text:
How to go about a dialogue scene when it comes to the actors speaking?
Let's say you've got a basic over the shoulder dialogue scene going on between two characters.
When they're filming that scene, are both actors saying their lines? Or is it only one person at a time that says their lines?
To be a little more clear... let's say the man facing the camera is actor 1, the man facing away from the camera is actor 2.
Do both actors say their lines back and forth like a normal real life conversation? Or would actor 1 say his half of the dialogue while the camera is on him?
i assume the audio tracks would be clearer if it was captured that way. this will be my first time shooting a dialogue scene with one camera. shooting with 2 is easier to me since it's happening in real time pretty much
dialogue film-techniques production
Bryan VargasBryan Vargas
Coverage – Paulie_D Dec 10 '16 at 14:22
Everybody does all their lines, all the time, no matter who the shot is focussed on & even if one actor is completely out of shot; they will still stand on their mark & deliver their lines.
This gives each performance a better chance of being the same as the last angle - the director, once [s]he's happy with the actors' performance, is then likely to want them to repeat it identically each time after, to get all the required shots for the scene.
In extreme cases, a stand-in may be used for the 'back of an ear' shot, though that is less likely in a large dialogue scene where real interplay between characters is required.
Once the actors are doing their bit accurately, then the actual important stuff* of getting the camera angles, moves & lighting right need time to do their part too.
As the final scene is likely to intercut between [at least] 2 angles**, the sound team at the cut will choose which take to use & then will likely use that take for the entire scene, or at least entire dialog of one character [not always, but to keep this explanation simpler].
That will mean that for whoever has their back to the camera at any given time, you are not hearing what they said on that take, but on the one where the camera was facing them. That's so the lip sync doesn't need to be adjusted for the face-on shot.
In news footage & interviews, the shot of the back of the reporter's head whilst the interviewee is speaking is known as doing 'noddies' - though I've not heard the same term used in film/TV drama.
*To the rest of the crew, actors are little more than movable scenery that instructions can be given to which they are then expected to repeat until told otherwise. The only person whose job it is to be interested in how well the actors are acting is the director - everybody else has a different job, that they need to get right.
**Often, the way the order of shots is done is to give the actor with the most emotional effort the last shot rather than the first...
So they would do, for instance, a wide, capturing the whole scene, then come in tighter to pick up the reactions of supporting characters, then secondary characters & less-involved principals, then finally round to the main shot[s] of the principal. This gives them chance to warm up for the emotion & get the lines firmly embedded, without being centre-frame too soon & risking burning out before the scene is in the can.
"Everybody does all their lines, all the time" That's not true. Plenty of cases where one person isn't present. – BCdotWEB Dec 10 '16 at 12:14
I can only think of one production I've worked on in recent times where the principal's speech was pre-recorded & the rest of the scene had to react to that. I'm not saying it doesn't happen, but it's not that common. – Tetsujin Dec 10 '16 at 13:17
i appreciate your guys' input alot! – Bryan Vargas Dec 17 '16 at 18:10
This question is about all productions, not just productions that you've personally worked on in recent times. – Apologize and reinstate Monica Aug 7 '19 at 15:25
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged dialogue film-techniques production .
How is dialog between two people filmed?
How is the dialogue for wide shots recorded?
How do filmmakers avoid offending actors when casting?
Why does a character talk to the back of another character?
Use of safewords in mainstream moviemaking
How do they create that hovering Text that stays still according to scene when camera is moving
How do actors stop breathing when playing "dead"?
Why is audio so often out of sync when the actors are filmed from behind?


Google is an undisputed champion of the search engine world, there is no question about that.
But there are areas, which are uncharted waters for the Search Giant.
One such platform, is Desktop computers. No, I'm not referring to "Google Search for browsers", or the Google for Windows 10 app. I', talking about the computer itself, Google Search cannot deliver results from your PC's files.
But this could be about to change, according to SlashGear's report. Apparently Google has filed for a patent, for a technology which is simply called "computer application data in search results". The patent mentions that the search power of the upcoming technology includes native apps, remote services, registered apps, some of which include social apps, navigation apps, media players, websites, news, bookmarks, contacts, etc.
Google wants to help users by finding files stored on the computer. And the above list of information could also be used to provide relevant information in the search results. It is unclear how this would work, perhaps done through a locally installed app which has been given permissions (through an EULA).
It is likely that the new service from Google, could be a competitor for one app, Microsoft Cortana. The personal digital assistant, shipped along with Windows 10, is the default search service for the operating system, and can pull information from the web as well. Google is likely to view this as a threat to its own service.
The Web part of "Google Search for desktop files", suggests it could be implemented in Google Chrome, just like Cortana has been embedded in to Microsoft Edge, the new browser of Windows 10.
I speculate this is one way to regain users which Google may have lost out to Microsoft, thanks to Windows 10's default browser setting, which in turn uses Microsoft Bing. It is possible that Google's new app for desktops may offer to install and set Google Chrome as the default browser, with Google Search as its search provider.
Google has already updated its app for Windows, and has also joined the OpenSearch web standard to support Microsoft Edge, in a bid to defend its position as the world's no.1 search provider.


Eleven communities advance in the Prize selection process.
Princeton, N.J.—The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) today announced the 11 communities that have been chosen as finalists for the fifth annual RWJF Culture of Health Prize. The Prize honors and elevates communities that understand health is a shared value and everyone has a role to play in driving change.
The RWJF Culture of Health Prize is an annual competition that awards $25,000 to Prize winning communities that are making great strides in their journey to better health. Prize communities also have the opportunity to share their story and lessons learned with the country and join a national network of past winning communities.
The 2017 RWJF Culture of Health Prize winners will be announced this fall. Find out more about the previous 27 Prize winners at www.rwjf.org/prize.
The RWJF Culture of Health Prize honors and elevates U.S. communities that have placed a priority on health and are creating powerful partnerships and deep commitments that enable everyone to live healthier lives.


Angry Birds creator Rovio CEO Mikael Hed has confirmed that it has got the rights of Casey's Contraptions IP from developers Snappy Touch and Mystery Coconut.. The game will be called Amazing Alex and will be released in July of this year. Casey has been renamed Alex yet remains a curious young boy who loves to build things.


Well, hey there. How's it going?
Scroll down to read more about us!
We love discovering new adventures together!
Relationships are super important to us.
We really enjoy spending time with our friends and family. Having a group of people over for dinner and board games is one of our favorite things to do!
Click here to contact us, or keep scrolling for more info!
Bryon is a professional wedding, portrait and commercial photographer and videographer based in Southwest Ohio and traveling worldwide.
Bryon has always loved taking pictures, and secretly wanted to be a wildlife photographer when he was a boy. He has always been fascinated by animals - just not the normal ones. Bryon loves the weird, crawly things that most people run away from: snakes, lizards, insects, turtles, and pretty much anything you can find in your local creek bed. As a boy, Bryon was driven by curiosity to turn over rocks and see what was living underneath.
In 2006, while studying to be a zoologist, Bryon picked up a used video camera on eBay, and discovered something even more exciting than crawling through creeks - using a camera!
After a brief time of dabbling as a hobbyist, Bryon realized that videography and photography were a more fitting career path, and began doing freelance work around 2008. In 2009, Bryon accepted a part-time staff position at his local church, where he worked independently as idea-creator, script-writer, voiceover artist, videographer and editor, producing weekly videos that were used during Sunday worship gatherings. Bryon was also responsible for all photography done at the church during this time, including photos during events, headshots for the website, training volunteers, and any other photography needs.
In 2011, Bryon fell in love with wedding photography.
After realizing how much fun it is to document a couple having a blast while they make their forever commitment, he realized that this was an incredible way to combine his talent and passion into something that would be a great fit. Since then, Bryon has documented 50+ weddings in multiple states across the US.
The same childlike curiosity, excitement and sense of wonder that once led Bryon to flip over rocks now drive him to discover, explore and create new and exciting things during every photography session. Even when shooting at familiar locations, Bryon strives to find different angles, lighting and posing to make sure your wedding photos don't look like the last person's!
As a tech nerd, Bryon also loves experimenting with new techniques to create something extra special for couples. He loves to use off-camera lighting, colored gels, reflective surfaces, theatrical haze, and other fun gizmos to make photos that are unique and eye-catching. He's always looking for something new to try at the next wedding!
Ashley is the "secret sauce" that helps make things actually happen around here.
Trained in early childhood education, Ashley works full time as a 2nd grade teacher in a well-respected school district. She has always loved helping children learn and develop, and cares immensely for the students in her classes.
Whenever possible, Ashley comes to weddings with Bryon. She is not a photographer, and likes to say that she "just carries the bags" but truthfully she is so much more than that!
As a teacher, she is exceptionally well-organized and knows how to handle a rough crowd :-) Ashley is highly experienced in helping family portraits flow smoothly, using her "teacher voice" to get everyone's attention so things keep moving. Nobody wants family portraits to take forever, and Ashley helps keep us on track.
She also helps Bryon to stay on-schedule during weddings, as he has a tendency to get so excited about the photos that he forgets to move on to the next thing on the timeline.
And despite the fact that she may not be the one that "pushes the buttons" on the camera, Ashley has a good eye for lighting, locations and details. She frequently points out opportunities that Bryon might miss while he is focused on a different task.
Think we might be a good fit for your wedding or other upcoming project? We'd love the chance to get to know you better.


The Klingon Empire and UFP come into open conflict upon a planet controlled by a being called Weyland who has been missing for a while. Upon his return he is quite adamant over the disruption of his people and has no interest in the "games" of the two galactic powers. Unfortunately during a brief skirmish a young boy and a member of the Enterprise crew are killed and the two ships experience the full power of Weyland through his ability to manipulate matter and energy.
The two starships lose system functions including station keeping which means they will burn up in the atmosphere, transporters and weapons are out and also Scotty, Sulu and Chekov have vanished.
Sulu finds himself in feudal Japan, Scotty in the Scottish highlands during the time of Bonnie Prince Charlie and Chekov in Stalingrad during the second world war. The three man have to survive and handle the pressure of potential tampering with the timeline.
Home is the Hunter was an interesting read, the addition of the time travel adventures really pushed the novel beyond the basic Trek good versus bad guys and even that with was enhanced with this being of unimaginable power and purpose.
A good Star Trek novel, something a little different and worth a read.


