text:
Affaires législatives
Visiter et apprendre
Assemblée législative de l'Ontario
Comité permanent des budgets des dépenses
Transcription du comité 2013-oct-08 (PDF)
E012 - Tue 8 Oct 2013 / Mar 8 oct 2013
STANDING COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES
Tuesday 8 October 2013 Mardi 8 octobre 2013
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
The committee met at 0901 in room 151.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): We are here to resume the consideration of the estimates of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. There is a total of 1.42 hours remaining. When the committee was adjourned, the official opposition had eight minutes remaining in their rotation. However, when we adjourned last week, we were considering Mr. Leone's motion, so we must first dispose of the motion before we resume the review of the estimates of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport.
Is there further debate on the motion? Everybody still has the motion in front of them? Okay. I'm going to read it into the record so that there's no confusion.
Mr. Leone moved that the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport release all correspondence delivered to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport, and the Pan Am and Parapan Secretariat related to the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, to the Standing Committee on Estimates by 12 p.m. Thursday, October 17, 2013.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Yes, Ms. Damerla.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: We have an amendment to propose to that motion.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): If you have an amendment, please put it forward.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: The amendment to the motion tabled would be this. I move that Mr. Leone's motion be amended as follows: that the words "related to the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, to the Standing Committee on Estimates by 12 p.m. Thursday, October 17, 2013" be removed and replaced with "from January 1, 2012, to October 3, 2013, related to the provincial funding of the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games, as soon as possible."
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. Having reviewed it, it appears that the amendment is in order, so we will proceed on the amendment. Any discussion on the amendment?
Ms. Dipika Damerla: We believe that this amendment is really important because we believe that the original amendment, as proposed by Mr. Leone, was nothing but a fishing exercise. It was unreasonable; the time frames were very unreasonable. And it would really take the focus of our officials away from the games, which is really what we are here for. We've all agreed in the past. I think MPP Jackson has said categorically that he'd like nothing more than to see the games succeed, and if you want the games to succeed, we need to make sure that the Pan Am officials can continue working on the games. Of course, we support any reasonable request for information, but we do believe that the time frames, as proposed by Mr. Leone, are quite unreasonable and that the time frame that we are suggesting is much more focused and much more relevant. It actually relates to what needs to be done. And so, Chair, we really think that this is a very, very important amendment.
If we can't go forward with this amendment, it will be very difficult for the bureaucrats to do what they need to do to ensure that the games are successful. We do believe that it is important to narrow down the time frame as it relates to the actual funding of the Pan/Parapan Am Games from the province and not the broader one as was originally requested by Mr. Leone.
Chair, it is really frustrating for us to see that there's an environment here where it's really—it's not a collaborative environment. The goal here isn't to get to the bottom of the estimates. What we really see here is a concerted attack by the opposition. It's really unreasonable, and what we really need to see is more collaboration and working together to get information that is really relevant to the proceedings and relevant to the estimates to go forward with the estimates. But to continue with these unreasonable requests for information, I think, Chair, is a waste of everybody's time, especially taxpayer money. I really do believe that this is a very important amendment and I look forward to further discussion. I'd like to turn this over now to my colleague MPP Colle, who might want to say a few words.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I don't have any other speakers, so I'll allow that, but usually it's the Chair who chooses who is next.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Sorry.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Colle.
Mr. Mike Colle: Good morning, everybody. I think the original amendment is a request for information, a request for all related documents, which is supportable. It's just that I think my colleague's amendment is asking for a more reasonable time frame so that the public servants in the ministry can get the information required in a reasonable manner, and we will get the information required.
The thing is, it depends on how much longer the minister is going to be here and the sequencing of time between the time the ministry and the staff are here and in terms of when we get this information, then what this committee does with the information. I think, in the amendment by my colleague, she's just asking for a time frame that is much more reasonable and much more fair. I don't see any reason why the committee can't consider this reasonable amendment by my colleague and see if we can get the information in a more appropriate time frame.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Further debate? Seeing no further debate, we'll call the question. All those in favour of—
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair? Sorry; I'd like to ask for a 20-minute recess before the vote.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): It is in order prior to a vote.
Mr. Rob Leone: Karma.
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: Karma.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Before I do this, is it likely—can I just seek your indulgence?—that at the end of the 20 minutes and after the vote we are going to proceed, or should I have the minister and his staff return in the afternoon?
Mr. Rob Leone: Chair, we're prepared to vote.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair, we'd like a recorded vote on the amendment.
Mr. Mike Colle: First, let's have a recess.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay, I'm just trying to be fair to the staff, because if we're not going to deal with them at all this morning I would just ask them to come back this afternoon, but it appears we may get to it. Therefore, we are recessed for 20 minutes at the request of Ms. Damerla. Everybody be back here at 9:30 sharp.
The committee recessed from 0910 to 0930.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I call the meeting back to order. We will now proceed with the vote. Everybody has a copy of the amendment in front of you.
All those in favour of the amendment, please?
Mr. Dickson, I don't believe you're able to vote.
Mr. Joe Dickson: You're right. I'm just so used to putting my hand up.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. Okay.
All those opposed?
Okay, it's up to me again.
I'm not going to support the motion. We have a motion in front of us. It's my duty to proceed, since there is no unanimity or even consensus among those present on the committee. I'm going to vote against the amendment and revert back to the main motion.
Another problem I do have personally is that it was open-ended. The "as soon as possible" did cause me some problem.
Be that as it may, I'm casting my vote against, as I'm required to do as the Chair, and we'll proceed to the main motion.
Further discussion on the main motion? Ms. Damerla.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair, I'd actually like to propose another amendment.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): You have another amendment?
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Does everybody have copies? All right.
I move that Mr. Leone's motion be amended as follows: that the words "related to the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, to the Standing Committee on Estimates by 12 p.m. Thursday, October 17, 2013" be removed and replaced with "from January 1, 2012, to October 3, 2013, related to the provincial funding of the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games, by Tuesday, November 5, 2013."
Chair, as you can see, this amendment does address the concern that you just raised about the "as soon as possible." We replaced that with a firmer date of Tuesday, November 5, 2013.
But I have to say, to go back to the issue of Mr. Leone's original amendment, that it is really unreasonable to expect our hard-working—
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, I don't want to hear any argument yet. The members do not have a copy of the amendment.
I'm going to have to recess, I think, for five minutes in order that copies be made available to all members. Please don't go too far. Once we have that, I will recognize you first to speak.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I call the meeting back to order.
Ms. Damerla, the floor is yours.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair. Now that everybody has the amendment—and I apologize for not providing them—as you can see, this amendment actually improves upon our previous amendment and addresses the concern that you had raised around the "as soon as possible." That has now been replaced by the date "Tuesday, November 5, 2013," which we believe is a much more reasonable date. The original date, as proposed, Thursday, October 17, 2013, was very unreasonable for our hard-working bureaucrats.
The point, Chair, is that these bureaucrats, these members of the Ontario public service, have a very important job to carry out, and that is to ensure that the games continue to be on budget. One of the wonderful things about these games is the fact that the games are on budget and are going to come in under budget.
Mr. Paul Miller: Mr. Chair, a point of order.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): On a point of order, Mr. Miller.
Mr. Paul Miller: Mr. Chairman, with all due respect, all they changed was one date: Tuesday, November 5. That's all they changed. It's exactly the same except for one date.
I believe, Mr. Chairman, with all due respect, this is a stall tactic, and this is basically just playing games here.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, no. I have to state that the motion is significantly—or not significantly, but it is different enough to qualify as a new amendment.
Mr. Paul Miller: One date?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): It's not the same as the old one—yes.
Mr. Paul Miller: It's exactly the same except for "Tuesday, November 5."
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): That is correct, and that is changing the amendment.
Mr. Paul Miller: Okay. If you've ruled that way, that's fine, but it's very disappointing, and this is just stalling.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I will recognize you to speak next if you want to speak to that, but right now the floor is Ms. Damerla's.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair.
As I was saying, one of the really impressive things about these games is the fact that they're going to be coming under budget. Now, this is something no other jurisdiction that has put up any kind of games of any kind of scale has ever accomplished, and so we here should be so proud that here is a minister under whose leadership these games are—
Mr. Rob Leone: Point of order.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): On a point of order, Mr. Leone.
Mr. Rob Leone: I'm not really sure what this has to do with the motion.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Well, it's straying a little, but I was giving some latitude for her to get to the point.
The point is your amendment, not on the pride of the Pan/Parapan Am Games, so please, to the amendment, why this is a good amendment, because that will help with the proceeding.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thanks, Chair. I was actually just trying to explain why it's important to give the bureaucrats more time, so that they continue to focus on these games. The point I was trying to make is, given that these games are coming under budget, on time, something that no other jurisdiction—
Mr. Paul Miller: Mr. Chair, on a point of order.
Mr. Paul Miller: The speaker is assuming that it's on target, and we have already proven there are problems, so that's kind of like a false statement. Let's talk about the motion. I don't want a history about how wonderful everybody is.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Miller, you can't accuse a member of a falsehood in this committee any more than you can do so upstairs, so I would like you to withdraw that.
Mr. Paul Miller: Okay, I withdraw.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): The second thing: Ms. Damerla, his second point—please, I understand what you're trying to say, but—
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: Paul, you dropped something.
Mr. Paul Miller: It's my crying towel.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): The issue here is the amendment. The amendment is different in that it has a date; perhaps you could talk about that or something else within the amendment that was not covered the last time.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair. The reason we changed the amendment was to clarify, because as you yourself pointed out, you're not comfortable with the wording "as soon as possible," and so we have changed it to "November 5, 2013," which gives the bureaucrats some more time. The reason this is important, and this is what I have not been able to express, is it's really important to express why we need to give bureaucrats a reasonable amount of time. That is because they are working very, very hard to make sure that the games are pulled off in a manner that showcases Toronto in the best possible light. So they have a heavy, heavy workload, and that's the point that I was trying to make when I was interrupted.
