It's true: none of my editorial pursuits have been as sorely neglected as this blog.
I've edited books and articles. I've written content and materials and articles and word games. I've proofread training manuals and websites. I've expanded my social media editing and management services.
And yet here sits this blog.
And that's OK. Sometimes the cobbler's kids LIKE to run around barefoot. Sometimes you're so busy "kindly bringing style and order to writing" that the only "telling the tale" you do is in short snippets on Twitter and Instagram.
But then there's this! —> I'll be heading out to #EFACon16 (the Editorial Freelancers Association National Conference in New York on Monday and Tuesday, August 29 and 30) and there will be much telling to tell! It's the first EFA conference in more than a decade, and I have the privilege of covering it for Copyediting, one of the sponsors of the event. I'll be telling the tale live on Twitter @Copyediting and will also be providing posts for Copyediting's Facebook and Storify accounts.
Tune in! I mean, maybe not HERE on the sorely neglected blog, but, you know, on Twitter and stuff.
Current business cards. Alas, I have only the electronic version. See "cobbler's kids" remark above.
Old words demand nothing from the conscientious editor. Time has set them aside in a nice, comfortable place where they aren't asking for our judgment or acceptance. My favorite current sanctuary of old-time words is Haggard Hawks Words.
Check out the full post on Copyediting or go straight to Haggard Hawks on Twitter.
I've seen them in the wild, and BuzzFeed's Ryan Broderick recently rounded up a collection of them [content warning: profanity] — examples of firstable being used instead of first of all.
It's #WorldKindnessDay today. So "firstable," I'm going to refrain from ranting or ridiculing. I rarely rant … on my blog … and genuinely try to never ridicule. My aim, as always, is to kindly bring style and order to the world of writing. Even when it's not World Kindness Day, I consider myself a kindness conspirator.
You could HAVE used first OF ALL and would HAVE used second OF ALL, if you had known. But really, you should HAVE simply gone with first and second.
Or, you could let your points stand on their own, without the unnecessary introductions. First points come first, second points come second, and people are generally smart enough to follow along. Really!
Simply say what you mean, without trying to give it a grand setup or overemphasize it. You will sound less defensive and, if it helps you avoid the unfortunate firstable error, better educated.
#NationalCatDay is full of squee, but #WorldStrokeDay can save a life.* And now, thanks to the wealth of cat pics on the Internet and the half-hour I stole from other projects, you don't have to choose between the two. Do yourself and your family a favor: get your blood pressure checked, learn the signs of stroke, and share this graphic of friendly felines to help educate others.
*This post has nothing to do with editing, but much to do with my everyday life. A couple of years ago, my mom survived a massive stroke that left her with hemiplegia and some short-term memory loss, among other more minor issues. She is an amazing and inspiring person whose story deserves to be told in full sometime. But today is not that time. Today is when #WorldStrokeDay meets #NationalCatDay. Enjoy!


text:
Neverwinter Nights Enhanced Edition Comes to Android!
TOPICS:Android AppsGamesPC Gaming
Posted By: Michael Anderson December 6, 2018
Neverwinter Nights (NWN) is a 2002 PC role-playing game (RPG) developed by Bioware as the follow-up to their classic Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn, which is regarded as one of the greatest games ever made.
NWN was both a commercial and critical success, spawning two large expansions and a later series of 'premium modules' that offered even more gameplay at a bargain price. On top of this, NWN offered incredibly rich tools for developing persistent worlds for story-based multiplayer experiences that are still active more than fifteen years later.
Earlier this year Beamdog released the PC and Mac versions of Neverwinter Nights: Enhanced Edition, continuing the series that includes both Baldur's Gate games, Icewind Dale and Planescape Torment. All of those games have gotten iOS and Android mobile ports, so it was hoped the same would happen for NWN. And a couple of weeks ago Beamdog sent out an email that they had released a 'beta' on the Google Play store. This allowed you to pay $9.99 to get in on the game while it was still in pre-release testing. I wanted to wait to report on it until I had the chance to play a decent chunk of the game, and will include my impressions after the news.
Neverwinter Nights: Expanded Edition has now been officially released to the public.
Here is what Beamdog have to say:
Neverwinter Nights: Enhanced Edition is now available on Android! Experience all the playable content of Neverwinter Nights: Enhanced Edition like never before!
• 100+ hours of content
• Cross platform play
• Play on community created worlds
• Works with community created content
• New mobile-specific UI
• All the playable content of Neverwinter Nights: Enhanced Edition.
o Kingmaker, ShadowGuard, and Witch's Wake will be made available as free downloads for NWN:EE owners at launch.
• Mobile Play: A new virtual joystick and context sensitive button makes gameplay easy.
• Improved Display: Featuring a new re-engineered UI for tablet and phone play. Portrait, combat bar, inventory, and other UI elements adjust in size based on device resolution and can be scaled to your liking.
• Backwards Compatibility: Works with save games, modules, and mods from the original Neverwinter Nights.
It's time to take this classic Dungeons & Dragons game with you on the go. Grab it on Google Play today!
Head to Google Play to grab your copy of Neverwinter Nights and begin your epic adventure!
I am playing NWN:EE on the recently released Samsung Galaxy Tab S4, which is the current 'Android tablet flagship' in terms of specs and performance.
At this point I am just about to complete Chapter 1 of the 'Original Campaign' – so really these are more than just 'first impressions', as Chapter 1 usually takes me about 20-30 hours to complete, as I tend to be a completist and do all the side-quests, henchman quests, and other optional areas. So instead this is more of a 'review based on ~30 hours of gameplay'.
So far everything that I have tried has worked perfectly – Neverwinter Nights features a decent sized tutorial area followed by a large first chapter that really has it all: a central hub with key quest-giver, multiple areas to explore featuring a variety of enemies and challenging battles, great loot to discover that will make you more powerful, a diverse cast of characters and henchmen with fully drawn personalities and motivations, and the ability to develop a rich character based on the Dungeons and Dragons universe.
I also took some time to start new games in the two main expansion packs – Shadows of Undrentide and Hordes of the Underdark. Hordes is perhaps my favorite module, you start out as a powerful character and quickly advance into the higher epic levels – allowing for the first time to truly wield the power promised by D&D. Both of these expansions performed well, and I am excited to revisit those once I complete the main game.
There are also other modules that are available for download or purchase, rounding out most of the 'Premium Module' program, and all at a reasonable cost (or free!).
The reality is that a game designed for the PC will never play better on anything else. That is true here – but I was impressed at how playable the game was on the tablet.
The basic system involves a fairly common 'dual virtual joystick' approach, with the left side of the screen used for movement and the right for camera control. Pinch-zoom controls the camera distance from your character, and you can tap anywhere on the screen to move to that place or interact with objects (doors, storage, characters). The UI (user interface) adapts from the PC version by having a persistent menu available on the right side of the screen, as well as the usual quick-slot menu at the bottom of the screen.
One of my favorite things is the big pause button next to the quick-slots. This allows you to pause the game easily to issue commands and rotate the camera to assess the situation. It is something integral to the PC game that was well done on the port.
Also, the PC game depends heavily on right-clicking pretty much everything – which is done in the Android port by long-pressing objects. Want to disable a trap? Long press to bring up the menu and select the disarm trap icon. It takes longer than a right-click or an iOS force touch, but it works perfectly and quickly became a normal action for me.
Finally, one thing that was missing in the initial release but added later was support for using the keyboard and pen/mouse to control your character. I am using the Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 with the keyboard folio cover. So I always have my tablet folded out with the keyboard ready to go – which made having to use the screen controls for everything a bit weird. Fortunately, now I can use WASD to simultaneously move my character and rotate the camera (I use the 'Chase Cam' setting), press the PC hotkeys to access game and character settings, and interact with the environment.
While Neverwinter Nights didn't have visuals to compare with contemporary shooters and action games, it was broadly praised for excellent graphics – particularly once large-scale battles started with spells flying around and multiple characters taking up tactical positions around the battlefield. One of the goals of the Enhanced Edition program from Beamdog was to clean up textures and models, making things look great on modern high resolution widescreen displays. The goal was not to make the games look like a brand new 2018 AAA release – this was disappointing to some, but is a reality that provides important context for assessing the game.
I have played NWN, the expansions, and premium modules multiple times through the years, using the original CD release, later DVD and digital releases of the Diamond Edition that collected everything together. I have not had issues with the graphics or performance of the game across a variety of Mac and PC laptops, but had begun to notice the issues with widescreen compatibility and lower resolution textures – so I was ready when Beamdog announced the Enhanced Edition!
The Android version looks and performs pretty much identically to the Mac version on my 12″ Macbook – and that is excellent! I never noticed any significant difference such as limiting numbers of on-screen items or experienced lag when casting graphically intensive spells. Overall – I am very impressed and satisfied with what Beamdog has accomplished.
When I first installed the NWN app and got started, it very much felt like a beta – I had stuttering performance at times and the game crashed repeatedly while interacting with tutorial characters in the initial area. As soon as the next update was released, all of those problems went away and I have not had a single crash or performance issue.
Back in 2002 I initially bought Neverwinter Nights because I was anticipating the release of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and was told that NWN would be a great introduction to the mechanics and systems involved in Bioware games … but it quickly became one of my favorite games of all time. You can measure my love by how many times I have run through the total 200+ hours of the game and its expansions and modules over the years, both using new character classes and types as well as just replaying using my trusty Sorcerer or Paladin.
Beamdog's release of Neverwinter Nights: Enhanced Edition brings another classic piece of PC gaming history to a mobile platform, and they did it about as well as possible. Performance, graphics, controls, compatibility and the overall experience are all wonderfully realized, and you never feel like you are getting an inferior experience. While I will always recommend playing games for the first time on their intended platform, I believe that anyone checking out NWN on an Android tablet is in for an incredible adventure!

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Riedel Vinum Cabernet / Merlot / Bordeaux wine glass is ideal for full-bodied, complex red wines that are high in alcohol and tannins. The generous size allows the wine to aerate in the glass and the bouquet to develop fully. The shape of the rim directs the flow of the wine to the front palate to enhance sweetness, thus accentuating the fruit while softening bitter tannins.
