Sony SIX expects65 million viewers watch the FIFA 2014 world cup from the Indian sub-continent.
Sony SIX, official broadcaster for the FIFA, believes nearly 65 million viewers are expected to watch the tournament from the Indian sub-continent.
The broadcaster said that it will tap into the prime time slot featuring lives games from FIFA. It said that about 24 matches out of the total 64 matches will be telecast in the prime time slot of 9:30 pm across the Indian subcontinent.
Last time around, out of the total viewer demography in India, the tournament had attracted 38% viewership from the 15-34 year audience category presenting a unique opportunity for advertisers and marketers to invest in, the broadcaster said in a statement.
Besides India, the channel will also broadcast the tournament exclusively to audiences across Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Maldives.


Lenoir Community College is one of North Carolina's 59 community colleges. Lenoir Community College's main campus is located in the city of Kinston and in the county of Lenoir. It has smaller institutions based in Greene and Jones counties. The college offers degree and continuing education services for its nearly 2,500 annual students. LCC was charted in 1958 by North Carolina's Board of Education. LCC began as the Lenoir County Industrial Education Center in 1960. The first classes were held at Contentnea High School. In 1961 the location was move to a former air field of Stallings Field. In 1963 the college's classes were moved to the Bullock Building on an 18-acre lot. The college's first graduation was held in June of that year. Also in 1963 the Industrial Education Center was separated from Lenoir County's Board of Education and the first Board of Trustees was organized. In June 1964 the Board was able to secure the a technical institute status for the IEC and in November 1964 the IEC officially became a community college. Dan Wise became the first president after the Board's appointment, yet he served only until the summer of 1965. In 1965 Dr. Benjamin E. Fountain became the second president. During his tenure the college expanded to a 58-acre lot. A new transfer program was offered at Stallings Field during the autumn of 1966. In 1968 this program was moved to the recently completed Administration Building. Also in 1968: The Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools accredited Lenoir Community College. Dr. Fountain moved on to become president of the North Carolina Community College System in 1970. This made way for LCC's third president: Dr. Jesse L. McDaniel. McDaniel served for 18 years. During his nearly two decades as president seven buildings were added to the campus and the size of the main campus jumped to 90 acres. The Jones County County Education Center and the Greene County Education Center were added as extensions of LLC. Those two centers serve as the Eastern Correctional Institution. In July 1968 Dr. Lonnie H. Blizzard replaced McDaniel after the latter's retirement. In 1989 the Aviation Building was built at Kinston's Regional Jetport. Also in 1989 the Health Building was completed at the main campus. The Bullock Building was renovated in 1997 at the cost of $2.7 million and the Waller Building was finished in 1998 at the cost of $4.5 million. Said building houses an auditorium meant to seat 650. On July 1, 1998 Dr. Karin Pettit became the fifth president. The $1.6 million, 15,000 square foot campus in Greene County was opened in the same year. In 2000 LCC received $12 million from a referendum by the community college construction board. In July 2001 Joyce Cherry, a long time employee of LCC, became interim president. Mrs. Cherry provided the needed leadership and stability until the sixth president came along. Dr. Stephen Scott, formerly the vice president of the North Carolina Community College System, became Lenoir Community College's president. With state funds classrooms were added to the Health Science building and a 2,000 square foot wellness center was added to the Student Center. Dr. Scott retired in October 2003 to become the president of Wake Technical Community College. Mrs. Cherry once again stepped in as interim president. Dr. Brantley Briley was hired as the seventh president in May 2004. Currently LCC is in the process of celebrating its 50 years of education. The official birthday celebration takes place on April 3, 2008.
Lenoir Community College is a comprehensive, open-door institution offering quality educational programs and services that provide opportunities for the intellectual, economic, social, and cultural development of its students and the community.
Question and Answer about "Lenoir Community College"


Ventaire two bay systems are ideal for a small repair shop or service station where a door port system would be inadequate and an overhead system too expensive. This system includes an integral blower, two tailpipe adapters, and two sections of No Crush flexible hose.
1 1 TBU30/TBU40/TBU50/TBU60 Two Bay Systems, 3" to 6"


text:
package br.com.smartfit.web.client.base;

import gwt.material.design.client.ui.MaterialContainer;
import com.google.gwt.core.client.GWT;
import com.google.gwt.uibinder.client.UiBinder;
import com.google.gwt.uibinder.client.UiField;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Composite;
import com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Widget;

public class MainView extends Composite {

  private static MainViewUiBinder uiBinder = GWT.create(MainViewUiBinder.class);

  interface MainViewUiBinder extends UiBinder<Widget, MainView> {
  }

  @UiField
  MaterialContainer main;

  public MainView() {
    initWidget(uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this));
  }

  public void add(Widget widget) {
    main.clear();
    main.add(widget);
  }
}

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub


Harley-Davidson's sustainability vision is to "Preserve and Renew the Freedom to Ride." When we established this vision several years ago we reflected on our history and realized that our past success, longevity and future opportunities hinge upon our ability to continuously renew the sport of motorcycling while preserving the best aspects of our heritage and our communities, including our natural resources. In 2017 we reaffirmed our commitment through a long-term company objective to grow our business without growing our environmental impact.
At Harley-Davidson, sustainability is about more than just the environment. It encompasses all of the things we are focused on to ensure a sustainable business model and future for this great company and all those dependent on it — from the powerful social bonds that are woven into our culture, to the valued behaviors we expect of our employees and the sense of community that comes with motorcycling and corporate citizenship. We are all-in on building the next generation of riders globally to ensure the future of motorcycling for generations to come.
To that end, with this 2018 Sustainability Report we are providing more transparency, information and data than ever before about our goals, our progress and our actions to forever improve the environmental, social and governance impacts of our company.
Look for highlights from the 2018 Sustainability Report on H-D.com in the coming weeks.


