Development of an attitudes and intentions scale for construction skills training programs.
Attrition is a major problem in construction skills training programs for young adults, with dropout rates ranging between 45% and 65%. Training resources could be used more efficiently if trainees' completion rates were increased. Understanding and measuring the psychological characteristics contributing to attrition allows training practitioners to implement interventions to reduce dropout. This article reports the development of an instrument designed to measure constructs that inform participants' performance and success within the construction training domain. Instrument reliability and validity as well as areas of further research are discussed.
The financial crisis of 2007-2009 (the Great Recession) resulted in an increase of 30 million unemployed individuals (Wanberg, 2012). Providing adequate jobs to support and sustain economic growth is a major challenge worldwide (International Labour Organization, 2012). According to the U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL) Employment and Training Administration (2007), "as the demand for workers with specialized skills and training grows, some economists fear that America is facing a 'skills gap,' a situation in which the demand by employers for skilled workers outpaces supply" (p. 23). Construction is an industry sector facing a shortage of skilled workers (Whyte, Elvin, Piper, Slaughter, & Stilley, 2013). In recent years, many jobs have been added to the labor market because of technical skills training (Hemphill & Perry, 2012). However, high attrition is a major problem in training programs (Sabates, 2008).
Workforce development and training consists of publicly and privately funded programs serving participants of widely varying skill levels. Although training organizations aim to facilitate participants' employment or reemployment through skills enhancement, the diverse nature of programs and trainees produces varying levels of success (Weigensberg et al., 2012). A dropout rate of 51.8% was reported for construction apprenticeship programs registered with the USDOL Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training (Bilginsoy, 2003). Although the length of apprenticeship programs (up to 27 months in Bilginsoy's, 2003, study) may partially explain dropout statistics, high attrition rates also plague shorter duration programs. The USDOL Office of Inspector General's (20ff) audit of the Employment and Training Administration's YouthBuild program indicated an attrition rate of 47.9%, and the Texas Job Corps programs reported dropout rates exceeding 65% (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2011). A national survey of more than 340,000 Job Corps participants ages 16 to 24 years revealed a 35% dropout rate within 90 days of commencing training (Ginsburg et al., 2000).
According to Mathieu, Tannenbaum, and Salas (1992), "to maximize the benefits of training, researchers and practitioners must know more than whether [training] worked. Many authors have called for greater attention to why training worked" (p. 828). Empirical investigations of training effectiveness are not new, and occupational training researchers have used various approaches to correlate individual and situational variables with training outcomes. The use of pretraining measures to predict individual behavior has received significant attention; however, many of these measures were general rather than domain specific. The predictive value of instruments is enhanced when items are tailored to a specific domain.
Noe and Schmitt (1986) posited that "determining the specific individual characteristics that influence the effectiveness of training is of utmost importance in order to understand how to increase the likelihood that behavior change and performance improvement will result from participation in training programs" (p. 498). Ginsburg et al. (2000) and Weigensberg et al. (2012) concluded that trainees' commitment, attitude, motivation, and confidence were paramount in the decision to complete or drop out of training. Other researchers (Colquitt, LePine, & Noe, 2000; Martoechio & Judge, 1997; Noe, 1986; Noe & Schmitt, 1986; Noe & Wilk, 1993) have predicted occupational training outcomes (e.g., skills transfer) using locus of control (LOC) and training-domain-level self-efficacy and motivation. For a review of self-efficacy within social cognitive theory, see Bandura (1977, 1997), Colquitt et al. (2000), and Pajares (2002). For a review of LOC, see Hotter (1966) and Spector (1988). Finally, Spector (2011) found that behavior in vocational settings could be predicted using the constructs (intention, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control) embedded in Ajzen's (1991) theory of planned behavior.
To address high attrition rates plaguing construction-related skills training programs, researchers should empirically investigate trainees' characteristics to elucidate their role in program performance and completion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a survey instrument specific to the construction training domain to assess the appropriate constructs among training participants. The development of the survey hinged on a comprehensive review of the literature to identify psychological constructs useful in understanding and predicting human behavior in occupational training. The constructs emerging from this review were training-specific self-efficacy and motivation; work LOC; participants' attitudes toward training; and participants' intention, norm, and perceived behavioral control regarding attendance on educational setting. In this article, we document the development and testing of the survey instrument to evaluate program effectiveness and reduce trainee attrition. We also discuss the validation and refinement of the instrument and its use by construction training organizations.
Figure 1 provides the conceptual framework and the steps we followed during the instrument's development. In this section, we discuss the following development procedures: instrument selection and adaptation, participants and data collection, Phase 1 survey item reduction, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), emergent factor identification and internal consistency reliability, Phase 2 administration, and validity testing.
Instrument development began with the identification of appropriate constructs from previous occupational and educational research. We adapted constructs informing training behaviors and outcomes from existing instruments for use within the domain of construction training. A review of the vocational training literature revealed two critically relevant instruments: the Attitudes Toward Training Utility scale (ATTU; Ford & Noe, 1987; Noe & Schmitt, 1986; Noe & Wilk, 1993) and the Training Attitudes Inventory (TAI; R. A. Noe, personal communication, June 15, 2011). The pertinent constructs of the ATTU and the TAI, namely, motivation to train, attitudes toward education, attitudes toward training utility, and training self-efficacy, were adapted to the construction training domain. Spector's (1988) Work Locus of Control Scale (WLCS) was designed to measure perceived LOC within vocational settings. We adapted the WLCS items to assess LOC toward training participation and outcomes. Finally, Ajzen's (n.d.) Class Attendance Opinion Survey (CAOS) was designed to predict students' attendance behavior through measures of perceived behavioral control, attitudes, subjective norms, and intentions. We adapted the CAOS items to assess class attendance in construction skills training. The response format, domain of measurement, source, and internal consistency reliability of the existing constructs are provided in Table 1.
The adaptation process resulted in a Phase 1 instrument containing 98 items distributed across eight subscales. Subscales were intended to measure respondents' perceptions of (a) construction training self-efficacy (CTSE; 20 items; e.g., "When faced with an unfamiliar problem during construction training, I expect to be able to solve it"), (b) construction training motivation (CTM; 19 items; e.g., "If I'm involved in construction training sessions and I can't understand something I get so frustrated that I stop trying to learn"), (c) training locus of control (TLOC; 17 items; e.g., "Most people are capable of successfully completing training if they make the effort"), (d) attitudes toward construction training (ATCT; 14 items [combined items from the ATTU and TAI scales]; e.g., "I think the best way to learn construction skills is by trial and error on the job, as opposed to attending a construction-related training program"), (e) perceived behavioral control in training (PBCT; eight items; e.g., "For me to attend the meetings of a construction training program on a regular basis is [extremely difficult-extremely easy}"), (f) construction training value attitudes (CTVA; six items; e.g., "For me to successfully complete construction training is [extremely valuable--extremely worthless]"), (g) construction training norms (CTN; eight items; e.g., "Most people who are important to me think that [I should-I should not] attend construction training"), and (h) construction training intentions (CTI; six items; e.g., "I will attend the meetings of this construction training program on a regular basis [extremely likely--extremely unlikely]"). All response formats were converted to either a 5-point Likert (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) or bipolar adjective (e.g., 1 = extremely difficult, 5 = extremely easy) scale in the instrument. Survey items were randomly distributed throughout the instrument to prevent item responses from influencing one another (Amedeo, Golledge, & Stimson, 2009).
Higher subscale scores indicate higher perceived self-efficacy toward construction training (CTSE), greater motivation toward construction training (CTM), a higher external LOC orientation (TLOC), and a more favorable attitude toward construction training (ATCT). For the subscales derived from the theory of planned behavior, higher scores indicate a respondent's positive expectations to regularly attend and/or successfully complete construction training (PBCT), a perception that construction training is viewed in a positive way by others (CTN), a positive perception regarding training usefulness (CTVA), and the likelihood that a respondent will expend effort to attend and complete construction-related training (CTI).
