text:
Q: I can't find duplicate string with python I want to find duplicate string from 2 file with python by print resrc_lst[i] from json file and line.split(' ' ,2)[2] split string from text file. This is my code.
for i in range(len(resrc_lst)):
    print(resrc_lst[i])

    if(resrc_lst[i] != ""):

        with open("clicker_out.txt", "r", encoding="utf8") as search_lst:
            for line in search_lst:

                if resrc_lst[i].strip() in line.split(' ' ,2)[2]:
                    print(line.split(' ' ,2)[2])

I'm sure 2 file have all duplicate string when I run the code it show like this.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\4

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshhttp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wshelper

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wwancfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\p2pnetsh

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\hnetmon

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nettrace

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\rpc

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wlancfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshipsec

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\whhelper

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\netiohlp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\napmontr

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\WcnNetsh

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dot3cfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\fwcfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\authfwcfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshwfp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\2

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dhcpclient

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\(Default)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Roaming\RefreshProcName

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HandleMgr

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Service\Enable

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\TransportDllPath

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\CryptoAlgo

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Roaming

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\MaxPendingDownloads

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Service\PolicyRefreshInProgress

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\CacheMgr\Publication

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\SecurityManager

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\MaxSimultaneousDownloads

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\SecurityManager\BlockSize

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\CooperativeCaching

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\CurrentBuildNumber

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DiscoveryManager

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Publisher

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\MaxPendingOffers

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\UserenvDebugLevel

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\MaxSimultaneousUploads

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\SecurityManager\Restricted\Seed

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\Download

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\CacheMgr\Republication

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\Connection

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\SecurityManager\Restricted

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Roaming\RefreshDllName

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\ServerRole

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\Protocol

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DiscoveryManager\DiscoveryProviderDllPath

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DiscoveryManager\MinBackoffWindow

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\DoNotUseSSL

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\HostedCache\ClientAuth

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\Peers\Connection

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\TransportDllPath

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Service

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\Discovery

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\PolicyProvider

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\Upload

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\SecurityManager\NumBlocksPerSegment

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DownloadManager\UtilityIndex

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\Roaming\ForceRoamingDetect

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\PeerDist\DiscoveryManager\RepubQuorumSize

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\CurrentBuildNumber
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\CurrentBuildNumber

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\4
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\4

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshwfp
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshwfp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dhcpclient
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dhcpclient

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wshelper
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wshelper

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshhttp
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshhttp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\fwcfg
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\fwcfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\authfwcfg
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\authfwcfg

C:\Windows\system32
C:\Windows\system32

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup\SourcePath
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup\SourcePath

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\DevicePath
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\DevicePath

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\Setup
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\Setup

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup\Upgrade
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup\Upgrade

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\2
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\2

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\netiohlp
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\netiohlp

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\whhelper
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\whhelper

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\hnetmon
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\hnetmon

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\rpc
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\rpc

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dot3cfg
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\dot3cfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\LdapClientIntegrity
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\LdapClientIntegrity

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\UseOldHostResolutionOrder
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\UseOldHostResolutionOrder

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\UseHostnameAsAlias
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\ldap\UseHostnameAsAlias

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\napmontr
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\napmontr

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\IPSEC\Policy\Local
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\IPSEC\Policy\Local

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshipsec
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nshipsec

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nettrace
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\nettrace

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\WcnNetsh
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\WcnNetsh

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\p2pnetsh
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\p2pnetsh

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wlancfg
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wlancfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wwancfg
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NetSh\wwancfg

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\iphlpsvc\Config
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\iphlpsvc\Config

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\iphlpsvc\config\Connectivity_Platform_Enabled
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\iphlpsvc\config\Connectivity_Platform_Enabled

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\캰=谘=齎
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\캰=谘=齎

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\p2pcollab.dll
C:\Windows\System32\p2pcollab.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.44.3.4!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\p2pcollab.dll
C:\Windows\System32\p2pcollab.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\(Default)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\QAGENTRT.DLL
C:\Windows\System32\QAGENTRT.DLL

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.47.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\QAGENTRT.DLL
C:\Windows\System32\QAGENTRT.DLL

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\dnsapi.dll
C:\Windows\System32\dnsapi.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.64.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\dnsapi.dll
C:\Windows\System32\dnsapi.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\ 0\Cryptﮐ
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\ 0\Cryptﮐ

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll
C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.1!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll
C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll
C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\OID\EncodingType 0\CryptDllFindOIDInfo\1.3.6.1.4.1.311.67.1.2!7\Name

C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll
C:\Windows\System32\fveui.dll

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NapAgent\LocalConfig
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NapAgent\LocalConfig

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\(Default)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enroll\HcsGroups
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enroll\HcsGroups

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enroll\HcsGroups\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enroll\HcsGroups\(Default)
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enroll\HcsGroups\(Default)

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enable Tracing
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Enable Tracing

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Tracing Level
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\LocalConfig\Tracing Level

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617\Description

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617\Registration Date

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617\Validator Clsid

...

I print 2 value in code it should show same string in 2 line. why some line not show duplicate string.

A: Because you are using the in operator and that is not used for checking duplicated strings.
Here:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617\Description
String HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617 appears in string HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\services\napagent\Qecs\79617\Description but is not duplicated
You could try with:
if resrc_lst[i].strip() == line.split(' ' ,2)[2]:


text:
El Retablo de fantoches fue un teatrillo de guiñol integrado dentro del departamento de teatro de las Misiones Pedagógicas de la Segunda República Española. Su director fue Rafael Dieste, y estuvo en funcionamiento recorriendo pueblos y aldeas de España entre 1933 y 1936, año en que todo el proyecto se vio desbaratado por la sublevación militar que provocó la Guerra Civil española.

El Retablo de Fantoches fue la alternativa funcional, sencilla y popular, que sustituyó al "Teatro de las Misiones" allí donde los montajes escénicos no podían llegar. Formaba parte de un paquete de divertimentos culturales, muy del gusto de Manuel Bartolomé Cossío –y de los aldeanos, como puede percibirse en el abundante material gráfico reunido–, en el que también estaban el coro y el recitado de romances. Todo ello en un marco evocador de las andanzas «juglarescas» de los orígenes del teatro, como ya Miguel de Cervantes describía en su Quijote en los episodios protagonizados por Maese Pedro, que luego inspiraron a Manuel de Falla el singular Retablo de Maese Pedro.

La primera representación (El dragón y su paloma) tuvo lugar en la localidad coruñesa de Malpica el 20 de octubre de 1933. Rafael Dieste, además de director fue autor de un nutrido conjunto de piezas o farsas, muchas de ellas convertidas luego en obras y comedias mayores. Entre las más destacables esta su adaptación del romance de La doncella guerrera, a petición de Cossío. El segundo guiñol se representó en León, para el que, al tratarse de una capital, se pudo disponer de mejores materiales y más tiempo de preparación. Para las marionetas se usaron papel, pasta, yeso y cola, y en pocos días dispusieron de dieciocho cabezas. Más tarde y con la ayuda de una costurera y un carpintero se puso en marcha un retablo casi estable que recorrió pueblos leoneses y castellanos.