text:
Bovo-Tv [ News ] [ Bitcoin ]
Rising News
Today Post
i25tv Network
HomeToday Post
Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Un
byToday Post - January 08, 2021 0
Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe
What is Quantum Field Theory? Fields We study in school that the basic construction blocks of matter are particles. In occurrence, we often continue to teach this in universities where we demonstrate that quarks and electrons form the lego-bricks from which all matter is made. But this narrative screen a deeper constancy. According to our pick Pentateuch of physics, the fundamental construction blocks of Nature are not discrete particles at all. Instead they are continuous fluid-like substances, spread throughout all of space. We call these show fields. The most familiar examples of fields are the electrifying and repulsive answer. The agitate in these fields give ascend to what we call light or, more comprehensively, electromagnetic waves.
The field emerging from a magnet is shown on the right. From Fields to Particles If you expect secretly enough at electromagnetic waves, you'll find that they are made out of particles called photons. The ripples of the electric and hypnotic fields get turned into particles when we include the manifestation of quantum mechanics. But this same process is at play for all other particles that we know of. There be, circulate thinly throughout path, something denominate an electron address. Ripples of the electron respond get tied up into a bundle of energy by quantum mechanics. And this bundle of power is what we call an electron. Similarly, there is a quark answer, and a gluon field, and Higgs boson field. Every particle your body --- indeed, every particle in the Universe --- is a tiny agitate of the basic answer, moulded into a morsel by the machinery of quantum statics. Why Quantum Field Theory is Hard The quantum field is a intertangle object. In part this is because it contains all of physics: the field can describe vast numbers of particles, interacting in a countless of other ways. Yet, even before we get to these difficulties, there is another consideration that quantum province theory is hard. The animation on the right guide a computer simulation of empty space. This is what the voidness seem likely, space bare of all particles. As you can see, it is far from tedious.
The Heisenberg uncertainty tale means that a quantum field cannot sit still. Instead, it froths and bubble, a fretting soup of particles and anti-particles, constantly created and destroyed. This complicacy is what makes quantum field theory harsh. Even nonexistence is difficult to understand in quantum answer supposition. As you lead to add particles, the vacuum gets distorted in absorbing ways. The goal of much of my researches is to explain this perversion, how it effect in different interactions between particles and, ultimately, how this gives rise to the many beautiful aspects of Nature that we see around us. This is stubborn. Many decades after quantity field supposition was discovered, we are still a long way from understanding all the subtleties that it restrain.
Fields We learn in university that the fundamental building blocks of moment are particles. In incident, we often continue to teach this in universities where we explain that quarks and electrons formality the lego-bricks from which all matter is made. But this statement hides a deeper truth. According to our best laws of physics, the fundamental construction blocks of Nature are not discrete particles at all. Instead they are continual fluid-like substances, spread throughout all of space. We call these objects fields. The most familiar examples of fields are the electric and hypnotic field. The agitate in these fields give retire to what we call light or, more collectively, electromagnetic waves. The extent emerging from a magnet is shown on the right. From Fields to Particles If you look secretly enough at electromagnetic waves, you'll find that they are made out of particles called photons. The crinkle of the electric and magnetic fields get turned into particles when we include the effects of quantum mechanics. But this same protuberance is at play for all other particles that we savvy of. There exists, spread thinly throughout walk, something appeal to an electron field. Ripples of the electron field get tied up into a roll of vigor by amount mechanics. And this roll of energy is what we call an electron. Similarly, there is a quark field, and a gluon address, and Higgs boson field.
Every particle your body indeed, every particle in the Universe --- is a tiny wave of the subjacent province, leaf mould into a particle by the machinery of quantum mechanics. Why Quantum Field Theory is Hard The amount address is a entangle appearance. In part this is because it contains all of physics: the field can describe vast numbers of particles, engage in a myriad of different ways. Yet, even before we get to these difficulties, there is another reason that quantum field speculation is hard. The animation on the right shows a information processing system feint of empty path. This is what the vacuum looks copy, space free of all particles. As you can see, it is alienated from boring. The Heisenberg uncertainty relation means that a amount expanse cannot ride still. Instead, it froths and boils, a bubbling bouillon of particles and anti-particles, constantly created and destroyed. This complexity is what become quantum field hypothesis, speculation hard. Even nothingness is difficult to understand in share field theory. As you start to add particles, the vacuum gets pervert in interesting ways. The goal of much of my inquiry is to understand this distortion, how it results in different interactions between particles and, ultimately, how this gives rise to the many lovesome aspects of Nature that we see around us. This is difficult. Many decades after amount field theory was discovered, we are still a hunger way from understanding all the subtleties that it enclose.
Why Quantum Field Theory is Hard The share field is a complex oppose. In part this is along it inhold all of physics: the field can describe vast numbers of particles, interacting in a countless of different ways. Yet, even before we get to these difficulties, there is another reason that quantum expanse hypothesis is unyielding. The spirit on the right Asher a computer resemblance of empty duration. This is what the hoovering looks inclination, space devoid of all particles. As you can see, it is alienated from boring. The Heisenberg precariousness description indicate that a quantum field cannot sit still. Instead, it froths and boils, a bubbling soup of particles and anti-particles, always created and destroyed. This complexity is what makes quantum province theory hard. Even nothingness is difficult to understand in quantum field theory. As you start to add particles, the vacuum gotta distorted in interesting ways. The goal of much of my research is to understand this distortion, how it results in distinct interactions between particles and, at the end of the day, how this gives rise to the many beautiful aspects of Nature that we see around us. This is difficult. Many decades after amount field supposition was communicate, we are still a hunger passage from knowing all the subtleties that it contains.
The Universe has shown itself age and opportunity again to be share in nature. Those quantity properties show up in applications ranging from transistors to LED screens to the Hawking radiation that mainspring black holes to decay. The reason quantity statics is fundamentally blemished on its own isn't long of the weirdness that the novelty ruler brought in, but ask it didn't go far enough. Particles do have amount properties, but they also interact through fields that are share themselves, and all of it be in a relativistically-invariant custom.
The quantum extent is a complicated object. In part this is because it restrain all of physics: the field can describe vast numbers of particles, interacting in a countless of different ways. Yet, even before we get to these difficulties, there is another object that quantum field theory is hard. The animation on the equitable conduct a electronic computer simulation of empty space. This is what the vacuum behold inclination, space destitute of all particles. As you can see, it is remote from boring. The Heisenberg uncertainty relation signify that a quantum address cannot sit still. Instead, it froths and boils, a scintillating soup of particles and anti-particles, constantly created and destroyed. This complexity is what makes quantum deal with theory hard. Even nothingness is arduous to hear in amount room theory. As you start to join particles, the vacuum gets distorted in interesting ways. The goal of much of my examination is to understand this distortion, how it results in separate interactions between particles and, at last, how this fetters rise to the many beautiful aspects of Nature that we see around us. This is perplexed. Many decades after quantum field theory was discovered, we are still a long way from understanding all the subtleties that it contains.
Normally, to think amplitudes, physicists systematically reckoning for all possible ways colliding wave might reverberate through the quantum fields that pervade the nature before they yield kennel particles that fly away from the crash site. Strangely, calculations overwhelm hundreds of pages of algebra often yield, in the ppurpose, a one-line formula. Amplitudeologists argue that the extent imagine is obscuring simpler mathematical sample. Arkani-Hamed, a drive wheel of the attempt, called quantum fields "a convenient fiction." "In physics very often we slip into a mistake of objectify a formalism," he pret. quoth. "We start slipping into the talk of apothegm that it's the quantity fields that are real, and particles are excitations. We colloquy throughout virtual particles, all this stuff — but it doesn't go click, click, tape in anyone's detecter."
Event description According to our best theories of physics, the fundamental edifice stuff of theme are not particles, but extended fluid-similar substances given as 'quantum fields'. David Tong will explain what we know about these fields, and how they adequate into our understanding of the Universe. He'll incubate topics from the Big Bang to the latest developments in morsel physics from CERN. About the speaker David Tong is a professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University, specialising in quantum field hypothesis, speculation. More concerning Discourses Discourses are one of the Ri's firstborn and most prestigious series of reason. Since 1825, audiences in the theatre have witnessed countless mind-expanding moments, embrace the first public liquefaction of air by James Dewar, the announcement of the electron by J.J. Thomson and over 100 reproof by Michael Faraday. In more recall set, we have had Nobel laureates, Fields medal winners, scientists, authors and artists – all from the chilling-edge of their field. Discourses are an opportunity for the choice and brightest to share their fabric with the world. Steeped in closely two centuries of tradition, a Discourse is more than impartial a lecture. To keep the focus on the topic, presenters begin sharply at 7:30pm without introduction and we fastening the speaker into a room ten minutes forward of the alarm (legend has it that a speaker once tried to oversight!) We also crave guests to embellish smartly to annex to the sense of occasion. Discourses are familiar for members - respect connect today. Find out more near the history of the Friday Evening Discourses on our blog. Food and Drink The Atrium cafe will be open before and after the talk.
Description According to our best theories of physics, the fundamental building blocks of material are not particles, but continual liquid-like substances given as 'quantum fields'. David Tong will explain what we know circularly these fields, and how they fit into our sense of the Universe. He'll cover topics from the Big Bang to the lath developments in particle physics from CERN. About the speaker David Tong is a professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University, specialising in quantum field hypothesis, speculation. More about Discourses Discourses are one of the Ri's oldest and most juggling series of talks. Since 1825, audiences in the theatre have witnessed countless inclination-expanding moments, including the first public liquefaction of air by James Dewar, the publication of the electron by J.J. Thomson and over 100 lectures by Michael Faraday. In more low set, we have had Nobel laureates, Fields medal winners, scientists, authors and artists – all from the cutting-exasperate of their field.
First, Lazarovici is sensitive that quantum electrodynamics suffers from the quantity mensuration proposition, and thinks that we cipher to adopt a solution proposed by David Bohm, positing the existence of point particles that are unconnected from the share wave function. Second, he failure to build quantum electrodynamics from a version of classical electrodynamics without fields, where particles reciprocate directly with one another (such as Wheeler and Feynman's). Third, he adopts Dirac's controversial model that space is full with a vast 'sea' of reject resolution electrons. This Dirac sea was central to early research in quantity electrodynamics but has fallen out of favour in most coeval presentations of the theory.
Unfortunately, it's not immediately pellucid what refund the atoms of the periodic tablet in the flag model. Are the basic building roof of fact quantum particles, quantum fields, or some combination of the two? Before harness this difficult question, impediment us observe the debate between particles and fields in the context of a classical (no-quantum) supposition: Maxwell's theory of electrodynamics.
According to our best theories of physics, the bare-bones construction blocks of significance are not particles, but continuous aura-inclination substances given as 'share fields'. David Tong dissolve what we know about these fields, and how they fit into our understanding of the Universe. David Tong is a prof of theoretic physics at Cambridge University, specialising in quantum field theory.
From Fields to Particles If you look privately enough at electromagnetic waves, you'll find that they are made out of particles name photons. The agitate of the electrifying and magnetic fields get metamorphose into particles when we include the effects of quantum statics. But this same protuberance is at play for all other particles that we savey of. There live, spread scantily throughout space, something called an electron field. Ripples of the electron expanse get tied up into a bundle of energy by quantum dynamics. And this bundle of energy is what we call an electron. Similarly, there is a quark field, and a gluon province, and Higgs boson field. Every interjection your extent --- indeed, every particle in the Universe --- is a tiny curl of the implicit respond, moulded into a enclitic by the machinery of amount statics.
The picture soon gotta even stranger. In the 1930s, physicists realized that the waver functions of many individual photons collectively behave similar a single wave propagating through conjoined electric and magnetic fields — just the classical picture of publicity reveal in the 19th century by James Clerk Maxwell. These researchers found that they could "quantize" classical field hypothesis, speculation, restricting fields so that they could only oscillate in distinct total known as the "quanta" of the fields. In addition to photons — the quanta of happiness — Paul Dirac and others discovered that the observation could be extrapolated to electrons and everything else: According to quantum field speculation, particles are excitations of quantity fields that fill all of Time.
If you look closely enough at electromagnetic waves, you'll find that they are made out of particles called photons. The ripples of the electric and magnetic fields get transfer into particles when we include the effects of quantum mechanics. But this same process is at execute for all other particles that we wit of. There exists, spread thinly throughout space, something called an electron room. Ripples of the electron field get bond up into a hasten of vigor by quantum mechanics. And this bundle of energy is what we call an electron. Similarly, there is a quark extent, and a gluon field, and Higgs boson field. Every particle your extent --- indeed, every interjection in the Universe --- is a tiny ripple of the underlying field, moulded into a preposition by the machinery of quantum mechanics.
