text:
May 22, 2021 May 22, 2021 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
So, we have an opportunity to think big, and out of the box? Good news:
I think big as a rule…
…and when I think about the best way to take advantage of some "closing the gap" funds and a significant opportunity, I think of targeting the foundation of learning first. For learners that foundation is a cognitive "net" woven during development from fetus to nurturing to parenting to schooling to life… It starts at the core of the person, and continues in the parents' arms, satisfying the most basic physical and emotional needs.
Then it starts developing beyond that core's reflexive responses to start reaching, touching, interacting. Those infant experiences are intertwining and stretching-weaving together continuously and then reaching outward and interconnecting with every new experience, whether introduced intentionally or just through circumstance. That cognitive net engages with its environment, makes sense out of it based on what it has already established, and then has new understanding as new experiences are integrated. Threads are created, reinforced, branches shoot off for little side trips that might connect with or just tickle/tweak other relevant experiences… The result of a well woven net (aka prior knowledge and experiences) is that learners more openly experience new settings, new people, new ideas, new understandings… Kids just absorb it as they live it and new experiences get cross-connected in a "seven degrees to Kevin Bacon" way.
The prepared and adept learner has an intricate weave and can access and pluck a plethora of threads that send signals all across that net and return information that drives that weaving and ends up providing the foundation for students at the beginning of their k-12 experience. We would like them to be at least "ready to learn" at the very beginning, and in the very best case scenarios: prepared to soar.
It seems our students are having difficulty, though.
The foundation, that "net" is the key. It's gaps where threads in the net might have been. It's threads and experiences we wish weren't there. The things we need students to be able to do aren't accessible to them yet because there's weaving to be done. Maybe even undone and then redone. A few years ago, as part of ongoing efforts to understand the students and their lived realities, their culture, we were made aware of what a pervasive and oppressive force poverty is during a poverty simulation.
The differences in the learners' exposure to language and vocabulary. The proportion of positive to negative interactions, and how starkly different that proportion looks when comparing our most stable and nurturing homes to those on the other end of the spectrum. Those eager to attack what educators are trying to do with catchphrases like "poverty is just an excuse" come up short on substance because they know the truth. The poverty line is not just a number to be exploited (like standardized test scores), and to engage in a rhetorical battle to blame teachers for the perpetuation of inequity and oppression through political and economic policy is disingenuous or misguided.
"This process starts with students' core relationships with parents or primary caregivers in their lives, which form a personality that is either secure and attached or insecure and unattached. Securely attached children typically behave better in school (Blair et al., 2008)."
Our academic mission is supposed to be our primary mandate, but we find ourselves having to spend a lot of effort on social and emotional gaps in order to get to that mandate.
The in loco parentis role (I'm told that means we are like crazy parents) kicks in because we find that prior knowledge/learning/skills ("ready to learn") is wanting in the areas largely pertaining to learners' empathy, emotional stability, social connections, sense of self-worth… A growing number are "trauma informed" in ways we wish we didn't know about, but need to know about to be our most effective. We are spending a lot of time actively nurturing in order to get to the teaching we'll be held accountable for.
So, us crazy parents have no choice but to rush into situational fires to save these children, only to emerge with them, covered in soot with our eyebrows singed off.
So that we can then make them take standardized assessments and later be shown spreadsheets of test data that show how badly we are failing them.
Sure we have to move that ELA test score needle in the right direction in a sustainable way, but it is going to require a shift in mindset not just doing the same things more rigorously.
We still need to target those mandates, but doesn't anyone wonder if we married our endeavor to the wrong spouse? I envision a more desirable common-law wife than HEDI, but getting rid of her evil influence is a side mission of my own.
In the here-and-now I'd like a shift away from:
continually identifying, measuring and remediating/repairing on the back-end to try and catch those falling behind and falling through that "net" because they haven't engaged in experiences and exchanges that weave well.
thinking that the space inside the four walls of the classroom is the "least restrictive environment".
accepting the crap of disingenuous reformers with an agenda that is more about markets and their opportunities, less about children and what they need.
I'd like to shift towards:
helping learners weave in more threads to extend their nets with, giving them more cognitive integrity and flexibility to support further (and more independent) learning.
re-envisioning the least restrictive environment. In my mind it is outside the box, out in the world, or at least in one that mimics the flexibility to move into and out of various settings and cooperative (mixed grade level, even) learning groups within the school.
teachers being the respected experts who have say in how education gets done instead of blamed for the results when others tell them what to do.
So, let's think big and "outside the box".
If the regular, standard setting/environment/program is one that allows more movement between settings and groups, it isn't an "accommodation" or "program modification" when it happens. It IS the program, and one that sends the fewest "why am I different" signals to students because everyone is doing it. The movement through and reconfiguration of various groups would be continuous and feel organic, while actually being planned to combine students in a purposeful way and track progress towards academic and social/emotional targets.
It's establishing that foundation/net and growing a culture of learners on the front end, and it could help prevent some holes in the net while inspiring more learners to start weaving on their own.Think of a district-wide PBL where "effective" (thanks to HEDI for that, at least) means active participation in one's own learning as well as the learning of the others in your community.
My opinion is that focusing on our school culture and nurturing learners first is a better strategy than obsessing over raised bars, grit and rigor.
A well-nurtured and guided learner is prepared for that grit and rigor when it happens. We shouldn't force grit and rigor onto them hoping for better outcomes. Remember the fable about the sun and the wind having the contest to see which could get a man's coat off the fastest? The wind was sure that by sheer force it could achieve the goal by just blowing the coat off. The harder it blew, the tighter the man gripped, held, resisted… and the coat stayed on.
The sun simply shone.
The man took the coat off himself!
Pretty cool that warmth did the trick. Even cooler that I am using "cool" and "warmth" together in a sentence that way. Hey look…I did it again!
So let's think big, shine like the sun, and warm this place up!
Send Your Comments on N.Y.'s ESSA!
August 13, 2018 August 13, 2018 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
Send your comments to NYSED today – don't punish schools for high opt out rates! Deadline for comments on the new ESSA regs Aug. 17.
Mine is below, borrow what you'd like:
To the Commissioner:
It is the job of schools to administer the test to all students, not sell parents on the value of tests at a time when the state's true commitment to the education of their children is questionable. If you want "opt out rates" to decrease, and let's be honest, "opt out" is weak, it is a refusal rate in New York, then you need to convince parents of your loyalty and commitment to better outcomes first-not to your own reputation and coerced and enforced testing requirements. That being said, the suggestion that Title I funding might be impacted by refusals is the wrong way to go at this time. It's doubling down on a rushed and misguided course and an anti-public education mindset.
Instead, examine closely and expand on some of the promise there actually seems to be in the ESSA draft:
School Accountability Methodologies and Measurements
(Under "what will be different"):
-Inclusion of new indicators: college, career and civic readiness (detail what, other than standardized test scores, these are)
-Data dashboards for transparent reporting of results and indicators not part of accountability/support system (use for collection of the "indicators" in an ongoing student portfolio, not for dissemination of private student data)
-Advisory group to examine different indicators of quality for accountability (Stakeholders on the ground who can guide content/scope/intent/use of the portfolio)
Supports and Improvement for Schools:
-Examination and addressing of resource inequities in low-performing schools
-Incentives for districts to promote diversity and reduce socioeconomic and racial isolation
-Parent voice in some budget decisions in low-performing schools
-Improving access to all programs for students who are homeless, in neglected facilities…migratory
Accountability seems to be the current priority, and I would agree that there needs to be more accountability for student outcomes, but be honest about testing as it exists: the quality of the tests has not been established following years of verifiable examples and concerns (content, level, vendor…) and during what may end up being state-wide shift to computer-administered tests. To draw a sword and threaten the schools of parents expecting more consistency and a demonstration of the state's will to commit to creating better outcomes (not just demand and measure them) will not inspire parent participation. Instead, require tests as before, but push for more of a shared accountability for things described already in the ESSA:
IN THE NYS's APPROACH TO ESSA PLANNING SECTION
-More equitable distribution of resources and student access to programs and "effective teachers"
-Build an accountability and support system that is based on multiple measures of college, career and civic readiness (use that "dashboard" to build a digital, developing citizen portfolio that belongs to and travels with the student)
-Recognize the effect of school environment on student academic performance and support efforts to improve climates of all schools
Four steps to better education reform (Introduction to MEGA)
August 8, 2018 ~ dmaxmj	~ 1 Comment
This will be the first installment of several in a "Better Education Reform" series. As I continue, I will be linking to associated definitions and explanations between installments, and at the end will include a glossary for some of the more colloquial-type terms I use. I try to tone it down a little, but hey-I can only water it down so much.
America needs to be better at educating its citizens. I say this for a couple of reasons. Mainly, the disparity in outcomes in our population is concerning-especially when that disparity is linked to race, gender and socioeconomic status. It suggests either systemic ineffectiveness, intent, and possibly both. Secondly, the political mechanisms that drive this disparity are almost wholly owned and operated by the most privileged class and their nearly as privileged agents. This has led to a situation where the vehicle we call democracy is like some eyesore the losers next door park on the lawn and tear up and down the street in at all hours. We can't really deny democracy exists, I mean it's parked right there. But it's right to wonder if it works, worry about how safe it is and what might happen to us, our property and our children with those losers behind the wheel. Seriously- all they ever do is a crappy touch-up with some spray cans and tint the windows so you can't see what the $#%& is going on inside of it!
Donald Trump is that eyesore. Who the hell knows what goes on in his head? And our "elected" leaders and the system preserving them are driving him around. But guess what? Trump is the president. That doesn't happen absent a decline in the character, practical intelligence, and moral commitment in the citizenry and the system. And those things-character, practical intelligence, depend on an effective comprehensive education. A real education.
That's quite different than schooling, which uses the sterile and dehumanizing language of industry (e.g. standards, tests, achievement, proficiency…) and is focused on the task-mastering of academic skills-an approach that supports control of the masses below by the few above. Real education reform should be an honest effort, and provide much more in terms of a foundation of soft skills and a content of character that allow a person to pursue, communicate, exercise their civic duties and responsibilities, connect effectively with the world, achieve, adapt, cooperate…Basically, education imparts the qualities that shape the person who applies the academic skills acquired through schooling.
By acknowledging, legislating and working through this more comprehensive approach to education, and a more shared accountability for the components that are required, the nation can improve outcomes for traditionally underachieving groups.
Part 1: the four steps
One of the primary roadblocks to better outcomes is the bipartisan cooperation in refusing to do what is right. In other words there is a lack of the political will to do right in our leaders. I will get more deeply into practical intelligence, quality, comprehensive education, and political will in just a bit. I'll also address the concepts of systemic ineffectiveness and intent-"intent" meaning that some of the ineffectiveness might be purposeful and used by those in power to suppress those with less in order to preserve an inequitable system.
