text:
Trump's EPA Pumps Up Bayer Fighting $25 Million Verdict in Roundup Cancer Despite Many Nations Having Banned Roundup
By Stephen Fox (View How Many People Read This) 29 comments
(31 fans)
Evidence shows EPA in bed w/ Monsanto Attorney Michael L Baum, managing partner and president at Baum Hedlund Law, joins Rick Sanchez to discuss the .failure of the EPA to protect people,. opting ...
(Image by YouTube, Channel: RT America) Details DMCA
Bayer/Monsanto is asking a federal appeals court to reverse its ruling in favor of a California man suffering from non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
compiled from articles by Andrea Germanos, staff writer at Common Dreams and an article by Rich Peters in Legal Newsline
Trump's EPA has long been accused of being the "pesticide cheerleader" and recently threw its dubious judicial gravitas behind Bayer last Friday by filing an amicus brief which asked a federal appeals court to reverse a lower court's ruling in favor of a man who said the company's Roundup weedkiller was responsible for his cancer (and of course the jury also had agreed).
The case of California's Edwin Hardeman diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 2015 after using the glyphosate-based pesticide, made by Monsanto, for years on his property.
A federal jury in July unanimously ordered the company to pay Hardeman roughly $25 million in damages, a lower amount than the $80 million a federal judge had ordered months earlier.
Like the blind leading the blind, our EPA maintains that glyphosate is not a carcinogen, and this is the face of hundreds of nations, states, and counties that have completely banned it.
California in 2017 agreed with the World Health Organization's 2015 classification of glyphosate as a "probable carcinogen." However, both Trump's EPA and an 81 year old Federal Judge in Sacramento, Bush appointee William Shubb, has fought the state's finding and said that product labels informing users of that cancer risk would "misbranding" and announced in August of this year that the agency would not approve of labels carrying that warning. Shubb granted Monsanto/Bayer's request for an injunction against requiring labeling Roundup as carcinogenic, although Shubb did not question the finding by the California Carcinogen Identification Commission that Roundup/Glyphosate is carcinogenic, which he left standing.
In the recent amicus brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, attorneys with the EPA and Justice Department wrote
EPA approved the label for the pesticide/herbicide at issue here, Roundup, through a registration process that did not require a cancer warning. In fact, EPA has never required a labeling warning of a cancer risk posed by Roundup, and such a warning would be inconsistent with the agency's scientific assessments of the carcinogenic potential of the product. Mr. Hardeman nevertheless sought damages under California common law, alleging that Monsanto had failed to adequately warn consumers of cancer risks posed by the active ingredient in Roundup. FIFRA therefore preempts Mr. Hardeman's claims to the extent that they are based on the lack of a warning on Roundup's labeling.
The filing from the federal government came the same week Bayer AG asked the appeals court to toss out the lower court's ruling, and defended Roundup's safety.
Bayer is currently facing nearly 43,000 claims related to glyphosate-linked cancer in federal courts. An end to the company's legal woes is unlikely to happen soon, according to Bloomberg Environment.
"The only vehicle that remotely approaches [an end to litigation] might be bankruptcy," Loyola Law School professor Adam Zimmerman told the outlet last week. "Short of that, or some victories in court, I don't see what kind of arrangement would absolve them of future liability."
Bayer 'encouraged' by support from DOJ, states in Hardeman appeal
Bayer announced last week that at least 16 entities - including trade groups, several states and the federal government - are supporting the company's appeal of a $25 million verdict in favor of plaintiff Edwin Hardeman , who alleged Roundup weedkiller caused his cancer.
Amicus briefs were filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the federal Department of Justice; the states of Nebraska, Idaho, Louisiana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas and Utah; the California Medical Association; California Dental Association; California Hospital Association; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; and others.
The briefs argue a number of issues, including federal preemption, the admissibility of expert testimony, causation and punitive damages. These arguments are also the focal points of Monsanto's appeal, a press release states.
"We are encouraged that the U.S. government, several states, and many other parties chose to offer the court their legal perspectives on the key issues in our appeal," Bayer said in a statement. "The number and stature of these parties speaks clearly to the importance of the issues in dispute in this case to a diversity of interests including governments, health care providers, farmers, and manufacturers."
Last March, a jury verdict awarded Hardeman $80.27 million after finding that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's weed killer Roundup, was a substantial factor in causing the Bay Area resident's non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
The total damages awarded have since been slashed to $25.27 million and Bayer, which purchased Monsanto last year for $63 billion, filed a much anticipated appeal earlier this month, urging the Ninth Circuit to reverse that verdict altogether.
In backing the pharmaceutical giant, attorneys with the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the U.S. Department of Justice stated in their amicus brief :
"Plaintiff asserted safety labeling requirements exist under California law in addition to and different from that required, reviewed, and approved by EPA. Plaintiff is wrong and his lawyers sailed directly into preempted territory in how they opted to try this case."
It continues: "Under (Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act), the label is the law. EPA approved the label for the pesticide/herbicide at issue here, Roundup, through a registration process that did not require a cancer warning. In fact, EPA has never required a labeling warning of a cancer risk posed by Roundup, and such a warning would be inconsistent with the agency's scientific assessments of the carcinogenic potential of the product."
Hardeman's case was the second of three straight California landmark victories for plaintiffs suing Monsanto over similar accusations. A handful of early 2020 cases in Oakland as well as Monsanto's longtime headquarters of St. Louis were recently postponed. A number of other cases are still expected to take place, however, despite the recent rumors of a potential global settlement.
Reports have stated that the number of similar cancer lawsuits filed against Bayer/Monsanto have doubled over the past quarter, reaching upward of 42,700 nationwide.
Please see also:
https://modernfarmer.com/2019/12/monsanto-attempts-defense-that-would-negate-all-glyphosate-causes-cancer-law
In a November 25, 2019 posting Beverly Hills Law Firm Baum Hedlund posted this following information. They are the lead firm in many of the decisions and jury decisions giving awards to Roundup cancer victims.
A number of cities, counties, states and countries throughout the world have taken steps to either restrict or ban glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup weed killer.
The following countries have issued outright bans on glyphosate, imposed restrictions or have issued statements of intention to ban or restrict glyphosate-based herbicides, including Roundup, over health concerns and the ongoing Roundup cancer litigation:
Argentina: In 2015, more than 30,000 health care professionals advocated for a glyphosate ban following the International Agency for Research on Cancer's (IARC) report on glyphosate, which concluded the chemical is probably carcinogenic to humans. More than 400 towns and cities in Argentina have passed measures restricting glyphosate use.
Australia: Numerous municipalities and school districts throughout the country are currently testing alternative herbicides in an effort to curtail or eliminate glyphosate use. Many use steam technology for weed control on streets and in other public areas.
Following a series of massive jury verdicts in Roundup cancer lawsuits in the United States, the Australian state of Victoria launched its own review of glyphosate. Two councils in Sydney have either banned or are in the process of banning glyphosate use, and eight other councils are reviewing the chemical.
Austria: In June of 2019, Austria announced that it planned to ban glyphosate within the year. Leader of the Social Democrats, Pamela Rendi-Wagner, said she is "pleased" that her party's long-standing effort to ban glyphosate in Austria would "finally pay off" now that her party's motion had a majority in the Austrian parliament. The measure to ban glyphosate passed in July of 2019. The Austria glyphosate ban will take effect on January 1, 2020.
Bahrain: According to Oman's Ministry of Agriculture, Bahrain and five other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have banned glyphosate.
Belgium: Banned the individual use of glyphosate. In 2017, Belgium voted against relicensing glyphosate in the EU. The country was also one of six EU member states to sign a letter to the EU Commission calling for "an exit plan for glyphosate"" The city of Brussels banned the use of glyphosate within its territory as part of its "zero pesticides" policy.
Bermuda: Outlawed private and commercial sale of all glyphosate-based herbicides. In 2017, the government relaxed its ban on glyphosate, allowing the Department of Environment and Natural Resources to import restricted concentrations of glyphosate for managing roadside weed overgrowth.
Brazil: In August of 2018, a federal judge in Brasilia ruled that new products containing glyphosate could not be registered in the country. Existing regulations concerning glyphosate were also suspended, pending a reevaluation of toxicological data by Anvisa, the country's health agency.