I hope that the committee will understand and appreciate the need for this important change in date, and I look forward to your support.
Mr. Mike Colle: Mr. Chair?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Colle—oh, excuse me, I did offer the opportunity to Mr. Miller, if he wanted to actually speak to the motion, to go next.
Mr. Paul Miller: There's nothing to say, Mr. Chair.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay, then Mr. Colle.
Mr. Mike Colle: The motion is basically asking for a couple of weeks' difference, from as soon as possible to November 5, which I think is a reasonable time. It's not unreasonable.
Basically, when you look at it, I've been trying to figure out the complexity of all these boards, the secretariat, the relationships, who's answerable to whom, trying to weave our way through it. We're dealing with three levels of government that have their hands in this. I don't even know, federally, who's responsible or who's involved. I have no idea, yet they're a $500-million partner, I think. I don't know how many municipalities are involved in it; I know Toronto is and Hamilton and Milton. So I point that out because it involves them trying to get all this information that flows back and forth between everybody and all the different levels of government.
The private sector is involved in it, too. How do we get their information and their correspondence back and forth with the ministry?
Then you've got a unique entity here that is the neither a government board or agency; it's a hybrid. It's a one-time thing. I don't know if we've ever had an Olympic or a Pan Am—I don't think we've ever had it in Ontario—
Mr. Paul Miller: Hamilton 1936.
Mr. Mike Colle: Okay, so we have to go back to 1936 in Hamilton, and Torchy Peden was probably involved in that one there. Only you would know who Torchy Peden is. He was a great cyclist, I think, Torchy was.
But anyway, I'm pointing that out in terms of the complexity of trying to get all this information from all these interwoven levels of government and the private sector, this unique model.
I'm very anxious, also, to get an org chart, which I've asked for from research, and we still haven't gotten that, to see how these different secretariats and the committee and the ministries—federally, provincially, municipally—involve themselves in this flow of information, so we can get that information. I have no idea because I haven't gotten the org chart yet.
I'm also looking to see who are the people, these mystery people, who are on the secretariat? Who are they? I have no idea who they are.
As I'm saying, if they can't even get us that kind of information, and we're trying to say, "Hey, give us all the correspondence," it just tells me we need a reasonable time frame. That's what this motion really does. It goes to November 5 to get the information before this committee so we can see all the documentation asked for by Mr. Leone, "correspondence delivered to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport, and the Pan Am and Parapan Am Secretariat, related to the 2015 ... Games, from January 1, 2010...."
I want to see a complete list. I want to see all the correspondence between the federal, provincial, municipal and private sectors, all that information flowing back through the ministry. That's what should be before the committee to give us a total context. If we're going to do this properly and we're going to ask the staff, who have to do the heavy lifting here, to do it properly, I think it's a reasonable consideration and I think the date is not a date far off. It's November 5 in the motion, right?
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Yes.
Mr. Mike Colle: That's what I think. It's a most reasonable amendment for this committee to consider in the fullness of time. Thank you very much.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Just for my own edification and clarity to the other committee members, you did state that you wanted to see all of the documentation from the private sector, from the feds, from the province. The amendment limits it to provincial funding only. Therefore, I don't know—I just want you to be clear on what you're voting on. That's all.
Mr. Mike Colle: A point of clarification on that: As you know, I've raised this before. Mr. Chairman and to the Clerk, if it relates to provincial funding—I mean, the funding is an equal funding in many ways, so how can you separate the provincial funding by itself since it's all contingent on partnership funding? That's the only thing. To me, either it is an entity by itself, or somehow, how we can segment out the province's role and the province's powers in this, and the province's finances by themselves—I find that quite perplexing, to separate the province out by itself, just because of the associations, financial and otherwise, that exist. And the board is made up of people of the city, the municipal sector, provincial and federal. I just find it troubling to try to get the whole picture unless we have the relationships in this whole thing. That's all.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): And I can understand that. I assume, then, you're speaking against the amendment.
Mr. Mike Colle: No, no, in favour—I'm in favour of changing the date.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. Mr. Bartolucci.
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: Thanks, Mr. Chair. I'll keep my remarks very, very short.
I was subbed in this morning, and I come here, I think, with a very objective point of view, and not a subjective point of view. I had very little trouble with "as soon as possible." However, that has gone through its due course. But I think we should learn from history, or else we could repeat it. I would think that to put a specific timeline on this that will allow the bureaucrats to do a complete job, a thorough job, not leaving any points out etc—and we can expand on that, but we won't, because that would just be wasting time—I see this amendment, from a very objective point of view, as a way of accomplishing what Mr. Leone wants more thoroughly.
I always look at an amendment to any motion as strengthening that motion. If it weakens the motion, then in my world, it's not a good amendment. This amendment, I think, strengthens the call for what the original member, Mr. Leone, wanted, so I see it as good.
I don't know how this is going to unfold in a vote, but I do know one thing for sure: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10 members are sitting here; a minister is sitting here; a bunch of bureaucrats are sitting here; all of whom—we understand we're on this committee, that's our job—could be doing something far more productive for the people of Ontario.
I'm suggesting that the motion is not unreasonable, that it allows, in a very real way, the bureaucrats to have a specific timeline, but a timeline that will allow for thoroughness so that we're not leaving out any points that are relevant with regards to provincial funding of the Pan Am Games. So I see it, Paul, to disagree with you a little, as more than just a date. I see it as a date that will bring about the desired ends of the original motion.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Leone.
Mr. Rob Leone: First of all, Chair, thanks for the opportunity. But for Mr. Colle, we actually do have available some org charts, a list of bureaucrats. We can even tell you how much they've made. So if you would like some of that information that we have, we'd be happy to—
Mr. Mike Colle: That's why I'm surprised I wasn't able to get it when I asked—
Mr. Rob Leone: We'd be happy to share it with you, if that's something that you would be interested in.
Mr. Mike Colle: Yes, I would.
Mr. Rob Leone: Mr. Jackson has done, I think, a tremendous job compiling all this information.
Mr. Mike Colle: I'd love to see that.
Mr. Rob Leone: Secondly, I think we're all focused on—I'm going to speak very briefly as well. I think we should get on with the motion and the vote. But two things: I think we're focused almost exclusively on the Tuesday, November 5, date, but we're ignoring what I think is the much more fundamental change to this motion, which is shortening the time frame from January 1, 2010, which the original motion stated. The new amendment is proposing a date of January 1, 2012. In order to make a full, thorough investigation of what we're looking at—actually, this amendment does weaken the main motion. It takes two years out of the investigation of what we're trying to undercover. So this, at the end of the day, I would suggest, weakens the motion to an intent that does not allow us to get the answers. We have two years of questions that we have to debate, and I think that's important to note.
Secondly, on the November 5, the reason why we chose October 17 originally was because we wanted to provide enough timeline, consistent with other motions that we've presented in estimates previously. It was a two-week turnaround. I understand the point made by the government, that we want to focus on making a great games. Well, wouldn't getting this deadline out of the way allow everyone else to focus, for the remainder of their time, on making this a great games? That's why I say shorten the timeline. Make sure it's a date that's reasonable. I'm not suggesting that we can't be more reasonable on the date, but I would say absolutely that we have to maintain the integrity of the motion when we're calling for documents from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, rather than amending it as this amendment does. That is, I think, the biggest part of this amendment that I have some serious objection to.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Miller and then Ms. Mangat.
Mr. Paul Miller: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In reference to the comments, I think the timeline was set because there were certain things that went on that we want to get to the bottom of. Shortening the time element certainly may help the bureaucrats with less work, but it certainly won't expose—if there were any improprieties done or anything that happened in that period before that, it should be brought to the attention of the public as well as this Legislature. By limiting the time on your amendments, you are cutting down our research and cutting the area that we want to look at, for obvious reasons.
So I think there's a lot more there, and there is more coming out every day, in the period that you want to eliminate. I am not in favour of that. If there's a mistake, if something was done wrong, the people of this province have a right to know, and we have to get to the bottom of it, just like Ornge, just like eHealth, just like the gas plants. They have a right to know, and I am not going to limit our research people, I'm not going to limit the opposition's ability to dig into areas that should be dug into, and I'm not going to expedite the process just to suit one party because they don't want to be exposed for whatever reason. So I am not going to support that at all.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Ms. Mangat.
Mrs. Amrit Mangat: Thank you, Chair. Picking up where my colleague Paul Miller left off, yes, we all want to get into the depth of the information. The name of the game is to know everything that is going on. The request which has been put up by my colleague Dipika is fair and reasonable.
The next thing is that this committee is looking at this year's estimates, not 2010. So in my opinion, this is outside the purview of this committee. It's a fair amount of time which we are asking, it's reasonable, so it should be granted. Thank you.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Further debate? Further debate? Ms. Damerla.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair, if there's going to be no further debate, we'd like to ask for a 20-minute recess before the vote.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. It's right prior to the vote, so she's entitled to that request. We are recessed for another 20 minutes. We will commence promptly at quarter after 10.
Interjections.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I'll take that back. Mr. Bartolucci?
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: And you know what—and rule me out of order, if you want, Mr. Chair—by the time we come back, it's going to be a quarter after. We have a whole bunch of people sitting here. It's not a good use of their time. Are we ever going to get to them today? Because if, in fact, there's going to be another amendment, that's going to rule out the possibility.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I have no idea whether this amendment will pass or not pass, and I have no idea if there's another one to follow it.
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: I understand.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I do know that Mr. Leone has eight minutes, which, if we vote—there would be about eight minutes left for his questioning, but I have no idea whether we're actually going to get to him.
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: Okay. All right.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair, I just wanted to say that if the vote doesn't go through, we do have other amendments.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. That being the case, if this vote does not go through and there are other amendments, I would suggest that the staff and the minister are free to go, but please return this afternoon at 3:45.
We are now recessed until about 17 minutes after 10.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay, the meeting is now resumed, and we're going on to the vote, which is the amendment by Ms. Damerla. All those in favour of the amendment? All those opposed to the amendment? Okay, thank you.
It is my job, again, to try to determine what is the best thing for the committee to do. I've had a chance in the last 20 minutes to consider what the arguments were. I was particularly persuaded, actually, by three arguments: the one made by Mr. Colle, the one made by Mr. Leone and the one, in fact, made by Ms. Mangat. They all made good points on this.