But first things first.
The key to better education reform, more equitable outcomes and reaching for that effective, comprehensive education is informing, preparing and activating the citizenry. Once that happens, education and reform can be freed from the tightly defined box constructed by and for the wealthy and powerful establishment who ironically use it as a tool of suppression. That paradigm of suppression has led to stagnant or unimpressive societal and academic improvements. Changing the paradigm and making education great again (that's MEGA, folks- I'll trademark it and begin making the red hats soon) won't be easy, but here are the four things I suggest to get us moving in the MEGA direction towards improving outcomes:
Four steps to MEGA:
1) Admit that accountability is shared for education outcomes, between policymakers, community, families and schools. Have mechanisms for measurement, evaluation and accountability that are collaboratively created by these stakeholders and keep all stakeholders involved and accountable.
2) Apply electoral and non-electoral leverage strategically to affect policy and distribute resources based on needs. That means targeting policymakers, communities, families, and schools with transparency, honesty and a purpose that is learner and future-focused.
3) Shift the stale paradigm for how schooling works and how outcomes are defined, and provide real opportunities to pursue both collective priorities (public education should serve the public, the same way public spaces, utilities and services do) and individual goals. This is a shift from the current impersonal demands for a standardized version of "proficiency".
4) Effectively advocate not just for the literal lives of children, but their quality of life as well. The key word being "effectively".
Next, "The four steps explained".
Holding Schools Accountable
July 27, 2018 July 27, 2018 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
While sorting through some old, old stuff, I came across a hard copy of this. I think it predated flash drives, I'm not really sure. Thank god I have a beautiful young typist that will ask for little more than a burger and maybe a few bucks. About 16 years ago, I think it was, and yet it could be today.
National Standards:
Daniel McConnell, Jr.
State University of New York
Cortland, 2002
While on the surface educational standards appear to be merely a logical move to provide cohesive instruction, the forces behind their origin and the pairing of standards with a call for "accountability" reveal other motives. Historically, the United States has taken great efforts to achieve and maintain a dominant world presence, much through advances in military technology (which are closely linked to the math and science fields). Most notably since the launch of Sputnik in 1957, when the former USSR beat the United States into space, policy makers have demanded that schools prepare students to be an active part in the US- led future. When "A Nation At Risk" was published in 1983, warning of pending failure in the competitive world market, the cry for school reform was renewed with a focus on curriculum standards, and accountability for schools not demonstrating student achievement of those standards. While doing this, policy makers ignore their own accountability in helping to nurture capable students and productive future citizens.
"Our Nation is at risk. Our once unchallenged preeminence in commerce, industry, science, and technological innovation is being overtaken by competitors throughout the world." (A Nation At Risk, 1983)
After a brief statement of educational philosophy, A Nation At Risk begins with this ominous warning. It does not warn against a pending invasion by a foreign power, or a nuclear attack, or even an anonymous biological threat. The threat, it seems, is economic: based on the ability of the US to compete and profit (to a greater degree than other nations of the world) in the global market. But the insinuation, if it could even be considered as subtle as that, is that the threat is just as dire: "If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war." (p.1). The tone of A Nation demonstrates a shift in perspective regarding the nature of America's "world leader" role, and the responsibilities of schools to support that role. Once in the business of promoting the rights of citizens by educating those citizens to exercise them in a responsible manner, schools have gradually found their role shifting from responsibility to protect the nation from tyranny to supporting the near-tyrannical forces of a corporate driven system. This system places monetary profit and domination of the world market high on the priority list, while subjugating the needs and desires of present and future citizens (i.e. the students themselves). With current US policy funded, advised and driven largely by leaders in the corporate world, legislation tends to favor the already wealthy and powerful minority at the cost of the less wealthy majority of Americans. This legislation includes the educational standards, and the standards-based reform movement that began largely as a result of A Nation At Risk. While staying competitive in the fields of math and science (which are cornerstones of the tech market and essential in maintaining military dominance) is important for the economic health of the nation, current efforts to impose standards and high-stakes standardized tests should be closely evaluated to determine whose needs they truly serve.
The History of Reform: Sputnik and the Science Scare
"Unless future generations appreciate the role of science in modern society and understand the conditions under which science thrives", he (Dr. Elmer Hutchisson, Director of the American Institute of Physics) said, "our way of life is, I am certain, doomed to rapid extinction." (New York Times, Oct. 8, 1957)
America's public school system has, since its inception, been a source of hope and a focus of criticism. It has been given the responsibility for shaping society at times, blamed for not doing so (or doing so in a misguided fashion) at other times. One time from our not so distant history that many believed revealed a weakness in our education system was in 1957, the year Russia launched the first space vehicle, Sputnik. At a time when the nations of the world were just beginning to consider the possibilities of space exploration, and most believed that the US would lead the way with its Vanguard program, the Soviets caught the world off guard when it launched a satellite weighing eight times that of the one the US intended to launch. The possibility that the Soviets had outmatched the United States in its ability to not only launch a satellite, but to launch a significantly heavier one gave rise to two fears: 1) the capitalist beacon of hope that was the US was technologically inferior to the other world power- the communist threat that was the USSR, and 2) If the Soviets could launch a satellite into space, they could launch a nuclear missile that could reach the United States.
Dr. Elmer Hutchisson, director of the American Institute of Physics at the time Sputnik was launched, gave the statement at the beginning of this section. In addition to the accusations from others that the Eisenhower administration was under-funding satellite research, Dr. Hutchisson added a warning about the science education students were receiving
..the United States must distinguish carefully between 'highly accumulative' scientific knowledge that can be taught by rigorous discipline and the namby- pamby kind of learning' that seeks to protect children against inhibition of their individuality or their laziness"
According to James Rutherford, former director of Project 2061, the American Association for Advancement of Science's program for revamping K-12 science education, the efforts to improve science curriculum and training throughout the educational system began shortly after Sputnik, but then halted after the United States put the first man on the moon (Harvard Educational Letter: Research Online, Sept/Oct, 1998).
Not surprisingly, this article states, results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS, 1997) showed that US students scored lower than half of the students in other developed countries by the eighth grade, and "dead last" by the final year of secondary school. Despite the call for creation of standards across subject areas by the first President Bush in 1989, America's schools are still having difficulty meeting the high expectations implicit in the new standardized assessments.
The Confounds Regarding Success in Reaching the Standards
"The average grade for all the standards he [L. Lerner] appraised is C-minus…In fact, we can only be confident from this analysis that six of our fifty states have first-rate science standards." (The Fordham Foundation, 1998)
While students are apparently not performing as well as those calling for standards and accountability suggest they should, other influences confounding those goals exist. Once source blocking student success is the standards themselves. Vague and/or poorly written for many states, teachers with standards that are not clear are left unsure of what to teach and how best to teach it. Another source of poor student performance is the "baggage" that students bring to school with them. An issue highly stressed in the current reform movement is the "achievement gap" between the high and low socioeconomic groups.
Schools have been called upon to reduce this gap, with the hope that it can be eliminated, but research shows what teachers know: students that come from stable, nurturing and supporting homes are more likely to succeed academically (Pianta, 2002). Instead of pushing policy that would enable lower class families to lead more enriched lives, devoting more time to bestowing the school readiness skills that are associated with future success for students, policy makers choose to make schools the repair shops- charged with fixing the damage done to the family unit by corporate-centered policy.
That the standards themselves need fixing is an ongoing issue. With individual states being responsible for their own, variance in style and quality of those standards is to be expected, and so then is variance in what is taught and how students perform. The Fordham Foundation is one organization involved in the education reform movement, and in 1998 they published a report on the progress states were making in their effort to write science standards. An excerpt from that report reads like a scolding:
"Among the thirty-six jurisdictions with elementary/secondary science standards fit for appraisal, he found six that deserve "A" grades and seven that earn "B's". Good grades for more than a third of the states! Yet that sounds good mostly because our expectations in such matters have fallen so low. Here's another way to look at the results: Dr. Lerner conferred nine failing grades and seven "D's": three more than won honors. Seven states earned "C's." (New York was among the "C's")"
This repost goes through each of the thirty-six states evaluated and thoroughly analyzes the quality and substance of the standards the state has developed for science, as well as the examples of properly achieving them. Without arguing the foundation's qualifications to do so, one could suggest that the nation's leaders have given little support for this monumental task, merely directives. If, after all, a standardized result were the expectation, then a more centralized and standard approach would be the best from the beginning. Rather than having fifty different sets of standards and exemplars with the hopes of reaching a similar achievement goal, one set for all to follow would be a more sensible approach.
In addition to standards that provide little help in reaching lofty new goals, administration officials have lumped in a healthy scoop of criticism- as well as a call for "accountability". Unfortunately, they overlook their own accountability in helping students reach their true potential, and fail to notice that very early in A Nation At Risk, the authors admit as much:
"That we have compromised this commitment is, upon reflecting, hardly surprising, given the multitude of often conflicting demands we have placed on our nation's schools and colleges. They are routinely called on to provide solutions to personal, social, and political problems that the home and other institutions either will not or cannot resolve. We must understand that these demands on our schools and colleges often exact an educational cost as well as a financial one." (p.6)
Rather than overhaul policy that has served the desires of the wealthy few (campaign finance, corporate reform, foreign trade initiatives) at the expense of working families, the finger has been pointed in another direction. More recently, the attack has turned ugly: Following in his father's school reform footsteps, President George W. Bush has lent his straightforward approach to the reform movement. Consider his words as he addresses the audience at the signing of the Education Bill in Hamilton, Ohio (Jan. 8, 2002):
"If we've learned anything over the last generations, money alone doesn't make a good school. It certainly helps. But as John mentioned, we've spent billions of dollars with lousy results. So now it's time to spend billions of dollars and get good results."
The message from The White House seems clear (if not unsettling): a lot of money has been wasted, and now it's time to all the public school system to the carpet and make it do its job. But what does the president mean by "lousy results" and "billions of dollars"? The "No Child Left Behind Act" fact sheet released by The White House on the day of its signing by the President conveniently arranges the reform position in a problem/solution format. In regards to money spent and the results that have gone unrealized, it says:
-Since the original Elementary and Early Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was signed into law in 1965, the federal government has spent more than $130 billion to improve public schools.
