Keystone XL would provide substantial economic benefits to the U.S. As found in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS), those benefits would include a multi-billion-dollar contribution to the U.S. GDP and significant property tax revenues, as well as sales and other tax revenues, to counties and states along the proposed project route. Keystone XL will pay more than one hundred million dollars in property and other taxes over its lifetime. This is money counties could use to build new roads, schools and hospitals. Additionally, sales and use taxes revenue from the construction of the proposed project would be approximately $66 million. These revenues could help to ease the tax burden on ordinary Americans. Construction of Keystone XL is also expected to contribute approximately $3.4 billion to the U.S. GDP.


text:
Tag Archives: corporatocrats
'President' Pussygrabber sets fascist, deregulatory, anti-government tone
"These smug pilots have lost touch with regular passengers like us. Who thinks I should fly the plane?"
Cartoon from The New Yorker
I watched "President" Pussygrabber's inauguration speech live today out of a sense of obligation to know exactly what toxic propaganda the fascist in chief is spewing into the political environment.
Thankfully it was a fairly short speech, and right off the bat Pussygrabber showed us the direction he's dragging us in: Gub-mint baaad!
To hear Pussygrabber tell it, the nation's ills are due to the craven, selfish gub-mint workers in D.C. (federal elected officials and federal civil servants, I presume) who for the past several years have been working for themselves instead of for the American people (I'd thought that it was the Mexicans and the Muslims whom we need to dispose of in order to Make America Great Again, but whatever…).
Pussygrabber huffed and puffed:
… For too long, a small group in our nation's Capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost.
Washington flourished — but the people did not share in its wealth.
Politicians prospered — but the jobs left, and the factories closed.
The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country.
Their victories have not been your victories; their triumphs have not been your triumphs; and while they celebrated in our nation's Capital, there was little to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.
That all changes — starting right here, and right now, because this moment is your moment: it belongs to you. …*
It's funny, because I could have sworn that our corporate and other plutocratic overlords, most of them not in government, committed these crimes against us commoners — including by, yes, buying off way too many of those in D.C. — and it's not that Pussygrabber truly believes that the government hasn't helped the citizenry enough; no, it's that the government has helped the citizenry too much, has been too regulatory.
The treasonous profiteers have a harder time treasonously profiteering at the expense of the people and of the planet when the government effectively is regulating bad actors.
Thus, we must put an anti-Environmental Protection Agency guy in charge of the EPA, an anti-Department of Energy guy in charge of the Department of Energy, an anti-public-school woman in charge of the Department of Education, and a white supremacist in charge of the Department of Justice, to name only some of the examples of Pussygrabbers' having appointed rabid foxes on crack to guard the hen house.
And, of course, the filthy rich — Pussygrabber's cohorts — want their massive tax breaks, and doing good, beneficial things for the citizenry takes tax dollars; therefore, we must convince the citizenry that the government spending tax dollars on them (even their own tax dollars) is bad.
And of course Pussygrabber and his deregulatory ilk have to falsely frame their deregulation schemes in terms of helping the average U.S. citizen when, in fact, deregulation more often than not harms the average citizen.
It's all good, though; when the United States of America becomes a complete fucking free-for-all, a treasonous profiteer's wet dream of deregulation, there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth among the vast majority of those who incredibly stupidly voted for Pussygrabber. (Unfortunately, there also will be suffering for the millions of us who did not vote for Pussygrabber, and about 3 million more of us did not vote for him than did.)
Of course a billionaire never had any intention whatsofuckingever of helping the little guy. After all, he stole his billions from the legions of little guys. (You don't get filthy rich by working; you get rich via the legalized thievery that is capitalism.)
In short order I expect the nation to go right back to the state it was at the end of "President" George W. Bush's eight illegitimate years (or worse). I expect another nationwide economic collapse and environmental catastrophes (natural and man-made) for which the government is wholly unprepared and/or unwilling to manage effectively.
And, of course, we'll probably have at least another unnecessary war; after all, as BushCheneyCorp knew fully well, the war profiteers can't profiteer without a war, and it's not that hard to fabricate a casus belli; a relentless campaign of propagandist lies will do the trick, as it did for the Vietraq War.
I mean, Pussygrabber already has started out just as Gee Dubya did: with a stolen presidential election. Nothing good follows a stolen election; a stolen election can be nothing else but a harbinger of doom. An individual who loses the popular vote but who takes office anyway isn't a democratically elected individual.
And an individual who becomes president with the help of a foreign, enemy nation is a traitor — we'll see how hard "President" Pussygrabber works to quash all further investigation into his very apparently treasonous ties to Russia and to his apparent puppeteer Putin.
With a patently fascist and treasonous "president" in the White House yet once again — yes, thank you, Gee Dubya, for helping to prepare us at least to some degree for Donald J. Trump — I am happy that I live in California, where regulation by the government makes our citizens' lives better, not worse (if it decreases some bad corporate actors' profits, oh, boo fucking hoo), and where I at least somewhat will be protected from the worst excesses from the unelected Pussygrabber regime.
We Californians, who reside in by far the most populous state in the nation and who voted for Billary Clinton over Pussygrabber by a margin of almost two to one, are not having this Pussygrabber bullshit and we plan to resist him the way that the Repugnican Teatards treasonously resisted the actually democratically elected Barack Obama every fucking step of the way.
As unpleasant as it is for me to hear "President" Pussygrabber speak even a short sentence, while he sickens me, as all neo-Nazis do — seriously, listening to even his short inauguration speech, one of the worst ever given, was work for me — I don't feel that I didn't do enough to try to prevent a "President" Trump.
From Day One I was a strong supporter of actual populist Bernie Sanders, whom I always saw as more likely to win the White House than the unlikable, corrupt, faux populist, Democrat in name only, Repugnican Lite Billary Clinton.
I gave Sanders' presidential campaign more than $1,000 over time and spent countless hours writing about him and discussing him with others. I even stood on my feet for at least two hours waiting to see him at a rally attended by thousands here in Sacramento in May.
But in the end, the "Democratic" dead-enders shoved the coronation of Billary Clinton down our throats — even though the nationwide polls, right up to the end of the Democratic Party presidential primary elections and caucuses, consistently showed Bernie Sanders doing much better against Donald Trump than she — and as a result of that colossal collective "Democratic" stupidity, we now have "President" Pussygrabber.
Yes, blame the fucktards who voted for Pussygrabber in the general election, but blame the fucktards who supported Billary Clinton in the Democratic Party presidential primaries and caucuses, too.
Clintonism finally is dead now, thank Goddess, but now we have to deal with "President" Pussygrabber and the damage that he is going to wreak through his systematic dismantling of our institutions in order to benefit himself, his family and his rich cronies.
We survived George W. Bush, but I don't know whether we'll survive Pussygrabber.
I only know that I am part of the resistance, even though my conscience is clear and even though I can say, Don't blame me — I voted for Bernie!
*Of course corruption, fraud, waste and abuse and even inefficiency should be rooted out in all levels of government and corrected, and of course in some states and locales (the vast majority of them Repugnican-controlled) the governments actually don't do the people's business but do the plutocrats' business, but on the whole, all levels of government do the citizenry much more good than harm.
Government is all that stands between us peasants and our corporate overlords getting absolutely everything that they want from us and doing absolutely everything that they want to do to us.
This is why "President" Pussygrabber and his ilk want to destroy, or at least seriously cripple, government: So they can get to us more quickly and more easily.
"President" Pussygrabber must distract the angry hordes carrying torches and pitchforks from the real enemy: our millionaire and billionaire corporate overlords like Pussygrabber. Indeed, as the new head of the Repugnican Party, this is one of Pussygrabber's chief jobs: to keep the faux populist propaganda flowing and to keep publicly identifying the wrong enemies of the people (Mexican immigrants, Muslims, and now, apparently, government workers and elected officials) so that our treasonous corporate overlords can continue to fuck us over blind.
Tagged as anti-government, anti-Trump, Bernie Sanders, California, capitalism, corporations, corporatocracy, corporatocrats, deregulation, Donald J. Trump, Donald Trump, fascism, fascist, George W. Bush, government, government regulations, Hillary Clinton, plutocracy, Plutocrats, Politics, populism, populists, President Pussygrabber, profiteering, profiteers, Pussygrabber, resistance, traitors, treason, Trump, Trump resistance, war profiteering, war profiteers
HELP MEEE!!! I'm DROWNING in all of this FREEDOM!
Reuters images
To smug Americans for whom freedom is only a word and for whom "freedom" is defined by our corporate and plutocratic overlords, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and American patriot Edward Snowden are easy targets to bash in order to feel better about their small, pathetic selves, so should Venezuela take Snowden in, predictably, the hypocritical rhetoric about how "free" and "good" the United States is and how "unfree" and "bad" Venezuela is will freely flow.
