text:
As Denúncias do Ministério Público Federal na Operação Lava Jato iniciaram-se em abril de 2014, quando a Polícia Federal do Brasil deflagrou a operação.

Em 21 de abril o Ministério Público Federal (MPF) denunciou o ex-diretor da Petrobras Paulo Roberto Costa e outras quatro pessoas por embaraçarem a investigação de crimes praticados e por organização criminosa.

Em 11 de dezembro, o MPF ofereceu denúncia contra 36 investigados na sétima fase da Operação Lava Jato, deflagrada pela Polícia Federal para investigar lavagem de dinheiro e evasão de divisas e que resultou na descoberta de um esquema de desvio de dinheiro e superfaturamento de obras da Petrobras.

Em 15 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF apresentou à Justiça Federal em Curitiba, no Paraná, denúncias contra quatro suspeitos de participação no esquema de corrupção investigado pela Lava Jato.

Executivos de empresas

OAS
Em 11 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF denunciou José Aldemário Pinheiro Filho, "Léo pinheiro", Agenor Franklin Magalhães Medeiros, Mateus Coutinho de Sá Oliveira, José Ricardo Nogueira Breghirolli, Fernando Augusto Stremel Andrade e João Alberto Lazzari por lavagem de dinheiro, corrupção e formação de organização criminosa, pelos crimes ocorridos entre 2004 a 2014.  Denunciaram-se ainda o doleiro Alberto Youssef, o ex-diretor da Petrobras, Paulo Roberto Costa e outros.

Galvão Engenharia
Em 11 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF denunciou os executivos da Galvão Engenharia, Dario de Queiroz Galvão Filho e Eduardo de Queiroz Galvão pelos crimes de lavagem de dinheiro, corrupção e formação de organização criminosa, ocorridos entre 2004 a 2014.  Também denunciou Youssef, Paulo Roberto Costa entre outros.

Engevix
Em 11 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF denunciou Alberto Youssef, Paulo Roberto Costa, Waldomiro de Oliveira, Carlos Alberto Pereira da Costa, Enivaldo Quadrado, o vice-presidente da empreiteira Engevix, Gerson Almada, Carlos Eduardo Strauch Albero, Newton Prado Junior e Luiz roberto Pereira pelos crimes de lavagem de dinheiro, corrupção e formação de organização criminosa que ocorreram entre 2004 a 2014.

Camargo Correa e UTC
Em 11 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF apresentou denúncia contra Youssef, Paulo Roberto Costa, Waldomiro de Oliveira, Dalton dos Santos Avancini, João Ricardo Auler, Eduardo Hermelito Leite, Marcio Andrade Bonilho, Ricardo Pessoa, Jayme Alves de Oliveira Filho e Adarico Negromonte Filho por lavagem de dinheiro, corrupção e formação de organização criminosa, ocorridos entre 2004 a 2014.

Odebrecht e Andrade Gutierrez
Em 24 de julho de 2015, o MPF denunciou executivos das duas maiores empreiteiras do país, Odebrecht e Andrade Gutierrez. No total, foram denunciadas 22 pessoas.

Petrobras

Área Internacional
Em 14 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF ofereceu denúncia contra Alberto Youssef, Nestor Cerveró, Júlio Camargo e Fernando Soares pelos crimes de lavagem de dinheiro, corrupção e evasão de divisas. Os crimes ocorreram entre 2006 a 2012. Júlio Camargo foi denunciado por pagamento de propina de aproximadamente US$ 40 milhões para Cerveró, a fim de conseguir a contratação de dois navios sonda pela Petrobras, para perfuração em áreas profundas no México e na África, em favor da Samsung Heavy Industries Co, construtora dos navios. Os contratos firmados, somados, atingiram pelo menos US$ 1,2 bilhão.

Em 23 de dezembro de 2014, o MPF denunciou novamente Fernando Soares, Nestor Cerveró por formação de quadrilha e Oscar Algorta por lavagem de dinheiro.
De acordo com a denúncia, a lavagem de dinheiro ocorreu pela compra de uma cobertura de luxo na cidade do Rio de Janeiro, em nome da offshore uruguaia Jolmey, que tinha Oscar Algorta como presidente do Conselho de Administração, para ocultar a real propriedade atribuída a Cerveró. A transação foi feita com valores ilícitos recebidos com o pagamento de propina. Fernando Soares é apontado como operador financeiro do esquema, que se associou a Cerveró em práticas criminosas. Foi pedido pagamento de reparação dos danos causados no valor de R$ 7,5 milhões.

Em agosto de 2015, o MPF apresentou denúncia contra contra os lobistas Hamylton Pinheiro Padilha Junior, Raul Schmidt Felippe Junior, João Augusto Rezende Henriques, o executivo Hsin Chi Su, e o ex-gerente da estatal Eduardo Vaz da Costa Musa. De acordo com o MPF, Hsin Chi Su e Hamylton Padilha repassaram US$ 31 milhões em propina para Jorge Zelada, Eduardo Musa e para o PMDB. Segundo a denúncia, o partido era o responsável pela indicação de Zelada para o cargo, e beneficiário do dinheiro ilegal do esquema.
 Jorge Luiz Zelada - corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro, evasão de divisas.
 Hamylton Pinheiro Padilha - corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Raul Schmidt Felippe Junior - corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 João Augusto Rezende Henriques - corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Hsin Chi Su (Nobu Su) - corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Eduardo Vaz da Costa Musa - corrupção passiva.

Diretoria de Serviços
Em 16 de março de 2015, o MPF ofereceu nova denúncia contra 27 pessoas pelos crimes de corrupção, lavagem de dinheiro e formação de quadrilha. Dos denunciados, cinco foram presos a pedido do MPF. O ex-diretor de engenharia e serviços da Petrobras, Renato Duque, o empresário Adir Assad, Sonia Mariza Branco, Dário Teixeira Alves Junior e Lucélio Goés. Esta é a primeira denúncia que envolve a Diretoria de Serviços da Petrobras.

Em 4 de setembro de 2015, o MPF apresentou uma nova denúncia contra membros da diretoria de serviços. Foram denunciados:
 Camila Ramos, filha de José Dirceu, acusada de lavagem de dinheiro.
 Cristiano Kok, presidente de Engevix Engenharia, acusado de organização criminosa, corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Daniela Leopoldo e Silva Facchini, arquiteta que reformou imóvel para José Dirceu, acusada de lavagem de dinheiro.
 Fernando Antonio Guimarães Horneaux de Moura, lobista suspeito de representar José Dirceu na Petrobras, acusado de organização criminosa, corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Gerson de Mello Almada, ex-vice-presidente da Engevix, acusado de corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 João Vaccari Neto, ex-tesoureiro do PT, acusado de corrupção passiva qualificada.
 José Adolfo Pascowitch, operador do esquema, acusado de organização criminosa, corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro,
 José Antunes Sobrinho, executivo da Engevix Engenharia, acusado de corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 José Dirceu de Oliveira e Silva, ex-ministro da Casa Civil, acusado de organização criminosa, corrupção passiva qualificada e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Júlio César dos Santos, ex-sócio minoritário da JD Consultoria, acusado de organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Júlio Gerin Camargo, lobista e delator da Lava Jato, acusado de lavagem de dinheiro.
 Luiz Eduardo de Oliveira e Silva, irmão e sócio de José Dirceu na JD Consultoria, acusado de organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Milton Pascowitch, operador e delator da Lava Jato, acusado de organização criminosa, corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Olavo Horneaux de Moura Filho, operador, acusado de organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Pedro José Barusco Filho, ex-gerente da Petrobras, acusado de corrupção passiva qualificada e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Renato de Souza Duque, ex-diretor da Petrobras, acusado de corrupção passiva qualificada e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Roberto Marques, ex-assessor de José Dirceu, acusado de organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.

Em 15 de janeiro de 2016, o MPF denunciou novamente Renato Duque pelos crimes de evasão de divisas e lavagem de dinheiro. O MPF ainda pediu a devolução à estatal de R$ 80 milhões em valores bloqueados do ex-diretor e em dinheiro em espécie e bens apreendidos com ele.

Eletronuclear
De acordo com as investigações, o esquema criminoso contra a Petrobras expandiu-se e, adotando o mesmo modus operandi, atuou nas licitações da Eletronuclear. Houve formação de cartel, principalmente nas licitações de serviços de montagem da usina Angra 3. As empreiteiras Andrade Gutierrez e Engevix, contratadas pela Eletronuclear, serviram-se de empresas de fachada para repassar propinas para o vice-almirante reformado Othon Luiz Pinheiro da Silva.

Denunciados e crimes:
 Othon Luiz Pinheiro da Silva: corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro, embaraço à investigação de organização criminosa, evasão de divisas, organização criminosa.
 Ana Cristina da Silva Toniolo: lavagem de dinheiro, embaraço à investigação de organização criminosa, evasão de divisas, organização criminosa.
 Rogério Nora: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Clóvis Renato: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Olavinho Ferreira Mendes: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa
 Flávio David Barra: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Gustavo Botelho: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Carlos Gallo: lavagem de dinheiro, embaraço à investigação de organização criminosa, organização criminosa.
 Josué Nobre: lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Geraldo Arruda: lavagem de dinheiro.
 José Antunes Sobrinho: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Gerson Almada: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Cristiano Kok: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Victor Colavitti: lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.
 Otávio Marques de Azevedo: corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro, organização criminosa.

SBM Offshore
Em 17 de dezembro de 2015, o MPF/RJ apresentou denúncia à 3ª Vara Federal Criminal do Rio contra 12 pessoas por crimes relacionados a contratos entre a Petrobras e a empresa holandesa SBM Offshore, que envolviam o afretamento de navios-plataforma, conhecidos como FPSO (Floating Production Storage and Offloading).  Entre os denunciados, estão Pedro José Barusco Filho (ex-gerente-executivo de Engenharia), Paulo Roberto Buarque Carneiro (membro de Comissão de Licitação de diversos FPSOs), Jorge Luiz Zelada (ex-Diretor Internacional) e Renato Duque (ex-Diretor de Serviços), os ex-agentes de vendas da SBM no Brasil Julio Faerman e Luis Eduardo Campos Barbosa da Silva, além dos executivos da SBM Robert Zubiate, Didier Keller e Tony Mace.

Petroquisa
Em 27 de abril de 2018, o MPF no Paraná denunciou quatro ex-gerentes ligados à Petrobras e Petroquisa referente à investigação da 46º fase da Operação Lava Jato. As investigações apontaram pagamentos de propina que se estenderam até o ano de 2014 e superaram o montante de 32 milhões de reais. Essas vantagens indevidas pagas são contratos firmados pela construtora Odebrecht, ainda em 2010, para realização de obras do Complexo Petroquímico Suape, em Pernambuco. Executivos da empreiteira também foram denunciados na mesma ação penal.

