text:
Two questions about Pepsigate and #SbFAIL: Contracts, principles, and credibility
By terrasig on July 10, 2010.
If you're tired of talking about the debacle that was PepsiCo's paid blog that was sprung on us here at ScienceBlogs earlier this week, please carry on elsewhere.
However, this episode is certainly the talk of both scientists and journalists. I suspect that this case will be discussed and dissected in the coming months at conferences and in journalism classrooms around the world.
Two questions have arisen in the last few days between discussion with my wife and fellow bloggers that have not been answered. One has a true answer while the other is more of a value judgement:
1. PepsiCo's Mehmood Khan, MD, put up a post at the existing corporate home of the Food Frontiers blog about their 36-hour presence at ScienceBlogs:
Earlier this week, PepsiCo's blog, Food Frontiers, was added to ScienceBlogs.com so we could begin open discussions about the role science can play in finding solutions to global nutrition challenges.
Since the announcement of our participation in ScienceBlogs.com, we've heard some very candid feedback from the ScienceBlogs community. As many of you have undoubtedly heard by now, the Food Frontiers blog has been removed from ScienceBlogs. In hearing the community's feedback, we agree with this decision and feel that the best approach is to take a step back and first examine the role industry scientists, such as myself, can play in the discussion about nutrition science within the larger scientific community.
We knew going in that there would be real differences among scientists within and outside of industry. Our intent is to embrace that conversation, share what we're doing, and have open discussions to learn from one another as we move toward real solutions. We look forward to engaging in those discussions in communities such as ScienceBlogs as well as here on Food Frontiers.
The specific wording that the blog "has been removed from ScienceBlogs" raises the question as to whether ScienceBlogs management canceled their contract with PepsiCo or whether PepsiCo realized they didn't want to stay with all of the turmoil associated with their presence. While we remaining bloggers at ScienceBlogs were not privy to negotiations at Seed Media Group's New York City offices, a contract between the two entities had to be dissolved.
Therefore, do you think that ScienceBlogs management initiated discussions with PepsiCo to cancel their contract or did PepsiCo actually initiate the discussion?
2. There has been much congratulatory commentary regarding those bloggers who were "principled" and left ScienceBlogs in protest. Many of the folks who left I consider dear friends as do I consider those who made such congratulatory statements to others. Some discussion has focused on the fact that professional journalists and book authors had no choice but to leave lest they strike a blow to their long-term credibility. Some bloggers feel that the debacle is outside of their personal blog mission to provide science content (i.e., they do not consider themselves professional journalists).
However, is it implicit that those of us who remain at ScienceBlogs are "unprincipled" or are otherwise lacking in credibility?
I've been trying to get a Polldaddy survey to render here for both of these questions but there appears to be some technical difficulty. And, as you might guess, there is no technical support person to contact here to help. Looks to me as though the Polldaddy widget works just fine in my backed-up blog at Wordpress.
So, in the meantime, let us know in the comments what you might think about these two queries.
"Very candid"
Pepsi's Chief Scientific Officer addresses #Sbfail: Earlier this week, PepsiCoâs blog, Food Frontiers, was added to ScienceBlogs.com so we could begin open discussions about the role science can play in finding solutions to global nutrition challenges. Mmmm, sorta. The blog was indeed added (then…
A teachable moment
So, PepsiCo has started up a new blog here on ScienceBlogs called Food Frontiers. From the profile: PepsiCo's R&D Leadership Team discusses the science behind the food industry's role in addressing global public health challenges. This is an extension of PepsiCo's own Food Frontiers blog. This…
Welcome to inescapable conflict of interest.
Today ScienceBlogs launched a new sponsored blog, Food Frontiers. The sponsor is PepsiCo. Here's the description of what the blog is going to be about from its inaugural post by Sb overlord Evan Lerner: On behalf of the team here at ScienceBlogs, I'd like to welcome you to Food Frontiers, a new…
PepsiCo Food Frontiers blog did not have to be a #SbFAIL
Given the events of yesterday about corporate sponsorship in the objective landscape of science journalism, I found it ironic that my research collaboration meeting at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill brought me to their beautiful FedEx Global Education Center where I enjoyed an iced…
Regarding question 1., I have no idea, since I have no facts beyond what you just provided me there. No comment.
Regarding 2. -- no, it does NOT make those of you who stayed automatically unprincipled, in my view at least. I am very aware from RL(tm) that highly principled people whose principles are in broad agreement can nevertheless follow different chains of reasoning (fuelled by different reasons) about "appropriate action" and end up with very different results. This doesn't make any automatically wrong, nor does it in this case.
By Luna_the_cat (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
1) I'm guessing the % of SB fans ticked off over this move >> the % of Pepsi fans ticked off by this move, ergo SB had much more *motivation* to initiate the discussion. That said, not being terribly familiar with negotiating contracts, I don't understand why it matters who initiates the discussion.
2) There are two possible categories of principles that might cause people to leave:
A) People can't take the blow to their credibility. The 'ethics' of this depend on whether their chief need for credibility is personal pride, or based on a realistic assessment of how much progress they are making in some bigger goal- like scientific literacy. Honestly, I see this category of motivation as predominantly selfish, unless someone has a very good idea about the readers they have, the readers they would have with the Pepsi blog as a neighbor, and the factors each of these groups weigh (and how much) in determining whether a source is trustworthy. In short, it's likely awfully speculative. Although I suppose if someone saw another blog network go totes down the crapper after getting too corporate that might mean the fears were valid- the next question is 'how much good are you doing in the first place' and I think that varies according to the blog and the purpose(s) of the authors.
That said, there is nothing unseemly about wanting to have one's *personal* integrity less questionable because of one's personal selfish goals for blogging. It's a matter of sensible personal cost-benefit analysis at that point though, not some noble-minded sacrifice of quitting SB for the larger good.
B) The other category, which you don't so much bring up but I think is causing immense distress to some of my favorite bloggers, is whether it is ethical to continue working for a business that has, reportedly, in some cases not treated it's workers so well. For that ethical category of issue, there are a lot of questions:
*How bad was the behavior? How widespread?
*How much good is Seed doing in general?
*Is Seed reformable?
*If you actually stopped and thought to ask the same questions (e.g. in the treatment of students by professors at your university), are you already tolerating worse business practices that you should protest? This question is somewhat tangential, because the number of places you can be outraged about at the same time >1, but as a practical matter there does have to be some realistic assessment of the question
*Is this a battle I want to prioritize?
Anyone leaving to enact better treatment of writers, or *staying* and *acting* to reform Seed to produce better treatment of writers, could be acting out of noble principles for this category of issues.
Of course, I suspect in many cases people are leaving out of a combination of not wanting to be treated badly as a writer *and* not wanting to continue supporting Seed as an organization which is not behaving well. Which is why it gets awfully messy to categorize 'principled' behavior and 'non-principled' behavior, but it's important to remember the amazing powers of the human mind in post-hoc rationalizations.
By becca (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Personally, I'm not sure either of your two questions can be addressed without considering them oversimplified. For instance, #1 may conflate which entity first suggested contract termination with which entity first noticed or monitored the outraged reaction in real time. There may also have been termination provisions in the contract beforehand; or, as some have suggested, Sb and/or Pepsico may have known going in that an outraged response was likely and prepared some sort of contingency plan. My personal thought is that "which entity initiated termination" is probably a meaningless question unless one side had to forcibly convince the other, which I find unlikely.
Question #2, again in my opinion, doesn't address the difference between actual and perceived loss of credibility, which in turn affects the personal cost that each blogger in their different situations had to consider. My personal view is that since the situation was caused by Seed management without the knowledge or input of the bloggers here, said bloggers can't *rationally* be held responsible for that breach of ethics. Leaving and staying can both be considered principled stances: weighing personal loss of credibility and the significance of conflicts of interest, versus collective loss of credibility and the importance of preserving an open scientific community.
I think a truer measure of integrity will be displayed by everyone's actions in the immediate future than what they've done in the immediate past.
By Pteryxx (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
do you think that ScienceBlogs management initiated discussions with PepsiCo to cancel their contract or did PepsiCo actually initiate the discussion?
I think it was probably mutual. The backlash Pepsi's reps and Adam Bly were seeing grow on an hourly basis would've definitely lead both parties to conclude that Food Frontiers being effectively syndicated on Sb, was a bad idea. I don't think we'll know who made the first phone call unless we're explicitly told by both Bly and Pepsi, but it seems like the decision was mutual. The network was becoming unmanageable for Bly, and Pepsi's PR people didn't want to deal with hundreds of comments filled with rage per post.
is it implicit that those of us who remain at ScienceBlogs are "unprincipled" or are otherwise lacking in credibility?
Why? Did you sponsor the PepsiCo blog? Did you endorse it and its content? Did you blog for their PR flacks? Then why would we think you would be less principled than those who left? Besides, I can understand the technical difficulties of moving a blog and really didn't expect anyone with good traffic to move anywhere in the first place.
Big blogs need a good platform. Someone like me, with between 1,200 and 1,600 views a day on average has a small enough blog to move wherever I please and even then it's a huge pain since the URL will change, Google will take months to catch up, and the syndication with Google News and other network partnerships is gone. When I moved from True/Slant back to my own domain (due to technical issues we just couldn't work out), my traffic went through an insane phase in which it fluctuated wildly and readers had trouble keeping up with the move.
A big blog like Orac's, or the giant Pharyngula, are very hard to move and all the difficulties with a URL change are multiplied tenfold for them. Plus, they need a small server farm to support their traffic, otherwise, they'll have to pay about $50 to $100 a month to avoid the site exceeding its bandwidth on a regular basis, and having users unable to load their newest posts.