Véase también
 Títeres de cachiporra

Notas

Referencias

Bibliografía

Teatro de títeres y marionetas
Misiones Pedagógicas

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
NFL arranges private workout for Kaepernick
Mike Alessandrini, Alex Murray
Paul Marotta / Getty Images Entertainment / Getty
The NFL sent its teams a memo Tuesday stating a private workout will be held for free-agent quarterback Colin Kaepernick on Saturday in Atlanta, according to NFL Network's Ian Rapoport.
Representatives from all clubs are invited to attend the workout, which will include on-field drills and an interview. Several teams inquired about Kaepernick's football readiness and both he and his reps have expressed a desire to return to the league, Rapoport added.
"Earlier this year, we discussed some possible steps with his representatives and they recently emphasized his level of preparation and that he is ready to work out for clubs and be interviewed by them," the memo reads, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter. "We have therefore arranged this opportunity for him to work out, and for all clubs to have the opportunity to evaluate his current readiness and level of interest in resuming his NFL career."
Kaepernick confirmed the news on Twitter, expressing his excitement regarding a second shot at playing in the NFL.
I'm just getting word from my representatives that the NFL league office reached out to them about a workout in Atlanta on Saturday. I've been in shape and ready for this for 3 years, can't wait to see the head coaches and GMs on Saturday.
— Colin Kaepernick (@Kaepernick7) November 13, 2019
NFL scouting president Jeff Foster set up the workout, which will take place at the Atlanta Falcons' team facility and be run by former NFL coaches. There will be no media allowed, though Foster and his staff will interview Kaepernick and make the video available to all teams, ESPN's Dan Graziano reported.
As indicated in his tweet, Kaepernick and his representatives weren't notified of the opportunity until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, sources told Schefter, who added that teams also weren't notified until the memo was sent.
Once alerted, Kaepernick's reps asked for the workout to take place on a Tuesday, but the NFL denied that request, according to Schefter. Most workouts occur on Tuesdays, as coaches and general managers can more easily attend, whereas Saturdays are usually used for preparation or travel during the season.
The NFL also reportedly denied a request to move the workout until the following Saturday, which would have given teams more time to decide whether or not to attend and which staff members to send.
When Kaepernick's reps inquired whether a specific team or multiple teams had asked for the workout, an NFL official said, "We can't tell you that," sources told ESPN.
Based on the lack of information, Kaepernick's team has begun to question the legitimacy of the workout, sources said. His reps have apparently asked the league office for a list of personnel executives that will be attending.
A source from an NFC team indicated to ESPN's Josina Anderson that their club would have "nothing to lose" by attending the workout. "I still think for us it would just be an information-gathering trip," the source added.
The Dallas Cowboys have expressed interest in attending as well, another source told Anderson.
Kaepernick became a polarizing figure in 2016 when he began kneeling during the U.S. national anthem before games to protest police brutality and social injustice. He hasn't played in an NFL contest since January 2017.
Reports surfaced in October that no franchise had offered the quarterback a contract or put him through private drills since he became a free agent in March 2017. At the time, Kaepernick's team said he had been "working out five days a week, for three years, in preparation to play again," according to Schefter.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Q: How to set Eclipse Library paths? I am trying to get MLPack to work in Eclipse, but have some problems with including a header file.
I manage to read a header file in Eclipse
#include <neighbor_search.hpp>

This header file calls itself
 #include <mlpack/core.hpp>.
I included in Eclipse in the library path the path just upto mlpack/core.hpp, i.e.
/usr/include/MLPack/mlpack-1.0.8/src in the includes tab of paths and symbols.
I get the error message though:
 /usr/include/MLPack/mlpack-1.0.8/src/mlpack/methods/neighbor_search/neighbor_search.hpp:26:27: fatal error: mlpack/core.hpp: No such file or directory
 #include <mlpack/core.hpp>

How do set my path correctly so that <mlpack/core.hpp> will be found?

A: I also use MLPack (but not in Eclipse) and had this error.
To resolve this problem you have to specify to GCC where the files of mlpack are. The thing is when you include a header file with #include <file.h> , GCC looks in these directory :

 /usr/local/include
 libdir/gcc/target/version/include
 /usr/target/include
 /usr/include

So what I did is create a soft link in /usr/include/ to the mlpack directory :
cd /usr/include/
sudo ln -s /full/path/to/the/mlpack/folder/ mlpack

Like that the GCC will have access to mlpack directory.
You'll have to download and install at least these 2 libraries (if you don't have them) :
boost and armadillo.
Personally I also had to create a soft link for the libxml library :
cd /usr/include/
sudo ln -s /usr/libxml2/libxml/ libxml

I'm a bit in late to answer, but I hope it'll help further people !

A: http://help.eclipse.org/indigo/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.cdt.doc.user%2Freference%2Fcdt_u_prop_general_pns_libpath.htm
Project Properties -> C/C++ General category -> Paths and symbols -> Includes tab

