text:
40 Years On, I think that "Postliberal" sums it up
Anxiety and Ideology
A popular psychology article about a recent study on anxiety and political beliefs The Unexpected Relationship Between Ideology and Anxiety. With Ann Althouse, I ask "Why unexpected?" I have been saying this since the 90s, that despite the accusations that conservatives are afraid and anxious and just can't handle all the changes and the modern world in general that it is actually the opposite: liberals cannot endure people not doing things the way they should given this frightening world that is falling apart and are just so anxious about that - and they project. I exaggerate unfairly, but the core point remains. The conventional wisdom is backward in this case - as it often is. The correlations of Big Five personality characteristics with ideology were also interesting. Not shocking to me at all, frankly.
The results are also consistent with another study using American data ... that found that people on the extreme political left reported higher rates of having mental disorders than people on the right. As I noted, research on the "Big Five" traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience has found that people identifying as politically liberal tend to be higher on openness to experience and neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness than their conservative counterparts (Fatke, 2017; Gerber et al., 2011). Additionally, surveys find that neuroticism is more strongly related to economic than social liberalism (Gerber et al., 2009).
The actual Finnish study based on British data is here. The data set is people who were all born in the same week in 1958, who have been followed over the years on a variety of measures. This particular study was a subset of 7,000 members of that group.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at 6:31 PM 10 comments
Looney Tunes Complexity
Warner Brothers introduced us to some varied and complex music with Looney Tunes, from Wagnerian opera to revived obscure minstrel show pieces. The music they had specifically done for their cartoons was often surprisingly complicated for pieces whose presumed audience averaged about ten years old. This was composed by Mack David and Jerry Livingston, who also wrote Disney intros (Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland) and popular songs (The Twelfth of Never).
Most of Daffy's harmony is pretty standard here, but a few bits are surprising, and the sudden syncopation as the whole cast parades in is a nice touch.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at 1:06 PM 2 comments
#70 - Conspiracy And Paranoia
Repost from 2019, and includes links from much earlier. I may comment further, but there's already enough here to keep people busy for a few days.
Well, this got out of hand. I thought I had written about conspiracy and paranoia a fair bit, but after reviewing the search bar results, I wonder if I have written about anything else. I gave up. I may have missed the best ones. Here is the original, 70th-most popular post that kicked it all off. As it concerns Lee Harvey Oswald and the KGB, it is likely that some of the traffic was driven by people search about the topic, not my friends and other sites telling everyone what a great post AVI had today. I wrote about that aspect at least one more time. Okay, two.
What has been more usual for me is writing that paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories precede an actual formed theory or focus. We do not become paranoid because of our experiences. We interpret our experiences in a paranoid way after developing the tendency. (I am willing to discuss this in the context of people under tyrannies if someone wants to go there. I think that is somewhat, but not entirely different.) I did find some posts about that. Categories of Paranoia, Conspiracy and Blue Hats, Paranoia FYI'
The principle applies even when it is mild paranoia or mere suspiciousness. Distributed power. Suspicion and the Liberal Mind. Yet if people really believed even that much, wouldn't they take up arms? Or leave the country? No, that pretend paranoia is merely there for signalling, a Poetic essence.
Ted Goretzel talks about who believes in conspiracy theories. It can include PhD's. I discussed why it is hard to convince people Conspiracy theories are unlikely and unnecessary.They are too easy. The truth is harder to fix.
The object of Paranoia can change over time. You can ascribe your troubles to different conspiracies. (Yes, she has now included the Jews.) There are whole lots of these theories, pick one. Sometimes they actually are ture: Journolist. People try to create conspiracies all the time, but the more people you have, the quicker it is going to become public. Daily Kos noticed that George Bush quietly changed a law in 2007 so that he could declare martial law in 2009 and not step down.
Does our style of paranoia choose our politics for us, rather than the other way around? Does the mechanism for accepting blame and responsibility in our brains break before the paranoia? Do fiction or film increase our vulnerability to paranoia or belief in conspiracies?
I'm sure I've said other brilliant things elsewhere, but this is already well more than enough.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at 12:33 PM 14 comments
Paranoia Repost
I had already been looking at some older posts about paranoia for other reasons when I saw Mike Guenther's approval of my posts on mental health issues, so I browsed through the list and thought this one might serve as a good introduction. Paranoia, Another Thought from earlier this year. I started in writing on the topic in 2006, and even categorised myself as a "psychblogger" then. I have not seen that term in a decade, so I think it just never caught on. I have written many times on this over the years and will put up at least one more, one that includes many internal links and references so you can have something close to one-stop shopping on my thoughts about this. I think I will touch on the related topic of Conspiracy theories as well.
Quick summary on paranoia: The paranoid mind-set occurs first, the targets are flexible and come later.
Less quick summary on conspiracies: Conspiracies are attempted all the time. It is not crazy to believe that people are trying to do these things. But secrecy and cooperation are hard among the ultra-suspicious, and most conspiracies fall apart quickly. It is good to ask yourself how many people would have to be in on the secrets, and how much they would have to get along.
Chesterton noted "The madman is not the man who has lost his reason. The madman is the man who has lost everything except his reason," going on to describe that such a one has lost proportion, and humor, and faith, just for starters. Or, more fully in the same work:
I mean that if you or I were dealing with a mind that was growing morbid, we should be chiefly concerned not so much to give it arguments as to give it air, to convince it that there was something cleaner and cooler outside the suffocation of a single argument. Suppose, for instance, it were the first case that I took as typical; suppose it were the case of a man who accused everybody of conspiring against him. If we could express our deepest feelings of protest and appeal against this obsession, I suppose we should say something like this: "Oh, I admit that you have your case and have it by heart, and that many things do fit into other things as you say. I admit that your explanation explains a great deal; but what a great deal it leaves out! Are there no other stories in the world except yours; and are all men busy with your business? (GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy, Chapter II: The Maniac.)
The Golden Name Day
My Aunt Jennie's book about Swedish-American girls, The Golden Name Day, a 1956 Newbery runner-up, has been reissued after many years. I have written about it a few times over the years, most recently in 2019. I had not heard that is was coming out again. The last paperback edition was 1971, I think.
It's a charming girl book, recommended for 8-12, and my wife has read it aloud to our two oldest granddaughters. Her grave is in the Lindquist family plot in the Swedish section of Pine Grove in Manchester, next to her favorite cousin (and everyone's else's favorite aunt), Selma. They both died decades ago, but we still go to the site every year.
I certainly like the old Garth Williams cover much better than the new one, but none of the family was consulted about any of this. The copyright has long since expired, but perhaps the illustrations have not. She donated her children's literature collection (she had been editor of The Horn Book as well) and many of her personal papers to White Pines College, which later became Chester College. I had the rest but could think of nothing to do with them and eventually donated those to the college as well. The school went under about a decade ago, and I imagine they are all long gone now, scattered or even destroyed. I keep thinking I should put in the effort to do a Wikipedia page on Jennie, but have never gotten around to it.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at 10:03 PM 1 comments
Archaeological Quotes
I listened to an interview with Dr. Lee Bray, lead archaeologist for Dartmoor National Park, and he turned out to be remarkably quotable.
"Looking into the prehistoric past is like looking into a well. It's dark and indistinct and sometimes all we can see is our own reflection." If one reads popular accounts of archaeological finds, this is recognisable. When something is found, the journalist - and sometimes the science writers and even the researchers spin a tale of what they think was happening and what the people must have been like. Somehow, they always seem to be like us, and the speculations of a century ago are noticeably different than what we guess today. It is rather like looking at episodes of The Flintstones or The Jetsons now, when the 1960s cultural assumptions are glaringly obviously projected onto both the past and the future. Not that we do that anymore...
"It's not true that they were just like us in many ways. The farther back you go the weirder they get."
"Artist's renditions of prehistoric people all look like attendees at a 1970s Glastonbury festival." He also wonders why we insist that their clothing must have been brown, given that we know they had vegetable dyes, cosmetics, piercings, and tattoos. They loved decoration. We even apply this dullness to recent historical eras when we have a wealth of data contradicting it. James had a recent post that classical statues were not actually white and unpainted.
"The sharp breaks in eras and cultural changes are almost surely wrong, even in the case of one population completely displacing another. It's not as if someone looked up one day and said 'Right, it's the neolithic now, we'll have to start farming.' We make categories in order to break them."
That last sentiment applies to a great many fields. Biology, where our definitions of species are increasingly discarded; medicine, where diagnoses are sometimes neither fish nor fowl; all social sciences, and all types of history, where eras are created in retrospect in order to clarify some aspects, yet necessarily obscure others. I don't recall ever being taught this, not only in introductory courses, but neither in more advanced courses. We were required to learn categories. That isn't a terrible approach in any field, for without something of that nature there can be no organising of the material into schema nor discussion about it. But I think warning the student that the boundaries are mere conventions and soft at best should be inserted into learning.
It might even make journalists and other dilettantes wary of thinking they know everything.
Natural Immunity Vs Vaccination
Update: I may have spoken too soon about the number of deaths receding.
My usual brilliant source knew of this one and I pass it along. Getting covid-19 is much less effective than being vaccinated.
More than a third of COVID-19 infections result in zero protective antibodies
Natural immunity fades faster than vaccine immunity
Natural immunity alone is less than half as effective than natural immunity plus vaccination
The part about one-third of infections resulting in zero protective antibodies was quite discouraging.
Deaths are receding nationwide, and even though they are still high in Texas and the lower Mississippi states, they are lower than they were a month ago. Last year the spike in cases moved north in late fall and winter, but that was before widespread vaccination. Perhaps it will not happen again this year, as a one-year event is still just a one-year event, not necessarily a pattern. I would express cautious optimism, but I have done so a few times during the pandemic and been wrong, so I will not do so at this time.
I have seen the argument advanced in a few places that getting lots of people vaccinated is actually more dangerous, because it creates a more likely opportunity for a super-variant of Covid to arise, one that overwhelms even vaccinated immune systems. While this is not so, it does have an element of truth in it that deserves refutation rather than mere dismissal.
Let us look for a moment at winning a lottery. A person who has bought a million tickets has a much better chance of winning than a person who bought only one, so his average expected winnings is a million times higher. But there aren't really "average" winnings in a lottery (a pure lottery. I am excluding the actual money-raising games that give lesser prizes for getting some of the numbers right). If you win the 10 million dollars, you win it, and if you don't you get nothing. The idea of average winnings is something of a statistical trick.
The rise of a supervariant is like a lottery in reverse, an enormous single bad-luck outcome. If everyone but one person were vaccinated, there would still be a chance, however minuscule, that the last person who contracted the disease carried a mutation that turned out to be the supervariant that overwhelmed everyone else. You can see how that might happen in theory, but no one is losing sleep over that possibility. Much more worrisome is the situation where there are many, many people carrying the virus. It's like millions of lottery tickets for that ugly reverse lottery. Even though the chance of a supervariant mutation is extremely low for each of those "tickets," in aggregate the odds are much greater. It is still small. There have been millions and millions with the virus, and only a couple of variants that have been problems. It may be that only the Delta is a big deal.There are likely many mutations out there already, but as well all know, most mutations make things work worse, not better. The many mutations simply sink beneath the waves.
But if there are a bunch of these mutations around, they have an enormous number of vaccinated targets. I am going to describe the situation as if the virus is "trying" to outwit the potential hosts, even though it is not sentient and trying to do anything. It's just with such enormous numbers it has that appearance, of an organism trying to get through defenses, like a hundred million squirrels trying to get through to the bird feeder by indefatigable persistence. When there are only a small number of variants, it's like there are fewer squirrels trying their hand at the obstacles. The odds of the squirrels in general succeeding and coming up with a strategy is low. But when there's lots of squirrels, the possibility that one might hit upon the one brilliant strategy is increased.
I don't know what the worst ratio is for that possible development of a supervariant is, but I have to think 50% vaccination - right about where we are now - might be close. With 95% vaccination, there just wouldn't be enough squirrels working at the feeder puzzle. But with 50%, there are a huge number of people carrying the virus, and they have a huge number of targets - both the easier targets of the unvaccinated and the hardened targets of the vaccinated. Or if you prefer, while one of the few unvaccinated in the 95% scenario might develop the winning ticket variant that is actually the losing ticket variant for us all, such a variant is more likely to arise in the scenario of only 50% vaccinated, because that would be like buying ten times more tickets for that lottery.
Even with all the unvaccinated counted together a supervariant might not arise. Even though it's ten times worse than the 95% vaccinated scenario it's still low. But remember, the original predictions months ago were that more powerful variants were unlikely - and we've already had one. Worse, the one we've got is still spreading, so a variant of that would only have to be a little worse to be a heightened risk. We don't actually know the likelihood. No one does. It may be unfortunate bad luck that we got even one Delta variant. Or we may have gotten lucky with ten almosts that just missed, with no reason to expect such good luck in the future.
It has some importance because of the insistence of the unvaccinated that they represent no danger to the vaccinated, and so should be left alone by all the busybodies. It is true in the limited sense that the potential danger of each unvaccinated person is low. Like lottery ticket low. Though someone does eventually win lotteries, and if you buy millions of tickets the aggregate danger is higher. At minimum, they increase the risk of danger for us all.
If someone has better math on this, let me know.
These were played more by girls than boys, and I think their disappearance has something to do with the availability of real sports for girls now. There weren't many outlets then. Swimming - not much good on the playground or most neighborhoods; cheerleading - much less athletic then than now; gymnastics, ditto; riding bicycles or roller skating. Organised sports were bigger in the private schools, likely because they didn't have neighborhoods to go home to. Skiing for the rich girls, skating more middle-class. Athletic girls were often directed into dance.
Even more important, "Ten O'Leary Postman" can't much compete with the fascination of an electronic device.
I was surprised how many of these British games and rhymes had American equivalents
The song Rubber Dolly was originally a ragtime number that got adapted for bluegrass, then done by Helen O'Connell with Jimmy Dorsey ("Is it the feller or the dolly, or the dolly or the feller?"), eventually becoming a playground rhyme done by a girl group in the 60s that keeps popping up over and over.
My wife did not recognise it. At her schools in Massachusetts, as at mine in NH, "Oh Little Playmate" and "Spanish Lady" were the thing.
A forgettable musical, but I recall my father, who did this sort of humor onstage - or off - whenever anyone would give him the slightest opening, speaking of it.
I never did any burlesque comedy myself, not even mock burlesques or parody skits, but my brother did lights for Ann Corio's "This Was Burlesque" when it played in Skowhegan Maine in the mid-70s. He drove "Luna, Goddess of Fire" in his Volkwagen into town for an errand. That seems like it could have been dangerously cramped.
Junk DNA
I guess it is more properly called "satellite DNA," and James has linked to an article about what it might be for.
Liberty: Upon Further Review
I recommend for you the comments section under "Liberty." I wrote there "Also, WRT surveillance and record-keeping. The comments clarify for me that if we have 30% more freedom because of our technology and even more permissive laws but only 20% more restriction, it still might be a net loss of liberty because of your increased vulnerability to pressure from a variety of corporations and departments."
In terms of that 30%, I have things to add. The disabled of all types have much more liberty. We are better protected against abuse from employers, abuse from family members, abuse from police. Protection from fellow citizens - is it about the same? We have improved protections against fraud, better protection (some would say too much) against being brought involuntarily to psychiatric institutions. In NH, it used to be that any doctor plus your local state rep could have you sent away.
I got to thinking what that 20% loss of liberty via restriction might be, in order to weigh the two sides clearly. As I was walking I concluded there are none, or perhaps few in case I haven't thought of something. Wait. It is much harder to father a child and bear no responsibility now. That's a restriction. I suppose, but not one we usually put under the category of "liberty." Undue liberty, perhaps, not a legitimate one. The added surveillance is not just for fun, after all, it is put in place to curtail bad behavior. The problems come later, as the definitions of bad behavior always expand, never contract.
It still might be a net loss because of the various types of surveillance, by governments, places we do business, and even (especially?) our fellow citizens: Financial observation, social observation, visual observation by device. Those are wide-ranging and insidious, and a few commenters provided good lists of what exactly is surveilled. So that's the whole trade. It's all increased freedom, all the way, with no added restrictions...
...except for the eyes watching, and the potential for abuse there. Most of us are unaffected, but we can look around and see how we might be affected, and in some bad places, people already are. The threat is quite real. As one commenter mentioned, we were always at the mercy of others social in neighborhoods and small towns, and memories could be long. Yet you could, in a pinch, move elsewhere, even taking on a new identity, as my great-grandfather did.
Posted by Assistant Village Idiot at 11:38 AM 8 comments
Bob Newhart
My mother bought this in the 60s and I became thoroughly enamored of it.
My brother, when he had a professional event lighting business in SoCal in the 80s, had business cards "Joe's Lights and Storm Door Company." He did get calls for storm doors occasionally, yes.
We have been talking covid, covid, covid, and the thought of mandates - which doesn't mean holding people down, BTW, whatever else happens - but issues of liberty have been coming up in libertarian and conservative circles for years. This just pushes them over the top.
It's not crazy. We have had liberating technologies, but governments have moved in to try and "make sure people use this right" just as often. We have many more restrictions, but I actually think we are in a net gain.
When I was a young man, the federal government could draft you and send your ass* overseas to get killed.
Tax rates in the 60s hit 90% for the highest incomes - which were not all that high - until Kennedy and then Reagan pulled them down. We roll our eyes at the fanatics talking about "confiscation" now, but really, look at that. How is that not a serious limitation on all your business actions, when nine parts in ten are going to DC?
Because we have made transactions less restricted, there are lots of things that are no longer an obstacle. You can buy a drink at a restaurant everywhere, including the south and midwest. You don't have to go to that one store, sometimes in the next town, to buy Playboy, if anyone is still interested in that. You can buy lots of things without your neighbors knowing. You can buy things on Sundays, and if the store isn't there you can order it online.
Plus, you might ask Black people about restrictions on their lives compared to pre-1970, and women could explain to you about some of the de facto vs de jure restrictions of their youth.
Much of what we object to is the government or large corporations knowing things about us that IBM or Eisenhower never dreamed of. It is new territory for freedom, but much of it immediately captured in worrisome ways. Counting credit cards, retirement and investment accounts, credit unions and banks, and online purchases that are essentially an account kept in records, how many more accounts do you have than your parents? Faceless entities know more because there is more information to be had.
Surveillance does alarm me.
*That construction is actually a pronoun now, according to linguist John McWhorter, and I think he is right. Think about it, and try to separate your thinking from its origin and look at what its usage is now. You might call it a synecdoche, but I think it has even gone beyond that at this point. "My ass," "Your ass," "Her ass" is just a coarse, dramatic, colloquial version of my/your/her
You Will Be Hearing These Forever
One downside of badgering people into vaccinations is that they will associate any negative experience in the days following with the injection and blame it. There was a female popular singer who got a lot of attention recently because a friend's cousin (or a cousin's friend?) got the vaccination and two weeks later had something go wrong with his testicles. The best response I saw was a friend who passed on a tweet "My cousin's friend got the vaccine, and two weeks later he gotten bitten by a moose. Do the research, people."
It is easy to sneer, but this happens all the time even with free choices. The brain seeks answers, and will settle on a bad one that fits its schema. That the explanation does not explain does not bother many people. It is the lack of explanation that is unendurable. They told me I had to get the shot in order to visit my grandmother and said it was safe, but now my immune system is worse and I get every cold and flu that comes along. The hard part is that these explanations will often never go away, remaining impervious to all reason.
I heard these all the time when taking social histories from patients or families about how this illness started. He was doing fine, had a job and was going to school part-time, and he moved in with this girl. She was a nice enough girl but she broke the relationship off and he went into a tailspin. He started talking psychotic and taking drugs and he's never been the same. He still talks about her. What is much more likely is that he was getting psychotic and taking more drugs, so the girl broke the relationship off. Cart/horse. Especially with our children, we make up these explanations for what went wrong based on the time association rather than a logical association.
Sometimes they are quite true. A serious head injury can explain just about anything. When I first started reading CS Lewis I marveled that he was doing something like algebraic proofs with ideas instead of shapes and graphs. I was stunned to later learn that he was not good at math. His mother took a math degree and taught it. He occasionally handled scientific concepts in his examples that were largely founded on mathematical principles. It seemed impossible. Only later did I learn that when he was at the school run by a certifiable and violent headmaster, he had that person as his maths instructor. Students were beaten if they got the answer wrong. They were also beaten if they got the answer right. That could interfere with learning.
Time association has largely driven the vaccine-autism fables. During the years when a child begins to interact with the world enough to display that something is wrong, he also gets lots of vaccinations. Such symptoms do not show up with bang, usually. It's not like a fever or neck pain where it was not there yesterday, but unquestionably here today. But once the idea is planted that this odd behavior in your child might be caused by vaccines, many parental minds are going to leap to "Hey, yeah, he did get a vaccine six weeks ago."
I think I have post brewing about Infection Control Nurses and the wheedling, badgering, suggesting, and insisting they do as a normal part of their job, trying to get employees to accept flu shots, or environmental services to ramp up its surface cleaning, or other infection prevention interventions. (Or maybe not. The summary is pretty easy. 1. Mandating an intervention is part of that continuum, not some entirely separate thing out of the blue. We have "forced" families to comply with various levels of health precautions for years. 2. Sometimes the professionals can be wrong, as can the nutritionists or psychiatrists or anyone else in the system. Just as in any profession. But mostly, 90%+ of the resistance and refusal they get is based on the same dumb-ass stuff they hear every year, of people claiming the flu shot always gives them the flu, or droplet precautions can be ignored if you are just poking your head into the patient's room for a second to tell him his visitors are here or whatever.) But the key takeaway is that the more you do this, the more resentful people are going to blame any subsequent thing that goes wrong on the hospital/school/Big Pharma, whatever.
Thus, I am big on avoiding that as much as possible. Over time it builds distrust of the whole system even when it is completely undeserved, because people don't like some explanations. Yet I also know that people cannot always be persuaded, and sometimes you have to put the hammer down. That's not just hospitals and health, it's your profession too.
Idaho is now in Crisis Standard of Care because of Covid. This means that depending on each individual hospital's resources, if you code, you might not get CPR.
You might not get CPR. You wanted to "wait and see" about getting vaccinated? This is the "see" part.
Surgeries and other care will be postponed. Something similar is up in Maine, which had been one of the safest states with the lowest covid rates until a couple of weeks ago. We had a relative tell us today about a friend who can't get a hip replacement for some indefinite period of time. So care is being postponed. I suppose you can call those "not real covid deaths" if you like. Or gee, it's not even death, really, just people sitting at home not able to get care. What could possibly go wrong?
You don't see this, because you don't work in a hospital or other care facility or know those who do.
91% of their admissions are unvaccinated. Further proof that the unvaccinated pose no danger to the rest of us.
Of course, a deep-blue state like Idaho must be fudging its numbers, because it's in on the covid conspiracy. Wink, wink, nod, nod. We intelligent people know how that works. It's all a ruse.