-Unfortunately, this investment in education has not reduced the achievement gap between the well-off and lower-income students or between minority and non-minority students (p.2).
The evidence is neatly laid out, but goes unexamined. Although $130 billion sounds like a lot of money, if you do the math and divide it across the years it was spent, it comes to a mere pittance when matched against other national budgeting priorities. Thirty-seven years passed while that $130 billion was spent, which raised two interesting questions: 1) If The White House wants to insist that this amount of money spent on the public school system should have been sufficient to close the achievement gap between the well-off and lower-income students, then why have they failed to consider some other source for failure in closing this gap other than schools- mainly, some function of the inequitable class system which creates "well-off" and "lower-income" students? And 2) With military spending far outpacing any developed country in the world many times greater than the money allocated to public schools (not to mention the hundreds of billions being allocated into new "homeland security" measures) how can the White House justify this indignant attitude of having spent "billions of dollars with lousy results"? If the future of our country was to truly be invested in and protected, it would be reflected in a national budget that better funded schools, and made it possible for struggling families to spend more time at home building the skills and experiences that foster school success.
The Issue Of Accountability
"You know, a huge percentage of children in poverty can't read at grade level. That's not right in America." (George W. Bush)
According to New York University's Edward Wolff, and expert on the wealth gap, a wealth tax starting at one-twentieth of one percent on net worths of $1 million, and rising to one percent on the super rich, would yield about $50 billion per year. Imagine earmarking this for, say, the education of poor kids.
As a teacher, I can accept that I am responsible for helping my students achieve the educational standards set for my students. It is, after all, my job. I resent, though, the treatment of my profession as if it were some magical machine that can turn the star-bellied sneeches and the ones with no stars upon thars (apologies to Dr. Seuss) into standardized products with equal potential and opportunity. Children come to my classroom from vastly different homes and those differences manifest themselves in all sorts of measures of behavior and achievement. It is a difficult thing to do, and has historically come with its own drawbacks, but I think the best way is to treat children as individuals- helping children meet their own goals to the best of their abilities. True, a sound set of standards that reinforce necessary basic skills is needed. But we have to avoid turning students into numbers within a statistical framework, and expect them to become "standardized". Human beings, with their wide variety in desires, abilities and learning styles- not to mention home environments, just don't work that way. Children are coming to school every morning from all sorts of family situations and it is reflected in what they are ready to do. At the end of the day, they go back to that home again. The connections are logical, even without hard evidence. More stable homes generally display stability across economic resources and family configuration. Families with two parents making a decent living wage have more time to be involved and supportive, have some history with and/or appreciation for education, and pass these values on to their children. They often are less stressed by the demands felt by lower income families who may not have the time to spend fostering the "readiness" skills (mostly communication, listening, and language skills). which are valuable to students (and the teachers who have them in their classes). Despite this, teachers must accept the responsibility for helping all children meet tough academic goals, with the expectations and demands continually rising.
While teachers, on the one hand, must accept accountability for their results, there is only avoidance of accountability from those imposing standards upon schools and students. District report cards outlining in detail how schools perform on high-stakes standardized tests appear in huge spreads in local newspapers. How our elected officials are voting on specific legislation and specifically whose agenda is being forwarded on Capitol Hill is information that requires extensive searching and investigation to uncover. Having clearly acknowledged the achievement gap between classes, our elected officials have chosen to avoid the issue of inequity in wealth and resources (including a parents' ability to spend quality time with their children) between the classes. Instead, "leaders" have chosen to subject the public schools to accountability for making up for this inequity. But if a standardized product is expected, then the materials that go into making that product must be standardized, as well.
The demand for standardization needs to be turned around and slid back across the table to the policy makers of America. If they will spend the time and resources to close the gap between the classes, they may see the achievement gap start to close, as well.
Harvard Educational Letter: Research Online (Sept/Oct, 1998). From Sputnik to TIMSS: Reforms in Science Education Make Headway Despite Setbacks. More time is needed for widespread classroom changes, By Naomi Freundlich. (http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/1998-so/sputnik.shtml)
Lawrence S. Lerner (March, 1998) An appraisal of science standards in 36 states. Fordham Report; Vol 2, 4
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education
Pianta, Robert (2002). School readiness: A focus on children, families, communities and schools. Educational Research Service, Arlington, VA.
Schmeck, Harlold M. (October, 1957). Nation is warned to stress science. Times looks back: Sputnik. The New York Times learning network. (http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/specials/sputnik/sput-15.html)
The White House (January 8, 2002). Remarks by the president at education bill signing. Office of the Press Secretary (Boston, Massachusetts). Hamilton High School Hamilton, OH.
The White House (April 4, 2002). Fact sheet: No child left behind. (On-line). (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020108.html)
Teaching is to Serve Stubbornly (Part II)
December 31, 2017 January 5, 2018 ~ dmaxmj	~ 1 Comment
In Part I I describe my general intent to stubbornly share about teaching. Certainly non-teachers looking to criticize have much to say about the job, and unfortunately it's often crazy stuff: blaming teachers for everything from cultural disconnect to poverty to crime and incarceration… But with all of that muddying the tone, intent and potential of "reform", it's good idea for everyone to connect with what teachers actually do (instead of create a tiny box for the results to fit in for a non-teacher's approval). If there's more understanding of the limitations of the actual job as it is, and some agreement on what others could/should do, we can have some shared accountability for better outcomes for children.
Teachers aren't entertainers, delivery workers, or just visitors
Teachers can't just pop-in at lunch time with some Subway food , visit, give lessons in lunchroom etiquette, play "cool dad" for the kids and then leave.
"I will keep visiting and modeling lunchtime behavior for my kids, and for their classmates who can't get enough of me (I'm the cool Dad, sorry if you're not) when I join them." (Chris Stewart, writing about his kids' school lunch program)
I am not "cool dad" (no apologies necessary, not my aspiration). But one thing Chris Stewart does, in this article, is echo the concerns my wife, I and my daughters have had have about school lunches. It wasn't that many years ago that Marguerite (Mrs. Lincoln) was the one making the delicious homemade mac-n-cheese-the kind that gets crusty on top and a little burnt around the edges; or those big breasts and thighs of that crispy-skinned chicken; or the moist chocolate cake with the peanut-butter frosting. Sure, the mashed potades were instant, but a butter pat and some warm gravy and blamma-lamma, baby! Mrs. Lincoln is still around, helps out when needed and at special events even though "retired", and other cafeteria ladies have come and gone. One of her twin grandsons was in my third-grade homeroom and he's since graduated.
But our pots and pans are also gathering dust, just like the ones Stewart saw in his dismal tour of some "central nutrition center" (how "big brother" is that?). Rarely graced by the purpose of culinary style or allowed the privilege of being put to real use by those who know better, the facilities have been essentially "reformed". An outside entity tracking and judging food consumption, sales, credits and debts- in real time via nutrition and cost VAM formula type technology. Those pots and pans and spoons and spatulas, dusty or not, are all present and accounted for- assigned a specific value. The food itself? Doled out in accordance to specific metrics to meet standards, and regulations. So many carbs, this many grains, that many proteins… all defined by gritty and rigorous high expectations.
All that effort and regulation and data…and yet still somehow having absolutely no freakin' soul, and appearing like cheap, crappy, institutional food meant to meet some minimal standard while making it appear that people above the people who care enough to do the job are doing right by our kids. Way back in that mac-n-cheese when, lunch had real quality and a purpose, and our girls had to be given a limit on buying lunch. Once a week, unless something really special popped onto the menu.
But cafeteria reform sucked the soul out of what the lunch once was, so my kids have "opted out" of school lunch since…well, since about the time it was "reformed".
That's "reform" and "accountability".
Real issues are ignored in the attempt of those atop to push a "proficiency" narrative, a testocracy, on those below. And teachers are being made to comply. So they can't just drop in with the popular stuff and then leave, you know: r-u-n-n-o-f-t.
And we shouldn't want them to.
Good teachers don't stop, judge, sort and leave. They stay and serve, and we need them to. What teachers do and what we need them for goes way beyond all the test stuff. As much as they want to deny it or sidestep it, the champions of reform admit it when they cry "cultural disconnect!" (regarding teacher perceptions of student behavior in the classroom, hallway…cafeteria?) and "prison pipeline!". Clearly (and I agree) teachers need to welcome students, nurture students, connect with them on a personal level in order to get them to engage with the academics…and apparently teachers need to keep them out of jail.
I don't think that means driving the getaway car, and I don't know the internal mechanisms of the classroom vs criminal choice that happens in the mind, but could community, home and family figure into the formula? In Stewart's article, there is a brief side-trip to judge the the failures of parents, the unseemly behavior of school children and the intolerable adults they'll someday be.
"I've visited schools where the lunch period was an extension of other learning periods. It wasn't a free-for-all. Some parents might fight me on this one, I know. I can hear the protests about how kids need to be kids, and how they need free-time to be wild, loud, and childish.Wherever you are working today, look at the co-worker who gets on your last nerve. That person had parents like the ones I just described."
I have waited years for this glimmer of understanding from warriors of reform that parents have power to actively raise children, just as they have a passive right to wait for a "school choice" to be offered.
And yet I feel no pleasure.
Because imagine far worse than some unseemly table manners (My stars, I do indeed believe I shall come down with the vapours!), or having some fun in the cafeteria at lunchtime. Lets talk parents who come into conference reeking of weed and asking how they can get to volunteer to help and come in sometime, because they "might get some learnin'". Imagine thinking that it really would do them good, but there is absolutely no way you can add two stoned adults to your roster. Their child, whom we were conferencing on (back when lunches were still good) left their home when he got the chance, a few years ago (at 12 or 13, I think). He's turning out to be a fine young man determined to make good choices.
He says I'm his favorite teacher (a label I'll take over "cool dad" any day), but I care less about that than him being one of my tentative shared-success stories. "Shared" because many others besides me (teachers, staff members and students) have been there for him and cared, and I'm sure he feels it. But I wouldn't say he's out of the woods- I worry about some students as if they were my own kids and in some danger zone or something. Maybe I'll stop worrying once I know he's safely reached thirty years old. His older sister who remained in the home just got busted for another parole violation. She's looking at some serious time.
Teachers never stop caring, and parents make all sorts of choices, every day.
It's teachers, there in school, dealing with the repercussions of parent choices right along with the students. Now maybe I am disconnected in my low SES, white, rural, tiny district. It could be that poverty, drugs, crime and instability in family and residency are more of a country white thing. You know, not so much an urban issue. It could be that in the big cities (the original target of education reforms) bad teachers and their unions are the biggest problems children face.
I don't know, and I know that I don't know. That's why I reach out and communicate. With school leaders, with teachers, with parents who thought they had "choice" until they were un-chosen, others involved… Anything I learn helps.
"You're not an authority on my children, my community, or my history. You are an agent of the state and you're employed by the single greatest threat to free thought and black liberation."