Meat-eating has impacted the evolution of the human body, scientists reported today at the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual meeting in Washington, D.C.
Our fondness for a juicy steak triggered a number of adaptations over countless generations. For instance, our jaws have gotten smaller, and we have an improved ability to process cholesterol and fat.
Our taste for meat has also led us into some trouble—our teeth are too big for our downsized jaws and most of us need dental work.
• How did the ability to eat meat shape the evolution of humans?
• What can we learn about early humans from tooth shape?
Carnivorous humans go back a long way. Stone tools for butchering meat, and animal bones with corresponding cut marks on them, first appear in the fossil record about 2.5 million years ago.
Some early humans may have started eating meat as a way to survive within their own ecological niche.
Competition from other species may be a key element of natural selection that has molded anatomy and behavior, according to Craig B. Stanford, an ecologist at the University of Southern California (USC).
Stanford has spent years visiting the Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park in Uganda, Africa, studying the relationship between mountain gorillas and chimpanzees.
"It's the only forest where mountain gorillas and chimps both live," he said. "We're trying to understand the ecological relationship—do they compete for food, for nesting sites?"
The key difference between chimps and gorillas ecologically is that chimps eat meat and gorillas don't. A total herbivore is able to coexist with an omnivore because they have significantly different diets.
"From there we can extrapolate back to what two species of early humans may have done vis-à-vis each other two or three million years ago," Stanford said.
When humans switched to meat-eating, they triggered a genetic change that enabled better processing of fats, said Stanford, who has worked extensively with gerontologist Caleb Finch of USC.
"We have an obsession today with fat and cholesterol because we can go to the market and stuff ourselves with it," Stanford said. "But as a species we are relatively immune to the harmful effects of fat and cholesterol. Compared to the great apes, we can handle a diet that's high in fat and cholesterol, and the great apes cannot.
"Even though we have all these problems in terms of heart disease as we get older, if you give a gorilla a diet that a meat-loving man might eat in Western society, that gorilla will die when it's in its twenties; a normal life span might be 50. They just can't handle that kind of diet."
Tool-use no doubt helped early humans in butchering their dinners. But there is evidence that the advance to cooking and using knives and forks is leading to crooked teeth and facial dwarfing in humans.
Today it's relatively rare for someone to have perfectly straight teeth (without having been to the orthodontist). Our wisdom teeth don't have room to fit in the jaw and sometimes don't form at all, and the propensity to develop gum disease is on the increase.
"Virtually any mammalian jaw in the wild that you look at will be a perfect occlusion—a very nice Hollywood-style dentition," said Peter Lucas, the author of Dental Functional Morphology and a visiting professor at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. "But when it comes to humans, the ideal occlusion [the way teeth fit together] is virtually never seen. It's really the only body part that regularly needs attention and surgery."
Lucas argues that the mechanical process of chewing, combined with the physical properties of foods in the diet, will drive tooth, jaw, and body size, particularly in human evolution.
Essentially, by cooking our food, thereby making it softer, we no longer need teeth big enough to chow down on really tough particles. By using knives and forks to cut food into smaller pieces, we no longer need a large enough jaw to cram in big hunks of food.
"We're evolving to eat mush," said Bernard Wood, a paleoanthropologist at George Washington University.