It is the Chair's responsibility to ensure that we proceed forward. It is the Chair's responsibility to make sure that there is always the motion forward, so even if this one fails, I'm given to understand that there will be another one and perhaps another one after that. We also have the main motion by Mr. Leone.
I am inclined not to support this. I am satisfied that the November 5 date might be right, but the statement made by Mr. Leone, that he is looking for—his original motion, intended to look for documents going from January 1, 2010, has been significantly replaced by one of January 2012, cutting out some two years of documents, which all members are entitled to have.
The point made by Ms. Mangat was that it's within the body of the estimates, although we have in this committee in the past gone outside the estimate period, where it is a long-going action. I'm thinking mostly back to the power plants. We went beyond the estimate period and went back years before that, when it was first funded. But her point is a good one.
Last, but not least, Mr. Colle made a very important point about the provincial funding aspect of this particular amendment. Although he was speaking in favour of the amendment, his arguments were very much opposed to the amendment because what this does in fact is limit the scope of what is being requested in Mr. Leone's original motion to those only related to provincial funding, whereas Mr. Leone's was to all documentation and would include those things from the private sector, the federal government and others.
I'm afraid I can't support the amendment either, and so the amendment fails.
Ms. Damerla, you have another one?
Mr. Rob Leone: Mr. Chair, point of order.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Point of order.
Mr. Rob Leone: Perhaps it would be helpful, if the governing party has a series of amendments, to table them all at once for our consideration.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): It may facilitate, but Ms. Damerla is under no obligation to do so.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Chair, if I may say so, the amendments really depend on the discussions; we endeavour to improve with every amendment. You can't just table all of the amendments together, because they sort of arise from how the proceedings play out.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. Ms. Damerla, the floor is yours.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair. I move that Mr. Leone's motion be amended as follows: that the words "related to the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, to the Standing Committee on Estimates by 12 p.m. Thursday, October 17, 2013" be removed and replaced with "from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, related to the provincial funding of the 2015 Pan Am and Parapan Games, by Tuesday, November 12, 2013."
I do have copies of the amendment here for the Clerk.
Mr. Paul Miller: Point of order, Mr. Chair: Listen, this is silly. She did one week; now she's moving in another week. It's the exact same discussion as the last two. With all due respect—
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): First of all, I'm not going to hear any argument until everybody has a copy in front of them.
Mr. Paul Miller: She just read it.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I know. She changed the week at the end, but she also changed her amendment from the last one by moving it back to 2010.
Mr. Paul Miller: It's the same as the last one.
Mr. Rick Bartolucci: No, it's not.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, it was 2012.
Mr. Paul Miller: That's not what she read.
Mr. Mike Colle: We added the years.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): The two years have been added back in. It is different. It's not hugely different, but it is different.
Mr. Paul Miller: So why did we take the two out in the first place?
Ms. Dipika Damerla: When I have the floor, I'll explain it.
Mr. Paul Miller: I'd like to hear that.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right, I'm going to give the floor back to Ms. Damerla. But we only have about two minutes and then we're going to have to recess until this afternoon so that we can all be up in question period. Ms. Damerla, the floor is yours until the bell rings.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair. As you can see, we endeavour to please you. You were not happy last time with the "as soon as possible," so we changed it to November 5. Then later on, you expressed some concerns around the time frame and suggested that the time frame we had suggested in our previous amendment wasn't broad enough, so we have actually gone back to the original, broader time frame.
I personally do believe that it's a fishing expedition, and I feel that if the members opposite want to fish so much, I'd welcome them to Port Credit. It has the best salmon fishing. I'm serious about that: It really does have the best salmon fishing in Ontario.
Mr. Paul Miller: Yeah, we'll get some mackerels. That's for sure.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: No, you'll get some really good Atlantic salmon, if that's what you want to do.
But to fish over here and waste everybody's time is unconscionable. However, just to make the committee move forward, we've come to this compromise, and we are suggesting—
Mr. Paul Miller: Rag the puck. You should have been a hockey player.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: I can try.
If you want to go back to the original, broader time frame that Mr. Leone had asked, then we suggest that it would be a fair compromise to at least extend the time frame now from November 5, 2013, to November 12, 2013.
Chair, I always tell my daughter that it's important not to set yourself up to fail, and it's really important to be fair. We have to be fair to our officials and give them a reasonable time.
If you really want estimates, if you really want this information around provincial funding from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013, as opposed to the more focused period, which is what we believe is the meat and potatoes—if you really do want that broader one, we will—I think it is fair to the Ontario public service that we give them more time. The October 17, 2013, deadline is just unreasonable. It's trying to set them up to fail, and that is completely unfair.
I know that Mr. Leone used to be a professor, I believe. You never want to set your students up to fail. You've got to give them a framework to do the job well. So it's really important, Chair, that this timeline be respected. I think we have met more than halfway. Our preference would be for a more focused look. We've agreed to a broader framework, so we hope that the opposition will meet us halfway. It's really not about meeting us halfway but ensuring—
Mr. Paul Miller: Move for adjournment.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay, I'm going to have to cut you off there. I will come back to you when we come back this afternoon, back to Ms. Damerla. A couple of points: As a fisherman, I want to tell you that those are not Atlantic salmon that are caught out in the lake; they are Pacific salmon.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: No, it's Atlantic.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, they are Pacific salmon. I want to guarantee you they are Coho. They are Pacific salmon.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: They have been restocked with Atlantic salmon.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, no. Okay, but—
Mr. Mike Colle: Can we have research verify that?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Yes, you can have research verify it. I know exactly what they are. They're transplanted. But we will be back.
As well, if I could, before I bang the gavel, Mr. Jackson, you have documentation that was alluded to. I think all members of the committee would like to see that, which I think were the org charts and the names. I think Mr. Colle had a good point; he wanted to see those. All members will have those by the time we resume this afternoon.
We stand recessed until this afternoon at approximately 3:45.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. We are now into orders of the day, so we can commence.
When the committee recessed this morning, the members were considering Ms. Damerla's amendment number 3. Ms. Damerla has the floor.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Thank you, Chair. As I was saying earlier, the more reasonable approach would have been for the opposition and for Mr. Leone to have asked for documents in a more focused time frame. If from that a need would had been felt to broaden the scope, surely we could have done that, but there seems to be some insistence that from the get-go they wanted a very broad scope.
In the spirit of compromise in accommodating the opposition, because we want to make this committee work, we have now amended our amendment to go back to the original motion, which would allow for the documents to be from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013. But given the broad scope of these documents, what we are saying, Chair, is that the deadline as proposed by Mr. Leone of October 17 is just not practical.
I have to say that I'm a little disappointed at this fishing expedition approach—
Mr. Rob Leone: Point of order, Chair.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: —I think all that—
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Hold on. We have a point of order. The point of order is?
Mr. Rob Leone: Maybe just a point of clarification, but—
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, no, just a point of order.
Mr. Rob Leone: Is there a withdrawal of the amendment? Is that what we're talking about now or—
Ms. Dipika Damerla: No.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): No, no. This is an amendment on your desk, item number 3.
Mr. Rob Leone: Okay.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): The changes, I believe, that Ms. Damerla is talking about are going back to the original date, January 1, 2010.
Mr. Rob Leone: Oh.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Which was in your motion.
Mr. Rob Leone: Thank you. I was confused
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Okay.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Please proceed. That's not a point of order, so therefore back to you.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Given the broad scope and the timeline, we feel that the five working days—Chair, that's what it would allow. If you were to start counting from tomorrow, it would give the Ontario public service just five working days to get documents spanning over three years.
Now, Mr. Leone, if you were to go and ask any of your constituents in Cambridge, "Is this a reasonable time frame, five days?" my guess is most of them are going to say that's not reasonable. It's just not practical, and that's the reason we are suggesting that we move the date to Tuesday, November 12, 2013. It's still a very aggressive deadline, but I think it is something that we can work with, because I feel that we have a responsibility here to be responsible and find a balance between the need of legislators to hold government to account—I completely respect that, and I want accountability myself—but also to ensure that the burden we put on the Ontario public service is not excessive, which is what this five-day period would do.
I don't think any reasonable person, any reasonable Ontarian, could demand of any set of officials that, over a five-day working period, they come up with all these documents that span nearly three years.
It is this that disappoints me, Chair, this aggressive deadline. It suggests to me that there's some political point-scoring taking place, almost setting us up to fail. Scoring at the cost of taxpayers impresses no one, least of our constituents, and that includes the constituents of Mr. Leone, Mr. Harris, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Nicholls and Mr. Miller.
So I think we owe it to the Ontario taxpayer to ensure that the time of the Ontario public service is used in a balanced manner and that we take a balanced approach. We don't go on fishing expeditions. Instead, we try and hold the government to account—
Mr. Paul Miller: Point of order, Mr. Chairman.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Point of order from Mr. Miller.
Mr. Paul Miller: She's talking about fishing and mentioning all the members who are asking for information that's pertinent to our whole situation here. She's trying to minimize the content of what we require to do our job. I kind of resent that. So stick to the agenda.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. It is not a point of order, but you have made your statement.
Please continue, Ms. Damerla, and on the topic—you've been fairly good so far—of your amendment.
Ms. Dipika Damerla: I was just trying to explain to this committee why we think it's really important to move the deadline from October 17, 2013, to the one we are proposing, which is Tuesday, November 12, 2013. It was in this context that I had invoked the names of some of the committee members. Certainly no disrespect intended, and certainly not trying to speak off topic.
At this point, Chair, I've sort of made my point as to why we think we need to extend the timeline. I think we've been really, really reasonable because we are agreeing to the broader scope, even though we are not sure that at this point it merits that. Our preference would have been to start off with a narrower scope for the documents that are being asked for in terms of the timeline and then to later broaden it if required. But in the spirit of co-operation, we are saying, okay, we'll go with the broader scope, but let us give the bureaucrats enough time to do a good job.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Further debate? Ms. Jaczek.
Ms. Helena Jaczek: I'm just coming to this perhaps with fresh eyes to look at both Mr. Leone's original motion and now Ms. Damerla's amendment. Looking at this time frame, which obviously is the subject of the amendment, it seems to me that the request that we're making is far more reasonable in terms of the potential volume of material.
