text:
Turbulence News Blog
Turbulence's Aaron Swartz #PDFtribute
Dutch translation of the Turbulence Issue 1 interview with Todd Hamilton and Nate Holdren, 'Compositional Power'
Turbulence workshop, May 30, Nottingham – "Rethinking the Realistic: Social Movement and Struggle in the Current Crisis"
'Stronger are the powers of the people': Film and Discussion Event curated by Turbulence Editor, Rodrigo Nunes, Berlin 24-26 February
Turbulence Flyers for #OccupyEverything Occupations
Event with Turbulence Editor: What Does Changing the World Mean Today? (Porto Alegre, Brazil)
Spanish Issue
Turbulence Book
Discuss Turbulence
Rolling Blogroll
Corporate Rule – A Corporate Watch project
infinite thØught
RSAnimate Video Series
Shut Them Down!
The Free Association book: 'Moments of Excess'
Verso's swanky new website
WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society
Wu Ming Foundation
It's all about potatoes and computers: Recipes for the cook-shops of the future
In the early eighties, Swiss author P.M. – the most common initials in the Zurich telephone directory – published Bolo'Bolo, 'a field guide to organising utopias', in the words of one reviewer. 'Replete with maps, drawings, a new lexicon and universally recognised symbols, and a "a planetary menu for subversion", the text could be considered a political-nerd's version of one of Tolkien's fantasies, but its references to real events and reflexive tone gives the book a kind of crackpot sense of real possibility.' A quarter-century later, P.M. is still planning.
Access to land and knowledge
The coming centrality of 'the commons' – based on the principle of the unconditional survival of all human beings on a decent basis – is obvious at this historical moment. At first they appear to be a 'fallback-option' for a system that is unable to allocate, use and distribute social assets in a rational way. But sustaining a social metabolism on the basis of obscure 'laws' of values, profits and interests was never a good idea and is now revealed as a catastrophic one. (It has never really been just an idea, but an instrument of oligarchic power. That's the dirty family secret of it.)
The future commons really boils down to two elements: access to land (i.e. food, fuels) = bites; and access to knowledge (capacity to use and improve all means of production, material or immaterial) = bytes. It's all about potatoes and computers.
With regard to both of these aspects, we see numerous movements that are struggling for – or, partly, already constituting – a new global commons. Whereas the principles are more or less uncontested and self-evident, the forms and necessary institutions are still unclear.
The commons cannot be based on some law of value. Land and knowledge should be shared according to needs. Everybody should have an equal say in everything. Nobody should be excluded on whatever grounds. Human fragility should be respected.
A commons without a consciously constituted community is unthinkable. Common usage must be based on reliable and equal communication and antioligarchical forms of organisation ('democracy'). Without such a social consensus, an unregulated commons will end in tragedy, given that this planet has ecological limits. Democracy is necessary since, without it, a ruling sub-group will always lack the motivation and responsibility necessary for efficient planetary stewardship. When the community suffers, the planet suffers.
The population of the whole planet earth is one community – simply for lack of outsiders. However, communication on practical, everyday matters on this scale is difficult – even with the help of email, Facebook and all other kinds of tools. Although it may sound a bit grandiose to speak about planetary planning at the present moment, some kind of institutionalised planetary allocation of resources will have to be achieved. Our oil, water, fertile soils, minerals, hunting and fishing grounds cannot be the exclusive domain of those who happen to be sitting on top of them by virtue of historical accident. If History must end – a good idea! – we must together discuss the terms of this ending.
Obeying Warren Buffett's motto of only investing in what we understand, I suggest we start our discussion of the global commons by considering our immediate neighbourhoods.
Micro-agro: neighbourhoods and boroughs
Ultimately the whole output of the complex planetary economic machine ends up as commodities that we use in our homes and neighbourhoods. If our everyday lifestyles can be redefined to respect general ecological (=healthy biosphere) and psychological (=happiness) limits, the rest will fall into place. At the moment, the world is divided: an 'affluent' 20 percent consume 80 percent of the resources, whilst a poor 80 percent share the remaining 20 percent. If we consider the whole planet as one community, the prospects of living together peacefully look bleak indeed if we cannot overcome this chasm. There must be an understanding of a 'good life' on a planetary basis: creating ways of us earthlings living together. The trust and cultural solidarity needed for the collective and sustainable use of resources can only be established on the basis of justice. Climate and geographical circumstances can be taken into account – we do not all have to live the same way – but our demands on the ecosystem must roughly be the same. Thanks to scientific advances, there is no reason why we should not all lead a decent life with plenty of spare time for our hobbies. Technical productivity is so high at the moment, that capitalist 'value' has problems catching up with it.
Now, what might a good neighbourhood life look like in, let's say, Switzerland, my accidental home country? A neighbourhood of about 500 members will not be purely urban, but linked to a piece of land of about 100 hectares (247 acres), situated within a perimeter of 15 to 80 kilometres (10 to 50 miles), depending on local conditions. Inhabitants of the urban community merge into one cooperative with those who farm the linked land. The International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), which published a report on global agriculture comparable in scope to that published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, recommends middle-sized agricultural units as the global solution to feeding the 9 billion or so people who will be living a few decades in the future. (Given fossil fuel inputs, the net caloric output of large agro-industrial production is negative and therefore has no future if we are to tackle carbon emissions and climate change.) The only feasible way of doing agriculture on this planet is intensive, mixed-crop, largely organic production: permaculture. This form of agriculture is hopelessly unprofitable under current conditions – so a new type of cooperation between consumers and producers must be found. In fact, the very distinction has to be abolished, transforming agricultural work into a part of housework for everybody. I call this system of 'global reruralisation' micro-agro.
Micro-agro links two nodes: an urban microcentre and a rural agrocentre. A microcentre is a cluster comprising food depot, communal kitchen, lounge, and restaurant – it's a service centre catering to all of the neighbourhood's 500-odd members. About 400m2 is required for the shop or food-depot (similar in size to a small supermarket). Here, food is stored, prepared, processed and cooked to guarantee a basic supply of nutrition.
If we calculate 1.8kg (4lb) of foodstuff per person per day, this generates a transportation volume of 900kg per day, let's say 7 tonnes a week. With deliveries three times per week, this means 2.3 tonnes each time – a small truck, theoretically. As the heaviest of the produce (potatoes, cereals, oils, legumes, etc.) is only delivered seasonally and in large quantities, this will allow more energy-efficient means of transportation (train, boat) a few times a year, delivering to a large number of adjacent microcentres at the same time. So, a smaller truck is sufficient for the every-other-day deliveries. This truck can be fuelled by the biogas produced from consumer waste. (Biogas trucks already exist.)
The agro-centre is internally diversified and can produce all of the main types of food: milk, cereals, vegetables, fruits, berries, eggs and so on. This diversification is technically feasible within relatively large units (100ha). In fact, it's necessary for the mixed-crop system to work. Exchange with neighbouring microcentres can further increase the diversity of foods.
Some products – salt, sugar, oils, coffee, wine, spices, etc. – cannot reasonably be produced on single-neighbourhood or even regional levels. Their production and distribution will remain territorial, continental or even global.
At the level of boroughs or small towns (roughly 40 neighbourhoods of 20,000 persons), additional distribution centres are necessary. This could be a 2000m2 supermarket, specialising in territorial or global products that are exchanged on the basis of fair contracts. (As an example, in our house we can drink coffee bought directly from farmers in Chiapas via the Rebeldia cooperative.) This supplementary supermarket would be located in the town centre – no more than a kilometre away – along with schools, administrative offices, special stores, cinemas, and so on. Called MiCo, these supermarkets could be territorial cooperatives (like the Migros supermarkets in Switzerland) and would be associated with territorial production and distribution centres – bakeries, breweries, sugar factories, etc.
Thewhole circuit of food production, distribution, preparation, consumption and waste re-use can be democratically managed under direct control of the people concerned. This is an important element of food sovereignty, and ultimately also of political power. People who can feed themselves are less prone to being blackmailed and exploited on other levels. Only on the basis of such global subsistence can supplementary systems of division of labour and cooperation (industry, research) remain anti-oligarchic and also ecologically sound.