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Microsoft Exchange email hack was caused by China, US says
The hack compromised tens of thousands of computers around the world earlier this year.
Author: ERIC TUCKER Associated Press
Published: 5:11 AM PDT July 19, 2021
Updated: 10:07 AM PDT July 19, 2021
WASHINGTON — The Biden administration and Western allies formally blamed China on Monday for a massive hack of Microsoft Exchange email server software and accused Beijing of working with criminal hackers on ransomware and other illicit cyber operations.
The announcements, though not accompanied by sanctions against the Chinese government, were intended as a forceful condemnation of activities a senior Biden administration official described as part of a "pattern of irresponsible behavior in cyberspace." They highlighted the ongoing threat from Chinese government hackers even as the administration remains consumed with trying to curb ransomware attacks from Russia-based syndicates that have targeted critical infrastructure.
The broad range of cyberthreats from Beijing disclosed on Monday included a ransomware attack from government-affiliated hackers that has targeted victims — including in the U.S. — with demands for millions of dollars. U.S officials allege that China's Ministry of State Security has been using criminal contract hackers who have engaged in cyber extortion schemes and theft for their own profit, officials said.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department on Monday announced charges against four Chinese nationals who prosecutors said were working with the Ministry of State Security in a hacking campaign that targeted dozens of computer systems, including companies, universities and government entities. The defendants are accused of stealing trade secrets and confidential business information.
Unlike in April, when public finger-pointing of Russian hacking was paired with a raft of sanctions against Moscow, the Biden administration did not announce any actions against Beijing. Nonetheless, a senior administration official who briefed reporters said that the U.S. has confronted senior Chinese officials and that the White House regards the multination public shaming as sending an important message.
Even without fresh sanctions, the actions Monday are likely to exacerbate tensions with China at a delicate time. Just last week, the U.S. issued separate stark warnings against transactions with entities that operate in China's western Xinjiang region, where China is accused of repressing Uyghur Muslims and other minorities. Then on Friday, the administration advised American firms of the deteriorating investment and commercial environment in Hong Kong, where China has been cracking down on democratic freedoms it had pledged to respect in the former British colony.
The European Union and Britain also called out China. The EU said malicious cyber activities with "significant effects" that targeted government institutions, political organizations and key industries in the bloc's 27 member states could be linked to Chinese hacking groups. The U.K.'s National Cyber Security Centre said the groups targeted maritime industries and naval defense contractors in the U.S. and Europe and the Finnish parliament.
In a statement, EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the hacking was "conducted from the territory of China for the purpose of intellectual property theft and espionage."
The Microsoft Exchange cyberattack "by Chinese state-backed groups was a reckless but familiar pattern of behaviour," U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said.
NATO, in its first public condemnation of China for hacking activities, called on Beijing to uphold its international commitments and obligations "and to act responsibly in the international system, including in cyberspace." The alliance said it was determined to "actively deter, defend against and counter the full spectrum of cyber threats."
That hackers affiliated with the Ministry of State Security were engaged in ransomware was surprising and concerning to the U.S. government, the senior administration official said. But the attack, in which an unidentified American company received a high-dollar ransom demand, also gave U.S. officials new insight into what the official said was "the kind of aggressive behavior that we're seeing coming out of China."
The majority of the most damaging and high-profile recent ransomware attacks have involved Russian criminal gangs. Though the U.S. has sometimes seen connections between Russian intelligence agencies and individual hackers, the use of criminal contract hackers by the Chinese government "to conduct unsanctioned cyber operations globally is distinct," the official said.
Hackers threaten poisonings, blackouts of utilities. So, are we prepared?
McDonald's latest company to be hit by a data breach
How you can protect your business and family from cyber attacks
The Microsoft Exchange hack that months ago compromised tens of thousands of computers around the world was swiftly attributed to Chinese cyber spies by private sector groups. An administration official said the government's attribution to hackers affiliated with China's Ministry of State Security took until now in part because of the discovery of the ransomware and for-profit hacking operations and because the administration wanted to pair the announcement with guidance for businesses about tactics that the Chinese have been using.
An advisory Monday from the FBI, the National Security Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency laid out specific techniques and ways that government agencies and businesses can protect themselves.
A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately return an email seeking comment Monday. But a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson has previously deflected blame for the Microsoft Exchange hack, saying that China "firmly opposes and combats cyber attacks and cyber theft in all forms" and cautioned that attribution of cyberattacks should be based on evidence and not "groundless accusations."
Kelvin Chan in London contributed to this report.


Ask any municipal bond expert what keeps them awake at nights and I guarantee that concerns over the escalating costs of pensions and post-retirement benefits for municipalities is on their top 10 list. The pension landscape is changing; as costs increase, the balance between fiscal, ethical and moral responsibility becomes more precarious. Analysts worry about how the costs will be funded and whether the costs will impact or interrupt debt repayment.
I was afforded the opportunity to moderate an expert panel on pension reform at the National Federation of Municipal Analysts annual conference last week and came away believing that while the problems are large, they are not insurmountable. Here are the key takeaways from the experts.
Politicians tend to think about the next two to four years, which is a not productive for pension reform which is an obligation for the next 30 to 60 years (think "kick the can" mentality). As Robert North, chief actuary for the New York City Retirement Systems said, "I have yet to find anyone who would rather not spend the money on other things." He noted that public pension financing is asymmetric: the more assets and better funded the pension plan is, the more money politicians are willing spend on enhancing plan benefits. Less assets and lower funded pension plans will result in increased employer contributions and less money in the budget for other services. Most politicians do not want to spend today's money on a future liability. This leads to some government employers not funding their pension plans at sustainable levels.
Steve Kriesberg, director of collective bargaining and healthcare policy for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, noted that retiree health spending is projected to rise, but that it is still a relatively modest share of governmental budgets. He also stated that some government reforms that decrease healthcare for government employees may push the costs onto the taxpayer in other ways; such as through state programs for underinsured patients. The labor opinion is that distressed pension situations are relatively few and easy to identify and that bankruptcy is not an effective way to solve the problems.
Perhaps the most encouraging speaker was Steve Toole, head of North Carolina's Retirement Systems. He noted that pension reform is underway in many states and local government agencies and that the underfunding can be solved with political will and creative planning. Progressive pension plans are changing their amortization periods from a rolling 30-year cycle to six to 12 years (this increases annual required contributions now, but will stabilize funding in the future). Other reform measures include removing annual cost of living adjustment provisions, decreasing discount rates and extending plan vesting periods. Toole noted that we should expect to see upward pressure on plan contribution rates for the short term, but that the improving stock market may reduce that pressure within the next five to 10 years.
We believe that increasing pension and pos-retirement healthcare obligations will continue to have an impact on municipality balance sheets, but that this won't immediately impact their ability to make bond interest payments. Reform is slowly becoming more palatable to politicians as taxpayers are paying closer attention to benefit costs, which should ease some of the pressure. We will continue to pay close attention to this issue and monitor our client's municipal bond holdings.