The instrument was administered in two phases to students at a large western university (University 1, N = 418) and a small midwestern university (University 2, N = 127). Data were collected in person via a hard-copy survey administered by research assistants at the beginning or end of a class session. Participants were enrolled in bachelor's degree programs designed to prepare students for management careers in the construction industry. For a full description of construction management education, see American Council for Construction Education (2013). The sample consisted of 1st-. 2nd-, 3rd-, and 4th-year undergraduate students and graduate students enrolled in 100- through 400-level construction management courses. Enrollment was controlled by prerequisite or corequisite courses to minimize the risk of the same students completing the instrument multiple times.
The total potential sample (N = 545) was divided into two groups, creating separate and distinct samples for each phase of the instrument's development. The Phase 1 instrument was administered to 333 potential participants across all courses surveyed at University 1 and University 2. For Phase 1, 247 students returned usable surveys for a response rate of 74.2%. The Phase 2 validated instrument was administered to 212 potential participants at University 1. For Phase 2,174 usable surveys were returned for a response rate of 82.1%.
Of the Phase 1 respondents (N = 247), 200 (81.0%) were male and 41 (16.6%) were female, with six (2.4%) students choosing not to report their gender. Most of the respondents were majoring in construction management (72.9%, n = 180) and reported being between the ages of 18 and 24 years (86.2%, n = 213). With regard to academic status, 57 (23.1%) were 1st-year students, 50 (20.2%) were 2nd-year students, 61 (24.7%) were 3rd-year students, 73 (29.6%) were 4th-year students, and two (0.8%) were graduate students; four (1.6%) participants chose not to report their year in school. Of the Phase 2 respondents (N = 174), 146 (83.9%) were male and 27 (15.5%) were female, with one (0.6%) student choosing not to report his or her gender. The majority of the respondents were majoring in construction management (87.9%, n = 153) and reported being between the ages of 18 and 24 years (78.2%, n = 136). With regard to academic status, 33 (19.0%) were 1st-year students, 33 (19.0%) were 2nd-year students, 38 (21.8%) were 3rd-year students, 63 (36.2%) were 4th-year students, and six (3.4%) were graduate students; one (0.6%) participant chose not to report his or her year in school.
Phase 1 data comprised 247 responses to the 98-item instrument. Item reduction initially involved identifying clusters within the instrument's eight subscales (i.e., CTSE, CTM, ATCT, CTVA, TLOC, PBCT, CTI, and CTN; Pett, Lackey, & Sullivan, 2003). For each construct subscale, we developed and analyzed a two-tailed Pearson correlation matrix with p set at .01 (i.e., a separate correlation matrix was produced for the 20-item CTSE subscale, the 17-item TLOC subscale, etc.). Subscale items with correlations of r [less than or equal to] .40 are unlikely to share common variance with other items in the same construct and may load on different factors (Pett et al., 2003). However, Field (2009) recommended a minimum interitem correlation of r [less than or equal to] .30 for the initial investigation of psychological constructs. Although we used the more conservative recommendation (r [less than or equal to] .40) as the initial threshold, we used the r [less than or equal to] .30 criterion for subscales with fewer items so that all of the subscales would be adequately represented in the EFA. Next, we investigated items with high interitem correlations (r [greater than or equal to] .80). Although high correlations are expected between survey items relating to the same construct (Field, 2009), items that are too highly correlated (r [greater than or equal to] .80) introduce multicollinearity and redundancy (Field, 2009; Pett et al., 2003). Therefore, for highly correlated subscale items that were determined to measure the same construct, we retained only one item.
Reduction then involved calculating the eigenvalues for the subscale items that demonstrated acceptable interitem correlations (.30 [less than or equal to] r [less than or equal to] .80). We used an eigenvalue loading greater than or equal to .40 on a single factor as the criterion for subscale unidimensionality (Field. 2009). Survey items with eigenvalues greater than or equal to .40 on multiple factors were considered for removal.
Overall, we removed 38 items through subscale analysis, leaving 60 items for the EFA. Internal consistency reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alphas) were calculated for each subscale. High Cronbach's alphas provide evidence of internal consistency reliability in the adapted constructs (Pett et al., 2003). Alpha levels of .70 to .80 are considered acceptable (Field, 2009). The Cronbach's alphas for the current subscales ranged from .77 (PBCT) to .95 (CTSE), with a Cronbach's alpha of .87 for the 60-item instrument. Table 2 provides the important pre- and post-reduction parameters for the subscale analysis process.
Because the instrument was adapted from existing constructs, we evaluated the emergent factor structure using an EFA. We performed the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test to ensure an adequate sample size (N = 247) for the EFA and attained a KMO of .94 for the 60 retained items. A KMO statistic greater than .90 is considered "superb" (Field, 2009, p. 647) evidence for sample adequacy.
Pett et al. (2003) stated that an unrotated factor solution rarely provides meaningful and understandable item clusters and often indicates that a general factor may be a statistical artifact. Hence, the initial step in factor identification was the development of a varimax-rotated factor solution. Using a total eigenvalue of greater than or equal to 1.00 as an acceptance threshold, we found that 10 factors emerged in the initial 60-item rotated factor solution (Pett et al., 2003). Seventeen items loaded with eigenvalues of greater than or equal to .40 on two factors. We removed 11 of the 17 items that loaded with eigenvalues above .50 on multiple factors. The remaining six items loaded on two factors with eigenvalues that differed by more than .10. We initially retained these six items in the factor with the higher loading for investigation of their theoretical fit within the emergent factors. Overall, we removed 11 items in the initial EFA, leaving 49 survey items.
We performed a second EFA on the remaining 49 items and identified seven factors with eigenvalues greater than or equal to 1.00. However, no items loaded on Factors 6 or 7 with eigenvalues greater than or equal to .40, thus yielding a five-factor model. Seven of the 49 items loaded with eigenvalues greater than or equal to .40 on two factors. Three of the seven items loaded with eigenvalues between .57 and .63 on Factor 5. Because scrutiny of the wording of these items indicated no coherent theoretical framework, we removed these three items. All four of the remaining dual-loading items originated from the CTSE subscale and loaded with higher eigenvalues on Factor 2. After examining the wording of these items, we determined that they were congruent with the theoretical framework of self-efficacy within construction training (e.g., "My past experience in accomplishments increases my confidence that I will be able to complete a construction training program") and therefore retained these items in Factor 2. Overall, we removed three items in the second EFA, leaving 46 survey items.
In the final EFA, we calculated factor loadings for the remaining 46 items to confirm the factor structure. The factor matrix indicated that Item 8 of the CTN subscale loaded on Factors 1 and 5 with eigenvalues of .68 and .53, respectively. Consequently, we removed this item, reducing the total eigenvalue of Factor 5 below the 1.00 threshold and yielding a 45-item instrument containing four emergent factors.
The rotated factor matrix contained eigenvalues for each survey item within the four emergent factors. A four-factor solution was confirmed in the scree plot. Factor 1 contained 14 items with eigenvalues ranging between .69 and .82. All of the items within Factor 1 were adapted from Ajzen's (n.d.) Theory of Planned Behavior questionnaire. Regarding internal consistency, Factor 1, hereinafter Planned Training Behavior (PTB), achieved a Cronbach's alpha of .94. Factor 2 contained 14 items with eigenvalues ranging between .56 and .81. All of the items in Factor 2 were retained from the adapted CTSE subscale. Factor 2, hereinafter CTSE, achieved a Cronbach's alpha of .94. Factor 3 contained 10 items (four items from the ATCT subscale and six items form the CTM subscale) with eigenvalues ranging between .58 and .77. Factor 3, hereinafter Training Motivation Attitudes (TMA), achieved a Cronbach's alpha of .94. Observation of item reliabilities indicated that the Cronbach's alpha of TMA would be higher (.94) if we removed one of the ATCT subscale items. Removal of that item yielded a nine-item TMA subscale and a 44-item instrument. Factor 4, hereinafter TLOC, contained seven items from the adapted TLOC subscale and achieved eigenvalues ranging between .60 and .74 and a Cronbach's alpha of .83. The 44-item instrument, hereinafter called the Construction Training Attitudes and Intentions Scale (CTAIS), achieved an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of .93. The four factors explained 60.51% (PTB, 35.66%; CTSE, 14.12%; TMA. 6.52%; TLOC, 4.21%) of the variance in participants' responses.
The CTAIS was administered to a separate and distinct group of participants in Phase 2, and internal consistency reliabilities were calculated using the Phase 2 data (N = 174). The CTAIS achieved a Cronbach's alpha of .90, and the 14-item CTSE, 14-item PTB. nine-item TMA, and seven-item TLOC subscales achieved Cronbach's alphas of .95, .91, .93, and .83, respectively.