Industrial subsistence: regions and territories
The capitalist industrial basis of our society is in crisis at the moment. Some of it must be got rid of, because it is not sustainable. The car industry, for instance. If we want a global commons based on justice, our power output can never exceed 1,000 watts and this, in most contexts, precludes the use of private cars. Trains, buses, tramways and boats were and are viable alternatives. Some of the industrial capacity used for cars and aeroplanes can be dedicated to the development and production of such means of transportation. Jobs, qualifications and technological know-how would not all be lost. Whatever we do, the overall volume of transport must be reduced, be it 'private' or 'public'. This can be achieved by reintegrating as many functions as possible into neighbourhoods and boroughs (see above).
How can our industrial basis be managed differently? At the moment, the way out seems to be nationalisation. As bankruptcies become more frequent, the state can acquire factories at cheap prices. Nationalised industries have a bad track record, and not just because of the neoliberal propaganda against them. The old nation state with its opaque institutions is not capable of managing an entire industrial base in the interests of the people. The opaque 'trust' must be transformed into a system of democratically organised general services. Ever since E.F. Schumacher wrote Small Is Beautiful, we have known that inefficiency arises if the size of organisations doesn't correspond to their optimal range of operations. 'Economies of scale' can also mean a smaller scale. So the general services must not form one big company, but rather exist as an articulated network of subsidiary, semi-autonomous entities. Why don't we call this system industrial subsistence?
Without a certain degree of direct inter-personal communication, there can be no democracy. But before we try to invent brilliant new systems of industrial democracy, we should start with what is already there. I have mentioned two 'levels' of democracy, the neighbourhood and the small town or borough. The neighbourhood is not a branch of general services, but rather a kind of collective household managed by its members. This form of direct democracy has been tested in innumerable cooperatives in countless forms all over the world. It has its limitations and problems, but there is no alternative unless you want to hand over control over your everyday life to anonymous organisms that 'know better'.
Things look different on the level of towns or boroughs (20,000 persons), especially if they're lumped together into larger cities. Here, existing public services can be augmented, perfected and democratically supervised. A borough is a kind of 'basic municipality' and could be the first branch/agency of the general services, providing water, energy, transportation, schools, a polyclinic, street maintenance, security, justice, housing/building, a fire brigade, communication media and so on. Already, prices for these services are 'political' – there's no market. In Zurich, for instance, the city has decided to lower water prices and the city owns its own electricity supply – it is the only city in Switzerland where electricity rates have been stable in recent years. Other cities have foolishly privatised these services, and the price of electricity has risen drastically.
At the level of small towns, public supervision of the management of services still works pretty well. Prices and rates can be set by democratic referendums. If we want to pay less for tram tickets, we can decide to do so. The goals are not profit or competition, but political: the welfare of the town's inhabitants, as well as ecological concerns. There is neither anonymous regulation nor the market's 'invisible hand', but conscious collective choice. As the private sector is collapsing, this model can be extended accordingly. Building companies can be taken over, clothes or furniture exchanges can be established, repair companies of all kinds can become public services (plumbers, roofers, electricians), media can become freely accessible (the bytes!), local industries can become 'public workshops'. In this way, existing public services can be extended into all industries through vertical integration. Public transport enterprises can take over the construction of trams, the school system can take over print shops, paper factories, furniture factories, construction companies, etc.
At the next level – regions of hundreds of thousands of people, or seriously big cities (New York, Shanghai, Moscow) – additional services and industries exist. These include hospitals, universities, power plants, concrete factories, opera houses, zoos, museums and ice rinks. They too can be democratically managed. Such urban services have a long tradition, but in a new situation, new services and enterprises can also be created. A cooperatory – not to be confused with a cooperative – is a platform where agents of social productivity interact. In such places, 'innovators' of all kinds meet 'the public' and arrange finance from regional banks. The idea of the bank here is to facilitate the pooling of resources for large-scale enterprises. The 'anticipation of necessary future resources' (communal planning) is also integrated in these institutions. Decisions would not be taken by obscure boards of directors, but in public assemblies. From the point of view of communication, it's an ideal 'market'; from the point of view of the commons, it's a democratic council. When you have an idea nowadays, you have to consult a whimsical bank employee, in the future you'll go to your regional cooperatory.
Cooperatories are also places where bytes are shared. Knowledge becomes a common stock on which anyone can build. The internet can function as a global on-line cooperatory, supporting the network of off-line cooperatories. But purely virtual cooperation will never work properly, because personal interaction is infinitely richer in channels of information (including body language). Ideas are not just ideas – you also have to see what a person looks like when she has an idea. Thus the internet and face-to-face gatherings of real people must complement one another.
A territory is an area in which most places can be reached by train in one or two hours. Thus daily interaction is possible and ecologically sound. Not too many services should be produced on this level – far fewer than nowadays – but some will have to be. Territories on this scale include present-day small nation-states (e.g. Estonia, Switzerland, Sri Lanka, Liberia, Ireland), regions (Brittany, Andalusia, Lombardy) or states (Iowa, Saxony, Andhra Pradesh). They are ideal for general services of many kinds: education, building materials, transportation, justice. Typically having between two and ten million inhabitants, territories allow for a mix of direct (referendums) and indirect (parliamentary) democracy without the risk of too grandiose nationalisms. At the same time, strong territories are the best means of dissolving traditional states like Britain, France, Germany, Russia or the US with their exaggerated power politics. The condition for this political healing process is the existence or creation of effective general services in these territories.
At the next level of organisation of general services are continents or subcontinents, composed of networks of relatively autonomous territories. Long-distance railway lines, river and sea transport, energy, technology and research, and the exchange of 'natural resources' can all be organised at this level. With the disappearance of cars and most trucks, there will be a renaissance of trains and boats on canals or along coasts. A kind of industrial subsistence is possible in this area – steel, aluminium, machine modules, chemical substances, electrical appliances, transport systems, communication networks etc. High-tech elements produced on a continental or global scale make regional production an option again. Like Lego blocks, these modules can be combined and adapted to local needs. A truly ecological design with no short-term profit constraints can be realised, allowing an increase in energy efficiency by a factor of 10.
Industrial subsistence also means a technological leap. Numerous innovations have not been developed or been repressed because they do not promise profits. Much ecological design is already technologically feasible and available. The Product Life Institute (www.product-life.org), for instance, stresses durability, adaptability, modularity and reparability in its designs. These aspects make them incompatible with capitalist profitability and control: they save work and resources, they do not imply large-scale production, they're intrinsically use-value oriented and are unfit for the production of surplus-value or for authoritarian command structures. The decentralised production of energy (not just solar, but from a wide range of sources) in the hands of communities affords a material autonomy that is much more reliable than a politically constructed one. (Actually, 'material autonomy' is just another way to say 'subsistence'.)
Ultimately, the planet as a whole is the commons. With the help of the internet bytes can be shared without limit. Information has already gone beyond all limitations imposed by the law of value. If people's livelihoods are guaranteed by subsistence and general services at all levels, free sharing of intellectual production is possible without endangering the survival of its producers. (It isn't easy to talk about shareware if you have nothing to share.) The planet can become a sphere for the free exchange of knowledge and ideas. Ultimately, these knowledge commons also have an impact on physical production – blueprints for machines and all manner of products are freely available.
In addition to these intellectual commons, a material commons must be constituted to establish a just distribution of resources. Burning fossil fuels, for example, cannot be considered a local or national concern. Carbon dioxide doesn't recognise borders. So there must be a global agency (perhaps constituted out of a transformed United Nations) that limits the amount of fossil fuels that can be taken out of the ground and that makes sure that which is extracted is distributed fairly.
A prerequisite for the creation of a truly democratic organisation at a global level is subsistence and democracy at all the levels below: neighbourhood, borough, region, territory and (sub)continent. At the moment the constituency of planetary organisations are nation states of very unequal political power and different levels of democratic decision-making. The global commons cannot be managed under the supervision of superpowers or regional grouping. What we need are two converging movements: first, the dissolution of large nations, along with the empowerment of territories, and second, the creation of effective and legitimate planetary institutions. This process is actually under way, although sometimes with very unsavoury motivations – new micro-nationalism, ethnic exclusivism, short-sighted oligarchic or 'tribal' interests (small can also be ugly). Maybe this step back to small-scale ethnic/tribal/micro-nationalisms might be needed as a stepping stone that breaks up larger powers, which in turn spurs two steps forwards towards planetary-scale institutions – think of Uiguria or Tibet.
The trinity of the commons
The commons have three spheres: general services, creative enterprises and agriculture. Each sphere is an aspect of a comprehensive global commons, but they operate differently, both materially and institutionally.