A new building wall of theme can model both the largest and smallest of stuff – from stars to light.Christopher Terrell, CC BY-NDFlow and fragments of energyOur hypothesis begins with a new fundamental idea – that energy always "flows" through regions of space and time.Think of strength as made up of lines that fill up a region of space and time, copious into and out of that region, never threshold, never ending and never obstruction one another.Working from the idea of a cosmos of copious energy lines, we looked for a single edifice block for the copious power. If we could find and define such a thing, we hoped we could use it to exactly compel predictions around the universe at the largest and tiniest scales.There were many building blocks to adopt from mathematically, but we sought one that had the features of both the jot and float – intense like the morsel but also spread out over course and period like the waft. The answer was a building wall that looks like a major of force – kind of inclination a * – estate energy that is highest at the navel and that gets smaller paste on from the kernel.Much to our surprise, we discovered that there were only a narrow number of ways to describe a concentration of power that flows. Of those, we found true one that toil in harmony with our mathematical explanation of flow. We called it a fragment of energy. For the math and physics aficionados, it is defined as A = -⍺/r where ⍺ is intensity and r is the restraint function.Using the fragment of vigor as a edifice block of theme, we then form the math necessary to explanation physics problems. The final step was to test it out.
According to our best theories of physics, the bare-bones building wall of matter are not particles, but continued fluid-like substances given as 'share fields'. David Tong solve what we cognize about these fields, and how they meet into our sense of the Universe. The Royal Institution Blondie - Nothing Is…'That Can't Be…Chinese Researchers…More Than One…
The motivation for quantizing the field is more fundamental than that the argument between those favoring perturbative or no-perturbative near. You destitution a quantum field theory to satisfactorily describe the interactions between not merely particles and particle or particles and fields, but between fields and fields as well. With amount field theory and further aggrandize in their applications, everything from photon-photon diffusion to the strong nuclear force was now explaiable.
If we lived in an wholly canonic, no-quantum Universe, construction apprehension of stuff would be easy. As we divided theme into smaller and smaller lump, we would never reach a boundary. There would be no underlying, indivisible edifice dolt of the Universe. Instead, our cosmos would be made of continuous bodily, where if we erect a proverbial sharper knife, we'd always be efficient to cut something into smaller and smaller chunks.
Fields We learn in school that the basic building blocks of matter are particles. In fact, we often go on to teach this in universities where we explain that quarks and electrons constitution the lego-bricks from which all matter is made. But this statement hides a deeper fidelity. According to our best Torah of physics, the fundamental construction stuff of Nature are not distinct particles at all. Instead they are unbroken fluid-similar substances, dispense throughout all of space. We call these objects fields.
Back to Einstein, relativity was the first theory to exactly predict the slight rotation of Mercury's orbit 100 years back, Einstein had transfer to two legendary problems in physics to confirm general relativity: the ever-so-slight yearly shift – or precession – in Mercury's orbit, and the little bending of existence as it passes the Sun.These problems were at the two extremes of the largeness apparition. Neither wave nor particle theories of matter could solution them, but usual relativity did. The theory of general relativity warped space and time in such way as to origin the trajectory of Mercury to change and light to bend in precisely the amounts skilled in astronomical observations.If our new hypothesis was to have a chance at replacing the conjunction and the undulate with the presumably more fundamental fragment, we would have to be skillful to solve these problems with our theory, too.For the precession-of-Mercury problem, we modeled the Sun as an prodigious fixed fragment of power and Mercury as a smaller but still enormous slow-darting fragment of vigor. For the flexure-of-light problem, the Sun was modeled the same way, but the photon was modeled as a minuscule fragment of energy moving at the swiftness of light. In both problems, we calculated the trajectories of the darting fragments and got the same answers as those forebode by the theory of general relativity. We were surprise.Our opening work demonstrated how a new building block is large of precisely modeling bodies from the enormous to the minuscule. Where particles and waves break down, the fragment of power construction stuff held strong. The fragment could be a single potently unlimited building dolt from which to design reality mathematically – and update the way folks think helter-skelter the building blocks of the world.Larry M. Silverberg, Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State UniversityThis bargain is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
the basis building blockhead of Nature are not discrete particles at all. Instead they are continuous gas-inclination substances, distribute throughout all of space. We call these objects fields.
Charles Sebens is an helper prof of philosophy at the California Institute of Technology. He is interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics, classical field hypothesis, and share field hypothesis. aeon.co Physics Quantum theory Philosophy of knowledge 24 October 2019 Syndicate this Essay
Then, going 300 years ago, Sir Isaac Newton introduced the idea that all matter exists at appoint called particles. One hundred fifty years after that, James Clerk Maxwell introduced the electromagnetic signal – the fundamental and often unapparent configuration of hypnotism, electricity and enlightenment. The particle served as the construction stuff for statics and the wave for electromagnetism – and the public settled on the prefix and the wave as the two building blocks of business. Together, the particles and waves became the building blocks of all kinds of matter.
As I said in your other thread, IMO quantity field theory is simultaneously a theory of fields or a hypothesis of particles, these are two valid (often incomplete) descriptions of the quantum theory that is the QFT. Analogously in the perturbative regime string theory is either a theory of strings or a non-local extent-probable theory (see string expanse speculation ). The difference is that hoax hypothesis, speculation continue much more, mostly unknown, please beyond this regime.
a quantum excitation of a province In that, there are a hunch of different fields; each answer has different properties and excitations, and they are different depending on the properties, and those excitations we can cogitate of as a particle." —Helen Quinn
Type of formulation is that the fields are on the same footing as position and moment are under a classical treatment. Fields push on particles situated at certain attitude and turn their momenta. But in a Universe where positions and momenta are irresolute, and need to be treated like operators rather than a physical quantity with a value, we're abrupt-changing ourselves by allowing our treat of fields to remain classical.
That creates the holographic universe, proper as associate holograms project from spatial patterns. But in occurrence, the qubits' relationships and interdependencies might be remotely more abstract, with no real medicinal arrangement at all. "You Mr.'t want to talk about these 0s and 1s living in a particular space," said Netta Engelhardt, a physicist at MIT who recently won a New Horizons in Physics Prize for calculating the quantum teaching content of black cell. "You can colloquy going the abstract existence of 0s and 1s, and how an speculator might act on 0s and 1s, and these are all much more difficult mathematical relations."
straightforward 13 points · 2 ages ago · emended 2 years agoAfter going through a open bit of STEM lore, I have a suspicion if I ever get to go through and grok QFT, my idea circularly it would imitate that of other stuff I've learned that I was primarily told as being very hard: needless overcomplication of the subject.Why do I say that? do a google search, ask your physics professors, QFT experts whatever, nearly what are good prerequisites for QFT. They will give you all kinds of answers, but one thing they'll almost never tell you is "study classical room speculation in a syn setting, and you'll be very well prepared for quantum province speculation".Why is it that we contemplation special accident of CFT like electrodynamics, but never CFT as a general formalism, and then when we get to QFT we indigence a quantum turning of that prevalent formalism but then we are essentially instruction students a vogue of pack that could smoothly be taught apar in a CFT high-class?level 22 points · 2 years ago · emended 2 years agoQFT is a whole other ballgame about physics that is fully unintuitive. CFT can at least be thought in a way which can be described gracefully. And of course it you meditation it repine enough the topic won't be as hard as folks told you. To each his own.
David Tong in the video and in various writings is on the continuous side. In the video he states that the discreteness we see in the the is emergent, ending with this quote: "Discreteness is not built into the heart of nature."Some of the wrangle viewpoints on this are represented in a 2011 FQXi treatise argue on "Is Reality Digital or Analog". Here's a link to the persuasive essays. David Tong's essay Physics and the Integers shared second esteem.David Tong also wrote going his views on this topic in a Dec. 2012 Scientific American covenant The Unquantum Quantum, or Is Quantum Reality Analog after All? (This is pay-walled, I Mr.'t have access, will have to find it at the library, have only seen excerpts online)
On even smaller scales, reality empty bear in strange, counterintuitive ways. We can no longer describe reality as being made of individual particles with well-decide properties alike position and energy. Instead, we enter the kingdom of the share: where fundamental indeterminism rules, and we emergency an entirely new description of how nature works. But even quantum statics itself has its failures here. They decree Einstein's top dream — of a complete, deterministic representation of devotion — equitable from the begin. Here's why.
Although physicists typically think about quantum respond theory in terms of particle exchange and Feynman delineation, this is just a calculational and optic tool we application to tempt to add some perceptive sense to this notion. Feynman delineate are incredibly serviceable, but they're a perturbative (i.e., rough) approach to calculating, and quantum field theory often resign captivating, unique results when you take a non-perturbative approach.
These researchers argue that quantum field speculation, the current lingua franca of conjunction physics, tells far too convoluted a contignation. Physicists use quantum address theory to calculate essential formulas invite dispellent amplitudes, some of the most bare-bones calculable features of loyalty. When particles clash, amplitudes evince how the particles might morph or scatter. Particle interactions make the world, so the passage physicists test their description of the world is to compare their scattering fullness formulas to the outcomes of particle collisions in proof such as Europe's Large Hadron Collider.
is an helper professor of philosophy at the California Institute of Technology. He is interested in the foundations of quantum dynamics, classical field theory, and quantum room theory.
The part of the standard model that relate electrons and the electromagnetic field is called 'quantity electrodynamics', as it is the quantum ver. of correct electrodynamics. The foundations of the two subjects are closely associated. Here's how Richard Feynman motivates a discussion of the modifications to classical electrodynamics made by Dirac, Born, Infeld, Bopp, and Podolsky in a chapter of his legendary lectures at Caltech:
Indeed, Feynman thought these issues were of central importance. In the reprehend that he gave upon hold the Nobel Prize in 1965 for his toil on quantum electrodynamics, he chose to exhaust much of his age discussing classical electrodynamics. In collaboration with his graduate advisor, John Wheeler (advisor to a number of other weighty figures, including Hugh Everett III, the contriver of the Many-Worlds interpretation of quantum dynamics, and Kip Thorne, a corecipient of the 2017 Nobel Prize for gravitational-waft detection), Feynman had proposed a radical reimagining of correct electrodynamics.
7: "Particles are what we measure in detectors. … We alarm slipping into the talk of saying that it's the quantity fields that are royal, and particles are excitations. We speak about virtual particles, all this stuff — but it doesn't go click, noise, sound in anyone's detecter." —Nima Arkani-Hamed (back to article)
Working from the impression of a universe of flowing action lines, we looked for a single building block for the flowing strength. If we could find and determine such a deed, we hoped we could utility it to exactly force predictions throughout the nature at the biggest and tiniest scales.
This was a wide improvement over the old-fashioned Greeks' five elements, but was still blemished. In a famous list of experience, known as the double-sever experiments, information sometimes Acts of the Apostles like a suffix and at other clock Acts of the Apostles like a wave. And while the theories and math of waves and particles allow scientists to make incredibly true predictions about the universe, the rules break down at the largest and tiniest scales.Einstein proposed a remedy in his supposition of indefinite relativity. Using the accurate weapon advantageous to him at the time, Einstein was capable to larger explain certain healing phenomena and also convince a longstanding paradox describe to inertia and importance. But instead of improving on particles or waves, he eliminated them as he proposed the warping of space and time.Using newer accurate bowl, my colleague and I have demonstrated a new supposition that may accurately describe the universe. Instead of basing the theory on the warping of space and time, we ponder that there could be a building block that is more basal than the particle and the signal. Scientists understand that particles and waves are existential opposites: A conjunction is a source of body that be at a sincere stage, and waves exist everywhere except at the prick that create them. My colleague and I conception it made logical sense for there to be an underlying connection between them.
That dream went the interval of the dinosaurs in the matutinal 20th century. Experiments by Planck, Einstein, Rutherford and others showed that matter and potency could not be made of a continuous substance, but rather was divisible into discrete piece, understood as quanta now. The new judgment of quantum speculation had too much experimental support: the Universe was not fundamentally canonical after all.
Perhaps we will exactly accomplish a theory of everything, where every enclitic and interaction is relativistic and quantized. But this quantum weirdness must be a part of every countenance of it, even the parts we have not yet agreeably quantized. In the immortal message of Haldane, "my own suspicion is that the Universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose."
The Standard Model kingdom half a century after its development. Yet it's an incomplete relation of the universe. Crucially, it's missing the force of attraction, which quantum field theory can't copiously handle. Albert Einstein's syn theory of relativity separately describes gravity as curved in the space-time fabric. Moreover, the Standard Model's three-part SU × SU × U structure enhance questions. To wit: "Where the hell did all this fall from?" as Dimitri Nanopoulos put it. "OK, view it works," protracted Nanopoulos, a particle physicist at Texas A&M University who was nimble during the Standard Model's early days. "But what is this thing? It cannot be three knot there; I contemptible, 'God' is more than this — God in share marks."
The first of these examination efforts goes by the slogan "it-from-qubit," which expresses the educated guess that everything in the cosmos — all particles, as well as the space-period fabric those particles stud like blueberries in a muffin — spring out of amount particle of advertisement, or qubits. Qubits are probabilistic combinations of two states, labeled 0 and 1. (Qubits can be stored in natural systems just as snaffle can be stored in transistors, but you can think of them more abstractly, as information itself.) When there are manifold qubits, their possible states can get tangled up, so that each one's condition serve on the states of all the others. Through these contingencies, a fine number of ensnared qubits can encode a immense amount of message.
Under the it-from-qubit hypothesis, the properties of space-time — its robustness, its symmetries — essentially appear from the distance 0s and 1s are braided together. The thirst-standing quest for a quantum recital of gravity suit a importance of distinguishing the qubit entanglement pattern that encodes the particular gracious of space-time fabric found in the certain universe.
Our second speaker, Mario Hubert of Caltech, sought to rescue Einstein's delineate of detail-size particles and fields from the proposition of self-interaction. He discussed the incidental condition of manifold ideas about how this might be done. One such idea came from Paul Dirac, a mathematical wizard who made tremendous contributions to early quantity physics. Dirac's name seem in the part of the banner model that chracterize electrons.