According to Patten (2007), construct validity is the combination of judgmental and empirical validity where the "researchers hypothesize about how the construct that the instrument is designed to measure should affect or relate to other variables" (p. 69). In the current study, face validity was confirmed through the emergent factor structure resulting from the EFA. To determine construct validity of the CTAIS, we developed hypotheses regarding the relationships between construct subscales on the basis of our review of the literature. This approach to construct validity was appropriate because previous occupational training research has reported associations among the constructs adapted for use in the CTAIS.
Face validity. Evidence for face validity was gained when the emergent factor structure from the EFA mirrored the factor structure of the original, previously validated constructs. Because the initial constructs had been validated through previous research, we expected that the adapted TLOC subscale items would load on the same factor. In addition, we anticipated that the adapted CTSE subscale items would load on a separate and distinct construct from CTM (and other adapted constructs) as evident in previous research (Colquitt et al., 2000). As noted, the retained CTAIS items loaded in an emergent factor structure that mirrored the factor structure of the original constructs after being adapted to the construction training domain. Therefore, the emergent factor structure in and of itself provided initial evidence of face validity.
Colquitt et al., 2000: Phillips & Gully, 1997) and negative correlations between TMA and TLOC (Ng, Sorensen, & Eby, 2006) were supported in the literature. Correlations observed between the emergent factors using Phase 1 and Phase 2 data are found in Table 3.
This article documents the development and testing of the CTAIS and its internal consistency reliability and validity. The study sample was composed of undergraduate and graduate students (N = 421) enrolled in construction management classes at two universities. The factors (i.e., CTSE, PTB, TMA, and TLOC) included in the instrument are domain specific and can be applied to any construction training population. However, our study's results likely reflect the nature of the sample. Study participants had already made the decision to begin construction training by enrolling in construction management classes. In addition, students in higher level classes possess construction knowledge and potentially have a history of successful construction training performance (e.g., a track record of successful course completion). In contrast, the target population may possess little knowledge of construction practices and have no previous success in training or construction experiences. Previous construction-related successes and knowledge will influence responses on the CTAIS, and the nature of this influence can be understood only by administering the survey to unemployed trainees with little or no construction experience.
The structure of and correlations between emergent factors were found to be congruent with previous research, thus providing support for face and convergent construct validity. However, the design of the study and the items included in the CTAIS did not allow for empirical comparison of participants' responses with established physiological metrics. Therefore, we were not able to investigate criterion-related validity during this initial step of instrument validation. Administration of the CTAIS in conjunction with established and previously validated construct measures is the next logical step in the validation of the CTAIS. Validation, rarely accomplished through a single study (Beattie, Pinto, Nelson, & Nelson, 2002; Norbeck, 1985; Yang, 2003), should be an ongoing process in instrument development.
Weigensberg et al. (2012) reported that training providers desired a more complete picture of participants' individual characteristics (beyond gaining employment) to gauge their training success. Although training assessments exist that measure participants' self-efficacy, motivation, and other characteristics pretraining, the metrics that are used often assess the constructs at a general level and comparisons between the characteristics and training outcomes are not reported (Weigensberg et al., 2012). According the Pajares (1996), general psychological constructs, such as self-efficacy, are unreliable predictors of behavior or expectations because they lack domain or task specificity.
The CTAIS provides practitioners with a measure of CTSE, PTB, TMA, and TLOC at the construction training domain level. Increasing the specificity of a measure should increase its predictive power (Bandura, 1997; Schwarzer, Bassler, Kwiatek, Schroder, & Zhang, 1997). The instrument has several potential uses. It may be used as (a) a pretraining measure of participants' characteristics to align trainees' needs with training providers' services; (b) a tool to assess participants' characteristics at multiple points during training interventions; (c) a means to determine the effectiveness of pre- and posttraining interventions; and (d) a metric by which to investigate differences in CTSE, PTB, TMA, and TLOC by participant attribute variables to better align training providers' services with the target population's needs.
The study was not structured to allow comparison of the CTAIS with established measures of training performance; therefore, the predictive value of the CTAIS was not explored. Pretraining instrument administration and comparison of CTAIS scores among trainees who complete or fail to complete training would illuminate its value as a predictor of attrition. Posttraining survey administration in conjunction with an established construction-related certification test can be used to evaluate training performance and provide support for criterion-related validity. In this case, the certification test must be directly aligned with the content focus of the training program. Otherwise, the usefulness of the survey as a predictive tool is compromised. Targeted programs for further administration and validation of the CTAIS include the USDOL's YouthBuild and Training Adjustment Assistance programs and construction craft training programs administered by organizations (e.g., National Center for Construction Education and Research) in the private sector.
The instrument developed and validated through this study allows training organizations to quantitatively measure and evaluate construction-domain-level characteristics shown in research to predict performance in work settings and attendance in educational settings. Identification of participants' characteristics that contribute to performance and attrition in construction training can assist training organizations in programmatic decision making. Preprogram assessment of trainees allows practitioners to make informed decisions at the individual level about appropriate interventions to increase the likelihood of training success. The CTAIS, when administered pre- and posttraining, provides trainers with a measure of individual characteristics that correlate with training successes. High levels of self-efficacy and motivation are predictive of persistence in job search activities and on-the-job performance. Therefore, higher posttraining CTSE and TMA subscale scores are indicators of training program effectiveness.
Further research is required to determine the predictive value of the CTAIS; however, it can be used to gauge trainees' perceptions of PTB, CTSE, TMA, and TLOC in its current state. Pretraining identification of participants' characteristics allows practitioners to better serve trainees and more effectively allocate scarce training resources. Eden and Aviram (1993) found that an individual's confidence level can be elevated through self-efficacy-boosting interventions, which presumably increases a participant's likelihood of completing training. On the other hand, trainees with high levels of CTSE may not require such interventions, and these training resources (e.g., staff, funding) could be directed elsewhere to maximize training effectiveness. As greater investments are made in training for workforce development, it is imperative that training providers customize programs to meet the needs of the target trainee population.
Amedeo, D., Golledge, R. G., & Stimson, R. J. (2009). Person-environment-behavior research: Investigating activities and experiences in spaces and environments. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Beattie, P. F., Pinto, M. B., Nelson, M. K., & Nelson, R. (2002). Patient Satisfaction With Outpatient Physical Therapy: Instrument validation. Physical Therapy, 82, 557-565.
Bilginsoy, C. (2003). The hazards of training: Attrition and retention in construction industry apprenticeship programs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57, 54-67.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
Norbeck, J. S. (1985). What constitutes a publishable report of instrument development? Nursing Research, 34, 380-382.
Patten, M. L. (2007). Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials (6th ed.). Glendale, C A: Pyrczak. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jonathan Elliott, Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University; Carla Lopez del Puerto, Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jonathan Elliott, Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, 1584 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1584 (e-mail: jon.elliott@colostate.edu).
(a) Internal consistency reliability observed in previous research.
(personal communication, June 15, 2011).
Training Norms; PBCT = Perceived Behavioral Control in Training.
* p < .05, two-tailed. ** p < .01, two-tailed.
Effects of business internships on students, employers, and higher education institutions: a systematic review.
Relationships of the practice of hijab, workplace discrimination, social class, job stress, and job satisfaction among Muslim American women.


Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe arrived in Hawaii on Monday to recognize the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor.
Abe landed at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam for the historic visit. He will be the first Japanese prime minister to visit the memorial that honors sailors and Marines killed in the 1941 attack.
Japan's former leader Shigeru Yoshida went to Pearl Harbor six years after the country's World War II surrender, but that was before the USS Arizona Memorial was built. Yoshida arrived at Pearl Harbor in 1951, shortly after requesting a courtesy visit to the office of Adm. Arthur W.R. Radford, commander of the U.S. Pacific fleet. The office overlooked Pearl Harbor, offering a direct view of the attack site.
The memorial will be closed to the public Tuesday when Abe visits the historic site, joined by U.S. President Barack Obama, who is vacationing in Hawaii with his family.
The importance of the visit may be mostly symbolic for two countries that, in a remarkable transformation, have grown into close allies in the decades since they faced off in brutal conflict. At the same time, it's significant that it took more than 70 years for U.S.-Japanese relations to get to this point.
Abe won't apologize for Japan's attack when he visits, the government spokesman said earlier this month.
The visit comes six months after Obama became the first sitting American president to visit Hiroshima for victims of the U.S. atomic bombing of that city at the end of the same war.


Qwest and other acts of defiance needed to keep smiling!
Recently, I was sitting around the table with my brothers and sisters one night. The conversation turned to the telephone bill. At this point, my sister said to me; "Zulu, why aren't you paying your phone bill online, it's much easier than a "stamp and check." I said I'll tell you why. It's because when I send my check for payment each month to Verizon, I utilize the open space at the bottom left hand corner of the check that says "For." In that space, I write in "stop tapping my phone!" Aaaarrrhhh she screamed. "You don't do that" she yelled. I just looked at her, and smiled. She snapped her head left to right trying in vain to get my brothers to validate her outrage. "Of course he does" my brothers laughed.
Today's blog is not about illegal wiretapping by Verizon and ATT; the Patriot Act killed that story for us. It's about finding some clever coping secrets without resorting to violence. It's for those times when a smile is hard to come by, and you have to continue on. After the illegal, and unwarranted wiretapping scandal came to light, I switched to Qwest for the long distance portion of my phone service. It was to reward them for upholding the law. Unfortunately I had to switch back to Verizon because Qwest had no internet service to offer in my area. There are a few other things I do; some are acts of defiance, and others are just plain fun.
When filling out forms, and they ask me my first name, I type in Sir Zulu. All further mail and correspondences are addressed to "Sir Zulu Delta." Royalty; it's good to be me!
Nosey retail stores? When stores ask my zip code, I instantly tell them; 60609. All the zip codes where I live start with 0, but when we were kids, and watched the Price is Right during the summer, "Johnny" was always talking about prizes from the "Spiegel Catalog; Chicago, Illinois, 60609." Extra points if you use the "Johnny voice" when you give the zip code.
Telemarketers got you down? Don't hang up, waste their time. Example; I answer the phone. The "TM" says; "can I speak to Zulu Delta." I say; "one moment please." I put the phone on the counter; scream "Zulu, telephone for you!" Then I go outside, mow the lawn, come back later and hang up the phone.
Credit card companies and 75% APR cards? Do your best to pay them down, then over pay the remaining balance so "they" own you 3 cents. This keeps your card active but denies them the larger interest rates. It also costs them more than 3 cents in time and postage to keep sending me the bill.
If you're curious……….yea, I'm still smiling reading this!
I have a variation on the telemarketer scheme. The phone number is listed under my maiden name. So all the calls to "Mr. or Mrs. Madsen" are instant hang ups.


text:
Q: Replacing and counting values in array I have an array of items which are ids
 var names = ['1','2', '1', '3'];

Then with this id i make an ajax request expecting to receive the name for each id and replace it with it;
 var names = ['ham','cheese', 'ham', 'onion'];

And finally show a list like this:
 ham x2, cheese, onion

The problem is i get this instead:
 ham x2, cheese, ham, onion

How can i do that?
here is my code
var list = [];

function _checkIngredients(pizza, ingredient) {
    for (var i = 0; i < list[pizza].ingredients.length; ++i) {
        if (list[pizza].ingredients[i] == ingredient) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return null;
}

pizzas.get().then(function (response) {
    list = response.data;
    angular.forEach(list, function (v, k) {
        //Find ingredients names per pizza
        angular.forEach(v.ingredients, function (i, ik) {
            ingPerPizza.get(i).then(function (response) {
                var name = response.data.name;
                if ( _checkIngredients(k, name) ) {
                    list[k].ingredients[ik] = '2x' + name;
                } else {
                    list[k].ingredients[ik] = name;
                }
            });
        });
    });

Thanks!