General services can only be managed by delegation, from the bottom up, with strict rules ensuring fair play, non-exclusivity and democracy. Even so, there's a risk of compartmentalisation, of re-oligarchisation, of the 'authority of the steam-engine' (as Engels called it), or put another way, there can be no democratic discussions in the cockpit of an airplane. Technological constraints can also give rise to certain delays in accountability. The use of such technologies can be minimised (no nuclear power plants, fewer airplanes, fewer risky technologies, prohibition of toxic substances) and their management can be made more transparent with democratic supervision. But there remains an intrinsic risk of some misuse of power. Therefore it is essential that the other two spheres have different material power bases, with different institutions and constituencies.
Diversity of social organisation is important for stability, just as natural diversity is for the biosphere. Agricultural subsistence is the ideal counter-balance to the general-services sphere: it's tactically independent, managed by directly democratic entities (neighbourhoods) and it operates on different rhythms (those of nature). The creative enterprises – that permeate all sectors – also act as a counter-balance to general services. Such enterprises have the most diverse organisational structures (from a one-person venture to a global cooperative) and they may operate with market systems, with money, bartering, gifts or just when there is occasional demand.
The infectiousness of small commodity production?
Is there a risk that capitalist relationships could arise again out of small-scale monetarised production, spreading from the sphere of creative enterprises? (This is a big concern in some parts of the left which demand completely moneyless exchange.) I think that there is no danger of this happening.
Firstly, the two other spheres both operate beyond commodity-exchange and the 'law' of value and they provide full existential security, so that any blackmailing with 'jobs' is impossible.
Secondly, there is no historical evidence that modern industrial capitalism automatically arises out of small commodity production. If that were true, capitalism would have originated in China, India or the Near East, where such conditions existed for thousands of years (much earlier than in Europe). Modern capitalism emerged with the creation of territorial states at the end of the 15th Century, and with their need for a cannon-building industry, which in turn was financed by the emerging banking systems of Florence, the Netherlands and Germany. Only these state-run enterprises were able to break down traditional small-scale commodity production, whose stagnation had been successfully guaranteed by guilds for hundreds of years. Shoe factories do not grow out of the neighbourhood cobbler's shop!
Thirdly, small commodity production need not be completely unregulated and can be contained within healthy limits. Ecological regulations must certainly apply, as well as minimum-wage conditions. Small commodity producers must also pay compensation ('taxes') for the use of communal goods and services, so that they don't turn into a parasitical 'free enterprise sphere' for extra-profits of informal oligarchies. As everybody's survival is amply cared for by subsistence and general services, a sphere of free association can really be a domain of free expression, not a sector where the law of the jungle applies. As we know, free enterprise is not free for those who must take any job just to survive: it's just the ideology of the exploiters and oppressors. Maybe even some elements of the guild system can be reactivated.
The trinity of the commons corresponds to the political wisdom of the separation of powers, of checks and balances. It represents material democracy and structural prudence: do not put all your eggs in one basket! Do not trust yourself. This trinity can be summarised – see table 1.
Intraditional ideological terms, this system could be defined as a compromise between communism/socialism, anarchism and communitarian subsistence.
Table 2 is – alas! – not the definitive blueprint of post-capitalist planning. It merely serves as a reductionist illustration of a very complex web of production, levels of organisation, fields of activities. The three spheres should not be seen as isolated, but as interactive, within and across organisational levels. The services, products and enterprises are only examples. Similar products can appear in all three columns.
Planning? What planning?
The excesses and blunders of state planning in the old socialist countries have given planning a bad name. In fact, planning just means thinking about the future and making the necessary adjustments. It is understandable that the ruling oligarchs do not want to think about the future, and even want to forbid thinking about it. As their system is unsustainable, they even flirt openly with its ruin to keep everybody on their toes. Without risk there is no profit, or only a very small one. Confronted with the present crisis the attitude towards planning seems to be getting more relaxed, more pragmatic – if markets are dysfunctional, maybe some planning could help. Profits are down anyway. In countries like France, that have always known a certain level of planning, the impact of the crisis is felt less, and the 'French Model' seems to be the darling of The Economist at the moment. It was not planning that got the socialist countries into trouble, but bad planning.
A postcapitalist household system is in principle demand-oriented. Instead of dumping commodities onto a market, goods that are needed are ordered by the consumers (who in turn are organised democratically on various levels). The producers (the same people wearing different hats) try to match these orders with the available resources (including their capacity or willingness to produce them) and give feedback to the ordering persons/institutions, who in turn modify their orders. This system of iterative planning seems clumsy, but computer programmes that can support it already exist. According to Paul Cockshott and Allin Cottrell's Towards a New Socialism, there is no amount of complexity that such planning algorithms couldn't handle. Even if consumer/producer iterations go back and forth numerous times, the specifications can be calculated and recalculated within seconds. So almost unlimited planning is possible. And it should be used, because it is the most just and the most ecologically sound procedure. (Markets are terribly wasteful!)
But before we begin to establish such planning mechanisms, we have to answer the question of what it is that should be planned. There is no pressure to minimise planning from the technical point of view – the idea that you'd need skyscrapers full of calculating bureaucrats is completely obsolete. But the principle of leaving people as free as possible to communicate directly is sound. Planning can lead to distortions and can create unwelcome power-bases that must be counter-balanced. Planning should not be a fetish, but merely a system of support, when interpersonal communication becomes too complex.
It is obvious that all the activities in the first sector or sphere, general services, must be planned at a global level. Already, most of these services are planned. However, once we have gotten away from present-day systems – which will need planning – subsistence agriculture requires minimal planning. The actual production of most food in agrocentres is left directly to the neighbourhoods. Agriculture operating on the level of territories, (sub)continents or the planet (producing salt or spices say) can be planned with the same mechanism as the general services. The third sector or sphere represents a very necessary counter-weight against a possible planning frenzy in the first.
The creative sphere, too, only needs minimal planning. The diversity of goods and services produced in this sector is so large and the activities so ephemeral that detailed planning could only happen after the event, which means it wouldn't be much different from what we now call the market. What this sector needs is a certain pool of resources (sourced from the other two sectors and from more basic branches of its own) that it can play with, without endangering social or ecological equilibria. This sector will be a mix of supply- and demand-oriented enterprises that use all kinds of regulation, including markets, free distribution and planning. The attempt of some of the state-capitalist bureaucracies to plan or regulate the area of small businesses led to some of its most depressing and ridiculous results. (Cockshott and Cottrell are optimistic that even this sector, down to the improvised lemonade stand at the street corner, could easily be planned within a few minutes. They also suggest, that – unfortunately – socialist planning came too early to be feasible. And when it began to look feasible in the 1960s, the bureaucrats stopped computerised planning because they were afraid of losing their hold on power and privileges. The planning bureaucracy itself had now become one of the major sectors of the economy.)
Iterative, democratic and permanent planning, as described above, is very different from current capitalist and defunct socialist planning. There is no separate planning authority – planning is not a command-structure – but it is one of the general services that are at everybody's disposal. Most of it is already in existence. If we had to re-invent and re-establish all the current patterns of supply which have evolved historically, this would in fact be a Herculean effort. But all we have to do is to feed the existing supply webs into the computer and then simply modify them according to the new requirements of the commons. (To do this, the existing bar code system is useful.)
Elements of a (Green) New Deal of eco-social reconstruction
Currently there isn't sufficient awareness of the necessity for a comprehensive social, economic and political restructuring of our global system. By definition a crisis is a turning point in the capitalist project: we could get further exploitation and oppression, or we could move beyond capitalist domination. It is difficult to discover how strong and how prepared the forces of radical change really are. Assuming that such forces exist, some provisional, but plausible, proposals for specific action can be made.
Such proposals must be based on the present situation, not on imaginary revolutionary leaps. So they are reformist and gradual proposals that won't immediately change the capitalist system. They might even appear to be solutions to soften its contradictions and problems.
Evidently, postcapitalist change must begin at the centre of capitalist globalisation, in the United States. It is inconceivable that comprehensive postcapitalist exclaves can coexist with an intact power structure of global capitalism. Of course, elements can be developed, tested and prepared in certain niches (Europe, Japan, South America), but they must be tentative and temporary. They must be abandoned before they get mutilated and perverted by the debilitating pressure of world capital. As soon as they are forced into a defensive position, they will degenerate and ultimately be re-absorbed by the hegemonic system. At the same time they will have set a discouraging example and will reduce the chance of a definite breakthrough.