The first part is right on. The last part is a bit much but I respect him for the times when he actually comes out with his convictions and willingness to say things others in the reform camp will not:
"I care about the successful education of 8 million black students. Whether or not charter schools are "public" is immaterial."
Like acknowledging of the influence of parents, there's some pure honesty in this message. And it identifies the mission. I know that teaching and teachers can improve. I know that I can improve. I know that my union can do far more to activate the troops and press for positive change. I'd bet I'm not the only educator that would admit those things. Tap dancing around, engaging in pretending "choice" is a public construct just makes some reform advocates look silly, and I'll take Stewart's honesty over the dance.
Teaching is to Serve Stubbornly (Part I)
December 31, 2017 December 31, 2017 ~ dmaxmj	~ 1 Comment
I guess my real resolution is to be stubborn.
Tomorrow begins a new year. That means goals, plans, hopes…etc. Maybe a "resolution" or two -which I had previously sworn off of. Resolutions, that is. Not because I think I'm so great, but because I think change isn't isolated to starting or stopping on a particular date, and I don't like being controlled by artifices like time, space, gravity… So when I want to start something I start, when I want to stop I stop. Maybe it's a control thing. I don't want some day on the calendar deciding my self-improvement plan for me. Also, I have a "when I think you're attempting to shape me, I will resist" sort of thing. That's one of the reasons I made what I think is my first actual New Year Resolution. It's sorta about being stubborn.
Why would a guy resolve to be stubborn? Is that even a resolution?
Did I do that right? Is it New Years, New Year's…I know it's not New Ears, though my wife would swear I need a new pair. Whatever it is, I have resolved to limit myself to 100 characters or less on how twitty I am in 2018. And I have been a big-ass twit from time to time, believe me. I know many already do. But there are some who seriously, seriously have it coming. And believe me, that won't stop.
You see, Twitter upped it's character limit, there's now some new wheelie thing that ticks down your remaining characters; I'm not even sure what the limit is now, but I do know that in the beginning I enjoyed playing Polonius and that more words means time wasted and wit wanting. I suspect twitter is trying to lure more in and keep more on, but I take the offer of more laziness and less rigor of thought as a challenge. So I'll yang the yin and go in the opposite direction-less than 120 characters.
Is a stubborn teacher a good thing?
With teaching it's different. I'm stubborn about teaching because I know why it's important and what it's like. I do it, and I communicate quite regularly with others that do it; those around me in my school, in schools nearby, in schools far away…It's important to communicate, mediate, alleviate, try not to hate…
Whoa. Sorry, that was a flashback.
Anyways, teaching is one of the roles that lies at an intersection where many roles cross. I was a student once. I am a parent-three times over (though some psychic my wife saw before we were married said I had a secret family, they have yet to reveal themselves), and now I'm a teacher. Being dedicated to a profession and a community can be a little restricting if you believe that history and wisdom are bad things (I don't), and it can mean less understanding of the communities of others, the people in them, their collective history and the wisdom they can share. That's why I communicate with avarice. I have and will continue to reach out and find out…and I will continue to point out.
There's a difference between wisdom and shit you think you know.
I think that policy wonks and politicians, university folk, lobbyists, seed investors, non-profit activists, foundation "think-tank" people, community organizers and activists, town council folk…I could go on and on. They are trying to do right, in most cases. They mean well and know their job(s), I hope. But they don't know teaching. I see a lot of writing and opinion from them on what they think about the results of what others do, what we should do to schools and to kids, but few have done the job to an extent that should get much respect from the people they target. Yes, we need reform in Education Town, but we need it on a lot of those highways that lead to and cross through as well. Driving by on the overpass and tossing a bag of your shit down on my folks and what we do just ain't gonna fly. What type of reform and why, what do we hope to get as a result, and who best to shape and drive the endeavor are matters for discussion and the discussion has been sadly dominated by those eager to blame and stake a claim.
So I am resolving to use my stubborn for stubbornly sharing with those who seem to not know teaching, and to defend what teachers and schools do as well as what parents and children need.
In that spirit, I am gearing up for the second part of this post. It's pretty much ready-this sucker was going well over a couple thousand words.
Evaluations That Make Sense
September 20, 2017 September 20, 2017 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
Did I actually get an email from NYSUT asking for money for the "No NY Convention Fund", or is it scam email? I know shady people are out there pulling email scam stuff like that. Anyways, I know my union leadership would be motivated to advocate for more respect of my colleagues and inclusion of them in the process of education and constructing/collaborating on a new and more sensible evaluation. That's why when I saw the "give us more money" I thought it was for a campaign to raise awareness of efforts like Assembly Bill A04016, submitted in January. I hadn't gotten any emails about it, but it looks promising.
Here is the justification text:
"This bill repeals the current teacher and principal evaluation system.The current method needs to be overhauled as it ties much of a teacher and principal's evaluation to an admittedly flawed curriculum and high stakes testing regime. This bill empowers the Board of Regents to create a new method for evaluating our state's teachers and principals and makes sure that they will do so in a manner that takes into account all tried-and-true methods of evaluating an individual's success. Continue to link our children's educational future to a flawed system is wrong."
Go to the NY Assembly page and check it out. Here's the first ten lines. I'll donate to get this passed and I believe that many, many teachers that would get behind this.
1 Section 1. Section 3012-d of the education law is REPEALED and a new
2 section 3012-d is added to read as follows:
3 § 3012-d. Teacher and principal evaluation system. 1. The board of
4 regents shall establish a new annual teacher and principal evaluation
5 system.
6 2. The new evaluation system shall be established with requisite input
7 from education experts, school administrators, parents, and teachers.
8 3. The new evaluation system shall be presented to the commissioner,
9 legislature, and governor as a report by no later than January thirty-
10 first, two thousand nineteen.
I'll be raising awareness to oppose the convention, and I'm assuming dues are already partially spent in that direction. What about this legislation that could make a huge difference and inspire collaboration among all stakeholders?
Teachers Save Children
Image ~ June 30, 2017 August 12, 2017 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
Imagine a war zone.
The medics put themselves into the battle, willing to sacrifice themselves for their cause and trying to protect the innocents who are in harm's way; treating the ones harmed. Of course there are casualties, and there are wounded.
Poverty is like war.
What it does to people, families, and children especially, is like they have been wounded and are being wounded. The deeper the poverty, the deeper the wounds and the more desperate the people trapped in that war zone. What happens to people, and what desperate people trapped in poverty find themselves needing to do to survive are things educators are made well aware of if they are serving that population. In the poorest of communities, the wounds tend to be deeper, more pervasive, fall on children the heaviest, and get more concentrated in classrooms filled with these young bodies and minds coming into school from those homes and those hoods. Traditional public schools, and public school teachers have open doors and open classrooms to take in those "wounded" from the community, regardless of the condition they arrive in. Without a doubt, bad outcomes are more concentrated in areas more impacted by poverty.
In the poorest of communities, the wounds tend to be deeper, more pervasive, fall on children the heaviest…
It's seems as if everyone actually in the battle, serving students, is aware, while the armchair education "experts" preaching reform from the outside have no clue-or worse, pretend to have no clue. What definitely doesn't help is when these experts deny the impact of the poverty while wasting their clout and energy trying to undermine the public servants actually in the battle.
Now I'm not trying to shame anyone at all, just instigate a better conversation. Airlifting some selected and non-critically wounded to a safe zone removed from the front lines, administering first-aid and distributing water bottles in the cool shade of evacuation tents is also a part of caring for the wounded. And a hearty slap on the back, a big jerky Trump handshake and a merit badge for supporting positive outcomes for those who got to ride your helicopters and get some R&R because you are due. But it would lean into arrogance to scoff at the survival statistics of the medics on that front line who are treating critically wounded as bullets fly and shells explode nearby-the same way it is arrogance to smugly use "poverty is not an excuse" as a bullshit accusation/catchphrase and use graduation rates and test scores when promoting schools that draw out a selective sampling from poverty; shameful to puff your chest and strut, comparing those stats removed from the front line and under the shady tent-the same way it is shameful to stroke one school's reputation with stats generated from a manufactured enrollment compared to an open-doors, traditional school.
…it would lean into arrogance to scoff at the survival statistics of the medics on that front line who are treating critically wounded as bullets fly and shells explode nearby…
Maybe replacing draft-dodging from the real war(s) with brave, honest and transparent choices is where the NAACP was coming from with their moratorium on charters.
No fear: the helicopters and tents are needed and there are edupreneurs willing to invest. Serving in that capacity is a choice for those seeking the merit badge-just remember that choice doesn't exist for the front-line medics.
Those real soldiers will battle on.
A Coleman Blank? UPDATE
June 18, 2017 June 30, 2017 ~ dmaxmj	~ Leave a comment
I am doing some research and am reading David Coleman's 2011 talk to NYSED regarding the common core standards.
This is the nysed.gov link to the full transcript I am using. When I get to the part where he says
But it also involved quite wonderfully several other teachers of every stripe from every organizational background who are involved in developing these standards and also of course the NEA and other groups. But if there's one voice that is loud and clear here, it is the voice of teachers. And let me tell you what we learned as we listened to those voices. (p.4-5)
It is followed by a large blank area before going on to the next section, with no mention of what David learned as he listened to actual educators. Did he not learn anything, or was it like the "listening tours" that happen from time to time-where people were talking but it didn't really impact the process?
If he did learn something, I would like to know what it was. If there is a better link, or more information, please share it with me.
Dan McConnell
I contacted NYSED, and heard back pretty quickly Took me some time but it's been busy. Daughter graduated, parties, family visits and whatnot. Still confusing, though. Read and see what I mean.
Me (June 18th):
I am doing some research and am reading David Coleman's 2011 talk regarding the common core standards.
This is the nysed.gov link to the full transcript I am using
http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/docs/bringingthecommoncoretolife/fulltranscript.pdf
When I get to the part where he says
But it also involved quite wonderfully several other teachers of every stripe from every organizational background who are involved in developing these standards and also of 5 course the NEA and other groups. But if there's one voice that is loud and clear here, it is the voice of teachers. And let me tell you what we learned as we listened to those voices. (p.4-5)
NYSED (June 19th):
Hi Dan, this transcript is complete, although the way it is formatted is a little misleading. If you listen to the video (available athttp://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/resources/bringing-the-common-core-to-life.html) , at 13:19 he ends with "…what we learned as we listened to those voices." The next thing he says starts with the text on page 5. However, whoever created the transcripts added the extra space and added the section headings which makes it seem like there was a break in what was spoken even though there wasn't. So the text of the transcript is complete and it is not missing anything in this section.
If you have any other questions about this, please let me know.
I haven't listened to the video, not this part anyway. I've seen the "world doesn't give a shit" part a dozen times, but not this part. Ron's word is good enough for now, because why would he lie and then give me the link? My issue, then, is the total disconnect from A) Saying "…let me tell you what we learned from listening to those voices." to then going on some more about your own ideas and understandings. Very little teacher voice or input seems to come out of what Coleman expresses. In going back to the transcript to see if giving anyone else any credit for informing his thinking comes out…I'm still coming up empty.