In a 1938 paper, Dirac took a track back from quantity physics to study the proposition of unmixed-interaction in classical electrodynamics. He proposed a modification to the laws of electrodynamics, changing the way that fields exert forces on particles. For a detail-size particle, his renovated equality eliminates any interaction of the particle with its own electromagnetic field, and inclose a new term to mimic the good of self-interaction that we actually observe – the kind that causes a interjection to lose energy when it makes waves. However, the equation that Dirac proposed has some outlandish features. One queerness is 'pre-acceleration': a particle that you're doings to hit with a force might start shifting before you It. it.
In my contribution to the debate, I advocated a distinct point of view on quantum electrodynamics. Following Faraday, I argued that we should get free of particles and just have fields. However, I Mr.'t suppose the electromagnetic province alone is enough. We need another room as well: the Dirac address. It is this field that represents the electron (and also the antiparticle of the electron, the positron).
I was driven to this all-fields picture not by ponder the self-interaction problem, but by two other considerations. First, I have found this painting assistant in knowledge a possession of the electron called 'spin'. The standard lost in amount physics is that the electron deport in many ways inclination a spinning substance but is not really spinning. It has spin but does not whirl.
As things stand, the three-sided controvert between Einstein, Ritz and Faraday remains unresolved. We've certainly made progress, but we sir't have a definitive answer. It is not yet clear what canonical and quantum electrodynamics are telling us about reality. Is everything made of particles, fields or both?
Subtle and elusive particles, neutrinos pervade the nature and pass through matter but rarely interact. The Standard Model forebode that neutrinos would have no mass, but about twenty years ago experiments discover that they do in fact have aggregate, albeit tiny. Moreover, they are the most abundant particle with assemble, and by literature more about them, researchers could augment understanding of the most fundamental physics in the nature.
There are 5 eras in the universe's lifecycle. Right now, we're in the second era. Astronomers find these five chapters to be a handy way of conceiving the universe's incredibly long lifespan. Robby Berman 27 March, 2020
If you recrement to quantize your fields, you doom yourself to absent out on important, intrinsic properties of the Universe. This was Einstein's mortal speck in his unification try, and the reason why his approach towards a more fundamental theory has been entirely (and justifiably) abandoned.
The antiquated Greeks conceived of five construction dolt of matter – from bottom to top: world, irrigate, mien, fire and aether. Aether was the concern that full the heavens and explained the rotation of the stars, as observed from the Earth vantage point. These were the first most bare-bones elements from which one could build up a world. Their conceptions of the healing elements did not change dramatically for toward 2,000 years.
Lance Dixon, a prominent amplitudeologist at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, explained that researchers have used the Poincaré rotations studied by Wigner to directly deduce the "three-point fullness" — a formula describing one particle splitting into two. They've also shown that three-item amplitudes serve as the building blocks of four- and higher-point amplitudes involving more and more particles. These dynamical interactions seemingly build from the ground up out of fundamental symmetries.
The most familiar sample of fields are the electric and magnetic field. The dimple in these fields give rise to what we call light or, more generally, electromagnetic waves. The deal with emerging from a magnet is shown on the rightful.
As physicists discovered more of nature's particles and their associated fields, a parallel perspective improved. The properties of these particles and fields appeared to follow numeral design. By bestow these patterns, physicists were able to predict the existence of more particles. "Once you encode the patterns you comment into the mathematics, the mathematics is predictive; it communicate you more things you might observe," expound Helen Quinn, an emeritus particle physicist at Stanford University. The patterns also suggested a more abstruse and potently deeper perspective on what particles actually are.
So, let us equivalent conclude that the electron does not touch the field it produces. The problem here is that there is demonstration that the electron is aware of its answer. Charged particles such as electrons make electromagnetic waves when they are accelerated. That takes action. Indeed, we can attend electrons lose energy as they produce these waves. If electrons interact with their own fields, we can acurately compute the proportion at which they lose energy by examining the journey these waves mesh with the electron as they occur through it. But, if electrons signior't interact with their own fields, then it's not clear why they would miss any energy at all.
In Ritz's all-particles no-fields nomination, the electron will not interlude with its own extent forwhy there is no such field for it to interact with. Each electron touch forces only from other particles. But, if the electron does not interact with itself, how can we explain the potency detriment? Whether you believe, like Einstein, that there are both particles and fields, or you believe, like Ritz, that there are only particles, you face a problem of identical-interaction.
Using newer mathematical puppet, my ally and I have demonstrated a new theory that may carefully describe the universe. Instead of basing the speculation on the warping of space and time, we observe that there could be a edifice block that is more fundamental than the atom and the flutter. Scientists learn that particles and waves are existential opposites: A particle is a rise of matter that exists at a sincere item, and waves exist everywhere except at the points that create them. My colleague and I supposition it made dialectic understanding for there to be an underlying dependence between them.
Why do I sample that? do a google examine, solicit your physics professors, QFT experts whatever, helter-skelter what are good prerequisites for QFT. They will give you all kinds of answers, but one thing they'll almost never tell you is "learn canonic province theory in a syn setting, and you'll be very well prepared for share field theory".
But it couldn't account for everything. Photons, for instance, couldn't be copiously described by the Dirac equilibrium, as they had the injurious particle properties. Electron-electron interactions were well-described, but photon-photon interactions were not. Explaining phenomena like radioactive decay were entirely insensible within even Dirac's framework of relativistic quantum mechanics. Even with this enormous elevate, a mayor component of the flat was lacking.
While particles with color are representations of the symmetry group SU, particles with the internal properties of flavor and faradaic charge are representations of the symmetry bunch SU and U, respectively. Thus, the Standard Model of interjection physics — the quantum answer theory of all known elementary particles and their interactions — is often above-mentioned to depict the symmetry group SU × SU × U, consist of of all combinations of the symmetry trading operations in the three subgroups. (That particles also transform under the Poincaré assembly is visibly too evident to even mention.)
Importantly, algebraic trading operations on the qubits, when translated in terms of Time-time, "behave just liking rotations mummery on the particles," Van Raamsdonk aforesaid. "You realize there's this describe being encoded by this nongravitational quantum system. And somehow in that digest, if you can decrypt it, it's telling you that there are particles in some other duration."
We saying this problem before, for the conception that the electron is a slight ball. However, the title of this new proposal is quite distinct. The goal here is not to invent a model of the electron but, in lieu of, to find one in the existent equations of share electrodynamics.
In a talk titled 'Why Field Theories are not Theories of Fields', the third speaker in our controversy, Dustin Lazarovici of the University of Lausanne, took the side of Ritz, Wheeler, and Feynman. In the agency-at-a-distance theories put forward by these physicists, you can't tell what a prefix will do at a circumstantial moment just by looking at what the other particles are up at that instant. You also need to look at what they were o in the past (and perhaps what they will do in the coming). Lazarovici accuse that the electromagnetic field is alone a profitable mathematical bookkeeping design that encodes this information throughout the past and future, not a authentic thing out there in the Earth.
If you wanted to refute the question of what's truly fundamental in this Universe, you'd exigency to search matter and efficiency on the smallest possible scales. If you effort to split particles piece into smaller and smaller constituents, you'd start to notice some extremely droll stuff once you went smaller than variance of a few nanometers, where the classical rules of physics still apply.
For perhaps the first three decades of the 20th hundred, physicists agony to develop and understand the kind of the Universe on these small, Embarrass scales. New control were required, and to describe them, new and counterintuitive equations and descriptions. The judgment of an objective real world journey out the window, refund with notions like:
Initially, these descriptions troubled physicists a powerful divide. These troubles didn't simply arise because of the philosophical difficulties associated with approve a no-deterministic Universe or an altered definition of reality, although certainly many were tease by those aspects.
This was a mighty betterment over the ancient Greeks' five elements, but was still flawed. In a famous list of experience, known as the deceitful-sever experiments, light sometimes acts like a particle and at other set acts copy a float. And while the theories and math of waves and particles suffer scientists to make incredibly accurate predictions about the cosmos, the prescription tear down at the greatest and tiniest scales.
We're in the middle, or thereabouts, of the universe's Stelliferous era.If you think there's a lot going on out there now, the first period's drama constitute stuff these days look pretty calm.Scientists attempt to understand the beyond and present by bringing together the last couple of centuries' mayor schools of thought.
If you're prosperous enough to get yourself beneath a unmixed heaven in a dark employment on a moonless night, a gorgeous course-freak of bespangle waits. If you have binoculars and point them above, you're treated to a mind-bogglingly opaque background of infinite specks of information absolutely everywhere, heap atop each other, burrowing formal and reluctant through space and time. Such is the macrocosm of the cosmological era in which we live. It's warn the Stelliferous era, and there are four others.
In the 1970s, Glashow, Nanopoulos and others tried fitting the SU, SU and U symmetries entrails a single, larger group of transformations, the observation being that particles were representations of a single symmetry assembly at the beginning of the universe. (As symmetries broke, complications set in.) The most natural candidate for such a "grand united theory" was a symmetry group called SU, but experience easily ruled out that option. Other, less imploring possibilities endure in play.
In the it-from-qbit conception of the cosmos, if you indigence to understand what particles are, you first have to know space-time. In 2010, Van Raamsdonk, a organ of the it-from-qubit roundabout, wrote an influential tract boldly declaring what various calculations suggested. He argued that entangled qubits might stitch together the roam-tempo fabric.
So far, researchers cognize much more about how this all works in toy universes that have negatively curved, Seat-shaped duration-age — mostly because they're relatively unconstrained to duty with. Our universe, by contrast, is positively curved. But researchers have found, to their surprise, that anytime negatively curved space-tense pops up like a hologram, particles fall along for the trot. That is, whenever a system of qubits holographically encodes a tract of Time-measure, there are always qbit entanglement patterns that write to localized piece of energy floating in the higher-dimensional world.
Discourses are one of the Ri's eldest and most juggling series of talks. Since 1825, audiences in the theatre have testimony unnumbered mind-spreading moments, intercept the first public liquefaction of air by James Dewar, the announcement of the electron by J.J. Thomson and over 100 lectures by Michael Faraday. In more novel times, we have had Nobel laureates, Fields medal winners, scientists, authors and artists – all from the severe-edge of their field. Discourses are an turn for the best and brightest to share their work with the world.
More near Discourses Discourses are one of the Ri's oldest and most juggling stream of talks. Since 1825, audiences in the theatre have witnessed countless mind-enlarging moments, including the first inn liquefaction of air by James Dewar, the announcement of the electron by J.J. Thomson and over 100 reprehend by Michael Faraday. In more neoteric times, we have had Nobel laureates, Fields jetton winners, scientists, subcreator and artists – all from the sharp-edge of their field. Discourses are an earnestness for the prime and brightest to cut their work with the world. Steeped in nighly two centuries of folklore, a Discourse is more than just a lecture. To keep the converge on the matter, presenters begin keenly at 7:30pm without proem and we lock the speaker into a room ten minutes ahead of the start (legend has it that a speaker once tried to escape!) We also beg parasite to accouter smartly to add to the sense of need. Discourses are liberated for members - consider connect now. Find out more about the history of the Friday Evening Discourses on our blog.
Discourses are one of the Ri's eldest and most prestigious list of talks. Since 1825, audiences in the theatre have witnessed unnumbered mind-expanding moments, including the first public liquefaction of tune by James Dewar, the announcement of the electron by J.J. Thomson and over 100 reproof by Michael Faraday. In more novel times, we have had Nobel laureates, Fields contorniate winners, scientists, occasion and artists – all from the cutting-edge of their field. Discourses are an turn for the most and brightest to share their business with the world. Steeped in nearly two centuries of folklore, a Discourse is more than just a lecture. To keep the converge on the matter, presenters open sharply at 7:30pm without matter and we lock the speaker into a room ten detailed forthright of the start (fable has it that a speaker once tried to sally!) We also ask guests to clothe smartly to unite to the reason of occurrence. Discourses are innocent for members - consider unite now. Find out more approximately the relation of the Friday Evening Discourses on our blog.
Einstein, who was averse to such behavior-at-a-distance, understood this interaction differently. For him, there are more players on the scene than exact the particles. There are also fields. Each electron exhibit an electromagnetic field that extends throughout room. The electrons move hence from one another not because they are directly mesh with each other across a gap, but because each one is feeling a force from the other's field.
Do electrons feel forces from their own electromagnetic fields? Either repay Saturn to trouble. First, suppose the answer is yes. The electromagnetic address of an electron gotta stronger as you get closer to the electron. If you think of the electron as a little ball, each piece of that ball would feel an enormous outward force from the very strong electromagnetic address at its location. It should detonate. Henri Poincaré suspicion that there might be some other forces opposing this self-repulsion and holding the electron together – now called 'Poincaré emphasize'. If you think of the electron as prick-size, the proposition is worse. The field and the force would be infinite at the electron's location.
Tags: Today Post
Today Post- January 09, 2020
Affiliate Marketing 2020: How to Make Money Online
Work from home money online for beginners
GTA 5 Online Free Money
COPYRIGHTED CONTENTS
Top 5 Covid-19 Prevention Mask Review
Iphone 11 pro review amazon
Janpan Country Towns Were Dying Them Covid 19
Tesla Model 3 top 9 USA Most sold car in American
CBD market estimating that the revenue would hit $16 billion by 2025
U.S. Says It Won't Discuss retreating Troops From Asian nation
New Cash app 2020 new invite
Fortnite Chapter 2 Season 5: Top 5 leaks hints at Winterfest 2020
Search Engine BOVOTV