I do not support mandatory vaccination - yet. But the push for it isn't coming out of nowhere. I support the harsh numbers of figuring out what will help more people get vaccinated, and doing that. I think this whole covid vaccination thing is new to people, and I get that some folks have questions, or feel nervous or afraid, or just don't understand it very well. Also, there are loud voices telling them crap, which muddles things. So I still think that persuasion is the better way to go, even though some will not be persuaded. But it's not because I am wringing my hands and saying "I just don't like telling other people what to do," it's because I think the numbers still lean that way.
The US is back up to 2000 deaths/day. I was as relieved as everyone else this spring when it looked like "Hey, the risk is going way down. It looks like we have this thing mostly licked, down to a level where we can open everything up and just endure the low level of disease circulation and death going forward." Then the data changed.
"When the facts change, I change my mind - what do you do, sir?" ― John Maynard Keynes
This was my freshman dormitory in 1971, the unfashionable one, unlike those preppies at Yates. Long-term patients from Eastern State (before Deinstitutionalisation), would sometimes just show up, puzzled, in the dorm looking for their old room. When you are that far off campus and the college no longer cares what happens to you, things get weirder than usual. We had our own Olympics, with the 267-inch dash and the Refrigerator Shove as events.
And...for all of you who thought in the last post that you are really are independent-minded people making up your own minds about these things.
Covid Links - But Not Really About Covid
This post has the appearance of trying to persuade you, but this is actually not so. I certainly hope you are persuaded by the links and my comments on them, but I have a deeper purpose, which I will get to below (or the next post - don't know.) There are then deeper levels beyond that, which I may or not reveal, depending on how things go. But the people who argue online are not fully representative of...well, of anything, really. So the following links are for demonstration purposes.
I have been waiting this post for bsking to put up her most recent on excess mortality, as she promised. Breaking down national data by race and age and age-adjusting the state data because there are large differences turns out to be interesting. Florida looks better than you would think from looking at the data - not surprising as it is an old state - and the safest states in the northeast and northwest look even better. Texas looks worse, and Mississippi and DC look terrible in excess deaths. She discusses some of the possible variations in assignment and counting. She is clearly not trying to make any side look better or worse - except perhaps noting defensively that while Massachusetts is often listed among the worst states for covid deaths, this is not so when one makes some reasonable adjustments. She makes the point to me that we should all be looking at data by states anyway, as we will have a much better sense if anything is fishy in the case of places we live, or have lived, or border on. It's easy to get into discussions about whether the upper reaches of the CDC are reliable, when none of us have much access. But I have great deal of confidence in what NH is reporting, because I have some familiarity with the people, and the local media, and local knowledge.
I have been following the more recent trends. You can browse the state data and look at the graphs here. Of note, some states with notoriously bad overall totals, such as New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut, show that they are all front-loaded for the beginning of the pandemic. Not much blip in cases or deaths since then. Texas has as many new cases and almost as many deaths as any time in the last 18 months, and Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas actually have more. As there is some vaccination even in the lowest-level states, it becomes a question of whether this is because they reopened too soon, the delta variant is worse enough to override even a partial vaccination rate, or some other reasons. South Dakota is interesting. It was trumpeted last year that Sturgis was/was not a superspreader event as predicted/denied, then watched as new cases quadrupled that month, held steady for another month, and then exploded. However, that was the time lots of other places were exploding as well, so maybe the festival wasn't the cause. The same thing is happening this year, with a spike in cases just after the gathering - but a lot of other places are seeing a spike right now as well. I think we will have to depend on honest, knowledgeable reporters in SD to figure that out. Hope they've got some.
Masks work. This means they have worked throughout, though Stone notes why this is hard to measure. I had an argument with one guy on another site who insisted that because masks do not absolutely prevent covid, they cannot be said to "work." We say that seat belts work even though some accidents are so bad that people die anyway. We say that condoms work, even though by their very nature people use them wrongly (impatience, usually) or skip them altogether, and relying on them has a higher pregnancy rate than other methods. We say that calorie restriction works for losing weight because it works some for everyone, at least for a short while, and keeps on working for a smaller percentage. I digress. Perhaps none of you were going to offer the same argument. There are huge caveats about masks, which I am certain I have stated repeatedly, as have most mask advocates. There are only secondarily a filter, they are mostly a barrier protection, very effective for coughs, sneezes, singing, yelling. They don't work if you are siting in an unventilated space with someone for extended periods, because all the air in the room eventually passes through the infected people. They don't work if they aren't worn properly. Just because they are mandated does not mean they are worn or worn properly, because people rebel and shave the edges. Just as with gun control (and, I think we may soon see, vaccines), people who don't like a law will find ways around it, and you don't get the result you expected. However, that doesn't mean that gun safety (or vaccination) doesn't work. It just mean the mandate didn't work. So too with masks. The masks-don't-work studies I have seen consistently make this error, that mandates don't work. The places where masking is enforced, as in hospitals and clinics. have found that everything else contagious has gone down so far that they will likely never go back to maskless. From that, they conclude that masks likely provide a similar benefit for covid, even though they have no baselines from 2015-2019 to compare it to. Because no covid then.
But the people with skin in the game think they work enough to keep going. That is always a big deal to me. Not "authority," which I will deal with later, but skin in the game.
Astral Codex Ten has a very thorough post on what we know about Long Covid. He always has lots of comments, some of which are also lengthy. I don't think one needs to read even any of them, let alone all of them, but I hope they at least dissuade people from jumping to the conclusion that "he has overlooked this really important point unsupported cliche I need to tell the world." I have seen a couple of links on other conservative sites that "long covid isn't as bad as we feared." As I never saw them express any fear at all, only the carefully curated news that supports the conclusion they had reached before the studies were even begun, that can't possibly be true. They had no fear at all and have ignored or denied it consistently. You can't get less than zero fear. I feel I have been mentioning this to an empty auditorium for months. They are holding scraps aloft. "Look, it's not as bad for children as the "experts" told us it would be!" What experts said that? Who made predictions? So let's start from the simpler premise of "long covid is real," and let's see how big a deal it is rather than ignoring it whenever we calculate what the tradeoffs have been. We conservatives (except me, of course) have an absolute failing grade here.
Nurses are resigning, especially in the states hardest hit recently. Yes, CNN plays the violin here, but 2000 fewer nurses in a state the size of Mississippi is a big deal. Medical care will be worsened for everyone. There have been claims that postponed care was already killing people, though that did not seem to show up in 2020's numbers. But there is a limit to how long you can postpone things. It may have started to happen this year. Even if true they only dent the definite covid numbers a little, but it's certainly not good. By the way, the anti-vaccination groups are trying to claim that the nurses are resigning over the vaccine mandates. Some are, especially among minority populations. I don't see evidence it's a lot. However, resignations may be occurring for both reasons and both sides trying to take credit for the aggregate number, similar to those poll questions of "Do you think this country is headed in the right direction?" Pretty useless question, with no predictive value of anything.
But that's not what I came to talk to you about. I want to go over some history about how opinions are formed on this matter. Way back in early 2020 I thought we might have much less problem on this side of the Atlantic. Trump had closed down flights despite opponents calling him racist for it - I now shudder to think how quickly it would have spread otherwise, back when hospitals didn't quite know how to treat it and we thought mechanical breathing was going to be key. Plenty of people - I have mentioned that Sarah Hoyt was prominent among them - assured us that we weren't going to have Italy's and France's problem because our hygiene was better. Others noted that we didn't have so many grannies living with families here, and our hospitals are better, etc.
Well, things spiked quickly, as you well know. Large gathering places started shutting down, particularly indoors. There was still the attitude that if we strangled this in its cradle we'd be okay. The idea of two weeks to bend the curve was only part of that, not some outlier. People now get enraged that the CDC and other experts said that and then it wasn't true, but we pretty much all subscribed to that general idea. One big slam. don't let it get a foothold. Then we could deal with a smaller, more manageable crisis after that. Churches thought they were going to be back open for Easter. There were some voices who were already telling us that novel contagion doesn't always work that way, and even announcing there would be a spike in summer. I was considered one of the pessimistic ones because I didn't think that the sharp increase in cases was going to be just as sharp going down. I thought we would have a more gradual decline.
The deaths kept mounting, and already people were trying on their new denials: there wasn't really an increase; the deaths weren't really covid, they were just sorta covidish, if they existed at all; masks don't work and there's probably nothing we can do to make things worse or better anyway; letting everyone get sick would probably be better. There were, and are, more. Some were darker, part of the motivated reasoning I will discuss later. "Everyone is acting scared (means: I'm brave and they aren't)." "It's only old people and people with other health conditions (the classic defense mechanism against danger, that you are somehow not vulnerable because you are smarter than that. He only got robbed because he wasn't being alert, etc.) and the self fulfilling "Americans aren't going to put up with this." Sure, it's patriotic to refuse to take health measures
Even in early August I nearly wrote in to one of the podcasts I had been listening to that had predicted a spike late July and early August - see? It didn't happen, did it? I don't hear you admitting you got that wrong. I am glad I held back, because then came September. A half a million deaths later, and people's excuses and opinions haven't changed. I have to wonder what would have changed them. I remember that summer the fury that some people had that some "experts" had dared predict we might have as many as 2.2 million deaths. What a maroon! That's why you can't listen to experts! I recall being apologetic for them that summer, trying not to call them alarmist and extreme, and cautioning others not to do so either. Well, that's the worst-case scenario...if you look at what's happening in Europe you might leap to that conclusion...don't assume they are just trying to scare you... So, coming up on 800,000 excess mortality now...estimates the vaccines have saved about another 200,000. Let's run the mental experiment of not shutting down the international airports, and of not closing down to prevent the spread, of not masking, not distancing. Could that have doubled the death total? I don't know. That seems possible. Gee, all the skeptics and critics - including me, to some extent - turned out to be even more wrong.
Remember that hospitals were overfull, with units being turned into covid-only, ERs overflowing - so let's take our imagination experience and double the number of cases. How's that playing out? Health-care workers doubling their exposure, and so more of them sent home. Whether lack of prompt care drove much excess mortality in 2020 is not clear - I think only a little, but may turn out to be wrong, and 2021 might be worse - but it absolutely would have been happening under that scenario. No hospital beds, huge numbers of doctors and nurses unable to come in because of quarantine. And some dying, by the way. That gets conveniently overlooked in the "only old and fat people" telling. As with Kipling's "Tommy" and soldiers, societies can devalue sacrificial people who just don't happen to be on their radar at the moment.
So the data changed, and changed dramatically, but people didn't change their opinions. When that happens, it is fair to ask whether they are engaging in motivated reasoning. Even when I strongly suspect it, I usually refrain from accusing others of poor motives unless I have very good evidence, and even then, only if they are accusing others of poor motives. I take the view that we are a mix of good and bad motives in all our decisions and we try to inspire others to do the best they can. I have questioned people's motives many times over the last sixteen years, because I think confirmation bias and motivated reasoning is enormous. But it is double-edged. As with CS Lewis and Bulverism, if you use that door, it swings both ways. So the data has changed, but the accusation of bad motives has not budged, or has even intensified. Suspicion of the accusers' motives is entirely justified now.
Persuasion isn't supposed to work like this. Elizabeth Breunig has a nice article on not shaming the unvaccinated, but listening to them, because many of them are not as unreasonable as advertised. She is a nice person, I think, and it is true. But I am not trying to be persuasive here. It will surprise you that I am not even talking about covid, ultimately. When discussing reasoning and motivation dispassionately, it is best to take non-emotional examples. Sam says that Julie is taller than she was last year. His wife says, no, she has stopped growing. But I am intentionally keeping this discussion in hot and even angry places. Because most of you know about logical fallacies in the abstract. Some of you know them better than I do. That's not what is happening here, and I want the examples bubbling. I am also not convinced that gentle persuasion is the best route. Greg Cochrane has been very ungentle, including to me directly, but he is one of the people who has most changed my thinking over the last five years. I am usually immune to shaming, but it is not mere shaming that is persuasive. It is finding I am wrong that is shaming, and in those instances the lash does not seem unfair. I get over it pretty quickly.
I keep thinking you have read what I have written to date and are slowly absorbing it over the week while I finish. That won't be the way it works, of course, it will come as a fire hose, and each of you will identify a particular bit you want to comment on, which might be something of less interest to others and which I have long moved on from. As there is some slight danger that this is my last post except for odd bits I might put in every week or so going forward, I will likely let things collect before I rejoin, if at all.
For review, one of my most-visited posts, Types of Liberty. See if you can anticipate as I develop this what this means for vaccination, lockdowns, masking, voluntary shutdown, etc in the various American regions.My hypothesis is that the regional variation in vaccination especially still has some founder effect values behind it. Following David Hackett Fischer, it shows the cultural differences in the various American colonies about the idea of liberty and how that still flows into our cultures now, though in attenuated form. I will not go into detail, except to notice that personal independence and civil disobedience are different in the New England, Coastal Southern, and Appalachian cultures. (I don't have a handle on the Quaker mid-Atlantic on the subject, and so won't try to force some interpretation in.) The Coastal South was deeply hierarchical, with initial forced obedience to the FFV or other cultural rulers of Wessex mentality. But this gradually created a shamefulness about being one of the people who had to take orders rather than give them. That former group was larger and may have had more cultural influence. The Appalachian Scots-Irish were mixed independent, often isolated most of the time but still connected to a web of relatives, a clan, which could take on the deeply obedient attitudes of tanistry, thanes of Cawdor, or of Buckland. This was hidden and less formal in America, but still real. It bled over into church authority among the Baptists and the many sects. I am getting far afield here, but these country churches kept splitting off from each other to form small churches a few miles down the road, but within those narrow walls, there was obedience unknown among New England Congregationalists. It's complicated, probably worth more than a few PhD theses (which I wouldn't encourage, because those knuckleheads would miss every elephant in every room throughout South Carolina, frankly). But I would put big money on the idea that there are congregations in the South where no one is vaccinated and others where everyone is, and where there is division among them, predict a church split in the next few years. So they may be deeply dug in along the lines of "You can't tell me what to do" to the government, yet willingly obedient elsewhere.
This is completely incomprehensible in Northern New England, past and present. The town and church were originally synonymous, but that's clearly not going to hold up, and quickly the town won out. Like before 1700. A New Englander - a default libertarian until about 1900 - used to be deeply suspicious of Concord/Montpelier/Augusta and very especially Boston. Washington DC was beyond even uttering out loud. The town won out over both the county and the Congregational Church. But the town actually did have the authority to tell you what to do. Without that, no schools, no hospitals, no roads would happen. And deep Yankees would accurately point out in the late 1800s that those things did not happen throughout the south. If you don't like what the bastards are doing, you vote them out next time. (This has clearly attenuated in the last four decades. We blame it on the rest of you moving up here. Especially New York.) But when people dig in and say they aren't going to do what Concord says, it is on the basis of "They're wrong," not "You can't tell me what to do."
Tangent: The Free Staters from around the country who chose New Hampshire and moved in and thought they could influence the politics of a small state and make us a City on a Hill for libertarianism never got this distinction. Still don't. They try that "sovereign citizen" nonsense on us and we just look at them blankly. When they tried to install a " fully libertarian" government in little Grantham, NH it was just anarchy.
Back in line. So when my friend Grim accused me of wanting to defer to medical professionals I was amazed that he would insult me at that depth. I spent my career fighting with arrogant doctors who actually didn't know better than me, and I could prove it, dammit. I am deferring to no one. The experts, while flawed, are making a better case than the skeptics and I am going along, thanking them for the time they have put in so I don't have to. But if they are wrong, we don't go to no experts, where we all just make up our own guess, but to new experts. Throw the bastards out. (I wish this were still deeply true about northern New England, but fully admit we actually don't throw the bastards out anywhere near as much as we used to anymore. The system may have broken beyond repair.)
So it took me a bit to figure out that in Grim's cultures of origin (which seems to be only a percentage of his current culture), that's how it must look. His word choice was suggestive, bleeding out from that base. And if Grimmy, who can step back into considerable objectivity, leaks out he thinks that about me, who he knows more about...the penny dropped for me. In other mouths, that idea is much more dominant. All this accusation from others - and boy do I know about those others at this point - that the people who put on masks are nervous and cowardly, and the people getting vaccinations are somehow believing authority like sheeple rather than following evidence, made sense in cultural terms. In their culture, that would be more likely, at least at some long-inherited level.
But that's more than a little ugly, and I'm going to not only push back, but shove back against it. Eighteen months of accusing that those other people just want power and to tell you want to do and grind you down, and don't actually have any good reasons I now think says more about the accusers than the accused. Because we have received new data month after month, and they haven't budged. So does that mean that this level of authoritarianism is what you would do if you held the whip hand, or does it mean that you just don't like being told what to do and reject all reasoning on that basis. Because at this point, I submit that this has to be at least part of your motivation, based on a dozen comment threads on a dozen sites. If I were wrong, it would have eventually shown up in the comments that you made, and I have been on this a long time now.
That you are annoyed at Karens wearing masks in what you perceive to be a showy, prim manner is irrelevant.
That high-ranking officials are traveling in ways denied others, or going maskless, or otherwise being hypocrites is irrelevant. It may be relevant as to whether you vote for them again, sure, but that fact that celebrities come to believe they are invulnerable and can do what they want isn't news, and it tells us nothing one way or the other about safety.
That it offends you that most parents are okay with their kids being masked (though they want them back in the classroom), and the kids are bothered by other requirements much more than masks is irrelevant. You want them to be furious. They aren't. This is taking place in your head. You have some need, whether social or personal, for some things to be true and others not. But that has nothing to do with actual truth, and frankly, it's not my problem.
That you want these new vaccines to be dangerous is motivated reasoning. There's no evidence for it. None. Zero. I tried to be polite for the sake of persuasion rather than confrontation about these bizarre idea that reproductive danger was possible - the absolute go-to for paranoiacs about anything they suspect - but this is just over. There will be something that shows up about the vaccines that isn't good, according to the law of averages. That's normal. We already know that premature births are occurring with covid, but not among the pregnant and vaccinated. I lean against making even complete fools do stuff unless the danger is clear, not because I think it's a bad idea this time to increase public safety (it will) but because I shudder at what such government overreach means next year or the year after.
Go back up to the original links. While I have referenced a few of the topics over the last months, I intentionally chose things that were new information. Did you treat this as new information to be absorbed into your views? Likely, you did not. The folks who thought masking was good thought Yes! Masks! I always said so! And the people who thought masks useless immediately went to There must be something wrong with this. I say this not to play the percentages - which would be valid - but because I have personally watched you do this. You either have the self-observation to see this, or you don't. I put up those links, then the subsequent harsh meta-discussion about how things have been going, not to persuade you, but simply to illustrate how this is done. I'm intentionally not persuading. You are on your own.
There are variations on this motivated reasoning. To move to a more neutral example, Sally says to Cindy that "Catholics don't let their people read the Bible." Then a few others chime in and they discuss this for half an hour, about no private interpretation, Vatican II, whether the practical results bear out Catholic theory, etc. Then Molly comes in and says "But you are missing the real issue. Catholics don't let their people read the Bible." And I wonder why I am bothering to discuss these things at all. Person after person, known to display some sort of intelligence on other topics, has proven unable to do anything other than burst in, recite their cliche from forty minutes or forty years ago, and expect others to just agree. Do I seem unfair? This just happened here, and I can pull up forty example over the last year from a very narrow band of sites. And this from people I actually like. It is a subset of motivated reasoning. It wastes everyone's time. It's just birds chirping out their current location.
But the central motivated reasoning is complicated and varied. You see yourself as brave, ignoring the poor bastard of a cashier at the supermarket quick line who is exposed to a thousand people a day at about 4' distance. Because you estimate, accurately, that you are not in much danger when you shop and don't need a mask. You are suspicious of the conventional wisdom - I really understand that one, since childhood - and think yourself wise thereby, better than those fools. You don't actually know anyone working in the ICUs but you think things are probably okay there, because...you want that answer. The danger is exaggerated. All your favorite conservative sites tell you so, and you don't trust the others.
As a CS Lewis-obsessed person, I feel confident I can lay claim to having looked at layer after layer of possible bad motivations I might have for anything I believe. As a psychiatrist friend once laughed, "I'm not absolutely sure of my own name. And my mother is a very honest person." Yet even within that context I might well have been only playing a complicated chess game against myself, letting black win this time because it would seem fair. It's unrealistic to expect any of you - except maybe James - to see things that thoroughly. But this year things went bad. I tried to stay with my peeps as long as I could, but i just can't.
If I seem unfair to the conservatives about this, and you want to point out how much worse liberals are. I will say I have done that for sixteen years. Yes I am being one-sided. Suck it up, Jasper. My belief is that we all have personal and social reasons for wanting some things to be true, and that's normal. We should try to correct for those, but we might miss a trick. We might miss many tricks. But I expect you to do that homework before you comment. We have some tradition of that here, which has increasingly slipped away in 2021. Some have. I would name you, but I would miss some and imply insult to the innocent.
Why do I rant? It's not about covid, covid is just an example, expressly chosen to burn and chafe. Because without the ability of a large percentage of us to beat ourselves up over possible suspect motives, there will be no cooperative governance, no understanding...
...no western civilisation, and ultimately people will be unable to consider the claims of Christ. I have that Quest for Saint Aquin view, a similar oversimplification of Aquinas to Francis Schaeffer's, that logic must ultimately lead to God, and removing logical obstacles in one sect will lead to lightning coming down on an altar elsewhere. Weeding is a humble but desperately needed act.
It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till. What weather they shall have is not ours to rule. JRR Tolkien
Mandatory Vaccination
It's always good to check in with The Volokh Conspiracy on these things. Usually very sound.
(Mostly) Friendly Sites
I don't know, but . . .
Can't tell the players without a scorecard - I've always had trouble remembering names of things--one of several reasons I did not become a doctor. So when reading history, I find that the names run ...
Chicago Boyz (David Foster)
Two Views on China - Yesterday, Aron Sarin published an article at Quillette titled Beijing in Retreat. Also yesterday, Barrons published China's Comeback is Getting Started...
Fancy "Dinner" - You have probably seen Hollywood movies in which, for a joke, an intensely masculine character played by someone like Sylvester Stallone or Arnold is taken...
The Orthosphere
Bad Books: PLEZ Section 5 - The Protocols is often called a forgery but is better described as a pastiche. Forgery and pastiche are two names for an imitation, the difference being t...
Stuck in the Middle (of Academia) - Academia is a mess, but there is still hope.
Pre-Registering Myself: Potato Edition - Back in July, I put up a post about some possible interesting ideas about the obesity crisis, which included a lot of discussion about potatoes. At the tim...
Podcasts & Substacks
Razib Khan's Unsupervised Learning
Lexicon Valley (John McWhorter)
House of Strauss
Science Fictions (Stuart Ritchie)
History of English
The Great Books
Tides of History
Gone Medieval
Manifold (Steve Hsu)
Rob Henderson's Newsletter
Not Just the Tudors
All About Jack (William O'Flaherty about CS Lewis)
The Prehistory Guys (Standing With Stones)
The Lowe Post
Lingthusiasm
The Glenn Show
Pints With Jack (CS Lewis)