Why are the newer glasses lighter in weight than the older ones?
BEST ANSWER: I have heard of no change from Riedel on the vinum cabernet glasses changing weight or size. They should be the same if you are comparing the same glass.
I am not sure but We sure like them better as they seem more fitting to enjoying fine wine.
Have both and no - they weigh the same - as I observe anyway.
Is the Reidel Vinum Classic the same as the Riedel Vinum Celebration set?
BEST ANSWER: Riedel Vinum Cabernet/Merlot/Bordeaux Wine Glasses (Set of 2) and the Riedel Vinum 260 Years Celebration Set Cabernet/Merlot are the same glass. Riedel wanted to celebrate their 260 year anniversary with every wine lover by offering special limited edition glassware sets.
Thank you, Sarah. I just ordered the Celebration set!
So very glad to hear you've ordered the Reidel Celebration glasses. Enjoy them. Cheers.
What are the box dimensions for the set of 2 glasses?
What is the dimension of the circumference?
BEST ANSWER: Thank you for your inquiry. The circumference is approximately 12" If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us at 800 356 8466. Thank you again.
These are very nice glasses. They are clearly not high end glasses in that the delicacy and size isn't top drawer. But they are also half the price of the sommelier set. I'd recommend them for people wanting to step up from base level wine glasses but unwilling to drop $90/glass.
Everyone should have a set of these in their cabinet. Useful for any occasion and most reds. Great style that will stand the test of time. Classic yet stylish.
These are the best everyday red wine glasses for me!
Riedel has elegance and superior quality associated with its name. That is true. However, at Wine Enthusiast you can afford Riedel wine glasses. We use them as our everyday glasses. It is impossible to beat this quality at this price. Riedel truly makes your wine taste better.
They were a gift for knowledgible wine drinkers and were well received.
Makes a $5 wine taste like a $15 wine.
I love these glasses so much, because they really do improve the experience of enjoying a wine! They are a good value, but they are finely made and have to be washed by hand. I wish they were cheaper, but I wish wines weren't getting so expensive, either.
Really do make a difference!
We use our glasses daily, and they really do improve the taste of the wine.
I like these so much I plan to add other varieties to my collection and give them as gifts as well.
As the manufacuter states the glass does make the wine taste its best. By their make and feel the glasses also increase the pleasure of the wine drinking experience. I don't consider the glasses to delicate but some people might; they aren't a mug.
These are really nice glasses. They feel great in your hand and make your wine taste even better!
These glasses, although delicate are beautiful, light weight but balanced and well constructed. I bought them for my boyfriend for Christmas and he loves them. Yes, I am concerned I will break them, but you just have to be a little more careful. I'm not sure if they make the wine taste better, but you almost feel decadent using them.
Great way to buy these wine glasses. Good price, and I didn't need to head to the mall to shop for them!
I enjoy the varied shapes to fit my wine selection.
Love these glasses. Use them for family everytine. You will replace some as they are delicate and may break if not hand washed with care.
I love these glasses and have them in several sizes for various wines. Personally I do not put them in the dishwasher as they are delicate and I think the dishwasher is too harsh on this type of glass. They have a great feel in your hand and definitely are the right shape to release the scents of the wines.
We have used this product for years and always buy more when we occasionally break one. Really makes a difference in the enjoyment of a wine. Personally, I don't notice a difference from the Speigalau's, but my husband insists they're better.
The glasses don't have a long shelf life, at least at my home.
I have come to understand the value of a good wine glass and how it compliments the wine. These glasses are simple yet well crafted to allow a wine to open up. I personally don't put good wine glasses in the dishwasher even though these are supposed to be dishwasher safe. The bowl is big enough for me to wash by hand easily. I would definitely recommend these glasses to anyone who really enjoys wine.
You will love these glasses!
These are great wine glasses to use for any type of affair. They are very nice for having a wine tasting because of their design.
Beautiful and useful! A pleasure to use.
Great glass, durable to use at any occasion!
Wouldn't drink wine from any other glass.
Well received gift to my son.
Although these wine glasses are expensive they truly do enhance the wine experience. Like all retired folks we are starting to remember to use the good stuff everyday or it will just sit in a childs china cabinet waiting for a special occassion.
Exceptional packaging. I have never had a Riedel glass broken in shipment.
We have needed to replace broken stems for a while, so when the sale was advertised, the time was right. [...]. Another satifactory experience with your company!
I have used these glasses for many years and bought some to fill in for several that had been broken. I love the design, the thinness of the glass as well as the lovely delicate stem, and the way the wine tastes. Excellent - I don't drink wine I care for out of any other glass! I also only hand-wash these glasses.
I never believed the glass could make such a huge difference in the wine-drinking experience until I participated in a Riedel workshop. Now I make sure I use the proper glass for the type of wine I am serving. The difference is huge!
Riedel makes excellent wine appropriate glasses. If you REALLY want to enjoy your wine, this is the way to drink!!
I use these glasses all the time! Love the feel in the hand and they compliment the wines beautifully. I haven't put them in the dishwasher yet...I wash all my wine glasses by hand.
I love these glasses, they enhance the experience and I enjoy entertaining with them.
I absolutely love these glasses. I drink wine all of the time and heard a good glass really makes a difference. I'm not sure I believed it, but these glasses proved it correct. They are great!
Deliveries arrived in good condition at each shipping address.
We use Reidel glasses whenever we drink wine at home.
The glasses made a huge difference in the taste and bouquet of the wine. I gave them as a gift and my family enjoyed them thoroughly until unfortunately they were broken. I will buy them again, and again.
I love these glasses. They are attractive. Only drawback is that they are fragile, so one needs to be careful when washing them and on hard surfaces such as granite countertops and glass tables. I recommend them for everyday use as well as for entertaining.
These were purchased as replacements for ones that have broken in the past. Great glasses...just be careful when washing them. They will break.


Eidfjord is perched at the end of the Hardangerfjord. Located on the official tourist route, Eidfjord is a great place to see Hardangervidda National Park, the highest mountain plateau in Northern Europe. The natural scenery of the area is splendid. The central placement of Eidfjord makes for convenient access to Bergen and Oslo.
Kayaking was beautiful despite rain . Bro good rain gear . Scenery was beautiful !
I loved this charming port. There is some shopping right in the town where we tendered. Originally, we were scheduled to dock in town. We took a HAL excursion, Eidfjord Cruise & Voringsfossen Waterfall. Unfortunately, when we arrived at the waterfall, it was surrounded in fog but just before we left, the fog cleared and we got some good photos. There is a large souvenir shop at the waterfall and the lovely Fossli hotel located at the far end of the Upper Eidfjord Lake. The cruise in the fjord was wonderful. The sun shone the entire time. .
Beautiful fjord. We did the hike to the Viking burial grounds. You have to go uphill at some point and it's rather steep. The walk along the river is level up until the last 800m of uphill climb to the plateau. Lovely to walk to the lake if you just want to do that and the trail is accessbile if pushing someone in a wheelchair. The pathway is wide and is made of compacted gravel, well maintained when we were there. Should be manageable if dry. This is just a comment from previous experience when traveling with someone who would love to see the sights but mobility impaired. You would not be able to do the uphill then downhill portion pushing a wheelchair in that case take the little troll train, views are beautiful. Buy a gallon of spring water for the boat at the Joker market for about US$5.00.
Best scenery and sailaway in the whole cruise. Gorgeous. Took the train to Flam which was a little unorganized.
There are currently 0 discussions about Eidfjord, Norway.


The U.S. Department of Commerce must love the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, because it is setting it free. ICANN, the California-based nonprofit organization that assigns Internet domains, such as .com, and country domains, such as .uk, is finally on its way to full privatization.
The U.S. has consistently fought off attempts to hand control of the corporation over to the United Nations or some other international governmental body, winning the most recent struggle just months ago. Under the new agreement, ICANN will avoid government oversight altogether. Exactly when ICANN will depart is unclear, but it may be free in as few as 15 months.
"It is not in the private sector's interests to have an inefficient Internet," says Paul Kane, chairman of the Council of European National Top-Level Domain Registries. The Internet, he adds, is "run by private networks interconnecting computers around the world" and deserves a chance to have a private life of its own.


text:
You are here: Home / Archives for Politics
Strife Feature – Political leaders with military backgrounds: a comparison of India and the US
June 25, 2018 by Strife Staff
by Saawani Raje
George Washington at the Battle of Monmouth
The US and India are similar nations in many respects. They have both had fairly stable trajectories of progress in the course of their democratic histories. Covering large areas of geographical territory, they are both nationalistic territorial nations with a colonial past. Significantly, they both have a history of successful civilian rule uninterrupted by military coups or takeovers. However, they appear to differ in one important aspect— in America, civilian leaders having military experience is common and politically advantageous. Multiple Presidents were serving Generals prior to ascending to the Presidency. In India by contrast, it is rare for political leaders at any level to have come from a military background.
This difference is interesting because it speaks to the civil-military 'problematique', which has been a central concern of civil-military relations theorists for the past several decades. This problematique is the challenge of reconciling a military strong enough to do anything civilians ask them to, with a military subordinate enough to do only what civilians authorise them to do.[1] A key question in this civil-military debate is the role of the military in the polity of a nation, especially in its decision-making process. A brief survey of military involvement in political decision-making in two of the world's biggest democracies— India and the US — brings forth an interesting distinction. The difference in American and Indian attitudes towards military participation in politics, I argue, stems from the role conflict has played in the creation of both these nations.
Military involvement in the United States
In a TIME article of April 2016, Mark Thompson discusses why Americans wanted a military general in the White House. Looking back at American history, the trend of military leaders eventually becoming civilian leaders is fairly typical. George Washington was the first general who went on to serve as the President of the United States, and twelve Generals have won American Presidential elections since. Significantly, only twelve out of the forty-three American presidents have never served in the military. In the 2017-2018 Congress, 102 members (18.8% of the leadership) had served or were serving in the military.