text:
Home / Europe / Travel / Which European countries have opened their borders ahead of the summer holiday season?
Which European countries have opened their borders ahead of the summer holiday season?
German police officers prevent a woman from entering Germany at the German-France border in Kehl, Monday March 16, 2020. Jean-Francois Badias/AP Photo
As European countries begin lifting COVID-19 restrictions, many people across the continent have begun thinking about whether they can have a holiday this summer.
But where can you access and what is still off-limits?
There is a mixed picture across Europe, with the usually easy travel across the Schengen Area restricted.
Almost every country has its own rules in place and its own timetable for reopening to tourists, both from its EU neighbours and further afield.
If you're intending on coming to the EU for a holiday it's worth knowing the bloc's external borders are set to be closed until June 15. But that only applies if you're a non-EU citizen coming from a non-EU country.
But it's all changing quickly, so here's our updated guide to the border situation in Europe this summer.
Austria has closed its land borders with Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Slovakia and the Czech Republic.
Vienna plans to fully reopen its frontier with Germany on June 15. Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said he was optimistic similar understandings could be reached with other neighbouring countries in the coming week (25-31 May).
For anyone who does arrive in Austria, for example by air, a medical certificate must be produced proving a negative COVID-19.
The certificate cannot be more than four days' old.
Entry by air is prohibited to citizens coming from countries outside the Schengen Area.
Belgium's borders are closed and the country has banned non-essential travel abroad.
FILE - In this Monday, March 23, 2020 file photo, a container and barriers block a road on the Netherlands border with Belgium. AP Photo/Peter Dejong
Bulgaria is set to open borders with Serbia and Greece from June 1.
Croatia reopened its border with Slovenia in mid-May and is set to do the same with Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia on May 29.
People arriving are only asked to self-isolate for 14 days if they have found to have been in contact with someone infected with COVID-19.
Cyprus has outlined plans for the phased resumption next month of commercial flights from a select number of countries with low COVID-19 infection rates to jump-start its vital tourism sector.
Transport Minister Yiannis Karousos said flights will begin in two phases — June 9 and 20 — from two groups of countries selected by an advisory body of medical experts.
The first group is comprised of Greece, Malta, Bulgaria, Norway, Austria, Finland, Slovenia, Hungary, Israel, Denmark, Germany, Slovakia and Lithuania. The second group is made up of Switzerland, Poland, Romania, Croatia, Estonia and the Czech Republic. The list excludes the country's two main tourism markets, former colonial ruler Britain, and Russia.
Karousos said starting June 9, passengers arriving from countries in either group must obtain three days prior to departure a health certificate confirming that they are virus-free.
Starting June 20, passengers from the first group of countries won't need health certificates, but those from the second group will still be required to obtain them.
From May 26 borders opened with Germany and Austria. From May 27, the country opened its frontier with the Slovakia and Hungary, but with restrictions.
Residents of EU member states able to enter to perform economic activities, to visit relatives or to study at a university. Everyone will have to prove themselves with a negative test for COVID-19 upon entry.
Borders are closed for foreign travellers. Only citizens or residents of Denmark, Greenland or Faroe Islands can currently enter, or those with a "worthy purpose".
From May 25 people with a permanent residence in one of the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) or Germany can re-enter if they are in a relationship with someone in Denmark, have grandparents there, or if they have a business trip.
By May 29 at the latest, the Danish government will reassess the temporary border controls.
Finland's land borders have been closed until at least June 14. They were reopened to workers from the Schengen Area in mid-May.
Borders remain closed at least until June 15, with exceptions made for EU, Andorra, UK, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Norwegian, Swiss, San Marino and Vatican City citizens who have their domicile in France or need to go through France to reach their domicile. Seasonal workers and EU citizens working for a company operating in France are exempted too.
Anyone travelling from non-EU countries will not be allowed in.
Travellers are expected to have a valid reason for entering Germany. However, restrictions at the borders have been loosened.
Checks at the frontier with Austria, Switzerland, France and Denmark and for passengers arriving by air from Italy and Spain remain in effect until 15 June.
EU citizens and citizens of the United Kingdom, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Norway and Iceland, and the family members of these citizens, are permitted to return to their home country or to their place of normal residence in Germany or to reach their country travelling through Germany if they need to.
Borders are set to reopen on June 15, but only to citizens coming from Germany, Israel, Cyprus, the Balkan and the Baltic countries.
Tourists will be allowed to enter Greece without taking a COVID-19 test or remaining in quarantine when international flights restart on July 1, but health officials will conduct spot tests when required.
Borders are open with Romania, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Slovenia and Serbia, albeit with restrictions. Frontiers are also open with Croatia with a holiday reservation. The border with Austria is closed.
Iceland is set to reopen on June 15.
Tourists will be tested upon arrival. A few hours later, they will get the result on their phone, after downloading a tracking app.
Authorities are yet to clear procedures for those who test positive.
The Irish health authorities currently require anyone coming into Ireland, except from Northern Ireland, to self-isolate for 14 days, upon arrival, including Irish residents.
Arrivals have to complete a passenger locator form, although exemptions are in place for providers of essential supply chain services such as hauliers, pilots and maritime staff.
Italy plans to reopen its borders on June 3 to EU, UK, Schengen area, Andorra and Monaco citizens, following the nationwide lockdown which came into force on March 9.
Some regions are taking precautions to ensure that the sudden reopening doesn't create new infection clusters. Sardinia's governor has suggested he might require visitors to the island to certify they had tested negative for the virus within the past week, or submit to a test on arrival.
The Tuscany regional government says on its website that any visitor from abroad or another Italian region must undergo quarantine for 14 days. It's unknown if Tuscany will revise that rule by June 3.
Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia
The Baltic trio opened their borders for each other on May 15. Only citizens and permanent residents of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania can travel between the three countries.
But their external borders remain closed.
Estonia says it won't be opening up until at least June 15.
Latvia's state of emergency is currently set to end on June 9.
Lithuania is also allowing entry to citizens of Poland for business and studies. Its quarantine
currently runs until May 31.
Luxembourg's border with Germany reopened on May 15.
Borders are open for those travelling within the Schengen Area. However, the government has strongly advised against non-essential trips.
"The Dutch government is discouraging travel of any kind and calling on everyone to stay at home as much as possible," it declares multiple times on its website.
Norway has closed its borders. Foreign travellers will be turned away at the border. Those who live or work in Norway are able to enter and airports are open.
The country's ministry of foreign affairs advises against all international travel that is not strictly necessary until August 20th.
By June 15, the government is considering exemptions for the Nordic countries. By July 20, exemptions for some nearby European countries will be considered.
Norway has a 10-day quarantine for those returning from international travel.
Poland has closed its borders with several countries, including the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Germany.
Workers and supplies are being allowed across Portugal's land border with Spain, but it is closed to tourists until at least June 15.
Border controls have been in place since March 16. There is currently no requirement for arrivals to go into quarantine, except in The Azores.
Eduardo Cabrita, Portugal's minister for internal administration, said no decision had been made on when to lift the restrictions.
Romania has reopened its border with Hungary.
Slovenia reopened borders to EU citizens on May 15. Prime Minister Janez Jansa boasted the country had "the best clinical situation in Europe".
Slovakia's border will be open to Hungary and the Czech Republic from Wednesday (May 27), but with some restrictions.
No quarantine will be required if the stay is less than 48 hours.
Borders will reopen to tourists on July 1. Currently, only Spanish citizens, residents of Spain (who must prove their habitual residence), cross-border workers, health or elderly care professionals who are going to work and people who can prove force majeure or a situation of need, are allowed to enter via Spanish ports and airports. The exceptions also include diplomatic personnel and everything related to the transport of goods in order to avoid shortages.
Since March 17, the borders with France and Portugal have been closed, allowing access to Spanish citizens, people resident in Spain, cross-border workers and those who can provide documentary proof of force majeure or a situation of need.
None of the regulations are applicable to Andorra or Gibraltar.
Currently, people who enter the national territory from abroad must stay in quarantine for 14 days after their arrival, but this will end on July 1 according to officials.
Sweden has introduced border restrictions but it only applies to non-essential travel from countries outside the EU/EEA, except the UK and Switzerland.
That restriction came into effect on March 19 and has been extended until June 15.
Switzerland, who brought in border controls on March 13, will reopen its frontiers with Germany, Austria and France on June 15 if the situation allows.
All travel restrictions at the border with Italy will remain in place until further notice.
Any foreign nationals who wish to enter Switzerland and do not hold a valid residence or work permit will be refused entry.
Air passengers from abroad are currently only able to enter the country through the airports at Zurich, Geneva and Basel.
The Swiss authorities have not imposed any quarantine measures on persons entering the country. However, you must comply with the government's hygiene and social distancing rules.
Borders are currently open. From June 8, visitors from abroad will be required to quarantine for 14 days. Those exempt from these measures include people travelling from Ireland, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man.
As in other countries, certain professions are exempt from these rules, such as healthcare workers travelling to deliver healthcare in the country. Upon arrival, those who are required to self-isolate need to provide their journey and contact details.
The government says these measures will be reviewed every three weeks.
Which European countries have opened their borders ahead of the summer holiday season? Reviewed by Net-News on May 29, 2020 Rating: 5