By Greg Fish (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
With regards to the first question, I think it's more likely that ScienceBlogs management initiated the discussions. Since much of the revenue is generated by site traffic, losing those who generate content cannot be good for business. It's also possible that it became a mutual decision quite quickly, given the less than favorable commentary about PepsiCo on the ScienceBlogs network.
In reference to the second question, the answer is no-staying at ScienceBlogs does not a priori make you or any other blogger "unprincipled". Many bloggers who have stayed published posts that were very critical of the whole situation and contributed to the changes that were made. If you had jumped on the SEED bandwagon and promoted the blog without question or without highlighting the commercial component, then we could start tossing around the unprincipled label.
By biochem belle (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Of course staying does not mean you are unprincipled. All it means is that you were not bothered enough by PepsiGate to make the move.
As biochem belle said, it's not as if you were ready to promote the whole PepsiCo blog, it's something that happened here without your permission. And since it's now gone, it's not even like you have to condone it's presence to stay.
By Candid Engineer (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
The first question is very interesting, but may turn out to be less so. It may be that both parties made a similar decision prior to communicating their final thinking on the matter. I suggest this becasue the final outcome became quite obvious at some point.
Your second question is also something I've been thinking about. Carl Zimmer made a comment that suggested that there was a spectrum of principled behavior correlated to a spectrum of action (those who left having higher principles). I pointed out in a comment on his blog post that he may not have meant what looks like an inappropriate value judgement, and he agreed. But it was interesting that a smart thoughtful journalist who is very good at expressing himself automatically slid into the rhetoric of ethical spectrum, even though he was not consciously thinking of that.
Later, I noticed that Eric at Primate Diaries had a similar statement. I wrote him a private email bout it, and he, like Carl, essentially agreed that he had not meant to imply that there is an ethical spectrum, but again, there it was in what he said, even though he was quite honestly aghast at the thought of such a thing.
As an aside, this brings something else to the forefront: If I was an asshole (and I very well may be) and I did't like Carl or Eric, I might well not give them a pass. I might insist that they need to take responsibility for their writing and must live up to the fact that they said this offensive thing about 70 or so of their colleagues (the ones that did not seek the high ground of quitting Sb). Much of the conversation on scienceblogs and elsewhere is shaped by that kind of culturally adapted ethically, and I find it annoying. It happens that I like/respect Carl and Eric. So I didn't get to be an assohole about it. (But of coruse, I wouldn't have anyway, I'm sure). But I digress.
One could also turn this around and say, and this has been said by various bloggers and commenters, that those who left instantly not only don't have a higher ethical sense, but rather, have a lower sense of proportion, or are touchy or raw in some way that they can't control themselves and are too reactionary, etc. etc.
What I find interesting about that, and I'm pretty sure this is very important: Look at the range of people who a) left, b) almost left and c) really really heavily threatened to leave. Look especailly at the first group. What holds them all together? What makes them similar?
Nothing,as far as I can tell. They are not ethics bloggers, they are not topically aligned, they are not all book writers (though maybe disproportionately so? ...I doubt that matters). There is a trend of severity of complaint: Journalist types and those involved in health issues linked to diet and nutrition said more about the ways they were offended than others. I suspect that difference, though, was in a matter of ability to instantly articulate their point of view.
I strongly suspect that the factors that determined who simply walked out vs who didn't even mention walking out, and shades of different in between, was mostly a matter of very individual difference. People even differed in how much they knew about what was going on and when (some bloggers actually ignore their blogs for a few days at a time!).
In the end, I suspect there is no pattern of any consequence. And, certainly, there is no ethical spectrum predicted by who did what and when, and associated with what rhetoric.
By Greg Laden (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
I have no idea about question 1, but I would guess it was initiated by SB.
As for question 2, no, staying does not make you unprincipled. There are lots of principled responses, including leaving at once, going on hiatus with the option to leave if things don't improve, remaining active but expressing concern and keeping the option to leave, remaining active and expressing support for the Pepsi blog, .....
The point I'm trying to make is that the incident and the response to it were a process. In the end, the feedback from readers and writers of blogs at SB brought about a change (one that I was glad to see). There were, and are, many options for principled response.
In fact, I hope that some of the folks who left will come back.
By ecologist (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
BTW, in reference especailly to Becca's comment, but generally important: We do NOT have a sample of who "left" vs. did not. This entire thing happened over 24 or 36 hours. We have a sample of people who left instantly vs those who may or may not have left, say, a few hours or a few days later. I'm certainly in that latter category. I made the conscious decision to wait a few days or even a couple of weeks to see what happened, since I thought it was a very dynamic situation.
By gregladen on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
No way to answer that first question. You seem to be asking "What is your opinion about unknown facts?"
Second question: I don't have any strong feelings about those who stayed versus those who departed. As a for-instance, PZ Myers brought the subject up, allowing great numbers of us readers to make ourselves aware of the PepsiCo site and the conflict, but did not depart from ScienceBlogs -- not, I think, because he's some traitor to the cause, but because he was STILL THINKING ABOUT IT, AND GATHERING MORE DATA. Considering the uproar, there was a very good chance, even early in the conflict, that PepsiCo (or ScienceBlogs) would abandon the effort. Among this readership, an obvious injustice (PepsiCo attempting to trade on the blogger-scientists' credibility) would obviously provoke an outraged response.
Those who left were necessary to give the argument heft in the eyes of ScienceBlogs and PepsiCo, and kudos to them all for having the courage to react so quickly to this travesty.
To those considering coming back to ScienceBlogs, I don't think they'd suffer any loss of honor or reputability. They made their point with courage; they're free to go back to ScienceBlogs or depart as their desires dictate. (And I think ScienceBlogs should publicly offer to take them all back, with no anger or enmity.)
By Hank Fox (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
One thing I DO take away from the thing: There were a number of wait-and-see comments throughout the blogs among the readers. Being a journalist, I can excuse non-journalists for failing to immediately understand the point, and it's completely okay with me that they felt cautious.
What I can't forgive is those commenters who acted like the rest of us with strong feelings about the incident were insane or hideously overreacting.
I suspect some of them may have been PepsiCo sock puppets assembled on short notice to quash the conflict, but I'd bet some of them were authentic readers of ScienceBlogs.
They're welcome to their opinions, then and now, but they're NOT welcome to my respect after having done what they did -- treating people (who, as it turns out, knew more about the true nature of the situation than they did) as if they were crazy.
One who sticks in my mind was a certain "dewey" among the commenters at ERV. Nasty little prick.
And just as a side note, I thought the blogger at ERV was a bit of a dick for his/her approach to the thing, calling some of those who left "spineless" and "pig fuckers," etc. in a post titled "SciBlogs caves to hysterics."
"However, is it implicit that those of us who remain at ScienceBlogs are "unprincipled" or are otherwise lacking in credibility?"
No. But what IS clear is that most of those who stayed are scientists, not journalists, and that breaching the wall between editorial and advertising didn't ring the same kind of alarm bells for them as it did for journalists.
By Dirk Hanson (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Good questions, Abel.
1) I have no idea, but it's an important question to ask. Throughout this entire ordeal, I have been extremely discouraged by the lack of communication between SEED HQ and Sb. Bly has enough time to start up a blog, but - outside of a tin-eared letter - not let us know what's up? Not a good sign. As I have said elsewhere, this latest event is not an isolated incident, but part of a pattern of poor communication and disrespect coming from SEED.
2) I don't think you - or any other blogger who has decided to stay - is "unprincipled" or lacks integrity for doing so. I guess that's the problem with trying to support people who have left/taken a prominent stand (especially in places like Twitter where there's very limited space to write) - by saying someone who took a particular action in this kerfuffle has integrity, are you also implying that people who have not done the same lack integrity? I don't think the people who have supported the Sb diaspora mean it this way, but (if I were on the other side of things) I might be a touch put off by such statements, myself.
Every blogger has decided to stay, go on hiatus, or leave for personal reasons - even though Scicurious, David Dobbs, Rebecca Skloot, and I all left (among others) I imagine our reasons for doing so partially overlap and partially differ. For me, this was a "last straw" kind of event which underscored my growing frustration with SEED. The fact that Sb was going to start running Pepsi advertisements under the guise of a science blog was a large part of my decision, but, to tell you the truth, the momentum behind my decision had been building for a while. That's why I don't look down or have any ill feelings towards those who stay - their experience is not mine, and what has become intolerable in my perspective might not be the same to them. Even in the cases where I disagree strongly with the reaction of other bloggers here (like ERV and Jason Rosenhouse) I don't think of them as corrupt or unprincipled for staying put.
For me, it was the right time to go, but I can't tell other bloggers what they should or should not do in this situation. Each writer has to assess the situation for themselves and then make their move. I have made mine, and I will be curious to see what other writers do over the next few days and weeks.
By laelaps on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
I have no opinion on (1) but I think I should probably say something about 2, given that I wrote a tweet yesterday in support of the departed bloggers that led to (a) the implicit assumption that you describe and (b) me getting taken to task by GrrlScientist and Drugmonkey. Which was fair enough.
Unconstrained by a 140-character limit, I think it is possible to applaud the principles of people who left, without casting aspersions on those of people who have (thus far) stayed. I think people who left made a brave decision (as Zimmer pointed out, any blog transition involves a loss of readers and a lot of inconvenience). And I think it was a principled one, whether those principles revolve around journalistic integrity or around feelings about Pepsi itself.
But it's also notable that many of the bloggers who stayed had the exact same objections. The fact that they didn't react in the same way as those who left illustrates nothing about their character. It's a complex decision influenced by many variables and individual circumstances dictate how people choose to express their principles. For someone who knows they'll get a spot on another blogging community, or who has a large enough readership to survive independently, it's perhaps an easier decision. It's a different situation for people who rely more heavily on blogging income or who has only just started building up a readership.
