As a Freshman (2018-19): Finished eighth in the NWC Top Rankings in the 200 Breaststroke (2:37.61) ... Had the fastest time of the season for the Pioneers for the 200 Breaststoke (2:31.30) ... Recorded the third fastest times of the season for the Pioneers for the 100 Breaststroke (1:12.91) and 200 IM (2:24.81).
Why Lewis and Clark?: I chose Lewis & Clark for the beautiful location, close-knit team, small class size and overall positive feeling on campus!


Women worldwide have an inborn liking for makeup. It's not really possible for women to imagine life without makeup or taking a step out of their homes without wearing that essential lipstick, mascara, lip gloss, eye liner or nail paint. What happens in case a woman is not able to wear makeup like her peers? She will be devastated, loose her self confidence and will try to keep to herself. Women without make up- its really difficult to imagine! Indeed there maybe cases where individuals are not able to wear makeup due to one or the other reason. The reasons may vary from sensitivity of the skin to disorders like Celiac. It's not the end of the world for women who can't wear the routine makeup that is lined up in the corner shops or in the supermarkets. There is always an alternative.
Individuals suffering from Celiac are prone to aggravate their problems by wearing the normal makeup that is laden with gluten rich products. These gluten laden makeup items although don't get involved directly in aggravating the problem, research has proven beyond doubt that indirectly they do have an effect on the digestive system of gluten intolerant individuals. There are divergent views on the use of gluten laden products and their effects on the health of individuals suffering from celiac, still evidence in the form of experiments have proven beyond doubt that makeup products make extensive use of gluten laden products for they are perfect binding agents in cosmetics. The gluten part of these cosmetics gets into the food chain and has an effect that causes the disorder to aggravate. Many beauty brands have started gluten free products that don't make use of gluten laden products to bind the elements together. People with Celiac now have the option of switching to these products before their problems aggravate and not compromising with their health.
Its time to take care of your health and switch to beauty products that are gluten free, vegan and organic in nature. However there maybe a price difference but think about the price that one would be paying for ill health and low self esteem especially among women who are gluten intolerant but have a penchant for wearing the best makeup available.
Today's guest blogger, Elva is an expert in writing on topics like food, health and medical Issues. She is a fitness freak and believes that nutritious food and good health are the essential elements of life that help a human being lead a quality life. Being gluten intolerant she is a big time advocate of a gluten free food and gluten free recipes.
are you gluten intolerant?, celiac disease and makeup, cpsmetics are laden with gluten, glten free cosmetics, gluten free, gluten free makeup, gluten free skincare products, gluten intoloerance, gluten is a good binding agent in cosmetics, guest post, How to make changes in your makeup routine in you are gluten intolerant?, Look fro gluten free products, mySkin, myskin.com, skincare product recommendations, unbiased skincare recommendations, what makeup to apply if you are suffer from gluten intolerance?, what makeup to apply if you are suffering from celiac?
Its so beautiful and meaningful information. you just done a fabulous job for helping lots of people regarding their beauty.
Really a motivating post for those who are suffering from Celiac and i do accede there is always a alternative so need to worry about it just go for brands providing gluten laden free products..


Laptops - they can get hot! And, some may claim they can emit some radiation...but alas, you have to put them on your lap (mostly). Depending on which laptop you have, some get hotter than others, of course, or if you are having a long-winded gaming session, you could experience it more than others. I personally use a MacBook Air, and it stays relatively cool.
I've spent the last week adding the DefenderPad to my bag of tricks (both literally, my messenger bag, and figuratively, my awesome bag of tech). Admittedly, I have to remind myself to grab it, but the DefenderPad is designed well to encourage use. It's fairly light, it's rigid, and you can just slide it in your bag next to your laptop.
A few years back, I had an angled lap pad that I would rest my Toshiba laptop on, but this is obviously much smaller and can be added to your bag with little addition of bulk.
I've never really thought about whether my laptop is causing (or could cause) issues with radiation, however, it being (like cell phones) are such new technologies that we're not sure what will happen over time, but there are studies that state the dangers with the emitted radiation...I now have piece of mind that I'll be protected.
At first, I actually felt this item wasn't really anything to get excited about. And as far as a piece of tech accessories, it falls pretty flat (pun intended) - it's not all that exciting - but it adds safety, and when I travel for work, I love having the flat, sturdy, rigid surface that is afforded by the DefenderPad. Even for day to day use, I've found myself changing the way I interact with my laptop at the office, while leaning back comfortably in my chair, using the DefenderPad. The only other negative would be the price, which at $89.99 is a bitter pill to swallow.
Mashbuttons.com would recommend the DefenderPad as a "buy".


text:
Postal Locations
Arkansas <
Tontitown Post Office
NOTICE: The Postal Service is an essential government service, and will remain open wherever possible.
246 N Barrington Rd, Tontitown, AR 72770
Toll-Free: 1-800-Ask-USPS® (275-8777)
Monday 8:30am - 12:00pm, 1:00pm - 4:30pm
Tuesday 8:30am - 12:00pm, 1:00pm - 4:30pm
Wednesday 8:30am - 12:00pm, 1:00pm - 4:30pm
Thursday 8:30am - 12:00pm, 1:00pm - 4:30pm
Friday 8:30am - 12:00pm, 1:00pm - 4:30pm
Saturday 9:30am - 11:30am
PO Box Access Available
Monday 24 hours
Tuesday 24 hours
Wednesday 24 hours
Thursday 24 hours
Friday 24 hours
Saturday 24 hours
Sunday 24 hours
Last Collection Times
Monday 4:30pm
Tuesday 4:30pm
Wednesday 4:30pm
Bulk Mail Acceptance Hours
*This facility does not process US Passports applications or renewals. Check nearby locations below.
[+] Services Offered at this location
Bulk Mail Acceptance
Bulk Mail Account Balance
Bulk Mail New Permit
Business Reply Mail Account Balance
Business Reply Mail New Permit
Duck Stamps
Money Orders (Domestic)
Money Orders (Inquiry)
Money Orders (International)
Pickup Accountable Mail
Pickup Hold Mail
PO Box Online
Lot Parking
Visit our Links Page for Holiday Schedule, Change of Address, Hold Mail/Stop Delivery, PO Box rentals and fees, and Available Jobs.
*Please call to verify information. Is anything incorrect? Let us know here
Nearby Post Offices:
210 School Ave
2811 Springdale Ave
115 E Midway St
Springdale Station
429 Holcomb St
*Comments below are not read by postal employees. Please do not post personal information.
*By clicking Submit, you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use.
*postallocations.com is not a part of, or affiliated with, the official United States Postal Service (USPS).
© 2021 Everything-Bytes | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Click Here for More Articles on CHICAGO
Back to Billy! Tony Yazbeck Will Rejoin Cast of CHICAGO Tomorrow
BroadwayWorld.com Mar. 13, 2017
The Tony Award-winning, record-breaking hit musical Chicago announced today that Tony Award nomineeTony Yazbeck will return to the Broadway production as "Billy Flynn" beginning tomorrow, Tuesday, March 14 at the Ambassador Theatre (219 W. 49th St., NYC). Tony Award nominee Christopher Sieber will play his final performance in the role tonight, Monday, March 13.
Tony Yazbeck has appeared on Broadway in Finding Neverland, On the Town (Tony, Outer Critics Circle and Drama League nominations; Astaire Award winner),Chicago, Irving Berlin's White Christmas, Gypsy (with Patti LuPone; OCC nom.), A Chorus Line, Oklahoma!, Never Gonna Dance, Gypsy (with Tyne Daly). He has appeared off-Broadway in Fanny Hill (York Theatre), Encores!: Little Me, On the Town, The Apple Tree, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, Pardon My English. He also starred in Kiss Me, Kate at the Royal Albert Hall in London. TV/film credits include "Billions," "Smash," the feature documentary Every Little Step. His one-man show is title The Floor Above Me. www.tonyyazbeck.net
Chicago currently stars Charlotte d'Amboise as Roxie Hart, Lana Gordon as Velma Kelly, Christopher Sieber as Billy Flynn, Raymond Bokhour as Amos Hart, NaTasha Yvette Williams as Matron "Mama" Morton and R. Lowe as Mary Sunshine.
With a legendary book by Fred Ebb and Bob Fosse, music by John Kander and lyrics by Fred Ebb, Chicago is now the #1 longest-running American musical in Broadway history.
Produced by Barry and Fran Weissler, Chicago is the winner of six 1997 Tony Awards including Best Musical Revival and the Grammy Award for Best Musical Cast Recording.
Directed by Tony Award winner Walter Bobbie and choreographed by Tony Award winner Ann Reinking, Chicago features set design by John Lee Beatty, costume design by Tony Award winner William Ivey Long, lighting design by Tony Award winner Ken Billington, sound design by Scott Lehrer and casting by Stewart/Whitley.
Set amidst the razzle-dazzle decadence of the 1920s, Chicago is the story of Roxie Hart, a housewife and nightclub dancer who murders her on-the-side lover after he threatens to walk out on her. Desperate to avoid conviction, she dupes the public, the media and her rival cellmate, Velma Kelly, by hiring Chicago's slickest criminal lawyer to transform her malicious crime into a barrage of sensational headlines, the likes of which might just as easily be ripped from today's tabloids.
Photo Credit: Jeremy Daniel
CHICAGO Will Celebrate its 24th Anniversary On NBC's ONE NIGHT ONLY
VIDEO: 150 Performers Perform 'All That Jazz' For CHICAGO's 24th Anniversary
Donna Marie Asbury is in the Guinness Book of World Records For 20-Year Stint in CHICAGO
VIDEO: CHICAGO Cast Members Perform 'All That Jazz' Choreography
DVR Alert: Hollywood Bowl Concert Series Kicks Off Tonight With MUSICALS AND MOVIES, With Audra McDonald, Kristin Chenoweth, and Sutton Foster
As BroadwayWorld previously reported a new weekly concert series, IN CONCERT AT THE HOLLYWOOD BOWL, will air on PBS. The series kicks off today with t...
VIDEO: On This Day, January 16 - Happy Birthday, Lin-Manuel Miranda!
On this day we're celebrating the birthday of the great Lin-Manuel Miranda! ...
Philip J. Smith, Chairman Emeritus of The Shubert Organization, Has Passed Away at Age 89
The Shubert Organization has announced the passing of its beloved Chairman Emeritus, Philip J. Smith. Mr. Smith passed away peacefully on January 15, ...
Michael Ball Releases 'Leaning on a Rainbow' From BLITHE SPIRIT Film
Last year, Michael Ball recorded 'Leaning on a Rainbow' for the soundtrack to the new film 'Blithe Spirit'. The full track is now available on Spotify...
MARY POPPINS RETURNS is Now Streaming on Disney Plus
When and where can you find Mary Poppins Returns streaming? We have your answer here!...
Haley Swindal's TO NEW YORK, WITH LOVE to Stream for 30 More Days
By popular demand, Birdland's all new concert event from Broadway perennial Haley Swindal, To New York, With Love, filmed as part of the "Radio Free B...