As I understand it, it's that the ministry should release all correspondence delivered to the ministry over a three-year period—almost three years. To expect that these documents could be provided within, as Ms. Damerla said, five business days, is, I think, completely unreasonable. Having had the experience of sitting on public accounts, where we've been looking and asking for correspondence related to the Ornge issue, and also my experience sitting on social policy as it relates to diluted chemotherapy, our committee has been able to come to some sort of reasonable accommodation in terms of what may be within some business practice in terms of searching records and providing them. I would say that I'm totally supportive of my colleague's comments made this afternoon, that changing the deadline for the production of these documents to Tuesday, November 12, 2013, seems to me a far more reasonable request of the ministry.
First of all, is it physically possible? I don't know if we've heard anything back from the ministry in terms of their opinion, but certainly I think any reasonable person who has had some experience in requesting correspondence and with a desire to have all the correspondence would agree that the ministry should be allowed to have several more weeks in order to accommodate the request. Thank you, Chair.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Further debate? Ms. Mangat.
Mrs. Amrit Mangat: Thank you, Chair. I said in the morning session as well that this time extension should be given. I'm sure all the members have this chart on their desks, which says "Pan/Parapan"—
Interjection.
Mrs. Amrit Mangat: This one. I'm sure you all have it. It looks so complex, and the time we are asking for is a very genuine request. It should be given. I reiterate my words from this morning that it must be removed and replaced with "from January 1, 2010, to October 3, 2013," and a grant must be given by November 12, 2013, looking at the complexities of the issues. We are discussing the Pan/Parapan Am Games, which will strengthen our economy. It will create jobs and it will showcase Ontario as the best place to do business, to invest in and to visit. I think that the request by my colleagues is a genuine one and that an extension must be given.
Mr. Rob Leone: Thank you, Chair. Just a few points of clarification. I do want the members of the committee to know that the reason why we selected Thursday, October 17 was that, at the time we tabled the motion, we were looking at it from a perspective of two weeks from that date, which was a standard practice of requests that we had made. We obviously have to put that into context with what's happening here, which is that we've moved a motion, recesses have been called, filibusters have emerged, and we're still considering whether the motion is actually going to see the light of day or not.
Even today, after spending a considerable amount of time discussing amendments and discussing the motion, we're still in a position where we don't actually have any degree of certainty as to the timeline.
The fact that they're now raising the point that it's five business days away is entirely their fault. We could have dealt with this a lot earlier and we would have been able to have a two-week time frame, which has been the time frame we've put on other document requests that this committee has put forth. With the greatest of respect to the members opposite, I realize that they're trying to delay actually moving and voting on this motion. I realize that they probably don't want to discuss the estimates of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport today because of what's happened just down the hallway with the release of the Auditor General's report that has pegged the cancellation costs of the Oakville and Mississauga power plants at over $1 billion.
We see here, I think, a continual attempt by the members of the governing party to delay these proceedings, and if that's the case, perhaps maybe they would entertain adjourning for the day and let's talk about the power plants, let that go forth, and we'll come back tomorrow.
That's what I think would probably be right, given the fact that we have numerous ministry officials here once again today. If, for whatever reason, you don't want to talk about the estimates today, then let's move this to tomorrow and not waste anyone's time.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I'm not sure what—you've made a suggestion, but you haven't made a motion—
Mr. Rob Leone: I'll move to adjourn.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): First of all, under the rules of order that are extant, a motion to adjourn takes precedence over any other motion that's made. It is a non-debatable motion and it must be called immediately.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): If you're seeking some clarification—I don't want debate on whether it's a good idea or not—
Ms. Dipika Damerla: Would it be possible to seek a recess before the vote on the adjournment?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): It is a vote; yes, it is a vote. You're entitled to a 20-minute recess, if you want one, to determine whether or not to vote for adjournment.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Is that what you're seeking?
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. We have a 20-minute recess on the motion of whether or not to adjourn. It's now 17 minutes after 4. Please be back at 4:37.
I would ask the minister and the staff to stay because I'm not sure where we're going here. If this motion passes, of course you can all go. If it doesn't, you may all go anyway because I have a feeling we may be here for a while.
We are recessed for 20 minutes.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): We will call the meeting back to order. We have a motion of adjournment. It is without debate.
Mr. Rob Leone: Recorded vote, Chair.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. A recorded vote is in order.
Harris, Jackson, Leone, Miller.
The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): The motion carries. We are adjourned until tomorrow at approximately 3:45.
Just before everybody goes, a statement on the record: At 3:45, we're going to be back here. There is still one hour and 42 minutes remaining. Given the time, I am going to indicate to the Ministry of Health that they need not attend, because if we can finish tomorrow, that will leave only a very short period of time, not enough to start the Ministry of Health.
As long as everyone understands that, we will attempt to finish this ministry tomorrow. At 3:45, we have one hour and 42 minutes remaining. We have an outstanding amendment tomorrow under the name of Ms. Damerla, which we will start with. Hopefully, we can deal with it expeditiously and go on to the purpose of this meeting, which is to do the estimates of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport.
Meeting adjourned till tomorrow.
The committee adjourned at 1638.
Committee business E-167
Chair / Président
Mr. Michael Prue (Beaches–East York ND)
Vice-Chair / Vice-Président
Mr. Taras Natyshak (Essex ND)
Mr. Mike Colle (Eglinton–Lawrence L)
Mr. Joe Dickson (Ajax–Pickering L)
Mr. Michael Harris (Kitchener–Conestoga PC)
Mr. Rob Leone (Cambridge PC)
Mrs. Amrit Mangat (Mississauga–Brampton South / Mississauga–Brampton-Sud L)
Mr. Rick Nicholls (Chatham–Kent–Essex PC)
Substitutions / Membres remplaçants
Mr. Rick Bartolucci (Sudbury L)
Ms. Dipika Damerla (Mississauga East–Cooksville / Mississauga-Est–Cooksville L)
Mr. Rod Jackson (Barrie PC)
Ms. Helena Jaczek (Oak Ridges–Markham L)
Mr. Paul Miller (Hamilton East–Stoney Creek / Hamilton-Est–Stoney Creek ND)
Clerk / Greffier
Mr. Katch Koch
Staff / Personnel
Mr. Jerry Richmond, research officer,
Sitemap Menu
Cette page vous a-t-elle été utile? Oui , cette page m'a été utile. Un sondage facultatif s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet. Non , cette page ne m'a pas été utile. Un sondage facultatif s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet.
Travailler à l'Assemblée
Programme de stages à l'Assemblée législative de l'Ontario (OLIP) (site externe en anglais uniquement)
Programme des pages de l'Assemblée législative
Bureau de l'Assemblée législative
Information sur l'Assemblée
Bureaux, divisions et directions
Droits d'auteur et déclaration concernant la protection de la vie privée
Accès à l'édifice
Cafétéria et salle à manger
La boutique de cadeaux
À propos du Parlement de l'Ontario
Députés actuels
Tous les députés
Documents de la Chambre
Documents des comités
Participation aux comités
Voir l'Assemblée législative à l'œuvre
Utilisation des terrains de l'Assemblée législative
Actuels
Adjointes parlementaires
Porte-parole opposition
Liste combinée
Divulgation depenses
Comprendre les depenses que divulguent les deputes
Projets de loi d'intérêt privé
Calendriers parlementaires
État des travaux
Annexe des budgets des dépenses
Index des pétitions et réponses
Liste de questions écrites
Motions de censure et de jour de l'opposition
Motions émanant des députés
Motions émanant du gouvernement
État des travaux des comités
Archives de la période des questions
Archives des déclarations des députés
Comités (salle 151)
Consignes pour les index de la chambre
42ème législature, 1re session
Intervenant lettre a
Intervenant lettre b
Intervenant lettre c
Intervenant lettre d
Intervenant lettre e
Intervenant lettre f
Intervenant lettre g
Intervenant lettre h
Intervenant lettre i
Intervenant lettre j
Intervenant lettre k
Intervenant lettre l
Intervenant lettre n
Intervenant lettre o
Intervenant lettre p
Intervenant lettre q
Intervenant lettre r
Intervenant lettre s
Intervenant lettre t
Intervenant lettre u
Intervenant lettre v
Intervenant lettre w
Intervenant lettre x
Intervenant lettre y
Intervenant lettre z
Sujet lettre a
Sujet lettre b
Sujet lettre c
Sujet lettre d
Sujet lettre e
Sujet lettre f
Sujet lettre g
Sujet lettre h
Sujet lettre i
Sujet lettre j
Sujet lettre k
Sujet lettre l
Sujet lettre m
Sujet lettre n
Sujet lettre p
Sujet lettre q
Sujet lettre r
Sujet lettre s
Sujet lettre t
Sujet lettre u
Sujet lettre v
Sujet lettre w
Sujet lettre x
Sujet lettre y
Sujet lettre z
Législature 39 session 1
Intervenant lettre m
Sujet lettre o
Séances des comités (calendrier hebdomadaire)
Index du journal des debats des comites
Consignes sur l'index des comités
Entrée des visiteurs
À propos les visites
Visite de l'édifice
Visites guidées à l'heure du midi
Visite intégrale
Promenade de Queen's Park
Visite art et architecture
Thé de l'après-midi
Visite de citoyenneté
Visite d'anglais langue seconde
Art à la Carte – célébrons les artistes ontariens
Critères d'admissibilité - Art à la Carte
FAQs - Art à la Carte
Galerie de photos - Art à la Carte
Forum de femmes 2019
Exigences et critères d'admissibilité
FAQ - Forum de femmes
Formulaire de demande - Forum de femmes 2019
Points saillants du programme
Programme d'extension communautaire
Demande - Programme d'extension communautaire
FAQ - Programme d'extension communautaire
Programmes arts de jeunesse
Prix du président pour les jeunes écrivains
Critères d'admissibilité et directives
Gagnantes précédentes
Programme arts de jeunesse
Critères d'admissibilité
Concours d'art pour Jeunesse
Programmes d'été
Simulations du Parlement
Simulation du Parlement postsecondaire
Pourquoi postuler?
Parlement simulé
Forum des enseignants
Admissibilité et sélection
Le processus de demande
Programme des expositions communautaires
Critères d'admissibilité
Le Prix du livre du président
Liste des finalistes 2019
Processus de soumission
L'œuvre lauréate 2017
Œuvres lauréates précédentes
Prix des jeunes auteurs
À propos le Programme des pages
La durée du stage
Exigences et critères d'admissibilité
Processus de demande
Postulez Maintenant
Dates limites des candidatures
Logement et Transports
Programme de scouts et guides
Aperçu du programme pour les groupes de scouts et guides
Camps de jour & groupes de jeunes
Programmes pour les familles
Programme de congé en mars
Programme de la semaine de relâche en mars pour les garderies, les camps de jour, et les groupes de jeunes
Fun en famille les vendredis
Les aventuriers en fin de semaine
Programme du Jour de la Famille
À propos des programmes scolaires
Aperçu du programme de la période de questions
FAQs - Democracy Day
Online application - Democracy Day
Options schedule
FAQs about school programs
Programme de chœurs
Performance de l'hymne national
Conditions d'admissibilité
Demande de performance
Programme de concerts des fêtes
Holiday Concert Application Form
Programmes élémentaires
Elementary General Information Program
Elementary Question Period Program
5e année
Programme des jeunes voyageurs de l'Ontario
Programmes secondaires
10e année
Secondary general information program
Secondary question period program
11e et 12e années
Programmes postsecondaires
Art et architecture de l'édifice législatif
Intro au processus législatif
Post-secondary general information program
Post-secondary question period program
Outils pédagogiques et plans de leçons
À propos des plans de leçons
À propos l'Ontario
Les symboles de l'Ontario
Distribution de la population de l'Ontario
Les trois paliers de gouvernement au Canada
Programme d'anglais langue seconde
Aperçu du programme d'anglais langue seconde
Demande de programme d'extension communautaire
Jeux, Questionnaires et activités
Comment un Projet de Loi devient Loi
Les pauers de gouvernement
Matching game: level one
Demande de programme scolaire à l'édifice législatif
Les rôles parlementaires
Qu'est ce que le parlement?
Le parlement de l'Ontario
Les paliers de gouvernement au Canada
Les branches du gouvernement
Les traditions parlementaires
La masse du Haut-Canada
Qu'est-ce qu'un projet de loi?
Comment un projet de loi devient-il une loi en Ontario?
Le processus électoral
À propos de l'édifice législatif
Terrains à Queen's Park
Histoire et héritage
Premiers édifices de l'Assemblée législative
Galerie de photos historiques
Cartes postales anciennes de l'Assemblée législative
L'Assemblée législative de l'Ontairo - d'hier à aujourd'hui - 1867 à 2017
Expositions et art
Une Assemblée remarquable - Les femmes de Queen's Park
Art in the Legislature
Visages de l'histoire
Lieu de rassemblement
Lieu de rassemblement - galerie en ligne
Hier et aujourd'hui à Queen's Park
plan 2016-2020 (mise à jour de 2019)
Déclaration concernant la protection de la vie privée pour le recrutement
Le rôle du président
Les anciens présidents
Les présidents de séance et les greffiers


