text:
Leaflet (PDF)
Open Access Option (OAO)
All issues Volume 29 / No 2 (April-June 2016) Aquat. Living Resour., 29 2 (2016) 208 References
Symposium of the Association Française d'Halieutique (2015)
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 29, Number 2, April-June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2016022
Ainsworth C.H., Morzaria-Luna H., Kaplan I.C., Levin P.S., Fulton E.A., Cudney-Bueno R., Turk-Boyer P., Torre J., Danemann G.D., Pfister T., 2012, Effective ecosystem-based management must encourage regulatory compliance: A Gulf of California case study. Mar. Policy 36, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar]
Albouy C., Mouillot D., Rocklin D., Culioli J.M., Loch F.L., 2010, Simulation of the combined effects of artisanal and recreational fisheries on a Mediterranean MPA ecosystem using a trophic model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 412, 207–221. [Google Scholar]
Allen J.I., Fulton E.A., 2010, Top-down, bottom-up or middle-out? Avoiding extraneous detail and over-generality in marine ecosystem models. Prog. Oceanogr. 84, 129–133. [Google Scholar]
Allen J.I., Somerfield P.J., 2009, A multivariate approach to model skill assessment. J. Mar. Syst. 76, 83–94. [Google Scholar]
Apostolaki P., Milner-Gulland E.J., McAllister M.K., Kirkwood G.P., 2002, Modelling the effects of establishing a marine reserve for mobile fish species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 405–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aumann C.A., 2007, A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems. Ecol. Model. 202, 385–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barange M., Merino G., Blanchard J.L., Scholtens J., Harle J., Allison E.H., Allen J.I., Holt J., Jennings S., 2014, Impacts of climate change on marine ecosystem production in societies dependent on fisheries. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 211–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bartelings H., Hamon K.G., Berkenhagen J., Buisman F.C., 2015, Bio-economic modelling for marine spatial planning application in North Sea shrimp and flatfish fisheries. Environ. Model. Softw. 74, 156–172. [Google Scholar]
Bastardie F., Nielsen J.R., Andersen B.S., Eigaard O.R., 2010, Effects of fishing effort allocation scenarios on energy efficiency and profitability: An individual-based model applied to Danish fisheries. Fish. Res. 106, 501–516. [Google Scholar]
Bastardie F., Nielsen J.R., Miethe T., 2013, DISPLACE: a dynamic, individual-based model for spatial fishing planning and effort displacement – integrating underlying fish population models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71, 366–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bastardie F., Nielsen J.R., Eigaard O.R., Fock H.O., Jonsson P., Bartolino V., 2014, Competition for marine space: modelling the Baltic Sea fisheries and effort displacement under spatial restrictions. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. fsu215. [Google Scholar]
Beecham J.A., Bruggeman J., Aldridge J., Mackinson S., 2015, An approach for coupling higher and lower levels in marine ecosystem models and its application to the North Sea. Geosci. Model. Dev. Discuss. 8, 5577–5618. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Booshehrian M., Möller T., Peterman R.M., Munzner T., 2012, Vismon: Facilitating Analysis of Trade-Offs, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity In Fisheries Management Decision Making. Comput. Graph. Forum 31, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar]
Bourdaud P., Gascuel D., Bentorcha A., Brind'Amour A., 2016, New trophic indicators and target values for an ecosystem-based management of fisheries. Ecol. Indic. 61, 588–601. [Google Scholar]
Brander K.M., 2007, Global fish production and climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 19709–19714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Brochier T., Ecoutin J.-M., Tito De Morais L., Kaplan D., Lae R., 2013, A multi-agent ecosystem model for studying changes in a tropical estuarine fish assemblage within a marine protected area. Aquat. Living Resour. 26, 147–158. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bulman C., Condie S.A., Furlani D., Cahill M., Klaer N., Goldsworthy S., Knuckey I., 2006, Trophic dynamics of the eastern shelf and slope of the South East Fishery: impacts of and on the fishery. Hobart: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. [Google Scholar]
Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. (Eds.), 2004, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference. New York, NY, Springer New York. [Google Scholar]
Butterworth D.S., 2007, Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 64, 613−617. [Google Scholar]
Butterworth D.S., Johnston S.J., Brandão A., 2010, Pretesting the Likely Efficacy of Suggested Management Approaches to Data-Poor Fisheries. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2, 131–145. [Google Scholar]
Caroll J., Smit M.G.D., 2011, An Integrated Modeling Framework For Decision Support In Ecosystem-Based Management: Case Study Lofoten/Barents Sea. Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
Charles A.T., 1998, Living with uncertainty in fisheries: analytical methods, management priorities and the Canadian groundfishery experience. Fish. Res. 37, 37–50. [Google Scholar]
Christensen V., Pauly D., 1992, Ecopath-Ii - a Software for Balancing Steady-State Ecosystem Models and Calculating Network Characteristics. Ecol. Model. 61, 169–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Christensen V., Ferdaña Z., Steenbeek J., 2009, Spatial optimization of protected area placement incorporating ecological, social and economical criteria. Ecol. Model. 220, 2583–2593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Colleter M., Gascuel D., Ecoutin J.-M., Tito de Morais L., 2012, Modelling trophic flows in ecosystems to assess the efficiency of marine protected area (MPA), a case study on the coast of Senegal. Ecol. Model. 232, 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Colleter M., Valls A., Guitton J., Gascuel D., Pauly D., Christensen V., 2015, Global overview of the applications of the Ecopath with Ecosim modeling approach using the EcoBase models repository. Ecol. Model. 302, 42–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Collie J., 2003, Using AMOEBAs to display multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 709–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Collie J.S., Botsford L.W., Hastings A., Kaplan J.L., Largier J.L., Linvingston P.A., Plaganyi E.E., Rose K.A., Wells B., Werner F.E., 2016, Ecosystem models for fisheries management: finding the sweet spot. Fish Fish. 17, 101–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Coll M., Shannon L.J., Kleisner K.M., Juan-Jordá M.J., Bundy A., Akoglu A.G., Banaru D., Boldt J.L., Borges M.F., Cook A., Diallo I., Fu C., Fox C., Gascuel D., Gurney L.J., Hattab T., Heymans J.J., Jouffre D., Knight B.R., Kucukavsar S., Large S.I., Lynam C., Machias A., Marshall K.N., Masski H., Ojaveer H., Piroddi C., Tam J., Thiao D., Thiaw M., Torres M.A., Travers-Trolet M., Tsagarakis K., Tuck I., van der Meeren G.I., Yemane D., Zador S.G., Shin Y.-J., 2016, Ecological indicators to capture the effects of fishing on biodiversity and conservation status of marine ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 60, 947–962. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Costanza R., Sklar F., 1985, Articulation, Accuracy and Effectiveness of Mathematical-Models - a Review of Fresh-Water Wetland Applications. Ecol. Model. 27, 45–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cury P.M., Shin Y.-J., Planque B., Durant J.M., Fromentin J.-M., Kramer-Schadt S., Stenseth N.C., Travers M., Grimm V., 2008, Ecosystem oceanography for global change in fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 338–346. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Daan N., 1987, Multispecies Versus Single-Species Assessment of North-Sea Fish Stocks. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 360–370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D'Agostini A., Gherardi D.F.M., Pezzi L.P., 2015, Connectivity of Marine Protected Areas and Its Relation with Total Kinetic Energy. PLoS One 10, e0139601. [Google Scholar]
Dambacher J.M., Rothlisberg P.C., Loneragan N.R., 2015, Qualitative mathematical models to support ecosystem-based management of Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery. Ecol. Appl. 25, 278–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dankel D.J., Aps R., Padda G., Rockmann C., van der Sluijs J.P., Wilson D.C., Degnbol P., 2012, Advice under uncertainty in the marine system. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 69, 3–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
de Reynier Y.L., Levin P.S., Shoji N.L., 2010, Bringing stakeholders, scientists, and managers together through an integrated ecosystem assessment process. Mar. Policy 34, 534–540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dickey-Collas M., 2014, Why the complex nature of integrated ecosystem assessments requires a flexible and adaptive approach. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1174–1182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dickey-Collas M., Payne M.R., Trenkel V.M., Nash R.D.M., 2014, Hazard warning: model misuse ahead. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. fst215. [Google Scholar]
EC, 2008a, Directive 2008/56/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) (No. Off. J. Eur. Union 22). [Google Scholar]
EC, 2008b, Council Regulation (EC) No. 199/2008 of 25 February 2008 concerning the establishment of a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy (No. Official Journal of the European Union, L60/1). [Google Scholar]
England P.R., Condie S., Feng M., Slawinski D., 2009, Modelling connectivity for resilient protected area design among areas for further assessment identified by DEWHA for the development of a Commonwealth MPA Network in the South-west Marine Region. Australia, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. [Google Scholar]
EU, 2013, Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy (No. Official Journal of the European Union). Official Journal of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
EU, 2014, Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. [Google Scholar]
Faivre R., Ioos B., Mahévas S., Makowski D., Monod H., 2013, Analyse de sensibilité et exploration de modèles. Application aux sciences de la nature et de l'environnement. Quae, Robert Faivre, Bertrand Iooss, Stéphanie Mahévas, David Makowski, Hervé Monod. [Google Scholar]
FAO, 2003, The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 4, Suppl. 2. Rome, FAO. 2003. 112 p. [Google Scholar]
FAO, 2008, Fisheries management. 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. 2.1 Best practices in ecosystem modelling for informing an ecosystem approach to fisheries. No. 4, Suppl. 2, Add. 1; Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. [Google Scholar]
Fay G., Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., 2011, Impacts of spatial uncertainty on performance of age structure-based harvest strategies for blue eye trevalla (Hyperoglyphe antarctica). Fish. Res. 110, 391–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fluharty D., 2011, Decision-Making and Action Taking: Fisheries Management in a Changing Climate (No. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 36). OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Fock H.O., Kloppmann M., Stelzenmüller V., 2011, Linking marine fisheries to environmental objectives: a case study on seafloor integrity under European maritime policies. Environ. Sci. Policy 14, 289–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Forrest R.E., Savina M., Fulton E.A., Pitcher T.J., 2015, Do marine ecosystem models give consistent policy evaluations? A comparison of Atlantis and Ecosim. Fish. Res. 167, 293–312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Francis R., Shotton R., 1997, "Risk" in fisheries management: a review. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1699–1715. [Google Scholar]
Friedrichs M.A.M., Dusenberry J.A., Anderson L.A., Armstrong R.A., Chai F., Christian J.R., Doney S.C., Dunne J., Fujii M., Hood R., McGillicuddy D.J., Moore J.K., Schartau M., Spitz Y.H., Wiggert J.D., 2007, Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models: Role of multiple planktonic groups. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 112, C08001. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., 2010, Approaches to end-to-end ecosystem models. J. Mar. Syst. 81, 171–183. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., 2011, Interesting times: winners, losers, and system shifts under climate change around Australia. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 68, 1329–1342. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., 2004, Lessons learnt from a comparison of three ecosystem models for Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 26, 219–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Punt A.E., 2004, Ecological indicators of the ecosystem effects of fishing: Final Report. (Report No. R99/1546). Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Punt A.E., 2005, Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing? Ices J. Mar. Sci. 62, 540–551. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Smith D.C., 2007, Alternative Management Strategies for Southeast Australian Commonwealth Fisheries: Stage 2: Quantitative Management Strategy Evaluation. Australian Fisheries Management Authority Report, ISBN-978-1-921232-86-2. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Smith D.C., van Putten I.E., 2011, Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish. 12, 2–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Johnson P., Gorton R., 2012, SE Fisheries and Climate Simulations: Barriers to Adaptation. 2010/023 - Quantitative testing of fisheries management arrangements under climate change using Atlantis, Appendix 3, Australia, CSIRO. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E., Jones T., Boschetti F., Chapman K., Little R., Syme G., Dzidic P., Gorton R., Sporcic M., Mare W. de la, 2013, Assessing the Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Management Strategy Evaluation. Int. J. Eco. Manag. Eng. (IJEME). 3, 83–99. [Google Scholar]