text:
Sameer Pande
Associate Provost, Enrollment Management and Student Services
Prior to coming to AUM, Dr. Sameer Pande served for 15 years as an administrator at the University of Houston-Clear Lake in Houston, Texas. His positions ranged from Coordinator of the Office of Student Diversity, Equity and Inclusion to Executive Director and Chief Global Officer of the Office of International Admissions and Experience Programs.
Pande received a BS in chemistry, geology and forestry in 1994 from Kumaun University in India. His graduate degrees include an MS and a PhD in forestry from Kumaun University and an MS in Management Information Systems from the University of Houston-Clear Lake.
His awards and honors from the University of Houston-Clear Lake include Staff Merit award, Early Achievement award, Student Services Best Practice award, Best Teamwork award, International Education award, and Meritorious Service Key award.
Professional memberships include American International Recruitment Council, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Association of International Educators, National Coalition Building Institute, Texas Association of College and University Student Personnel Administrators, Texas International Education Consortium and the Institute of International Education.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Put an egg on it? You bet. Poached eggs are healthier than fried and quicker-cooking than hard-boiled. And once you get the hang of it (this quick videoshows you how!), they're also a cinch. Make the most of your perfectly poached egg with this delicious recipe for Harvest Wheat Berry Salad, which combines your leftovers with a few poached eggs for a fast and easy meal.
1. COMBINE the wheat berries, beans, greens, cherries, and pecans in a large bowl. Drizzle with the oil and vinegar and toss well. Season with salt and pepper to taste.
2. DIVIDE the salad among four bowls. Top each bowl with a poached egg. Serve.