Camel 1.1.0 Release - Apache Camel - Apache Software Foundation for your Wiki!
Welcome to the 1.1.0 release which includes a number of new features, improvements and bug fixes.
When upgrading please make sure you check your spring.xml file as a few minor changes have occurred in the XML Schema as a result of the move to JAXB2. In particular if you are configuring Java based DSL rules in Spring you need to change the packages attribute to be one or more package elements.


text:
Road Maintenance Services
"White Goods" Collection Program
Report Potholes
Heavy Hauling Permit
Traffic Calming Application
Utility Permit Application
Driveway Culvert Installation Form
"Accredited by the American Public Works Association"
Charles Sims
Director/Road Manager
(Except on legal holiday)
Motto: Let's Make It Happen!
POTHOLE AND ROAD REPAIR HOTLINE: (601) 857-ROAD (7623)
All after hour emergencies please call (601) 857-2600
The Department of Public Works (Department) formerly called the "Road Department" was established as a result of House Bill No. 4, which required the Board of Supervisors (Board) to operate a county wide system of road administration, effective October 1989. The Department operates under policies which have been adopted by the Board and by statutory authority in accordance with Section 65-17-1 of the Mississippi Code.
The administrative head of the Department is the Public Works Director/Road Manager, who is appointed by the Board, and is educated and experienced in the construction and maintenance of highways, bridges, and other facets of public works responsibilities.
The Director/Road Manager oversees the construction and maintenance of approximately 900 miles of rural road and small urban roads, including 334 bridges throughout rural Hinds County, Mississippi.
The Department is comprised of four major divisions: Engineering and Development, Planning and Administration, Roadway and Drainage, Construction and Maintenance. Each division is managed and directed by a division head. Each division performs tasks that are unique to its specific purpose.
There are 121 full-time positions assigned to the department, administrative, construction and maintenance.
There are four Hinds County Public Works locations:
Central Office - Raymond, Mississippi
North Maintenance District - Bolton, Mississippi
Southeast Maintenance - Terry, Mississippi
Southwest Maintenance - Utica, Mississippi
The mission of the Department of Public Works is the working, construction, and maintaining of all public roads and bridges, as defined in Title 65 of the Mississippi Code; the operation of a countywide system of road administration as defined in Section 19-2-3; enforcement of certain subdivision regulations as defined in Section 17-1-23; and the implementation of other orders as determined by the Board of Supervisors.
Our vision is to consistently improve the delivery of services to our customers, grow the capabilities and advance the well-being of our staff.
Our employees will treat each other and our customers with courtesy and respect, will show dedication to our mission and will represent the Department and County with dignity.
"Let's Make it Happen" (MIH)!
Charles Sims, Engineering Manager
Raymond, Mississippi 39154
Surveying, Subdivision inspections and approval, design, and construction, heavy haul permits or utility permits
J. D. White, Deputy Director
Louis McGriggs, Infrastructure Manager
North Maintenance District
Walter Kelly, Superintendent
1000 Frontage Road
Bolton, Mississippi 39041
Southeast Maintenance District
Paul Buckner, Superintendent
4055 Volley Campbell Road
Terry, Mississippi 39170
Southwest Maintenance District
Sammie Barnes, Superintendent
328 Curtis Road
Utica, Mississippi 39175
Dion Quinn, Traffic Control & Safety Coordinator
Phone:601.857.8732 or 601.353.5762


text:
Church of Ireland Historical Society
Promoting the study of Irish church history
COIHS Podcasts
Ref 500 Podcasts
Tag: register
The Tuam, Killala and Achonry Diocesan Archive
The RCB Library is pleased to report that the historical diocesan archive for Tuam, Killala and Achonry has been arranged and listed, and the detailed catalogue will be published online for public perusal. When the Library reopens to the public, the collection will become available for researchers, and it is likely to be of considerable […]
Tags Achonry, archives, catalogue, eighteenth century, Killala, nineteenth century, RCB Library, records, register, Tuam
The Short Read: Monaghan Parish Register and Disestablishment
Under the terms of the Irish Church Act, of 26th July 1869, which passed into law in 1871, the union between Church and State in Ireland that had existed since the Reformation was dissolved, and the Church of Ireland ceased to be established in law, leaving it 'free to shape her future course, independent of […]
Tags baptism, burial, Christ Church Cathedral, Clogher, Disestablishment, marriage, Monaghan, nineteenth century, RCB Library, Reformation, register
RCB Library Acquisitions: A Resource for Local and Family History
Each year, the RCB Library's managing committee – the Library and Archives Committee – delivers an annual report of the Library's recent activities and developments to the General Synod, the governing body of the Church of Ireland. The report includes a detailed appendix of all of the acquisitions that came into the Library's custody and were […]
Tags cathedral, genealogy, parish, PRONI, RCB Library, records, register
The pre-Reformation World in Dublin & Glendalough: Alen Register digitised
As the RCB Library continues its efforts to digitize and make more resources available to a worldwide audience, a second of its most significant medieval manuscripts: the Liber Niger Alani being the record of John Alen (c.1476-1534), Archbishop of Dublin and Glendalough, 1530-34 (RCB Library D6/3) is now digitally available for public consultation on the Church of […]
Tags Christ Church Cathedral, Church of Ireland, Digitisation, Dublin, Medieval, RCB Library, Reformation, register, sixteenth century, Tudor
The Kinmonths of Shandon, Cork
The RCB Library recently solved a genealogical mystery concerning the family of Kinmonth from the parish of St Anne's, Shandon. Whilst originally a family name of Norman origins, and with strong links in Scotland, Kinmonth is not a typical Cork name, yet some older Corkonians would have heard of the Kinmonth family as being poultry […]
Tags Cork, eighteenth century, genealogy, Kinmonths, nineteenth century, records, register, Shandon
Looking back: Armagh conference 2019
On Saturday 6th April, the Church of Ireland Historical Society (COIHS) hosted its first conference of the year in the Armagh Robinson Library. We had a superb turnout and wish to thank members, both old and new as well as day visitors who came to hear four excellent papers. We hope you enjoyed the day […]
Tags Armagh, Chapel Royal, Dublin Castle, eighteenth century, Francis Hutchinson, Medieval, Neely Prize, Postgraduate, RCB Library, records, Reformation, register
Ireland's earliest register: St John's Parish Register 400 years old
On 7th February 1619, the oldest surviving register in existence in Ireland, the combined register from St John's parish in Dublin, commenced. This makes this particular volume 400 years old this month. During her recent visit to the Representative Church Body Library, the Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Josepha Madigan TD, viewed the St […]
Tags burial, Dublin, marriage, parish, register, seventeenth century
The Strokestown (Bumlin) Parish Registers 1811-1969
Those with an interest in the Longford/Roscommon region might be particularly interested in the latest finding at the Representative Church Body Library. Below is transcribed content of the parish registers of the former union of Bumlin, Kiltrustan and Lissonuffy in Co. Roscommon, together with the memorial inscriptions on the monuments in the surrounding churchyard adjacent […]
Tags Board of First Fruits, Bumlin, burial, Elphin, Famine, Longford, nineteenth century, parish, register, Roscommon, Strokestown, twentieth century, vestry
The importance of parish records: the case of Shrule, County Longford
The Representative Church Body Library currently holds 1,114 collections of parish records covering a variety of time spans (some dating back to medieval times, but most from the late 17th Century onwards). They contain a wide variety of sources relating to a multitude of human-interest stories. In spite of the loss of approximately 500 collections […]
Tags Church of Ireland, Gazette, Longford, parish, records, register, Shrule
Government grant for digitisation of Church of Ireland Parish Registers
The Representative Church Body Library has welcomed the announcement of a €100,000 capital grant towards the digitisation of Church of Ireland parish registers as part of the Department of Culture, Heritage and Gaeltacht's digitisation scheme. The funding was announced by the Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ms Josepha Madigan TD, during a visit […]
Tags Church of Ireland, diaspora, Digitisation, genealogy, government, parish, register
Online Release of the Church of Ireland Gazette Editions from 1970s: Special Focus on the 'Borderless Church'
Listen Back: COIHS Winter Conference Online 2020
'Becoming Strangers?' The Experience of Southern Protestants 1900-23
A Republic of Ireland Perspective on the 1960s: the Church of Ireland Gazette
Editions of the Church of Ireland Gazette for 1960s now available Online
All members of the public are welcome to join the Church of Ireland Historical Society. For further details, please visit our Membership page.
Missed the last COIHS conference? Members can catch up by listening to the most recent papers on our COIHS podcasts page.
© 2021	Church of Ireland Historical Society


text:
var colog = require('colog');

var debug = 'log';

exports.log = function (method, resource, status) {
	status = status + '';
	if (debug == 'log') {
		console.log(method + ' ' + resource + ' ' + colog.colorGreen(status));
	}
}
exports.warning = function (method, resource, status) {
	status = status + '';
	if (debug == 'warning' || debug == 'log') {
		console.warn(method + ' ' + resource + ' ' + colog.colorYellow(status));
	}
}
exports.error = function (method, resource, status) {
	status = status + '';
	if (debug) {
		console.error(method + ' ' + resource + ' ' + colog.colorRed(status));
	}
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