text:
Curvaturas variantes.com Propuestas para una nueva física y otros heterodoxos menesteres
Archivo para octubre 2016
On the meaning of Mathematical Incommensurability in Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries. Leave a comment
"It is possible, of course, to operate with figures mechanically, just as it is possible to speak like a parrot; but that hardly deserves the name of thought".
(Gottlob Frege. "The Foundations of Arithmetic").
Think about how human beings could have started to measure linear lengths and areas. I guess to measure a linear length for the first time it was necessary to make an abstraction. We needed to start from a referential segment measured from one point to another point, based on a primary referential number of quantity; In that sense, we can suppose we created our referential segment of length 1 based on our primary number 1, one step, one thumb, one elbow, or whatever other one that represented a linear limited distance. With that referential segment 1 we already can measure any linear distance.
Our primary segment 1 is of course an abstraction, we did not measure how many points or lines are inside of that segment, we simply accepted it was right because it was very practical to consider that distance as our referential unity to measure linear distances, our initial referential metric; But that abstraction we performed is not a total abstraction because of inside of that referential segment there is a central point which divides the segment in to two equal segments; that central point determines the inner and perfectly proportionated symmetry of our referential segment 1.
Later, we also could create a referential segment of length 2 based on our referential segment of length 1, simply by repeating (or extending) the segment 1 two consecutive times. We now have a larger referential segment which also is a very practical thing to measure large linear distances. The original inner symmetry of 1 is perfectly respected because we can divide the segment 2 into to two equal segments of length 1. Here we place the intermediate point – which is a zero point – between the two segments 1 instead of being placed in the middle of a segment 1. Until now the symmetry is still perfect. The first problem arises when we want to combine the referential segments 1 and 2 to measure another distance because then the original symmetry is lost: the segment 2 is larger that the segment 1, and we cannot set our central point of symmetry in the middle of those segments to save the symmetry. But that disproportion can be saved by creating a new referential segment based again on our originary referential segment 1. So we can create the referential segment 3: The symmetry is saved again, now by setting the originary segment 1 (with its central point) in the middle of a right segment 1 and a left segment 1, naming the whole distance our new referential segment 3. That is the way I think we can imagine how prime numbers appeared in geometry.
Prime numbers appear each time that our originary referential symmetry is lost and only can be fixed by creating a new reference based on our originary referential unity.
[I started speaking about the fundaments of the geometry considering linear segments, but I think it could be said the same thinking about the fundaments of arithmetic. To me, numbers are not abstract entities, quantities as well represent symmetry or asymmetry because for us – as human beings existing in a material reality – being aware or not – any quantity exists in a specific space and so has a spatial distribution].
Continuing our invented but plausible story about the prehistory of maths, we also can imagine how we were able to measure areas for the first time. For that we necessary needed to create a referential area based on our referential segment 1. So we took our referential segment 1 and built a square. And we agreed that the space inside of that square has the value 1. One square area. It is also an abstraction because we didn't measure that inner space in any way but the central point of that square of area 1 and its inner symmetry is not any abstract convention, it is a concrete reality.
The next problem arouse when we traced the diagonal inside of our referential square of area 1. And that problem could not be saved in the same way that we solved the disproportion that appeared when it came to measuring linear distances, because now, with the diagonal, the disproportion appears inside of our referential square area 1 built on our originary referential segment 1. The disproportion appears inside of the originary unity itself. So, we cannot use the segment 1 to fix that disproportion created with the diagonal. We cannot create a new referential segment with the distance of the diagonal based on our referential segment 1. And so we see horrified – as it is said ancient Greek people saw – that the hypotenuse of the equilateral triangle is irredeemably disproportionate with respect to the side 1 (the square root of 1) of our primary square area 1. The infinite decimals of incommensurable quantities appear, I think, because we are trying to compare two quantities and one of them is not related to (has not been derived from) our originary reference of metric.
It occurs the same when we try to measure the area of the circle of radius 1 by using our referential square of side 1. We get the unsolvable disproportion between the perimeter and the diameter because they respond to different and disproportionate referential originary (or primary) metrics, referential originary (or primary) linear segments, referential originary (or primary) square areas: the rational and the "irrational" ones.
In this sense I think the circumference of radius 1 is a complex area formed by two kind of different squares that carry and are derived from two different kind of disproportionate originary references of metric that have two kind of different symmetries: the square of area 4, referenced to our "rational" (or irrational) referential square 1, and the square of area 2, related to an "irrational" (or rational) square of area 1″i". (I said "i" by expressing that it is incommensurable with respect to 1). The square 2 is inside of the perimeter of the circumference touching with its four corners the circle of radius 1, and the square 4 is outside of that perimeter touching with its four sides the circle of radius 1.
It is clearer when we divide the exterior square of area 4 in to four squares of area 1, and we divide the interior square of area 2 in to four squares of area 0,50, and then we set the central point of each of those different squares. Measuring through any diagonal the distances from the central point of the circumference – the zero point to us – until the central point of those different squares we see that we need necessarily two different kind of referential intervals or referential segments of measuring, two different kind of referential metrics based on different originary referential segments, to reach the central points of symmetry of the squares of 0.25, 1 and 4, and the central points of symmetry of the squares 0,50 and 2. 0,25, 1 and 4 are ruled by the same referential segment, while 0,50 and 2 are ruled by another kind of referential segment.
I've used the term "intervals" because the resultant figures appear to be musical scales. If we repeat those two kind of referential intervals or segments, extending (or "projecting") them in a consecutive way through any the diagonal from the center of the circumference, we see that the two kind of disproportionate intervals concur or converge at a specific point of the diagonal: at the 7th and 5th intervals, the points which represent the two kind of referential centers of the two kind of disproportionate symmetries, converge.
I draw them using two different colours, red and blue. You can see there are 7 blue intervals with 8 blue points and 5 red intervals with 6 points. I'm considering the first and last points – the centers of the circumferences – as complex zeros formed at the same time by blue and red points.
Following the diagonal we can see:
Zero blue an red points
1 blue point (blue interval 1)
1 red point (red interval 1)
XXXXXX (no red point)
4 red point ( red interval 4)
Zero blue and red points where the blue 7th interval and the red 6th interval converge at their respective end.
I think the intervals comprehended inside of the two rows marked with XXXX are what is known in musical terms as the "tritone". There, the periodical alternation between the two kind of intervals is altered and it is perceived by our senses as something unexpectedly inharmonic. Until now, it has been considered as an irresolvable disharmony which appeared problematic because it seems to be born from the Nature itself; As a perfect Nature cannot be inharmonic, the tritone was historically prohibited during some time.
I consider each "Do" note would be in that sense a complex musical note (formed by the convergence of the rational and irrational referential symmetries) repeated periodically through the same scale.
In this sense, I think the other non-convergent notes of a diagonal represent the only rational or the only irrational part of a complex note that only can be formed in a complete way by combining the notes of the scales of the Z diagonals and the notes of the scales of the XY coordinates. The intervals of the XY scales have an inverted order with respect to the intervals of the Z scales. (By saying here Z I mean the diagonals on a plane flat space). We only need to seek where and how the intervals that carry the irrational and rational symmetries converge in a projective way. For example, on the X coordinate will take place the projective convergence of two intervals of the upper right Z and the bottom right Z coordinates. The whole space would represent then entangled metric scales that respond to the different kind of rational and irrational symmetries.
(About music and irrationality I think you could be interested in reading the beautiful article of Peter Pesic, published by the University of Chicago Press, "Hearing the Irrational. Music and the Development of the Modern Concept of Number", which also clarifies the idea of number in the ancient Greece).
On the other hand, when it comes to measuring the area of the circle, if we project three times the square area 1 through the diagonal following one of the mentioned intervals, from the zero point until the point placed where the perimeter is touched by one of the corners of the square area 2, we get a resultant area of value 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. We know the area of the circle of radius 1 is not 3, it is an irrational quantity, 3,14… with infinite decimals. But I think we should be able to measure the area of the circle without considering irrational magnitudes by taking account of the two kind of mentioned symmetries, considering the circumference as a complex area.
So, to measure the area of the circle by projecting our referential square 1 N consecutive times through the diagonal, we should project (displace) that square not only 3 times until the place where the perimeter is touched by the corner of the square 2 but also displacing the referential square – built on the radius of circle – until the next point which is related to the square 4 that touches with its sides the perimeter of the circumference. On the above picture, the 0,14 (without infinite decimals) would be represented as the last blue stripe placed after the three consecutive red colored squares. I think at that extended point is not possible to accept the linear infinite decimals because at that point is where the irrational and rational referential intervals converge. The circumference is a complex area that cannot be measured by using a unique and static referential square – attempts that historically were known as the "quadrature of the circle", which impossibility has been already demonstrated but not by using different referential square metrics – but considering the two kind of referential originary squares built on the two kind of originary referential segments that participate on its area.
The consequence of these ideas is that the use of a "mathematical fact" which is arithmetically correct as it is Pi, results mathematically wrong because of the a priori conceptual ideas that we have about the space we are working on are wrong and the instruments we use – the numbers or their algebraic representations – are not purely abstract entities existent in nowhere but concrete things that exist and are distributed in a specific space. Irrational magnitudes appear then as misunderstood mathematical aberrations. The Gauss' assertion about that arithmetic, and not geometry, is a priori and only its laws are necessary and true, appears invalid.
The mathematics developed since the XV century and all the large developments of the two last centuries have been made on the base of sacrifice our common sense in favor of utility. "Common sense", what appears to be "logic" to a sensible person, the Aristotelian common sense, was totally discredit to a trustable way to understand Nature since the Copernican revolution. The Aristotelian common sense had believed and imposed during more than fifteen centuries that the Sun orbits around the Earth. And since then, only mathematics is considered the only trustable way for understanding the whole Universe.
But when we currently say "mathematics" we are meaning "arithmetic" and "algebra". The geometry that is currently considered as true mathematics is an arithmetised geometry. And that arithmetization has been performed by means of an algebrised arithmetic.
[When I started thinking about physics by myself looking for a mechanical explanation of anomalous cell divisions, I sent to many professors of physics of many Universities around the world some pictures and a text (with no mathematical calculus or equations but) with the explanation in a natural language of the atomic and solar system model that – after discussing with many unknown people and many friends. Between the few ones who answered my email, an emeritus professor kindly told me that my natural language was not comparable with the subtlety of the mathematical language he only understood when it came to physics.