Alusa
Em junho de 2018, o MPF denunciou seis pessoas por propinas de mais de nove milhões de reais na construção de casa de força na Refinaria Abreu e Lima. Um dos denunciados foi Sérgio Bocatelli, preso na 51. fase da operação, investigado como operador dos desvios nos contratos da estatal. De acordo com a denúncia, executivos da Alusa pagaram propina para o ex-diretor da Petrobras Pedro Barusco e ao ex-gerente Glauco Colepicolo.

Agentes políticos
Em 14 de maio de 2015, o MPF denunciou treze pessoas pelos crimes de corrupção, lavagem de dinheiro e peculato. Entre os acusados estão os ex-deputados André Vargas, Luís Argôlo, Pedro Corrêa e sua filha, Aline Corrêa.  Foi a primeira denúncia da força-tarefa envolvendo agentes políticos.

Em 27 de abril de 2015, o MPF denunciou João Vaccari Neto, Renato de Souza Duque e Augusto Ribeiro de Mendonça Neto pelos crimes de lavagem de dinheiro de crimes de fraude à licitação, cartel, em detrimento da Petrobras, por 24 vezes, no total de 2,4 milhões de reais, correspondentes a parte das propinas pagas, entre abril de 2010 e dezembro de 2013. De acordo com a denúncia, parte da propina paga a Duque, então diretor de Serviços da Petrobras, foi direcionada por empresas do grupo Setal Óleo e Gás, controlado por Augusto Mendonça, para a Gráfica Atitude, a pedido de Vaccari, então tesoureiro do Partido dos Trabalhadores. Os repasses aconteceram através de 2 contratos de fachada firmados por empresas do Grupo Setal com a Gráfica Atitude, em 1º de abril de 2010 e 1º de julho de 2013. A gráfica nunca prestou serviços reais às empresas do grupo Setal, emitindo notas frias para justificar os pagamentos.  O MPF pediu a condenação dos réus à restituição de 2,4 milhões de reais, e o pagamento a título de indenização de mais 4,8 milhões de reais.

O MPF apresentou em 23 de junho de 2015 nova denúncia contra André Vargas, a esposa, Eidilaine Soares, e o irmão dele, Leon Vargas, à Justiça Federal, por lavagem de dinheiro desviado da Petrobras.

Delcídio do Amaral e André Esteves
A Procuradoria Geral da República (PGR) denunciou em 7 de dezembro de 2015 o senador Delcídio do Amaral e contra o empresário André Esteves, do banco BTG Pactual, presos em novembro sob suspeita de interferir e atrapalhar as investigações da Operação Lava Jato. A denúncia ainda inclui o chefe de gabinete de Delcídio, Diogo Ferreira, e o advogado que trabalhava para Nestor Cerveró, Edson Ribeiro. Os quatro são acusados pelo crime de impedir e embaraçar a investigação de infrações penais que envolvem organização criminosa com pena de três a oito anos e patrocínio infiel com pena de seis meses a três anos, que é quando o advogado trai o interesse de seu cliente. Delcídio, Diogo Ferreira e Edson Ribeiro também são acusados de exploração de prestígio, com penas de um a cinco anos.

Pecuarista José Carlos Bumlai
No dia 14 de dezembro de 2015 o MPF denunciou o pecuarista José Carlos Bumlai e mais dez pessoas por crimes de lavagem de dinheiro, gestão fraudulenta, corrupção ativa e passiva. Os procuradores também pediram reparação por danos causados à Petrobras de 53,5 milhões de reais. A denúncia trata dum esquema de corrupção para escolha da Schahin Engenharia, em 2009, para o contrato de operação do navio-sonda Vitória 10 000 pela área internacional da estatal.

Deputado Federal Vander Loubet
Em 18 de dezembro de 2015, a Procuradoria Geral da República denunciou ao STF o deputado federal do Partido dos Trabalhadores Vander Loubet e outras 4 pessoas.  Os demais denunciados foram Paulo Leoni Ramos, Ademar Chagas da Cruz, Fabiane Karina Miranda Avanci e Roseli da Cruz Loubet.  Todos os denunciados são acusados dos crimes de organização criminosa, em esquema ligado ao senador Fernando Collor de Mello (PTB-AL) junto à BR Distribuidora. As investigações encontraram indícios de corrupção passiva no valor de 1 028 866,00 de reais, entre 2012 e 2014.

Em janeiro de 2016, o Procurador-Geral da República, Rodrigo Janot, pediu ao STF a cassação do mandato do deputado Loubet em razão do recebimento de propina de mais um milhão de reais, configurando crimes de peculato, corrupção ativa e passiva e de lavagem de dinheiro no âmbito da BR Distribuidora.

Deputados do Partido Progressista
Em 30 de março de 2016, a Procuradoria Geral da República denunciou sete deputados do Partido Progressista pelos crimes de corrupção passiva e ocultação de bens. Denunciaram-se João Pizzolatti (PP-SC), o ex-deputado federal e ex-ministro Mário Negromonte (PP-BA) e os atuais deputados federais Luiz Fernando Ramos Faria (PP-MG), José Otávio Germano (PP-RS), Roberto Pereira de Britto (PP-BA) e Arthur Lira (PP-AL). Além desses crimes, a PGR também atribui ao deputado federal Mário Negromonte Júnior a acusação de organização criminosa e embaraço a investigação. A acusação está em segredo de justiça.

José Dirceu, João Vaccari Neto e outros
Em 7 de abril de 2016, o MPF denunciou doze réus da ação penal da Operação Pixuleco. No documento, o MPF pede condenação com uma análise ampla das investigações.

Denunciados e crimes:
 Cristiano Kok: organização criminosa, corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Fernando Antonio Guimarães Horneaux de Moura: organização criminosa, corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Gerson de Mello Almada: corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 João Vaccari Neto: corrupção passiva.
 José Adolfo Pascowitch: organização criminosa, corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro e fraude processual.
 José Antunes Sobrinho: organização criminosa, corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 José Dirceu de Oliveira e Silva: organização criminosa, corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Júlio César dos Santos: organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Júlio Gerin Camargo: lavagem de dinheiro.
 Luiz Eduardo de Oliveira e Silva: organização criminosa, lavagem de dinheiro e fraude processual.
 Milton Pascowitch: organização criminosa, corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro e fraude processual.
 Olavo Horneaux de Moura Filho: organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Pedro José Barusco Filho: corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Renato de Souza Duque: corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.
 Roberto Marques: organização criminosa e lavagem de dinheiro.

Marcelo Odebrecht, João Santana e outros
Em 28 de abril de 2016, o MPF apresentou denúncia relacionada às fases 23 e 26 da operação.

Denunciados e crimes:
 Zwi Skornicki: operador: organização criminosa, corrupção ativa, lavagem de dinheiro.
 João Santana: marqueteiro: corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Monica Moura: mulher de Santana: corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 João Ferraz: ex-diretor da Sete Brasil: organização criminosa, corrupção passiva.
 Pedro Barusco: ex-gerente da Petrobras: corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Renato Duque: ex-diretor da Petrobras: corrupção passiva.
 João Vaccari Neto: ex-tesoureiro do PT: corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro.
 Eduardo Musa: ex-gerente da Petrobras: organização criminosa, corrupção passiva.

Gim Argello, Delúbio Soares e outros
Em 6 de maio de 2016, o MPF denunciou o ex-senador Gim Argello, o empresário Ronan Maria Pinto, o ex-tesoureiro do Partido dos Trabalhadores Delúbio Soares, Marcelo Odebrecht, Léo Pinheiro, entre outros por envolvimento em crimes investigados pela Operação Lava Jato.

Primeira denúncia
 Jorge Afonso Argello (Gim Argello) - ex-senador pelo PTB - corrupção passiva, concussão, lavagem de capitais, organização criminosa e obstrução à investigação.
 Jorge Afonso Argello Junior (filho do Gim Argello) - corrupção passiva e lavagem de capitais.
 Paulo César Roxo Ramos - corrupção passiva, concussão, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Valério Neves Campos - corrupção passiva, concussão, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 José Aldemário Pinheiro Filho - corrupção ativa, corrupção passiva, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Roberto Zardi Ferreira - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Dilson de Cerqueira Paiva Filho - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Ricardo Ribeiro Pessoa - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Walmir Pinheiro Santana - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Marcelo Bahia Odebrecht - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.
 Claudio Melo Filho - corrupção ativa, lavagem de capitais e obstrução à investigação.

Segunda denúncia
 Ronan Maria Pinto - empresário dono do jornal Diário do Grande ABC.
 Sandro Tordin - ex-presidente do Banco Schahin.
 Marcos Valério Fernandes de Souza - publicitário que cumpre pena na Ação Penal 470, conhecida como mensalão.
 Enivaldo Quadrado - empresário condenado na Ação Penal 470, conhecida como mensalão.
 Luiz Carlos Casante - empresário.
 Breno Altmann - jornalista ligado ao PT.
 Natalino Bertin - empresário.
 Oswaldo Rodrigues Vieira Filho - empresário dono da Remar.
 Delúbio Soares de Castro - ex-tesoureiro do PT.

Gleisi Hoffmann e Paulo Bernardo
Em maio de 2016, o procurador-geral da República, Rodrigo Janot, denunciou ao STF em um dos processos da Lava Jato a senadora Gleisi Hoffmann (PT-PR), o marido dela, o ex-ministro do Planejamento e das Comunicações Paulo Bernardo, e o empresário Ernesto Kugler, supostamente ligado ao casal, acusados de corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro por suposto recebimento de valores indevidos desviados da Petrobras para a campanha de Gleisi ao Senado em 2010.

Aníbal Gomes e Luís Carlos Batista Sá
Em 16 de junho de 2016, o PGR, Rodrigo Janot, denunciou o deputado federal Aníbal Gomes (PMDB-CE) pelos crimes de corrupção e lavagem de dinheiro. Segundo a denúncia, constatou-se a atuação de Aníbal Gomes com promessa de pagamento indevido no valor de 800 mil reais ao então diretor de Abastecimento da Petrobras Paulo Roberto Costa, para permitir e facilitar a celebração de acordo entre a Petrobras e empresas de praticagem atuantes na Zona de Portuária 16, diz a nota publicada pela PGR. Foi denunciado também Luís Carlos Batista Sá. De acordo com a PGR ele é acusado de receber a vantagem indevida destinada a Aníbal Gomes e atuar como figura central para a lavagem de dinheiro proveniente do acordo celebrado em decorrência dos atos de corrupção, em benefício próprio e do parlamentar, diz a denúncia.