Retail Systems organises and hosts a range of exclusive intimate roundtables and bespoke events throughout the year, which are free to attend for retail technology professionals.
A roundtable is a form of discussion where participants debate specific business and technology topics. Each person is given equal right to participate in the discussions which centre on current trends and issues affecting the retail sector.
Roundtable discussions and event write ups are often published digitally and in print. Where applicable the write ups and comments are sent to participants ahead of publication and they are given the chance to approve their comments.
There is also the opportunity for us to work with you on networking drinks evenings, half day conferences, seminars, workshops and much more.
PCI standards deliver real benefits for retailers, but many find the compliance a headache. In April a panel of experts assembled at Tower 42 to discuss PCI. The event was chaired by Andrew Johnson, director general, UK Gift Card and Voucher Association.
Right now it is estimated that 77 per cent of the world's population owns a mobile phone. Millions of people use mobile devices every day to check their bank accounts, and authorise online transactions – but are mobile payments in-store the next logical step?


text:
Q: scipy.signal.lsim and scipy.signal.step output and use-case The output of scipy.signal.step and scipy.signal.lsim are not what I'd like them to be, so I must be using them wrong. The output of lsim is actually quite close, but the amplitude is attenuated by many orders of magnitude. Is my problem that a linear system can't be non-zero for zero input? My initial condition is 1.65V (I'm modeling an op amp circuit), and in real life the input is 1.65V for a long time >> time constant of the circuit, before the step occurs.
I've plotted all waveforms and zoomed in on the output of lsim by itself, to see that has a roughly accurate shape.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
from scipy import signal