A 2017 Gallup poll shows that American society's confidence in the military remains high, at 72%. Additionally, public endorsement of presidential candidates by retired Generals and military officers has become a mainstay of the presidential race. In the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential race, twelve retired generals and admirals endorsed Kerry, himself a military veteran. Kerry's Vietnam war record became a matter of controversy, and General Merrill McPeak eventually appeared in television advertisements defending Kerry and his service in Vietnam. On the other side, retired General Tommy Franks who had the distinguished military record of being the architect of the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions, endorsed George Bush and went on to speak in support of his candidacy at the Republican National Convention. In 2008, Colin Powell , a retired four-star general and the National Security Advisor under George Bush (2001-2005) famously crossed party lines to endorse Obama on national television. Political endorsements from military leaders reached a fever pitch during the Clinton-Trump race. In September 2016, Clinton touted 100 endorsements from former military leaders after Trump displayed 88 retired military figures who backed his campaign. The involvement of military officials in American politics, whether as leaders or leader-makers continues unabated.
Civil-military gap in India
The situation in India could not be more dissimilar. The civil-military dissonance is so pronounced that there seems to be no evidence of polls, policy briefs or literature that even engage with the notion of a civilian leader with military experience taking office. This lack of any evidence points to how deeply entrenched the civil-military separation is in the minds of the Indian populace and political and military elites alike. Since 1947 (when India became independent), there has not been a single Prime Minister with military experience. Defence analyst Nitin Gokhale opines that the 'havoc' wrought by 'an indifferent polity and insensitive bureaucracy' to India's armed forces 'has hit the ordinary soldier hard….The Indian soldier today stands at the crossroads, confused about his status in the society and unsure about his own role in a nation led by "faux peaceniks"'. Retired military men make rare appearances on news channels— never the campaign trail— and restrict themselves to talking about military matters. In recent years, the military has shown an increased willingness to get involved in the polity. In 2007, for example, the Indian army opposed the demilitarisation of the Siachen glacier. The Army chief General J J Singh publicly expressed his views more than once in a country where it is extremely unusual for military leadership to vocalise their disagreement with civilian leaders. These instances are, however, not a mainstay of political debates around policymaking and certainly never crossing the border into civilian leadership, in sharp contrast to the US.
Role of military conflict as influencing factor
This poses an interesting question: What could be the factors that influence this significant difference in the way military involvement in politics is perceived in the US as opposed to India? I would argue that the role military conflict played in the formation of a nation and national identity is a significant factor in influencing attitudes to military involvement in politics. Military conflict played a significant role in the development of the US as a nation. The US has been in a state of either declared war or conflict for 79 of the 179 years, from just before the founding of Jamestown until 1785, nominally known as the end of the Revolution. It thus had a predominantly military experience of colonialism. The military also played a crucial role in the War of Revolution marking the end of colonial rule. The War was an event with mass participation— according to some historical estimates, two out of every five white American men who could serve did so either in the state militias or the Continental Army.
Royster proposes that military service was the source of an 'American' character.[2] The Revolutionary War created a 'dual army' tradition that combined a citizen-soldier reserve (which was the militia) with a small professional force 'that provided military expertise and staying power'.[3] This democratised and nationalised military service has lasting legacies on the psyche of American society regarding attitudes to military service. Furthermore, Congress in 1775 created the Continental Army commanded by George Washington. This Continental Army was built on ideological motivation and a sense of loyalty that surprised most foreign observers. Baron von Closen of the French army exclaimed: 'It is incredible that soldiers composed of men of every age, even children of fifteen, of whites and blacks, almost naked, unpaid, and rather poorly fed, can march so well and withstand fire so steadfastly!'[4]
This and Washington's appointment as General of the Continental Army despite the 'hypersensitive fear of military ascendancy' are significant.[5] Washington remained deferential to Congress even when its inefficiency threatened the army's survival. Despite the prominent position held by the military, Washington set forth an example of civil supremacy while commanding the army. This attitude and his later Presidency could have contributed to erasing civilian suspicion of ex-military men becoming civilian leaders. In sum, it can be argued that armed conflict and the military experience— whether for independence or for individual rights as Englishmen within the empire played an intrinsic role in shaping the American identity as a society and nation.
Transfer of Power from the British to Indian government on 15 August 1947
Indian independence and the military
The Indian experience of the handover of power was very different. First, unlike in America, the Transfer of Power from the British to the Indian government was a predominantly administrative procedure that did not involve physical military confrontation. The army was seen as a tool by the British and Indian civilian leaders who used it for their own political ends. Second, the British recruitment policy for the colonial Indian army focused on drawing recruits from select communities, alienating the armed forces from the rest of the population involved in the nationalist movement. This was in contrast to the experience of the US militias, which democratised and nationalised military service and experience. This also built a deep-rooted suspicion between the civilian leaders of India and the military (which was headed by British commanders-in-chief for a few years even after India became independent). This suspicion led to institutional arrangements separating civilian and military spheres. The position of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces was abolished, soon after independence in 1947, and the President of India (a nominal civilian head) was made the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces.[6] Significantly, a Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs occupied the top tier of higher defence management in India. This was a purely civilian committee and included senior ministers from the Prime Minister's Cabinet.[7]
Additionally, lasting attitudes of civilian and military leaders also did not allow the overlapping of military and civilian leadership to the extent that was prevalent in America. In September 1946, a year before India became independent, Jawaharlal Nehru (the first Prime Minister of India) wrote to the Indian Commander-in-Chief Sir Auchinleck. As a 'coup-proofing' strategy, Nehru felt 'the need to make the army firmly responsible to India's elected representatives in the future'. This resulted in Indian institution-building regarding defence and military matters that continuously evaluates the army to prevent it from getting 'out of control'. For example, the Commander-in-Chief was removed from the Cabinet in 1946— a privilege he had enjoyed thus far— to keep him out of political decision-making. Additionally, all significant communications and decisions have to go through civilian officials and politicians at the Ministry of Defence little or no military experience. Thus, decision-making in India with regard to military matters was firmly established as the preserve of the civilian bureaucrats.
It can be proposed that the stake of military conflict in the creation of an independent nation is a factor influencing social and political attitudes towards the mixing of civilian and military spheres. This is not to argue that this is the only factor. The time periods in which India and the US secured independence are drastically different. Furthermore, India follows the Westminster parliamentary system and not the Presidential system, which influences public opinion on political leadership in general. Additionally, while India has been involved in a protracted conflict with Pakistan over Kashmir since independence, it has not had the direct experience of experiencing the World Wars or Cold War as an independent state or major party. These factors contribute to civilian perceptions of military involvement in political spheres.
Lawrence Freedman in his recent work 'The Future of War: A History' emphasises the need to keep context central to the study of war and conflict.[8] Differences such as the one identified in this article raise pertinent questions about the applicability of seemingly generalisable civil-military relations theories. This post makes a case for viewing these theories through specific historical contexts.
Saawani Raje is a Doctoral Candidate in the King's India Institute. Her work focuses on civil-military relations in India and decision-making during military crises. She holds an MA in South Asia and Global Security from King's College London and a BA from the University of Cambridge. Her other areas of research interest include security studies, strategy, diplomatic history and South Asian politics. You can follow her @saawaniraje
[1] Peter Feaver, "The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control," Armed Forces and Society 23, no. 2 (January 1996): 149- 78.
[2] Charles Royster, A Revolutionary People At War: The Continental Army and American Character, 1775-1783 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press for the Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1979).
[3] Alan Millet, Peter Maslowski and William Feis, For the Common Defense: A Military History of the United States from 1607 to 2012 (New York: Free Press, 2012), 165.
[4] Millet, Maslowski and Feis, For the Common Defense, 175.
[6] Ayesha Ray. The Soldier and the State in India. (California: Sage Publications, 2013), 37.
[7] Ayesha Ray in Harsh Pant (ed.) The Handbook of Indian Defence Policy (New Delhi: Routledge India 2015).
[8] Lawrence Freedman, The Future of War: A History (London: Allen Lane, 2017).
Banner/image 1: http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~cjd327/military.html
Image 2: https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/india/images/9/9f/Transfer_of_power_in_India%2C_1947.jpg
Filed Under: Feature Tagged With: army, history, India, Politics, USA
Decrypting the effects of the Russian Presidential Election
April 27, 2018 by Strife Staff
By Jackson Oliver Webster
Credit Image: БЕЛАРУССКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ
This article is part of a two-part pre- and post-election analysis of the Russian elections and their significance for the country and region going forward. The pre-election break-down can be found here.
It came as no surprise that, late in the evening of 18 March 2018, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin was announced as the clear winner of Russia's Presidential Election, with 56,430,712 votes representing 76.69% of participating voters. This result represents more votes in real terms for any president in the history of the Russian Federation. The most important figure for the Kremlin however was not Putin's score in terms of votes, rather his score in terms of turnout, which fell below the announced target of 70%. The runner up was the Communist Party candidate, billionaire Pavel Grudinin, who won 11.77% of the vote, performing slightly better than expected, possibly as a result of his personal notoriety compared to Putin's liberal challengers.
This article will outline the performances and reactions of several opposition candidates, as well as the fate of the opposition following the election. The second part will briefly discuss how Putin's victory and eventual succession might affect Moscow's foreign policy and defence posture over the coming years.
Opposition Candidates
Liberal candidates performed particularly poorly, with Ksenia Sobchak, the self-styled "other choice against all" ("Sobchak protiv vsekh"), winning a whopping 1.68% of the vote, and veteran politician Grigori Yavlinski of the Yabloko Party obtaining only 1.05% of the vote, according to official results. Perhaps the best-performing liberal candidate was Abstention, with turnout rates especially low in the traditionally opposition-leaning city of Yekaterinburg, where, according to the Mayor's office, only 434,000 of the city's over 1,300,000 residents participated. Navalny will continue to claim abstaining voters as his own supporters, given his repeated calls to boycott the elections, having changed his campaign hashtag from #Navalny2018 to #NeVybory2018 ("non-elections2018"). Fraud occurred in multiple polling stations, and independent observers including Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) noted less-than-clandestine ballot stuffing on security camera footage. Grigory Melkonyats of the NGO Golos said fraud was "partly in reaction to Navalny's boycott campaign." In Chechnya, due to political repression and fraudulent polling, Putin won over 99% of the vote, duplicating his other strong showings in the Autonomous Republic against which he fought a war in 1999, his first action as Russia's Prime Minister.