text:
United States presidential election in North Carolina, 1976
Jimmy Carter Gerald R. Ford
Democratic Republican
Georgia Michigan
Walter Mondale Robert Dole
North County Results 1976
Gerald R. Ford
Elections in North Carolina
United States Senate elections
United States House elections
2004 (1st)
2014 (12th)
State executive
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant Governor elections
Attorney General elections
Council of State elections
General Assembly elections
State Senate elections
State House elections
State judiciary
Judicial elections
Amendment 1
Mayoral elections
Charlotte mayoral elections
Raleigh mayoral elections
The 1976 United States presidential election in North Carolina took place on November 2, 1976 throughout all 50 states and D.C., which was part of the 1976 United States presidential election. Voters chose 13 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for President and Vice President.
North Carolina voted decisively for the Democratic nominee, Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter, over the Republican nominee, incumbent President Gerald R. Ford of Michigan. Carter carried the state with 55.27% to Ford's 44.22%, a victory margin of 11.05%. Carter's victory was the last time a Democratic presidential candidate would win North Carolina's electoral votes except in 2008 when Barack Obama would carry it with a narrow plurality.
United States presidential election in North Carolina, 1976[1]
Democratic Jimmy Carter 927,365 55.27% 13
Republican Gerald Ford (incumbent) 741,960 44.22%	 0
American Thomas Anderson 5,607	 0.33%	 0
Libertarian Roger MacBride 2,219 0.13%	 0
US Labor Lyndon LaRouche 755 0.04% 0
Totals 1,677,906 100.0% 13
Voter turnout 54.52% —
Primary Elections
Former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter scored a decisive victory over Alabama Gov. George Wallace in the North Carolina Democratic presidential primary on March 23, 1976, with approximately 53 percent of the vote to Wallace's 35 percent. Sen. Scoop Jackson trailed far behind, with approximately 4 percent.[2] The North Carolina primary was the first in which Carter won an absolute majority and helped seal his ultimate nomination.[3] Wallace, who had won the North Carolina primary in 1972, was all but eliminated from the race by his defeat.[4]
Republican primary
Former California Gov. Ronald Reagan defeated incumbent President Ford in the North Carolina Republican presidential primary on March 23, 1976, with approximately 52 percent of the vote. It was Reagan's first primary victory of 1976, and came about with key support from North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms. Reagan's win prolonged the contest for the Republican nomination and paved the way for him to be elected president in 1980. Reagan would go on to narrowly win the state in 1980.[5]
↑ http://web.archive.org/web/20091026141022/http://geocities.com/Athens/Agora/8088/Dem1976.html
↑ Redeemer: The Life of Jimmy Carter
↑ CQ Almanac
↑ North Carolina History Project
State Results of the 1976 U.S. presidential election
Election timeline
Republican primaries
Democratic Convention