So no, I don't cast any judgment upon any of the Sciblings for their decisions (except possibly the example highlighted by Hank Fox, which was about as puerile a reaction as you could get). And as Hank said, I do cast serious judgment on people who accused others of taking this too seriously, or overreacting.
Perhaps the biggest failing here was that people like myself who were trying to support the departed Sciblings by applauding their decisions failed to consider that those who opted to stay were going through an equally difficult time in a less public way. For that, apologies.
By Ed Yong (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
What Ed, Hank and Dirk said. I equally support those who left, and those who spoke out yet stayed. It's a personal decision, and not always clearcut, because different people have different priorities and predicaments. The journalists were understandably more upset than the scientists, because that's a really important "wall" in our profession. It just can't be tolerated. The "it's no big deal" crowd were being disingenuous at best, but the spittle-flecked incoherent rantings of ERV/"The Situation" did provide some comic relief. :)
By Jennifer Ouellette (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
I agree with Ed and others here that support for those who left in no way implies disdain (or even lack of support) for those who stayed. It's an incredibly tough decision and there's no right answer. As a science journalist and someone who's very concerned about the blurring of these ad/edit lines, I'm heartened by the fact that some bloggers were in a position where they could take a stand. That bodes well, I believe, for the future. But those who spoke up yet stayed did something important too. I hope Science Blogs emerges stronger from all this, so that it can stand as an example of a site that made a wrong call, listened to its bloggers and remedied the situation, and became a beacon for editorial integrity. Who knows, it could happen...
By Hillary Rosner (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Re: Question 1 - I have no data upon which to form a hypothesis. :/
Re: Question 2 - Definitely not "unprincipled". Every day, we decide what battles we want to fight, and {insert fictional character here} only knows how many there are out there. You can't be expected to fight every battle, every where, or you'll not get anywhere on any of them. Everyone has their own way of reaching a conclusion, and if people reached the conclusion that leaving was what was best for them, so be it. Doesn't mean your ethical calculator is miscalibrated, it must has a different way of working. :)
I'm glad you stayed. BTW - congrats on the millionth page view!
By Samantha (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
but the spittle-flecked incoherent rantings of ERV/"The Situation" did provide some comic relief. :)
Well I personally really liked your reasoned response as to why Im actually wrong.
By sa smith on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
To complicate it further, there was more to the story than just principled outrage at an ethics violation. There has also been a simmering discontent over very poor tech support at Sb, and some purely pragmatic forces are contributing to the unrest.
I was sitting on the fence waiting for some resolution before I jumped one way or the other -- ultimately, I think the management at Seed is idealistic and well-intentioned. Good intentions don't mean you won't make catastrophic errors, unfortunately, and so I gave them time to sort it out, and was 90% confident they'd do the right thing.
One real problem that might have prevented this from happening in the first place is that the sciencebloggers have almost no communication with the Seed overlords, and vice versa. That has the good effect of giving us a lot of independence, and the bad effect that all the talent on the Sb side of operations is virtually completely untapped by the Seed Media Group side. A few conference calls or email discussions, none of this chaos would have erupted.
By PZ Myers (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
I don't think I can improve on Ed's articulation: I agree completely.
By David Dobbs (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
1) i assume that seed was proactive in cutting it off. this was a much bigger issue for SMG.
2) i don't think there's a one-size-fits-all solution for the problem. people start at different points anyway. my exp. with SMG is recent enough that i really empathize with the 'last straw' sentiment, and i've been confused for other SBers enough over the years (or with their opinions and positions) that i can get why some people were really alarmed at the blurring of the wall between advert. and editorial. but there are other aspects too with fall on the other side of the ledger. SB has added many good quality blogs in the last 6 months. i think it is a good thing for SB to continue and these blogs to get more attention and visibility.
By razib (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
1. No opinion.
2. It is absolutely not unprincipled. I actually largely agree with Greg, except that I wonder if there isn't one common element among #1 and #2 - whether it is possible that most of those of us most adamant about leaving could afford to leave fairly easily. It is easiest to walk or threaten to walk if you are not too deeply financially tied to the organization, and also have other alternatives and places you might easily shift your blog to, or if you have already investigated your options due to other things.
IMHO, this is best seen as a bit of spontaneous labor organizing and collective bargaining, and when that happens, generally speaking that's how things shake out. Often the segments of the workforce best able to walk do first, or if there's more time, begin to shift financial support to those less able to move on. Given that this only went on for a matter of a day, I wonder if at least some of those who left also did so because they could. There's nothing inherently wrong with that - it can be good in achieving a set of goals, but not being able to cut and run quickly doesn't make you a better person.
Neither, of course, does choosing the best and most ethical course you feel you can choose.
By sastyk on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Fabulous insights from everyone! I now realize it would've been silly to have a poll for either question because question 2 is especially not a simple answer.
Ed, I agree 100% with your statement, "Unconstrained by a 140-character limit, I think it is possible to applaud the principles of people who left, without casting aspersions on those of people who have (thus far) stayed."
What is simple and a point David Dobbs, Ed Yong, and others have stated on Twitter (and that fits in that 140 character format) is that PepsiCo buying a slot on SB for their own people to blog is an absolutely clear conflict of interest for Seed Media Group. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe there is no disagreement about this with any of the 20 or so of us here in the comment thread.
What varied was the rate and magnitude of reaction among bloggers. As PZ and others point out, the reaction was not solely to the PepsiCo blog but some combination of continued dissatisfaction with ScienceBlogs management and technical support.
Those of you who know me online or IRL know that I tend to the middle of the road in controversies and only infrequently act on impulse. Yet my blog queue does have a draft post saved on July 6 at 8:47 pm entitled, "Terrasig Leaving ScienceBlogs," with the text:
Funny that this should happen on the same day that I ask readers why them come to Terra Sigillata.
I do know that none of you come to read on a network that houses as "blog content" a blatant advertisement of a multinational company that so broadly contributes to human suffering directly, though obesity and diabetes
I hereby declare that Terra Sigillata will be leaving ScienceBlogs in 48 hours if the PepsiCo blog, Food Frontiers, is not removed from the network.
Instead, I took a few deep breaths, talked to my wife and other bloggers and started another post that night which I didn't finish until the morning of July 7 entitled, "PepsiCo blog, Food Frontiers, is an affront to those who built the reputation of ScienceBlogs," wherein I specifically objected to the fact that our hosts here sold one of our slots to a multinational corporation.
The stand I chose to take was to not go on hiatus because I needed, professionally and emotionally, to use whatever bully pulpit I have here to object to the decision of SB to put that blog here in the first place under those conditions and as though it were just another blog. I hold with the utmost respect my friends who left immediately and am deeply saddened by the loss of community. But I specifically pointed out I was angry not at any bloggers but rather at SB and Seed for creating a situation that left many of my friends with no choice but to leave the network, either because of them being professional journalists or bloggers-only who found this to be the last straw.
ERV, I'm sorry but your post was completely unnecessary, destructive, disrespectful, and childish. As you can see from this thread, these were not easy decisions for anyone and the degree of name-calling of your colleagues did not reflect well on your professionalism. Some standards of behavior are not generational.
This ScienceBlogs thing is a very interesting beast. We bloggers are, when it comes down to it, independent contractors who provide unedited content to the network in return for a very small amount of compensation and the assurance of a functioning technical setup. ScienceBlogs started as a really interactive community that was well-supported by people like Christopher Mims, Katherine Sharpe, and Virginia Hughes. Adam Bly never seemed to be engaged at all. I missed the one opportunity to meet him when he invited bloggers to his NYC apartment in July, 2007.
But although we are contractors, we provide 99% of the content here. And as I said before, ScienceBlogs would not have been an attractive enough advertising opportunity for Pepsi if it were not for the reputation we built over the last 4.5 years. Mixing it in as though it were a regular blog was absolutely wrong and it differed from previous corporate-sponsored blogs where some of you were actually asked to provide content around a topic, not as a propaganda machine for the company.
And although we are contractors, we all have a vested interest in the success of this enterprise because I think we all joined to further the communication of science and actively combat scientific misinformation. Many of us have suggested to management some great ideas to enhance the reach (and business returns) of SB but it falls on deaf ears. We did get a PDF of a handwritten note from Bly when SB had its record traffic day a couple of months ago. And while Bly had time to start a blog, there has been no formal apology, no further personal contact with bloggers, and no direct contact with the SB blogger community other than the promise of a conference call that still has not been scheduled. I guess we can just go comment on his blog and hope for a response from him or Lee Billings.
I derive a great deal of personal satisfaction from being here and having my blog read a bigger audience than I'd be likely to have back on Blogger or Wordpress. (Samantha, I really appreciate your sentiments - thank you.) The community here has, I think, made me a better writer and someone who thinks more broadly about science, policy, and culture. Being here has been the liberal arts education that I missed as an undergrad.
But I do have to say that ScienceBlogs is trying really hard to get the rest of us to leave. Many of us are staying because we are so deeply committed to the mission of the enterprise and are willing to forgive even this incomprehensible conflict of interest by a media company. But this is beginning to become the blog analogy of an abusive relationship and I suspect that the next several weeks will indeed be pivotal for many.
By terrasig on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
This, Abel (#23) is the best summary of my feelings I've read (or written) so far. Completely agree.
By Jason G. Goldman (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Abel, you continue to provide some of the most urbane and thoughtful contributions to this debate.
ScienceBlogs started as a really interactive community
Is this something that necessarily becomes lost as a community grows, or is this something that can reasonably be rebuilt and maintained?
Again (as I set aside packing to take my wife to her birthday dinner), ditto what Ed said, and simpatico to Abel. And yes: a diversity of blogger responses to seed's blunder is not only natural but useful: I left partly bc I figured it would take both stayer/objectors and leaver/objectors to change Seed's behavior.
Gotta go. Dinner and my own true love await.