During the vote, Navalny and a campaign manager sat in Navalny Live's studio with Sobchak and a member of her staff to watch the results roll in on a broadcast later replayed by Dozhd, Russia's only non-state owned TV network. After it was evident that, to everyone's surprise, Putin was to emerge the clear winner, Sobchak proposed that she and Navalny's party form a united opposition for the upcoming State Duma elections. Navalny, in his typically direct style, launched into a speech ultimately condemning Sobchak as part-and-parcel of the system she claims to oppose, saying he wants nothing to do with her 'opposition' which he views as 'permitted' and 'selected' by the Kremlin. Some Russian political commentators have alleged that the Kremlin will begin reorganizing a straw man 'opposition' based on an engineered entente between nationalist and 'liberal' forces, with caricatures like Zhirinovksy and Sobchak serving as rhetorical punching bags for United Russia. This would be reminiscent of the early days of the Putin presidency, when Kremlin political technologists used rapid party creation and dissolution to engineer a surprise victory for pro-Kremlin factions over the Communist Party, and later reorganised these elements into United Russia. Though your author usually avoids conspiratorial thinking, he would be less than surprised if the Kremlin tapped Sobchak for some sort of role in a post-Putin political order, however this speculation will be left for another, much longer article.
Liberal movements such as Sobchak's and Navalny's are caught between a rock and a hard place. Either they follow Navalny's model and refuse to take part in an unfair election process and exclude themselves; or they participate, thus legitimising an election campaign run by a politicised Federal Electoral Commission and influenced by highly-biased state-run media with rampant voter fraud. The despondent mood of the liberal opposition is best summarised by Yabloko political consultant Max Katz:
"The opponents of Putin have put forward many strategies. And none of them has worked. The boycott hasn't worked: the turnout is very high and — it seems — will not be artificially propped. The calls to spoil bulletins haven't worked — there are few of them. Voting for Sobchak hasn't worked: her score is very low. Voting for Grudinin hasn't worked . . . his score is lower than Zyuganov's [the leader of the Communist party] in the last presidential elections. And our calls to vote for Yavlinsky haven't worked either."
Navalny for his part is falling back on his "political machines", the Civic Platform Party and the FBK, to give him and his campaign longevity beyond the presidential election. His YouTube presence has been particularly active since the elections, attacking the government over its handling of a deadly mall fire in Siberia and denouncing the elimination of direct mayoral elections in Yekaterinburg. Most recently, he called for protests on 5 May in a video entitled "Putin is not our Tsar" ("Putin nam ne tsar'").
So what can be expected, particularly from a European perspective, in the coming months and years from a reelected Putin?
Before the elections, most Western media were fixated on Putin's particularly bellicose State of the Federation address. He boasted of all sorts of first-strike, high-tech weapons clearly in development with Western conventional foes in mind: hypersonic intercontinental cruise missiles, underwater tactical nuclear platforms, and other weapons. Many defence analysts have argued that these systems are either not beyond the conceptual stage, and may not provide any significant strategic edge should they become operational. However, the spirit of the address seemed to mark a shift towards openly aggressive rhetoric which may come to define Putin's fifth term foreign policy.
Russian historian Irina Pavlova argues that Putin's comments represent his will to "raise the stakes" of his current confrontation with the West. This belligerence is, she continues, a demonstration of Putin's confidence in his own competence and position relative to his adversaries. She concludes that this assertiveness follows the general framing of Kremlin foreign policy by state media, which sets Russian civilisation against a weak and decadent Western world. It also feeds into Kremlin talking points, namely the framing of the Ukraine conflict in terms of the fight against so-called 'Ukrainian fascists'. This creates a "modern Stalinist'" confrontation with the West in which Putin himself is the hero. "As for the sanctions the West threatens, they only strengthen this regime above all in the eyes of its own population," argues Pavlova.
NATO defence planners[1], on the other hand, operate largely under the assumption that succession is, eventually, inevitable, and that this succession period will be extremely unstable. Many Western governments may view the current Russian regime as undesirable, but there is a general respect for the current Kremlin's competence and strategic rationality. Thus, the key strategic goal for NATO in the east is to raise the cost of miscalculation for Moscow by strengthening Baltic defences. A legitimate concern is that, in the coming years, a succession battle within the Kremlin combined with long-term economic instability may cause Russia —or rather certain powerful actors in Moscow— to lash out in the 'near-abroad'.
Moving forward, the most important developments in Russian politics worth following will be the fate of the 'liberal' opposition, in all its various forms, and eventually the succession process. The main question for the opposition is whether or not a united front will form between various factions —old liberals, Navalnyites, nationalists, communists, and so on. As for succession, there are multiple possible outcomes over the next six years. We will either see a reordering of the current elite as Putin steps down from power, or a constitutional amendment abolishing the two-term limit. Regardless, the West can expect an assertive stance from Moscow as Putin attempts to reinforce his domestic credibility in the face of a stagnant economy and shrinking European demand for fossil fuels.
Jackson Webster is a graduate of the Department of War Studies, and is currently reading for a master's in International Security at Sciences Po Paris. His research focuses on Russia, its relationship with Central Europe, and cybersecurity. He is currently working on cybersecurity issues with a legal tech consultancy in Paris.
[1] Section based on an off-the-record conversation between the author and senior NATO officials.
http://journalby.com/news/navalnyy-protiv-rossii-rossiya-protiv-evropy-i-sobchak-protiv-vseh-1099 (in Russian)
Filed Under: Blog Article Tagged With: election, feature, Jackson Oliver Webster, Politics, putin, Russia
This is the year of the nationalist reckoning
February 19, 2018 by Strife Staff
By Dr Pablo de Orellana, King's College London
Lega posters for the upcoming 2018 Italian Election (Photo credit leganord.org)
Nationalism is back. In the last two years, nationalists have conquered the core of conventional politics in an electoral resurgence that has brought it back from the fringes. Its support, discourses and arguments draw on old logics but directly address grievances born out of global effects of the economic revolution that begun in the 1980s. While 2017 saw the consolidation of nationalist successes in the West, 2018 will see their ideas put to the test.
Nationalism is now a dominant political paradigm. In 2015 I predicted that identity politics and especially nationalism would burst into the global mainstream. In 2016, nationalist ideas were by far the most successful political offering, able to explain grievances including unemployment, future prospects, poverty and social change while suggesting solutions predicated on identity. The vote for Brexit and Trump's victory also show that mainstream politics failed to address such grievances, particularly poverty. Furthermore, besides bringing some nationalists to power, in cases like the UK, France and Italy, nationalist ideas have conquered traditionally democratic establishment parties. In non-democratic states like Russia and China, nationalism is reinforcing their rulers' grip on power, which might otherwise have run short on legitimacy and support.
As the short film accompanying this article explains, the core premise of nationalism is that if "patriots" win power, rights and services should be allocated on the basis of identity. Nationalists vary in their definition of identity, from citizenship to religion, race or ethnicity. Some nationalists define identity on the basis of biological differences, which is why the body can be so important for nationalist ideas of identity. Furthermore, this impacts on ideas of gender, with some nationalists, particularly in populist movements, drawing on biologically-framed arguments to determine the social or political role of genders. In this worldview, identity struggle is the result of "natural" difference, which is how nationalists can conflate patriotism with nationalism while accusing critics of treason. As seen in Poland over recent months, the radicalisation of such ideas can seriously jeopardise democracy. It is also crucial to note that nationalism is an extremely flexible political paradigm, able to live under right-wing as well as left-wing political umbrellas.
Nationalism has changed since its previous mid 19th and 20th century incarnations. A crucial difference in terms of political practice and dynamics is that nationalist electoral forces like Vote Leave in Britain, Republicans in the US, Front National in France and Forza Italia in Italy have come to depend on alignment or direct coalitions with loose extremist coalitions such as Leave.EU, the Alt-Right, Génération Identitaire and La Lega, which add vital votes to extremely narrow electoral margins. The international outlook of this generation of nationalists is not simply reducible to isolationism. Rather, it seeks to reshape international relations to allow "natural" identity conflict – read as Darwinian struggle for survival – to determine winners and losers. The antisemitism that characterised previous waves of nationalism has been replaced by anti-immigration sentiment and especially islamophobia. The consolidation of transnational alliances like the Europe of Nations and Freedom coalition between nationalist parties shows that, like the liberal, feminist and socialist ideals they revile, nationalism is also a remarkably transnational force.
2017 was the year of nationalist consolidation. Internationally, four of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council are now nationalists: Trump continued his conquest of Republicanism while overtly emboldening identitarian extremists and May's Brexit has to a great extent became an anti-immigration endeavour. In France, however, while Le Pen convinced a staggering 33% of the French electorate, rival Macron decisively defeated her with 60% of the vote. Front National's results in the subsequent parliamentary elections (8 MPs out of 577) show that French voters have rejected nationalism as a viable option for government. It is, however, likely that FN's abeyance will to a great extent depend on Macron's and possibly the EU's performance in the near future. 2017 also witnessed mainstream politicians jumping on the "dragon of nationalism" for their own goals. The appeal of populist expressions of nationalism and movements has not only been evident in the US and France, but also elsewhere in Europe where it is having significant effects on all sides of the political debate. In Germany, the electoral surge of Alternative für Deutschland in the 2017 Federal Elections has led to attempts by mainstream parties to shift their policies towards the nationalist offering. In Italy, the current electoral campaign is witnessing the farce of Berlusconi proposing himself as a moderate while simultaneously promising to deport 600,000 migrants and disputing the elections in coalition with the extremist Lega and Fratelli d'Italia. A key development showing the broader appeal of nationalist politics in the last two years is the attachment of other agendas to a variety of nationalist ideas. In Britain, the Gove/Johnson wing of the Conservatives and the Corbynite side of Labour both regard Brexit as an opportunity to further their ideological models of the state, economy and society.