By targeting the cancer cells, LTX-315 induces the release of potent immune stimulants and an extended range of patients` own tumor antigens - increasing patient specific immune response to attack cancer. A body of data has been generated on LTX-315 which confirms a modest and predictable clinical safety profile and emerging clinical evidence of anti-tumor and immune effects. In addition, preclinical data demonstrate strong synergy with LTX-315 and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Based on this Lytix Biopharma intends to initiate the first combination trial in the second half of 2015.
There is a paradigm shift in cancer treatment with the introduction of cancer immunotherapy. Combinations of complementary immunotherapy treatments are expected to be an integral part of future cancer treatment delivering significant clinical benefit. ICIs "take off the brakes" imposed by the tumor on the immune system and they are expected to be an integral part of future cancer therapy. LTX-315 stimulates or "pushes the accelerator" of the immune system through release of potent immune stimulants. In addition, LTX-315 differentiates from many other immune stimulants by inducing the release of the broadest possible spectrum of patient specific tumor antigens. These antigens enhance the effect of potent immune stimulants released by LTX 315 and potentially the effect of standard of care treatment (including immune therapies such as ICIs).
The strong preclinical data in addition to evidence of anti-tumour effects (including immune effects) in the Phase I study have provided Proof of Concept for LTX-315. Lytix Biopharma intends to present the safety and efficacy data from the ongoing Phase I monotherapy study at an oncology conference in the second half of 2015.
LTX-315 has a multi-indication potential, and malignant melanoma will be the 1st indication in which combinations with LTX-315 will be evaluated.