My best guess is that "Public Enemy Number One" Edward Snowden will end up in Venezuela, which, predictably, is going to result in a maelstrom of even more Venezuela bashing here in the United States. (The government of Venezuela, you see, has the audacity to govern the nation as a sovereign nation and not as a satellite of the United States, as a "good" nation "should.")
Even so-called members of the so-called U.S. left wing mindlessly engage in Venezuela bashing, as though the United States — with its stolen presidential elections, its bloated-beyond-belief military-corporate complex and its bogus wars, its killer drones and its extralegal executions, its Abu Ghraib House of Horrors (and other acts of torture and crimes against humanity), its ridiculous income gap between the rich and the poor, its right-wing Supreme Court that routinely rules against the people and for the plutocrats (gay marriage doesn't harm anyone's profits, you see), its bought-and-paid-for-by-the-corporations Congress, and its government's gargantuan electronic storage of the records of much or most or even almost all of our phone calls, e-mails, Internet activity, and even our snail mail — were the paragon of a truly free and open nation.
Salon.com, for instance, in "seriously" examining Edward Snowden's options for political asylum, helpfully notes that on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 being the most free and 7 being the least free, Venezuela ranks only a 5, according to some organization called Freedom House, which conveniently gives the United States a 1 for freedom.
Wow. Especially after I just learned that apparently all of the snail mail that I receive is photographed* and the images of my snail mail are stored by the federal government (along with my phone-call records, e-mails, Internet activity, etc.), I, for one, don't feel that the U.S. is No. 1 in terms of freedom. (In Freedom House's defense, maybe they gave the U.S. a 1 for freedom before NSAgate broke, but I am confident that they'd still give the U.S. a 1, regardless.)
I wonder if Salon.com's writer even bothered to look up Freedom House on Wikipedia, for fuck's sake. Wikipedia notes of Freedom House (all emphases are mine):
Freedom House is a U.S.-based non-governmental organization that conducts research and advocacy on democracy, political freedom, and human rights. Freedom House was founded in October 1941, and Wendell Willkie and Eleanor Roosevelt served as its first honorary chairpersons. It describes itself as a "clear voice for democracy and freedom around the world."
The organization's annual Freedom in the World report, which assesses each country's degree of political freedoms and civil liberties, is frequently cited by political scientists, journalists, and policy-makers. Freedom of the Press and Freedom of the Net, which monitor censorship, intimidation and violence against journalists, and public access to information, are among its other signature reports.
As of 2010, grants awarded from the U.S. government accounted for most of Freedom House's funding; the grants were not earmarked by the government but allocated through a competitive process. Freedom House is widely regarded as a reliable source. Nonetheless, some critics have accused Freedom House's reports of bias or of promoting U.S. government interests abroad.
Well, yeah. Duh. If the U.S. government is funding you, could you give the U.S. government anything but the highest mark possible? I mean, who is going to pay for a report that is unflattering?
That and we need to define "freedom" and truly examine how much freedom a nation's citizens actually have.
Freedom of the press, for instance — sure, Americans at least in theory have freedom of the press, but unless you are very wealthy, how can you possibly even remotely compete with the corporate media machine, which pumps out pro-corporate and pro-plutocratic and pro-status-quo messages relentlessly? Sure, at least in theory, you can say whatever you want — but who will ever hear you?
Democracy, too — sure, in theory you could run for political office, even for the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate or even for U.S. president, but, regardless of how bright and talented you are, how successful are you actually going to be in your quest for political office without a shitload of money?
About half of the members of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives are millionaires. The median net worth of the typical American household, by comparison, is not even $70K. (And if you think that the Democrats are on your side, know that the typical Democrat in Congress is even richer than is the typical Repugnican. Really, you're so fucked. We're so fucked.)
So — can the average American really run for political office? Or, like freedom of speech is, is it a rich person's game? Are hundreds of millionaires in D.C. truly representative of the average American's interests?
What we have in the United States is the veneer of freedom. "Freedom" is defined for us by the plutocrats, and so therefore in the U.S., "freedom" is pretty much synonymous with "capitalism." We Americans are free (if we have the money) to buy shit that we don't need. We are free to go into debt (if the all-powerful credit-reporting agencies deem us worthy enough) in order to buy shit that we don't need. We are free to pick a wage-slave job (McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Taco Bell, etc.). We are free to go to college in order to be in student-loan debt for life while there aren't any jobs for which we can even use our college degrees for which we can't afford to pay. We are free to be inundated with corporately produced propaganda telling us how "free" we are, and we are free to vote for pro-corporate candidates, at least around half of whom are millionaires.
So much fucking freedom!
It's a fucking joke to hear and read Americans boasting about how free and wonderful the United States of America is when there are mountain ranges of evidence to the contrary.
I don't maintain that other, Latin American nations that even a supposedly left-wing website like Salon.com has bashed recently, including Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua and Ecuador, are perfect nations, are Utopias, but so smug are we Americans, the planet's biggest fucking assholes, that we apparently are completely oblivious to our own glaringly obvious flaws while we (even those of us who call ourselves "liberals" or "progressives" or the like) gleefully bash other nations as supposedly being less free than we are ("free" according to our plutocratic overlords, of course).
Sick fucking shit.
Venezuela is looking pretty fucking good to me right about now.
P.S. In case you are wondering, on the so-called Freedom House's "freedom scale" of 1 to 7, I'd give the U.S. a rating of 3.5, maybe 3.0, at best. And from what I know of Venezuela, I'd give it no worse a rating than the U.S.
*We're "assured" that our snail mail isn't ever actually opened without a court order allowing it, but that only the outside of our snail mail is photographed. I, however, don't trust "my" government at all. Human beings tend to abuse their power whenever and wherever they can get away with doing so, and Edward Snowden's biggest "crime" is exposing such ubiquitous abuse of power here in the land of the so-called "free."
Tagged as "freedom", asylum, Bolivia, corporatocracy, corporatocrats, democracy, domestic spying, Ecuador, Edward Snowden, Edward Snowden's asylum, Freedom House, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, hypocrisy, hypocrites, Latin America, millionaires in Congress, National Security Agency, Nicaragua, NSA, plutocracy, Plutocrats, Politics, propaganda, Salon.com, Venezuela
Reading between the conventions' lines
Reuters photo
Repugnican Tea Party Speaker of the House John Boehner shakes the hoof of right-wing New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan after Dolan gave the closing prayer at the Repugnican Tea Party Convention in Tampa, Florida, on August 30. Not to be outdone in wingnuttery, the Democratic Party had the right-wing Dolan also give the Democratic National Convention's closing prayer, in which Dolan expressed his and the Catholick church's opposition to abortion and to same-sex marriage. Yet the shameless Democratic Party hacks cry foul when those of us who are sane and who reject evil pieces of shit like Dolan claim, correctly, that the two right-wing, pro-corporate parties (which I can think of only as the Coke Party and the Pepsi Party) are becoming more indistinguishable from each other day by day.
About the last thing that you want to pay attention to at the Coke Party's and Pepsi Party's quadrennial conventions are the politicians' speeches.
The vast majority of political speeches are just shameless propaganda, false proclamations of actually giving a shit about the average American, and are not an actual reflection of reality (what it has been, what it is now or what it will be).
No, you look for other clues at the partisan duopoly's conventions to inform you as to what's really going on.
The two things that you have needed to know about the Repugnican Tea Party convention are that a black camerawoman for CNN had food thrown at her by white delegates and was referred to as an "animal," and that an addled, doddering, grumpy old man who wants to take us back to the 1950s (or before) in a way-back machine still is the face of the Repugnican Tea Party. (It was John McCainosaurus in 2008, and Clint Eastwood this time.)
Of course, if you watched any of the Repugnican Tea Party convention coverage (even just brief clips, as I did), you saw, as the camera panned across the convention attendees, that it was a sea of lily-white faces. Seriously, why don't they go ahead and don their pointy white hoods already? We all know that they want to.
I've seen only snippets of Mittens Romney's acceptance speech. He wore way too much makeup, which only made him look even faker than he already comes across, and his whisper-like, condescending, faux-compassionate voice makes me want to hurl.
This man is a multi-millionaire Mormon. He cares only about his fellow millionaires and his fellow Mormons. If you believe otherwise, then there is something seriously the fuck the matter with you and your grasp of reality.
I don't need to listen to Mittens' words. I have only to listen to the strong voice within every time I see even a brief clip of Mittens: This uber-phony man is evil. He has to be phony because if he showed us his true self, enough of us would be repulsed that he'd never win the election. It wouldn't even be close enough for him to steal it, as appears to be his party's game plan, a la 2000.
Not that the establishmentarian, Clintonesque Democrats are much better.