Nationalist rebels are no longer confined to fringe parties. In 2018, nationalists in power will need to prove that their solutions work or find ways to explain failure. It will be worth keeping a close watch on the success of Trump's tax reforms and anti-immigration measures, whether difficulties in Brexit negotiations outweigh Brexiteer national liberation optimism, and the continued role of anti-immigration sentiment in polls such as Italy's general election in March. Italy, still mired in the overtly racist debate as to the political rights of Italian blood, is also an excellent example of how the simple politics of birth and blood rights triumph in the face of complex economic problems and the failure or incapacity of mainstream politics to address them. In France, while Macron's 2017 election is regarded as a centrist victory, Le Pen will indubitably benefit should he fail to address urgent grievances or please the complex "neither left nor right" coalition that brought him to power.
Crucially, the success of nationalists will not be assessed as an objective truth. As Trump, Putin, and the Brexiteers showed, one of the greatest successes of the contemporary nationalists is to link truth to identity rather than fact, expertise, reliability or science and treat criticism as sabotage or fake news. That is, as we have seen with Trump's unwavering supporters, the believability of politicians will be determined by their identitarian credentials. In my assessment, this will aggravate the bubble effect where believability is determined by identity and political tribalism, leading to further radicalisation.
Much depends on the extent to which nationalists can address acute economic and social grievances on the ground as well as the sinking hopelessness for the future felt by the young. They might, as Trump has done over the past year, claim betrayal as an excuse for delay or failure. Ultimately, the future rests on whether the loose and small electoral constituencies forged by nationalists continue to believe in identity birthright as a political paradigm.
Nationalism: tales of love, fear, and hatred
A short documentary that explores the re-emergence of nationalism in our time, explaining how it works, why is it so powerful, and why it has returned. Written by Dr Pablo de Orellana of King's College London and directed by Fernanda Marin of OuiShare Paris, the film introduces identityhunters.org, a student-led initiative to analyse and explore nationalist ideas and politics around the world.
Dr Pablo de Orellana is a Fellow of the Department of War Studies, King's College London and Co-Chair of the KCL Research Centre in International Relations. His research focuses on nationalism, identity politics and its effects on diplomacy and public political discourse. His Twitter handle is @drdeorellana. For more information about his research and teaching, please visit https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/warstudies/people/teachingfellows/deorellana.aspx
Banner: http://www.leganord.org/politiche2018
Image 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FU_cIAJn91M&feature=
Filed Under: Blog Article Tagged With: Brexit, feature, Identity, nationalism, Politics
Why Colombia's Referendum Result Poses an Opportunity for Peace
October 12, 2016 by Strife Staff
By: Charlotte Manson
The 'No' vote in Colombia should be viewed as an opportunity to secure an inclusive agreement for a durable peace.
Results from Sunday's referendum in Colombia have been described as astonishing and disappointing that will potentially throw the country into tumultuous uncertainty. Many journalists leapt to compare Brexit and recent referendums in Hungary and Thailand with Colombia denouncing the use of referendums as "messy, dangerous and not as democratic as they may seem" and as political tools for leaders. Other commentators pointed out that despite their rising popularity, referendums are continuously producing an unexpected and unintended result due to the problematic nature of reducing complex issues to a binary choice.
Yes, there are risks with referendums but there is one essential difference in the Colombian conflict as El Pais points out, "there are weapons involved." In other words, the rejection of the referendum in Colombia should not necessarily lead to a rejection of using referendums to make peace.
The result of the vote on Colombia's peace process by 50.2% – 49.8% with a voter turnout of 37.4% on Sunday 2nd October is therefore a wake-up call. This outcome was a declination of the particular deal that emerged from the peace process. Mass demonstrations have taken place across the country since the vote results were announced, demanding that the peace be salvaged, preventing any return to war. Both the Government and FARC have repeatedly vowed to maintain the ceasefire and press on with negotiations. Yet Colombia's former President and leader of the 'No' camp, Alvaro Uribe has made clear that he wishes to amend the existing deal but he has ruled out any direct participation in talks with FARC rebels. A large number of Colombians remain sceptical of the current terms in the existing peace deal, hoping that Uribe will push for a tougher stance on prosecution and punishment of FARC members. The guerrilla group's leader Rodrigo Lodono – better known under his alias as Timochenko – has the added pressure of having to sell the peace accord to all FARC members in order to avoid dissident activity. However, can the setback of the 'No' vote thus pose an opportunity for peace?
First, if peace negotiations are not inclusive, they will not produce a positive result. As negotiations in Northern Ireland prior to 1998 proved, excluded voices will find alternative ways to espouse their opinion. Uribe has thus far been exempt from all peace negotiations despite leading the "No" camp with support from millions of Colombians. His voice, along with his supporters who reject the current peace process, came to the fore through the referendum result.
Within days of the 'no' vote, President Santos and the FARC rebels announced that Uribe needs to be at the negotiation table. Speaking in the Senate, Uribe said his party "has the will for dialogue", while President Santos has selected three negotiators for bilateral talks with Uribe's Democratic Centre party. Going forward with the peace process, the inclusion of members of Uribe's party will allow for more hard-line opinions, much of which the charismatic Uribe represents, to be represented in the negotiations. Still it remains to be seen whether Uribe sustains the willingness to enter talks with FARC.
However, President Santos has managed to make strides in re-engaging with the country's second largest left-wing, rebel group the National Liberation Army (ELN). Earlier this week, he announced that the Government-ELN formal talks will begin on 3 November 2016 in Quito, Ecuador after three years of stalemate. Earlier negotiations with the 2000-strong ELN were markedly different to talks with FARC as high-profile ELN-kidnapping activities forced the Government to cut off all discussions in May of this year. Although the rebel-group still hold a number of prisoners captive, recent prisoner releases – including Spanish journalist Salud Hernandez Mora – are viewed as a signal of the ELN's desire to be involved in the peace negotiations. Thus it is the inclusivity of all future negotiations that is the deal-breaker. The referendum result provides the chance to correct this mistake.
Second, peace is not automatic even if overwhelming support is secured. Imagine the result of the vote had been different and the majority (50.2% based on the results of the recent referendum) of people voted 'Yes' – would it be fair for the peace agreement to be ratified despite 49.8% of voters rejecting the terms of peace plus more than 50% abstained voters?
In Northern Ireland, 71.1% of people voted 'Yes' in the Good Friday referendum of 1998. Despite significant changes that have occurred since, the power-sharing government in Belfast still faces serious challenges and 98 physical peace walls exist in Belfast today. In South Sudan an overwhelming majority of 98.8% voted for independence in 2011 ending Africa's longest running civil war. Yet five years on, the euphoria of peace has perished as the country is embroiled in civil war, with millions of internally displaced persons and chaotic power-sharing governance
Remarkably, a minimum of 13% of the 4.4 million registered voters was required for the accord to be ratified. For such a decision after 52-years of conflict, the people need to have their say on a peace accord negotiated by the few. But the task of securing peace in any post-conflict society is formidable, even when majority support for peace is secured.
Third, finding out why people voted as they did is very important going forward, besides cumbersome weather conditions. Abstention in Colombia's elections is usually higher than 50% – recent presidential elections saw 59.9% turnout – and the 37.4% turnout on Sunday is lower than was widely expected.
As Annette Idler correctly pointed out a substantial part of the Colombian population demonstrated with their votes they are ready to join 'Pact of Reconciliation' – it was just not enough to constitute a peace deal for all Colombians. But what about those who abstained, and did not put forward their opinion on the peace deal?
Civil society should organise, promote open dialogue and establish an equitable presence in the media. Uribe has the advantage of securing consistent media coverage due to his political machine and negotiations between the Government and FARC are rigorously followed by both Colombian and international media. There are diverse opinions in Colombia and as the high-level negotiators discuss the most contentious points, so too should civil society take part in the conversation.
Fourth, when analysing the geographic distribution of the vote, there is a large rural-urban divide in Colombia. Those further away from the zones of FARC activity, and those residing in urban areas voted 'No', with the exception of voters in Bogotá. In stark contrast, the country's peripheries include many of the hardest hit provinces hardest hit by the ongoing FARC violence – for example those whom experienced bombings, hostage-taking and murders. Colombian newspaper La Silla Vacia reported that 67 of the 81 municipalities most affected by the conflict voted Yes in the referendum. In the town of Bojayá, where one of the FARC worst massacres was carried out in 2002 – after a rocket hit a church where more than 117 people sought refuge, all of whom were killed – the Yes vote won by 96%.
Colombia is highly divided on the issue of negotiating the conditions for peace, and it's no wonder. The scale of the task towards reaching peace is immense: demobilisation, disarmament, reintegration, options of transitional justice, acceptance of FARC in everyday society including holding elected public office, scaling down the lucrative $30bn cocaine trade and the vast criminal networks associated with FARC.
No peace process allows for winners and losers, it is a compromise. Therefore all Colombians, particularly those at the negotiating table, are being tested on their commitment to ending the violence. So the setback from the referendum can be turned into an advantage. Reconciliation does not occur overnight and this referendum setback is part of the long process.
Therefore trust is key right now. Trust in the process, in the negotiators, in FARC sticking to their word, and in Santos and Uribe placing their personal and political differences aside and instilling confidence in the public, so that all parties are committed to moving forward. The potential for the peace process to ultimately result in an agreement that all sides can adhere to remains, despite the setback in the recent referendum. Indeed, when the Nobel Peace Prize Committee handed out the Prize to President Santos on Friday 7th October the Committee stressed "the fact that a majority of the voters said No to the peace accord does not necessarily mean that the peace process is dead".
Colombia held a peaceful referendum ending in a disappointing result. Yet there are so many opportunities for Santos, Timochenko, Uribe, civil society and all other stakeholders to get a better deal in which the majority of Colombians can accept. The 'No' vote should be viewed as an opportunity to secure an inclusive agreement for a durable peace.