text:
Tørring kan henvise til flere artikler:
 Tørring (proces) – det at tørre noget
 Tørring – en by og et ejerlav i Tørring Sogn, Hedensted Kommune
 Tørring (Randers Kommune) – en bebyggelse og et ejerlav i Øster Tørslev Sogn, Randers Kommune
 Tørring (Skanderborg Kommune) – en bebyggelse og et ejerlav i Tulstrup Sogn, Skanderborg Kommune

Se også
 Tørring Sogn


Reminder of Special Offer: Register by 3/1/19 (date extended) to receive a complimentary copy of Julie Wilson's new book: The Human Side of Changing Education. Join us for an exciting day of sharing and learning with timely and innovative sessions.
Conference limited to 250 educators so REGISTER NOW!


The seepage – also known as seeps – tests positive for toxic chemicals and heavy metals associated rwith coal combustion waste, according to environmentalists who ran the tests. When the river is low the contaminants collect in multicolored pools, evidence of groundwater flowing through the ash ponds into the river.
Long-time Oakwood residents Kristin and Mike Camp have become local activists to protect the Middle Fork River from coal ash pollution from the Vermilion Power Station. "Their own tests show that they're polluting the groundwater with toxic chemicals," Kristin said. "It's absolutely seeping through the coal ash pits into the river."
"There's been a groundwater violation notice at the Vermilion site since 2012," said Andrew Rehn, a water resources engineer with the Prairie Rivers Network, the nonprofit environmental group that has tested the seeps.
Such collapses have happened twice in the last decade in the U.S - in Tennessee and North Carolina.
"What we're seeing if you take a canoe down the Middle Fork is that this coal ash is seeping through the riverbank and creating a couple hundred feet of orange purple oily sheen stained riverbank where coal ash pollutants are entering the Middle Fork River," Rehn said.
"Vermilion was exempted from the 2015 EPA coal ash rule because it's a so-called legacy site where there was not an active power plant in place as of the effective date of the rule," said Thomas Cmar, an attorney from Earthjustice who is representing Prairie Rivers in its lawsuit against Vistra/Dynegy.
"The permit for the closed facility has been on hold to allow coordination of efforts to address bank stabilization and final closure of the ash ponds," replied the Illinois EPA replied via email on July 26, 2018, when asked about Dynegy's permit. "In the meantime, the company is still obligated to comply with the permit conditions established in Permit No. IL 0004057."
Vistra is preparing to permanently close its three Vermilion coal ash impoundments, either by excavating and removing the coal ash, or capping the ponds and leaving the ash in place. The company plans to submit a closure proposal to the Illinois EPA in October, including its latest groundwater testing and hydrological studies of the site.
This lidar image shows the main channel and the floodplain of the Middle Fork River. The Vermilion Power Station coal ash ponds are located within the river's floodplain.


Young Rebel Star Prabhas's action entertainer 'Rebel' has completed its shooting and the film is currently under post production. The film's re-recording is underway and special focus is being put to deliver maximum impact for key scenes.
Prabhas will be seen in the company of Tamanna and Deeksha Seth in the movie. Lawrence is the director and he has also composed the film's music. The audio album will be released on September 14th in Hyderabad. Bhagawan and Pulla Rao are jointly producing this big budget action extravaganza. The film is set for release on September 28th.


Disruptions happen when three elements converge: market needs, available technologies, and an environment of experimentation and adventure. Those all exist today, and cognitive computing is one innovation at that crossroads. Some would argue it is the industry's most important one.
In 2011, when IBM's Watson soundly defeated the two leading human Jeopardy champions, it alsoestablished cognitive computing as a new phenomenon to be watched. Cognitive computing could become an important new platform for innovation by the industry, but it will require market definition, a far broader level of education than exists today, and a new level of clarity in the conversation to dispel a growing skepticism among industry players and customers alike.
We believe that cognitive computing systems are fundamentally different from today's software. But we must pin down precisely what differentiates cognitive computing from what has gone before. What will these new types of computing architectures and applications allow us to do that we are unable to accomplish with today's tools?
Information adept—capable of integrating multiple heterogeneous sources and then synthesizing ideas or answers from them.
Dynamic and adaptive—learn and change as they receive new information, new analyses, new users, new interactions, new contexts of inquiry or activity.
Probabilistic—discover relevant patterns based on context, predict the probability of valuable connections, and return answers based on learning and deep inferencing. Find unexpected patterns—a kind of machine-aided serendipity.
Highly integrated—all modules contribute to a central learning system and are affected by new data, interactions and each other's historical data.
Meaning-based—leverage language structure, semantics and relationships.
Highly interactive—provide tools and interaction designs to facilitate advanced communications within the integrated system and incorporate stateful human-computer interactions, data analysis and visualizations.
Cognitive computing systems must be able to handle ambiguity and a shifting set of variables, constantly re-evaluating information based on changes in the user, task, context, goal or new information. They must understand the question or context before seeking answers. They may offer multiple "good" answers that are weighted for confidence or closeness to the query or topic. Users must be able to interact with the system easily in a kind of continuing "conversation." Like humans, these systems must be dynamic, and they must learn.
Cognitive computing should redefine the relationship between people and their digital environment. Context is the new element at the heart of this next computing frontier. The first wave of computing made numbers computable. The second wave has made text and rich media computable and accessible digitally. The next wave will make context computable.
Cognitive computing gathers contextual information from multiple sources, including your current task, your past behavior, the traffic, the weather and any other information that might be pertinent. It takes it all in, but then filters it using the lens of your context. Together, the user and the system act as a team to steer information gathering and decisions as the twists and turns of an information path unfold.
We hope to help ground the discussion of cognitive computing on a verifiable framework of capabilities and technologies. Please join the discussion. Find our latest thinking on cognitive computing at synthexis.com, or watch our website at cognitivecomputingconsortium.org for resources, events and publications on cognitive computing.