Xxoo's to Pharmboy,
David "Defector" Dobbs
My original reply was "Can I just go with 'What Ed Yong said?'"
I've refreshed the comments page, and Abel's #23 is now up, so... that plus also #23.
After following this whole... snarl... for the past several days, I appreciate that Abel and PalMD have been keeping threads on track for respectful, productive, functional discussions. (There may be others; I don't follow all the blogs, so I apologize if I'm missing them.) Thanks for this.
By Silver (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
PZ-There has also been a simmering discontent over very poor tech support at Sb, and some purely pragmatic forces are contributing to the unrest.
How is that Pepsis fault?
I point out hypocrisy and bullshit. I appreciate when my own hypocrisy and bullshit is pointed out to me.
But I wont pretend Im wrong when Im not.
EXAMPLE #97236594: the "it's no big deal" crowd were being disingenuous at best, but the spittle-flecked incoherent rantings of ERV/"The Situation" did provide some comic relief. :)
I dont know Jennifer from Eve. Ive never said a word to this woman. I didnt even know she had a blog here. But she thinks its funny to make fun of being healthy, exactly the sentiment I brought up seven months ago (Jocks vs Nerds). Response? *crickets*
I could have sworn a few days ago everyone was ranting about how unhealthy Pepsi is.
Googled Jennifer. 'Science journalist' that leeches off the work of scientists to make it BIG in HALLYWOOD!
And Im supposed to believe people left for their 'integrity'?
Believe Im mean all you want. I wasnt 'mean' until people started badmouthing SEED.
But if you want to prove my point is wrong, you have to do better.
Followup on my earlier comment on ERV:
I entered a critical comment to ERV's post "SciBlogs caves to hysterics," but it never showed up. ERV has an approval gateway in comments, and that's fine, but he/she also apparently deletes comments that he/she considers unflattering.
As I said earlier, he/she is kind of a dick.
I love people who demonstrate passion, and I don't mind strong language in the least, but to viciously attack people â calling them "pig fuckers,â âungrateful media whore,â âfucking two-faced ass,â and âhypocritical spineless shitsâ â just because you can is the sign of a juvenile and a bully.
As one who was once part of this community, for several years several years ago, I've been watching this Pepsi incident unfold with interest and sadness. Although I am not a blogger here anymore, I still very much care that ScienceBlogs lives and breathes on because the principles it was purportedly founded on are wonderful. Open exchange of information, some expert opinions, some lay thoughts, public posting of a body of work, freedom to criticize without reprisal, the opportunity to create a community based on central thoughts and discussions.
Sounds a lot like academia. Bloggers here are, in a loose way, tenured faculty with protections of ideas and speech. The pay is nominal. The thrill of discovery or engaging in thoughtful discussion is the real reward. They are promoted based on their work ethic and quality of work (the promoting is done by readers though, not Seed!). The reputation of their institution is nearly as valuable as their own, for better or worse, and there is a clear incentive to improve that reputation. Additionally, they have a vested interest in who is admitted as a colleague. Its not just about your neighbors, its about who will participate and carry on the discussion you hope to lead.
So, what then might happen if someone tried to buy a professor position at your institution? Wouldn't you feel upset and betrayed?
Don't take the comparison too seriously. I'm now entrenched in academia and recognize the many differences. However, as with academia, problems crop up when the system tries to turn a profit rather than turn an idea. Just check out the many unaccredited for-profit universities and degree mills. I do realize that contributions can be made by such institutions, but the waters become murkier. Its easy to say that being true to science is in line with making money, but the truth is that they often do not align.
Seed, and hence Adam Bly, needs to do some soul searching as to what can realistically be accomplished when the bottom line is a dollar sign. This incident is an ugly example of the two principle clashing, and truth in science losing. He styles himself as the dean of the scienceblogs university, but even the most ivory-towered of deans have faculty meetings once in awhile.
By Ex-Scibling (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
What are you, ERV; 12 years old? 6?
You have many years of hard work ahead of you before you can claim to have done as much for the sciences as Jennifer has, or Rebecca Skloot, or for that matter many of the other colleagues you've slandered.
You say you "didn't know Jennifer from Eve"? Well, a few days ago I had no idea that you existed. I've been a writer focusing on the sciences since before you were born. I am strongly predisposed to look favorably on young women who are starting careers in the sciences and who write besides, and yet after just a few days exposure to your writing I come away with the impression that you're an unprofessional, toxic boor with nothing of value to contribute to this discussion, driven by jealousy of other people's professional success and attention-seeking.
And this is coming from someone who *likes* obnoxious people, who thinks PZ soft-pedals his message at times.
Seriously. You have some valid points to make. Make them. Lose the personal attacks. They only boost the credibility of the person you slam, and undermine your own.
By Chris Clarke (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
Why are the journalists and assorted free-lance writers not more exercised about the non-payment issue? This is hovering in the background. Is it common for media to stiff free-lance contributor?
By Cashmoney (not verified) on 10 Jul 2010 #permalink
#33 - From my experience it isn't especially common to be outright stiffed, but doing what Seed has done and paying infrequently and irregularly is not uncommon. Maybe the reason it hasn't bothered me enough to do much is that since December I've only been paid for three months - never got in the habit of receiving money from them ;-).
But she thinks its funny to make fun of being healthy
She wasn't making fun of you for being healthy, she was making fun of you for showing off. "The Situation" got his name from gratuitously putting his abs on display.
By The Solution (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink
ERV is just another PZ-wannabe retread with an insecurity complex the size of Oklahoma. Sadly this complex remains firmly wedged squarely between both ears, preventing from hearing anything constructive and only encouraging her to type shit like HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I CAN'T HEAR YOU FUCK YOU OK THX BYEEE!!!!!!!ELEVENTY!!!!!!!
By Kobayashi Maru (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink
Actually, Hank, you just went to the wrong thread. Glad you came back here to correct yourself. But Im not posting your comments now :-D
The Solution-- she was making fun of you for showing off
Yes. Showing off the fact that it is possible to enjoy 'BAD' food and maintain a healthy body, contrary to the comments ripping through SciBlogs re: Pepsi.
I do not condone attitudes that encourage disordered eating, a position that has been clear on ERV for a very long time. I didnt know that was funny.
Chris Clarke-- You have many years of hard work ahead of you before you can claim to have done as much for the sciences as Jennifer has...
Shes sold out to Hollywood (I dont care). But is condemning SciBlogs because she judged scientists as sell-outs for working for Pepsico, and judged them before they were allowed to post anything, assuming what they said would hurt everyones 'integrity'.
Yet she helped them make 'The Watchmen' movie against the wishes of Alan Moore, unconcerned about her 'integrity', despite being a writer herself.
Its hypocritical.
I also dont think that is funny.
Then, there is this: http://xrl.in/5tom
Good question, and I like the analogy. But I don't care for the presumed answer I think many people will have. Here, let me google that for you. And then there's this. In management schools they'll even sponsor your locker.
ERV- First, where has anyone ever said "it's NEVER possible to enjoy a Pepsi and be remotely healthy, EVER"? You are wrong because you are attacking a strawman position.
Second, why don't you post your glucose fasting test results, and demonstrate your insulin sensitivity, instead of posting about your abs which can only lead thinking people to conclude 1) you are interested in visual attractiveness over actual, scientifically measurable health and 2) you are vain and shallow as hell.
Third, if you really want Seed to endure, do you really think the way you are "defending" it is going to help? You are throwing ridiculous shitfits over *other* people's "hysterics" and then ranting about hypocrisy. You have to be the least self-reflective person I've ever met. Get a grip.
I'm sorry to continue to feed the troll, but if abbie is so concerned about Jennifer "selling out to hollywood" (whatever the fuck that means) then why can't she see that others might not like being seen to "sell out" to a major corp?
Of course, "selling out" was never the issue, and neither was PepsiCo, but she couldn't be bothered to read and comprehend the various posts written by more thoughtful and experienced folks.
By PalMD (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink
For the record, for anyone reading who might not know Jennifer, her "selling out to Hollywood" consists of working to help writers and directors of motion pictures get their science right: work that anyone in his or her right mind should applaud.
Chris, I also wanted to add my strong support for what Jennifer Ouelette does with the Science & Entertainment Exchange. This is a two-year-old program of the National Academy of Sciences that does indeed provide guidance to filmmakers and television producers to ensure scientific authenticity of content and portrayal of scientists.
I have been fortunate to be called upon three times by Jennifer and her staff to provide consultation and background on projects including a movie and a HBO feature film. I am grateful to Jennifer for being our bridge to Hollywood to allow us to have direct impact on the scientific content of mainstream entertainment.
A good scientist would gather all the data about Jennifer's position before making childish conclusions.
For more information on the Science & Entertainment Exchange of the National Academy of Sciences, go to:
http://www.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org/
Thanks, Jennifer, for all you do on our behalf to interface with the entertainment community in this mass media outreach program.
Wow, I missed all the drama on this thread. :) Thx to Chris and Abel for clarifying on my behalf, and thanks to Abel for coming to the Exchange's aid on several occasions when writers were stumped on pharmacology questions -- once, while recovering from a serious illness. A couple other Sciblings have also helped the Exchange, so thanks to them as well.
I should add that the Exchange is 100% nonprofit and the scientists who participate usually do so voluntarily. And my role is one of making an introduction and getting the hell out of the way so the two groups can interact without my interference. The notion that this intrinsically self-effacing position is somehow indicative of me "selling out" to "make it big in Hollywood' by leeching off scientists is far too laughable to be taken seriously as an insult. :)
Personal attacks are one thing. Abbie is free to vent her wrath on me as much as she chooses if it makes her feel better. But the Exchange itself does not deserve to be attacked, so thanks again for clarifying.
I should add that the Exchange is 100% nonprofit and the scientists who participate usually do so voluntarily.