Fulton E.A., Bax N.J., Bustamante R.H., Dambacher J.M., Dichmont C., Dunstan P.K., Hayes K.R., Hobday A.J., Pitcher R., Plagányi É.E., Punt A.E., Savina-Rolland M., Smith A.D.M., Smith D.C., 2015, Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles. Phil. Trans. R Soc. B 370, 20140278. [Google Scholar]
Gaichas S.K., Aydin K.Y., Francis R.C., 2010, Using food web model results to inform stock assessment estimates of mortality and production for ecosystem-based fisheries management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67, 1490–1506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Garcia D., Urtizberea A., Diez G., Gil J., Marchal P., 2013, Bio-economic management strategy evaluation of deepwater stocks using the FLBEIA model. Aquat. Living Resour. 26, 365–U3382. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Gårdmark A., Lindegren M., Neuenfeldt S., Blenckner T., Heikinheimo O., Müller-Karulis B., Niiranen S., Tomczak M.T., Aro E., Wikström A., Möllmann C., 2012, Biological ensemble modeling to evaluate potential futures of living marine resources. Ecol. Appl. 23, 742–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gewin V., 2004, Troubled Waters: The Future of Global Fisheries. PLoS Biol. 2, e113. [Google Scholar]
Girardin R., 2015, Ecosystem and fishers' behaviour modelling: two crucial and interacting approaches to support Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management in the Eastern English Channel, Université Lille 1. [Google Scholar]
Girardin R., Vermard Y., Thebaud O., Tidd A., Marchal P., 2015, Predicting fisher response to competition for space and resources in a mixed demersal fishery. Ocean Coast. Manag. 106, 124–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gray R., Fulton E.A., Little L.R., Scott R., 2006, Ecosystem model specification within an agent based framework. Hobart, CSIRO. [Google Scholar]
Greenstreet S.P.R., Fraser H.M., Piet G.J., 2009, Using MPAs to address regional-scale ecological objectives in the North Sea: modelling the effects of fishing effort displacement. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 66, 90–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gribble N.A., 2003, GBR-prawn: modelling ecosystem impacts of changes in fisheries management of the commercial prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery in the far northern Great Barrier Reef. Fish. Res. 65, 493–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Grimm V., Revilla E., Berger U., Jeltsch F., Mooij W.M., Railsback S.F., Thulke H.-H., Weiner J., Wiegand T., DeAngelis D.L., 2005, Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology. Science 310, 987–991. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Grimm V., Ashauer R., Forbes V., Hommen U., Preuss T.G., Schmidt A., van den Brink P.J., Wogram J., Thorbek P., 2009, CREAM: a European project on mechanistic effect models for ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16, 614–617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Guénette S., Meissa B., Gascuel D., 2014, Assessing the Contribution of Marine Protected Areas to the Trophic Functioning of Ecosystems: A Model for the Banc d'Arguin and the Mauritanian Shelf. PLoS One 9, e94742. [Google Scholar]
Guillen J., Macher C., Merzereaud M., Bertignac M., Fifas S., Guyader O., 2013, Estimating MSY and MEY in multi-species and multi-fleet fisheries, consequences and limits: an application to the Bay of Biscay mixed fishery. Mar. Policy 40, 64–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Haddeland I., Clark D.B., Franssen W., Ludwig F., Voß F., Arnell N.W., Bertrand N., Best M., Folwell S., Gerten D., Gomes S., Gosling S.N., Hagemann S., Hanasaki N., Harding R., Heinke J., Kabat P., Koirala S., Oki T., Polcher J., Stacke T., Viterbo P., Weedon G.P., Yeh P., 2011, Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results. J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 869–884. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hall S.J., 1998, Closed areas for fisheries management – the case consolidates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 297–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hamilton S.H., ElSawah S., Guillaume J.H.A., Jakeman A.J., Pierce S.A., 2015, Integrated assessment and modelling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions. Environ. Model. Softw. 64, 215−229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hannah C., Vezina A., St John M., 2010, The case for marine ecosystem models of intermediate complexity. Prog. Oceanogr. 84, 121−128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Harwood J., Stokes K., 2003, Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 617–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Haynie A.C., Pfeiffer L., 2012, Why economics matters for understanding the effects of climate change on fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. fss021. [Google Scholar]
Hill S.L., Watters G.M., Punt A.E., McAllister M.K., Le Quere C., Turner J., 2007, Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries. Fish Fish. 8, 315–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hobday A.J., 2010, Ensemble analysis of the future distribution of large pelagic fishes off Australia. Prog. Oceanogr. 86, 291–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Holland D.S., 2000, A bioeconomic model of marine sanctuaries on Georges Bank. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1307–1319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hollowed A.B., Bax N., Beamish R., Collie J., Fogarty M., Livingston P., Pope J., Rice J.C., 2000, Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? Ices J. Mar. Sci. 57, 707–719. [Google Scholar]
Hughes T.P., Linares C., Dakos V., van de Leemput I.A., van Nes E.H., 2013, Living dangerously on borrowed time during slow, unrecognized regime shifts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 149–155. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hyder K., Rossberg A.G., Allen J.I., Austen M.C., Barciela R.M., Bannister H.J., Blackwell P.G., Blanchard J.L., Burrows M.T., Defriez E., Dorrington T., Edwards K.P., Garcia-Carreras B., Heath M.R., Hembury D.J., Heymans J.J., Holt J., Houle J.E., Jennings S., Mackinson S., Malcolm S.J., McPike R., Mee L., Mills D.K., Montgomery C., Pearson D., Pinnegar J.K., Pollicino M., Popova E.E., Rae L., Rogers S.I., Speirs D., Spence M.A., Thorpe R., Turner R.K., van der Molen J., Yool A., Paterson D.M., 2015, Making modelling count - increasing the contribution of shelf-seas community and ecosystem models to policy development and management. Mar. Policy 61, 291–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2013a, Report of the Workshop on Benchmarking Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (WKBEMIA) (No. ICES CM 2012/SSGRSP:08). 27–29 November 2012, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2013b, North Sea: multispecies considerations for the North Sea stocks (No. ICES Advice June 2013, Book 6, Sect. 6.3.1). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2014, Interim Report of the Working Group on Multispecies Assessment Meth-ods (WGSAM) (No. ICES CM 2014/SSGSUE:11). 20–24 October 2014, London, UK. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2015a, First Interim Report of the Working Group on Integrating Ecological and Economic Models (WGIMM) (No. ICES CM 2015/SSGIEA:05). 11 - 12 May 2015, Via WebEx conference call. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2015b, ICES 2015. Report of the Working Group on the assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak (WGNSSK) (No. ICES CM 2015/ACOM?:13)., 28 April-7 May 2015, ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2015c, Report of the Fifth Workshop on the Development of Quantitative Assessment Methodologies based on Life-history Traits, Exploitation Characteristics and other Relevant Parameters for Data-limited Stocks (WKLIFE V), 5–9 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. ICES CM 2015/ACOM:56. 157pp. [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2015d, Report of the Working Group on Mixed Fisheries Methods WGMIXFISH -METH) (No. ICES CM 2014/ACOM). [Google Scholar]
ICES, 2015e, Report of the Working Group on Mixed Fisheries Methods (WGMIXFISH-METH) (No. ICES CM 2015/ACOM). 5-9 October 2014, DTU-Aqua, Charlottenlund, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
Issaris Y., Katsanevakis S., Pantazi M., Vassilopoulou V., Panayotidis P., Kavadas S., Kokkali A., Salomidi M., Frantzis A., Panou A., Damalas D., Klaoudatos D., Sakellariou D., Drakopoulou V., Kyriakidou C., Maina I., Fric J., Smith C., Giakoumi S., Karris G., 2012, Ecological mapping and data quality assessment for the needs of ecosystem-based marine spatial management: case study Greek Ionian Sea and the adjacent gulfs. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 13, 297–311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Johnson K.F., Monnahan C.C., McGilliard C.R., Vert-pre K.A., Anderson S.C., Cunningham C.J., Hurtado-Ferro F., Licandeo R.R., Muradian M.L., Ono K., Szuwalski C.S., Valero J.L., Whitten A.R., Punt A.E., 2015, Time-varying natural mortality in fisheries stock assessment models: identifying a default approach. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 72, 137–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Joint Research Centre, 2014, Towards an integrated water modelling toolbox. Deliverable 9.1. Report on contribution to a scoping study on available modelling tools, strategy on modelling and Model toolbox including potential use of FATE in the toolbox. [Google Scholar]
Jolliff J.K., Kindle J.C., Shulman I., Penta B., Friedrichs M.A.M., Helber R., Arnone R.A., 2009, Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment. J. Mar. Syst. 76, 64–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kaplan I.C., Marshall K.N., 2016, A guinea pig's tale: learning to review end-to-end marine ecosystem models for management applications. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73, 1715–1724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kaplan I.C., Levin P.S., Burden M., Fulton E.A., 2010, Fishing catch shares in the face of global change: a framework for integrating cumulative impacts and single species management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67, 1968–1982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kaplan I.C., Horne P.J., Levin P.S., 2012, Screening California Current fishery management scenarios using the Atlantis end-to-end ecosystem model. Prog. Oceanogr. 102, 5–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kell L.T., Mosqueira I., Grosjean P., Fromentin J.-M., Garcia D., Hillary R., Jardim E., Mardle S., Pastoors M.A., Poos J.J., Scott F., Scott R.D., 2007, FLR: an open-source framework for the evaluation and development of management strategies. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 64, 640–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kleijnen J.P.C., Sanchez S.M., Lucas T.W., Cioppa T.M., 2005, State-of-the-Art Review: A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments. Inf. J. Comput. 17, 263–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kraak S.B.M., Kelly C.J., Codling E.A., Rogan E., 2010, On scientists' discomfort in fisheries advisory science: the example of simulation-based fisheries management-strategy evaluations: Scientists' discomfort with fisheries MSE. Fish Fish. 11, 119−132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kraus G., Pelletier D., Dubreuil J., Mollmann C., Hinrichsen H.-H., Bastardie F., Vermard Y., Mahevas S., 2008, A model-based evaluation of Marine Protected Areas: the example of eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias L.). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 109–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Largouet C., Cordier M.-O., Bozec Y.-M., Zhao Y., Fontenelle G., 2012, Use of timed automata and model-checking to explore scenarios on ecosystem models. Environ. Model. Softw. 30, 123−138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Larkin P.A., 1977, An Epitaph for the Concept of Maximum Sustained Yield. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106, 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lefort S., Aumont O., Bopp L., Arsouze T., Gehlen M., Maury O., 2015, Spatial and body-size dependent response of marine pelagic communities to projected global climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 154–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lehodey P., Alheit J., Barange M., Baumgartner T., Beaugrand G., Drinkwater K., Fromentin J.-M., Hare S.R., Ottersen G., Perry R.I., Roy C., van der Lingen C.D., Werner F., 2006, Climate Variability, Fish, and Fisheries. J. Clim. 19, 5009–5030. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lehuta S., Mahévas S., Petitgas P., Pelletier D., 2010, Combining sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to evaluate the impact of management measures with ISIS–Fish: marine protected areas for the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 67, 1063–1075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lehuta S., Mahevas S., Le Floc'h P., Petitgas P., 2013a, A simulation-based approach to assess sensitivity and robustness of fisheries management indicators for the pelagic fishery in the Bay of Biscay. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70, 1741–1756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lehuta S., Petitgas P., Mahévas S., Huret M., Vermard Y., Uriarte A., Record N.R., 2013b, Selection and validation of a complex fishery model using an uncertainty hierarchy. Fish. Res. 143, 57−66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lehuta S., Vermard Y., Marchal, Paul, 2015, A spatial model of the mixed demersal fisheries in the Eastern Channel. In: Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of Socio-Ecosystems. Proc. 15th French-Japan. Oceanogr. Symposium. Presented at the 15th French-Japan. Oceanogr. Symposium, edited by H.-J. Ceccaldi et al., pp. 187–195. [Google Scholar]