text:
Albany International Corp Class A (AIN) Q3 2021 Earnings Call Transcript
By Motley Fool Transcribers – Oct 26, 2021 at 2:00PM
NYSE: AIN
(-0.25%) -$0.27
AIN earnings call for the period ending September 30, 2021.
Albany International Corp Class A (AIN -0.25%)
Oct 26, 2021, 9:00 a.m. ET
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Albany International Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] We will conduct a question and answer session later and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]
I'd now like to turn the call over to our host, Director of Investor Relations, Mr. John Hobbs. Please go ahead, sir.
10 stocks we like better than Albany International
They just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Albany International wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
John Hobbs -- Director of Investor Relations
Thank you, Brad, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Albany International's third quarter 2021 conference call. As a reminder for those listening on the call, please refer to our press release issued yesterday afternoon detailing our quarterly financial results. Contained in that text is a notice regarding our forward-looking statements and the use of certain non-GAAP financial measures and their associated reconciliation to GAAP. For the purposes of this conference call, those same statements apply to our verbal remarks this morning.
Today we will make statements that are forward-looking. that contain a number of risks and uncertainties, among which are the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations, the markets we serve and our financial results. For a full discussion, including a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures we may use on this call to their most comparable GAAP measures, please refer to both our earnings release of October 25, 2021, as well as our SEC filings, including our 10-K.
Now I will turn the call over to Bill Higgins, our President and Chief Executive Officer who will provide opening remarks. Bill?
A. William Higgins -- President & Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, John. Good morning and welcome everyone. Thank you for joining our third quarter earnings call. We're pleased to report another good quarter of results. We executed well and we continue to do a great job for our customers on many fronts in quality, delivery service, and our technology partnerships. Our supply chain teams work 24/7 to overcome unprecedented logistics challenges and material shortages to keep our factory supplied. And I am most pleased that we achieved a record level of performance and safety something our teams have been working hard at in all of our plants around the world.
As a company, we delivered GAAP EPS of $0.95, $0.83 on an adjusted basis on $232 million in revenue, an increase of nearly 10% from Q3 last year. Our Machine Clothing segment continues to fire on all cylinders and grew sales by 11% compared to Q3 last year with excellent profitability and free cash flow generation.
Engineered composites delivered top-line growth of nearly 7% and performed well, as we work toward the upturn in commercial aerospace. Our profitability was solid with gross margins of 40%, operating margins of 19%, and adjusted EBITDA margins of 26% and we continued our strong free cash flow generation, over $40 million in the quarter. We have low debt and a healthy balance sheet, and we look forward to continuing solid performance from our Machine Clothing segment and gradual recovery in commercial aerospace.
As we mentioned last quarter, long-term secular trends are favorable and Albany's market positions, global footprint, and product development take advantage of these trends.
In our Engineered Composites segment, we expect commercial aerospace to gradually improve with narrow-body aircraft demand improving before wide-body demand. Consequently, we're hiring employees and planning for a ramp-up in LEAP production driven by Airbus A320neo and Boeing 737 MAX growth. We are coordinating with Safran to expand production in our three LEAP facilities in the US, France, and Mexico.
We see positive signs in international travel bookings as borders reopen and people have begun to travel internationally, although we don't expect any near-term pickup in wide-body production demand such as for our Boeing 787 composite frames line as there still inventory in the system and international travel has been slow to recover.
Our AEC businesses continue to perform well on our military platforms Sikorsky CH-53K helicopter, Lockheed Martin's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and Jazan missile programs. We're fortunate to be on excellent programs and our teams are executing well.
We also continued our pursuit of new customers and new applications for advanced composites. During the quarter, we announced our technology collaboration with Spirit AeroSystems to apply our advanced 3D woven composite technology to hypersonic vehicles and take advantage of our proprietary 3D woven composites in a high-temperature environment providing both structural robustness and thermal protection, and building on our proven ability to industrialize 3D woven composites at high volumes. This is an example of the intense collaboration our teams are good at, working closely with our technology partners in the design, development, and commercialization of the most advanced composite applications.
In addition to working on engine component applications with our partner Safran, we continue development of Wing applications with Airbus Wing of Tomorrow program and other composite programs in commercial and defense applications.
Our Machine Clothing segment continue to perform exceptionally well. Our engineers and sales and service teams in MC work closely with key customers to develop the next generation of belt materials for improved operational efficiency, performance, and durability. And customers value our service technical expertise and innovation. We saw a good demand in the quarter for new products and all product lines.
Demand in MC's end markets has been resilient and particularly strong in packaging in the Americas. Tissue markets have held up although demand is mixed and flat overall as tissue machine utilization is below long-term averages and tissue producers are working through distortions caused by the pandemic's effect on away-from-home paper markets. This should improve as workers go back to offices and students are back in school.
In other end markets, demand was strong in the quarter for corrugators, nonwovens, and building products. Even publication was better this quarter, likely a pause in the longer-term secular decline of printing and writing grades of paper. We are seeing significant logistics challenges and price inflation on various raw materials and wages. So far, supply chain management and operations teams have done an excellent job. They've been able to secure the materials we need to run our operations that only moderate increases in cost.
In general, we strive to offset inflationary costs through productivity savings. This time may be different, as we don't see inflationary pressures abating anytime soon. If anything, conditions grew more challenging during the third quarter.
Let me make a few comments on corporate governance and capital allocation before turning the call over to Stephen. In early August, the company move closer to a single-class share structure following the secondary offering of nearly all of the Standish Family's ownership in the company with our few remaining shares converted to Class A common stock. As a result, today, there are more than 32.3 million shares of Class A common stock outstanding and less than 1,200 shares of Class B stock outstanding, which are held by two former employees. The transaction effectively created a conventional single-class governance structure for our shareholders.
Regarding capital allocation. As we mentioned in the past, our priority is to use our balance sheet first for organic growth investments where we can add value for our customers. And then acquisitions that fit our strategy enable us to build on our technology, leadership, and market positions in both segments.
Adding to these options, Albany's Board of Directors has authorized a $200 million share repurchase program, expanding the set of capital allocation alternatives we have at our disposal. We continue to look for acquisitions that advance our technology and market position at a fair price and we're focused on value creation from both an organic and inorganic investment perspective.
In summary, we had another good quarter. Our businesses are executing well, we continue to push the envelope in our technology development with new products in both segments, and secular trends in our end markets are favorable.
So with that, I'll hand the call over to Stephen for more detail on the financials. Stephen?
Stephen M. Nolan -- Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
Thank you, Bill, and good morning to everyone. I will talk first about the results for the quarter and then comment on the outlook for our business for the balance of the year. For the third quarter, total company net sales were $232.4 million, an increase of 9.6% compared to the $212 million delivered in the same quarter last year. Adjusting for currency translation effects, net sales rose by 8.8% year-over-year in the quarter. In Machine Clothing also adjusting for currency translation effects, net sales were up 9.9% year-over-year. All major grades of product led by engineered fabrics and packaging grades contributed to the year-over-year increase in net sales.
Engineered composites' net sales, again, after adjusting for currency translation effects, grew by 6.7% primarily driven by growth on LEAP and CH-53K partially offset by expected declines on the 787 and F-35 platforms. During the quarter, the ASC LEAP program generated about $25 million in revenue, comparable to the first two quarters of this year, but up about $9 million from the third quarter of last year. We are pleased with the reduction in our inventory of LEAP-1B finished goods.
During the most recent quarter, we reduce that inventory by over 30 engine shipsets down to about 140 engine shipsets on hand. Given the current rates of the inventory consumption on that program, we would not plan to have that inventory level drop below about 100 engine shipsets, so we can see the light at the end of the tunnel in terms of inventory destocking. I'm looking forward to an earnings call for I no longer have to discuss LEAP-1B inventory at all. We hope to return to a more normal levels of production on LEAP-1B on par with the current production rates for LEAP-1A early in 2022.
However, we do have some concern with the rate of which Boeing is destocking its inventory of finished 737 MAX aircraft, so there is still some lack of clarity around 2022 build rates. We will hopefully have better insight for you on our fourth quarter call. Also during the quarter, we generated under $3 million of revenue on the 787 program down slightly from the second quarter, but down from almost $9 million in the same quarter last year.
Third quarter gross profit for the company was $92 million, an increase of over 5% from the comparable period last year. The overall gross margin decreased by 160 basis points from 41.2% to 39.5% of net sales. Within the MC segment, gross margin was flat at 51.5% of net sales as the benefit from improved absorption was offset by the impact of year-over-year foreign currency changes and rising input costs.
For the AEC segment, the gross margin declined from 21.6% to 16.1% of net sales caused by a smaller impact from changes in the estimated profitability of long-term contracts, a change in program mix, and lower fixed cost absorption due to the lower 787 and F-35 revenues, and the impact of sharing with our customer base a portion of The Aviation Manufacturing Jobs Protection grant received during the quarter. The $5.8 million benefit of this grant appears in the corporate portion of the results while the reduced profitability caused by sharing a portion of the grant with our customer base is reported in the segment results.
During the quarter, we recognized a net favorable change in the estimated profitability of AEC's long-term contracts of about $2 million but this compares to a net favorable change of about $3.5 million in the same quarter last year.
Third quarter Selling, Technical, General, and Research expenses were $47.4 million in the current quarter, down slightly from $47.8 million in the prior year quarter and were down as a percentage of net sales from 22.6% to 20.4%. While R&D was up over $4 million -- over $1 million this quarter and while we also incurred higher travel expenses, these were more than offset by a foreign currency revaluation gain this quarter compared to a foreign currency revaluation loss in the same quarter last year.
Total operating income for the company was $44.5 million, up from $38.8 million in the prior year quarter. Machine Clothing operating income rose by $9.8 million, driven by higher gross profit and lower STG&R expense. And AEC operating income fell by $3.9 million caused by lower gross profit and higher STG&R expense partially offset by lower restructuring expense.
The income tax rate for this quarter was 29.4% compared to 24.7% in the same quarter last year. The higher rate this year was caused by the generation of a higher share of our global profits in jurisdictions with higher tax rates and by less favorable discrete income tax adjustments. We reported over $2 million in expense under other income expense this quarter primarily due to a true-up of indirect taxes in a foreign jurisdiction.
Net income attributable to the company for the quarter was $30.9 million, an increase of over $1 million from $29.6 million last year. The increase was caused primarily by the higher operating profit, partially offset by higher interest expense and the higher tax rate. Earnings per share were $0.95 in this quarter compared to $0.92 last year.
In addition to the normal non-GAAP adjustments we typically make to cover the impact of foreign currency revaluation gains and losses, restructuring expenses, and expenses associated with the CirComp acquisition and integration, this quarter, we are also adjusting out the impact of The Aviation Manufacturing Jobs Protection grant as we do not believe it is reflective of ongoing profitability.
After making these non-GAAP adjustments, adjusted earnings per share was $0.83 this quarter compared to $0.96 last year. Adjusted EBITDA declined by 2.6% to $60.2 million for the most recent quarter compared to the same period last year.
Machine Clothing adjusted EBITDA was $59.2 million or 38.4% of net sales, up from $52.6 million or 37.9% of net sales in the prior year quarter. AEC adjusted EBITDA was $16.3 million or 20.8% of net sales, down from last year's $19.5 million or 26.6% of net sales.
Turning to our debt position. Total debt, which consists of amounts reported on our balance sheet as long-term debt or current maturities of long-term debt remained steady at $350 million. We have a floating to fixed interest rate swap in the place of debt level for the life of the current credit agreement and currently, we do not intend to pay down total debt below that level. Cash increased by about $33 million during the quarter resulting in a reduction in net debt by the same $33 million.
Capital expenditures in the quarter of about $9 million were roughly the same as incurred in the same quarter last year. From a capital deployment perspective, as Bill mentioned, our priorities are unchanged. The first priority is organic investments followed by disciplined and targeted acquisitions followed by returning capital to shareholders. Our fundamental strategy has not changed. However, given our modest leverage and strong free cash flow outlook, the Board of Directors has authorized a $200 million share repurchase program. We believe that such a program will be the most efficient, effective and value-additive approach to returning additional capital to our shareholders.