I haven't bothered to watch even a brief clip of Barack Obama's convention speech. Why? What would be the point? We know what we're going to get with four more years of Obama: more broken promises, more of the same, more concessions to the corporations and to the right wing, more excuses as to why Obama absofuckinglutely refuses to head an opposition party, which is what the Democratic Party used to be until the slimy baby boomer Bill Clinton destroyed it, as the greedy, corrupt, talentless baby boomers have destroyed or are about to destroy all of our nation's best institutions (including, of course, Social Security and Medicare. [They destroyed even capitalism, too, but of course, capitalism needed to be destroyed]).
We know that while of course Mittens would be worse than would be Obama (except for Mittens' fellow Mormons and his fellow millionaires, of course), the prospect of another four more years of Obama is nothing to be excited about.
There were two stand-out events at the Democrats' convention that, for me, tell me what I really need to know about the party. And again, you won't find this shit in politicos' propagandistic speeches.
First, there was Barack Obama once again capitulating to right-wing and "Christo"fascist criticism, demanding that the Democratic Party's platform, which the delegates had already democratically approved, be changed to add the word "God" and to add that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
As I wrote, the selfish, anti-democratic actions of the convention's chair, the slimy Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, were repugant. Clearly Villaraigosa didn't have the two-thirds voice vote by the delegates that he needed for the alteration of the platform to pass, but he shoved the changes to the platform down the delegates' throats nonethefuckingless.
The Los Angeles Times today published Villaraigosa's "defense" of his repulsive actions. He said:
"It was a lot of ado about nothing."
When he was told that others didn't hear a two-thirds voice vote, he replied smart-assedly, "That's nice to know. I was the chairman and I did, and that was the prerogative of the chair."
"It's more a media concern than a delegate concern. I can tell you this — the president of the United States said, 'Wow.' The president said, 'You showed why you were speaker of the California Assembly.' The president, the vice president, Mrs. Obama, all of them acknowledged the decisive way I handled that."
"The president of the United States and the leader of my party asked me to do this, and so I'm proud I have a president who believes God and Jerusalem should be in the platform, and so do I."
What a fucking weasel Antonio Villaraigosa is. To call a blatantly anti-democratic move "decisive" is sick. No, Villaraigosa, you are not "decisive." You are a fucking self-serving coward.
And it was not "a lot of ado about nothing" and not only a "media concern." (Blaming shit on the media is quite Palinesque of Villaraigosa, however.) It was the hijacking of the platform that already had been democratically approved, and that is a serious matter. I'm not even a registered Democrat — because of slimeballs like Villaraigosa I'm a registered Green Party member — and I wasn't even there, but when I watched the clip of Villaraigosa's actions, I was incensed — as were many delegates who were there, for whom the lying Villaraigosa pretends he can speak. (It wasn't a "delegate concern" — because he says so!)
"I was the chairman and I did [hear a two-thirds vote], and that was the prerogative of the chair," Villaraigosa huffed. Bullshit. He did not hear it, which is why he had to hold the voice vote three fucking times (watch the clip yourself), and so when he claims that he did hear it, he fucking lies, but then immediately after his lie, he inadvertently tells us the truth: "that was the prerogative of the chair."
I'll translate that from the weaselspeak that Villaraigosa speaks into English: "I was able to abuse my position of power and trust, and so I did so. Fuck you for even questioning my authority."
And then, Villaraigosa does even more quite inadvertent truth-telling: "The president, the vice president, Mrs. Obama, all of them acknowledged the decisive way I handled that," and "The president of the United States and the leader of my party asked me to do this, and so I'm proud I have a president who believes God and Jerusalem should be in the platform, and so do I."
Well, yes, indeed, Barack Obama (and, if Villaraigosa is telling the truth — it's hard to know, because he's such a fucking liar — Joe Biden and even Michelle Obama) wanted Villaraigosa to ram the last-minute, "Christo"fascist- and wingnut-placating changes to the party's platform down the delegates' throats, and so Villaraigosa the shameless fucking sellout dutifully did so.
But that is a "defense" — that he pleased his puppeteers? That makes what he did OK?
And what does it fucking matter what Barack Obama and Antonio Villaraigosa believe? The party platform already had been democratically approved by the convention delegates. Why bother to have the delegates at all if they can be overriden by power-drunk autocrats like this?
I'll never give the slimeball Antonio Villaraigosa my vote even for dog catcher. He has demonstrated his character amply.
As has Barack Obama, of course.
Not content that he had alienated enough of his base by anti-democratically using his tool, the fool Villaraigosa, to change the party's platform against the wishes of the delegates (who clearly are just window dressing, if that), Barack Obama decided that it would be a swell fucking idea to have the right-wing, anti-choice, anti-same-sex-marriage Catholick Cardinal Timothy Dolan give the closing benediction at the Democratic National Convention.
The "Christo"fascist Dolan said these two things in his "benediction" to the Dems:
"Thus do we praise you [he's talking to "God" here, you see] for the gift of life. Grant us the courage to defend it, life, without which no other rights are secure. We ask your benediction on those waiting to be born, that they may be welcomed and protected."
"Empower us with your grace so that we might resist the temptation to replace the moral law with idols of our own making, or to remake those institutions you have given us for the nurturing of life and community."
If you claim that these are not thinly veiled references to the Dark-Ages Catholick church's "Christo"fascist stances on abortion and same-sex marriage, then you are a fucking liar or you are a fucking moron. (Or both.)
Dolan also talked about "freedom" and "liberty" in his "benediction" ("bene" is from the Latin word for "good," but Dolan is evil, so to call it a "benediction" is a contradiction), but in Dolan's and the Catholick church's worldview, women may not have the freedom and liberty to make their own fucking reproductive choices, and same-sex couples shall not have the freedom and liberty of marriage equality, but are to be continued to be treated as less than equal human beings, as they have for centuries.
"Freedom" and "liberty" are reserved only for those who agree with Dolan and the right-wing, dying dinosaur that is the Catholick church under the command of Pope Palpatine, you see.
Know that this is how much brazen contempt Barack Obama and the ossified Democratic Party (the best of which it can do is wheel out the right-wing fossil that is Bill Fucking Clinton every once in a while) have for you: to invite a known — a well-fucking-known — right-wing, misogynist, homophobic, patriarchal piece of shit like Timothy Dolan to give the closing "benediction" of the Democratic National Convention.
Barack Obama isn't concerned in the fucking least about delivering for his base.
He never fucking has been and he never fucking will be.
Barack Obama is way too busy catering to the right wing, you see, pushing the Democratic Party further and further to the right, making it more and more indistinguishable from the Repugnican Tea Party, and his stance toward you is the same arrogant, power-drunk stance that Antonio Villaraigosa has toward you:
It's his prerogative.
What are you going to do about it anyway?
Tagged as "Christo"fascism, "Christo"fascists, "freedom", "liberty", abortion, Antonio Villaraigosa, baby boomers, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Catholicism, Catholics, Clint Eastwood, Coke Party, corporatocracy, corporatocrats, cowardice, cowards, Democratic National Convention, Democratic Party, Democratic Party hacks, Democratic Party platform, Green Party, John Boehner, liars, millionaires, Mitt Romney, Mittens Romney, Mormon cult, Mormonism, Mormons, Obama, partisan duopoly, Pepsi Party, plutocracy, Plutocrats, Politics, Pope Palpatine, Republican National Convention, Republican Party, Republican Tea Party, Romney, Same-sex marriage, scumbags, Sellouts, slimeballs, theocracy, theocrats, Timothy Dolan, traitors, treason, weasels, white supremacism, white supremacists, wingnuts, wingnuttery
Notes on the nationwide occupations
Reuters photos
These are my kind of people: The powers that be won't admit it, but prolonged anti-plutocratic protests in our nation's cities like these (the photos above were taken today in New York City) embarrass our nation's plutocrats in the eyes of the world. That is why sustained protests are effective, although an all-out second American revolution would be the ideal.
I have yet to get my ass down to Sacramento's Occupy Wall Street effort, Occupy Sacramento, but I support the participants and the protesters 100 percent, and I hope soon to support them more than just in spirit, but to support them practically. They don't appear to be going away soon — they even have a website with a calendar of events — and their website has listed things that they need to have donated to them, including the basics, such as food, water and toiletries. I can do that much, if I can't join them for long periods of time, since I work full time.
As Ted Rall points out in his book The Anti-American Manifesto, there are levels of support of revolutionaries. Even if you are able to support the participants of the Occupy Wall Street movement only in spirit, that's still much better than opposing them.*
Many of us, I think, myself included, have been watching and waiting to see how all of this is going to pan out, and thus far it seems that it's panning out to be the true people's movement that the "tea party" traitors only pretended to be.