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


Sirius Satellite and XM Satellite Video?
In 2007, Chrysler and Sirius satellite radio announced that Sirius satellite VIDEO receivers will be available in 2008 model cars. Chrysler will be the first to feature these players in its Town & Country and Grand Caravan Mini-Van. Sirius has announced plans to begin broadcasting some type of children's video programming in 2007.
Yes, you read right. Sirius Satellite VIDEO (not audio).
Although currently used mainly for music and other forms of radio programming, satellite radio systems are technically capable of delivering any type of data, including audio, text and video. Two or three stations are planned for the initial launch and will be mainly, if not exclusively, used for children's programming; Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network, and The Disney Channel have been mentioned by some sources. The video service will be offered to current Sirius subscribers for an additional fee.
Sirius's video service is still in the early stages and many questions remain unanswered such as the quality of the video signal and whether the video would be streamed live or perhaps downloaded onto hard drive based players for later viewing, which would likely lead to higher quality video at the cost of instant viewing. Sirius will be working with Microsoft using Microsoft's Windows Media Video 9.0 technology.
If you don't want to buy a Chrysler vehicle, it's likely you can buy a standalone receiver for Sirius's video service which will likely go on sale soon before the service's official launch.
If you don't want to buy a Chrysler vehicle, it's likely you can buy a standalone receiver for Sirius's video service which will likely go on sale soon before the service's official launch.


Canada Goose Jacket features a bomber style that's just the thing for a window-shopping expedition in a mountain resort village, while the Chilliwack's premium duck down insulation and luxurious, frost-proof coyote hood trim stand up to frigid winds on an exposed sleigh ride. Canada Goose Parka is the original,undefeated champion of extreme cold-weather utility jackets,and its quality and warmth are simply without question. Canada Goose Jackets fits true-to-size and a Large fits comfortably with room for a hoody underneath. New to the Arctic Collection,inspired by our Canada Goose Jacket,the Citadel is a slimmer and stylish version,perfect for the city.