time = np.linspace(0,1e-3, num=100)
fc = 2e3
tau = 1/(2*np.pi*fc)
gain = .7
step_amplitude=.4
initial = 1.65
input_step = [1.65 for i in range(20)] + [2 for i in range(80)]

ideal_ckt = signal.ZerosPolesGain([],[-3e3*2*np.pi],[gain])
t, ideal_step = signal.step(ideal_ckt, X0=[1.65],T= time)
t, output, x = signal.lsim(ideal_ckt, input_step, T=time)

should_be = step_amplitude*gain*(1-np.exp(-(time)/tau)) + initial
should_be[20:] = should_be[0:80]
should_be[0:20] = 1.65

fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(time, input_step, label='input')
ax.plot(t, output, label='lsim')
ax.plot(time, ideal_step, label='signal.step')
ax.plot(time, should_be, label='should_be')
ax.set_xlabel('time')
ax.set_ylabel('Voltage')
ax.legend()
fig.show()

I expect to see a nice RC-like, first order exponential rise to the steady state value of initial value + input step amplitude * gain.  I expect the curves of should_be, ideal_step, and output to all look the same. Why don't they?

A: The system should be defined as:
ideal_ckt = signal.ZerosPolesGain([],[-p1*1],[gain*p1])

Because of the way the documentation describes the form. This explains the large attentuation:
1/(s/p+1) is the normalized form. But the form of the scipy code is 1/(s+p). To get from the first form to the second form you end up with p/(s+p)

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


text:
Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells
Shanshan Jiang, Wei Zhou, Yingjie Niu, Zhonghua Zhu, Zongping Shao
ChemSusChem
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200264
10.1002/cssc.201200264
RM sElocation
Jiang, S., Zhou, W., Niu, Y., Zhu, Z., & Shao, Z. (2012). Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem, 5(10), 2023 - 2031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200264
Jiang, Shanshan ; Zhou, Wei ; Niu, Yingjie ; Zhu, Zhonghua ; Shao, Zongping. / Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. In: ChemSusChem. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 10. pp. 2023 - 2031.
@article{4b0700efe81c497a8b1ca640672592a8,
title = "Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells",
author = "Shanshan Jiang and Wei Zhou and Yingjie Niu and Zhonghua Zhu and Zongping Shao",
doi = "10.1002/cssc.201200264",
pages = "2023 -- 2031",
journal = "ChemSusChem",
Jiang, S, Zhou, W, Niu, Y, Zhu, Z & Shao, Z 2012, 'Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells', ChemSusChem, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 2023 - 2031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200264
Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. / Jiang, Shanshan; Zhou, Wei; Niu, Yingjie; Zhu, Zhonghua; Shao, Zongping.
In: ChemSusChem, Vol. 5, No. 10, 2012, p. 2023 - 2031.
T1 - Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells
AU - Jiang, Shanshan
AU - Zhou, Wei
AU - Niu, Yingjie
AU - Zhu, Zhonghua
AU - Shao, Zongping
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cssc.201200264/pdf
U2 - 10.1002/cssc.201200264
DO - 10.1002/cssc.201200264
JO - ChemSusChem
JF - ChemSusChem
Jiang S, Zhou W, Niu Y, Zhu Z, Shao Z. Phase transition of a cobalt-free perovskite as a high-performance cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. ChemSusChem. 2012;5(10):2023 - 2031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200264

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
BioTechnology: An Indian Journal
Campylobacter Open Access Articles
Campylobacter (meaning "curved bacteria") may be a genus of Gram-negative bacteria. Campylobacter typically appear comma- or s-shaped, and are motile. Most Campylobacter species can infect humans and other animals, causing disease. The bacterium's main natural reservoir is poultry; humans can contract the disease from eating food contaminated with Campylobacter species. Another source of infection is contact with infected animals, which frequently carry Campylobacter asymptomatically. a minimum of a dozen species of Campylobacter are implicated in human disease, with C. jejuni and C. coli being the foremost common. C. jejuni is now recognized together of the most causes of bacterial foodborne disease in many developed countries. C. jejuni infection also can spread to the blood in individuals with AIDS, while C. lari may be a known explanation for recurrent diarrhea in children. C. fetus may be a explanation for spontaneous abortions in cattle and sheep, also as an opportunistic pathogen in humans. This genus has been found to be a part of the salivary microbiome. Open access (OA) may be a set of principles and a variety of practices through which research outputs are distributed online, freed from cost or other access barriers.With open access strictly defined (according to the 2001 definition), or libre open access, barriers to copying or reuse also are reduced or removed by applying an open license for copyright. the most focus of the open access movement is "peer reviewed research literature." Historically, this has centered mainly on print-based academic journals. Whereas conventional (non-open access) journals cover publishing costs through access tolls like subscriptions, site licenses or pay-per-view charges, open-access journals are characterised by funding models which don't require the reader to pay to read the journal's contents. Open access are often applied to all or any sorts of published research output, including peer-reviewed and non peer-reviewed academic journal articles, conference papers, theses, book chapters, and monographs.
Arrival and departure capacity evaluation in terminal area based on air leg intersection
Wang Jianhui
Review Article: BioTechnology: An Indian Journal
Simulation study of the tectonic stress field of Luling coal mine of China
Xiaoping Shi
Original Article: BioTechnology: An Indian Journal
Survey and analysis about sports injuries of college weightlifting athletes
Shuyan Wang
The dynamic load balancing protocol in RAMCloud
Changtian Ying, Jiong Yu, Chen Bian
Based on the principal component factor analysis method of NBA players comprehensive ability evaluation research
Wei Yin
Relevant Topics in General Science
BioTechnology: An Indian Journal received 875 citations as per Google Scholar report
26th World Congress on Biotechnology
27th Global Congress on Biotechnology
21st International Conference on Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology
27th European Biotechnology Congress
Tweets by biotechnology_j


There are myriad responsibilities that must be addressed after you've submitted your merger filings. Our Resource Center has the information you need to make sure nothing falls through the cracks post-merger.
In this podcast, CT Client Relationship Manager Mike Malkowski discusses how to avoid the biggest mistakes companies make during the merger & acquisition process.
In this video, CT Corporation Client Relationship Manager Mike Malkowski identifies the 3 key objectives to meet during post-merger work and offers other important tips.
How do you ensure nothing slips through the cracks when going through a merger? It's all about having the right team in place to manage the post-merger transition.
A vibrant M&A market is certainly a positive development for potential acquirers. Yet identifying the right deal is only part of the battle—the most challenging work begins once integration starts. Without a carefully planned and executed strategy, the odds of completing a successful merger plummet.


"Hi Neighbor" was created to encourage people to come outside and talk with their neighbors, reconnect with those they haven't seen in awhile and begin establishing relationships that build strong communities. Initially a one night event in June, the Community Relations Commission (CRC) now promotes the entire month of June as "Hi Neighbor" month. This is a great time to plan a block party, do a good deed for a neighbor or just bring out the lawn chairs for a visit.
Do you know your neighbors? Have you taken any time recently to stop and chat with those that live near you? Many of us might answer no to both of these questions. Our busy lives and the construction of modern homes with the focus on backyard patios rather than front porches, have led to isolation among neighbors. Worthington has taken steps to change this through our annual "Hi Neighbor" night. Sponsored by the Community Relations Commission, "Hi Neighbor" began in 2001 and received international attention through media outlines throughout the United States, Canada and Britain.
The idea for this event grew from conversations that former City Council Member Courtney Chapman had with several Worthington residents. The September 11th tragedy has made many of us long for more connections with family, friends, and neighbors. Worthington City Council is supportive of this initiative to build neighborly relationships throughout the City, and asked the Community Relations Commission to organize this event. "Hi Neighbor" nights in Worthington are meant to be informal opportunities for neighbors to get to know each other. Participants could bring along family photos of new grandchildren or recent vacations. These evenings could be perfect opportunities to plan a summer Block Party. The possibilities are endless.


Rachel Maresca has left the New York Daily News, where she worked as an entertainment reporter and columnist since 2013. She previously worked as a writer and producer at Celebuzz, and prior to that she reported for Life & Style Weekly. Follow NYDN on Twitter for breaking news, politics, entertainment and sports coverage in New York and beyond.


text:
Grand Man
[1 of 3] Swedenborg (1688-1772, Sweden): primary subject "Grand Man (form of heaven)" (search under Cosmology/Cosmology, Laws)": source "Divine Love and Wisdom": detail "Section 19"
The universal heaven, consisting of myriads of myriads of angels, in its universal form is as a man. Each society of heaven, be it large or small, is so likewise; hence also an angel is a man, for an angel is a heaven in the least form.
[2 of 3] Swedenborg (1688-1772, Sweden): primary subject "Grand Man (form of heaven)" (search under Cosmology/Cosmology, Laws)": source "Divine Providence": detail "Section 254[3]"
Also among the arcana of heaven is this: in the Lord's sight the angelic heaven is like one man whose soul and life is the Lord. In each particular of his form this divine man is man, not only as to the external members and organs but as to the more numerous internal members and organs, also as to the skins, membranes, cartilages, and bones; but in that man all these, both external and internal, are not material but spiritual. Further, the Lord has provided that those who cannot be reached by the Gospel but only by some form of religion shall also have a place in this divine man, that is, in heaven, by constituting the parts called skins, membranes, cartilages, and bones, and like others should be in heavenly joy. For it does not matter whether their joy is that of the angels of the highest heaven or of the lowest heaven, for everyone entering heaven comes into the highest joy of his own heart; joy higher still he does not endure; he would suffocate in it.
[3 of 3] Swedenborg (1688-1772, Sweden): primary subject "Afterlife, finding one's place in" (search under Afterlife/Afterlife, Heaven, Hell)": source "Spiritual Experiences, vol.4": detail "Section 6058"
Certain ones asked why it is that evil spirits, thus those who deny God, who are silent, cannot be in an angelic society. They received the reply that all spirits ultimately come to the place where they are as it were in their own center, for those who are above him, who are below him, and who are around him on every side result in his being in that place, because there is a communication and inflow of affections, for which reason in the end no one can be in another place than in his own position, and as it were in his own center. All angels and all spirits are also centers, for the heavenly form is made up of continuous centers.