In the US the postcapitalist era will probably take on the – historically false, but who cares? – name of a '(Green) New Deal'. It is obvious that the Green New Deal, as proposed by Obama and some Green parties, is only meant to be Plan B for the rescue of capitalism. It's not even meant to be a deal, i.e. a bargaining proposition for unions, state and bosses, but just a list of measures. But it's still in its soft phase and can be defined in different ways – if there is enough pressure. Why not hitchhike on this vehicle and make it greener, newer and fairer? It will basically establish state management of an almost-stagnant 'capitalism', with a profit-rate below one percent. The stronghold of the old oligarchies of capital will slowly be eroded and their companies will be integrated into the general services. From the current 50 percent, the share of Gross Domestic Product allocated by the state will rise to 70 percent or more, and so determine the strategic factors of development.
This benign strategy (scenario A) is based on the ability of the working classes to make the other option – aggressive exploitation, steep rise of the profit rate, ecological and military risk-taking – less appealing for the global oligarchies. The new French style of class struggle – taking managers or owners as hostages, threatening to blow up factories, riots ' plus global rigidity on salaries, could help to convince them. An additional strategy of discouragement, of an anti-economical war of attrition, could comprise the following behaviours:
refusal to buy the new (energy-efficient, hybrid) cars, for there is no such thing as an ecological sustainable car – an electric car is also a nuclear car, or a coal-powered car;
insisting on ecological products, standards and services;
refusal to replace unnecessary household goods;
refusal of suburban segregation – instead moving together to urban centres;
making connections with farmers and building up subsistence networks, boycotting supermarkets and small grocers alike;
creating territorial subsistence ('transition towns');
refusal of additional work, slowing down work rhythms;
insisting on free social services (education, health, transport, income);
boycotting shopping centres;
watching DVDs in neighbourhood centres (microcentres), preferring inner-city cinemas and boycotting multiplex cinemas in shopping malls;
slow food, slow work, slow travel;
reduction of commercial consumption, substituted by communal sharing;
exchange of goods for free.
These mostly individual activities cannot replace collective action, but they can become a nutritious side dish and keep the 'movement of discouragement' (of economic recovery) alive in periods of relative social tranquillity. Collective action is dependent on a logic of events: it is path-dependent, and not all events are possible at any given time, even if theoretically correct and necessary. (Maybe at this point Shakespeare could be more helpful than Marx.) But we can be confident that many opportunities soon will arise for effective collective action. All of this could lead the capitalist machine into such a quagmire that scenario A would look relatively appetising.
The following proposals are all based on scenario A. Scenario B – a global showdown – could be forced upon us, though. The winning of which seems very improbable to me. The costs would be immense. It's the old question: socialism or barbarism?
A Green New Deal would bring the state, the capitalists and the unions to a table. The central item of the Deal would be the ecological and social reconstruction of the US. The population of the United States is roughly 300 million, so we'd theoretically be dealing with 600,000 neighbourhoods, 15,000 boroughs or towns, 300 regions and 30 territories. As the territorial distribution of the population isn't homogeneous and various geographical factors come into play, the effective numbers will be somewhat different. The creation of 600,000 sustainable neighbourhoods based on micro-agro subsistence might cost $5 million each (not including the costs of resettling suburbanites), totalling $3.6 trillion. The establishment of lively town centres might cost $20 million each, another $300 billion. (In some towns, almost no investment would be necessary, in others hundreds of millions.) All in all, we're talking about $4 trillion that must be invested over a number of years. Additional investment should go into the reanimation of the (sub)continental train-system. The creation or relocation of regional and territorial industries alongside train tracks would also cost billions of dollars. The insulation of buildings, local energy plants, eco-design of industrial goods would create a final micro-industrial boom before terminal stagnation. This promise could be important to get some of the more enlightened (green) capitalists on board.
As costs of living could be reduced by these schemes without any loss of quality of life, the Green New Deal programme could easily be financed out of current wages – let's say ten percent. Of course, it could also be financed by taxes or the national debt, but this would only distort the situation, defer payment and trigger inflation. In a sense, the proletariat of the US would found a virtual cooperative that would be able to determine the use-value aspect of capitalist development. The organisation of this cooperative would be the existing state, or the tripartite Green New Deal Board running the programme of ecosocial reconstruction – in real-political terms this is the state. The annual wages of the 100 million US workers currently total $3.7 trillion, so ten percent of this would be $370 billion a year. Within ten years, the programme could be financed without creating a new debt bubble and risking runaway inflation. Realistically, the programme would start out with a three percent contribution from current wages, increasing annually thereafter until it reaches 20 percent or more, after ten to twenty years. Industry, of course, would profit from lower wages – but it would have to accept social direction regarding what it produces (no more cars, but trains, buses, micro-agro trucks, cheap medicines etc.).
At the same time, a part of the Green New Deal fund would have to go towards similar projects in poor countries (in Africa, South America, Asia) to reduce the planetary divisions within the working class – the only hope for forming planetary-scale institutions for living harmoniously. At least $100 billion would have to be paid in 'reparations' each year in return for the flow of resources from global South to North over the past 500 years (in addition to current foreign aid of $20 billion). This figure seems insufficient, but if we assume that all other nations follow the US-example, poverty on the planet could be eradicated within a few years. What the currently poorer countries need, however, must be worked out more concretely.
The idea at the heart of the Green New Deal is that the goose that lays golden eggs should not be killed before it has laid its last egg. This follows Marx's insight that the basis of a new form of society must always be created within the old. We cannot postulate an instant alternative to capitalism, jumping over the old mechanisms from one day to the next. Revolutions are just not feasible any more in our complex social systems. So, the Green New Deal programme outlined above must have the form of a genuine inter-class compromise: (small) profits will be made, wages will be earned, a green business-cycle is engineered. It is obvious that we (waged workers, farmers and so on) lay all of the golden eggs, but at the moment we are only able to lay them under the existing conditions, not under some imaginary non-value conditions. The Green New Deal is largely non-confrontational, laws are mostly obeyed and expropriations few and far between. Property, as long as it doesn't self-destruct (as is happening in the current financial crisis), is respected. The future is not conquered, but bought. The content of the Deal – and only this makes it an interesting deal for the working class – is the construction of the material bases of a postcapitalist global society. For the capitalists it's a desperate Deal, but considering the other options, it could still be their best. They always said that they'd be dead in the long run. And who knows how it'll really turn out? It could still happen that we chip in those three percent or ten percent and get ripped off. There's that risk in any real deal.
At the end of the programme, the ex-working classes would have the material basis of the three spheres of the commons at their disposal. We can throw off the chains of waged labour, the law of value and the rule of the oligarchs (as persons, they can be absorbed into the general population and live happily ever after)… If all goes well, of course!
I can understand that my proposal of real dealing as opposed to staunch resistance looks like a form of defeatism. This is not the case. It presupposes a position of strength. To get into such a position seems optimistic, at the moment. But: there is no alternative.
p.m. is author of a number of books and 'blueprints', including Bolo'Bolo (now available at www.turbulence.org.uk [Coming soon, watch this space!]) and Akiba: A Gnostic Novel. He recently published Neustart Schweiz [trans. Restart Switzerland). His next project will be writing Restart Earth. He can be contacted via www.neustartschweiz.ch
Turbulence is a journal/newspaper that we hope will become an ongoing space in which to think through, debate and articulate the political, social, economic and cultural theories of our movements, as well as the networks of diverse practices and alternatives that surround them. Read more here
Turbulence on Myspace
Creative Commons 2008 turbulence • Powered by WordPress • Using Whitespace theme by Brian Gardner


Holidays are a time for you to connect with your family and share gifts with the people you love. However, the pressure of preparing for holiday parties and trying to get gifts that everyone will like can become stressful and create a lot of tension rather than joy.
As a result, many people end up getting tense and holding that stress in their bodies. If you find your skin breaking out more than usual, or feel tired and achey all the time around the holidays, it's possible that you're holding too much stress in your body.
When you get stressed, the fight or flight response activates in your body. Your brain floods various body systems with stress hormones to get ready for potential danger. Activating the relaxation response reverses that and brings the stress levels in your body down, slowing down your heart and helping your muscles ease up.
You don't have to just deal with holding on to that added stress, even if you are short on time. There are many ways to relieve tension in your body so your holidays will be a little less stressful. Some of them only take a few minutes, and some of them take a little longer.