A: You can store all ingredients in an array and then group them by name with underscore's (http://underscorejs.org/#) _.groupBy function.
pizzas.get().then(function (response) {
    list = response.data;
    angular.forEach(list, function (v, k) {
        //Find ingredients names per pizza

        var ingredients = [];
        angular.forEach(v.ingredients, function (i, ik) {
            ingPerPizza.get(i).then(function (response) {
                ingredients.push({name: response});
            }
        }
        ingredients = _.groupBy(ingredients,'name');
        //do something what you want with this object and attach to pizza
    });
});

Now in ingredients you will get something like:
{
  "ham": [
    {
      "name": "ham"
    },
    {
      "name": "ham"
    }
  ],
  "cheese": [
    {
      "name": "cheese"
    }
  ],
  "onion": [
    {
      "name": "onion"
    }
  ]

So you can easily check quantity of each ingriendt by using ingredients['cheese'].length.
You can also display them with something like:

{{key}} x {{data.length}}

http://jsfiddle.net/aartek/7gfs27zz/

A: You can extend the Array and Object natives to provide this functionality. This will return: ["ham: 2", "cheese: 1", "onion: 1"].
     var names = ['ham','cheese', 'ham', 'onion'];

     Array.prototype.compileObj = function() {

        var instances = {};

        this.forEach( function( element, index ) {

            if ( instances[element]) {
                instances[element]+= 1
            }

            else {
                instances[element] = 1;
            }

        });

        return instances
    }

    Object.prototype.toArr = function() {

        var returnArr = [],
            obj = this;

        Object.keys( obj ).forEach( function( element, index) {

            returnArr.push( element + ': ' + obj[element] );

        });

        return returnArr;
    }

    console.log( names.compileObj().toArr() )

A: I would use an external library like lodash or underscore, in this case the countBy function works nicely:
var list = ['ham','cheese', 'ham', 'onion'];
$scope.result = _.countBy( list );

Result would be:
{
  "ham": 2,
  "cheese": 1,
  "onion": 1
}

Then print it out:

{{key}} x{{data}}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


The brand new product line is expected to sell out fast, with its Boho & Tribal Patterns in Gold, Mint, and Coral hues to coordinate with this year's trends.
Eloquent Innovations has always produced more than average home decor, however, they have really out done themselves with their brand new Oh So Pretty Collection!
This Collection is jam packed with benefits for the customer to enjoy; from rich colors of mint, gold, and coral to subtle grey & white. Every piece in the collection was made to be interchangeable so anyone can be mix & match, the bedding, pillowcases, throws, and even window curtains flawlessly, so no design skills required.
The Oh So Pretty Collection is also great for girls who share a bedroom or bunk beds, and because of it's sophisticated style it is perfect for dorm rooms.
Oh and of course I cannot forget their "Float" bedding set will be made out of their most premium material.
Eloquent Innovations is a specialty company that creates unique & personalized home decor for those who want more than average home decor for their household.
All of their fabric is printed & almost all of the sewing is done right here in the US!
Whether you're putting the finishing touches into your bedroom or adding a foundation piece to your loft I hope you will consider Eloquent Innovations along the way.


text:
require 'spec_helper'
describe Rubotium::Memory::Monitor do
  it 'starts memory pooling' do

  end
end

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


On August 10, 2004 the Acme Township Board of Trustees adopted the ( Acme Township Farmland and Open Space Ordinance). In November 2004, Acme Township voters approved a 10 year–1 mil assessment for the purpose of preserving Acme Township farmland via a purchase of development rights (PDR) program.
The millage generated approximately $2.7 million dollars for Acme Township farmland protection. These township funds were matched nearly 1:1 by funds brought to the table by the Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy leveraged grants, and through "bargain sales" where landowners themselves contributed to the program by agreeing to sell their development rights to the township for less than full fair market value.
This 2004-2014 Acme Township Farmland PDR program was very successful, protecting five working farms and over 810 acres of land identified as eligible for preservation in Acme Township's Master Plan.
As a result of this success, demand for the Acme Township PDR program has increased. There are currently eight landowners involving thirteen farms and 1,200 acres in the Acme Township Farmland Preservation Zone who have made formal application for inclusion in the second round of Acme Township farmland preservation. Much of this farmland is situated along US-31 and includes more than a mile of frontage on that stretch of highway though the township.
Given the historical success of the township's program and the continued interest in the program from Acme's farm families, citizens approved in November 2014 a renewal of the assessment to support the farmland preservation program. It has created a dedicated funding stream for the permanent preservation of farmland for the township and is serving as a showcase for what is possible to neighboring townships and other communities around the region.


Hand sized Dance Mat controller for Sony Playstations. Accessible dance controller suitable for people able to use their hands to play. Play against people using full sized dance mats. With specific additional controller adapters, this controller can be used with PCs and older games machines.
LEDs light up when pressing the direction buttons.
Colour of controller may vary.


What Is ShopingLily.com – Is ShopingLily.com Scam or Legit?
Find Out Here In This #1 Review On What Is ShopingLily.com – SCAM ALERT!
Good job here on finding out What Is ShopingLily.com at www.shopinglily.com. Is ShopingLily com fake, scam, fraudulent, crooked or Is ShopingLily good, safe, legit, genuine, real? This ShopingLily Review is to help alert all that they are a fraudulent site that that maybe stealing your cash, for sub-par goods, and personal banking details. Their other sites to watch out for as well are OnlineBookGoods.icu, MoreRate.com, BalmllJucy.com, Neoiu.com, Coolerones.com, ShopMyBest.com, MyLoveGoods.com, ForYouthSome.com, InovGoods.com, Conglide.com, NuxtFit.com,1SuperShop.com, RTRindingete.com,MjKiu.com, ActionSallyhy.com Easious.com,OnsuathyMealle.com, Morderneo.com, Skying.icu,SetComing.com, InnovStylish.com, SuperGoMall.com VsTroll.com and LucuryBuy.com, also there are 100's of them online.
Those that were scammed are welcome to report them below. Also do report them at the bbb.org and IC3. The more reports that exist about them online the sooner they will all have to shut down for good, therefore, saving many people much money. Typically such dishonest sites are coming out of China. That is where their entire scam network is coming from. The above links are all the reviews of the sites that we have found or were reported to scamwitness.com. Please keep on alerting us to these sites and we will expose on page 1 for all to know.
#1 ShopingLily.com Review – Scam Reports Needed.
There are very few sites online that has extensively covered this particular scam network then scamwitness.com. And still, I know, there are so many others that it maybe impossible to find them all. Their sites many times shut down even after months of being online. Please report them to your payment provider and get a refund while those sites are still online. Let us now take a quick look into why they are completely and utterly fraudulent.
Their was created and registered online 2019/01/07 and they have done this for only 1 year online. Why would a site that is selling such good quality items decide to exist online for so little time. This is not the usual way that legit selling sites register for such a small amount of time. Also the are now already following the well known scam pattern of setting up a site for 1 to 2 years, defraud countless people for free cash, and the skulk away in the night like thieves with good peoples money. The orders they may send out are nothing but an insult to the cash you paid for it. You have been warned.
Phone Number of +1.3478727726 is being used on other sites. These sites typically belong to the owners that own ShopingLily. Always Google phone numbers, email addresses, any addresses sites leave for your viewing because often there are scam reports connected to such information. The reason for that is because they tend to use the same details for so many of their sites, which I can't understand, because they are making it too easy for scam busting sites like this one to find them. Additionally, that number does not work, and if by some miracle it does, they will never get back to you.
As always there is no Founder Name or customer support email address left on their sites registration. So we have to assume it was either one of the X-Men or Google is being haunted by a Ghost. Or, there needs to be some kind of enforcement agency online to demand verification from sites that either offer work from home jobs or sell stuff online. So the hosting providers are very, very, very happy to take fee's and not do to their jobs to help protect the population on the net.
Additionally, you can always report them to their host provider and so see PrivacyGuardian.org.
There are 100's of this diabolically malicious sites floating around everywhere online. You may have connected with them on Facebook, Instagram, You-Tube ad etc. Where ever you found them then those platforms simply could not care less or so it seems. They don't take any action that I am aware of and they have not been helpful at all when people complain about scam companies using their platform to target people for illegal purposes. But still, at least the platforms and the scammers are getting rich. Who cares about the rest of us, the rest of us without which, these social media platforms would be nothing. Nice gratitude.
So, undisclosed multiple sites is a clear cut sign of a scam network. I mean why would they not tell their members about all their other sites? Each site of theirs has its own wave of traffic, traffic that is obvlious to all their other identical sites, and so these cyber-crooks are making a fortune online and no one is doing a thing about it. Your reports is the only way to stamp out these scam sites before too many people lose their cash.
Their copyright date on their is a not true. 2010 to 2019 is a pure lie because you can find out for yourself on WHOIS their real date of their sites registration. They lie on this point for the reason to make you think they are an old and trusted site. Older sites seem to automatically garner trust and that leads to more sales. Unfortunately it does convince people to make that purchase.
They have the same wording, similar to identical image products on their site. Images are not their own and you will either get a shoddy, inferior version of the products or they will send you out nothing at all. Also, if you see a tracking number, that miraculously turns out to be legit, see the weight of the item. If too small relative to your order then they are sending you out an empty envelope, bubble wrapped parcel with nothing in it or something so small to only produce that tracking info. This nonsense usually happens when you apply for your refund.
Reductions in prices is complete make-believe and you would never get such high quality items at that price. SO in the real world they are only taking your cash and send you out nothing, or something so worthless, they still have made a fortune from your order.
You may peruse all the articles in the list above and you will see the same old number for most of them on their sites. That number is 1 626 456 6688. That is a bogus number and you won't get through to them. It seems there is no way to contact them unless they provide you with such details after you make your purchase.
Despite when they tell you when they will charge you, you may find that they take payment very fast. Even they may not give you a receipt or calculate for taxes. These are bad signs indeed.
Their About Us Section is the same as some of their other sites. They have completely erased the old spiel they use to spout to less content. You will notice it is generic and wholly unhelpful. That is only to give a semblance of 'content' on their site. Nothing about them is real except that they are a scam site.
Want to Help Shut Them Down With Your Own ShopingLily.com Scam Report? Feel Free To Lambast Them In The Comments To Help Warn Others – Thank You Kindly.
If you still have confusion on whether they are scam or legit then I advise you read the article again. They have been online years as a scam network and they are going into my sites List of Internet Scammers. They will take your cash for inferior, cheap, shoddy products for which you would have paid way too much for. Contact your bank for a refund and to cancel your card. Also, please spare a moment as well to help warn others below as well – thank you to those that will to help make our Internet a safer place for all.
That is all on What Is ShoingLily.com and hope it has answered all of your questions. All owner data is hidden and that is enough to call any selling site a scam. Name me one legit site that hides all that info? And so you see we can't be dealing with legit people. Those with questions, extra info or other reports on other sites, are welcome to place all that in the comments below. Take care for now and hope to hear from you and others in the comments below.
Keep Up To Date With The Latest Online Scam Alerts HERE!


