar recommendations for step therapy, starting with the lower cost medications.
Gastric bypass and other weight loss surgery is available for military dependents who are extremely overweight and unable to shed pounds by diet and exercise. DoD policy bars active duty personnel from receiving these types of surgeries.


text:
'This Week' Transcript: Hillary Clinton, Sen. Marco Rubio, and Donald Trump
A rush transcript for "This Week" on February 7, 2016.
February 7, 2016, 9:57 AM
Hillary Clinton speaks during the MSNBC Democratic Candidates Debate, Feb. 4, 2016 in Durham, N.H. Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally, Feb. 4, 2016 in Exeter, N.H. Marco Rubio holds a campaign town hall event on Feb. 3, 2016 in Bow, N.H.
Justin Sullivan/Joe Raedle/Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
— -- THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT FOR 'THIS WEEK' ON February 7, 2016 and it will be updated.
ANNOUNCER: Starting right now on a special edition of THIS WEEK with George Stephanopoulos, debate night face-off. The GOP candidates on the attack in a fiery final debate in New Hampshire.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JEB BUSH (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Let me talk.
DONALD TRUMP (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Be quiet.
A lot of times --
ANNOUNCER (voice-over): Two days until the first-in-the-nation primary.
Will Trump put a win on the board?
TRUMP: And our country is going to hell.
ANNOUNCER (voice-over): Donald Trump joins us live.
Then, Rubio under fire: the freshman senator takes incoming from all sides.
GOV. CHRIS CHRISTIE (R-NJ), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: There it is. The memorized 25-second speech.
ANNOUNCER(voice-over): Marco Rubio responds in a THIS WEEK exclusive.
Plus, the Democratic underdog?
Hillary Clinton knocking on doors in New Hampshire.
Can she come from behind against Bernie Sanders?
Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Hillary Clinton, all here live. From ABC News, a special edition of THIS WEEK, live from Manchester, New Hampshire.
Here now, chief anchor George Stephanopoulos.
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC HOST: These last debates before the New Hampshire primary have made a big difference in years past. And last night's was a doozy. Donald Trump back at center stage.
The three governors had their best night yet. Toughest one yet for Marco Rubio. And the latest poll from WMUR here in Manchester, taken just before the debate, shows Donald Trump back up to 33 percent, 17 points ahead of Marco Rubio, followed by Ted Cruz at 14 percent, Ohio governor John Kasich at 11 percent, Jeb Bush back at 7 percent.
And the big question now, how did the debate play with that fluid group of New Hampshire voters, who wait until the final minute to make up their minds?
Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Hillary Clinton all here this morning. And ABC's Jon Karl starts us off with the highlights of last night.
Good morning, Jon.
JONATHAN KARL, ABC NEWS CHIEF WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Good morning, George.
As our audience saw, there was a bit of a traffic jam up there as the candidates came on the stage. But once they made to it their podiums, it was a big night for the governors and for Donald Trump.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
KARL (voice-over): Back at center stage after skipping the last debate, Donald Trump defended his temperament to be commander in chief.
TRUMP: I actually think I have the best temperament. I'm not the one with the trigger. Other people up here, believe me, would be a lot faster.
KARL (voice-over): Ted Cruz, the man who beat Trump in Iowa, had hammered him all week but on the debate stage, Cruz pulled his punches.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You said he doesn't have the temperament to be commander in chief.
Do you stand by those words?
CRUZ: I think that is an assessment the voters are going on make.
TRUMP: If you noticed, he didn't answer your question. We're going win with Trump. And people back down with Trump.
KARL (voice-over): The candidate rising fastest in New Hampshire?
Senator Marco Rubio took fire all night with a barrage coming from New Jersey's Chris Christie.
CHRISTIE: You have not been involved in a consequential decision where you had to be held accountable.
KARL (voice-over): Rubio drew ridicule for repeating himself repeatedly.
RUBIO: And let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing.
Let's dispel with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing.
This notion that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing is just not true.
CHRISTIE: There it is. There it is. The memorized 25-second speech.
KARL (voice-over): Christie and his fellow governors at the edges of the stage dominated much of the night, all fighting for a New Hampshire comeback. John Kasich hoping to appeal to moderates, won over the crowd with a positive message.
GOV. JOHN KASICH (R-OH), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We have to solve problems in America by coming together, Republicans and Democrats. Americans first, party and ideology second. That's what we need to do.
KARL (voice-over): And Bush made his most forceful attacks yet against Trump on the issue of eminent domain.
BUSH: What Donald Trump did was to use eminent domain to try to take the property of an elderly woman.
TRUMP: Yes, and he wants to be a tough guy and it doesn't work very well with --
BUSH: How tough is it to take property from an elderly woman?
TRUMP: Let me talk. Quiet.
BUSH: How tough is it?
TRUMP: -- a lot of times -- a lot of times -- that's all of his donors and special interests out there.
So it's what it is.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
KARL: That's right. Donald Trump went after the audience. I have never seen that in a debate before. But he still has a solid, double-digit lead here in New Hampshire.
But remember, George. New Hampshire voters are famous for changing their minds and for deciding at the very last minute.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Yes, a third of them haven't made up their mind yet. And Donald Trump joins us right now.
Welcome back, Mr. Trump.
So what did you think about last night?
TRUMP: I loved it. It was a great debate. We had some fun. I had a great time and I'm very happy with the results. It was terrific.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You did have that back-and-forth with Jeb Bush on eminent domain. And the facts do seem to be on his side.
Vera Coking
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- let me just explain it first. Vera Coking, you wanted and the Casino Development Authority of New Jersey wanted to take her house to build a parking lot for your casino.
TRUMP: Not a parking lot.
STEPHANOPOULOS: She went to -- She went to court. You fought her for three years and finally the state supreme court ruled and here's what they said.
Trump, not the public, stood to benefit from the proposed seizures and that the deal was analogous to giving Trump a blank check with respect to future development on the property for casino hotel purposes.
TRUMP: Good.
And you know what I did?
I let the court stand as opposed to going higher up.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, it was the state Supreme Court.
TRUMP: But let me -- we could have gone higher. But let me just tell you, George, I decided not to do it. I decided not to pursue it. We could have --
STEPHANOPOULOS: A three-year fight.
TRUMP: -- doesn't matter. We could have gone a different way. I offered her a lot of money. She ended up selling the house for much less money than I offered her.
Eminent domain is a very important thing. Jeb Bush doesn't understand what it means. And if you look into the Bush family -- I found this out five minutes ago. They used eminent domain for the stadium in Texas, where they own, I guess, a piece of the Texas Rangers.
STEPHANOPOULOS: That was George W. Bush.
TRUMP: That doesn't matter. It was the Bush family. They used private eminent domain. He didn't tell anybody this. So I mean, he should have told people. Maybe -- he probably doesn't know because I don't even think he knows what eminent domain is. But I just found that out five minutes ago.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So no second thoughts about your position at all?
TRUMP: Eminent domain is important. You wouldn't have highways, you wouldn't have roadways, you wouldn't have bridges, you wouldn't have hospitals. You wouldn't have anything without it.
The Keystone Pipeline, everybody wants the Keystone Pipeline. If you're a conservative, you want the Keystone Pipeline. They have a whole section on eminent domain. When they write up, the whole thing, on the Keystone. They have a whole section right now --
STEPHANOPOULOS: The crowd wasn't on your side.