Here are some of the most recommended techniques out there. Many of these methods can be used at any time, so if you notice your stress while you are out and about, you work on it right then. Other methods take a while, but taking the time to relax can give you more energy to tackle your holiday to do list.
Breathing meditations are some of the easiest ways to release tension in your body. You don't have to know any fancy techniques or rely on having a script or recording at the ready to assist you.
There are many different types of breathing meditations. The types of techniques available to you differ depending on what symptoms you want to address. Almost any type of breathing meditation will help you control your stress and activate the relaxation response.
Deep breathing makes your oxygen exchange more efficient, as it activates your parasympathetic nervous system, the part of your body that tells your brain it's time to rest and relax. It's the opposite of what the sympathetic nervous system does, which is to get your body ready for action. When you breathe deeply, you're telling the parts of your brain that control the autonomic nervous system that you are safe and not in danger.
Harvard Medical School found that being able to control your breath is one of the most effective ways to reduce stress. Breathing from your diaphragm instead of your chest is a great way to make sure your body gets the exact amount of oxygen you need, not too much or too little.
As long as you pay attention to the breath moving in and out of your body, you should be able to enjoy the benefits of breathing as a stress reduction technique.
If you feel like you've got the hang of simple breathing techniques and are ready for more, you can check out these guides on holotropic breathing, wim hof breathing, and diaphragmatic breathing.
If you haven't tried it before, progressive muscle relaxation might seem a little counterintuitive. The practice requires you to tense up different muscle groups in a particular order and then release them to get stress relief. This technique is especially helpful if you carry stress in different parts of your body, like your shoulders or jaw.
This technique works best if you practice it regularly. Those with experience say that regular practice helps them know when their muscles are tense and when they are relaxed. With time, they can use this knowledge to simply relax their muscles instead of needing to tense them first.
Try to set aside 10 or 15 minutes a day to experience relief from the stress you tend to carry in your body. If you don't know how to go through a progressive muscle relaxation, check out some guided walkthroughs on YouTube to get started.
You may have already used guided meditation without realizing it. Guided meditation is simply a term for going through any kind of meditation with someone to help you through the process. Whether you have gone to a yoga class and have had an instructor help you learn to breathe, or listened to a YouTube video to visualize a solution to a problem you face, there are many forms that guided meditations can take.
Deepak Chopra is a great source for guided meditations. He is an expert in the mind-body healing field, and has created many resources for those who are looking for ways to heal from stress or health concerns. You can check out some of his free resources here.
If you want to try some guided meditations, we have many of them available to you on our soundcloud page, or in the Spire app. These meditations range from only taking a minute or two, to lasting a little over ten minutes.
YouTube is also a great place to find guided meditations. You can find a meditation full of imagery to help you let go of the stress and get to a place of relaxation, or help with the worries you might be facing about a particular issue in your life. Simply go to the search bar and type "guided meditation" + whatever issue is on your mind and you'll find plenty of videos to assist you.
Yoga helps reduce tension in your body because of the holistic mind-body approach it was founded on. Different poses move various parts of your body while requiring your concentration to maintain the breath.
The great thing about yoga is that there are many styles to choose from. When most people think of yoga, they think of Hatha Yoga, which is the physical movement of the poses. Kundalini Yoga focuses on your energy, and Restorative Yoga is designed for restoration and helping you relax.
Yoga can also help you release any emotional energy you might be holding on to. During stressful times like the holidays, emotions are often running high, which can create conflict in situations that normally wouldn't have any.
If stress gets you too wired, more active yoga poses can help you burn some of the tense energy in your body. Or, if stress tires you out, you can turn to restorative poses to bring in more energy and face the demands of the holiday season.
If the thought of a total stranger touching you is too weird, there are also many different kinds of spa treatments you can utilize. At home face masks are a great way to clear toxins from your face and reduce any tension you might be holding there.
If all else fails, you can always draw up a bath full of relaxing essential oils like lavender and jasmine to help your mind realize it's time to relax.
You don't have to stick with just one type of relaxation. If one method doesn't work for you, feel free to try another one. You should do what works best for you. Once you have a technique you can use regularly, it'll be easy for you to implement it in almost any situation. The most important thing is to find time for yourself to help relieve some of that stress.


-not the biggest Sublime fan but I love this particular song. Makes me think of the hot sun beating down my shoulders, the smell of bbq, and the refreshing taste of a Corona with a wedge of lime.
eating: some cut up honey dew.
drinking: decaf skinny white chocolate mocha.
wearing: Gap straight jeans, black tank, black cardi, my favorite high heeled booties.
-have been wearing loads of black post-baby.
-although we've had some pretty good weather up here, I'm smart enough to know that this is not the official break up.
wanting: to squeeze an extra few hours out of the day.
-trying to find balance in my life right now. between being a mom, home life, office life, going forth with my own business ventures..I'm finding myself a tad overwhelmed. I'm seeing light at the end of the tunnel though and that keeps me going.
thinking: about a long distance online friend.
enjoying: the warmth of the sun I'm feeling through my office window.
wondering: how other working mom's juggle everything and keep their sanity.


text:
By Sarah Franks 30 December, 2021 3 mins read 311 Views
BRITS who live in the EU have been stopped at the Eurotunnel – because they're banned from travelling through France.The French government is..
BRITS who live in the EU have been stopped at the Eurotunnel – because they're banned from travelling through France.
The French government is enforcing strict new Covid rules to try and slow the spread of the mutant Omicron variant as an astonishing 208,000 cases were registered yesterday alone.
Brits have reportedly been banned from travelling through France via the Eurotunnel amid a crackdown on Omicron
Earlier this month, worried passengers queued at St Pancras in London to get to France before the rule change
And passengers hoping to travel from the UK to Belgium, Italy, Spain and Germany have now been told they'll no longer be able to drive or take a train through France to get there.
The Eurotunnel links Folkestone in England and Coquelles, near Calais.
There were also unconfirmed reports that P&O Ferries had issued similar advice to their passengers.
The company is currently directing its customers to the French authorities for travel advice.
Officials in France say British travellers must have a "compelling reason" to visit the country. No information is provided on what that might be.
Confusion has only deepened this morning after the French Interior Ministry insisted to MailOnline that Eurotunnel chiefs are wrong – despite reports that Brits have been turned away from boarding.
'TREATED LIKE A CRIMINAL'
Roland Moore, who works as a public affairs director in Brussels, says he was escorted off the Eurotunnel "like a criminal".
In a post on Twitter, he said he was "denied access" by French customs officers – who told him "being a Belgian resident was no longer a compelling reason".
"Imagine how I felt – stranded and deserted last night and escorted off Le Shuttle property like a criminal," he said.
In an "urgent" update on its website, Eurotunnel appeared to confirm the rules have changed.
"Following a French Government decision, on 28/12/2021, unless they hold French residency, British citizens are now considered third country citizens and can no longer transit France by road to reach their country of residence in the EU," the statement said.
Have you been affected? Email us at [email protected] or call 0207 782 4368. You can WhatsApp us on 07810 791 502
The current advice on the French government's website is that nationals of the EU "or equivalent", as well as their partners and children, can travel from the UK through France.
However, that's only if their main home is in France, or if they'll be visiting their main home in a country of the EU that can be accessed via France.
Under the country's new Covid crackdown, wearing masks on the streets of Paris is mandatory from Friday, with a €135 fine for those who don't.
Mask wearing is already mandatory inside public buildings and on public transport.
Speaking after record cases yesterday, French Health Minister Olivier Véran said: "I wouldn't call Omicron a wave anymore, I would call it a groundswell.
"Given the numbers we have been seeing these past few days, we're talking about a landslide."
And he warned that, at the current rate, two people in France test positive for Covid every second.
A string of hugely positive studies have shown Omicron IS milder than other strains, with official reports revealing the risk of hospitalisation is 50 to 70 per cent lower than with Delta.
Trending In The News's Jabs Army campaign has been helping get the vital extra vaccines in Brits' arms to ward off the need for any new restrictions.
More than 208,000 new Covid cases were recorded in France yesterday alone
covidrulesthespread
Fortnite fans HATE the new Tilted Towers because of this one change

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The 40 gram silica gel aluminum canister protects up to 3 cubic feet and contains blue indicating silica gel to stop condensation by absorbing moisture in the air.