text:
The Portrait of a Man with a Roman Medal is a painting by the German-born Flemish artist Hans Memling, dating to c. 1480 and housed in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp, Belgium.

Description

The painting portrays a man from a three-quarter point of view, with an attention to details typical of Flemish painting.  The man is wearing  a black coat and a hat of the same color. In the left hand, he is showing a sestertius of emperor Nero, a symbol of his attention to Humanism. In the background is a lake landscape: Memling was one of the first painters to use natural landscapes for backgrounds of portraits (instead of the traditional black one), influencing later Renaissance artists such as Sandro Botticelli and Pietro Perugino.

The identity of the subject is unknown. It has been supposed that he could be one of the numerous Italians living at the time in Antwerp or Bruges, who often commissioned artworks to local painters.  It has been variously identified as Bernardo Bembo, or with  the Florentine artist Niccolò di Forzore Spinelli, who died in Lyon, where the painting was in the early 19th century. Or it may be Giovanni di Candida.

See also
 Portrait of a Man with a Medal of Cosimo the Elder

References

Sources

External links

 Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp: Man with a Roman Coin

Man with a Roman Medal
1480s paintings
Man with a Roman Medal
Paintings in the collection of the Royal Museum of Fine Arts Antwerp

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaWikipedia


text:
«Vi sitter i Ventrilo och spelar DotA» (шведською "Ми сидимо у Вентріло, граємо в DotA, або скорочено «DotA») — пісня шведського танцювального ді-джея Басхантера, в якій звучить реміксована версія французької пісні «Daddy DJ» від Daddy DJ. Слова шведською мовою записувалися за допомогою програми голосового чату Ventrilo під час гри у Defense of the Ancients, в ігровому режимі в Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos. Пісня містить зразки ігрового процесу вищезгаданої гри. Пісня була випущена в якості другого синґлу першого альбому Basshunter LOL <(^^,)>.

Музичне відео
Відео починається з того, що мати Басхантера (є його справжньою матір'ю) відчиняє двері, і дізнається, що він та його друзі грають у DotA. Вона заявляє, що він занадто багато грає на DotA, а він. натомість, починає співати. Відео продовжує показувати свою гру в DotA, а пізніше співає в ігровому залі наживо. Кліп знімали не під час DreamHack, як багато хто вважає, а під час подібної події під назвою The Gathering, однієї з найбільших світових вечіркових подій. Один із слухачів тримає табличку з написом «Vadå båt?» (Whaddaya означає човен?) — маючи на увазі початкову плутанину слухачами слів шведської пісні «Boten Anna», де слухачі помилково сприймали слово «boten» (бот) як «båten» (човен). Це пояснюється неправильним перекладом у німецькій версії «Boten Anna», де «Boot» (човен) співається замість слова «Bot» (бот). Інше припущення полягає в тому, що людина, що тримає цей знак є німцем, та бажає зробити відсилання на цю помилку і Бассхантер просто записав це як елемент самопародії.

Нове відео починається з того, що він сидить у кріслі, гортає сторінки на екрані, сидячи на своєму стільці, потім вибирає відео з маленького меню, яке плаває в повітрі. Потім на відео звідти можна розгледіти інших людей, які грають у DotA, та кілька кадрів молодої жінки, яка танцює. Його також можна побачити як героя Tiny, де він купує предмет «Butterfly». Нове відео використовує мікс New Single Version.

Музичне відео зняли в Мальме Карл-Йохан Вестрегард та Кім Папу.

Трек-ліст
 CD синґл
 «Vi sitter i Ventrilo och spelar DotA» (Single Version) — 3:21
 «Vi sitter i Ventrilo och spelar DotA» (Club Mix) — 5:43

Чарти

Тижневі чарти

Річні чарти

Нагороди

Англійська версія пісні під назвою «All I Ever Wanted» була випущена як другий синґл у Великій Британії 7 липня 2008 року. Спочатку планувалося, що другий синґл матиме назву «Будь ласка, не йди», але через деякі технічні проблеми випуск синґлу був скасований у Великій Британії та випущений лише у Швеції.

Примітки

Список джерел

Посилання

Warcraft
Сингли 2006
Basshunter


Audio Guide "The Shadow of Potters"
Through this route you'll enjoy a encounter with the history of ceramics Hellin. Stroll so quaint streets like Pottery, Slope of San Rafael or Bernales, small prominence of the population in this neighborhood stands traditionally potter, where potteries activity achieved in all their spot light.
1. Introduction and Cantarerias Street.
3. Barranco Street, Peñon Street and Union Street.
1. Introduction and Cantarerías Street.
3. Barranco Street, Rock and Union Streets.


The Alumni Relations Office organized The Great Basketball Challenge - LAU Alumni vs LAU Varsity Teams. The game took place on Friday May 24, 2013 at the Beirut Campus. Alumni and friends enjoyed a good game. The victory was snatched by LAU Varsity - both women and men teams. In all cases, congrats to LAU!


Find all ideas can be found in Houzz Bedroom Sets. When you read this post, we always strive to provide the best for you. If you liked the post of Houzz Bedroom Sets You can share this post to a friend or your family. We are very happy if you can share with anyone. We hope you get the information from this post Houzz Bedroom Sets we have given to you.
You should know that this post Houzz Bedroom Sets also still related with You can find other interesting things Houzz Bedroom Sets we have provided on the gallery page. Thank you for visiting this page Houzz Bedroom Sets. I really hope you happy.
Houzz Bedroom Sets Rated 65/100 From 529 user and has 4004 Subscriptions.


The award-winning women's cycling brand has been going from strength to strength over the last couple of years. Using a mixture of cutting edge engineering and rider feedback, they're consistently able to deliver high quality bikes on both the road and MTB scene. We had a closer look at the Liv Pique SX 2 mountain bike.
Our staff member Charli had a Liv Pique back in 2017 and it's safe to say she was a huge fan. The Liv Pique was Charli's first mountain bike and she didn't look back. With the mantra "fast up fast down, Pique is the versatile XC trail bike with an affinity for speed".
120mm of travel and an updated 140-mm fork give this bike a real agility through the descents. Though the lightweight frame mixed with great power transfer let you attack the climbs without feeling like you're restricted. With 27.5″ wheels the bike is certainly nimble through the corners. It feels stable over the rough terrain, but still playful and sharp.
The 2019 version of the Liv Pique SX also comes with a slacker head tube angle giving the bike much more downhill capability. You can really get stuck into the technical trails with confidence not offered by many other bikes.
Coming with quite a high bottom bracket, the Liv Pique SX can offer a slightly uncertain balance point for some riders when you're hammering through the steeper corners. Though this clearance allows you tackle almost any terrain without issue. Internal cable routing keeps the bike clean & protected.
The suspension rocker arm is made from a carbon composite. This offers great weight savings in the bike, but the stiffness and strength gained massively improved the handling of the bike. The ride feels very controlled similar to much larger bikes, without the heavy, dull feeling.
A new green/blue colour scheme is greatly improved from last years "blast yellow", though still isn't to everyone's taste. The darker colours and innovative paint schemes have been selling much better through the Liv range, so it's no surprise that the feedback on the aesthetic of the new Liv Pique SX has also been positive.
As Liv is the sister company of Giant, the Pique SX is finished with a lot of the Giant components. A contact switch dropper seat post, Giant handlebars & a Giant stem are among some of the components used to finish the bike as well as the wheels.
The Liv Pique SX 2 comes with a lot of features not often seen in bikes at that price point. Available for just shy of £2,500 the specifications of this bike won't let you down. Comfortable, sturdy & with great handling, the Pique SX is playful on the downhills and firm on the climbs. It'll allow you to instantly get out & explore the off road world.