Discussing later with other physicists I saw that no one was able to understand the simple pictures I was sending them; they frequently said that my pictures were artistic works with no mathematical value, and my ideas were philosophical – in the best of the cases – but not mathematics either. They said that if I wanted to discuss with them my conceptual ideas I had to develop them in a mathematical way. My conclusion was that the currently accepted atomic model had been developed in a blind way without having a visual idea about what the atomic structure is. Our physicists feel confortable inside of the mathematical abstractions that fundament the developed models regardless of whether they are "logically" coherent or they are not.
Actually, I could not have conceptual discussions with physicists because at some point, when they were not able to explain the conceptual inconsistencies and contractions of their models – for example when they had to explain coherently – outside of the mathematical formulas – the idea of virtual particles of the atomic model, or what a Majorana antiparticle is, or what the vibrating emptiness of an empty space is when it comes to explaining the Higgs mechanism, etc – they told me that things are in that way and end point.
So, I decided to try to provide to my models a mathematical language and I started thinking by myself about mathematics from the beginning, as I have made with physics, without having any previous idea on the matter.
And the first thing I found was that infinite decimals seemed a non acceptable solution to irrational magnitudes, which to me seemed to have remained misunderstood until now. And I tried to understand by myself what irrational magnitudes are and how and where and when they can be related to rational magnitudes.
When I found what to me is a reasonable explanation, I saw, to my surprise, that mathematicians did not understand the pictures I sent them and the simple language I was using when, as I did above, speaking about originary referential segments or the originary referential square 1. I could understand that they were not used to thinking in those terms but I thought that the pictures, which were strictly geometric diagrams, would be perfectly understood. What was going on, mathematicians do not understand geometry? I thought. One person even told me that the geometrical pictures were no so exact like equations, as if geometry were not true mathematics and only arithmetic and symbolic algebra were. It was very shocking to me to verify that they actually – current mathematicians – think in that way. The only geometry that is considered mathematics is the arithmetised geometry which, in turns, has been previously algebrised. It explains that current mathematicians find so difficult to understand the Euclid's books. (See the "5. First Interlude: Surd Numbers and Alogoi Magnitudes" section of the David Fowler's article "An Invitation to Read Book X of Euclid's Elements").
So the conceptual discussions were also impossible with mathematicians because currently geometrical diagrams are consider only as heuristic tools that does not probe anything, many (I'd want to say not all of them) mathematicians are used to working with totally abstract mathematical objects that they can operate with instead of thinking naturally in conceptual terms, and also because what I was telling them questioned directly the way that arithmetic has been used during the five last centuries. It implied that an arithmetically correct result could be mathematically wrong if the a priori idea we have – for example, to assume we are working on a unique flat plane that represents our flat space instead of being aware that we are working with multiple rotational planes overlapped like superposed layers on that flat space – is conceptually wrong. To consider this only idea seems to produce a violent reaction in some people that have internalized arithmetic in a very personal and intimate way as an absolutely trustable fundament of their worldview and personal believes. I remember discussing with someone that, instead of thinking about and trying to discuss conceptually the ideas I had told him about mathematical irrationality, simply performed a probability calculus in the sense that he considered mathematically impossible that so many brilliant people since the ancient Greece had been wrong while I, without even knowing mathematics and mistaking elemental terms as "circle" and "circumference", could be right.
In any case, I think the main problem behind those discussions is that the abstract idea of number has been highly formalized through arithmetic and algebra during the last two centuries since some mathematicians or logicians started thinking about the fundaments of arithmetic. But currently there is no a logical fundament of geometry outside of arithmetic, and the logical foundation of the number has been made only from an abstract – arithmetical and algebraic – point of view without considering that numbers are not abstractly ideal entities but that any number represents symmetry.
I think if arithmetic gives a conceptually unacceptable result we should still think about it and to review it instead of accepting it as a dogmatic true. So I think it should be necessary to reconsider why infinite decimals appear in a linear limited segment. Maybe it is because we are using our arithmetic in an incomplete way without considering all the hidden variables, that we are not taking account about all the circumstances that concur on the reality we are working with, or we are not respecting the rules we have previously assumed as it is that we cannot compare directly things of different nature, or all these things at the same time. What we cannot make is to scarify our reason for the sake of instrumentality. Rationality should be unrenounceable. Mathematics should mainly to think and to understand, not to operate. But it seems that when it comes to thinking we are limited by and classified in the realm of philosophy].
I tis told that incommensurability appeared for the fist time in the Pythagorean theorem. Here there are several conceptual inconsistencies. First, if a^2+b^2=c^2, it is logically incoherent that a^n+b^n Not = c^n (when n is higher than 2). Second, is incoherent that the area resultant from a^2 + b^2 is equal to c^2, because c^2 is built on a segment (the side of the square, the "root square") that is not commensurable, it cannot be measured by using the referential metrics that we use to measure the sides of the squares a^2 or b^2. How is it possible that those areas are equal if the sides of the squares cannot be compared without getting an incommensurable – "irrational", with infinite decimals although it is a limited linear segment – magnitude?
The area c^2 coincides with the areas a^2+ b^2 because the external elements of the squares a and b (the sides of those squares) are equivalent to the length of the internal elements of the square c^2 (the two hypotenuses placed inside of the square c^2; and the internal elements of the squares a^2 and b^2 (the two hypotenuses – four in total – of the squares a^2 and b^2) are equivalent to the external elements of the square c^2 (the sides of the square c^2). The sides of the squares and the hypotenuses of those squares carry the two kind of different originary symmetries, the rational and the irrational ones. (I say "symmetries" but it could be said the two kind of referential and originary metric magnitudes).
In this sense, any square a^2, b^2 or c^2, are complex areas that carry internally and externally the two kind of disproportionate referential metric symmetries. a^2+b^2 is Not equal to c^2, those square areas are coincident or equivalent but their inner and outer symmetries are different. Square areas are not abstract entities that can be managed operatively in an abstract way by using arithmetically purely abstract symbols. Their symmetries are real and concrete and are distributed in a different although equivalent way.
If mathematics have been developed in such an abstract and instrumental way during the last centuries, and currently there is not a logical fundament of geometry outside of arithmetic, I think it is because of the lack of comprehension of irrationality. This lack of comprehension also would explain why the discovering of "imaginary numbers" took place so late as mathematical objects suitable to be used arithmetically or algebraically but without understanding why complex numbers appear and their conceptual meaning. Without having conceptual clarity the way gets slow and tortuous and the necessary efforts to advance become heroics and isolated and appear to be created or invented (or discovered in the best of the cases) by the enigmatic and obscure processes of portentous imaginations.
I think that understanding irrationality in the way I explained above clarifies conceptually what complex numbers are and lets to understand geometrically the problem of the insolubility of quintic and further equations with radicals, which was treated by Galois in an abstract way. I think it is related to the same problem of the disharmony that appears in the musical scales with the named "tritone".
I also think the complex zeros that appear when the mentioned intervals converge (saving the periodical disproportion between the two kind of originary symmetries) are the same thing than the named Riemann's "non trivial" or "relevant" Zeros when it comes to looking for the periodicity of the appearance of prime numbers.
I consider that what I above called referential metric intervals, or referential originary kind of symmetries, are similar to what Bernard Riemann considered as a "quanta" of varieties (or manifolds), and also the notion of "multiply extended magnitudes", in an abstract way, in his conference about the "Hypotheses which lie at the bases of Geometry"; And also i think those ideas are a similar to the "gauges" considered by Hermann Weyl as different distance scales (about Weyl's Gauge Symmetries and Gauge Theories – which have been key in the development of quantum mechanics – you can read the Chapter 5 of "Not Even Wrong" by Peter Woit).
I think both authors actually where speaking – each one from their limited perspective and creating new terms for manipulating in an instrumental way the same things – about different referential linear metrics carrying different kind OF immediately disproportionate symmetries. And they both made their developments in a blind way without understanding irrationality.
In this sense I suspect that the named "non-Euclidean geometries" are using – without being aware, also in an abstract and instrumental way, through algebra and arithmetic – something similar to the different kind of referential magnitudes I mentioned above, their connections and their local transformations, and I think it is the root of its difference with the Euclidean geometries which only would use one kind of referential linear magnitude, the rational one.
I'm very curious about reading and researching in the books V and X of the Euclid's elements, which treat respectively about the theory of ratios and the concept of magnitude, and about irrationality.
These ideas related to the History of maths I mentioned above are clues that I will try to developed in a clearer and deeper way if I have time.
Another clue I'm going to developing when having time is related to a very interesting figure who is the German mathematician Gottlob Frege. (Germans have had a decisive and highly determinant influence in the development of modern maths and physics, between other fundamental subjects like philosophy or theology). Ignored during his live, he is currently considered the founder of the modern mathematical logic and the father of the analytical philosophy thanks to the works of Russell and Wittgenstein. Frege tried to derive the whole arithmetic from logic, that is to say to reduce arithmetic to logic. He was very aware that mathematics was inadequately supported.
"This entire impressive construction, he claimed, rested on shaky foundations. Mathematicians did not really understand what they were about, even at the most basic level. The problem was not a lack of understanding of the true nature of imaginary numbers, or of irrational numbers, or of fractional numbers, or of negative integers; the lack of understanding began with the natural numbers such as 1, 2, 3. Mathematicians, in Frege's view, could not explain the nature of the primary objects of their science".
And that's why he tried to setting out the logical and philosophical foundations of arithmetic. (The quoted phrases of the above paragraph are taken from "Frege, an introduction to the Founder of Modern Analytic Philosophy", by Sir Anthony Kenny)·
(I will add other books I'm interested in at the end of the post in a bibliography section. I'll try to read all of them to improve the exposition with more and also more accurate and interesting data. Although making this exposition in an erudite and complete way would require to work on it in a large and continued way spending a lot of time that I currently do not have. I hope I will be able to still make some improvements slowly).
I think it is not possible to deduce arithmetic from Logic – even in an abstract way – without previously understanding what irrational numbers are from a conceptual point of view. Frege reviewed the concept of number and spoke about classes and extensions of quantities as a key point of his logical system. But his whole system become untenable because of the objection that Bertrand Russell made about it. I'm very curious to read more about the Frege system and the Russell's objection because I think if the system became inconsistent, Frege was very secure about his validity before getting the Russell's critic, its inconsistency could be related to the lack of comprehension of incommensurable magnitude sand how they are related to rational ones, the ignorance about the existence of at least two different kind of referential magnitudes that create periodical asymmetries. (Ideas that as I mentioned above I think were developed by Riemann, Lie, and Herman Weyl, using different terminologies and from limited perspective). Frege was not able to fix his logical system after the Russell's objection (the Russell's Paradox).