4.0" X 2.0" X 0.5"
Hydrosorbent's SG-40 Silica Gel canister prevents rust, mildew, corrosion and spoilage to protect your valuables. Each 40 gram canister can protect up to 3 cubic feet of enclosed space. Perfect for use in small storage areas, such as cases for guns, cameras, telescopes, instruments and tool & tackle boxes.
Blue indicating silica gel (2-3 mm) is sealed within a 2-piece perforated aluminum canister, which will change from blue to pink to indicate moisture absorption. The top of the canister contains a heat resistant mica disc for viewing the color change. At full absorption, the canister can be reactivated by heating in a 300°F oven for 3 hours or until the silica gel has turned blue.
Packaging: Canister is heat sealed in a foil wrap pouch.


text:
Last Updated: Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 04:46 GMT
French Muslims promote 'cool Islam'
By Robert Pigott
Religious affairs correspondent, BBC News
Medine's raps set out to sell Islam to French society
I met Medine in the coastal town of Le Havre, in a scaled-down version of France's notorious banlieues.
Medine was here - hunched into a parka against the chill sea breeze - to practise in the municipal dance hall.
He was brought up in the bleak tower blocks that overshadow the place, and was once a member of the disenchanted Muslim youth who preached to French society about its decadence and immorality. He was named after the Muslim holy city of Medina.
Now his CDs and live performances send a different message - the offer of a new deal, and full participation in a secular society, and of a readiness to compete for success in a free market and liberal democracy.
We reached the dance hall up a stained concrete staircase, off a plain of concrete slabs, designed to engender a sense of community but today empty and colonised by weeds.
The community centre's grey walls are decorated with thin lines of yellow tiles and the mirrored hall is light and warm. But the whole place seems to belong to a long-abandoned social strategy, its occupants half-way through moving out.
'Common values'
Medine - whose rap is more pleading than angry - is also part of a generational shift.
I've decided to talk about some of my values in my album - but it's not to say that my religion is best, or to say 'join my religion'
Burly, crew-cut and bearded, Medine faces Mecca to pray at the set hours and sticks to a regime of Muslim clean-living.
His raps set out to "sell" Islam to French society. But he doesn't emphasise Islam's religious dogma, stressing instead what he says are the universal principles it shares with Western society.
"I think that in all religions today, there are common human values", says Medine.
"I don't think that sharing is unique to Islam, or that generosity is unique to Catholicism, or love is unique to Judaism.
"I've decided to talk about some of my values in my album, but it's not to say that my religion is best or to say 'join my religion'. Not at all."
Marketing Islam
Economic competitiveness and artistic success are the hallmarks of the new Muslim elite.
Medine's office in the ground-floor flat of another tower-block is equipped with computers and stuffed with merchandise, mostly clothes.
They are trying to promote an Islamic identity - but also an ethic of solidarity, charity, responsibility for each other
Amel Boubekeur
Islam series: Radical rethink
Amel Boubekeur, of the School of Social Studies in Paris, has named the movement "cool Islam".
She says it combines business and performance to promote Islam, but on French society's terms.
Making money is now an important mark of success to a generation whose parents were suspicious of wealth.
But their businesses and performances, whether rap, song, theatre, television or comedy, also promote Islamic ethics.
"They are trying to promote an Islamic identity, but also an ethic of solidarity, charity, responsibility for each other," Ms Boubekeur says.
"They use products in order to make a positive contribution to society."
Ms Boubekeur says "cool Islam" is being led by a generation which, unlike their parents, have accepted that they are in France to stay.
Unicite's clothes extol values such as friendship, charity and justice
But for all their willingness to contribute, to participate, there is friction with an aggressively secular state.
'Proud to be Muslim'
The leaders of the new Islam want to be acknowledged as both French and Muslim.
That certainly goes for the staff of Unicite - a Muslim company whose name underlines the oneness of God.
Three young Muslim men distribute clothes from a chilly garage in a house on the outskirts of Paris.
The clothes - T-shirts, shorts, baseball caps - bear Islamic symbols, classic Arabic script, a childlike depiction of a hand making a Muslim blessing.
But more importantly, the messages they bear emphasise the need for values - not so much Muslim values, but any values in an increasingly godless society.
"Those values we want to show are coming from Islam. They are human values that everyone - a Muslim and a non-Muslim can recognise," the company's director Thierry Roseau says.
"Values such as friendship, charity, justice and so on. So, the first thing we want is for Muslims to stop hiding and to be proud of what they are."
Embracing the West
There's nothing furtive about Zahya, a young Muslim woman trying on wedding dresses, among the profusion of dress shops in the streets around the Gare du Nord in Paris.
Like many women, Zahya intends to wear a white dress for her wedding
Zahya's marriage will be conducted by an imam, but the rest of her wedding will be as Western as her everyday life.
"We go to the cinema, we go to night clubs, we party", Zahya says with an edge of defiance.
"We do the things everyone else does - and more and more openly. Now in the year 2008, we live according to the moment.
"Everyone wears white dresses for their marriage. Just like all other women, I want to wear a white dress."
But perhaps more significant than young Muslims' embrace of secular French society is that the religion itself may also be moving towards Western liberalism.
Imams such as Tariq Oubrou are thinking the unthinkable - and suggesting that only by becoming a Western religion can Islam allow its followers to thrive in European culture.
We have to take a fresh approach, and ask how the Koran would have revealed itself in this time and place, in this culture
Imam Tariq Oubrou
He presides over a conventional-looking mosque, rows of men, mostly Arab in origin, listening silently as he preaches, and moving to pray in unison.
But in an upstairs office dominated by books heavily embossed in classic Arabic, what he says is revolutionary.
The new Islam needs to take account of Western philosophy and theologians, even Catholic and Protestant thinkers, he says.
He accepts that it will mean revisiting Islamic texts - including the Koran - and reinterpreting them in a way that fits the modern era.
"We're living in an evolving geopolitical climate, therefore we have to have a dynamic approach towards our texts", says Imam Oubrou.
"We can't afford to read our texts to the letter in a static way. We have to take a fresh approach, and ask how the Koran would have revealed itself in this time and place, in this culture - and then apply this new model to our everyday lives."
The idea is being echoed elsewhere in the Muslim world, especially in Turkey.
A formal revision of the Hadith - the sayings of Muhammad - is well advanced in Turkey, and Muslim women in the West have been pushing for equal status with men.
It doesn't mean giving up on faith, or abandoning a Muslim identity. In France that much is evident from the wild applause live audiences give Medine when he demands a religious identity for French Muslims.
People such as Imam Oubrou and Medine insist that however radical Islam's adaptation to contemporary culture, it will preserve a kernel of uncompromising, permanent Muslim belief.
They say European societies need to let it flourish if they are to win the bigger prize of a renewed, reinterpreted Islam no longer at odds with a secular West.
VIDEO AND AUDIO NEWS
The rapper promoting 'cool Islam'
US Muslim women seek active faith role
27 Feb 08 | Americas
Turkey in radical revision of Islamic texts
26 Feb 08 | Europe
Islam-West rift widens, poll says
21 Jan 08 | Europe
RELATED BBC LINKS
Religions - Islam


A Gem card is a one-time transfer—after the recipient has redeemed the code, it is now a part of his or her Gems account.
The code is redeemable on the recepient account or the purchaser account, please note that after activation the code will no longer be valid.
If you would like to gift the code to a family member or a friend please do not redeem the code on your own account as it will no longer work on a different account.
Giftable to a friend, buddy or a family member.


All of our Cloud VPS nodes run on only the best hardware and utilize Raid protection to ensure your VPS and data remains intact. Every bit of data is mirrored across multiple disks to certify your VPS is available.
All of ZoomCloud's VPS Nodes are hosted on quality HP hardware. Every server offers multiple CPU's and Cores, Massive amounts of RAM, and are all inter-connected to multiple tier-1 peer networks.
Have you ever wondered exactly what your server was doing now? Or how about when it was under heavy load at 3 AM on Tuesday morning? Our detailed statistics will provide you with all the reporting capabilities you could need.
We welcome new users and well seasoned IT professionals. If you need help no matter how simple or complex, we are here for you.
We are maniacal about support. We ensure every client is 100% satisfied. Our support staff is available 24X7, 365 days a year. We strive to ensure all support tickets are responded to within one hour maximum.
We only use Xen Virtualization technology when deploying our VPS's. Xen, in our opinion, is the best hypervisor available. Additionally the resources defined to your VPS are not shared. Your Ram and CPU are yours!