text:
Music Notes May 2011
May 31, 2011 at 12:13 am	(Uncategorized)
What I've been listening to this month.
1. Stornoway – 4AD Sessions (Tour EP edition)
Oh sure, the songs are available elsewhere, but there's a lovely handmade sleeve to go with these lovely songs. Sure to be going for $500 on E-bay anyway now. Pick it up if you see them on tour.
2. EWA – Past Life Martyred Saints
A sort of grungy, grimy spoken word electronica that's quietly compelling. How can you resist a record that contains the line, "fuck California, you made me boring." Playing the Garrison in Toronto in June.
3. Beasts of Burdon – The Axeman's Jazz
Australian cow-punks, heavy on the irony, perfect listening after you re-watched the Proposition. Best track: The Day Marty Robbins Died.
4 Television – Adventure
I've never really understood why Television aren't played to death on classic rock radio – these are classic rock songs (OK, I do understand). Not quite as perfect as Marque Moon, but pretty close. This re-issued re-masted version contains a few alternative versions, but that doesn't really matter. Tom Verlaine's muscular guitar and whiney vocals are good enough for me.
5. Lykke Li – Wounded Rhymes
Er, OK, I admit it, I love this record. From neo-Phil spectorisms to the tribal sound of Get Some, everything about this record works. A perfect pop release. Damn those Swedes are good.
6. Cornershop – Cornershop and the Double O Groove of
In which Cornershop disappear behind the lovely vocals of Bubbley Kaur to create a more traditional Indian sound. Punjabi hip hop folk music or something like that. Oh, just get it, you'll love it.
7. Anna Calavi – Anna Calvi
My thoughts about Anna Calvi are best summed up in the review of her show I wrote yesterday, so I won't go on here too much. needless to say, this is an amazing record by an astonishing new talent. Quiet when it needs to be; ferocious when it can be.
8. Captain Beefheart – The MirrorMan Sessions
Erm, the follow-up to Safe as Milk, sort of. Deeply weird blues, and essential listening all the same. Beefheart jams out with songs lasting as long as 18 minutes. Like it or not, you have to admit the man was some sort of genius.
9. The Ravonettes – Raven in the Grave
Leaving aside the dreadful pun, the new Raveonettes album sounds…er…exactly like all the other Raveonettes records, which si never a bad things. For fans of the Everly Brothers and the Jesus and Mary Chain.
10. Dexy's Mdnight Runners – Searching for the Young Soul Rebels (Deluxe Edition)
If you think Come On Eileen when someone mentions Dexy's, you might be forgiven, but you really owe it to yourself to check out their first record. Before the urban folk sound, Dexy;s were all about Geno Washington and the new soul. The deluxe format has a whole record of outtakes, BBC sessions, B-sides and more.
And lastly, let's give a moment's silence for Gil Scott-Heron who passed away at 62 a few days back. Leaving us much too soon, the man gave us tracks that will never be forgotten.
Anna Calvi in Toronto – A Review
May 29, 2011 at 9:31 pm	(Uncategorized)
And for the second time in a week I headed down to the neon palms of the El Mocambo for a Collective Concerts show. Earlier in the week, it was for Stornoway and Sea of Bees, but this time it was for Anna Calvi, whose Canadian debut had been rescheduled due to a hand injury.
Calvi has received a lot of buzz about her work. Names like Patti Smith, Polly Harvey and Nick Cave are often bandied around in connection with her debut album. In truth, she doesn't sound like any of them, but what you do have is an extraordinarily powerful record.
I didn't catch the name of the opening band, and while they seemed like nice fellows who played a Talking Headish funk, they didn't really move me. Other audience members disagreed and they received a positive reaction from the crowd.
But it was the main item, we were really waiting for.
Calvi took to the stage shortly before midnight, with the two members of her band multi-instrumentalist Mally Harpez and drummer Daniel Maiden-Wood. They show began with the instrumental opener from the album and very quickly it became clear just how much of a talent Calvi is. Leaving aside the guitar and voice, the songs are remarkably seductive, pulling in the audience.
jumped from one instrument to another, and Maiden-Wood created a fiercely intense backing for Calvi's guitar. And despite her recent hand injury Calvi played most of her album as well as a cover of Elvis' Surrender and the Edith Piaf song Jezebel.
And once again I'd have to say that my only complaint was the shortness of the show. Around fifty minutes including the one song encore. A few more songs to take us over the one hour mark would have been nice, but in all fairness, the show was so good, that I was just happy to be there.
Permalink 1 Comment
Stornoway and Sea of Bees in Toronto – A Review
Snap decisions can sometimes go disastrously wrong. But not always.
I've been a fan of Sea of Bees since I heard their cover of "Feliz Navidad" on Mojo's Christmas compilation, so when I heard a rumour they were playing Toronto supporting Stornoway, I though I'd get a ticket. trouble was I wasn't absolutely sure they were opening, and I was only vaguely aware of Stornoway. The guy at Soundscapes convinced me.
Before the show I contacted Sea of Bee's manager and asked about the possibility of an interview. The details in place, I headed down early to the El Mocambo.
I don't think I've been to the Elmo in about 15 years. The last time was to see Wreckless Eric, and the stage was on the other side. Unfortunately too, the interview wasn't possible before the show, but I did get to watch Stornoway's soundcheck, which was lovely.
Sea of Bees began their set at about 9:15. Sea of Bees is Julie "Jules" Baenziger's project, but recently she has been joined by additional guitarist Amber Padgett. And that was the band. Just Jules and Amber on stage in front of some rather lovely red drapes, but within seconds they created an intimate atmosphere which drew in an appreciative audience.
If you pick up the full-length Sea of Bees album Songs for the Ravens, the material has a richer feel, but the stripped-down approach worked beautifully for the confined quarters of the Elmo. The band played what seemed like a too-brief a seven song set, Skinnybone, Gnomes, Wizbot, Strikefoot, Marmalade, Sidepain and the Woods, but perhaps they'll be back to see us soon.
After the show, I did an interview with Jules and Amber which will appear in this space as soon as I transcribe the tape.
As we were finishing the interview, Stornoway came on stage. After the soundcheck, I'd chatted with a couple of the members of the band. The band is from Cowley, which is just outside Oxford. I lived in a town called Wantage when I was a kid (after 30 minutes from Oxford) and my dad worked in Cowley. Small world. On the strength of the soundcheck, I'd bought their tour EP (it sounded lovely in the car on the way home), so I was very excited about their set.
Like Sea of Bees, Stornoway created an instant rapport with the audience with their mixture of kinetic folk and catchy ballads. Singer Brian Briggs told the crowd that their Toronto show from last year was their favourite gig of the tour, and you might almost believe that wasn't just flattery. The crowd seemed to soak up every little aspect of the show from the faster singalongs to the quiet intimate moments. It's something of a tell, that when Briggs asked the audience for quiet during a number, the audience shut up.
The time seemed to fly by. Within what seems liked moments the band were announcing their final number, then a quick two-song encore and it was over.
The 12th Annual Montreal Anarchist bookfair
May 24, 2011 at 1:13 am	(Uncategorized)
So, here's my brief report on the Montreal Anarchist bookfair which took place this weekend.
The bookfair started in 2000 and is the largest radical left/anarchist bookfair in Canada, and one of the largest in North America. It was originally a one-ay affair in a small community centre, it has not expanded into a month of activates with a two-day fair in a much larger venue, which seems smaller every year (Big thank you to Sara who got me a better table!)
I have tabled every year, first as Red & Black Notes and now as Notes from Underground (but of course, Internationalist Perspective occupies a place of prominence on my table).
NFU/IP is one of three Marxist groups at the fair. The others being the Internationalist Communist Tendency (formerly the IBRP) and a split from it, the Internationalist Communists of Montreal. Others at the fair include the IWW, Common Cause, the Libertarian Communist Organization (both ex-NEFAC, anarcho communists), La Sociale, AK Press, PM Press, 5th Estate, Autonomedia, South End and a whole host of smaller publishers and distributors. I also got to see a few old friends from years gone by and to reintroduce myself to Penelope Rosemont.
All in all a good cross-section.
The bookfair is an interesting mixture of ideas. While the focus is anarchist, there is room for others; It's not uncommon to see Che t-shirts. I mentioned above some Marxists are allowed space, but for a variety of reasons (more historical and local). Anarchists are hostile to Leninists, Trots and party builders in general. (for that matter, so am I) But not necessarily to Marxism. Indeed, what they see as anti-state communism are usually welcome. (so Dauve, Aufheben and others are usually big sellers on my table) IP too, though curiously I sell more English than French copies.
I had a number of interesting conversations about value theory and also the role of activism. Maybe next year, I'll stay for both days. For now, it's next stop Hamilton in June.
Apocalypse Pretty Soon
If you've got stuff to do, you better do it soon because the end of the world is coming.
I know some people were comforted by the Mayan Apocalypse which is coming next year, because that meant hey, you've still got plenty of time to get your shit together. But no, good people, according to some, the end of the world is Friday. Which really sucks because it's the beginning of the Victoria Day long weekend, and I was planning to go to Montreal for the anarchist bookfair.
If it had been a Monday (or in the case of next week, a Tuesday), I don't think too many people would have minded.
But before you get out your Visa cards to spend , spend , spend (or alternatively pop down the mall for some last minute looting), it should be noted that not everyone agrees this is the date. According to one prophet of the end of days, the apocalypse will begin on Friday with the Christian rapture and end on October 21 (a few days before my son's birthday and Halloween, so double sucks there) with the end of the world. I'm not really putting any stock in this, but I may be slightly unnerved if I see any of my Christian neighbours floating into the air on Friday.
But seriously, end of the world and Milleniumist predictions are hardly new. They date back thousands of years. Here's how at least one group calculated the new one (courtesy of Wikipedia)
According to [Harold] Camping, the number five equals "atonement", the number ten equals "completeness", and the number seventeen equals "heaven".
Christ is said to have hung on the cross on April 1, 33 AD. The time between April 1, 33 AD and April 1, 2011 is 1,978 years.
If 1,978 is multiplied by 365.2422 days (the number of days in a solar year, not to be confused with the lunar year), the result is 722,449.
The time between April 1 and May 21 is 51 days.
51 added to 722,449 is 722,500.