text:
Since the dawn of time, the life forms on Earth have constantly evolved, with "constantly" often requiring millions of years. Scientists through fossilized remains are able to tell us some of the most intricate and amazing details of how a species was born, changed and exists as it is today. Which makes it all the more surprising, that something as potentially harmful as a poisonous bird, would go unrecorded until 1989.
Jack Dumbacher, who was netting birds in New Guinea, caught a Hooded Pitohui (pronounced like spitting: pittoeey), and in untangling it from his net, got scratched and bit. But it was a small bird, and not a big threat, right? Wrong. Dumbacher put a cut finger in his mouth and his lips and tongue went numb. While that was the extent of his reaction, it caused a much more significant one in the scientific community.
Tests revealed that the Pitohui bird carries a poison that is virtually identical to that of the dart poison frogs, Phyllobate. The poison is a steroidal alkaloid, never seen in any other animal or creature of any kind except the frog and Pitohui birds.
Oddly enough, the Pithohui has three species, two of which are even brightly feathered in red and black warning colors, much the same as the frogs. The Hooded appears to be the most dangerous, with the Variable being of medium toxicity and the Brown Pitohui the least harmful.
Undoubtedly, there are other bird species that have chemical self-defense mechanisms to prevent predators from eating them, but to date, this is the only bird found to actually be poisonous to humans. Can you eat them? Yes! The natives of New Guinea do eat them, but warn they must be prepared very carefully, including skinning. Even gently simmering the skin in water will produce a toxic substance

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaCommonCrawl


The Finance Minister was briefed on the reforms introduced so far in various laws to counter money laundering and errorist financing.
errorist as seen es of his of eed, ns, and tage of int-Top of the world PILE-UP: Snow jokes BEYOND THE POLE (15, pounds 19.
Unlike for the practical t errorist, "No change in the world order will ever content the apocalyptic terrorist, since his actual discontents are internal to himself.
During a rally in July 1= 999 Imam Musa displayed a cashier's check made out to "Hamas Palestine" a t= errorist organization.
Meanwhile, t errorists fired several mortar shells at thedirection of Harasta highway and al-Qaboun area near Damascus city.
Today's readers may therefore expect to encounter unusual interpretations, for example: that "Galatia is actually a place in Greece" (131); that Paul was asked to remember the poor (Gal 1:10) because they "had sold all their goods" (193); that when Peter was rebuked by Paul (Gal 2:4) he became "a great example of humility" (194); that the Galatians had been bewitched (Gal 3:1) just as "the gaze of a menstruating woman infects the mirror that has been recently cleaned" (217) and they saw Christ's crucifixion because they possessed "the four books of the Gospels" (95); that the troublemakers should be cut off (Gal 5:12) so they cannot produce more errorists "just as severed testicles cannot procreate" (175); that "those who are spiritual" (Gal.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Ariyeh Mekel said Hamas t= errorists who control Gaza can stop the attacks if they want to, adding tha= t Hamas was responsible for the crisis.
A car is hijacked in the South, packed with its lethal cargo which then needs to be driven only a few miles to the chosen target in the North, and before the horror even unfolds the t errorists will be back in the relative safety of their lairs in the Republic.
Barbarism, in the sense of proposing to destroy the families of Daesh errorists, is politically incorrect in the sense that it is wrong.
Fundamental errorists, indeed, ought to be the subjects of uncompromising controversy, and of exclusion from church privileges.
Vilnai said in a Monday radio interview with Kol Israel that Israel could = potentially free the murderer in a future deal with Palestinian Authority t= errorists.


Week 5 of Piece and Quilt blog hop- Finale!
Here are the phots for the final week of the blog hop!
The first picture is an initial layout of my sampler quilt of all of the blocks in the book! I am going to float all the blocks in a white background. I will make them all the same sized by adjusting the sashing for the blocks and make them all the same size in a row to look like the blocks on the design wall. I like the arrows block at the top!
I put all of the blocks of the variation together on the design wall, second picture in the link. I really like how they look. I am not sure if I want to make the quilt bigger or not. I am gonna think about it for a couple of weeks.
I doodled a few ideas for free motion quilting for my quilt on post it notes during my down time. I had a couple of ideas and the post it on the left was ok but I decided nope! What I really liked was the tiny switchbacks and curls seen on the step out pen drawing. I have made the stitche before and cannot remember where I origianlly saw this idea. This free motion quilting stitch is done per block and in columns, see the pen step out drawing. I also chose to do a sharp stipple in the little squares of each blocks. I wanted texture, texture, texture!
The end of the blog hop is here already. I am so excited to send this quilt off to Christa and it will be in the Benartex booth with the Modern Marks line! If you go to Quilt Market in Huston take a picture and let me know!
I had so much fun sharing my journey in making Gridwork. I really enjoyed thinking and sharing my design process in making a variation as well as the memory sampler with each test block. I want to thank Christa Watson, Benartex and Hobbs batting for making this hop possible. I want to give a special thanks to two of my BQF's Hollyanne and Kristin for all of your encouragement and support in my quilting journey without you this would be impossible.
Please sign up for my newsletter and I will keep you updated on what's happening, events and freebies! Please checkout the tutorials and free patterns at the links above.
Edit: Sun came out and I took a glamor shot!


text:
Former Telemundo Executive Producer Desirée Colomina Joins Magid as Senior Consultant, Local Media
NEW YORK, January 20, 2021 – Magid announces the hiring of Desirée Colomina as Senior Consultant, Local Media. Colomina, an award-winning journalist and executive producer, joined the company on January 6, 2022, bringing expertise in broadcast media, journalism, and Spanish-language television to her role.
Colomina joins Magid from Telemundo, where she was most recently Executive Producer of the morning show "hoy Día." She began her career as a segment producer for Al Rojo Vivo, Telemundo's afternoon newsmagazine. She was later promoted to assignment manager and subsequently to on-air reporter and director of special projects for Telemundo network news. In that role, she was responsible for specials, investigative shows and breaking news.
"Desirée has both the knowledge of the industry from myriad roles in broadcast throughout her career – from producing to reporting to programming – and the creative thinking that will guide our clients as they develop a vision for the future," said Marissa Nelson, Vice President, Consulting, Local Media at Magid. "Her many accolades and awards highlight her hard work and dedication to journalism, and I'm delighted to have her join our talented team."
Colomina also previously served as the director of FIFA programming and directed many of Telemundo's special news programming. In 2012, she worked on the launch of the XFINITY Latino channel, a Comcast platform to promote Hispanic content, overseeing production of the channel until early 2016.
She holds a bachelor's degree in broadcast communication from Barry University.
The sky is falling for Netflix
Syndies Spectacular as 2022 Starts
Bill Hague to speak at Google-PMVG Public TV NextGen Summit
Magid explores improving trust in local journalism with RTDNA (part II)


MobiCHECK is our instant due-diligence solution that provides assurance that you are not purchasing lost or stolen devices. We check device IMEI numbers against a variety of independent datasets, including the GSMA Global Blacklist Registry, Insurance, Law Enforcement, and also our own datasets, which include lost property and our 'Watchlists'.
Make important buying decisions based on the most up to date data available.
Avoid the costs of fraud and protect your profits.
Connected to 120+ operators globally.
Protect your stock by adding devices to our watchlist, with instant alerts.
With costs per check as low as 8p you can reduce your costs of checking.
Monitor IMEI for 30 days, reducing the risks around post purchase block.
Devices that are compromised can be identified prior to purchase.
Have full access to our API with integration support.
Because we are connected to the GSMA and their Global Device Blacklist Registry you can be assured that the data is from all their connected networks from around the world.
Before we process any checks, we validate whether the IMEI submitted is valid, therefore protecting you further from trading fake mobile phones.
We share data with Law Enforcement Agencies, Insurers, and other Fraud Prevention Organisations to help combat device crime. This has already assisted with many device recovery operations.
Because many of our customers are on the High Street, we can create instant alerts throughout our network of outlets, massively reducing the window in which stolen devices can be traded.
Our All-in-One Low Cost device testing solution for processing devices fast and efficiently.
Designed to work with Retail Stores AND Hub Operations.
Our Secure data sharing platform to reduce mobile related crime and fraud.
SHARE has already prevented over £3m of mobile fraud.
Our PC-based secure and certificated data erasure tool, complies with GDPR requirements.
Protecting you against data breaches.
Our unlocking services help to maximise your stock value and reduce the number of stock SKU.
We offer both Cable and Code Solutions.
MobiCode are pleased to announce that we are now the exclusive providers of a Vodafone network unlocking service for Vodafone UK's business customers.
Click here to view the official press release, or to register your interest in this service, click here.
There are many tariff options available to suit your needs, the more checks you process the lower the cost per check.


The Kentucky Supreme Court has made it harder for grandparents to win visitation with their grandchildren when the child's parents object.
In a 6-1 ruling, the state's high court ruled Thursday that parents who oppose giving a grandparent visitation must be presumed to be acting in the child's best interests.
The court did not strike down Kentucky's 1984 grandparent visitation law but said a grandparent must present "clear and convincing" evidence to win the right to visit a grandchild over a parent's objection.
The court said grandparents may win court-ordered visitation if they can show that the child would be harmed by denying it or where the grandparent and child lived in the same household for some time or the grandparent regularly baby sat the child.
The court directed judges to consider eight factors, including the nature and stability of the relationship between the child and the grandparent; the amount of time they had spent together; the effect that granting visitation would have on the child's relationship with the parents; and the wishes and preferences of the child.
Of course the parents should have near-total authority. The alternative is to give some stupid family court judge near-total authority.
I have readers who are grandparents, and they want to see their grandkids. But should the judge really be overruling the parents and saying who the kids can and cannot visit? I say no.
Even with this decision, if parents ask the grandparents to babysit the kids, then they are running the risk that some judge will order visitation in the future. If the parents want to play it safe, then they should put their kids in daycare instead letting the grandparents babysit, if there is any risk that the grandparents will turn litigious.
Of course I am a parent, and these Kentucky grandparents still have more rights to see their grandkids than I have to see my own kids. I was not just a babysitter either.
I understand that the courts can be "frustrating" to say the least. But right now, as verbal abuse in my parents' household is the main reason my children are no longer allowed to visit them, along with falling asleep while smoking, having black outs & not knowing where they are, & the fact that my younger brother has just been recently put into a mental institution due to their behavior, I find this comforting to myself, as proving all of that would be difficult at best. I do hope your situation gets better, as it was the courts "forcing" ME to visit these people growing up is the only reason I have contact with them as an adult. I don't think that is your case, but I do hope someone sees the light for you & your children.
When the PARENT has a valid reason for denying those rights.
Not all persons should have rights espucallt of it can bring harm to those involved.
I have a question--my brother and his ex-wife have shared parenting and she wants to keep their kids from visiting our family in Ohio, even supervised with my brother. Is it possible she could get a court order stating the kids are not able to visit us?
Usually one parent cannot dictate what another parent does. But some family do crazy things.
My son passed away a little over two years ago. He was 20 and my only child. He has a son, and for two months after he passed, his girlfriend and my grandson lived with me. They saved my life. I babysat him every Friday night for two years while she went to school, and whenever else she needed me. New boyfriend comes into the picture, and now it seems like every time my husband and I ask to visit, they are always too busy, going somewhere together or with her family. I just love the boy, and all we want is one day a week for a few hours with him. I don't think it is too much to ask. He has no other grandparents besides us. I know he loves me because when I do get to see him, his little face lights up just like mine does. He will say, "Granny, where have you been?" Just sad for us both, but she is the mom and I guess that is all that matters. Love her too, and don't understand the thinking behind what she does.
"If the parents want to play it safe, then they should put their kids in daycare instead letting the grandparents babysit, if there is any risk that the grandparents will turn litigious."
SO TRUE. I realize this post is several years old, but as a woman who was a single mom most of her life (mom at age 18; college educated, non-welfare or child support recipient), I am experiencing the God-awful truth of this statement now. Now, my daughter's paternal grandmother and grandmother are trying to use the child care card to have de facto custodian status.
In a divorce decree we were to have visitation once a month with our grandchild. Our son is in the service several states away and unable to come home every month. The visitation was stipulated by him so he would get to skype with his son. His ex-wife won't let us get him, sighting something every time we are to get him. So very frustrating!