text:
The Meat Pie – Australia's Own Fast Food
History of Unilever in Balmain
Lightning Ridge Project
Timber Truss Bridges
Qantas and the Lockheed Constellation
On 25 September 1946, Qantas Empire Airways (QEA) signed the contract to purchase four Lockheed Constellation aircraft for the Kangaroo Route between Britain and Australia flown in conjunction with BOAC.
BOAC, which at that time held half the shares in QEA, had argued long and hard for British aircraft being used on the route, but finally accepted the advice of the Australian QEA management that Qantas should use the Constellation. Prime Minister Chifley had supported this advice and given the Australian government's approval to the allocation of scarce US dollars for the purchase.
The first Qantas Constellation arrived in Australia on its delivery flight from Burbank on 14 October 1947and the service from Sydney to London commenced on 1 December.
The Constellation was the world's first pressured airliner in widespread commercial service. Lockheed built fifteen of them before the end of the Second World War and delivered them to the US Air Force as C-69s; these were later made available to civil operators. BOAC bought six in 1946 and 1947 for its London-New York service.
After its initial order Qantas bought three more Constellations. The Qantas service to South Africa commenced, using Constellations, in 1952.
By the time the last was delivered in 1951, their replacement was becoming an important issue. BOAC, Qantas partner on the Kangaroo Route, was pressing strongly for Comets, and when the Comet's problems mounted, for Bristol 175 turbo-props (which became the Britannias). Qantas favoured the Super Constellation which had begun flight testing in August 1951. In October that year Qantas ordered its first three Super Constellations.
The first of the Qantas L-1049 Super Constellations was delivered on 15 April 1954, and just one month later Qantas used it to inaugurate its Pacific service.
On 14 January 1958, two Qantas Super Constellations left Melbourne, to begin the Qantas round the world service, first visiting Sydney and then flying off in opposite directions, both arriving back in Sydney on 20 January.
By that time Qantas had a fleet of sixteen Super Constellations. The previous year Qantas had decided on its replacement with Boeing 707s, and had placed an order for seven. The first of these was delivered to Qantas on 29 June 1959, making Qantas the first airline outside America to fly American jet aircraft. They progressively replaced the Super Constellations. The last Qantas Super Constellation to be sold was the first one to be delivered; it left Sydney on 3 May 1963.
This note is based on information in two volumes of John Gunn's official history of Qantas, Challenging Horizons and High Corridors.
World Climate Change in the Modern Age: A Brief History
Hammerhead Crane, Garden Island Naval Dockyard, Sydney
Timber Truss Bridges of NSW
The Garratt Locomotive
Australia's First Telephones
Frozen Meat Trade
Sydney Harbour Bridge Competition, 1902
Wolseley's Sheep Shearing Machine
Downloadable brochures form a series describing self-guided tours to places of engineering and technological interest in the Sydney area. All of the brochures are published in pdf format and may be viewed and downloaded for printing on a desktop printer ... more
ASHET Projects
Copyright © ASHET
Designed by Plumm Websites


text:
I was greatly influenced by Billy Graham
As a young boy and then as a teenager 3 evangelists have had a great influence on my life : Luis Palau, Reinhard Bonnke and Billy Graham.
Reverend Graham was without any doubt the greatest evangelist of all times. A few days ago, at age 99, the much respected American preacher went to be with the Lord.
Billy Graham did more than preach the Gospel to crowds : he inspired and equipped generations of evangelists, launched the Lausanne Movement to get the Good News to the unreached people of the Earth and was a powerful instrument in bringing together Christians from every denomination.
I was 13 years old when Billy Graham came to France. Terrorist attacks in the Parisian underground did not stop people flocking to hear him preach. Each meeting held in Paris was transmitted via satellite to a number of locations across the country. I remember going to that little town of Thiers in Central France to see the famous preacher on screen. Technology back then was not at its best: At one point we could see Billy Graham but the sound had gone. It still did not stop people to respond at the end of the sermon and come down in front of the big screen to give their hearts to Jesus!
I was 16 when I finally saw Billy Graham 'for real'. My parents , my brother and I happened to be in London. Earl's Court Stadium was packed. As Mr Graham came to the pulpit to preach, a group of young hecklers holding a banner started to disturb the meeting. Billy Graham kept his calm, looked at the group and simply said: 'No worries. Back in the 40s when I first came to London your parents where already trying to disturb my meetings!' The crowd cheered and applaud.
The whole London crusade was transmitted across the African continent. Nelson Mandela was back then still in prison. He happened to hear Graham's sermon and we were told had while in his prison cell turned his life to Christ.
Millions across the world today are thankful to God for the preacher of North Carolina who one day led them to a personal relationship with Jesus.
Preaching in Malaysia
'HOW I AM GOING TO MISS YOU, KOEUN!'


Non-native invasive weeds are becoming an increasing problem in the UK. At Bay Landscapes in Swansea we provide a comprehensive control and eradication service. Whether for your commercial property or your home, we employ physical and chemical methods to address your problem. We will arrange regular visits to your property to ensure that the problem is managed ongoing.
The company is fully qualified in the identification of invasive weeds and the physical and chemical treatments employed to eradicate them. We hold NPTC qualifications levels: PA1; PA2 and PA6.
Whether you are having problems securing a mortgage becasue of Japanese Knotweed, or you are worried about skin burns from Hogweed, we can solve your problem.
Sometimes also known as Giant Cow Parsley.
Cotoneaster (various species), Rhododendron, Cherry Laurel, Japanese Rose, Giant Rhubarb (Gunnera), Virginia Creeper, Montbretia, Yellow Azelea, Sea Buckthorn, Buddleia.
Canadian Waterweed, Australian Swamp Stonecrop, Parrot's Feather, Nuttall's Waterweed, Floating Hyacinth, Water Lettuce, Water Primrose, Fanwort/Carolina water shield, Water Fern.
No matter how big your weed problem, we can help. Contact us on 01792 851596 or email info@baylandscapesltd.co.uk to arrange an appontment.


text:
Prof Mary Wingfield
Professor Wingfield is an ex Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at the National Maternity Hospital and St. Michael's Hospital Dublin. She qualified in medicine at Trinity College Dublin and trained in Ireland, the UK and Melbourne. She is an Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at University College Dublin, and Adjunct Professor in the School of Medicine at Trinity College Dublin. Professor Wingfield is a founding member and past President of the Irish Fertility Society and served on the government-appointed Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction. She has written several fertility-related position papers for the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and has acted as an expert witness in High Court cases regarding assisted reproduction. In 2017, Professor Wingfield authored 'The Fertility Handbook' (Gill Press), a guide to fertility and infertility. Her current clinical and research interests are subfertility in all its facets, including the development of national frameworks and legislation, equitable access to fertility treatment, endometriosis and fertility preservation.