text:
After 16 years, Air India to serve Australia again
Air India (Mumbai) will again serve Australia after a 16-year absence. The carrier is launching a triangular route from Delhi to Sydney and Melbourne and back to Delhi four days a week starting on August 29 per this report from The Sydney Morning Herald. On the other three days of the week, the route will be Delhi-Melbourne-Sydney-Delhi. The restored route will be operated by its Boeing 787-8s. Therefore it will become the first 787 operator in Australia.
Read the full story from The Sydney Morning Herald: CLICK HERE
Copyright Photo: Ton Jochems/AirlinersGallery.com. Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner VT-ANH (msn 36276) taxies to the terminal on arrival at Frankfurt.
Air India:
This entry was posted in Air India and tagged 36276, 787, 7878, 787800, 787837, Air India, Boeing, Boeing 787, Boeing 7878, FRA, Frankfurt, VTANH on June 30, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
AirAsia Japan to be shut down on October 31
AirAsia Japan (Tokyo-Narita) will cease all scheduled services on October 31, 2013. ANA has decided it will not merge the joint venture with Peach Aviation. The airline started operations on August 1, 2012.
All four Airbus A320s will be returned to AirAsia (Malaysia) the following day.
Copyright Photo: Michael B. Ing/AirlinersGallery.com. Airbus A320-216 JA01AJ (msn 5153) approaches the Tokyo (Narita) hub.
AirAsia (Japan):
This entry was posted in AirAsia (Japan) and tagged 5153, A320, A320200, A320216, AirAsia, AirAsia (Japan), AirAsia (Malaysia), AirAsia.com, Airbus, Airbus A320, Airbus A320200, JA01AJ, Narita, NRT, route map, Tokyo on June 30, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Silver Airways to drop the Montana EAS contract
Silver Airways (Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood) has filed a 90-day notice with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) that it intends to drop its Montana routes under the Essential Air Service (EAS) program according to the Independent Record.
The airline will be required to operate the routes until a replacement carrier is located. The DOT has set a deadline of July 15 for the bids from other carriers. Silver Airways intends to move its Beech (Raytheon) 1900Ds from the Montana operation based at Billings, MT to the Cleveland operation.
Previously Great Lakes Airlines was outbid by Silver Airways (formerly Gulfstream International Airlines) for the EAS contract and may re-bid the contract.
Read the full article: CLICK HERE
Silver Airways:
The Montana Route Map:
This entry was posted in Silver Airways and tagged billings mt, essential air service, route map, Silver Airways on June 30, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
A new era for Iraqi Airways; new aircraft and a new brand
Iraqi Airways (Baghdad) in May 2008, through the Iraqi government, ordered 30 new Boeing 737-800s from The Boeing Company with options for 10 additional aircraft. The first aircraft in the order is being prepared for delivery. The flag carrier is taking the opportunity to also introduce a new livery for the airline. The airline is retaining its historic green and while color scheme but now with updated lines.
Copyright Photo: Duncan Kirk/AirlinersGallery.com. Boeing 737-81Z YI-ASE (msn 40104) taxies to the runway at Boeing Field (King County) in Seattle yesterday (May 28) in the evening for a test flight.
Iraqi Airways:
This entry was posted in Iraqi Airways and tagged 40104, 737, 737800, 73781Z, BFI, Boeing, Boeing 737, Boeing 737800, boeing company, Boeing Field, Iraqi Airways, King County, livery, Seattle, YIASE on June 29, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Gestair Cargo rebrands back to Cygnus Air
Gestair Cargo (Madrid) has rebranded back to its original name of Cygnus Air Corporacion.
The airline is currently owned by the Macholfam International (Grupo Gestair) (60%) and IMES (Grupo ACS) (40%) according to Wikipedia.
Top Copyright Photo: Ole Simon/AirlinersGallery.com. This Gestair Cargo color scheme and name was introduced in 2008.
Bottom Copyright Photo: Gunter Mayer. Now ex-Iberia Boeing 757-236 EC-KLD (msn 24121), pictured at Nuremberg at night, is wearing the basic Gestair livery now with Cygnus Air Corporacion titles and the new (old) tail logo.
This entry was posted in Cygnus Air, Gestair Cargo and tagged 24121, 757, 757200, 757200F, 757236, Boeing, Boeing 757, Boeing 757200, Boeing 757200F, Cygnus Air, ECKLD, Gestair, Gestair Cargo, MAD, Madrid on June 29, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Norwegian takes delivery of its first Boeing 787-8 from ILFC and Boeing
Norwegian Air Shuttle (Norwegian Long haul) (Oslo) has taken delivery of its first Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. Boeing, International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC) and Norwegian celebrated several milestones on Thursday (June 27) during a delivery ceremony for a new 787 Dreamliner. It was the first 787 delivered to ILFC and its lessee, Norwegian, which will operate the airplane. The 787 also marked the 700th airplane Boeing delivered to ILFC.
The delivery to ILFC builds on Boeing's 40-year relationship with the Los Angeles-based leasing company and largest 787 customer with 74 Dreamliners on order.
Norwegian currently has eight 787s on order through lease agreements and direct deliveries. The carrier will use the 787s to service its new long-haul routes from Oslo and Stockholm to New York (JFK) and Bangkok. In November, the airline also will operate the 787 to Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood from Oslo, Stockholm and Copenhagen.
The delivery flight to Oslo (Gardermoen) took 8 hours and 20 minutes.
Before the new aircraft is deployed on its long-haul routes to New York (JFK) and Bangkok, between July 4 and August 4, the new type will be flying a range of European routes from Oslo to include London, Alicante, Malaga, Nice and Barcelona.
Copyright Photo: Nick Dean/AirlinersGallery.com. Norwegian's Boeing 787-8 EI-LNA (msn 35304) with Sonja Henie on the tail is pictured departing Paine Field near Everett yesterday afternoon (June 28) as "Norstar 576". Norwegian will operate its new Boeing 787s as a separate "Norwegian Long Haul A.S." (DU/NLH) division.
Norwegian:
This entry was posted in Norwegian Air Shuttle, Norwegian Long Haul, Norwegian.com, Norwegian.com (Norwegian Air Shuttle) and tagged 35304, 787, 7878, Boeing 787, boeing 787 dreamliner, Boeing 7878, Dreamliner, EILNA, Everett, leasing company, Norwegian, Norwegian Air Shuttle, Norwegian Long Haul, Norwegian.com. Boeing. Boeing 787, PAE, Paine Field, sonja henie on June 29, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Delta to begin renovations on Delta Flight Museum, set to open in 2014
Delta Air Lines (Atlanta) will begin renovations funded by a $6.3 million grant from The Delta Air Lines Foundation and will kick-off a corporate sponsorship campaign to refurbish Delta's historic hangars on the company's corporate campus. Upon completion of the project, the facility will open to the public as the Delta Flight Museum offering daily tours and a unique private event facility.
The hangars, originally built in the 1940s for Delta's aircraft maintenance, were repurposed in 1995 as the site of the current Delta Air Transport Heritage Museum. Its mission then was to preserve the history of Delta's people and culture of exceptional customer service forged by founder C.E. Woolman. The site has served as the backbone of the company's global headquarters for more than 70 years.
"Returning Delta's historic hangars to their original glory helps preserve the history and rich Delta employee culture for generations of aviation enthusiasts," said Tad Hutcheson, vice president – Community Affairs and Chairman of the Board of Directors for the Delta Air Transport Heritage Museum. "The new Delta Flight Museum will offer a one-of-a-kind experience for the Atlantacommunity and visitors from around the world."
The renovation project will last 12 months and is scheduled to be complete in advance of Delta's 85th anniversary of commercial aviation service on June 17, 2014. Some of the major improvements include the addition of a welcome theater, installation of an elevator and construction of a new mezzanine level.
When completed, the new museum will offer a full-service event space that will accommodate private events for groups ranging from 100 to 1,200 people for a seated meal service. The facility will be among the largest capacity venues in the Atlanta metropolitan area and will offer a variety of scalable rental options.
The entrance to the Delta Flight Museum will offer convenient access for daily visitors and will include dedicated parking for museum patrons as well as capacity for valet parking services to compliment private functions held in the facility.
The Spirit of Delta will continue to be one of the largest items on display in the museum. The Boeing 767-200 (above, caption below) was purchased by Delta employees in 1982 as an expression of thanks to the company and has been located in the museum since being retired from service in 2006.
The renovation also will include preserving the hangar doors by returning them to their original condition and polishing the concrete floors to retain the distinctive markings created when Delta installed the reinforced concrete needed to handle heavier aircraft as it transitioned from the use of propeller planes to the jet age.
New air conditioning and heat controls will provide a comfortable year-round visitor experience inside the large hangar facility. A full Convair 880 cockpit already owned by the museum along with a Boeing 737-200 flight simulator will be installed as permanent exhibits and a new retail store will be built for visitors to purchase aviation memorabilia and Delta-branded items.
The hangars were designated as an official Historic Aerospace Site by The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Feb. 2011, acknowledging them as the oldest surviving buildings currently in use at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.