Leslie H., Sievanen L., Crawford T.G., Gruby R., Villanueva-Aznar H.C., Campbell L.M., 2015, Learning from Ecosystem-Based Management in Practice. Coast. Manag. 43, 471–497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lester S., Halpern B., Grorud-Colvert K., Lubchenco J., Ruttenberg B., Gaines S., Airamé S., Warner R., 2009, Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 384, 33–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Levin P.S., Fogarty M.J., Murawski S.A., Fluharty D., 2009, Integrated Ecosystem Assessments: Developing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem-Based Management of the Ocean. PLoS Biol 7, e1000014. [Google Scholar]
Levin P.S., Kelble C.R., Shuford R.L., Ainsworth C., de Reynier Y., Dunsmore R., Fogarty M.J., Holsman K., Howell E.A., Monaco M.E., Oakes S.A., Werner F., 2014, Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: a US perspective. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 71, 1198–1204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Levin P.S., Williams G.D., Rehr A., Norman K.C., Harvey C.J., 2015, Developing conservation targets in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 20, 6. [Google Scholar]
Lewy P., Vinther M., 2004, A stochastic age-length-structured multispecies model applied to North Sea stocks (No. ICES CM 2004 / FF: 20). [Google Scholar]
Libralato S., Coll M., Tempesta M., Santojanni A., Spoto M., Palomera I., Arneri E., Solidoro C., 2010, Food-web traits of protected and exploited areas of the Adriatic Sea. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2182–2194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Link J.S., Ihde T.F., Townsend H.M., Osgood K.E., Schirripa M.J., Kobayashi D.R., Gaichas S.K., Field J.C., Levin P.S., Aydin K.Y., others, 2010, Report of the 2nd National Ecosystem Modeling Workshop (NEMoW II): Bridging the Credibility Gap Dealing with Uncertainty in Ecosystem Models. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service. [Google Scholar]
Link J.S., Ihde T.F., Harvey C.J., Gaichas S.K., Field J.C., Brodziak J.K.T., Townsend H.M., Peterman R.M., 2012, Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: The paradox of use for living marine resource management. Prog. Oceanogr. 102, 102–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Livingston P., Aydin K., Boldt J., Ianelli J., Juradomolina J., 2005, A framework for ecosystem impacts assessment using an indicator approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 592–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Longo C., Hornborg S., Bartolino V., Tomczak M., Ciannelli L., Libralato S., Belgrano A., 2015, Role of trophic models and indicators in current marine fisheries management. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 538, 257–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lynch D.R., McGillicuddy D.J., Werner F.E., 2009, Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems. J. Mar. Syst. 76, 1–3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Macher C., Guyader O., Talidec C., Bertignac M., 2008, A cost-benefit analysis of improving trawl selectivity in the case of discards: The Nephrops norvegicus fishery in the Bay of Biscay. Fish. Res. 92, 76–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mackinson S., 2014, Combined analyses reveal environmentally driven changes in the North Sea ecosystem and raise questions regarding what makes an ecosystem model's performance credible? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71, 31–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mackinson S., Blanchard J.L., Pinnegar J.K., Scott R., 2003, Consequences of Alternative Functional Response Formulations in Models Exploring Whale-Fishery Interactions. Mar. Mammal Sci. 19, 661–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mahévas S., Méhault S., Bertignac M., 2012, Consequences of change in selectivity versus the establishment Marine Protected Areas on the hake–nephrops fishery in the Bay of Biscay. Presented at the ICES Annual Science Conference. [Google Scholar]
Marchal P., Vermard Y., 2013, Evaluating deepwater fisheries management strategies using a mixed-fisheries and spatially explicit modelling framework. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 70, 768–781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marchal P., Little L.R., Thébaud O., 2011, Quota allocation in mixed fisheries: a bioeconomic modelling approach applied to the Channel flatfish fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 68, 1580–1591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marzloff M.P., Johnson C.R., Little L.R., Soulié J.-C., Ling S.D., Frusher S.D., 2013, Sensitivity analysis and pattern-oriented validation of TRITON, a model with alternative community states: Insights on temperate rocky reefs dynamics. Ecol. Model. 258, 16–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marzloff M.P., Little L.R., Johnson C.R., 2016, Building Resilience Against Climate-Driven Shifts in a Temperate Reef System: Staying Away from Context-Dependent Ecological Thresholds. Ecosystems 19, 1–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maury O., Gascuel D., 1999, SHADYS ("simulateur halieutique de dynamiques spatiales"), a GIS based numerical model of fisheries. Example application: The study of a marine protected area. Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
Meier H.E.M., Andersson H.C., Arheimer B., Donnelly C., Eilola K., Gustafsson B.G., Kotwicki L., Neset T.-S., Niiranen S., Piwowarczyk J., Savchuk O.P., Schenk F., Wêsławski J.M., Zorita E., 2014, Ensemble Modeling of the Baltic Sea Ecosystem to Provide Scenarios for Management. AMBIO 43, 37–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Melbourne-Thomas J., Johnson C.R., Perez P., Eustache J., Fulton E.A., Cleland D., 2011, Coupling Biophysical and Socioeconomic Models for Coral Reef Systems in Quintana Roo, Mexican Caribbean. Ecol. Soc. 16, 23. [Google Scholar]
Melbourne-Thomas J., Constable A., Wotherspoon S., Raymond B., 2013, Testing Paradigms of Ecosystem Change under Climate Warming in Antarctica. Plos One 8, e55093. [Google Scholar]
Metcalfe K., Vaz S., Engelhard G.H., Villanueva M.C., Smith R.J., Mackinson S., 2015, Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritization software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 665–674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mohaghegh S.D., 2014, Production Management Decision Analysis Using AI-Based Proxy Modeling of Reservoir Simulations. A Look-Back Case Study. Presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27−29 October. [Google Scholar]
Morzaria-Luna H.N., Ainsworth C.H., Kaplan I.C., Levin P.S., Fulton E.A., 2012, Exploring Trade-Offs between Fisheries and Conservation of the Vaquita Porpoise (Phocoena sinus) Using an Atlantis Ecosystem Model. PLoS ONE 7, e42917. [Google Scholar]
NMFS 2014, Atlantis Model for the California Current: Report of Methodology Review Panel Meeting. 30 June–2 July 2014, Seattle, Washington, NMFS-NWFSC. [Google Scholar]
NPFMC 2006, Draft Report of the Scientific and Statistical Committee to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council. [Google Scholar]
Oreskes N., Shraderfrechette K., Belitz K., 1994, Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical-Models in the Earth-Sciences. Science 263, 641–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pastoors M.A., Poos J.J., Kraak S.B.M., Machiels M.A.M., 2007, Validating management simulation models and implications for communicating results to stakeholders. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 64, 818–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Peck S.L., 2004, Simulation as experiment: a philosophical reassessment for biological modeling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 530–534. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pelletier D., Mahevas S., 2005, Spatially explicit fisheries simulation models for policy evaluation. Fish Fish. 6, 307–349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pelletier D., Claudet J., Ferraris J., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Garcìa-Charton J.A., 2008, Models and indicators for assessing conservation and fisheries-related effects of marine protected areas. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 765–779. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pelletier D., Mahevas S., drouineau H.,Vermard Y., Thebaud O., Guyader O., Poussind B., 2009, Evaluation of the bioeconomic sustainability of multi-species multi-fleet fisheries under a wide range of policy options using ISIS-Fish. Ecol. Model. 220, 1013–1033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perry A.L., 2005, Climate Change and Distribution Shifts in Marine Fishes. Science 308, 1912–1915. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pinnegar J.K., Hufnagl M., Sinerchia M., Palacz A.P., Girardin R., Travers-Trolet M., Fulton E.A., Gorton R., 2014, Holistic framework(s) for assessing multiple drivers. Deliverable No. 5.1.3 of the FP7 project VECTORS No. 266445. [Google Scholar]
Pinsky M.L., Fogarty M., 2012, Lagged social-ecological responses to climate and range shifts in fisheries. Clim. Change 115, 883–891. [Google Scholar]
Piroddi C., Teixeira H., Lynam C.P., Smith C., Alvarez M.C., Mazik K., Andonegi E., Churilova T., Tedesco L., Chifflet M., Chust G., Galparsoro I., Garcia A.C., Kämäri M., Kryvenko O., Lassalle G., Neville S., Niquil N., Papadopoulou N., Rossberg A.G., Suslin V., Uyarra M.C., 2015, Using ecological models to assess ecosystem status in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Ecol. Indic. 58, 175–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Plagányi E.E., 2007, Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries (No. 447). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. [Google Scholar]
Plagányi E.E., Bell J.D., Bustamante R.H., Dambacher J.M., Dennis D.M., Dichmont C.M., Dutra L.X.C., Fulton E.A., Hobday A.J., Ingrid van Putten E., Smith F., Smith A.D.M., Zhou S., 2011, Modelling climate-change effects on Australian and Pacific aquatic ecosystems: a review of analytical tools and management implications. Mar. Freshw. Res. 62, 1132–1147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Plagányi E.E., Punt A.E., Hillary R., Morello E.B., Thebaud O., Hutton T., Pillans R.D., Thorson J.T., Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Smith F., Bayliss P., Haywood M., Lyne V., Rothlisberg P.C., 2014, Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity. Fish Fish. 15, 1–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Planque B., 2015, Projecting the future state of marine ecosystems, "la grande illusion"? ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. fsv155. [Google Scholar]
Poos J.J., Machiels M.A.M., Pastoors M.A., 2006, Investigation of some Management Scenarios for North Sea Sole and Plaice in 2006 and beyond (No. Wageningen-IMARES: CVO Report, 06.004). IJmuiden, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
Prato G., Gascuel D., Valls A., Francour P., 2014, Balancing complexity and feasibility in Mediterranean coastal food-web models: uncertainty and constraints. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 512, 71–88. [Google Scholar]
Prellezo R., Accadia P., Andersen J.L., Andersen B.S., Buisman E., Little A., Nielsen J.R., Poos J.J., Powell J., Rockmann C., 2012, A review of EU bio-economic models for fisheries: The value of a diversity of models. Mar. Policy 36, 423–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pretzsch H., 2007, Analysing and modelling forest stand dynamics for practical application - an European review and perspective. Eurasian J. For. Resour. 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., Cui G., 2001, Review of progress in the introduction of management strategy evaluation (MSE) approaches in Australia's South East Fishery. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52, 719. [Google Scholar]