text:
es un videojuego Móvil de mahjong de la saga TwinBee para teléfonos móviles desarrollado por Konami y publicado el 6 de mayo de 2003 solamente en Japón. Es la treceava en la saga (siendo unos Spin-off como TwinBee: Rainbow Bell Adventure, TwinBee: Taisen Puzzle Dama, TwinBee PARADISE in Donburishima, TwinBee RPG y Pastel Jan) y Es Parte de la Serie Konami Taisen Colosseum.

Personajes
 TwinBee
 WinBee
 GwinBee
 Dr. Cinnamon
 Dr. Warumon

Referencias

Enlaces externos

Videojuegos para teléfonos móviles
Videojuegos de 2003
Videojuegos de Konami
TwinBee
Videojuegos de TwinBee
Videojuegos exclusivos de Japón


I love nature and see beauty in the ordinary. My greatest joy behind the lens is documenting what two people share and how they connect. I love the response from couples when they see how their love looks like to the world. My philosophy is to come as you are, natural, because life is extraordinary without anything extra.
With ten years of experience, last minute changes, wedding timelines, and family dynamics do not phase me. I become an advocate for my couples to enjoy their day.
I live in the bustling city of San Francisco with my husband and two kitties. I have a green thumb and glean all of my personal and professional inspiration from nature.
Please fill out form below to get in touch or email at jessie@simplyjessie.com.


text:
Port Huron expected to OK school tax vote Monday
Two part proposal seeks $153 million for construction and upgrades
Port Huron expected to OK school tax vote Monday Two part proposal seeks $153 million for construction and upgrades Check out this story on thetimesherald.com: https://bwne.ws/1RopV0K
Syeda Ferguson, Times Herald Published 4:33 p.m. ET Jan. 14, 2016 | Updated 5:05 p.m. ET Jan. 14, 2016
Four school districts have requests on Tuesday's ballot.(Photo: Photos by JEFFREY M. SMITH / TIMES HERALD)Buy Photo
The Port Huron Schools Board of Education will be asked to adopt a resolution placing two bond proposals for up to $153.3 million on the May 3 ballot at its monthly board meeting Monday.
The meeting is at 7 p.m. at administrative offices, 2720 Riverside Drive, in Port Huron.
Port Huron's proposals are posted on the Michigan Department of Treasury website.
Proposal 1 for $125.9 million, covers construction of new school district buildings including a replacement elementary school, a new early childhood center, and additions to existing school district buildings including flexible learning spaces. Remodeling of existing school district buildings and classrooms include safety and security, energy conservation and climate control and classroom improvements. Furnishing, refurnishing, equipping and reequipping school district buildings; improving and developing sites, including traffic flow, sidewalks, parking areas, playgrounds, outdoor athletic facilities and other improvements in the school district; acquiring and installing instructional technology, technology infrastructure and equipment in and connecting new and existing school district buildings.
Proposal 2 for $27,505,000, covers constructing additions to and/or remodeling of existing school district buildings, including a magnet school and classrooms, roofing replacements, and heating, cooling and climate controls; furnishing, refurnishing, equipping and reequipping school district buildings; improving and developing sites, including parking, playgrounds and other improvements in the school district; and acquiring and installing instructional technology, technology infrastructure and equipment in and connecting school district buildings.
District spokeswoman Keely Baribeau said voters will vote separately on each proposal with the following outcomes based on what passes:
"If Proposal 1 passes alone, it will be funded. If Proposal 1 and 2 both pass, they will both be funded. If Proposal 2 passes alone, neither will be funded. They are tied. Proposal 2 alone will not be funded," Baribeau said in an email.
Keely Baribeau (Photo: Picasa)
The board will also hear a report on the bond process leading up to its vote on whether to adopt the resolution.
Amanda VanDusen from Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone P.L.C., the district's legal counsel for the bond, will present the report. She will address the board on the campaign phase of the bond with dos and don'ts of campaign financing, according to Baribeau.
"It is critical that everyone in the district understands what is allowable and appropriate in terms of campaign action, especially with the recent passage of SB 571 and new challenges that could be encountered by the district when educating the electorate on the facts of the proposals," she said.
Senate Bill 571 was signed into law on Jan. 6. It prohibits public bodies, including school districts, from using public funds or resources to communicate to taxpayers about ballot issues 60 days prior to a local election.
The district's proposals are posted on the Treasury's website, but the action item could be taken off the agenda if the district doesn't receive official confirmation from Treasury before the Monday vote that its request for a bond was approved, Baribeau said. In that case the board would decide at a special meeting in February whether to formally proceed with a bond election in May.
Contact Syeda Ferguson at (810) 989-6276 or email her at syeda@thetimesherald.com. Follow her on Twitter @shossainfe.
Port Huron Schools voters approved every bond proposal since 1997. Here is what was passed:
June 1997 — $7.98 million bond. Description unavailable. Yes: 2,481 No: 1,969
September 2002 — $16.25 million bond for new performing arts centers at Port Huron High and Port Huron Northern, Northern media center, Port Huron High and Garfield Elementary gyms, Central Middle School band room and technology acquisition and installment. Yes: 3,811 No: 2,812
May 2011 — $22.78 million for technology and technology infrastructure and equipment, remodeling and improving buildings and classrooms, remodeling and expanding athletic facilities at Memorial Stadium. Yes: 3,730 No: 3,572
Source: Michigan Department of Treasury
Read or Share this story: https://bwne.ws/1RopV0K
2nd Amendment sanctuary resolution pulled from county agenda
The Windjammer closes for 2nd time in past 6 months
UPDATE: Missing Sanilac County woman, child located
Man charged in killing visited Port Huron
MDOT: Crews working on M-25 in Sanilac County to prevent further shoreline erosion
Winter weather advisory issued for Sanilac, St. Clair counties