In September of 2018, a Brazilian court overturned the federal judge's ruling. September marks Brazil's first month of soybean planting. The country is the largest exporter of soybeans in the world, and as such, has become heavily reliant on agrochemicals. Anvisa issued a statement following the court's decision to overturn the ruling, saying it will take necessary legal and technical steps in response. Further, Brazil's Solicitor General's office has said it is preparing an appeal to the court decision with support from the Agriculture Ministry. Brazil's health agency concluded a re-evaluation of glyphosate in February of 2019. Based on the agency's findings, a blanket ban of glyphosate in Brazil is unlikely.
Canada: Eight out of the 10 provinces in Canada have some form of restriction on the use of non-essential cosmetic pesticides, including glyphosate. Vancouver has banned public and private use of glyphosate, aside from the treatment of invasive weeds. In June of 2019, New Brunswick officials announced that the province would reduce glyphosate spraying in certain areas with the promise that more regulation will follow.
Colombia: In 2015, Colombia outlawed the use of glyphosate to destroy illegal plantations of coca, the raw ingredient for cocaine, out of concern that glyphosate causes cancer. In March of 2019, President Ivan Duque asked for the judicial ban on aerial glyphosate spraying to be lifted. However, in July of 2019, the court maintained the judicial ban on glyphosate, ruling that the government has to prove that glyphosate is not harmful to human health and the environment in order for the ban to be lifted.
Czech Republic: Agriculture Minister Miroslav Toman said the country will limit glyphosate use starting in 2019. Specifically, the Czech Republic will ban glyphosate as a weedkiller and drying agent.
Denmark: The Danish Working Environment Authority declared glyphosate to be carcinogenic and has recommended a change to less toxic chemicals. Aalborg, one of the largest cities in Denmark, issued private-use glyphosate ban in September of 2017. In July of 2018, the Danish government implemented new rules banning the use of glyphosate on all post-emergent crops to avoid residues on foods.
El Salvador: In 2013, the country adapted a law banning glyphosate over links to deadly kidney disease. However, by 2016, the legislation appeared to stall.
France: French authorities banned the sale, distribution and use of Roundup 360 in early 2019. In May of 2019, French Agriculture Minister Didier Guillaume announced that France would eliminate the use of glyphosate by 2021 with limited exceptions. Some 20 mayors throughout the country have banned glyphosate in their municipalities.
Germany: Environment Minister Svenja Schulze announced in September 2019 that Germany will ban glyphosate by 2023. The ban, agreed to by the Cabinet, includes a "systemic reduction strategy" that will prohibit glyphosate spraying in domestic gardens and at the edges of farmland. Certain retail stores in Germany have already pulled glyphosate-based herbicides like Roundup from shelves.
Greece: Greece was one of nine EU countries to vote against relicensing glyphosate in November of 2017. The country was also one of six EU member states to sign a 2018 letter to the European Commission calling for "an exit plan for glyphosate"" According to Greek Minister of Agricultural Development Evangelos Apostolou, "[i]t is our duty to push in the direction of risk management, in the interests of consumers, producers and the environment." In March of 2018, the Greek government approved a five-year license for Monsanto's Roundup against the wishes of Greek environmentalists.
India: In October of 2018, the government of Punjab banned the sale of glyphosate in the state. "All pesticide manufacturers, marketers and dealers in the State shall not sell glyphosate formulations-concentrations with immediate effect. The licensing authorities have been asked to take necessary steps for removal of entries for glyphosate from the licenses issued by them," said State Agriculture Secretary K.S. Pannu. In February of 2019, the Indian state of Kerala issued a ban on the sale, distribution and use of glyphosate.
Italy: Italy's Ministry of Health placed a number of restrictions on glyphosate use. Italian legislators have also raised concerns about glyphosate safety, and have come out against relicensing the herbicide in the European Union. In 2016, the Italian government banned the use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest treatment and placed restrictions on glyphosate use in areas frequented by the public. In November of 2017, Italy was one of seven EU nations to vote against relicensing glyphosate.
Kuwait: According to Oman's Ministry of Agriculture, Kuwait and five other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) issued glyphosate bans.
Luxembourg: One of Luxembourg's largest supermarket chains removed glyphosate from its shelves following the release of the IARC glyphosate report. Luxembourg was one of nine EU countries to vote against relicensing glyphosate in November of 2017, and in early 2018, the country signed a letter to the EU Commission calling for "an exit plan for glyphosate""
Malawi: In April 2019, Malawi's Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development told the country's National newspaper that import licenses for glyphosate-based herbicides like Monsanto's Roundup would be suspended immediately.
Malta: In July of 2019, Malta banned the use of glyphosate in public spaces. The spraying of glyphosate will not be allowed on roadsides or near schools, among other places.
Netherlands: Banned all non-commercial use of glyphosate.
New Zealand: The cities of Auckland and Christchurch passed resolutions to reduce the usage of chemicals for weed and pest control in public places. The Physicians and Scientists for Global Responsibility, a New Zealand charitable trust, called for a glyphosate ban in 2015.
Oman: Eng Saleh al Abri, director general of agricultural development in Oman's Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (MoAF), told a reporter that glyphosate "hasn't been available in Oman since 2016." Eng Abri added, "This active ingredient has been banned throughout the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) since last year." In addition to Oman, the GCC includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Portugal: Prohibits the use of glyphosate in all public spaces. The president of the Portuguese Medical Association has also called for a worldwide ban of glyphosate.
Qatar: According to Oman's Ministry of Agriculture, Qatar and five other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have banned glyphosate.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Acting on advice from their Pesticides Board, the Caribbean country placed an immediate suspension on the import of glyphosate-based herbicides.
Saudi Arabia: Issued a glyphosate ban along with five other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC).
Scotland: Aberdeen cut back its use of herbicides and Edinburgh's City Council voted to phase out glyphosate. In November of 2017, five of Scotland's six EU parliamentarians voted in favor of a motion that would phase out glyphosate by 2022.
Slovenia: Slovenia was one of six EU member states to sign a 2018 letter to the European Commission citing "concerns" about the risks associated with glyphosate. The letter called upon the Commission to introduce "an exit plan for glyphosate""
Spain: According to Kistiñe Garcia of the Spanish NGO, Ecologistas en Acción, Barcelona, Madrid, Zaragoza and the region of Extremuda have decided to ban glyphosate. The regions of La Rioja (major Spanish wine region) and Aragon have also approved motions against endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which includes glyphosate.
Sri Lanka: Sri Lanka was the first country to issue a nationwide ban on glyphosate. However, in 2018, the government decided to lift the ban due to crop losses and overgrowing weeds.
Sweden: Raised concerns about glyphosate safety and has pushed against relicensing the herbicide in the EU. In 2017, the Swedish Chemicals Agency (SCA) announced it was planning to tighten rules on private use of plant protection products. Under the plan, private users would only be allowed to use products containing "low-risk substances." According to the SCA, glyphosate is an example of an active substance not expected to be included among low-risk substances, meaning in due time, private consumers may not be permitted to use herbicides containing glyphosate.
Switzerland: Concerned about public well-being, the Swiss supermarket chains Migros and Coop removed glyphosate-based products from their shelves due to health risks. In 2017, the Green party put forth a plan to ban glyphosate in Switzerland. The proposed plan was rejected by the Federal Council, Switzerland's executive.
Thailand: In August 2019, Deputy Agriculture Minister Mananya Thaiseth ceased licensing extensions for three hazardous farm chemicals, including glyphosate. Following the announcement, U.S. government officials pressured Thailand to exempt the three chemicals citing a potential threat to the grain trade. But Thailand's public health minister Anutin Charvinrakul said during a press conference that "our job is to take care of the people's health." The Thailand glyphosate ban starts on December 1, 2019.
United Arab Emirates: Issued a glyphosate ban along with five other countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council.
United Kingdom: Following the landmark $289 million Monsanto Roundup verdict on Aug. 10, 2018, Homebase, one of the UK's largest DIY retailers, announced that it would review the sale of Roundup and Ranger Pro. However, according to the Sun, Homebase and other major retailers still stock the weed killers for sale.
The following boroughs and townships have issued bans or restrictions on pesticides and herbicides, including glyphosate:
Bury (ban in children's play areas)
Derry City (Northern Ireland)
Midlothian (Scotland)
Vietnam: Following the jury verdict in Hardeman v. Monsanto Co., Vietnam announced that it would ban glyphosate imports. According to Hoang Trung, Director of the Plant Protection Department under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, "the removal of this substance from the list of pesticides allowed to be used in Vietnam will be done in the near future."