While there is no guarantee that we will execute all or even any of this authorization, it is the company's intention to make use of this authorization subject to prevailing market conditions and while recognizing the inherent limitations on how quickly we can execute such a significant program. Fully executed, the share repurchase program would increase our net leverage a little under one turn of EBITDA leaving us with sufficient dry powder for additional strategic actions.
As we look forward to the balance of 2021, the outlook for the Machine Clothing segment remains strong. Q3 revenues were up over 11% compared to last year partially aided by some currency tailwinds to revenue, primarily due to strong euro. Packaging and tissue grades remain the primary drivers of long-term growth. While we also saw a nice recovery in publication revenue in the third quarter, driven by a return to office and schools, a continuation of this recovery is in jeopardy as a result of the Delta Varian surge which at par has paused some return to office efforts.
Also, after we get through the pandemic effects, we do not expect any change in the long-term secular decline in the publication market. I would also like to note that the growth rate for the MC segment this quarter was unusually high driven by timing of customer needs.
Segment orders year-to-date are up about 6% compared to last year and backlog entering Q4 is only modestly higher than at the same time last year. We typically generate about 23% to 25% of the segment's revenue in the fourth quarter, and we expect this year to be broadly similar to that. As a result, we are raising our previously issued guidance of revenue for the segment to between -- to be between $600 million and $610 million, up from the prior range of $585 million to $600 million. From a margin perspective in Machine Clothing, we delivered another strong quarter, with adjusted EBITDA margins of almost 39%. We are seeing increased pressure from input expenses of all types particularly logistics and expect these pressures to continue to increase through the balance of the year.
However, as previously discussed, many of these cost increases began in Q2 and accelerated in Q3, have yet to materially impact our results due to both the terms of our supply agreements and the roughly six-month lag between procuring raw materials of the higher cost and those cost being reflected in the segment's cost of goods sold. We will see more impact from these cost pressures in Q4, but we will not see the full impact until 2022.
In addition, late in the third quarter and early in the fourth quarter, we have seen some relaxation of travel restrictions in certain regions and are beginning to see our level of visits to customers increase, which will result in somewhat higher STG -- oh, sorry. SG&A in the fourth quarter.
Driven primarily by the strong revenue performance, we are increasing our adjusted EBITDA guidance for the segment to a range of $215 million to $225 million, up from the prior range of $210 million to $220 million.
Turning to Engineered composites. We delivered a strong quarter, very much in line with expectations. Last quarter, we indicated that we expected Q3 profitability to be similar to that delivered in Q1 and it was within a few hundred thousand dollars of that level.
We were very pleased to be awarded an Aviation Manufacturing Jobs Protection grant during the quarter of $5.8 million which recognizes the challenges that we, along with the rest of the industry have experienced due to the COVID pandemic. However, as I already noted, we have adjusted the effects out of both Q3 adjusted results and segment guidance for the year as it is not reflective of continuing operational performance.
While unlikely to have any material impact on the balance of 2021, we are concerned about the slow recovery of the Boeing 787 program where Boeing has indicated that they will continue to produce at a low rate for the foreseeable future. As of the end of the third quarter, we had the equivalent of about five shipsets of 787 product in either finished goods or WIP which is not unusually high. However, significant quantities of our finished goods exist in Boeing's overall supply chain, which combined with Boeing's low level of production will likely lead to very low levels of production for us, for the foreseeable future and may even lead to significant production gaps.
Any impact in 2021 would be modest as we are not anticipating any significant recovery on the program this year, but it will likely delay any meaningful recovery on the program until beyond 2022. As you know, our production levels on the F-35 have been uncertain this year, as our customer has dealt with issues elsewhere in the supply chain over the last 18 months and with lower depot consumption of aftermarket parts. We are confident in our outlook for the balance of the year, but I will note that Lockheed Martin and its government customer have established a new outlook for program production that plateaus at 156 aircraft in 2023, a lower rate, and an earlier date than the previously planned plateau. The F-35 remains a very good and profitable program for us. This programmatic change has no impact on this year, but it will likely temper the revenue upside in the program for us in future years.
Overall for the AEC segment, the year is progressing largely as we expected when we last issued guidance, although we are now less concerned about downside risk. Therefore we are raising the lower end of our guidance range for segment revenues resulting in the range of between $310 million, up from the previous range of $290 million to $310 million. From a profitability perspective, given the year is progressing largely as expected, we are maintaining the previously issued guidance range for AEC adjusted EBITDA of between $65 million and $70 million.
We are also updating our previously issued guidance ranges for company-level performance, including revenue of between $900 million and $920 million increased from prior guidance of $880 million to $910 million. Effective income tax rate of 28% to 30%, unchanged from prior guidance. Depreciation and amortization of about $75 million, unchanged from prior guidance. Capital expenditures in the range of $40 million to $50 million also unchanged from prior guidance. GAAP earnings per share of between $3.23 and $3.38 increased from prior guidance of $2.84 to $3.14. Adjusted earnings per share of between $3.15 and $3.30 increased from prior guidance of $2.19 to $3.20 and adjusted EBITDA of between $230 million and $240 million increased from prior guidance of $225 million to $240 million.
Overall, while the pandemic is not yet behind us and risks still remain across our business, we are very pleased to be able to raise guidance yet again, reflecting the hard work and dedication of our teams across the globe. The coming years will continue to be a challenge as we and the rest of the industry slowly recover from the severe downturn in commercial aviation and as the machine clothing market searches for its new post-pandemic normal.
We also recognize of our risks ahead in terms of supply chain constraints and inflationary pressures, should the recent and current increases be more than transitory. However, our track record of operational excellence and continuous improvement positions us well to address these challenges.
With that, I would like to open the call for questions. Brad?
[Operator Instructions] And we'll first go to the line of Peter Arment with Baird. Please go ahead.
Eric Ruden -- Robert W. Baird & Co. -- Analyst
Hi, good morning. You actually have Eric Ruden on the line for Peter today. If I could start maybe just at AEC, in terms of the MAX destocked there, just thinking through this, it actually looks like you grew contract assets by about $3 million, which compares to the $16 million and $10 million burn-downs in the first half of the year here. How does that actually tie to this destock? I know you mentioned the 30 shipsets decrease, I would have expected the cash piece to be a bit higher there. Can you just help us think through the puts and takes on revenue and cash recognition there?
Sure. Look, your general premise is correct that with burning through those -- that inventory finished goods, those are in contract assets on which we have already recognized revenue and profit and we just collect cash as we ship them. So in general that does lead to better cash flow conversion. I think it's important to understand that within contract assets is far more than just LEAP-1B, in particular, the F-35 and the CH-53K programs are also in there, 787 is in there, and those programs, they are lumpy. CH-53K in particular is a lumpy program wherein certain quarters, we go grow contract assets significantly in the other quarters. We collect cash based on deliveries of our product.
So those parts, particularly the very large parts of CH-53K, the sponsors, and the vertical rotor pile on. They're very large part, take a long time to produce. So we build a lot of contract assets as we go through those production process, which we then liquidate when we ship an invoice for after part delivery. So it's really driving that contract assets growth in other programs, other than LEAP-1B.
Okay, thank you. That's pretty helpful. And then just in terms of thinking through the rest of this year. Can you just provide some commentary around how we could up actually seeing the bottom end of the EBITDA guidance range coming into play? Or is it safe to say you should be trending much closer above or to the top of the end here? Especially at MC, I think if I run the math for the fourth quarter implied margin, would be below 30% on the bottom end, which would be a pretty dramatic fall off from the levels we've been seeing in recent memory here.
It's certainly true that we're trending. Based on recent experience we're trending toward the upper end of our guidance range and we certainly hope to deliver in the upper half of our guidance range. But it's early in the quarter. There is still a lot that has to get done to deliver on that. So not prepared to tighten the range at this stage, but certainly your basic premise is correct that based on recent experience, we should be trending toward the upper half of that range.
Yeah. I might add just some color in the MC business. We have customers that took delivery of material, which helped with our sales growth in Q3. And I think there is a lot of concern out there in the supply chain, logistics, and people not able to acquire materials they need. There is probably some behavior out there of bringing material in early. We did that a little bit. We add a little bit to our inventory so that we're protecting our ability to produce. So that could slow down if things get better. So we're just going to look about the cyclicality and the lumpiness of the businesses.
Okay, that's helpful. And then just looking to 2022, I don't see -- I know obviously no guidance here, but just, is there anything you can give us in terms of sizing the actual margin impacts you're thinking about? In terms of the supply chain headwinds, given that there is that six-month lag for the rising input costs actually flow through. Just anything you can give us there would be helpful.
It's a little early to tell for the full 2022 given we don't know when these increases are going to end. And so the increases we've seen to date have certainly been in the few 100 basis points, let's say, but those increases are continuing. And it's premature of us right now to talk about what the impact might be for the full year 2022. When you get around to issuing guidance in February, and hopefully by then we will have more clarity into when -- whether this inflationary spike was transitory or sustained, and if sustained, we'll be better able to project what the impact will be in the full 2022. It's a little early to project that at this stage.
Okay, thank you. I appreciate the color. I'll hop back in queue.
And next, we'll go to line of Michael Ciarmoli with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.
Michael Ciarmoli -- Truist Securities -- Anlayst
Hey, good morning guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Nice results here. I kind of wanted to stay on both of those lines of questioning, but maybe just thinking about the mechanisms you guys have in place to pass through some of these costs. Can maybe -- maybe we start with the engineered components. I know you have a cost-plus agreement with Safran. Does that cover some of the raw material increases or just naturally under master contracting agreements assuming Hexcel is raising prices or other chemical components or seeing significant inflation. Are you able to pass all of this through or what can you kind of say on the aerospace AEC side first with the pricing environment?
Yeah. So look, we've two types of contracts. So under the cost-plus contract with Safran, all of those cost increases get passed through whether there are increases in raw materials or increase in labor costs or increases in the logistics, all of that gets passed through. So we are protected there some price increases.
On the bulk of the rest of our business, which is primarily fixed-price contract, some of its government business some of its commercial business. On the commercial business, we will typically have entered into some multi-year contract at a firm fixed price, so will be some protection on the raw materials. Particularly with the fiber and the resins which are typically specified by our customers, we are -- we purchase it under it and enabled material supply contract from our customer. And typically we will get to pass along some of those, if not all of those price increases in the core raw materials. There are a lot of raw materials that don't end up in the finished product. If you're like non-end item, stuff that's used within our factories, whether it's vacuum bags or gloves or anything else, on those sorts of contracts, those sort of increases, we will not have protection for nor will we have protection for increases in labor costs in those sorts of contracts.
On government contracts, it's kind of a hybrid in the middle and it depends on the specific contract. But the way a lot of our government contract work is -- are negotiated fixed-price contracts where each time we get a new award we disclosed of all -- all of our prior cost and pricing data and establish a new baseline which will allow for profit margin. If all those price increases occur in the system, we do get to pass those along in the next go-round of that -- of negotiation of the next phase of that contract. How long that is before we get to negotiate that next phase? Really depends on the individual contracts. In some cases, we're pricing a new buy every year or 18 months, and others, it could be three or four years in between negotiations. So that's why it's a hybrid somewhere in the middle. There is some protection, but certainly not as much as on the Safran contract.
So overall on AEC, we have certainly some exposure, particularly to the labor cost but on the core raw materials we're largely protected.
Okay. Got it. And then presumably Machine Clothing, it's really just to grind, you've got to use productivity to offset any of those increases because I think the contracts are more lengthier in nature and they don't often come up for renewal, is that correct?
Yeah. And it depends on the customer and the specific contract...
And some get our three types contract, some are repriced regularly, some are from fixed price for many years with no reopened, some have an escalator in there, whether it'd be tied to some industrial or consumer price index. But overall, it's certainly true that we do not get to pass along the full impact of the cost increases to our customers. And as you say, we do have to rely on continuous improvement efforts to offset a significant portion of that increase.
Yeah. As I noted on commentary, we've done a really good job over the years of offsetting inflation, wage inflation at lower levels. Now that we are seeing higher increases and wage pressure around the world in both segments but in Machine Clothing, it's more work to try and offset that through productivity and cost savings, but will be to get -- we'll be able to get part of it, but it just depends on how high wage inflation goes there.