Qiu W., Jones P.J.S., 2013, The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Mar. Policy 39, 182–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Reecht Y., Gasche L., Lehuta S., Vaz S., Smith R., Mahévas S., Marchal P., 2015, Toward a Dynamical Approach for Systematic Conservation Planning of Eastern English Channel Fisheries. In: Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of Socio-ecosystemsProceedings of the 15th French-Japanese Oceanography Symposium. Ceccaldi, H.J., Hénocque, Y., Koike, Y., Komatsu, T., Stora, G., Tusseau-Vuillemin, M.-H. (Eds.), pp. 175–185. [Google Scholar]
Reum J.C.P., McDonald P.S., Ferriss B.E., Farrell D.M., Harvey C.J., Levin P.S., 2015, Qualitative network models in support of ecosystem approaches to bivalve aquaculture. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 72, 2278–2288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Roberts C.M., 2002, Marine Biodiversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities for Tropical Reefs. Science 295, 1280–1284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rochet M.-J., Rice J.C., 2009, Simulation-based management strategy evaluation: ignorance disguised as mathematics? ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. 66, 754–762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rochet M.-J., Trenkel V.M., 2003, Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60, 86–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rochette S., Lobry J., Lepage M., Boët P., 2009, Dealing with uncertainty in qualitative models with a semi-quantitative approach based on simulations. Application to the Gironde estuarine food web (France). Ecol. Model. 220, 122–132. [Google Scholar]
Romagnoni G., Mackinson S., Hong J., Eikeset A.M., 2015, The Ecospace model applied to the North Sea: Evaluating spatial predictions with fish biomass and fishing effort data. Ecol. Model. 300, 50–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rosa R., Carvalho A.R., Angelini R., 2014, Integrating fishermen knowledge and scientific analysis to assess changes in fish diversity and food web structure. Ocean Coast. Manag. 102, 258–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rose K.A., 2012, End-to-end models for marine ecosystems: Are we on the precipice of a significant advance or just putting lipstick on a pig? Sci. Mar. 76, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
Rose K.A., Allen J.I., Artioli Y., Barange M., Blackford J., Carlotti F., Cropp R., Daewel U., Edwards K., Flynn K., Hill S.L., HilleRisLambers R., Huse G., Mackinson S., Megrey B., Moll A., Rivkin R., Salihoglu B., Schrum C., Shannon L., Shin Y.-J., Smith S.L., Smith C., Solidoro C., St. John M., Zhou M., 2010, End-To-End Models for the Analysis of Marine Ecosystems: Challenges, Issues, and Next Steps. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2, 115–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rosenzweig C., Jones J.W., Hatfield J.L., Ruane A.C., Boote K.J., Thorburn P., Antle J.M., Nelson G.C., Porter C., Janssen S., Asseng S., Basso B., Ewert F., Wallach D., Baigorria G., Winter J.M., 2013, The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170, 166–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rötter R.P., Carter T.R., Olesen J.E., Porter J.R., 2011, Crop-climate models need an overhaul. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 175–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Salomon A.K., Gaichas S.K., Shears N.T., Smith J.E., Madin E.M.P., Gaines S.D., 2010, Key Features and Context-Dependence of Fishery-Induced Trophic Cascades. Conserv. Biol. 24, 382–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E.M., 2008, Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, Wiley. [Google Scholar]
Sargent R. G., 2007, Verification and validation of simulation models. Presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, S. G. Henderson, B. Biller, M.-H. Hsieh, J. Shortle, J. D. Tew, and R. R. Barton, eds. [Google Scholar]
Savina M., Condie S.A., Fulton E.A., 2013, The Role of Pre-Existing Disturbances in the Effect of Marine Reserves on Coastal Ecosystems: A Modelling Approach. PLoS ONE 8, e61207. [Google Scholar]
Savina M., Lunghi M., Archambault B., Baulier L., Huret M., Le Pape O., 2016, Sole larval supply to coastal nurseries: Interannual variability and connectivity at interregional and interpopulation scales. J. Sea Res. 111, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Scheffer M., Barrett S., Carpenter S.R., Folke C., Green A.J., Holmgren M., Hughes T.P., Kosten S., van de Leemput I.A., Nepstad D.C., van Nes E.H., Peeters E.T.H.M., Walker B., 2015, Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems. Science 347, 1317–1319. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schellnhuber H.J., Frieler K., Kabat P., 2014, The elephant, the blind, and the intersectoral intercomparison of climate impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 3225–3227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schmolke A., Thorbek P., DeAngelis D.L., Grimm V., 2010, Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 479–486. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shin Y.-J., Travers M., Maury O., 2010, Coupling low and high trophic levels models: Towards a pathways-orientated approach for end-to-end models. Prog. Oceanogr. 84, 105–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Simons S.L., Döring R., Temming A., 2014, Modelling the spatio-temporal interplay between North Sea saithe (Pollachius virens) and multiple fleet segments for management evaluation. Aquat. Living Resour. 27, 1–16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Sims S., 1984, An Analysis of the Effect of Errors in the Natural Mortality-Rate on Stock-Size Estimates Using Virtual Population Analysis (cohort Analysis). J. Cons. 41, 149–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Skern-Mauritzen M., Ottersen G., Handegard N.O., Huse G., Dingsør G.E., Stenseth N.C., Kjesbu O.S., 2016, Ecosystem processes are rarely included in tactical fisheries management. Fish Fish. 17, 165–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Smith A., 1999, Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 967–979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Smith M., Fulton E., Day R., Shannon L., Shin Y.-J., 2015, Ecosystem modelling in the southern Benguela: comparisons of Atlantis, Ecopath with Ecosim, and OSMOSE under fishing scenarios. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 37, 65–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K.B., Tignor M., Miller H.L., 2007, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007 (No. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.). [Google Scholar]
Spiegelhalter D., Pearson M., Short I., 2011, Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future. Science 333, 1393–1400. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stafford R., Williams R.L., Herbert R.J.H., 2015, Simple, policy friendly, ecological interaction models from uncertain data and expert opinion. Ocean Coast. Manag. 118, 88–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
STECF, 2015, Evaluation of management plans: Evaluation of the multi-annual plan for the North Sea demersal stocks (No. STECF-15- 04). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, EUR 27232 EN, JRC 95959. [Google Scholar]
STECF-SGMOS, 2010, Development of the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management (EAFM) in European seas (No. SGMOS-10-03 Working Group). [Google Scholar]
Steele J.H., Aydin K., Gifford D.J., Hofmann E.E., 2013, Construction kits or virtual worlds; Management applications of E2E models. J. Mar. Syst. 109, 103–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sterman J. D., 1984, Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. Dynamica 10 part II Winter, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
Stoltz G., 2010, Agrégation séquentielle de prédicteurs?: méthodologie générale et applications à la prévision de la qualité de l'air et à celle de la consommation électrique. J. Société Fr. Stat. 151(2), 66–106. [Google Scholar]
Thébaud O., Doyen L., Innes J., Lample M., Macher C., Mahévas S., Mullon C., Planque B., Quaas M., Smith T., Vermard Y., 2014, Building ecological-economic models and scenarios of marine resource systems: Workshop report. Mar. Policy 43, 382–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Thorpe R.B., Le Quesne W.J.F., Luxford F., Collie J.S., Jennings S., 2015, Evaluation and management implications of uncertainty in a multispecies size-structured model of population and community responses to fishing. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 49–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Townsend H.M., Link J.S., Osgood K.E., Gedamke T., Watters G.M., Polovina J.J., Levin P.S., Cyr N., Aydin K.Y., 2008, Report of the National Ecosystem Modeling Workshop (NEMoW) (No. NMFS-F/SPO- 87). U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO- 87. [Google Scholar]
Travers M., Shin Y.-J., Shannon L., Cury P., 2006, Simulating and testing the sensitivity of ecosystem-based indicators to fishing in the southern Benguela ecosystem. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 943–956. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Travers M., Shin Y.-J., Jennings S., Cury P., 2007, Towards end-to-end models for investigating the effects of climate and fishing in marine ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 75, 751–770. [Google Scholar]
Travers-Trolet M., Shin Y.-J., Field J., 2014a, An end-to-end coupled model ROMS-N 2 P 2 Z 2 D 2 -OSMOSE of the southern Benguela foodweb: parameterisation, calibration and pattern-oriented validation. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 36, 11–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Travers-Trolet M., Shin Y.-J., Shannon L.J., Moloney C.L., Field J.G., 2014b, Combined Fishing and Climate Forcing in the Southern Benguela Upwelling Ecosystem: An End-to-End Modelling Approach Reveals Dampened Effects. PLoS ONE 9, e94286. [Google Scholar]
Trenkel V.M., Rochet M.-J., Mesnil B., 2007, From model-based prescriptive advice to indicator-based interactive advice. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 768–774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tyrrell M.C., Link J.S., Moustahfid H., 2011, The importance of including predation in fish population models: Implications for biological reference points. Fish. Res. 108, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Ulrich C., Reeves S.A., Vermard Y., Holmes S.J., Vanhee W., 2011, Reconciling single-species TACs in the North Sea demersal fisheries using the Fcube mixed-fisheries advice framework. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 68, 1535–1547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Valls A., Gascuel D., Guénette S., Francour P., 2012, Modeling trophic interactions to assess the effects of a marine protected area: case study in the NW Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 456, 201–214. [Google Scholar]
Vinther M., Reeves S.A., Patterson K.R., 2004, From single-species advice to mixed-species management: taking the next step. Ices J. Mar. Sci. 61, 1398–1409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Walters C., 2000, Impacts of dispersal, ecological interactions, and fishing effort dynamics on efficacy of marine protected areas: how large should protected areas be? Bull. Mar. Sci. 66, 745–757. [Google Scholar]
Walters C., Pauly D., Christensen V., 1999, Ecospace: Prediction of Mesoscale Spatial Patterns in Trophic Relationships of Exploited Ecosystems, with Emphasis on the Impacts of Marine Protected Areas. Ecosystems 2, 539–554. [Google Scholar]
Walther Y.M., Möllmann C., 2013, Bringing integrated ecosystem assessments to real life: a scientific framework for ICES. ICES J. Mar. Sci. J. Cons. fst161. [Google Scholar]
Weijerman M., Fulton E.A., Janssen A.B.G., Kuiper J.J., Leemans R., Robson B.J., van de Leemput I.A., Mooij W.M., 2015, How models can support ecosystem-based management of coral reefs. Prog. Oceanogr. 138, 559–570. [Google Scholar]
Wiegand T., Jeltsch F., Hanski I., Grimm V., 2003, Using pattern-oriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application. Oikos 100, 209–222. [Google Scholar]
Worm B., Hilborn R., Baum J.K., Branch T.A., Collie J.S., Costello C., Fogarty M.J., Fulton E.A., Hutchings J.A., Jennings S., Jensen O.P., Lotze H.K., Mace P.M., McClanahan T.R., Minto C., Palumbi S.R., Parma A.M., Ricard D., Rosenberg A.A., Watson R., Zeller D., 2009, Rebuilding Global Fisheries. Science 325, 578–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zitek A., Schmutz S., Preis S., Salles P., Bredeweg B., Muhar S., 2009, Evaluating the potential of qualitative reasoning models to contribute to sustainable catchment management. Ecol. Inform. 4, 381–395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
The need for a protean fisheries science to address the degradation of exploited aquatic ecosystems
Aquat. Living Resour. 29, E201 (2016)
A multidisciplinary approach to the spatial dimension in ecosystem-based fisheries management
Aquat. Living Resour. 2018, 31, 23
Ecosystem-based fisheries management: An Australian perspective
Aquat. Living Resour. 18 (2005) 261-273
Towards an ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM) when trawl surveys provide the main source of information
Using trophic models to assess the impact of fishing in the Bay of Biscay and the Celtic Sea
Aquat. Living Resour. 2017, 30, 7
Aquatic Living Resources
Editors-in-Chief: Pierre Boudry, François Le Loch, Olivier Thébaud and Verena Trenkel - Editorial board
© EDP Sciences / IRD