Here's a cool new illustration that Martha did for Smithsonian Magazine. This was for an article titled "The Counterfeit Queen of Soul", which is a fascinating true story that took place in Florida in 1969, in which a woman was kidnapped and forced to impersonate Aretha Franklin. Crazeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!


text:
The Future of Economic Research Under Rising Risks and Costs of Information Disclosure
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 5, 2019 2:30 PM - 4:30 PM
Atlanta Marriott Marquis, A706
Hosted By: American Economic Association & Committee on Economic Statistics
Chair: Ben Casselman, New York Times
Why the Economics Profession Cannot Cede the Discussion of Privacy Protection to Computer Scientists
John Abowd
Economists rely heavily on designed data and administrative records from governmental agencies to do critical analytical research. These studies are often done under the supervision of a statistical agency exercising its dual mandate to disseminate information and to protect the privacy and confidentiality of respondent data. We have long recognized that there is tension between these mandates. Cryptographers established in the early 2000s that there is a hard limit to the amount of fully accurate information that can be published from any finite confidential database (Dinur and Nissim 2003)—a budget constraint stated in terms of confidential information leakage. There quickly followed new methods of confidentiality protection, known as formal privacy in computer science. Although the database reconstruction theorem was well-understood in cryptography, its implications for the work of statistical agencies were largely unexplored before the U.S. Census Bureau announced its research program (Census Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, September 2016) and its decision to implement differential privacy, the leading variant of formal privacy models, for the 2020 Census of Population (Census Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, September 2017). The Commission on Evidence-based Policymaking also explicitly recommended that statistical agencies embrace privacy-enhancing data analysis methods in its report (September 2017). Because these methods enforce an explicit production function relation between privacy protection and statistical accuracy, they must be implemented in a manner that is fully cognizant of the analysis being performed with the released information. Moreover, an explicit choice—outside the domain of computer science, but integral to economics—must be made: what is the optimal accuracy-privacy protection point for a given problem. This social choice is constrained by the formal privacy technology introduced by cryptographers. The preference mapping, on the other hand, must be expressed based on the uses of the published information and the attendant confidentiality risk. Social scientists have behaved as if they could always have maximum accuracy in every published statistic. We must now re-design many of our analysis protocols to accommodate the constraints of provably effective privacy protection. We aren't the only ones. Google, Apple, Microsoft, and many other information technology giants face the same
Differential Privacy and Census Data: Implications for Social and Economic Research
Steven Ruggles
Download Preview (PDF, 332.22 KB)
Download PowerPoint (PPT, 350.00 KB)
The Census Bureau has announced a new set of standards and methods for disclosure control in public use data products. The new approach, known as differential privacy, represents a radical departure from current practice. In its pure form, differential privacy techniques may make the release of useful microdata impossible and severely limit the utility of tabular small-area data. Adoption of differential privacy will have far-reaching consequences for research. It is possible—even likely—that scientists, planners, and the public will lose the free access we have enjoyed for six decades to reliable public Census Bureau data describing American social and economic change. We believe that the differential privacy approach is inconsistent with the statutory obligations, history, and core mission of the Census Bureau.
Reconciling Access and Privacy: Building a Sustainable Model for the Future
Katharine G. Abraham
Download PowerPoint (PDF, 132.49 KB)
In recent decades, social science research has benefited greatly from access to survey and Census data collected and disseminated by the Federal statistical agencies. The research made possible by this access has generated invaluable insights. An important factor in the government's ability to collect data from individuals and businesses is the promise it gives to data subjects that their information will be kept private. The statistical agencies are vigilant in their efforts to honor this promise. Given the explosion of outside data about all of us that increasingly is available in electronic form, however, the risk that information contained in data products released by the federal government could compromise the privacy of data subjects has grown. It seems to me to be an unavoidable conclusion that, in order to honor the promises of privacy made to data subjects, current modes for disseminating information based on survey and Census data will need to be rethought. The challenge will be how to do this in a way that also enables effective use of the data. Tiered access is likely to be a central element of any new model for data access, with the information needs of many data users satisfied through publicly disseminated tabulations and the capacity to provide necessary behind-the-firewall access to other data users expanded. This same mix of approaches also can be used to increase access to administrative records for research purposes. While the broad outlines of what a new system will look like seem clear, many important practical questions about its implementation remain to be addressed.
Privacy-Protection for Economics Research in Small Cells
Raj Chetty
John Friedman
Nathaniel Hendren
Public release of disaggregated statistics holds tremendous value for research and policy but presents challenges for privacy protection. This paper presents a new approach to protecting privacy when publishing statistics from data in small cells. This noise-infusion algorithm draws from ideas in the privacy literature and is straightforward to apply in almost any setting, even for complex statistical models. After describing the details of our approach, we discuss its benefits relative to common privacy-protection procedures, such as count-based suppression
JEL Classifications
C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics


text:
Plato Puzzles
100% Australian made jigsaw puzzles
2020 Jigsaw Puzzle Catalogue
Education & Early Learning
School Education Resources
Custom Puzzles for Aged & Disability services
Murri Art
Adult wooden Jigsaw Puzzles
About Plato Puzzles
WBPC – Jigsaw Puzzle
PALM COCKATOO
ABOUT THE PALM COCKATOO
The palm cockatoo is 55 to 60 cm in length and weighs around 1.2kgs. Palm cockatoo's are mostly found around Cape York, in the far north of Queensland, Australia and in Papua New Guinea. It is probably the largest cockatoo species and is the largest parrot in Australia, (although some yellow-tailed black cockatoos and sulphur-crested cockatoos can overlap in size). It has a distinctive large crest and has one of the largest bills of any parrot. This powerful bill enables palm cockatoos not only to eat very hard nuts and seeds, but also enables males to break off thick (3cm) sticks from live trees to use for a drumming display! As a result, the male has a larger beak than the female.
The palm cockatoo also has a distinctive red cheek patch that changes colour when the bird is alarmed or excited. It has a large and complex vocal repertoire, including many whistles and even a "hello" call that sounds surprisingly human-like. Distinct dialects occur throughout the species' range. Evidence indicates a palm cockatoo at 80 or 90 years of age in an Australia. Yet the oldest confirmed bird was aged 56 in London Zoo in 2000. While the age of zoo birds is known, the lifespan of palm cockatoos in the wild is still unknown.


Got yours and replied. Hope you got it - I'm not used to using the PM system.
Topic: Brass fuel tube thingy... Any ideas what it is?
A trophy? I like, but what name could you give it until you know what it's for?
Go on, take it off; I dare you!
The ends with flats may screw out and I bet you find a few hundred shot-gun pellets in there...……………..
Sorry, Trevor. Looks as if I have to go back to the drawing board!
Phil - Sorry, but I had to skip the lock.
But I'm not quite 80 yet, so let's say you might as well have asked me why the universe and everything in it exists!


text:
Chapter 1260: What Is The Point... Of Leaving Any Behind!?
As the army from the Seventh Mountain and Sea was picking up speed, Meng Hao was back in the Eighth Mountain and Sea. He was also being tracked by shadowy figures who occasionally materialized and then vanished. Apparently, they were watching him and keeping track of his location.
There had not been any wars between the Mountains and Seas for many years, but it seemed one was about to break out now. There were even various entities above in the 33 Heavens who were using special techniques to observe the Mountain and Sea Realm without being detected. They were looking down at the Eighth Mountain and Sea, their eyes gleaming with anticipation....
Meanwhile, outside of the 33 Heavens, out in the boundless expanse, two forces were approaching from different directions, and they were growing inexorably closer.
Apparently, war... was nigh!
Meng Hao and Meng Ru were speeding along through midair when all of a sudden, an intense feeling of alarm rose up inside Meng Hao, causing his face to flicker. Before he could react, the parrot's shrill voice could suddenly be heard in his mind.
"They're coming. Coming, I tell you! They're close, I can sense them. Dammit, they're moving a lot faster than I anticipated.... Meng Hao, they're almost here!!" The parrot sounded anxious, even terrified.
Meng Hao's eyes flickered. He knew exactly who the parrot was talking about, and it caused him to slowly lift his head up to look up into the sky. It was almost as if he could see out into the vast expanse beyond the 33 Heavens.
"Well then, I guess I need to hurry up," he said softly.
Off to the side, Meng Ru gaped in shock. "Big bro Meng Chen, what did you say?"
"Oh, nothing," he replied, shaking his head as he continued to lead Meng Ru through the starry sky toward the Meng Clan's central continent.
He passed through the protective spell formations without triggering any of them, and proceeded directly toward the ancestral mansion.
"The two sisters we're going after are big sis Qiu'er and big sis Meng Fei," Meng Ru said quietly. "Their latent talent is better than mine, and their cultivation bases are higher.... I managed to meet them and pass the news about what was happening, but I was prevented from taking them away. If it weren't for big bro mastiff, I might have been detained as well.
"They're both in the hands of cultivators from the first bloodline...." When she looked at Meng Hao, it was almost worshipfully. In her mind, once Meng Chen arrived on the scene, all their problems would be solved.
Meanwhile, in the East District of the Meng Clan's ancestral mansion, there was a huge temple surrounded by nine pillars. Beneath each of those pillars was a furnace.
Those burning furnaces were causing the nine pillars to slowly heat up.
Bound to the pillars were nine young women, all of whom had ashen faces and were trembling. They looked terrified and were pleading for their lives, except for two who, although they were not spectacularly beautiful, were charming and pretty. Those two had their jaws clenched; despite the increasing temperature of the pillars they were tied to, they refused to utter any pleading words.
Sitting in the middle of the pillars and furnaces was an old man, who was currently performing double-handed incantation gestures and sending sealing marks out toward the furnaces, which were causing the furnaces to burn even more fiercely.
Surrounding the entire area was an audience of young men. The audience was clearly split into two groups, one of which clustered around a young man in a green robes, and the second group around another young man in a yellow robe. Clearly, the two of them had very high statuses, and currently, their eyes were fixed upon the old man in the middle of all the columns. They were also turning deaf ears to the pleading cries of the young women.
After a moment passed, the young man in the green robe suddenly asked, "What are we betting on this time?!"
"I bet that this time, Grandmaster Song's pill refining will result in... her, her and her all becoming Young Beauty Pills!" As the young man in the yellow robe spoke, his eyes glittered as he singled out three young women among the nine. Two of those young women were those who refused to plead for their lives.
After a moment of thought, the young man in the green robe replied, "You made your choice pretty quickly. Well, in that case, I say that those three will fail to become pills!"
Then the two young men exchanged an icy glance.
It was at about this time that rumbling sounds could be heard as Grandmaster Song's eyes suddenly flared with light. He waved both hands forcefully out into the air, causing the nine furnaces to blaze with fire. The pillars instantly grew hotter, and in the blink of an eye, nine flaming threads shot out of the fires toward the nine young women.
Terrified screams of desperation rang out from the mouths of seven of the young women. As for the other two, they were trembling, and clearly terrified, but still refused to make even a single sound. However, their hearts were clearly filled with regret.
When Meng Ru had told them about what was happening back in their bloodline mansion, they had instantly wanted to return, but now, it seemed that would be impossible.
Sighing inwardly, they exchanged glances, then slowly closed their eyes as the flaming threads closed in on them.
"Become pills!" Grandmaster Song threw his head back and roared, rising to his feet and throwing his hands into the air. Strange light shone out from his eyes, and yet, even as the words left his mouth, an enraged snort suddenly echoed through the air like thunder.
Cold words also rang out. "You're the one who should become a pill!"
As the icy words reverberated back and forth, cracking sounds could be heard as the ground froze over. The nine furnaces trembled, and their flames winked out. Next, the furnaces actually exploded, and cracks began to spread out across the pillars, which then shattered.
The nine young women could now move. As soon as their feet touched the ground, they began to flee, except for the two who had refused to beg for their lives, who looked up into the air, excited expressions on their faces.
The crimson threads attached to the columns almost seemed to be self-aware, and were trying to flee in fear. However, before they could get very far, a powerful force sucked them back, twisting them together into what looked like a white medicinal pill, which came to rest in the hand of a young man who had suddenly appeared in the air up above.
He waved his arm, sending the white medicinal pill flying toward Grandmaster Song's forehead. As it flew through the air, it crumbled, then fused into Grandmaster Song, who trembled and let out a miserable shriek. His body instantly burst into flames, and was burned into ash, all the way to the bone. What was left behind was a red medicinal pill.
The young man who had just arrived was none other than Meng Hao, followed by Meng Ru. Meng Ru was staring at the two steadfast young women, tears pouring down her cheeks. She quickly flew over and stood in front of them protectively.
This sudden development left all the bystanders completely shocked. As they edged backward, the two young men's faces darkened.
"What gall! How dare you kill Grandmaster Song! Men, kill these people!"
"Bring me his head!" In response to their orders, the crowd of cultivators surrounding them flew into the air toward Meng Hao.
"What kind of clan are you?" Meng Hao said quietly, his eyes blazing with icy killing intent. "Refining people into pills for pleasure? You completely lack any humanity whatsoever. What is the point... of leaving any of you behind?!"
Note from Er Gen: I wrote this chapter in the car, and ended up getting carsick. I feel horrible, but did my best and can't write any more. Please forgive me, this chapter is only 2,000 Chinese characters instead of 3,000.
Note from Deathblade: This chapter is indeed much shorter, coming in at about 1,300 English words instead of the usual 2,000+.
After I Shall Seal the Heavens... is A Will Eternal....
Get the latest updates about my translations, novels, games, videos, etc.
Greetings everyone, if you're interested in occasional updates about the content I create, sign up for my e-mail list. No spam, just periodic news.