And I say that from direct observation. In February, at the California State Capitol here in Sacramento, I attended a pro-labor, pro-working-class rally in solidarity with the public-sector unions that were (and that remain) under attack in Wisconsin, and across the street from us was a much-smaller contingent of uninvited, treasonous "tea party" counterprotesters, many of them with videocameras, obnoxiously voicing their opposition to labor unions, very apparently wanting to provoke a physical response from us so that they then could post to the Internet their selectively edited video clips of "unprovoked" labor-union "thuggery." (I wrote about the event here.)
The vision of those of us who are pro-labor and pro-working-class is that everyone should have a living wage, good benefits and good working conditions. The apparent "vision" of the "tea party" traitors is that almost everyone should be without these things and should be miserable. Those of us who are pro-labor and pro-working-class want to raise all boats; the "tea party" traitors don't want us to own even viable boats. They want only a handful of us to own yachts while the rest of us sink or swim.
Labor unions, seriously weakened over the past several decades already, probably are the last barrier between bad and even worse, the last barrier — short of all-out bloody revolution — preventing all of us from becoming serfs to our corporate feudal overlords.
Yet the "tea party" traitors gladly would destroy that barrier. They claim that they follow in the footsteps of the early American revolutionaries who opposed the oppressive British monarchy, which profited obscenely from the early Americans' labors, yet today's "tea party" traitors do not oppose, but aid and abet, the oppressive corporatocrats and plutocrats, who are today's monarchs, as stupidly as chickens aiding and abetting Colonel Sanders. Which is why I call them traitors: because they are. They support the status quo, they support the powers that be over their fellow Americans. Under their "vision" things only can get much, much worse.
Which is why the "tea party" already is pretty much dead: The insanity of "revolutionaries" fighting on behalf of our corporate oppressors is evident to even the dullest among us.
The Occupy Wall Street movement, on the other hand, feels like something else. It's not a bunch of treasonous troglodytes in tri-corner hats pretending to have the monopoly on patriotism and Americanism. It's a bunch of normal, working-class Americans, many if not most of whom now have nothing else to lose. At rope's end, they now find themselves out in the streets.
Our young people especially have nothing to look forward to unless the current system of inequity, built up over decades (starting, most notably, with Ronald Reagan, whom President Hopey-Changey fucking worships, unsurprisingly) to benefit a select few at the expense of the vast majority of the rest of us, is not reformed/"reformed," but is replaced.
And people who have nothing to lose are, let me tell you, dangerous to the status quo.
That, I think, is why the "tea party" traitors never felt like much more than a national irritant: the "tea party" traitors, for the most part, aren't desperate people, aren't people with nothing else to lose. They're just a bunch of tools who are trying to prop up the crumbling system of rule by the stupid white man, who incredibly stupidly believe that the way to improve things is to continue to do what you've been doing all along — only with even more force and fervor.
The Occupy Wall Street movement, however, feels like an incipient hurricane, one that, if it grows to its full potential, can — will — alter the national sociopolitical landscape forever.
The Occupy Wall Street movement might seem to have come out of nowhere, but that's not the case. While we Americans have been focused on differences such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, nationality, ethnicity, etc., what almost all of us (indeed, 99 percent of us, the protesters say) have in common is that over at least the past several decades, those in power, gradually and behind the scenes, have been stacking the deck increasingly in their favor and against ours.
To name just a few of their deck-stacking victories, they have the U.S. Supreme Court, which has deemed corporations to be people, on their side; they have most of the members of the U.S. Congress in their pockets in a system in which paying off legislators isn't called what it is — bribery — but is called "campaign finance"; they own and operate even President Hopey-Changey, who can't make enough of them his economic advisers; and because of all of this, the functions of our nation's laws and our nation's law enforcement (and our nation's military, too, of course), over decades, have been grossly contorted from benefitting and protecting us, the people, to delivering even more of our commonwealth into the hands of the super-rich few.
It's much like how a virus hijacks a cell and changes the cell's normal functions over to the replication of more viruses, benefiting the virus but eventually destroying the cell.
And our presidential elections under the political duopoly of the increasingly indistinguishable Coke Party and Pepsi Party have become such a fucking national joke to the point that about the only people who can become excited about them are the rich and the super-rich who have poured their millions and millions of dollars into the campaign coffers of the money-whores who, once in the White House, would sell us out the most.
Again, this isn't a system that you can "reform." This is a system that you can only raze. And then you start over again.
Anyway, here are more thoughts on the Occupy Wall Street movement, which at this point we can call a movement:
It's fine that everything isn't hammered out yet. Probably the No. 1 way to try to kill an individual's or a group of individuals' enthusiasm for creating something new — and thus to preserve the status quo, even though the status quo even literally is killing all of us — is to point out that he or she or the group doesn't have every future move choreographed yet.
So fucking what? Getting there is more than half of the fun, and things do happen organically, if we just let them unfold and don't panic that we don't have a clear roadmap yet.
The early American revolutionaries surely didn't have everything all mapped out, and to a huge degree their efforts were a shot in the dark (sometimes even literally). Yet it was their hunger for freedom from their oppression that kept them going, even against the fear of not knowing what the future would hold for them, including potential retaliation from their oppressors, including even their execution.
It's perfectly OK to employ corporately produced and delivered goods and services in our fight against corporate oppression. In fact, it's not just OK, it's pretty unfuckingavoidable. Early into the Occupy Wall Street movement, the "tea party" traitors and/or their sympathizers put this "clever" image out there:
Ha ha ha ha ha! That's so fucking funny!
OK, yes, in a capitalistic system such as ours, by definition corporations/capitalists own and control the means of production. Therefore, most of the products and services in such an economic system would have been produced and delivered by corporations/capitalists. Duh.
But this is the problem: Those relative few who own and control the means of the production of goods and the delivery of services are slowly killing the rest of us (global warming is just one example, but probably the most [literally] glaring one), and they have taken over so much of the people's business and so many of the people's natural interests that it has left us, the people, fairly powerless, and has put us at their mercy. (The massive British Petroleum oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, on the sidelines of which the U.S. government sat fucking helpless, is a stark example of this.)
We, the people, need to own and control the means of the production of essential goods and the delivery of vital services and/or, at the very, very least, exercise meaningful, substantial, democratic oversight of capitalist production and practices to ensure that the net effect of this capitalist activity is not to our common detriment, but is to our common benefit. It's a fucking lie that the corporations are going to police themselves. They're not. Their only concern is ever-increasing profiteering. They don't give a flying fuck about what happens to the rest of us as the result of that.
But the "humorous" image above does apparently unintentionally illustrate the degree to which corporations have infiltrated our lives. Of course, the image apparently assumes that corporations (the majority of them, anyway) are benevolent and that the Occupy Wall Street protesters just don't know how great they have it. In order to try to prevent the slaves from revolting, the masters always tell the slaves how much the slaves need them, don't they?
Anyway, it's perfectly fine — and, as I said, fairly unfuckingavoidable — to use the goods and services produced or delivered by corporations in the fight against against corporate greed, in our fight against the ongoing corporate feudalization of the United States of America. This isn't "Avatar" where we're the natives and we can use only what we find in nature, for fuck's sake. (Besides, if we did that, they'd only criticize us for our bongos and for our loincloths…)
Speaking of which, um, what's wrong with bongo drums? Anyone who doesn't mimic the consumeristic clones portrayed in corporate advertising isn't a human being worthy of dignity and respect? It seems to me that the point of a revolution is freedom — which of course includes the freedom to be the way that one wants to be and the freedom to do what what wants to do as long as he or she isn't harming anyone else.
The system won't be changed from within, won't be changed by cooperating with it. (Try to cooperate with it, and it will only co-opt you.) The protesters should keep their bongos and wholeheartedly reject the idea that the way to win this budding revolution is to don a three-piece-fucking-suit and act just like the assholes whom they want to overthrow.
The corporate media prostitutes who with straight faces call themselves "reporters" and "journalists" are owned and controlled by their corporate pimps, so it's not like they're ever going to be on our side anyway. Let them find the colorful members of Code Pink and the one person in the crowd who brought his or her bongo drums and put that kind of stereotypically negative image out there. (I love Code Pink, by the way. The members of Code Pink have balls, which is why they are so widely hated by cowardly, corporation-obeying sheeple.) Once the people's revolution were complete, there would be no more treasonous corporate media anyway — which is why the self-preserving, self-interested corporate media portray in a negative light anything that threatens their continued parasitical existence.
The use of violence should never be taken off of the table. "Peaceful" this, "nonviolent" that — that kind of wussy talk makes me want to vomit. When did the so-called 1 percent ever rule out the use of violence against the rest of us? Indeed, when they're not using actual violence against us, such as with police brutality or even just threatening to sic the National Guard on us, they are employing socioeconomic violence against us every fucking day (yes, Americans die every day because they do not have access to adequate health care, shelter, food, clothing and other basic necessities, almost all of which are controlled by our loving corporations).