I am a barrister and holder of a private pilot's licence with night and IMC (Instrument Meteorological Conditions) ratings. I have flown a wider range of types, including complex and retractable SEPs.
I am currently an arbitrator for the ABTA Travel Arbitration Scheme and was previously an adjudicator for the CEDR Aviation Adjudication Scheme.
During my legal training, I researched aviation law, including the Air Navigation Order 2016 and the Rules of the Air Regulations 2016. I have since conducted analysis on Civil Aviation Authority prosecutions.
I can be instructed by pilots and operators direct under the public access scheme, or via a solicitor.
Contact me for a confidential and no obligation discussion about your situation.


text:
UPDATE: Lyle Shelton vs the Discrimination Industry – Round 1
by Dave Pellowe | 13 Aug, 2020 | Opinion
I RECEIVED an email from Brisbane City Council this morning to advise me the ePetition, "Adult entertainment is not suitable for children", was closed.
It garnered 7,127 signatures. Compare this to other BCC petitions closing soon:
228 signatures on "Include walking and cycling facilities in works on Miles Platting Road, Rochedale"
13 signatures on "Build a New Skatepark in the Kenmore Area"
85 signatures on "Upgrade cycling facilities when resurfacing roads"
261 signatures on "Cycle Lanes – 864 – 905 Nudgee Rd, Banyo", and
36 signatures on "Naming of a place in Stringybark Drive Park, Aspley – Kerrie Blencowe Place"
It's very clear there's a significantly higher than usual support amongst the residents and rate payers of Brisbane City Council for this petition, which requests:
"Residents draw to the attention of Council and the Lord Mayor the controversial and divisive practice of hosting drag queen story time in our public libraries. The appropriateness of Drag Queen entertainment for children when a person, usually male, imitates and exaggerates female gender signifiers and gender roles for entertainment purposes, is highly contested and should not be a tax payer funded activity for many reasons, including: 1.The practice is highly offensive to females 2. The sexual nature of drag queen entertainment is inappropriate for children 3. Telling our kids that trans is great is highly controversial. Medical experts warn of the danger of confusing children about their biological gender when the effects of puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and surgery are known to be harmful. The use of our public libraries for such events is a divisive practice rather than inclusive.
Your petitioners therefore request that our public libraries no longer be used for drag queen story times."
The insulting response of Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner's "conservative" LNP, pale Green administration can be read here. It completely fails to address the points of fact asserted by the petition and waffles on endlessly with patronising propaganda. Parents are presumably meant to be comforted that the demeaningly hyper-sexualised caricatures of femininity "hold appropriate Blue Card registration".
That a recent winner in the Adult Entertainment Industry (porn & prostitution) Awards has a Blue Card is entirely irrelevant to parents who may be visiting the library with their young children while he's flaunting his age-inappropriate wares there. The porn industry clearly knows Drag Queens are adult entertainment, but Lord Mayor Schrinner's council administration thinks if you squeeze your eyes really tightly and say "inclusive, inclusive, inclusive," porn stars will suddenly become wholesome role models for promoting early childhood literacy.
Instead of these noxious ideas being relegated from "family-friendly" libraries to seedy strip clubs and other over 18 venues (which would be a win for rate payers, their innocent children & common sense) those criticising the erotic clown show are being punished in the weaponised discrimination industry. Good Sauce contributor Lyle Shelton has been hauled before the Qld "Human Rights" Commission (QHRC) for having the audacity to opine about the commonly observed danger of Drag Queens as role models for young and impressionable children.
Lyle's hearing before the anti-conservative kangaroo court was today. Here is his brave and courageous opening statement to the QHRC, in full:
I believe in our common humanity and that all people from the moment of conception to natural death deserve respect and dignity.
My faith in Jesus Christ, the greatest teacher of all time, teaches me this. My beliefs stem from the Christian teaching that all of us are created in the image and likeness of God.
In fact, Jesus of Nazareth is the only teacher in history who asserts the equality and humanity of all, no matter how vulnerable or how strong we might be at any given time.
I believe all people are equal but not all ideas are equal. Truth exists and error exists.
I do not agree with all peoples' views of what constitutes the good life or what should be preferred in public policy.
In fact, people of good will (and sometimes not so good will) have always differed on such matters. That's why we invented parliaments, that's why we developed ways of debating each other that allow us to distill issues and come to settlements.
Freedom to disagree and argue, even robustly, is the hallmark of a free and open society.
However, I am here today because those who disagree with me are choosing not to debate me. They simply pulled a trigger available to them through laws widely regarded as flawed.
My alleged crime was to be moved by the courageous stand of Wilson Gavin and the young people who peacefully and courageously protested drag queen story time at a Brisbane City Council Library in January of this year.
When video of them calmly but firmly protesting appeared on social media, I recognised at least one of the young people with Wilson as a friend.
"Drag Queens are not for kids" they chanted. There was no yelling or screaming, as some later claimed. One of the protesters advised me last week that they did not even enter the area where children were.
When I first saw the footage, I wished I had known about the protest because I would have joined them.
Sadly, the social media backlash against Wilson and his friends was vitriolic. All manner of gay and left-wing activists, including some high-profile figures, attacked him in the most vicious manner.
Tragically for reasons known only to Wilson himself, he took himself to the Chelmer railway station in Brisbane's inner west the next day and threw himself under an on-coming train.
I joined a number of prominent LNP parliamentarians who attended Wilson's funeral at Clifton on the Darling Downs the next week. It was unspeakably sad.
As a long-time campaigner against gender queer ideology, including the dangerous and harmful idea that gender is fluid, I did some research on the two drag queens that were reading to children that day.
Given that the events at the Brisbane City Council Library were matters of public interest, I decided to write about what I had unearthed from publicly available information about the drag queens because I believe most mainstream parents would be deeply concerned.
Also, as a leader of the campaign to preserve the definition of marriage during the 2017 same-sex marriage plebiscite, I frequently warned that de-gendering marriage would lead to further efforts by LGBTIQA+ political activists to expose children to radical LGBTIQA+ sexual concepts and gender fluid theory.
I was scoffed at by the leaders of the so-called marriage equality campaign whenever I asserted this.
But even I was shocked how quickly after the legalisation of same-sex marriage things like drag queen story time, which seeks to normalise queer theory with children and gender fluid teaching in schools, have become embedded in schools and libraries.
Teaching children that their gender is fluid, against well-established science that it is not, is now compulsory in Queensland State schools and in many other states.
It's no wonder there is a sudden epidemic of children presenting at gender clinics around the nation suffering from confusion about whether or not they were born in the wrong body.
There is also a growing de-transition movement by people who regret doing irreversible things to their bodies as children.
With all this in mind and with the material publicly available on the two drag queens' social media pages, I wrote a blog pointing out the error of exposing children to such role models.
No one sought to debate me. My complainants didn't try and refute me by engaging in intellectual debate.
They went straight to flawed legislation which meant they did not have to do the hard work of thinking through my arguments responding. Why would they when they can pull a legal trigger and seek to cancel me?
Wilson Gavin's opponents didn't debate him either. They sought to cancel him and in doing so they drove him to his death.
In the same way no one is debating me or critiquing my arguments. I am being hounded through an unjust legal process with the aim of cancelling me too.
Good public policy cannot be achieved through bad debate or when one side of a debate is silenced. That's how totalitarian regimes work.
The idea that respectful public comment can be cancelled because it does not constitute the approved view of certain elites or identity groups is antithetical to Australia's "fair go" ethos.
It is also anathema to the precious human right of free speech.
I sought to use my voice, my freedom of speech, to contribute thoughts I believe to be important to the public debate about whether or not sexual libertarianism and gender fluid ideology are harmful or not to children.
Mature people disagree but defend the right of each other to propound ideas which they each find offensive.
Offence taken because of a difference of opinion over public policy and what is appropriate or not for children should never be the basis for a legal action where the only purpose is to muzzle a dissenting point of view.
Debate and argument cannot occur without there being offence. Offence is the price we all pay for living in a free society.
I will make no apology for arguing that drag queens are not for kids. I will make no apology for arguing that advocates of gender queer theory and the so-called adult entertainment industry are dangerous role models for children.
My post was a reasonable articulation of the concerns shared by a great many mainstream Australians. People have the right to consider my arguments and debate them.
They can't do that if they are cancelled.
I consider myself somewhat battle hardened. My office was bombed by an LGBTIQA+ political activist in 2016 causing shock and trauma to me and my staff (as well as $100,000 of damage to our building). After this another same-sex marriage activist by the name of Michael Barnet put my home address on the internet as a way of intimidating me and my family.
I have been falsely and routinely called a bigot and a hater, prominent LGBTIQA+ political activists like Benjamin Law helped get #eatshitlyle trending globally on Twitter and the ABC's Q&A program has unsuccessfully sought to discredit me.
I have never sought to take anyone to a human rights commission or a tribunal.
But still, receiving legal papers from the Queensland Human Rights Commission compelling me to be here today sent a chill down my and my wife's spines.
Two of my children who live overseas Facetimed me immediately concerned about where this process might lead.
We realise as a family we are at the mercy of laws that no longer respect the Western tradition of free debate and argument but which now fall in favour of those who seek not to debate but to demonise.
It would be better if those who seek to use the apparatus of flawed laws to silence me actually engaged my arguments.
They should make the case publicly as to why inducting children into queer theory and adult concepts through queer and porn trade role models is beneficial to children.
In fact, given publicly available evidence, they should argue why putting role models like this before children is not harmful to them.
But none of that happened. A legal trigger was pulled to end the argument.
If I am wrong, tell me why. In public. Don't seek to cancel me.
Sadly, ideas have been met with the law. That is cancel culture's ultimate weapon.
To disagree is not to discriminate or vilify.
There is a public debate in Australia about the harms gender fluid ideology is causing children.
There is a public debate about pornography rightly spurred on by the #metoo movement and the permission structure pornography gives to harmful sexual expressionism.
When entities like the Brisbane City Council make public libraries available for the proponents of gender fluid ideology and the porn trade to influence children, it is only appropriate that this be met with robust public debate and even protest, as brave Wilson and his compatriots did.
I don't understand the complaint against me today. Vilification requires the incitement of hatred, serious contempt and ridicule. I have ridiculed no one. I respect every person, even those who I think have made terrible life choices. I also consider that everything I have said is the Truth. Law shouldn't be used to crush Truth. My comments are not hate-filled, not contemptuous and do not ridicule – quite simply there is no vilification. My prose is civil, my message and tone are serious and deal with serious issues. Even by the standards of this flawed law, today's claim doesn't meet the legal test. There is no vilification. I respectfully ask that it be withdrawn.
I believe I should be compensated for the time and angst this compulsory and flawed process has caused me and my family.
I'd be happy to sit down over coffee and discuss my arguments with you. Better still, we should debate them in public and you should feel free to contest my ideas.
In the meantime your complaint should be withdrawn and we should interact as free and equal citizens instead of with this flawed legal power imbalance.
Rest assured The Good Sauce will keep you up to date with ways you can support Lyle and his battle on all our behalves should the aggressors choose to engage further in lawfare. In the meantime, why not contact your local MP and ask them to make a public statement condemning the political persecution of conservatives through the weaponised discrimination industry, specifically (but only most recently) highlighted through this vexatious complaint.
This content is produced and published without censorship or paywall by the team at The Good Sauce, thanks to the Good Sauce Supporters. If you'd like to be part of the solution by helping us produce more truthful content like this, become a Good Sauce supporter today.
Dave Pellowe is a Christian conservative writer & commentator, editor of The Good Sauce, and convener of the annual Church And State Summit. He believes in natural law & freedoms, objective Truth & justice, personal responsibility & voluntary charity, strong nations & families, free markets & small government. Dave's show, "Pellowe Talk", offers honest insights on important public issues & ideas, as well as informative long-form interviews with experts and insiders. Many of Dave's articles are syndicated across Australia and New Zealand. [more]