TRUMP: The crowd was on my side except they were all friends of mine that were donors and special interests and lobbyists, some of whom worked for me in the past.
It was -- actually, it was a very -- it shows how broken the system is. The people in that audience were the people that were supporting all of the candidates. I'm the only candidate not taking money. I'm not taking money.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You had no supporters in the crowd?
TRUMP: I had supporters. I had 20 tickets. I mean, they gave me 20 tickets.
Hey, George, all of those people in that crowd, 90 percent of them were people that gave to the various candidates and mostly to Bush.
Look, Bush got $128 million. He's nowhere. He spent over $100 million on this failed campaign of his. And he's nowhere. Those people were in the audience. So every time anybody said anything, in fact, Rubio actually said, he said, why does nobody get any response but Bush?
I just think it's really showing the system. When you have somebody like me, where I don't take money, where I'm a self-funder, people really appreciate that. And that's why I brought it out last night. It was a good point, I think. But I brought it out last night.
STEPHANOPOULOS: The issue of waterboarding front and center last night as (INAUDIBLE). You said, I would bring back waterboarding and I would bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding.
What did you have in mind?
TRUMP: Well, George, you're not talking about what I said before that. I said we're living in a world where, in the Middle East, they're cutting people's heads off. They're chopping a Christian's head off. And many of them, we talk about Foley, James Foley, and you know, what a wonderful young man. Boom, they're chopping heads.
So then I went into this. I said, yes, I would bring back waterboarding. And I would make it a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Yes.
TRUMP: I had in mind going worse than waterboarding. It's enough. We have right now a country that's under siege. It's under siege from a people, from -- we're like living in medieval times. If I have it to do and if it's up to me, I would absolutely bring back waterboarding. And if it's going to be tougher than waterboarding, I would bring that back, too.
STEPHANOPOULOS: As president, you would authorize torture?
TRUMP: I would absolutely authorize something beyond waterboarding. And believe me, it will be effective. If we need information, George, you have our enemy cutting heads off of Christians and plenty of others, by the hundreds, by the thousands.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Do we win by being more like them?
TRUMP: Yes. I'm sorry. You have to do it that way. And I'm not sure everybody agrees with me. I guess a lot of people don't. We are living in a time that's as evil as any time that there has ever been. You know, when I was a young man, I studied Medieval times. That's what they did, they chopped off heads. That's what we have...
STEPHANOPOULOS: So we're going to chop off heads...
TRUMP: We're going to do things beyond waterboarding perhaps, if that happens to come. The question was asked. I thought Ted's answer was very tentative, Ted Cruz. He gave a very tentative answer. If we have to, we're going to have to do more.
But when you have conditions like that, I would say absolutely, I would approve waterboarding and if you go beyond it, I'm OK with that.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So let me just clarify this. Right now, the law says they have to follow the Army "Field Manual," which prohibits...
TRUMP: Right.
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- waterboarding. You would try to overturn the law (INAUDIBLE)...
TRUMP: Well, no, you had to have it reclassified. You reclassify and you'll see what happens.
But I would certainly approve waterboarding. They laugh at us. Our enemies laugh at us, George. They say waterboarding, they don't even think it's a form -- you know, they don't even view that as real torture.
But they say waterboarding and they chop off heads. They think we are so stupid, you have no idea. The enemy that we are fighting -- and no wonder they're doing so well, because with this kind of thinking, that's why they're doing so well.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, you -- there was another issue that came up last night. You -- you just cited how you always were against the Iraq War. Fact checkers have gone through and haven't seen any statements of you against the war until after it began.
TRUMP: In 2003-2004, I was against the war. That's probably the first time. Now, again, I wasn't a politician, George. I'm not somebody that you would interview. I was a businessman.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I actually interviewed you back in 1999...
TRUMP: You probably (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: You were thinking of running for president then.
TRUMP: But the point is -- yes, I was, actually. Maybe I should have done it. I like this one better. I like this time better.
But the fact is that in 2003-2004, I was very much opposed to the Iraq War. I said it's going to destabilize the Middle East. It exactly destabilized the Middle East.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Let's talk about another issue, a social issue on voters' minds right now, gay marriage.
Last Sunday on "Fox News Sunday," you said you would strongly consider appointing Supreme Court justices to overturn the ruling that every state must offer gay marriage.
But later this week, you said this to a reporter here, Sue O'Connell of the New England Cable Channel.
SUE O'CONNELL: When President Trump is in office, can we look for more forward motion on equality for gays and lesbians?
TRUMP: Well, you can. And, you know, again, we're going to bring people together. And that's your thing and other people have their thing. We have to bring all people together. And if we don't, we're not going to have a country anymore.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
STEPHANOPOULOS: But just last Sunday, you said you would strongly consider appointing justices who would overturn it.
TRUMP: I'm talking about bringing people together and we -- I would appoint justices. It would take a long time, frankly, because I don't know how long it would take to appoint a...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you want them to overturn...
TRUMP: (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- that Supreme Court decision?
TRUMP: If they -- if they -- I would appoint them and we will see how they will vote but I would...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But how does that move us to equality?
TRUMP: We'll find out. I mean we're going to find out. There's a lot of people that want to see that. But I would, I'd -- more important than anything else to me, this country is so divided right now, as per her question. This country is so totally divided, it's probably almost never been as divided as it is right now and we have to bring it together.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But a majority of Americans now support the idea of gay marriage.
Wouldn't it be divisive to try to overturn it?
TRUMP: It has -- it has really been determined and we will see what happens. We're going to look at judges. They've got to be great judges. They've got to be conservative judges. We're going to see how they stand depending on -- on what their views are.
But that would be my preference.
STEPHANOPOULOS: See, that's what I mean.
Where do you want them to stand?
TRUMP: I would prefer that they stand against it, but we'll see what happens. It depends on the judge.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And how does that move us toward equality for gays and lesbians?
TRUMP: Well, I think what will happen is -- and, look, George, it's very simple. We're going to bring our country together. We're going to unify our country. We're going to do whatever we have to do. I'm going to put the absolute bed -- best judges in position. If their views -- we're going to see what their views are. I will make the determination at that time.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But what do you say to gays and lesbians who think that overturning that decision is not unifying our country, it's dividing our country?
TRUMP: Well, I think I understand what they're saying and we're going to see what happens. It's a long way off, George. It's a long way off.
STEPHANOPOULOS: What's happening here in New Hampshire?
TRUMP: I think we're doing well. I think it's going well. I think our ground forces are good. I think I had a good debate last night.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Better than Iowa?
TRUMP: Well, I think I did very well in Iowa. I came in first or second, depending on how you want to count the Carson vote. I mean depending on how you want to count that, I came in either first or second out of originally 17 people.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, you came in second.
TRUMP: Well, I'll tell you what, if you add up all of the thousands of votes that were added onto Cruz, you know, you'll see what happens. I mean I think I might have come in better than second.
But it doesn't matter. I think second a very good finish.
You know, Rubio came in third. Every -- everybody was saying what a great job he did. I came in second and they said, oh, he had a bad performance.
And I said why is that bad?
I mean I came in second, he came in third, he was good and I wasn't?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Marco Rubio is coming up.