text:
UT - UT & Confidential [vinyl 2LP limited]
Limited Edition of 500 Copies Worldwide! Repackaged as Double 12" with PVC Outer Bag Cut at 45rpm for Maximum Sound Fidelity Remastered by Dominique Brethes at Wolf Studios Part of the UT reissue series. The UT reissue series. The band is reissuing its remastered catalogue on Out Records through Forte Distribution in 2017 and 2018. The UT reissue campaign starts with the Ut EP and the Confidential EP, remastered by Dominique Brethes at Wolf Studios and repackaged as a double 12" (both cut at 45rpm for maximum sound fidelity) and a CD version. Ut is a radical rock group founded by Nina Canal, Jacqui Ham and Sally Young in NYC in Dec 1978. Originating in the downtown No Wave scene and inheritors of the collision between rock, free jazz and the avant-garde, Ut exploded the rigidity of conventional rock, constructing songs through collective improvisation, swapping instruments and rotating the role of singer/director. Migrating to London in 1981, Ut played with bands like The Fall and The Birthday Party and released music on their own label, Out Records. Ut became a favorite of BBC's John Peel and recorded sessions for his show. Joining forces in 1987 with the label Blast First, they released the critically acclaimed In Gut's House in 1988 and made the NME op 50 Albums' that year. As The Washington Post exclaimed, "With In Gut's House, Ut has scraped and droned one of the finest underground rock albums of the year... The tightly interwoven, firmly focused sound... is rich, spooky, urgent and quite unexpectedly beautiful." The album Griller followed in 1989, engineered by label mate Steve Albini, who shared Ut's raw aesthetic and captured the band's intensity. Ut disbanded in 1990 and began performing again in 2010. They have since toured the US, UK, Ireland and Europe.
1 SHAM SHACK
2 THIS BLISS
3 NEW COLOUR
4 EXILEE GOES OUT
7 TELL IT


text:
Home General The question "Are you pregnant?", being a female student in academia and...
Ayşe Gülkızı
Asking the question of marriage during gynecological examination by saying "Patients want it", hiding behind pretexts
Paula Rego, Untitled No. 5, 1998.
Over the weekend, twitter, our blissless bliss environment, witnessed a mind-boggling debate. When a twitter user, who was (apparently) asked "are you married" at a gynecology appointment, complained (rightly) that doctors should change this jargon (and added that some doctors do this as a form of morality watchdog), of course, all hell broke loose. The reaction of the group of doctors, who have been subjected to increasing rates of violence, inequality and loss of rights in recent years, who are constantly forced to talk about those issues in every environment and whose reflexes to react collectively have gradually developed for this reason, was this time directed towards this reproach. The majority of the reactions were in the form of bringing into line that did not serve a purpose, such as "this is Turkey". In some of the reactions, from the risk of violence that doctors may be exposed to because of this issue to the doctors sued for vaginal examination, and to issues related to professional difficulties were mentioned, which of course should be discussed in the context of health policies. There were also doctors who were justifiably concerned that if they asked the patient this question, he might put the woman in a difficult position. However, the majority of the reactions on the part of the doctors consisted of the finger-wagging answers stating (in a rather patronizing manner) that the Twitter user was not a doctor and she could not know how difficult it was to ask this question, so it would be better if she did not express her opinion too clearly . Some doctors, on the other hand, took it one step further and said, "When you stop saying 'I'm not married'," and easily moved on to the content accusing the patient/woman/victim. (Aside from the simple fact that these two responses do not come from the same person, a response that does not hear both voices, has no intention of hearing anyway). In the meantime, unfortunately, we were not surprised to see that the age, veganism, lifestyle and sexual life of the woman who posted the first tweet came into the discussion. (I should add that this woman tried to respond to all the tweets from doctors, except the insulting ones, with kindness and justification). Some even suggested that she should go to Europe/be deported!
Meanwhile, the expected deontological approach came from a female medical student. The woman, a doctor candidate, said clearly that "asking the question of marriage because patients want it is a pretext to hide behind and that the right thing to do is to ask the most appropriate question for medical ethics – that is, to ask about patient's sexual history in a straightforward way, but in a way that the patient can understand." I don't know if it did others' hearts too, but it did my heart good, and a fresh summer breeze blew. However, instead of bringing the discussion to the right plane, this brave step must have shaken some bodies to see the reaction from the medical world, both from a young person and a woman, and this time it was the female student's turn to be targeted. She was called by her first name by older-male-surgeons-doctors, fingers were shaken at her, she was put in her place, given a lesson, threatened, accused of trying to be a Twitter hero, attacked on the basis of her physical appearance, mocked and made joking matter.
No need to prolong it. There are two young women in the middle, a patient and a medical student. They expressed their reactions in the area that they saw as problematic, in a very proper and courageous manner. One has to give them a standing ovation. To encourage. Let's at least like it. Let's think about it at least a little bit. No, ears are blocked again. The bodies are not able to stomach even the risk of the slightest bit of truth in what has been said. It's more comfortable to ignore. It is more comfortable to say that I am just following the truths of society and what I should do. Because what you isolate yourself as the truth of that society is actually your truth too, but your bodies that you put above everything do not allow you to express it. That's why it causes aggression mixed with nausea, saying that what you insist on normalizing is not normal, it is a form of oppression. Deep down inside, you don't accept the state of being a woman, women's body perception, the fact that women can have sexual preferences, let alone blaming it on society, hiding behind excuses – just like the medical student woman said. You are one of the reasons why these women continue to suffer from the system, because as long as you don't face it and you play the helpless role, you keep running the system and you don't feel any discomfort about it. Even if someone tries to make it feel, that pointing finger comes out immediately, you don't want to face it, you don't want the power you have established, the information hegemony on which your power is based, to suffer the slightest damage. At the slightest threat, you turn to violence, just like the ones you criticize. And again, by using gender inequality, that you don't want to know, see or hear about, to the fullest, and by putting young women in their place. If these women are so openly subjected to violence on social media, especially by doctors, shouldn't we first of all discuss how objective the medical environment, which you think is so objective and above all, is?
Of course, there is much more to discuss on this issue, but in general, the fact that women are exposed to masculine behaviors in outpatient polyclinics of gynecology and obstetrics in every way, that these examinations, which are already a very difficult process, are often made even more difficult by health personnel, that women are shamed in various ways about their sexuality and their bodies, are actually known facts, even though some of us bury our heads in the sand. It is also one of the unwritten rules of medicine that being a woman in the lower ranks of the academy means that you will not be listened to most of the time (if not always). It is thought to be normal as it is normalized. Rules that are harder to raise a voice against as they become normalized.
I've been a doctor for over 15 years, and I think I've seen the good and the bad. I do not mean that the medical world should be a pioneer in society. I know/we know that the medical world is what society is. Just as masculinity is effective in society, it is also effective in the medical world. It feels important to put that aside and accept it. Because it's the only way to face the patriarchy inside us. After that, maybe it will be possible to calmly try to understand what is being said without getting defensive and raising our shields, to face ourselves, to think about how we reproduce the masculine reactions of society by acting according to them. If we accept this, we will be able to look for ways to build our own methods, and we will not need to make excuses. As long as we realize that we are in a spiral of violence in order not to lose the comfort of ignoring. As long as no one is captured by the laziness of saying that society is like this and there is nothing to do.
Let me end with the words of a third female twitter user: "What should society do if doctors are like this". There is no place isolated from patriarchy, and there is no end to the struggle with patriarchy.
For the original in Turkish / Yazının Türkçesi için
Translator: Gülcan Ergün
Proof-reader: Müge Karahan
gynecolog
Previous articleInterview with the journal Jineolojî following the assassination of Nagihan Akarsel / "Nagihan's resistance, discourse and semantic world should reach all women"
Next articleOn "the Patriarchy of Things" / Interview with Rebekka Endler
Will and Testament: "One cannot choose family, but can choose to tell her story"
The struggle against patriarchy in Mytilene / Interview with Anormia
Sexist software developers exposed on Twitter: Interview with women developers
Refugee women's poverty and opportunities for feminist struggle
Egotistic World of Bikers
Why is the Istanbul Convention in the crosshairs?
Homo sapiens 2.0 and bio attack in Margaret Atwood's novel