Huh. I wonder ... If they were paid a lot -- I mean a LOT -- if their service would be even more valued and hollywood would thus get it even more right.
@Greg: Honestly? I WISH more of the scientists were paid for their expertise, because they've certainly earned it. Then again, they might be accused of "selling out." :) Truth is, the paid consulting business model just doesn't work for this, mostly because of how the system works. Scientists can have the most impact by getting involved in the early development stage, and that's when there is no budget. Everyone's working on spec. (Hollywood is a town of freelancers, in essence.) The more Hollywood comes into contact with real-world scientists and interacts with them freely, the more this will impact their portrayal of science and scientists.
That's the idea, anyway. The National Academy of Sciences is doing the experiment, and it's a long-running one, at that (real change takes years). We'll see if/how much it works.
#1 I have no idea but there would be good odds for my guess.
#2 This is going to sound contradictory but I'll do my best to explain: In no way do I consider bloggers who remain at Sb unprincipled. Bloggers were not included in the decision making process or even warned that a big business would be paying seed for hosting a blog under the umbrella of Sb. (I wonder how much PepsiCo paid and how Sb would respond to an individual who wants to "buy" a blog slot.) That being said, Sb is a community which pretends (in the sense of pretense) to have certain values/standards for content. These values are not unlike the ethical standards of science itself: transparency, truth telling and critical discourse (which in a sense is like peer review). Writers on Sb are engaging in a relatively new form of journalism (indexed by Google News) and as such, has a responsibility to adhere to the ethical standards of journalism. By including what amounts to a paid advertisement masquerading as a source of reliable information (without any prior discussion), Seed Media has violated more than one minimum standard for ethical conduct and in the process, violated the trust, credibility and reputation of all of the individual (or group) bloggers. This is not just irresponsible behavior but criminal. And this crime must not go unpunished. There may be some bloggers who, for whatever reason, are either unable or unwilling to leave Sb. The individual bloggers are not responsible for this debacle, and therefore judgement on their decision(s) to remain at Sb must be suspended. HOWEVER, every single blogger who feels like her/his integrity has been compromised (and it has!) SHOULD leave Sb. *Should,* not must -- because this is a matter of community integrity AND personal integrity.
I predict Sb will soon fold.
I suggest groups of like-minded bloggers form their own platforms. It's a lot of work, money is involved, but it's worth it. Furthermore, ERV and Isis should have their own special blog group of two. They may think they have nothing in common, but quite consistently, their behavior proves otherwise. Janet should be the Queen of her blog group, not to mention Queen of the Universe (please note that the philosopher/ethicist has already done the right thing). What I don't understand is why bloggers continue to think inside the box of advertisements as a means of financial survival. There MUST be a better/alternative way. Grants? Publishers? Universities? Form a non-profit? AND you should all be getting paid. Really paid. You are a smart bunch, put your heads together and figure it out.
I know a couple of people who spend a large part of every year working to put on one of the best, most affordable, fun (and with perfect gender parity, even with an open lottery) blogging conferences in the country. Meals are included, the wi-fi is excellent, first rate speakers, free, frequent shuttles to and from the hotel -to conference and airport- everything you could possibly want (except a free massage), and what do they get in return? The immeasurable satisfaction of a job well done, but not one red penny (for all those months, days, and hours!) It is a mitzvah to give generously but, as long as cash is required for basic survival, those who give should also get some reward, especially great bloggers.
By aidel (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink
1- I suspect ScienceBlogs initiated the discussion, but that's just a gut feeling. I have no way of knowing of course.
2- No, definitely does not make you or any of the other unprincipled in any way. Although I was certainly not happy with the Pepsi blog idea, I think their reactions were a bit overkill (or more accurately, premature). Although I definitely still respect them for doing what they felt they had to do.
There are many reasons I don't think this makes you unprincipled, but the biggest is that the Pepsi Blog never even made it past the introductory stages. I think the best course of action was to wait it out and see how it played out- and since it got pulled anyway there is nothing to worry about.
By Kat (not verified) on 11 Jul 2010 #permalink
I like the way aidel thinks.
1. I dunno
2. No. The folks who left were too hasty if Pepsi were the only concern. (Some said it was just the last straw.) The fact that the situation was resolved so quickly and, presumably, lessons were learned means that anyone who left for that, sole reason could have waited.
By Joe (not verified) on 12 Jul 2010 #permalink
Jennifer [46]: Honestly, I don't know. I defer to you entirely. It seems to me that when a category of expert is brought into a commercial enterprise, used in important ways, and never paid, that this is ideal for those getting the expertise and not paying for it. That is a little like the early days of contract archaeology, where institution based archaeologists went into proposed construction areas and provided compliance to (early forms of) law and regulation to road builders and so on. Later, when archaeology was professionalized, the effort became less academic, but more consistently done, and a lot of archaeological sites were saved that otherwise never would have been. More to the point, however, this earlier period of (Oh, we'll do it for free because we love the idea) contributed to the fact that the first decade or so of professional compliance archeology, the professionalism wasn't complete, the pay sucked, and when push came to shove, the archy's were shoved and pushed out of the way.
Hollywood is an utterly different situation because although "getting it right" and needing experts for that is parallel to EIS compliance, it is nothing close to a regulated requirement. I don't know anything about the business model. I certainly have helped novelists and even some journalists writing non-fiction a number of times, in those early stages, where there was no money flowing anywhere, and there was no expectation of pay. On the other hand, Microsoft sure got paid for their software the same people were using, and Office Max did not offer free paper for the novelists to print their novels on using the criterion that no money was flowing yet.
So, yes, it is all very complicated. I guess I would feel better if we were working towards a model where expert science consultants were not treated differently than script writers. Meaning, I suppose, like shit but with the prospect of some remuneration sometimes.
But again, I know nothing about it. I have questions but no valid opinions.
ScienceOnline'09 - Friday Lab Tour: the NC Museum of Natural Sciences
After coffee cupping, still pretty frozen, we went back to Radisson to see who else has arrived for ScienceOnline09 in the meantime. I set up my temporary field Headquarters in the lobby (photo by Lenore): After a quick lunch, it was time for Lab Tours (check blog posts and pictures for other people's experiences). A bunch of us went to the NC Museum of Natural Sciences where Roy Campbell, the…
Putting a Hex on Hitler, 1941
William Seabrook achieved fame in the early 20th century as a man willing to travel the world in search of adventure (and drink), eating with cannibals in West Africa and uncovering the Haitian zombie. His fascination with the occult and witchcraft guided many of his travels, and he was guest of honour at a remote cabin in the Maryland woods in January 1941, where a group of right-on youths were…
How Tides Work
When you get into a tight place and everything goes against you, till it seems as though you could not hang on a minute longer, never give up then, for that is just the place and time that the tide will turn. -Harriet Beecher Stowe Last week, our longtime reader Pamela asked if I could explain how the tides work. As you all know, when the tide comes in at the ocean, the water level appears to…


Brazil placed near the bottom of a 54-country ranking of English proficiency this week. But with floods of tourists expected to attend the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics, more people are signing up for English classes.
Natalia Correa (l.) teaches a basic English class at Brasas English Course, on September 21, in Rio de Janeiro. Many Brazilians are learning English in preparation for the World Cup and Olympic Games. This class meets daily, and the focus is on the spoken language rather than written.
Each day a group of seven comes to this small classroom in downtown Rio de Janeiro on lunch break. The energetic young teacher, Natália Correa, runs a drill of simple English sentences by snapping her fingers and clapping her hands to keep up a fast call-and-response beat.
"Ask me how much the pants are!" she demands.
"How much the pants are?" many of the students respond enthusiastically, if not correctly, forgetting to invert the question.
Their little cluster of learning includes a lawyer, real estate agent, IT specialist, and civil servants. And it would be nothing extraordinary, except that this kind of gathering was hard to find just a few years back.
Rated at the bottom of a new list released this week on English proficiency in a 54-country survey, Brazil is now rushing to play catch-up on the linguistic front after decades of low priorities placed on English – and Spanish – learning. With its vast size, the language barrier placed between the Portuguese-speaking nation and the rest of Spanish Latin America, and two decades of military rule that ended in the 1980s, Brazil was for a long time very inward-looking, closing its door to outsiders.
But experts say that's changing – albeit slowly – as the world eyes Brazil's booming energy sector, its public works projects, and its plans to host the World Cup in 2014 and the Summer Olympics in 2016. And with a rising middle class, millions of Brazilians are today beginning to treat English classes not as a privilege for the rich but as a commodity, not unlike a gym membership.
"It's part of the day-to-day of the growing middle class to have English as an activity," says Rone Costa, the manager for development for Cambridge ESOL Examinations in Brazil, which tests and certifies students' English proficiency.
Brazil already has some 6,215 franchises of more than 70 language schools with names like Wizard, Yes!, Wise Up, and Cultura Inglesa, according to the Brazilian Franchising Association. And that number doesn't include private teachers who give individual courses and small group lessons across the country.
Their market is large: About 4 of 5 Brazilians in the middle class, which accounts for more than half of the country, do not speak any foreign language, according to 2010 research by the Brazilian Institute of Public Opinion and Statistics. That's approximately 100 million Brazilians.
And for those who can't afford private courses, the government is putting new attention on English learning. In 2009, after Brazil won the bid to host the Olympics, it began to require that public schools in Rio de Janeiro teach English to all children between ages 6 and 8 in a program called Criança Global (Global Child).
Brazil could host hundreds of thousands of tourists and engineers in coming years. Some 700,000 jobs will be created in the tourism industry between 2011 and the 2014 World Cup, according to the Ministry of Tourism. As multinationals keep tabs on the energy and infrastructure sectors, foreigners are increasingly doing business in Brazil, with many even relocating.