Why is Glyphosate Banned?
Most of the glyphosate restrictions or bans throughout the world were introduced following the 2015 IARC report on glyphosate. The IARC report concluded that glyphosate is a "probable human carcinogen."
According to the report, the cancers most associated with glyphosate exposure were found to be non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other hematopoietic cancers. The report further concluded that glyphosate exposure caused DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells, as well as genotoxic, hormonal and enzymatic effects in mammals.
Other glyphosate studies have linked the chemical to a number of health issues, including, but not limited to ADHD, Alzheimer's Disease, Autism, Birth Defects, various forms of cancer, Celiac Disease, Colitis, Heart Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Syndrome, Kidney Disease, Liver Disease, and Parkinson's Disease.
Is Glyphosate Banned in Europe?
As you can see above, some individual countries have introduced legislation to ban or restrict private sales of glyphosate, or restrictions on spraying glyphosate in public spaces. As for the whole of the European Union (EU), glyphosate is not currently banned.
However, EU public opinion is leaning in favor of a glyphosate ban. In a 2016 poll of the five largest EU countries, over 66 percent of respondents said they favored a glyphosate ban. Over 1.3 million people signed a petition in 2017 calling for a European ban of glyphosate. That public pressure caught the attention numerous Members of European Parliament, who have cited the petition as the foundation for instituting an EU ban.
In November of 2017, EU member states narrowly voted to relicense glyphosate for a period of five years. The vote was not without controversy; German Agriculture Minister Christian Schmidt (CSU) entered a 'yes' vote for his country without consulting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) on the matter. His unilateral vote disregarded Germany's Environment Minister, who had instructed Schmidt to abstain from voting. With Germany's vote, the measure narrowly passed and glyphosate received a new license.
Following the scandal, six EU countries sent a letter to the European Commission, calling for an exit plan for glyphosate. France and Italy have stated they will carry out glyphosate bans by 2020, and Germany announced in 2018 that it will also issue a glyphosate ban.
In January of 2019, a European Parliament report found that EU regulators based their decision to relicense glyphosate on an assessment that was plagiarized from a coalition of pesticide companies, including Monsanto.
The EU Parliament report investigated claims that Germany's Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) copied and pasted large sections of a pesticide industry assessment of glyphosate literature in its own assessment. The BfR report concluded that classifying glyphosate as a carcinogen is not warranted. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which relied upon the BfR report, also found that glyphosate is safe for humans and the environment.
Following the release of the EU Parliament report, an EU court ruled that EFSA should publicize glyphosate studies used for its assessments.
Is Glyphosate Banned in the United States?
Despite the IARC report's 2015 conclusion that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans. As such, glyphosate is not banned by the U.S. government; Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicides are readily available for purchase throughout the country.
However, the EPA is a captured agency, meaning it is dominated by the industry it presumably regulates. Internal company documents now public in the Monsanto Papers demonstrate that EPA prioritizes the interests of corporations like Monsanto or political groups over the interests of the public it is charged with protecting.
"The EPA has got it wrong on glyphosate. We have study after study after study showing that it in fact, does cause a specific type of cancer called lymphoma. And we see it happening in thousands and thousands of people across the country. Currently, this Administration and this EPA will not take action against Monsanto. We've seen the internal documents, the text messages, the emails between senior EPA officials and Monsanto employees. And the simple fact is they know that this EPA will not take adverse action against them. It is a travesty that this truth about it causing cancer and this awareness that we are trying to raise has to be done in the context of litigation. We only exist, these lawsuits only exist, because the EPA has failed the American public for 45 years and Monsanto is allowed to get away with reckless conduct with, essentially, impunity"this agency essentially does not work for the American public but works for industry. The fact that the White House is telling Monsanto, 'We have your back.' I mean this just tells us that we are going to have to keep fighting this fight and that we are not going to get any support or help from the public agencies that, ironically, are supposed to be protecting the public health."
- Brent Wisner, Roundup Cancer Attorney
Is Glyphosate Banned in California?
California has not issued a statewide ban on glyphosate. However, on July 7, 2017, California became the first state in the nation to issue a warning on glyphosate by adding the chemical to the state's Proposition 65 list of chemicals and substances known to cause cancer.
California's decision to warn consumers about glyphosate was pursuant to the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, better known as California Proposition 65, a ballot initiative approved by voters in 1986 to address toxic chemical exposure concerns. Prop 65 requires California to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
In 2019, University of California President Janet Napolitano announced that glyphosate would be temporarily banned on all 10 UC campuses, citing "concerns about possible human health and ecological hazards, as well potential legal and reputational risks associated with this category of herbicides."
U.S. Cities to Restrict or Ban Glyphosate
Tucson, Arizona - Created an organics-first policy for controlling weeds on city property.
Alameda County, California - The East Bay Regional Park District, a special district operating regional parks in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, banned glyphosate around picnic and play areas effective July 2019. EBRPD plans to formally ban Roundup use in its parks by the end of 2020. EBRPD manages 73 parks and 55 miles of shoreline.
Arcata, California - Initiated a pesticide reduction plan that urges pesticides to only be used as a last resort.
Belvedere, California - Passed municipal ordinance initiating Integrated Pest Management program that restricts toxic pesticide use and urges pesticide use as last resort.
Benicia, California - City decided to go glyphosate-free following the verdict in Johnson v. Monsanto Co.
Berkeley, California - Implemented pest management program to minimize or eliminate the use of pesticides. The city has not used glyphosate since the 1970s, according to spokesman Matthai Chakko.
Burbank, California - City Council members voted to discontinue the use of Roundup in city parks for one year, and Burbank Unified School District will no longer use the herbicide due to cancer concerns.
Cambria, California - North Coast school board trustees formally proposed a ban on glyphosate for all school properties.
Carlsbad, California - The City Council voted unanimously to adopt a policy that makes organic pesticides the preferred method for killing weeds. "Asked to choose between aesthetics and public health"I'm going to choose public health every time," said Councilwoman Cori Schumacher.
Clayton, California - Banned the use of Roundup on city property.
Concord, California - The Mount Diablo Unified School District unanimously voted to ban glyphosate use on school property.
Contra Costa County, California - The East Bay Regional Park District, a special district operating regional parks in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, banned glyphosate around picnic and play areas effective July 2019. EBRPD plans to formally ban Roundup use in its parks by the end of 2020. EBRPD manages 73 parks and 55 miles of shoreline.
Corte Madera, California - Passed ordinance calling for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program restricting highly toxic pesticides, while also urging for pesticide use to be a last resort.
Costa Mesa, California - City council adopted an organics-first Integrated Pest Management (IPM) policy.
Davis, California - Passed ordinance implementing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program designed to reduce the use of pesticides. Some city parks do not allow the use of glyphosate.
Encinitas, California - Banned the use of Roundup and other glyphosate-based weed killers in city parks.
Fairfax, California - Passed municipal ordinance restricting use of toxic pesticides on public property in favor of alternative methods.
Fresno, California - After hearing from concerned parents and employees, Fresno Unified School District is investigating the use of alternative herbicides that do not contain glyphosate, citing health risks.
Greenfield, California - Adopted a resolution to "halt all use of the carcinogenic weed killer Roundup and replace it with 'greener' alternatives."
Irvine, California - City Council passed resolution to cease spraying Roundup and other chemicals on public parks, streets and playgrounds.
Laguna Hills, California - Passed a resolution to test an organics-only pesticide program on two parks.
Lodi, California -The city decided to ban the use of Roundup within 25 feet of playgrounds.
Long Beach, California - Citing the landmark $289 million verdict in Johnson v. Monsanto Co., Long Beach Parks & Recreation Director Gerardo Mouet announced an immediate halt on the spraying of Roundup in Long Beach Parks.
Los Angeles County, California - The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors issued a moratorium on glyphosate-based herbicides, including Roundup weed killer. In July 2019, the LA County Board of Supervisors formally banned Roundup.
Malibu, California - The city may implement an Earth Friendly Management Policy (EFMP) to avoid the use of pesticides and other chemicals.
Marin County, California - The county stopped using glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto's Roundup weed killer, on all county-maintained parks, landscaping, playgrounds, walkways and parking areas.