Finished the 2010 Buller Gorge Half Marathon Run in 02:40:18 in FOPEN class!
She came 201st in class and 1021st overall!
No photos of Olivia Burge in 2010 , we may still be uploading/processing, check back later.


Like Johnny Cash channeling Leonard Cohen with lyrics by Charles Bukowski, Tom Russell's latest is a collection of true-life vignettes accumulated over his wild and wooly past. Not all of the adventures are his, but he recounts them with the attitude of a man who's been there and done that, getting to the meat of the matter with no fooling around. A true Renaissance man, Russell is equally well-known for his essays and painting as for his singer-songwriter skills. His credentials also include a master's degree in criminology as well as a stint teaching sociology in Nigeria during the Biafran War.
The title cut is an original inspired by "October In The Railroad Earth," from the beat generation's free-ranging scribe Jack Kerouac, a prose poem written while Kerouac was working as a railroad brakeman in San Francisco.
Only Russell could write a song about a guy in El Paso who fixed his lawnmower and have it end up as an Irish film. "Small Engine Repair" inspired Irish writer/director Niall Heery's 2006 account of a small town engine fixer and his shiftless friend who aspires to be a country singer. The film has gained more attention in recent years due to lead actor Iain Glen, who sings the tune in the film, starring as Sir Richard Carlisle in Downton Abbey and Jorah Mormont in Game of Thrones. Glen's take on it is crusty folkie, while Russell's version is full-bodied Bakersfield twang, the singer belting it out like a road-weary Red Sovine.
There's an old-time country/western flavor to much of the record, but Russell proves once again that he's capable of masterful Tex-Mex material as well. Russell's 1989 Marty Robbins-tinged "Gallo Del Cielo" is a Tex-Mex classic, the saga of Carlos Zaragoza leaving his home in Casas Grandes to steal the mighty fighting rooster El Gallo Del Cielo and win enough money to buy the land Pancho Villa stole from his father. But just as in the Robbins ballads, things don't work out as planned, and a broken beaked El Cielo can't deliver the big bucks. Russell's latest excursion into what was originally known as the San Antonio sound popularized by Doug Sahm and Flaco Jimenez features Los Texmaniacs Max Baca on bajo sexto and his nephew Josh on accordion keeping that sound alive on "Isadore Gonzales," with Russell whooping like the vaquero name-checked in the song who rode broncs for Buffalo Bill's Wild West show in the 1880s.
Russell tangles with one of the world's fiercest creatures in "Hand-Raised Wolverines," sounding like Warren Zevon in tone and content. "I've never experienced fear like you could taste it," he sings, recalling emerging relatively unscathed except for a shredded leather jacket after going into a cage with the deadly buggers as a result of challenging his booking agent at the time to find something interesting for him to do on his day off while on a Canadian tour some years ago.
"Highway 46" is the musical route that Russell has traveled for most of his career, funneling him toward Bakersfield, reminding him of where he was and how he felt when Merle Haggard died: "Did you pull off the road, break down and cry?" he sings, sounding like Merle narrating his own end. "I drove down Highway 46 / Sang a verse of 'Mama Tried,'" he says of his musical eulogy for Merle.
"You know I'm an occasional drinker, the kind of guy who goes out for drink and wakes up in Singapore with a full beard," Russell says, quoting Raymond Chandler as a prelude to the album closer, pretty much summing up the hard-living characters in this collection. "I like those old country songs about drinkin', cheatin', murder and train-wrecks. And this is the first song I learned as a kid off the first Johnny Cash record," Russell says, introducing "Wreck Of the Old 97." Russell sounds as genuine as the Man in Black himself. Guest guitarist Bill Kirchen, best known for his slide work on "Hot Rod Lincoln" as a Lost Planet Airman serving under Commander Cody, adds some Owens-Bakersfield licks to the honky-tonk mix along with Marty Muse's greasy pedal steel.
Whether you look at, listen to, or read Russell's creations, it's always a fascinating expedition to far-flung places, slightly skewed yet true-to-life adventures based on the reality that exists between his ears.