text:
JAN. 20/2002 (Game 45) P1 P2 P3 OT FINAL
PICKERING PANTHERS 1 3 0 0 4
MARKHAM WAXERS 1 3 5 0 9
After being outplayed for the most of the initial 40 minutes, a goaltender change seemed to light a fire under the butts of the Waxers who exploded for 6 unanswered goals in the final 20:26 of the game for a 9-4 victory over the Pickering Panthers Sunday night. The game capped a sweep of the home-and-home series with the Panthers over the weekend following the 7-4 victory at home Friday.
Pickering got on the board early in the first for the quick 1-0 lead before the Waxers were able to respond in the final two minutes of the period. Patrick Diotte carried the puck through the neutral zone and dumped it and some good forechecking caused a turnover that found its way back to Diotte. His point shot hit the Panther goalie and in the ensuing scramble, Jesse Boucher whacked at the puck and Travis O'Rourke corralled that rebound and shovelled it over the tender for the 1-1 tie after 20 minutes.
Pickering scored early in the second to take a 2-1 lead which stood for the next 7 minutes. The Waxers tied the game at 2-2 when Jason Duffy fed Joey Grasso coming out the zone and Grasso carried the puck in to the Panther end. Grasso dropped the puck to Matt Neely whose one-timer was stopped by the goalie and Grasso was there on the doorstep to slam home the rebound. Less than two minutes later, the Waxers grabbed a shortlived lead when Ben Cottreau scored his 15th of the year. Kevin Cribari and Boucher cycled the puck behind the net before Cribari centred to Cottreau. The puck was deflected up in the air and hit Cottreau as he heade to the net. The puck hit the goalie in the chest and dropped by his feet and Cottreau smacked the puck under the goalie a split second before he could cover it. Pickering responded with 2 goals in the next 2:30 to recapture the lead with 3:59 left in the period. Markham changed goalies at that point, sending in Chris Lawrence for Kevin Sit, and took over the game from that point. Numerous chances were thwarted before the Waxers were able to tie the game at 4-4 with just 26 seconds left on the clock in the second. While on the powerplay, Cribari and Neely combined to create an open shot for Neely and his blast was redirected by Ryan Steane, his first of three on the night.
The third period was all Markham as they scored 5 goals on 17 shots. Boucher scored the game winner on the first shift of the period when after taking a clearing pass from Cribari, he hit the red line and dumped the puck in. O'Rourke won the race to the puck and Boucher won the race to the front of the net and buried the centering pass for the 5-4 lead and his first of two on the night. Steane got his second of the night 3 minutes later when Diotte and Michael Fish moved the puck back and forth before Fish found Steane in the slot and he beat the goalie low, glove side. Derek Doucette then scored his 13th of the year when he followed up a Boucher breakaway and stuffed home the rebound for the 7-4 lead. Steane then finished off the hat trick after a pretty set up in front of the net from Doucette while on the powerplay leaving him a wide open net for the goal. Cribari picked up assists on those to goals, giving him 5 on the evening. Boucher finished the scoring with 5:49 left on the clock when he deked the goalie while left in front after Grasso picked off the puck at the blueline, fed Cottreau in the corner who found Boucher in front.
A fairly wide open game that apparently had the shots 51-49 in favour of the Waxers. Not sure there were that many shots but certainly the big ice surface in Pickering lent itself to shinny hockey at times.
G A M E S U M M A R Y
1. Pickering, McFarland (Aitken) 4:32 5x5
2. Markham, O'Rourke 8 (Boucher, Diotte) 18:04 5x5
PENALTIES: Cribari MW (tripping) McFarland PP (holding, misconduct) 6:47, Neely MW Bradley PP (roughing) 14:36, Boucher MW Chandler PP (high sticking, roughing after the whistle) 20:00
3. Pickering, Alexiou (Hanna) 4:17 5x5
4. Markham, Grasso 6 (Duffy, Neely) 11:52 5x5
5. Markham, Cottreau 15 (Cribari, Boucher) 13:18 5x5
6. Pickering, Chandler (Alexiou, McFarland) 14:13 PP 5x4
7. Pickering, Hugli (Hanna, Winder) 16:01 5x5
8. Markham, Steane 11 (Neely, Cribari) 19:34 PP 5x4
PENALTIES: Diamond MW (interference) 4:36, Doucette MW (slashing) 9:02, Skeels MW Mitchell PP (slashing) 12:06, Duffy MW (elbowing) 13:28, Winder PP (roughing) 18:31
9. Markham, Boucher 43 (O'Rourke, Cribari) 0:41 5x5 GWG
10. Markham, Steane 12 (Fish, Diotte) 3:31 5x5
11. Markham, Doucette 13 (Boucher, Cribari) 6:07 5x5
12. Markham, Steane 13 (Doucette, Cribari) 12:21 PP 5x4
13. Markham, Boucher 44 (Cottreau, Grasso) 14:11 5x5
PENALTIES: Peacock MW (slashing) 8:22, Doucette MW (delay of game) 9:09, Tonkin PP (slashing) 11:09, Peacock MW (misconduct) 14:16, Fish MW (slashing) 15:21, Aitken PP (slashing) 15:51, Doucette MW (high sticking) 16:28, Kleine MW Alexiou PP (roughing) 18:56
GOALTENDERS: Markham: Kevin Sit (36:01) Chris Lawrence (23:59), Pickering: Scott Gray
SHOTS ON GOAL P1 P2 P3 OT FINAL
PICKERING PANTHERS 16 21 12 - 49
MARKHAM WAXERS 16 18 17 - 51
G A M E S T A T I S T I C S
No. PLAYER
2 Michael Pain did not play
3 Derek Doucette 1 1 2 6 0 0 0
4 Michael Diamond 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
5 Patrick Diotte 0 2 2 0 0 0 0
8 Michael Fish 0 1 1 2 0 0 0
9 Albert Ferrante 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Jason Young did not play
13 Matt Neely 0 2 2 2 0 0 0
14 Travis O'Rourke 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
15 Joey Grasso 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
17 Kevin Cribari 0 5 5 2 0 0 0
18 Jesse Boucher 2 3 5 4 0 0 1
19 Ryan Steane 3 0 3 0 2 0 0
21 Mark Skeels 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
22 Ben Cottreau 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
23 Pat Porretta did not play
24 Steve Nobili 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 Eric Kleine 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
26 Greg Peacock 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
27 Mark Menonte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 Jason Duffy 0 1 1 2 0 0 0
29 Chris Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 Kevin Sit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 9 11 18 36 2 0 1
Copyright � 1998 - 2005, Savolainen.Com Inc. and Restoration Environmental Contractors.


Discount will be applied once product has been added to cart.
Caitlan is a high quality textured blockout fabric with naturally occurring slub type details running through subtle horizontal stripes. Caitlan roller blinds are custom made to order and come in 2 neutral colours options.
Choose from an inside or outside mount and a range of rail, control and chain colours.
For an inside mount measure the inside width of your window frame at the top, middle and bottom of the frame in millimetres. Use the smallest of the three measurements.
For an outside mount measure the desired width of your blind in millimetres. We recommend taking it to the outside edges of your frame or architrave. Where there is no architrave or frame we recommend making it at least 40mm wider than the window opening.
For an inside mount, measure the drop of the opening from the inside top of the window frame to the top of the sill in millimetres. For an outside mount, measure the desired drop from the top of the architrave or frame to the sill (or lower if desired). You will require 30mm of frame or architrave to mount the control brackets to so, where there is less than 30mm, measure from a point at least 40mm above the window.
The roller blind is controlled by a chain at one end of the blind. Select which side you want this on, taking into account accessibility as well as the look.
We recommend matching the chain colour to either the roller blind fabric, to the window frame or to the control and rail colours.
The control is the mechanism that controls the movement of your blind and includes the brackets that fix your blind to the wall, architrave or window frame. We suggest matching it to the roller blind fabric, to the window frame or to the chain and/or rail colours.
The rail is the aluminium profile along the bottom of the blind that anchors the fabric. We suggest matching the rail to the roller blind fabric, to the window frame or to the control and/or chain colour.
A child lock is used to secure your blind chain to the window frame or wall so that it does not hang loose. It is an important safety device that prevents young children from putting their heads through the chain and suffering a tragic accident. We highly recommend its use in any home where young children may be present.
Caitlan is a high quality textured blockout fabric with naturally occurring slub type details running through subtle horizontal stripes.
Wipe clean with warm soapy water and a damp cloth.


text:
Вениамин Георгиевич Антипин (1906—1988) — советский учёный, доктор технических наук, профессор.

Автор около 300 научных работ, в том числе в соавторстве, а также ряда патентов.

Биография
Родился 26 октября 1906 года в селе Благовещение Волокославинской волости Кирилловского уезда Российской империи, ныне Кирилловского района Вологодской области. В семье родилось двенадцать детей, из которых только семеро достигли взрослого возраста.

В 1924 году окончил Кирилловскую школу-семилетку и уехал учиться в Ленинградский техникум индустриального земледелия. По окончании техникума, в 1928 году поступил на работу научным сотрудником  в отдел машин государственного сельскохозяйственного музея, одновременно начав учиться в спецгруппе Ленинградского сельскохозяйственного института на факультете механизации сельского хозяйства. Летом 1930 года Вениамина Антипина перевели на должность лаборанта отдела машиноиспользования Всесоюзного института механизации сельского хозяйства (ныне Федеральный научный агроинженерный центр ВИМ). В 1932 году он окончил Ленинградский сельскохозяйственный институт (ныне Санкт-Петербургский государственный аграрный университет) и был назначен младшим научным сотрудником отдела уборочных машин Института механизации. Принимал участие в разработке и создании комбайнов марок СКАГ-1 и СКАГ-2. С 1933 года находился в служебной командировке в Средней Азии, где руководил испытаниями северных комбайнов на уборке зерновых в тёплом климате.

В 1934 году В. Г. Антпин вернулся в Ленинград и назначен ведущим инженером-конструктором, а затем заместителем руководителя лаборатории уборки зерна. В феврале 1938 года был назначен начальником лаборатории механизации уборки зерновых. Работал в институте и после начала Великой Отечественной войны, участвовал в обороне Ленинграда. В августе 1942 года из-за тяжёлого состояния здоровья был эвакуирован в Челябинскую область, где работал инженером в колхозе. Там же в 1943 году был призван в Красную армию, служил при штабе в Уральском военном округе до октября 1946 года.

Окончил войну в звании инженера-капитана. В 1946 году вернулся в Ленинград и работал преподавателем Ленинградского сельскохозяйственного института. В январе 1947 года был назначен в открывшееся Ленинградское отделение всесоюзного научно-исследовательского института механизации руководителем лаборатории механизации уборки зерновых культур. В этой должности проработал следующие почти двадцать лет. В 1949 году В. Г. Антипин защитил кандидатскую диссертацию, а в 1963 году — докторскую на тему «Научные основы разработки системы и конструкции зерноуборочных машин для Северо-Западной зоны СССР».

В 1966 году Вениамин Георгиевич был назначен заместителем директора института по научной работе. А 1973 году он перешёл на должность старшего научного сотрудника, а в 1975 году был избран ученым секретарём института, в должности которого находился вплоть до конца жизни. Под его руководством подготовлены 28 докторов и кандидатов наук.

Умер 26 января 1988 года в Ленинграде. Был похоронен на Казанском кладбище в городе Пушкин.

В. Г. Антипин был награждён орденами Ленина, Трудового Красного Знамени и «Знак Почета», а также медалями. В 1977 году ему было присвоено почетное звание «Заслуженный деятель науки и техники РСФСР».

В архиве Кирилло-Белозерского музея-заповедника сохранились ученические тетради В. Г. Антипина. В Санкт-Петербурге ему установлена памятная доска.

Примечания

Ссылки
 Юбилейный 100-й номер журнала «Технологии и технические средства механизированного производства продукции растениеводства и животноводства»

Выпускники Санкт-Петербургского аграрного университета
Военные инженеры Великой Отечественной войны
Члены КПСС
Похороненные на Казанском кладбище


text:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

			<title>Docs For Class TargetingIdea</title>
			<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../media/stylesheet.css" />
			<meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html; charset=iso-8859-1'/>

Class TargetingIdea

Description

					Description |
													Vars (details)
						|											Methods (details)

Represents a TargetingIdea returned by search criteria specified in  the TargetingIdeaSelector. Targeting ideas are keywords or placements  that are similar to those the user inputs.

			Located in /adwords/src/Google/Api/Ads/AdWords/v201109/TargetingIdeaService.php (line 5036)

Variable Summary

			Description |
						Vars (details)
							|
									Methods (details)

					Type_AttributeMapEntry[]
					$data

Method Summary

			Description |
																		Vars (details)

				|
						Methods (details)

											TargetingIdea
										__construct
											([ $data = NULL])

											the
										getNamespace
										()

											the
										getXsiTypeName
										()

Variables

			Description |
										Vars (details)

										|
									Methods (details)

			Type_AttributeMapEntry[]
			$data
						(line 5041)

access: public

Methods

			Description |
															Vars (details)
																	Methods (details)

		Constructor __construct (line 5059)

access: public

		TargetingIdea

			__construct

					([ $data = NULL])

				$data

		getNamespace (line 5047)

Gets the namesapce of this class

return: namespace of this class

access: public

		the

			getNamespace

				()

		getXsiTypeName (line 5055)

Gets the xsi:type name of this class

return: xsi:type name of this class

access: public

		the

			getXsiTypeName

				()

		Documentation generated by phpDocumentor 1.4.4

redpajama_set_name: RedPajamaGithub