Charlotte Manson is a conflict resolution specialist having worked on peace-building and reconciliation projects in Northern Ireland, Iraq, Bahrain, Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territories. She obtained a MA War Studies from KCL and is a Graduate of Sciences Po Paris and the University of Glasgow. Charlotte is currently a Policy Advisor in the European Parliament working on the Brexit negotiations following the UK's referendum on the EU. You can follow her on Twitter @cemanson27.
[1] 'Why Referendums Aren't as Democratic as They Seem' New York Times October 4 2016; http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/world/americas/colombia-brexit-referendum-farc-cameron-santos.html
[2] 'Colombia, like the UK, just sabotaged itself through a referendum The Independent, October 4 2016; http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/colombia-farc-brexit-referendum-sabotaged-itself-a7344866.html
[3] 'Why Referendums are problematic yet more popular than ever' The Guardian, October 6 2016; https://www.theguardian.com/politics/political-science/2016/oct/06/why-referendums-are-problematic-yet-more-popular-than-ever
[4] 'Embattled Colombian government fights to save FARC peace deal' El Pais, October 4 2016; http://elpais.com/elpais/2016/10/04/inenglish/1475582361_630819.html?rel=mas
[5] 'Why the Colombian peace agreement failed, and what we can expect now' The Washington Post, October 4 2016; https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/10/04/why-the-colombia-peace-agreement-failed-and-what-we-can-expect-now/
[6] 'Thousands march for peace in Bogotá and throughout Colombia' The City Paper Bogotá, October 6 2016; https://thecitypaperbogota.com/news/massive-peace-march-takes-over-bogota/14834
[7] 'Colombia's peace deal in limbo after shock referendum' Reuters, October 3 2016; http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1230BH
[8] Colombia's Santos rival Uribe willing to work on peace deal' Reuters October 6 2016; http://www.reuters.com/article/us-colombia-peace-idUSKCN1251MX
[9] 'Colombie: la paix, les FARC et la <<théorie du genre>>' Le Monde October 6 2016; http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2016/10/06/colombie-la-paix-les-farc-et-la-theorie-du-genre_5009083_3222.html
[10] 'Defeat of FARC pact puts focus on Alvaro Uribe's next step' The Financial Times October 5 2016; https://www.ft.com/content/26149bda-8ac8-11e6-8cb7-e7ada1d123b1
[11] 'Colombie: Santos et Uribe tentent de sauver l'accord de paix avec les FARC' France 24 October 6 2016; http://www.france24.com/fr/20161006-juan-manuel-santos-alvaro-uribe-accord-paix-farc-guerilla-referendum
[12] 'Colombia to begin formal peace talks with ELN in November while salvaging deal with FARC' The City Paper Bogotá October 11 2016; https://thecitypaperbogota.com/news/colombia-to-begin-formal-talks-with-eln-in-november/14912
[13] Colombia ELN rebels free Spanish journalist Hernandez Mora BBC News May 28 2016; http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-36403957
[14] Results of the Referenda in Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, Friday 22 May 1998, Conflict Archive on the Internet (CAIN) Ulster University; http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/politics/election/ref1998.html
[15] Official Southern Sudan Referendum 2011 Results, ; http://southernsudan2011.com/
[16] 'Colombia's president rushing vote on deal with rebels' The Washington Post August 25 2016; https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/colombia-farc-rebels-reach-deal-to-end-half-century-war/2016/08/24/3d15425e-6a5b-11e6-91cb-ecb5418830e9_story.html
[17] 'Colombia's Referendum: Low Turnout and Activist Minorities' Security Praxis October 3 2016; http://www.security-praxis.eu/article/colombia-referenda-low-turnout-activist-minorities/
[18] 'Colombia Referendum: Voters reject FARC peace deal' BBC News October 3 2016; http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-37537252
[19] 'Así es el país que votó No' La Silla Vacía October 5 2016; http://lasillavacia.com/hagame-el-cruce/asi-es-el-pais-que-voto-no-58201
[20] 'Colombia War Brings Carnage to Village Altar' New York Times May 9 2002; http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/09/world/colombia-war-brings-carnage-to-village-altar.html?pagewanted=all
[21] 'Colombia's proof that democracy doesn't work' New York Times, October 7 2016;http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/opinion/sunday/colombias-proof-that-democracy-doesnt-work.html
[22] 'The lessons of Colombia's extraordinary peace process' BBC News, September 29 2016; http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-37498940
[23] 'Nobel Peace Prize for Colombia's Juan Manuel Santos' BBC News, October 7 2016 ; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-37585188
[24] Image Source: http://topsy.fr/hashtag.php?q=%23PazColombia
Filed Under: Blog Article Tagged With: colombia, FARC, feature, Politics, referendum, Voting
Resource-Induced Conflicts, Part IV: Society, Resources, and Conflict in Yemen
September 21, 2016 by Strife Staff
By: Dr. Charles Schmitz
In Yemen, natural resources do not cause conflicts, people do. The relationship between natural resources and people is mediated by society such that a simple, causal relationship between resource abundance or scarcity and conflict does not exist. In Yemen, scarcity does not cause conflict; in fact, a better case might be made for the reverse, namely that conflict causes scarcity. Conflict drives investment and capital away from the country, destroys productive infrastructure, debilitates the state, and prevents the sustainable management of resources.
Talk of natural resource scarcity in Yemen focuses on oil and water. In the 2000s, Yemen's economy and government depended heavily upon oil revenues. About a third of economic output and three quarters of government revenue came from oil.[1] But oil production peaked in 2002 and has declined steadily ever since.[2] What is more, Sana'a is often described as the first capital in the world to run out of water. Water levels in aquifers around the city and elsewhere in Yemen are dropping precipitously. Oil production is falling and water resources are dwindling and in 2015, Yemen collapsed into a devastating civil war. While natural resource scarcity appears to coincide with conflict, the causal relationship between scarcity and conflict is difficult to support.
Unnatural Scarcity
In Yemen, the political dynamics of the Saleh regime created scarcity by driving investment away from the country and failing to manage Yemen's assets. Yemenis and foreign advisors alike were well aware of two fundamental realities. Firstly, Yemen's oil and water resources were limited. Secondly, like some of the oil economies of the Gulf States – such as Bahrain, Oman, or even Saudi Arabia today – Yemen needed to invest its revenues from oil to harness the labour of Yemeni's in economic activities that could produce wealth in a post hydrocarbon economy. Yet the Saleh regime used the economy not for enhancing Yemen's productive capacities, but for bolstering its political position. It created informal political barriers to entry that allotted key positions atop the private economy to a select group of families; those not included invested their money elsewhere. The lack of private sector development outside of the hydrocarbon sector meant that when oil revenues declined, the economy was not equipped to offer alternative means of making a living. Additionally, the regime also exacerbated tribal and political conflicts preventing the sustainable management of water resources. Thus, the political strategy of the Saleh regime drove the economy into the ground, and created unnatural scarcity by failing to manage Yemen's resource assets.
The Politics of Aridity
While it is true that water resources in Yemen are very limited, water is also a renewable resource. The majority of Yemen's water comes from rain, which – given its geographic location astride the Indian Ocean and its mountainous terrain in the West – is plentiful. In addition to the rain, Yemenis exploited groundwater by digging wells. Beginning in the 1950s, but greatly expanding in the 1970s, bore wells enabled Yemenis to exploit groundwater at far greater depths. While traditional social institutions had been developed to regulate the water rights for farmers and herdsmen, they were ill-equipped to monitor and regulate the emerging bore wells that allowed much faster withdrawal rates. Thus, the country's water problem is not the absence of water, but rather the inability to manage the available resources. In this case, scarcity is a matter of management and state capacity, not a lack of water.[3] When water is managed in a manner that takes into account the technological developments of the last half-century, Yemen's water resources will consequently be restored.
Additionally, water is not a driver of conflict, at least not directly. Those that make Malthusian arguments about water in Yemen point to violent disputes over wells. While it is true that tribal groups do fight one another over the control of wells, water is not the sole focus of tribal conflict. Rather, the increase in tribal conflict was driven by the politics of the Saleh regime that exacerbated armed conflict in general in the northern highlands.
While tribes in Yemen are long standing traditional institutions that mediate conflict, the fractured nature of tribal society is also prone to conflict.[4] In the far north of Yemen, Saleh used tribal conflict to his advantage.[5] He ruled by the politics of chaos rather than direct control, supporting opposing groups in order to cause and nourish conflict, thereby preventing them from uniting in opposition to his regime.[6]- [7] Thus, conflict among tribes was not caused by resource scarcity, but by a conscious political strategy of the Saleh regime, particularly in the northern highlands. In a slightly different analysis, Lichtenthaeler shows how disputes over land and water in the northern governorate of Sa'adah were driven not only by population increase, but also by the attempts of the regime to alter the political composition of the region's landowners by installing elements supportive of Saleh.[8]
Oil and Conflict
In our global economy, the relationship between people and the environment is mediated by markets. So while it is true that the quantity of oil produced in Yemen peaked in 2002 and declined every year since, government revenues rose dramatically in the post peak period. Average government revenue from exports of crude oil from 2003 to 2014 was 2.9 billion USD, whereas in 2002 revenues were 1.6 billion USD. Only in 2014 did government revenue from oil exports return to 2002 levels.[9]
The timing of the rise and fall of these oil revenues is important because those making Malthusian arguments for Yemen might point to the correspondence of the decline in oil production with the distinct episodes of conflict in Yemen's recent history: a secession attempt in the south in 1994; an insurgency in the north from 2004 to 2010; a stubborn civil disobedience movement in the south from 2007; the overthrow of the regime of Ali Abdallah Saleh in 2011; a campaign against al-Qaeda in the south in 2012; and a civil war beginning in 2015 and still raging today. These episodes of violence, with the exception of the war of 1994, do correspond to declines in oil production, but they do not correspond to any scarcity of government resources or recession in the economy. In fact, oil revenues for the government and for the economy were highest in the period of the highest instability: 2004-2011. Thus, something other than resource scarcity was driving these violent outbreaks, namely political conflict over power and the nature of the state.