What do you think happened with him last night?
TRUMP: I don't know. I mean, I don't know. He had a rough time, but, you know, we'll see what happens. I mean we have a -- an interesting two days ahead. But I wanted to get by the debate. People said I won the debate. Almost everybody said I won the debate. Even you said I did well.
And we'll see what happens.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Who's standing between you and the nomination right now?
TRUMP: I don't know. It's a long way to go, George. To me, it's a long way to go. I mean I see these wonderful poll numbers, but they don't mean anything to me. I just don't know about polls. I don't know if they're accurate. When they interview 300 people and then they come up with this brilliant poll, to me, the people in New Hampshire have to get out, have to vote and hopefully they're going to vote for Trump, because I'm going to do a good job.
STEPHANOPOULOS: We'll see you on the trail.
TRUMP: Thank you.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Thanks for joining us this morning.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And up next, we're just getting started here in New Hampshire. Hillary Clinton coming up. She had a big comeback four years ago in New Hampshire.
Can she do it again?
Marco Rubio is next taking on the critics with his tough night.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
SEN. MARCO RUBIO (R-FL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: And let's dispel once and for all this fiction, that Barack Obama doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing. We are not facing a president that doesn't know what he's doing. He knows what he is doing. Let's dispel with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn't what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing. Anyone who believes that Barack Obama isn't doing what he's doing on purpose doesn't understand what we're dealing with here.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Democrats are circulating that video from last night, Senator Marco Rubio joins us live right now.
RUBIO: Well, actually, I would pay them to keep running that clip because that's what I believe passionately. It's one of the reasons why I'm not running for reelection to the Senate and I'm running for president. This notion and this idea that somehow, oh, this is an accident -- ObamaCare was not an accident. Dodd-Frank was not an accident. The deal with Iran was not an accident --
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you're getting pounded for repeating that speech.
RUBIO: Well, look, we raised more money last night in the first hour that debate than any other debate. As far as that message, I hope they keep running it and I'm going to keep saying because it's true. Barack Obama -- yes, has he hired incompetent people to implement laws and run agencies? Absolutely.
But when it comes to the -- what he's trying to do to America, it's part of a plan. He has said he wanted to change the country; he's doing it in a way that is robbing us of everything that makes us special.
I'm going to keep saying that because that not only is it the truth, it is at the core of our --
STEPHANOPOULOS: But even after Chris Christie called you out for what he called canned speeches, 25-second canned speeches, you repeated again, he says, there you go again. That was not a good moment for you, was it?
RUBIO: It's what I believe. And it's what I'm going to continue to say because it happens to be one of the main reasons why I am running. I -- this is the greatest country in the history of mankind because of a certain set of principles. Barack Obama wants us to abandon those principles that he has spent seven years putting in place policies that rip them from us: undermining the Constitution, undermining free enterprise, undermining our standing in the world, weakening America, apologizing for us on the global stage.
The reason why I'm running is if we elect someone like that for the next four years, I think it may be too late for American to turn around.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Lindsey Graham supporting Jeb Bush now, said the case for Marco Rubio is ready to be commander in chief took a hit tonight.
RUBIO: Well, Lindsey Graham supporting Jeb Bush, I don't expect that he's going to say positive things about me.
Here's the truth of everybody on that stage: no one on that stage last night has more experience or better understand of the national security issues before this country than I do. And that is the most important thing the president does. The president doesn't run the economy but the president does have to be commander in chief.
No one --
STEPHANOPOULOS: Even though you've never been in an executive position?
RUBIO: No one on that stage has a better understanding or has shown better judgment on foreign policy than I have, period. And I think I demonstrated that last night and I've demonstrated that throughout the campaign.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Speaking of national security and foreign policy, just heard Donald Trump back here on the issue of waterboarding and torture, said he would authorize something even worse, that sometimes we do have to mirror our enemies.
What did you make of that?
RUBIO: Well, I don't even know what that means, obviously, so I can't make much of it. I can tell you two things and I said it last night.
The first is we shouldn't really be discussing specific tactics because it allows a terrorist -- literally -- to plan for how they'll be interrogated to avoid -- to avoid --
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you would reserve the right to order waterboarding?
RUBIO: Well, we are going to interrogate terrorists. We're not even doing that now because they're not -- there's no one being sent to Guantanamo. But beyond that, I would tell you that we have to understand we cannot interrogate a terrorist as if it was a law enforcement investigation.
A law enforcement investigation is about collecting evidence for prosecution. A terrorism interrogation is about finding out information to prevent something from happening, to prevent an attack or to target others who are involved in actively plotting.
So you have to use different tactics. We're not going to discuss those tactics. Let me -- suffice it to say that we are going to comply with whatever a civilized nation would do. But you have to treat terrorists differently than you do a street criminal.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You also got called out by Jeb Bush and Chris Christie on the issue of abortion because you don't support exceptions for rape and incest.
And Jeb Bush also said this to CNN. I want to put that up.
He said, "It's a tough sell to tell a pro-life mother that her daughter has been raped, that she would just have to accept that as a sad fact. This is not an easy decision. But Marco will have to explain that position."
What would you say to -- ?
RUBIO: Well, a couple things. Number one, abortion to me is not a political issue. It's a human rights issue. And so if Jeb wants to make it a political issue, that's his right. For me, it's not.
Number two, I have supported laws that have expectations, the 20-week abortion ban.
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- what you believe.
RUBIO: Well, first of all, I do require an exception for life of the mother because I'm pro-life. Number two, I -- as I've said, if they pass a law in Congress that has exceptions, I'll sign it because I want to save lives.
The broader point I've made, however, is I believe all human life is worthy of the protection of our laws. That's what I deeply and personally believe. And I'm not going to change my position on something of -- that is so deep in me in order to win an election.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So what do you say to that mom, to look her in the eye --
RUBIO: It's a terrible situation. I mean, a crisis pregnancy, especially as a result of something as horrifying as that, I'm not telling you it's easy. I'm not here saying it's an easy choice. It is a horrifying thing what you've just described. It's heartbreaking. It is unimaginable, quite frankly. I get it. I really do. And that's why this issue is so difficult.
But I believe a human being, an unborn child, has a right to live irrespective of the circumstances by which they were conceived. But I know that that's not a majority of Americans don't agree with me on that. And that is probably -- and that's why any law that limits abortions that passes will almost certainly have exceptions. And I'll sign it with exceptions.
But I personally believe that all human life is worthy of the protection of our laws.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Immigration, the most talked about issue online last night. You get a hit for being for the gang of eight bill, part of the gang of eight on immigration, also for running away from it.
So bottom line, was it a mistake to forge the original deal?
RUBIO: No, look, I went to Washington to try to solve problems. Immigration is a huge problem in Florida. And I saw an opportunity to do the best we could in a Senate controlled by liberals like Harry Reid in the hopes that the House would take it up and make it even better. It happened in the Senate, did not happen in the House.
Here's the bottom line, that's not the way we're going to do it when I'm president. We have a majority of Republicans in the House and Senate and I'm president, we're going to do it differently. We're going to do it the way I want to do it.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But if that's the best you could do, you would sign it?