And as Brazil gets more press as an emerging economy member of the so-called "BRICS," it wants to remain competitive as a major world player. A push is under way for authors to translate works to English and to send Brazilian students abroad through government-sponsored programs.
"Brazil is such an entrepreneurial society and produces a lot of quality research, yet many people don't realize this since information is rarely in English for non-Portuguese speakers to have access to," says Mary Risner, associate director at the University of Florida's Center for Latin American Studies.
As is the case across Latin America, the elite are much more likely to have language skills. "It really depends on your social class. In my house, no one speaks [English]," says Valdson Rodrigues Maia, a civil servant at the lunchtime English course. His classmates add that the course per month costs about $340, nearly as much as Rio's monthly minimum wage.
But Brazil still fares poorly compared to other nations in the region, despite its reputation as a regional political leader. The private research firm Education First ranks its proficiency in English as "very low," behind Mexico, the second-largest economy in Latin America after Brazil, and its neighbors Chile and Argentina, the only country in the region to fare well in the rankings worldwide. Brazil, on the other hand, sits at 46 out of 54 countries.
Ms. Risner says there is not just interest in English, but Spanish, too. Even though many Portuguese speakers can get by understanding Spanish, the opposite is often not true. And English is a different story altogether.
"The greatest problem we have here is pronunciation," says Ms. Correa, the teacher.
Mr. Costa says he hopes that the commitment to English learning, even if slow to start, is not fleeting.


A menu widget can be either a pull-down menu in a menu bar or a standalone context menu. Pull-down menus are shown by the menu bar when the user clicks on the respective item or presses the specified shortcut key. Context menus are usually invoked by some special keyboard key or by right-clicking.
A menu consists of a list of action items. In applications, many common commands can be invoked via menus, toolbar buttons as well as keyboard shortcuts. Since the user expects the commands to be performed in the same way, regardless of the user interface used, it is useful to represent each command as an action.
The Menus example consists of one single class, MainWindow, derived from the QMainWindow class. When choosing one of the action items in our application, it will display the item's path in its central widget.
QMainWindow provides a main application window, with a menu bar, tool bars, dock widgets and a status bar around a large central widget.
In this example, we will see how to implement pull-down menus as well as a context menu. In order to implement a custom context menu we must reimplement QWidget's contextMenuEvent() function to receive the context menu events for our main window.
We must also implement a collection of private slots to respond to the user activating any of our menu entries. Note that these slots are left out of this documentation since they are trivial, i.e., most of them are only displaying the action's path in the main window's central widget.
We have chosen to simplify the constructor by implementing two private convenience functions to create the various actions, to add them to menus and to insert the menus into our main window's menu bar.
Finally, we declare the various menus and actions as well as a simple information label in the application wide scope.
The QMenu class provides a menu widget for use in menu bars, context menus, and other popup menus while the QAction class provides an abstract user interface action that can be inserted into widgets.
In some situations it is useful to group actions together, e.g., we have a Left Align action, a Right Align action, a Justify action, and a Center action, and we want only one of these actions to be active at any one time. One simple way of achieving this is to group the actions together in an action group using the QActionGroup class.
In the constructor, we start off by creating a regular QWidget and make it our main window's central widget. Note that the main window takes ownership of the widget pointer and deletes it at the appropriate time.
infoLabel = new QLabel(tr("<i>Choose a menu option, or right-click to "
Then we create the information label as well as a top and bottom filler that we add to a layout which we install on the central widget. QMainWindow objects come with their own customized layout and setting a layout on a the actual main window, or creating a layout with a main window as a parent, is considered an error. You should always set your own layout on the central widget instead.
To create the actions and menus we call our two convenience functions: createActions() and createMenus(). We will get back to these shortly.
QMainWindow's statusBar() function returns the status bar for the main window (if the status bar does not exist, this function will create and return an empty status bar). We initialize the status bar and window title, resize the window to an appropriate size as well as ensure that the main window cannot be resized to a smaller size than the given one.
A QAction object may contain an icon, a text, a shortcut, a status tip, a "What's This?" text, and a tooltip. Most of these can be set in the constructor, but they can also be set independently using the provided convenience functions.
In the createActions() function, we first create a newAct action. We make Ctrl+N its shortcut using the QAction::setShortcut() function, and we set its status tip using the QAction::setStatusTip() function (the status tip is displayed on all status bars provided by the action's top-level parent widget). We also connect its triggered() signal to the newFile() slot.
The rest of the actions are created in a similar manner. Please see the source code for details.
Once we have created the Left Align, Right Align, Justify, and a Center actions, we can also create the previously mentioned action group.
Each action is added to the group using QActionGroup's addAction() function. Note that an action also can be added to a group by creating it with the group as its parent. Since an action group is exclusive by default, only one of the actions in the group is checked at any one time (this can be altered using the QActionGroup::setExclusive() function).
QMenuBar's addMenu() function appends a new QMenu with the given title, to the menu bar (note that the menu bar takes ownership of the menu). We use QWidget's addAction() function to add each action to the corresponding menu.
Alternatively, the QMenu class provides several addAction() convenience functions that create and add new actions from given texts and/or icons. You can also provide a member that will automatically connect to the new action's triggered() signal, and a shortcut represented by a QKeySequence instance.
The QMenu::addSeparator() function creates and returns a new separator action, i.e. an action for which QAction::isSeparator() returns true, and adds the new action to the menu's list of actions.
Note the Format menu. First of all, it is added as a submenu to the Edit Menu using QMenu's addMenu() function. Secondly, take a look at the alignment actions: In the createActions() function we added the leftAlignAct, rightAlignAct, justifyAct and centerAct actions to an action group. Nevertheless, we must add each action to the menu separately while the action group does its magic behind the scene.
To provide a custom context menu, we must reimplement QWidget's contextMenuEvent() function to receive the widget's context menu events (note that the default implementation simply ignores these events).
Whenever we receive such an event, we create a menu containing the Cut, Copy and Paste actions. Context menus can be executed either asynchronously using the popup() function or synchronously using the exec() function. In this example, we have chosen to show the menu using its exec() function. By passing the event's position as argument we ensure that the context menu appears at the expected position.


For years JPFO has warned Americans of the coming police state. A few have listened. We strongly encourage you to watch this film presentation - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0LvtQAQ6sc&feature=related - with the author of "The end of America". We also are including a link to a print interview with the author - http://www.alternet.org/rights/68399/ . One very interesting point, the author is a far left feminist but fears Hillary as much as George and praises Ron Paul. She is even beginning to learn about the Second Amendment, although still needs to learn much more.
Watch her interview and then talk up Bill of Rights Day( Dec.15) and this interview to everyone.
Don't forget, to gain further information on police state policies check out http://www.innocentsbetrayed.com/ and http://www.thegangmovie.com/ .
"The Gang Movie" can be purchased here - http://shop.jpfo.org/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=84 and the "Innocents Betrayed Movie" here - http://shop.jpfo.org/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=8 .


Amanda Agan has a fantastic collection of resources on her website related to writing and presenting your work, as well as advice for preparing referee reports. Check it out here.
Below is the Google map of the ASSA/AEA hotels listed on https://www.econjobmarket.org/.
If you have a Google account, you can save the map in My Maps after which it will be available on your mobile devices. For this you need to be logged into your Google account on both the pc/laptop and your phone/tablet. Go to the Maps app, open the tab on the top left, select "Your Places", and then navigate to "Maps". There you can easily select the different hotels and get walking directions by tapping on the purple star icons.


The 4-quart size is suggested for singles or partners, and any measurement more substantial is great for families. All it normally takes is prep time in the early morning or at night, and the gradual cooker does the rest!
8 Eyeglasses of drinking water. H2o before and soon after every food helps make you sense entire and aids in the right digestion of foodstuff, consequently avoids the vegetarian products tendency to overeat.
Salmon. Cardiologists will contact this the tremendous foods of meat, due to the fact it is a prosperous supply of unsaturated excess fat. Bought some Cajun spices on this delicious fish 2 times a 7 days and sense like you are ingesting steak.
Boca Burger has the All American Flame Grilled, the Unique, and the Grilled Vegetable. The initial two are made to flavor like meat, and the Grilled Vegetable has a vegetable taste such as zucchini, crimson pepper, and cheese. Only the First is vegan (manufactured with no eggs or dairy products.) The All American burgers have marginally far more extra fat (3.5g vs. .5g) and energy (90 vs. 70) than the initial and somewhat less protein (9g vs. 13g), but also have a richer additional beef like flavor and much considerably less excess fat and calories than a standard burger. The grilled vegetable is comparative to the other people in conditions of nourishment (1g extra fat, 80 cal, 12g professional).
You are also likely to discover yourself slowly reducing the unwanted and junk foods that you buy. I can assure you that before long the harmful stuff will not even taste fantastic to you any longer. The flavors of salt and sugar will develop into overwhelming and you'll speculate the place the chocolate went when the boxed brownie blend is so quite dark brown but all you can taste vegetarian products is salt.
Stop by Penguin Foot Pottery amongst ten a.m. until eventually one p.m. for Brunch and a Bowl at 2514 West Armitage. For $30, you'll get your very own handmade dog bowl and breakfast although you hand-pick meals and treats for your puppy. The celebration rewards Venture Rescue Chicago. Discover more on the internet.
Unsaturated body fat is a substantially more healthy body fat to eat vegan and is recognized as omega-three and omega-six fatty acids. This variety of body fat is found in greens and nuts. Unsaturated fats can decrease the possibility of heart ailment by reducing our triglycerides, the unwanted fat identified in our blood. More recent scientific tests propose that people who lose physique extra fat by taking in food items higher in unsaturated fat have a decreased risk of heart illness than these who seldom try for a very low-fat diet plan.