Of course I don't advocate wanton, willy-nilly violence in the street that is for the amusement of the perpetrators rather than for the greater cause. But I can think of no major world revolutions that did not take place without at least the credible threat of violence. The treasonous plutocrats aren't just going to give us back what they stole from us over decades because we nicely ask them to do so. (Ted Rall and I are in agreement on this, and if you haven't read his Anti-American Manifesto yet, you should — and you can get it for less than $10 on amazon.com [which, yes, is a corporation that for now is an/the avenue for most of us to most cheaply purchase books].)
Speaking of violence, whose side are the cops on? Increasing incidents of police brutality raise this question. (Didn't the actions of the cops during Hurricane Katrina demonstrate to us whose side they are on?) Let's fucking face it: Most cops are just paid security guards for the rich and the super-rich. And to add insult to injury, we, the people, pay the salaries of these security guards who work not for us, but who work for the rich and the super-rich.
Let me just say this: When the shit really hits the fan, those cops (and yes, members of the military, too) who still are trying to protect our oppressors instead of protecting us will be identified by the masses for who they are: agents of the oppressors. The cops might have some weaponry and some skill in using it, but we, the people, can get weapons, too, and we vastly outnumber the cops.
(I fully support the Second Amendment, because you never know when/if you will need to defend yourself, but I believe in the judicious use of firearms and other methods of force. I'm not one of the ignorant, fearful gun nuts who believes that the best way to solve virtually every conflict or threat or to get what you want is with a gun, but at the other extreme, "judicious" doesn't mean that you rule out the use of force in every single conceivable situation, and thus a belief in blanket nonviolence is bullshit.)
Buckle up! Any budding revolution could fizzle, I suppose, but the Occupy Wall Street movement seems different. It seems like it's here to stay for at least the foreseeable future.
Minimally, the Occupy Wall Street movement seems to be striking fear into the cold hearts of those sellouts who call themselves "Democrats" and "liberals" who had thought that they could shit and piss upon their base indefinitely. Maximally, the Occupy Wall Street movement will result in the second American revolution that we have needed for a long, long time — a revolution that will be only as bloody as the treasonous plutocrats and their supporters (who include the "tea party" traitors and those cops and members of the military who attack the American people in defense of the plutocratic traitors) necessitate.
Those sellouts who call themselves "Democrats" and even "liberals" don't dare openly criticize the Occupy Wall Street movement, since the Occupy Wall Street movement consists of the millions and millions of us who are pretty fucking pissed off that we were promised "hope" and "change" but have seen only the gap between the rich and the poor widen since President Hopey-Changey took office in January 2009.
Wall-Street-weasel-coddler-in-chief Barack Obama has not a shred of credibility left, so I don't see Team Obama successfully co-opting the Occupy Wall Street movement for Obama's re-election campaign. Obama can't now openly oppose Wall Street without only drawing even more attention to the fact that he's been in bed with the Wall Street weasels since before he took office.
It's safe to assert, I think, that the audaciously arrogant Obama and his henchpeople never saw the deeply politically embarrassing Occupy Wall Street movement coming, and that they're still scrambling to figure out how to respond to it. (They will, I surmise, do their best to pretend that the new movement doesn't even exist, since it wasn't in their 2012 re-election playbook, and they will continue to pretend that we're still in 2008, when "hope" and "change" weren't just empty campaign slogans. The best slogan that they could come up with for 2012 would be something like "Really This Time!" — but how many would buy it?)
Defeating faux progressives like Obama & Co., I might argue, is even more of a coup for us actual progressives than is defeating blatant right-wingers, because if even phony progressives won't be tolerated any longer, how could blatant right-wingers be tolerated any longer?
Finally, support your local revolutionaries! It seems to me that unless they can do something grandiose, many if not most people don't do anything at all. The net result of this is that no one does anything. There are plenty of things that you can do that don't cost (much) money. If it's not feasible for you to camp out at one of the occupation sites across the nation, as it isn't for me, you still can talk to your friends, family members and associates in support of the Occupy Wall Street movement. You can blog in support of the movement and otherwise assert your support for the movement on the Internet.
If the movement isn't perfect, at least it's Americans getting off of their asses and into the streets in order to redress their grievances, which is loooong overdue.
When you hear some assbite defend the corporations, such as with the "funny" graphic above, you can call him or her on his or her shit.
If you can give money or other necessary resources to the occupiers, why not? While writing this longer-than-usual blog post I gave $25 to Occupy Sacramento (my name is on their donors' page, which is kind of cool). I'd rather be camping out with them, but giving them a donation is better than doing nothing at all.
At the bare minimum, if you don't want to help to create a better world, if you are too fearful and cowardly and/or too lazy and/or too self-interested and/or too uncreative and untalented to help to alter the status quo, then the least that you can do is to stay out of the fucking way of those of us who are trying to make a difference.
P.S. As many have noted, one of the simple ways that you can fight back is to withdraw every penny that you have in any bank and to use only credit unions, not banks. I've used only credit unions for more than a decade now, and I'm quite happy with credit unions' service.
*Occupy Sacramento's donations page first lists this as the kind of support that it is seeking:
It's not all about money; you can also support us by sharing the movement with your friends and family. Make a post on Facebook letting us know that you have our backs. Call the mayor and let [his office] know you support this movement.
I am pleased that Occupy Sacramento lists spiritual support first. It is a statement of faith that from spiritual support, material support naturally follows. And that's not just faith; that's observable fact.
Tagged as "Anti-American Manifesto", "freedom", "tea party", "Tea Party" traitors, "The Anti-American Manifesto", American Revolution, banks, Barack Obama, bongo drums, California, capitalism, capitalists, class warfare, Code Pink, cops, corporations, corporatocrats, credit unions, economy, Episcopal Church, force, Greed, labor unions, nonviolence, Occupy Sacramento, Occupy Wall Street, plutocracy, Plutocrats, police brutality, Politics, President Hopey-Changey, profiteering, Protest, protests, Revolution, revolutionaries, Ronald Reagan, Sacramento, second American revolution, socioeconomic violence, Ted Rall, traitors, treason, violence, Wall Street, Wall Street greed, working class
Julian Assange, my hero
WikiLeaks crusader Julian Assange of Australia, shown above in a photo taken last month, is closest that we have to this guy:
I've been following the WikiLeaks saga for some time now but until now I have yet to comment. (I actually wanted things to gel a bit before I opened my mouth, believe it or not…)
The inescapable conclusion that I have drawn is that Julian Assange's biggest "crime" is that he has stepped on the toes of the powers that be.
Tell a lie and no one really cares. (Look at the volume of lies that the right wing pumps out on a daily fucking basis, and look at how Liar in Chief George W. Bush and his henchpeople had complete impunity for their relentless lying.) Tell the forbidden truth, however, and look out!
Most of the dirty truths that Julian Assange and his associates have put out there pose no threat to national security or to public safety. That's just bullshit, a red herring put out there by the right wing and the powers that be (yes, including members of the Obama administration).
If the right wing really gave a flying fuck about public safety, we wouldn't have seen the almost 3,000 people killed on Sept. 11, 2001 (even though then-"President" George W. Bush the month before had received a presidential daily briefing warning "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.") or the almost 2,000 confirmed deaths from Hurricane Katrina.* (You might argue that 9/11 couldn't have been prevented, but the deaths from Hurricane Katrina most certainly could have been, as there had been ample warning of the impending catastrophe.)
And "national security" sure is flexible, isn't it? It was perfectly OK when the stupid white men of the unelected, treasonous Bush regime outed Central Intelligence Agency operative Valerie Plame** for petty political revenge against her husband, then-Ambassador Joe Wilson, but we just have to put Julian Assange in prison. Some wingnuts have even called for his assassination.
Assassinating (or even imprisoning) Assange, of course, would only make him a matryr, and hundreds or thousands of us who are on the verge of bloody revolution against the power elite would take his place.
The powers that be need to be very, very careful.
Speaking of the powers that be, I love this news photo:
That's Britain's Prince Charles and his consort in London on Thursday showing complete and utter shock that the rabble — some of them wonderfully yelling "Off with their heads!" — were able to reach their Rolls Royce during a student protest against the tripling of university tuition.
How could this security breach have happened? everyone is asking — when the real question, in my book, is Why, in the year 20fucking10, when so many of us are in need, do we still have royalty?
That's an issue for the Brits to resolve (although I firmly am on the side of the students whose future is being compromised by Britain's selfish power elite), but the equivalent question here in the United States of America is why we still have our own aristocrats, the plutocrats and the corporatocrats who do such things as fight tooth and nail for tax cuts for the wealthy while they fight to push the age for eligibility for Social Security retirement benefits for members of Generation X (and those who follow Gen X) to age 70 (when most of us will be dead before then for lack of health care).