Deputado Federal Eduardo da Fonte
Em junho 22 de junho de 2016, o PGR, Rodrigo Janot, denunciou o deputado federal Eduardo da Fonte pelo crime de corrupção passiva, acusado de ter intermediado uma propina de 10 milhões de reais ao Sérgio Guerra, para prejudicar os trabalhos da CPI da Petrobras, em 2009. O PGR ainda pediu que ele perca o mandato e pague danos morais de 10 milhões de reais, o mesmo valor da propina. A denúncia de Janot foi feita com base nos depoimentos de Paulo Roberto Costa e do doleiro Alberto Youssef. Os dois confirmam o pagamento da propina. O Procurador-Geral da República também utilizou uma gravação de encontros entre Paulo Roberto, Sergio Guerra e Eduardo da Fonte, em hotéis e escritórios privados no Rio de Janeiro no mesmo ano.

João Cláudio Genu
Em 24 de junho de 2016, os procuradores da força-tarefa da Operação Lava Jato em Curitiba denunciaram o ex-assessor parlamentar do ex-deputado José Janene e ex-tesoureiro do Partido Progressista João Cláudio Genu pelos crimes de formação de organização criminosa, corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro envolvendo valores desviados do esquema de corrupção na Petrobras. A força-tarefa aponta que ele teria recebido 6 milhões de reais do esquema, mesmo enquanto era julgado pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal no mensalão.

José Dirceu e Renato Duque
Em 28 de junho de 2016, o MPF apresentou nova denúncia contra o ex-ministro José Dirceu e o ex-diretor da Petrobras Renato Duque. Os dois já foram condenados em processos anteriores da Operação Lava Jato. Nesta nova denúncia, eles teriam cometido crimes como corrupção e lavagem de dinheiro. Além deles, outras cinco pessoas também aparecem na denúncia, que é um desdobramento da 30ª fase da Operação Lava Jato.

Acusados na Operação Abismo
Em 9 de agosto de 2016, O MPF denunciou 15 pessoas por suposto envolvimento em irregularidades na construção do Centro de Pesquisas Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello (Cenpes), da Petrobras, no Rio de Janeiro, referente à Operação Abismo. Entre os denunciados estão o ex-tesoureiro do PT Paulo Ferreira, o operador Adir Assad, e o ex-diretor da Petrobras Renato Duque. É a terceira denúncia contra Renato Duque, que já foi condenado em outra fase da operação.

Ex-presidente Lula, Marisa, Paulo Okamoto
Em 14 de setembro de 2016, o MPF denunciou o ex-presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, sua esposa Marisa Letícia, o presidente do Instituto Lula, Paulo Okamoto, o ex-presidente da OAS, Léo Pinheiro e outras quatro pessoas ligadas à construtora OAS.

Em agosto do mesmo ano, a Polícia Federal indiciou Lula, Marisa Letícia, Léo Pinheiro, o arquiteto Paulo Gordilho e Paulo Okamotto por crimes como corrupção ativa, passiva e lavagem de dinheiro. Os cinco foram investigados por supostas irregularidades na aquisição e na reforma de um apartamento triplex do Edifício Solaris, no Guarujá, no litoral de São Paulo, e no depósito de bens do ex-presidente.

Senador Fernando Bezerra
Em 3 de outubro de 2016, a Procuradoria-Geral da República denunciou o Senador Fernando Bezerra Coelho nos crimes de corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro pelo recebimento de propina de pelo menos 41,5 milhões de reais das empreiteiras Queiroz Galvão, OAS e Camargo Correa, contratadas pela Petrobras para a execução de obras da Refinaria do Nordeste ou Refinaria Abreu e Lima.  A denúncia acusa os empresários Aldo Guedes Álvaro, então presidente da Companhia Pernambucana de Gás, e João Carlos Lyra Pessoa de Mello Filho, de serem os operadores que viabilizaram o repasse da propina. O PGR também pediu a reparação dos danos no valor total de 41,5 milhões de reais.

Antônio Palocci
Em 28 de outubro de 2016, o MPF denunciou o ex-ministro Antônio Palocci e outras 14 pessoas, entre elas, Marcelo Odebrecht, João Santana e João Vaccari Neto por corrupção ativa e passiva e lavagem de dinheiro. O MPF pediu que a Justiça Federal bloqueie R$ 284 696 735,92 de todos os acusados. O valor é correspondente a 0,9 por cento dos contratos firmados entre a Sete Brasil e a Petrobras e também ao valor correspondente à lavagem de dinheiro.

André Vargas
Em 10 de novembro de 2016, o MPF denunciou o ex-deputado André Vargas, Leon Vargas, irmão de André Vargas, a contadora do doleiro Youssef, Meire Pozza, e o empresário Marcelo Simões.  Segundo as investigações, Meire usou suas empresas para emitir notas fiscais falsas de consultoria para a empresa de Simões, especializada em sistemas de informática, para lavar dinheiro que Simões desviou de um contrato de R$ 71 milhões junto à Caixa Econômica Federal (CEF). André Vargas foi denunciado por lavagem de dinheiro, falsidade ideológica e uso de documento falso.  Foi a terceira denúncia contra André Vargas na operação Lava Jato.

José Guimarães
Em dezembro de 2016, o procurador-geral da República, Rodrigo Janot, denunciou ao STF o deputado José Guimarães (PT-CE), líder da minoria na Câmara dos Deputados e ex-líder do governo Dilma Rousseff, pelos crimes de corrupção passiva e lavagem de dinheiro. O inquérito surgiu a partir da delação premiada do ex-vereador do PT Alexandre Romano, que também foi denunciado com o parlamentar pelos mesmos crimes.

Jorge Luz e Bruno Luz
Em 31 de março de 2017, o MPF apresentou denúncia contra os operadores financeiros Jorge Luz e Bruno Luz. De acordo com o MPF os dois agiam como lobistas para beneficiar o Grupo Schahin junto à Petrobras, em contratos de aluguel e construção de sondas para a exploração de petróleo, que custaram, somados, mais de 2 bilhões de dólares. Além dos irmãos, foram denunciados outras sete pessoas pelos crimes de corrupção ativa e passiva e lavagem de dinheiro.

Segundo o delator Nestor Cerveró, "o Jorge Luz era um operador dos muitos que atuam na Petrobras. Eu conheci o Jorge Luz, inclusive nós trabalhamos, também faz parte de uma propina que eu recebi, que faz parte da minha colaboração na Argentina. E foi o operador que pagou os seis milhões de dólares, da comissão. Da propina da sonda Petrobras 10.000, foi o Jorge Luz encarregado de pagar ao senador Renan Calheiros...", afirmou Cerveró.

José Dirceu e João Vaccari
Em 2 de maio de 2017, o MPF apresentou denúncia contra José Dirceu, o irmão do ex-ministro, Luiz Eduardo de Oliveira e Silva; o ex-tesoureiro do PT João Vaccari Neto; o ex-executivo da Engevix Gerson Almada, e o ex-executivo da UTC Walmir Pinheiro Santana. De acordo com o MPF, Dirceu recebeu mais de 2,4 milhões de reais entre 2011 e 2014 das empreiteiras Engevix e da UTC a partir de contratos com a Petrobras.
A suspeita é a de que a quantia tenha sido usada, em grande parte, para custear assessoria de imprensa e de imagem para ele no julgamento do Mensalão.

Políticos diversos do Partido dos Trabalhadores
Em 5 de setembro de 2017, o  Procurador-Geral da República Rodrigo Janot denunciou os ex-presidentes Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva e Dilma Rousseff, ambos do PT, além de Guido Mantega, Gleisi Hoffmann, Paulo Bernardo, Edinho Silva e João Vaccari Neto por suspeitas do crime de integrar organização criminosa.

Lula e Dilma Rousseff
No dia 6 de setembro de 2017, o Procurador-Geral da República Rodrigo Janot denunciou o ex-presidente Lula e a ex-presidente Dilma Rousseff por obstrução de justiça no episódio da nomeação de Lula como ministro da Casa Civil.

Armando Tripodi
Em dezembro de 2019, o ex-chefe de gabinete da presidência da Petrobras Armando Tripodi foi denunciado, pela força-tarefa pelos crimes de corrupção e lavagem de dinheiro.

José Serra
Em 3 de julho de 2020, a força-tarefa em São Paulo denunciou o senador e ex-governador de São Paulo José Serra (PSDB) e a filha dele, Verônica Allende Serra, por lavagem de dinheiro.

Empresários diversos

Mariano Marcondes Ferraz
Em 11 de janeiro de 2017, o MPF denunciou o executivo Mariano Marcondes Ferraz, representante da empresa Decal do Brasil, acusado pela prática de crimes de corrupção e lavagem de dinheiro.

Luis Mario da Costa Mattoni
Em 8 de junho de 2017, o MPF denunciou o administrador da empresa Andrade Gutierrez Luis Mario da Costa Mattoni. Também foi denunciado Paulo Roberto Fernandes, da da Akizo e Liderrol, por corrupção passiva, lavagem de dinheiro e organização criminosa.

Jaraguá Equipamentos Industriais
Em 14 de outubro de 2019, a força-tarefa em Curitiba denunciou executivos da empresa Jaraguá Equipamentos Industriais S.A por corrupção ativa e lavagem de dinheiro em contratos da Petrobras que somaram mais de 400 milhões de reais.