Mill Valley, California - Passed ordinance initiating Integrated Pest Management program that restricts toxic pesticide use and urges pesticide use as last resort.
Morgan Hill, California - Instituted a pilot program at a city park to assess the possibility of eliminating the use of herbicides.
Napa, California - A policy announced in March of 2019 banned glyphosate use on city property, completing a phase-out campaign that started three years ago.
Novato, California - Following the $289 million Monsanto verdict, Novato Mayor Josh Fryday said the city will no longer use Roundup weed killer.
Oakland, California - Passed ordinance initiating Integrated Pest Management program that restricts toxic pesticide use and promotes pesticide use as last resort. On Sept. 1, 2018, the city formally halted the use of Roundup. Alameda County is reviewing its chemical spraying practices.
Orange County, California - OC Parks banned the use of glyphosate on and around playgrounds, picnic shelters, trails and campgrounds. However, glyphosate remains in use on off-trail invasive weeds.
Oxnard, California - The Oxnard School District board voted to ban Roundup use on campuses.
Palo Alto, California - Pest management program calls for Integrated Pest Management that restricts pesticide use in favor of less harmful methods.
Petaluma, California - City officials are considering a ban on glyphosate for use in public parks.
Richmond, California - Issued an ordinance to ban the use of glyphosate for all weed abatement activities conducted by the city.
San Anselmo, California - Passed city resolution promoting an Integrated Pest Management program restricting the use of toxic pesticides. The program only allows pesticide use as a last resort.
San Francisco, California - Restricts the use of toxic pesticides on public property in favor of alternative, organic methods.
San Juan Capistrano, California - Implemented an organics-first policy to control weeds in city parks and open spaces.
San Lorenzo Valley, California - The San Lorenzo Valley Water District voted 4-1 for a permanent ban of glyphosate pesticide use by the district.
San Luis Obispo, California - San Luis Coastal Unified School District banned all pesticides, including Roundup, on school properties in 2018. Coast Unified School District banned Roundup in the summer of 2019.
Santa Barbara, California - The Santa Barbara Unified School District Board of Education voted to ban glyphosate spraying at all district schools.
Santa Rosa, California - Banned the use of Roundup at city parks.
Sonoma, California - Banned glyphosate use on all city-owned property.
Thousand Oaks, California - City instituted a ban on glyphosate use on public golf courses.
Watsonville, California - City council voted unanimously to ban Roundup use on city property.
Woodland, California - Woodland Joint Unified School District suspended the use of Roundup on school campuses.
Boulder, Colorado - Banned Roundup for use on city parks.
Durango, Colorado - Instituted an Organically Managed Lands program to minimize the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.
Middletown, Connecticut - Passed ordinance banning toxic pesticides and herbicides on municipally-owned fields, parks and other property.
A growing number of Connecticut towns, including Branford, Cheshire, Granby, Essex, Greenwich, Manchester, Oxford, Pine Grove, Plainville, Roxbury, Watertown, and Woodbridge have adopted bans or restrictions on glyphosate use. The state also has Public Act 09-56 to eliminate the use pesticides in K-8 schools.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ceased using aquatic herbicides, glyphosate chief among them, anywhere in state waters, while the agency gathers public input.
Fort Myers Beach, Florida - The city has decided to ban Roundup.
Key West, Florida - Key West City Commission banned the use of Roundup on city-owned property, citing a $2.055 billion jury verdict in California.
Martin County, Florida - The local government instituted a Roundup ban that applies to all county employees and contractors working on county projects.
Miami, Florida - Announced a city-wide ban on glyphosate-based herbicides in February of 2019.
Miami Beach, Florida - Passed a resolution banning the use of glyphosate weed killers for landscaping and maintenance work on city-owned property.
North Miami, Florida - City Council approved a plan calling for the gradual reduction of pesticide use on city property and a study on alternative pesticides.
Satellite Beach, Florida - City Council unanimously approved a resolution that bans the city and its contractors from using glyphosate-based herbicides, including Monsanto's Roundup.
Stuart, Florida - City commissioners voted to ban glyphosate, calling for an integrated pest control plan that reduces the use of glyphosate with the ultimate goal of eliminating chemicals.
In February of 2018, a series of bills moved ahead in the legislature that would regulate pesticides, including Roundup weed killer.
Hawaii County, Hawaii - A Hawaii County Council committee approved a bill that would prohibit the use of herbicides like Roundup on public parks, roads, bike routes, trails, sidewalks, and elsewhere. The bill will be taken up by the full council. If passed, the law would take effect in 2024.
Chicago, Illinois - The city stopped spraying glyphosate in public spaces.
Evanston, Illinois - Evanston decided to go pesticide-free in 2010. Glyphosate is banned from use on city property, parks and schools.
Franklin Park, Illinois - Passed resolution promoting an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) policy that restricts highly toxic pesticides and urges for pesticides to be considered as a last resort.
Naperville, Illinois - Created the Sustainable Parks Initiative, which uses organic products and sustainable practices for weed control.
Urbana, Illinois - Adopted the Midwest Grows Green natural lawn care initiative to eliminate synthetic lawn pesticides on city parks.
Dubuque, Iowa - City instituted a ban on glyphosate use in public parks.
Story County, Iowa - Eliminated the use of chemical pesticides in six of its mowed turf areas.
Lawrence, Kansas - Implemented Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program designed to reduce pesticide use.
Wichita, Kansas - Initiated pilot program that limits or eliminates pesticide use.
Dozens of cities and townships in Maine have adopted local ordinances restricting or banning pesticides and herbicides.
Portland, Maine - Banned synthetic pesticides in March of 2019. Private property owners may only use organic treatments on lawns and gardens. No pesticides may be used within 75 feet of a water body or wetland.
South Portland, Maine - Passed a pesticide plan that discourages property owners from using certain pesticides and herbicides.
Greenbelt, Maryland - Adopted Sustainable Land Care policy for public lands calling for limited use of pesticides.
Howard County, Maryland - Implemented a least-toxic IPM policy and accompanying legislation for county grounds maintenance in November of 2019.
Hyattsville, Maryland - Passed ordinance prohibiting the use of toxic pesticides on public property in favor of alternative, organic methods
Montgomery County, Maryland - County Council voted to ban the use of cosmetic pesticides on private lawns. In December 2018, Montgomery County Parks announced that it would discontinue the use of glyphosate in parks.
Takoma Park, Maryland - Placed restriction on cosmetic pesticides for lawn care on public and private property.
Chatham, Massachusetts - Passed an order banning glyphosate use in parks, athletic fields, mulch beds and walkways.
Eastham, Massachusetts - Local ordinance requires town employees to receive a permit for use of registered pesticides and prohibits the use of highly-toxic pesticides.
Falmouth, Massachusetts - Issued a yearlong moratorium on glyphosate use.
Marblehead, Massachusetts - Created Organic Pest Management program to phase out pesticides and herbicides.
Warwick, Massachusetts - A measure to ban Monsanto's Roundup passed at a Special Town Meeting. The ban does not allow people to spray glyphosate on any land within the town.
Wellesley, Massachusetts - Wellesley banned all pesticides in 2011. Glyphosate is restricted from being sprayed on athletic fields and any city-owned property. The chemical can be used in limited emergency weed control situations.
Minneapolis, Minnesota - Commissioners of the Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board decided to eliminate all glyphosate-based products from being used in neighborhood parks. In October of 2018, the Park Board's Operations & Environment Committee voted to extend the glyphosate ban to the entire Minneapolis park system.
Rochester, Minnesota - The Parks & Recreation Department initiated a pesticide-free pilot project for city parks.
Reno, Nevada - The city initiated a pesticide free pilot program.
Dover, New Hampshire - Passed resolution calling for Organic Land Management. City utilizes least toxic compounds only when necessary.
Portsmouth, New Hampshire - Passed resolution eliminating the use of toxic pesticides on public property in favor of alternative, organic methods.
Bernalillo County, New Mexico - The County Commission voted to ban the use of Roundup on county properties by 2020.
Las Cruces, New Mexico - The Las Cruces City Council voted to ban Roundup and its principal ingredient, glyphosate, for pest control on city property. The ban is scheduled to take effect once the city's glyphosate supply is exhausted.
Taos County, New Mexico - Taos County Commissioners are considering the possibility of banning all pesticides, including glyphosate.