text:
Q: Troubles with setting up a Build System in Sublime I'm trying to make a Build System for my .g4 files in Sublime Text 3. I've already done alias for antlr4 command in my terminal, and when i'm trying to compile .g4 file from terminal everything works ok. But my current build system in Sublime doesn't ok at all. I'm getting an error antlr4: command not found.
{
"cmd": ["antlr4", "$file"],
"shell": true
}

What am i doing wrong?

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The new B63S - 700 performance kit from BRABUS significantly boosts the power and torque of the 5.5-liter twin-turbo engine in the GLE 63 S, which in standard specification is rated at 430 kW / 585 HP (576 bhp). Producing an additional 85 kW / 115 HP (114 bhp) necessitates numerous modifications to the peripherals of the turbocharged eight-cylinder four-valve engine.
While the intake and charge-air pipes immediately attract attention due to their BRABUS Gold Heat Reflection sheathing, other important details of the conversion remain hidden from view. These include the two BRABUS special turbochargers with larger compressor unit, which produce a higher boost pressure than the production turbos.
The standard emission control system is replaced with an exhaust system featuring free-flow metal catalysts and down pipes with a diameter of 75 millimeters (3 in). In addition, a BRABUS stainless-steel sports exhaust system with actively controlled butterfly valve is available for all GLE 63 models. It gives drivers the option of choosing between a subtle "Coming Home" mode and a markedly sporty exhaust note at the touch of a button on the steering wheel.
As the model name BRABUS 700 indicates, the driver of the exclusive SUV Coupe has command over 515 kW / 700 HP (690 bhp) between 5,300 and 5,800 rpm. Just as impressive is the increase in peak torque to 960 Nm, which is on tap between 2,000 and 4,500 rpm.
Anyone looking for even more performance can opt for the BRABUS 850 6.0 Biturbo 4x4 Coupe based on the Mercedes GLE 63 Coupe. Its twin-turbo V8 engine with an increased displacement of six liters produces a power output of 838 bhp and a peak torque of 1,450 Nm. This supercar accelerates from rest to 100 km/h in just 3.8 seconds and reaches an electronically limited top speed of 320 km/h.


Strictly star Letitia Dean is the person fans would most like to see back in a soap as Sharon Rickman.
Strictly Come Dancing star Letitia Dean has been voted as the person viewers would most like to return to a soap for Christmas.
In the poll conducted by Inside Soap magazine, readers said that Dean's EastEnders character Sharon Rickman is the one they would most like to see turn up for a shocking Christmas Day twist.
Dean is currently competing in BBC1 dance contest Strictly Come Dancing.
The survey also found EastEnders baddie Sean Slater (Rob Kazinsky) to be the man they would most like to snog under the mistletoe.
Meanwhile the Queen Vic was deemed the best venue to hold a work Christmas party, beating Coronation Street's Rovers Return and Hollyoaks pub of choice Dog In the Pond.
Editor of Inside Soap Steven Murphy said: "From snogging Sean Slater under the mistletoe to whooping it up with Peggy in The Vic, it seems that soap characters would be as welcome a dinner guest this Christmas Day as any of our own family.
"Once again, it seems all the nice girls love a bad boy, with Sean Slater heading the snog-ability league, just as Grant Mitchell did during the nineties. And as for Sharon returning to Walford on Christmas Day - well, stranger things have happened in soap!
"Let's hope she takes that Strictly Come Dancing 100-watt smile with her - that'll certainly brighten up the Square's celebrations."


text:
June 16, 2010 Music » Homespun
Homespun: Joe Stickley & Sean Canan
Loaded to the Gunwales
(self-released)
By Christian Schaeffer
Joe Stickley and Sean Canan
8 p.m. Tuesday, June 22, through Saturday, June 26, and Tuesday, June 29, through Saturday, July 3.
John D. McGurk's, 1200 Russell Boulevard. Free. 314-776-8309.
Spend enough time in Irish bars in the United States (or, if you're lucky, Ireland) and you'll find that there are two types of Irish musicians: dexterous instrumentalists who can spin through reels and jigs on fiddles, tin whistles and accordions, and guitar strummers who lead the pub in boisterous or teary-eyed sing-alongs. On their first outing, Joe Stickley (Joe Stickley's Blue Print) and Sean Canan (Bockman) are firmly in the latter camp, having strung together thirteen tunes of folksy good cheer. Stickley and Canan have been holding down the tiny stage on Sunday nights at John D. McGurk's in Soulard, and that stint has helped the pair add the trappings of American folk music to these well-known, well-worn Irish chestnuts. Stickley and Canan are both fine, hearty singers, and they thankfully don't pour much schmaltz on these already sentimental tunes.
While the bulk of Loaded to the Gunwales is covers-heavy, Stickley contributes two originals to the collection. The first, "Old Irish Ladies," fits the mold but relies on tired Irish stereotypes that are more boring than offensive. "Ditty Bag" is much better, a slow, sweet love song to a life on the sea; this record could use a few more songs like it. The inclusion of Steve Earle's "Galway Girl" is an inspired move, and Canan's mandolin strokes and Andrew Weir's accordion help the tune spring to life. But the remainder of the record is bogged down by a track list that reads like a greatest-hits collection of Irish drinking songs. Even the Guinness-averse know the words to "Dirty Old Town" and "The Irish Rover," while "Whiskey in the Jar" should have been locked in the cupboard after Thin Lizzy perfected it. Nearly half of these songs have been covered by the Pogues (not to mention countless other bands), and while the duo's approach lends a country-ish flavor, one wishes that Stickley and Canan would have dug a little deeper.
Want your CD to be considered for a review in this space? Send music c/o Riverfront Times, Attn: Homespun, 6358 Delmar Boulevard, Suite 200, St. Louis, Missouri, 63130. E-mail [email protected] for more information.
Tags: Homespun, Columns, Joe Stickley, Sean Canan, Europe, Ireland, John D. McGurk's Irish Pub
« Homespun: Dropkick the Robot | Homespun: Teresajenee »
More Homespun »
Staff Pick Menu
John D. McGurk's Irish Pub
1200 Russell Blvd., St. Louis St. Louis - Soulard MO 63104
www.mcgurks.com
Watch Irish People Experience the Pain and Pleasure of Red Hot Riplets
The Cover of the August 19 Print Edition
Menu Sneak Peek: Hog Days of Summer at Público
Latest in Homespun
St. Louis Artists Turn to Self-Recorded Projects During COVID-19 Times
St. Louis Musicians to Get You Through These COVID Days
Jeremiah Johnson Goes in a More Rock & Roll Direction on New Album Heavens to Betsy
More by Christian Schaeffer
18andCounting Stays Bent and Busy With 71-Day Livestream Run
Jack Grelle to Release New Album If Not Forever While Prepping for European Tour
New Hong Kong Chinese Restaurant Read More
Dunkin' Donuts Read More
Nick's Irish Pub Read More