Ligações externas

2014 na política do Brasil
2015 na política do Brasil
2016 na política do Brasil
Operação Lava Jato
Ministério Público Federal


In contrast L-ascorbic acid in sauerkraut has been shown to remain perfectly intact because of the anaerobic preservation conditions.
Hmm. I think you may be onto something. AA is added to many foods as a sacrificial substance.
However, recent studies show that we can converted oxidized AA (L-DHA) back into AA. I guess I don't know enough about AA chemistry to know if AA oxidizes into L-DHA exclusively or predominately.
I can't give a url either, but read years ago that sauerkraut has more vitamins and enzymes than raw cabbage.
I would like to see a study that investigated this specific question.
As far as I know one way James Cook and other sailors prevented their crews from getting scurvy was embarking barrels of sauerkraut which is lacto-fermented cabbage that contains traditionally only a tiny amount of seasalt typically about 0.5%.
Sauerkraut has vitamin C. I suspect the lacto-fermentation produces more vitamin C than is in the raw cabbage.
I think salt is the culprit there.
Salt causes the body to be wasteful of its vitamins and minerals.
I personally do not add salt in my diet. I find I am more efficient with my food and drink without salt.
Plus "salted meats" is of course less nutritious than fresh raw meat.
How does salt cause the body to be wasteful of vitamins and minerals?
Many wild animals will walk a long way to get salt so it's not like salt is a uniquely human, degenerate behavior.
What's interesting about humans, is that salt doesn't appear to be a nutrient. Or at least we've never been able to identify a salt deficiency disease.
That being said, sodium and chloride are critical nutrients and without them we suffer a rapid death. But almost all food has enough sodium and/or chloride to meet this need, thus no need for salt.
Stefannson wrote that the Eskimos he studied considered salt to be an addictive substance like tobacco. White people were addicted to salt, Eskimos were addicted to tobacco.
I've noticed that grain foods seem to be a substitute for meat. They have the same "mouth-feel," the same satiation (though short-lived), they are even dressed the same (with fat and salt).
Weren't the first agrarians primarily grain farmers? I remember that one of the oldest agrarian archaeological sites ever discovered contained a granary (9500BC, in Jordan).
I've always thought primitive grain farming must have been incredibly labor-intensive. I've always wondered why that took hold and spawned a cultural (and biological) revolution. It seems to me that it would have been much easier and nourishing (rewarding) to "specialize" in animals when the time came to settle down.
In the UK, they've found evidence of fencing for animal herding that dates back 30,000 years. I suspect that animal agriculture occurred before grain agriculture did. This makes sense to me because the practice of following wild herds as they migrate was probably the first activity we did as hunters. Driving animals during the hunt is another pre-herding behavior. Eventually someone figured out that if you build a simple fencing system and herd animals into it, that they are thus captive and then it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
Some people do raise chickens without feeding grains. But that doesn't mean the chickens aren't foraging for grain.
Chickens will use their feet to bend grass down and peck at the seed head.
After all wheat, rye, oats, barley and corn are all grasses and their seeds are the grain.
I have yet to find a genuine source of UK-based 100% pastured fowl. Almost all fowl in the UK is raised on a 100% grain-filled diet, with a few, like some geese, raised partially on a grass-fed diet. It's always explained that, in order to lay enough eggs per season, even the geese must be fed some grains.
Yeah here in Canada, there are no 100% pastured fowl.
I've read the same thing about egg production. But you have to ask, how would they survive in the wild without us to food them?
Perhaps the answer is migration, at least for ducks and geese. The wild one migrate to warmer climates where food is available.
I think chickens are a tropical animal naturally? Or at least I don't think they would migrate.
I thought Alicia was the one who wrote the diet book about not eating anything with a face?
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" Pollan makes the point very clearly that the current system of agriculture we have is a dead end.
Each acre of corn and soybeans requires about a barrel of oil to produce (and I bushel of topsoil). And this doesn't count the natural gas needed to make fertilizer.
Once we hit peak oil (permanent, protracted price rises) grain based food prices will go through the roof. When this happens, there will have to be a complete overhaul of our agricultural system. My guess is that meat production will go back on pasture as the grain will have to be diverted entirely to feed people. Meat may end up cheaper than grain!
Natural gas will be diverted to fuel use which would mean that fixing nitrogen will have to go back to bacteria and away from natural gas. But this will reduce the total amount of nitrogen that can be fixed by a wide margin.
I personally believe that we have always lived with a perpetual meat shortage. I believe a major reason we invented agriculture was to increase our meat supply. During the first half of the 19th century, there was a protracted meat shortage in the US that really never abated until after WWII.
Even today we still live with a sever meat shortage in the context that if everyone tried to eat nothing but meat, we wouldn't even come close to having enough.
Biology 101 is that an animal's population will rise to meet the available food supply. So the more food we produce to "feed the world", the bigger the world gets. The ethical thing is to use family planning to try and have people voluntarily reduce/control population, but so far that hasn't been working out. High food prices may end up being more effective.
In FOTL, Stefansson writes that salted meat, unlike fresh, raw meat doesn't prevent scurvy.
Raw meat could cure/prevent scurvy by any of the following: ascorbic acid, L-DHA or hydroxlysine/hydroxyproline, displacing carb calories or some combination.
I know that ascorbic acid is destroyed by heat but I don't know what salt does to it.
I don't know much about L-DHA as the discovery of our ability to recycle L-DHA back into ascorbic acid was only recently discovered.
Also not sure about the effect of heat or salt on hydroxylysine/hydroxyproline.
Anyone have an idea why salted meat wouldn't cure/prevent scurvy?
Anyone know anything about raising pastured chickens, ducks and geese?
Virtually all the information out there is the same and insists that poultry needs grain.
two most common food sources. In the wild, plant seeds (grain) is only available for about 1/4 of the year--if that.
definitely be slower. There would also have to be enough insect life to meet their protein requirements.
than a monocrop of just chickens let's say.
buy from had to import beefs from NZ just to get genetics that would do well on grass.
General Discussion / Re: Cordain, hero or heretic?
It's perfectly true that scientists are sometimes studying just processed meats. But if you check, many studies focus also on less processed meats, albeit mostly grainfed meats, and they show similiar, if slightly reduced results. Another point is that those studies focus specifically on the molecules created by the cooking process, such as advanced glycation end products, hetertocyclic amines. These molecules have been shown,in isolation to have extremely harmful effects - cooked grassfed meats also have these harmful molecules, no matter how full of healthier nutrients they are(and many such nutrients (eg:- omega 3)are significantly damaged by cooking, anyway). So, in some ways it would be much healthier to eat raw grainfed meat than to eat cooked, grassfed meats, as that would involve a dramatic drop in the intake of heat-created toxins.
The trouble is that Taubes seems to be just a self-publicist author, not a serious food-scientist. And many criticise his own reviews of studies.
Taubes is a science journalist, not a scientist. Which is a rather rare breed since you have to have the technical chops to understand the science in great detail, but also have the skills of a journalist to tease out what's relevant and write about it in a way that is accessible. GCBC was written for professionals. He's working a more mainstream version that's more accessible.
From my observations most of the critiques against Taubes are pretty uniformed (i.e. they haven't read his book, or they did and didn't understand it or couldn't face the stagerring truth that their entire career is baseless) and typify the "circle the wagons" mentality that is common in academia whenever anyone comes along and points out that the proverbial emporer has no clothes on. You can certainly find bits and pieces to quibble over in GCBC, but the general thesis is spot on--they're not asking the right questions in most nutrition studies related to obesity or chronic disease. The classic example is a high-fat vs. low-fat diet. There have been no large scale, controlled studies to compare the two--so we don't know which is in fact better at reducing chronic disease or extending life expectancy. The first such trial was ended after the initial round because the preliminary data was so overwhelmingly against a low fat diet and they'd already committed to low fat.
Toxins in "overcooked" food is a mainstream idea, yes. But not yet the idea that homo sapiens should abandon cooking altogether. I wish i were mistaken but i don't think mainstream science is about to demonstrate that raw is a key concept in nutrition. A few years ago, i had some e-mails exchanged with Vlassara where i suggested her to compare rodents on a really natural raw diet and on the usual commercially available processed chows rather than on more or less heated chows (as her group usually does to change the amount of ingested dietary AGEs) since one might expect even much more striking differences between the really "raw" and the "cooked" mice. Apparently the suggestion met little interest and i'm afraid that such a basic experiment is neither underway nor even planned anywhere.
Up to now, Vlassara, cautiously, just warns against ingestion of fried, broiled etc foods and promotes steaming and boiling instead.
I personally think life expectancy isn't much of a good indication of health. It's quite a mystery to me, looking at various people and seeing when they die or how long they live. My grandfather is 90, barely eats anything, and what he does eat is milkshakes, Chinese food (noodles), pasteurized juices and fruits. NO MEAT. He cannot eat hardly any meat because he has this problem with his throat closing up on him. He is stressed out and angry often because he owns a business and still goes there every day to run it, but isn't a good business owner. He gets no exercise and hasn't for decades. He gets almost no sun, and as far as fresh food I think it's almost nothing, occasionally some fresh fruit like grapefruit. Sometimes my mom makes him cooked eggs (grocery store eggs, nothing to write home about) and toast.
What I'm saying is that he is doing everything wrong in terms of what most on this forum, including most in mainstream health, thinks is wrong for longevity. Yet he's still alive, and actually gets up every day (7 days a week) to do stuff. Meanwhile plenty of people on paleo diets, or raw paleo diets (tribes people) die way earlier.
In fact I have yet to meet an old person who knows anything about paleo nutrition in my life. I remember one old person who talks about healthy diet, but her idea of that is stuff like diet soda. She's in her 80's.
Yeah it's like the cliche about the 100 year old woman. When asked why she lived so long, she says it's the cigar and shot of whiskey she has everyday. In general, individual differences are greater than groups differences. So I think longevity varies greatly from one person to another. Also keep in mind that life expectancy is controlled by some odd factors, like infant mortality. Japan has one of the highest group life expectancies, but when you look at the data most of the effect is because they have one of the lowest infant mortality rates.
I agree that there is a large body of studies investigating the dangers of chemicals produced by cooking and that there is definitely something going on in the cooking process.
I've looked at a lot of these studies and many others related to meat consumption and cancer. And virtually all of them are very poorly designed.
In support of your basic point, many study cooked meat and conclude that meat is bad when in fact another body of research seems to indicate that it's the cooking, not the meat.
But there are many more examples of similar lack of controls or unjustifiable conclusions.
The meat they use for testing is usually conventionally raised, grain fed meat.
The grain is often GMO and contaminated with numerous pesticides, the animals are given pesticides for parasite control and non-therapeutic antibiotics and growth hormones, and raised under near constant stress and given synthetic vitamins and chlorinated/fluoridated water and on and on the list of novel molecules or industrial cultural practices goes. Any one of these could have a statistically significant influence in the study outcome, but almost none of these factors are controlled. And many of these novel molecules are known carcinogens. So while they are looking for meat to be the cause of cancer, they are overlooking literally hundreds of common synthetic molecules, many of which are know to be carcinogens. And there are almost no studies looking at the cumulative effect of all these molecules.
So at the end of the day I discount most of these "meat is bad" studies since they have no clue what the hell they are actually studying. Instead they are just engaged in a semi-religous activity, not hard science. Taubes talks about this at great lengths in "Good Calories, Bad Calories".
And I completely agree with you when you say, "The problem is the alternative is even worse. "
So here we are in the middle.
On the one side we have pseudo-scientific people occasionally using science to bolster a point and on the other we have our best and brightest, mostly well intentioned people who are frequently engaged in intellectual facism and self-deception of the highest order. If you haven't already checked out the "How to Think About Science" series on CBC radio, you really should invest the time--you won't be disappointed.
It's not the first time I find myself stuck in no-mans land. It's like buying food. The grocery store is a train wreck, but the "health food" store is no better with all vegan and soy crap. I end up getting my food directly from farmers. I just got 15lbs. of cavity fat from a 100% pastured beef--for free! I had to go to the slaughter house to get it, but that's a small price to pay for some good quality fat.
I've been trashed too many times in the past by Fallon/Enig/Price supporters to want to comment on Cordain vs. Fallon, but I will say that I disagree with both on some things and agree with both on other things and I learned something from both, so why not check them both out (for both there are free Youtube videos, articles and interviews online that you can access before you decide what if any book to buy)? Surely it's better to get a variety of perspectives on a topic as important as nutrition and health.
I've been trying to collect as much information as possible and frequently see interesting patterns, confirmations, contradictions, etc.
While I agree with most of his "I'm a scientist, she's not" responses. It is interesting that he contradicts himself by first dismissing her critique because she is not a "scientist", but then later says the source of an ideal shouldn't matter, only it's merit.
While his analysis of fatty acids in wild animals is interesting. I think it misses the point. It's almost like he thinks hunters hunted the same thing every day of the year--like how we now shop at the grocery store. There are numerous accounts of hunters being highly selective of which species, which members of a species, what time of year and even which body parts they ate. They had a very deep understanding of exactly which tissues they wanted for very specific purposes of health. Something that Cordain isn't even attempting to characterize with his over simplified, reductionist scientific method. It was very common for hunters to go after very specific animals during a season, harvest many of a specific type (alpha males) and then cache up that food for later use. So I think the entire exercise of trying to deduce the lipid profile of a Paleo diet is a nearly futile effort. Although I do agree that there is a huge difference in the lipid profiles of grain fed meat vs. pastured meat vs wild game.
The other major problem with his whole response is that he totally seems to have missed the main point of the criticism. He freely admits in his response that he is doing exactly what he is being criticized for--that is, trying to distort a Paleo diet to fit within the narrow confines of conventional nutritional theories. He never questions the notion that a high fat diet is bad, or that saturated fat and cholesterol are bad. I happen to think these are all fine and have little to do with chronic disease. Unfortunately the majority of nutrition and medical researchers don't agree with me. Too bad for them reality isn't based on democracy. Conscensus is frequently wrong--just look at the history of mercury as medicine, female hysteria cures, Vioxx, the list is endless. Of course there are consensus ideas that are true, but the trick is trying spot the impostors at any given moment in time.
idea from the beginning. "
So in many ways peer-reviewed journals are where wrong theories go to die.
I agree with William--there is no fame or fortune to be made studying high-meat. This is a very big problem right now in science.
Public funding for science has turned into an business subsidy program. There is no money to be made protecting us, so almost no research gets done to prove stuff is unsafe or useless.
Instead most of the research is skewed by the funding source and we now have a body of science that is heavily out of step with reality.
There are many aerobic pathogenic bacteria and molds. So aeration in and of itself will have no suppressive effect on those types of pathogens.
In lacto-fermentation, salt can be used to suppress pathogens until the pH drops low enough from lactic acid production.
Another method is to add a large amount of inoculant and lactic acid to help start at a lower pH, like fresh liquid whey or liquid from a mature ferment.
enough lactic acid to lower the pH to the point that pathogens cannot survive.
I believe one person's high meat is another persons spoiled meat, correct? It's really just a matter of perspective.
So is there a detailed chemical and biological analysis of what exactly is going on in high meat?
If not, how about a detailed theory?
So for example, I've read that aerobic bacteria are favored, but which species? What exactly is the end product sought?
What yeasts or other fungi are involved? What are their end products?
What role do the anaerobic bacteria in the meat play? Does high meat have higher lactic acid levels than fresh meat?
What principles of high meat production help to ensure that if the meat is contaminated that the pathogens won't proliferate and sicken you?
I agree with general principle of this post.
I believe that life would be of far higher quality.
live to 85 and have to deal with all these problems of physical degeneration.
Here is a review of the book from Sally Fallon--granted she is more neolithic than paleo, but she does make many good points.
From talking to a grass-based farmer, there are two major challenges. First, the genetics for most meat animals have been selected for grain fattening for so long that when you put that kind of animal on 100% pasture it's not going to fatten well. He even went so far as to import some Devon beefs from NZ because they have been breeding for a long time on nothing but pasture. All pasture dairy farmers do the same thing for the same reason--NZ has the best genetics for an all pasture diet.
The other problem, especially for beef, is that mad cow has the meat inspectors all paranoid and they have regulations that force slaughter at a young age. Here in Ontario it's 30 mo. max. Traditionally, the older the beef, the better the quality, the higher the fat content and the higher price at market. 5 year old beef is a premium product in many markets across the world. In the past, hunters would have sought out the older males because of their larger stores of fat. The regulations also force the carcass temperature down too soon for hardly any of the natural breakdown process to occur. Even during the first few hours after death, there is significant chemistry going on to break down tissues that would make the meat more tender.
General Discussion / Cordain, hero or heretic?
What's this groups POV on Cordain's paleo diet work?
I searched for "Cordain" and got zero hits, which seemed odd.
As you can see, fruits and vegetables are at the very bottom. Now factor in the simple fact that this is laevulose, not refined, isolated, crystalline fructose. Completely different than HFCS in both quantity and biochemical sequence. There is also another important fact that the "all sugar is created equal" crowed misses: Unlike glucose, laevulose is an insulin-independent monosachharide. In a healthy person, fruit does not spike blood sugar violently, like table sugar does. So, in other words, stay away from refined, man-made fructose, but fruit in it's natural form is fine. I think one of the most important thing some raw paleo/meat eaters often overlook is the need for antioxidants in todays environment.
I agree that reductionist principles in science often result in studies that have no relevancy in the real world. I've never seen a study comparing crystalline fructose with a diet containing an equivalent amount of bound fructose in the form of whole fruit--not that I've done an exhaustive search of the literature.
I'm afraid the above statement is simply wrong. Raw milk contains many very harmful aspects that are also present in pasteurised milk. Examples of this include the opioids in raw and pasteurised milk(which foul up the human hormonal system), the excess calcium(which can lead to issues such as osteoporosis or magensium-deficiency, and then there's the casein and lactose issues. While some rawists have desperately claimed that lactose/casein are only an issue with pasteurised dairy, many, many rawists would beg to differ, given their own very negative experience re dairy.
Raw and pasteurized milk do share many common characteristics like the ones you mention. But they also have many differences like probiotic bacteria, vitamin C and multiple factors that make raw milk hostile to pathogenic bacteria. All these factors are reduced or destroyed by pasteurization.
My main point though is that the entire field of dairy studies is fraught with difficulties from bias, to asking the wrong questions, not asking the right questions, and numerous poorly designed studies that make unwarranted conclusions about superficially related topics that don't hold up under even the simplest of scrutiny.
I'm not trying to advocate consumption of dairy either, so please don't interpret my comments in this way. I'm just pointing out that most discussions of dairy are complicated by all the above problems.
I think it's pretty obvious that dairy is a novel food and that many people can't tolerate it at all or it does not serve them well. Milk sales have been falling every year for the past 20 years even though the prices have been going down--that's a pretty clear indication that something is wrong with milk (at least industrial milk).
As I recall from my reading of TFOTL, Stefansson's younger wife tempted him with sweets and that was the "cause" of his early strokes.
Also, he did eat raw when he lived with the Eskimos, but when he was back in the states, he ate cooked food. I'm re-reading the book now so I'll keep this thread in mind as I go.