Why do we allow these thieves to steal from us, to destroy our planet, to keep us in perpetual wage slavery and in perpetual bogus warfare, and overall to destroy our future? Why, when there are so many of us than there are of them, and when in reality they need us and we don't need them, do we allow these wolves to continue to feed on us?
What Julian Assange has done is reveal to the world the communiques of the wolves, for it is by their keeping their behind-the-scenes maneuverings as secret as possible that the wolves maintain their control over us sheep. Destroy the wolves' secrecy, and you destroy their power. Destroy their power, and you destroy them.
Julian Assange has taken serious shots at the wolves. Therefore, in my book, he is a hero.*** And should anything happen to him, thousands of us, minimally, should rise up and take his place.
P.S. While there is much about libertarian Ron Paul that I don't like, including his homophobia, his being anti-choice and his support of "states' rights" (which can be used to support all kinds of oppression of minorities), there are some things about him that I do like, such as his opposition to torture and domestic surveillance, and I love his recent impassioned defense of Julian Assange against the power elite on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. You should watch it here.
P.P.S. I just now found this news photo, taken yesterday at the British embassy in Madrid:
Wow. Apparently many of us have the same idea…
*And despite its ubiquitous campaign promises of "hope" and "change," the Obama administration handled the catastrophic British Petroleum oil spill about as well as the Bush regime would have: in a way that put a corporation over the environment.
**I recommend the film "Fair Game," which chronicles this treason by the Bush regime. The film screams "Give me my Oscars already!" but it's worthwhile nonetheless.
***I certainly don't assert that Assange is an angel. None of us is. However, I separate the information about the power elite that he has revealed to the world from the details of his personal life.
The right wing's tactic in cases like this is to try to assassinate the rebel's character — if not the rebel him- or herself — in order to divert attention away from the damaging information about the power elite that the rebel has revealed.
Way too many of us see this bullshit for what it is, however. If Assange is guilty of any sexual misconduct, that is a separate issue, and Assange's work of exposing the power elite is larger than is Assange. And should anything happen to him, we must continue his work, because if he weren't on to something, they wouldn't be on him as they have been.
Tagged as "Fair Game", 9/11, aristocracy, aristocrats, Assange, Barack Obama, BP, BP oil spill, Britain, British Petroleum oil spill, corporatocracy, corporatocrats, George W. Bush, hero, Hurricane Katrina, Joe Wilson, Julian Assange, London, national security, Obama administration, plutocracy, Plutocrats, power elite, powers that be, Prince Charles, public safety, royalty, V for Vendetta, Valerie Plame, WikiLeaks
This is all I'm going to say about 9/11
The unelected Bush regime beat the nation over the head with 9/11 for many years, so sue me if I long have been 9/11'd out.
As nightmarish as it was to have had to experience the reign of BushCheneyCorp after the stupid, fat and lazy American public just allowed the right-wing thieves (redundant…) to steal the White House in late 200o, the traitors who comprised the Bush regime were, in their own sick, twisted and treasonous way, brilliant. I mean, they took a spectacularly tragic event that they'd been warned about but did not prevent — and used it for political gain.
It was only until the mid-term elections of 2006 that the Repugnicans no longer could wave the bloody shirt of 9/11 for political gain.
What have we Americans learned since Sept. 11, 2001?
Absofuckinglutely nothing.
We were attacked on Sept. 11, 2001, because we wantonly had slaughtered Muslims, or allowed them to be slaughtered or allowed or caused them to die, in the Middle East. In fact, the main reasons given by 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden himself (and other members of al-Qaeda) for 9/11 were: the U.S.-led sanctions against Iraq in the 1990s, which resulted in the deaths of untold numbers of Iraqi civilians, including children; the presence of the U.S. military in Saudi Arabia after the first George Bush war on Iraq; and the U.S. government's blind, slavish support of Israel.
So: What has changed since then?
Well, let's see: The U.S. killed even more innocent Iraqi civilians in George W. Bush's Vietraq War for Big Oil and for the war profiteering of the war profiteers, such as Dick Cheney's Halliburton; the U.S. military moved its main base in the Middle East from Saudi Arabia to Iraq, which, to my understanding, still violates the fundamentalist Islamist belief that no infidel should be allowed to occupy Muslim land; and the U.S. government still licks the ass of Israel, which can do no wrong and which enjoys the blind, slavish support of both parties in the duopolistic dog and pony show that we call "democracy."
While I'm not asserting that when Osama bin Laden shouts "Jump!" Americans should ask "How high?", it seems clear to me that Americans are hated around the world because they just allow their government and their military (which are only in the service of the corporatocrats and the plutocrats) to shit and piss upon the poorer, weaker peoples all around the globe — yet these same Americans fully expect to be adored around the world just the same.
Why do they hate us?
They hate us because we're stupid.
They hate us because we're xenophobic — we don't even bother to try to learn about other cultures, but we function from the stubborn but incorrect belief that other cultures have just failed at being us. We just assume that they want to be just like us (they don't) but that they just can't pull it off because they don't have what it takes.
They hate us because we're hypocrites. (To give just one of many examples, the U.S. government maintains that Israel may have nukes but that Iran may not. And for the only nation ever to have nuked another nation to be dictating who does and who does not get to have nukes — because you just can't allow one nation to nuke another nation — is pretty fucking insanely hypocritical.)
They hate us because we have no empathy whatsofuckingever. We use the occasion of the anniversary of 9/11 to wallow mawkishly in our own national pity party about the 3,000 or so Americans who were killed on Sept. 11, 2001, while we don't say a word about the tens of thousands of civilians whom we allowed our government to kill or cause to die in Iraq using 9/11 as a pretext. We talk only about American losses because we consider only Americans to be fully human. Yes, they hate us because we don't consider them to be fully human.
They hate us because we're greedy, fat and lazy — and that we use violence around the globe to support our ability to be fat and lazy.
They hate us because we're destroying the very planet, such as with global warming.
They hate us because we are, in a word, Rome, which I surmise also was rather hated throughout the world.
We fat, lazy and stupid Americans should remember: Rome fell.
Happy International Burn a Koran Day.
Tagged as 2001, 9/11, 9/11 anniversary, Big Oil, Burn a Koran Day, Bush regime, corporatocrats, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, global warming, Halliburton, hypocrisy, ignorance, International Burn a Koran Day, Iraq, Iraq war, Israel, Israelis, Koran, Koran burning, laziness, Osama Bin Laden, Plutocrats, Rome, Saudi Arabia, September 11, stupidity, Vietraq War
A dingbat ate my anchor baby!
Ann Cunter parodied on "Saturday Night Live" as a "manserpent"
Gee, I had thought that the cause of our nation's problems were such parties as the corporations that evade billions and billions of dollars in taxes while we working people sure pay ours, the bloated-beyond-belief military-industrial complex that gobbles up billions and billions of our tax dollars in perpetual wars for the war profiteers while things literally crumble here at home, corporations that spill millions of gallons of oil into the ocean and then are defended by likes of Repugnican Tea Party candidate Ron Paul and Repugnican Big Oil bribe collector Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, and corporations that ran our economy into the ground through their hocus-pocus practices and then got hundreds of billions of dollars in bailout money, because it's socialism only if needy people get any money. (Wait — according ot the wingnuts, corporations are people, right?)
Oh, and corporate-caused global warming.*
But I was wrong.
The nation's economic collapse has nothing to do with the greedy corporate criminals (a phrase that is redundant) who are responsible even for the melting polar ice cap.
It's the anchor babies.
You haven't heard of an anchor baby?
Well, that's because this dire threat to the nation was just discovered by the Repugnican Tea Party (only coinky-dinkily because elections are just around the corner, you fucking cynic).
Seriously, though, how does a dire problem just materialize?
OK, true, the British Petroleum oil spill — which the Repugnican Tea Party says is no big deal stop picking on BP whom we owe an apology because picking on BP is un-American — more or less just materialized, but anchor babies have been with us for a very long time.
"Anchor babies" are babies that non-U.S. citizens give birth to in the United States of America in order, the theory goes, for their parents to claim U.S. citizenship. And the babies' births are paid for by us, the taxpayers.
Ann Cunter cares passionately about this new-found "issue," which is the topic of her latest venomfest.
Seriously, though, Cunter has become a fucking caricature.
Just when you thought the acid-for-blood harpy couldn't get any more evil and vile, now she (and her scaly ilk) are after the poor, brown-skinned people's babies.
I repeat: Babies.
Again: Babies.
Because Jesus Christ clearly taught that we should persecute babies.
Cunter's biggest problem with the brown-skinned babies probably is that she isn't allowed to eat any of them. And I am pretty sure that her jaw detaches from her skull and that her fangs fold back, enabling her to swallow a baby whole.