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Sawica ist ein polnischer Gewässer- und Ortsname:
 Sawica, bis 1945: Sawitz, als Oberlauf des Flüsschens Saska (Heidbach) Nebenfluss des Omulew (Omulef) in der Woiwodschaft Ermland-Masuren
 Sawica (Szczytno), Ort im Powiat Szczycieński, Woiwodschaft Ermland-Masuren, bis 1938: Sawitzmühle, 1938 bis 1945 Heidmühle, Kreis Ortelsburg, Ostpreußen

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
Home Breaking Quotes of Brent and WTI are growing steadily
Quotes of Brent and WTI are growing steadily
the price of "black gold" standard grades in the course of trading day on Friday continue to rise, and growth accelerated as the recovery after a sharp fall the day before.
By 14:25 GMT, the September futures for North sea petroleum mix of Brent rose by 0.91% to $43,33 per barrel, September futures on West Texas crude fell 0.9 percent to $40,28 per barrel, reports "Finmarket".
Quotes are encouraged by the hopes of traders to the new stimulus by the US authorities after the publication of data on a record reduction of the country's GDP in the II quarter of 2020 (32.9% in annual terms).
As the Director of the Academy of management Finance and investment Arseniy Dadashev, "in a broader perspective the risks of falling prices persist, causing further spread of the coronavirus in the world, which continues to threaten the prospects of recovery in demand, especially in light of the easing of restrictions on OPEC production+, which takes effect tomorrow."
for his part, analyst IK "VELES the Capital" Elena Kozhuhova States that "at the end of the next July futures for Brent oil increased by 4.5% and settled above $ 43, while WTI increased by 2%, having won a $ 40".
the expert indicates that in August, "the oil market will be loosened quota restrictions on production cuts, which, however, needs to be at least partially offset by the stricter discipline of a number of countries". "Anyway, the price is already quite difficult to keep steady growth without significant positive factors, but at the same time, until good reasons for no sales, buyers are also in no hurry to leave the market", — said in the review analyst.
we also Recall that since the beginning of this year on the global oil market rode several waves of falling prices for "black gold". A negative situation was youbeen called a whole complex of factors: a General overproduction of raw materials, a sharp drop in demand due to the rapid spread of coronavirus infection COVID-19 (March 11, was declared a pandemic) and concerns about its impact on the global economy and the collapse of the deal, OPEC+ (officially from April 1, but in fact, after fruitless negotiations of the countries-oil producers at a meeting on March 6 in Vienna).
However, on April 12 OPEC+ agreed on a new deal, joined by 23 States. The agreement will be valid for two years, from may 1, 2020 to may 1, 2022-th. In may—June this year, the production cuts will amount to 9.7 million barrels per day (from October 2018), then — until the end of 2020 — 8 million barrels, and 6 million by the end of April 2022. New business OPEC+ was a forced reaction of oil producing countries on the situation in the market and pressure from the United States. Overall, however, it is not blocked volumes decline in global demand, besides on the market have accumulated huge reserves of raw materials.
At the meeting on June 6, the member countries of OPEC+ extended on a month — until the end of July — the period of validity of the agreement to reduce oil production to 9.7 million barrels per day.
15 July, the meeting of the Ministerial monitoring Committee (JMMC), which is composed of representatives of the countries participating in the agreement OPEC+ coordinated easing from August 1, restrictions on oil production (about 2 million barrels per day) — mined before the imposition of restrictions on the volume will be reduced not by 9.7 million, only 7.7 million barrels per day.
Previous articleIn the settlement Marushkinskoye build a kindergarten
Next articleTrain at the metro station "Polyanka" is not stopped because of a suspicious box