RUBIO: Well, I don't think that's the right. I don't think that law, the way it was constructed, could have ever passed, because most certainly I think when you look at the House and the broader population in America, people don't want to move on immigration until you can prove to them that illegal immigration is under control.
And that's the point I've been making now for three years. We are not going to be able to do this comprehensively. As president, we will not. As president the first thing we're going to do is secure our border. And until the border is secure, nothing else is going to happen on immigration. And anyone who believes otherwise is either delusional or is not being honest.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But no regrets about being for the gang of eight, being part of the gang of eight?
RUBIO: I went up there to try to solve problems. It would have been easier to sit back and just give speeches and criticize what other people did.
I went up there to try to solve problems. Immigration is a big problem. And it's still -- it's harder today and worse today than it was three years ago.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Your opponents had no trouble last night saying you're not ready to be commander-in-chief. Straight question, do you think Donald Trump is ready to be commander in chief?
RUBIO: Well, I think in order for Donald to pass that threshold eventually at some point he's going to have to show some in depth knowledge of the foreign policy issues before us. Up to now, he has not done that.
And, you know...
STEPHANOPOULOS: He's not ready right now.
RUBIO: Well, he's new to politics, and so I think he still has time to learn about these things, but he's running out of time. Last night alone, we just had a brief question about North Korea. This is a huge threat. The leader of North Korea is a lunatic, but he possesses long-range missiles that are probably already capable of reaching the United States, most certainly capable of reaching Guam and Hawaii and not to mention our allies like Japan and South Korea.
And this is an emerging issue, but it's a very dangerous one. He better have an in depth understanding of that, that because on your first day in office you cannot predict what issue will confront you. I know this, of all those people on that stage last night still running for president, none of them has more experience or a better understanding or has proven better judgment on these issues than I have.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And right now Donald Trump does not have that readiness?
RUBIO: Well, I don't think Donald Trump has answered questions about foreign policy in depth up to this point. He didn't know what the nuclear triad was what he was asked a few weeks ago in one of our other debates. And even last night, the most he could say about North Korea was something about China and leverage.
So, I think that ultimately -- I'm not here to pick on other Republicans. I'll let at the end of the day the voters make that design, but I can tell you if you want to be commander-in-chief, whether it's Donald or everybody else running, you better show that you understand these issues in depth and that you have some good judgment on them.
STEPHANOPOULOS: People writing about your strategy say you have a 3, 2, 1 strategy, third in Iowa, second in New Hampshire, first in South Carolina. Still on track for a second place here?
RUBIO: Well, you've never heard anybody in my campaign say anything about that. We wanted to get as many as we can and as many delegates as we can. So last week in Iowa came in third, but we had as many delegates as the second place finisher, and one less delegate than the first place finisher.
This is going to matter in a race like this potentially.
Same strategy in New Hampshire, we want to get as many people to vote for me as possible. And we'll keep moving forward.
I can tell you that we've built a campaign that's going to be around in South Carolina, in Nevada, on March 1 and beyond. And I feel very optimistic about where we are going to be once the delegates are tallied, once everyone else -- and especially once the race has narrowed two or three people.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And nothing from last night changes that?
RUBIO: Absolutely not. Other than the fact that we raised more money in the first hour of that debate than we did in any other debate.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Senator Rubio, thanks for joining us this morning. Thank you.
And that's it for the Republicans. Hillary Clinton up next, plus our Powerhouse Roundtable on last night's winners and losers and where things are headed in this wild race.
LARRY DAVID, "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE": I come from a wealthy family. Technically, my life is worth more than all of yours put together, especially these women and midgets. So if it's all the same to you, I'm going to pop down in that lifeboat.
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-VT), DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Hold on. Hold on. Wait a second.
SANDERS: I am so sick of the 1 percent getting this preferential treatment.
SANDERS: Enough is enough. Enough.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Bernie Sanders on "Saturday Night Live" last night.
We're joined now by his opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
She joins us now from Manchester, as well.
Madam Secretary, thank you for joining us this morning.
So you have had your own turn on "Saturday Night Live."
How did he do?
HILLARY CLINTON (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Well, I didn't get to see it, but it's always a fun experience. I'm sure he did great. You know, it's a wonderful forum. It's a crash course in trying to figure out how to do live TV. And I had a great time doing it.
STEPHANOPOULOS: We also had, of course, the Republican debate last night here at St. Anselm's. And Marco Rubio called you out on the issue of abortion.
SEN. MARCO RUBIO (R-FL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Why doesn't the media ask Hillary Clinton why she believes that all abortions should be legal, even on the due date of that unborn child?
Why don't they ask Hillary Clinton why she believes that partial birth abortion, which is a gruesome procedure that has been outlawed in this country, she thinks that's a fundamental right. They are the extremists when it comes to the issue of abortion and I can't wait to expose them in a general election.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Are you going to get exposed in a general election?
CLINTON: You know, George, I -- it's really quite sad to see what Senator Rubio is becoming in this campaign. Everybody understands that he is diving as far right as he possibly can. You know, I've been on record for many years about where I stand on abortion, how it should be safe and legal and I have the same position that I've had for a very long time.
But what's really going on here is an effort by the Republicans to keep pushing as far as they can to overturn "Roe v. Wade," to defund Planned Parenthood, to make accusations and attacks that are really extreme...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But are there any...
CLINTON: -- and I -- I think the Amer...
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- restrictions you would accept on late-term abortions?
CLINTON: Well, you know, I've been on the record on this for a long time. You know, I think that the life and health of the mother, obviously, rape and incest, have to be always taken into account. And, you know, when he raises the, you know, very, very difficult issue of late-term abortion, he conveniently overlooks the fact that there are medical reasons, there are health-related reasons.
I've met women who have had to face this excruciating choice. This is not something that anyone that I've ever met with enters into without the deepest thought, the most careful consideration.
And I remember at an event back in the '90s, where, you know, we sat and talked with some of the women who had to make a very hard decision.
You know, it's -- it's just so unfortunate that politicians like Senator Rubio are trying to politicize these kinds of very difficult concerns.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You...
CLINTON: And I don't think he should be allowed to get away with that.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You had your own debate with Bernie Sanders this week, as well. And he challenged -- you challenged him to come up with evidence that contributions from Wall Street ever influenced your positions.
He and his team have circulated the charge from Elizabeth Warren, who said you changed your position on the bankruptcy bill back in 2001 because of contributions.
Here's what Senator Warren had to say.
SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D), MASSACHUSETTS: One of the first bills that came up after she was Senator Clinton was the bankruptcy bill.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And?
WARREN: She voted in favor of it. She has taken money from the groups. And more to the point, she worries about them as a constituency.
STEPHANOPOULOS: How do you respond to that charge?
CLINTON: Well, I'm glad you asked me about it, because this is one of these, you know, innuendo insinuation charges that the Sanders campaign is engaging in.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, that was Senator Warren, though.
CLINTON: If you -- no, but -- but I know. But if you had played the entire quote, you know, what you would have heard her say, she and I worked together in 2000 to stop a bankruptcy bill that we both believed was very harmful.
When I got to the Senate in 2001, one of the first big votes there was on a version of the bankruptcy bill and I was deluged by women's groups and children's advocates groups to do everything I could to make sure that child support and women's precarious financial situation in case of divorce or not being able to get the kind of funding they needed from a partner or a spouse in bankruptcy would not be endangered. And it was. The current -- that bill was making it a very low priority.