text:
Login to RFB
info@RecordsForBuildings.com
About RFB
Products & Features
Terms of Use for RecordsForBuildings
These Terms of Use, together with any and all other documents referred to herein, set out the terms of use under which you may use this website, RecordsForBuildings.com ("Our Site"). Please read these Terms of Use carefully and ensure that you understand them. Your agreement to comply with and be bound by these Terms of Use is deemed to occur upon your first use of Our Site. If you do not agree to comply with and be bound by these Terms of Use, you must stop using Our Site immediately.
In these Terms of Use, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the following meanings: "Account" means an account required for a User to access and/or use certain areas of Our Site, as detailed in Clause 4; "Content" means any and all text, images, audio, video, scripts, code, software, databases and any other form of information capable of being stored on a computer that appears on, or forms part of, Our Site; "User" means a user of Our Site; "User Content"means any content submitted to Our Site by Users including, but not limited to, documents, readings, gps locations and comments; and "We/Us/Our" means Healthy Buildings International Ltd
Healthy Buildings International Ltd, a limited company registered in England under company number 2203384, whose registered address is Parkside, Spencers Wood, Berkshire RG7 1AE, UK.
2.1 Our Site is operated by Healthy Buildings International Ltd, a limited company registered in England under company number 2203384, whose registered address is Parkside, Spencers Wood, Berkshire RG7 1AE, UK, Healthy Buildings International Ltd. and db Management Systems Ltd , a limited company registered in England under company number 06540641, whose registered address is Permanent House, 1 Dundas Street, Huddersfield, England, HD1 2EX. 2.2 Our servers are maintained and hosted by eUKhost Ltd a company registered in England and Wales under registration number 5616528 whose registered office address is Suite 2, 7 Commercial Street, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 8HX, United Kingdom. 2.3 Our VAT number is GB 614518944.
3. Access to Our Site
3.1 Access to Our Site is not free of charge. 3.2 It is your responsibility to make any and all arrangements necessary in order to access Our Site. 3.3 Access to Our Site is provided "as is" and on an "as available" basis. We may alter, suspend or discontinue Our Site (or any part of it) at any time and without notice. We will not be liable to you in any way if Our Site (or any part of it) is unavailable at any time and for any period.
4.1 Our Site requires User and Company Accounts in order to access it. 4.2 Company Accounts may only be created by Us. 4.3 User Accounts can be created by your Company Administrators or Us. 4.4 When creating an User Account, the information you provide must be accurate and complete. If any of your information changes at a later date, it is your responsibility to ensure that your Account is kept up-to-date. 4.5 We require that you choose a 'Strong Password' for your Account, consisting of a combination of lowercase and uppercase letters, numbers, and symbols. It is your responsibility to keep your password safe. If you believe your Account is being used without your permission, please contact Us immediately using Email. We will not be liable for any unauthorised use of your Account. 4.6 You must not use anyone else's Account. 4.7 Any personal information provided in your Account will be collected, used, and held in accordance with your rights and Our obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998 and GDPR, as set out in Clause 16. 4.8 If you wish to close your User Account, you may do so at any time by contacting your Company Administrator. 4.9 If you wish to close your Company Account, please contact Us and we will arrange for the Account to be closed.
5.1 With the exception of User Content (see Clause 6), all Content included on Our Site and the copyright and other intellectual property rights subsisting in that Content, unless specifically labelled otherwise, belongs to or has been licensed by Us. All Content (including User Content) is protected by applicable United Kingdom and international intellectual property laws and treaties. 5.2 Subject to sub-Clause[s] 5.3 [and 5.6] you may not reproduce, copy, distribute, sell, rent, sub-licence, store, or in any other manner re-use Content from Our Site unless given express written permission to do so by Us. 5.3 You may: 5.3.1 Access, view and use Our Site in a web browser (including any web browsing capability built into other types of software or app); 5.3.2 Download Our Site (or any part of it) for caching; (not recommended) 5.3.3 Print [one copy of any] page(s) from Our Site; 5.3.4 Download extracts from pages on Our Site; and 5.3.5 Save pages from Our Site for later and/or offline viewing. 5.4 Our status as the owner and author of the Content on Our Site (or that of identified licensors, as appropriate) must always be acknowledged. 5.5 You may not re-use any Content printed, saved or downloaded from Our Site for commercial purposes without first obtaining a licence from Us (or our licensors, as appropriate) to do so. This does not prohibit the normal access, viewing and use of Our Site whether by business users or consumers.
6.1 User Content on Our Site includes (but is not necessarily limited to) Documents,Systems of Control, Readings, Actions,Comments and Calendar entries. 6.2 An Account is required if you wish to submit User Content. Please refer to Clause 4 for more information. 6.3 You agree that you will be solely responsible for your User Content. Specifically, you agree, represent, and warrant that you have the right to submit the User Content and that all such User Content will comply with Our Acceptable Usage Policy, detailed below in Clause 11. 6.4 You agree that you will be liable to Us and will, to the fullest extent permissible by law, indemnify Us for any breach of the warranties given by you under sub-Clause 6.3. You will be responsible for any loss or damage suffered by Us as a result of such breach. 6.5 You (or your licensors, as appropriate) retain ownership of your User Content and all intellectual property rights subsisting therein. 6.6 If you wish to remove User Content from Our Site, the User Content in question can be deleted. Please note, however, that caching or references to your User Content may not be made immediately unavailable (or may not be made unavailable at all where they are outside of Our reasonable control) and that certain user Content will be retailed see our Privacy Policy. 6.7 We may reject, reclassify, or remove any User Content from Our Site where, in Our sole opinion, it violates Our Acceptable Usage Policy, or if We receive a complaint from a third party and determine that the User Content in question should be removed as a result. 6.8 We are not responsible for the content or accuracy, or for any opinions, views, or values expressed in User Content. Any such opinions, views, or values are those of the relevant User and do not reflect Our opinions, views, or values in any way.
7. Links to Our Site
You may not link to any page without Our express written permission.
Links to other sites may be included on Our Site. Unless expressly stated, these sites are not under Our control. We neither assume nor accept responsibility or liability for the content of third party sites. The inclusion of a link to another site on Our Site is for information only and does not imply any endorsement of the sites themselves or of those in control of them.
9. Liability and Disclaimers
9.1 Nothing on Our Site constitutes advice on which you should rely. It is provided for information purposes only.Professional or specialist advice should always be sought before taking any action on the basis of any information provided on Our Site. 9.2 Insofar as is permitted by law, We make no representation, warranty, or guarantee that Our Site will meet your requirements, that it will not infringe the rights of third parties, that it will be compatible with all software and hardware, or that it will be secure. 9.3 We make reasonable efforts to ensure that the Content on Our Site is complete, accurate, and up-to-date. We do not, however, make any representations, warranties or guarantees (whether express or implied) that the Content is complete, accurate, or up-to-date. 9.4 To the fullest extent permissible by law, We accept no liability to any User for any loss or damage, whether foreseeable or otherwise, in contract, tort (including negligence), for breach of statutory duty, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with the use of (or inability to use) Our Site or the use of or reliance upon any Content (including User Content) included on Our Site. 9.5 If you are a business user, we hereby exclude all implied conditions, warranties, representations or other terms that may apply to Our Site or Content. We will not be liable for any loss of profits, sales, business or revenue; loss of business opportunity, goodwill or reputation; loss of anticipated savings; business interruption; or for any indirect or consequential loss or damage. 9.6 If you are a consumer user, please note that Our Site is intended for business use only, however if, as a result of Our failure to exercise reasonable care and skill, any digital content from Our Site damages your device or other digital content belonging to you, you may be entitled to certain legal remedies. For more details on consumer rights, please contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau or Trading Standards Office. 9.7 We neither assume nor accept responsibility or liability arising out of any disruption or non-availability of Our Site resulting from external causes including, but not limited to, ISP equipment failure, host equipment failure, communications network failure, natural events, acts of war, or legal restrictions and censorship. 9.8 Nothing in these Terms of Use excludes or restricts Our liability for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, for death or personal injury resulting from negligence, or for any other forms of liability which cannot be excluded or restricted by law. 9.9 The limitations of liability included in this Clause 9 apply only to the use of Our Site.
10. Viruses, Malware and Security
10.1 We exercise all reasonable skill and care to ensure that Our Site is secure and free from viruses and other malware. 10.2 You are responsible for protecting your hardware, software, data and other material from viruses, malware, and other internet security risks. 10.3 You must not deliberately introduce viruses or other malware, or any other material which is malicious or technologically harmful either to or via Our Site. 10.4 You must not attempt to gain unauthorised access to any part of Our Site, the server on which Our Site is stored, or any other server, computer, or database connected to Our Site. 10.5 You must not attack Our Site by means of a denial of service attack, a distributed denial of service attack, or by any other means. 10.6 By breaching the provisions of sub-Clauses 10.3 to 10.5, you may be committing a criminal offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. Any and all such breaches will be reported to the relevant law enforcement authorities and We will cooperate fully with those authorities by disclosing your identity to them. Your right to use Our Site will cease immediately in the event of such a breach.
11. Acceptable Usage Policy
11.1 You may only use Our Site in a manner that is lawful and that complies with the provisions of this Clause 11. Specifically: 11.1.1 you must ensure that you comply fully with any and all local, national or international laws and/or regulations; 11.1.2 you must not use Our Site in any way, or for any purpose, that is unlawful or fraudulent; 11.1.3 you must not use Our Site to knowingly send, upload, or in any other way transmit data that contains any form of virus or other malware, or any other code designed to adversely affect computer hardware, software, or data of any kind; and 11.1.4 you must not use Our Site in any way, or for any purpose, that is intended to harm any person or persons in any way. 11.2 When submitting User Content (or communicating in any other way using Our Site), you must not submit, communicate or otherwise do anything that: 11.2.1 is sexually explicit; 11.2.2 is obscene, deliberately offensive, hateful or otherwise inflammatory; 11.2.3 promotes violence; 11.2.4 promotes or assists in any form of unlawful activity; 11.2.5 discriminates against, or is in any way defamatory of, any person, group or class of persons, race, gender, religion, nationality, disability, sexual orientation or age; 11.2.6 is intended or otherwise likely to threaten, harass, annoy, alarm, inconvenience, upset, or embarrass another person; 11.2.7 is calculated or is otherwise likely to deceive; 11.2.8 is intended or otherwise likely to infringe (or threaten to infringe) another person's right to privacy; 11.2.9 misleadingly impersonates any person or otherwise misrepresents your identity or affiliation in a way that is calculated to deceive (obvious parodies are not included within this definition provided that they do not fall within any of the other provisions of this sub-Clause 11.2); 11.2.10 implies any form of affiliation with Us where none exists; 11.2.11 infringes, or assists in the infringement of, the intellectual property rights (including, but not limited to, copyright, patents, trade marks and database rights) of any other party; or 11.2.12 is in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party including, but not limited to, contractual duties and duties of confidence. 11.3 We reserve the right to suspend or terminate your access to Our Site if you materially breach the provisions of this Clause 11 or any of the other provisions of these Terms of Use. Specifically, We may take one or more of the following actions: 11.3.1 suspend, whether temporarily or permanently, your Account and/or your right to access Our Site; 11.3.2 remove any User Content submitted by you that violates this Acceptable Usage Policy; 11.3.3 issue you with a written warning; 11.3.4 take legal proceedings against you for reimbursement of any and all relevant costs on an indemnity basis resulting from your breach; 11.3.5 take further legal action against you as appropriate; 11.3.6 disclose such information to law enforcement authorities as required or as We deem reasonably necessary; and/or any other actions which We deem reasonably appropriate (and lawful). 11.4 We hereby exclude any and all liability arising out of any actions (including, but not limited to those set out above) that We may take in response to breaches of these Terms of Use.
12. Privacy, and Cookies
Use of Our Site is also governed by Our Cookie and Privacy Policies, available from our Privacy Policy. These policies are incorporated into these Terms of Use by this reference.
13. Changes to these Terms of Use
13.1 We may alter these Terms of Use at any time. Any such changes will become binding on you upon your first use of Our Site after the changes have been implemented. You are therefore advised to check this page from time to time. 13.2 In the event of any conflict between the current version of these Terms of Use and any previous version(s), the provisions current and in effect shall prevail unless it is expressly stated otherwise.
14. Contacting Us
To contact Us,please visit our support Site or Email our support team.
15. Communications from Us
15.1 We may from time to time send you important notices by email. Such notices may relate to matters including, but not limited to, service changes, changes to these Terms of Use, Our Terms of Sale, and changes to your Account. 15.2 With the exception of repling to an information request, we will never send you marketing emails of any kind based on information you have entered on Our site. 15.3 For questions or complaints about communications from Us, please contact Us at via Email , or using any of the methods provided on Our Contact page.
16. Data Protection
16.1 Any and all personal information that We may collect will be collected, used and held in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act 2018 / GDPR and your rights and Our obligations under those Acts. 16.2 Use of Our Site is governed by Our Cookie and Privacy Policies, available from our Privacy Policy.
17.1 These Terms of Use, and the relationship between you and Us (whether contractual or otherwise) shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, English law. 17.2 If you are a business, any disputes concerning these Terms of Use, the relationship between you and Us, or any matters arising therefrom or associated therewith (whether contractual or otherwise) shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales. 17.3 If you are a consumer, any disputes concerning these Terms of Use, the relationship between you and Us, or any matters arising therefrom or associated therewith (whether contractual or otherwise) shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England, Wales, Scotland, or Northern Ireland, as determined by your residency.
RecordsForBuildings
(UK Head Office)
RG7 1AE
The RFB Supportline 9am - 5pm, Mon-Fri
E. info@RecordsForBuildings.com
Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | RecordsForBuildings for Android
© 2006-2021 RecordsForBuildings. All Rights Reserved.
BUILT BY SF WEB