To speed up metabolic process and aid in weight loss, vegetables are just one of your very best possibilities! Veggies consist of vast amounts of fiber which boosts digestion and helps make you come to feel fuller. Veggies even support rid the body of poisons. Salad and cooked or raw greens ought to be a part of every food.
Meats to vegan product try to eat include things like salmon and turkey. Other protein resources incorporate nuts and beans. Organic teas, as in other detox weight loss plans, are also applied to support detoxify selected physique devices.
Whenever your arranging on your first day, you ought to, which is really significant is obtaining a ideal area to meet up with. Acquiring a day in bars or golf equipment is not a amazing plan to go as you can discover it actually irritating to have a discussion given that you can't listen to each other even though the tunes is actively playing loud.
Eat mindfully. Consume Ristorante Vegetariano a Aosta or vegan meals as generally as you can. Look at supporting local and natural and organic solutions whenever attainable. Provide a yummy vegan dish to the subsequent vacation potluck.
Garlic - Do look at unsafe feeling about garlic. No, it's not like that. Garlic has more medical positive aspects and can help you inhibit blood stream and demolish cancer cells. In the scenario of the Blood pumping the concept can enable for additional contradiction and rest to use with some physical exercises a lot more beneficial for diabetic folks.
These breakfast strips have the taste of bacon and are crispy and scrumptious. The texture is not very the exact same as real bacon, though. They are lacking the excess fat that is usually marbled by way of real bacon. You gained't fool any person into considering this is genuine bacon, but it's still delicious. I like to serve them on a breakfast sandwich consisting of a scrambled egg, a veggie bacon strip, and a slice of cheese on a toasted English muffin.
What I suggest you do alternatively is really easy. Simply go to your nearby grocery shop and concentration seriously in the fruits and veggies aisle very first, then (thinking about you are not vegan or vegetarian products) concentration on wholesome meats (this kind of as grass-fed beef, hen breast, turkey breast, and fish), and then target on every little thing else that is healthful (complete grains, unwanted fat-absolutely free dairy, and many others.).
My name is Dillon. I am a receptionist but the promotion never comes.
As a guy what I really like is to perform hockey but I haven't made a dime with it.
If you have any sort of questions relating to where and exactly how to utilize Ristorante Vegetariano a Aosta, you can contact us at our own web site.


Stacking the Shelves is a book haul hosted by Tynga's Reviews.
Hi gang! Unfortunately, I haven't been too active this month due to university assignments and a short reading slump of some sorts. But I've been doing a ton of planning and scheduling for next month, which is LGBT month! I'll be reviewing books and films that feature LGBT characters, so you should stick around if you're interested.
After reviewing a couple of older films for next month, I've been thinking about whether I should return to reviewing old films or just sticking with reviewing only new releases. The problem with reviewing only films that are in the cinema is that there isn't always something that I want to watch and I can't really afford to be going to the cinema every single week (plus, I'd gain a ton of weight from eating so much popcorn). So, as you can see, I've placed a poll in the sidebar since I'd like to know which you guys would like to see.
I went to Comic Con! Not one that's particularly huge, but we never have real conventions up in the North East, which is where I live so it was really exciting. I got a copy of Metal Gear Solid at one stall that was selling retro games (I'm going to get a console next year because there's tons of old games that I want to play, so I'll either get a SNES or a N64) and I also got some pins that were 4 for £3, as well as a Catching Fire necklace and a Dexter poster that I need to find room for.
There was a lot of good cosplay there, but I think the best that I saw was a whole family cosplaying as Goku, Chichi, and Gohan from Dragon Ball Z. The mum and dad were dressed as Goku and Chichi, while their baby was dressed as Gohan. I don't know if they won the contest, because we left to have another look around before they announced who won. Maybe I'll cosplay someday (probably as Debra Morgan, since once girl was Abby from NCIS)!
Did you get any goodies? Leave me a link and I'll make sure to pop by!
Looks like you had a good week. I haven't been to a convention for quite a while but I had fun at the ones I did attend. Come see what I added this week at Inside of a Dog and Ms. Martin Teaches Media. Happy reading!


Modern dental procedure technology can reshape uneven teeth and veneer them with high-tech ceramic. The result will give the appearance and function of a symmetrical smile. The effectiveness of this approach can depend on how crooked and crowded the teeth are to begin with. What we can do is absolutely amazing. For many adults this option is better than traditional orthodontics, and treatments can be complete in as little as two visits.
Smile Design is a conservative, non-aggressive way to rejuvenate your smile. Veneers work well for tooth reshaping and resizing. Veneers are an attractive way to rejuvenate your smile because they achieve a very natural look with a very conservative tooth preparation(shaping). Very little natural tooth structure is removed when veneers are bonded into place and the virgin strength of the tooth is recaptured as well. We have found that this is the treatment of choice for smile enhancement if more than whitening is needed.
The best use for bonding is to repair slightly chipped, discolored, or misaligned teeth. Bonding involves placing tooth-colored composite material onto the tooth. The advantages of bonding is that it is inexpensive and an ultra conservative way to restore a tooth. Bonding will discolor and is easier to break, however.
By intercepting the potential of fracture before experiencing symptoms of hot/cold sensitivity and biting pain, new conservative treatments like tooth-colored filling or porcelain bonded restorations are preventing the side effects of toothaches and broken teeth. Using a proactive rather than reactive approach to amalgam replacement is a choice many patients are happy to have.
Many restorations are fabricated using a metal lining covered with porcelain. These types of crowns are used because they are less expensive and easy to place in the mouth. They are opaque or flat looking because they do not let light pass through as a natural tooth does. There is often a dark or gray line next to the gum-line. We provide exclusively all porcelain bonded restorations. When properly placed they are as strong, if not stronger then the porcelain covered metal crowns. Notice the appearance of natural teeth again.
A Bridge is a custom device anchored to neighboring teeth that replaces one or more missing teeth. When a lost tooth is replaced with drudgework, the teeth on either side of the missing one are prepared as crowns to serve as abutments to hold the prosthetic (replacement) tooth in place. Crowns and bridges are most commonly prepared from high quality materials such as semiprecious or precious metals, porcelain, or a fused combination of the two. Aesthetics, function, and tissue compatibility are considered when selecting the material most suitable for you.
Full Mouth restoration involves restoring the teeth, bite, and muscles back to a natural looking and youthful feeling condition, thereby improving self-esteem.
Using computerized technology and an artistic eye, full mouth restoration may be the answer to many problems, such as heat sensitive teeth, sore jaw muscles, and recurring headaches.
Tooth whitening or bleaching is one of the most popular areas of cosmetic dentistry. Even subtle changes in shading can make someone look years younger. Several factors can contribute to the darkening of teeth, including the effects of age, certain foods, and drinks, smoking, and medications.
We use the Zoom! In-Office Whitening Procedure. It is easy for you, and doesn't cause any sensitivity, like other home bleaching products. We apply the Zoom! Whitening Gel to your teeth after isolating your lips and gums. A specially designed light activates this gel. All you need to do is lay back and relax as your smile is lightened.
Invisalign is a ground breaking alternative way to straighten your teeth without braces. Invisalign uses a series of removable aligners that are virtually invisible, so you don't have to worry about your appearance. You can take them out for daily necessities like eating, drinking, brushing, and flossing. Comfortable, convenient, and complimentary to your smile, Invisalign is the preferred method of teeth alignment for patients.
Implants completely simulate a natural tooth. Implants involve a surgical procedure that replaces missing teeth. A titanium cylinder secured in the bone functions as the root of your tooth. Then a crown attached to the titanium cylinder gives the appearance of a natural tooth.
Over 35 million Americans have some level of anxiety when it comes to going to the dentist. But for many, it is more than being afraid. Some of our patients have had a traumatic experience in a dental chair. But regardless of your personal history, we are here to help. We understand that your fears may have kept you from a dentist. We are not here to judge you; we are here to help you and encourage you so that you can have the confidence a beautiful smile can bring.
Most patients feel no discomfort during their treatment and feel surprisingly good afterwards. You'll receive just enough sedation so that you'll be completely unaware of the treatment, as you would if you were asleep. At the end of the treatment, you'll have little or no memory of your dental visit.
If you've been putting off years of dental work, Oral Conscious Sedation can change your life.
Yes, we accept children. In fact, they are some of our favorite patients. A child's first dental visits forms a lasting impression toward dentistry. We create a positive approach for a healthy beginning.
As we grow older, our needs change. We provide an individualized approach to accommodate each unique need with the proper dental procedures.
The greatest gift our patients can give is the referral of their friends and loved ones.


text:
· Similar Artists
Ed Sheeran - Profile
Ed Sheeran Biography
193,615 Views ·
Country : United Kingdom
Latest Song : One Life
Latest Music Video : One Life
Share ThisProfile
Other Accounts:
Howwe
Flame-haired singer/songwriter, beatboxer, and guitarist Ed Sheeran's eclectic blend of acoustic pop, folk, and hip-hop has been championed by everyone from the underground grime scene to American Oscar winners. Born in Halifax, West Yorkshire, England in 1991, Sheeran released his first EP, The Orange Room, while still at school, and his first ...