(5 x 10 x 17)2 or (atonement x completeness x heaven)2 also equals 722,500.
Thus, Camping concludes that 5 × 10 × 17 is telling us a "story from the time Christ made payment for our sins until we're completely saved
The problem of course being that numbers can do just about anything you want them do. So, for example, today is monday which is the 1st day of the week, and I have $18. 68 in change in my pocket, so multiply 1,868 X 1 X the number of books in the old testament divided by… I'm sure I could figure something out given enough time.
Oh and by the way, in case you're mildly concerned you might not be Christian enough to survive and that fiery lake doesn't sound too appealing, Harold Camping believes in what's called annihilationism. Souls who are not saved will not spend an eternity in hellfire and damnation (that's a comfort), but will simply cease to exist (in other words they die – pretty much what I was expecting at the end of life anyway).
Pause for breath.
I've spent a good part of my life as an advocate of a cause that many would see as fairly unrealistic (except for that glorious moment when it isn't), but I have to say this kind of thing still leaves me mystified. When Marx talked about religion being the opium of the people, he went on to note it was the sign of the oppressed creature. In other words, the existence of religion was a sign of a deep problem in society. Religion was a relection of a deep social disorder. Unfortunately, religion has become a shield which instead of viewing those social problems as the cause of religion, it views the lack of religion as the cause of the problems.
I leave the last words on this mess to the world's most famous atheist Richard Dawkins:
"he will inevitably explain, on May 22nd, that there must have been some error in the calculation, the rapture is postponed to . . . and please send more money to pay for updated billboards."
(Read Dawkins full article here)
Dylan's China Gig Set List (Up-date)
May 15, 2011 at 12:31 pm	(Uncategorized)
Dylan release this statement on Friday about the China's shows.
To my fans and followers
Allow me to clarify a couple of things about this so-called China controversy which has been going on for over a year. First of all, we were never denied permission to play in China. This was all drummed up by a Chinese promoter who was trying to get me to come there after playing Japan and Korea. My guess is that the guy printed up tickets and made promises to certain groups without any agreements being made. We had no intention of playing China at that time, and when it didn't happen most likely the promoter had to save face by issuing statements that the Chinese Ministry had refused permission for me to play there to get himself off the hook. If anybody had bothered to check with the Chinese authorities, it would have been clear that the Chinese authorities were unaware of the whole thing.
We did go there this year under a different promoter. According to Mojo magazine the concerts were attended mostly by ex-pats and there were a lot of empty seats. Not true. If anybody wants to check with any of the concert-goers they will see that it was mostly Chinese young people that came. Very few ex-pats if any. The ex-pats were mostly in Hong Kong not Beijing. Out of 13,000 seats we sold about 12,000 of them, and the rest of the tickets were given away to orphanages. The Chinese press did tout me as a sixties icon, however, and posted my picture all over the place with Joan Baez, Che Guevara, Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg. The concert attendees probably wouldn't have known about any of those people. Regardless, they responded enthusiastically to the songs on my last 4 or 5 records. Ask anyone who was there. They were young and my feeling was that they wouldn't have known my early songs anyway.
As far as censorship goes, the Chinese government had asked for the names of the songs that I would be playing. There's no logical answer to that, so we sent them the set lists from the previous 3 months. If there were any songs, verses or lines censored, nobody ever told me about it and we played all the songs that we intended to play.
Everybody knows by now that there's a gazillion books on me either out or coming out in the near future. So I'm encouraging anybody who's ever met me, heard me or even seen me, to get in on the action and scribble their own book. You never know, somebody might have a great book in them.
Montreal Anarchist Bookfair 2011
Less than two weeks now to the Montreal anarchist bookfair, now in its 12th year. I've tabled at every one and I'm happy to say I will be back this year.
The bookfair takes place on May 21 and 22 at CEDA, 2515 rue Delisle
(a short walk from Lionel-Groulx metro) from 10 – 6. Free!
As usual I've got new issues of Aufheben, Internationalist Perspective and Radical Anthropology, as well as pamphlets, Lots of good stuff from PM and AK Press and a selection of other new and used titles. Come and say hello at the Notes from Underground table. .
And go to the bookfair site for all the details
May 8, 2011 at 10:10 pm	(Uncategorized)
Then there was the Great Chicago Fire. I was there. The stories of how the fire began were wildly contradictory, but I was there. Some people say the fire was started by a stampede of cows. Some say it was just one cow. Some tried to blame it all on someone they didn't like. One fella tried to blame it on his own brother, just because his brother had stolen away his girlfriend and married her. The wedding took place in Las Vegas. It was a modest affair of about 150 guests, non-denominational (which really pissed off the parents of the bride, but hell you can't please everybody). During the ceremony, some rotten little punks yelled "Fire! Fire!" and the whole place cleared out in no time. The maid of honor even broke her ankle in two places after being shoved down the altar by the always overly zealous justice of the peace. Well, the ankle was pretty bad and the maid of honor had to be shot, and exactly one week later the entire block burned to the ground. Even the bricks burned. But at least nobody tried to blame it on a cow. And the wedding went ahead as planned. And some people actually believe that Nero fiddled as Rome burned, and that he really did look like a badly aging Peter Lorre. On Sunday nights we'd all gather 'round the television set to watch the Disney show, and I would always fall asleep from boredom. But I had a big ol' Siamese cat named Butch who'd always loved to play with my face within moments after my head hit the pillow. So I'd awake startled, sometimes crying, sometimes covered with blood and crying, staring into the idiot box. sometimes I'd see Walt himself, sometimes Mickey or Goofy. But sometimes I'd see a thousand bright blue caribou racing a dust storm to the finish line, neck and neck all the way, like nature's own Indy 500! Flesh and blood racing against the elements! And I remember wondering to myself…"Why are they racing?" Then one fine day I understood why the race took place. It was because the hairs on those caribou necks were being tickled by the instinctual knowledge of a fire raging not too far away, and most certainly headed this way. Humans often get the same feeling…like an oddly warm breeze, malevolently fueled by the maddening flames behind it. Come ride the fiery breeze of Galaxie 500!
Kramer, notes for Galaxie 500's second album On Fire.
New York City, 1989.
The Good Ole El Mocambo
May 5, 2011 at 2:28 am	(Uncategorized)
Yes, yes, I know. It doesn't make any sense to say the El Mocambo when el means the as well. Such is life.
I've seen some great shows there over the years Alex Chilton probably being my favourite. Although the Steve Wynn/Exene Cervenka show and Wreckless Eric were pretty good too.
The El Mo's star doesn't burn quite as brightly these days, but this month are two shows not to be missed:
Stornoway plays May 24. English indie folk band, but the real treat is the absolutely wonderful Sea of Bees is opening the show (at 9:15). Get there early.
Three days later it's Anna Calvi. Which also promises to be a great show.
There's still life in the beast yet.
The Kills in Toronto 2011 – A Review
It always seems to be raining whenever I go to the Sound Academy. Not a big deal except that it makes traversing the parking lot a bit tricky as the place fills up like the Thousand Islands – my shoes are always soaked. And when you're charging an exorbitant $20 for parking, you might at least have it properly paved.
But I digress. I was at the Sound Academy to see the Kills, one of my favourite bands, play stuff from their new album Blood Pressures. The Kills were in Toronto two years ago at the smaller Phoenix. Since then the band has been overshadowed by Allison Mossart and Jamie Hince's solo projects – The Dead Weather in the case of Mosshart and Kate Moss in the case of Hince. Which is a shame, since the Kills are a truly great band.
I got the show about 7:50, just in time to join the line for the merch counter (?) I don't think I've ever had to stand in line at a show to buy a t-shirt before. It all seemed to work well though, and from the band's point of view it's smart: much less hubbub (so less chance of things being stolen), and audience members are more likely to buy something if they've waited twenty minutes to get to the front of the line. I was tempted to buy a tour poster, but it was little rich for my blood, and I walked away with a few badges.
It's hard to be an opening band. Your job is to warm up the crowd, who for the most part, are not there to see you. But should you be too good, you're likely to get encounter the hostility of the headliners or at worse get kicked off the tour. It's not a enviable position to be in.
The Entrance Band (hardly an inspiring name to be sure) took the stage about 8:15. The band is from Baltimore and played a kind of laid-back heavy rock. lots of guitar and extended jams. They received polite applause from the audience who had gathered early, but it always seems to me that there's something wrong when the band is having more fun than the audience. The Entrance Band played a thirty minute set in which they spoke to the audience exactly twice. Both times to say, "We're the Entrance band."
9:15 and Cold Cave came on. I know it's lazy writing to say this band sounds like that band, but to my ears they sounded an awful lot like Depeche Mode. As poppy as the Entrance Band were rockist, they bopped around for about forty minutes in a haze of blue smoke receiving quite a bit more applause than the openers.
The Kills hit the stage around 10:10 starting their set with the title track of 2005's No Wow. As befitting their sound the Kills stage was sparsely decorated. A simple leopard print backdrop with scattered sparkles was the only prop, and for fifty minutes they played a bluesy-punk set that had the audience singing along, enjoying every moment.
The band drew from all four of their albums, although No Wow was the only song from their second album. They played eight of the eleven songs from their new album, and if they songs took a while to grow on disc, there was no problem live. The effect was immediate.
My only complaint, and this is a complaint that says you did a good job, was it was too short. The regular set was a little shy of an hour, and although it was a three song encore, it felt short. (also, why no "Pale Blue Eyes" ? The version they recorded for Levis Sessions is superlative). But hey, nothing's perfect. A great Sunday night
No Wow
Future Starts Slow
Heart is a Beating Drum
U.R.A. Fever
Tape Song
You Don't Own the Road
Fried My Little Brains