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Caring For the Land and Serving People
Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests Pawnee National Grassland
Forest Service Home
Contact the National Office
Inside the FS
Rock Climbing Areas
Boulder Ranger District, west of Boulder
The Boulder Ranger District encompasses over one hundred thousand acres of the Front Range in western Boulder and northern Gilpin counties. The district includes Indian Peaks and James Peak Wilderness Areas and the Peak to Peak Scenic Byway.
Many areas of the district are within an easy two-hour drive of Denver and its suburbs, making this one of the top recreation destinations in the state.
Boulder Canyon
Canyon Lakes Ranger District, west of Fort Collins
Canyon Lakes Ranger District is located in north-central Colorado and encompasses approximately 650,000 acres in the Roosevelt National Forest, mostly in Larimer County. The Canyon Lakes Ranger District offers visitors a variety of recreation opportunities throughout the year, and also provides for traditional uses, such as permits for firewood gathering and grazing. We are home to four Wilderness areas, three national recreation trails, two historic districts, and Colorado's only Wild and Scenic River.
State Highways 34, 36 and 14 allow for easy access to one of our many hiking trails, campgrounds, four-wheel drive roads, and lakes and streams.
Chicago Lakes Trail (#52)
Cameron Peak Fire Closure
View All Forest Alerts
Find An Area
Select an Activity - Select an Activity -
Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests & Pawnee National Grassland
2150 Centre Avenue, Building E
Visitor Information: 970-295-6600
https://www.fs.usda.gov/activity/arp/recreation/climbing/?recid=28024&actid=37