Carbendazim (CAS 10605-21-7 ) Inhibits beta-tubulin synthesis.
acropetally. Acts by inhibiting development of the germ tubes, the formation of appressoria, and the growth of mycelia.
hydrochloride, sold as Eertavas, is marketed as a treatment for Dutch elm disease.


text:
A Treatise on Cosmic Fire - Section Two - Division E - Motion on the Plane of Mind
3. Triangular Linking
Enough has been indicated in this Treatise to show the general plan underlying and accounting for systemic emergence or incarnation, and it is not my purpose here to enlarge at great length. Just as it is not possible for a man in an early incarnation to conceive of the effects of evolution upon him and to realize the nature of the man upon the Path, so it is not possible for even great [1153] systemic existences to conceive (except in the broadest and most general terms) of the nature of the solar Logos, and of the effect evolution will have on Him. Suffice it to add, anent this matter, that when certain vast cosmic alignments have been made and the energy from the logoic causal ovoid on the cosmic mental planes is able to flow unimpeded through to the physical plane atom (our solar system) great eventualities and unconceived of possibilities will then take place.
Certain phenomena likewise of a secondary nature to this major happening will also take place as the cycles slip away which may be generally summarized as follows:
First. Certain systemic triangles will be formed which will permit of the interplay of energy between the different planetary schemes, and thus bring to more rapid maturity the plans and purposes of the Lives concerned. It should be noted here that when we are considering the transmission of energy through alignment and through the forming of certain triangles, it is always in connection with the energy of the first aspect. It deals with the transmission of electric fire. It is important to bear this in mind, as it preserves the analogy between the macrocosm and the microcosm with accuracy.
Second. A final systemic triangle will be formed which will be one of supreme force, for it will be utilized by the abstracted essence and energies of the septenate of schemes as the negative basis for the reception of positive electric energy. This electric energy is able to circulate through the schemes owing to the bringing about of a cosmic alignment. It is the bringing in of this terrific spiritual force during the final stages of manifestation which results in the blazing forth of the seven suns. 23 Though the seven have become the three, this is only in [1154] connection with the dense physical planets. The blazing forth spoken of in the occult books and in the Secret Doctrine is in etheric matter; it is this etheric fiery energy which brings to a consummation (and so destroys) the remaining three major schemes. In this we have a correspondence to the burning of the causal body at the fourth Initiation through the merging of the three fires. It is only a correspondence, and the details must not be pushed too far. The Saturn scheme is esoterically regarded as having absorbed the "frictional fires of systemic space"; Neptune is looked upon as the repository of the "solar flames," and Uranus as the home of "fire electric." When, through extra-systemic activity based upon three causes:
Logoic alignment,
The taking of a logoic Initiation,
The action of the "ONE ABOUT WHOM NAUGHT MAY BE SAID,"
these three schemes are simultaneously stimulated and the fires pass from one to another in a triangular manner, they then too pass into obscuration. Naught is left save the blazing etheric suns and these - through very intensity of burning - dissipate with great rapidity. [1155]
23 The rising and setting of the Sun symbolizes manifestation and obscuration.
- S. D., II, 72.
Pralaya is of different kinds:
Cosmic pralaya - The obscuration of the three suns, or of three solar systems.
Solar pralaya - The obscuration of a system at the end of one hundred years of Brahma. Period between solar systems.
Incidental pralaya - The obscuration of a scheme. Period between manvantaras.
Man repeats this at seventh, fifth initiations and at each rebirth in three worlds.
The Pleiades are the center around which our solar system revolves.
- S. D., II, 251, 581, 582.
The Sun is the kernel and matrix of all in the solar system.
- S. D., I, 309, 310, 590, 591.
Kernel comes from the same word as corn.
Compare the words in Bible:
"Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die it abideth alone, but if it die it bringeth forth much fruit."
The Sun is governed by the same laws as all other atoms. - S. D., I, 168, 667.
Last updated Monday, June 1, 1998 © 1998 Netnews Association. All rights reserved.


It's January first which means one thing to the majority of people: eat better and exercise more. It seems to be the one resolution that brings us together as a society.
To help you get started on the right path this year, check out DailyMile.com. It's a great cyber fitness journal and activity log that allows you to track your workouts, create fitness goals, posts photos and videos, make and share walking or running routes, and meet like-minded people.
DailyMile has a handy events section that lists marathons, 5Ks, and half-marathons so you know what's happening in your area (and you can add activities to your online calendar). There is a robust forum for Q & A, and a variety of groups to join (e.g. running, cycling, triathlon, etc.). You can also invite your friends to join your community so you can compete against one another!
For those of you who want to incorporate more techie features into your DailyMile experience, you can sync your Facebook or Twitter accounts to the site so you can update your activities when you're out and about. There are also some great widgets that allow you to share your training schedules and upcoming races!
So, if your New Year's resolution is to hop on the fitness bandwagon, check out DailyMile. It could be just the thing to keep yourself committed to your healthy, new lifestyle!
Daily Mile is AWESOME I've been on the site since the Summer of last year and it's a great support system plus I'm a big fan of their analytics.
Intresting post regarding fitness website helping ou people!! In todays world health and fitness is surely becoming area of high concern.
JT: Thanks for chiming in. So glad your experience with Daily Mile has been positive!
Fitness Website: Thanks for your comment. Indeed, health and fitness is an important topic.


Have you received a text message or phone call from (01258) 488374? Read the comments below to determine who is calling from this phone number. Please share any additional information by posting a comment below.
The phone number 01258488374 appears to be registered with a phone company. The number is located in Blandford, in The United Kingdom. One person has shared a comment for this number.
Is (01258) 488374 Safe to Answer or a Spam Caller?
Comment: Have you received a phone call, text, or fax from 01258488374? Please leave a comment about it below.
Often telemarketers use similar phone numbers to make their calls so checking phone numbers around (01258) 488374 can help determine who is calling.


text:
Pocan Questions DeVos on Guns in Schools, Invites Her to Tour Low-Performing Voucher Schools in Wisconsin
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today pressed U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos on several issues, including her position on gun violence prevention, her support for school choice programs, and her failure to visit low-performing schools.
Pocan Extends Job Offer to Andrew McCabe
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today extended an offer of employment to Andrew McCabe, the former Deputy Director of the FBI, so that he can reach the needed length of service after President Trump fired him just days before he was set to retire.
Pocan Statement on the Passing of Congresswoman Louise Slaughter
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) released the following statement regarding the passing of Congresswoman Louise Slaughter (NY-25).
Pocan Statement on Supreme Court Holding Oral Arguments for Janus v. AFSCME
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02), a member of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, today released the following statement regarding the U.S. Supreme Court holding oral arguments in the case of Janus v. AFSCME Council 31.
Pocan Statement on Trump's Infrastructure Plan
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today released the following statement regarding the Trump Administration's infrastructure plan, of which only a fraction of funding will come from the federal government.
Pocan Statement on Sensenbrenner's Comments Regarding the State of the Union
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today released the following statement in response to comments made by U.S. Representative Jim Sensenbrenner (WI-05) earlier today.
Pocan Calls on House Intelligence Committee and Trump to Release the Nunes Memo
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today released the following statement after reviewing a memo authored by U.S. Representative Devin Nunes (CA-22). The memo includes allegations of misdeeds at the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
House Rural Broadband Caucus to President: Include Dedicated Broadband Funding in Infrastructure Proposal
As President Trump prepares to unveil his infrastructure proposal, the six bipartisan co-chairs of the House Rural Broadband Caucus today sent a letter to the President, urging him to include dedicated rural broadband connectivity investments in his proposal to Congress.
Pocan Statement on the Trump Shutdown
U.S. Representative Mark Pocan (WI-02) today released the following statement regarding the government shutdown.


text:
Midnight, Texas: Season 1 Episode 9 - Riders on the Storm
The penultimate episode of Midnight, Texas was all about everyone's favourite jumper-wearing witch, Fiji and the demons on a quest to collect the virgin witch.
What was nice with this episode was seeing that Fiji wasn't always like how she is now. As with most teenagers, Fiji went through something of a metamorphosis when she arrived in Midnight, having burnt down her hospital room! This was arguably the biggest secret she had kept from her fellow townsfolk and friends, she had been commited to an institution because of her powers which were beginning to emerge and she was placed into solitary confinement when she was discovered not taking her meds.
This of course all ended badly for the insitution which found itself burnt to the ground when Fiji finally snapped and destroyed every inch of it. She ends up at her aunt's house and the dark-eye-lined and pin-straight haired Fiji is introduced to us through a series of flashbacks to show us how the powerful witch finally learned to hone her powers.
As with most of her fellow Midnighter's, her past is laced with tragedy and it happens to be one of the darkest yet. Fiji finally falls in love with Jeremy, a boy in town and the pair are about to do the deed, her passion leads to his face melting off. Now we know why Fiji has been pushing Bobo away ever since the pair first shared a kiss.
This episode also gives the problems with the demon Kolkenar, who wants Fiji because older virgin witches are more powerful than younger ones and are rarer and much more powerful. He sends the spirit of Jeremy along with a nasty sand storm, filled with demonic wraiths, in order for him to convice her to go to Kolkenar willingly.
But this act sends all the townspeople flying out of Midnight, after Manfred, the Reverend and Joe fail to find the bones of a shaman who could supposidly help them. The gang end up in the Cartoon Saloon, where Fiji is forced to come clean about everything, including her virginity and leaves everyone, stunned.
While she runs away in humilliation, Manfred decides to get his act together and try to do something. This leads Manfred and Fiji to combine their magicial ways and perform a seriously dark spell which requires a blood sacrifice from someone. Of course, the Reverend offers himself up, because of all the people he has killed in the past but is pushed aside by Mr. Snuggles, who is sick and tired of being an old cat.
Of course, I had my doubts, a network television show couldn't kill a cat, not in the gruesome way that was proposed. And I was right, Manfred dies instead, turning blue.
The thought that she has killed Manfred sends Fiji over the edge and she flees into the storm with Jeremy. What she doesn't know is that this is when Manfred wakes up with information on how to kill Kolkenar.
The penultimate episode was a solid one, almost feeling like a series finale of an old television series, I would have been perfectly happy with season 1 ending with Fiji walking off into the sand-storm, almost like Clark Kent rushing into the tornado after Lana at the end of the first season of Smallville. But it is a great set up for the finale...