The war of 1994 is an important example because it is sometimes explained by arguing that the driver of the war was natural resources. However, the war of 1994 resulted from leadership disputes between the former rulers of the southern People's Democratic Republic of Yemen and the northern Yemen Arab Republic. The two republics were Cold War enemies, but the collapse of the Soviet Union allowed their leaderships to negotiate an agreement for unification. The agreement created a transitional government with equal power sharing while a new constitution was drafted for the united Yemen. The understanding of the leadership of the (much smaller demographically) southern state was that the two former ruling parties would form a coalition government following elections. However, the northern ruling party decided instead to form a coalition government with a third Islamic party in the north that was hostile to the southern socialist leadership.
In the interim period between the unification of Yemen in 1990 and the elections of 1993, significant oil was discovered in the region of the former southern state. Thus, some argued that the driver of the war was northern fear that the south would secede with its newfound oil wealth — a classic resource war. While oil revenues may have enticed the former ruler of the south to attempt secession and thereby secure the survival of his state, the war was not between the north and the south; it was between those that supported unification and those that supported secession. In the south, support for secession was not strong, as many distrusted the old socialist leadership and preferred to live under the liberal state (at the time) of unified Yemen. Moreover, half of the Yemeni Socialist Party also rejected the attempt at secession. In January 1986, the ruling YSP had been rocked by an extremely violent internecine conflict. The losing faction of the YSP and its associated military units fled to the northern Yemen Arab Republic. In the war of 1994, these southern refugees in the north led the war against the secession attempt. Their motivation was revenge. Among the military commanders of the southern forces supporting unity was Hadi, a southerner from the Abyan Governorate and the current president of Yemen. Thus the war was not a case of northerners taking over the south, but northerners and southerners determining the nature of the state and its leadership.
Similarly, the uprising in the south that began in 2007 was not a result of resource scarcity, but a failure of the political strategies of the Saleh regime. Following the war of secession in 1994, Saleh tried to build support in the south. However, rather than rebuilding southern politics, northern supporters of Saleh treated the south as war booty to be plundered. Southerners, including those who rejected secession in 1994, were consequently marginalized; a fate that led them to overcome their many differences in 2007 and unite in opposition to Saleh.
Significantly, the protests in the south came at a time when the Saleh regime was wealthier than ever. In 2006, revenues from state export of crude oil reached four billion USD. In 2007, revenues slid to three billion, but in 2008, state revenues from oil exports reached a record 4.5 billion USD [see charts]. The Yemeni state had more resources than ever, yet irrepressible conflict flared. Saleh tried to use his resources to calm the south by reinstating many southern military officers that had been dismissed after 1994. But the grievances ran deeper than Saleh's patronage could mollify. Thus, when the state coffers were overflowing, protests raged – scarcity or abundance did not cause conflict, the state's behaviour did.
Current Conflict
In the current conflict in Yemen, it was the conflict itself that shut down oil exports and drove the economy into the ground. And while natural resources may have played some role (for example, the Houthi movement overran Sana'a with the promise to roll back cuts in government subsidies to oil products), the primary driver is the ambition of the former ruler of Yemen, Ali Abdallah Saleh, now allied with the leader of the Houthi movement, Abd al-Malek al-Houthi, to rule the country. Pitted against their ambitions is the hawkish regime of King Salman in Saudi Arabia who accuses them of facilitating Iran's influence in Yemen. The Saudi air campaign and the naval blockade of the country crushed what remained of the oil economy and led to dramatic declines in the standard of living as well as a massive humanitarian crisis.
There is, however, one way through which scarcity drives the current conflict: poverty and desperation drives young men to enlist in the many different militias of the competing warlords. The Saudi regime (by proxy), Ali Abdallah Saleh, the Houthi controlled state, and al-Qaeda in the south all pay young men to join the fight. Were these young men not desperate to feed themselves and their families, Yemen's warring leadership would have much greater difficulty filling the ranks of their militias, and a negotiated settlement would be much easier to accomplish.
The Yemen case shows that the relationship between natural resources and people is mediated by society, and that it is the people that drive conflict rather than resources. In some circumstances, conflicts occur along with resource scarcity, but in other circumstances, resource scarcity accompanies social harmony. People and their politics are the key variables, not the abundance or scarcity of natural resources.
Charles Schmitz is a professor of Geography and a specialist on Yemen at Towson University in Baltimore, MD, USA.
[1] Central Statistical Organization (2012), "Annual Yearbook," Sana'a: Republic of Yemen.
[2] Energy Information Agency (2016), "Yemen," Washington DC: US Government http://www.eia.gov/beta/international/country.cfm?iso=YEM
[3] Lichtenthaeler, Gerhard (2010) "Water Cooperation and Conflict in Yemen," MERIP Vol 40, no. 254; Schmitz, Charles (2013), "Geography," in Steve Caton (ed.), Yemen, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO
[4] Dresch, Paul (1990), "Imams and Tribes: The Writing and Acting of History in Yemen," Khoury, Phillip, and Joseph Kostiner (eds), Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, Berkeley: University of California Press, p. 287
[5] Adel Sharjabi ed. (2009), The Castle and the Chamber: the political role of the tribe in Yemen. Sana`a: Yemeni Human Rights Observer (Arabic)
[6] Blumi, Isa (2011), Chaos in Yemen: Societal Collapse and the New Authoritarianism, New York: Routledge
[7] Phillips, Sarah (2011), Yemen and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, London: Adelphi Books
[8] Lichtenthaeler, Gerhard (2003) Political Ecology and the Role of Water: Environment, Economy, and Society in Northern Yemen, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company
[9] Central Bank of Yemen (2015), "Monetary & Banking Developments," January 2015, http://www.centralbank.gov.ye/App_Upload/Jan2015.pdf
[10] Hill, Ginny and Peter Salisbury (2015) Yemen: Corruption, Capital Flight, and Global Drivers of Conflict, Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press
[11] Alley, April (2010) "The Rules of the Game: Unpacking Patronage in Yemen," Middle East Journal Vol. 64, No. 3, Summer 2010.
Image Source: http://www.zamzamwater.org/yemen-details.php
Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: feature, Politics, Resource Conflicts, Water Politics, Yemen


text:
Facts of Daniella Pineda
Birth Date : February 20, 1987
Birth Place : Oakland, Alameda, California
Marital Status : Single
Horoscope : Pisces
Net Worth : $2.5 million
Eye Color : Dark Brown Eyes
Father Name : Eric Klein
Mother Name : Patricia
Daniella Pineda could be a Mexican actor, and a comedian UN agency is well-liked for her role as a witch in episode twenty of the hit series 'The lamia Diaries'.
Similarly, she is additionally acknowledged for taking part in the role of Zia Rodriguez on the Yankee fantasy journey motion picture 'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom'. She is additionally featured in 2 Netflix series, large in France and What/If.
Daniella Pineda was born on twentieth February 1987 in a metropolis, Alameda, California. As of 2020, she is thirty-three years. Her full name is Daniella Nicole Pineda. She is Yankee by her status and belongs to Mexican quality. Similarly, her zodiac sign is Pisces.
Talking concerning her family, her father's name is Eric Klein and her mother's name is Patricia. Likewise, as per her siblings, she contains a brother named Elliot Klein and a sister Anneliese Michaela.
Talking concerning her academic background, she graduated with a serious in discipline from Mills faculty, Oakland, California.
Read more: Nicki Minaj welcomes her first baby with husband Kenneth Petty: May Finally Have a Son
Talking concerning her career, she gave beginning to her career as an associate actor. In 2010, she created her debut by taking part in the role of Kit within the Yankee comedy-drama tv series, 'Men of a particular Age'. She conjointly created her look on the internet|the net} comedy web series 'College Humor' that is that the CH Originals.
In 2011, she compete for the role of Vanessa within the Yankee comedy-drama motion picture 'Newlyweds'. In 2012, she created her look as Abbie on the Yankee comedy-drama motion picture 'The Fitzgerald Family Christmas'. Likewise, she has conjointly featured on many comedy movies like 'Sleeping with alternative People' and 'Mr.Roosevelt'.
Furthermore, she came into the limelight once taking part in the role of Zia Rodriguez on the Yankee fantasy journey motion picture 'Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom'. She conjointly competes for the lead role, dockage Hess, on the Netflix original horror motion picture 'Mercy Black'.
In addition, she gained additional quality once taking part in the role of witch Sophie Devereaux on the CW tv network fantasy supernatural series 'The lamia Diaries'. Further, along with her wonderful acting during this pilot episode, she plated on 'The Originals' that is that the spin of The lamia diaries.
She has appeared in many series like land, atmospheric phenomenon, What/If, Yankee Odyssey, The Detour, Dream firm LLC.
Know more: Cowboys QB Dak Prescott Suffers Gruesome Ankle Injury In Giants Game, Will Have Surgery Sunday Night
How Rich Is She?
Talking concerning her financial gain, as an associate actor, she has earned an honest quantity of cash for her living. in step with the information of 2020, her calculable internet value is around $2.5 million.
$2.5 million Under review
Daniella Pineda: Gossip and Rumors
Till currently, she has not baby-faced any reasonable dispute. Similarly, there aren't any extreme stories concerning her rumors concerning her personal and vocation.
She has maintained a clean image. Currently, she is specializing in her career instead of involving in scandals.
Daniella Pineda has not shared any info concerning her relationship standing. She keeps her personal life personal.
Similarly, she neither has introduced any guy as her lover nor has noticed with any men hitherto. Therefore, we will guess that her current relationship standing is single.
Read more: Robin Williams' son Zak Williams married Olivia June on World Mental Health Day
Daniella Pineda: Body Status
She contains a height of five feet five inches and weighs around 53kg. She has stunning brown hair with brown color eyes. Similarly, she has maintained an honest body form of 32-25-34 inches for her brassiere size, waist size, hip size severally.
She is active on social sites like Twitter and Instagram. She has quite ninety-four.1K followers on Instagram and over forty-one .2K on Twitter.
You may like to know more about Gossip, Bio, Dating, Relationship, Net worth, Salary, Husband, Girlfriend, Professional life, Social media, Rumors, Height, the weight of Chris Arana, Makayla Brooke, Kirsty Belle Addison, Mona Alawi, and more.