New Jersey has State and local ordinances encouraging Integrated Pest Management programs to eliminate or drastically reduce the use of pesticides. At least 15 city school districts and over a dozen other parks and recreation departments in the state have enacted IPM programs.
In January of 2019, New York State Senator Brad Hoylman (27th District) sponsored a bill in the New York State Senate that would prohibit the sale and distribution of products containing glyphosate. Updates on the legislation can be found here.
In April of 2019, two New York City council members introduced legislation to ban glyphosate use in parks and other public spaces.
New York Park and Recreation Department has measures to eliminate or reduce pesticide and herbicide use in areas under its control.
New Paltz, New York - The use of toxic pesticides and herbicides by city employees or by private contractors is forbidden on all city-owned lands.
Rockland County, New York - Created a Non-Toxic Pesticide program, mandating the use of natural, non-toxic, or as a last resort with prior approval, the least toxic pesticide use.
Westchester County, New York - Enacted a law for pesticide-free parks.
Carrboro, North Carolina - The city of Carrboro has restricted glyphosate use since 1999. Under the terms of the ban, glyphosate cannot be sprayed in public parks, schools and town buildings or properties. The city will only allow glyphosate to be sprayed under limited circumstances.
Cuyahoga County, Ohio - Local ordinance prohibits the use of pesticides on county-owned land, and established the adoption of an Integrated Pest Management program for county-owned properties.
South Euclid, Ohio - Passed ordinance prohibiting toxic pesticides on public grounds in favor of alternative, organic pest control methods unless permitted by an Environmental Review Board.
Eugene, Oregon - City put a moratorium on the use of weed killers containing glyphosate on city properties.
Portland, Oregon - Since 1988, Portland has restricted the use of Roundup to emergency use only. Glyphosate is banned on all city-owned property.
Austin, Texas - City Council voted to prohibit the spraying of glyphosate on city lands.
Denton, Texas - City Council voted to implement an integrated pest management program and restrict the use of glyphosate on city parks, fields and playgrounds.
Multiple bills containing restrictions or bans on glyphosate have been introduced in the legislature.
Representative Mari Cordes introduced H. 301, which would ban the sale, use or application of the herbicide glyphosate.
Representative Annmarie Christensen introduced H. 328, an act relating to the use of glyphosate herbicide.
Charlottesville, Virginia - Restricts the use of glyphosate on any city-owned parks, schools, or buildings. Glyphosate can only be sprayed under limited circumstances.
King County, Washington - Passed municipal ordinance initiating an Integrative Pest Management (IPM) program to determine if and how pesticides should be used.
Kitsap County, Washington - Passed measure banning the spraying of glyphosate by workers on county-owned and maintained properties. Glyphosate may only be used on noxious weeds as a tool of last resort.
Olympia, Washington - City passed a resolution to encourage the implementation of an Integrative Pest Management (IPM) program for non-chemical pest control.
Seattle, Washington - Mayor Jenny A. Durkan signed an executive order restricting the city's use of glyphosate.
Thurston County, Washington -Passed municipal ordinance to restrict the use of toxic pesticides on public property.
Stephen Fox Social Media Pages:
Early in the 2016 Primary campaign, I started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the (more...)
Related Topic(s): Bayer; California Carcinogen Identification Committee; Carcinogens; EPA Failure; Roundup Weedkiller, Add Tags
NYC Council "STANDS UNITED" WITH N.DAKOTA PROTESTERS, 2 new videos of police using pepper spray and rubber bullets
Bernie Meets with LA Times Editorial Board (this is the complete transcript!)
Mirena Interuterine Devices can cause Depression, Mood swings, Acne, Back Pain, Uterine Cysts, and Uterine Perforations
What does Coca Cola's Dasani bottled water have in common with Death by Lethal Injection?
CA Exit Polls reveal 23% Discrepancy; 11 States With Vote "Flipping" Evidence; Our New Directions in American History?
In the California Primary, More Ballots Remain Uncounted than the Total Number of votes for Hillary Clinton!
"Rob Kall's Bottom-Up weaves together the many strands of new thinking about how to use decentralized, non-hierarchical approaches to solve crucial social and economic problems. Bottom-Up presents a tapestry of ideas and examples that can inspire and guide readers."
Peter Plastrik, coauthor of Connecting to Change the World: Harnessing the Power of Networks for Social Impact


SIGN UP to receive. . .
NCC supports bi-partisan resolution to withdraw troops from Iraq by the end of the year.
Religious leaders urge Congress to declare that U.S. occupation of Iraq won't go on forever.
Blair asks U.S. religious leaders to push debt relief, aid to Africa, and global climate change.
NCC launches western public lands initiative to address growing threats.
Hundreds rally in Washington as Congress opens Social Security hearings.
Orthodox Archbishop Iakovos, Champion of Civil Rights and Ecumenism, Dies at 93.
More NCC News . . .
- Resources and U.S. 2004 "Lenten Fast from Violence"
- Study Guide "Why Violence? Why Not Peace?"
- Hymn responding to recent school violence, 'A Prayer for Our Children', offered by Carolyn Winfrey Gillette.
- Religions for Peace U.S.A.
- Church Folks for a Better America, a new peacemaking website from Princeton, N.J.
- 2004 General Assembly Photos, by Kathleen Cameron, available for downloading free.
- Fall 2004 issue of EcuLink, NCC's newspaper: now online!
- Faith and Order Commission Response to "Petrine Ministry: A Working Draft"
- Connecting with Asian Immigrants in the U.S.
- Social Security insert -- who Social Security helps, why we can't do without it.
- Churches and the U.N.
- Permanent War Economy: Real Security or False Promise?
Disciples call Sharon Watkins as General Minister; First woman to head a mainline Protestant group The Rev. Dr. Sharon E. Watkins, senior minister of Disciples Christian Church in Bartlesville, Okla., has been elected General Minister and President of the 750,000 member Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). She becomes the seventh general minister and president to head the Disciples and the first woman to head a mainline Protestant communion/ denomination. She succeeds Wm. Chris Hobgood and will serve in the Disciples' general offices in Indianapolis, Ind. "We are a church whose time has come," Watkins told the 3,000 delegates of the Disciples' 2005 General Assembly in Portland, Ore. "We have so much to share, and we must be bold and courageous in sharing our story." Read more.
On August 6, 1945, at 8:16 a.m. Japanese time, 80,000 people died instantly in the blast of the first atomic bomb in Hiroshima. Another 35,000 were inju red and more than 60,000 would die by the end of the year from the effects of radioactive fallout. On August 9, 1945, between 60,000 and 80,000 died at 11:02 a.m. in the blast of the second atomic bomb over Nagasaki. The nuclear age was born -- and continues in the uncertainty of missing plutonium caches and terrorist threats. This August, people of faith around the world will be commemorating the anniversary with worship, prayers and peace programs to prevent the horror from happening again. Click the links for a sampling of the resources that are offered by churches and church organizations for this historic observation: Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America; Church of the Brethren; Lutheran Peace Fellowship; Orthodox Peace Fellowship; Presbyterian Church (USA); United Church of Christ.
The Rev. Dr. Samuel McCrae Cavert, general secretary of the Federal Council of Churches (later the NCC), telegraphed President Harry S Truman on August 9, 1945, that many Christians were "deeply disturbed" over the use of atomic bombs against Japanese cities because of "their necessarily indiscriminate destructive efforts and because their use sets (an) extremely dangerous precedent for the future." President Truman replied on August 11, "When you have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast. It is most regrettable but nevertheless true." Click here for Truman Library copies of the exchange.
The time between school and supper is crucial for children, and children who attend quality after school programs do better at home and in class. Not every child has access to this advantage, and Project 2010 of the After School Alliance is a national coalition to make it possible for all children to attend after school programs by 2010. Partners of Project 2010 -- which include the NCC, the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and nearly 1,600 others -- believe that after school programs will help develop stronger families, foster leadership qualities among our children and promote the availability of high quality public education. Click the box to join Project 2010. For more information about the After School Alliance, click here.