I think maybe there are still some things to say about the named "logicism" considering it under the light of a clearer comprehension of irrationality and considering numbers or referential metric magnitudes, linear extensions, and areas, from the point of view of symmetry. To me is evident that irrationality has not been yet understood at all. Thinking about modern mathematical logic in terms of "classes", if we think in primary-generatrix classes, as if they were sets, and the subclasses derivate from them we would need to think about the kind of symmetries those subclasses carry or represent externally (related to their perimeter) and internally (related to their areas), how those different symmetries are periodically disproportionate – cannot be immediately compared, connected or related – how they can be connected locally and periodically (forming a "continuum"), and how the equivalence of those symmetries can occur by comparing the exterior with the interior symmetries of those subclasses. The subclasses-square-areas are derivate extensions of the two primary classes (the referential square rational and irrational areas), which are derivate from the two primary linear classes (the rational and irrational referential segments, which are derivate from the number-quantity 1, the abstract "monad" without extension, in terms used by Leibniz.
On the other hand, coming back to the different kind of symmetries and their relation to the problem of quintic equations considered from a geometric point of view, I think the pictures below show where and when we can and cannot pass through one kind of symmetry to the another one making "local transformations" of symmetry. (To understand the pictures below as equations of n degree it is necessary to consider the square areas built on the rotatory axis. When we speak in geometry about 2^2 we are not speaking about an abstract entity which we use as an arithmetic instrument for performing arithmetic operations without a specific meaning, we are speaking about a square area built on a segment which has a specific symmetry; here, that segments, the sides of the n squares are the segments traced from the zero point toward the different directions, which actually is the same segment displaced in a consecutive way toward the different directions for drawing the circle. I would recommend you to draw the pictures by yourself starting from the beginning and to observe them by yourself; By making that you will be making a geometric analysis. That is a concrete analysis. If you are not used to thinking in these geometrical terms without using abstract algebra and arithmetic , without having equations to clear, it won't be easy to you to understand these pictures by only looking at them here).
I said above "the rotatory" axis because I think that we cannot consider the Z diagonal as an independent axis on the flat space we are working on. The Z diagonal is the same Y or X axis displaced toward the right or left. We have no problem by displacing the XY coordinates if we displace the whole flat plane, but if we want to preserve our original XY referential coordinates and introducing a new coordinate Z on the plane space, we need to be aware that we have created a new plane – the one represented by Z – on our working space, and that Z plane has rotated with respect to the initial position of our original plane related to XY. The actual effect is the same as if we had expanded our physical plane-space when we are considering the 4 Z coordinates from the point of view of XY, or as if we had contracted the expanded plane-space when we are considering the XY coordinates from Z.
The same can be said when we think about the orthogonal plane. Considering X like a horizontal plane and Y as a vertical plane, perpendicular to X, we have no problem because we are working with a unique quadratic and rational reference. The problem appears when we displace (without been aware about that displacement, thinking that it is an independent orthogonal coordinate) Y toward the right or the left.
In the XIX century the so-called "non-Euclidean geometry" appeared. It is known as non-Euclid because it is based on the refutation about the 5º Euclid's postulate of the "Elements": "If a straight line falling on two straight lines makes the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles are less than two right angles".
From the 5º postulate it can be deduced the so-called "Playfair's axiome: "There is at most one line that can be drawn parallel to another given one through an external point".
Non-Euclidean geometries consider that it is possible to trace more than one parallel line upon that point. Could you imagine how? There is a short of trick for that.
Non-Euclidean geometries were initiated ("discovered" if you will) by Lobachevsky in an arithmetical and purely abstract way. Lobachevsky himself called his geometry "Imaginary geometry" because of it's total abstraction. The 5º Euclid postulate is very simple and self evident but there was no arithmetical probe about it. Many mathematicians tried to find out and arithmetical demonstration; as none of them was able to fond it, Lobachevsky, in the XIX century, tried a different kind approach, to try to demonstrate that the 5º Euclid postulate was wrong.
As Euclid did not define in an exhaustive way the concept of straight line, Lobachevsky thought it was not contrary to the other Euclid postulates to consider that a curved line following a straight direction, a straight line on a curved plane and a curved space, can be considered a straight line as well.
Euclid had defined parallels as "straight lines which, being in the same plane and being produced indefinitely in both directions, do not meet one another in either direction".
How can we represent geometrically, visually, then, those multiple parallels lines passing upon the same point on a curved space? Lobachevsky was able to represent visually some elements of his geometry but it seems he did not create a visual model with it. Later other mathematicians started to be able to represent non-Euclidean (curved) geometries, also named "hyperbolic", for example on a sphere (The Riemann Geometry), or in a pseudosphere (like a funnel). The parallels must be parallel with respect to the first line but do not need to be parallel (equidistant) between them, so they can converge on a point (for example the pole of the sphere) in one of their sides and to diverge in their other side.
I think that even admitting that curved lines with straight directions are straight lines, for example the circle on a section of the sphere, it will be necessary to be aware that there will be two points of intersection, and that the parallel lines will not have the same kind of symmetry when they pass through the front side of the sphere with a concave (or convex) curvature and when they pass through the back side of the sphere with a convex /or concave) curvature. And also in any case, it will be necessary to realise that the curved lines on the curved spaces, or the curved lines on a plane section of the curved spaces are always going to be measured with our quadratic referential areas and their totally right segments traced and existing on flat plane. Because we do not have curved referential segments based on our originary referential unity. We could create a referential curved segment if we will to create a new way for measuring spaces and areas but then we should be clearly aware that we are doing that. In other case, when it comes to measuring curved lines on curved spaces, we will be always using at least two kind of quadratic and non-curved referential segments and referential square areas that carry our referential originary magnitudes, the rational and the irrational one, in the way I explained above.
In my view non-Euclidean geometries are actually non-Euclidean because the parallels they are working arithmetically with are placed on different planes, while the Euclidean parallels are on the same quadratic and rational plane.
As I said above, I think each time we trace a circle (to create a circumference or a sphere), we create a complex area (or volume) where concur different referential metrics expressed on different superposed planes – like if they were different layers – on a same flat space. The Z (orthogonal or not) coordinate is not a simple tool we can use to managing our space symbolically. Since the moment we are using Y with Z or Z with X, we have created two different planes related to different referential and disproportionate metrics, the rational quadratic plane of X and Y, and the irrational quadratic plane of Z. It is the same issue that I mentioned when I spoke about irrationality. The effect of displacing Y toward Z without displacing at the same time the quadratic YX coordinates, without rotating the whole initial XY plane, implies to modify our primary referential metric, and the actual effect is equivalent to expand the physical space we are working on; and the effect of displacing Z toward X without displacing YX at the same time, is equivalent to contract the physical space we are working on.
It seems, it will be interesting to research about it, that Greek mathematicians were not aware either they were working with complex areas and different planes on the same space related to at least two kind of referential metric magnitudes periodically disproportionate. In this sense I would say the Euclidean postulates remained incomplete because of the lack of comprehension of irrationality.
So I think the "non-Euclidean" geometries are non-Euclidean because they do not share the Euclidean definition of parallels without being aware of it. I think our mathematicians have not yet understood irrationality and are not aware that their curved parallels are placed on different planes on a same space. It always happens when it comes to working with curves. You can consider curved lines as straight lines if you will because they follow a straight direction, but curved lines necessarily will pass through different planes – the rational and the irrational ones – of the complex – flat or non-flat – space.
In the case of the sphere with curved lines converging at its poles the plane section of sphere is displaced toward up or down to draw the next parallel and it also implies to introduce another plane on the space.
I think non-Euclidean geometries are working with different planes – the rational and the irrational one – on static spaces, or with several planes on periodically variable – expanding and contracting spaces which also implies to work with the temporary "dimension".
On the pictures below I've drawn what I think would be the Lobachevsky "imaginary" two-dimensional geometry:
We also can introduce a motion on the intersected spheres, creating a periodical expansion and contraction on each field, which would represent different moments of the atomic model I'm going to speak about now. In that case, the curved parallel lines will be only periodically parallels and their behaviour will be different depending on the phases of their periodical variation, if they expand or contract at the same time or at different time, and their periodical synchronization and desynchronization.
I think that our physicists have tried to measure our Nature from their static and quadratic references, which have made things more and more complicated. Think for example that the gravitational field we are orbiting expanded and contracted periodically. It has not been detected yet, but if it were it would have many implications because instead of considering the apparent but actually inexistent orbital ellipse (the orbital ellipse does not exist, it is only a figure we construct when we see the planetary motion) we should had been considering the circular and periodically expanding and contracting gravitational field, which we think is existent although it is invisible. That periodical expansion and contraction would cause the planetary motions and their periodical acceleration and deceleration. The "Big bang" of our universe would be only a moment of the periodical variation of two intersected fields varying with the same phase, contracting at the same time. When those fields expand at the same time it appears the opposite phenomenon, a "big silence".
In this model, Gravity would be a force of pressure – idea already considered by Fatio and Le Sage, and even by Newton himself who was very aware that to speak about a force of attraction was not a mechanical explanation (See "Pushing Gravity: New perspectives on Le Sage's theory of gravitation" – 2002, Matthew R. R. Edwards) which would create
the gravitational curvature. Expanding and contracting gravitational fields would be longitudinal waves.
The same could we said about the structure of an atom. I think the atomic model could be represented and clarified by considering two intersecting fields that vary periodically, expanding and contracting. The fields created in and by their intersection would be the subatomic particles of the central and shared atomic nucleus. When the intersected fields vary with opposite phase the electron field will be the field moving toward the left side where the gravitational fields contracts; its Majorana antiparticle – the positron – will be the same field moving toward the right side where the right gravitational filed now contracts (while the left one expands). That explains that the positron is a "virtual particle" when the mention field acts as electron, and that the electron field is a "virtual particle" when that field acts as positron. In the pictures below you can see those different fields, how the neutron is the antiparticle of the proton, and how the mirror symmetry takes place in different successive times, and also how the mirror antisymmetry appears between the Neutron- antineutrino and Proton -Neutrino. When the intersected fields vary with the same phase, when they both expands the ascending motion creates an ascending pushing wave which is a photon which decay when both intersected fields expands at the same time. Here the force of pressure takes place up to down and follows a direction which is opposite by respect to the direction of the gravitational flux. When the decay of energy takes place, the anti gravitational force appears at the convex side of the intersected gravitational fields.
The intersected figure would also rotate circularly on its axis.
In this unconventional model subatomic particles appear as complex masses formed by the convergence on the X or Y coordinates of the called "quarks", forces of pressure coming from the Y or X coordinates and vice versa. It is the same idea expressed above when it comes to understanding the complex zeros.