Delta moved its headquarters from Monroe, Louisiana, to Atlanta in 1941 and began use of the hangars as the primary maintenance facility for its daily commercial flight operations. Aircraft maintenance moved to the site of Delta's current Technical Operations Center in 1960. In 1990, a group of Delta retirees launched an effort to consolidate Delta memorabilia, archival collections and one of Delta's first 1940s era Douglas DC-3 aircraft. The effort resulted in the creation of the Delta Air Transport Heritage Museum located in the hangar facility donated by Delta.
Top Copyright Rendering: Delta Air Lines.
Middle Copyright Photo: Bruce Drum/AirlinersGallery.com. "The Spirit of Delta" in the form of donated Boeing 767-232 N102DA (msn 22214) worn several different liveries in its career with Delta. Here is the special "Celebrating 75 Years 2004" livery at Miami.
Delta Air Lines:
Bottom Copyright Photo: Brian McDonough/AirlinersGallery.com. Douglas DC-3-357 NC28341 (msn 3278) lands at Baltimore/Washington (BWI).
This entry was posted in Delta Air Lines and tagged 22214, 3278, 767, 767200, 767232, aviation enthusiasts, Baltimore/Washington, Boeing, Boeing 767, Boeing 767200, BWI, dc3, DC3357, Delta Air Lines, delta air lines atlanta, Douglas, douglas dc3, MIA, Miami, N102DA, NC28341, Spirit of Delta on June 29, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Sichuan Airlines takes delivery of its first Airbus A320 with Sharklets
Sichuan Airlines (Chengdu), the largest all Airbus fleet operator in China, has taken delivery of its first A320 aircraft equipped with Sharklets.
The A320, powered by IAE V2500 engines, features a comfortable two class cabin, seating 164 passengers with eight in business class and 156 in economy.
Sichuan Airlines was also the first Chinese airline to operate the A320, the first to take delivery of an A320 assembled at Airbus' Tianjin Final Assembly Line, and now one of the first with Sharklets in China.
Sichuan Airlines is China's largest all Airbus fleet operator. It introduced an A320 in 1995 to become the first Chinese airline to operate an Airbus fly-by-wire aircraft. In 2009, the airline received the first A320 assembled at the Airbus Final Assembly Line China (FALC) in Tianjin. Now it operates a fleet of five A330s and 70 A320 Family aircraft.
Copyright Photo: Airbus. The pictured Airbus A320-232 F-WWIM became B-9935 (msn 5646) when it was handed over on June 26, 2013.
Sichuan Airlines:
This entry was posted in Sichuan Airlines and tagged 5646, A320, A320-200, A320-232, Airbus, Airbus A320, Airbus A320-200, aviation, B-9935, F-WWIM, Sichuan Airlines, transportation on June 28, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Libyan Airlines takes delivery of its first Airbus A330-200
Libyan Airlines (Tripoli), the national carrier of Libya, has taken delivery of its first A330-200 becoming a new operator for the type. The carrier already operates seven Airbus A320 aircraft, with three A330-200 and four A350-800 aircraft on order.
Accommodating a two-class configuration of 24 business and 235 economy seats, the aircraft is powered by GE CF6-80 engines and will be deployed in the Middle East, around Dubai and Jeddah, as well as on Asian and European trunk routes.
Copyright Photo: Eurospot/AirlinersGallery.com. Airbus A330-202 F-WWCK (msn 1412) became 5A-LAR on delivery.
Libyan Airlines:
This entry was posted in Libyan Airlines and tagged 1412, 5ALAR, A330, A330200, A330202, Airbus, Airbus A330, Airbus A330200, FWWCK, Libyan Airlines, TLS, Toulouse on June 28, 2013 by Bruce Drum.
Qatar Airways to fly its Boeing 787 to Stockholm starting on August 1 and Copenhagen and Oslo on September 1
Qatar Airways (Doha) has announced an expansion of its Boeing 787 services to Europe with the new state-of-the-art aircraft being deployed on three Scandinavian routes.
The Doha-based carrier will launch 787 flights to the Swedish capital Stockholm on August 1, followed a month later to both Copenhagen and Oslo – capital cities of Denmark and Norway, respectively, effective September 1.
Qatar Airways operates daily flights to each of the three Scandinavian capitals from its hub, capital of the State of Qatar, with a total weekly capacity of 21 services.
Qatar Airways Boeing 787 Business Class Interiors (Qatar Airways).
Qatar Airways has 254 custom-made seats across its 787 Business and Economy Class cabins with specially designed interiors. Business Class is configured 1–2–1 with 22 seats, while Economy has a 232 seating capacity in a 3–3–3 layout. All seats in Business Class are fully reclinable.
The airline's 787s are the world's first fully connected Dreamliners with wireless facilities for passengers to remain in touch with friends and colleagues on the ground through the internet and SMS mobile texting across both Business and Economy cabins.
Made up of composite materials, the 787 Dreamliner is lighter and more fuel-efficient than any comparable aircraft of its size and range. Unique features include larger windows, reduced cabin noise and cleaner cabin air.
Qatar Airways currently operates five Boeing 787s, flying on the London Heathrow, Frankfurt, Munich, Zurich and Dubai routes from Doha. The airline took delivery of its sixth Dreamliner at the Paris Air Show, where the aircraft was open for VIP, trade and media tours. Qatar Airways currently has a further 54 Dreamliners on order.
Qatar Airways has seen rapid growth in just 16 years of operations, currently flying a modern fleet of 125 aircraft to 128 key business and leisure destinations across Europe, Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and The Americas.
The airline has so far launched six destinations this year – Gassim (Saudi Arabia), Salalah (Oman), Najaf and Basra (Iraq), Phnom Penh (Cambodia) and Chicago (USA). Over the next few months, the network will grow further with new destinations introduced to Sulaymaniyah, Iraq (August 20), Chengdu, China (September 3), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (September 18), Clark International Airport, Philippines (October 27) and Philadelphia (April 2, 2014).
In other news, Qatar Airways intends to introduce its first Airbus A380 on the Doha-London (Heathrow) route followed by Doha-Paris (CDG) in early 2014.
Qatar Airways currently has 13 Airbus A380s on order with plans to operate them on popular routes, especially in slot-constrained airports. The first A380 will arrive in early 2014.
Top Copyright Photo: Antony J. Best/AirlinersGallery.com. Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCL (msn 38330) prepares to touch down at London (Heathrow).
Qatar Airways:
Bottom Copyright Image: Airbus. The painted tail has been attached to the first Qatar A380 at Toulouse. The first three A380s will be msn 137, 143 and 146.
This entry was posted in Qatar Airways and tagged 38330, 787, 7878, A380, A380-800, A7BCL, Airbus, Airbus A380, Airbus A380-800, Boeing, Boeing 787, Boeing 7878, Boeing 7878 Dreamliner, Dreamliner, Heathrow, LHR, London, Qatar Airways, scandinavian capitals on June 28, 2013 by Bruce Drum.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Outdoor Bar Stools Patio Lowe S Canada Attractive With Regard To 9. Amazon Com Capral Outdoor Grey Wicker Barstools Set Of 4 Kitchen Residence Bar Stools And Also 11. International Caravan 4215 2CH Barcelona Outdoor Bar Stool Set Of 2 Dream Stools Intended For 22. Outdoor Bar Stools Sets Costco Dream For 37. Hampton Bay Rehoboth Dark Brown Wicker Outdoor Bar Stool 2 Pack Warm Stools With Regard To 4. ÄPPLARÖ Bar Stool With Backrest Outdoor IKEA Stylish Stools Intended For 27. Outdoor Patio Bar Stools Look More At Http Besthomezone Com Pertaining To 38. Outdoor Bar Stools Walmart Com Inspire And Also 7. Brazil Outdoor Bar Stools 2 Pk Sam S Club Residence Regarding 5. Amazon Com Sundale Outdoor 2 Pcs Brown Wicker Bar Height Swivel House Stools With Regard To 3. Outdoor Bar Stools Modern Contemporary Designs AllModern Invigorate As Well 26. Outdoor Bar Stools Walmart Com Cozy And Also 32. Outdoor Bar Stools Furniture The Home Depot Dream With Regard To 2. Outdoor Bar Stools You Ll Love Wayfair Ca Stunning As Well 34. Patio Bar Stools You Ll Love Wayfair Cozy Outdoor As Well 29. Outdoor Bar Stools Furniture The Home Depot Inviting As Well 15. Modern Outdoor Bar Stool Foter Dennis Futures Brilliant Stools Along With 12. Wicker Counter Height Bar Stools Outdoor Brilliant For 18. Outdoor Bar Stools Furniture The Home Depot House With Regard To 1. Outdoor Accent Furniture Tables Bar Stools Sets Warm For 16. Outdoor Bar Stools Modern Contemporary Designs AllModern Attractive Intended For 21. Outdoor Bar Stools Target Aspiration With Regard To 19. Aluminum Outdoor Bar Stools Furniture The Home Depot Dream With Regard To 36. Outdoor Wicker Barstool All Weather Brown Patio Furniture New Bar Gorgeous Stools Intended For 6. Outdoor Bar Stools Patio Lowe S Canada Incredible For 13. Outdoor Bar Stools Spice Up Your Decor InOutInterior Outside Aspiration With Regard To 24. Commercial Aluminum Faux Teak Outdoor Backless Bar Stool Aspiration Stools Intended For 25. Bryant 2pk Faux Wood Patio Bar Stool Black Project 62 Target Wish Stools Outdoor 0. Elegant Outdoor Swivel Bar Stool Tallahassee Adjustable Motivate Stools With Regard To 39. Decor Of Patio Bar Stools Backyard Design Pictures Outdoor Custom Dream Along With 30. Outdoor Bar Stools Patio Lowe S Canada Amazing Intended For 20. The Usable Outdoor Bar Stool Com Home Stools In Addition To 10. 5 Bar Stool Designs For Indoor Outdoor Use Interesting Stools As Well 14. Outdoor Bar Stools Modern Contemporary Designs AllModern Cozy For 33. Patio Bar Stools You Ll Love Wayfair Gorgeous Outdoor 23. Murano Modern Brown Outdoor Bar Stool Eurway Dennis Futures Wish Stools With Regard To 31. Modern Swivel Outdoor Bar Stools Designs Dennis Futures Warm Pertaining To 28. Outdoor Bar Stools Patio Swivel More Hayneedle Desire Pertaining To 17.