Got it. Helpful. And then just shifting to the F-35. Obviously, you guys articulated the new plan from Lockheed. I mean are you guys going to be dealing with any sort of inventory destock? I mean those original plans, I think called for maybe close to 170 units this year moving to 180. Are you going to have to deal with any excess capacity? Presumably, there is going to be a headwind on revenue as that program flattens out, but anything else on the destock or maybe excess capacity weighing on margins that we should be aware of?
I don't see any destocking challenge anything of that severity. It's more of the revenue pressure and managing the production through the next couple of years and trying to keep it at a level rate so that we can be most effective, most cost-effective in the factory with our suppliers as well.
As we said before, Mike, we did go through some degree of inventory destocking this year unrelated...
To the plateau on 56. And so that -- we're absorbing that impact this year as I think you know we have been on their trajectory for growing our average revenue per shipset. So at the same time as this is leveling out there has been some growth in that. So it's a little noisy in terms of showing our exact profile that -- our exact revenue profile won't match Lockheed's build profile exactly, but there is a little uncertainty in the out years exactly how those two effects are going to feather together and what sort of growth or lack thereof we might see in '22, '23, '24, but we'll have more color when we issue guidance.
Yeah. I would say to the other thing, it's a little hard for us to predict as to what the demand is going to be for sustainment for the aftermarket repairs and overhauls and whatnot, sometimes that's hard for us to see going forward.
Got it, got it. Yeah. And I think they actually put out Lockheed call sustainment maybe growing 6% CAGR through '26 in there -- their slides today. Last one I had. I know you're not going to obviously provide '22 guidance, but meshing this altogether F-35, 787 at drag, sounds like the MAX production rate is still an unknown. You're going to exit the fourth quarter with the Machine Clothing EBITDA margin 30%, maybe it's a little bit better. Sounds like that gets more challenging as we go into next year. I mean just trying to calibrate us for '22, I mean it seems like it could be a challenge to grow earnings year-over-year if there is pressure, all those kinds of unknowns and pressures and is that the right way to kind of be thinking about the operations, as you move into '22?
No, again, as you pointed out upfront that we're not going to give guidance for 2022. I will note in your list of things that the -- you noted in Machine Clothing margins close to 30% in Q4, I'd be careful about using that as some sort of jumping-off point for predicting '22 margins in that business. Typically Q4 has -- it's one of our lower absorption quarters. There are lot of holidays in the quarter, and therefore, lost production days and therefore lower absorption therefore fixed cost is more of a drag on our production costs in the fourth quarter. So that's not a normal number. Yeah, I would be careful rolling that forward into 2022. The other pressures you talked about certainly exist in 2022 and we have to deal with them. We -- it -- as -- I'd say though it's premature for us to start giving you any specifics, Bill, I don't know if you have other color to give on that.
No, not at this point, I think we'll come back to it.
Okay. Fair enough. Thanks, guys. I'll jump back in queue.
And next, we can go to the line of Peter Skibitski with Alembic Global. Please go ahead.
Peter Skibitski -- Alembic Global -- Analyst
Hey, good morning, Bill, Stephen, and John. Nice quarter.
Thanks, Peter.
I mean, I guess just start with the Machine Clothing. Even at the low end of your revenue guidance here, the updated guidance, it looks like you're expecting to be pretty much back to your pre-COVID volume levels, up 6% year-to-date order-wise. I'm just trying to get a better feel from you if kind of the mid-term outlook for Machine Clothing is the same or you're thinking flat to maybe up low-single digits or has that changed at all for you guys after COVID with this kind of packaging surge? How are you kind of thinking about that?
Yeah, it's not easy to see through how it plays out. Again, we're kind of talking about next year as we go forward. Obviously, we really like packaging and tissue markets and that's where we've moved our strategic approach to and we've had a good run there so far. Tissue has been sort of a mixed market as we noted in our comments, at home and away from home behave differently in the distribution channels production. But overall packaging has been really strong in the Americas. We see a little bit of a slowdown in Asia. We're watching China for instance with the energy shortages there and some material shortages. We're seeing a little bit of softness in China. But then Europe, it seems like it's a little bit behind in the recovery, so it's coming up a little bit. So it's a real mixed picture around the world, so that kind of gets hard to look through into next year at this point. And hopefully, a better view on it when we get to the fourth quarter report.
Okay. Yeah, I mean, I think some of the energy issues in China. So I hear you there. And then I just wanted to switch gears. Lockheed is talking about pretty meaningful supply chain issues on the military side. So not necessarily inflation and logistics per se, it seems like maybe more so shortages, I guess, we'll learn more later. But are you guys seeing any of that on your side, real genuine, we can't get you the parts, supply chain issues on the military side. And do you have any visibility into any inventory building up on the military side for you guys because of that?
Yeah, we don't really see it or I should say, we don't really experience it. We start with raw materials of fiber and resin and we make a lot of our components. We're not buying a lot of manufactured components that we assemble them into subsystems. So the products that we make were earlier in the supply chain and we seem to be doing OK. I will say, the behavior we see out there and includes Albany as well, where we've added a little extra inventory for cushion is probably driving capacity constraints in -- at suppliers in general. So I imagine that's what Lockheed is referring to it in addition to the logistics and shipping challenges from all over the world. So we're not having that same experience though.
Okay. Okay. And just so -- again, maybe you can talk to this generically or directionally, but it looks like CH-53K is kind of all systems go. I think Lockheed's talked about another production award or accelerating production there, and it seems like your F-35 comp would be easy going into 2022. So just directionally, should we feel good about those two programs?
Yeah. We feel really good about CH-53K and longer-term F-35 as well. We just got to work through it, the next year or so in F-35.
Okay, OK. Great. Thanks for the color, guys.
And next, we can go to the line of Gautam Khanna with Cowen. Please go ahead.
Gautam Khanna -- Cowen Inc. -- Analyst
Hey, good morning guys.
So a couple of questions. Maybe, Stephen, could you talk about -- could you quantify the destocking again for 787, F-35 and any other programs in 2021? Just update us on where you expect those to shake out at?
Yeah. Look, kind of as we talked before that in the '20, back in 2019 787 was north of $50 million, it was in the $40 million range last year in 2020. And this year, we will be in the $10 million range when all is said and done. We've been in that $2 million to $3 million per quarter range and each quarter so far, so it'll be in that range. So you see there, it's been an impact of about $30 million. Now that's a mix view of destocking and just reduced production rates overall. But just to give you an idea, that's the impact here in 2021 787.
F-35 is smaller. We'd originally feared it could be a significant reduction, will be some reduction this year, but it will be lower than we had originally feared. We'll see exactly where we come out, but reduction somewhere in that close to $10 million range is probably fair $5 million to $10 million for the full year is probably not unreasonable to assume. And that's large -- in that case, that's largely driven by some destocking where they produced fewer aircrafts last year than they expected and consumed less in depots. They came into the year with more of our finished goods on hand than they had originally expected.
Okay. And those would be only programs you'd call out in terms of destocking this year? I mean obviously 7...
Yeah. Look on LEAP overall, obviously, we talk a lot about the destocking we're going through. But as we mentioned, in terms of revenue, last year we produced close to $100 million of revenue in that program. This year it's going to be similar number trending a little higher than that. But a few million dollars higher than that this year but materially -- at roughly similar level as the growth in 1A has picked up nicely. And even though we're not generating a lot of revenue on 1B, it -- overall, it's about the same level of production as last year.
Okay. And I may have missed this in your opening remarks, but I think you mentioned $2 million of favorable EACs at engineered composites this quarter. And if that was the number then what explains the -- in a sequential EBIT margin decline ex. If we take out EACs, was there anything about the mix underline that was different, or any other costs that you want to call out specifically...
Yeah. No look, it's primarily what I called out. Mix is a big driver where you while year-over-year we have revenue growth, if you look where we grew year-over-year, LEAP grew, whereas programs like 787 and F-35 declined. F-35 and 787, certainly 787 as it was last year, much higher margin than LEAP last year. And so as we just grow one shrink the other you get a mixed impact where the margin comes down. This quarter was a little unusually low for F-35 compared to some of their other quarters that didn't help us and LEAP was unusually high on a relative basis. And then the lack of fixed cost absorption because of both 787 and an F-35 being down. Both are fixed-price programs produced in our Salt Lake City facility, we have to worry about the overall fixed cost absorption there, that was a challenge this quarter.
You're right, with the $2 million of EAC pickups, it was $3.5 million a year ago, so that $1.5 million alone represents a couple of 100 basis points of your margin degradation. You add a few of those factors together you get there.
Okay. And I know you don't want to guide '22, but I am curious, Machine Clothing been an upward revision story for a while now, for years actually. So I'm curious, at one point, we thought that $100 million, $200 million of EBITDA was the right baseline. I think a quarter or two ago, you mentioned it might be $200 million-ish or slightly better as the run rate. Even with publication grade declines and what have you. Do you guys have an updated view? I mean obviously this year you took up the numbers again, but how much of over-earning are we actually seeing, order of magnitude? Is there any way to kind of frame? And I'm not asking about '22, I'm asking about long-term, what is sort of a -- the right I mean reversion level, we're going to move back to?
Yeah. We don't see a reversion back to where we were before below the $200 million level. I mean we can't predict the future and we haven't given guidance for next year, but we're going through our annual planning, our strategic look for the next number of years and profitably is very, very good in MC. The work that we've done, the strategic work to shift the business toward the higher growth markets packaging and tissue and where the technology development is today, particularly in tissue. And then the global footprint we've had, we've done a really good job, the team has done a great job over the years.
And you mentioned it has been a upward revision for years. Because of that strategic footprint that we've worked toward by consolidating sites and moving toward where the customers are, and having our operations running at best utilization rates we can around the world. And then shifting the mix once in a while if we need to optimize. So the team has done a really good job. We expect to -- we're still going to run above that $200 million. Can't say exactly how high above it but we'll come back around on that when we talk about next year. But it is at a new level of performance and we're really pleased with the team's and how they've done.
Sure. So $200 million plus is sort of the low-end and we're at $225 million this year. Last one, Stephen, I thought -- I also thought you mentioned that Q3 had some more just timing of deliveries that benefited Machine Clothing in the quarter. Are there any -- I imagine your salespeople are pretty close to when these things are going to need replacement. Are there any things you'd point out at least into 2022 about, hey, this quarter is going to have more activity than that quarter even directionally, just based on how these things are being utilized? And thank you.
Yeah. No, look, nothing unusual. Two points really in '22. As we look at third quarter of 2021, so certainly two things are true. One, third quarter of 2020 was a little low. Third quarter 2020 had been down over to -- I think it was 8% year-over-year from third quarter of 2019 and an almost I think was 9% sequentially from the second quarter of '20. So the third quarter of '20 was a fairly low quarter. So it was relatively easy comp, part what explains the high growth in the third quarter of 2021. But also, as Bill alluded to, there is a little bit of our customers being a little risk-averse and maybe taking delivery of some product a little earlier they may otherwise do so, to make sure they can get it in the doors since they're worried about logistics and supply chain constraints.
And -- but that partly might explain a little bit of a weaker Q4. I'm not sure yet, it's a little premature to talk about some particularly weak or strong quarters in 2022. At this stage, we don't see anything terribly unusual in 2022, but it's early yet. Things have the habit of changing quickly over the last couple of years. So that's why it's a little early for us to start giving any specific guidance.
Thanks, guys.
Hey, thank you, Gautam.
Next, we'll go back to Michael Ciarmoli with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.
Hey guys, thanks for taking the follow-up. Just on the LEAP-B and the MAX, in general. Can we assume that your current production -- are you in line with Boeing's stated 16 a month and just remind us what if Boeing is going to take that 31 a month and realizing you've got a little bit of destocking left to get to that 100, but I think what would you say 30 units this quarter? So 15 planes and maybe 20 left to go. I mean, when should we see or what's the normal LEAP time if they are going to go up to 31 per month?
Yeah. So, right now, look they're consuming not only as you mentioned correctly, during the quarter, we shipped 30 more engine shipsets we produce, equivalent to about five aircraft a month. You take that off the top. There is also a product finished goods of our product within elsewhere within the Boeing supply chain that's being consumed, whether it's a top brand or elsewhere in the engine supply chain. So right now we're producing well below Boeing's target build rate right now. And we don't expect that to materially change starting here in Q4. As I mentioned, we hope to see it pick up early in 2022, assuming everything goes smoothly and Boeing hit its marks, but there is not couple of quarters to go before we settle down fully.
Yeah, I would say...
The short answer is no, we're not totally lined up with Boeing's production, but we are with Airbus A320.
Got it. Perfect. Thanks, guys.
And currently, we have no further questions in queue.
Thanks, Brad. Thank you everyone for joining us on the call today. We appreciate your continued interest in Albany International and of course, if you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to John Hobbs, our Director of Investor Relations. His number is 630 330 5897. Thank you and have a good day.
More AIN analysis
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
$107.93 (-0.25%) $0.27
Albany International Corp (AIN) Q1 2021 Earnings Call Transcript
Albany International (AIN) Q1 2020 Earnings Call Transcript