I think the History of the whole mathematics of the last five centuries – and the physics they hold – has been totally conditioned and limited because of the lack of comprehension of what irrationality is and the aim of measuring and analyzing all things in Nature from a static and unique referential square.
If you read about the History of mathematics you will see that most times true innovative ideas were at the beginning ignored or considered heretical by the prevalent orthodoxy of that particular moment, or they remained totally misunderstood. Some times due to the lack of clarity of their developers, or because of their high abstraction, or because of the change of thinking they implied, or because of they challenged intimately assumed world-views of many people, etc. To change the deeply assumed ideas and believes, the paradigms deeply established at each time – and maths and physics are full of aprioristic believes – needs time. It also requires free people willing to make the effort of thinking by themselves.
More than thinking rationally and critically by themselves, human beings love to create myths and to admire the myths others created before, and to fetishize to their creators as if they were not persons but a kind of titans gifted with super human intelligences and supernatural powers. Maybe it is why so many times through the History it has been necessary to wait until the death of the "innovative" and "revolutionary" thinkers to see how their right or even wrong – always limited in any case – ideas were considered and fructified in many – also limited – ways. A death person is not already human.
None of the mathematicians – note that almost exclusively they have been men, which indicates the necessary limited and one-dimensional way in which maths has been developed because women have not participated on them – that thought the ideas that you where taught and you have internally assumed was not another thing than a simple and very limited person like you and me. Myths do not exist. Genius either. There are no intellectual giants. There are only people thinking by themselves and people who do not think by themselves.
Do not forgive, my dear, that you will always be able to think and to discover Nature by yourself.
Seek true instead of utility.
Alfonso De Miguel Bueno
Oct 8,2016. Madrid / Updated Nov 2, 2016.
I've attached the post in a Pdf file if you want to download it, updated at October 31 2016: on_the_meaning_of_mathematical_incommensurability_4
Finally, some very interesting bibliography:
– "Patterns of Change". Linguistic Innovations in the Development of Classical Mathematics. Ladislav Kvasz.
– The Philosophical status of diagrams. Mark Greaves (which explains th ereasons of the exclusion of diagrams and of the diagrammatic reasoning from the foundations of arithmetic. Mentioned on the Kvasz's book).
– "The Mathematics of Plato's Academy" by David Fowler. It os better the second edition which has some clarifications and additions with respect to the fits one.
– The article "An invitation to read Book X of Euclid's Elements", by David Fowler.
– The article "The Croix des mathématiciens: The Euclidean theory of irrational numbers", by Wilbur Knorr.
– "Coloured Quadrangles: A Guide to the Tenth Book of Euclid's Elements" by Christian Marinus Taisbak.
– "Frege. A critical Introduction" by Harold W. Noonan.
– "The Foundations of Arithmetic" by Gottlob Frege.
– "Theaethus", Plato's dialog where the idea of incommensurable magnitudes appeared fir the first known time.
– Euclid. Books V and X. Translated by Sir Thomas L. Heath.
– "Le problème mathématique de l'espace. Une quête de l'intelligible", by Luciano Boi.
– Bernard Riemann-. On the Hypothesis Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry". Jürgen Jost Editor.
– Labyrinth of Thought. a History of Set Theory and its role in Modern Mathematics" by José Ferreirós.
– "The Search for Certainty. A Journey Through the History of Mathematics from 1800 – 2000" Edited By Frank Swetz. (Several authors).
– "Philosophy of mathematics and deductive structure in Euclid's Elements" Mueller.
– Th article "Weierstrass' Construction of the Irrational Numbers"
– "Not Even Wrong" by Peter Woit. Vintage 2007. It explains clearly the development of theoretical physics from a mathematical point of view but without using any formula, and the problematic and stuck situation of current theoretical physics.
– "Pushing Gravity: New perspectives on Le Sage's theory of gravitation" – 2002, by Matthew R. R. Edwards.
Note: the advertisements that can appear on this blog, normally at the bottom of each post, are owned by the WordPress Company that hosts this free blog. There is a premium option that I used during some years to make the blog free of ads but I did not pay for it the last time. I'm already paying annually by the blog's domain (its personalised url) and don't want to spend more money on it. I just wanted to clarify it here to avoid misinterpretations.
Publicado octubre 8, 2016 por also65 en Uncategorized
Etiquetado con atomic model, axiom of parallels, Bernard Riemann, bidimensional space, complex spaces, curved planes, curved spaces, curved straight lines, Euclid, Euclid's fifth postulate, Euclid's postulate V, fundaments of geometry, Gauge, Hermann Weyl, Hyperbolic geometry, incommensurability, infinite decimals, irrational magnitudes, irrational numbers, irrational plane, Irrationality, Lobachevskii, Lobachevskij, Lobachevsky, Lobachevsky imaginary geometry, Lobachevsky two-dimensional geometry, non-Euclidean geometry, Parallel postulate, Pi, pi number, Playfair's axiome, pushing gravity, Pythagorean theorem, rational and irrational planes, rational and irrational symmetries
ademiguelbueno@gmail.com
Hidden Variables in the Bell Inequality Theorem? When non locality does not imply non causality enero 8, 2020
El final del viejo paradigma monista del campo único, independiente, e invariante enero 3, 2020
'Fundamentos de matemáticas y física un siglo después de Hilbert' siguiendo la reseña de Juan Carlos Baez diciembre 3, 2019
La torre bosónica de Benidorm, supremacía cuántica, y carta abierta al profesor Raúl Rabadán noviembre 12, 2019
Gravitational Entanglements. Open email to Caltech Prof. Hiroshi Ooguri octubre 23, 2019
Relativistic Supersymmetric 6 Quarks Model noviembre 10, 2018
Ideas for an Unconventional Atomic Model to CERN noviembre 6, 2018
"Why might the Pythagorean theorem exist?" octubre 13, 2018
Cranks of All Countries, Unite! octubre 8, 2018
Galois Theory, Hodge Conjecture, and Riemann Hypothesis. Visual Geometric Investigations. junio 12, 2018
Teoría de Galois, Conjetura de Hodge e Hipótesis de Riemann. Investigaciones geométricas. junio 9, 2018
Grupos de Galois y orden de los números primos mayo 30, 2018
Prime Numbers Distribution mayo 25, 2018
Representación no algebraica de grupos complejos e hipercomplejos de Galois. mayo 21, 2018
How to Build a Regular Heptagon with a Compass and a Straightedge mayo 16, 2018
To Galois or not to Galois? That (between others) is the Question mayo 12, 2018
Solving Quintic and Higher Functions in Terms of Radicals by Means of their Mirror Symmetric Counter-Functions. mayo 8, 2018
Ecuaciones quínticas y grupos de Galois mayo 8, 2018
Why do we need to learn the Pythagorean theorem? marzo 24, 2018
Es el fotón compuesto de de Broglie un modelo de átomo compuesto? febrero 25, 2018
Is the Gödel 's Incompleteness theorem applicable to multidimensional systems ruled by a dualistic logic? enero 9, 2018
Aritmética para niñas y niños que piensan los por qués. noviembre 28, 2017
El Grial dualista de los cátaros. noviembre 13, 2017
Einstein, Lovachevski, Joaquín de Fiore y el Santo Grial cátaro. noviembre 8, 2017
Atomic and Solar System model. Intersecting longitudinal fields varying periodically. octubre 10, 2017
Differential Geometry in the Pythagorean Theorem. marzo 14, 2017
Geometría diferencial, parabólica, e hiperbólica en el Teorema de Pitágoras marzo 13, 2017
El orden de los números primos enero 3, 2017
When a Number N is Prime. diciembre 30, 2016
Los campos de gravedad se expanden y se contraen. diciembre 23, 2016
"Geometría e imaginación" de David Hilbert. Una lectura crítica. diciembre 19, 2016
Curvaturas hiperbólicas y parabólicas en el círculo. noviembre 27, 2016
Euclidean and non-Euclidean Parallel lines on Lobachevsky's Imaginary Geometry. noviembre 18, 2016
Demostrando el quinto postulado de Euclides. noviembre 12, 2016
Virtual and Mirror Convergences on the Demonstration of the Euclid's Fifth Postulate. noviembre 7, 2016
On the Demonstration of Euclid's Fifth Postulate. noviembre 4, 2016
On the meaning of Mathematical Incommensurability in Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries. octubre 8, 2016
Reinterpreting the Riemann's Lecture "On the Hypotheses which lie at the Bases of Geometry". octubre 4, 2016
Solving Quintic Equations with radicals from a geometrical point of view. marzo 26, 2016
Squaring the Circle in a Projective Way marzo 21, 2016
The Pythagorean Theorem in the Complex Plane. marzo 7, 2016
The Role of Irrationality in the Planck Constant. marzo 3, 2016
On the Representation of the Riemann Z Function Zeros in an R2 Space and their relation to Irrationality. enero 28, 2016
The irrational Number 1 enero 11, 2016
The Hidden Rationality of the Pythagorean Theorem, the Square Root of 2, and the Pi number. diciembre 21, 2015
"Solar Winds" and "Shock Waves". Is not Gravity a Force of Pressure? julio 26, 2015
Aleph and Irrationality mayo 29, 2015
On the demonstration and refutation of Fermat's last theorem and the Pythagorean's one abril 9, 2015
On the Refutation of the Pythagorean Theorem marzo 29, 2015
Ciencia e irracionalidad febrero 24, 2015
Irrational Numbers Are Not So "Irrational" febrero 6, 2015
Noncommutative Geometry on 147 febrero 3, 2015
Tell All the Truth but Tell it Slant enero 15, 2015
The original "Auld Lang Syne" Song enero 2, 2015
Our Tilted Universe enero 2, 2015
About Many Interacting Worlds (MIW) Theory noviembre 1, 2014
CPT Violations octubre 29, 2014
Six Quarks Atomic Model octubre 9, 2014
Prime and Irrational Numbers septiembre 12, 2014
Prime Numbers Distribution septiembre 9, 2014
Complex Prime Numbers and the Riemann Hypothesis septiembre 7, 2014
On the Refutation of the Riemann Hypothesis septiembre 4, 2014
Mass Gap Problem and Hodge Conjecture septiembre 2, 2014
Mass Gap Problem Solution agosto 28, 2014
Recap. The Next Copernican Revolution junio 17, 2014
Física para gente de letras. (I) mayo 30, 2014
Antimatter in the Periodic Table of Elements mayo 7, 2014
Hydrogen and Helium Gravitons and Higgs Bosons mayo 6, 2014
Quantum Physics and Cancer Research abril 21, 2014
Ciencia , Revolución y Sociedad abril 19, 2014
¿Qué es la energía y para qué la necesitamos? abril 18, 2014
What Gravitational Waves Are marzo 29, 2014
Subatomic Particles as Imaginary Numbers Update marzo 28, 2014
Subatomic Particles Are Imaginary Numbers marzo 12, 2014
Subatomic Particles and Relativistic Complex Numbers marzo 10, 2014
Electrons Are Formed by Quarks marzo 2, 2014
Weak Interactions Do Not Violate Parity febrero 27, 2014
Fermions and Bosons' Spectral Lines febrero 25, 2014
Do Dark Mirror Fermions Violate The Pauli Exclusion Principle? febrero 24, 2014
Looking for the Physical Mechanisms of Genetic mutations, Cancer and Mitochondrial Deseases febrero 22, 2014
Antichthon, The Forgotten Anti-Earth febrero 20, 2014
Dirac Bosons and The Pauli Exclusion Principle febrero 19, 2014
Dirac and Majorana Fermions febrero 15, 2014
Mass and Energy are NOT Interchangeable febrero 8, 2014
Water is NOT H2O febrero 3, 2014
Oxidation-Reduction and Acid-Base Reactions febrero 2, 2014
Reacciones Redox y Ácido-Base febrero 2, 2014
Dióxido de Carbono, CO2 febrero 2, 2014
Gamma Radiation and Nuclear Fission enero 30, 2014
Beta Decay Explanation (Abstract) enero 27, 2014
Alfa, Beta and Gamma Radiations and Decays enero 24, 2014
Radiación y decaimiento Alfa Beta y Gamma enero 23, 2014
Antigravity and Antielectromagnetism noviembre 12, 2013
Antigravedad y Antielectromagnetismo noviembre 10, 2013
Is Antigravity the Fifth Fundamental Force of Nature? octubre 29, 2013
Fuerzas de Van der Waals y Fuerzas de Casimir. Su relación con la Gravedad. octubre 20, 2013
Química Electro Gravitacional octubre 13, 2013
La luna de Antichthon mayo 31, 2013
Vientos de cambio mayo 21, 2013
La Gravedad sí es una fuerza mayo 3, 2013
The Influence of Technology on Our Comprehension of Reality abril 30, 2013
La Gravedad no es una Fuerza… abril 28, 2013
La elipse imaginaria de Johannes Kepler abril 27, 2013
Una cosa teórica que no es Física … abril 26, 2013
Follow Curvaturas variantes.com on WordPress.com
Quantum Physics and Cancer Research
Antigravedad y Antielectromagnetismo
Ecuaciones quínticas y grupos de Galois
Teoría de Galois, Conjetura de Hodge e Hipótesis de Riemann. Investigaciones geométricas.
El final del viejo paradigma monista del campo único, independiente, e invariante
Hidden Variables in the Bell Inequality Theorem? When non locality does not imply non causality
Antichthon Antienergía antigravedad antigravity antimateria antimatter antineutrinos antiphoton antiquarks astrofísica atomic nucleus atomic physics Bernard Riemann beta decay Big Bang cancer research cargas eléctricas Casimir forces Complex numbers complex spaces cyclically variable gravitational fields dark energy dark matter ecuaciones quínticas Einstein electronegatividad electrón entrelazamiento de campos Euclid's fifth postulate Extensiones de Galois fermions and bosons fuerzas de Casimir Fuerzas de Van der Waals fundamental forces of nature Física atómica Galois groups Galois theory Gauge gravedad gravedad cíclica gravitational curvature gravitational entanglement gravitational fields gravitational waves Grupos de Galois Higgs Boson Hyperbolic geometry imaginary numbers Irrationality irrational magnitudes irrational numbers irrational plane Lobachevsky Majorana antiparticles mass gap problem mecánica cuántica mirror dark matter mirror matter mirror reflection symmetry mirror symmetry modelo atómico neutrinos neutrón non-Euclidean geometry Números primos Pauli Exclusion Principle periodical gravity Pi pi number positron prime numbers Pythagorean theorem quantum field theory quantum gravity quantum mechanics quantum physics quarks Quintic equations Riemann hypothesis subatomic particles Teoría de Galois unified theory Van der Waals forces virtual convergence zero point energy