text:
Le Fonctionnaire
Government communications under Trudeau
Tout comme leurs prédécesseurs, les libéraux fédéraux appliquent des méthodes de campagne aux communications gouvernementales. Le Cabinet du premier ministre et le Bureau du Conseil privé ont encore les choses bien en main.
par Alex Marland 18 avril 2017
Those who follow Canadian politics are well aware that a stubborn problem with government is the concentration of power in the "centre." In Ottawa, everything turns on the whim of the prime minister and central agencies, in particular the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and the Privy Council Office (PCO). Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has pledged to devolve power to his ministers. Perhaps, but he is a media darling who welcomes the spotlight, and the Liberal strategists around him care deeply about managing the boss's brand. If they will not tolerate Liberal election candidates going off script, they are highly unlikely to permit any other government spokespersons to do so either.
Does that mean all communications decisions must flow through the Trudeau PMO — or are ministers and departments trusted by the centre to handle media relations? Both, it turns out.
In 2016, my research assistant Laura Howells and I collected over 100 internal communications templates from 21 federal ministries and agencies. The documents were obtained through a combination of asking departments to provide them informally and, when necessary, by filing access to information requests. Among the collected materials were forms used for processing inquiries from the media, such as media "lines" and notes for communications opportunities. We also collected media relations strategy templates; for instance, announcement plans, video project proposals, event planning checklists and key message templates. Also in the set of documents were communications calendars and rollout plans, including plans for using social media. These internal instruments illustrate that there are many moving parts to be aligned when the government prepares to make a public announcement. The findings, coupled with insights from government insiders about the strategic management of media relations, were recently published in the journal Canadian Public Policy.
One of the surprises was that aspects of the Conservatives' Message Event Proposal (MEP) template were still being used by some departments. That central management tool, an example of which can be found in the Canadian Public Policy article, was used to methodically coordinate Stephen Harper's media activities during the 2006 election campaign. It was then imposed throughout government by the Harper PMO around 2008, during a tumultuous period of minority governance when political personnel sought to approve all facets of communications. Some might say that the MEP turned public servants into cogs in a propaganda machine. The Trudeau Liberals quickly ended the practice, but some departments have continued using elements of it within their own media planning. However, we found no evidence of a parallel Liberal instrument.
Their practices reflect today's communications battlefield of data mining, digital and social media, political marketing and permanent campaigning.
Another interesting finding is that the Liberals are introducing a new dynamic to their government communications strategy. One planning document requires the promotion of data points: key messages must include statistics, key dates, milestones and other numbers such as how many participants are involved in an event or program. Moreover, the government's evaluation of its communications requires that online metrics be employed. Public servants count the number of shares on Facebook and retweets on Twitter. Statistics about media coverage are generated through Google Analytics and Quick Response code data. As others have before them, the Liberals are imposing the communications machinery that worked for them on the campaign trail and are availing themselves of the government's formidable resources. Their practices reflect today's communications battlefield of data mining, digital and social media, political marketing and permanent campaigning.
So, on the surface, departments are using their own communications templates rather than one imposed by the centre. They are drawing on a variety of best practices, including carry-overs from the Conservative era and the introduction of new approaches plied by the Liberal Party. In this light, government by cabinet is back, as Trudeau promised.
But look a little deeper and we see that the PMO and PCO remain very much interested in what ministers and departments are doing. Among the collected documents was an internal diagram titled "Events and Announcements—Approval Guidelines." It states that departments are to package their messaging to highlight connections with broader government initiatives, notably the Throne Speech and budget. Ministers still need the permission of the centre to proceed with an announcement, though they do have discretion on small items. Specifically, the approval guidelines instruct that the PCO must vet the following: "sensitive issue; PCO discretion; horizontal issue [e.g., a whole of government matter that touches multiple departments]; specific item in the Speech from the Throne; specific item in the mandate letter; international meetings; over $10M; federal/provincial/territorial; legislations and House of Commons activities; budgetary measures." On such issues, information is fed up the line so that the PCO and the PMO are aware of a minister's plans and can authorize whether the announcement should proceed. Personnel in the centre offer strategic guidance, plug the announcement into a central communications calendar and review draft media products. If the event is particularly juicy, they might co-opt it so that the prime minister takes centre stage.
My impression is that the level of communications coordination in the Trudeau government's first year exceeds that of the Harper government's at the same stage in its tenure. This is hardly nefarious. Communications technology and the public environment have evolved considerably. Anyone who does not synchronize spoken, written and visual messaging won't punch through the clutter and is at risk of controversy. A united, cohesive brand is paramount. Nevertheless, Canadians should be concerned when centralization in public administration becomes normal, particularly when power is concentrated among staff who sit atop the government hierarchy and are not accountable to Parliament.
New rules introduced by the Liberals about government advertising go some way to resolving ways that the Harper government exploited communications resources for partisan gain. For instance, Advertising Standards Canada now reviews government ads in an effort to minimize partisanship. But considerably more needs to be done where unpaid media and spin are concerned. The communications policy of the government of Canada needs to be more stringent about applying standards of non-partisanship to the use of social media. Details about spending on media relations such as photo ops should be outlined in annual reports to Parliament, as is done for advertising and public opinion research. I do not think that we should tolerate the practice of unnamed government "sources" leaking information to journalists in exchange for favourable treatment, particularly when the unidentified officials are PMO staffers. Finally, internal communications planning templates like the ones examined as part of our research should be publicly available. While none of these measures would stop the trend toward central control, they would signal a further step toward good government.
Photo: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, centre, speaks at a wrap-up news conference following a Liberal cabinet retreat in Calgary, Alta., Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh
Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission. Here is a link on how to do it. | Souhaitez-vous réagir à cet article ? Joignez-vous aux débats d'Options politiques et soumettez-nous votre texte en suivant ces directives.
Alex Marland
Alex Marland est professeur au Département de sciences politiques de l'Université Memorial de Terre-Neuve, dont il est aussi directeur. Il est l'auteur de Brand Command: Canadian Politics and Democracy in the Age of Message Contral (UBC Press, 2016) et de Whipped: Party Discipline in Canada (UBC Press, 2020). Il est membre du conseil d'administration de l'Institut de recherche en politiques publiques, qui publie le magazine Options politiques.
Tous les textes de l'auteur(e)
Republier cet article
Vous pouvez reproduire cet article d'Options politiques en ligne ou dans un périodique imprimé, en suivant nos lignes directrices.
Nous vous demandons d'attribuer l'article à son auteur et d'indiquer qu'il a été initialement publié dans le magazine Options politiques. Il est interdit de modifier l'article, mais vous pouvez en citer des extraits.
par Alex Marland. Originellement publié sur le site Web d'Options politiques

Government communications under Trudeau

par Alex Marland. Originellement publié sur le site Web d'Options politiques
avril 18, 2017

Those who follow Canadian politics are well aware that a stubborn problem with government is the concentration of power in the "centre." In Ottawa, everything turns on the whim of the prime minister and central agencies, in particular the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and the Privy Council Office (PCO). Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has pledged to devolve power to his ministers. Perhaps, but he is a media darling who welcomes the spotlight, and the Liberal strategists around him care deeply about managing the boss's brand. If they will not tolerate Liberal election candidates going off script, they are highly unlikely to permit any other government spokespersons to do so either.