Follow us on FaceBook and Twitter to see what our clients are saying about our services. Also if you follow us on these social networks you will have the chance to win prizes, promotions and giveaways throughout the year.


text:
Why Do Cats Purr? A Purr With a Purpose
For some, it's nothing more than a low hum, while for others, it can seem as loud as an engine, with a body-shaking vibration to match. Either way, it's a sound that signals comfort and safety—all emanating from the body of one of nature's fiercest predators. Whether it's coming from your average house pet or a ferocious cheetah, it's a question that keeps coming up: why do cats purr?
Anyone who has ever had a pet at home knows that domestic animals exhibit a fascinating and wide range of behaviors. These behaviors illustrate the tension between the creature comforts (pun intended) they enjoy as pampered pets of the modern era and the sheer animal instincts that were developed in the millennia before domestication. From the way dogs interact in packs to the way a dog or cat may circle the spot they intend to lay down in a few times before actually doing so, the way that pets behave tends to speak for thousands of years of experience and adaptation. So what does a purr mean, and what can it teach us about the cats emitting it?
The How and Why Cats Purr
It's surprising to find out, but more is known about why cats purr than how they purr, which, even after extensive scientific research, remains speculative. In terms of brain function and purring, all that science has really been able to tell us is that it has something to do with "neural oscillations"—AKA, brainwaves. Then again…so does pretty much everything.
In terms of the physical manifestation of a sweet little purr, it's speculated that it comes from within the voice box, where muscles expand and contract, creating a vibration as the feline breathes. Another factor may be what is called "hyoid ossification," which has to do with another weird fact: no cat who can roar can purr, and vice versa. That's right, many of the larger species of big cat, like lions and tigers, do not purr—but cheetahs, cougars, snow lions, and a few other species still do. What's up with that, and what does it have to do with hyoid ossification?
Well, the hyoid is a bone in the larynx (or voice box). Some scientists argue that when the hyoid bone isn't fully ossified, as in lions and tigers, it enables the cat to roar. When the bone is fully formed, cats both big and small are able to achieve that mysterious purring sound, though it keeps them from roaring. But this is just one, likely flawed, theory: for example, the snow leopard has an incompletely ossified hyoid, but it purrs.
Purring is just one of the many ways cats communicate, along with meowing, growling, hissing, body language, scent rubbing, etc. Each form of communication serves a different purpose, and purring generally seems to show that the cat is content. The different forms of communication are also meant for different audiences—many (including yours truly) may be surprised to learn that adult cats don't meow at each other. They only meow at other animals and humans.
Just Purr-fect
As for purring, it appears to be a fairly universal signifier of contentment, and some animal behaviorists believe that it may have developed as a way for a mother cat to communicate a sense of security to their young. In rarer cases, a cat may purr to express other states of being. Because purring usually expresses comfort, some cats may purr in the presence of other cats to signal that they don't intend to cause trouble. When they are newborns, cats purr when feeding or trying to feed. In situations where a cat has a one-on-one relationship with the human who feeds them, they may even use a high-pitched purr in an attempt to signal hunger.
Every once in a while, a new article or news item pops up reiterating that humans can actually trick themselves into feeling better by smiling or laughing, even if they're faking it. Similarly, cats may actually purr when they're in distress for a comparable reason. It's been posited that the act of purring may release a calming hormone that can help dampen the pain the cat is experiencing, and that mother cats may purr during labor for this reason.
Interestingly enough, the frequency—as in sound, not prevalence—of a purr may also have healing powers. Cats are known for sleeping a lot, averaging about 15 hours a day, if not more. A side effect of disruptions in the sleep pattern is a loss of bone density, but the frequency at which a housecat's purring occurs (25 Hz) is actually one that can help promote bone density and healing—something that seems simply too well-aimed to be a coincidence.
I Knead You to Purr
Sometimes, a nice purr from a cat may be accompanied by a more kinetic expression of contentment: the knead. This is when a cat moves their paws up and down as if they were a human kneading bread, pushing their paws down and extending their claws before lifting up again. It's often a precursor to sleeping, and because it's generally done to a soft surface—for example, a lap, a blanket, or a couch—it's been suggested that it's an evolutionary remnant of when cats would tamp down grass or other organic matter outdoors to sleep on. It may also be related to the action of newborn kittens kneading the mother in order to properly latch for feeding. Some cats may even adopt a favorite blanket for performing their act of kneading and purring!
The beneficial effect that the presence of animals can have on humans is well-known—think of all those programs now where cats or puppies are available to comfort those in need in hospitals, nursing homes, schools, and airports. And for us humans who are lucky enough to have a happy cat around, the cat's purr can have a relaxing effect as well. People generally associate the sound with peacefulness and tranquility. We may also be hard-wired to respond to purrs as well, since the lower frequencies in a purr aren't that far off from the frequencies in a baby's cry. These associations work to draw pet owners closer to their feline charges—a situation that's good for both the cat and their human!
The Final Word on Purr
Even after a slew of scientific research, the "how" of purring is still a mystery—but there seems to be a consensus on the "why," at least most of the time. If your cat is purring, there's a good chance they're feeling content—and if you have a chance to sit with them and soak it up, it may just rub off on you too!
Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
A Million Dollar Treasure Hidden In The Rockies: The Forrest Fenn Story
Generous People Share The Nicest Thing They've Ever Done For Someone
43 Bone-Chilling Facts About Death
People Reveal The Most Disturbing Things They've Ever Found Inside Their Homes
Quiz: How Much Do You Know About The Human Brain?
People Share Their "I'm Surrounded By Idiots" Moments
When Edward VIII's baby brother Prince John died of severe seizure at only 13 years old, Edward's response was so disturbing it's impossible to forget.
The average person doesn't even get 50% correct. I guess it's hard to be smarter than an 8th grader...
42 Gothic Facts About Victor Hugo, France's Greatest Novelist
Mortified Children Share The Most Embarrassing Things Their Parents Have Ever Done to Them
How Much Do You Know About The Late, Great Robin Williams?
Heartbroken People Share Their Worst Rejection Stories
I had an imaginary friend named Charlie. My parents asked what he looked like, and I always replied "a little man." When we moved away, Charlie didn't come with us. My mom asked where he was, and I told her that he was going to be a mannequin at Sears—but that wasn't even the most disturbing part. The years passed by and I'd forgotten my imaginary friend, but when someone told me a story about my old house, I was chilled to the bone.
The average person only gets 10 right. You muggles don't stand a chance...
Samantha Henman
Often called "nearly insufferable" and "surprisingly vulgar," Samantha Henman is a senior editor at Factinate. Despite her reverence for pop culture, she is often LVP (least valuable player) at trivia night.


Need a good pair of boots? I would definitely take a look at the Danner boots website.
The Danner Shoe Company was founded in Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin with five employees beginning the manufacture of handcrafted work boots. In 1936 Charles Danner moved his family and the Danner business out to Portland, Oregon.
This long-established brand is known for offering protective and utilitarian boots suitable for any outdoor activities: from hunting to hiking.
"Quality, craftsmanship… utilitarian," are part of the company's heritage. Most of the production is, in fact, carefully made in factories outside Portland.
These boots are more than work boots, though. They are so versatile, cool and comfortable that can be easily worn also in your every day life.
My favorite boot is the Mountain Light Cascade, a tribute to one of Danner's iconic hiking styles introduced in the early 1970's. Handmade in Portland, these boots are made of water-proof leather with Vibram rubber outsoles.
Reese Witherspoon wears them in "Wild" on her 1,000 mile hike on the Pacific Crest Trail. I have not planned to walk so much, but these boots are, for me, definitely a must-buy this winter.


text:
RSW Airport
Southwest Florida International Airport was certified for operation in May 1982 and has grown to be one of the top 50 airports for passenger traffic in the United States of America. A new State-of-the-art terminal opened in 2005 and was designed with today's traveler in mind and tomorrow's opportunities in view.
8050 Bayshore Road 33917 Fort Myers United States
Back to the list opens in a new tab
The Neptune
Email: info@TheNeptuneResort.com
Our Partners & Awards
© The Neptune | Designed by TravelClick, an Amadeus company


At the end of every year we take the time to look back on how the past 12 months have affected the street fashion scene we know and love. Shortlisted by us, but chosen by our readers, the Highsnobiety Crowns are our way of celebrating the leading forces in our field, and the changing face of our industry. And like last year, the winners will receive special aluminum key trophies designed by Snarkitecture and Highsnobiety.