text:
HomeFrom The Editor's Desk
Credit: CormacGP & Repsol Honda MotoGP Team
Catalunya-Barcelona Mayhem With Marc Marquez Running Away With The Title!
Close your eyes and imagine hearing the sound of bikes crashing, the crowd roaring and riders yelling at one another. This is exactly what took place at the 2019 race in Catalunya with Jorge Lorenzo innocently taking out Andrea Dovizioso, Maverick Vinales and Valentino Rossi at turn ten so early in to the race. If you watch the accident back, all the riders had a role to play with Lorenzo braking hard and losing his front end collecting the others like a bowling bowl. Of course, Lorenzo understands he is to blame because he went for a door that was open and then closed rapidly. It was an ambitious and clever move that unfortunately did not pay off. As a result, Marquez ran away out the front and has resulted in a 37 point lead in the World Championship. The Spanish Ant is smiling from ear to ear with the victory and was smart in his tyre choice knowing that his main competitor was Fabio Quartararo. MM93: "I chose the soft rear to try and push in the beginning and to try to not overheat the tyre but to try to be constant and fast. All of the Repsol Honda Team did a really good job this weekend; we worked hard and prepared well for the race. The team told me something had happened to Dovi, so I just kept pushing and focusing on my own race. We had the perfect strategy regardless and I want to thank all the fans who came out. Gracias! It's always special when you can celebrate winning together with your brother, Alex rode well this weekend!" The double whammy Marquez effect was felt across Spanish soil and what a way to win at a home event.
The key point to take away for Lorenzo fans is that he was fast, comfortable and in the top four so early in to a race which is a very positive sign. He was chasing and catching the front pack which is exactly what Honda was waiting to see. JL99: "You don't have any options if you brake a little bit too late here, like happened with me. It was my fault, my mistake and I apologise. It was really unfortunate to take out Dovi, Maverick and Valentino – it wasn't their fault obviously, it was mine. The only thing that matters today is the crash, I took out three riders unfortunately but if we think aside from this it was a weekend where we were able to make a step forward and I was consistent throughout." With the test on Monday, Lorenzo is looking forward to gaining more track time, trying new things and going to Assen with a strong package.
In contrast, it was pure anger for Vinales, frustration for Dovi and confusion for Rossi. Mixed emotions across the board as Danilo Petrucci, Alex Rins, Quartararo, Jack Miller and Cal Crutchlow battled it out for the remaining positions. If there is anyone who wears emotions on their sleeve it is Vinales who was making his emotions clear as daylight on television. MV12: "Actually, I saw someone coming very fast on the inside, and I tried to pick up the bike to avoid a crash. Dovi was in front of me and I thought that just they were going to crash, but unfortunately they touched my rear tyre and I jumped. I couldn't avoid it and I'm really disappointed, but on the other hand I'm really happy." On the other side of the garage was Rossi who was also in a way ambitious with making a move on Petrucci. VR46: "I was very optimistic, but unfortunately in that corner I tried to overtake Petrucci and I already arrived a bit fast. At the same moment the crash in front of me happened, so I couldn't avoid the bike of Jorge and I crashed. It's a great shame, because I could have done a good race. I felt strong. On the positive side, it was a better weekend, compared to Mugello. I was competitive and enjoyed it a lot more, so we will start again from this point." The dominos fell on race day with the group and DesmoDovi was the most devastated as he watched points wash down the drain. AD04: "After a great start, I took the lead and I was in a strategic position to ride the race we had planned. The rear tyre still wasn't perfectly heated up so I wasn't pushing the pace yet but, considering how the race eventually unfolded and the rhythm shown by other riders, I believe we could have been contenders for sure. I prefer not to comment about the incident, but the race still was entirely up for grabs at that point. Tomorrow we have another important test to keep improving our base, and we'll try to make the most of it to bounce back immediately at Assen." Lorenzo, the former teammate probably is off the Christmas card list!
Credit: Mission Winnow Ducati MotoGP Team
Credit: Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Team
In addition to the above incident, it was an unfortunate finish for Crutchlow who had the podium pace and overcooked his entry causing him to run wide and fall in to the kitty litter. His accident not a key talking point with so much friction in the debriefs regarding the flying Honda of JL99. Crutchlow: "The crash was completely my own fault. I was trying to pass Jack (Miller) and I locked the rear with the rear brake, one of the problems we have had this weekend on corner entry. There was always a possibility of it doing it if I went in hard on Jack, but I had to try to pass him because there was a chance of a podium, so I went down fighting for it at least." With that said, Crutchlow was the fastest on the circuit at the time and showcased strength after a rough patch with the 2019 Honda machine. He is pleased with the improvements and was able to push the bike which felt good.
For Petrucci, Rins and Quartararo it was a superb battle across the entire race distance. Miller was there for a while and just lost tyre grip that resulted in a lack of pace and not ideal considering his performance all weekend. It was a solid finish from the Australian rider though frustrating he could not push any further. Ride of the day goes to the Frenchman Fabulous Fabio! Not only did he have arm pump surgery just twelve days ago, he raced with a clear vision, calculation and pure class. Tears ran down his face as he celebrated his first MotoGP podium and he had every reason to be proud. What a transition for the former Moto2 rider, rookie in 2019 and with a brand new team. FB20: "I'm very happy with what we've achieved today especially as it was a very hard race. We made our best start this year, since I only dropped two positions. Then I made a mistake at Turn 4, losing another four positions, and I was a little further back! Nevertheless, I found myself in the fight for the podium and a few laps from the end I managed to get into second and push. Thanks to adrenalin of fighting for the podium – and the medicine – my arm didn't trouble me so much in the race. In the final laps my arm started to hurt a lot, but the reward of being on the podium is much greater than that. Twelve days ago I was undergoing an operation, and now I'm on the podium. Since the European races have begun, we have been very fast; this weekend the worst result in a session was second. The pace we have is very good, but we have to continue working as we have done so far. I want to thank the team for the opportunity they have given me and all the work they do. I am very happy to have achieved the first podium for PETRONAS Yamaha SRT."
Credit: Gold & Goose & Petronas Yamaha Sepang Racing Team
Tyre marks were both on the track and on leathers. Rins and Petrucci swapped tyre marks with the Spaniard incredibly aggressive to a point where the Mission Winnow Ducati rider had to stand his ground lap after lap. Petrucci did not expect a podium finish and these points are vital for his title campaign. Rins was not so happy as he thought the result would have reflected his efforts. No doubt, the Team Suzuki Ecstar rider pushed the limits and was lucky to stay upright. The track was very hot for their bike and tyre choice which made it quite difficult on the tyres. Rins struggled with the feeling in particular when it came to the right hand turns. If his start was better, the result would have definitely been different. With so many riders failing to finish, the title is going forward in the direction of MM93 who is laughing and smiling as he goes to Assen next which is a favourite. Will anyone be able to challenge Marquez and force his hand to make a mistake…. This is the question everyone is asking themselves.
Credit: Pramac Racing MotoGP Team
CatalunyaFabio QuartararoMarc MarquezMOTOGPSpain
Teams Arrive In Barcelona Eager To Fight For Spanish Victory!
Assen – Jorge Lorenzo Withdraws From Dutch TT With Fractured Vertebra
Myanna has an incredible grasp and knowledge of the sport in detail and continues to secure lead stories every week. She is in constant contact with team and rider media management. She is an admitted lawyer with two degrees and is currently writing a biography on Alan Jones MBE 1980 F1 World Champion. She is a fond lover of two wheel motorsport, predominantly MotoGP, Moto2 and Moto3.
MotoGP, Moto2 and Moto3 Cancelled In Silverstone
Honda Spain Catalunya Sport Motorsport Valentino Rossi Brno Austin Assen 2018 Crutchlow Shannons Insurance Sepang Jorge Lorenzo ItalianGP Marc Marquez Silverstone Racing Maverick Vinales Phillip Island Championship Barcelona Ducati Malaysia ROSSI Qatar Andrea Dovizioso Le Mans Repsol Honda Yamaha MOTOGP Marquez Mugello Dovi Motorbikes


Neue Tornetze für "Bolzplatz" - Dorfgemeinschaft d´ Weilemer e.V.
Neue Netzen bekam der Bolzplatz in Weiler .
Wonderful goods from you, man. I've understand your stuff previous to and you're just extremely excellent. I actually like what you've acquired here, really like what you're stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it wise. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a terrific site.