One word summary: the money was well-spent watching Sherlock Holmes, A Game of Shadows.
Arguably one of the most anticipated sequels in recent history, I was a bit apprehensive that this movie will not live up to expectations. After all, its predecessor was so good and a runaway financial hit and it is quite hard to top it. And, you have to consider the "sophomore jinx" that hounds all sophomore efforts – be it a musical album or a movie, there is always that something that is lost between the first and its sequel. To cut it short, it is simply rare to top the first.
But is that what this movie accomplished? Hard to tell so let's just say it's as good as the first one. Story – wise, I find it as riveting, if not more so, as the first. Loosely based on the novel, The Final Problem, this movie tells of the dangerous game being played by Sherlock Holmes and his arch-nemesis, Professor Moriarty, a man in whom Holmes meets his intellectual match. Moriarty, using his powerful alliances and his genius, plans to start a world war and reap the profits by taking control of the biggest arms dealers and supplying weapons to all parties who will be involved in the war. This plan is meticulously executed through a series of seemingly unrelated deaths, business acquisitions and partnerships that no one takes notice of, except for Holmes, who presumably goes on a personal mission against Moriarty to set his beloved Irene Adler free from him.
Men would love the explosions (the story is, after all, involving arms trade) and the comedic antics of Robert Downey Jr. as he brings to life a version of Holmes that is rarely seen: a genius bordering on lunacy but more funny than somber. A lot of critics disagree with this portrayal, saying that Downey has degraded a beloved character; but I must say, I find his portrayal quite a refreshing change. Either way, we don't really have a basis for concluding that Holmes was a serious fellow other than that his previous reincarnations depicted him as such; in the books, while there were no comedic lines, I did find him as hilarious as in the movies, delivering one witty line after another in such serious manner that you can't help but laugh.
What remains the biggest draw of this movie are the leads: Holmes and his faithful comrade, Dr. Watson. All the previous portrayals of Watson have reduced his character to that of sidekick, a comic relief as opposed to Holmes' somber demeanor and being played in entirely the opposite way by Jude Law in this movie is a worthy redemption of Watson. I had never thought of him as less than an equal to Holmes; in fact, I don't think Holmes would have survived as long as he had if not for his friend, Dr. Watson, who, we must remember, was an accomplished doctor, a war veteran, and a sharpshooter, the latter probably the reason why Holmes brings him along on more adventurous missions that involve the use of guns. I admire the fact that while this movie is about Holmes, there is no tug-of-war between the two leads and both are given enough screen time and importance as befits partners.
Watson's expression, again, when he receives the package containing the oxygen mask from an unknown sender, immediately realizing that Holmes was in fact, alive.
However, while Moriarty was played well by Jared Harris, I find Mark Strong's Lord Blackwood as a more compelling villain and I find Stephen Fry as Mycroft Holmes a rather ill-fit. I can't quite put my finger to it but I didn't find any spark of brilliance emanating from him, when Mycroft was supposedly more adept at mind games than Sherlock and this aspect was not fully explored in the movie. Same with Noomie Rapace, who played Simza, a gypsy whose brother was recruited by Moriarty to become his assassin. I find her acting rather distracting.
Perhaps my biggest disappointment though, is the death of Irene Adler (sorry for the big spoiler). I wasn't expecting it – I know she didn't have a very large part in the Sherlock Holmes universe, but I know she didn't die; she in fact got married happily, a sort of the woman who got away for Holmes and to see her wasted like this (well, not really wasted; her death proved a motivation for Sherlock to defeat Moriarty) is kind of sad.


I try to find simplest way to put (and overwrite) only newer files. Only one file at time.
* https://winscp.net/eng/docs/scriptcommand_synchronize is not an option, because synchronize automatically create all subdirectories.
* I am very lazy to read output of remote "stat" to compare with local times.
You can make synchronize non-recursive by using -filemask=|*/.


Therapeutic soaps play a safe and effective role in protecting and healing skin and skin conditions. Since soap was first fashioned from wood ash, animal fat and water. Essential oils and herbs were added to these soaps to treat, spots, eczema, dry skin, insect bites and rashes. You may also find these soaps described as csmeceutical soaps.
Many of these soaps are antibacterial and antifungal, however, they need to also be able to moisturise the skin as well as remove dirt grime and dead skin cells. Find the specific condition you are interested in treating in the CONDITION column and select your soap or soap type. Clicking the link will take you to pre-searched products, select you favourite based on need and value and we will despatch it to you via our fast and efficent carriers.
Sulphur Soap (sulphur) Acne, rosacea, scabies, acne, dandruff, anti bacterial Not for children under 12, Sulfur is a mild anti-bacterial agent.
Black seed soap Psoriasis, Anxiety, Acne, anti-histamine, Skin clarification Use in conjunction with black seed oil. The mythical cure all.


Loughlin, who has remained tight-lipped about her legal strategy ahead of her federal court appearance, and her husband designer Mossimo Giannulli, are accused of paying half a million dollars to get their two daughters into USC by having them labeled as recruits to the school's crew team.
Huffman is charged with paying the scheme's alleged mastermind, Rick Singer, $15,000 to have a proctor correct her daughter's SATs. We're learning some parents may be considering plea deals and are seeking advice on time spent behind bars from a former convicted felon to help them make that decision.
But Paperny said the most important conversations he's had with many are about accepting responsibility, which he believes can lead to a more lenient sentence.
"I would encourage defendants, any defendants, if they broke the law to own it, to acknowledge it, to run not walk towards taking a plea agreement," Paperny said. "Those that respond more appropriately should get better prison sentences."
CBS News learned from court documents filed Tuesday that at least one of the parents expected in court Wednesday – businessman Devin Sloane who's accused of paying a $250,000 bribe – is already in plea discussions with the government. We may soon know if others are having similar talks.


text:
Hana Khlaif Ghena
Home > Vol 7, No 3 (2016) > Khlaif Ghena
Between Home and Exile A Reading of the Exilic Experience of the Iraqi Poet Adnan Al-Sayegh
This paper aims at exploring the exilic experience of the Iraqi poet, Adnan Al-Sayegh whose involuntarily departure from his homeland, Iraq, in the early 1990s made him suffer a strong sense of estrangement, nostalgia, self-fragmentation and disconnection. The paper is divided into three sections and a conclusion. Section one sheds light on the circumstances that forced Al-Sayegh into self-exile. Investigating these circumstances necessarily entails a discussion of the concept of exile, its nature and consequences, which is the subject of section two. Section three examines a number of poems that typically translates Al-Sayegh's deep sense of dislocation and disaffection in his new host lands. The conclusion argues that exile as a physical, geographical, and psychological state of being is a 'basic condition,' in Al-Sayegh's poetry and life.
Keywords: Exile, Iraq, Al-Sayegh, estrangement, and nostalgia
Adelman, H. (2008). The refugee and the IDP problem in Iraq. In H. Adelman (Ed), Protracted displacement in Asia: No place to call home(181-209). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Adnan, A. (2004). Complete poetical works. Beirut: The Arabic Institution of Studies and Publication.
Adnan, A. (2011). And. Beirut. Al-Kwakab Press Services.
Anderson, L. & G. Stansfield. (2004). The future of Iraq: Dictatorship, democracy, or division? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Al-Athari, L. (2008). This rhythm does not please me: Women protest war in Dunya Mikhail's poetry. Kansas: Kansas State University.
Al-Ubaidi, W. (2002). "An Interview with Adnan Al-Sayegh). Al-Thifaf Magazine. Issue no. 9. Retrieved October, 10,2015.
Al-Zareebi, W. (2008). Adnan Al-Sayegh: The poet who carried his exile under his armpit." Tunisia: the Tunisian Company of publication and Plastic Arts development. Retrieved December, 8, 2015.
Arendt, H. (1951). On the nature of totalitarianism: An essay in understanding. Retrieved December, 8, 2015.
Camelia, A. (---). Exilic Dimension of Modernism: D.H. Lawrence's 'Island'-Characters. Retrieved December, 5, 2015.
Dobrinescu, A. M. (---). Travelling across cultures- Jhumpa Lahiri's interpreter of maladies. Retrieved October, 1, 2015.
Dodge, T. (2003). Inventing Iraq: The failure of nation building and a history denied. New York: Colombia U.P.
Friedrich, C. J.(1953). The unique character of totalitarian society. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Totalitarianism (47-60). Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
Hanks, P.(Ed).(1974). Encyclopedia World Dictionary. Beirut: Color Press.
Iamandi, P. On Solaris: Exile the SF way. Retrieved December, 4,2015.
Johnson, A. (December16,2005). Putting Cruelty First: An Interview with Kanan Makiya. Retrieved December, 5, 2015.
Kurdi, M. (2010). A Woman Leaving Twice to Arrive: The Journey as Quest for a Gendered Diasporic Identity in Anne Devlin's After Easter. Estudios Irlandeses,5, 58-67.
Mitrea, I. Re (creating) home from afar: memories of exile. Retrieved December, 4, 2015.
Nalepka, E. (2014). Saddam is Iraq and Iraq is Saddam: Saddam Hussain's Cult of Personality and the Perception of his Life and Legacy. Retrieved January, 10, 2016.
Rodrigues, A. L. (2007). The trauma of diminished Existence: Chinua Achebe Revisited. Postcolonial Text, 3(4), 1-23.
Rohde, A. (2010). State- Society relations in Ba'thist Iraq: facing dictatorships. London: Routledge.
Ropero, L. L. (2003). Diaspora: Concept, Context, and its Application in the Study of New Literatures. Revista Alicantina de Es tudios Ingleses. Retrieved November, 3, 2014.
Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. London: Vintage Books.
Said. E. (1996). Representation of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith lectures. New York: Vintage Books, 1996.
Said, E. (2000). Reflection on exile. In Reflections on exile and other essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Said, E. (1990). Reflections of exile. In R. Ferguson (Ed.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary cultures(357-366). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sassoon, J. (2011). Saddam Hussein's Ba'th Party: Inside an authoritarian regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tabori, P. (1972). The anatomy of exile: A semantic and historical study. London: George G. Harrap & Co.
Tsaaior, J. T. (2011). Exile, exilic consciousness and the poetic imagination in Tanure Ojaide's poetry. Tydskrif Vir Letterkunde, 48 (1) 98-109.