In 2015, we launched Under the Radar with the aim of shouting out the best new brands to hit us up each month, and the series quickly became one of our most successful recurring features.
Under the Radar has shown us that there's a mind-blowing amount of talented new brands and designers out there, and even better, the feature is truly global. We've highlighted brands from as far away as Brazil, South Africa, Poland, Indonesia, and South Korea, alongside countless collections from all the usual fashion hubs.
Here's how you voted in this year's Highsnobiety Crowns awards for Best Under-the-Radar Brand, along with one extra Editors' Choice, chosen by us.
See the full list of nominees for Best-Under-the-Radar Brand here and check out the full list of stores, fashion collections, brands, sneakers, people and more here.
Fresh out of Los Angeles, GFT's "Sinsanity" collection was one of the strongest U.S. streetwear debuts we've seen in some time. The graphic references included Lucy Liu's character from Kill Bill Vol.1, some trippy canines, and an eye-catching "EXORCISE" logo with abstract prints on the back.
Their latest collection features a recurring chain motif, which adds instant impact to the streetwear staples of shorts and black track pants. Across the board, we think that zips haven't been utilized in an interesting way for some time, but GFT have made them a valid talking point again with a graphic "skeleton crew" hoodie that sees the zipper run all the way up the hood and down the back of the garment.
From Seoul/New York comes new smokewear brand Sundae School. Their objective is two-fold, firstly to bring visibility to an underrepresented Asian-American counterculture and secondly, to create some really dope clothes to smoke weed in. Their first collection, titled "Genesis" set a precedent for their innovative design instincts that blends some highfashion concepts — such as a denim jacket with transparent plastic coating — with functional stoner-details such as hats with double-stitched spliff holders at the side.
For their second collection, "When Tigers Used to Smoke" (an old Korean saying that translates to "a very long time ago") Sundae School channeled the nostalgia of pre-war Seoul by referencing the traditional Korean garb of Hanbok. Their contemporary spin on the traditional garment was conceived in pinstripe denim which they modified with covert pockets and straps to carry spliffs, lighters and the rest.
Jacob Kane is a British designer from Northern England. A welcomed antidote to a slightly crowded London fashion scene, every collection from Jacob Kane's Manchester studio has been refreshing, immaculately conceived into a lookbook, and of course, totally wearable too. The label's debut collection, titled "Unite or Perish," shows an amalgamation of the designer's interests" including photography, the rise of political tensions from Brexit, Northern art exhibitions, and old issues of '90s counter-cultural tome, The Face.
Shot in and around a garage with vintage cars, the collection included logo T-shirts, hoodies, patchwork denim jeans with an oversized ring-pull zipper, and as a standout item, a one-of-a-kind parka jacket that fuses grey and technical khaki, mid-blue denim, metal ring pulls, and a detachable faux-fur hood. Also, a big shoutout to the very long-sleeve, oversized oxford shirt which, when styled with Kane's more street options, is as steezy as you can get.
For our Editor's Choice for the Best Under-the-Radar entry this year, we had to single out one brand from a wealth of emerging talent. It would be remiss not to mention how much we liked the metallic chain motif from GFT, or the webstore design from 1KCORP. However, after some debate, we're championing what we believe has the tenacity to grow into something really special (while also bringing us back to our streetwear roots), which is why we've chosen Indonesian brand, Domestik.
Firstly, what's not to like about repurposed images of '80s Indonesian pornos, martial arts and tropical firestorms? In its relatively short lifespan, what Domestik has done so well is tap into the core of what makes streetwear so brilliant: slapping interesting and esoteric graphics onto T-shirts.
Domestik has now traveled over 7,000 miles to be sold at the prestigious Dover Street Market, which is commendable for such a young brand. By drawing attention to the colorful Indonesia-inspired visuals, Domestik is comparable to Gosha Rubchinskiy who effectively put Russia on the map as a go-to aesthetic for styleheads around the world.
In 2018, we're excited to see what other kind of graphic offerings Domestik can surprise us with, as well as hopefully watch them expand into designing other garments and build on their international presence, possibly turning Indonesia into the next style hotspot.


text:
Home Home PTI launches 100-day development and reform agenda
PTI launches 100-day development and reform agenda
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has unveiled its 100-day development and reform agenda if the party manages to form the government after the next general elections.
Senior PTI leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi announced his party's 100-day agenda at a ceremony held in Islamabad on Sunday.
He said that FATA 's merger into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was Imran Khan's top priority.
"FATA reforms is a life old dream of Imran Khan who has roamed the areas on foot. To bring prosperity to the people of these areas who have been deprived for decades.
"The miseries of the people of FATA are evident for all the country to see. We will remove and abolish the oppressive system. We will launch a mega development plan with involvement from the federal government. "
"Right now it is only the government of KP that has even thought of the people of FATA. We will engage all provinces to bring them into the mainstream and repeal the FCR with new laws in place after consultation with locals.
"Through a constitutional route we want to extend the jurisdiction of our courts; it's been 1.5 years but this government has not even set in place one foundation stone for a legal structure in FATA." We will create employment opportunities for the people in FATA.
He said PTI intents to establish South Punjab province.
"We also intent to carve out a new province for the southern region in Punjab," he said, adding that "time has come to address the prevailing sense of deprivation in South Punjab."
"We want to bring marginalised people back into the mainstream."
"Southern Punjab; a province of 4 crores. Today this province is marginalised and there is no devolution of power there. We still sit with power in the hands of a few. It is time to remove this feeling of deprivation in Southern Punjab."
"This area is even bigger than the current province of KP and we want to empower it with the rights it deserves."
He said Balochistan is also the future of Pakistan and a fundamental of the CPEC project.
"Those who have raised arms against the state because of grievances and deprivation, we will not marginalise them further, rather bring them back into the mainstream.
He said that his government would heal the wounds of Balochistan.
"Promises had been made about Balochistan but they were not kept," he regretted.
About Karachi, he said the PTI intends to crack down on qabza mafia in the metropolis. "The first priority will be to restore peace and stability in Karachi, and carry out developments."
The PTI government will provide a complete transport system in Karachi. "We will bring an empowered local government system in Karachi."
He said that PTI would strengthen the federation by devolving power to provinces.
Commenting on PTI's economic policies, Asad Umar said that his government would create 10 million new jobs in five years.
"We have to reduce the burden of taxes on traders, businessmen and industrialists Small industries cannot bear the burden of unfair system of taxation," he said.
The electricity and gas prices will be brought down as par with other countries in the region.
"We will provide level-play fields to traders, farmers, businessmen and industrialists."
Umar said that private sector would be encourage to build five million new homes within first 100 days of his government under Prime Minister Imran Khan Housing Scheme.
"Let me make it clear that this will be done in the first 100 days by Prime Minister Imran Khan, Inshahullah."
Four new tourism spots, he said, would be created. "A competent FBR chairman will be named after introducing reforms in the Federal Bureau of Revenue."
"We have end our dependence on thermal power. The biggest problem has been to import coal for power generation."
China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a game changer, he said, adding his government would encourage private sector to join the corridor.
"We have to bring reforms in our financial system. God willing, this will take place after the election of Imran Khan as Prime Minister," he said, amid clapping from participants.
Speaking on the occasion, PTI leader Jahangir Khan Tarin said that small farmers would be given loans. "More fruits and vegetable markets will be set up across Pakistan ," he said .
100-days
Previous articleArtists welcome monthly stipend from KP Govt
Next articleاسلام آباد پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے چیئرمین عمران خان خطاب کرتے ہوئے


20 years experience. 100% ROI for clients. 1st China SEO.
Please fill in the following confidential inquiry form. ChinaSEO will reply to your contact normally within 24 hours.
Please enter your business email for commercial purpose.
Please enter your company you're serving for.
Please indicate your business type.
Please enter the domain of your website.
Please enter core keywords you want to target.
Please tell us what services you're interested.
Which sounds acceptable, as for your marketing budget?
Please describe your marketing goals and requirements in detail.


This bright garden apartment has what you are looking for in a home. A large private garden, generous room sizes, corner unit with lots of sunlight, fireplace, in suite laundry, private patio for your barbeque and pets are allowed.All of this just steps to the seawall, rec centre, library and the bus stop at your front door. The advantages of a home and the convenience of an apartment.