But just remember, voter, in November, that the nation's ills have nothing to do with the white-skinned white-collar criminals who have been bleeding this nation dry for decades. (In the past 30 years, since 1980, we've had a pro-rich, pro-corporate Repugnican in the White House for 20 of those years, and for the remaining years we've had a Repugnican-Lite, corporate-ass-kissing "Democratic" president running the show.)
No, don't go after the filthy few rich plutocrats who are so far fucking removed from the damage that they cause the masses that you never even see them.
No, with your torches and pitchforks, go after those brown-skinned anchor babies.
Babies.
Because babies, especially those born to poor, brown-skinned parents, can't fight back, and it takes real fucking bravery — you know, those cojones that "tea party" princess Palin-Quayle recently was talking about — to attack the weak and the relatively defenseless.
Just like Jesus would do.
*Cold-blooded reptiles love the heat. Maybe that's why the members of the Repugnican Tea Party love global warming so much…
Tagged as anchor babies, anchor baby, Ann Coulter, Ann Cunter, corporations, corporatocrats, cowardice, dingo got my baby, evil, global warming, Oppression, plutocracy, Plutocrats, Racism, Racists, vile, white supremacism, white supremacists, white-collar crime, white-collar criminals
Are there ANY competent journalists left?
I earned a bachelor of science in journalism, so I think that I'm qualified enough to ask that question.
Recently, former President Jimmy Carter stated what those of us Americans who are intelligent and honest and sane already knew: that much of the opposition to President Barack Obama is rooted in racism.
This is the complete text of one of the first news stories that I read on Carter's statement, from MSNBC:
In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, former Democratic President Jimmy Carter attributed much of the conservative opposition that President Obama is receiving to the issue of race.
"I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man," Carter said.
[Carter added:] "I live in the South, and I've seen the South come a long way, and I've seen the rest of the country that share the South's attitude toward minority groups at that time, particularly African-Americans."
Carter continued, "And that racism inclination still exists. And I think it's bubbled up to the surface because of the belief among many white people, not just in the South but around the country, that African-Americans are not qualified to lead this great country.
"It's an abominable circumstance, and it grieves me and concerns me very deeply."
OK, now Carter very most likely made his comments because the incident in which Repugnican U.S. Rep. Addison Graves (a.k.a. "Joe") Wilson (of first-to-secede South Carolina) yelled "You lie!" at President Obama during Obama's nationally televised address to Congress on the topic of health-care reform was still quite fresh in the national memory.
Now, nowhere in Carter's comments do you see Carter state that anyone who opposes Obama's health-care reform plans is actually just a racist. Carter doesn't focus on whether or not one agrees with or opposes what the wingnuts like to call "Obamacare."
Carter clearly states that it is the "intensely demonstrated animosity" that smells racist to him.
Again, this is what Carter actually said: "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man."
What Carter meant, I believe, is that it was the highly unprofessional, disrespectful, beyond-the-pale act of any U.S. representative, perhaps especially a white man from the South, yelling "You lie!" at President Obama that points to racism — not Wilson's or anyone else's opposition to Obama's health-care reform plans.
Yet somehow many if not most journalists have rewritten history to indicate that Carter actually said that if you oppose Obama's health-care reform plans, you're a racist.
There is this, in full, from The Associated Press today:
Former President Bill Clinton says he doesn't think racism is a principal factor in resistance to President Barack Obama's plan for overhauling health care.
Interviewed [today] on ABC's "Good Morning America," Clinton said "there's no question" racism exists in some outbursts in recent months. But he also said he believes "if he were not an African-American, all of the people who were against him on health care would still be against him. They were against me, too."
Clinton said that "I sympathize with" former President Jimmy Carter's feeling that racism accounts for the strenuous opposition to Obama, but said "that's not what's driving" Obama's critics. Clinton said: "What's driving them is they don't want health care."
WTF? Who truly doesn't want health care? Was Clinton being flippant?
I'm not sure which of them had it wrong, Bill Clinton or the AP writer — or both of them — but again: Carter never said that if you oppose Obama's health-care reform plan then you must be a racist.
However, let's be clear: from allegations that "B. Hussein Obama" is an "Islamofascist" sympathizer to allegations that he's a "socialist" (oh, I wish that he were!) to allegations that he is not an American citizen, the real problem that the vast majority of those who spew forth such allegations have with Obama is that he's not white.
And if I had to put my money on it, I'd bet that the majority of those who attend "tea parties" bitching and moaning about taxes (even though hundreds of billions of American taxpayers' dollars have gone to the war profiteers, such as Dick Cheney's Halliburton, via the bogus Vietraq War) and bitching and moaning about the "socialist" "takeover" of health care are using these issues only as fronts for the fact that they're just pissed off that their guy, John McCainosaurus, lost the November 2008 presidential election to Obama — whether racism has been the main factor in their preference for the McCainosaurus-Palin-Quayle ticket over the Obama-Biden ticket or not.
But back to my original point: Journalists need to get it right.
"Former President Bill Clinton says he doesn't think racism is a principal factor in resistance to President Barack Obama's plan for overhauling health care," the AP story above begins.
Who in the hell ever said that it was?
Certainly not Jimmy Carter.
Let's not let the national dialogue on race and racism be shut down because we first misquote luminaries like Jimmy Carter and then attack our own misquotes — or because we allow others to do that. The national dialogue is too important for us truly patriotic Americans to allow that to happen.
Speaking of tea parties, I have to share this 'toon with you:
That 'toon is from murraythenut.com. Many (if not most…) of the 'toonist's 'toons are just scatological, but his political 'toons are great. Here's another:
I love Murry the Nut.
Anyway, finally, yes, Bill Clinton is correct that the wingnuts opposed health-care reform when he was president, too. That's historical fact. However, never did a stupid white male member of Congress yell "You lie!" or anything else like that while Clinton was giving a nationally televised address to Congress.
Ask yourself why it is that nothing like that happened to Bill Clinton but happened to Barack Obama.
And finally finally, I hope that Clinton was only being facetious when he said that the opponents of Obama's health-care reform plans don't want health care.
Of course they want health care. It's that the right-wing noise machine, funded by millions and millions of corporate dollars, wants the masses to believe that anything that Obama proposes that isn't good for the corporatocrats and plutocrats is "socialist" (which means "anti-American") and is even anti-Christian.
These plutocrats/corporatocrats and their wingnutty mouthpieces like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh wrap themselves in the American flag and in the shroud of Turin to the extent that they have convinced millions of easily duped Americans that to oppose the stupid-white-male power structure — such as to wish that health care should be available to all Americans, and that no one should profit obscenely from Americans' pain and suffering, as is the case under the current wealth care system — is to oppose the nation and patriotism and puppies and kittens and even God and Jesus Themselves.
We, the people, elected Barack Obama as president. Those Americans who are so stupid as to support the plutocrats and corporatocrats and their cheerleaders (like Beck and Limbaugh and Fox "News") — just like the chickens supporting Colonel Sanders — are the minority.
We, the majority, need to ignore the loud-mouthed minority, and we, the majority, need to proceed with the business that we, the majority, elected President Barack Obama to do.
Tagged as Addison Graves Wilson, Barack Obama, corporatocracy, corporatocrats, Fox "News", Glenn Beck, health care reform, Jimmy Carter, Joe Wilson, journalism, Murray the Nut, plutocracy, Plutocrats, President Barack Obama, President Obama, race, Racism, Racists, Rush Limbaugh, South, tea parties

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


3 million individuals live with mental illness, yet Georgia ranks 47 out of 50 states for accesss to mental health care, resources and insurance. If you have even a small track record of helping people change, you are familiar with the dynamics regarding change: client presents with problem (often precipitated by a crisis), becomes aware of compelling reasons to adopt a healthier lifestyle or cease harmful behaviours, and then hems and haws, straddling the fence with incomprehensible. Find problem gambling resources in your area. Ohio Problem Gambling Helpline - 1-800-589-9966. National Gambling Helpline - 1-800-522-4700. Ohio Department of Mental Health amp; Addiction Services: 614-466-2596 or www. mha. ohio. gov A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is us citizen gambling in canada behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning. casino tulsa river spirit Packer is suffering from mental health issues. At this time he intends to step back from all commitments,quot; a Packer spokesman said in an emailed statement. Us citizen gambling in canada Division of Mental Health and Us citizen gambling in canada (DMHA) restaurant casino bad aibling with a network of mental health care providers. DMHA operates six psychiatric hospitals and funds addiction prevention and treatment programs. Child and Family Therapist QMHP. Crawford County Mental Health Center in Pittsburg, KS is seeking a full-time Qualified Mental Health Professional in our Childrens Program. The largest shareholder of Crown Resorts, which owns casinos in Australia and London, Packer stepped down from the board in March 2018. Packer's departure was reportedly due to mental health issues, following a tough year in which Crown exited its Macau and U. gambling investments. IPLA Office Hours: Monday - Friday 8:00 a. - 4:30 p. Find Your Profession. The Indiana Prescription Monitoring Program (PDMP) has moved.
at Scarborough Downs, a 500-acre horse racing track that was pitched for use mantas visockis poker Amazon. Credit Greta Rybus for The New York Times The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is an American mixed martial arts organization based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that is owned and operated by parent company Endeavor. It is the largest MMA promotion in the world and features the top-ranked fighters of the sport.