Jef Holm
Sarah-Jade Bleau
Angelina Jordan
Justin Hurwitz
Tyler Rich
Julia Voth
Rosie McClelland
Maddie Poppe
Vanessa Ferlito
Vanessa Ferlito is a stunning American actress. She was born on December 28, 1980, in Brooklyn, New York. Her net worth is expected to be $6 million in 2021. She stands about 5 feet 6 inches tall and weighs about 52 kilograms.
Sofía Vergara
Sofía Vergara is an associate degree player and a model. In addition, the multi-talented player is additionally a TV host, producer, and comedian.
Salma Hayek could be a Mexican -American film thespian and producer. Likely, she asterisked within the film El Callejón Diamond State Los Milagros (Miracle Alley) that she was appointed for an Ariel Award.
Gal Gadot is an Israeli actress, martial artist, singer, and model. She was born in Petha Tikva, Israel, on April 30, 1985. She has a height of 5 ft. 10 inches and she weighs 59 kg.
Shelby Simmons
Shelby Simmons is an American actress, who is popular for her role as Ava on Disney's hit show "Bunk'd". She is also well known for appearing on Game Shakers, Andi Mack, and Bunk'd.
Olivia Edward
Olivia Edward is an American actress. She was born on Long Island, New York, on January 25, 2007. She has a height of 4 ft. 6 inches and weighs 38 kg.
Adrienne Bailon
Adrienne Bailon is an American singer, actress, and talk show host.She stands a height of 4 ft 9 and weighs 54kg. Her Dress Size is 8 (US), Bra Size is 32C
Gail Bean
Gail Bean is a famous movie actress. She was born on November 27, 1992 in St. Louis, MO. She has an estimated net worth of around $100k USD. She is currently living her single life.
Sophia Weber
Dahyun
Carmela Zumbado
Crisha Uy
Sayeed Shahidi
Leanna Powell
Venetia Stevenson
Amelia Gray Hamlin
Saleka Shyamalan
Fessy Shafaat
John Hensley
David Correy Bio, Age, Nationality, Net Worth, Relationship, The X-Factor, Parents, Height, Instagram, YouTube Channel
Geeta Patel
Haya Khadra
Sarah Stage
Romee Strijd
Alexandra Lenas
Cookie Swirl C
Michelle Khare
Yasmeen Stafford
Nakita Johnson


Brits fed up of the cold winter weather can transport themselves to the Caribbean through the medium of music thanks to a new campaign, #StKittsShoutOut.
The initiative, given backing by St. Kitts Tourism Authority, brings a taste of St. Kitts to the UK by showcasing its unique music, local people and idyllic scenery that holidaymakers can experience for themselves.
Anyone can dedicate a song to someone, to be performed by award-winning Kittitian steel pan band EBJ Harmonics, over social media.
They simply need to visit St. Kitts Tourism UK Facebook page and comment on the Shout Out video, stating their requested song and who it is dedicated to and why, using #StKittsShoutOut.
Winners will have their chosen song recorded and filmed for them before being uploaded to the Facebook page with their personal shout out.
Facebook users were quick to request their own songs and shout outs, while sharing their own memories of St. Kitts. Showing a bid to escape the cold winter weather of the UK, the winning song to be chosen was 'Feeling Hot Hot Hot' by The Merrymen.
EBJ Harmonics will visit St. Kitts' beautiful beaches, mountain scenery and historic sites to record fan's shout outs. Video locations include Brimstone Hill, which traces back to the first Western settlements in the region and the lively Frigate Bay beach, home to beachfront bars serving up grilled lobster, Cajun grouper and steamed snapper.
The band will also be recording at former sugar plantation Romney Manor and showcasing St. Kitts' range of luxury and boutique accommodation.
For more information about the campaign or to request your own song visit St. Kitts Tourism UKs Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/StKittsTourismUK/.
St. Kitts is the authentic, quintessential, year-round Caribbean destination for the discerning, experienced traveller. Intoxicating unspoilt natural beauty, sunny skies, warm waters, and white sandy beaches combine to make St. Kitts one of the most seductive spots in the Caribbean. Located in the Eastern Caribbean, the island is easily accessible for British travellers with twice-weekly British Airways flights from London Gatwick (with a short stop in Antigua).
Following the passage of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, St. Kitts & Nevis thankfully sustained minimal damage and the destination is welcoming visitors. The St. Kitts Tourism Authority continues to keep those impacted by Irma and Maria in their thoughts and prayers. The Caribbean Tourism Organization has activated its CTO Relief Fund to help families and countries rebuild after hurricanes, with monies raised being sent directly to CTO-member destinations affected by the catastrophic storm. For more information or to donate, visit www.gofundme.com/hurricane-relief-fund-CTO.
For more information, go to www.stkittstourism.kn, www.facebook.com/StKittsTourism, www.twitter.com/StKittsTourism or www.instagram.com/stkittstourism.


These intructions are updated sporadically as the build infrastructure is enhanced and soon will be osoleted by these "Working With NB sources" instructions.
Build failures are sent to broken_builds@netbeans.org.  Committers have to  subscribe to this mailing lists (send a message to broken_builds-subscribe@netbeans.org) and monitor the traffic there.
There is also a NetBeans plugin called build monitor which periodically reads the RSS feed from hudson and displays red/green light on the IDE status line.
Note you do not need to modify the golden files if your friend dependencies are only within the visualweb cluster for now.
I actually had to delete build/public-packages-jars/* from a Windows explorer since for some reason Cygwin would not let me delete this.


text:
Q: How to use Model for QCombobox I want to use  QCombobox  as a the Combobox of Swing in Java. So i need to  use  Model for  holding my object. How can i  hold my object in QCombobox. (I think that I should hold  data in Model because QCombobox was designed according to MVC Pattern ... )
Any help will be appreciated.

A: You can add a model to your QCombobox by using the setModel function. You can use a predefined model or create your own by inheriting from QAbstractItemModel.
Your model will contain your object to separate display from data.

A: Qt uses a simplified version of MVC which only has the Model / View parts.
You can use one of the provided subclasses of QAbstractItemModel if you don't need any specialized behaviour, which one to use depends on whether you keep your data in a file system or a data structure in memory.
You should read up the whole section on model/view programming in the Qt documentation.

A: Depending on what you want to display with your QComboBox, you'll need to write your own model, inheriting QAbstractListModel, reimplementing rowCount()and data().
Then, use QComboBox::setModel() to make the QComboBox display it.
If you just want to display strings, you can use a QStringListModel, provided with Qt.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Hannah Ho, reporter
The Death of Elijah McClain
*Content warning- the information in this story could be triggering to some readers*
Elijah McClain was a 23-year-old black male who died a few days after being confronted by Aurora, Colo. police officers Nathan Woodyard, Jason Rosenblatt and Randy Roedema.
On Aug. 24, 2019, McClain was on his way home from a convenience store while listening to music when Aurora police received a call saying that he looked sketchy and was wearing a ski mask and waving his arms.
McClain was wearing a ski mask because he had Anemia, a blood condition that makes people get cold easily.
A police officer stopped McClain on his walk home and told him he had the right to stop him for looking suspicious then proceeded to grab him by his arm.
As another officer began to approach the situation, McClain said, "I am an introvert, please respect the boundaries that I am speaking. Leave me alone."
Even though McClain did not commit a crime, the three police officers restrained him and began to arrest him.
According to NPR, a federal civil right lawsuit was filed by McClain's parents against Aurora Colorado police officers, paramedics, and medical director of Aurora Fire Rescue.
In the lawsuit, it stated that the officers pinned him down for about 18 minutes, 15 of those minutes was him getting handcuffed. While McClain was being pinned down and crushed, he still told the police officers how beautiful they were.
In the officers' body cam footage, McClain is heard saying, "You all are phenomenal. You are beautiful. Forgive me. Ow. Ow. I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. Ow. Ow, that really hurt. You guys are very strong. Teamwork makes the dreamwork," as he was getting arrested.
McClain told the officers, "I can't breathe," five times.
"I'm just different, that's all. That's all I was doing. I'm so sorry. I have no gun. I don't do that stuff. I don't do any fighting. Why were you attacking me?" McClain said.
"I don't do guns. I don't even kill flies. I don't eat meat… I am a vegetarian. I don't judge people for anything. I try to live, and I respect all life. Forgive me. All I was trying to do was become better… But I'll do it. I'll do it," said McClain as he was crying and being crushed by the officers' body weight.
At one point, officers used great force on him and put him in a carotid hold which restricts blood flow to the brain. The excessive amount of force used on him made him briefly lose consciousness.
Aurora officers repeatedly slammed his body to the ground even after he had arched up for a moment to vomit as a reaction to the pain.
As McClain tried to reach for his phone to turn off the music so he could listen to the officers, an officer said "He just grabbed your gun dude," to another officer.
The officers began to threaten McClain. They said that they would tase him and get their dog to bite him if he did not stop messing around.
While the officers continued to crush McClain with their weight, paramedics injected him with a massive dose of ketamine in an attempt to sedate him. He did not have any medical conditions that needed to be treated with ketamine.
Ketamine has very devastating side effects, and even if the use of ketamine was medically indicated, which it was not, the paramedics injected him with a massive dose, more than someone his size should receive.
After injecting McClain with a massive dose of ketamine, his body became limp and a few moments later, went into cardiac arrest. McClain died six days later on Aug. 30, 2019.
Police officers Woodyard, Rosenblatt and Roedema were placed on administrative leave but came back shortly after the autopsy of McClain was released.
According to The New York Times, no criminal charges were filed because there was not enough evidence the officers had broken the law when they confronted and arrested McClain using force.
After many protests, Governor Polis of Aurora, Colo. revised an executive order to potentially prosecute the police.
McClain was a massage therapist who loved animals and taught himself how to play instruments like the guitar and the violin. McClain would play music for stray cats because he believed that it soothed them.
Even in such a negative situation, McClain spoke nothing but positivity and many people are still signing petitions and protesting to not only get the police officers fired, but to get the officers prosecuted as well.