Whether you're replacing existing greenhouse coverings or building a greenhouse you're sure to find the best greenhouse covering at FarmTek. Greenhouse glazing is the material that covers the greenhouse frame and the most widely used materials are polycarbonate and poly film. We also carry greenhouse film repair tape, batten strip, poly patching tape, polypropylene strapping, greenhouse silicon sealants, as well as polycarbonate latches and channels.
Polyethylene film is a thick, flexible material that comes in sheets of various thickness (measured in mil) that can be used in single or double layers (for better insulation). A quick and inexpensive option for growers, FarmTek's high quality greenhouse film has ultraviolet (UV) protection and offers excellent tensile strength durability. Polyethylene plastic greenhouse film translucency diffuses light well, bouncing the available sunlight and reducing shadows, both of which aid plant growth. Poly film is also easy to install with homeowner tools and modest building skills.
One of the strongest greenhouse coverings, polycarbonate is a translucent rigid plastic that is almost as transparent as glass. It is available in corrugated single layer or flat twin wall thickness — the air pockets between the two walls acts as an insulator. Light transmission through polycarbonate is very good and the lightweight material can be easily cut and installed.
Read our Greenhouse Coverings Buyer's Guide.
View our Winterizing Your Greenhouse Webinar.


The world is in the middle of an identity crisis—that is, it doesn't know the real identity of Jesus. But rather than asking everyone else, the best way to know who Jesus really is, is to find out what He says about Himself. Starting with "The Bread of Life," Dr. Sproul explores what Jesus says about Himself by looking at the I AM statements He makes in the Gospel of John.