So I did go to work on behalf of all these women's groups and children's groups because they needed a champion. And I got that bill changed. And in return, it had nothing to do with any money whatsoever -- and I resent deeply any effort by the Sanders campaign to so imply...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But...
CLINTON: It had to do with trying to get a deal...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But that's not what...
CLINTON: -- that would protect women. But now let me finish, George, because this has been bandied about and I just want to set the record straight.
And so then three years later, part of the -- part of what Senator -- Senator Warren said, you played. You didn't play the whole thing, because we've been allies. I faced a tough decision and I stood up for women and children. I went to the Senate floor, said that was exactly what I was doing.
Then the bill did not pass. It never became law. And then when the next bill came up, 2005, women's issues were taken care of because I had made that a point back in 2001.
And so then I was against that bill. I didn't get a chance to actually vote against it because Bill was in the hospital having a heart procedure. But I put a statement out. I was against it.
So I'm happy to set this record straight. And I really want to, once again, call out the Sanders campaign, which claims they like to run a positive campaign. But they have been quite artful in raising questions and trying to cast doubts about my record.
And I really am not going to sit and take it anymore --
STEPHANOPOULOS: But Senator --
CLINTON: I have a public record. I have never, ever been influenced in a view or a vote by anyone who has given me any kind of money. So I'm just going to keep setting the record straight.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But in her book, Senator Warren said the bill was essentially the same but Hillary Clinton -- Hillary Rodham Clinton was not. Big banks were now part of Secretary Clinton's consistency. She wanted their support. They wanted hers, including --
CLINTON: George, look, I -- look, I have the greatest -- I have the greatest respect for Senator Warren. As I said, we did work together. I faced a choice. I could have said to the women who have been my advocates for 30 years, I'm sorry; I'm now in the Senate. But you know, I can't help you. Nobody else is helping them. They were desperate to get help. They were afraid that child support was going to be below credit card debt, that they were going to be really left out and left behind and badly damaged.
I could have said, you know, I can't do that because somebody in 10 years might say that, you know, something else is going on. That's not the way I work. So they came to me; I said this is outrageous. I went to the floor. I lobbied to get a change. And as part of getting that change from both Democrats and Republicans, who were leading that legislation, they said if we change this bill at the last minute to take account of these issues you're raising about women and children, which they had not clearly made a priority before I showed up, then you know, you have to say you'll vote for it.
It was -- you know, look, that's what you have to do. I swallowed hard; I said OK. But it was also the case it didn't get passed. So I got what I needed into the bill. It stayed in the bill, even in the bad version that I posed in 2005.
So thanks for the opportunity to set the record straight.
STEPHANOPOULOS: In the debate the other night, you said you'd look into whether or not to release the transcripts of your speeches to financial groups.
Have you made up your mind?
CLINTON: Yes, you know, here's another thing I want to say. Let everybody who's ever given a speech to any private group under any circumstances release them. We'll all release them at the same time. You know, I don't mind being the subject in Republican debates, the subject in the Democratic primary. That kind of goes with the territory. I've been around long enough.
But at some point, you know, these rules need to apply to everybody. And there are a bunch of folks, including, you know, my opponent, who's given, you know, speeches to groups and people on the other side who've given speeches to groups. Let -- if this is now going to be a new standard so then it should apply to everybody and then I'll be happy to look into it further.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Madam Secretary, thanks very much for your time this morning.
CLINTON: Great to talk to you, George, thanks.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And we'll be right back with the roundtable.
What did they make of last night's debate and the road from here.
CHRISTIE I'm proud of my record and, by the way, I like Kasich's record, too, as governor.
BUSH: I trust Kasich and Christie to build the roads and the infrastructure of their states than Washington, D.C.
KASICH: Jeb is right. If you delay and you wait, the Washington operators will take you down. There's so much that could be done. But I don't trust Washington to do it. I trust the state capitals to be the place, to be the source of innovation and reform in this country.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Best night yet for the governors on the stage last night, even though they're behind right now. Here in New Hampshire, across the country, let's talk about the debate, where the campaign goes from here on our roundtable.
Joined by Cokie Roberts, Matthew Dowd, Donna Brazile and Bill Kristol.
Matthew, let me begin with you, the big story coming out of last night. You saw Marco Rubio handle it here, this morning said he wouldn't do anything different.
But the worst reviews he's gotten this entire campaign.
MATTHEW DOWD, ABC NEWS SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT: Yes, I think he went in, having won almost every single debate coming up until Iowa. And he lost the most important debate in his momentum campaign.
I think, one, it stalls any momentum he had here. And his ability --
STEPHANOPOULOS: That serious?
DOWD: -- yes, I think it stalls any momentum in his ability to get second place is now in peril.
I think the second thing, more importantly than that is this kind of thing, is this kind of thing a virus that he can't get rid over the course of the campaign? Now will everybody see him through this lens? Is he prepared? And is he only a canned speech?
And that's what I think they're most worried about.
COKIE ROBERTS, ABC NEWS CORRESPONDENT: But you know, the point that they were going after him on, the governors, especially Christie, were going after him on and as you just heard in that sound bite from Jeb Bush, is a very important one because the truth is, up until 2008, we only elected two sitting senators ever president. And then in 2008, there were two senators running against each other. So you had to pick a senator.
And Obama's big resume point was not the United States Senate. So these -- this is always a problem for these guys. They don't have accomplishments to point to. And when you're in the Senate, you have to cast votes. And you do cast votes often on one side and the other of something because of the way legislation works.
And so the combination of the fact that he has that Senate around his neck and first-term Senate around his neck and that he keeps saying the same thing over and over again has people looking and saying, what are you good at?
STEPHANOPOULOS: Is that what voters see?
You heard Marco Rubio here today, raise a lot of money last night. He wants to --
STEPHANOPOULOS: -- people watch him take on Barack Obama.
So is this something that he just can come back from pretty easily?
Or is it like Rick Perry in that "oops" moment back in 2008?
BILL KRISTOL, "THE WEEKLY STANDARD": Yes, David French had a good piece; Rick Perry at that horrible moment in 2012, the "oops" moment, which kind of crystallized doubts about him and therefore lingered forever, sort of a virus, as Matt says.
On the other hand, Mitt Romney had a horrible debate in South Carolina. He couldn't explain why he wasn't releasing his income tax forms. He lost South Carolina to Newt Gingrich. So he did pay a price that he came back, did a very good job against Gingrich in the debate in Florida. I think what it means is the race will go on. People, I think if you're Christie or if you're -- certain if you're Kasich or Bush, in any case it will do well here in New Hampshire incidentally, you look at that debate, you don't -- you think, I'm not getting out after two states --
KRISTOL: -- they can stay in. Maybe it's the -- whichever one runs the lowest, I supposed, looks now it might be Christie -- will get out. But I think this -- I think -- look, think of the last week. One week ago in Iowa, Trump was supposed to win Iowa. Cruz upsets him. Whoops. Ooh, Trump's wounded.
Cruz wins Iowa, supposed to be get a bump into New Hampshire. No apparent bump. Maybe he's just another Huckabee or Santorum who wins Iowa but can't play in more moderate states.
Rubio is the one with momentum. Whoops, Saturday night debate. Rubio stumbles.