text:
FORGOTTEN BOOKS: CHICAGO LIGHTNING AND TRIPLE PLAY
Chicago Lightning and Triple Play by Max Allan Collins (both 2010)
It's hard to catagorize these two as Forgotten Books, but they do replace two out-of-print older collections, Dying in the Post-War World (1991) and Kisses of Death (2001), and then some.ax
A few words about Max Allan Collins. The Iowa native has had his hand -- successfully -- in many endeavors: from comic books and comic strips, from computer games, puzzles, and trading cards to fiction and non-fiction, from writing, producing, and directing films to playing in popular bands. He has written film and television tie-in novels. Among fictional series are the Quarry novels (about a hit-man), the Nolan novels (about a thief), the Mallory novels (about a mystery writer), the Elliot Ness novels (about the real-life character), the Jack and Maggie Starr novels (with a comic strip background), the Trash 'n' Treasure novels (written with his wife, Barbara Collins), the Ms. Tree stories (both comic books and a novel), the J. C. Harrow thrillers, the Disaster series (mixing real-life mystery writers with real-life crimes), the Reeder and Rogers novels (political thrillers, the second book in the series, Fate of the Nation to be published soon), Mike Hammer novels (posthumous collaborations based on partial manuscripts and notes by Mickey Spillane), a western trilogy based on a script by Spillane, Criminal Minds tie-in novels, CSI tie-ins (Los Vegas, Miami, and New York -- in novels, computer games, comic books, and puzzles), Dark Angel tie-ins, Dick Tracy (tie-ins, novels and the comic strip), NYPD Blue tie-ins, The Mummy (ties-ins), GI Joe tie-ins, Mommy tie-ins (based on movies created by Collins), and Road to Perdition tie-ins (both novels and graphic novels). That doesn't include his well-researched introductions to comic strip collections and collections of pin-up art, as well as books and articles about true crime, television shows, men's magazines, the mystery field, mystery writers, comicbooks and comic strips, or his film reviews...Phew! The man's a powerhouse.
The thing is, just about everything Collins has written is damned good. And that includes his Nathan Heller series.
Nathan Heller is a former Chicago cop turned private detective. Readers first met him in the 1983 novel True Detective, set in the Chicago days of Al Capone and Frank Nitti in which Heller tries to survive on five Dollars a day plus expenses. Throughout the Heller series, we watch him go from a one-room office with a Murphy bed to owning a successful agency to owning a large successful agency with an added office in Los Angeles, from meeting Dillinger and Ma Barker to hobnobbing with Dorothy Kilgallan as she tries to ferret out who killed John F. Kennedy. Along the way (in a total of fifteen hisorical mysteries, with a sixteenth -- Better Dead -- to be published soon), Heller finds himself involved in famous crimes and events: the assassinations of Anton Cermak and Huey Long, the Lindburgh kidnapping, the disappearnace of Amelia Earhart, the Black Dahlia murder, the Roswell "saucer" mystery, the death of Marilyn Monroe, the forgotten assassination attempt on John F. Kennedy, and his assassintion a month later. Along the way Heller befriends gangsters and politicians and the famous and infamous
A hallmark of the Heller series is the scrupulous historical research done for each story and the seamless welding of fact and speculation. Heller himself is a tarnished knight with a personal moral code that allows for moral lapses. He doesn't hesitate to deliver justice himself, a la a cetain character created by Mickey Spillane, and he certainly doesn't hesitiate bedding a number of famous females along the way.
The first Heller short story "The Strawberry Teacup" was first published in 1984, the year following Heller's True Detective debut. Over the next quarter century more stories trickled from Collins' imagination, most of them published in original anthologies. In many cases, the short stories allowed Collins to focus on little-known true crimes with the care and research used in his novel-length adventures. (A "tip of the hat" is openly given to George Hagenauer, Collins' diligent researcher and collaborator on the series.)
Chicago Lightning collects thirteen Heller short stories, while Triple Play collects three Heller short novels; together they contain all of the Heller shorter works published through 2010 (and all the stories in earlier collections Dying in the Post-War World and Kisses of Death). Chicago Lightning adds three additional stories not included in the two previous collections.
Need I mention that these two collections are highly recommended?
I thought not.
ROLL ON MISSISSIPPI
DESERVEDLY OVERLOOKED FILM: THE KILLER SHREWS
WAY DOWN YONDER IN NEW ORLEANS
STEPHEN HAWKING -- QUESTIONING THE UNIVERSE
WHITE PRINCESS OF THE JUNGLE #4 (AUGUST 1952)
KEEP MY SKILLET GOOD AND GREASY
FORGOTTEN BOOK: THE AGE OF THE TAIL
FOUR FIVE
UNDERAPPRECIATED MUSIC: JOHNNY RIVERS.
CBS RADIO MYSTERY THEATER: THE OLD ONES ARE HARD ...
ASK THE LONELY
IT'S NATIONAL PUPPY DAY!
OVERLOOKED FILM: THE HITCH-HIKER (1953)
THE SIGN OF THE BROKEN SWORD
THE PUG THAT COULDN'T RUN
RANGERS COMICS #49 (OCTOBER 1949)
JIMMY BROWN THE NEWSBOY
GHOST CORPS
THE PARTING GLASS
OVERLOOKED FILM: IRISH LUCK
ARTHRITIS BLUES
TED TALK: 7 RULES FOR MAKING MORE HAPPINESS
MATHEMATICAL PI
CAPTAIN MARVEL, JR. #75 (JULY 1949)
THE MAN BEHIND THE MASK
FORGOTTEN BOOK: THE ZANZIBAR CAT
I WISH I COULD SHIMMY LIKE MY SISTER KATE
SAM SMALL'S BETTER HALF
BEAST OF BURDEN
THE STREETS OF LAREDO
OVERLOOKED WESTERN: RIO RATTLER
HENRY LEE
THE BEAST WITH FIVE FINGERS
HAPPY, HAPPY BIRTHDAY BABY!
THE DURANGO KID #32 (SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1954)
YOUNGER GIRL
FORGOTTEN BOOK: ONLY THE CAT KNOWS
I NEVER WILL MARRY
SILVER DOLLAR
OVERLOOKED TELEVISION: ROCKY KING, DETECTIVE
DIXIE FRIED
THE REWARD


text:
The Doctrine In The Shadows: Reverse-Erie, Its Cases, Its Theories, And Its Future With Plausibility Pleading In Alaska
by Philip A. Tarpley
In 2007 and 2009, respectively, the United States Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, abrogated Conley v. Gibson's notice pleading standard, and imposed a new plausibility pleading standard upon the federal court system. Alaska, along with a majority of states however, still retains Conley's "no set of facts" notice pleading standard. This Note asks, in light of the difference between the federal and Alaska pleading standards, whether Alaska—or any state—could be forced to apply the federal pleading standard when it adjudicates federal substantive claims. Prior to Iqbal, a plaintiff in Alaska would have faced the same pleading obligations in state and federal court regardless of whether he pleaded a state or federal claim. As this Note describes, now, a plaintiff could face different pleading standards depending on not only where he brings his claim, but also, if he's in state court, whether he brings a state or federal claim. The reason for this is the Reverse-Erie doctrine: an little-developed judicial choice of law theory that broadly asks which procedure, federal or state, applies in a state court proceeding. Using the differences between federal and state pleading standards as an opportunity to flesh out Reverse-Erie, this Note concludes that while it is unlikely that the Supreme Court would force a state to adopt the federal pleading standard, the jurisprudential framework for such a move exists.
Philip A. Tarpley, The Doctrine In The Shadows: Reverse-Erie, Its Cases, Its Theories, And Its Future With Plausibility Pleading In Alaska, 32 Alaska Law Review 213-248 (2015)


This clever charging system is designed to fit in a car cup holder to dock an iPhone (up to iPhone 5) or iPod in place preventing it from moving around while driving. It also neatly stores the charging cable away in the base to prevent clutter in the car's interior.
Two cigarette lighter sockets are provided as well as a USB output for use with other electronic devices. It also has an LED indicator to indicate the level of your battery.
Dimension: 100(H) x 70(Dia. base) x 92(Dia. top)mm.


text:
/**
 *
 */
package org.corpus_tools.atomic.api.commands;

import org.corpus_tools.atomic.api.editors.DocumentGraphEditor;
import org.corpus_tools.salt.common.SDocumentGraph;
import org.eclipse.core.commands.AbstractHandler;
import org.eclipse.ui.IEditorPart;
import org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI;

/**
 * TODO Description
 *
 * @author Stephan Druskat <mail@sdruskat.net>
 *
 */
public abstract class DocumentGraphAwareHandler extends AbstractHandler {

	private final SDocumentGraph graph;

	/**
	 *
	 */
	public DocumentGraphAwareHandler() {
		IEditorPart editor = PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getActiveWorkbenchWindow().getActivePage().getActiveEditor();
		if (editor instanceof DocumentGraphEditor) {
			graph = ((DocumentGraphEditor) editor).getGraph();
		}
		else {
			graph = null;
		}
	}

	/**
	 * @return the graph
	 */
	public final SDocumentGraph getGraph() {
		return graph;
	}
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


DSP Bond Direct-Dividend Monthly is a Debt mutual fund scheme from DSP Mutual Fund. This scheme was launched on 01 Jan 2013 and is currently managed by its fund manager Saurabh Bhatia. It has an AUM of ₹491.37 Crores and the latest NAV decalared is ₹11.129 as on 18 Apr 2019 at 9:30 pm.
DSP Bond Direct-Dividend Monthly scheme return performance in last 1 year is 4.61%, in last 3 years is 23.83% and 62.57% since scheme launch. The min. SIP amount to invest in this scheme is ₹500.