Industry 4.0 has two clear demands on field devices: To connect them to a cloud and to generate data that goes beyond pure I/Os, e.g. diagnostic, analysis and state data. This information serves as basis for further business models.
For information transfer to the cloud, the IoT communication, netIOT Interface solutions will be additionally equipped with an OPC UA server and a MQTT client. Thus, the data of the fi eld device can be accessed via the TCP/IP channel of the Real-Time Ethernet protocol using the same physical cable.


Women play a major role in the development of the wine industry. Some of the world's most popular wines and brands have been created or piloted into the public spotlight by women. What's more, women have been proven time and again to be better tasters than their male counterparts.
Whether they are pruning the vines, making the wines, developing marketing strategies, negotiating local and international business accounts, or entertaining visitors, the women of wine play an integral part in how we enjoy one of the world's greatest beverages.
← B-double-E-double-R U N – Beer Run!


Okay, so I adored the first episode of GG. But since then, I've been sort of "eh" about it. My enthusiasm was revived with the photo shoot episode--I think I love it when B. and S. are friends. So cute. And--hello--there was some excellent Chuck time in that episode too.What do you guys think: Is the show good enough to last? PS-A lovely review of Violet on the Runway on bookbitch.com. (She has major win-books contests too.) Yay!


text:
PACE financing
PACE financing (property assessed clean energy financing) is a means of financing energy efficiency upgrades, disaster resiliency improvements, water conservation measures, or renewable energy installations of residential, commercial, and industrial property owners. Depending on state legislation, PACE financing can be used to finance building envelope energy efficiency improvements such as insulation and air sealing, cool roofs, water efficiency products, seismic retrofits, and hurricane preparedness measures. In some states, commercial PACE financing can also fund a portion of new construction projects, as long as the building owner agrees to build the new structure to exceed the local energy code.
Examples of energy efficiency and renewable energy upgrades range from adding more attic insulation to installing rooftop solar panels for residential projects and chillers, boilers, LED lighting and roofing for commercial projects. In areas with PACE legislation in place, governments offer a specific bond to investors or in the case of the open-market model, private lenders provide financing to the building owners to put towards an energy retrofit. The loans are repaid over the selected term (over the course of somewhere between 5 and 25 years) via an annual assessment on their property tax bill. PACE bonds can be issued by municipal financing districts, state agencies or finance companies and the proceeds can be used to retrofit both commercial and residential properties. One of the most notable characteristics of PACE programs is that the loan is attached to the property rather than an individual.[1][2][3][4] A PACE loan is therefore said to be nonrecourse to the borrower.[5]
PACE can also be used to finance leases and power purchase agreements (PPAs). In this structure, the PACE property tax assessment is used to collect a lease payment of services fee. The primary benefit of this approach is that project costs may be lower due to the provider retaining the tax incentives and passing the benefit on to the property owner as a lower lease or services payment.
PACE programs help home and business owners pay for the upfront costs of green initiatives, such as solar panels, which the property owner then pays back by increasing property taxes by a set rate for an agreed-upon term ranging from 5–25 years. This allows property owners to begin saving on energy costs while they are paying for their solar panels. This usually means that property owners have net gains even with increased property tax.
3 Concerns for residential PACE financing
4 Securitization
5 Locations with PACE legislation
Voluntary assessments for repaying municipal bonds have been attached to property taxes since the early 1800s to fund projects for public good, such as sidewalks, fire stations, and street lighting. PACE uses the same concept, but for projects that benefit the private sector, or individual building owners. PACE was originally known as a "Special Energy Financing District" or "on-tax bill solar and efficiency financing."[citation needed] The concept was first conceived and proposed[citation needed] in the Monterey Bay Regional Energy Plan in 2005[6] but followed voter approval of a similar solar bonds program approved by San Francisco voters in 2001.[7] The concept was designed to overcome one of the most significant barriers to solar and costly energy efficiency retrofits: up-front costs. A homeowner could spend tens of thousands of dollars on a solar photovoltaic system, upgrading windows to be more energy efficient or adding insulation throughout the home, yet all of these investments would not likely be recovered when the home was sold. PACE enables the homeowner to "mortgage" these improvements and pay only for the benefits they derive while they own the home.
The first PACE program was implemented by Berkeley, California, led by Cisco DeVries, the chief of staff to Berkeley's mayor and then-CEO of RenewableFunding and Matthew Brown. University of California, Berkeley led the development of the program via the "Guide to Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Districts for Local Governments" contributed by Cisco DeVries, Ann Livingston and Lestis Private Capital Group's Matthew Brown. The guide was funded through grants to the City of Berkeley from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.[8] Berkeley's PACE program was recommended as an alternative to the solar bonds authority approved by neighboring San Francisco voters in 2001 in conjunction with the City's Community Choice Aggregation program, which is being implemented in both San Francisco and Sonoma counties.[9] DeVries saw PACE as a way to provide a viable means to help achieve the Bay Area's climate goals. California passed the first legislation for PACE financing and started the BerkeleyFIRST climate program in 2008.[3][10] Since then, PACE-enabling legislation has been passed in 31 states and the District of Columbia, allowing localities to establish PACE financing programs.[11]
However, PACE financing for residential properties was dealt a serious blow in 2010 when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refused to back mortgages with PACE liens on them.[12][13] In August 2015, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced that it intends to require liens created by energy retrofit programs to remain subordinate to loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and that it would be issuing guidance on how to handle the transfer and sale of homes with a PACE assessment.[14] HUD clarified its policy in 2017 by stating properties with PACE obligations were ineligible for FHA financing.[15]
Benefits[edit]
For a city, PACE can play an important role in reducing local greenhouse gas[16] emissions, promoting energy efficiency improvements in its buildings, making the shift to renewable sources of energy more affordable, and reducing energy costs for residents and businesses. Because PACE is funded through private lending or municipal bonds, it creates no liability to the city's funds. Additionally, most PACE programs made possible through public-private partnerships rely on private capital to source financing. PACE also enables states and local governments to design and implement such programs in their communities.[17] PACE programs also help to create jobs and thus spur local economic development when local solar installers and renewable energy companies partner with the program. It is also an opt-in program, so only those property owners who choose to participate are responsible for the costs of PACE financing.[1][10][18]
PACE enables individuals and businesses to defer the upfront costs that are the most common barrier to energy efficiency or renewables installations. The PACE loans are paid by additional assessments on the property owner's property taxes over an agreed upon term while energy costs are simultaneously lower, providing the PACE consumer with net gains. Also, because the solar panels and the PACE loan is attached to the property, the consumer can sell the property leaving the debt to be paid through the property tax assessed on the subsequent owners.[1][2][10][18]
Concerns for residential PACE financing[edit]
For consumers, PACE type programs have several problems. Because the financing is designed to stay with the property, eligibility is based primarily on property information rather than income and FICO scores. A homeowner's ability to pay is currently based primarily on their mortgage and property tax payment history as well as the requirement that there are no recent bankruptcies. Most significantly, homeowners are financed for the home improvements without any assessment of whether the financing is affordable for the homeowner, though Senate Bill 242, currently being considered in California, would require PACE providers to conduct an income review.[19][20][21] Because the PACE financing is structured as a tax assessment instead of a loan, the PACE programs historically have not had to provide to homeowners the same disclosures about the financing costs that traditional lenders must provide.[20] In September 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed AB2693 into law, which required PACE programs to provide mortgage-level disclosures and some providers to conduct live recorded calls with the homeowner to confirm financing terms and obligation.[22] In some cases, without either an assessment of affordability or these disclosures about the costs of the financing, homeowners depend on what the PACE program providers tell them when trying to figure out whether the financing is affordable. Homeowners have complained that PACE contractors are lying about the costs of financing as part of selling the program.[23] These problems create a situation in which homeowners can suddenly owe far more in property taxes than they can afford to repay; this is especially true for retired and disabled homeowners on fixed incomes. PACE architects Cisco DeVries and Matthew Brown deny these claims as "isolated incidents."
Interest rates for PACE programs are usually 3-4% higher than for traditional mortgage loans, with additional administrative fees close to 5%,[19][20] which can often total more than $4000,[24] but compare well to many lending options such as credit cards and HELOCs, without tying up credit lines.
Many buyers and sellers have had difficulty with sales of homes with PACE tax assessments. Though the PACE assessment typically appears on the title report, some buyers find out about the assessments after the sale, which may force them to pay money out-of-pocket unexpectedly.[25] In some cases, sellers have agreed to pay off the PACE assessment or lower the sale price to compensate for the PACE tax assessment.[26][27][28] When the remaining payments are unable to be assumed by the new buyer, this renders the PACE financing to a position more similar to that of a traditional lending product.
Some homeowners have reported that there were massive differences in the lump sum payment required at the first assessment as well as far from the reported monthly costs to increase in escrow.[29]
A problem with PACE for both residential lenders and consumers is that the tax liens for PACE financing take priority over other lien-holders, and those lien-holders may not be notified or given an opportunity to object.[30][31] Commercial PACE is less problematic because priority lien-holders for those properties are notified beforehand. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have refused to purchase or underwrite loans for properties with existing PACE-based tax assessments,[32][33] but in mid-2016 the Veterans Benefits Administration (VA) announced guidance for how to manage the financing of properties with PACE obligations.[34] Properties encumbered with PACE obligations are not eligible for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured financing.[15]
Securitization[edit]
Bonds associated with PACE assessments can be packaged and securitized. Securitization, which was developed in the mortgage industry, works by pooling a series of assets, such as mortgages, and selling notes backed by these assets to investors. Because these bonds are for property improvements which achieve a positive environmental impact, some PACE providers have had their bonds green certified. PACE bonds are unique amongst the green bond market because products rated as efficient are reducing carbon emissions as soon as they are installed.[35][36][37]
Locations with PACE legislation[edit]
PACE is enabled in 37 states and the District of Columbia, covering more than 80% of the U.S. population.
Original Map with updated PACE Financing Location Information
Alaska C-PACE available - no current programs
Arkansas Available in some locations
California Available in some locations
Colorado Available
Connecticut Available
District of Columbia Available
Florida Available
Georgia Under development
Hawaii On hold
Illinois Under development
Kentucky Under development
Louisiana Under development
Maryland Available
Massachusetts Under development
Michigan Available
Minnesota Available
Missouri Available
Nebraska Available in Omaha and Lincoln
Nevada Under development in Las Vegas and Reno
New Hampshire C-Pace under development
New Jersey Under development
New Mexico Under development
New York Available
North Carolina Available,but no current programs
Ohio Available
Oklahoma Available, but no current programs
Oregon Under development
Pennsylvania Available in some areas
Rhode Island Available
Texas Available
Utah Under development
Virginia Available
Washington Available
Wisconsin Available
Wyoming Available, but no current programs
Energy portal
Environment portal
^ a b c "PACENation: Property Assessed Clean Energy". PACENation.
^ a b PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) Financing
^ a b "Our Financing Solutions - Renew Financial".
^ "Solar Power Energy Systems - Solar Panels - Pure Energies". Pure Energies.
^ "Emerging Issues: Residential PACE Loans and Bankruptcy". natlawreview.com. 2018-02-08. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
^ Kammerer, Kurt (April 6, 2006). Monterey Bay Regional Energy Plan (PDF) (Report).
^ "LOCAL POWER (November 8, 2001): San Francisco Voters Approve Unlimited Solar, Wind, Conservation with Passage of Proposition H".
^ "Guide to Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Financing Districts for Local Governments" (PDF).
^ "First Marin, now Sonoma moves on energy program". The North Bay Business Journal.
^ a b c "PACE Program (Property Assessed Clean Energy) Financing". 1BOG.org. Retrieved 2010-08-18.
^ Speer, Bethany; Koenig, Ron. "Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing of Renewables and Efficiency" (PDF). National Renewable Energy Lab. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
^ Hsu, Tiffany (2010-07-07). "Fannie, Freddie freeze PACE energy-efficiency retrofit financing programs". LA Times. Retrieved 2011-07-09.
^ Interview with Cisco Devries on Sea Change Radio, originally aired May 26, 2010
^ "FACT SHEET: President Obama Announces New Actions to Bring Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency to Households across the Country". whitehouse.gov. 2015-08-24. Retrieved 2016-05-25.
^ a b "ML 2017-18: Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)" (PDF). HUD.gov. 2017-12-07. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
^ Ygrene PACE, How the PACE program helps reduce emissions.,July 2018
^ Brookings Institution, Enact Legislation Supporting Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing (PACE), November 2012
^ a b "pacefinancing.org".
^ a b Cox, Prentiss (2011). "Keeping PACE?: The Case Against Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing Programs" (PDF). University of Colorado Law Review. 83: 109–113.
^ a b c "FHA's Property Assessed Clean Energy Guidance: Preliminary MBA Analysis" (PDF). Mortgage Bankers Association. 2016. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
^ "Bill Text - SB-242 Property Assessed Clean Energy program: program administrator". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Retrieved 2017-07-11.
^ Register, James Reed | Orange County (2016-10-07). "Consumer Protections for PACE Now Written into State Law". Orange County Register. Retrieved 2017-07-11.
^ grindall61 (2016-05-01), THE CALIFORNIA HERO SOLAR PANEL PROGRAM HAS BEEN EXPOSED AS A MASSIVE SCAM TO SCREW YOU., retrieved 2016-10-11
^ "Ygrene: PACE Impact Window Financing Guide (11/01/2018)" (PDF). www.impactwindow.com. Retrieved 2018-12-11.
^ GRUSZECKI, DEBRA. "MORENO VALLEY: Homebuyer files lawsuit over HERO-financed transaction". Press Enterprise. Retrieved 2016-10-12.
^ "Print Article: INLAND: Realtors offer word of warning about solar financing program". www.pe.com. Retrieved 2016-10-12.
^ "Print Article: Riverside County DA investigating how contractors pitch HERO program". www.pe.com. Retrieved 2016-10-12.
^ "PACE Loans Can Throw a Wrench in Home Sales". Voice of San Diego. 2015-06-22. Retrieved 2016-10-12.
^ www.fairbids.com/pace-loan
^ GRUSZECKI, DEBRA. "INLAND: Realtors offer word of warning about solar financing program". Press Enterprise. Retrieved 2016-10-11.
^ "Reminder about Mortgages with PACE Obligations - Freddie Mac". www.freddiemac.com. Retrieved 2016-10-11.
^ "B5-3.4-01: Property Assessed Clean Energy Loans (12/01/2010)". www.fanniemae.com. Retrieved 2016-10-11.
^ "Veterans Benefits Administration: Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Loan Processing" (PDF). July 19, 2016.
^ "First energy-efficiency bonds sold to investors". Reuters. 2014-03-07. Retrieved 2016-05-25.
^ "Renovate America gets green bond certification for all of its PACE securitizations - Stratton Report". Stratton Report. Retrieved 2016-05-25.
^ "PACE Roundup: $150M Securitization by Ygrene, Clean Fund Closes $60M". www.greentechmedia.com. Retrieved 2016-05-25.
Solar irradiance
Active and passive solar energy
Passive solar building design
Solar chimney
Solar air conditioning
Solar pond
and related topics
Photovoltaic effect
Polymer solar cell
Nanocrystal solar cell
Photovoltaic module (solar panel)
Photovoltaic array (and systems)
Heliostat
Solar tracker
Parabolic trough
Solar power tower
and proposed
Solar updraft tower
Solar-pumped laser
Thermoelectric generator
Solar chemical and artificial photosynthesis
Space-based solar power
Magnetic sail
Solar thermal rocket
Solar Shade Control Act
and uses
Financial incentives for photovoltaics
Solar vehicle
Solar balloon
and horticulture
Agrivoltaic
Polytunnel
Solar-powered pump
Building-integrated photovoltaics
Hybrid solar lighting
Solar Tuki
Light tube
Solar furnace
Salt evaporation pond
Solar water disinfection
Soil solarization
Solar still
Solar combisystem
Zero carbon solar controller
Photovoltaics topics
Solar power by country
Solar power in the United States
Energy in the United States
Avra Valley
Blue Wing
Blythe Mesa
California Flats
California Valley
Castle Gap
Crescent Dunes CSP
Desert Stateline
Desert Sunlight
East Pecos
Holaniku
Imperial SEC West
Imperial SEC South
Imperial Valley
Ivanpah CSP
Martin CSP
Mojave CSP
Mount Signal
Nevada Solar One
Panoche Valley
Roserock
San Luis Valley
Sierra SunTower
Silver State North
Silver State South
SolairHolman
Solana CSP
Solar Star
Techren
Three Cedars
Three Peaks
Webberville
Planned and
Aiya Valley
American Kings
Arlington Valley
Desert Harvest
Eagle Shadow Mountain
GA Solar 4
Gigawatt 1
Long Ridge
Morada del Sol
North Rosamond
Peak Valley
Pleinmont
Robins Air Force Base
Sandstone CSP
Skeleton Creek Solar
Snow Mountain
Soda Mountain
Sonoran
Sun Streams
Sunshine Valley
Townsite
White Camp
White Wing
Yellow Pine
Ausra
BP Solar
BrightSource
eSolar
EnviroMission
Global Solar
Grape Solar
HelioPower
Jinko
Loanpal
Miasole
Practical Solar
S-Energy
SkyFuel
Solar Frontier
Solaren
SolarReserve
SoloPower
Sopogy
StratoSolar
Stirling Energy Systems
SunEdison
Sunrun
8minutenergy Renewables
Solar Energy Industries Association
1BOG
Citizenre
Community solar farm
REC Solar
Sungevity
SolarCity
SolarStrong
Sunlight Solar Energy
Sundog Solar
Sunetric
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PACE_financing&oldid=994892057"
Renewable energy in the United States
Renewable energy policy
Solar energy in the United States