text:
Street Kids United (out of the competition) / Street Kids United
Tim Pritchard, UK, South Africa, 2010.
Directed by: Tim Pritchard
Producer: Sandy Markwick, Mike Downey, Sam Taylor
Production company: Film and Music Entertainment, Ten10, Elfin Productions
Cinematography: Ad Ahmed, Tim Pritchard
Editing: Anna Ksiezopolska
Music: Crispin Taylor, Isango Ensemble
In 2010, as South Africa geared up for the World Cup, another football tournament was taking place, away from the glare of the media and the attentions of big business. The South African city of Durban played host to the Street Child World Cup bringing together the vulnerable and overlooked � street kids from around the world, in search of a better and brighter future. 'Street Kids United' follows a group of Durban street children as they compete for places in the South African squad. They are all desperate to win a place on the team. It could be the start of a great adventure that offers them a chance to get away from the abusive and violent life they live on the streets and propel them to better things.
Berlin International Film Festival 2011
Tim Pritchard is a documentary film-maker and producer whose films are shown all over the world. His credits include documentaries for Channel 4, BBC, PBS and Discovery Channel. His first book, AMBUSH Alley, is eye-opening account of the most extraordinary battle of the Iraq war. His second book, Street Boys, tells the story of a London street gang. His documentaries include the award-winning series 'Hostage' for Channel 4 and PBS, 'Ross Kemp On Gangs' for Sky One, 'The Force' a documentary series on the RUC for Channel 4, 'Planet Islam', a series looking at religious fundamentalism for the BBC and PBS and 'When Black Became Beautiful', a series charting the rise of black beauty for the BBC.
Location and screening schedule: MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART, Saturday, October 22nd at 18.30
Street Kids United (out of the competition)
The Other Chelsea: A Story from Donetsk
Taliban Behind the Masks
Wood of Value
I�m Still Here: The Lost Years of Joaquin Phoenix
Marija's Own
Land of Knowledge
Barzakh
This Chair Is Not Me
At the Edge of Russia
The Last Day Of Summer (out of competition)
An African Election
Orchestra (out of competition)


VA-7 E/Leesburg Pike via EXIT 66A toward Falls C hurch. Turn left onto Haycock Rd/VA-703. Turnleft onto Falls Reach Dr. Take the 1st right to stay on Falls Reach Dr. 7011 FALLS REAC H DR is onthe right.
I am interested in 7011 Falls Reach Drive UNIT 207, Falls Church, VA 22043.


Additional Information 120/208 VOLT AC 3 PH, 60 HZ, .8 PF.
AUTO START, CIRCUIT BREAKER, BATTERY CHARGER, COOLANT HEATER, SILENCER.
NEW WITH NEW FACTORY WARRANTY, 50KW STAND BY, NATURAL GAS FUELED, SOUND ATTENUATED ENCLOSURE.


text:
Top50Charts
Wizkid Makes Second Appearance On Billboard Hot 100
Tobi Olakolu
The Lion King: "The Gift" album was released on the 19th of July, 2019 by Beyonce. The album featured a lot of African acts like Wizkid, Tiwa Savage, Salitel, Mr. Eazi, Busiswa and many more. Since its release, the reception of the album has been magnificent. One of the songs that were everyone's favorite was "Brown Skin Girl" which features our very own Wizkid.
The song made a debut on the Billboard Hot 100 on the 76th spot this week. This makes it Wizkid's second appearance on the chart as he first appeared on it with Drake's "One Dance" back in 2016.
Furthermore, the track which is off Beyonce's "The Gift album" is the most played song on the album. Also, it is expected to earn a Grammy nomination.
Brown Skin Girl
One Dance
Previous articleEven in the midst of getting snubbed I always knew I was doing more than the award winners- Burna boy
Next articleRAPPER FALZ CALLS OUT SEX-TOY SENATOR ON HIS RECENT AWARD
https://top50charts.com
Top 20 Naija; Simi Still On The No. 1 Spot For The Second Week
Seyi Shay Poses in Tiny Nude Bikini
Meet Future's Baby Mamas to his Seven Children
Top 20 Naija; Simi Still On The No. 1 Spot For...
Joeboy Call Lyrics
Top 5 Simi; Her Best Collaborations
Follow us on Instagram @top50chartsng
The latest news, exclusive charts and key trends across all music genres only on Top50charts.com
Contact us: info@top50charts.com
© Top50Charts.com Team - Designed by SMD
Glaire Ekong - May 22, 2020


text:
The 100 Worst Ed-Tech Debacles of the Decade
The Flipped Classroom". It was probably Sal Khan's 2011 TED Talk "Let's Use Video to Reinvent Education" and the flurry of media he received over the course of the following year or so that introduced the idea of the "flipped classroom" to most people. MORE
Pearson MOOC Knewton Khan Academy 83
5 Ed-Tech Ideas Face The Chronicle's Version of 'Shark Tank'
Wired Campus
And then lastly a lot of these Learning Gadgets allow you to bring in third-party content — so almost anything that exists on the web you can bring right into a Versal course, organize it, organize it in lessons, put assessments in between, and so on. A lot of the technology that's built for the classroom is organizational technologies like, Hey, organize this better, organize that better, get a lot of stuff out of there. We do hybrid classrooms. We do flipped classrooms. MORE
Chegg Outcomes Company Course 37
Assessment Chegg Classroom Flipped Classroom
The Flipped Classroom". It was probably Sal Khan's 2011 TED Talk "Let's Use Video to Reinvent Education" and the flurry of media he received over the course of the following year or so that introduced the idea of the "flipped classroom" to most people.
Pearson 83
And then lastly a lot of these Learning Gadgets allow you to bring in third-party content — so almost anything that exists on the web you can bring right into a Versal course, organize it, organize it in lessons, put assessments in between, and so on. A lot of the technology that's built for the classroom is organizational technologies like, Hey, organize this better, organize that better, get a lot of stuff out of there. We do hybrid classrooms. We do flipped classrooms.
Chegg 37


text:
What is PediGri®?
Request registration
Who is/are the data controller/s?
The data controller is Grifols International, S.A., with address for contact purposes at Avda. de la Generalitat 152, 08174, Pol. Ind. Can Sant Joan – Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona – (Spain) ("Grifols").
Who is the data protection officer of Grifols and how can you contact him/her?
The data protection officer acts as an interlocutor between Grifols and you in order to ensure Grifols' compliance with the data protection legislation and guarantee your rights under such legislation. You may contact the data protection officer at dpo@grifols.com.
For which purposes does Grifols process the personal data?
Grifols processes the personal data to:
(a) manage the access to and offer information regarding the quality and safety of Grifols' plasma-derivative products and the service itself, as well as permit that the data subject accesses this information in the language selected by him/her. Additional information is available in the Cookies policy, and
(b) respond to requests of information and/or suggestions.
Which is/are the lawful basis/bases to process the personal data?
The legal bases to process the personal data are:
(a) the consent provided through the data collection forms, and
(b) the legitimate interest of Grifols to share your personal data with third party distributors and the Grifols' group companies engaged in the sale and distribution of plasma-derivative products, to the extent that this may be necessary to manage and provide with access to the aforementioned information or, only in the case of said Grifols' group companies, to respond to requests of information and/or suggestions.
We consider that the legitimate interest in which Grifols bases the processing of personal data overrides data subjects' fundamental rights and freedoms, given that the processing is part of the daily management of a multinational group of companies. In any case, you may exercise your right to object by addressing such request to privacy@grifols.com.
How long does Grifols retain the personal data?
Once the purposes for which the personal data processed are fulfilled, Grifols retains the personal data until the end of statutes of limitation of any liabilities that may arise and during the term required to comply with any applicable legal obligation.
With whom does Grifols share the personal data?
In order to verify if the institution to which the data subject belongs is a customer, it may be necessary to provide the personal data to third party distributors and to Grifols' group companies that sell and distribute plasma-derivative products, depending on the location of the health institution that uses Grifols' plasma-derivative products. Likewise, these Grifols' group companies may have access to the data of the data subject in order to respond to its requests of information and/or suggestions.
Which are your data protection rights?
Access You may request confirmation as to whether or not your personal data is being processed and, if so, you can obtain access to your personal data included in Grifols' files.
Rectification You may request the rectification of your personal data if this is inaccurate.
Erasure You may request that your personal data is erased.
Objection You may request that your personal data is not processed in specific circumstances.
Portability You may request receiving, in an electronic file, the personal data that you provided Grifols, as well as the right to transmit it to other parties.
Restriction of processing You may request a restriction on how personal data is processed when:
the accuracy of your personal data is being verified after you have contested its accuracy.
processing of your personal data is unlawful and you oppose to its erasure.
Grifols does no longer need the personal data for the purposes of the processing, but they are required by you for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
you have objected to the processing for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or necessary for the purposes of a legitimate interest, whilst it is being verified whether the legitimate grounds of Grifols override yours.
Withdrawal of consent You may withdraw your consent without affecting the lawfulness of processing based on consent before its withdrawal.
You may exercise, when appropriate, the data protection rights by sending a written communication to privacy@grifols.com and indicating as subject matter of the communication "Pedigri". For these purposes, Grifols may request a copy of your ID card/passport in force or any other valid document evidencing your identity.
In addition, you may lodge a complaint with the Spanish Data Protection Agency (www.aepd.es) or with any other data protection authority.
Date of last update: April 2020
Terms of Use | Privacy Notice
What is PediGri®? · Our commitment · See demo · Request registration · Contact us
© 2021 Grifols International, S.A. All rights reserved worldwide