All three of them have been I think shown enough in the way of flaws that if I were advising Kasich or Bush or maybe even Christie I would say why not stay in this? Another debate, isn't there one just Saturday night in South Carolina?
DONNA BRAZILE, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Right, right. Well, look, Marco Rubio was supposed to be the rock star. He was supposed to be the guy who comes out and with his charisma to transcend all of this, what I call, messiness of the Republican Party.
He came out last night, George, with a prerecorded stump speech in his head and he couldn't hit pause to respond to Chris Christie. Chris Christie prosecuted Marco Rubio. And he kept coming back with his stump speech. And his stump speech was, unlike Obama, and then he stalled.
And so I think it was a bad night for him.
ROBERTS: He has ads on that are exactly the same. So that same little clip is on TV over and over and over again.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And we'll see what kind of impact it has.
Meantime, you know, Donald Trump showed a lot of different sides of himself last night, but also had to be helped by the fact with the exception of Jeb Bush on eminent domain, nobody took him on.
DOWD: No, I think this debate was a perfect storm for John Kasich and for Donald Trump that worked in their favor, because Donald Trump came in here with a lead. He's led 75 straight polls now in New Hampshire. He wanted to recover from the Iowa loss and basically he gets the guy that was coming up close to him, gets battered around in the course of the debate. And then he actually shows up. He had a few shots that he did, but he basically stayed on even keel in the course of this.
And so when we go into election night on Tuesday, we may announce that New Hampshire picks presidents. And they're going to pick a democratic socialist on one side, if that happens, and a reality TV star on the other side. They may -- that New Hampshire may be picking those two people as who they think is president.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Right now they're both ahead.
Meantime, Ted Cruz last night as well. No one really touched him he had that apology to Ben Carson.
BRAZILE: You know what, I guess it was a lot of Reagan last night. Reagan's 11th commandment.
But Cruz may not be a factor...
STEPHANOPOULOS: I don't think Marco Rubio feels that way, but yeah...
BRAZILE: No, he doesn't. No one turned the other cheek on him.
No, Cruz didn't really want to perform. I think he just wanted to get out of the way. He was beaten up enough in Iowa winning as well as the last debate.
You know, I agree with Matt, Kasich, you know, we get asked all the time on the Democratic side who do you most fear? I don't fear anybody.
But Kasich last night, he talked as if he was looking past New Hampshire into the fall. He talked to I think the fears of Republicans, but the hopes of many Americans. So I think he's one to watch leaving the state.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But the more people stay in, Bill Kristol -- yeah, but the more people that stay in, the better that is for Donald Trump, isn't it?
KRISTOL: Maybe, but Trump lost Iowa. The late deciders went against him in a big way. I think that will happen in New Hampshire. He will under perform his poll number. I don't think he's going to win by double digits. And I don't think it's out of the question that John Kasich could make it a close race against Donald Trump. I think Kasich will become of the governors the one who has the best chance here.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But what does that mean? He doesn't really have a lot of money right now. He hasn't been able to build an organization much beyond New Hampshire. He put all his chips here in this state.
KRISTOL: Right. So we'll see what he can then do in subsequent states. I just think it means people don't get out.
I think we all think this field has to get narrowed. I'm not sure that voters think that and I'm not sure that each of those candidates (inaudible), because I also think Cruz could do pretty well here and be pretty strong.
You know, we -- maybe this year is different from -- it certainly seems like it's been different in many way than previous years, but here's just a couple of facts. Every time since the modern primary system, '72, Republicans have nominated someone who won either Iowa or New Hampshire. Secondly in both parties, you have to have been first or second in New Hampshire to win the nomination.
It could change this year. Trump is really -- Trump is really a weird wild card.
Still, I think, you know, the fact is Cruz is sitting well having won Iowa. That is not nothing. And coming in first of second in New Hampshire would be a big deal.
ROBERTS: And then he goes into much more fertile territory for him as we go south.
STEPHANOPOULOS: March 1.
ROBERTS: That's right.
But the other thing is the rules have made it easier for people to stay in, because you don't get a winner take all primary until the middle of March. And the fact that you can have these super PACs make it easier for people to stay in, because they don't have to raise the money.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, Cokie has made an interesting point. I think March 15 you have, what, Florida and Ohio both on the same day, both winner take all. If Rubio and Kasich and maybe even Bush all stayed in and split those states, this could go straight to the convention.
DOWD: Yeah, I think this -- well, I think this goes for sure into April. I think after last night, what Jeb Bush is thinking, even if Jeb Bush finishes fourth or fifth, I think Jeb Bush is going to go on, because he's basically said, look, if this guy didn't perform well over the course of this race he's not going to perform well. I'm the guy that can step up and do that, even if Kasich finishes second here I don't think he has the resources ready to really have a full impact by March 1. Maybe later on.
But this race, both sides of this, the Democratic side and the Republican side of this, is going to go long into the spring and maybe into the early summer.
ROBERTS: I mean the Democrats.
ROBERTS: ...debates through May.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And right now you -- and the latest poll here in New Hampshire has 58 Bernie Sanders, 35 Hillary Clinton. 23 point lead for Bernie Sanders. Hard to see how she can come back from that.
BRAZILE: The Clintons are 1 for 2 in terms of winning New Hampshire. But they're two for two in terms of spinning New Hampshire.
So, my sense is that she has to close the generation gap. And clearly she has to expand the gender gap. She can do that, I think, it'll be maybe a 10 point defeat.
But they have a ground game here. And they're going to continue to move those, what I call voters who are undecided along the Massachusetts border.
I think they'll give Bernie Sanders the western part, the northern part, but they're going to make this part of the state their battleground. So we'll see.
KRISTOL: If you would have said six months ago that I think Hillary Clinton can spin a 10 point defeat to a 74 year old democratic socialist Bernie Sanders here in New Hampshire, it's really jaw dropping.
I mean, it is amazing.
I think the Trump phenomenon has been amazing, but the Sanders phenomenon in the Democratic Party is even more notable.
And I don't know why everyone kind of assumes that, well, once we get through these first two states in which Sanders has been 50/50 with Clinton and is now going to beat her presumably here, well suddenly everything is going to change.
ROBERTS: Oh, it's not. I think...
KRISTOL: I don't think it's going to change as much as people think.
ROBERTS: Oh, it's not. It's not. I think -- look, Bernie Sanders could be the Democratic nominee. That's absolutely the fact.
DOWD: Well, and then you're inviting...
DOWD: If Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are the nominees of the major parties...
KRISTOL: Then Bloomberg runs.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, that's for sure.
KRISTOL: That'll be a fun three-way race.
BRAZILE: You know, Wall Street is playing the same kind of partisan issue that Iraq played in 2008. It has become a very important issue for Democrats. And I think Bernie has captured that on the Democratic side.
But his ability to get independents and young people, that is really...
STEPHANOPOULOS: So, what did you make of how Secretary Clinton then handled that issue this morning saying, you know, calling out Bernie Sanders, she says, for this campaign of innuendo?
BRAZILE: There's a lot of, what I call, virtual internet rabble rousing going on. And it's rattling a lot of nerves, whether it's people who are being attacked or being in the establishment, because they're a member of Planned Parenthood or the Human Rights Campaign, or lawmakers who are saying that that's not the record.