Ed Sheeran Music
One Life - Ed Sheeran
Penguins - Ed Sheeran
Beautiful People Ft. Khalid - Ed Sheeran
South Of The Border Ft. Cardi B, Camila Cabello - Ed Sheeran
Cross Me Ft. Chance The Rapper, PnB Rock - Ed Sheeran
Take Me Back To London Ft. Stormzy - Ed Sheeran
Best Part Of Me (feat. YEBBA) - Ed Sheeran
I Don't Care - Ed Sheeran & Justin Bieber
Antisocial - Ed Sheeran & Travis Scott
Remember The Name (Ft. 50 Cent & Eminem) - Ed Sheeran
Ed Sheeran News
Ed Sheeran - Shape of You
Castle on the Hill - Ed Sheeran
More "ED SHEERAN" News
Ed Sheeran Music Videos
One Life — Ed Sheeran
Beautiful People ft. Khalid — Ed Sheeran
South of the Border ft. Cardi B, Camila Cabello — Ed Sheeran
Best Part of Me (feat. YEBBA) — Ed Sheeran
I Don't Care — Ed Sheeran & Justin Bieber
Antisocial — Ed Sheeran & Travis Scott
Put It All on Me (Ft. Ella Mai) — Ed Sheeran
Nothing on You (Ft. Dave & Paulo Londra) — Ed Sheeran
More Ed Sheeran Videos

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Our office in Radcliffe is centrally located on Water Street, a twelve-minute walk away from the Radcliffe Metrolink tram stop, on the Bury to East Didsbury line. Both the 91 and 98 buses stop around the corner from our office on Ainsworth Road.
Our team in Radcliffe covers all of our services, including friendly and straightforward help with family law, litigation, conveyance, criminal law, wills and personal injury. We pride ourselves on providing legal advice in plain English, and are committed to providing the highest quality of care and service to our clients.
Our Radcliffe office is located to help our clients in North Greater Manchester and beyond, including those seeking solicitors in Bolton, Bury and Prestwich.
Call our Radcliffe office on 0161 724 0203 and we will make sure the best person is available for your enquiry when you visit.
At Garratts Solicitors we provide legal advice to the Manchester and Greater Manchester area with a local focus to make sure a high quality solicitor is always available close by.
Any data that you submit using this web form or email address will be held by Garratts as Data Controller and will be held securely and in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation for 12 months before being securely and confidentially destroyed (unless you have consented to joining our mailing list in which case your contact details will be removed only when you unsubscribe).


text:
Port and Shipping News
Dun Laoghaire News
Ferry News
Naval Visits
Irish Harbours
Galway Harbour
Greystones Harbour
Drogheda Port
Warrenpoint Port
Dun Laoghaire Cruise Liner Berth – 'Save Our Seafront' Win in Court Battle
Wind Surf making the last cruise call of the season to Dun Laoghaire Harbour in 2016 Photo: Matt O'Brien
The Dun Laoghaire waterfront environmental protection group "Save our Seafront" last night posted (below) of successful progress in the latest legal proceedings against the installation of a large cruise liner berth in Dun Laoghaire Harbour writes W M Nixon
The full ramification of this decision are still being fully analysed. But initial opinions suggest that this is indeed good news for those who hope to see Dun Laoghaire maintained and respected as a unique amenity which takes full account of its magnificent setting and exceptional history.
"Save Our Seafront wins legal case against the proposed Dún Laoghaire Cruise Terminal, An Bórd Pleanála concedes case without a fight - 7 April 2017
• Save our Seafront today won its legal action against the decision to grant planning permission for the Dún Laoghaire Cruise Terminal. Had it proceeded, the planning application by Dún Laoghaire Harbour Company which was granted by An Bórd Pleanála would have allowed the construction of a giant cruise berth in the middle of Dun Laoghaire's historic harbout and the mooring of large numbers of super-sized cruise ships during the summer season.
• Save Our Seafront's case before the Commercial Court was that, contrary to the EU Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, the environmental effects of the proposed development had not been assessed. In particular, the case argued that Dún Laoghaire Harbour Company and the Bórd had failed to take into account the environmental impacts of the proposed development on protected species such as otters, whales, porpoises, and birds and recreational users (including those who use the pier for walking). Save Our Seafront also argued that the proposed development would lead to the dumping of toxic sludge in Dublin Bay and neighbouring Special Areas of Conservation and that the cruise ships would discharge waste directly into the Bay
• Commenting on the victory Richard Boyd Barrett, chair of Save Our Seafront said "This is a crucial victory for the future of Dublin Bay and Dun Laoghaire Harbour and all who enjoy these unique and wonderful amenities. Hopefully this victory will finally convince the Harbour Company about the unsuitability of bringing enormous cruise ships into the harbour or promoting inappropriate developments that would destroy it as a public amenity and a precious piece of our marine heritage. We hope that common sense will prevail and that the harbour can be developed for the benefit of all users in sympathy with, rather than destructive of, the natural beauty of Dublin Bay and Dún Laoghaire harbour.
• I would like to sincerely thank Fred Logue of FP Logue Solicitors, David Conlan Smyth SC, and John Kenny BL for their excellent work on this case. I would also like to thank all of the supporters of Save Our Seafront, the sailing community, and the general public, who have supported us in this endeavour and without whom this victory would not have been acheived. We now need to look forward positively to developing our harbour as a public amenity for all, that will contribute to enhancing this wonderful town that we live in."
• The case will return to the Commercial Court after Easter for the Court to make final orders"
Published in Dublin Bay
Popular Ports Stories
Mike Walsh Takes the Helm at Kinsale Yacht Club
Expert Group Tells Government to Bolster Naval Service to Protect Irish Maritime Security
New Stena Ferry to Enter Service Next Week - But 'God Parent' Needed After Taoiseach Declines Offer
Ferry Operator in Mayo Issues Call for New Pier Facilities
New Lough Erne Ferry Provides Important Cargo Transport for Cattle & Equipment


text:
Elimity | Library
How to protect what you cannot see?
How to prevent a data breach?
How to deal with unused accounts?
How to successfully defend your business against internal cyber threats?
Data Breach 101: Hit by a data breach? Read this first…
Strategic Insights
How Augmented Intelligence Improves your IAM Strategy
The right strategy to create trust in a world of data breaches
How the strategic use of AI improves IAM in your organization
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Identity & Access Management
Is your organization ready for IGA 2.0?
Privileged Access Management: Necessary, but not enough
The Most Dangerous Myths About Identity Intelligence
Why SMEs Are in the Danger Zone for Data Breaches
How will the NIS Directive impact organizations and companies in Belgium?
Top IAM / RegTech / Cybersecurity podcasts for 2020
What are orphan accounts and what can you do about them?
7 Real-World Cases of Breaches caused by Insider Threats
What is the actual cost of a data breach?
7 Intriguing Examples of Data Breaches caused by Insiders
By Thomas Van den Bossche 02/01/2020
It is inevitable that people change jobs – whether or not they stay in the same company – all the time. It's also inevitable that this entails quite some extra work – mainly administrative tasks – on the employer's side. One of those tasks is to delete all passwords and close all accounts the former employee was using. This seems like a logical and important step and yet it is often overlooked. This leads to the existence of so-called 'orphan accounts', which could be hazardous for your company.
What are orphan accounts exactly?
An orphan account is an account that has no valid owner, but can provide access to an organization's system nevertheless. Orphan accounts arise when people stop working at a company. As mentioned, when people change jobs, they often leave behind a lot of accounts that they no longer need, and they don't bother with cleaning this up. However, switching jobs is not the only reason that leads to the existence of orphan accounts. Accounts can also be abandoned if a user's mail address is changed, if the user gets a new role in the company or because a new platform is installed.
Threats under the radar
Even though an orphan account does not have a valid owner, it still provides access to corporate systems, services and applications, which might include sensitive data and intellectual property. Orphan accounts are therefore associated with high security risks. A single account that falls into the wrong hands could lead to your entire system being at risk. Because orphan accounts are considered part of the organization, people with access to one of these accounts could cause a lot of harm without triggering any suspicion.
It's pretty clear that these accounts should be taken care of as soon as they lose their valid owner. The problem with orphan accounts however, is that they tend to disappear out of sight and quietly slumber somewhere below radar. This could be due to the IT department being busy with other things and forgetting about it. The orphan accounts could also be created without IT being notified and thus they can't be managed afterwards. People tend to think that the risks will eventually fade away over the years, but unfortunately, the opposite is true. This is because orphan accounts will no longer be up to date with security best practices and will therefore become more vulnerable over time.
Because the orphan accounts operate under the radar, they can spread like weeds and the security risk can easily spiral out of control. Companies could end up with thousands of these accounts without even being aware of it. And it happens more than you think. According to a study by Thycotic, 55% of organizations fail to remove privileged accounts after an employee is terminated. This number only covers privileged accounts, the total number of orphaned accounts is probably a lot higher.
The importance of de-provisioning
The issue of orphan accounts is situated within the joiner-mover-leaver process. Every part of an employee's "lifecycle" at a certain company needs to be properly managed. Whether it is someone joining an organization or someone leaving: specific actions need to be taken. This is done through provisioning and de-provisioning, which are two identity and access management (IAM) processes to grant or remove access, respectively. The first one usually gets the most attention, as people who join a company need to be given access to certain systems or resources to properly execute their job. However, de-provisioning is equally important. When a staff member leaves the company, all relevant accounts need to be properly and completely deactivated. It is common sense that departing employees need to hand over the keys of their company car, so it should be just as obvious to terminate their keys to the organization's network.
The identity and access management of a company should always contain an efficient approach to de-provisioning. It is paramount that a company possesses the right tools to easily terminate orphan accounts. It is arguably even more important to be able to find orphan accounts in the first place. Therefore, your IAM architecture should also include a smart access governance solution that can easily find and keep track of existing orphan accounts.
Where Elimity comes in
Elimity Insights is a complete SaaS identity intelligence solution which – amongst many other things – enables you to scan the access rights of all current and former employees on the fly, allowing you to easily take care of orphan accounts.
Author Thomas Van den Bossche
I'm in charge of the content marketing
Stay up to date of new articles and follow us on LinkedIn by clicking on the button below!
We help companies understand, manage and govern who has access to what.
Leading companies in all industries — from tech to banking — use our platform to get in control fast, remain in control with minimal effort, and to stay ahead in business.
Our head office is located in Belgium, the heart of Europe.
Motstraat 30, 2800 Mechelen, BE
EU +32 474 907 266
UK +44 2071 297 069
info@elimity.com