Does that mean all communications decisions must flow through the Trudeau PMO — or are ministers and departments trusted by the centre to handle media relations? Both, it turns out.

In 2016, my research assistant Laura Howells and I collected over 100 internal communications templates from 21 federal ministries and agencies. The documents were obtained through a combination of asking departments to provide them informally and, when necessary, by filing access to information requests. Among the collected materials were forms used for processing inquiries from the media, such as media "lines" and notes for communications opportunities. We also collected media relations strategy templates; for instance, announcement plans, video project proposals, event planning checklists and key message templates. Also in the set of documents were communications calendars and rollout plans, including plans for using social media. These internal instruments illustrate that there are many moving parts to be aligned when the government prepares to make a public announcement. The findings, coupled with insights from government insiders about the strategic management of media relations, were recently published in the journal Canadian Public Policy.

One of the surprises was that aspects of the Conservatives' Message Event Proposal (MEP) template were still being used by some departments. That central management tool, an example of which can be found in the Canadian Public Policy article, was used to methodically coordinate Stephen Harper's media activities during the 2006 election campaign. It was then imposed throughout government by the Harper PMO around 2008, during a tumultuous period of minority governance when political personnel sought to approve all facets of communications. Some might say that the MEP turned public servants into cogs in a propaganda machine. The Trudeau Liberals quickly ended the practice, but some departments have continued using elements of it within their own media planning. However, we found no evidence of a parallel Liberal instrument.

Their practices reflect today's communications battlefield of data mining, digital and social media, political marketing and permanent campaigning.

Another interesting finding is that the Liberals are introducing a new dynamic to their government communications strategy. One planning document requires the promotion of data points: key messages must include statistics, key dates, milestones and other numbers such as how many participants are involved in an event or program. Moreover, the government's evaluation of its communications requires that online metrics be employed. Public servants count the number of shares on Facebook and retweets on Twitter. Statistics about media coverage are generated through Google Analytics and Quick Response code data. As others have before them, the Liberals are imposing the communications machinery that worked for them on the campaign trail and are availing themselves of the government's formidable resources. Their practices reflect today's communications battlefield of data mining, digital and social media, political marketing and permanent campaigning.

So, on the surface, departments are using their own communications templates rather than one imposed by the centre. They are drawing on a variety of best practices, including carry-overs from the Conservative era and the introduction of new approaches plied by the Liberal Party. In this light, government by cabinet is back, as Trudeau promised.

But look a little deeper and we see that the PMO and PCO remain very much interested in what ministers and departments are doing. Among the collected documents was an internal diagram titled "Events and Announcements—Approval Guidelines." It states that departments are to package their messaging to highlight connections with broader government initiatives, notably the Throne Speech and budget. Ministers still need the permission of the centre to proceed with an announcement, though they do have discretion on small items. Specifically, the approval guidelines instruct that the PCO must vet the following: "sensitive issue; PCO discretion; horizontal issue [e.g., a whole of government matter that touches multiple departments]; specific item in the Speech from the Throne; specific item in the mandate letter; international meetings; over $10M; federal/provincial/territorial; legislations and House of Commons activities; budgetary measures." On such issues, information is fed up the line so that the PCO and the PMO are aware of a minister's plans and can authorize whether the announcement should proceed. Personnel in the centre offer strategic guidance, plug the announcement into a central communications calendar and review draft media products. If the event is particularly juicy, they might co-opt it so that the prime minister takes centre stage.

My impression is that the level of communications coordination in the Trudeau government's first year exceeds that of the Harper government's at the same stage in its tenure. This is hardly nefarious. Communications technology and the public environment have evolved considerably. Anyone who does not synchronize spoken, written and visual messaging won't punch through the clutter and is at risk of controversy. A united, cohesive brand is paramount. Nevertheless, Canadians should be concerned when centralization in public administration becomes normal, particularly when power is concentrated among staff who sit atop the government hierarchy and are not accountable to Parliament.

New rules introduced by the Liberals about government advertising go some way to resolving ways that the Harper government exploited communications resources for partisan gain. For instance, Advertising Standards Canada now reviews government ads in an effort to minimize partisanship. But considerably more needs to be done where unpaid media and spin are concerned. The communications policy of the government of Canada needs to be more stringent about applying standards of non-partisanship to the use of social media. Details about spending on media relations such as photo ops should be outlined in annual reports to Parliament, as is done for advertising and public opinion research. I do not think that we should tolerate the practice of unnamed government "sources" leaking information to journalists in exchange for favourable treatment, particularly when the unidentified officials are PMO staffers. Finally, internal communications planning templates like the ones examined as part of our research should be publicly available. While none of these measures would stop the trend toward central control, they would signal a further step toward good government.

Photo: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, centre, speaks at a wrap-up news conference following a Liberal cabinet retreat in Calgary, Alta., Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Do you have something to say about the article you just read? Be part of the Policy Options discussion, and send in your own submission. Here is a link on how to do it. | Souhaitez-vous réagir à cet article ? Joignez-vous aux débats d'Options politiques et soumettez-nous votre texte en suivant ces directives.

This article first appeared on Policy Options and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Copier au presse-papiers
Vous pouvez reproduire cet article d'Options politiques en ligne ou dans un périodique imprimé, sous licence Creative Commons Attribution.
Médias et culture
L'éclatement du bien public à l'ère numérique
par Catherine Côté 10 décembre 2021
Canadians will be glad to know
par Timothy Andrews Sayle, Susan Colbourn 25 novembre 2021
Loi et droits
Institutionnaliser la transparence au sein de la sécurité nationale
par Thomas Juneau, Dominic Rochon 19 novembre 2021
Médaille d'argent 2019
Meilleure chronique
Meilleur balado
Prix d'excellence en publication numérique
Médaille d'or 2017
S'ABONNER À I'INFOLETTRE
Soumission d'articles
Archives de l'édition imprimée
514 985-2461 irpp@irpp.org
1470, rue Peel, b. 200
Montréal (Québec)
Politique de confidentialité | Modalités et conditions | Plan du site


Meetings of 5 hours or less $300. Every hour thereafter will cost a further $60 per hour.
NB: To book the hall, payment has to be made via the BAA Bank Account – details provided upon booking. The full booking fee plus bond must be paid to secure your booking. Please refer to the hall hire agreement for full details.


Join us for a 5-week Advanced Beginner Level Argentine Tango series starting Thursday, April 4 at 8:00pm and culminating in our Nuevo Tango Milonguita (or Argentine Tango social dance)! This social will be free for all participants of 5-week series.
The class will cover many of elements of Argentine Tango including body awareness and axes, connection, and styling along with progressing through a variety of different components and movements of the dance.
Series tuition is $100 per person, or check out our VIP Tango package which includes admission to both Beginner and Advanced Beginner Series and the Milonguita all for only $150. No partner necessary.