"Temporary Resident" will be required to register with the Australian Foreign Investment Control (FIRB) and be approved when purchasing any Australian property in the form of a dwelling.
When preparing your Australian property purchase application, you need to know some of the requirements for FIRB approval.
Temporary residence permits allow you to stay in Australia for more than 12 consecutive months (no matter how long your visa is valid).
Currently resides in Australia and has applied for a permanent residence card, and owns a "linked" visa allowing the individual to remain in Australia until the application for a permanent residence permit is approved.
Australian real estate is old.
Older homes are residential properties and are not newly built (not including commercial buildings such as hotels, motels and motels).
– Only use this property as your primary residence in Australia.
– No part of the property shall be leased and must be completely empty at the time of handover.
– Must sell the property within 3 months from the date of removal from the property.
Temporary residents are not allowed to buy a second home for the purpose of investing, renting or in the form of a condominium. They must register with FIRB and be approved before purchasing any old property for renovation purposes.
Provisional temporary residents will have to register with FIRB and get approval before entering old property auctions. This is mandatory in Australian real estate law. Once the bid has been won, the applicant will have to buy the property without the right to refuse for any reason ("unconditional").
The Secondary Exemption Certificate is a certificate that allows applicants to participate in more than one auction to buy a second home with a one-time registration fee. Candidates can buy any old house at a certain value and must declare to FIRB when the auction is successful.
Temporary residents can buy new property in Australia without any obligation, even buying a new property after buying an old home. Although applicants still have to register with FIRB before buying, there is no limit to the amount of real estate that can be claimed.
– Was, is and will be built in the residential area and has never been sold as a dwelling or has never been inhabited before.
– In case this property is part of the project and has been sold by the owner, it must not have been occupied for more than 12 months.
New real estate does not include refurbished or refurbished properties.
Some of the new real estate properties in the project areas that have been granted FIRB Exemption Certificates will be entitled to sell to foreigners. In this case, once it is certain that the real estate is about to be acquired within the scope of the project, the temporary permanent resident may file a copy of the Certificate of Exemption for the project to FIRB.
As a result, temporary residents will not have to go through the procedure for applying for a foreign investment certificate to an individual as usual.
The construction must be completed within 4 years from the issuing date.
Must submit documents evidencing the completion of the house to the Foreign Investment Control Board FIRB within 30 days after the completion of the project. The application will include a certificate of residency or a certificate of completion of construction.
In some special cases, if the construction must last more than 4 years, the investor may apply for an extension depending on the specific circumstances (this extension must be made 2 months before the expiry date). 4 years).
– Before the demolition, rebuilding, real estate Australia is not allowed to rent.
– Demolition and rebuilding should be completed within 4 years of the licensing date.
– Evidence of completion of the property must be submitted to the FIRB within 30 days of completion. The application will include a certificate of residency or a certificate of completion of construction.
The form of repurchasing an old property to re-build into a new property will not be valid in this case.
If added value 1 million AUD. AUD $10,000 for each one million AUD deposit.
If you are interested in inquiring or want to do real estate Australia please contact Gold Land Australia by Hotline 0911.899.595 (Hanoi) – 0911.899.597 (HCMC).


The biological function of a protein is determined by its amino acid sequence, structure, and internal dynamics. In turn the prediction of a protein structure from its folding pathway involves the characterization of the dynamics of the polypeptide backbone. This study addresses how the internal dynamics of arborescent polypeptides are affected by increased crowding of the interior of these branched polymer molecules. Linear, comb-branched, and arborescent poly(L-glutamic acid) (PGA) samples were analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy to determine their chain conformation. The PGA chains of these constructs were shown to adopt α-helical and random coil conformations in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), respectively. The hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of the arborescent PGAs, determined using dynamic light scattering measurements, increased with increasing generation number and when the side-chains adopted random coil instead of α-helical conformations. The PGA samples were labelled with 1-pyrenemethylamine to determine how their structure affected the internal dynamics of the arborescent polymers in solution, from the analysis of their fluorescence spectra and decays. For each pyrene-labelled polymeric construct excimer formation increased with increasing pyrene content, and the efficiency of excimer formation increased with the generation number due to the increased density of the macromolecules. Comparison of the time-resolved fluorescence results acquired in DMF and in DMSO demonstrated that the helical conformation led to slower chain dynamics in DMF and that despite the higher viscosity of DMSO, the polypeptide side-chains were more mobile as a consequence of the random coil conformation of the linear PGA segments. These results suggest that the formation of structural motives inside a polypeptide slows down its internal dynamics.


Why Pay More, When you can Save More With Us!
We all want to have the best possible service and prices that are available. Easy Dumpster Rental promises that you will receive the best care and solutions to your dumpster needs at the lowest possible price.
We promise to have your rolloff dumpster on your site at exactly the day and time you requested. Great customer service is just not a slogan with us. We stand by our commitment to offer the highest standards and service.
For more information, you can reach them at the landfill location office number 256-881-8700.
For more information, you can contact the office at 256-880-6054.
Their hours are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
The city of Huntsville garbage service collects paper products including cardboard boxes as well as household waste from the kitchen or bathroom. The waste is collected once a week. For more information see these schedules.
Solid Waste Disposal Authority collects recyclable materials from curbside bins in Huntsville once a week on scheduled days. We could not find information about the pick-up times.
Paper Items: newspapers, magazines, junk mail, shredded paper (bagged), pasta and cereal boxes, cardboard that is broken down to be smaller than 2'x2'.
Cans: steel cans, aluminum cans as well as EMPTY aerosol Cans from hair spray, shaving cream or air fresheners.
Plastic items: milk jugs, #1 or #2 narrow neck plastics, shampoo bottles. Reminder: Completely rinse out bottles and remove any lids or pumps.
Used Motor oil that is in a clear plastic container with a securely fastened lid.
In the case of a major holiday, the drop off will be on the second Saturday of the month.
Paints and Paint Removing Products.
Note: Bring household hazardous wastes in their original containers when possible, or put them in a box that has been properly lined with two garbage bags or a container with a lid. For leaks, use an absorbent material like kitty litter or sawdust.
Call 256-880-6054 with any concerns.
Yard waste is picked up with regular trash collection. Containers must be at the curb by 7:00 a.m. All yard waste must be placed in a container before it is collected. Building materials like boards, planks, and siding must also be placed in a container before pick up.
Have debris on the curb by 7:00 a.m.
Place all debris away from mailboxes, parked cars, utility poles, etc.
Rocks, dirt, bricks, shingles, concrete or any contracting work materials are not allowed.
Tree Limbs must be cut below FIVE FEET in length.
Most basements are typically used for storage of unused or forgotten items just sitting there taking up space. Instead of converting our basements into a nice room to relax, we store items that we will most likely never use. So, it might be a good idea and go through the heap of clutter you have collected over the years. Many items that are just laying around could be put to good use by another family. Recycling these items can most likely be put to better use. And Easy Dumpster Rental can help you take your recyclables to a recycling center or to the local landfill. With a call to our office, we can easily get you the right size bin or dumpster to help you haul away all of that clutter and finally turn that basement into a man cave or a place for the kids to hang out. We offer 4 dumpster sizes for any job, residential or construction, we have the right dumpster rolloff for any project. You will like our prices too. We guarantee both our prices and services. If you find a lower price, lets us know and we will match or beat our competitors prices. And, don't waste your time and money using a truck. A dumpster is much more of a practical solution. Our smallest bin is 10 cubic yards which are equivalent to 4 pickup trucks. And if that is the size you need, you don't want to be making 4 round trips to the local recycling and/or landfill. What a waste of time and money. We will drop off the bin on the day and time of your choosing and we will pick it up and drop the debris at the landfill for you. Simple and easy. give us a call now and get that basement cleared out and use it for family functions.
How do I schedule a dumpster rolloff for my backyard remodeling project in Huntsville?
Scheduling a dumpster is a very simple process with Easy Dumpster Rental. And renting a bin or dumpster is ideal for backyard projects. A dumpster is easier to fill and is more affordable than using a truck. A dumpster can haul away all of your branches, shrubs, dirt, and leaves without the hassle of renting a pick up truck. Give our office a call and when you speak to one of our sales reps, give him/her the details and the scope of your venture and the sales rep will be able to tell you what size bin you will need and give you a quote in minutes. All that is left for you is just tell us when you want the dumpster delivered, where you would like it placed, and when you are finished you your remodel, give us call or go online to schedule a pick up. We promise and guarantee both on time delivery and pick up. We will also offer valuable tips on how to properly fill your bin so there is no wasted space. If yard space is a problem and you would like to place the dumpster on the street we will call city hall and find out what the permitting process entails in Huntsville. If you decide to put the bin on your lawn or driveway, we recommend going to your local lumber store and picking up some plywood. The plywood will be placed under the wheels of the rolloff to protect your lawn or driveway. So, pick up your phone, give Easy Dumpster Rental a call and get that project completed.


Earlier I highlighted the major deductions available (as misc unreimbursed business expenses) available to me as a result of my temporary assignment for work.
Trash Can - I purchased a trash can (as well as several other small functional items) for the furnished room I stayed in. Again I think this is deductible since if I stayed in a hotel room one would have been provided for me.
Mileage to Grocery Store - I believe this is deductible because its the same as taking mileage to go to dinner at a restaurant. However this may already fall under the incidental allowance that is part of the M&IE daily per diem. I need to do more research.
Cleaning Products - ex. Lysol wipes - if I was staying in a hotel, the cleaning would be done for me so I have to think that cleaning supplies is also deductible.
Im not sure how aggressive I should be with these. One could quickly argue either way on these expenses. I probably will not attempt to expense any of these types of items since they don't are not a significant portion of my temporary assignment expenses.
The deduction for unreimbursed business expense is hard to qualify. The deduction is only available if you itemize deductions, and only to the extent that the qualified expenses exceed 2% of your AGI. Another blog I read: http://taxplaya.typepad.com/tax_playa/ has good information on unreimbursed business expenses and business travel (look at the topic list on the right side).
That said, as long as you can document a good faith effort to comply with the tax code, go ahead and deduct these items. Worst case scenario, you get audited and those items are disallowed. As long as you are not out to defraud the IRS and you keep good records, you should not be scared by the potential for an audit.