Campbell County is located in the U.S. state of South Dakota. Its county seat is Mound City. The county was created in 1873 and originated from Buffalo. The name of the county comes from Newton B. Campbell, territorial legislator. The links directory provides suggestions for a variety of websites to assist in your family history and genealogy research.


We'd love to hear from you! Please fill out this form and we will get in touch with you shortly.
Contact us to chat about your project. It'll be more fun than you think.
AMN offers initial consultation at no charge.


text:
package com.lxj.mainTest;

import com.lxj.SimpleStore.SimpleChangfenStore;
import com.lxj.Store.ChangfenStore;
import com.lxj.Store.STStore;
import com.lxj.Store.SZStore;
import com.lxj.simpleFactory.SimpleFactory;

public class Main {
	public static void main(String[] args){
		ChangfenStore SZstore = new SZStore();
		SZstore.orderChangfen("meat");
		SZstore.orderChangfen("vegetable");

		ChangfenStore STstore = new STStore();
		STstore.orderChangfen("meat");
		STstore.orderChangfen("vegetable");
	}
}


text:
Download XBRL
NONEfalse000172058000017205802022-12-022022-12-02
Adicet Bio, Inc.
200 Berkeley Street, 19th Floor
☐Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Symbol(s)
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
The Nasdaq Global Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§ 230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§ 240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☒
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On December 2, 2022 (the "Effective Date"), Adicet Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Subsidiary"), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Adicet Bio, Inc. (the "Guarantor", and together with the Subsidiary, the "Company"), and Pacific Western Bank ("PacWest") entered into a Fifth Amendment (the "Amendment") to that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 28, 2020, by and among the Subsidiary and PacWest (the "Agreement"). Pursuant to the Agreement, PacWest will provide one or more term loans (each a "Term Loan" and collectively the "Term Loans"), as well as non-formula ancillary services.
The Amendment extends the drawdown period for any Term Loan by one year from April 19, 2023 to April 19, 2024. In addition, pursuant to the Amendment, if the Company receives at least $60,000,000 from the sale or issuance of its equity securities and/or up-front cash payments from strategic partnerships other than payments from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on or before September 30, 2023, then the Interest Only End Date (as defined in the Amendment) will be extended another six months from April 19, 2024 to October 19, 2024.
Furthermore, the Amendment extends the final maturity date of any Term Loan by one year from October 19, 2025 to October 19, 2026, and the maturity date of non-formula ancillary services to November 30, 2023. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company must maintain the lesser of (i) $200,000,000 or (ii) 70% of the Company's combined balances in demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, and/or insured cash sweep accounts with PacWest.
On the Effective Date, the Guarantor also executed an affirmation of guarantee pursuant to which the Company affirmed the prior guaranty and security interest in substantially all of its assets other than the Company's intellectual property granted to PacWest on September 15, 2020.
The foregoing description of the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the agreement, which is attached to this report as Exhibits 10.1 and incorporated by reference in this Item 1.01.
Item 9.01 Exhibits.
Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 2, 2022.
Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
/s/ Nick Harvey
Nick Harvey
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
This Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into as of December 2, 2022, by and between PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, a California state chartered bank ("Bank") and ADICET THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Adicet Bio, Inc. ("Borrower").
Borrower and Bank are parties to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 28, 2020 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Agreement"). The parties desire to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
A. Section 6.6 is amended to read as follows:
Primary Depository. Borrower and Guarantor shall maintain the lesser of Two Hundred Million Dollars ($200,000,000) or seventy percent (70%) of their combined balances in demand deposit accounts, money market accounts and/or insured cash sweep accounts with Bank. Subject to the preceding sentence and the final sentence of this Section 6.6, Borrower shall maintain, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to maintain, all of its Cash in depository and operating accounts with Bank and all of its investment accounts to be managed by Bank or Bank's Affiliates (but which investment accounts may, for the avoidance of doubt, be held by a third-party custodian, including, without limitation, U.S. Bank) (an "Investment Account"); provided that (i) prior to Borrower maintaining any Investment Accounts with Bank's Affiliates, Borrower, Bank, and any such affiliate shall have entered into a securities account control agreement with respect to any such Investments Accounts, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Bank. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) Borrower shall be permitted to maintain an aggregate amount not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) in one or more accounts outside of Bank, and (b) Adicet Israel shall be permitted to maintain an aggregate amount not to exceed Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) in one or more foreign accounts outside of Bank
B. Exhibit A to the Agreement is amended by amending or restating, or adding, in appropriate alphabetical order, as applicable, the following defined terms to read as follows:
"Availability End Date" means April 19, 2024.
"Fifth Amendment Date" means December 2, 2022.
"Funding Milestone" means receipt by Borrower after the Fifth Amendment Date and on or before September 30, 2023 of at least $60,000,000 from the sale or issuance of its equity securities and/or up-front cash payments from strategic partnerships other than any Regeneron payments.
"Interest Only End Date" means April 19, 2024, provided that upon satisfying the Funding Milestone, Interest Only End Date shall mean October 19, 2024.
"Maturity Date" means October 19, 2026.
"Non-Formula Ancillary Services Maturity Date" means November 30, 2023.
277047946 v5
Unless otherwise defined, all initially capitalized terms in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Agreement. The Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. Except as expressly set forth herein, the execution, delivery, and performance of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of, or as an amendment of, any right, power, or remedy of Bank under the Agreement, as in effect prior to the date hereof. Borrower ratifies and reaffirms the continuing effectiveness of all agreements entered into in connection with the Agreement and the security interest as granted as of the Closing Date continues without novation.
Borrower represents and warrants that the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment (provided, that those representations and warranties expressly referring to another date shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such date, and provided further that any representation or warranty that contains a materiality qualification therein shall be true and correct in all respects). No Event of Default exists, or would exist with notice or lapse of time or both under the Agreement or any other Loan Document. A true and correct copy of each of Borrower's and Guarantor's certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as in effect as of the date of this Amendment have been delivered to Bank.
This Amendment and any documents executed in connection herewith or pursuant hereto contain the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior agreements, understandings, offers and negotiations, oral or written, with respect thereto and no extrinsic evidence whatsoever may be introduced in any judicial or arbitration proceeding, if any, involving this Amendment; except that any financing statements or other agreements or instruments filed by Bank with respect to Borrower shall remain in full force and effect.
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.
The terms of Article 11 of the Agreement are incorporated herein by this reference, mutatis mutandis.
As a condition to the effectiveness of this Amendment, Bank shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to Bank, the following:
this Amendment, duly executed by Borrower;
an Affirmation of Guaranty;
payment of a fee of $7,500 plus an amount equal to Bank Expenses relating to this Amendment, which may be debited from any of Borrower's deposit account maintained with Bank; and
such other documents and completion of such other matters, as Bank may have reasonably requested.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the first date above written.
ADICET THERAPEUTICS, INC.
By: /s/ Chen Schor
Name: Chen Schor
Title: President, Secretary & CEO
PACIFIC WESTERN BANK
By: /s/ Steve Kent
Name: Steve Kent
Title: Vice President
CORPORATE RESOLUTION
I/we hereby certify as follows, as of the date set forth below:
The following is a true and correct copy of certain resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Adicet Therapeutics, Inc. ("Borrower") in accordance with applicable law and the Borrower's bylaws, and that such resolutions are now unmodified and in full force and effect:
BE IT RESOLVED, that:
(A) Any one (1) of the following, duly elected officers of the Borrower (each, an "Authorized Officer") whose position, actual signature, email address, and cell phone number is shown below, is authorized to act for, on behalf of, and in the name of the Borrower in connection with the resolutions below:
ACTUAL SIGNATURE
Chen Schor
President, Secretary & CEO
/s/ Chen Schor
(B) Any Authorized Officer may:
i) Borrow money from time to time from Pacific Western Bank (the "Bank"), and may negotiate and procure loans, letters of credit, foreign exchange contracts and other financial accommodations from Bank, including without limitation, that certain Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 2, 2022, and also to execute and deliver to Bank one or more renewals, extensions, or modifications thereof;
ii) Give security for any liabilities of the Borrower to Bank by grant, security interest, assignment, lien, deed of trust or mortgage upon any real or personal property, tangible or intangible of the Borrower;
iii) Purchase, sell, exchange, assign, endorse for transfer and/or deliver certificates and/or instruments representing stocks, bonds, evidences of Indebtedness or other securities owned by the Borrower, whether or not registered in the name of the Borrower;
iv) Discount with the Bank, commercial or other business paper belonging to the Borrower made or drawn by or upon third parties, without limit as to amount;
v) Authorize and direct the Bank to pay the proceeds of any such loans or discounts as directed by the persons so authorized to sign;
vi) Issue a warrant or warrants to purchase the Borrower's capital stock;
vii) Execute and deliver in form and content as may be required by the Bank any and all notes, evidences of indebtedness, applications for letters of credit, guaranties, subordination agreements, loan and security agreements, financing statements, assignments, liens, deeds of trust, mortgages, trust receipts and other agreements, instruments or documents to carry out the purposes of these resolutions, any or all of which may relate to all or to substantially all of the Borrower's property and assets;
(C) The Authorized Officers may designate additional or alternate individuals as being authorized to request loan advances, to do and perform such other acts and things, to pay any and all fees and costs, to use electronic records and signatures to execute, receive, present, deliver, and/or submit any of the Loan Documents (including one or more renewals, extensions, modifications, refinancings, consolidations, or substitutions therefor), and to execute, submit, and/or deliver such other documents, statements, reports, and agreements as he or she may in his or her discretion deem reasonably necessary or proper to carry into effect the provisions of these resolutions.
(D) Any and all acts authorized pursuant to these resolutions and performed prior to the passage of these resolutions are hereby ratified and approved, and the authority conferred herein may be exercised singly by any such officer, and these resolutions shall continue in full force and effect until written notice of modification or revocation is received and accepted by Bank (such notice to have no effect on any action previously taken by the Bank in reliance on these resolutions). Bank may rely upon any form of notice, which it in good faith believes to be genuine or what it purports to be.
The resolutions are in full force and effect as of the date set forth below and are intended to replace, as of this date, any resolutions previously given by the Borrower to Bank in connection with the matters described herein; these resolutions and any borrowings or financial accommodations under these resolutions have been properly noted in the corporate books and records, and have not been rescinded, revoked or modified; neither the foregoing resolutions nor any actions to be taken pursuant to them are or will be in contravention of any provision of the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Borrower or of any agreement, indenture or other instrument to which the Borrower is a party or by which it is bound; and to the extent the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Borrower or any agreement, indenture or other instrument to which the Borrower is a party or by which it is bound require the vote or consent of shareholders of the Borrower to authorize any act, matter or thing described in the foregoing resolutions, such vote or consent has been obtained.
The officers, employees, and agents named above are duly elected, appointed, or employed by or for Borrower, as the case may be, occupy the positions set forth opposite their respective names, and the email addresses and cell phone numbers provided for each person set forth opposite their respective names are the true and correct email addresses and cell phone numbers for conducting business on behalf of Borrower.
In Witness Whereof, I, the duly elected and qualified Secretary of Borrower, have affixed my name on December 2, 2022.
Chen Schor, Secretary*
*If the certifying officer is designated as one of the Authorized Officers in Section 1(A) above, this certificate must also be signed by a second officer of Borrower.
Nick Harvey, CFO


text:
<?php

namespace Magento\Framework\Phrase\Test\Unit\Renderer;

class InlineTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
{
    /**
     * @var \Magento\Framework\TranslateInterface|\PHPUnit_Framework_MockObject_MockObject
     */
    protected $translator;

    /**
     * @var \Magento\Framework\Phrase\Renderer\Translate
     */
    protected $renderer;

    /**
     * @var \Magento\Framework\Translate\Inline\ProviderInterface|\PHPUnit_Framework_MockObject_MockObject
     */
    protected $provider;

    /**
     * @var \Psr\Log\LoggerInterface|\PHPUnit_Framework_MockObject_MockObject
     */
    protected $loggerMock;

    protected function setUp()
    {
        $this->translator = $this->getMock('Magento\Framework\TranslateInterface', [], [], '', false);
        $this->provider = $this->getMock('Magento\Framework\Translate\Inline\ProviderInterface', [], [], '', false);
        $this->loggerMock = $this->getMockBuilder('Psr\Log\LoggerInterface')
            ->getMock();

        $this->renderer = new \Magento\Framework\Phrase\Renderer\Inline(
            $this->translator,
            $this->provider,
            $this->loggerMock
        );
    }

    public function testRenderIfInlineTranslationIsAllowed()
    {
        $theme = 'theme';
        $text = 'test';
        $result = sprintf('{{{%s}}{{%s}}}', $text, $theme);

        $this->translator->expects($this->once())
            ->method('getTheme')
            ->will($this->returnValue($theme));

        $inlineTranslate = $this->getMock('Magento\Framework\Translate\InlineInterface', [], [], '', []);
        $inlineTranslate->expects($this->once())
            ->method('isAllowed')
            ->will($this->returnValue(true));

        $this->provider->expects($this->once())
            ->method('get')
            ->will($this->returnValue($inlineTranslate));

        $this->assertEquals($result, $this->renderer->render([$text], []));
    }

    public function testRenderIfInlineTranslationIsNotAllowed()
    {
        $text = 'test';

        $inlineTranslate = $this->getMock('Magento\Framework\Translate\InlineInterface', [], [], '', []);
        $inlineTranslate->expects($this->once())
            ->method('isAllowed')
            ->will($this->returnValue(false));

        $this->provider->expects($this->once())
            ->method('get')
            ->will($this->returnValue($inlineTranslate));

        $this->assertEquals($text, $this->renderer->render([$text], []));
    }

    public function testRenderException()
    {
        $message = 'something went wrong';
        $exception = new \Exception($message);

        $this->provider->expects($this->once())
            ->method('get')
            ->willThrowException($exception);

        $this->setExpectedException('Exception', $message);
        $this->renderer->render(['text'], []);
    }
}