So, look, we're having our fight on the Democratic side. It's energizing, it's engaging, and you know what the race...
KRISTOL: I think whenever a candidate has to say, well, it's very complicated and I -- she does differ from Bernie Sanders on economic policy. That is a true statement. And what she should say I think if she were confident that she could win the debate in the Democratic Party is, yes, we have pretty big differences. He's a socialist. I'm a Clinton Democrat.
DOWD: I don't think she still has a good answer for this. And every time she's confronted with it, it's not a good answer.
Gandhi said integrity is when your thought and your words and your actions are in alignment. And I think there's a lot of Democratic voters out there that don't think...
ROBERTS: Wow, we have Matt Dowd quoting Gandhi.
DOWD: ...is in alignment. I think the problem is we all know, we've been involved in campaigns. We've all seen it. Is you are judged by your contributors and your friends. That doesn't go away. And Hillary Clinton, no matter what she says when she takes $20 million from Wall Street and gives speeches to Goldman Sachs, she is going to be judged by that. She has to come up with an answer...
KRISTOL: But Matt, the right answer is I am proud that under my husband's leadership this economy did well and did well for everyone. It can do well for Wall Street and for Main Street. There is a sensible Clinton Democrat answer to Bernie Sanders. And what was most striking I thought about her conversation with you is that she's not giving it.
ROBERTS: But not to mention that she was the senator from New York. What's in New York. Wall Street.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But she makes that. She makes that argument.
DOWD: That argument doesn't help.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But, you know, I want to pick up on what Bill is just saying, Donna Brazile. Is the Clinton team, once they get beyond New Hampshire, going to have to start making that argument more directly about socialism.
You've seen some of her allies, including Claire McCaskill make it. Is the Clinton campaign going to have to take it on directly?
BRAZILE: I think they will have to find a way to address the insecurities of Americans who feel that they've been left behind. At the same time, the aspirations of those who want to continue...
STEPHANOPOULOS: That's not what I asked, though.
BRAZILE: George, look, I'm neutral. I'm neutral.
DOWD: I'll be Donald Trump. She didn't answer the question.
BRAZILE: Hey, guess what (inaudible).
But as a southerner, I know Bernie Sanders is going to be able to compete in the south. And if he comes out of this state with a double digit lead in terms of his national support -- winning in New Hampshire, he's going to give them hell in the south.
STEPHANOPOULOS: Could he win South Carolina?
BRAZILE: He can get 40 percent of the vote, because the firewall will break with Millennials for Bernie Sanders.
But Hillary Clinton has a lot of strength. And I know we talk about her weaknesses a lot, but she has an incredible strong, what I call backbone. But more importantly, she has people who will stand up and fight for her down south.
STEPHANOPOULOS: You know, we only have 20 seconds left. I want each of you to give me the month when each nomination is going to be decided.
ROBERTS: Oh, the month. I'd say May for the Democrats. For the Republicans, June.
DOWD: I'll say April for the Democrats and May for the Republicans.
BRAZILE: I'd say April for the Republicans and May for the Democrats.
KRISTOL: I don't know. Well, after Hillary is indicted for the emails, you know, then everything will get...
ROBERTS: What are you drinking?
KRISTOL: There's an FBI investigation. We don't know what's happening.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I'm going to go with April...
BRAZILE: That's all fantasy football.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And the Super Bowl is tonight. We'll be right back after this from our ABC stations.
STEPHANOPOULOS: And now we honor our fellow Americans who serve and sacrifice.
In the month of January, three service members were killed overseas supporting operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
And that is all for us today. Thanks for sharing part of your Sunday with us. Stay with us all through Tuesday's primary. I'll be standing by with our whole team to bring you all the results. And I'll see you tomorrow on GMA.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


When it comes to spending in the marketplace, there's no doubt that the tween and teen set carry a lot of clout. In fact, children ages 17 and under are responsible for more than $830 billion in annual spending — prompting one company to design a mobile payment platform specifically for this age group.
According to a Finextra, Virtual Piggy, Inc. is working with Univest Bank & Trust Company and starting beta tests for the child-focused payment service known as OINK.com, giving kids ages 8–14 the ability to become direct buyers with full regulatory and parental controls built in.
OINK.com will have a fully automated parental control system known as Instant Monitoring Parental Account Control Technology (IMPACT). It gives parents the ability to individualize the rules of engagement for their child's use of Virtual Piggy's payment system so they have more control over their children's spending, while also providing freedom for the child to shop on their own and learn financial discipline.
Virtual Piggy is finalizing the architecture in preparation for the beta testing, and its tech team and user experience (UX) partner, Red Interactive Agency of Santa Monica, California, have agreed on the scope of the first stage of the beta system test product, which is set to launch in April.


O'Brien Insurance Agency, LLC is a family-operated independent insurance agency that is licensed in CT, NY, FL, AZ, and NC. We help you SAVE on your insurance by comparing the policies of numerous insurance providers.
Some may choose to blow it on a new car or motorhome. funds to live. Only.
Arizona drivers must have two types of auto liability coverage on their car insurance policies: bodily injury liability coverage and property damage liability.
860-350-5505 – FREE quotes. Discounts available. Independent insurance agency. Home insurance. Auto insurance. Business insurance.
Feb 12, 2018. If you're looking for cheap car insurance quotes in Arizona, shopping around is key. Rates fluctuate from one company to the next, based in part.
Aetna is one of the largest health insurance companies in the United States, with more than 35 subsidiary companies in addition to the primary company.
It makes sense that if you have a car accident, your insurance premium could go up. or savings from bundling home and auto policies into one package. Get free.
"Until people actually live. quote on similar models and car manufacturers from Confused.com, a price comparison site, found a female driver aged between 30.
Custom-build your own Arizona auto insurance policy with Nationwide. You'll find affordable rates on the coverage you need with Arizona auto insurance quotes. in the Copper State, rest assured you and your car can be protected on the road with Nationwide. Simplify your life and save more by bundling your coverage.
Get your free Arizona car insurance quote online today, and learn about. Whether you live in Phoenix, Flagstaff, or Tucson, see if you qualify for these.
After getting instant quotes, there's no commitment to buy. Spend 6 of the most useful minutes of your life with us. Delivering car insurance coverage since 1997.
We reviewed car insurance rates in Arizona to help our readers find the. Depending on where in Arizona you may live, the cheapest companies and rates will.
Jan 9, 2018. I got four quotes and found that State Farm had the best yearly rates for both. Our Top 4 Picks for the Best Car Insurance in Arizona. Some insurance providers still require you to speak to a live agent on the phone, but all.


The purpose of Therapeutic Rhythm Based Activities is to benefit people with Dementia. Beth Abraham Health Services used the grant to initiate and sustain an educational program for care staff and skilled nurses, instructing them on basic therapeutic drumming and rhythmic techniques, and enabling them to incorporate these techniques in the day to day care of patients with dementia.
Beth Abraham developed a multimedia-training curriculum to instruct additional facilities on basic therapeutic drumming techniques.
Goal: Improve health and quality of life outcomes by creating a sense of community among residents, and providing opportunities for social interaction, communication, and emotional expression.