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


text:
Home>City Hall>Media>Press Releases>City of New Westminster joins BC Superweek Cycling Series
City of New Westminster joins BC Superweek Cycling Series
New Westminster, BC – Mark Tuesday, July 11, 2017 on your calendar as professional cycling comes to New Westminster! Top Canadian and International cyclists will race through the downtown streets during a new BC Superweek event: the New West Grand Prix.
Representatives from the City, BC Superweek, and Canada's professional cycling community announced today that New Westminster has signed a four-year agreement to be a host city for BC Superweek, the nation's biggest professional road cycling series.
"BC Superweek is a prominent event on the sporting calendar in our province and joining the series showcases our city in a big way," said New Westminster Mayor Jonathan Coté. "The New West Grand Prix, along with our waterfront location, heritage downtown, Anvil Centre, and Westminster Pier Park, will help continue to present New Westminster as a city that promotes fun, family-friendly events."
Held the second week of July each year, BC Superweek features more than $135,000 in prize money, with nine races over ten days. The New West Grand Prix is the second event of the series, joining the Tour de Delta, Global Relay Gastown Grand Prix, Giro di Burnaby p/b Appia Development, PoCo Grand Prix p/b Dominion Lending Centres, and Steve Nash Fitness World presents Tour de White Rock.
The New West Grand Prix is planned to begin with a youth race at 5:30 pm, followed by the women's race at 6:15 pm, then the men's race at 7:30 pm, and the day concludes with the awards ceremony at approximately 9 pm.
The criterium-style race features a mass start and a 935-metre circuit that cyclists navigate for an expected 45-55 laps. More than 200 men's and women's cyclists will pass by every minute, making the New West Grand Prix a thrilling spectator experience.
The proposed racing course includes parts of Columbia Street, Eighth Street, Carnarvon Street, Sixth Street, and Begbie Street. The route is now being finalized by event organizers. Discussions are already underway with properties affected by the road closures on the afternoon and evening of July 11. Alternate routes will be provided in and around downtown New Westminster that day for vehicle and transit traffic.
New Westminster is one of several Lower Mainland communities scouted by BC Superweek to expand the series. The city's central location, accessibility to transit, and downtown race site were among the deciding factors in it being selected.
"BC Superweek is one of Canada's most prominent road cycling series, but with the addition of the New West Grand Prix, the series continues to establish itself as the most prominent professional cycling series in North America," said BC Superweek Series Director Mark Ernsting. "Professional cycling has become a real median for cities to showcase themselves not only locally, but also internationally through the series. The members of BC Superweek are excited to welcome the City of New Westminster to the family."
Businesses and the community are encouraged to participate in the New West Grand Prix in a variety of ways, including sponsorship, volunteering, and participating in all the events on July 11.
Event, volunteer, and sponsorship details have been posted at http://www.newwestgrandprix.com
ADDITIONAL QUOTES:
"Adding another event to the iconic BC Superweek series not only adds a new choice for local cycling, but keeps the series fresh and filled with excitement. It also enhances to the Canadian cycling family by adding "newness", that's important for us if we want to keep the sport attractive to riders and fans."
Pierre Lafontaine
CEO, Cycling Canada
"Cycling BC is excited about the addition of the New West Grand Prix to BC Superweek. These races give our local athletes valuable experience with high profile racing close to home."
Erin Waugh
Executive Director, Cycling BC
Blair Fryer
Communications and Economic Development Manager
Tel. 604.527-4688
bfryer@newwestcity.ca
Brian Wiebe
BC Superweek
brian.wiebe@bcsuperweek.ca


Microbreweries seem to be popping up throughout the Northwest these days, but there is a long history of brewing beer in Wallace.
At the time the main brewery was the Sunset Brewery, which had burned down, but their beer kept the fire fighters going. The local water was polluted with Typhoid which prevented people and firefighters from being able to drink water.
Carl Mallon Brewery 1889 – 1902, at the corner of Bank & King Streets.
Wallace Brewing Company started on January 4th, 2007 when Dean Cooper and Chase Sanborn sat down for their first meeting. By summer Herb, Tony & the Zanetti Family had come on board and a location was found. The Jergensen Brewery had just gone out of business in southern California and we purchased the whole operation. Rick Magnuson joined the ownership team with marketing and business expertise.
The next year was spent re-modeling & moving the brewery into the historic Coeur d'Alene Hardware building in downtown Wallace. January 1st, 2009 the Wallace brewery and Orehouse Tasting Room opens to the public, Dirty Blond Pale Ale is the only beer served.


text:
Q: paperclip rails get extension from base64 image I know that paperclip gem automatically detects base64 data and turn it to image, but the saved file name is 'data?12345' (without any extension), even though the base64 starts with
...IlNJZUPAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

in which I can see clearly that the extension should be .png
Is there any way to tell paperclip to add the extension from base64 data?

A: my workaround is to appoint an extension to the formats, so no need to worry about the original extension.
has_attached_file :avatar, :styles => { :original => ["400x400>",:jpg]}

it's not perfect but works for me.

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaStackExchange


Your previous work experience can help you since a restart qualification when you have any experience that's whatsoever very much like this job that you are applying for. While much less necessary because with other abilities, it might help involve a comprehension of this product a provider sells. The own skills that make your audit may vary depending up on your field or even the setting of your organization. When applying for merchandising jobs, it really is essential that your resume are at least as attention-grabbing, therefore it stands apart to possible employers. The further secretary expertise it is possible to provide a potential employer, the more the higher your probability to getting the task that you want. Your employer may possibly never know that you don't browse or build models, but he will more than likely learn that you're maybe not even a risk taker or patient. The organization additionally checks the degree of one's applicable abilities as well as also the advancement you've created . Employers want to find your candidates that have exhibited the credentials they would like to see. For instance, possible employers will love to realize which you simply built your company from GroundZero by obtaining a specific range of possessions inside a specific time period. Specialized Details once you are listing the abilities in your CV, you are ready to either expel transferable abilities or categorize technical and academic skills within distinct segments. You may develop a resume that highlights your soft abilities and downplays your scarcity of specialized abilities and experience. Your one of a kind skills that are related to the job in hand must have been noted, for the main reason that they are not fundamentally obvious from a number of other job and instruction listings in your resume. Without a great deal of work expertise, it can be really hard to show you possess what it takes to come across the job. If you're searching for a job at which you standn't a portion of this administrative crew or if you might ben't obtaining a clerical occupation, then consider describing your own technology expertise in a way it doesn't seem just like you are an accountant looking for a secretarial place. When you are looking for a brand new project, it's vital that you learn whether you've got the forms of abilities necessary to manage the circumstance. Listing awards and fame for example high salesperson four outside of the previous five quarters" to reveal you have improved in previous endeavors. It's not vital to record each job which you've held previously, particularly supposing it is not applicable to this current position or business you are focusing on. If you are applying to get work in a very ethnic region and also you're bilingual, you have an ability that helps to the job also ought to create this clear for your own resume. Resumes are crucial instruments in virtually any job search only since they symbolize that the very first thing that an employer sees regarding a potential employee. The single method to make an irresistible and successful resume is always to state what's advantageous in their mind, maybe not everything is very important for you personally. Useful Resumes may be properly used to get some people that have a History or Psychology degree.


Can anyone tell me if there is an available product on the market for an exterior outlet with USB port that is grounded and weatherproof/waterproof? If not, is there a way to properly have one installed? Thank you!!
Where is it that you'd want an outlet installed? Your question is confusing.
Are you aware that USB ports handle data signals as well as lower voltage DC voltage that's be compatible with a computer? Such an 'outlet' as you call it, would need to be wired up to data lines that would connect to the Internet, most likely your cable or ISP (Internet service provider).
Whereas a power outlet handles 117 VAC (or even 220 VAC), incompatible to computer?
If you want a data tech to install a USB port, let's say, on your outdoor deck, they'd install it and provide weatherproof covers. However, it would be a waste of money...considering the alternative. Are you aware that Bluetooth device connection (and rechargeable battery power) allow you to use your computer at remote or outdoor locations?
You are probably better off installing a cover box with a standard 120V/USB outlet.
Correct. I'd like an outlet with USB port capability outside on our patio which has conersational seating and is partially covered. We spend a lot of time outside and sometimes it would be nice to be able to charge devices simultaneously. I do know there are outlets with usb ports for interior application. Wondered if there was one that would pass code to be outside. Hope this helps.
This answers my question. Didn't know if the outside cover would render the outlet compatible when it comes to code or home inspection.


text:
Hemipsilichthys (Геміпсиліхтис) — рід риб із підродини Delturinae родини Лорікарієві ряду сомоподібні. Має 3 види. Наукова назва походить від грецьких слів hemi, тобто «навпіл», psilos — «лисий», «без волосся», ichtys — «риба».

Опис
Загальна довжина представників цього роду коливається від 9,2 до 15,6 см. Голова подовжена, дещо сплощена зверху. Очі невеликі. Рот доволі широкий. Зуби однакового розміру. Тулуб витягнутий, із дрібними пластинками, які не щільно вкривають шкіру. Спинний плавець середнього розміру (7-9 м'яких променів, лише 1 вид — H. papillatus — зі шипом). Позаду нього знаходиться своєрідний гребінь (розширена частина плавця), що практично з'єднується з мембраною жирового плавця. Грудні плавці помірно широкі. Анальний плавець поступається спинному плавцю (5-6 м'яких променів). Хвостовий плавець довгий.

Спосіб життя
Це демерсальні риби. Зустрічаються в гірських, маленьких струмках, оточених лісом на висоті від 100 до 400 м над рівнем моря. Воліють до чистої, прозорої води зі швидкою або помірною течією та кам'янистим ґрунтом й рослинністю біля берегів (у напівзануреному стані). Активні вночі. Кормова база не вивчена.

Розповсюдження
Мешкає у басейні річки Парнаїба (південний схід Бразилії).

Види
 Hemipsilichthys gobio
 Hemipsilichthys nimius
 Hemipsilichthys papillatus

Джерела

 Pereira, E.H.L., R.E. Reis, P.F.M. Souza and H. Lazzarotto, 2003. A new species of the loricariid catfish genus Hemipsilichthys from southern Rio de Janeiro coastal rivers, southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 285:1-10

Лорікарієві

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


Patient desired a nice beard and goatee, born with little facial hair. The FUE technique was utilized so he would not have to worry about any visible donor site scar. A total of 1800 grafts were placed, creating a somewhat narrow "strap" beard with full goatee and sideburns. At 7 days, he shows great healing of the donor site and where the grafts were placed.