Taboo – the classic game that challenges you to guess words and phrases. Fun, easy and always a crowd pleaser when the family gets together. I just never knew my Goldendoodle was into that sort of thing!
He may be cute, but he couldn't help his team. They lost the game!
Oh I will check out Taboo! I haven't heard of this game but it sounds like a great one for family gatherings! Great pics – looks like you all had fun over the holidays!
Now that my kids are older, we've really gotten into games over the holidays. Taboo has become one of our favorites.
Better stick to dog games like catch the wabbit where you have the advantage.
Good job, Jaxson! That team would have been lost without him. LOL He is really good at that game for someone who can't speak human words. 🙂 Taboo is a lot of fun. You have a gorgeous family!
how could he lose? He would never had said the taboo words!!!
He was the life of the party, that's for sure.
My family loves playing games too, but I don't think the dogs ever tried to help! You give it your best effort, Jaxson!
Games for our family is relatively new. We are enjoying them now – more than ever!
I love Taboo! We haven't played in eons. I'll have to bring it out at the next family function.
We're just now enjoying games with the kids, there are so many out there that can keep an entire room laughing for hours. Tiffany is the game person, she's always bringing a new one home.


text:
Home/Books/Book Reviews/Book Review: Accelerando Will Make Your Brain Hurt – In a Good Way
Book Review: Accelerando Will Make Your Brain Hurt – In a Good Way
Tim Gebhart August 22, 2005 4 Comments 303 Views
Hold on to your brain. Accelerando may cause cognitive overload.
Trying to "understand" Charles Stross's latest novel starts with something called the Singularity. The Singularity is a point in the future where technological progress and societal change produce such superhuman intelligence that those who precede the event are unable to comprehend it. As elucidated by mathematician and science fiction author Vernor Vinge, this superhuman intelligence may arise from computers or computer networks that awake to consciousness and/or individual computer/human interfaces that allow humans to be continually connected to computing power and information.
This is the rarified stage upon which Stross follows three generations of the highly dysfunctional Macx family in the 21st century. We meet Manfred Macx in the opening decades of the 21st Century. He is an idea man. He uses his human/computer interface to assimilate more than a megabyte of text and several gigabytes of AV material every day, staying current on ideas, trends and news as he develops concepts for new businesses, patents and other intellectual property. But Manfred isn't a billionaire, he's a venture altruist. He gives his ideas away, eschewing money to live off the favors and benefits his clients bestow upon him.
In Manfred's world humans can work and reside in two places separately or at the time time&#8212cyberspace and "meatspace." Part of Manfred's ideas and efforts involve freeing lobster "intelligence" uploaded into and meshed with a computing system that runs an asteroid mining project space and his seemingly off the cuff discussion of dismantling the planets and moons in the solar system to convert them into computronium for use in a system-wide nanocomputer network.
These are just the surface of the ideas Stross explores. Trying to grasp some of them will force you to seriously engage your frontal lobe. Moreover, some of the more difficult concepts can only be described in language that does not easily flow. For example, here is Stross's description of a "3D printer" in action:
It hisses slightly, dissipating heat from the hard vacuum chamber in its supercooled workspace. Deep in its guts it creates coherent atom beams, from a bunch of Bose-Einstein condensates hovering on the edge of absolute zero. By superimposing interference patterns on them, it generates an atomic hologram, building a perfect replica of some original artifact, right down to the atomic level&#8212there are no clunky moving nanotechnology parts to break or overheat or mutate. Something is going to come out of the printer in half an hour, something cloned off its original right down to the individual quantum states of its component atomic nuclei.
Similar detail applies to many of the central concepts, perhaps indicating why some innovative souls have created a wiki technical companion to the book.
But Stross doesn't focus solely on technological and scientific ideas. He also raises some of the multitude of significant societal issues they create. Here is just one, "here's another potential ramification" example:
A religious college in Cairo is considering issues of nanotechnology: If replicators are used to prepare a copy of a strip of bacon, right down to the molecular level, but without it ever being part of a pig, how is it to be treated? (If the mind of one of the faithful is copied into a computing machine's memory by mapping and simulating all its synapses, is the computer now a Moslem? If not, why not? If so, what are its rights and duties?)
The issue and ramifications of dealing with minds loaded into computers becomes highly relevant in the next generation. Amber is the next Macx on the stage. She may be the first to qualify as "posthuman." As a teen, she goes to Jupiter as part of a mining and colonization effort. She ends up creating her own society on a rocky asteroid orbiting that planet. Ultimately, she becomes part of a group of explorers who seek out an alien router. That's right, a router like that used for any computer network. Humanity, such as it is at this point, is realizing that the universe may be just one vast computer network. The question is how humans can connect to that network, especially since work to dismantle planets to turn the solar system into a nanocomputer network is getting underway.
How do the explorers search for the router? They upload their "brain states" to a "Coke-can-sized slab of nanocomputers" which is launched toward the a brown dwarf star that is the suspected site of the router. These uploads reside and live in "simulation space" throughout their journey, although their people whose minds were uploaded remain at Amber's asteroid and continue to live their own lives. If and when the uploads return, the plan is to download them into newly cloned bodies, meaning one person may have two separate lives, memories and experiences.
Macx Generation 3.0 is Sirhan. Sirhan enters the scene as part of a group terraforming, so to speak, Saturn in the last third of the 21st Century. Most of the inner planets are gone, converted into computronium, and someone or something is pushing completion of that task in the solar system. Much of what comprises "humanity" today resides near the system's central core, wanting to be near as much bandwidth as possible.
The posthumans terraforming Saturn call those in the central core the "Vile Offspring." They are "weakly godlike intelligences" who no longer need or want physical bodies. The activities of the Vile Offspring, combined with artificial and intelligent financial instruments operating on the basis of "Economics 2.0," pose a dire threat to Saturn's posthumans. Yet they and an increasing flow of immigrants&#8212memories of human "ghosts" the Vile Offspring are uploading to the planet and that are being placed in bodies created from accompanying genome information&#8212differ as to how to deal with the threat.
Yet all of this just touches the surface of the ribbons of ideas Stross unfolds in this work. Given the number of ideas and the complexity of some, Accelerando can drag at times. This may also be due in part that the book basically brings together nine novelettes Stross published in Asimov's Science Fiction from 2001 to 2004. Each novelette was nominated for recognized science fiction awards, with four earning Hugo nominations, but they won no awards.
Accelerando itself may be a publishing version of the "open source" ideas Manfred Macx exemplifies. Not only are the nine short stories upon which it is based available online, Stross has made the complete work available for free online in various electronic formats under a Creative Commons license.
Undoubtedly, Stross owes much to other thinkers and visionaries of the predicted Singularity. Yet in years to come, Accelerando may be recognized as a seminal work of science fiction. It certainly is deserving of a Hugo nomination for best novel. Someone may even have to create a new award for the work of science fiction that most makes the reader's brain hurt so good.
Edited: PC
Tags books SF
About Tim Gebhart
After 30 years of practicing law to provide shelter for his family, books and dogs. Tim Gebhart is now perfecting the art of doing little more than reading, writing and sleeping.
Comic Review: 'White Savior' by Eric Nguyen and Scott Burman
Book Review: 'The Silent Patient' by Alex Michaelides
Book Review: 'Last Night in Brighton' by Massoud Hayoun
Comic Review: 'Revenge of the Librarians' by Tom Gauld from Drawn+Quarterly
'Revenge of the Librarians' by Tom Gauld is a must-read comic collection for every bibliophile.


Quality of TMC receivers on the market varies largely. Poor receivers utilize the efficient TMC service only to a fraction. Long waiting periods, wrongly received messages as well as incomplete and outdated messages are the consequences for the user.
While the TMC service is able to keep several hundred traffic events continuously up-to-date, bad receivers use only a small fraction of it and lead the driver around not existing jams or directly into existing ones.
The frustration of the users is understandable and the shortcomings of bad receivers destroy the image of the navigation devices or are wrongly charged to the TMC service.
"...a short test showed that with the AVANTEQ device the reception was troublefree and provided the messages earlier than the device of ..."
and many more factors, which our TMC solutions take into account.
Our SUPERTUNE ® technologies guarantee good reception even under difficult conditions. In addition to measures regarding hardware and antenna design, learning algorithms characterize this technology.
Our software continuously analyzes the available stations, automatically tunes fast and accurately FM tuner parameters and thus ensures an optimal reception. This technology, we have named: SUPERTUNE ®.
The better reception has been verified. In tests of the renowned technical journals c't and Pocket PC Magazine, our receivers have been compared with competitors' products and stood out due to their superior reception quality and won the tests.
You can easily test it yourself. Just check, if your navigation device shows first traffic messages seconds after switching on. Or compare, if the message stock is complete within few minutes. It should be - provided an according TMC infrastructure exists. Beyond the reception quality under lab conditions - most important is the reception under field conditions, when many stations can be received, but only a few are usable.
For several of our newly developed technologies we have applied for international patents.


Enjoy all the exclusivity of owning your own suite for one night only!
Whether you are treating family, friends or entertaining clients you can enjoy your own VIP suite and make it a very special occasion with balcony seating in a luxury suite for 12-28 people.
Interested in Exclusive Suite Hire? View the upcoming events below and click on your event for more information and prices.