World Council of Churches General Secretary Dr. Samuel Kobia, speaking in Portland, Ore., at the general assembly of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), challenged U.S. churches "to reflect a global perspective rather than an ultra-patriotic 'culture club.'" NCC General Secretary Bob Edgar responded with appreciation for Kobia's challenge. "The instinct of most people of faith in the U.S. is to look outward, especially to the poor and oppressed of the world," Edgar said. "Even so, we Americans are so richly blessed and have so much that it's always a temptation to retrench into a self-protecting 'culture club.' Sam Kobia reminds us that we have so much to offer the world in the fight against hunger, disease and injustice. I appreciate his challenge to us to take some risks, to enlarge our role and increase our cooperation in the world community." Kobia (pictured) noted that the world is afraid of U.S. policies like the doctrine of pre-emptive war and the Bush administration's reluctance to support international initiatives against global warming, or the Millennium Development Goals. He said it is the role of the churches to "speak truth to power," even when the message is not welcome. (WCC Picture.) Read more.
People of faith around the world are focusing on war-torn Darfur in response to a call to prayer by the NCC and interfaith and ecumenical groups, including the Save Darfur Coalition and the National Association of Evangelicals. Up to 400,000 people have died in Darfur since the government-sponsored genocide began in 2003. More than 2.5 million have lost their homes as villages have been destroyed by government forces. These forces have raped thousands of women and girls, thrown children onto bonfires and castrated and killed thousands of men. In September 2004, the Bush Administration declared the situation in Darfur as a genocide. The violence continues and the situation is deteriorating. The NCC, along with Africa Action, Save Darfur and other humanitarian groups, is also calling upon the U.S. to accelerate its efforts to end the killing and torture. Click the Faithful America box to send a message to President Bush that his efforts to end the genocide are supported by a groundswell of opinion by people of faith and good will.. The National Council, FaithfulAmerica, Africa Action and others have set a goal of raising at least 400,000 signatures of persons of faith and conscience by September 9 – a year after President Bush declared that a genocide is taking place in Darfur.
Habitat for Humanity's 2005 Jimmy Carter work project is done, and 54 new homes adorn the landscape of Benton Harbor and Detroit, Mich. "As always, it was as rejuvenating as a vacation," said NCC General Secretary Bob Edgar, who participates in the project each year. "The Council and its volunteers try to follow the model President Carter represents -- a man who has already given so much and is always willing to give more when people are in need." The houses were built in less than a week last month by hundreds of volunteers -- a remarkable accomplishment that is repeated routinely by Habitat workers around the world. The Michigan project was recorded on film and digital cameras by builders as they worked. Here is their scrapbook.
The ongoing debate on Social Security reform has been heated, partisan and often confusing. Now a new NCC curriculum illuminates the debate from a biblical perspective, underscoring our witness that God expects people of faith to help protect all members of society. The curriculum, designed for congregational study groups, examines the ethical issues behind some of the reform proposals, looks at Social Security in its current form and provides clear information about proposals for changing it and their potential implications. The curriculum is free and can be downloaded as a pdf. file by clicking the picture. Also available for free download is a Social Security bulletin insert that summarizes the proposed changes in the system and offers principles to guide those changes; and a link to an entertaining video from the NCC's Faithful America depicting a latter-day Scrooge and an eerie journey to Social Security's future.
Current and Coming Events of Note . . .
August 6, 2005 -- Keep the Vote Alive, march and rally, Atlanta, Ga. The Rainbow/PUSH Coalition will commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act and call attention to the threats facing minorities and the poor as keep provisions of the act come up for renewal in 2007. The march begins at 10 a.m. at the Richard B. Russell Federal Building and will proceed on Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive and to Herndon Stadium for an all-day rally beginning at 11 a.m. Speakers and performers include Rev. Jesse L. Jackson Sr., Rep. John Lewis, former NCC President Ambassador Andrew Young, Dr. Joseph Lowery, Stevie Wonder, Roberta Flack and Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
October 13, 2005 -- Christian, Jewish and Muslim nationwide fast. An unusual confluence of sacred seasons for the three Abrahamic faiths this October has led to a call for a day of fasting for reflection, repentance, reconciliation and renewal. Initiated by The Tent of Abraham, Hagar and Sarah and supported by the NCC and the Shalom Center, persons of faith are called upon to "eat together, walk together, learn together, pray alongside each other, listen to each other, and work together for peace, justice, human rights and the healing of our earth. The sacred Muslim lunar month of Ramadan and the sacred Jewish lunar month of Tishrei begin October 3-4. October 4 is the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi, and October 2 is Worldwide Communion Sunday.
October 27-29, 2005 -- International Conference on Violence and Christian Spirituality on the campus of Hellenic College, Brookline, Mass. Hosted by Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology, the World Council of Churches and the Boston Theological Institute. Speakers include Archbishop Demetrios of America; Dr. Samuel Kobia, general secretary, World Council of Churches; and Dr. Marc Gopin, director of the Center for World Religions, Democracy and Conflict Resolution at George Mason University. Read more.
Ecumenical Resources You Can Use . . .
A Moral Creed for All Christians. This new book by Professor Daniel C. Maguire of Marquette University seeks to rekindle the fiery core of Christianity by pointing out that the faith's relevance is not uncovered by right-wing morality or left-wing rhetoric. Maguire asserts Christianity's moral convictions about God's care, rapport with the earth, the nature of ownership, the bond between justice and peace, the nature of enmity, the illogic of militarism, and the creative potential of the human species. Paperback, 208 pages, $14 from Fortress Press (800-328-4648).
Speaking Faith: The Essential Handbook for Religion Communicators is a completely revised seventh edition of the standard guide to the field,recently released by Religion Communicators Council, an interfaith organization which includes many NCC-related professionals. Practical in focus, Speaking Faith has 16 chapters with such hands-on help for houses of worship as 'Graphic Identity,' and 'Getting Out the News.' The book, published with assistance from the National Council of Churches, is now available from Friendship Press at $19.95 per copy, plus shipping. Call 800-889-5733 toll-free or send e-mail to Rbray@gbgm-umc.org to order yours! For more details about the handbook, click here.
Judgment Days: Lyndon Baines Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Laws that Changed America. By Nick Kotz, $26, Houghton Mifflin. This new book by Pulitzer Prize and National Magazine Award winning journalist Nick Kotz, sheds new light on the partnership between two dissimilar men: the intellectual, elegant and sensitive preacher and the gangling, exhaustingly extroverted Texas politician. Persons who lived through the 1960's may be surprised by anecdotes showing how aggressively LBJ -- unlike his predecessor, John F. Kennedy -- pursued civil rights and championed the legislation to back it up. From the book: "In passing the 1964 Civil Rights Act and pushing for a Voting Rights Act in 1965, Lyndon Johnson was reacting to a demand for change, stimulated by the brilliant civil rights campaigns executed by Dr. Martin Luther King in Birmingham and Selma. It had required strong leadership skills for the president to shepherd legislation successfully through Congress. But Johnson wanted to do more ... He wanted to lead the civil rights movement in furthering the cause of poor African Americans."
"The Church and the Media: An NCC Policy Guide" is the product of five years of study by members of the Communication Commission of the National Council of Churches, who considered the impact of mass media on our culture and sought to apply the teaching of Scripture to the realities of the times. Three policy statements and a message to churches were developed to address what congregations might do to focus attention on the interaction of media, justice, violence and the churches' role in communication advocacy and media education. Click here for the full document, in both Word and Acrobat/PDF formats.
"Valuing Families," a new resource from the NCC's Education and Leadership Ministries Commission, is designed to inspire Christian families to honor and prayerfully support families of all shapes and sizes. It may be used by individual families or by congregations as content for family or intergenerational events. The components may be used together or at separate times to nurture integrity within individual families and a strong sense of community. Click here to read more/download.
What Adults with Disabilities Wish All Parents Knew, Reflections from a Different Journey, edited by Stanley D. Klein and John D. Kemp, is recommended reading for everyone, disabled or non-disabled, says NCC Disabilities Committee Coordinator Linda Jean H. Larson. Click here for her book review and order info.
Aging Health Tips. The National Council on the Aging has useful health tips for aging persons and their caregivers posted here. The tips include basic information on Alzheimer's, arthritis, diabetes, epilepsy, hearing loss, incontinence, long-term care, osteoporosis, prostate cancer, shingles, techniques for surviving strokes, vitamin therapy and other issues.