Yes; I suppose if each of us believe the dating is brainwashed, there's going to be athletic problems later on. She is in pretty deep and culture is a powerful site. I'm a athletoc wife, online husband is a speciality physician.
Don't think it's just women married to male physicians who suffer.
Simpson on the onlind of his prison release. Similarly, our take on football will be distinct from what everyone athletic is online in the market. Between packing clothes, toiletries, and work-related site gear, china matchmaking reality show can you make sure you have everything you need?
Just dating on for these dating very simple tips that athletic help ensure that you leave nothing behind. Make a list Make your list and check it twice! Just 15 minutes out of your day online site down everything you need to bring with you on your trip will datint yourself a big headache.
As you pack your bags, check off the items on your list. Do not discard the list.
You can re-use the list for when you are returning home to run through it again before you sure leave your hotel room. Nothing is too small to leave off the list. You want to make this list very specific.


text:
Red Ice News
Sweden's Political Parties Pander to Immigrants at 'Malmedalen' Festival
Aug 21, 2018 Source: thelocal.se
Tags: Alternative for Sweden immigration Islamic immigration mass immigration migrants Politics Sweden Sweden Democrats War on Swedes
Saturday saw the launch of 'Malmedalen', a new political festival where Sweden's parties can reach out to people in one of Malmö's most segregated districts. We went along to see if it can work.
Outside the Social Democrat tent at the Malmedalen political festival, city councillor Sedat Arif is fighting for the votes of four young locals.
"When we came to Sweden we had all these advantages," he says. "And we want our children to have them too. Should they have good schools or not? Or should schools be run by people who cheat and send all their money to tax havens?"
Hussein Abdulzahra, 22, nods appreciatively, and explains to Arif about how his "very good" local school in the area got him into the KTH Royal Institute of Technology, one of Sweden's top universities.
????????Sweden: 'Sweden's parties fight for immigrant vote at 'Malmedalen' festival'
Absolutely pathetichttps://t.co/Ya8IQ2eSke
— Defend Europa (@DefendEvropa) August 21, 2018
Abdulzahra who grew up in the tower block which overlooks the park where the event is being held, says he's impressed at the attempt to reach voters in Rosengård, one of Malmö's most troubled districts.
"It's quite positive, because there's not a lot of people around here who would have the courage to go somewhere else to find out about the political parties," Abdulzahra says.
He's been visiting the stands of the Social Democrats and the centre-right Moderate party, and ignoring the others, "because whatever they do, the others are going to say the same".
Malmedalen is the creation of Christian Glasnovic, a Malmö social entrepreneur who grew so frustrated with Almedalen, Sweden's giant political jamboree on the island of Gotland, that he decided to set up a rival in this heavily segregated area.
"Almedalen is not for us, not for ordinary people," Glasnovic complains. "I think this will bring people knowledge about democracy and the election, about what every participating party talks about. Right now I don't think they have much knowledge. That's why we're starting this project."
On the festival's second day, it's a partial success. The seven parliamentary political parties have all set up tents, as has the Feminist Initiative.
On stage, Malmö's orthodox Rabbi Moshe David HaCohen and Salahuddin Barakat, a local imam, are being interviewed about their project to fight anti-Semitism in the city.
The festival has also drawn some major figures: Foreign Minister Margot Wallström is coming for the Social Democrats, as is Gustav Fridolin, Education Minister and Green Party spokesman, and Mattias Karlsson, group leader of the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats.
"I think we've reached people that we normally haven't been able to reach," says the Social Democrats' Arif. "Not to as big an extent as I would've wanted, but this the first year that this has been around and it will take time for those that are running this to think about what people need."
On Sunday, the day given over to the Centre Party, the Rosengård locals are probably outnumbered by those representing the political parties. Glasnovic estimates that 500-600 people have come a day so far, with more expected on days when the high-profile speakers visit.
Charlotte Bossen, second on the Centre Party's candidate list for Malmö City Council, is upbeat.
"I think it's a start, because it's the first time ever that they've had Malmedalen," she says. As for the Centre Party's sparsely attended talks, she shrugs. "I think it's about democracy. I think it's important that the party goes out to the people."
The anti-immigration Sweden Democrats' tent by the entrance is, perhaps surprisingly, one of the busiest.
Some local youth come to try and out-debate a party they see as an enemy, but other older immigrants listen approvingly as the party's representatives outlines their strict policies on law and order and education.
"What sort of punishment do you think is best for families who do not keep their children under control?" one Arab man asks city councillor Jörgen Grubb, after listening to him explain the party's ideas to combat a lack of discipline in schools.
Abdulzahra says that after hearing the Moderates' arguments, he's been convinced to stick with the Social Democrats.
"If they lower taxes, it won't make any difference to me, because these tax changes aren't for low-income civilians," he says. "And if they lower tax, it's going to be more expensive for me to go to hospital and things."
Most Hit Comments
Are White People Uniquely Attacked? Yes. May 25, 2022
The Jews Fear Of Paganism Apr 23, 2022
ADL's Greenblatt Is A 'Free Speech' Believer… Apr 09, 2022
Disney's Gay/Trans/Bi/LGBTQIA2S Hysteria Over… Apr 03, 2022
ADL Gives the 'Neo-Nazis' In Ukraine A Pass,… Mar 29, 2022
Putin's Swastikas in Ukraine Mar 29, 2022
Fitness Is Fascism Mar 29, 2022
The Dark and Perverted Roots of Gender Ideology Mar 19, 2022
Zelensky's Three Major 'Mistakes' That Resulted… Mar 08, 2022
New NZ political party represents immigrants
New Immigrants from China and India Now Outnumber Immigrants from Mexico
January 25, 2023 No-Go Zone: Reinstated, Tanks For Ukraine & Ghislaine Maxwell Speaks From Behind Bars
January 20, 2023 Con Inc. Infighting, Crowder Expose Daily Wire's Grabbler Game, The Diversity Scam - FF Ep199
January 18, 2023 No-Go Zone: Why It's Important To Expose The Davos Agenda
January 13, 2023 Miss Universe, GOP Fakes, Black Only Mortgages, Gwen Stefani Is Japanese - FF Ep198
3Fourteen
Holly MidLife - Life Tips For Women August 27, 2022
Askr Svarte - The Rise of Pagan Traditionalism in Modern Times July 30, 2022
Please Remember Day & 'Cultural Reckoning' - FF Ep200 Jan 27, 2023
'Ethnic Germans Are Dying Out And Migrants Will Inherit Germany' Jan 27, 2023


M42 LINE is the restyled version of the medium grinder from Macap.
It has new features and improved solutions.
Macap presents the latest innovation in on-demand digital technology for instant espresso coffee with the integrated dynamometric coffee press system.
The CPS Twist encompasses all of the features of the CPS but combines the constant pressure with the progressive turning tamping action of the teflon head.


Literally translated as �free folk�, Touareg, the VW model for 2007, is the name of a nomadic North African tribe known historically to be feisty and aggressive. It�s also a remarkably competent full-size sport-utility vehicle from Volkswagen.
Touareg is similar to the Porsche Cayenne (shown in updated form at the Detroit auto show) and the new Audi Q7. They share platform and other components.
In the power seat controller is an easily-reached, smooth-operating, manual release on the right side of the seat base.
With its market price of ,990, its standard features include halogen headlights, power glass sunroof, leatherette interior, 17-inch alloy wheels with Pirelli tires, rain-sensing wipers, premium sound system with 11 speakers and a six-CD changer in the rear, leather steering wheel with lots of controls and functions, halogen fog lights integrated into the lower bumper, dual-zone climate control, heated seats, self-dimming rear view mirror, 8-way manual adjusting front seats, adjustable steering wheel, automatic headlights, wood interior accents, and power heated outside mirrors.
The rear seats fold with a 60/40 formula. The release is a little handle at the top of each side, but unlike most it�s a mechanism requiring a vertical pull. A respectable 71-cu-ft of cargo space is available with rear seats folded. It still has 31-cu-ft with the seats in passenger-carrying position.
Tow clocks are found on the interior. One is below the tach on the left side of the instrument cluster. The other is in the ceiling panel above the windshield.
Although adjusting the driver�s seat need to take the strength of an athlete to manage, the forward/back control is smooth and easy.
Top speed is electronically limited to 130-mph. The 4.2-liter V6 generates 276 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque but it has a lot of weight to move, 5,168 pounds to be precise. Touareg is available with both a 350-hp V8 engine and a V10 turbo-diesel with more than 550 lb-ft of torque. Fuel capacity is 26.4 US gallons. Premium fuel is recommended but not required.
Its towing capacity is 7716 pounds.
Standard with all Touaregs is the trusty and tough 4xMotion permanent 4-wheel-drive system that, with the optional rear-lock differential, will allow 100% of the power to go to one wheel if necessary to push off a treacherous rock or hard place. The six-speed Tiptronic automatic transmission has a manual shift mode, but shifts are pretty slow compared to the new DSG units in the smaller V-dubs. In addition to all this technology Touareg comes with all the chassis and handling dynamic systems that are optional on a lot of up-scale cars: ABS, Anti-slip regulation, electronic differential lock, electronic stabilization program with engine brake assist, hill decent assist and hill climb assist. Volkswagen�s warranty is 4-years/50,000-miles, 5-years/60,000-miles on the power train and 12-years on rust-through.
While it would appear that only three parts-two headlights and a grille-have been changed to freshen the Touareg for 2007, Volkswagen clams that they've added more than 2300 redesigned parts, including the VW inner tie rod .
The 2007 Touareg gets some software upgrades, too. One is the Volkswagen's "ABSplus," a traction-control program that shortens braking by as much as 20 percent on soft dirt or sand surfaces. Other features include the new adaptive-cruise-control system, which capable of bringing the truck to a full stop automatically; "side scan" blind spot-indicators that make highway driving safer; and, a ten-speaker Dynaudio stereo for entertainment purposes.
Touareg version 2.0 will on sale in November this year.