More From Two Lanes Blog. Nashville Paw Magazine: February March 2013; Toledo Free Press; Kid Pickers Contest with Mike Wolfe at the Tennessee State Fair 2014 Mitt Romney criticized Republican lawmakers Saturday and said he would lead us citizen gambling in canada effort to repeal Obamacare and block massive spending bills if he is elected to the U.
Senate in November. Romney, 71, a one-time Republican presidential nominee, is expected to see an easy GOP nomination and victory. May 5, 2018. Who the Hell is Running the Country. Trump or Mueller. There is another election going on in the Deep State. Right before your eyes. Follow the StateFairRecipes. com blog to stay up to date us citizen gambling in canada new State Fair recipes, unique creations, and tips us citizen gambling in canada entering special recipe contests.
Us citizen gambling in canada 26, 2010nbsp;0183;32;4th Biennial Epilepsy Pipeline Update Conference Recap ; A Standardized Diagnostic Approach and Ongoing Feedback Improves Outcome in Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures The Freedom Foundation was formed by a group of local military veterans who saw the need why does islam ban gambling a quot;Veterans Helping Veteransquot; approach to navigating the challenges of everyday life after serving our country.
The brand new Kodi 1080p Movies add-on from GrantWilt brings a nice reliable source for free 1080p movies to Kodi. Read on for more information. Welcome To ASHRAE Houston. ASHRAE, founded in 1894, is a global society advancing human well-being through sustainable technology for the built environment. Safe Kids Springfield is one of more than 400 grassroots coalitions in the United States that bring together health and gambling hotline new brunswick experts, educators, corporations, A discussion of knowledge management that goes above and beyond technology.
Wrightslaw is the leading website about special education law and advocacy with thousands of us citizen gambling in canada, cases, and free resources about hundreds of special education topics, books by Peter Wright and Pamela Wright, and special education law and advocacy training. The 15th Annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run July 13 amp; 14, 2018 Speed, excitement and thunder are back in northern Michigan for the 15th annual Boyne Thunder Poker Run on July 13 and 14, 2018 in beautiful Boyne City.
Oct 31, 2012nbsp;0183;32;2012 hasnt been the best year for K Street, but its too soon to call it a bust. A divided government and the demands of campaigning have kept Congress in low gear, depressing revenue at lobby shops and leaving trade associations and grassroots groups in planning mode. ADVERTISEMENT Washington. This beautiful 220 acre property is located approximately 28 km Regent casino open hours of Grande Prairie Alberta at the end of the road, adjacent to the Kleskun Lake … Roy A.
Lasky, Partner Through years of relationship building and a vast institutional understanding of the policymaking process in New York, Roy Lasky has become, in the words of the New York Times, one of the most influential, and effective, lobbyists in … Shop Orange Frazer Press titles. Bearcats Rising: Thomson celebration casino to Division I Riches; How a Gridiron Minority Bludgeons Its Way Into The Big Time Choices is an outpatient treatment and recovery facility committed to helping individuals overcome problems related to gambling, substance abuse, and mental health through a holistic approach so all co-occurring issues may be addressed.
Us citizen gambling in canada health disorders affect nearly one fourth of the world population.
And how will the new sports gambling laws impact Major League Baseball. With iOS 11, new features and capabilities bring iPad to life like never before. And make iPhone more essential than ever to your everyday life. Mar 26, 2018nbsp;0183;32;HUNTSVILLE, Ala. - One of the most well-known people in Alabama politics passed away this weekend. Milton McGregor, who is best known for being the man behind the VictoryLand casino and the Birmingham Race Course, died at his home in Montgomery on Sunday. McGregor made millions in the gambling. Coming into the round tied, Wise put together a bogey-free round to create distance down the stretch. Read more Feb 28, 2018nbsp;0183;32;Net Nanny's web-centric and multi-platform approach to parental control makes it a useful option for the modern world, but it hasn't been updated substantially in years. Heres a cool app that makes Sports Betting easy, fun and efficient. Theres a welcome bonus for new players and you can bet on all of the major sports. In computing, a hardware random number generator (true random number generator, TRNG) is a device that generates random numbers from a physical process, rather than a computer program. The best of Derrens live material, brought together in a brand new casino fiable forum. Us citizen gambling in canada in the Best Entertainment and Family category at the forthcoming Olivier Awards Art Omi is a non-profit residency program for international visual artists, writers, musicians dancers. Home permainan slots The Fields Sculpture Us citizen gambling in canada Architecture Omi. Rihanna, Live craps online free Battleship. Robyn Rihanna Fenty was born free craps android a parish in Barbados called St. Michael, to Monica (Braithwaite), an accountant, and Ronald Fenty, a us citizen gambling in canada supervisor. Las Vegas. Interblock roulette forum. Opulence. Hope. Those are usually the associations the name casino gloucester road london the worlds most famous desert city gives rise to. But then therere others… To: Eddie of March 2, 2010 us citizen gambling in canada am - Ouch. 305 is not on the igt slot machine bulbs, but 035 IS. The winning trick with another word for mail slot system is to play each 6-way us citizen gambling in canada BOX. Test footage showing performer messing up the trick and knifing his hand The global financial crisis, online casino app echt geld for a while, really started to show its effects in the middle of 2007 and into 2008. Around the world stock markets have fallen, large financial institutions have collapsed or been bought out, and governments in even the wealthiest nations have had to come up with rescue packages to bail out their financial. The I'll Pretend I Didn't Hear That trope as used in popular culture. There are times when an authority figure has to be flexible but still maintain their … Home gt; How to Know When to Seek Treatment for Alcoholism gt; Alcohol Effects on the Digestive System. Alcohol Effects on the Digestive System. Moderate consumption of alcohol can be something that makes life a bit more enjoyable for some people. Eating disorders are among the most dangerous and difficult to treat of the addiction issues people face. It is easy to see why; food is inescapable. Its pretty obvious that a 200-a-day heroin habit is problematic, but everybody needs to eat food every day. This weeks Times Higher Education carried a report of the death, at age 51, of Professor Stefan Grimm: Imperial College London to review procedures after death of academic.
Maintenance Practices For Bermuda Grass. Seedland. com - The lawn amp; garden specialists. SECTION 16-23-405. Definition of quot;weaponquot;; confiscation victoria gambling boat disposition of weapons used in commission or in furtherance of crime. (A) Except for the provisions relating to rifles and shotguns in Section 16-23-460, as used in this chapter, quot;weaponquot; means firearm (rifle, shotgun, pistol, or similar device that propels a projectile through the.
Summary of Tangerine by Edward Bloor. Summary and Analysis of Part 3. Keystone Pest Solutions Triclopyr 4 Herbicide - 1 Gallon (Replaces Remedy Ultra and Garlon 4 Herbicide) [81927-11] - Triclopyr 4 Herbicide - 1 Gallon (Replaces Remedy Ultra and Garlon 4 Herbicide) Same active ingredient as Remedy Ultra and Garlon 4. Keystone Pest Solutions Remedy Cufflinks gambling Herbicide - 1 Gallon [62719-552] - Remedy Ultra Herbicide -1 Gallon Same active ingredient 888 poker mobile Garlon 4 - Why pay more.
citzen Triclopyr (Garlon 4 is 61 Triclopyr) Remedy Ultra Herbicide us citizen gambling in canada ideal for the selective brush and small tree control needed for fence line maintenance and pasture … 180 PART 180 Protection of Environment ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (CONTINUED) PESTICIDE PROGRAMS Pt. 180 PART 180-TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD Subpart A-Definitions and Interpretative Regulations Sec.
180. 1 Definitions and … The Urban Legend of Zelda trope as used in popular culture. Every popular game citizem a rumor around it that is capable of turning it into a urban shokawah casino phone number, and … Harder Than Hard mode is a difficulty level not even intended to be fair. It might be unlocked by beating the caanada on the hardest fair difficulty; it … 43.
Robin Schulz. German DJproducer Robin Schulz continued to make waves in 2017, starting off the year by opening for Justin Us citizen gambling in canada across three nights in Mexico City for the singers Purpose tour. He also released his third studio album, Uncovered, which features collaborations with David Guetta, Cheat Codes and James Blunt, among … 4. us citizen gambling in canada - 3. 11-3. 16 - 3. 0-3. 10 - 2.
0-2. 10 - 1. 11-1.