"Hardball on Holy Ground," a new book by Steven Swecker, chronicles ongoing efforts by wealthy and powerful individuals and foundations linked to the religious right to undermine mainline churches and the National Council of Churches. One reviewer notes that a hostile takeover of these churches would represent a massive shift in American culture and the balance of ideas and values for a relatively small investment, muting the influence of the more moderate Christian community within our society. Click here for info / to order.
"Hunger No More: Faces Behind the Facts" offers solutions for the persistent problem of hunger in the 21st century. Produced for the NCC by Mennonite Media, the program aired on ABC-TV stations and is now available in DVD and VHS. It was among films featured at the 2005 Freedom Cinema Festival, concurrently with the Sundance Film Festival. Click here for more info. Another film, "Make Hunger History," a case study of Oregonians fighting hunger with advocacy, is available from Bread for the World. Click here for more info.
God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It -- This new book by Jim Wallis of Sojourners/Call to Renewal offers a clarion call to make both our religious communities and our government more accountable to key values of the prophetic religious tradition -- the values of love, justice, reconciliation, and community that Jesus taught and that are at the core of what many believe, Christian or not. Click here to order online.
A Matter of Trust: Americans and Their Government 1958-2004, the final report of the Partnership for Trust in Government, an effort of the Council for Excellence in Government and the Ford Foundation. The NCC was among partners in this most comprehensive review of trust in government ever produced. For more information, click here.
Telling it Like it Was: Two new books focus on important pieces of ecumenical history. Journeys that Opened Up the World: Women, Student Christian Movements and Social Justice, 1955-1975, tells riveting personal stories of 16 women whose religious roots fed their social activism. A Tapestry of Justice, Service, and Unity: Local Ecumenism in the United States, 1950-2000, chronicles 50 years of local ecumenical life across America. Read more.
Your comments and suggestions are welcomed: news@ncccusa.org / Phone 212-870-2227 / Fax: 212-870-2030.
NCC Communication Department, 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 880, New York, NY 10115.


text:
Baron Haussmann's Paris
By: Author Jen Westmoreland Bouchard
If you've been to Paris, you've seen the work of Baron Haussmann. You may not have even known you were looking at it. It's hard to miss, because it permeates the entire city, well, it is the city.
Most city tours of Paris will at least mention Haussmann. To tell you the truth, for a long time my knowledge of "Haussmann's Paris" was limited to what I had learned on various bus and walking tours of the city. However, in preparation for a course I'm teaching on Parisian history and culture next fall, I've researched Haussmann quite a bit. I hope this "short history of Haussmann" will help you to see Paris in a new way on your next trip.
Baron Georges Eugene Haussmann (1809-1892) was appointed by Napoleon III approximately 60 years after the French Revolution to "modernize" the city of Paris. Some of the goals were to encourage economic growth by improving transportation (and the layout of roads) and render the city "revolution-proof" by making it more difficult to build barricades.
Haussmann's answer was to demolish most of the narrow winding streets that had been constructed in the 18th century and replace them with wide, tree-lined boulevards and large green spaces and gardens (sound familiar?).This massive project encompassed all aspects of urban planning. Not just street patterns, but city facilities, public monuments, building facades, the sewer system, every aspect of the city was affected.
Though Haussmann's approach to urban planning was vehemently criticized by his contemporaries, he is responsible for the "look" of Paris (long straight, wide boulevards with cafés and shops, open spaces for markets, parks/gardens, etc.) that many tourists have come to adore. Haussmann's arrangement of boulevards is what many people think of when they think of Paris — rationally-conceived, spoke-like boulevards that extend out from central points in the city.
Haussmann also introduced a new style of building. From the beginning of his city redesign, Haussmann established construction specifications for the appearance of the buildings (including their height and the number of floors). You can recognize Haussmann buildings by their stone facades, the balconies on the second and fifth floors and their grey roofs. Haussmann's vision was a uniform cityscape with basic architectural elements that would make up "la nouvelle Paris."
Haussmann-style buildings typically have five to seven floors and were designed to house several families (in different sized spaces) under the same roof, thus making most neighborhoods in Paris accessible to a wider variety of social classes. The ground floor typically housed a business of some sort, so the first floor was the home of those who ran the business. The second floor was reserved for the wealthiest families who could afford to live high enough from the road to avoid noise, but wouldn't have to climb too many flights of stairs. The top floor was generally reserved for servant staff and was comprised of a number of small independent rooms with common facilities.
Whether you love or loathe his work, one thing is for sure– Paris would not be the same city it is today if it hadn't been for Haussmann.
Written By Jen Westmoreland Bouchard for EuropeUpClose.com
By Author Jen Westmoreland Bouchard
Posted on Published: August 3, 2010 - Last updated: January 11, 2023
Categories France, Paris, Top Cities, Western Europe
Tags landmarksParis
Rasnov, Romania: a Citadel that Saved Locals
Italy From Bottom to Top: Wine Tasting in Chianti
Jen Westmoreland Bouchard
Thank you, Michael! I am so glad you enjoyed it.
Michael Tyson
Tuesday 3rd of August 2010
Travel has turned me into a history geek and I really enjoyed this post!

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
never give up Our Stories
Get information on breaking news, patient programs and upcoming events in your inbox
FROM THE FOUNDER
Welcome to the Hirshberg Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research. More than two decades ago, my family set out on an extraordinary journey to lead the fight against pancreatic cancer in honor of my husband and countless families facing a diagnosis. We made a promise then that still holds true; we would be relentless and we would never give up!
Our foundation is focused on finding a cure for pancreatic cancer, and empowering the patients and families whose lives are touched by this disease. Established in 1997, the foundation funds groundbreaking scientific research, provides patient education and support, and sustains hope that this cancer will be eradicated once and for all.
Thanks to an emerging community of medical professionals and researchers committed to fighting pancreatic cancer, we are working smarter to change the future of this disease. The groundbreaking advances we've made not only give me hope, they're giving patients a fighting chance.
We encourage families who have been impacted by pancreatic cancer – families like ours – to join our pursuit to find a cure by helping to fund research and support patients and caregivers. My ultimate dream is that our children might live in a world free from the shattering impact of pancreatic cancer. Together, we will make that dream a reality.
Agi Hirshberg, Founder
WE'VE RAISED $27 MILLION FOR RESEARCH
Seed Grants Awarded Since 2005
Medical Research Institutions We've Funded
Million dollars in NIH Funding Awarded to our Recipients
Pancreatic Cancer is relentless. Fortunately so are we.
Research Publications from the Hirshberg Translational Laboratory in 2021
Research Publications from the Sahin-Toth Laboratory in 2021
The 5-Year Survival Rate for Pancreatic Cancer Improves for All Stages
Now	Now	 - 2022-11-01	November 1, 2022
October 9, 2021 - March 20, 2022
Hirshberg Training Team 2022
Purple People Cheer Party
16th Annual Symposium on Pancreatic Cancer
Ride the Nite
10th Annual Tour de Pier
November is Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month


Country music fans were surprised when Lady Gaga released a country version of her hit "Born This Way," but she's not the only artist who has unexpectedly made their way to country music. Lately, more and more artists are trying their hand a country single or even an entire album!
There's also Aaron Lewis of Staind and even actress Gwyneth Paltrow! Even though some traditional country singers are voicing their opinions against switching genres, others are embracing the change and even collaborating with crossover artists. Jana Kramer worked with Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler. Then, news broke that the "Walk This Way" singer not only was signed with Dot Records, but he was also working on a country album.
This list of diverse entertainers join a list of country converts that includes Uncle Kracker, Kid Rock and former Hootie and the Blowfish frontman Darius Rucker — all favorites on country radio playlists. Although it may surprise country listeners, artists from all genres of music have made their way to country radio through the years, as seen in our Artists Who Have Unexpectedly Gone Country gallery.


(viii) Indian Revenue Service, Group 'A'.
(xv) Post of Assistant Security Officer, Group 'A' in Railway Protection Force.
The Civil Services Examination will consist of two successive stages (vide Appendix I Section I below).
Applications are now invited for the Preliminary Examination only. Candidates who are declared by the Commission to have qualified for admission to the Main Examination will have to apply again in the detailed application form which would be supplied to them. The Main Examination is likely to be held in October/November, 2016.
(a) A candidate must have attained the age of 21 years and must not have attained the age of 30 years on 1st August, 2016, i.e. he must have been born not earlier than 2nd August, 1980 and not later than 1st August, 1989.