text:
DU SPEAK
FOODS AND PLACES
TECH AND YOU
DU DIARY
DU Times
NSUI urges DU VC to consider pandemic-related problems faced by students…
Jamia Millia Islamia Entrance Exam of 20 Jamia 21 Results Out
DU UPDATES
DU Colleges to reopen from today! Know the guidelines here.
NIRF Ranking released : 5 DU colleges remain in the top…
DU plans a phased re-opening of colleges.
Du students never letting us down.
NIRF RANKING 2021: 5 Delhi University Colleges in top 10
Delhi University to Reopen in Phased Manner from September 15
Delhi University to implement FYUP for the next academic year 2022-23
ADVANTAGES OF DELHI UNIVERSITY
The Future Of Cryptocurrency In India.
Sometimes it's the smallest decisions that can change your life forever.
Impact of Phone on culture
Home CAMPUS LIFE Societies of DU you need to know about.
Societies of DU you need to know about.
Vanshika Mohila
Every student's ambition is to attend a college where he can maintain a healthy mix of academics and extracurricular activities. Every student also aspires to show his or her potential in an area other than studies, whether it is dance, singing, theatre, athletics, photography, or something else entirely. This is when societies enter the picture. A good college is judged not just on its academics, but also on the co-curricular activities in which its students are encouraged to engage. This is why DU's colleges are ranked among the best in the country.
The societies assist students in grooming their whole personalities, since it is vital to set aside time for self-improvement, which promotes holistic growth and development. Cultural societies, clubs, and co-curricular activities at DU provide students with this forum. While several colleges claim to provide the ideal balance of academics and extracurricular activities, none of them can compare to our colleges. When it comes to cultural societies, college fests, and everything else a student might want in a cultural society, DU has carved out its own place.
So, If you are planning to be a member of Delhi University and have a knack for anything else other than studeis, you need be aware of these famous cultural societies.
PIXELS – Hans Raj College's Photography Society
Pixels is one of Delhi University's most well-known societies. At the Indian Habitat Centre, it was the first society at DU to hold a photographic exhibition. Pixels' annual photography event, Plickture, draws a significant number of aspiring photographers from over DU. It includes thrilling competitions and a photography exhibition in which anybody with a camera and a skill may participate and present their work to the rest of the college's students.
2. Nazaakat – Gargi College's Folk Dance Society
Nazaakat, Gargi College's Folk Dance Society, is recognised for its vibrant, colourful costumes, complex choreography, and the group members' soul-touching emotions. It is one of the most talented folk dancing organisations on campus. You should certainly be a member of Nazaakat if you enjoy folk dances and convey your emotions via your facial expressions.
3. Ibtida – Hindu College
At DU, students with a passion for theatre have always been welcome. Some of our country's greatest performers began their careers in theatre organisations. Ibtida is one of Delhi University's top theatrical societies. Only the finest make it into the society after a three-day audition procedure. Imtiaz Ali, a Bollywood director, created Ibtida while a student at Hindu College. As a member of this group, Ali directed a number of plays and appeared on stage. This club hosts the university's annual theatre festival, "Medina," which is a great popularity. Ibtida has also performed in nine Rajasthani districts.
4. Lakshya – Kamala Nehru College's Theatre Society
This group, which has just 16 members, considers theatre to be a revolutionary art form. The members of Lakshya have taken on the aim of making theatre and drama the focal point of academic culture in Kamala Nehru College and the Delhi University Campus in general, as the name suggests. The Lakshya has established numerous characteristics by which a candidate is assessed, including confidence, acting skill, creative thinking, expertise in theatre, and vocal clarity, through a rigorous and comprehensive audition procedure. It is a place where kids may study, grow, and develop their abilities to new heights.
6. Geetanjali – Miranda House's Indian Choir,
Geetanjali is a wonderful illustration of how music plays an important component of the student life at Delhi University. Geetanjali is a fusion of two separate schools of Indian Classical Music, Hindustan and Karnataka, that gives melody to students' lives. Because Geetanjali is a music society at a women's only institution, the melodic tunes she produces carry a veiled message of female empowerment. As they perform together, it gives our ladies a powerful voice.
7. Kamala Nehru College's Glitz – The Fashion Society
If you're attracted to ramps and catwalks, this one could be for you. The Glitz is DU's Kalmala Nehru College's official fashion society. This club caters to all fashionistas and has received several awards for being one of the finest on campus. Several media have named it the finest Fashion Society in DU, and it has received numerous prizes to support this claim. Glitz society will assist you in enhancing your individuality via outstanding style and appearance.
DU's Cultural Societies Colleges are much more than simply being a fun pastime, they extend the horizons of the students while offering them an outlet to express themselves to the utmost. They also help students find their passions and provide them with the skills and experience they need to take the first step toward turning their passion into a profession. The DU cultural groups described above are only the tip of the iceberg; there are many more that you may search about and join as a new student, as well as afterwards if you change your mind. However, as a du student and a member of a cultural society which I love, my suggestion is to take advantage of this amazing opportunity and pursue your passion.
Previous articleWhat feminism means to me.
Next articleOpportunities you shouln't miss as a DU student
An aspiring journalist with a background in English and Economics. I'm greatly passionate about writing and you'll always find me with a book in hand or vibing to my favourite music.
Anti-ragging guidelines.
DU gets a lukewarm response from students
From this session onwards, DU students will be required to plant trees.
Here's all you need to know about DU's inter-college migration.
CAMPUS LIFE Vanshika Mohila - November 20, 2021 0
DU issues anti-ragging guidelines as colleges prepare to open. According to the anti-ragging standards, heads of institutions may designate a Disciplinary Resource Person (DRP) in...
PG Admissions of Delhi University' 2021
ADMISSION Vanshika Mohila - November 13, 2021 0
The University of Delhi has released the timetable for postgraduate admissions based on merit and entrance exams. The first merit list for DU PG...
12 Colleges of DU are facing financial Crisis
DU UPDATES Sania Saifi - November 2, 2021 0
12 Colleges of Delhi the university funded by government are facing a financial crisis due to the low allocation of funds in the budget....
Delhi University issued Special cut-off list
DU UPDATES Sania Saifi - October 26, 2021 0
Delhi University announced a special cut-off for some eligible applicants, officials said. Registrar of the University, Vikas Gupta said on Monday, a special cut-off has...
Special Cut-Off list to be released today. Know what to expect.
ADMISSION Vanshika Mohila - October 25, 2021 0
Delhi University will release a special cut-off list today as the admission round for the third cut-off list has concluded. Students who have been...
All the latest news and admission updates from Delhi University.
Contact us: info@dutimes.com
© Developed by DU Times


The following malls in Nairobi made it to the top 10. You can check the listing on youtube below.
This is one of the most busy malls but is highly congested. There is an expansion to the mall which is to be currently in operation.
One of the Pioneer malls.
Easy to access but not very spacious.
One of the most secure malls. Eco-friendly and good design.
The largest of them all. Construction is still in progress and once its done, this could become the best of them all. However it is far from the CBD.
Variety of shops and ample parking space.
The most lively of them all with many shops around. Great design and good customer care service. This is the best mall for kids.
Great Design, a variety of shops, good security,very eco-friendly available accomodation and easy to access via the Thika road and Outering road.
The above list is subject to different opinions by Nairobians so feel fee to add or comment below about this list.