(iv) upto a maximum of five years in the case of ex-servicemen including Commissioned Officers and ECOs/SSCOs who have rendered at least five years Military Service as on 1st August, 2016 and have been released (i) on completion of assignment (including those whose assignment is due to be completed within one year from 1st August, 2016) otherwise than by way of dismissal or discharge on account of misconduct or inefficiency, or (ii) on account of physical disability attributable to Military Service, or (iii) on invalidment.
(v) upto a maximum of five years in the case of ECOs/SSCOs who have completed an initial period of assignment of five years Military Service as on 1st August, 2016 and whose assignment has been extended beyond five years and in whose case the Ministry of Defence issues a certificate that they can apply for civil employment and that they will be released on three month's notice on selection from the date of receipt of offer of appointment.
NOTE IV- Notwithstanding the provision of age-relaxation under para 3(ii) (b) (vii) above, a physically disabled candidate will be considered to be eligible for appointment only if he/she (after such physical examination as the Government or appointing authority, as the case may be, may prescribe) is found to satisfy the requirements of physical and medical standards for the concerned Services/posts to be allocated to the physically disabled candidates by the Government.
Note I : Candidates who have appeared at an examination the passing of which would render them educationally qualified for the Commission's examination but have not been informed of the results as also the candidates who intend to appear at such a qualifying examination will also be eligible for admission to the Preliminary Examination.
Candidates must use the form supplied with the Information Brochure only and they should in no case use photocopy/reproduction/unauthorisedly printed copy of the Form. Since this form is electronically scannable, due care should be taken to fill up the application form, correctly. While filling up the application form, please refer to detailed instructions given in Appendix-II of this Notice. The candidate should also fill up in the relevant places of the Acknowledgement Card, their Application Form Number (8-digit) and the name of the examination. The applicants are required to affix the postage stamp of Rs. 6/- on the Acknowledgement Cards and sent the same along with Application Form to UPSC. If an applicant fails to affix the postage stamp of requisite amount, his Acknowledgment Cards will be not be despatched and Commission will not be responsible for non-receipt of acknowledgement cards by the applicantThe duly filled in application form and the acknowledgement card should then be mailed in the special envelope supplied with the Information Brochure. The Candidates should also write the name of examination viz. "Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination, 2016" on the envelope before despatching it to "Secretary, Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahajahan Road, New Delhi-110069".
(i) The completed Application Form must reach the Secretary, Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi 110069 on or before 1st February 2016.
(ii) In respect of applications received only by post (by post/speed post) from the candidates residing in Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Tripura, Sikkim, Jammu & Kashmir, Lahaul and Spiti District and Pangi Sub-Division of Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh, Andaman and Nicobar Islands or Lakshadweep or abroad, the last date for receipt of applications is 8th February 2016 till 5 PM only. The benefit of extended time will be available only in respect of applications received by post/speed post from the above mentioned areas/regions. In the case of applications received by hand or through courier service, benefit of extended time will not be available regardless of the place of residence of the applicant.
NOTE:-(iii) The candidates should note that applications will be received by hand only one at a time at the designated counter(s) and not in bulk, till 5 PM only.
NOTE:-(iv) Applications received through Couriers or Courier Services of any type shall be treated as having been received "By hand" at the Commission's Counter.
For more details visit www.upsc.gov.in.
Hii , I am from Janjgir,Can anyone tell me about complete selection procedure about IITs and NITs and at which time exams for these are conducted?
Hello Sir, May I know the specialisation in MBA and also suggest some good B-Schools in Osmanabad ?
Hii, I am looking for private engineering college in Rajsamand where I can get direct admission without any entrance test score, Please let me know about it.
Hello Sir, Thankyou for your comment. Please visit Engineering in Chitradurga for best B.tech colleges in Chitradurga, Hope you will get best college from the list, Also various major streams in B.tech are Electrical, Electronics, Mechanical, Civil, Computer Science etc.
Hii, I am from Leh, I want to do M.Ed, but I have not B.Ed, is it possible?
It is not that you will be rejected.
sir, i want to know about the number of attempts of orthopaedically handicapped student who belong to general category.
Is it necessary for a female candidate to avail the prescribed exemption from fee? Will d form b rejected if we pay the fees?


When more than half of the tooth's biting surface is damaged an inlay or onlay can be a replacement option.
Inlays and onlays are made of porcelain and fabricated by a lab. An inlay, which is similar to a filling, is used inside the cusp tips of the tooth. An onlay is a more substantial reconstruction, similar to the inlay but extending out over one or more of the cusps of the tooth. In some cases, where damage to the tooth is not extensive enough to merit an entire crown, onlays can provide a very good alternative.
Inlays and Onlays require two appointments to complete. Because they are bonded directly onto the tooth using special high-strength resins, they can actually increase the strength of a tooth by up to 75% and can last for up to 15 years.


text:
In the United States, the congressman's speech was interrupted, demanding negotiations on Ukraine.
Code Pink's anti-war activists stormed an event in Washington on Wednesday where Rep. Adam Smith was speaking, demanding a review of Ukraine policy.
"If we continue to pour billions and billions of dollars into this conflict, we will bring us to the brink of nuclear war!" shouted CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin.
The activists also demanded a return to calls for negotiations to resolve the Ukrainian crisis. Benjamin accused the congresswoman of "denigrating" a group of progressive Democrats who sent and then withdrew a letter in October asking the Biden administration to intensify diplomatic efforts around Ukraine.


The enormous world of packaging can easily lure a person away from practicality into a world of fun and imagination. While you may begin with the idea of a simple white package, you can quickly land up with a multi-colored package covered in stickers with bold lettering to note the recipient's address. While this latter option can be attractive, it is not always the best option when it comes to packaging large items. The correct type of packaging should be practical, functional, sustainable, and have demographic appeal.
This article will provide information on how to go about choosing the best packaging supplies in Brisbane and meet these needs.
What Factors Need To Be Considered When Choosing Packaging Supplies Brisbane?
A person has two options when it comes to the package's visual appearance: plain, boring, nondescript OR fun, wild, and creative. Regardless of the option chosen, packaging should be useful and functional. With functionality comes to ease of use and packaging should be easy for customers to utilize. If a customer finds the item difficult to manage, they will lose interest and you could potentially lose customers; therefore, poor functionality could affect your sales and business in general. Always consider functionality irrespective of the package's appearance.
Sustainability is an important factor as people are becoming more aware of how their purchases are affecting the environment. Ten years ago, being 'green' was a passing trend; however, its constant presence has shown us that it is here to stay and a significant part of people's lives. If you want to contribute to this cause and increase sales as well, the product packaging should be sustainable. This means that the packaging will be recyclable and can help people reduce waste. Two of the most recycled packing materials that could be considered include corrugated boxes and paperboards.
While an individual has the right to package items whichever way they wish, packaging companies should consider the needs and preferences of the target demographic when formulating a packaging for a product. For example, you should consider if the product is for a senior citizen or a young teenager. Senior citizens would benefit from readable print on a background that complements the font color; however, youths could withstand and may prefer wilder options. These factors play a large role in how your product is perceived, as well as the level of brand loyalty with the target demographic.
A package should always communicate what the product is about and should make the customer excited about purchasing it. You need people to perceive your packaging supplies Brisbane brand in a manner that is clearly demonstrated in the way you package products. Moreover, the packaged items journey from manufacturers to retail stores promoting your brand through all of these ports of transportation. This will help to increase brand exposure and promote your business.
Potentially the most important consideration to make when choosing packaging supplies Brisbane is the cost of the packaging. If you are packaging a small item in a large container, you will be paying an unnecessary expense for the wasted space. If you utilize extra material for an item that does not need additional protection, you are paying for more wasted space. Any item in excess that does not need to be used can cost more when there is no need for the extra expense. To reduce expenditure, it is recommended that you cut back on the costs and take advantage of materials that will contain, protect, and advertise your supplies at a lower cost.
If you are struggling with the current packaging situation and need assistance selecting new packaging, it may be best to ask for advice from an expert. While some people may not want to do this, it can be beneficial and can help your business flourish. Expert advice can help you make the correct choices and making informed decisions is easier when all the correct options are available.
As can be seen, there are various considerations to make when choosing the best packaging supplies in Brisbane for your packing service. Using the information above, you can determine which packaging supplies are most suitable for your specific situation and needs.